Im prove The Live W ith M inim al Losses
Pr e s e r vi ng Ma i nt a i ni ngs oc i a lc ohe s i on a ndt hewa yofgr owt ha nd f or ma t i onoft heur ba n f a br i coft hene i g hbor hood
I mpr ov e At t r a c tpe opl et o t hene i g hbor hood 3ma i npl a z a s
Ur ba nFa br i c Ur ba nf a br i cr e f e r st ot he phys i c a lur ba ne nvi r onme nt ( e l e me nt s ,ma t e r i a l s ,f or m, s c a l e s ,de ns i t ya ndne t wor ks ) , a ndt oi t sps y c hol og i c a l , s oc i oc ul t ur a l ,e c ol og i c a l , ma na g e r i a la nde c onomi c s t r uc t ur e s .Theur ba nf a br i c t he mes t udi e st her e l a t i ons be t we e nt a ng i bl ea ndi nt a ng i bl e s t r uc t ur e si ndi f f e r e ntc ont e xt s ,
1. Pa r ka ndRi de 2. FoodSt r e e t 3. Ba z a a r
I mpr ov et hee c onomi cl e v e l
Fi negr a i n
theory of urban fabric
“St r e e tpa t t e r nsmus tbee a s i l yna vi g a bl e 5. oppor t uni t i e sf ordi s c ov e r y a ndl a t t i c el i ke ,wi t hbl oc kst ha ta r enott oo a nde xpl or a t i on bi ga ndi nt e r s e c t i onst ha ta r enott oof a ra pa r t ” 6. f e e ll uxur i ousa ndma ke — RogerLewis pe opl ewa ntt ol i ng e r i nora r oundi t 1. s e v e r a ls ma l lbl oc ksc l os e 7. f r e que ntf r ont s t og e t he r 8. mos twi t hna r r owf r ont a g e s 2. Mor ef l e xi bl et ha nc oa r s e 9. I tde v e l opsov e rt i me f a br i c
3. Doe snoti mpos ei t s e l fon s oc i e t y 4. Adyna mi cpr oc e s st ha tr e f l e c t st he c ha ng i ngne e dsoft hene i g hbor hood
“Tr a ns por ti st hema ke r a ndbr e a ke rofc i t i e s“
theory of urban fabric Howt oma kea ndc r e a t emor el i v a bl e ur ba nf a br i c:
Col i nCl a r ks a i d:
wa l ki ng a ut omobi l e
Mor ewa l ka bi l i t y t r a ns i t
Be t t e rpubl i c t r a ns por t
Ea c hur ba nf a br i cha spa r t i c ul a rs e tof: 1. Spa t i a lr e l a t i ons hi p
Ac t i v i t i e sma kes t r ongs oc i a lr e l a t i ons hi p: Ta l ki ngwi t hf a mi l y Soc i a lne t wor k
2. Typol ogyofbui l di ng
3. s pe c i f i cl a ndus epa t t e r n
De ns e r mi xe dus e
Wa l ki ngur ba nf a br i ca ndwa l ki ngc i t i e s:
e xe r c i s e
concept
from people to people Re mov a lFe nc e s
study proxim ity
stronge social netw ork
Bui l di ng Huma ni t y Land use
Diversity
Hierarchy Low Econom y
Ope nSpa c e s Pe de s t r i a n
NoOpe nSpa c e s
Neglected
At t a c he dHous e s
Ne t wor k Pl a z a s
Affordability
hierarchy of landuse Thi sc r e a t e sa nur ba nf a br i ct ha tc a ns e a ml e s s l y t r a ns i t i onf r om l i g ht l yde v e l ope dr e s i de nt i a l a r e a st omi xe dus e dr e t a i lt ode ns eur ba nc or e Ma i nt a i ndi v e r s i t yi nl a ndus e
Di s t r i but i onofl a ndus e s ,hi e r a r c hyf r om c omme r c i a l t oe nt e r t a i nme ntt hr oug hmi xus ea ndr e s i de nt i a l . Howt ol i nkt hei ndus t r i a lz onewi t ht he ne i g hbor hood? * . De s i g nba z z a rpl a z at oa t t r a c tpe opl ef r om t hei ndus t r i a lz onet oi t . * . Byput t hec omme r c i a la ndmi xus e d ont hea l i g nme nts i de
Come r c i a l
Re s i de nt i a l
Mi xus e d
hierarchy of netw ork
hierarchy of plazas