f'^f.>'
I
j,.\
<.
-f
.
.'
* r.
* *
4
^
SI
^ tt
:
•• -
-
V-
I
m
*1Vv>V^^' <
A
«.• ) -•
i
^i -
f
«
3
*;t
%-f ijT
1* r .' .i
•f-.-.^
\ \
'''li.
^
Anni Albers
'^/i
By Nicholas Fox Weber and
""f>'
V^v'^'a
'#1 1
Pandora Tabatabai Asbaghi *
m
:
'.4' -r. ''">
,-»' *
.
:>'^A ±_i
With
contributions by Kelly Feeney,
Jean-Paul Leclercq, and Virginia Gardner Troy
Anni Albers (1899-1994) foremost
is
K--
*.
'
considered the
designer of our century. Albers,
textile
one of the
central figures of the
Workshop
at the
effect
-
Weaving
Bauhaus, had an enormous
worldwide on the design of yard materials
i
;
es?:
and on the creation of singular weavings and wall hangings. This catalogue, accompanying a centennial retrospective of her work, brings to light a
wide selection of her weavings, drapery
materials,
and wall coverings
as well as the
••'
^_
preparatory studies and graphic works that
accompanied them. In addition
s'
'
to full-color
reproductions of Albers's most important works, it
also includes
documentation of scores of
her highly influential textile designs. Scholars Virginia Gardner Troy and Jean-Paul Leclerq
explore the significance of her
work
in the -
context of the history of Western and pre-
Columbian
textile design;
'J
Kelly Feeney discusses
her important commission of ark panels for
Temple Emanu-El
in Dallas;
and Albers scholar
Nicholas Fox Weber provides an insightful
memoir of the
artist's
A
the graphic
arts.
chronology
details
and as
career in
exploration late in
comprehensive
Anni
famed painter and
artist
of
H
'
I
Albers's fascinating life
Germany and
an independent
life
illustrated
and
in
America, both
as the wife
of the
instructor Josef Albers.
f^Ji
*•/-
.'J'
'"::
A<^
»
5
..,'•"-
*
..*-\«
.*'*
J.
.
'*"-
«' f
»,/«•»<-,
.1
/" ,
>.
' .
.'
Anni Albers
Anni Albers Nicholas Fox Weber
and Pandora Tabatabai Asbaghi
GUGGENHEIM MUSEUM
Published on the occasion of the exhibition
Peggy Guggenheim Collection, Venice,
Anni Albers,
organized by Nicholas Fox
March 24-May 24, 1999 Museum, Bottrop,
Weber
Josef Albers
and Pandora Tabatabai Asbaghi
June I2-August
Musee
29, 1999
des Arts Decoratifs, Paris,
September 20-December
The Jewish Museum, New February 27-June
Š
Front cover
Drapery material,
ca. 1944.
by Philip Johnson house,
New
Commissioned
1999
The Solomon
New
Foundation,
R.
4,
for Rockefeller guest
York. Plastic, copper
toil,
and
All
works by Anni Albers and Joset Albers
York, Gift of Anni Albers 1970. 75.10a.
by permission.
Back cover
ISBN 0-89207-218-0 (softcover)
Anni Albers
90.5
at
2000
Guggenheim
Š
X
1999
The
Josef and
Anni Albers
Foundation, Bethany, Connecticut. Used
Black Mountain College,
All rights reserved.
ISBN 0-8109-6923-8 (hardcover)
near Asheville, North Carolina, 1947,
Guggenheim Museum
photographed by Nancy Newhall.
1071 Fifth
Publications
Avenue
New York, NewYork
10128
Frontispiece
Josef Albers, Pazcuaro, date
unknown.
Hardcover edition distributed by
Collage of twenty contact prints,
Harry N. Abrams
mounted on cardboard, 25.4 x 20.3 cm (10 X 8 inches). The Josef and Anni Albers
100 Fifth Avenue
New
York,
New
York looii
Foundation, Bethany JAF:PH-553. Design: Nathan Garland
Production: Esther Editor: Jennifer
The
operations and programs of the Peggy
Guggenheim
Yun
Knox- White
Collection are supported by:
INTRAPRES^ COLLEZIONE GUGGENHEIM Aermec
iGuzzini Illuminazione Istituto Poligraficoe
Arclinea
Automotive Products
Zecca dello Stato
Leo Burnett
Italia
Banca Antoniana Popolare Veneta
Lubiam I9n
Barbero 1891
Luciano Marcato
Bisazza
Rex Built-in
DEW AG
Safilo
Gretag Imaging Group
Swatch
Gruppo 3M Italia Gruppo Imation Italia
Wella
Group
Zucchi-Ba.ssetti
Group
Management by Bondardo C'omunicazione
The
trustees of the
Solomon
R.
Ciuggenhcim Foundation gratefully
acknowledge the Regione Veneto operation o( the Peggy
Offi cial carrie
1999
York. All rights reserved
cm (39 x 35 Vs inches). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New cotton, 99
31,
York,
for the
Guggenheim
r/llitalia
annual subsidy that assures the effective
Collection.
9
Introduction
Contents
Nicholas Fox Weber
28
Thread
as Text:
The Woven Work of Anni Virginia Gardner Iroy
64
On
the Structure
of the
Weavings
Jea)i-Pattl Leclercq
94
Constructing Textiles
Anni Albers
118
Anni
Albers:
Devotion
to Material
Kelly Feeney
124
The Last Bauhausler Nicholas Fox Weber
152
Anni Albers 1899-1994 Pandora I'abatahai Asbaghi
Albcrs
The Solomon
Preface
Guggenheim Foundation
R.
Thomas Krens
which
Director,
Foundation
is
Guggenheim
to present the
and
in Europe,
story
first
do
to
and her
art,
often overshadowed by that of her husband, Josef belong firmly
in the fabric R.
proud
shown
Her Httle-known
so in the centenary year of her birth.
The Solomon
is
retrospective of the art of Anni Albers to be
weavings.
of twentieth-century Modernism,
It is
a
remarkably pure but
by some of the dramatic events that took place
two world wars and her emigration
one of her
like a thread in
and humane
lively
touched
story,
Germany between
in
to a strange land, the
This exhibition has been made possible above
United
all
the
States.
by the Josef and
Anni Albers Foundation and by its indefatigable director, Nicholas Fox Weber, who, with Pandora Tabatabai Asbaghi, organized this exhibition. While thanking them personally for their leadership of the project, I also want to acknowledge how full a partnership with the Albers Foundation this exhibition has been.
loans from
its
expertise of
its
The
collections
excellent staff This
Guggenheim Foundation Foundation.
Albers Foundation has generously
Our
not the
is
time that the
first
has had the pleasure of working with the Albers
previous collaborations include two highly successful and
distinguished exhibitions of the
which originated
made
and has contributed the time and unmatchable
in 1988 at the
work of Josef Albers, a full retrospective, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in
New York, as well as a show devoted to his works in glass, which was shown at the Peggy Guggenheim Collection in Venice in 1994 and at the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in New York in 1995. Furthermore, we owe the presence of important paintings and photographs by Josef Albers Guggenheim's collections to the extraordinary generosity of the
in the
Albers Foundation.
My particular gratitude goes the Metropolitan
Museum
many important
of which have made
to
two
of Art and the
New
York
Museum
of
institutions,
Modern
professional staffs was vital to the success of this presentation.
who
other lenders to the exhibition, this catalogue,
After
Albers Paris,
I
it
Museum
my
wish to express
in Bottrop,
most sincere thanks.
Germany, the Musee des Arts Decoratifs
and the Jewish Museum to be
New York.
in
Kleeblatt and his colleague Susan
as
is
has been the Peggy
all
those
who
at
in
Norman
those institutions.
Guggenheim Collection
are
generously provide annual funds
gratefully noted elsewhere. For
Guggenheim
in
an honor for the
Marie-Claude Beaud, and
Chevlowe
Exhibitions presented at the Peggy inconceivable without
It is
working with these museums, and
particular with Ulrich Schumacher,
its activities,
To the many
are listed individually elsewhere in
closes in Venice, the exhibition will travel to the Josef
Guggenheim Foundation
for
Art, both
loans; the cooperation of their
many
years, Alitalia
Collection's official airline; the Regione
Veneto has provided an annual subsidy since
1981; the loyal
and enthusiastic
Advisory Board of the Peggy Guggenheim Collection, presently led by Luigi Moscheri, has been a key part of the collection's success in the
eighteen years since
it
joined the
the Intrapress Collezione
European corporations, earmark cultural
Guggenheim Foundation; and
finally,
Guggenheim, numbering twenty distinguished their
annual support specifically to the
programs of the collection. Thank you to them
all.
How
appropriate that this major retrospective exhibition, the most complete
show
ever of Anni Albers's art,
hundredth anniversary of the
Guggenheim
the Peggy
which has been organized
artist's birth,
was
a perpetual explorer
and
left
sort
Nicholas Fox Weber
Ciuggenheim
Albers, Peggy
and adventurer, someone who broke down
behind the potential ease of one
barriers
devoted to
life
Foundation
art.
thanks to the extraordinary steward of Peggy's legacy, the engaged and
engaging Philip Rylands, Deputy Director of the Pegg\' Guggenheim GoUection, that
We
feel
this
show has been made
profound gratitude
of thought. At the
Pegg\'
him
to
possible
Guggenheim, we
and
and
tor his vision
that
it
opens
in Venice.
his perpetual clarity
are also gratefiil to
Renata Rossani,
who
Chiara Barbieri, Beate Earner, Glaudia Rech, and Sandra Divari,
have
undertaken a range of responsibilities with tremendous grace and energy.
The subsequent venues in Bottrop,
Germany,
is
years
fifty
and
to the
director, the splendid
Musee des
the fore.
It
nil
and where
because of
is
Marie-Glaude Beaud
—
woman one
a
its
and
brilliance have
is
and tenacious
success assured by
Development; Dominique
however particular
certain Anni,
would have loved
—
that this exhibition
Anne de Rougement,
Pallut, Exhibitions
has
art
been brought to
director, the exuberant, perceptive,
its
in her personal preferences,
splendid place, with
originalit)'
an
and
Arts Decoratifs in
time and again the place where the distinction of craft and
been rendered
of
Then on
art
of Anni's
a kunsthalle for the finest abstract
of the century, under the expert guidance of its patient Ulrich Schumacher.
Museum
Josef Albers
both the great showcase for the
husband and partner of
Paris,
The
are equally fitting.
fills
that
Director
Department Manager; and
Jean-Paul Leclercq, conservateur en chef du patrimoine charge des collec-
XlXe siecle. And finally the Jewish Museum in New home of Edward M. M. Warburg, the patron who, quietly
tions anterieures au
York, once the
and
background, paid the Alberses' steamship
in the
States in the
Bauhaus.
harrowing period
Thirt)' years later,
it
after the
and powerful Six
United
Gestapo padlocked the doors of the
was the farsighted institution
the patronage of Vera List, awarded for the elegiac
fare to the
Anni her most
Norman
Prayers.
that,
significant
thanks to
commission,
and
Kleeblatt, Susan
Elihu Rose Curator of Eine Arts, and Susan Chevlowe, Associate Curator of Fine Arts, are the open-minded and spirited individuals to
whom we
have
thank for 1109 Fifth Avenue again being Anni's sanctuary in America.
At each of those institutions the support with
Equal thanks go to those
Museum
of Art in
New
at
Department
Museum
the
York, without
have been possible. At the the
staff has tackled this project
and devotion that has made every stage of the work
flair
Museum
of Architecture
of
a pleasure.
Modern Art and Metropolitan
whom
this project
would not
of Modern Art, one must thank,
in
and Design, Matilda McQuaid, Associate
Curator; Luisa Lorch, Cataloguer; and Lynda Zycherman, Associate Conser\'ator; at the Metropolitan Assistant,
Department
Museum of Art,
Jane Adlin, Curatorial
of Twentieth Centur\- Decorative Arts;
the Antonio Ratti Textile Center of the Metropolitan
Conservator
Kajitani,
Gae design that
is
Aulenti
in
—
and
at
Museum, Nobuko
Charge, and F^lena Phipps, Conservator
so alert to Anni's vision; like Anni, so focused
"anonymous and
herself forward; so thorough
timeless
"
rather than
and quietly assured
—
is
any attempt
to
on
push
responsible not only for
many of its underlving precepts. Gae's office staff has been wonderful. In particular, we owe profuse thanks to the architect Massimiliano Caruso, who has managed the inordinately complex the appearance of this show, but for
details
of
textile
presentation with infinite patience and diligence, and to the
architect Francesca Eenaroli, for her continuous strength
Executive Director,
The Josefand Anni Albers
of existence for the supreme
pleasures, as well as the never-ending challenges, of a It is
Acknowledgments
should have been initiated by
Anni
C'ollcction. Like
honor oi the
in
and professionalism.
Pandora Tabatabai Asbaghi, co-curator of the breadth and depth of
its
contents,
Anni's persona along with her
art.
this exhibition, sculpted
and expanded
its
concept to include
Pandora has done so with
flair
and
insight,
with the "open eyes" so cherished by both Josef and Anni, and with rare energy and imagination. In compiling the chronology, Tirso Eduard Wiegel provided Pandora with much-appreciated administrative assistance.
Nathan Garland, the designer
of this book, has seen, with spectacular
conscientiousness and attentiveness, to the creation of a publication that
we hope, not only
functions, to
an exhibition catalogue but
as
He was
approach Anni Albers in adequate range.
Chase and Karin Krochmal. Katharine Weber,
as the first
volume
ably assisted by Gregg
as editor
of some of the
text,
has tackled difficult tasks with acuity and great finesse.
Great thanks also go to Anthony Calnek, Director of Publications the
Guggenheim,
humor
in overseeing the
complexity.
am
I
many
at
guidance and constant patience and good
for his superb
stages of assembling this publication in
all its
Managing Editor/Manager of
also gratefiil to Elizabeth Levy,
Foreign Editions; Jennifer Knox- White; Esther Yun, Assistant Production
Manager; and Liza Donatelli, Administrative and Editorial
Assistant.
Brenda Danilowitz, chief curator of the Josef and Anni Albers Foundation, has, more than anyone
made
else,
this
undertaking a
Her
reality.
attention to detail has been nothing short of staggering, her thoroughness
and
alertness,
even under circumstances of intense pressure, amazing.
It is
impossible to enumerate the tasks she accomplished with fortitude and care,
show would not have been possible without her. Others on the staff of the Albers Foundation have also played
quite simply, this
specifically in the imaginative effects.
essen-
Jackie Ivy, our curatorial associate, has helped in myriad ways,
tial roles.
and
Craig Taylor, curatorial
effective presentation
and
of Anni's personal
and Terry Tabaka, building superin-
assistant,
tendent, have been inordinately helpful in seeing to
vital details
pertaining to
the care of the objects. Phyllis Fitzgerald, our administrative assistant, has,
with her professionalism,
as well as the history
of her long friendship with
Anni, been an invaluable support. Camilla Lyons, an intern, did considerable research for the catalogue chronology.
Kelly Feeney, for
many
years a curator at the foundation,
responsible not only for a re-organization of our
documentation, but also for our success missing or
of time, she did insight. Sarah
this,
and much
Lowengard, the
in re-locating,
over a long period
with intense personal devotion and
else,
textile conservator,
consummate professionalism and with utmost wisdom and generosity.
themselves with advice
and re-acquiring
known and admired Anni
weavings; having
lost
was
Anni Albers holdings and
has cared for the objects skill
and provided
essential
Bobbie Dreier, the dearest of friends to both Anni and Josef Albers
from the moment of their
done more
for this
arrival in
America
in
November
show than she can imagine. She
of 1933, has
has unearthed
Anni's most thrilling hardware jewelry as well as other of the
handmade as always, I
objects, provided reminiscences
brought true joy to
am
all
both
telling
artist's
ways
to
my
of
splendid
and amusing, and,
of us engaged in Anni's work and
also grateful in countless
some
life.
fellow directors of the
Albers Foundation, John Eastman and Charles Kingsley, for their unflagging
support and generosity.
been an angel
who
And
As Anni declared is
always an "and."
century, of a a
On
any others, be
it
at
Hans Farman,
has, as always,
in her favorite
1
quotation from Kandinsky, there
behalf of one of the true pioneers of the twentieth
woman whose
wonderful friend,
Anni's brother,
has provided what no one else could have supplied.
integrity
repeat the
was on
a par
with her
words Anni Albers loved
talent,
to utter
and of
more than
ceremonial occasions or everyday moments: thank you.
Why
Anni Albers?
To begin
Introduction
with, she transformed textiles as an art form. Anni elevated the
woven threads and put the mediimi on equal footing with oil on canvas and watereolor on paper. And so Buckminster Fuller declared, "Anni Albers, more than any other weaver, has succeeded in exciting mass realization of the complex structure of fabrics. She has brought the artist's intuitive sculpturing faculties and the agelong weaver's arts into status of
Nicholas Fox Weber
historical successful marriage."'
She took up weaving a
full-Hedged
her,
artist, just like
Anni had wanted
reluctantly.
men who
the
but circumstances and certain unalterable
even though she
in the way. Yet
felt
that she
Paul Klee and
\'asil\'
of abstract art
when
Kandinsk\' had accomplished it
was
still
wall hangings of incomparable If weavers
realities of
her milieu got
had been forced into
medium what
she did her utmost to achieve with the
to be a painter,
attended the Bauhaus around
in paint. .A
pioneer
concept, in the 1910s, she
a radical
power and
and
Hair
textiles,
her heroes like
made
visual excitement.
of previous generations had replicated the flower patterns and
decorative motifs that were prescribed for the form, Anni used her yarns to create "visual resting places" (a term she
borrowed from one of her
Wilhelm Worringer), which are as calming and diverting as they infinitely rich and complex. Anni's textile compositions put in visual
heroes, are
form aspects of the natural world and of philosophical thought that reflected her endlessly probing, inventive
The
direct effects
fiir-reaching. Abstract wall
and echoes
mind.
of her daring search ha\e been
come
hangings have
to flourish as an art form.
become completely acceptable for thread to be its own voice, to have no obligation to represent anything other than itself. And in her own, extremely small body of work, she made individual masterpieces It
has
weavings that inspire meditation enrich the
lives
And what
a
do
brave
that profoundly
fix,
I.
woman Anni
was! She
left
the comforts of her
the unprecedented at the Bauhaus. She married a
other side of the tracks in art.
to
quick
who wanted man from the
upbringing to join those daring souls
Itixurious bourgeois to
as well as a
of their viewers.
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;
because they shared a consuming faith
in part
Their joint pursuit of technical and aesthetic heights counted more
them than anything
to represent to
embody and moral and human standards. The making came both
else in life; the visual
them the highest
of art was the means and the goal that enabled
this
to
wonderful couple
not just to survive, but also to thrive, in spite of the sometimes desperate vicissitudes
of their existence,
duress were a
realit)'.
which Nazism,
in
illness,
and
financial
Their accomplishments triumphed.
Anni's marriage to Josef Albers that she holds for us. Neither of
is,
of course, part of the fascination
them bought
into any of the cliches that
on the subject. Sometimes Anni of downtrodden wife, but then she would disparage
others might have tried to promulgate
would assume
the role
the progress potentially offered by feminism.
whom,
there
is
no
single
answer
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;
On
same
cause. Integrity, hard work, the serenity
at
best, the deliberate
its
distract
them from
their
ongoing and
Not only did Anni
who
influenced
and strength afh)rded bv
avoidance of those sides of the
of trendiness and corrupt values:
some
the issue of
except that both were believers in the
this
art
diligent search, the
mutual loathing
was what the Alberses cared
create individual objects that hold
of the finest abstract paintings of the century, but she
art
world that might
up
made
for.
against
functional
materials of incomparable subtlet\ and richness as well as practical
Anni Albers, Dessau,
ca. 1929,
photographed by Umbo.
2.
Josef and
Anni
Albers, Oberstdort,
Germany, 1927-28.
3.
Anni and Josef AJbers,
1942,
photographed by Ted Dreier.
10
A
effectiveness.
made an auditorium — —was sound-absorbing and
wall covering she
earned her a Bauhaus diploma
tor
the piece that
light-reHecting
while unimaginably modern and soothing to look
at.
The
air
and
light
that Howed through a space divider she designed were as essential to piece as its wooden strips, dowel, and thread. .Another wall covering
concealed
And
nail holes.
in all
extolled equally; the synthetic
approach was forever
of
this the
the
machine and handweaving were
was revered alongside the natural. Anni's
original, ba.sed
more on her own
and understanding than on .iinthing
olxservations
in the air, .iiul she
was wondertullv
able to surprise us.
Anni's influence was vast. She directly affected her students at
two of the in
greatest art institutions of the twentieth century
Weimar and
North
C^arolina
and Black Mountain College near
Des.sau,
—and, through
her
work and writing and and guided
of her thoughts worldwide, she inspired artists in directions that
And
have
quite late in
life
now become
—
the
Bauhaus
Asheville,
the dissemination
a large
number
of
part of the mainstream.
she became a printmaker who, in collaboration
with some of the leading technicians of the medium, blended screenprint with photo-offset, used the processes of etching, shifted and overprinted plates,
and drenched lithographic stones
such startling and
in acid, in
original
ways that time and again she achieved the unprecedented, while
making
art that
is
as fascinating
No wonder and." That
as
it
was brave.
and
a writer
aesthetic philosopher she was.
on
D«/^//>/^^ invariably has readers exclaiming
Her cultured and educated
voice, nourished as
it
its
Her book
strength and eloquence.
was by the wisdom and
temperance of the Enlightenment and Goethe, was infused with reticence
so
I
always an
is
verity certainly applied to her.
And what
On
and engaging
she so often quoted Kandinsky's, "There
and modesty. "The good designer
believe, the
one who does not stand
is
a Zen-like
1.
in the
appearance.
A
way
to a useful life
useful object should
perform
(What would she have made of today's and the conspicuous display encapsulation of
The
its
reality
examine
it,
its
without an ambitious
duty without
Her
faith in art,
ado."'
3.
it is endless. It
to us as
never ending. As
and the
we
obeys laws never totally lucid to our
understanding.
The
reality
of art
as completion
Art
Who
is
is
concluded in
itself. It sets
up
its
own
laws
of vision.
constant
and
else has articulated
it is
complete.'
such ideas
as succinctly or
"Design:
"Art
Press, 1959).
Anonymous
— A Constant"
pp. 47-48-
was nothing short of marvelous.
of nature will appear
Amii Albcrs,
.uid
I
inuless"
(1946), in ibid., pp. b-~.
obsession with designers' logos
of designers' names?)
possibilities,
much
j.ickci ot
Designing (Middlctown, C^onn.:
Wesleyan University 2.
sends his products on their
Quoted on back
On
anonymous designer, way of the material; who
the
engagingly?
II
(1939), in ibid.,
4-
Wall hanging, 1924.
Cotton and
{66% X 39X The
silk,
169.6
x
100.3
cm
inches).
Josef and
Anni Albers
Foundation, Bethany.
^Miimd
5-
VC'all
hant;ing, 1925.
Wool and silk, 236 x 96 cm inches). (92 X X 37 Die Neue Sammlung St.uuliches 'X<.
n
Museum
tiir
Munich
^64/26.
angewandtc Kunst,
6.
Wall hanging, 1925.
Silk, cotton,
and
acetate,
145 X 92 cm (57 X X 36 -Ab inches). Die Neue Sammlung Staatliches
Museum
fiir
Munich
363/26.
7.
angewandte Kunst,
Wall hanging, 1926.
X
cm
Silk,
X 48 inches). The Busch-Reisinger Museum, Harvard University Art Museums, 182.9
122
(72
Cambridge, Massachusetts, Association
Fund BR
48.132.
14
15
8.
Preliminary design for a wall
hanging, 1926. Gouache and pencil
on
paper, 34.9
(13
K X
II /ÂŤ
x
29.5
inches).
of Modern Art,
cm
The Museum
New York,
Gift of the designer 397.51.
16
HI
ann^ia* alters entvmrf
fiir
3.
26.
jacriuard
1. 9.
Preliminary design tor a wall
hanging, 1926. Gouache and pencil
on paper, (10
X
25.4
x
8 inches).
Modern
Art,
20.3
cm
The Museum of
New York,
Gift of the designer 398.51.
17
lo.
Design
for a jacquard weaving,
1926. Watercolor and gouache
on
paper, 34.3
(13
X X iiK
x
28.6
cm
inches).
The Busch-Reisinger Museum, Harvard University Art Museums, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Gift of Anni Albers 48.46.
Annl Albere 113.1926 design for Jaquard ireaTlng
II.
Drapery material, 1927.
Designed
for the
Dessau. Spun
(2X X
Theater Cafe Altes,
silk,
4i/< inches).
of Modern Art,
7
x
105.4
cm
The Museum
New York,
Gift of the designer 451.51.
18
12.
Tablecloth material, 1930.
Mercerized cotton, 59.3 x 72.4 (23
Xx
The Museum of Modern
New
cm
zS'A inches).
York, Purchase
Art,
Fund
561.53.
19
.
"
~T
fe^ \\it
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;
wiri
TrinBML-
annelise albers 8. 25. gobelin V besitz nationfelmuseiiin miinchen '
iSiiiiitft'^iilf
"o'>i*(J''
I"
IV-
:
13.
Design
11
^
tor a wall hanging, 1925.
Gouache on paper, 31.7 X 19.2 cm (12X X 7%(, inches). The Museum of Modern Art, New York, Gift of the designer 395.51.
20
'-;
c Iters If Jute-teppich y..
>.nnÂťS-iÂŤ*t
2oo cm.
'^
a<
27.
131-,
c,-,
14.
Design for
^cv-
a jute rug, 1927.
Watercolor and india ink on paper,
cm (13 X 10 The Museum of Modern 34.6
X
26.3
/^
X<.
inches).
Art.
New
Gift of the designer 403.51.
21
York,
WVWVWVrt H iBV'^H'''Hi
H
Hi
Bl
H
~iH
Hi
B H H H Jl H I I
^'-^1
'~
-p,
i.
IB'.
;sr
w
^';.
.^
.,:'
1^
PjBm
»«
.iiifiiiiiii
nrie»±i&« 6,1136X3 2.
sweater teppich
28.
;
gvc-^-^-
,
'' <- -""^
15.
Design for
a rug for a child's
room, 1928. Gouache on paper,
X 10 34.1 X 26.5 cm (13 The Museum of Modern '/(,
New York, 405.51.
22
%. inches).
Art,
Gift of the designer
c?.
^.ft^M^^ÂŤJÂŤA a
!^H^aP^^^iW^ ^
^ ^Jg ^ ^"^
^^^^
9e.
g^
^ ^
arais
gg
ted iprcao!
annaiias albers
2. 28. entv.urf fur eine 'bettdeclce
^-'-
i6.
10
7h^ It^Y
Design
for a bedspread, 1928.
Watercolor and pencil on paper, 32.5 X 25.9 cm (12% X 10X6 inches). The Museum of Modern Art,
New
York, Gift of the designer
406.51.
23
ste JeSlTer^orhknGc ftr'dc. oliappeseide loo
on;
th.ateroafe in desnau
.tr.
17.
Design
Designed
for drapery material, 1927.
for the
Theater Cafe Altes,
Dessau. Watercolor on paper, inches). cm (9 X Art, New York, Modern The Museum of
22.9
X
35.2
I
yi
Gift of the designer 404.51.
24
i8.
Design
1928.
tor a theater curtain,
Gouache on
paper,
cm (4X X i^'A inches). The Museum of Modern Art, II.
4X
35.2
New York,
Gift of the designer
407.51.
25
19-
Design for a tablecloth, 1930.
Watercolor and gouache
on square-ruled paper,
cm (10 X X 9/. inches). The Museum of Modern Art, 26 X 24.1
New
York, Gift of the designer
393-5I-
26
^f*^^
Mil
III
20.
Design for a tablecloth, 1930.
Gouache on paper, 30.2 X 23.8 cm (11 X X
9 X inches).
The Museum of Modern
New York,
Art,
Gift of the designer
408.51.
27
Thread
as Text:
The Woven Work of Anni
Virginia Gardner Troy
Albers
Anni Albers was acutely aware of the semantic function of thread and textiles in the context of art and design. Throughout her prolific and lengthy weaving career she explored the notion of thread degree that remains unsurpassed by any other textile
She achieved
"'
textiles
Andean
Albers advanced textile art,
by synthesizing what she had learned from two
this position
primary sources: Andean
as text to a
artist this century.
and the
art
and teaching of Paul
Klee.'
most outstanding examples of
textiles as "the
calling the weavers of ancient Peru her "great teachers"'
and
using their extraordinary textiles as her primary textbook in her quest to create art that could be "turn[ed] to again
possibly
last for
she stated, "I "his art
is
and that
lasting,
teachers, the artistic
Andean
is
to Klee as
what It is
my great
interests
that
might
Of Klee,
things have. "^
hero," because
me: the lasting things, and not
significant that Albers linked her great
weavers, to her hero, Klee, by
way of her concept
permanence.
Klee's art
mind by
and again and
some ancient Peruvian
come always back
quick passing things."'
[the]
of
centuries as
and Andean weavings were
her interest in
artistic
language.
also
connected
in Albers's
Through her continuous
investigation of thread as a carrier of meaning, not simply as a utilitarian
product, she was able to create art that functions as she believed her ancient
embedded her work with of the pictograph
ideograph
mark
mark
representation).
that refers to an external subject), the
first
and the
an idea, not necessarily through pictorial
These semantic and
Albers's
language,
that stands for a letter or word),
(a sign that indicates
visual signs that Klee
as a visual
predecessors had done." She also
poetic content by exploring in thread the notion or
(a sign
calligraph (a beautiful
Andean
had examined weavings to
artistic
elements were forms of
in his art.
result
from her
interest in visual sign
languages were her large, multi-weave wall hangings from the Dessau
Bauhaus period, such Black-White-Red this
as
an untitled hanging from 1926
{ic)x6, fig. 21),
and Black-White-Gray
time she had become an important force
weaving workshop toward
a systematic
(fig.
4), fig. 22)."
(i^iy,
in leading the
By
Bauhaus's
and orderly approach
to textile
design and production that emphasized the integral relationship between
construction and pattern. In this
and the substitution of one for another, could
of the production process." to decipher
textiles
could be produced in
it;
The
role of
series,
one weave construction
change the entire nature of the finished
same time Albers promoted the code
way
fiber for another, or
handweaving
as
textile.
one of the
At the first
steps
use of a system implies the availability of a
in Albers's case the textile itself served as the code, or
prototype, lor production. Fhe approach to textile design and production that she developed at the
28
Bauhaus was one
of Albers's great achievements.
21.
Black-White-Red, 1964
reconstruction of a 1926 original.
Cotton and (68
Xx
46
silk, 175
x
118
cm
X. inches).
Bauh.uis-ArLhi\', Berlin.
22.
Black-White-Gray, 1964
reconstruction of a 1927 original
Cotton and (57 'X X 46
"/(.
silk,
147
x
118
inches).
Bauhaus-Archiv, Berlin.
.
11
M
"
rj JET! 29
cm
^
»J" Affuis-
for
it
provided an alternative to the narrative and figural European tapestry
tradition— in which
a textile
ftfi (fcf
J*^<*'^
—
and it allowed the modern weaver to compose on the loom.' Through her study of Andean textiles, Albers
often created by others i f/M.
flH.li
directly
was able
how
understand
to
the direct communication between use and and product, was accomplished in ancient
design, between process
^
t
was produced by weavers based on cartoons
hand looms by
times on simple
a sophisticated culture that did not use
conventional Western writing systems, but instead employed symbols to *>»
/fc;
J^a
(fa-
communicate
ideas.'"
In designing her wall hangings, Albers
neaCj
on
a language
division.
at the
"Padagogischen Nachlass,"
Kunstmuseum
These
The
which Klee taught
in his theoretical classes
year 1927 was an important one for Albers, because she
was among those
ca. 1923.
principles,
Bauhaus, had an integral relationship to the underlying structure
of weaving. Paul KJee, Page from the
23.
system based
a
of rotation, color swapping, repetition, multiplication,
to the principles
and
employed
of geometric, modular forms, which she arranged according
who
attended a course taught by Klee specifically for
weaving-workshop students." Certainly she had had access
to his
Bern, Paul Klee Stiftung.
work
before this time through his published pedagogical notebooks and exhibitions of his work." stated,"
and
"We
were so
full
of admiration for Klee," she once
"He was my god
added,
later
at the time."'^
What
she
primarily absorbed from Klee during his course were his lessons dealing
with structural composition, particularly in relation to the explained
it,
the grid
units as well as
is
a structure generated
grid.
