APWA Reporter, August 2012 issue

Page 100

Understanding the options in construction management Ohio opens door for Construction Manager at Risk Kristen Braden, P.E., Esq. Construction Project Manager H.R. Gray Hilliard, Ohio

he Ohio legislature is expanding the choices allowed in construction contracting methods and catching up Ohio with the other 49 states by providing other selections to owners when choosing a construction delivery method of a public project. An owner must be fully educated on the differences between the various construction delivery methods and accept the responsibility that each method may lay upon the owner. In addition to the existing method of multiple prime contractors, the other construction delivery options now available include general contractor (GC), design-build (D-B) and Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR).

Contracting methods at-a-glance In the general contracting method, similarly to the traditional multiprime method, the contractor is not involved in the project until after the design is completed. The owner hires a general contractor to be responsible for the day-today oversight of the construction site, and management of vendors and trades. A general contractor is responsible for providing all of the material, labor, equipment and services necessary for construction of the project. The general contractor hires more specialized subcontractors to perform portions or all of the construction work, allowing for the lowest cost to be obtained through the bidding process. The general contractor doesn’t become involved 98 APWA Reporter

August 2012

until after the design is complete, which is when he will generate an estimate that includes the entire cost of constructing the project. The most obvious advantage of the GC over the multi-prime is, since the owner has only one contract, any disputes about the scope of the work or issues with defective work are only directed toward one entity—the general contractor. The Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) method is set up to give the authority and cost control to the CMAR. The CMAR does not perform the design service or any of the actual construction services—such as construction, repair, or demolition. The CMAR becomes involved during the design phase, sets a GMP for completion of the project after design, and hires all the contracting firms. The CMAR is responsible for cost control and any overages are at his expense. He acts as a consultant to the owner in the development and design phases, but is basically the equivalent of a general contractor during the construction phase. The CMAR makes more money when the job is brought in at a lower cost than bid. In design-build (D-B), the owner hires a design-build team which handles the entire process—from the initial design through the construction of the project. The D-B team is responsible for the design, construction, demolition, repair, or reconstruction of the project. The architect, general contractor, and all

the specialty contractors are all part of this integrated delivery system. The D-B procurement route changes the traditional sequence of work. It is a single-point of responsibility for the owner in an attempt to reduce risks and overall costs. Further, D-B projects can be completed faster because the potential for construction problems are uncovered early in the design phase. A single price is quoted for the entire project. In this process, the same parties are involved from beginning to end so there is intimate knowledge of all phases of the project, allowing for smooth coordination of the process.

Pros/Cons of Construction Manager at Risk Typically, a CMAR arrangement eliminates a low bid construction project. It is considered a cost-saving form of construction management, since the contractor is responsible for monitoring all the costs and must assume the cost of any overages; he is motivated to keep the project on schedule and under cost. The CMAR operates as a business manager, ensuring that costs are adequately controlled and that expenses are kept in check. The owner typically can select the CMAR based on qualifications, not just on lowest cost. Any claims that arise between subcontractors are handled within the CMAR’s contract, not by the owner. Having the CMAR involved from the design stage provides him with a better understanding of the project and what may be involved. He provides the owner with a GMP


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Products in the News

17min
pages 142-149

Advertorials

5min
pages 140-141

World of Public Works Calendar

1min
pages 154-156

Ask Ann

5min
pages 138-139

Roadway safety data and public works: it’s fundamental

6min
pages 134-137

Green infrastructure the answer for Frog Hollow residents

4min
pages 132-133

How to hire a construction management firm

7min
pages 128-131

Public works agencies in U.S. look to Japan for best practices in delivering more projects within budget

4min
pages 126-127

Students and public works collaborate to keep one small city (and the rest of the world) clean

7min
pages 122-125

Understanding contract documents

5min
pages 120-121

Underground at the 2012 London Olympics

7min
pages 116-119

Converting a degraded quarry into a community asset

5min
pages 114-115

Building a Green Roof to promote environmental responsibility

8min
pages 106-109

Understanding the options in construction management

5min
pages 100-101

Claims mitigation and avoidance

7min
pages 110-113

Pay it forward: volunteers make the difference

6min
pages 98-99

What’s next for public safety in the right-of-way?

12min
pages 78-81

Keyholing and core farming: the perfect match

6min
pages 74-77

Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Jobs Creation Act of 2011

3min
pages 72-73

Utility coordination at FLL: abandoned underground lines

10min
pages 68-71

Case study for automating field data collection with smart phones

4min
pages 60-61

Global Solutions in Public Works

21min
pages 52-59

Pipe bursting of asbestos cement pipe: making it happen

6min
pages 62-63

The Great 8

8min
pages 48-51

Trends in equipment operator training technology

6min
pages 46-47

Trees v. Sidewalks: There doesn’t have to be a loser

6min
pages 38-39

Succeeding at succession: a portfolio approach

5min
pages 44-45

Engage the public and get work done: a shared responsibility strategy

8min
pages 40-43

Don’t miss these at Congress

1min
page 35

One-day passes available for Congress

1min
page 36

Media relations for public works

3min
page 37

Four options to attend Congress

1min
page 34

Awards 2012

38min
pages 20-33

Chapter Membership Achievement Award winners announced

2min
page 15

Boomers Millennials: Are we really that different?

8min
pages 16-17

Washington Insight

6min
pages 8-9

Education Calendar

0
page 7

Mentoring the next generation of leaders within the APWA Donald C. Stone Center

8min
pages 12-14

A year of diversity

5min
pages 18-19

President’s Message

10min
pages 4-6
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.