EDITORIAL: TUITION FEE AKIN TO CLASS WARFARE
ROTATION SHORTENED BY INJURIES SPORTS — 6
STUDENTS REACT TO SUPER BOWL OUTCOME
ONLINE AT DAILYWILDCAT.COM
PERSPECTIVES — 4
DAILY WILDCAT
Tuesday, February ,
DAILYWILDCAT.COM
SERVING THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA SINCE 1899
Presidential search nears end By Will Ferguson DAILY WILDCAT
The search for the next UA president is finally drawing to a close, after a selection process that has spanned more than a semester. Senior Vice President of Research Leslie Tolbert and Faculty Senate Secretary J.C. Mutchler announced Monday at the Faculty Senate meeting that the Arizona Board of Regents will make its decision about who will be the next UA president within a week or two.
“I know everyone was not happy with how this search went, but it is incumbent on us to help make this next person feel he has 100 percent support from the faculty,” Mutchler said. Tolbert and Mutchler, two members of a regent-appointed presidential search committee, said the Arizona Board of Regents has committed to sending the final candidates to meet with campus community members before the next university president is named. They did not specify when and where this
meeting would be and whether it would be open to the public. UA Interim President Eugene Sander said ABOR will reveal its decision at one of its meetings on Feb. 17 or 18. “At this time four or five years ago, they were concluding the search,” he said. “I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if the February Board of Regents meeting would be when they would announce their decision … but I’m not going to hint at anything else.” The Faculty Senate’s concern
over Senate Bill 1474 took center stage for the rest of the meeting. The bill would allow anyone with a concealed weapons license to take their firearm onto a university campus. Members of the senate voted unanimously to send a letter of opposition to the state legislature concerning the bill. The letter states UA faculty is strongly against SB 1474 and encourages members of the legislature to commit themselves to a meaningful dialogue on the subject. Sander, who said he owns
several rifles and a handgun, had strong words against the passage of the bill. “There are a lot of responsible gun owners. I am not worried about them,” he said. “I am worried about the yahoo who would walk into Centennial Hall with a gun, or someone like the guy who killed several members of our faculty a few years ago … The argument that a lot of people carrying guns will make it safer is wrong.”
SEARCH, 2
Mobile app provides clicker alternative By Stephanie Casanova
KEITH HICKMAN-PERFETTI / DAILY WILDCAT
With new smartphone apps the era of traditional classroom clickers may be over.
DAILY WILDCAT Now that the university recently chose one brand of clicker, Turning Technologies, to be used campus-wide, students may not need to worry about buying a clicker device at all, thanks to a new app. Students can now buy and download the company’s application, ResponseWare, on their smartphone, tablet or laptop instead of buying a clicker at the bookstore, as long as their instructor isn’t opposed to the use of multimedia technology in the classroom. The cost of the application varies based on the length of the license. While some students and professors see the clicker app as a benefit to the classroom, others strongly oppose the idea, unable to see any benefit of having a multimedia device active during lectures. “It’s highly dependent on the preferences of the faculty in terms of what they want to see occur in
the class,” said Michele Norin, chief information officer and executive director of University Information Technology Services. Steve Kortenkamp, a visiting instructor in planetary sciences, has allowed one of his students to use the clicker application on his iPad and the student has had to overcome a few problems with WiFi. Kortenkamp said he believes that if there’s a way to guarantee a stable Internet connection, then the application would be useful. With a clicker device, shortanswer questions require more response time because students have to type using a phone-like dial pad instead of a full keyboard. With the older clickers, students had to scroll through letters to respond. “I think it (the app) works better than the actual clickers,” Kortenkamp said. “You could be using the full keypad on your laptop to reply to these questions and they could be longer and … get your thoughts across better than just
multiple choice A to E. But if you just have the device you buy in the bookstore, you’re limited.” Derek Masseth, senior director of Infrastructure Services at UITS, and Malcolm Elliott, a multimedia instructional support technician, said they agree that it is ultimately up to the professor whether they allow a clicker application instead of the device itself. The acceptance of ResponseWare by professors has grown from 11 instructors last semester to 31 this semester, according to Elliot. Astronomer and Senior Lecturer of Astronomy Thomas Fleming said he disagrees with Kortenkamp, and that he considers the use of any technology other than the clicker itself a distraction to the learning environment. “I can’t trust the students. My duty is to have a distraction-free environment so they can learn,” Fleming said. “I think we’ve gotten our act together here at the