As Klee
both by the repetition of
by the under- and overlapping of bands. Pages from
his
pedagogical notebooks show that weaving featured in his thoughts on the grid. Indeed, for a unit
on
structural composition he
warp and weft construction of weaving in order to
show
"I
diagrammed
weaving
as well as
the inherent checkerboard pattern of the
think
I
owe most of my
the
in cross section
medium
insight into problems of
form
(fig. 23).'*
to Klee,"
Albers later stated, pointing to Klee's importance as a source for her early investigations into the language of nonobjective
within the idiom of weaving."'
The geometric
form and
its
significance
patterns that she created
within a grid format are essentially self-referential in that they are inherent to the works' structure; at the
the idea of text.
The
same time they suggest both the image and
viewer scans the images for clues to a code, and by
doing so becomes engaged in a perceptual
activity
Albers's exploration of textiles as text
of sign modules was reinforced during
this
not unlike that of reading.
through the arrangement
period by the
Andean
textiles
she saw in various museums.'' She admired the dazzling and complex color
and shape patterning of
Inca, Wari,
and Tiawanaku
tunics,
which have
a
strong similarity to the type of patterning she was exploring at the Bauhaus.
She 24. in a
Tocapu tunic, Island of Titicaca, found stone chest near Moro-Kato. American
Museum
of Natural History,
New
F.
Bandelier in 1896 32601.
Andean open-weave and multi-weave
textiles.
Albers
structures in these textiles rather than to specific iconography, even
though
York,
Part of the Garces Collection, Purchased by
A.
also studied
responded primarily to the concept and use of ideographic signs and
she was aware that discrete information about the
embedded within
their
forms and structures. She was particularly interested
in the Inca tunics that incorporated a geometric as tocapu in the
Quechua
language. She
examples of such tunics in the
Museum
Vieux Perou
(1924)."'
fig.
24)
motif patterning known
would have seen outstanding fiir
Munich,'* as well as in two books: Walter des Alten Peru (1923,
Andean world was
Vdlkerkunde
Lehmanns
in Berlin
and
Kunstgeschichte
and Raoul d'Harcourt's Les
Tissus Indiens
These technically extraordinary, handmade
with their complex geometric and color arrangements, served formal and technical models for Albers's exploration of
du
textiles,
as ideal
textiles as art.
Albers immigrated to the United States with her husband, Josef,
30
in
19?^ From that year until 1949 she taught
Black Mountain College,
at
made the first of more From the start she including Andean textiles
near Asheville, North Carolina. In 1935 the couple
than fourteen trips to Mexico and South America.'"
combed
Mexico
the markets in
lor "old things,"
During these
for her personal textile collection.
substantial collection of
trips she also
assembled a
Black Mountain College, and acquired
textiles for
numerous items tor her and lose! s collection of Mesoamerican and Andean art, which eventually included more than one thousand ceramic, and
stone, jade,
textile pieces.'
mediately after her
first visit
of ancient American impact of Klee's
(both 1936,
She was
and
years
made
figs.
Mexico also
reflect
her deepening understanding
beginning to
understand the
fully
work and teaching now that she was able
upon her Bauhaus hangings she
art.
to
woven work im-
that occurred in Alberss
Fhe dramatic changes
in the
her memories of them.
filter
United
States,
element of Klee's
first
back
two wall
Ancient Writing and Monte Alban
companion
37 and 38), which are possibly
decisively different
to look
The
pieces,
were
from her Bauhaus work. Both pieces incorporate an
art that she assimilated in
own work
her
only after her
Bauhaus period: the exploration of the personal and associational aspects of subject matter, particularly in the context of semantics.
With Monte Alban Albers used
for the first time a technique
throughout her subsequent weaving
that she practiced
career: the supple-
mentary, or floating, weft, in which an extra weft thread "floated,"
is
above the woven surface. Albers would have seen
threaded, or this
common
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;
Andean technique which is still widely used in modern Latin America in Germany and in publications; indeed, she owned numerous examples of it.' In Mo>ite AlbcDi Albers used this technique to "draw" lines on the surface of the woven structure to refer to the ascending and descending and the underground chambers of the ancient
steps, the Bat plazas,
after
which the work
former
civilization
named. "We were aware
is
upon
of layer
under the ground," she wrote of her
The supplementary-weft technique
on the
to be vitally important, her focus
visit to
overall textile
inscription
was
new under-
standing of both Andean art and Klee's vision. She later said,
had
.
.
.
influence
on
my work
and
my
continued
a significant
departure from her Bauhaus work. This change reveals her
[Klee] probably
"I find that
thinking by just
looking at what he did with a line or a dot or a brush stroke, and a
way
to find
my way
in
my own
of
the site."
allowed her to devote attention to the
While the structure of the
surface of the weaving.
site
layer
my own
material and
In Ancient Writing s\\t similarly used a
title
tried in
I
craft discipline."'''
and abstract
visual
forms to imply content. She evoked the idea of visual language by grouping together differently textured and patterned squares like words or glyphs,
locking this "text" into an underlying grid.
margins, appears to Klee, Albers
jump forward
sometimes used pictographic,
signs simultaneously in her visual language
work
in
and mark-making,
The
to be "read
"
"text," like
which
words on
calligraphic,
is
set
within
a page."
Like
and ideographic
order to address concerns related to
a practice that
occupied Albers through-
out her career in the United States and that she continually framed within the context of to have
um
Andean
She was amazed that Andean culture seems
textiles.
had no written language, and she concluded that the
itself
"was their language
.
.
.
their
way of speaking about
textile
medi-
the world."''
Monte Alban and Ancioit U'';7//;/i^ signaled the beginning of Alberss long exploration of what she called her "pictorial weaving." his term is somewhat contradictory in that she never wove recognizable pictures 1
in the traditional
European manner; "abstract
pictorial
weaving"
(as
——
opposed
more accurate term. one method by which
would be
to "figurative pictorial weaving")
Albers thought of the floating-weft technique as
unique
to create a
direction of
art."'"
image
pictorial
the raison d'etre of
With
my
Quipu,
Inca,
from the
coastal valley
Natural History,
New York
Museum
threads
upon
which
unique objects of her weavings, Albers could
Black-White-Gold I
of
threads be articulate again," she wrote,
let
change her work Irom prototype 25-
"the
pictorial weavings.""**
the augmentation of the floating-weft thread,
essentially created
of Chancay, Peru. American
worked toward
She believed that the creation of art revolved around
the process of articulation: "To "is
in thread as she
a
42), she
{i<)')0, fig.
added
calligraphic floating-weft
woven
the central portion of the
effectively
weaving
to art. For her pictorial
field.
She
introduced
also
325190.
the supplementary knotted weft, a technique derived from a Peruvian source,
most
likely the elaborate
Andean recording
device called a
quipu, a knotted thread instrument that held codified data (see
fig. 25)."'
Discussing the Andeans' use of quipus, Albers stated,
[Andean weavers] developed a very
tricky mathematics.
.
instruments were, again, not written. They didn't have as I told you.
But what
did [have] was threads
they
quipus, this instrument.
And the
with different knots
Here was a
clear
how
to
and different do
The amount
and applied
and so
heights
called
had
to
ivas indicated
on. I
knew
once,
as text,
which Albers
own work.
to her
woven work of the
Albers's pictorial
dominated by her
ivriting, .
it.'"
example of thread functioning
innovatively translated
.
These
.
dijferent things that they
deliver were designated on each thread.
at one time,
.
.
1950s to the early 1960s was
and use of visual sign languages. She
interest in
believed that textiles, particularly
Andean
textiles,
served as "transmitters
of meaning." She wrote.
Along with cave paintings, threads were among the
earliest transmitters
of meaning, hi Peru, ivhere no written language in the generally
understood sense had developed even by the time of the conquest in the sixteenth century, this
but because of it
come
to
Albers
On
—
we find
—one of
to
my mind not
in spite
the highest textile cultures
of
we have
know."
wove Two
44) in 1952 with these thoughts in mind.
(fig.
top ol an underlying plain-weave checkerboard ground, Albers wove
heavy dark
fibers using a
supplementary technique. Thus the dark shapes
appear to overlap one another upon the ground, creating a dynamic and scriptlike figure-ground relationship. Tivo
was originally woven "sideways,"
with the short end in the vertical direction; afterwards Albers turned it
in
and signed
horizontally,
it
on the lower
one direction and then turning
it
right.
The
to another after
practice of
working
completion was
Andean weavers of the Middle Horizon
frequently employed by expert
(500-900 ad) and Late Horizon (1438-1534 AD)periods." Klee, too,
fre-
quently turned or inverted his work after completion."
Two
is
a particularly significant
De of De
clear indebtedness to
formal vocabulary
Stijl.
Stijl
—which
she
for over three decades,
viewing
it
American
parallels
between
their use
She saw
art.
De
Stijl
subject matter later
would
32
striking piece because of
its
in light
first
learned at the Bauhaus
of her contact with ancient
De
Stijl
and Andean
textiles in
of universal abstract languages and patterns.'^ Albers was aware
that early
while
and
Albers maintained her involvement with the
—
images were essentially distillations of recognizable
abstractions that resulted in pictographic representations
images moved toward the ideographic and the nonobjective. She
also have noticed that Pict
Mondrian's and Theo van Doesburgs
linear block
compositions echo the inherent construction of weaving and
create figure-ground relationships like that of text
The
between the principles of
parallels
apparent in works
textiles are particularly
ambiguous and
ships are
De
a page.'
and Andean
Stijl
which figure-ground
in
abstract pictorial signs
owned numerous Andean
ones.'" Albers
on
relation-
merge with ideographic
textiles that
contain this visual
ambiguity, such as a C]hancay fragment constructed with two different techniques: the top portion
portion
is
interlocked tapestry
and value patterning,
color
supplementar\-weft brocade, while the lower
is
are established
bold figure-ground relationships that
as well as
lower portion
reversals, the
for Two, while the
upper portion served
manv of these burlap
late is
of
stepped lines
its
clearly a formal source
as a technical source.
Modern
works on burlap,
at the
1949 KJee Klee painted
Art.'" Interestingly,
a loosely
woven, natural-fiber
cloth.
painted, the warp-and-weft structure and texture of the
emphasized,
is
In
which Albers would have seen
Museum
retrospective at the
cloth
is
also reveals an indebtedness to Klee's late script pictures with
their grafifitilike signs,
When
dynamic
parts involve
through contrast and repetition.
and figure-ground
Two
Roth
26).
(fig.
on the Rocks [Flora
as in KJee's Tlora
am
FeLeru 1940, 26. I'rc-C'olumhi.m textile Ir.igiiK-iu,
fig.
work
27), resulting in a
that appears to be both painting
Klee frequently explored the merging of
artistic
and
textile.
Chancay. 1100-1400 AU. Cotton,
techniques along with the
merging of signs, and Albers clearly emulated this fluid approach.
Soon
companion
after Albers
made Two
piece, Pictographic (1953,
sideways." Blocks of color arranged
on
she fig.
a checkerboard
ground
to refer to the is
not
as
image of a
pronounced
of value and
While the
in Pictographic as
contrast between light
it is
in
cm
(6
y*
X
5
inches),
I're-("olumbian Textiles ot the Joset and .•\nni
Albers Foundation, Bethany.
are "inscribed"
this
work and dark
Two, the varying degrees
between the blocks and the Xs produce subtle
intensit)'
figure-
that evoke a passage of text or layers of text.
ground relationships
The most
text.
12.7
rhe Anni Albers Collection ot
wove what may have been a 28), also a long rectangle woven
with forty-one Xs. As in Two, Albers used line and shape in
X
16.5
striking examples of Albers's pictorial weavings
from
main thematic groups:
the 1950s and 1960s can be divided into two
those using imagery derived from ancient American motifs or landscapes,
South of the Border (1958) and Tikal (1958); and those evoking linguistic characters and systems through the rectilinear arrangement of
such
as
ideographic signs.
Many
textual references, as in
of the
Memo
titles
(1958),
of these
Open
latter
works have ,
Haikti (1961), and Code (1962). In light of Albers's focus
and
signs
it is
American
interesting to note that .some of the
art that
stamps used
direct
Letter {i%%) Jotting (1959),
first
on
inscriptions
pieces of ancient
Albers purchased in Mexico were ceramic and stone
to print
and block designs
are similar to the type
29-32)."'
(figs.
once used to compose
These stamps
text in printing in that
both
require the creation of a figure-ground relationship in order for the
image or
text to
1^
be seen and therefore read.
The relationship of image/text to ground was one that Albers delighted in and explored with increasing intensity during the 1950s. pictorial
weavings of
this
rectilinearit)'
within patterns and
in pattern
is
90.7
sequences. In
Memo,
to read this
"memo"
bars.
strict
for
Although one's
for information, Albers's
intention was not simply to simulate a page of text; rather, she sought to investigate the nature of ideographic signs visual information
Klee, /•/on;
am
(»i
inc kocKi
FeLen), 1940.
X
70.5
cm
(35 'kfiX
Kunstmuseum Bern
a repertoire of sign characters that are similar to
an alphabet, and these are arranged along horizontal automatic respon.se
I'aiil
Oil and tempera on burlap,
Her
period reveal a deliberate effort to create a high
degree of contrast between figure and ground, and to maintain a
example, she employed
.
(Flora
and the expression of codified
through thread.
33
G
27
X
1622.
inches)
Cotton,
28. Pictographic, 1953.
45.7
X
101.6
cm
(18
X 40
inches).
The
Detroit Institute of Arts, Founders Society purchase, Stanley and
Madalyn Rosen
Fund, Dr. and Mrs. George Kamperman Fund, Octavia W. Bates Fund,
Emma S.
Fechimer and William C. Yawkev Fund.
29.
Pre-Columbian stamp, Guerrero,
1250-1521 AD. Ceramic, 7
wide. Peabody History,
New
Museum
^a>.
251685.
Peabody
inches) wide.
History,
New
Museum
8
cm
(3 VÂŤ
of Natural
^iuÂť
Haven, Connecticut, Gift of
^MiMiilMi
Anni Albers 257022.
Josef and
Pre-Columbian
roller
stamp, possibly
Valley of Mexico, 1200-100 BC. Perforated
sandstone, 8
Museum
New
cm
(3 /s
inches) long.
Peabody
of Natural History,
Haven, Connecticut, Gift of Josef
and Anni Albers 257679.
32.
Pre-Columbian
Valley of Mexico, 9
cm
(3 Vi
roller
stamp, Tlatilco,
1200-900
inches) long.
of Natural History,
BC. Ceramic,
Peabody
New
^K
^^
Pre-Columbian stamp, Highland
Mexico, 1250-1521 AD. Ceramic,
31.
m m^h^^^yi. ^m ^ ^^^P^5 s^^^^^3^1 ^3m M9 ^ ^^ Jt^'m^^^
(^V, inches)
Haven, Connecticut, Gift of
Josef and Anni Albers
30.
cm
of Natural
Museum
Haven,
Connecticut, Gift of Josef and Anni Albers 257542.
34
m
'^9
M JaMM QSS
tics, in
work:
a
(1955, fig- 4~) also relates signihcantl)- to
IHtiy
of Squares
way
that has generally
element of
its
been overlooked
white squares and
play. Thirry-six
brown squares appear
in
horizontal bands. As the viewer scans for a code, one system
on
medium brown band
a
formula does not emerge. In
â&#x20AC;&#x201D; but an
than the earlier work, and
its title
is
revealed
is
brown band
or three
overall, sequential
way, PLiy oj Squares
this
Black-White-Gray (1927), but Play of Squares in texture
dark
thirr)'-rhree
apparcntk random order along rwenty-three
every row has either three dark squares on a light light .squares
seman-
of Albers's
in discussions
similar to Alber.s's
is
smaller and nubbier
suggests that
is
it
more
poetic
and improvisational. Ibis nonsensical and apparentl\- random arrange-
ment of squares within of words and
Here
.sounds).
format evokes an ambiguous arrangement
a linear
letters (a play
of words) or of musical notes
connection ro Klee
Albers's
is
(a
play of
again apparent: Klee, a
master of word play, shifting signs, and improvisation, perfected the art of visual
pimning by
skillfully creating figures, shapes,
metamorphose from one thing
to
and
texts that
could
another depending on the viewers
reading of them. Albers was clearly aware that the process could easily overwhelm
strict
creativity, so
limitations of the weaving
she continually advanced
the role of improvisation anti frequentl}' brought up the subject of play
when
discussing the creative process. In her 1941 article
Today," for example, she suggested that designing
"Handweaving loom should
at the
first
involve play:
An to
elementary approach will be a playfiil beginning, unresponsive
any demand of usefdness, an enjoyment of colors, forms, surface
contrasts
and
harmonies, a tactile sensuousness. This
first
and
always most important pleasure in the physical qualities of materials needs but the simplest techjiique
and must
be sustai)U'd tluvugh
the most complicated one. For just this satisfaction
material qualities
Through artist
is
working with
this playful
coming f'om
part of the satisfaction we get from art/" materials, Albers believed that the
could begin to create meaningful form.
Two main efforts dominated Albers's work of the 1960s: large woven murals for public spaces primarily ark curtains for synagogues and her book On Weaving, which is still a standard text in weaving courses
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;
today.
The
.synagogue commissions required Albers to approach text-
another way, and
related issues in yet
this resulted in
powerful ark curtains
and celebrate the Hebrew Scriptures.
that both protect
Albers achieved the union of art and utility that
is
evident in
these curtains through her admiration and imderstandin" of the Klee,
who
.sought to interpret the physical
in codified yet playful
study of Andean
work of
and metaphysical worlds
ways. Ihis union can equally be attributed to her
textiles. In
On Weaving s\\e
described the
work
of the
Andean weavers with admiration:
Of infinite phantasy
withi)i the
world of threads, conveying strength
or playfidness, mystery or the reality of their surroundings, endlessly
varied in presentation
and construction,
a code of basic concepts, these that
is
From
textiles set
even though
bound to
a standard ofachievement
unsurpassed." these
two sources, Albers deri\ed the inspiration
for her
exploration of semantics within the field of weaving. As a teacher, collector, student,
of artists
and
artist,
and designers
and Albers
herself,
an
Albers has inspired subsequent generations
to strive to create, like Klee, the
art that
is
lastint:
Andean weavers,
and meaniniiful.
35
Pre-Columbian
textile
fragments from Anni Albers's personal collection
33.
Late Intermediate period
(1100-1400 ad). Cotton and wool, 36.2
X
The
18. 1
cm
(14X X 7/s inches).
Josef and Anni Albers
Foundation, Bethany PC018.
34.
Nasca period (100 BC-700 AD).
Wool, 36.2 X 7.9 (14
X
)<
The
cm
3/8 inches).
Josef and
Anni Albers
Foundation, Bethany PC032.
i.'A
35.
Middle Horizon period
(500-900 ad). Cotton and wool, 27.6 X 30.2 (10 Ts
The
X
II 7s
cm
inches).
Josef and
Anni Albers
Foundation, Bethany PC020.
36
*"^
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;
rlfliTnTtifi
I
I
Notes
1.
Mary
Jane Jacob, in tur
A Modern Weaver
Albcrs:
language, no graph paper, and no peniiK
"Anni
(.ssay
could manage such inventions, wc should
as Artist," in
—
hope
The Woven and (iraphic Art of Anni Albers
be able
(Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian
these structures."
1985),
was the
first
Press,
to discuss the textual
also briefly
between
mentioned
connection
a
contact with Peruvian weaving
For
(p. 72).
Droste, Giinia
am
Significance of
Woven and Work," Ph.D. diss., Emory
Pedagogical
Frankfurt
Albers
UMI und
Anden,
Amerika. Kiinstlerpaare
—
in
'
Europa und
Main, 1986; Ingrid Radewaldt,
Hamburg,
1986;
and
In her 1924 article "Bauhauswebcrei,"
Albers (who was then
known
as
weavers could learn from ancient weavers,
who wove
Awareness and
"according to the inherent prop-
of handicraft and material" rather
Application," Surface Design Journal lo,
erties
no. 2 (winter 1996), pp. lO-ii, 35-37.
than following prepared plans.
Anni
On
Albers,
Weaving (M\A<i\cuwjn.
Conn.: Wesleyan University
4.
Sevim
reprinted in Bauhaus
with Anni
Fesci, interview
New
transcript in
Zeitschrift "Junge
Menschen" (Munich: Kraus Reprint, 1980).
Haven, Conn., July
Archives of American Art,
New
5,
p.
This was discussed in two important
ID.
1968,
pre- World
W.
York;
War
and A.
Rciss
Ancon
The Josef and Anni Albers
Foundation archives, 5.
p. 188;
Weimar: Sonderheft der
Ibid., p. 6.
AJbers,
"Bauhauswebcrei," Junge Menschen 8 (Nov. 1924),
Press, 1965),
pp. 69-70. 3.
I
German
(Berlin, 1880-87), translated into
(London and
Richard Polsky, interview with Anni
Max
and
1985,
11,
Berlin:
Gewcbe mit Szenenhaften
Resesarch Office, Columbia Universit)-,
in
The
Josef and Anni
6.
Recent
of thread
document
in
terms of
ancient American textiles include Jane
"The Anthropolog)' of Cloth,
Schneider,
Annual Review of Anthropology
16 (1987),
Weave for the Sun: Andean
Textiles in the
(Boston:
Museum
and Walter Mignolo,
of
Boone
Fine Arts, 1992); Elizabeth Hill
eds.. Writing
Press, 1994);
Without
University
in
On
Weaving
fabrics that
(p. 50):
Andean
textiles
"Double weaves
are
have two separate layers which
can be locked
at
both
within the fabric,
at
sides, at
one
side, or,
any number of places
where the design asks
for
an exchange of
top and bottom layers, usually of difVerent colors.
There are
also triple
period, these factors
were discussed
Ernest
in
Fuhrmann, Reich
der Inka (Hagcn and Darmstadt: Folkwang
Museum,
1922); ^'ilhelm Hausenstein,
BiUnerei exotischer Volker (Munich: Piper Verlag, 1922); Herbert Kiihn,
Die Kunst
1923);
and Eckart von Sydow, Die Kunst der
Naturvolker t4nd der Vorzeit (Berlin: Propylaen-Kunstgeschichte, 1923). Albers
likely familiar
with
See Troy, "Anni Albers:
all
of these books.
The
Significance of
Ancient American Art for Her
Albers described multiweave construc-
tions within the context of
New
During the
Weimar Bauhaus
most
Art, trans. Esther Allen (Austin:
University of Texas Press, 1996). 7.
(Leipzig
and other members of the Bauhaus were
and Cesar Paternosto,
The Stone and the Thread: Andean Roots
ofAbstract
i
Berlin: leubner Verlag, 1911;
der Primitiven (Munich: Delphin-Verlag,
Words: Alternative Literacies in Mesoamerica
and the Andes (Durham: Duke
Beitnige zur Viilkerkunde, vol.
Barbaren und Klassiker: ein Buch von der
pp. 409-48; Rebecca Stone-Miller, To
Museum of Fine Arts
Darstellungen,"
York: Johnson Reprint, 1968).
texts that discuss the subject
as a social
Co., 1906);
Ehrenreich, ed., Baessler-Archiv:
P.
and
Albers Foundation archives, pp. 49-51.
&
Asher
Schmidt, "Uber Altperuanischc
"American Craftspeople Project," Oral
York; transcript in
publications:
Das Totenfeld von
Stiibel,
English as The Necropolis at Ancon in Peru
5.
Albers, Orange, Conn., Jan.
New
Annelise
Fleischmann) suggested that modern
Kunstmuseum Bern; Cologne: Dumont, 1998); and "Andean
2.
diss..
Sigrid
Wortmann Weltge, Bauhaus Textiles (London: Thames and Hudson, 1993). 9.
Kiinsllerfreunde
(exh. cat.; Bern:
Textiles at the Bauhaus:
Master's thesis, University of
am
University of
Josef Helfenstein and Henriette Mentha, eds., Josef und Anni Albers,
Bauhaus-Archiv,
"Bauhaustextilien 1919-1933," Ph.D.
Publications, 1997); "Anni
die Icxtilkunst der
.SVoZz/ (Berlin:
Bauhaus, Anni Albers, Zwischen Kunst
und Leben,"
(Ann Arbor,
at
Hopkins
Maria Jocks, "Eine Weberin
Ancient American Art for Her
Mich.:
weaving
Bauhaus include Anja
University, Baltimore, 1994; M.igdalena
1987); Petra
University, Atlanta, 1997
to repeat at lease
Baumhoff, "Gender Art and Handicraft
following essays by Virginia Gardner
The
—
texts that discuss the at the
further discussion of these topics, see the
Troy: "Anni Albers:
I
the Bauhaus," Ph.D. diss., Johns
open weaves and her
Albers's
Recent
8.
workshop
references in Albers's pictorial weavings,
and she
easily
weaves and
Woven and
Pedagogical Work," pp. 37-44 and 65-74. II.
Albers joined the Bauhaus in 1922,
taking the preliminary course with
Muche Itten's
at that
Georg
time and then Johannes
course in 1922-23. In 1923, her third
semester, she joined the weaving workshop.
During her fourth semester,
in
1923-24,
she assisted in the dye laboratory, and in her
fifth
semester, in 1924, she most likely
quadruple weaves. ... In ancient Peru,
completed her
double weaves
complicated designs were
took Vasily Kandinsky's "thcor\' of form"
weaves have been found,
course during the 1925-26 semester.
made, and .IS
in
triple
well as a small quadruple piece. If a
highly intelligent people with no written
September
to
first
wall hanging. She
December
1929, she
From
was
act-
ing director of the weaving workshop. After
37
graduating
1930 Albers worked indepen-
in
dently and again served briefly (during the
of 1931)
fall
as director
of the weaving
Albers had purchased Klee's Two Forces
{Zwei Kraft, 1922)
The
in 1924.
Josef and
Anni Albers Foundation generously provid-
me
ed
with
information.
this
Neil Welliver, "A Conversation with
13.
Anni
Albers,
1967, p.
"
and Graphic Art of
it
in Klee, Notebooks,
The
p. 241.
November
lesson
1923,
Composition" was included
is
not
and
it
in the
same
(The dates of lessons are not always
clear in the
two published volumes of
1925),
Albers
held
at
was
Toni Ullstein Fleischmann,
member of this prominent
a
handbook,
a
copy of
which included
20.
A summary
of the Alberses'
travels fol-
Havana;
Mexico;
lows: 1934, Florida, 1936,
Mexico; 1937, Mexico; 1938, Florida;
1939,
Mexico; 1940, Mexico;
New
his earlier
in
classroom
published
Mexico; 1967, Mexico. This
from documents held
piled
Mountain College
Papers,
Anni Albers Foundation 21.
York:
in
Anni
Pre-Columbian
and
art
began
Germany,
in
museums
there. Nicholas
The
Josef
Fox Weber,
The
Albers Foundation
in Berlin already
Museum
the largest col-
it
Art,
American
which
Museum,
Major donations of Andean
art to
(see Karl
in
1899 and the Reiss and
is
acquired 2,400 items in 1882
Hudson
from Cuzco
in 1888
ancient American pieces to the 1907.
collec-
and the Bolivar
Wilhelm Grctzer
col-
sold 27,254
museum
in
Immina von Schuler-Schomig, "The Andean Collections at the Museum
Central fiir
Volkerkunde, Berlin, Their Origin
and Present C^rganization,"
Hocquenghcm, Collections in
ed.,
Anne-Marie
Pre-Columbian
1987), pp. 163-65. See
Corinna Raddatz, "Christian Thcodor
Wilhelm Gretzer and
his
Pre-(^olumbian
Collection in the Niedersiichsisches
Landesmuseum of Hannover,"
38
in the
and Anni
Mexican Miniatures: The Josef and Anni
The Anni
Pre-Columbian
Andean
York: Praeger, 1970],
Textiles (comprised of 113
textiles),
which
is
now
the Josef
at
Harriett Englehardt
Memorial Collection
of Textiles (comprised of ninety-two textiles
purchased by Anni Albers for Black
Mountain
College),
which
is
now housed
University Art Gallery. Bl.ick
Mountain College
Papers, vol.
2,
box
8;
and Troy, "Anni Albers: The Significance of Ancient American Art for Her
Woven
and Pedagogical Work," pp. 163-69. 22.
same
[New
Albers Collection of
and Anni Albers Foundation; and The
at Yale
European Museums (Budapest:
Akademiai Kiado, also
in
and
Anni Albers Foundation
of Pre-Columbian Art [New York:
p. 4);
lection in 1904.
Peabody
at the
Hills Press, 1988], p. 9,
and subsequently the tion
Josef and
Taube, The Josef and Anni Albers
Collection
Albers Collection
Centeno
collections
The
now housed
from Dr. Jose Mariano Macedo of Lima, large
main
art:
Albers and Michael Coe, Pre-Columbian
Stubel donation of 2,000 items in 1879.
The museum
in 1939 after
Yale University Art Gallery,
Josef and
at the
of 11,690 items
Toni and
Anni Albers Collection of Pre-Columbian
at the
included the Baessler donation
father,
met Josef and Anni
Alberses had three
Europe
museum
the
Volkerkunde
fur
owned more than 7,500 making
textiles,
lection of these textiles in
time.
Toni
Nazi Germany.
of ancient
archives.
1907, the
mother and
Veracruz in 1937 and again
in
The Josef and Anni
Andean
1939, see
and Anni Albers Foundation
Siegfried Fleischmann,
fleeing
By
and
in 1937
English transcript, translated by
video interview with Anni Albers, 1984,
18.
Mexico
archives. Anni's
that she frequently visited the ethno-
graphic
archives.
Fleischmann's grandson Theodore Benfey, in
21.
Albers remarked in 1984 that her interest
17.
North Carolina
Ullstein Fleischmann's 1937-39 travel diaries;
Welliver, "A Conversation with
16.
was com-
list
in the Black
For information regarding the Alberses'
trips to
Praeger, 1953).
Albers," p.
1953, Chile,
and The Josef and
State Archives, Raleigh,
in English as Pedagogical Sketchbook, ed.
Moholy-Nagy (New
Mexico;
1941,
Mexico; 1949,
Walter Gropius and Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, trans. Sibyl
1935,
Peru; 1956, Mexico, Peru, Chile; 1962,
Piidagogisches
The handbook was
publishing
family.
Mexico; 1952, Mexico, Havana;
Anni Albers owned
Skizzenbuch (published by the Bauhaus
exercises.
(Much of Albers's The Josef and Anni Foundation.) Schmidt's Kunst und
now
is
1946-47, Mexico,
Klee's notebooks.)
Klee's classroom
and she owned the 1934 French
Kultur von Peru was published by Ullstein;
assumed that "Constructive Approaches
Josef and
25,
images of other Andean
as well as
Albers's mother,
on structure
follows his lessons
dated Saturday, 10
series.
Lindenfeld,
4, 1996;
included numerous images from Lehmann's
library
Heinz Norden (New York:
Wittenborn, 1973),
to
Page and Lore
Kadden Lindenfeld and former colleague Tony Landreau. (Letters to the author
edition of d'Harcourt.
Two: The Nature of Nature, ed. Jiirg
SpiUer, trans.
is
which he
"Constructive Approaches to
dated, but
Don
former students
textiles,
Composition," appear Vol.
she taught
Black Mountain College, according to
at
book,
Albers, p. 19.
titled
when
1996.) Albers's personal slide collection
Klee's notes for this lesson,
15.
und
Schmidt's extensive Kunst
Kultur von Peru (1929),
Nov. 20, 1996; and Landreau, Sept.
15.
Date," in The Woven
Anni
Max
from Page, Sept.
Craft Horizons, July-Aug.
Nicholas Fox Weber, "Anni Albers to
14.
