Dwelling: An interior system

Dwelling: An interior systemDwelling: An interior system

In realising the idea of dwelling as the lived interior, the dwelling is materialised In realising the idea of dwelling as the lived interior, the dwelling is materialised through the arrangement of spatial boundaries, surfaces and objects that define the through the arrangement of spatial boundaries, surfaces and objects that define the living. Dwelling is also materialised through the joining of elements and materials. living. Dwelling is also materialised through the joining of elements and materials. Tectonic as “the art of joining” (Frampton, 1995) becomes a key process of Tectonic as “the art of joining” (Frampton, 1995) becomes a key process of materialising the idea of dwelling space into the physical space to be lived in. The materialising the idea of dwelling space into the physical space to be lived in. The process of materialisation is the process of developing the dwelling as a whole process of materialisation is the process of developing the dwelling as a whole system, in which each part of the system has its functionality as “the ability to become system, in which each part of the system has its functionality as “the ability to become integrated into an overall scheme” (Baudrillard, 1996, p. 63). integrated into an overall scheme” (Baudrillard, 1996, p. 63).

In an interior system, each object and element takes a role as a part of the system with In an interior system, each object and element takes a role as a part of the system with its functionality. It is important to consider how objects and elements fit together into its functionality. It is important to consider how objects and elements fit together into the whole system and defines the functionality of the whole system. The functionality the whole system and defines the functionality of the whole system. The functionality of an object is “the very thing that enables it to transcend its main 'function' in the of an object is “the very thing that enables it to transcend its main 'function' in the direction of a secondary one, to play a part, to become a combining element, an direction of a secondary one, to play a part, to become a combining element, an adjustable item, within a universal system of signs” (Baudrillard, 1996, p. 63). In the adjustable item, within a universal system of signs” (Baudrillard, 1996, p. 63). In the understanding of dwelling interior, while each need and activity may correspond to understanding of dwelling interior, while each need and activity may correspond to particular objects, elements or parts of space, the way they are related to one another particular objects, elements or parts of space, the way they are related to one another is what defines the functionality of the dwelling as a whole. is what defines the functionality of the dwelling as a whole.

The process of materialising the inhabitation into the dwelling interior depends on the The process of materialising the inhabitation into the dwelling interior depends on the definition of tectonic “not solely as a visual occupation with the joint, but as a direct definition of tectonic “not solely as a visual occupation with the joint, but as a direct spatial transformation of the joint in a furnishing sensuous approaching of the human spatial transformation of the joint in a furnishing sensuous approaching of the human body” (Hvejsel, 2011, p. 241). In this way, the formation of dwelling materiality is not body” (Hvejsel, 2011, p. 241). In this way, the formation of dwelling materiality is not merely a technical issue of “the art of joining” (Frampton, 1995); it opens opportunities merely a technical issue of “the art of joining” (Frampton, 1995); it opens opportunities for the spatial boundaries and surfaces to provide the qualities that are directly related for the spatial boundaries and surfaces to provide the qualities that are directly related to the human body and experience. to the human body and experience.

The idea of dwelling as the lived interior and as the interior system eventually leads to The idea of dwelling as the lived interior and as the interior system eventually leads to the making of the dwelling that integrates the programme and the tectonic. The the making of the dwelling that integrates the programme and the tectonic. The process occurs back and forth between the programmatic functions of the dwelling process occurs back and forth between the programmatic functions of the dwelling and the physical materiality of architecture and interior elements. The conversation and the physical materiality of architecture and interior elements. The conversation between idea and realisation, between programme and tectonic, and between between idea and realisation, between programme and tectonic, and between function and materiality, becomes an integral part of the process in celebrating the function and materiality, becomes an integral part of the process in celebrating the interiority of the dwelling.interiority of the dwelling.