CLICKERS, 2
WORTH Arizona university students lobby NOTING legislators on higher education issues This day in history
By Rachel Gottfried DAILY WILDCAT
Students from the three in-state universities advocated for issues pertaining to higher education at the Arizona Students’ Association’s annual Lobby Con event in Phoenix. The event is organized by the association, which works to ensure that higher education is affordable and accessible in the state by advocating to elected officials. The three-day conference brought together student leaders from the UA, Arizona State University and Northern Arizona University to learn about important issues in the public university system and gain advocacy and lobbying skills. Some of the participants were the association’s interns, students involved in the Associated Students of the University of Arizona and other students approached about the opportunity and decided that they wanted to partake in the event. The weekend prepared participating students for Lobby Day, which
took place on Monday, and allowed students to have the opportunity to go to the Arizona State Capitol and lobby legislators about the issues discussed throughout the weekend. The first day of the conference focused on learning about Arizona’s budget, its political landscape and introduced issues regarding costs of university attendance and textbooks. Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett attended the conference to explain the budget and where higher education stands in the state’s priorities. Bennett put together a visual model to show that most of the state’s budget goes to the K-12 school system and health and welfare. Higher education, he said, is the state’s third priority. Bennett explained that when the economy started declining, the state was forced to start borrowing money from the public universities. When the state was unable to pay the universities back RACHEL GOTTFRIED / DAILY WILDCAT on time, they delayed payments, causing some of the UA’s current problems. Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennet explains the state’s budget using shoe
>> 1926: Carter G. Woodson founded Negro History Week, which later became Black History Month.
QUOTE TO
NOTE
“
After all, (Kavanagh) probably has bootstraps on his bootstraps — all the better to pull himself up by, unlike those college students leeching the state dry in their selfish pursuit of higher education.”
PERSPECTIVES — 4
boxes during Lobby Con on Friday. The three-day conference allowed students to
LOBBY CON, 3 speak to state legislators about issues regarding higher education.
‘Like‘ us on Facebook facebook.com/dailywildcat
Professors combat cheating in online classes Internet courses may give students chance to skirt academic honesty By Stephanie Zawada DAILY WILDCAT With more educational options being offered online and through digital services, the opportunities for cheating have multiplied. More than 75 percent of college students admit to cheating at least once in their post-secondary career,
according to a U.S. News & World Report article. Cheating in online classes is “a new example of an old problem,” said Stephen Gilliland, executive director of the Center for Leadership Ethics at the Eller College of Management. “I think a big part of cheating comes from the available opportunity,” Gilliland said. “If there is an opportunity there, students that may not otherwise be likely to cheat may take that opportunity if it’s easy enough. I think the online course environment creates more opportunity.”
Online course management, Gilliland said, is more challenging than “brick-and-mortar” class control when it comes to test taking. “We give a lot of thought to how we can ensure a testing environment that limits available opportunities for cheating,” he said. The Eller College put one of its larger classes online this past summer and had to work through a number of technical solutions to limit cheating opportunities, Gilliland said. One way to control cheating is to limit the time when students can take
an exam, Gilliland said. “Instead of letting people take the exam on a specific date, give them a time block to ensure that every student is taking the exam at the same time,” Gilliland said. Another technological solution the college implemented was having a remote proctor. The college had a service watch the students take their exams through a web camera, and professors can look back at the footage if a student is reported cheating.
CHEATING, 3
Follow us on Twitter twitter.com/dailywildcat
Look at our sets on Flickr flickr.com/arizonadailywildcat
HI
73 48 LOW
Fakenham, UK Hood, Va. Wink, Texas
32 / 25 59 / 35 57 / 30