Albers used Lehmann's book, as well
19.
as
workshop. Droste, Guiita StolzL pp. 143-55. 12.
publication (pp. 169â&#x20AC;&#x201D;75).
is
A
cotton Chancay in Albers's collection
particularly striking because
it
is
one of
the few fully finished pieces that she owned. It
has four finished edges, or selvages, and
although
due
become somewhat
h,is
it
to wear,
approximately the
is
distorted
size of a
standard sheet of paper (seven by eleven
On
inches).
would have appreciaicd work and
the completeness ol this
the repetition ot the
Albers and Coe, Pre-Columbian
23.
Designing. In
how Andean
the
"Artist
with Albers, juiv
like borders." Jacob,
Weaver
per
as Artist," p. 93. 11,
Welliver, "A Conversation with .â&#x20AC;˘Xnni
Albers," p. 22. Albers frequently referred to
work
as a
way
as a
method ol working,
approach
for her to
possibly
the level of
rise to
art
"\Xbrk with Materials" (1937),
and
to
Weave for
proposed that the weavers
in Albers,
On
.1
tcxiile scholar
her solution to this problem was
se,
advanced It is
for the time.
likely that Albers
De
the journal
was familiar with
trom her Bauhaus
StiJl
and
years. In addition, she
owned
Josef
of Neo- Plastic Art, edited by Theo van Doesburg and published by the Principles
Bauhaus
Albers,
art.
her article
have produced a large web. C'onsidering
35.
her pictorial
in
Colonial
in Inca
that Albers was not
"Anni Albers:
1985, p. 43. 27.
Susan Niles.
itself.
and Empire
used a hinged loom, which would also
described the side
Polsky, interview with Albers, Jan.
26.
loom
yielded
it
ot greater dimensions than
the Sun, p. 56,
portions ot these two weavings as "margin-
A Modern
when unfolded,
web
Textiles," in Stone-Miller, To
5,
3.
Mary Jane Jacob
25.
must have been woven .iccordion-
style so that,
a single
2.
Fesci, interview
weavers were able to weave
technique on frame looms; each plane
Mexican Miniatures: The Josef and Anni
1968, p.
in
Albers investigated
concluding that the weavers must have
Albers Collection, p. 24.
it,
widths ot cloth on hand looms,
ot warps
grid formation.
fish in
On
was subsequently published
it
utilized a triple- or quadruple-layer
the supplementar)'-weft
technique. Albers
and
large
rwcnty-five cuttlefish were
it,
woven using
correspondence with Bird,
after a lengthy
Albers
in 1925.
is
said to have liked
van Doesburg's work, and ma)' have met
DÂŤ;^;///f (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan
him
Universit)' Press, 1971, 1987), p. 52.
Conversation with Nicholas Fox Weber,
Anni
Albers, introduction, in
28.
Pictorial Weavings (exh. cat.;
MIT
Mass.:
Press, 1959), p.
from Chai'in
Hudson,
Thames and
Inca (London:
to
11,
On
Albers,
Weaving,
p. 68.
For this technique, the cloth was
32.
woven with
a short vertical
warp and long,
pattern-carrying weft threads in the hori-
Thus
zontal direction.
Andean weaver
the
was oriented "sideways"
to the final design,
a feat that required great mental dexterity. See Stone-Miller, To
and
visual
Weave for
Klee's Carpet
of Memory
(
1966.
See Rebecca Stone-Miller, "Camclids
Huari and Tiwanaku
in
Textiles," in
Richard Townscnd,
Ancient Americas (exh.
of Chicago, 1992),
(Cambridge, Mass.: Ml'F 37.
A
Teppich der
Klee, edited
by Margaret
and expanded access to
in 1945.
Susanna Partsch, Paul Klee
(Cologne: Benedikt Ttschen, 1993), In the
the
same year
major
first
that Albers
p. 28.
wove Two
De StijI exhibition was Museum of Modern Art
presented at the in
New York.
It
is
likely that Albers
the exhibition, becau.se
was
New
at
saw
the time she
was revised
Miller,
Albers had easy
numerous exhibitions
of Klee's
and museums
in galleries
in
New
York. For example, sixty works by Klee
from January
and then turned
Press, 1990).
Museum of Modern Art in The accompanying catalogue, Paul
1941.
were exhibited
34.
p. 336, for
held at the
Erinnerung, 1914), for example, was originally
horizontally.
The
memorial exhibition was
large Klee
made
in a vertical direction
ed..
Chicago: Art
cat.;
a discussion of Andean abstraction. For a
work
the Sun, p. 38. 33.
18,
death in 1932.
his
summary of De Stijl, see Yve-Alain Bois, "The De Stijl Idea," in Painting iis Model
1985, pp. 45-46. 31.
36.
Institute
1995), p. 212.
Polsky, interview with Albers, Jan.
30.
Nov.
and Chaos
3.
An of the Andes
Rebecca Stone-Miller,
29.
Albers:
Cambridge,
Ciermany before
in
at the
to
Buchholz Gallery
February
one works were exhibited Art Circle trom April to 38.
A
pictograph
is
1951, at
May
a sign
and
the
thirt)'-
New
1952.
with figurative
references, as Albers used in
Monte Alban.
In titling Pictographic, however, she
used the term the
more
in a
work does not
general way, as
refer to
an external
York regularly to conduct
figurative subject but rather to the notion
research with the
Andean
and the image ot mark-making.
Junius B. Bird
the
visiting
at
textile scholar
American
Museum
of Natural History. Correspondence
39.
Flcischmann describes
between Junius B. Bird and Anni Albers,
40.
February and March 1952, Junius B. Bird
Textile
Papers,
American
Histor)-,
New
Albers wrote
on the
Museum
of Natural
York. at least
Albers,
purchase
"Handweaving Today
Work
The Weaver 41.
one scholarly
this
in her travel diaries, p. 24.
Albers,
at
Black Mountain College,"
G, no.
On
i
(Jan. -Feb. 1941), p.
Weaving,
p.
3.
69.
article
subject of Andean weaving tech-
niques, "A Structural Process in Weaving,"
written in 1952 for a course she attended at Yale Universir)-, which was taught by
George Kubler. Albers
revi.sed
the essay
39
llUilil!|||UiirfiiÂŤKBraWB|a illlil
llllllifllllillfl
36. UntitUcL 1934.
Rayon, linen, cotton, wool, and 53.3
X
116.8
cm
(21
X 46
inches).
Collection of Mrs. John Wilkie,
New York
jute,
37-
Ancient Writing, 1936.
Rayon, 149.8
X
linen, cotton,
and
jute,
cm (59 X 43 % inches). Museum of American Art,
III
National
Smithsonian Institution,
Washington, D.C., Gift of John
Young
1984.150.
41
Monte Alban, 19^6. Silk, linen, and wool, 146 X 112 cm (57 X X 44 inches). The Busch-Reisinger Museum, Harvard University Art Museums, 38.
Cambridge, Massachusetts, Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Richard G. Leahy
BR
42
81.5.
39- L'^
I^'iiz /,
1947.
Cotton, hemp, and metallic gimp,
47 X
82.5
cm
(18
X X 32X
The Josef and Anni
inches).
Aibers Foundation,
Bethany.
43
" "" „„__ iiaxjxtaitirtttixiittm «
—
'
timmtaixuitxi^avm
)
•'txtxttTxS.ixtatafzi',
„ -__
»"HISISt;rtr7iTVTTiiijjTtiriuUHtioM«MlMlli:XMTira:i[UiW<«IMM»(lui»iTr»iwi(rtiti^^
uxit tijiitrttt I ^ ^
Ww .:;tv i;iM-J
..r;i;t
40. Untitled, 1948. Linen
and cotton,
cm (16 Xx 19 X inches). The Museum of Modern Art, New York, Edgar Kautmann, Jr. Fund 41.9
X
49.5
200.50.
44
^mii,t:
amauisi'aviitaamr,ยงt KiBatiBtiian t^^nyii JKi'-na* it i li'ii i i if
-<< โ ขjaa;
41. Cityscape, 1949. Bast
44.5
X
67.3
cm
{ij'A
and cotton,
X 26X
inches).
Collection of Ruth Agoos Villalovos.
45
—
i|iiiiumiMati»»»HHinn;jmiK"«"»""<»B'"*fl"'l*"""^'^'"'-?"'^'»»™«<!<f6; liiiMihtiiwnltlllHHHliilniiiinmaHiMiiiiittttlllinHinnmittiiirininiKi^fcr.
KimuiimtiiiiiitiriMintMiaTTm rtS^SiiB .ir.^T imr[( n tflgaKHmunHH^Kimirrnir TrtTiiimtrir ^'yrr
T«ft
!
rn
^'.^
1
1
r
1 1
r^
PWCf svii«H*^»>.*.«i.>>»?5r?!^3ni!::«
!n'Bg^irnmiwiffTjmtniiiiiiffimiitiiiiwniinf)iipTn^ .
^
htitJiiteaMymfltimHm^HMU^^
.
—
:,„^u^.,,^
T'
i!tiiwi( )Ui iUi iBiia«>^w^ii(ilitii)W'feu^3iff)(taHtt« ----^fa*r'^tur»iit>Wi|fotttljitllMl»tiiilnmiTitT M»| li l »|BkutlUUttm^^ i
-tg<^"g^Hntminni.<Bg t«ttmiT ft |
i
JT^^g'-
.
..
'niiiniTiniijiitifriiiiiiiiiinrTi
Mimmimmxtuiumunw
lUmmtluniTJ?
,
g
affirmnitiiHMiii,
.^
„,
i^S-SfSKJTtn^lWtfti'.
'S
'
;«Mtln)r
iiiii.iimdi'
!i;iiH»niiJM|MMrt!||(ajj|«||i|nii»MiiimMjt i
—
~
'mumminiinumavaiciitif
illllllllV-'u
jIimtltlltntlHXlTUlTOlKKKi iuiiiiiiJui.ixiiini«i"nmtTOnuiijmii<(i,
-ii.i.iii.v
iim i mswiiwftwtii
,
'
lifitTTTrinri-iTmninnitTm [iimiTjjiir
.ttttpiiitiiUiUiuaaixl&iMuiUfiiwU^^
ijMIH
H.li.'iimMjJnnHiiBDDniii '""•"--"'[
^"'^'";;''rTltllflTrnTiTinit»llllirnrinnli
' , i
iritrMlttn<h1ilMli|(igi"iiirf^
ininriiminff^!itWniuiHmttftiryR)tHin>iHi!!!;rTnirn:
iiiiitni-
-^.^
tn.niiTffTrnOTPinnfflTOiHiiHiiifimnfjHiwM'MiiitTirnmiiw
iiotaiatoi
fniimniHiiiiiii .iinmin»iiiTiiMimiij5iri)iilll5nt«KH331i;
i.W1iy[MiKa«ri]|iWwyn[iihii. *MTHiijiniiHJiiKHij
'
'mnmninimimi WSSWWMTtttftf tttliB!
miirirattil iiiiUJCEffli:
mttj^iHifrtmnniainramrrninrriT zf([U]niTnnin«Htnmiiiiir!H{i iHHill
mwmnrmwf XJttyrtfc
ata-fiin
IflttimfflijIUmw 1 J JB7ini:W»»WMMSm( rill ITOJUliTpiJiTntl 1
^
-^«j„.^«,,.,...
,.,.,p..^
tqik
reiriKJIJOrBB;!; .„».....™..,„
,.-..JiwiDaJ,TOMfiiHniminTO^w«iiH«iiTinn»^i'3iSxmmin\a
^
42. Black-White-Gold
Cotton, 63.5
X
jute,
48.3
L 1950. and metallic ribbon,
cm
(25
X
The Josef and Anni Bethany.
46
19 inches).
Albers Foundation,
,,,^
Vl
ini
;t' '•'1
»t
r.T
li
nV '
,
It
!
"
ll> »»'
'
'^i
91
i
'^V'
^
f?
« jp
i^i I rt>
;
-
•« •!>*
Vi
^
5
=
rr
f^
'J^f
^^^nm'! ^3
{V*
I"
'^
HI'
f'vT
^r'.;^V
^'
I
c
JKIt
;;,iS.
— IT
;^!'jr??3l-ir':/l-
1*.
hlh H,'..K.)I"4.
:v\^3;
43.
Development in Rose
I,
1952.
Cotton and hemp, 57
X
The
43.8
cm
X(. X 17X inches). Anni Albers Foundation,
(22
Josef and
Bethany.
47
â&#x20AC;˘Ul!!!; wi
44. Tivo, 1952. Linen, cotton,
46.4 X 104
cm
(18
K X 41
and rayon,
inches).
Anni Albers Foundation, Bethany, Gift of John Norton and Lucia N. Woodruff
The
48
Josef and
45. Untitle/^, 1950.
Cotton and
bast,
X 38.1 cm (25/^ X 15 inches). Cunningham Dance Foundation, 64.8
New
York.
49
Red Meander, 1954. Linen and X 50 cm (25 % X 19 % inches). Collection of Ruth Agoos Villalovos.
46.
cotton, 65
50
47- Pi^y
of Squares,
1955.
Wool and linen, 87.6 X 62.2 cm (34X X 24X inches). The Currier Galler)' of Art, Manchester,
New
Hampshire,
Currier Funds 1956.3.
SI
WiiT" TMnHffi lig i
J
»>iitw«(»itimiii» *«!•""'!'''*
^^
ii ii
ii^
P^|iiPMWPS:S;?5^
«?l 1««::j:-^':^^|eMj[-
tiMimmi-
Pf^=.=:=ii
MM
isi
mtu :mi^iB
'
ii«iiHiii»»»*.:
->v^,' V
U
It
yxJt
filll,:
iilMlAlMMWl 4 U
I/.I
'j)iii;i;s«:
a»i|MS;lli«t IIHpf Hi"
am ^^^^¥.-'iim: imii
>'*^.
MHIWlAiiUll
^
»a;"':: '«j,^ »»»>«.:;
..^.>r,
.
v^ItIW
,....„.„.„
m WW
-
\i».iv»/
**^*-z::i=siAw ««««
^i"**'
jir-r*'
f'«K'S' '«'''
I'll"!'
i3Si(
ZSilSS"*^""
^"~~;
.icjaE;
•M'WWKW """
"
"""
"*
'
'
.-
..,•«..<•,.•,,
..... ..V.V.W.M.V-
...V.VWfr..,;..
;
l;^?;m
-i;w;rtiV .v/.V.V.Vif,....
__ __^^,,
-
..
.•."/.../././..„ „
:
J.i^a:i;,^^S ,V.'.V.>.V,Vf..l^....,„„., ,./...',v;,',VA.
>.'iSV.v.v
miiiiiiiiiil
"
""
^ii^Uj^^Hi^^
48. I htckly Settled, 1957.
and
jute, 78.7
X 62 cm
Cotton
(31
X 24K
inches)
Yale University Art Gallery,
New
Haven, Connecticut,
Director's Purchase
52
Fund
1972.83.
....
:HS||;fHl^fjp@||HSi;!mmB?flP^
49. 58.4
The
Open Letter, 1958. Cotton, X 59.7 cm (23 X 23X inches). Josef
and Anni Albers Foundation,
Bethany.
53
50. In the Landscape, 1958.
Cotton and 29.5
X
98.5
jute,
cm
(11 /ÂŤ
X
38
"A<,
inches).
Collection of Dt. William and
Constance G. Kantar.
51. South of the Border, Cotton and wool,
1958.
10.6 X 38.7 cm (4 Mr, X 15 /f, inches). The Baltimore Museum of Art,
Decorative Arts and Contemporary Crafts
Fund
1959.91.
54
52. Pasture, 1958.
cm
Mercerized cotton,
X 15% inches). 39.4 The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 35.6
X
New
[i^Yu.
York, Purchase,
Moore,
Jr.,
Gift, 1969
Edward C. 69.1^5.
55
Red and Blue Layers, 1954. Cotton, X 36.8 cm (24 X 14X inches). The Josef and Anni Albers Foundation, 53-
61
Bethany, Formerly collection of
Mrs. Eleanor Grossman.
56
vv.\
..WW'.
••.'vV.'-.''.
..
.
/iMaavaafP':
W««*«"api'^>'
m'IH'
*•»' lU'Jiji'JiifVi
^
vy;
,tT'ii#ii'iiflil|JPRp-""^^f'
"'"'" '^"'ii/
//I
ir«^
O:
'f if
T
1^ f p » f r ffipFf
Frow rA^- East, 1963. Cotton and 65.4 X 42 cm (25 X 16M inches). 54.
The
Josef and
plastic,
Anni Albers Foundation,
Bethany.
57
:
r f
I
fii
n
55-
Variation on a Theme, 1958.
Cotton, linen, and 87.6
X
77.5
cm
plastic,
(34;/
X
30/<inches)
Collection of Dr. and Mrs.
Theodore
58
Dreier,
Jr.
i.
"••
•5..:5.*i5i::2'"*' •
^•iiiB«i«ai«iia«iia«iriiBWitBapii"?|
V*
^
*«**••'"»•
'
yV
56.
'
'
11
Haiku, 1961. Cotton, hemp,
cm
X 7X
57.2
X
The
Joset and Anni Albers Foundation,
18.4
Bethany.
{ii'A
57.
Code, 1962. Cotton,
hemp,
and metallic thread,
and metallic thread, inches).
cm
58.4
X
The
Josef and
18.4
(23
X 7K
inches).
Anni Albers Foundation,
Bethany.
59
58. Intersecting,
1962.
Cotton and rayon, 40 X 42 (15%,
X
cm
i6'A inches).
Collection of Katharine and
Nicholas Weber.
60
s^M)smtsr?tt.
59.
Liuicr Way, 1963.
Cotton, linen, and wool,
74 X 61.2 cm (29 'A X 24/* inches) Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, Smithsonian Institution,
Washington, D.C.,
Bequest of Joseph H. Hirshhorn, 1986.
61
»ffli!,s^^^!«i;uKiS^i^^^
Wll(i^^^ -^•'VtWt
6o. 5zx Prayers, 1966-67. Cotton, linen, bast,
The
Jewish
Museum, New
and
•,.T.'-tmiM
IMWMIII
>
'
-II
silver thread; six panels, 186
York, Gift of Albert A. List Family JM149-71-6.
62
"^
"""7
x
-'"'
50
cm
(73
X<,
x
19
% inches)
each.
iliiii:
iiii
SiliiS^^^^
IIIIB
;il»i«M*iun(ii[uil!utiMt<u:
a^""''',m
63
—
On
the Structure of the Weavings
5*c
^^
-!*
• «e %
Jean-Paul Leclercq
6i.
Detail of Two, 1952 (see cat. no. 44).
pattern width
Two
(1952) presents a strictly orthogonal
brown and
pattern in dark
are several right-angle direction changes,
but the entire pattern
is
organized around
the basic unit of the square.
The
weave checkerboard ground
in subtly
trasting tones gives the piece
The
result
is
its
plain-
rhythm.
made
Bauhaus;
at the
thus independent of the
Two
pattern in
—
that
is,
is
formed by an
and the thick white
additional twill float,
weft
The checkerboard ground
perfectly
mate-
illustrates Albers's interest in texture,
and
structure.
While the weave does
not change, variations
appearance are
in
the patterns of those works are also strictly
achieved through the warping, the shuttling
orthogonal, but are built on intersecting
order,
rectilinear strips
of unequal width.
and the binary properties
the plain weave.
The warping
of
warp
cords),
and the
dency
to play
a study
manufactured
in France.' In this eigh-
teenth-century example, the threads are finer
and there
is
no pattern other than the
one produced by the plain weave and the
alternates
viewed
Albers alternately passed a thin black weft
threads, or
one does
in
conducted around 1790 of fabrics
inversions are
if
Albers drew
example among the samples included
warp and weft
determine
fact that
with structure and material.
thinner white thread. During the weaving,
difficult to
its
But she would have found an identical
between a thick dark cream thread and a
is
weave and
these possibilities here reflects her ten-
direction in which the piece should be
In works with abstract patterns, the
by the play
variations (like the addition of weft or
on
every other ground pick
therefore floats to the back, without binding.
rial,
possibilities afforded
of even and odd (or alternating) threads are very important in plain
width.
The
con-
very different from the hang-
ings that Albers
fabric's
There
yellow.
is
The
and the
the height of the pattern,
materials. Yet the evenne.ss
made with two dark
two dark blue
blue
picks, while the
not understand the designer's intentions.
pick and then a thick white weft pick, thus
other threads, in both the weft and the
In Two, Albers indicated the direction by
creating the two different combinations.
warp, alternate between white and pale
adding her embroidered signature
The warp
In the dark squares, the thick dark
at the
work
blue.
Thus
the squares have a dark outline
cream warp binds and covers the thick
and the checkerboard resembles
white weft, and, conversely, the fine black
on the
lengthwise, in the direction of the warp,
weft can easily be seen because
twigs. Blue
but has a transversal pattern, to be read
to the front
lower right.
in this
is
hori-
was woven
zontal, not vertical; the piece
uncommon,
weftwise. Although generally
goes
it
above the thick warp. This
what produces dominant
is
and white
the material
tabby
lines are created
and the weave;
(which resembles
lines in the
a
of baskerwork made of large
scale
in
by
one square
a vertical rectangle), they
direction of the weft that alternate between
follow the direction of the warp, while in
weft direction can be found in the European
black and dark cream. In the light squares,
the next (which resembles a horizontal
tradition, such as the mid-fitteenth-century
the thick white weft
examples of textiles with
altar-front pieces
a pattern in the
comprised of
a single
horizontally, with a very large pattern
which binds the
made of a
single
comber
eightcenth-ccntury
unit. Patterns
found
textiles in
woven
in
which the
two or more
bands within the width of the such
cases, the
width of ihc
fabric. In
fabric
front,
becomes
set apart
keeping
it
fine black weft
rectangle), they follow the direction of the
when
on the
rather hidden.
The checkerboard
in late-
pattern has a top end intended for furniture borders; these are
is
it is
above the thick dark cream warp,
it
in the weft direction are also
bound only by
the thin white warp, but
width of figured gold brocaded velvet used
unit
is
pattern
is
one square
to
another
accomplished by warping two consecu-
tive threads
from the same warp;
direction of the warp,
it
is
in
the
executed during
weaving, with two consecutive picks of the
64
same
weft.
result
is
a fabric that appears to
and warp threads
as these squares
and bound
in
as
wide
the form of
weave.
created
In the direction of
the weft, going from
The
consist of weft
a plain is
very simply, by inverting evenness at the
end of each square.
weft.
I.
Registre d'Enqucte Industrielle, Toiles et
Mu.see de
Toileries (Paris, ca. 1790),
Mode
et
du
Textile, Palais
Union Centrale des Arts
la
du Louvre,
Paris,
Decoratifs, p. 329.
62. Detail
of La Luz
/,
1947 (see
cat. no. 39).
brocading
not on top of the binding sys-
is
tem, but rather introduces
At
first,
La Luz I (1947) seems
graphic quaht)' that
work and
Albers's
is
have
to
a
foreign to the rest ot
Bauhaus
to the
own
its
system,
reasons, but in these
weave on
been
several consecutive picks.
its
symmetrical pattern suggests a cross
the pattern, AJbers played with both the
some
material and the weave; the
The
eagle.
piece's scale,
as
an
however, allows us
to perceive the individual play of threads,
with twelve warp threads and seven picks per centimeter.
The
varies greatly, as the thick
weft
is
in this
brownish-yellow
processes used by Albers
work can be found
later in
cailigraphic-stir'le "pictorial
This
is
wider
in the
in the
warp
it
weh
number
approximately half a centimeter
Some of the
wide.
latter
appears
at
plain strips,
weft direction than
The
the top and
it is
bottom
in the
comes from the warp
twill (3/1,
S direction), with the space between threads giving the textile a
But elsewhere
it
warp
dominant
weft.
varies, ver\' irregularly in
area
weave variations
seeming
to
remove any
textiles,
repetitions. Irregularities are created
through weaving by the inclusion ot additional wefts in certain areas,
where they
on the back,
rather than
to get to
weaving on the
which
is
of Albers's "pictorial weavings.
"
process,
used in
The
thread from one pick to the next, exposing
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;which,
such as
.-Mbers,
sometimes crossed
thus introducing a local binding .system
(in
between two ground
10 the
are the
kinds of liberties allowed by tapestr\' work as
it
wa.s practiced
by the Copts. Ihe
its
horizontal
in other pieces
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;
or even vertical lines
which case the weft thread runs
warp
lines to
be
by
Frotyt the East (1963), are
other warp threads float freely to the back,
These
all
process
accentuates the continuirv' of the weft
vertical course as well as
parallel
thread). For these shapes
visible, the scale
and
of the weft
thread in relation to the pattern and to the textile has to be large
enough
for the
course of a single thread to be seen, as it is
in Albers's
Haiku (1962),
(1961),
Black-White-Gold I (i^^o).
Code
(1962), Intersecting
and From the
The technique
continuitv' of the weft thread
pick to the next
is
a
is
from one
hidden feature and
a violation ot a
premise of Western
next
its
Andean
front, this
practiced today,
is still
or along the selvages, where the
pattern weft thread does not integrate
which
starting point. Technically facilitated by
oblique lines
weave by
European examples, these returns
does not have a prominent graphic quality,
main pattern, the brocaded
cading wefts are bound
picks.
else-
are obtained through material,
its
threads, while the
too fine for
into the selvage weave. In such works, the
and
one. This produces rounded shapes,
in plain
much
file is
graphic quality to have been utilized.
In other
brocading wefts. In some places these bro-
warp
an element
appear more often on the backs of the
the ground, and there are also additional
several consecutive
its
thread repeatedly returns on the front,
long
seems to have
integration ot the brocading and with
In the
basic weave, as
it
varied shuttling order competes with the
wcavings.
a short, horizontal piece,
direction.
and the gold
grounds
by the use of complex or uneven thread.
her
works
a constraint, rather than
of the pattern; the patterns are figurative
Despite the general simplicity ot
aesthetic:
of symbolic bird, such
thread brocaded elements for technical
using the same warp threads as the ground
or
sort
used in fifteenth-century velvets with gold-
East.
of placing the returns
of the brocading thread on the front was
65
fundamental
textiles.
ijr^M.::
'm-'^-'^m.
',^'^-^^*
•-?
.•^M...L..<*->':^iir
r-«x./„0M>«^
««)
...
f '3
^'-
f?" ^"^^
^-^ W:''
63. Detail
Sfe«>
pm.tv^^-
1!^ mif «*B»-.--
of In the Landscape, 1958
'
: f»
^i^. _^»
lat
i
changes color according to a tapestry
technique, but
(see cat. no. 50).
it is still
bound by
the
colored warp. In the Landscape (1958), like also a horizontal piece
It
has a striped and banded plain weave,
with brocading that
and
is
shifts
about on the face
With warping
that alternates between
and thick threads
various colors, the textile, which
is
in
loosely
woven, presents a dominant weft, though its
weave appears
to
have a square pattern
because the warp threads bind the weft picks of the
same
and
between
a thick colored weft,
except in the bands at the top and bottom,
where a thick orange-yellow thread used exclusively
is
Elsewhere, the black warp (the
pick),
and
as
odd
odd
both are fine they are rather
inconspicuous. Meanwhile, the colored
warp
(the even thread) binds the colored
weft (the even pick), both of which have
heavy sections. In some
(yG
is
added on the
lat
which
is
tabby.
black warp threads bind the brocading
with the fine black weft simultaneously,
When
it is
bound by
in this way, the
dark blue,
is
areas, the basic
the fine black
warp
brocading pick, which
barely interrupted visually
is
and
appears to be continuous, winding above the squarelike
ground produced by the
plain weave.
This
is
a
good example
uses of a single weave,
of the diverse
which here has been
varied through the unique possibilities offered by the warping, the shuttling order,
and the
local
doubling of one of the two
ground picks with
in the weft:.
thread) binds the black weft (the
The
warp-
material. Like the
ing, the shuttling order alternates a fine black weft
pick
front of the binding system,
with the two passes together in the shed.
vertical in certain areas.
fine black threads
The brocading
La Luz /(1947),
with a short warp.
is
a
brocading pick. This
produces a double tabby weave, which is
typical
of silk
textiles.
:MiiJH»J»ZMliI£
,
'"-VWi
ummMnmu. l2;il»HT1Tgfc
m ravvftjij
iTx;
ttBOSEET
ttumiulirunmi YiimiMni 64. Detail oi Black-White-Gold
brown
variation in the order:
1950
I,
jute pick
gold lamella pick
in the first shed,
(see cat. no. 41).
65. Detail
in the
of
Intersecting,
1962
(see cat. no. 58).
second.
Black-White-Gold I
example ot torial
{\<)so)
is
a
The warping
superb
Alber.s's calligraphic-style "pic-
weavings." Like her La Ltiz /(1947)
and In
the Landscape (1958),
also pre-
is
it
sented in the direction of the warp, but is
it is
its
it
longer in the direction of the warp than in the direction
larger
dimension
of the weft is
—
that
is,
not horizontal.
Here again Albcrs used
a striped,
distinct use of the curves of
the face.
varies. Similarly, the
the two alternating wefts,
are based
threads: even
have
ways to create a background with squares.
The low
density of the weave
pared to the scale oi the piece
—
com-
eight
warp
threads and three to tour vveh picks per
centimeter
—
allows the threads to be read
individually, while the curves
and white brocading picks
The ground weave strips
of
is
patterned in vertical
a single color or a
of two colors
brown and
—
of the black
are highlighted.
combination
black, black
and white,
brown
—with the
black, or
and
jute
all
and odd
of the
threads,
ot
which
of which have a delicate section; only
odd threads with
a
The
and the
jute are
the white
odd
bound
threads,
is
some
and
in
lamella
when
is
the
The
lamella
by
places
other places
by the black even threads. The
luster
of the
interrupted most emphatically
warp binding
it is
black and wide.
inversion in this piece
is
vertical,
created by t%vo consecutive jute picks,
following the principle of evenness inversions. (Albers's
Two
[1952]
is
an example
of double evenness inversion,
warp and the
in
some
cases lat
but
in others, yielding several inversions
of contrast and
warp
Generally, the
readabilit)'.
both the
weft.)
67
threads, as there
one brocading pick picks;
heasy section; only even
threads with a heasy section.
in
brocaded threads are bound by the same
warp all
brocading on
white, orange, and blue
with the warp thread and ground not
heavy section; even and odd threads,
a
The
brocaded thread contrasts
reveals
four combinations, which
on the section
and brocaded plain weave, playing with the
complex
warp
brown
gold lamella, to varying degrees. As a
warping and shuttling order
in
a particularly
the visibility of the white and black in the
warp
banded, and
Intersecting (\<)6i), a striped,
brocaded tabby, presents
threads, but
because .some are thin and others thick,
result, there are
banded,
between white
alternates
odd threads and black even
there
it is is
ground
is
a
proportion of
for every
rwo ground
tabby hound, however, where
one brocading pick pick.
for every
From
66. Detail of
More
the East, 1963
From
mon
the East {1963) transforms the
com-
look of a warp
twill 3/1
using only
The
pass has
one more pick
shuttling order.
its
ground
pick, the
ing
The
lat.
twill
a lisere
which
weft. This produces a gold lamella binding
warp
the
twill 3/1,
resembling a binding by
same warp threads on
all
picks.
even and odd: the warp
is
prepared with
eight repetitions of a sequence comprised
of eight black threads, eight orange threads, eight white threads, threads.
The
and eight more orange
degree to which the luster
of the lamella
is
interrupted by the bindings
depends on the color of the ends. As is
lamella in the
end the
textile,
which
in this
start
and
work have an
from
width,
its
warp
twill 3/1
weave that
formed with the orange weft, but ues in a pick,
winding fashion,
on the
like a
the place where
The
it
is
contin-
brocading
face (in accordance with
and returns
Albers's favorite principle), it
to
will next replace the
relief has
been enhanced by
the use of the beater in places where the
lamella
bands that
results
the lamella stops where the thick black
The
in the
This
greater than that of the orange
weft passes; this weft then replaces the
ground weave (from which
variations have
each of the orange
that follow. Conversely, like a brocading
weavings," one has to search for the
been made)
lat. is
lamella.
often the case with Albers's "pictorial
like
band formed by the four orange weft picks
lat,
Here Albers was not playing with
and the brocad-
lisere\3.t,
lamella comprises part of the
ground weave,
followed by four picks of a fine orange
in
Albers's violation
is
weft picks, but seems to have an effect like
than the weave: a wide gold lamella, which is
interesting
of the usual distinction between the
(see cat. no. 54).
is
almost absent in a single pick.
higher relief
is
met
two
in
two of the black threads cross
areas,
where
an X.
in
Here two or more small hand shuttles have been used for a single medium, another
all-black weft.
