Artinformal In-House Catalog | ALT Philippines 2020

Page 1

FEB RUAR Y 1 4 - 1 6 , 2020

A LT P H I L I P PINES 2020, SMX C ONVENTION C ENT ER , SM AUR A PR EM IE RE, TAGUIG CITY

MATERIALS

OF

THE

ARTIST

NICE BUENAVENTURA Tony Godfrey: Nice, do you start with materials? Nice Buenaventura: No. I start with a tension. That is what I try and resolve through a process I’m comfortable with, like making. In some ways my practice is really just an offloading of personal and social tensions, but incidentally productive. Godfrey: You make it sound psychological. Buenaventura: It feels that way. Godfrey: Can you give me an example? Buenaventura: My last show at Artinformal was a response to Walter Benjamin and his attack on mechanical reproduction. I was unsettled by the idea that a celebrated Marxist could be against something that aided in the democratisation of information, entertainment, art. The

works I had in that show featured motifs that appear accidental but they took ages. One nine-bytwelve-inch work took me a week. And yes, in the case of drawings, the paper is more important than the pencil. I have to have paper with a deep enough tooth to catch the tones. Godfrey: Do you make prints? Buenaventura: Yes, but by drawing them. If I did it by etching, I would have to vary them all, make each a little different. I like the minor differences in all machine-made things. I like blips, errors and mis-registrations. My dilemma now--or should I say tension--is whether to continue resisting technology or to integrate it into my methods. I’m working on a new media installation for a class, an acrylic box with a plant and some sensors and motors inside. The idea is to present nature and technology not as divergent but as parallel systems.

It’s something that excites me but you have to realise, my interest in technology lies in that I can subvert it. Godfrey: And how does the material affect what they eventually mean? Buenaventura: I like to think that the materials I end up using are products of improvisation, a theme that runs parallel to the problems I set out to define through art-making. To my mind the more important thing that separates man from machine is not the quality of their output but of their manner. When confronted with difficulty, a machine just stops working. We, on the other hand, improvise. I was never formally trained as an artist, not even now as I’m taking an MSc I Media and Arts Technology, and so the charcoal I suspend in oil or the eraser shields I craft out of paper are things I just make up as I go along.

ALVIN ZAFRA Tony Godfrey: What is different about your new work? Alvin Zafra: It is made with white stone on sandpaper, but then I put smoked glass over it. I wanted to emulate what things look like when I don’t have my glasses on. The image is from a photo I took in a flea market – the parts of a sewing machine. Godfrey: Is that image important to you? Zafra: The inspiration for it came from my mum. She used to teach home economics. Sadly, soon after I made this new work, she had a stroke and her eyes became blurred. Godfrey: Can I ask what your most recent show at Artinformal was about? How how were they made?

Zafra: The images were of public sculptures here in Manila. They are not powerful, but small, battered, rundown, often not very good. As usual, sand paper is my support. The material I chose to draw on the sandpaper was white stones. It seemed appropriate because it felt urban, the same colour as concrete and the city. What else have I used to rub against or draw on the sandpaper? A skull (twice), bullets, fingernails. I plan to use precious materials like gold, silver or jade. Both for the colour and the value or symbolism. Way back in 2000 I rubbed with gold but once rubbed on it looked grey. Godfrey: What problems does your chosen support cause? Zafra: It is difficult to mount on wood. It is very difficult in the Philippines to find large sheets of fine sandpaper which is what I

use. I don’t add varnish but I have been experimenting with other ways to ensure the material sticks. I injure myself often, especially when smudging areas by rubbing. My fingers get worn down, the skin gets thin. But there is no alternative: I can’t work with gloves on. It is a very physical process. I have found ways to avoid allergic reactions to the sandpaper. Sometimes I wear a mask which is awkward if you wear glasses like me! I have now made 65 photo-realist works on sandpaper. I am faster than I was but it is still a very slow process: something like the triptych I showed at the recent Art Informal show can take three months to complete. Godfrey: Do you sometimes wish you had never discovered sandpaper? And how did you discover it?

teacher, Sir Chabet told me I needed to find something original. My first sandpaper work was made from a statue of the Virgin Mary. I saw it stood on a piece of sandpaper so I literally put the two things together. It was a eureka moment for me. The next thing I made was a realist drawing of a finger bone using a finger bone. Both those early works are lost, though I made another version of the Mary statue later on. Godfrey: How do you construct these realist works? Zafra: I simplify things. I omit lines from landscapes. I am more faithful to what I feel then to what I see. The images or subjects should speak to me.

Zafra: No. It’s my thing now. My

AR TIN FO RM A L / M ATERIA L S O F THE A RTIST, A LT P H IL IP P IN ES 2 0 2 0


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.