Being supple, the lamella sinks below the bindings, losing
its
flatness
on an appearance similar
and taking
characteristic is
of brocading; only one shuttle
used for a single material
when
it
involves a
ground
lamellas u.sed by embroiderers in the seven-
patterning
lat,
teenth and eighteenth centuries. This
with a shuttle across the entire width of
resemblance, which most likely
the fabric.
can be found as well as in
tradition.
68
in
to the pleated
is
many of Albers's
fortuitous,
works,
examples from Europe's
textile
lat,
a lisere \at, or a weft-
since the passage
is
performed
67- Detail of
Open
Letter, 1958
(see cat. no. 49).
threads; the
threads with irregular sections in this and
applies also to the white weft.
Letter
(i'.)$S) is
based on a plain weave,
with gauze variations
in several areas.
It
a
is
are
rather than in the effect of the threads.
the different weft
Elsewhere, the plain weave brings out
as
an organizing principle
The warping
is
in
her weaving.
composed of a
sequence of r%vo white threads (the
which
a spiral thread) lollowed
is
first
of
by two
in a different
first
two
and contrasting material than
that of the last rwo.
As
a result, the
work
has a two-level, binary a.spect.
There forty-eight
weaving
warping
are twelve
warp threads
units, or
altogether,
of
and warp thread
colors.
The
warp and weft threads
warp
that are not used act
as a visual base for the deviating
white
bound only by
threads that
sveft
the white
threads that are
warp
threads, the
two black
effect
on the other hand,
back; the black areas, are
woven with black weft threads that the black warp threads,
ser\'e as
the gauze.
transparent gauze that involves
arc
is
uncertain since
it
technique used by Albers
floating to the back.
be found
where there
all
the
depends on the surface
the rwo white threads of the warping unit
among
are black
on a white background,
visual
threads and picks, as in this case the effect
under the
In the areas
warp
The
thus better controlled than with a
is
bound only by
rectangles
types,
black and white
woven with
and the
effects are organized in strips
and
textures,
threads: the white areas are
threads of the warping unit floating to the
black threads; hence the warping unit consists of four threads, with the
the color contrast between the
effects in the piece
produced by various combinations of
weaves; for her, textile art lay in the weave,
prime example of Albers's use of the binary
principle, but in reverse,
The many gauze
other pieces, she preferred to play with
Open
same
nature of the thread. Although Albers used
piece. Instances
in the
European
work can
textile tradition;
the gauzes by Tabourier, Bisson et
Cie that were presented
the
of the gauze in this
at the 1889
World
equal width that follow the direction of the
weave becomes an extended tabby with
Fair, for
warp. These strips are divided horizontally
two warp
with green weft and warp gauze on a
at intervals
traverse the
by bands ol plain weave that width ot the
though these bands ceptible, they
The
red
fabric;
even
are practically imper-
produce
a pattern
of squares.
from the brocading pick
is
added
in places to the black
and white of the
warp and the ground
weft. In plain-weave
areas involving
â&#x20AC;&#x201D; â&#x20AC;&#x201D;
thread
its
all
the threads, the spiral
winding quality highlighted
by the two black threads of the warping unit
fabric,
lends a dense gauze look to the
which
is
due not to the texture of
the fabric, but rather to the composite
threads; the white weft
warp threads and the The principle
is
the
bound,
is
by the two black
in alternating fashion,
r^vo
white ones.
same
in the areas
pink background and unused weft threads floating without binding to the back.
with
white rectangles on
a
but here the weft
black instead of white.
is
is
ing alternates between the rwo black warj
thread; the white spiral to the back.
The warp
warp
warp thread
floats
tension causes
the rwo ribs corresponding to the black weft binding to protrude, by a single thread,
which
is
white. Ihe
warp
relief inverts
with the following weft pick, which is
bound on
the face with the
is
both
a red
either white or black that
is
woven
in
in a
tabby with one of the warps. Here the visu-
black and the bin/
threads and the second, thin white
In specific areas, there
brocaded weft and an additional weft
black background,
In the areas with black ribs striped
with white, the weft
example, was a rwo-color piece,
nvo black
69
al
distinction between
brocading pick
is
ground pick and
blurred.
^^l-^^':iK' ViV
68. Textile sample, ca. 1945.
Cellophane and
jute, 91
(35% X 40 inches).
Museum Gift of
70
of Art,
X
101.5
cm
The Metropolitan
New
York,
Anni Albers 1970.75.9.
'^'''^^V\*''A'A\V''^^,\\\m\H
69. lextile sample, ca. i960. Linen,
90 X
133
cm
{35
X X 52 K inches).
The Metropohtan Museum
New
ot Art,
York, Gift of Anni Albcrs
1970.75.16.
71
70. Drapery material, ca. 1935Cellophane, rayon, and cotton,
cm (126 X 32X inches). The Museum of Modern Art, 320
X
82.5
New York,
Gift of the designer
67.75-SC. .1
71.
Drapery material,
Jute
and
X
'JltlTiit
1961.
metallic thread,
cm (48 X 52 inches). The Museum of Modern Art, New York, Gift of the designer 121.9
.-
132.1
68.75-SC.
im
m
Drapery material,
72.
ca. 1948.
Cotton and metallic thread,
mi^mm^Mm
109.2 cm (68% X 43 inches). Museum oi Modern Art,
X
174
'm^"
The
New
York,
(iift
of the designer
63.75.SC.
:^^^(^/'ÂŁ;i^
73. Partition material, ca. 1949.
Cotton,
jute, horsehair,
and cellophane, (59
X X 33X
151
x
85
cm
inches).
The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New
York, Gift of
1970.75.12.
73
Anni Albers
74- Wall-covering material, ca. 1930.
325.1
X
Linen and cellophane,
119. 4
cm
(128
X 47
inches).
The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New York,
Gift of Anni Albers
1970.75.4.
75. Textile
sample,
ca. 1935.
Cellophane, cotton, and rayon, 174
X 82 cm
(68 'Ax
}!'/ÂŤ
inches).
The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New York,
Gift of Anni Albers
1970.75.13.
74
76. Textile sample, 1940. Rayon,
260.4 ^
8'-3
'-"ni
(102 X
X
32 inches).
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New Gift of Anni Albcrs
1970. 75. 11.
75
York,
77- Textile sample, date
Cotton, 28
unknown.
X 20 cm
(11 X 7 /s inches). The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New York,
Gift of Anni Albers
1970.75.72.
78. Textile sample, date
unknown.
Cotton and wool, 28.5 X 20 cm (11 K X 7 ?{ inches). The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New York,
Gift of Anni Albers
1970.75.69.
j6
79- Textile sample, dace
unknown.
Cotton and wool, 28.5
X
19
cm
(11
<
X
7 / inches).
The Metropolitan Museum
New
of Art,
York, Gift oi Anni Albers
I970-7S-70.
80. Textile .sample, date
Cotton and 27 X 20.5
unknown.
linen,
cm
(10
%x
S'A inches).
The Metropolitan Museum
New
1970.75.68.
..,./.n'.v.ViV,',v.'.v
..,.,</,'.v,',v.'.',<,«.«,,^^ '
»,
, .
.
.
w
.
I
I
>
>
I
J (
L(
«
I
I
M, ''''•'*•••
"'v.«i'i».v.».'.'»»,t,'.vi
N'ri'iN'i'iVjWi'i'A
'.S'tS'i'.'.'iS'i'iV't'i').
>
»
•.S'.'.'.'.V.'.V.V.V,"""" •'"''"
#
.11 II LLl. I I.I
1.1
... .J
...'•••'' •
•
".1-1-l.ilV
V^\W^W^hw('l'^''''''
77
ot Art,
York, Gift of Anni Albers
'
8i.
Textile sample, date
Cotton and 28
X
21
cm
unknown.
jute, (11
X
8
^ inches).
The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New York,
'J^J^^^*>
%».t.t.r.».M.»,».r.#ii.»'."
Gift of Anni Albers
»
<«•
mSmSMfSMSSnmSoSSSaa
1970.75.73.
KaqfflHHHBSBBW
l.Hi>!M.\u.»ii?!J.;!r,;:.^,.:i;,^
ifS«»-B5a«aiUajiMoti3^iii;v
82. Textile
sample, date unknown.
Cotton and 28
X
21
linen,
cm (11X8^
inches).
The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New York,
Gift of
Anni Albers
1970.75.71. 1(11
I
.
•
. (
1
« • I
1
n
,
1
I
I
I
I
•
«
I
I
•
1
I
I
1
I
I
)
»«
)
(
t
I
I
1
M
<
I
'
,
'^^'l^:.y,^^^^v.^'i.^^!.:i^^:.'.^v,:,^^:.^^y,^:,:,^^^'.^y;,!i^^^^
fl*4MfMtM»*M((M*HM«i
78
t 1,1
";l
111
It
83.
Upholstery material,
ca. 1929.
19.4 cm /% inches). Ihc Museum of Modern Art, New York,
Cotton and rayon,
11.4
X
i^'Ax
Gift of Josef Albers 450.70.61.
84.
Drapery material, date
unknown. Cotton and metal foil, 28 X 44 cm (11 X 17X inches).
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Gik of Anni Albers 1970.75.20.
85. Textile
sample,
ca. 1946.
Cotton, linen, and metal
toil,
X 45 cm (13 'Ax i-jYa inches). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 34
New
York, Gift of Anni Albers
1970.75.18.
79
86. Wall-covering material, 1929. Raffia, cellophane,
and
linen,
II. 2 X 23.8 cm (4 X X 9 X inches). The Museum of Modern Art,
New York,
Gift of the designer
426.51.
'«i«w_w>»>ss=a s .^^'
.W.WWa'K'ab'B^
'-^•Mg'«-tW--'»w'g»»fgV»'»W«w - 'a'K<h V-
'tf«WB?'
':i-«'
•
87. Textile sample, date
•
•
••
--'
-;'
;-
'
'
';.
t-eK''i(i-
unknown.
Linen and rayon,
X 26.6 cm
X loX inches). The Museum of Modern Art, 17.7
New York,
(7
Gift of Josef Albers
450.70.62.
!g^?
88.
Wall-covering material, 1929.
Raffia, cellophane,
and
linen,
cm {4'/iX II inches). The Museum of Modern Art, II.
4 X 30.5
New
York, Gift of the designer
424.51.
.UOI
80
89. W;dl-covi.Min<; material, 1929-
SffiSSSSiS^^
Raffia, cellophane,
mmqmMkiitoUii
1
he
and
linen,
cm (4/ X II X Museum of Modern
X
1.4
1
New
30.2
inches).
Art,
York, Cnft of the designer
421.51.
SMawowtt«i»«l^^ OMBWVV nBiwnnniirtninnn.1
Tt^pms. i^f^HrsAHi!^ -1
4
-rj** (*
•
r1 -
^fc^
^
*~^
after 1933. 15.2
r
Cotton and rayon,
cm (6 X 8 inches). Museum of Modern Art,
X
The
New
20.3
York, Gift of Josef Albers
*
450.70.60.
.I-.V ,-»^'
\
90. Textile sample, prohahly
.
« -'-a
9
91.
Wall-covering material, 1929.
Raffia, cellophane, II.
linen,
cm (4X X 12 inches). Museum of Modern Art,
4 X 30.5
The
New
York,
423.51.
81
and
Ciift
of the designer
,:
92. Wall-covering material,
probably
after 1933.
Cellophane,
cm (5 X X 8 X inches). 13.9 The Museum of Modern Art, X
21
New York,
Gift of Josef Albers
450.70.91.
TT^^tr
Wall-covering material,
93.
probably after 1933. Cellophane,
cm (5 X X 6 X inches). The Museum of Modern Art, 14
X
15.9
New York,
Gift of Josef Albers
450.70.93.
btr ^r n tr 11 -
l^ pit;
ti II
94. Wall-covering material,
probably after
1933.
Cellophane,
cm (4^X 6/^ inches). The Museum of Modern Art, 12. 1
X
New
:-
"*# 11=
:-'
"^
*r-
*F
ft
r
^-
*i^
-
:>
"ifr
,;:
m m^ «r
jft
450.70.92.
:;:
y^
ti
ti^
tt
^
<
tt r *t :vtt? tM^ If; x ## ;^
A1
ft
fV
It
fl
n
I*
tl n s «# «^ ft n ft n W ft It rr-
15.6
York, Gift of Josef Albers
** *i-
- :ti"
ja JLiiiii :ii::it:li:ii:u tt." JK TK^Jt^H!
^a ;
- -fl^'^„;
:
IR' ft
I n n
tr rt
rr
gfV ti rr w *r vr
82
ft
tt
It 1* rr It
#r It rr ft
tt «F If rr tr If tr rr ft 4¥ ft
tt
ft it
n
n
f* tt w^ II
rt-;.j
tt
tt
it ft tt tt tt it ft tt tt tt tt it it it rt rt iti; tt
n n
it
ti
n
If ft. tt ft ft
U
ti
tt
«i^
tt It ff tt tt ft ft tt
tr tt tt *r IK tt tu tr It tr ft tf 1* ft fi^ tt »' rr tt tr tr t» tt tr tt-
95- Textile
sample,
Fiberglass, 19
(7X X
5
x
15
ca. 1948.
The Metropolitan Museum
New
tl;*iÂŤ
cm
X inches). of Art,
York, Gift of Anni Albcrs
1970.75.59-
96. Textile sample, date
unknown.
Cellophane and cotton,
X
22.5
18.5
cm
(8X X 7X inches).
The Metropolitan
New
Museum
ol Art,
York, Gift of Anni Albers
1970.7S-S7-
97. Textile sample, date
unknown.
Cellophane and cotton, 20 X 19 cm (7X X 7/ inches). The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New
York, Gift of Anni Albers
1970.75.56.
98. Textile sample, ca. 1948.
Fiberglass, 21
x
13.5
(8Xx 5X inches). The Metropolitan Museum
New
York, Gift of
'I
cm of Art,
Anni Albers
i
1970.75.58.
83
99. Textile sample, date
Cotton and (11
X
linen, 28
X
unknown. 21
cm
8 /finches).
The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New York,
'mi.
Gift of Anni Albers
I970.75-4IC.
100. Textile sample, date
Cotton and
unknown.
linen,
28 X 20.5 cm (11 X 8X inches). The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New
York, Gift of
Anni Albers
i970.75-4ib-
•"v^r^-x:
sample, date unknown.
loi. Textile
ii:^.
Cotton and
linen,
X 20 cm (10 >( X 7 /s inches). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 27
J-'
#.:'•"
New York,
Gift of Anni Albers
i970.75-4ia.
102. Textile sample, date
Cotton and 27 X 20
cm
unknown.
^
linen, (10
M!
X 7X
The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New York,
iSP
'J'
i-r
id^
Gift of Anni Albers
i^RliP^
•,!
'
.
,*^^ •
84
.'i^
'
^a^j^
1970.75.43.
'
'vir
inches).
103.
sample, date unknown.
Textile
C^otton and linen, 23
X
18
cm
(9
X -
:(
inches).
The Metropolitan Museum
New
York,
Gih
of Art,
Anni Albers
of
1970.75.61.
104. Textile sample, 1950.
Cotton and 16 X 19
cm
linen,
(loX X
7M inches). The Metropolitan Museum of
New
Art,
York, Gift of Anni Albers
1970.75.60.
mm.
105. lextile
sample,
ca. 1949.
Linen and metallic thread,
X 37 cm (17 X X 14X inches). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 45.5
New
York, Gift of
Anni Albers
SIS 1^;-
1970.75.17.
106. Textile sample, ca. 1959.
Cotton and
cm
linen,
42 X
35
New
York, Gift of Anni Albers
X X 13 K inches). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, (16
•»»•*« ••tint'
1970.75.26.
I
mtttiUiiiVi
85
loy. Textile sample, ca. 1951.
Jute
and
metallic thread,
X 17.7 cm (8 % X 7 inches). The Museum of Modern Art, 21
New
York, Gift of Josef AJbers
450.70.74-
108. Textile sample, ca. 1951.
Jute and metallic thread, 24.2
X
16.5
cm
{c)'Ax 6'A inches).
The Museum of Modern
New York,
Art,
Gift of Josef Albers
450.70.72.
109. Wall-covering material,
probably
after 1933.
Cotton and metallic thread, 27.9 X II. 4 cm (11 X 4X inches). The Museum of Modern Art,
New York,
Gift of Josef Albers
450.70.66.
no. Casement material, 1950.
Cotton or synthetic and metal
foil,
cm (11 X 6 X inches). 27.9 The Museum of Modern Art, X
17. 1
New York, 450.70.80.
86
Gift of Josef Albers
111.
Textile
sample,
ca. 1951.
Linen and metallic thread, 25.4 X 17.8 cm (10 X 7 inches). The Museum of Modern Art,
New
York. Gift of Josef Albers
450.70.73.
112.
Textile
sample,
ca. 1951.
Linen and metallic thread, 27.9 X 15.9 cm (11 X 6X inches). The Museum of Modern Art,
New York,
Gift of Josef Albers
450.70.79.
kt-
r
t^
113.
Textile sample, ca. 1933. Linen,
e*ii^::::^vJ^5=^
cm (9x8 inches). The Museum of Modern Art, New York, Gift of Josef Albers 22.8
X
20.3
-«|lt<.'^-'-»U^
450.70.70. 't
"i
>
'>-^: 114. Textile
sample, probably after
;'j'\
XM
1933. Linen, 24.1
(9X X of
8 inches).
Modern
Art,
X
20.3
cm
The Museum
New
York,
Gift of Josef Albers 450.70.71.
^m-^
r-
87
*t(*
Textile sample, probably after
115.
X 26.6 cm X loX inches). The Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1933. Silk, 17.7 (7
Gift of Josef Albers 450.70.63.
Wall-covering material,
116.
ca. 1950.
X
29.2
Jute and metallic thread,
12.7
cm
(iiX
X
5
inches).
The Museum of Modern
New
Art,
York, Gift of Josef Albers
450.70.65.
w ^^^sStftrS-kJiSiS:
i vfvii>< ^;v'*^''^!.4>.^j'-V*^
117.
Wall-covering material,
ca. 1950.
29.2
X
Jute and metallic thread,
12.1
cm {n'Ax
^'4 inches).
The Museum of Modern
New York,
Art,
,l!a.^raa ;
^
—
«.
i.__;
i^^-aa r-TiS
^'TV'^--'^ j*-'^ *
'
fVrsa **^J-^C
^__,
'J-'^^^^'i'
"^ 7\ ~*-*
''^^
-
:r^''
"'f 'l.?J( 5^^P* Pv.i^
Gift of Josef Albers
450.70.64. »-J^ ,^ _" » 1
118.
Evening-coat material, 1946.
,
i
"-.^iS-'^
? t.~B ^^j=
(fWii
J>^.?^
Linen, cotton, and Lurex, 33
X
29.8
cm
(13
X
II
K
inches).
The Museum of Modern
New York,
Art,
Gift of the designer
434-5I-I^J' ''
14i~« i%IC
i
mtm\
'
~ ~
-
^:^ ifrti^ -'
^mMMi^M^.
t^~^^-jSY{'^^
'h^ '^^ if^rr.i^
A.rtj
Hit
FTK^
.^1»1J*^
jT-gc
'R^.,
'
'-
119- Textile
sample,
ca. 1948.
Harnessmaker's thread, 18 X 8 cm {7 'Ax yA inches). The Metropohtan Museum ot An,
New
York,
Clitt ot
Aiini Albcrs
I970.75-77-
120.
Fextile
sample,
ca. 1948.
Harnessmaker's thread, 10.3 X 7.6 cm (4/1. X 3 inches). The Museum of Modern Art,
New
York, Gift of Josef Albers
450.70.100.
121.
Textile sample, ca. 1948.
Harnessmaker's thread, 21.6 X 8.3 cm (8 >^ X 3 ;< inches). The Museum of Modern Art,
New
York, (lih of Josef Albers
450.70.101.
122.
Fextile
sample,
^-%-^~
ca. 1948.
Harnessmaker's thread, 15.9
X
S.i
cm {6Ax }A
The Museum
New
of
'i
Âť^'ryiki/J inches).
Modern
Art,
York, Gift of Josef Albers
450.70.99.
.1
.xi-y-f-^y ff-
"f-^l^^l
89
1^
"
sample, probably after
123- Textile
^Tf'^f^^- .i-yy^'1^
Cotton and metallic thread,
1933.
16.5 X 19 cm (6X X 7X inches). The Museum of Modern Art,
New York,
Gift of Josef Albers
450.70.81.
1 ;^
unknown. X 24 cm
124. Textile sample, date
Cotton and (6
/(.
X
9
7,6
linen, 16
inches).
The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New York,
A_
•\«»5v.jfc»^
,v^»..
j^,^
fil..-
.,<
ajflr'-' OHT
fjtr-
um£< ,JU^ -^k^
|iTi>"
_^
<•»•. j«io«». rt«?a» «{!»^
ilifi*!
>»—
Gift of Anni Albers
1970.75.42.
^i^^o
dtfe>^
.i»i« t,a«i< Mki^,
»>> aC> bi^ £^^iik^
,x»
filk— •!^».
i—
^ .£rti£r^[^;i&r^
-
-
'
>*k^' W*2^^
dfc-
•«.;»SiS'
125.
«9»*' >^to: fcsr^
wsh
ida-' .js"
ii^v ,««?- ^.^^ ^**> ,a»*..^ -^-.
!*=-
^Ji»i:^>
w^.
jfc-;^-
j41
*^ a^. «^44^. :.s;:dS:^
Upholstery material, 1929.
X
19.7
U'Ax 7 finches). The Museum of Modern
Art,
Cotton and rayon,
New
11. 4
cm
York, Gift of the designer
419.51.
S^Si^ii
90
-\^
"",*'
•.•rrTr:*
i960. Linen,
ca. 53
'
Knitted casement material,
126.
X
39 cni (20 X
X
The Metropolitan
New
15
X inches).
Museum
of Art,
York, Ciih ot Anni Albers
1970.75.22.
127.
Wall-covering material, 1929.
Designed
for the
auditorium
of the Allgemeinen Deutschen Gewerkschaftsbundesschule, Bernau, Germany. Cotton and
X 12.7 cm (9X5 inches). The Museum of Modern Art, cellophane, 22.9
New
York, Gift of the designer
433-5I-
mm Knitted casement material,
128. ca.
i960.
Cotton and metallic thread, 57 X 35.5 cm (22%. X 14 inches). The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New
York, Gift of Anni Albers
1970.75.21.
129. Textile
Cotton and
X
cm
sample, date unknown. linen,
X 8X inches). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 28
New
21
(11
York, Gift of Anni Albers >
1970.75.62.
,1
,
K
).i .J.
«.»
I.
vV'.V.V.ht .1.1 1'liV'Ni
i.«,V,j.*K«.'«.V.»',V»"''.'i
liJWfl
91
sample, 1950.
130. Textile
Cotton and 32.5
jute,
X 48 cm
(12
HxiS'A
inches).
The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New York,
Gift of Anni Albers
1970.75. 31a.
131.
Textile sample, 1950.
Cotton and 67.3
X
34
linen,
cm
il6'/iX 13
%
inches).
The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New York,
Gift of Anni Albers
I970.75-34-
92
I ***4i4«i<a«
•
V?""""
«••••»**
^ffi^fi .«*l«|l*«« «»4»ltl««
«••«<•••
•••4«»«»-"'
-.
.
«
.
•(•Aiatt*
-
:::::::«
jSgaa lit! ii*«ia«i«
ifaitiMr
•vtatisit
?::5:c
Mt.M, I
,
Jl
»
I
Ml
11
I
•».
I
I
•
I
"I
•
•»••«,
1
I
I
••««•»••» **•«*•«•«
'••»«•••.
132. Textile
Cotton and
««««••*••{
sample, 1950. linen,
33 X 34 cm (13 X 13 X inches). The Metropolitan Museum of
New
Art,
York, Gift of Anni Albers
1970.75.32.
93
Constructing Textiles
Anni Albers
Retrospection, though suspected of being the preoccupation of conservators,
can also serve
an active agent. As an antidote for an elated sense of
as
progress that seizes us from time to time,
proper proportion and makes
it
shows our achievements
in
where we have
possible to observe
it
advanced, where not, and where, perhaps, we have even retrogressed. It
thus can suggest
When we
new
areas for experimentation.
examine recent progress
the curious realization that the to a closely defined area
.
.
.
in
momentous development we find is limited new fibres and finishes. While
the process of weaving has remained virtually
unchanged
for
textile
uncounted
about far-reaching changes, greater
changes perhaps than even those brought about through the
mechanics of
to
the creation of
centuries, textile chemistry has brought
in the
we come
cloth-making,
production during the
fast
century.
last
advance
We
find
the core of textile work, the technique of weaving, hardly touched by our
modern
wider area has acutely affected the
age, while swift progress in the
quality as
much
as the quantity
around the center has taken
of our
methods of weaving have not only
place,
been neglected, but some have even been forgotten easy to visualize
It is
how
intrigued, as
of ancient Peru would be in looking over the
been exposed
achievements. production,
He would
at the
the low price.
to
it,
marvel,
of
we can imagine,
He would
weaver
of our day. Having textiles fair
and having judge of our
speed of mass
at the
uniformity of threads, the accuracy of the weaving and
He would
crease-resistant,
enjoy the
new
yarns used
.
.
rayon, nylon, aralac,
.
name some of the most important
admire the materials that are glazed or water-repellant,
permanent pleated, or flame-retarding, mothproof or
shrinkage-controlled and those finishes.
textiles
of time.
as mystified, a
he can be considered a
dacron, orlon, dynel, and Fibreglas, to ones.
in the course
much
to the greatest culture in the history
been himself a contributor
while a development
fabrics. In fact,
made
Even our traditionally used
treated with them.
He would
well as of the chemical
fluorescent ...
fabrics take
learn with
methods of
all
results of
our new
on new properties when
amazement of the physical as which give them their
treating fabrics,
Though our may be surprised unknown to him, as
tensile strength or their reaction to alkalis or acids, etc.
Peruvian to see
critic is
accustomed
new nuances and
to a large scale
of colors, he
often a brilliance hitherto
well as a quantitative use of color surpassing anything he
expert
had imagined.
The wonder of this new world of textiles may make our ancient feel very humble and may even induce him to consider changing
his craft
and taking up chemistry or mechanical engineering. These
are
the two major influences in this great development, the one affecting the
94
quality of the working material, and the other the technique of production.
But strangely enough, he may Hnd that neither one would serve him his specific interest: the intricate interlocking
of two
Concentrating
his attention
now on
this particular
work, he would have a good chance of regaining
monotony would
strange
looked
most
at millions
him. In if
many
in
at right
find
textile
as
he
in the simplest technique. In
one glance the principle of construction,
at
most oi the more complex weaves
his search for inventiveness in
examples to fascinate him.
any,
phase of
his self-confidence.
him and puzzle him, we imagine,
strike
of yards of fabric woven
he would recognize
cases,
and he would even few,
of threads
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;weaving.
angles
A
sets
familiar to
weaving techniques, he would find
He
himself
would
feel that
he had
suggestions to offer.
An
impartial critic of our present civilization
would
attribute this
number of factors. He would point out an age of machines, substituting more and more mechanisms for
barrenness in today's weaving to a that
handwork,
limits in the
same measure the
versatility
of work.
He would
explain that the process of forming has been disturbed by divorcing the
planning from the making, since a product today
no longer
in the
Thus
hands of many,
in the
hands of one. Each member of the production
mechanically his share to control.
is
its
formation according to
a plan
the spontaneous shaping of a material has been
blueprint has taken over.
A
line
beyond lost,
adds
his
and the
design on paper, however, cannot take into
account the fine surprises of a material and make imaginative use of them.
Our
critic
would point out
that this age
promotes quantitative standards
of value. Durability of materials, consequently, no longer constitutes value per se and elaborate
of pleasure.
Our
critic
workmanship
would show
is
a
no longer an immediate source
that a division
between
art
and
craft,
or between fine art and manufacture, has taken place under mechanical
forms of production; the one carrying almost entirely
spiritual
emotional values, the other predominantly practical ones. logical that the
the in
its
has
new development should
making of useful
clarify the role
objects, paralleling the
It is
and therefore
of usefulness
in
development of art, which
process of clarification has divested itself of a literary by-content and
become
abstract.
Though
the weight of attention
is
now
given to practical forms
purged of elements belonging to other modes of thought, aesthetic qualities nevertheless are present naturally
and inconspicuously. Avoiding decorative
additions, our fabrics today are often beautiful, so clear use
of the raw material, bringing out
its
we
believe,
through the
inherent qualities. Since even
95
solid colors istics
might be seen
we
of a material,
Our new
as
an aesthetic appendage, hiding the character-
undyed
often prefer fabrics in natural,
tones.
synthetic fibres, derived from such different sources as
seaweed or lime have multiplied many times the number of our traditionally used fibres. Our materials therefore, even when woven in the simplest techniques, are widely varied in quality, and the number of variations are still increased through the effects of the new coal, casein, soybeans,
finishes.
Yards and yards of plain and useful material, therefore, do not
bore
Rather they give us a unique
us.
earlier civilization,
such
as
satisfaction.
To
member of an
a
our Peruvian, these materials would be lacking
would make them meaningful to him or beautiful. Though we have succeeded in achieving a great variety of fabrics without much variation of weaving technique, the vast field of weaving in those qualities that
itself is
open today
At
for experimentation.
present, our industry has
laboratories for such work. (Today, 1959, the situation test
tube and the slide rule have, so
no
The
changing.)
is
taken good care of our progress.
far,
Nevertheless, the art of building a fabric out of threads
is still
a
primary
concern to some weavers, and thus experimenting has continued. Though not
in general
admitted to the officialdom of industrial production,
some hand-weavers have been as
an integral part of
At are bringing
textile
to
weaving
itself
work.
their looms, free
back the
draw attention
trying to
from the
dictates
qualities that result
of a blueprint, these weavers
from an immediate
relation
of the working material and the work process. Their fresh and discerning attempts to use surface qualities of weaves are resulting in a
of
textile design. It
is
largely
due
work
to their
becoming an element of interest. Texture
effects
new
school
that textures are again
belong to the very structure
of the material and are not superimposed decorative patterns, which at present
become
as
have
lost
much
our
love. Surface
treatment of weaving, however, can
an ornamental addition as any pattern by an overuse
of the qualities that are organically part of the fabric structure.
Though that the industry all
it is is
through the stimulating influence of hand-weaving
becoming aware of some new
hand-weaving today has contributed
work
that leads
to
it.
textile possibilities,
To have
away from the general trend of a period has
certain perplexities.
There
is
a
danger of isolationism
.
.
.
to
overcome
hand-weavers
withdrawing from contemporary problems and burying themselves weaving recipe books of the sent,
96
which due
past; there
is
a
not
positive results, a
in
resentment of an industrial pre-
to a superior technique of manufacture, by-passes
them;
there
is
romantic ovcrestimation of handwork
a
work and vital
beHet in
a
artificial
Any
or as a therapeutic means.
under discussion
here. C]rafts
of art and usefulness (once level of art
and not quite
and the
industr)'
no longer of
craft
is
that of a
backwoods subsidy
potentially arc,
a natural
ment and
in
art
.
.
.
such not are hybrids
An example
trash.
is
the
an unauthorized manner,
its
craft
of weaving
new developwe can look forward
contribution to the
beginning to draw attention to
is
as
union), not quite reaching the
of a feud, they should have a family reunion. Since the
making,
and
become problematic when they
new form of the old crafts, and both should remember their genealogical relation. Instead
industry crafts
beyond
that of clearly defined usefulness.
our present day ash tray
Modern
is
is
importance. Crafts have a place today
is
machine
in contrast to
preservation of a market that
itself,
when it will be accepted as a vital part of the industrial process. The influence that hand-weaving has had thus far has been mainlv treatment of the appearance, the epidermis, of fabrics. The engi-
to the time
in the
neering work of fabric construction, which affects the fundamental characteristics of a material, has barely
been considered.
It
is
probably
work in this direction. For just as silk, can become stiff in the form of taffeta, through
again the task of hand-weavers to soft material
by nature,
a certain thread construction,
and
linen, a comparatively stiff material, can
be made soft in another, so an endless number of constructional
produce new
new
fabrics.
The
increasing
number of new
fibres
qualities creates a special challenge to try the effects
them. Just
as
a
effects
can
incorporating
of construction on
chemical treatment has produced fluorescence, so structural
treatment can produce, for example, sound-absorption.
Our
ancient
Peruvian colleague might lose his puzzled expression, seeing us thus
adventures with threads, adventures that
we
set for
suspect had been his passion.
Industry should take time off for these experiments in textile
construction and, as the easiest practicable solution, incorporate hand-
weavers as laboratory workers in
its
scheme. By including the weaver's
imaginative and constructive inventiveness, as well as his land-loom
with
its
wide operational scope, progress
in textile
work may grow from
progress in part to a really balanced progress.
This essay originally appeared
was reprinted Albers:
On
in
in
"Constructing Textiles" Design 47:8 (April
Alvin Lustig, ed. Visual Communication
(New
4,
1946) and
York, 1945) and in
Anni
Designing (\^es\cy3r\ I'niversiiy Press: Middlelown, C'onnccticiit, 19^1), pp. 12-16.
97
133-
Drawing for a Rug
II,
1959.
Ink and pencil on paper, 13. 1
The
X 43.6 cm (5 X 17 Xf, inches). Josef and Anni Albers '/<.
Foundation, Bethany
AA DR
013.
134. Drawing for a Rug II, Gouache on paper, 13. 1 X 43.6 cm (sXi, X i-jYu,
The
inches).
AA DR
135. Drawitig for a Rug II, Gouache on paper, 13. 1 X 43.6 cm (5X<, X 17X1,
The
Josef and Anni Albers
Foundation, Bethany
98
1959.
015.
1959.
inches).
Josef and Anni Albers
Foundation, Bethany
AA DR
016.
136.
Study for Ctvuiiio ReiiL
Gouache on blueprint paper, 29.7 X 27.6 cm (11%. X loX inches). The Josef and Anni Albers ca. 1967.
Foundation, Bethany
AA DR
021.
99
137-
Study for A, 1968.
Gouache on graph paper, 27.9 X 26 cm (11 X ioYm, inches). The Josef and Anni Albers Foundation, Bethany
100
AA DR
024.
,.m., y-h
\j:a&,
tK rk
"..<i^.,
:;k,
^^
â&#x20AC;˘^'
^
-
PT
1 .1.
vZS
^
w^
'
3^.
.i^-. J^.. ^-(^
V4-W
"
....-^'
-i^r
y
*
.J
^^
i
1"
'^''
'-i-
'
:-^-:'-^'^.'/^
W^
'-s^-
'^ ~* 7' "'Sf*'*^^^
.
r
1:T
^^^
-Ww"
.--.^^^T'
"-
.j^:^ :;;>gp-^!-:: -^-^ V~^'
-^-T^r^
IIILI., 138.
Study for B, 1968.
Gouache on graph paper, 31 X 23.8 cm (12 /i. X gX inches). The Josef and Anni Albers Foundation, Bcthanv
AA DR
025.1
lOI
-^.^^^
-4
r^r A 2 2 ^ ^ ^ j^ A ^ ^ \. y '^ _ A^ A\ A r A A _
/
139.
DR XV B,
38.4
X
The
Josef and
58.9
Bethany
OR
cm
1974. Ink (15 X X
on
paper,
22 X inches).
Anni Albers Foundation,
AA DR
053.
'y-TV
140.
38.4
DRXIV, i^j^. Ink on paper, 58.9 cm (15)4 X ^^yÂť inches).
X
The Josef and Anni Bethany
102
AA DR
Albers Foundation,
051.
141.
Study for Triangulated Intaglio
1976. 31.
1
The
X
Gouache on 28.4
Josef
Bethany
cm
(12
V,
paper, yâ&#x20AC;&#x17E;.
X
II
M'6
inches).
and Anni Albers Foundation,
AA DR
070.
103
142.
Line Iin'olvcmoit lU 1964.
Lithograph, 50.5 x 37.5cm {\C)V*
X 14%,
inches).
The Josef and Anni Bethany
104
AA PR
Albers Foundation,
005/II.
I 143.
Line Involvement
Lithograph, 37.5 (i4'M'6
The
X
x
UL 1964. cm
50.5
19/8 inches).
Josef and Anni Alhcrs Foundation,
Bethany
AA PR
005/III.
105
144- Line Involvement IV, 1964.
Lithograph, 50.5 (19
Xx
14
'/t
x
37.5
The Josef and Anni Bethany
106
cm
inches).
AA PR
Albers Foundation,
005/IV.
145- I-ine
Involvement
K
Lithograph, 37.5 x 50.5 (14
')4
The
X 19X
1964.
cm
inches).
Josef and Anni Albers Foundation,
Bethany
AA PR
005/V.
107
146. Li)H' hivolvemeyit VI, 1964.
Lithograph, 50.5 X 37.5 (19 7s
X 14%
The Josef and Anni Bethany
108
cm
inches).
AA PR
Albers Foundation,
oos/VI.
147- Line Involvement VII, 1964.
Lithograph, 50.5 (19
/ÂŤ
The
X
14
'X*.
X
37.5
cm
inches).
Josef and Anni Albers Foundation,
Bethany
AA PR
005/VlI.
109
148. Yellow
X
Meander. Screenprint,
cm
(28 X 24 inches). The Josef and Anni AJbers Foundation, 71. 1
61
Bethany
no
AA PR
016.
149-
PO
72.9
X
II,
55.9
1973. Screenprint
cm
(28
%X
The Josef and Anni Bethany
AA PR
and photo-offset,
22 inches).
Albers Foundation,
034.
Ill
'
•.-• '•'» •;
k
.1^
i. i
1
1
^^^^^^^^jm/tliy ^fr^^^^^^^^M^-
'
-•:^*fpf?^^^^ v.; •"'
;
'^y/':
1
^'
t.
k
-^-..^
A '•\i-V-' ;>•.'-':/:
'."
'
.
'
1
^^,,. X ^H9»^ ^
^
'
•
T
^•.'_';r,/
V
r
."
-
'-
' '
'."
'.^BH^BjeS^H
'
-,:)'
i
j|' iff''
V^
'-Hfl^^^9l^i£tf^2Pk^ r
'\
'
A
-^^^BK^^jj'
*^* '.
/'
1,
'
,
'•'";.
Ifj.-
•
-'.
'
''^'*{'^-;r*^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^H^^^H •^ > flHilflui^HI '
.'-"^-';-:.v
•• ...
'
'..
^ r''^. ..^.^i
^p
1 m
wB^M^^Et ^^ps^^^^^^
^x j*f
^*
^
tl^^^^^^mt *V a^^^M
'^^
^^^Bkt o«IR
'%ry.-ii:;.ji;ir
r\
k
-'"''': -^
/ ai /
''^>'
J^
<iM^^^* • • • I ^H^H
^^^1
^H
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^1
• •
^ :^K^^L,^^^r^^B»_M^^^^
UJJ^L^^^^^^r^r^Ly. J. M
m R^ ^^^^^^^^^^R f A^y
******
.^^^"
1
***^'SP^^^^^^^^^^^H
X /^^Jr^^^W^^^KSS^^w
W
\\
vvJv
W.
1
^m^w//ffflll^^^ ^^1
'-1/^[I[IJII^ V-'
^ 1
^^^i^^^M,
^L ft
^^^^^^H&'
^^HiHiii 150.
Anni Albers and Alex Reed,
Neck
piece, ca. 1940.
Aluminum
strainer,
paper
clips,
and chain; pendant: 10.8
X
8
cm
(4
Collection of
112
/{
X
3
X
Donna
inches).
Schneier.
Anni Albers and Alex Rccd, Neck piece, ca. 1940. 151.
Washers and grosgrain ribbon. 109.2
cm
(43 inches) long.
Collection of Mrs. Barbara Drcier.
113
152. Anni Albers and Alex Reed, Neck piece, 1988 reconstruction
of a
ca.
1940 original.
Corks, bobby pins, and thread,
cm
78.7
(31
inches) long.
Collection of
153.
Mary
Emma
Anni Albers and Alex Reed,
Neck
piece, ca. 1940.
Brass
grommets and cotton
83.8
Harris.
cm
cord,
(33 inches) long.
Collection of Mrs. Barbara Dreier.
154.
Anni Albers and Alex Reed,
Neck
piece, ca. 1940.
Brass
grommets and chamois,
104. 1
cm
(41 inches) long.
Collection of Mrs. Barbara Dreier.
114
155-
Anni Albcrs and Alex Reed,
Neck of a
piece, 1988 reconstruction
ca.
1940 original.
Eye hooks, pearl beads, and thread, 83.8
cm
(33 inches) long.
Collection of
Mary
Emma
Harris.
"5
rjjw
156.
Free-hanging
room
divider,
ca. 1948. Walnut lath, dowels, and
waxed-cotton harnessmaker's thread, 326.4 X 108 cm (128 X X 42X inches). The Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New York,
â&#x20AC;˘e^--
Gift of Anni Albers
I970.75-78-
157.
Free-hanging room divider,
ca. 1949. Jute,
X 86.4 cm (57 X 34 inches). of Modern Art, Museum The 144.8
New York, 411.60.
116
Gift of the designer
I'^H.
Free-hanging room divider,
1949. Cellophane
and cord,
cm (94 X 32% inches) The Museum of Modern Art, 238.7
X
New
York, Gift of the designer
409.60.
"7
82.5
Anni
Kelly Feeney
By
all
1950s,
Albers: Devotion to Material
accounts,
when
Anni Albers had never
synagogue before the mid-
visited a
the ark panels she designed for
Temple Emanu-El
in Dallas
160-61) were installed. Born to a family of assimilated Berlin Jews,
(figs.
Albers was baptized and confirmed in the Protestant church. This complex religious identity
was
a changeable feature of Albers's personality.
she was explicit about her background, particularly
if
Sometimes
she anticipated
an affront. But on occasions she was quick to remind others that she was not Jewish (except,
as she
put
it,
Cohen
asked Albers to weave a matzoh
cover for her family's Passover seder. "You
know
I'm not Jewish," Albers
proceeded to carry out the assignment.
replied, yet
when
"in the Hitler sense"), as in 1959,
the graphic designer Elaine Lustig
One wonders
if
Albers sensed any irony in the Dallas commission, or in those she later received for other synagogue decorations
and
for a
Holocaust memorial."
In 1922 Albers left behind the upholstered comfort of her family's
apartment
in Berlin to attend the
closing of the Bauhaus, she
of Germany to teach
at
Bauhaus. Eleven years
and her husband,
another experimental school. Black Mountain
College, in the United States.
During
this
herself to her art, as well as to teaching (for
example, the 1939 text "Art
tumultuous time Albers devoted
and writing about
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;A Constant")
commitment. Clearly Modernism was for
In the mid-1950s the building
art.
Her
essays
often prescribe a devotional
Albers's religion,
overshadowed the complex relationship she had
it
the
later, after
Josef, left the uncertainties
and her fervor
to Judaism.
committee of Temple Emanu-El
hired the sculptor Gyorgy Kepes to oversee the interior decoration
of its new synagogue, which had been designed by Howard Meyer and
Max and
Sandfield. Kepes,
stained-glass
who
designed the sanctuary's pendant light fixtures
windows himself
and
selected Albers for the design
fabrication of the ark covering.
Albers collaborated with Kepes on a fabric pattern that echoed
not only his blue, green, and amber geometric
window
sparkling adobe-brick pattern of the sanctuary's
main
design, but the
wall as well.
Although
Kepes had originally envisioned conventional ark curtains that could be drawn back to reveal the Torahs, Albers prevailed upon him to
mount
the material
Kepes accepted, fabric
had
on
sliding
wooden
typifies Albers's genius:
to be spun,
panels. Ihis solution,
let
her
which
fewer yards of the expensive custom
woven, and dyed, and, with the money saved,
she was able also to design and produce a silvery material to line the back
of the tabernacle.
The in a diverse
118
eight twenty-foot-high ark panels appear at
first
to be covered
mosaic of gold, green, and blue Lurex blocks. Albers,
who
159-
Study for Temple Emanu-El ark panels,
1957. Collage
of colored paper,
foil, textile
sample, and typewritten labels on paper,
cm
43.1
X
The
Josef and
36.2
Bethany
(17
X
14
/:
inches).
Anni Albers Foundation,
AA DR
095.
119
— was
fluent in the language of geometry, achieved this effect
an underlying modular structure
in her fabric design;
panel bears the same pattern, the fabric the repeat the spare
on the center
or,
mounted
at different points in
down. This way,
panels, simply turned upside
of fabric that Albers supplied to the temple could be used
roll
any one of the eight panels
to replace
is
by setting out
even though each
damage were ever to occur. economy transformed
if
Alberss rigorous aesthetic and practical
the synagogue's ark covering into a splendid architectural element.
The
panels are such a focal point in the sanctuary that the temple's building
committee Kepes
objected to them, even though they had approved
initially
the design several
months
November
In
earlier.
1956 the committee asked
Albers could produce a fabric pattern with "softened transitions"
if
had
to replace the fabric she
made
just
—
in time for the synagogue's
January dedication." Albers informed Kepes that
would be impossible
it
to
meet that deadline, so the committee was forced
as
they were. But no one complained after the February 1957 issue of
magazine came out, with the
Life
to accept the panels
glowing sanctuary reproduced
vast,
in
glorious color.'
Four years
Rhode work
Modern
that
had made studio
Congregation B'nai
is
building by Samuel Glaser. Albers responded with
entirely different
weaving
in Dallas,
(fig.
164).
of Woonsocket,
Israel
an ark covering for their new temple,
Island, invited Albers to create
a baroque a
later the
As
from the
six
sleek,
machine-woven piece she
on
textured tapestries
in Dallas, she
mounted
loom
a
the textiles
in her
on wooden panels
designed to slide apart during services. Measured amounts of gold Lurex in the tapestries lend luster to the other,
—and make
and
jute
entirely of gold.
—which
weft
On
much
quieter, materials
the textiles appear from a distance to be closer inspection the black
Albers referred to
as
"thread hieroglyphs"
of the general luminosity.^ The B'nai temple's sanctuary with a
and white
Israel panels,
shimmering radiance,
—cotton
woven
lines
of floating
—emerge out
which dominate the
are
somewhat
calligraphic,
symbolic of the sacred scriptures they protect and adorn. In an unpublished statement about this commission, Albers wrote
which she described
that an earlier weaving,
as "linear in design,
vaguely
suggesting written ciphers," was her point of departure.' (The earlier is
presumably ^/rtc^-W/^/r^-G'o/^/
relates to
[1950,
fig.
42].)
work
This reference to "ciphers"
an ongoing theme in Albers's work: the implicit relationship
between language and weaving. Albers's preoccupation with
this idea
grew
out of a lifelong admiration for the weavings produced in pre-Conquest Peru, a culture that
left
behind extraordinary
textiles
but no written
language. Albers believed that the "expressive directness" of the
Andean
weavers was possible precisely because they did not communicate through writing."
But Albers was
that language can take.
also interested in the variety
Among
Anni Albers Foundation)
are
of visual forms
her papers (now held at the Josef and
magazine clippings from the 1960s of various
scripts,
including Japanese calligraphy, musical notation, cuneiform, and
Arabic,
among
others.
She enjoyed the graphic
qualities
of these written
languages and the mystery of their abstraction. In the cipherlike design of the interest in the written
of Judaism
—
the study of
Albers's
the biblical injunction against iconography in favor of
Hebrew
texts.
Six Prayers, for the Jewish
120
Woonsocket commission,
form intersected compellingly with a basic tenet
The same
Museum
is
in
true of her subsequent commission.
New
York
(fig.
60).
The Jewish
i6o and
Temple
161.
Ark panels,
l-.inanu-lX Dallas, 1956
(open and closed).
IZI
Museum had begun
in
1964 to acquire
art
memorializing the Jews
died in the Holocaust, after the philanthropist Vera List (the
Samuel Glaser) had established
Sam
a special
fund
of
for this purpose. In 1965
Hunter, the director-elect of the museum, wrote to Albers, inviting
commemorative
her to execute a
tapestry.
He
and that the museum "placed no
restrictions
character of the commissioned memorial, or
Albers worked for several
format by weaving
months on
commissions
stated that
were not being granted on the basis of religious
its
who
sister
faith or ethnic origin,
of any kind on the
upon
its
artistic
authorship.""
the piece, gradually developing
the spring of 1966, after
five full-scale studies." In
she had submitted the finished tapestries and had received enthusiastic
approval from the director. Hunter then hesitated to accept them. At the last
minute he and
had noticed
List
similarities
between the work and
her ark covering in Woonsocket. Hunter wrote to her, expressing his reservations: "It a
memorial
would
was our hope, of course, for the six million,
my
detract in
to
opinion from the uniqueness of
Albers responded to Hunter three days
what must have been
have something quite unique
and the existence of a work so
a
later.'"
this
keen sense of disappointment, lor by then she
clearly
of enormous importance to
her.
the comparison of Six Prayers to the earlier synagogue
Woonsocket she had
set
them
and
career,
this
She welcomed
work but pointed
out significant differences. In both works she had used in
commission."'
In her letter she moderated
was sixty-seven years old and near the end of her weaving
commission was
as
similar
six panels;
but
close together to read as a unified whole,
while in Six Prayers she had set them apart from one another, like stelae representing the six million dead. She also pointed out that the synagogue
panels were a ceremonial, festive gold, in contrast to the
monochromatic
gray and silver of Six Prayers. She emphasized technical differences as well: for the ark panels,
had used
a
worked on over for
which she had woven
warp of loosely a
set cotton,
in a
matter of weeks, she
while for Six Prayers, which she
period of several months, she had used a durable linen
both the closer-set warp and In the end, the
for
most of the weft.
museum overcame
its
reluctance
and accepted
Six Prayers. In a press release announcing the work's inaugural presentation,
Albers wrote that the piece was conceived to be intimate rather than
monumental." Conducive effect elicit
to meditation,
of Albers's characteristic poise and
it
has a palpable silence, the
restraint. Yet the panels
prayer; they are a prayer, evoking loss
and sorrow through
not only
their
woven
strands. Like the Peruvian textiles that Albers so admired. Six Prayers
communicates outside any recognizable language. lit
by
silver,
their secrets.
122
Its
"thread-hieroglyphs,"
possess a subtle intensity; tugging at us, they slowly reveal
i62.
Ark
Cotton,
panels, 1962. jute,
and Lurex;
X 213.4 cm X 84 inches) overall. Temple B'nai Israel, six panels,
162.6
(64
Woonsocket, Rhode
Notes
1.
Onl)- the most signiticant ot these
commi.s.si()ns are discussed here.
her commissions tor lemple
Temple B'nai
in Dallas,
Emanu-E!
Israel in
in
Albers also created ark-curtain
material for the Marcel Breuer-designed
Scarsdale
New
Scarsdalc,
York, in 1958, and a set of ark panels
tor the
Congregation Hartzion Agudath
Achim, (The
Reform Temple,
Silver Springs,
latter
is
now
Maryland,
Ancient Writing (1936), Pictographic
Memo
{1958),
Jotting (1959),
Haiku
(1953),
Scroll (1962),
Museum
Woonsocket, and the Jewish
New York,
as
Apart from
in 1967.
of
in the collection
Museum, Jerusalem.) Howard Meyer and Max Sandfield,
(1980). For
Open
sec Virginia
Code
(1962),
Epitaph (1968), and Letter
more on the
between language and
Text:
Letter (1958),
(1961),
Gardner
relationship
AJbers's weavings,
Troy's
"Thread
The Woven Work of Anni
as
Albers"
in this publication. 7.
.Sam Hunter, letter to
June
25, 1965,
Foundation
The
Joset
.-Xnni .Albers,
and .Anni
.-Mbers
archives.
the Israel
8.
2.
collections: Bauhaus-.'\rchiv, Berlin; .Art
memorandum
to the I'emple
Building Committee, Nov.
Temple Emanu-El, 3.
Emanu-El
12,
1956,
Dallas.
"Lotr\' Shrine: Dallas
Dedicates Synagogue,"
Congregation
Life, Feb. 25, 1957,
p. 6z. 4.
museum
and Weatherspoon
Institute ot Chicago;
Gallery, University of
North Carolina,
Greensboro. Another
is
in a private
collection in Pittsburgh.
The
fifth
has not
been located. 9.
Albers used the phrase 'thread-
1 hrcc ot the five studies are in
Sam
March
Hunter,
23, 1966,
letter to .Anni .Albers,
The
Anni Albers
Josef and
hieroglyphs" in a letter to the Jewish
Foundation archives. Hunter had expressed
Museum, March
enthusiasm
26, 1966,
Anni Albers Foundation 5.
Anni
The
Josef and
archives.
Albers, unpublished manuscript,
10.
Foundation archives.
March
6.
Anni Albers, On Weaving (Middlctown,
p. 68.
The
titles
Press, 1965),
of many of AJbers's works
refer explicit^ to written language,
an
earlier letter,
such
dated Feb.
and .Anni
18,
.Albers
Foundation archives.
June 1962, The Josef and Anni Albers
Conn.: Wesleyan University
in
1966, also in the Jo,sef
Anni
Albers, letter to
26, 1966,
Sam
Hunter,
The Josef and Anni Albers
Foundation archives. 11.
Press release.
New
The
York, Jan. 1967,
Jewish
The
Museum,
Josef and Anni
Albers Foundation archives.
123
Island.
'
The
Nicholas Fox Weber
Last Bauhausler
Grasp the simple, embrace the primitive.
Diminish yourself,
— Lao
bridle your passions.
Tzii
I.
When Anni Albers asked me if it would be possible to make fine-art prints at my family's commercial offset shop, she became a little girl eager to embark on
marvelous adventure.
a
septuagenarian
embarked
lit
for the
The
eyes of this generally
up with expectation. As when she had, Bauhaus half a century
earlier,
dour
age twenty-two,
at
she was entering her
favorite realm: that of uncharted territory.
This austere woman, dressed in her inevitable whites and pale beiges, her graying hair sensibly cut, her only
maybe some powder,
makeup
a hint of lipstick
and
sparkled like an eight-year-old in a party dress. Alice,
perhaps: an unbridled enthusiast about to enter the magical kingdom. It
would
had not occurred
minutes from
five
to
me
that
anything to either of the
offer
for insurance
their house,
my
family's printing
artistic AJberses.
Fox
company some forty-
Press,
mostly churned-out booklets and brochures
and manufacturing companies;
it
was known
for high-
quality color-process printing, not for the sort of work that bears an
artist's
on each sheet in the tradition of limited-edition lithographs, etchings, and screenprints. But Anni made her proposal with zeal. This great figure of Modernism who would, by the end of her life, be the last surviving signature
—
teacher of the Bauhaus
—
suggested
it
with the same eagerness and openness
with which she entered the vast domain of her
local Sears
Roebuck
(ten
minutes from her house) and embarked on a course of what, with her cadences, she enthusiastically called "tah-reasure hunting."
lilting Berlin
At Sears she would
extol the merits of plastic containers
blouses, declaring that that
"all this
machine processes were
among
a
and polyester
emphasis on handmade was nonsense, '
wonderful thing, and that synthetics were
the marvels of our century. I
told
Anni
a bit
about the technology of photo-offset.
I
gave a
simple description that touched on the process in the most fundamental
way
—
when,
trying as best a
I
few months
taking a Lord to the other
could to follow Anni's patient and generous lead earlier,
& Taylor box
she had led
me
to understand
weaving by
top and stretching lines of string from one end
and then inserting popsicle
sticks at right angles to the string,
with the sticks placed alternately above and below the taut
fiber, in
order to create a bare-bones loom that demonstrated warp and weft. She
had told
work
124
—
I
me
then that she was delighted that someone so interested in her
was hoping,
I
had
said, to write a
book about
it
— knew nothing
163.
Anni
Albcrs, Milan, July 1983.
125
—
about
work
her
technique, as she quite loathed
textile
to be thought of as art
swim
aspects of her personality, but her wish to
me, and since
I
thought Anni's
of pure and great abstract
art
against the tide intrigued
weavings" to have
"pictorial
—
and wanted
that craft stuff"
"all
did not yet recognize the perverse
first. I
the qualities
all
belong next to the paintings of her
to
Bauhaus confreres Paul Klee and Vasily Kandinsky
—
and since I, too, had most weaving with macrame and needlepoint and was amused and willing to follow her route.
the arrogance to link the like,
I
When we photo-offset, utilize the
began to discuss the possibility of her working with
Anni proved
medium
to
quick study. She decided that she would
to be a
make
a print
of two horizontal rectangular forms
stacked one on top of the other. Each of the rectangles
keeping with the
a triangulated pattern, in
would contain
recent geometric experi-
artist's
full of diversion and ins and outs, but deliberately symmetry or repetition. At the Bauhaus, Anni had been deeply moved by Wilhelm Worringer's pivotal book Abstraction and Empathy; she embraced Worringer's idea of abstraction providing the
mentations, a design lacking in internal
opportunity to create "visual resting places" removed from the often painful realities
and
of the natural world. She was interested in
in history
—
life itself
keep the viewer engaged, the new creation, to
locale or
moment
or to the maker's personal experience. This pure realm of art
could provide some of the harmony that
had
was timeless
art that
known
universal rather than art with specific links to a
eschew easy resolution;
like Josef,
like all
own
artist's
of Anni's compositions,
Anni imbued
certain tension, a perpetual in/out motion, an
and ground. The
sometimes lacked. To abstraction with a
ongoing play between image
persona was to fade
in deference to the
sacred realm of art and the comforts as well as the realities of the technical.
Anni had no wish
to reveal private
fluctuations of her
own mind and
on
the purely aesthetic
for
many
that
Lao
and
emotions or the sometimes troubling heart; she preferred, instead, to focus
Tzii's
It is
words were so beloved by Anni, who kept
philosophy in perpetual reach
a
just as she
had
no wonder
volume of his
at her bedside.
Photo-offset, she determined,
own
of printmaking,
practical issues
years reveled in the construction of textiles.
would enable her to reproduce her and simultaneously to obtain
deliberately irregular pencil strokes,
the crystalline edges
and
reversals allowed
by machine technology. The
photographic reproduction of her gray markings had never been possible
mediums with which
in the print
etching,
and screenprinting.
musical,
communication of the
and other ancient forms
—
if
meaning of its intonations
the precise
to the gray, a red pattern that
a bright plastic sheet
stripping department from an original sketch
opaquely on the top half of
and
lithography,
sort that fascinated her in hieroglyphics
idea of a voice being heard even
to be reversed
—
of writing. She liked nonspecific language, the
was indecipherable. In contrast hand-cut on a rubylith
she had previously worked
enabled her to suggest mysterious, and
It
on the lower
of two
layers
by Anni was
—
had been in the
to be printed
this
two-section print, while the pattern was
half.
What was
red above was gray below,
vice versa, another result of the photo-mechanical process.
The
solids
above were pencil strokes below; the pencil above unmodulated red below.
The
irregularity of her pencil strokes
against the crisp purity of that,
with a
flick
of the
—
this elusive fuzziness
machined forms appealed to her. So did the idea could make what was negative in one
wrist, she
rectangle positive in the other. She was grateful to the technology for having
opened new party.
126
Now
visual possibilities
—
as
if it,
not she, was the responsible
she could achieve the sort of contrast and unpredictability, the
^^ 164.
Fox
I,
1973. Photo-offset,
X 34 cm (14?^ X 13 inches). The Josef and Anni Albers Foundation, 38
'/(,
Bethany.
127
MX
165.
Fox
II,
1973. Photo-offset,
X 34 cm (14 K X 13 /(, inches). The Josef and Anni Albers Foundation, 38
Bethany.
128
niixtuiv o{
tlic
personal and
impersonal, the coincidence ot order and
ilic
spontaneity, and hence the playfulness and elements ot surprise intrinsic to
— while being — when A and work — she would work
her
part ot the
year or so later
munist
letting
you know
me,
ot the evidence remains.) The
would shorten her
(she
she was about ten aiul
first still
with tutors, was a Miss \
world
in the
work. (Unfortunately,
teacher ot Annelisc FIcischmann
she took josets as her
being etliicated
— Anni lo\ed
when
last),
small groiic) ot children
ni a
—
name for whom she autumn leaves."' Then,
the
painted "some good naturalistic watercolors ot
when
life
Com-
had started out with very
in her
first art
name when
iolet
about Anni's
detail
tone ot a rebel
had grown up with finger bowls
abstractionists, she
traditional renditions ot the natural
none
some
in
in the confessional
that she
many
house, that, like so
began to write
I
tell
modern world.
little
she was fourteen and had enrolled in the Kceiim, her parents hired
a private art teacher, loni Mayer,
who came once
a
week
house
to the
with a nude model tor Anni to draw. In retrospect, the idea ot the figure
drawing she had done at the
the
time
way
look
it
made
as a
her
young woman made
"feel
that the progressive
sense to Anni, but
and liberated "Tonuschka" gave her
beyond bourgeois
at the worici
little
very professional," and she was excited by "a first
Berlin." At age fitteen, in 1914,
Anni
made as her entry to a lyceum competition tor posters to give to World War orphans "a picture ot short-haireti little girls sitting behind each I
other in a row. Each wore a skirt about three inches short ot her knees and
was knitting, with a
a ball
of wool
in tront ot her."
premonition of her future involvement with
with that image she was combining her role ot bete noir? She got skirts
too brief
A
word
that the posters
Could Anni have had Did she realize that
threaci?
with that ot
star pupil
were unacceptably immodest, the
poster she considered distinctly inferior
won
first prize,
while hers was awarded only an honorable mention. Her frustration
—Anni always seemed —was with her over
over this
to take a certain pleasure in
wronged
still
With her next and breaking the
rules.
Martin Brandenburg,
art teacher, she
telt
she
made
having been
later.
continued both working figuratively
Now a tull-time art student with the Postimpressionist whom she liked and trom whose strict discipline
she benefited even
she
half a century
it
she questioned the specifics ot his training,
representational paintings about halt
The problems
lite-size.
began when, "ha\ing seen a beautiful Lucas Cranach Eve painted against a
black background"
—one must imagine
the sonorous, soft voice and
deliberate speaking manner, the subtle but distinct emphasis "beautiful,"
its first
warmly
syllable stretched
—she began,
of Brandenburg's recommended technique, to put black
Brandenburg
said that if she did not
could not return to his
classes.
reconciliation, the rebellious student dictates, but the
much
I
work she produced
this use
in tears.
vowing
to
atter that
in her paintings.
of black she
Her mother arranged
comply with the
time makes clear
a
teacher's
how
she ultimately delighted in that black.
When Anni red,
abandon
Anni was
on the word
in violation
first
gave
me
made in solid handwork exactlv. Mv outlines she would want the same
the sketch for the pattern to be
instructed the stripper to simulate her
erroneous assumption was that
in the
sort ot personal ettect that the gray pencil strokes had.
It
took the stripper
days to cut a rubylith that perfectly resembled her drawing
—only
to
have Anni respond by .saying that she hated the handmade appearance.
She meant her drawinti
onl\- as a tiiiide to the
design and desired exact.
129
and sharply pointed
crisp lines
The
do was cut one
to
Once
with the points
reverse of the top,
the preparatory stages were complete
all
my
thrilling intimacy, to a
devotion to
had ever thought possible
wanted
make
to
I
Fox
a trip to
this process
more honest and intense Anni said that she
—
She needed, she
Press.
—
felt,
to
watch the
actual printing in order to determine the intensity of the gray as
and
off the press
make
to
sure that the
opaque red trapped
it
rolled
it
exactly,
containing the pencil without any unwelcome white space around
We
he
all
regular visits to the Alberses
had exposed me, with than
triangles
piece.
had taken many months, during which art
just lightly touching.
from which he cut the
bottom unit was simply the
precisely; since the
had
triangles
stripper then developed a grid
it.
would pick her up one morning at the modest, shingled, raised ranch house where she and Josef lived on a pleasant suburban street in the town of Orange, fifteen minutes from the center of New Haven. Although she still drove short distances on her own, it was better for
agreed that
me
I
to take her
on the hour-long journey
was on the north side of Hartford, and return her In those days
I
Fox
to
at the
MG roadster, which
drove an
Press,
which
end of the
day.
thought would
I
be impossible for Anni to get into. She walked awkwardly, often using a
and her
cane,
what her
and
legs
feet
seemed
slightly
precise disability was, but she
had been an incorrect rumor
at
contracted rickets during World
Josef danced
War
referred to having
all
broken her hip problem. like
(I
night, a
and
few years
would
at
i66. Josef Albers at 8
New
North Forest
Haven, Connecticut,
Circle,
ca. 1968.
—and
there
she wore large custom-made
accommodate
a structural
remained seated
problem.
Bauhaus
at
parties while
but she never identified the actual
sister,
Lotte,
them
to
of which their leg muscles
feet, as a result
children might be similarly afflicted it
—
from her brother, Hans Farman, that Anni,
could not fully develop. Anni's
that
I
her mother, suffered from a genetic syndrome that caused
have an extreme arch in both
know
did not yet
another point had mentioned that she had
earlier,
later learn
I
terribly thin calves
Black Mountain College that she had
shoes that were clearly designed to
Anni had once
malformed.
had
and Hans both
feared that their
— they were not— and Hans presumed
was one of the reasons that Anni and Josef had never had children
of their own. Indeed, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, the hereditary progressive nerve disorder from
which Anni
suffered,
would probably have
caused any female children she had to have the same sort of clawed
feet,
nerve deterioration, and wasting of leg muscles as Anni had.' Other people,
however, said that the reason was that the Alberses' work was their children,
and
that their involvement with their art
for family matters.)
So
for the sake
left:
of Anni's comfort
I
no time or energy drove
my
mother's
Rover sedan, which so fascinated Josef that he came outside to the drive-
way
to study
it.
Josef paced back and forth analyzing the English
he
said, to their
Mercedes,
in that, unlike
of these models wasted trunk space.
American
car. It
was
similar,
designs, neither
The importance
of this relationship
of form and function was never minimized. The Alberses had already told
me on many
portable
Sony
Clean and
occasions that they preferred their Polaroid camera and
television to the paintings
effective design
of the Abstract Expressionists.
with a purpose ranked
far
higher than art
focused on the revelation of one's private self
Anni evinced the same pleasure embarking on our outing had over our collaboration from the eagerness of a
And
130
I
young man
was content beyontl
as she
the start. Clearly she liked the attention,
to cater to her
belief; after years
whims and soak up of studying
her views.
art history, in
both Anni and
josct
had ciKounicicd,
1
people ulio
as nc\(.T bftoic,
j;cn-
uincK' h\cd and breathed art as the essence of their h\es. lor the Alberses art
was the central
— not on
issue
of American education and
supreme
and
opposed
line as
more
was
in
Ihe
visual
to Duccio's,
most of Americas famous two
accessible of the
of
artists
she was as selective as in
— but Anni was
them, eager to cross the
all
the
from discussing
line
was entirely
friends. In this arena
of her other choices, but once one had made
sanctum, there was
to the inner
it
Giotto's
architecture, about
work and sense of self; Anni needed
his
a remarkable
— about
topics to establishing an intimate personal connection, josef
content with
institutions
world was
had established
I
German Rococo
about
most
in their marriage.
months Anni and
often had wonderful conversations
I
the tiaudulence oi
it
at large.
of them individually, and
for each
In the preceding
rapport. Josef
the peripher)' as
our culture
in
much
pleasure in being there, even
if
one had to remain somewhat on guard and on good behavior. Arrogant,
woman,
imperious, demanding, and snobby, this highly intelligent
grand duchess of Modern
art,
could be
she could be dismissive.
so, as
who
the few
and savored
recognized the
I
it
was Josef who
in 1971.
was then
I
My
among
of the position
latched onto the significance of
iiiitialK'
What
from the world of printing.
them laden with
at Yale.
rarit\'
as such.
it
in m\'
ordinary and bourgeois and businesslike for people to
this
and charming, genuinely
was, of course, Battering to be
It
escaped her opprobrium:
In fact,
my coming
as gracious
friend
both Annis and
Ihe occasion was our very
rare potential.
a twenty-three-year-old
Ruth Agoos
graduate student
first
who had
was
meeting,
in art history
— who with her husband. Herb,
work, and
Josef's
mind seemed too
like the Alberses
collected
been, to the cool and distant
extent to which the Alberses jointly permitted personal relationships to
develop, a friend of theirs for over a decade her in calling on them. At that point
reputation but
by her
I
knew
had seen I
about
little
his wife's
had, a year
I
anticipated meeting.
know what to expect from the great who had now made such a mark on American
earlier,
been the
Museum
Metropolitan
of Art
in
New
York
painter art
—
and
Josef
major retrospec-
living artist ever to have a
first
accompany work and
other than the pieces
was Josef whom
It
to
Josef's
did not quite
color theorist
tive at the
very
at the Agooses'.
— had asked me
was familiar with
I
— but
I
was properly
donned my one clean pair of corduroys, a herringbone jacket, and a tie would later discover how right I was in having a foreboding that such details counted in a major way nervous and intimidated
in
advance.
I
—
where
was going
I
—and did my utmost
when had to get underneath the By the time Ruth and pulled up I
I
Drive, 1
I
was past being Happed
—
MG
I
to
to
keep the grease off
bang the
at the Alberses' at least
fuel
pump
—of
the house, with
its
I
had expected
—
But the interior
more
more than
head
—
his build
its
mind,
at least
some-
from I.evittown.
satellite
the half-fJight of stairs and, in an
met the
Alberses, their presence
the impression of
was almost
who was
and
my
and minimal and spare than anything one would
space completely. Josef was stocky, of
while Anni,
by Walter Gropius, or
chrome, not a
moment we went up
austere
ever find in I.evittown,
presence,
in
— but
in fact,
shingles the color of Band-Aids
to arrive at a pavilion
a rock.
house, at 808 Birchwood
strident concrete foundation completely devoid of planting. In
thing sleek and white and edged
pants
with
the car had finally started
could not help being astonished by the blatant ordinariness
the ugliness
my
tall
two
medium
like Picasso's,
for a
—
it
.separate beings
height,
was
—
a
filled
and had
mutual the
a large
but without the musculature
woman, was
thin as a
rail.
But whatever
131
"
were truly big people; they animated the world around
their builds, they
them. The nearly empty house, with
and complete absence of personal
few pieces of lean furniture
its
objects,
walls practically blank save
its
by Josef and work by two of his students (nothing
for four paintings
by Anni was
"
was
in sight),
minimal Modern
like a
by
stage set occupied
characters of Shakespearean dimensions.
The
redness of Josef's skin seemed accentuated by the snow-
whiteness of his smooth, straight
would have remarked on tell
me
hair, precisely the sort
of color effect he
Anni, although she would
in his teaching.
was so dark-skinned that she had been able
that she
of sun without any problem during their
Mexico
visits to
later
to take lots
in the era before
sunscreens were readily available while the fairer Josef had had to protect
made
himself assiduously,
—
a paler impression
like a figure in a
white movie slightly out of focus and infused with that she
had something about her
comic book fame, but
that
was
if this
less
light.
me
reminded
I
black-and-
regret to say
of Olive Oyl of Popeye
than flattering to her looks, the Olive
Oyl-like mix of awkwardness and amiability, the apparent receptiveness
and eager gaze
me
at
newcomer, won
as a
"What do you
me
do, boy^'' Josef asked
seconds after Ruth had introduced us and
over.
me
and control with which the rugged octogenarian had shaken study art history at Yale,
"I
to
some lower
answered
sir," I
only
in a strident voice
had been struck by the strength
I
—
my
hand.
reduced, as
was,
I
echelon: a student before a senior professor, an apprentice
before a master, a private before a general.
"Do you
like
it,
boyV This was not someone who believed
in
pussyfooting.
had no idea what
I I
fellowship grant; in an instant. cost,
and
if
But
mean,
.
"Why
not,
"Well,
sir, I
.
.
really
.
.
my
find that I'm losing
or
how
semester
it
for that
for the past three
I
weeks
like,
I
think so
much about
When
all
I
tried to talk to the
me
New
I'orcst Circle,
he put
his
I
like, boy,''
Josef declared,
arm around me and patted my
as,
art
anymore.
with what
my
to
I
deduced was
complete surprise, bastards
Haven, Connecticut, 1968,
photographed by Henri Carrier-Bresson.
in art history don't I
you
like?"
answered, and
we bandied about
professors in the department.
the
names of a few of the
Anni now chimed
in.
They had
the usual
disdain that practicing artists hold for art historians. She referred to
one well-known professor used the American idiom
—
as
"And what does your puzzled
by
132
my
me
slightly.
I
—she grinned
being
"full
of hot
parents' professions
like a little kid as
— and
it
she
air."
father do?" Josef then asked.
had not expected
—
it
I
The
question
was past defining myself
was only months
a
if quizzical smile.
"Which of those
back.
Now
the facts they're looking
of the
can't feel that inexplicable thrill
I
noticed that Anni was looking at
"This North
been
about the colors and forms,
degree of fascination, and with what seemed an approving 167. Josef All)^.r^ a( X
I've
fixtures in nineteenth-century
was made, he said that that wasn't the subject of the course.
find
I
art.
been taking a course called 'Seurat and the
I've
what the painting looked
go to museums
I
I.
passion for looking at
France to understand the details of Le Chahut.
when
my
boyV
basement studying gas-lighting
teacher about
of
packing
don't.
.
Iconography of Entertainment,' and in a library
me
have always been one to declare the truth at whatever
I
sir, I
this past
as part
thought he might have the power to send
I
he wouldn't mince words, neither would
"No,
I
with the university was, and
his relationship
was greatly dependent on the monthly stipends awarded
later that
I
realized
to
what extent
emphasized
Josef always
Albers had been
and plumbing;
a
Josef
who
occupation. I.orenz
his hither's
also did carpentry, electrical
work,
had the deepest admiration h)r the practical
skills,
hoiisepainter
on technical proficiency and knowledge
the emphasis
he had learned
of materials,
come from Adam and my who pointed to
as a child. "I
he would declare resolutely to scholars
whom
Johan Thorn-Prikker (with
That's all,"
father.
the glass artist
had apprenticed before attending
Josef
the Bauhaus) or to \'incent van Cjogh, or, less accurately, to the
and
Expressionists as a source for his early style
my
Besides,
mother was
Alberses might be interested that that the whiff of oil paint
one
as the
a painter; I
But
my
answered the question
I
in a
house with
a studio in
room was
detected in their living
I
had known throughout
I
thought perhaps that the
I
grew up
German
sub.secjuent developments.
the
it,
same
childhood.
"Hes
as asked.
a printer.
I
mean,
he owns a printing company."
"Good," Josef something. YouVe not
Anni had been looking of a
girl
that
my
owned
grounds
Her
—
his
for
was
From
many
round
father for the
What
all right.
own company, and a furniture
in effect
—
manufacturer
of business
felt isolated, this
graphic arts
me
met her
just first
moment
that
felt at
I
as
if
Hrst with the nervousness, then the relief, first
rime,
and who
did not yet realize was
I
we came from
similar back-
which her word of choice would have been "bourgeois."
combination
nature
art historian."
answer had afforded her a certain comfort, since her father had
father
in its
an
me
at
whose date has
has gotten through the
also
"Then you know something about
replied, smiling. just
link
a line
of work similar
and aesthetic concerns. For Anni, who by
between us had meaning.
that point forward, Josef talked to
— he esteemed graphic design
interesting printers,
to printing
an
as
and had designed
me
art
often about the
form, had worked with
several alphabets
— and gave
various materials pertaining to the subject.
Meanwhile, Anni,
who had had
far less to say in that first
conversation, had obviously begun to hatch a scheme.
been interested
some more something
And
in
my
While Josef had
printing connection theoretically, she recognized
tangible possibilities in the relationship. She might at the different sort of
in the
printing
company my
\oung man who had been brought
might have both
in that
and an admirer. She was,
a friend
I
make
familv owned.
afternoon, she
discovered in time,
deeply in need of both.
What that
1
most remember of the
Anni and Ruth
station
wagon,
anti
1
to procure lunch,
and that
world through the eyes of one of the
and
the ma.ss production a
new dimension, and
I
also
foods takes
encounter was
I
learned that
when you
Kentucky Fried Chicken
like "Josef
see the
proponents of the Bauhaus,
and
I
when
distinction
takes
on
and
ele-
don't like extra kah-rispy,"
more ordinary came to see that day that even the least appealing of fast on a new charm when enunciated in quiet Berlin tempo
"Ken-tucky fah-ried
from
initial
when someone of Anni's
has a magic that such preferences lack
souls.
of that
earliest
efficiency of
that
gance makes a pronouncement it
rest
went out, with Anni driving her Ghevrolet
a spare
"
— and
and lean
uttered by
served on immaculate white Rosenthal china
rolling cart, arranged there
by someone whose
eyes and imerring design sense govern every slight decision.
It
was two years
later that
1
was driving Anni
to her entrance to the printing plant the
to
Fox
Press.
She gave
same very individual magic, the
deliberateness and quirky charm, that she lent to most simple actions.
133
—
Proportioned
one
like
of Alberto Giacometti's striding figures
with the aid of her plain
stick,
Anni was
of her dark brunette hair and her
stately
she "purposefully avoided an arty look"
who was most
and walking
striking both for the dignity
own
manner. By her
—
definition,
a bent she shared with Josef
often seen in solid-colored, straight-collared shirts and
khaki or gray wool trousers; the tone
set
by
was of consider-
their clothing
able importance to both the Alberses. For her Fox Press outing, a simply cut, rather severe khaki skirt that
and
a silky white crepe blouse,
knowing her
well,
Anni wore
below the knee,
just
pure-white cable-stitch sweater. Not yet
a
assumed that the sweater was expensive, handmade,
I
— someone of Anni would wear nothing —but having become more acquainted with have come
and imported else
ended
that
Albers's stature
her
closely
to realize that
and from
it
work
For
a discount store.
practical products of ly instructed
I
was probably machine-made, synthetic, and washable I
now know
handmade and
weavers championing the
to look at their
that she always preferred the
mass production to most luxury goods
own
— and
belittling
regular-
machine
shirts.
Anni's plain, mostly inexpensive clothes acquired a rare elegance
on
her, in part
Alexander's
because of the
(When
have been Chanels.
asked
fit
for
whom
and hung; her its
suits
from
cheap merchandise) might
she considered to be the greatest
of the twentieth century, she was inclined to answer "Coco Chanel.")
artist
Along with the whites and a
way they
department store noted
(a
shimmering brown
were of color
as well as
When we had
father
built
tans that day,
Anni had on
Press,
I
lamented
I
told
Anni
that
when my
he had considered buying Standing Lithographer
by David Smith, a seven-and-a-half-foot-tall for a chest.
jacket,
of texture.
walked into the pressroom,
Fox
brown suede
a
and heavy brown suede shoes; the balances
scarf,
this
figure with a steel type case
with the collector's usual woe over the
art
masterpiece almost bought, explaining that the ten thousand dollars
needed
to
buy
had ended up being required
it
had recently sold I
for
for a fire door.
one hundred and seventy thousand
considered too vulgar to mention but of which
Anni was
surprisingly
Without missing
unmoved by what
I
I
(The Smith
dollars, a detail
was keenly aware.)
considered a misfortune.
a beat, she simply pointed to a large Swiss two-color
and declared, "You see that machine? That, that more beautiful than anything David Smith ever touched." Anni positioned herself carefully on a wooden chair next to
press in front of us is
far
the thirty-two-inch single-color press where her print was to be run.
She exuded
a sense of
was mercifully
free
importance and rectitude,
as well as grace,
but
of the self-consciousness of a grande dame. She was,
quite simply, an honest worker trying to do her job as best she could.
There was nothing of an old lady about
her; she
was neither
a "character"
nor a "person of importance," and her age and gender assumed minor roles.
What was
remarkable was her quiet brilliance, and her humility
alongside her complete originality. As the pressman adjusted the press,
she spoke of the
wonder of the machine and of the
to the capabilities
artist's
need to respond
of the equipment.
Anni was curious about the
flexible plate that
was being locked
know more about how it was made. The pressman fetched the platemaker, who suggested that we go into the prep department to see how it was created. Observing the chemical processes onto
and
a roller
fit
and wanted
to
of the halftones, Anni marveled
As she exulted
in
the technology, this
accuracy of mechanization.
woman who
worked alongside Klee and Kandinsky
134
at the
fifty
at the
years earlier,
Bauhaus had
somehow made
this prinrint; pl.iiu in C'oiiiiccticut
and its
What
lite.
complicated
but rather
its
an outgrowth of B.uih.uis thinking
she c\okcd of that great and pioneering art school was not politics
the rivalries that sometimes sullied
t)r
and marriage
crisp thinking
While impressively himible
its
atmosphere,
and technology.
ot creativity
her demeanor, she had a degree
in
of politeness that suggested the true ranks of noblesse. Shaking hands
men
with the
at the plant,
Anni smiled graciousK- and
me
to
that she in
an
simply
their inability to use machines; they should
from
aside, suffered
them
told
admired what they did. "Craft people," Anni complained
look at what they were wearing to understand the value of mechanization. It
was yet another
reiteration of this favorite point.
Watching the used to
first
few prints
roll
off the press, which was usually
Anni was
off brochures by the thousands,
fire
been while the parts were clamped into place and the
was consistent with the passion
for preparation
when
often voiced to me. As a child of ten,
with her collars,
both
sister,
in their
and process
she went to the
When
parties in their Berlin apartment, she loved
fascinated by the return to the
norm
her parents gave costume
moved
in, just as
The end
quite as interesting. But what pleasure there had been
vast area of parks
her familvs formal
on the
had
symphony
she was
after the party; transformation,
the working of components, were her nectar.
were speciallv
This
that she
watching the usual furniture
being taken away and the party props being
when
she had
as
alwavs been that of the orchestra timing
up— more than the actual performance.
her childhood
—
black velvet dresses with white Irish lace
moment had
her favorite
riveted
rollers inked.
result
and
was never
on the occasion
in
became the (itunewald, the
flat
outskirts of Berlin. Large canvases of landscapes
and guests entering the
installed to create this picnic setting,
verdant paradise were met by a simulated boat, created on a bed frame
on wheels,
that ferried
them
few
a
feet
through the entr\\vay,
as
they
if
were crossing one of the lakes of the Grunewald. Most!)' Anni had negative
memories of her mother; she mainly her mother had arranged
showed some
Oskar Kokoschka a pupil
— he
she fondly
the study of
when
though
the adolescent Anni
and had accompanied her
Dresden
in
art
to the studio
hopes that he would take her on
in the
168.
of
remembered
stands, ticket booths, lost
the occasion
when
a railroad station
—
as
her mother appeared at a partv'
established by murals of sausage
and information desks
— and
acted like a child
before returning as a mother looking for a missing child.
Variations outside the norm, the shifts from one state to another, the sense of something happening: these brought considerable delight to
Anni and
Josef.
On
when
those occasions
were invariably fascinated by construction buildings, pointing out to Trial
and
error
—
Anni. By the time of our
handmade
me how
1
drove them to
sites
— never seemed
these grays imits had to be larger than she intended print so that the\- could be totalK' trapped, as
Anni saw She
Now,
was her
upper fault;
occasions and had applied too her
work
in
to frustrate
little
half
we
them
discovered that to be in the final
Anni wished them
as the first prints
that the gra\' of the
insisted that this
of new-
the print shop, she had had to redo the
pencil part of her print at least twice before
the solid design on top.
York, they
the process evolved.
the essence of process
visit to
New
and the scaffolding
began
to be,
by
to roll off the press,
was darker than
at
Annclisc and Ixniu
Berlin, ca. 1908.
did not) and her mother's complaints and pessimism. But
where the motif was
who was
all
initial talent,
recalled confrontation (even
the bottom.
she had done the two parts on separate pressure the second time. As with
weaving, certain issues were paramount: the knowledge
of materials, the decree of force or laxirv, the wish for deliberate balance
135
IL-isclim.iiiii.
and the adjustments required
as a setting for irregularity,
from the
initial
concept to an end result that was
The foreman
to proceed
completely
still
fresh.
joined the pressman in discussing the problem of
They determined would enable them to lighten the top gray. Anni the machine to correct her mistake. She explained
the two differing grays and Anni's wish to regulate them. that a press adjustment
was to
thrilled to use
oi us that the printing was as important to her artwork as was her
all
The
design concept.
initial
equipment, she subsequently told
role of the
me, had been equally important when she started twenty-two. "sissy stuff"
—
she used the term often
—
as
by which she had gained admission
jects
opposed
hoped
the other Bauhaus workshops she had
textile
work
medium and had
she had resisted the
Initially
— and
and metal
accompanied by
to enter.
it
As her entrance pro-
Bauhaus, she had made a
to the
a very naturalistic
a black-to-white color
age
to wall painting or
three-dimensional study out of the interiors of thermos bottles bits of glass
at
considered
drawing of
sequence.
— broken of wood
a piece
Not unnaturally
in light
of the thermos assemblage, once she was admitted she considered entering the stained-glass workshop,
where she admired the
made by
the glass-shard collages being
of the reasons that, in spite of having failed her
had become so eager
to
remain
at the
skill
and
originality
Josef, eleven years her elder initial
entrance exam, she
Bauhaus. (Josef coached her for the
second round of tests, which she passed.) But the Bauhaus masters
—and
one person was enough
in that field
metalwork would prove
to be too strenuous for her.
not
at all enthusiastic
wanted
to
do
in the possibilities
warp and
had
to
Kandinsky s, you had
do
that if
I
wanted
a
kind of railing to
me
a
tremendous help
to
so long as you, at the
—
weft,
"Even
structural aspect of knotting. Klee's or
and not something
She told me,
as sissy as
textiles,
and limitations of the loom, the
materials, the role of
and the if
to stay;
and
I
"I
was
as
think
I
same time,
are
it
I
working with
she immersed herself textures of the available
charms
as well as the
a painting student of
a course in a
wanted
the limitations that
me,
visible
you were
go through
to
that
that carpentry, wall painting, or
But once she accepted the idea of
threads."
felt
about going into the weaving workshop, because
a real man's job
of
and one
workshop. So
to stay. This
come with
I
weaving was
That was
a craft.
probably can be to anybody,
concerned with breaking through
it."
II.
knew a man once who was the best compositor in the world, and who was who devoted themselves to inventing artistic types; he derived joy, not so much from the very genuine respect i)i which he was held /
sought out by all those
by
persons whose respect was not lightly bestowed as from the actual delight in the exercise
of his
craft,
a delight not wholly unlike that which good dancers derive
from dancing. I have known mathematical
way
or
type,
difficult. I
also compositors
who were
or script, or cuneiform, or anything else that was out
did not discover whether
these men's private lives
but in their working hours their constructive instincts
— Bertrand A month print
up
experts in setting
of the
were happy,
ivere frilly gratified.
Russell'
or so before this trip to Fox Press,
one afternoon when we
print over a Velox
—
pattern, but did not
a
Anni had devised
a
second
accidentally juxtaposed a negative of the
shiny proof
want thin
— of
lines of
it.
first
She was happy with the resultant
blank paper to show between the
shapes and the overlap, a result that was possible to achieve only through printing techniques; there could not have been a study drawing.
shop foreman, who had
136
closely h)llowed the
1
he
development process of both
came over
prints, if
it
second image was coming oH the press and asked
as this
wasn't even better than
tlie
concept behind the
first
Anni smiled
print.
and agreed. As with the
image, Anni
first
margins so that the paper
The
frames.
size
would
lormat and
liad de\ ised tlie o\erall
fit
into prefabricated metal-strip
work
Alberses were both great believers in adjusting their
according to the
products. Standardization appealed.
sizes oi available
Anni had given up her loom
in
moving
1968 because she was
where no room was big enough
for
house
to a
or at least this was the reason
it;
she gave. (This obkiscation through sounding deceptively martcr-of-tact
me
struck
being on a par with her
as
passport as "housewife." Clearly
listing of her profession
on her
she had wanted to keep on weaving,
if
she could have moveti to a house with enough space for her loom.)
When
an earnest art historian once asked josef wh\' he had enlarged the
size of his
Honitiga
to the SqiKtrc
and had begun
a grou|i of fortx-eiglu-
by-forty-eight-inch panels, and, to Josef's irritation, suggested that
something
to
do with
a response to the scale of the
had
it
American landscape
and the oversize canvases used by the Abstract Expressionists, Josef replied that
was because he had gotten a larger station wagon.
it
Meanwhile, the press had been the second image. As
we admired
when he switched from Rives
BFK
It
was time
Hew
specified, the print
coverage lush and gorgeous. Just
made
and luxuriant
off the press,
one hundred and
like that,
of
to print the black
the proof paper to the thick
Anni had
that
up
set
the adjustments the pressman
its
ink
fifty sheets.
for lunch.
On
the car ride to a local restaurant,
woman,
this elderly
for
all
was again struck by how
I
had something
of the visibility of her struggles,
about her of an eager child. Her face undisguisedly revealed the
battles
of her youth; the rebellion against her mother and anger toward her rejected the trappings of upper-class existence for the rigors of
the Hight from
Nazism and, more arduous
years later to get family
and friends
powerful and
caused no
little
all
America when refugee ships were
to
in the
self-satisfieci
man, whose draw
marriage
a
for other
women
grief for his very self-conscious wife.
Anni often person
too
Modernism;
the painful efforts a few
yet,
being turned away from our shores; the ups and downs of to a
as she
room.
wherever she was she
said that "
She
first
"the youngest
felt like
me when
mentioneci this to
describing
being taken, as a child, to the Secession show in Berlin. Her father regularly
museums on Sundays;
took her to
more adventurous than
usual.
this
She
time he had opted for something
crowds shaking their heads disapprovingly "simply thought,
'Why
not?
"
shocked
said that as she observed the
Telling
me
at the
avant-garde images, she
when
this
she was seventy-six,
she remarked that having been the only child at that Secession exhibition, she had
felt like
that she
still
most of
my
like the
awkward
the youngest person in
always asked,
most situations ever
since,
and
"'Why not?"
Indeed, in attitucle and interest she was younger, and fresher, than
contemporaries, even
if
I
was
fifty
pleased with herself, but rather the one
who
She was
years her junior.
sort of adolescent girl, not the ver\- prett\-
has to
make
one patently
the extra effort,
the one intensely asking questions and looking at the world before her.
I
have, since that tirne, heard
who knew ever lived.'
saw her
in
Anni
her for years at Black I
called
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;â&#x20AC;&#x201D;by
Mountain
woman woman who
a perfectly guileless
"the homeliest
have also heard scores of witnes.ses
who
public describe her as incredibK- beautiful.
visited her 1
ler face
house or
was sharply
137
— — and sometimes
delineated, intense,
a bit crazed
but her looks were quite unlike anyone
Anni
was uncertain
It
problem with being Jewish because face because to her
like Virginia
to
me
for her as to
was associated
it
were very caught
whether she had a in her
any event,
in
much
as
1
would
body, but also with her religious heritage and, on
Nothing was easy
femininity.
was so
like a true
mind with
the
represented her Jewishness, which she eschewed for
it
— but
acknowledge
rather not
she was supremely uncomfortable not just with her
this,
Woolf's
she did not like in herself, or whether she disliked her
facial characteristics
other reasons
which
herself hated her features,
up with her Jewishness.
—
else's.
some
own
face
levels,
and
with her
complex person, who paradoxically
for this
ingenue.
In the car that day,
on the way
to the restaurant, she
was happier
than usual and eagerly took the conversation from topic to topic. She and Josef led a
life
of remarkable solitude. Their house was truly a machine
for working, with living as a secondary concern; they virtually never spent their evenings
with other people, and any encounters they had were almost
always for the purpose of making or showing
art.
Josef was not
inclined under any circumstances to discuss politics or world
much
affairs.
Anni,
on the other hand, was keenly aware of the news, which came to her through a large radio and a TV that sat on rolling tables near her bed, and if her husband, she told me, felt as if the news was "all the same, always repeating her.
not
itself,
as interesting as art," the events
of the world fascinated
Like Josef, she too had art as a credo; she would point out that while
science constantly changes
unique
and new
discoveries outdate old ideas, art offers
the example of a two-thousand-year-old Korean
stability, citing
teapot with timeless appeal that affects the beholder in as the art
On
of our
way
the
own
times. Nevertheless, the
lunch and
to
recent shooting
on an
at the restaurant,
Israeli airplane;
most
much
news mattered
the
same way
to her.
what was on her mind was a often, though, in that time
period she was preoccupied with Watergate and desperate to discuss
Maureen Dean or Martha Mitchell or Nixon himself In some ways, she seemed to be a broader intellectual, and a fuller person, than Josef With the Israeli shooting as her topic, Anni's ambivalence about being Jewish was again apparent. Although she would subsequently change it,
in her will at that
been
there, she felt
time she had
Museum
textiles to the Israel
an
left
her collection of Pre-Columbian
in Jerusalem;
even though she had never
affinity for that country. Yet she
would often
describe herself as Jewish only "in the Hitler sense": her mother's family,
named
UUstein, had gone through a mass family conversion to Christi-
anity at the
end of the nineteenth century, and her
Fleischmann, had seen to her being confirmed
hood
—
in Berlin's great
She was proud that
as a
father, Siegfried
Lutheran
in her child-
and fashionable Karl Wilhelm Gedachtniskirche.
this latter fact
had enabled her and Josef
to acquire the
grave plots they wanted in Orange, in the section of the cemetery where
Catholics like Josef were generally not allowed to be buried. (The choice
of burial
site
was extremely important
to
them, in part because they want-
ed to be right next to the narrow driveway that wandered through the
cemetery so 169. Josef
Town
and Anni
Albers's graves,
Orange
that,
go to the post
once the
office
first
of them had died, the remaining one could
and then drive into the graveyard, stop the
car, roll
Cemetery, Orange, Connecticut.
down
company of the other Indeed, Anni often made such
the window, and read the mail in the
without having to get out of the
car.
although, contrary to plan, she was driven there by
never seemed to understand that,
meant entering from
118
if
my
visits,
wife or me, and
she was to be right next to Josef this
the opposite direction than they had originally
planned, since
But
car.)
Anni
now
she was in the passenger's seat, on the other side ot the
of anti-Semitism,
in the face
Anni had when,
me
told
month
a
how oHended
she was
named
known
said that they should have
her.
doubt that she saw any irony
me numerous
Irom hrankturt
nastily ot "Jewish girls
Anni I
about
earlier
Bauhaus, Mies van der Rohe and anottier architect,
at the
Ludwig Hildesheimer, had spoken
to
as reflected in the violence in Israel,
considered herself to be Jewish.
better than to
even though she had explained
in this,
times that she didn't really consider herscll to be Jewish.
own background was
But her attitude toward her
unique
as
as
when
everything else about her. Instead ol reacting with anger or fear
her
Jewish heritage had forced them out ol Germany, she told
me
she had
"uncomfortable and responsible lor Jo.sels having to leave
his
homeland
alter lorry-five years."
Josef's neck.
When
"
;
that in Iront of
.say
She considered
herself "almost a weight
had docked
their boat
New
in
lelt
around
York, hours late
because of a storm, and the photographers, there to cover the arrival of first-class
passengers but then told that a famous artist was also
had begun
who had
of the Modernist
to take pictures
mood
Black Mountain, a jaunty newspaperman had lightened her
else: "
erably with a remark that might have infuriated .someone Let's get the wife too!"
delight
he had exclaimed. Anni quoted
on numerous occasions. She
been happy to surrounding
.see
this to
relished his informality,
someone break ranks from
the
on board,
arrived to teach at
consid-
Fhe wife.
me
with
and she had
crowd of reporters
The attention had somehow helped assuage her
Josef.
There was never an
iota
of resentment
In spite of her not having
guilt.
her retelling of the incident.
in
been offended when others might have
been, Anni often considered herself the victim of an insult or rudeness;
many times her memories of people had made to her. Mies, Anni would was central
revolved around a nast)' remark they
another of our conversations,
recall in
She and Josef were newly-
to yet another social slight for her.
weds and had
just
moved into one of the masters' houses at the Dessau new bride that Mies and his mistress, Lilly Reich,
Bauhaus. Josef told his
would be coming for dinner. Anni was determined to do her best in every way possible. Her mother had given her a butter curler, and she made a neat
mound
arrival.
of butter balls that she put
Mies and Reich had only
her and burst out, "Butter the Bauhaus you'd have a
Here
balls!
good
on the
walked
just
at
wound
table prior to their guests'
when Reich looked
the Bauhaus!
solid ^/of^
Anni's face betrayed the
in
I
should think
consequence
—
she had incurred at the remark;
of the same. Once,
a year or so following
after Josef's death),
my
exhibition of Josef's al,
no-makeup
larly
wife purchased a
work
prettiness
new
marriage
total lack
and very becoming
a source
of vanity,
dress.
was stretching out
with more than the usual "Is that a
new
(a
much
few months
dress for the
of envy
We
felt
for
Anni
opening of an
—whose — was not
in
high
the
lilt
last
to Anni's
spirits,
house
and, in spite
rather pleased about the simply cut
She entered Anni's bedroom at
natur-
particu-
went together
up belore the event. Katharine was
of an almost
tically,
my
the Yale Art Gallery. Katharine
at
was
confident about clothing matters.
to pick her
— perhaps
beleaguered victim could dish out
this
at
of butter."
she said that she had barely been able to get through dinner. Yet as a natural
before
minute
to rest
— Anni,
characteris-
up before the event
to her walk.
dress?"
Anni asked
as she
gazed seriously.
"Yes," Katharine answered.
"Can you by
a sadistic smile.
still
return
What
it?"
This second question was accompanied
the incident realK- ie\ealed about
Anni
139
170. Josef in
New
and Anni Albcrs arriving
York on board the SS Europa,
November
24, 1933.
her jealousy, her extreme mixture of kindness and nastiness, or her cruelty,
whether deliberate or inadvertent
—
hard to gauge, but
is
was
it
t\'pical.
Yet in spite of this exchange, and other comparable slights,
Katharine had considerable fondness and respect for Anni
Once, when going
the unique workings of her mind.
up some
to pick
requested "a banana"
or the other as
was the
— pronounced bah-«/?/>nah — No
"an avocado."
ly stretched
was making
groceries for Anni, she
if
one
Katharine
else,
—and
relished
market
to the local
a
list
when Anni
with the as similar-
or,
could want one
felt,
they were comparable. But for Anni texture, not
taste,
issue.
Katharine also took particular delight in Anni's obsession with lyi.
For Kathy's Nov.
1982. Yellow
14.6
X
15.9
12, igSi,
cm
(5
/<;
X
6
warehouse where
to the
inches).
/^
She was fascinated by the way
plastic.
marker on wove paper,
enormous
used to cover sofas
clear bags
when
that,
went
the three of us
was stored, Anni would covet the
Josef's art
Collection of Katharine Weber.
—
just as she relished the sleeves
given by banks for savings-account passbooks. Katharine has often
map of some
Like a medieval
Anni's drawing for
my
distant island,
twenty-seventh
birthday in 1982 signifies the uncharted
and unchartable nature of her own emo-
who made
remarked that Anni was the only person she has known covers for her washer
and
dryer.
The
herself out of shower-curtain material favorite of
slip-
great textile artist stitched these
—which, Katharine
felt,
was Anni's
substances.
all
me, the drawing has
tional geography. For
always represented something unspoken
between
that existed
was one of mutual
us.
Our
relationship
affection,
and occasional
sparring.
The same week
adversarial
made this we were
she
drawing, Anni learned that expecting our second child perhaps, but also another
— another
member
an edge. left
The
three squared dots
are elements that
might
it
over the open top of the form and
about
inside. Is
body?
Is it
it
a
political
views were based on the impressions people made, on their faces
Indian wife.
maze?
Is it
I
pleasant,
The
more than on any deeper knowledge
So she and Josef liked Nelson Rockefeller,
and had
little
novelist Robert
something about of
up
move
is it
suspended, a weighted, chunky form that
"who had
use for Gerald Ford,
Penn Warren was of no
his face. It
was
as if
interest to
people were
like
who seemed
a face like a knee."
them
— because of
constructed works
the qualities of balance or aggressiveness, of correctness or ugliness,
art:
could be apprised even with a cursory view.
Anni
a living
leaping across the page or
learn over the years that
character,
also has
on the
travel
said that she
many of her
his
of their platforms. Looks were paramount, in people outside the realm of
of
and dimensional, because
flat
— and
admired
politics as well.
her thick line seems to float yet
would
also sang the praise
candidate
a potential presidential
rival,
organic shape in the drawing
looks both
— then
and the appearance of their
her not quite family.
The
At lunch on the day of our Fox Press outing, Anni of Fred Harris
respect, cautious
for,
seem
also didn't
to have
would often
the effects of her words. So she
theory that what seems bad at
first
any awareness
can
in the
of,
or at least concern
when
say,
justifying her
long run be beneficial, "After
her shaky pen has carved in the paper?
Did she
anticipate that our second
all,
this Hitler business
not grasp, even
Does the drawing depict her conception
might offend
of the three
little
Webers nearly devoured
by the grasping, looming form of her distorted body?
Or were we
her safe harbor?
Katharine Weber
had the
statement the view that
Red China seemed
the ideal country, for
society lacked. She
complained that we had too much freedom
like a tiny
archipelago along her coast, sheltered in
turned out rather well for Josef and me." She did
when my wife pointed it out to her, that this some people. Now, at lunch, Anni put forward
baby would take us farther away from her?
moment But
if
—
just as there
it
discipline
had been too much freedom
her effect on her audience didn't count,
it
at
me
now. He'd be furious
When Anni lunch,
1
offered
improve our change.
but
I
My
and
up the
my
father
idea that
society, that
I
and
if I
seemed
he heard
me
at that
said,
say that."
drove back to Fox Press after
did not think any government could
I
thought that religion could help;
I
of the Bauhaus come
alive:
Hard work,
clarity,
and
brilliant art
this diaart!"
through buildings,
through teacups, through the design of newspapers, there could yes to the soul.
said no,
"Through
logue, apparently deep in thought. Suddenly she burst out, faith
"I'm glad
our whole way of thinking was what needed to
father asked if
was the
husband
that her
thought that education might. Anni was quiet throughout
It
own
Black Mountain.
was her conscience or superego: smiling apologetically, she Josef can't hear
our
result a
could together change
the world.
The magnificence of this
140
woman became
clear to
me. She had
a
faith
—
system both tor herself and for
a belief
she devoted her
life.
was by doing everything she could ways,
her as a husband
irritate
their relationship
credo. But
side
too apparent
all
and code she
that, entirely in her
— and constantly looking. "to
open
sometimes obstreperous,
yang of
wife.
own
this better
Anni
They
raison d'etre.
a true
make
to
his
com-
Annis
his laundry, served
right, she
make open
was daring and
giv-
after arriving at
the eves"
— which soon
his higliK- influential
than his uncompromising,
— — had
ancJ Josef together
two sometimes contrasting
their
which
organization of an exhibition
svnon\'mous with
eves," the v\'ords
and
had declared, shortly
Josef
— and no one exempliHed
teaching
to
Josef; he might, in
— but he was
revered,
in the
Black Mountain, that his goal was "to
became
and aid
to support
of the ocean or the doing of
be\ond
—
the disappointments and frustrations of
run more smoothly, whether
life
on the other ing
—
were sometimes
practitioner of the philosophy
plex
societ\- at large
Part of the \va\- that she ser\ed this liigher [nirpose
personalities
for
the vin and
all
common
a
believed that art could change the world as nothing else
could. Morality, balance, decency, a responsiveness to the richness of
human
the universe and of
of this could be revealed and abetted
life: all
through paint, thread, and ink.
Anni was immensely
When,
a
few weeks
she recalled that
made "through
later,
my
before bringing
all this,
but she was also wry.
the topic of social change again,
father had offered that
improvement might be
She repeated
a
sex."
was one of her
learn,
serious in
we took up
this
with
glimmer. Sex,
She had
favorite topics.
to
1
would
know someone
later
very well
up, but, sometimes playful, sometimes mischievous,
it
she had lots of questions she wanted answered, lots of words she had
heard on television and neecJed to have explained. Once, Black Mountain asked her wJio
at
been or
who
when
a
student
she would most like to have
in history
her favorite imaginary persona was, Anni, with her rather
and mmlike persona, did not miss
sticklike figure
a beat in her
answer:
"Mae West." Back
at
Fox Press
after lunch,
found contentment
Anni again bore the look of glee
—with which
do with the making
of art.
Once
commenced any
she
— bearing an uncanny resemblance
Vicomtesse de Noailles,
— of
pro-
having to
she had gone through the diplomatic
niceties with the pressmen, she seated herself again
chair
activity
on the simple wooden
to Balthus's portrait
of the
which that great patron of the avant-garde was
in
painted not in one of her elaborate residences but rather, dressed austerely,
on
a
simple side chair
rugged
in the artist's
atelier,
her face serious, her
thoughts turned inward. Anni became both resolute and concentrated, a
missionary on a campaign, a research scientist peering into a microscope
in the
to
hope
that
what would soon be
visible
might provide an answer
an unsolved mystery of existence. She approved the tone and color mix
of the red for her
first
print,
wash-up, Anni compared weaving, securit)',
it
was
all
and off
it
rolled.
this necessity to the
Then, watching the press
counting of threads
part of the process of art, she remarked.
the sense of hope, the sublime feeling of possibility afhirded by
that process
were her
Now
it
elixir.
was time
to
run the brown of her second print. Josef had
selected the precise ink a few days earlier from the In that simple act of collaboration,
one could
asked questions about their relationship as fellow
living
and working together
in the
PMS
see the
ink swatch book.
answer to the often-
artists, as a
wife achieving different levels of success in similar
woman
in
The emotional
fields, as a
husband and
man and
twentieth ceritiu\. I'he Alberses
141
were
rwo-person religious
like a
Their goal was simple: to make the
sect.
best possible art.
They
to this task. Like
two builders working
same
cared above
edifice, occasionally
all
about honesty
on the
work, they mainly
of Josef leaving the house
Or was
and he did not want
known of rwo
at 8
North Forest
in her
this
wife's success, as the observer
On
great artists.
maintain that
as
claim
is
that
Anni
suffered as the lesser-
who
the other hand, there are weavers
Mrs. Josef Albers she had entree where they did
from the
visits to
her house of art-
kitchen
Circle,
Connecticut, 1958.
for the
following the publication of his Interaction of
not, that she benefited considerably
Anni Albcrs
the director of
to steal the stage but rather to let his wife
The common
enjoy the attention?
172.
when
because he was then at the peak of his fame, particu-
it
community
larly in the Yale
bitterly
kept their
not returning until after the deal was complete. But was
out of jealousy, his not being able to bear his
Color,
just
buy one of Anni's weavings
the Yale Art Gallery arrived there to
inferred?
erection of the
hears stories that suggest that there was competitiveness in
their relationship, like that
museum and
on the
not on each other.
job,
One
side
they might take advice from one another, hear
a helpful suggestion; otherwise, in their
eyes
by
side
.
approach
in their
New
Haven,
name that was known by every critic and work amount to less because she functioned,
world luminaries, and from
museum
Did her
director.
a last
to use her favorite term, as "that
dragon
her
at the door," protecting
husband from the sometimes unwelcome advances of journalists,
and students? Did she
lose
gallerists,
out because of the time she spent doing his
laundry or preparing his meals? Indeed, Josef was so inept in this latter process that once,
Anni was heading
to the hospital for a scheduled operation that
require her absence of three days, she
instructed
him
him
precisely
on how
(twice)
left
out a row of cans of food,
and showed
to use the electric can opener,
what was involved
in
when
would
turning the stove on and off But,
as
she often pointed out, the activity of thinking about food and cooking
only entered her
once she was
life
the sort of household
where only
fifty;
1950,
when
she and Josef arrived in
it
like a
new
artistic
refer to the color
And
Mountain
New
it
childhood she had lived
staff entered the kitchen; at the
there had been a cafeteria, at Black
about making dinner.
in her
in
Bauhaus
dining room. Only in
a
Haven, did Anni have to think
rather than resenting the task, she approached
medium.
Josef, after
arrangements of
all,
used the word "recipe" to
Anni too saw cooking
his Homages:,
an act of taking components and combining them
effectively,
even
as
was
if it
an area where she favored minimal expenditure of time and energy and
aimed merely
for adequate, not exciting, results.
(When
I
was
first
setting
up modest bachelor digs and clearly had little idea about how to cook, heaven and she advised me on her favorite recipe, for ''himmel und erde'
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;
consisted of taking a jar
of applesauce and mixing
earth.
It
parts,
with instant mashed potatoes.)
But whatever the
When
things for Josef
details,
she once told
band asked
manage
me
to shake off the
met the
once and
for
all.
The
him
shirts
of an occasion
for her help
tion with Josef,
in equal
that she liked
doing
he died, one of her immediate laments was that
she would miss the need to buy level,
Anni often claimed
it,
when he wanted
woman on
and
when
his
to
socks.
On
quite a different
she was pleased that her hus-
end
a love affair
own; Anni,
in
and could not
complete collabora-
forlorn mistress in order to stop the relationship
terms of their marriage are hardly to everyone's
taste,
but apparently they suited the participants. Anni's
memory of their early courtship reveals a singular lack may explain a lot of her subsequent attitudes. At
of confidence, which
142
her
Bauhaus Christmas party
first
by
brilHant green silk accented
many
from
gifts to distribute
shy newcomer"
tion, "a
—
Anni was
I
knew
home
in Berlin tor
similarly surprised
when
a
photograph
told
me
a
few
good
was an image
hir her.
It
when
knew
from her
feet
gr.icctu! l\g\ ptiaii
hgure existed,
I
her,
on the
pillow. In hict, every to her bed.
173.
Gionu, ihght
into
l.g)'l>t<
1304-06.
Scrovegni Chapel, Padua.
that shortly after receiving the Egyptian figure,
some money by
made out of little now seeing often,
selling necklaces that she
whom
she was
have a conventional suit made.
tailor to
and
ot the
shows the bronze next
beads, and this enabled her to take Josef, "to a
one
her rwentv-
package arrived
a lithe
her bedside
at
it
ot an\'whcre she ever lived
Anni she earned
had
still
wooden bookshell onK'
plain white
was unequivocal.
Josef; the thrill
Joset had secured this
Anni
well, since
descrip-
Suddenly
she was
when
Pergamon Museum. Only rwo copies
and the near-penniless
get one.
her a print of Giotto's Flight into
containing a twelve-inch-high bronze copy of figure at the
a dress of
— by her own
would not
that she
He handed
1 he following June, third birthday,
— she wore
huge basket; Anni
his
The card was addressed to her from
Egypt.
in 1922
pink velvet ribbon. Santa Claus had
a little
— knew
Santa called out her name.
Weimar
in
khaki corduroy jacket with a hint of white
His usual garb was a
"
silk scarf
showing beneath
it;
while Anni considered this very becoming, she was also concerned about unconventionality. She reacted similarly to the
its
forward in bangs:
"I still fall for
any man with
way he wore
his hair
this haircut today,"
she allowed with a smile, but she added that he had to change this haircut
Weimar
for the reason that "the waiters in
restaurants were inattentive
because of his bohemian looks." In a similar vein, Anni the
new
she wanted them to
easy about the
feel
These attitudes
art school."
notions about clothing in
message of
class
— both
its
he should have
felt
world of her parents;
suit as a necessary prelude to a visit to the
young man from
"the adventurous
and the
the aesthetic preferences
sociological context, or visual
—were with Anni throughout
her
st\'le
and the
life.
Indeed, the entire Fleischmann family was charmed by Josef in his suit. side."
Annis
brother, ten years
Her younger
for bringing
home
sister
younger than
wrote to Anni
"the beautiful
at
she, "could not leave Josef's
the Bauhaus just to thank her
Memling." Her mother would
Josef that if he ever had an\- real trouble with Anni, the house
open
to
him without
her.
When
Josef in 1925, was the
first
later tell
was always
student to be
asked by Gropius to become a master at the Bauhaus, meaning to Anni (so surprisingly traditional in certain
ways) that she could
parents about their getting married, her parents gave their the wealthy Jewish Berliners readily
Catholic, even far less
if Josef's
father
support;
in Bottrop,
church a short walk from the Fleischmanns' apartment as guests
ask her
full
embraced the impoverished Westfalian
and stepmother, back
comfortable with the match. Anni and Josef were
immediate family present
now
— and then
wed
were
in a Catholic
—with only her
repaired to the elegant
Hotel Adlon for a celebration lunch. Larger parties and events, Anni and Josef
felt,
were not for them. They belonged,
things like that";
the
of the Alberses' time
rather, "to those
and
had
energ)'
who do
to be focused
on
making of art.
In 1953 in
all
New
and
1954,
when
Josef was teaching in
Haven, they wrote
spondence that
is
to each other
all
Ulm
while Anni remained
the time
— thus
one of the few written testimonials
leaving correI'^4
and
I~5.
RcprodiKtion
figurine given to
communication with one another.
An emphasis on
She wrote
Anni by
t;\p(iaii
Joset
on her
tweniy-third birthday (above), and the
clothing, as well as
Josef, are recurring themes.
1
of their particular
to
him
Annis
delight in helping
figurine
shortK- after his departure, in
on Anni
s
bedside shelf at
808 Birchwood Drive, Orange, Connecticut. 1994 (below).
143
a letter full
of chat about the details of
more
family (they were apparently
time
I
knew them) and
done or off. It
wrong,
said
something quality, as
—dinners out with
friends
and
Anni's usual mix of pleasure and fear of things
painting your ceiling now,
"I started
goes slow. But
life
sociable during this period than at the
your
all
shirts
new
have their
all
gets done."' Pleasure, rather than resentment,
the paper
So
collars. is
is
at least
a salient
her love for her husband and for the sights and miracles of
is
existence they savored together:
The moss outside
and greener as
looks uwnderful, greener
the days
get wetter.
Almost 2
Now Four days
iveeks
gone by
III
two weeks
less.
and paint some more ceiling, being in your room helps. after writing to him almost daily with typewritten pages
I'll
later,
go
of news, she concluded,
full
/ like
How love
Three days
your room.
best being in
the dark beer?
is
and
Ank.
love
after that, there
coats
and tomorrow
Remains
But
still
was more of the same:
now
your room, the area ivith the 2 doors
Still painting
I hope
toward the
the niche
has two
get the last one so that that
to
street
.
.
.
and
is
done.
the radiator.
begins to look ivonderful.
it
abound here. Josef's father had been a housepainter, while someone who hired workmen for such tasks. Josef made art with paint the medium that Anni would gladly have opted which she only used now, in this menial way, to redo his over textiles Ironies
Anni's had been
— —
his
for
room
in his absence.
But no such factors or resentment entered her
conscious thoughts. Her delight was
total.
Two-and-a-half weeks
later,
she
reported,
I finished your room today, the awful radiator
with two coats
come
back.
early,
but
As a
it
and
ofi enamel,
noiv
it
now fine
is
can smell
made up your bed
special treat, I
white
itself out until you
today,
a
little
made me feel good.
Along with news of arrangements with the Sidney Janis Gallery on Josef's behalf with a keen response to his letters their lack), with chat about further evenings out and details of bank
in
New York made (or
statements and other aspects of domestic so ambivalent about her
same time intensely go there
new Monday!!!" The a
Most important:
my
grown
How
end of one
letter,
hairdresser
report
lessons
is
came
days
to cut excellently,
later:
fom
one of your students, Slutsky or so, someone again, perhaps Si. I think
much better already and gradually he shape when all that was cut wrongly has
hair into better
Si
will
—
two of Josef's most successful knowing that the element of their sense their teacher's wife had to do with her
Sillman
—would have
felt
Anni was not being
frivolous; hair
In evaluating Josef 's students, if Anni that she
144
supposed
questionable.
Yet
all
five
is
it is
of form that mattered most to coif
who
back.
Robert Slutsky and
students at Yale
at the
ivants to continue ivith
you would agree that get
woman, who was
that I have a hairdresser ivho has a sense offormlll
Has taken drawing
and he
this
appearance, so seemingly plain while
self-conscious, also reported, at the
'And most important: will
own
life,
had
to
do was
wanted
refer to "the
was
a serious matter.
to denigrate
bearded ones."
any of them,
Not. 28.53
Juv7e I onlyDie Uberfahrt klingt nicht so besonders erholend! hope you were not too miserable and that you recovered on The menu looks enormous! the rest of the trip.
And by now I hope you are in Ulm and that it is what you Maybe Sofar I had a letter from Southhampton. had hoped for. another one v.ill come today.
Thanksgiving I was All goes well here and people are nice. next door at the Halls, with your photos, and all was reallynice. One afternoon the Chaets came with the archaeology One evening I had Si and Jim and girl and that was nice too. Sheilagh and she is going to take her Jeep station wagon to New York with Si and me to pick up the Cooper Union things. So that will I had offered to pay for all expenses involved. be Dec. 1. if there is not snow by then, as the weatherman has announced CCr these days. Today Wu has asked Kans & Bettyincluding children and me for dinner. I aim- embarrassed that by bringing the children he will have such a crowd. I They come asked him to bring them first for cocktails here. already early in the afternoon and ?.'u is taking them through the gallery. (
!
)
Paps writes he plans to stay till april. What then, I don't know, Hans writes he wants to take up the money problem.
Yesterday Si took me after lunch with them, to the upper part of the Gallery with the Asia things etc. Looks really fine. George Howe I have not reached yet. Never there. Do write him a postcard. I'll also try again. ^'Sf ^ t" ^v^ a y ^ ^ A nice note from Farnsworth, Chicago. And one from Bobby... I'll go there for Christmas. started painting your ciiling now, all the paper is off. slow. Put all your shirts have their new collars. So at least something gets done. I
It goes
The moss outside looks wonderful, greener and greener as the days get wetter.
Almost
2
weeks gone by!!!
two veeks less.
Now I'll go and paint some more ceiling, being in your room helps. so love,
<^vv^.<^
176. Letter
from Anni Albcrs
November
28, 1953.
to Josff Albers,
14s
C<
t^
u^
tenimed for a second
Josef
Ulm
stint in
in the spring of 1955,
document both the feelings and the details that mattered to the .\lberses. Anni s voice repeals the same resened exuberance tbar is evident in her art, a comparable immersion in tactile and \4sual pleasures, and a need for emodonal connection that is as strong as the feeling for linkages of thread and shape. In a letter wrinen to "Juvel" on Mav iz, she assured him. "Here all is fine and I am not lonelv because I ha\e such a good feeling about us and the i~. to look forward to. Aug. i~ so again there are letters that
is
wiiai tbey
here
sai.-
VHjen
the
is
arri%"al
took laxi
i>ou leji,
She
date.~
tweed and
TTD'se^a really good coat, m^ersibU,
think vou
sidi,
saw
u-ill
were
still
rain-coat, inside-out-
apprvir, expensiie too, ~^,T7. In other stores
So now I have a good one
Twtlyino tijoi looked rizht.
TTie%-
also reported,
w Abrrcrombu and Fitch and bou^n
both wearing these coats when
too.
knew them
I
more than fifteen ^^ears laten in a \*ay the .-Vlberses sometimes looked like brother and sister as much as the}" did husband and wife, and the simple, generous cur of these coats with raglan slee\es gave them a comp>arable iook of timeless fashion. The warm tweed and practical waterproof material
were a
and appealing combination.
srviish
Art and other aspects of the visual world permeate dence.
Anni reported to Josef, of a show
"Tliere
is
a fi-ench painter in there, Manessier,
nne. he looks right and wiiat he writes
w^iom
beautihil,
is
show an equal concern
time, the leuers
Museum
at the
I
I
this correspon-
of Modem Art,
Uke. Pictures look
think."
At the same
Shordy before
for the fimadonal.
going to teach at dbe Ha}-stack School in Maine. .Anni informed Josef
Bought myselfsom£
light colored
and washable
cotton slacks for
Ofall places it wasfijudly Sean Roebuck where Ifound
l^imne.
some decent
ones. Tried Abercrombie etc.
.
.
And there too,
.
I bought myselfa birthday present, a little gray metal typewriter table on rollers, charming only ~.)0 amazingly enough. It comes packed in parts and on the 12th [fune 12, her birthday] I will get it out and put
Hope
it
so love
will
think
it together,
just right to roll around on
my
uvrk out when
and it seems At least that's what I think/
fiou will like it
own.
up.
its set
and love, from Ankele
.-\nd six
days
later,
on the
twelfth, this
woman, who
so relished
had received
dbe assembling of components, wTote to "Jm'el"
first
three birthday letters fi-om
really turned into a fine
birthday
— him on time — added. with your my new And now I am —I had around which "so
jxjwerful help" sitting
together
and was
^and
at
gray metal typewriter-table,
saved it for today, the putting
ofthe parts and it took me a good part ofthe morning interesting to do.
After JoseTs death, Anni found ries
little
dye room,
rolls
it
he was indifferent
me my first prints
at
it
easy to fault him; in her
rimes to her bad health, comf)eririve
looked like
wallf>a{>er 'j.
and
about the financial well-being that came to him
dme, she saw I said.
herself as equally difficult
The}' re like Easter e^s. If that s
have enough to the
last
eat.'").
years of their
sar\- less
that she
But
life
all
you
way
memotold
—
parricularly
secretive
lace in life.
("When he made
at least in the
THe
praint,
that
I
now we 11
ne\'er
them in wedding anniver-
often saw
together, through their fiftieth
than a year before Josef died in 19-6, and
At the same
his first squares,
as their great
Black
Mountain companions and housemates Ted and Bobbie Dreier knew them to be, the Alberses, in ^ite of the occasional squabble, were mutually
supponive teammates, intensdy lespeoful of each
other's dedication to art.
seriousness oi purpose,
and
titles
and acliie\enient. joset
iiuegrit)',
information on
otiier
back oi Annis
tlie
some
handwriting; was neater than hers. In
Anni voiced
tor her to use. Likewise,
Homages. In
them
her
fact, in spite of
much
glorious, so
on others
his
a preference for certain of Josef's
response,
initial
uhnn.ueK
slie
we
so that after Josef's death
of those over
because
he also suggested a color
cases,
which she had
toiuui
m
discovered that,
addition to the thousands of artworks he had already
on the backs
wrote the
al\va\'s
\\ea\ int;s
he had,
left her,
\'oiced particular
enthusiasm and
that he considered his ultimate achievements, written "N.F.S."
— "Property
not for sale
came
collection that
He had
mourning.
of A.A.
also
— but
So within
"
a
her period of deepest
in
— given her
alwa\s knew
this she
was
Josef's collection there
complete surprise
to her as a
the Hrst
of ever\' print edition.
Anni was proud
made
at
Fox
that Josef
He
Press.
that for years they
had selected the brown
was, after
were
the colorist.
all,
in different fielcis
the wea\er, while he pursued glass
was mainly involved,
helped, of course,
within the same arena
—
she was
and metal and wood and then paint
when both were printmakers
but even
different (he
second print she
for the
It
work was
the nature of their
so
in the late stage of his graphics, the
point at which Anni took up the medium, in color as the central issue, she
more
in line
and surface and the
competition was not
shop of Ken
Tyler,
went
I
he\'
knew
by side
side
where they made many of their
and offering suggestions.
on an artwork
of the process) that
particularities
a factor. Rather, they
better than to
and too — both were too — but they completely supported and
work and
the priorit\' of
—
— she
hollowing Josef's death decades
—Anni
pride, with a slightly arrogant
him manners.
behave
in the
knowledge of
when
She, after
'
all,
came from
a
had
face, "I
F'nglish, v\hich
made such
made him sound and
about
see
it!'"
do
a
his best
and
how
there was her
—
think,' she
on
his
own,
losef
knew none
felt:
Zastrow functioned his class
one
'And he
Zastrow
this;
my
a
insists that
relinc|uish the job
a
German government
pro-Nazi clippings
all
look at
you think and
that
them up and threw them
othcial.
losef 1
lis
arcnind the Lee Hall
room, the main place where people congregated
me, "while
an inter-
as
Mrs. Zastrow
'Do have
"If he said,
say,
day.
anecdote about Mrs. Zastrow and
Mrs. Zastrow's son was
course, picked
nurse and governess.
him. At Black
in English.
a telling
left
on
would
that Mrs.
Irish
also interpret for
sat in
too Teutonic, Anni
what you
doting mother regularly living
Anni
Anni demanded
herself.
do
a difference
woman named Fmily
Anni recounted
"I, of
Then
Anni had had an
F.nglish,
preter for Josef's teaching,
Josef
to
world where people served
they emigrated to America in 1933. This, too, reflected the class
Mountain, when
to
For one thing, she would say with
so.
fancy houses of art collectors.
So she could teach him
and
social,
him by nearly two
outlived
and superior look on her
difference of their backgrounds.
this
—
he did not. She could guide the son of a Westfalian laborer on
her;
to
interests
to a secont1ar\' sphere.)
often recalled the ways in which she had helped him; she
was immensely pleased to have done
teach
work together
respected each
(Other
in their li\es.
it
were relegated
all
work-
potentiall)' cantan-
strong-willed,
family, recreational
to
tr\-
kerous, for that other's
to the
prints, taking turns
at
Black Mountain.
in the Hreplace,"
Anni
told
honest and very careful Josef insisted, "You have no right
they aren't yours.'
.So
how
did he go about
iti*
He
picked them
up and put them into the back pages of the newspapers, which were thrown awav
ever\' morniii".
147
â&#x20AC;&#x201D; She
EngHsh
when
own
also rold a story at her
Once
to Josef.
expense about teaching
they were walking in a
"Browns
Josef saw a sign for
Anke: pasture?" Her answer was
field near Black Mountain and inquired, "Was ist das,
pasture,"
"Oh
certain:
very
that's
clear,
Juppi,
the opposite of future."
it's
Humor
was one of Anni's
Once, when
dark.
my
salient traits,
and
was often very
it
wife was visiting her in the hospital,
Anni was recovering from
a
broken hip, and
it
seemed
might go home the next
day, Katharine said, "So, if
and you're not here
Anni interrupted her with the
."
.
.
"Send a wreath."
When
Renwick Gallery
in
with a
stiff
come tomorrow instruction,
an exhibition of her work opened
Washington, D.C., and
New Haven
had come from
I
a
when
that the patient
in 1985 at the
well-meaning
who
visitor,
proudly presented her
just for the occasion,
and overarranged bouquet of flowers, the
presenter's face
aglow
with pleasure, Anni, in a wheelchair, put them on her lap with the words, "For
my
The woman stopped
casket."
even thought to
let
her off the
mind making people
not
In this respect, to receive
Museum a in
Anni Albers
at
the opening ot an
exhibition of her work, the
Gallery of the National
American
Renwick
Museum
of
Art, Smithsonian Institution,
Washington, D.C., June
12, 1985.
in the
once
not sure
if
Anni
diplomatic efforts to get Anni
failed at all
whom
this
just to see her,
world.
It is
and a phone
call
that day
not having
come
she was eager to hear. She had no trouble
amiable
museum
professional,
who had made
the
loved her work, and, additionally, would help her
no wonder then
behind the Alberses' coming
museum
mood
she was in a bad
a digestive disorder
from
a friend
journey
am
I
thank you; she did
outside her chosen circle uncomfortable.
Modern Art because
of
being truly nasty to ijH.
a simple
an extremely thoughtful and courteous curator from the
combination of
from
I
in her tracks.
hook with
that Philip Johnson, the central figure
America and the curator of Anni's
to
first
Museum
of Modern Art in 1949, told me that he had realized early on that Anni was not someone who would act in
major
her
own
almost
show, at the
had no
best interests, that she
as if
instinct for public relations.
she associated gentility with fraudulence, good
sort of artistic shilly-shallying that infuriated her in people like
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;someone both she and Josef considered
himself
and
associate
Johnson
their friend
Mies van der Rohe. Alas, there was a side of Anni that was
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;and not
simply perverse
very nice.
But when happy, Anni could be an angel. Back trouble with the line-up of the
A
with the black.
long, tense
through without the desired sat patiently.
was
the
a traitor to their artistic
Modernism he had once embraced through
credo and to the
It
PR with
brown
at
Fox
Press, there
second print
was
in juxtaposition
hour followed. Proof after proof came effect.
As she reviewed each
tions to the stripper
in the
I
paced back and forth
sheet, she
restlessly.
Anni
simply made further sugges-
and pressman, nodding her head "no" or smiling
Her object was to avoid white hairlines knew was that there was something about this
"yes" at their latest adjustments.
between shapes. image, both in
What
its
I
systematization and lack of simple resolution, that was
to resemble, or at least simulate,
of plant growth
as elucidated
Gems, Anni pointed
out,
both the structure of gems and the nature
by Goethe
depended on
in his Metamorpljosis of Plants.
irregularity in their cellular struc-
ture in order to be strong. Plant growth, according to the passages she
cherished in Goethe, revealed a repetition of
were three parts to the leaves.
now
roots, there
were
She had evoked both of these
systems;
if
there
qualities in her initial design.
and
But
she had to resolve the hairline problem; having achieved her well-
thought-out design, she wanted to refine
148
number
also three parts to the stems
it
according to the dictates of her
ever-demanding
eye.
There must
and
also be a clarit)'
and mystery inherent
as the playfulness
powerful
serenit}' as
complex pattern achieved
in this
through printcrK' o\erlapping. The tools of the process were essential to the creation of the artwork, and
now
compliance with the
It
by working
artists e\'e.
manipulated
to be
in
could be realized
a result that
Without condescension, she
the technicians involved in the process.
ed them not mereK'
coworkers but rather
as
watched the pressman use
some
change the
to
register
sections of the image to
We
avoid the white gaps in various places created wider gaps in others. tried
blowing up one pattern with the camera
pated
— but
destroyed the whole.
this
suggested using the Rives
would make
For Anni,
it
was
BFK
— here
working
the stripper partici-
kept pacing. Finally the foreman
paper saved for the
because the flimsy
a difference like the
I
treat-
as heroes.
wrench
his
a hair one way, then the other. Lining up
ness
oiil\'
tandem, and no one could ha\c been more respectful of
in
We
had
the\'
was
final prints; its thick-
and thin
of thick
paper was expanding.
trial
fibers, of jute
with
cellophane: a world of texture and reality she well knew, lb conserve the
remaining Rives, we
Anni foimd
print.
first
brown on some
ran the
that the red
second print on top of the discards from the that she took samples to
And
walls.
show
discards from the
— proofing — looked
and brown together first
this
so architectural
architects as possible patterns for tiled
fortunately the heavier paper
made
the difference.
pressman had touched up the plate by hand while
profound admiration and delight ran the print, and
— she approved
Italian bread,
afternoon printing session,
ing out to the car. "I
am
my
father
had gone out
at best
—
Anni
as
we were head-
meant
it.
her anxious. She was a poor passenger
of doing a
lot
of back-seat driving when
—and now we encountered
torrential rains. These,
reminded her of Mexico, where they had gone fourteen times,
when
initially
made
drive, however,
clearly in the habit
said,
to procure a loaf,
leaving with treasures," the former master of
the Bauhaus said enthusiastically; she truly
Josef was at the wheel
artist's last.
explaining that
Anni along with some scratch pads
to
the
While we were monitoring the
"Josef, a true Westfalian, lives for bread."
Our
—with
the line-up at
the
roller,
we were done.
At lunch, Anni had praised the
which he handed
Once
was on the
it
thus getting rid of the few white lines that remained
He
first
of the
enormous
they were nearly penniless. Mexico had had an
influence on both of them; Anni said that "art was everv^where there": in
peoples clothing,
in the
in their beads, in the
cheapest country pottery.
than a verbal one.
I
It
was
paint trim on the adobe houses,
a visual
would not normally
link
world
— more, perhaps,
Anni with Antonin Artaud,
but given Artaud's passion for nonverbal communication, gesture
and
facial
and the
ear for the voice of the ancient gods,
when
life
Artaud
his
emphasis on
expression rather than text, his feeling for the exotic and
he fled Paris in the 1930s,
as sophisticated
I
role of
Mexico
in Artaud's
have come to see Anni and Josef and
European Moderns of the same camp
—even
if
the
peyote that flavored Artaud's every thought in the Mexican villages he visited,
where he might well have walked by Anni and Josef would have
been anathema
to the artistic pair,
who were
so intent
on control and
rationalism.
But although Anni was happ\' to have the sheets of rain evoke
memories of I'enayuca and Oaxaca, they alarmed all
accounts had been quite resolute
visibly
cars
on the edge
and
of panic.
I
in
her; the
woman who
bv
her flight from Nazi Ciermanv was
offered to follow the lead of a few other
pull over to the side of the
highway
until the
downpour
let
up.
149
Anni gently implored. Under the
"Please,"
shelter of an overpass,
turned
I
off the motor.
Anni's face betrayed considerable relief "You deserve a reward,"
she said in a tone
been wanting to
more
jocular than patronizing. "Well,
know about
Patil Klee.
think
I
know
I
you the story of
will tell
I
you've
his fiftieth birthday." It
was 1929. Klee, Anni told me, was her "god
also her next-door neighbor.
and unapproachable
aloof
—
he was
at the time";
Although the Swiss painter was,
in her eyes,
Christopher carrying the weight
"like Saint
—she admired him tremendously. She had watercolors — purchase having been
of the world on his shoulders" even acquired one of his
the
a rare
public admission of her family's wealth (she told
embarrassed by the appearance 179- Josef Albers,
Biarritz VIII
'zg,
Paul
Klee, (Guetary)
1929. Collage of three
photographs, mounted on board
The
Josef and
Hispano
Stiiza that
Anni Albers Foundation,
corridor of the
were hiring
in
which Klee tacked up
new Bauhaus
Anni heard
birthday,
Bethany.
a small
that she
had been so
Dessau Bauhaus of her uncles
at the
she had begged them to leave immediately)
one of the exhibitions
(detail).
me
most recent work
his
As her god approached
building.
in a
—out of
that three other students in the
his
in a
major
weaving workshop
plane from the Junkers aircraft plant, not far away, so
that they could have this mystical, other-worldly man's birthday presents
descend to him from above; he was beyond having
gifts arrive
on the
earthly plane.
were to
Klee's presents
angel.
Anni made the curled
arrive in a large
hair for
Other Bauhauslers made the
shavings.
from Lyonel Feininger,
a
out of
it
package shaped
shimmering
tiny,
the angel
gifts
would
like
an
brass
carry: a print
lamp from Marianne Brandt, some small objects
from the wood workshop.
Anni was not
l^^^l
^^^^V^BI^'^*^^/
originally scheduled to be
on the small Junkers
when
aircraft
from which the angel was
airfield
with her three friends, the pilot deemed her so light that he
she arrived at the
first flight.
As the
cold October air penetrated her coat and the pilot joked with the
young
invited her to get
on board. For
to descend, but
of them,
all
it
was the
ifts*-
weavers by doing complete turnabouts
open cockpit, Anni was so obsessed with responding with
fear,
they huddled together in the
as
abstract art that, rather than
what struck her most was the sudden awareness
of a new visual dimension. She had been living on one optical plane, and
now saw from 180. Paul Klee, Gifts for I
1928.
{Gabe fiir
I),
Tempera on gessoed canvas mounted
on wood, 40 X
55.9
cm
(15
The Museum of Modern
K X 22
Art,
Gift of James Thrall Soby.
inches).
New York,
a
very different vantage point.
She served the mission by spotting hers
and
Josef's, in the
As planned, they
building. crash.
row of let
Klee's
house next door to
masters' houses a short
out the
gift. It
But Klee was pleased nonetheless
unusual presents and their delivery
—
walk from the main
landed with
a bit
in a painting. Josef,
impressed. Later that afternoon he asked Anni
if
however, was
less
she had seen the
idiots flying
around overhead. Anni smiled mischievously
this. "I told
him
I
of a
he would memorialize the
as she recalled
was one of them," she said with her usual tone of
unperturbed defiance.
Although
in the
course ol time Anni
came
to
remember
Joset as indifferent
and comfort, when we pulled into the driveway of their house completing our drive when the torrents lessened to mere rain, he
to her needs after
opened the automatic garage door his wife
the
any unnecessary steps
window
for quite
handed him some lated as
may
it
some
prints
as
we made
in the rain.
time.
I
a
have been waiting at
he two of them were ebullient
and the bread;
have been, seemed
the turn in order to spare
He must
their life together, austere
panoply of pleasures
Fhey were, of course, both people
for
whom
at that
as she
and
iso-
moment.
the idea of survival
had
meaning
real
because ot the struggles ot the Bauhaus;
iniiiallv
then the horrible
Nazi Germany;
realities oi
after that,
in safer territory, the intense financial pressure at
unhappy departure from
subsequently, hallowing Joscts vicissitudes of old age
palpable
In
relief.
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;and
flict,
Anni's safe return
may
this
me
that breaking a date
in
the\-
were
Yale;
now
the
the storm afforded
them
be one of the reasons that Anni took par-
ticular delight in aborting plans entirely
told
even once
Black Mountain and,
because of bad weather. She once
was one of life's great pleasures, comparable
only to returning something to a department store. Dressed and ready to
go
New
for an outing to
phone
York, only to have a
because of inclement weather the meeting in the
Anni, rather than showing disappointment, looked
been given an unexpected
treat. In
Ulm, she wrote, with regard
my enormous
"To a
two days
my name
even
is
Of
scheduled half an hour awav,
my
can get
I
following
my
per told
me
was too bad that
trip
Press, the
pressman and
of our customers were not
all
men and
111
thoughts straight."
with Anni to Fox
Anni. Unlike the advertising
"The Bridgeport group,
Annie Alkers of N.Y.! Think
spelled wrongly, if
Josef,
bad. Everything they touch they do wrong-
feel
The day
it
course there were other factors as
had written to
speak about Quality there,
that
someone who had
like
of the letters she sent to josef in
to a lecture
are having."
earlier she
Weavers Guild, makes me ly,
be rescheduled,
pleasure m\' talk in Bridgeport was canceled because of
new snowstorm we
well;
one
suggesting that
call
cit)'
purchasing agents,
who
strip-
like
said that
they did not care what the machine could or could not do as long as they got what they wanted, she
worked
in
tandem with
the equipment.
"The
lady with the cane," the bindery foreman added, "really liked the shrink
wrap
too.
She figured out right away
same poetry and
the
how
it
lightness that demarcate her artwork.
with the ideals that Gropius had established ing art school he had opened in
had rendered
nil
machinery and
and
creativity to
be the
Indeed, for the
do
have a
aid,
common
and
voice,
And
in
keeping
Bauhaus, the pioneeryears earlier, she
fifty
art.
She had allowed
and technical
not the foe, of inspiration.
The
restraints
practical
were one.
spiritual
had died, the
at the
Weimar more than
the boundaries between craft
possibilities to
and the
does the corners."
had brought into the printing plant some of
in her person she
rest of
her
life,
even after Josef and
living Bauhausler kept the vision alive
last
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;
all
the others
as her art will
forever.
Notes
1.
I
Ills
ir.msl.uion oi the sixth-century bc
Chinese philosopher a
handwritten note
the Josef and
This
and
Anil] are
in
quoted from
Anni's papers
all
troiii
translation
from
in
Nov.
a
pre-nicd student at
a
4.
this
information
in a
conversations with the in
preparation hir
artist
memo
19, 1998.
All letters are in
Anni Albers with Nicholas Fox Weber
1981.
1
he
Liveright.
|osel
//,
in the living
room
at
80S
Birchwood Drive, Orange, Connecticut.
ot
1930), p. 118. 5.
1974 and 1975
a
181.
and Fox
Bertrand Russell. The Conquest of
Huppinea (London: Horace
while the author was interviewing the
on tape
Camilla Lyons,
provided
at
subsequeni staiciiicnts by
author that took place
3.
Yale College as well as an art historian,
Anni Albers Foundation;
may bc her own German source. it
2.
is
.md .\mii
Albers Foundation archives and are i|uoied as they appear.
book devoted
to her work.
151
Anni Albers 1899-1994 Pandora Tabatabai Asbaghi
182.
Anni Albers,
ca. 1908.
Anni Albers
left
us a
compact but
Albers rarely expressed regret
pure legacy that comprises not only
about the necessity of leaving
her artworks but also her writings
Germany
and other statements, which,
future in the United States;
together, provide a clear guideline
about design and
for thinking art.
An
artist,
teacher, for
designer, writer,
detached observer of industrial,
and
if
and
somewhat
political,
artistic
develop-
ments. Her curiosity was that of a true pioneer,
and her work
consistently reveals a deep respect for the universal truths
an uncertain
rather, she preferred to dwell
on
the consequent opportunities that
most of the century
she was an interested
in 1933 for
of the
came
to her
and Josef As they
explored Mexico and the American
Southwest, they were both deeply affected scape,
by the
by the
scale
of the land-
aesthetic marvels of
the indigenous art
and
architecture,
and, in Mexico, by the beauty
of the ancient culture that seemed to
grow
in the
ground
in the
past as well as a search for solutions
lorm of the tiny Pre-Columbian
only possible
artifacts that
Connecting
in the present.
craft to industry, uni-
Was
fying art with design, generously
sharing her learning with others, she
made few
own
claims about her
originality,
speaking instead
of rediscovery, re-invention.
they collected with a
shared passion. it
Albers's physical dis-
ability or the social
and
cultural
environment of her past that never quite allowed her to
move
freely
and express herself with complete independence? Under her elegance
and modesty, and despite the sure
15^
hand and voice
in her art
and
her writing, there lay an ambition for greater recognition that at
1899-1921
odds with her rechisive nature.
183.
Hans Farman (Fleischmann)
Annelise Else Frieda Fleischmann 184. Lotte
hfe,
Here, an accoimt ot Albers's
at
arranged around the artists
Charlottenburg section oi Berlin
5
Lessingstrasse in the
words along with those oi people
on June
who knew
eldest of three children
her well or
studied her
art,
who
have
proves that her
legacy to us stands alone
and
is
12,
1899.
born
and Toni Ullstein Fleischmann
"[When
not only for
growing up] her mother's
historic value
to teach us art in
it
can continue
about the place oi
our dailv
lives.
to
Siegfried Fleischmann (1873-1963)
(1877-1946).
its
ca. 1920.
She was the
worthy of our consideration today, but also tor what
1930,
photographed by Josef Albers.
Anni Albers was born
was
she was family,
the Ullsteins of publishing fame,
seemed
slightly
her father's turer)
(a
more
brother,
commercial
to her,
furniture manufac-
aristocratic."' Albers's
Hans Farman (born
in
1909), who changed his name from Fleischmann when he moved to
the United States in 1936, notes that the
women
of the Ullstein
family were well educated, but
were expected to "get married on their
own
.
.
.
whereas the sons
inherited the [family] fortune."'
Hans's wife, Elizabeth (Betry), notes, "[Albers]
swam
against the
153
Benfey (nee Fleischmann),
185. Siegfried
Fleischmann, 1930,
photographed by Josef Albers.
186. ca.
Toni Ullstein Fleischmann,
1940.
Stream, she was rebellious and she
resented her mother.
.
.
beautifuL that the character of a
Anni had
.
person came out
some kind of artistic longings and leanings in her. Her family, in didn't feel the artistic her mind .
.
.
leanings as she did. "'Around 1912 the family
ment
moved
Kurfiirstendamm. Albers's
a photograph, for
than in
better
instance.
.
.
.
I
of my mother, ivhich I took under my arms
made a with
terrible [portrait]
my mother
to try to get to
Dresden, where Kokoschka lived,
to a large apart-
at 7 Meinekestrasse,
much
near the
and see
sister,
could learn.
if he
had classes where
And he had one
I
look at
and said, "Why do you paint?"
Lotte Benfey (1900-1987), recalled,
that
"We had
I was fifteen or sixteen so that was
eight or nine rooms.
There was the music room that was only used was
a
Opa
room
.
.
.
.
the smashing ansiver
There
for Anni's painting.
and antiques.
.
.
had
cent, her
Albers was an adoles-
mother arranged
have an
art tutor. Later,
for her
from
1916 to 1919, she studied painting
with Martin Brandenburg, an Impressionist painter. [In
my]
portraits that
early teens.
.
.
I saiv
[Oskar] Kokoschka
had drawn and I thought
154
.
.
the
they were
and that was
end of that.' In 1920 Albers attended the
Kunstgewerbeschule (school of applied
.
loved to go to art museums."^
When to
.
[Siegfried Fleischmann]
furniture
He
for parties.
arts) in
Hamburg.
After two
months she was disappointed with the learning
program and sought
out other sorts of instruction.
1922-24
adventurous
Fortunately a leaflet came
way from there
the
my
Bauhaus [on which]
was a print by Feininger, a
something; that
it
cathedral,
that wasn't true at
ver)'
great
through some connections
body told
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;
me
[that
experimental place. "
That looks more
what I
.
it] .
like
.
it,
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;some-
Berliner
a seamstress
so this
is
a week, the
who was
used to
She
but was
Albers entered the mandatory
Vorkurs (preliminary course)
Bauhaus on April
studying with Cieorg first
going on fom all
at
21, 1922,
Muche
in the
semester and with Johannes
Itten in the second.
Well the Bauhaus today
like Klee
and
sides.
Kaiuinisky
And this
to find their kind ofgeneral
searching was very exciting. this
is
what
vacuum.
And
.
.
.
I called the "creative
"'
Ihe Bauhaus
leaflet that
attracted Albers to
Weimar had
been written by Walter Ciropius,
admitted on her second attempt.""
the
in a
They were starting
and laundress applied
at first,
was
was a great
weren't recognized as the g>-eat masters.
"
to the experimental school.
was rejected
It
there
I thought,
"In a rented room, with a bath
young
searchijig
there in 1^22
And people
way.
once
muddle and
new
the founder of this art
and design.
It
school of
stated that "any
person of good repute, without regard to age or sex,
education
is
whose prcNious
deemed adequate by
the Council of Masters, will be
admitted,
as far as
ca. 1923,
Lutia Moholy-Nag)'.
was a readymade
all.
Anni Albers,
phomgr.iphed by
was a new
tried."
available only
18-.
i)iteresting one, to
But when I got
spirit.
and I thought that was beautiful and also at that time,
and
which you went and were taught
space permits."'
is
thought of always as a school, a very
155
"
i88.
Georg Muche and members
weaving workshop
Weimar, extreme
ca. 1923.
at the
of the
Bauhaus,
Anni Albers
is
at the
But despite the school's apparent
workshop and there was already
commitment
somebody in there [JosefAlbers]
gender equality,
to
Gropius wrote to a
woman who
whom
with
right.
applied for admission in 1920, is
"It
not advisable, in our experience,
women work
that
craft areas
For
forth.
such
in the
this reason a
So
at the
textiles;
My
women.
We
are
fundamentally opposed to the education of
the weaving
bookbinding and
pottery also accept
women
as architects."'"
The entering students had enter a workshop
and
after
there.
completing the
Vorkurs, Albers reluctantly entered
Bauhaus which works particularly with
was not chance of any kind
offurther work
women's
formed
to
allow a second person because there
carpentry and so
as
section has been
heavy
I would have loved
be in that workshop but they didn't
to
workshop
in 1923.
beginning was far fivm
what I had hoped for:
my hands
fate
put
into
limp threads! Threads
to
build a future? But distinst turned into belief and I
the workshops
was on
Albers credited
my
Gunta
'"'
way. Stolzl
I thought I might try all weren't
for
quite suited for me. For instance, I
claiming that she had "almost an
didn't
want wall painting because
I didn't like climbing on ladders
and I
didn't
want metal workshop so hard and pointed.
because
it is
I didn
want woodworking where
you
't
had
there
to lift
was one
heavy beams,
left
and
that was a glass
most of her
early training,
animal feeling for
textiles."
who was down and Sometimes we sat
/ learned fi-om Gunta,
a great
teacher.
tried to do
together
it.
We
sat
and tried to
solve problems
of co}istruction." In the
weaving workshop,
Albers assisted in dyeing yarns and
made
her
first
wall hangings
and
yard fabrics. She and her fellow
156
students participated in the official
Bauhaus exhibition
first
Haus
with
Alberss
appeared in 1924,
met
first
by
Bauhaus
in
By
as part oi Gropius's
advanced rapidly
Bauhaus. In
Weimar, they were
to instructor
Umbo.
190.
had
that time Josef
from student
she wrote:
it,
Bauhaus, Dessau, 1919. photographed
Josef Albers at the
married.
drive to elicit public support for the
Albers
published writing
textiles.
first
189. Josef Albers in his studio at the
In 1925, three years after
in 1923,
furnishing the experimental
am Horn
1925-26
losct Albers
house what
it
to
needs today
functionalform.
.
.
.
Its
give the
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;
1923,
Master
goals are the
This
of things, suitable and a new type oj beauty.
new beauty
Today a thing
form tion,
is
is
is
not
style.
and when
it
.
when
beautifiil
in agreement with
has been
well-chosen materials."
.
in 1925.
"It
was
after their
work bore
.
its
its func-
made of
.
.
.
They
191.
.
wedding
.
traveled to
.
few years
that their art
the closest resemblance.
Each was responding
possibilities
to
new
of abstraction, to the
idea of playfulness with the figure-
ground
relationship, to the comforts
afforded by control. Right angles, solid expanses
of color, and
pure bands of black became part
of their new language.
"'~
Ihat same vear the Bauhaus
moved from
\*^cimar to
its
new
Modernist glass-walled structure
in
Dessau, designed by Gropius. But the aesthetic
harmony
ca. 1926,
Josef Albers, stained-glass window,
Berlin, 1927.
honeymoon.
in the
balcony
in
junior Bauhaus
to
Italy lor their
clear structure materials,
and
a
workshop
of the Vorkurs
Ullstein Printing
The Bauhaus attempts
on
photographed by Marianne Brandt.
at the school,
in the glass
Ann! and
of the Bauhaus building, Dessau,
that
Gropius imagined would flourish
157
Works, Templehof,
192. Josef Albers,
Anni Sommer
25, 1923.
Collage of two photographs,
mounted on cardboard, (11 "At
X 16
/«
29.7 x 41.7
at the
Bauhaus proved
wall hangings were published in
to be an
the
elusive goal.
cm
Concerned
and
ivith form
ivith
German
and
journal Offset
in Tapis et Tissus, a portfolio
inches).
The Josef and Anni
Albers Foundation,
Bethany JAF: PH-423.
of objects surrounding that is, ivith design we will
the shape
—
us
have
to look
—
at the things
we have
selected
shifted
A
made. With the evidence of our
work
before us,
verdict.
Today
we cannot
it tells
escape
its
us ofseparate-
ofsegregation andfragmentation, I interpret rightly. if ness,
For here we find two
distinct
points of departure: the scientific
and
technological,
and
the artistic.
Too often these approaches arrive at separate results instead
of at a
all-inclusive form that
embodies
single,
the whole of our needs: the need
for the functioning of a thing the need for
and
an appearance that
responds to our sense
ofform."' In 1926 Albers began to
work on the double and jacquard looms. Color illustrations of her
by Sonia Delaunay.'^
In Dessau, the Bauhaus's focus
place
from
craft to
production.
most curious change took
when
the idea
of a practical
purpose, a purpose aside from the
purely artistic one, suggested itself to this
group of weavers. Such a
thought, ordinarily in the fore-
ground, had not occurred
having been the problems
and
of the material
of handling
it.
itself
This considera-
of usefulness brought
about a
profoundly difrerent conception. shift took
A
place from the free play
with forms
to
a logical building of
structures.'"
Women
students occupied
an ambiguous space "[In] the
at the
Bauhaus.
widening polarization
between industry and
158
them,
to
absorbed in
the discoveries of unlimited
ivays
tion
so deeply
craft
.
.
.
women latter.
were identified with the
industriahzation increased, the role
of the designer gained
and
attracted males.
lost
ground.
.
.
of the weavers
.
in status
Women
The ambivalence nowhere
is
.
.
.
observe
to
that in ancient myths from
parts of the world deity,
it
many
was a goddess, a
students asked Paul Klee to teach
who brought
the inven-
program
specifically geared
93 1,
when he
at
startling,
for today
of men than with weaving
it
.
perceiving the world. to the student
made
of human and natural creation are essentially one; that art
women.
order of things.
.
.
Later,
as one
of the weaver's
to the foreground
feminine
role in it
in our eyes."
and
tasks
moved
thus the
has become natural
proposed
the basis of
in the
.
It
aimed way of
work: that the wellsprings
have their roots
.
.
as the
what Klee himself
closer to the inclination
traditions established, embellishing
.
.
.
and science
selfsame
The process
Klee taught, while rationalistic,
was ultimately nonrarional.""
Although Albers revered Klee,
One of his my head that understand anything and
she later admitted, classes
was
I didn't
im
so far over
159
Atelier,
XI
'29,
1929.
Collage o{
six
photographs,
(11
29.7 x 41.7
cm
%. X i6/Âť inches).
The
Josef and Anni Albers Foundation,
Bethany JAF: PH-2.
form of a important
as
inculcating a specific
his
is
toward
resigned from the
process leading to
believed and
thought
a
Bauhaus. "Klee's repeated insistence
work was not
Josef Albers, Klee
Dessau
mounted on cardboard,
weaving, which he taught until
a process ofstructural organization thinking in terms ofstructure seems
developed
a class in design. Klee
of weaving to mankind. When we realize that weaving is primarily
tion
this
weaving workshop
that the ultimate
writing.""' It is interesting
female
193.
In 1927 the
1
better expressed than in their
own
1927-32
As mechanization and
194. 195.
Dessau,
197.
and
196. Josef
and Anni
ca. 1925.
Albers,
had
to leave.
Klee
and his
Also in 1927 Albers designed
Anni and Josef Albers,
Oberstdorf, Germany, 1927-28.
198. Josef ca. 1935.
and Anni Albers,
I was not yet ready for thinking."
of [travel] when we were still at the Bauhaus and married not for a
—
very long time. This
was wonderful
to
be
the Theater Cafe Altes in Dessau
away from the parents' choice vacations when ive always went of
and the curtain
to
Bavaria
wall coverings
and curtains
for
for a theater in
—
to
winter in one of the
Oppeln. These projects required
wettest corners, Oberstdorf.
new
thought [instead] sun
approaches. It is really interesting to
trate like trate
so
an
concen-
architect has to concen-
on the functioning ofa house,
I enjoyed concentrating on what
so on.
we went .
.
it
.
It
And I
and sea and 1 found a banana boat and to Tenerife, to the Canaries.
was such a small boat and
took three weeks to go there. It
[a] specific material demanded. I
was quite shaky and there were only
developed a
twelve people.'''
materials,
of wall-covering ivhich at the time I did series
it
was nonexistent
to
make them
really.
And I tried
so that they
were
Despite Albers's dislike of
Oberstdorf she and Josef did vacation there in the winter of
partly even light-refecting, that they
1927-28. Albers's
could be brushed
recalled, "I
be fixed straight
wall
IV ith out
shapes. So
a
off,
that they could
and easily on
the
pulling into different
specific task sets
you
to
—you took
house.
to the barn.
/ was always the one
160
who thought
for four
every year
your technique."
a trip to the C'anary Islands.
the governess
The
go climbing at
Lotte,
Oberstdorf in Bavaria. ...
was what you did
a very interesting way of dealing with your choice of material, with In July 1927 the Alberses took
sister,
went twenty-lour times
and
.
—
home and
.
cook and
lived in a peasant
peasants .
the
It
weeks
moved out
Anni
didn't like to
she would stay
paint and read.""'
In 1928
Bauhaus
Gropius
the
left
to return to private
architectural practice,
and Hannes
Meyer, a Swiss architect, took
Breuer,
Deutschen CiewerLschaftsbundes-
(rear center)
Moholy-Nagy
of Gropius's departure.
moved
house vacated
I
wake
he
the
Hannes Meyer was building a
um
there
Moholy-Nagys
make a able.
Klees and the Kandinskys. Albers
in the
and from September the following year the
fall
of
1
93
1
to
December
and again
in
she replaced Stolzl
as acting director.
In the 1929
recess,
.
and
in the auditori-
echo.
.
.
.
And he
if I could think of a ivay
textile
that
would be
suit-
The usual solution at that time '20s
the walls.
was that you put
The
little fibers
I'eli'et
And of course
was
be at all practical in a room
to
if the velvet
used by hundreds of people so very often
it
would have
to
be a dark
Otherwise you could see all the
marks offingerprints and so on. And I had an idea that if I .
the Alberses traveled to Avignon,
Geneva, in
Biarritz,
August
and
Paris
and
to Barcelona for the
on
absorbed the
sound.
color.
summer
.
oj subduing this echo, if we could
and became neighbors of the
became an assistant in the weaving workshop under Stolzl's direction,
.
was an
me
asked
into the master's
b\'
architect.
large school
resigned in the
Meyer
schule in Bernau, for which
was the
and Lucia and Laszlo
Alberses
199. Josef
Herbert Bayer, Marcel
his place.
made a
.
.
was made
surface that
out of a kind of cellophane
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;and
International l^xposition, where
cellophane just was coming in
I.udwig Mies van der Rohe
new material we had been in Florence, Italy, and I had bought a little crocheted cap made oj this
and
Lilly
German
as a
Reich had designed the exhibits.
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;
Also in 1929 Albers designed a wall-covering material for the
and Anni Albers
auditoriimi of the Allgemeinen
new
161
ca. 1925.
with Bauhaus friends,
zoo. Walter Gropius, 1930, photographed
by Josef Albers.
material.
used
And I unraveled it and the first attempt
it for
auditorium of the Allgemeinen
Deutschen Gewerkschaftsbundesschule, Bernau, Germany, 1929 (see
showing the
cat. no. 127),
reverse side with label
indicating the reflection of light as
an
.
and
.
ofabsorption I put
this velvet quality 201. Wall-covering material for the
in
.
interesting construction into
the back
of this
tnaterial.
on the surface a
and in
quality
So
it
had
light-reflecting
the back the sound-
And this I don't think but that
went into production.
it
was made on machines,
was made in workshops made yard goods. And it was
it
used for worked.
this .
.
auditorium.
And it
.And the Zeiss
Ikon
Works in Germany made a kind of analysis
of how the
surface worked.
.
shown
So
this
was
Moderner
an exhibition
Modern textiles. During the summer she traveled with Josef to of
San Sebastian, Spain, and
to the
and Lake Maggiore
in Italy.
Their
mented
in Josefs
travels are
docu-
photographs. In
August 1930 Mies van der Rohe
Meyer as director of the Bauhaus, and appointed Reich as replaced
the
new
director of the weaving
workshop.
At the important Deutsche
light-reflecting .
.
The same
in Ausstellung
Bildivirkereien,
Tyrol, Ascona,
absorbing quality.
analyzed by Zeiss Ikon, Berlin.
auditorium in 1930.
year two of Albers's works were
Bauausstellung
(German building
quite an intriguing kind of textile
exhibition) in Berlin in July 1931,
engineering.'"
Albers's
Albers later that
it
really
.said
ot this material
Stadt Berlin Prize.
was something I am
happy
to sign
with
for that was a completely
my name, new
approach.''
Bauhaus diploma
In
lor the wall-
covering material for the Bernau
October 1932 the Bauhaus
was forced
power
in the local
and cut funding
Dessau
after
came
government
to the school.
Mies van der Rohe reopened the school as a private institution in Berlin,
162
to close in
the National Socialist party to
Albers was awarded her
work was awarded the
and
for the next six
Germans To Tench Art Near Here
^
M-hool mere until HtUor't poUclri oaujcO lD«d lb« IacuUt of BUok UouniAln coUcfa <l«p»rUnmi In Uie coll«fe
t
Germans On Faculty At Black Mountain School And Frau
Josef
Named
»u. which wma world ramou*
Albers
Art There
brought to Black MountAlct coltLe ODlj c«U»g« In tttc Uoltcd
u'rro
with VtOStmov JoMf and ten. ol DeoMU. GcrmADr
u
t
wu
toioe Tbe Kboot ol art close bK*ua« ot the natloual CAtlODbl policies ol the
Instructors In
Pnu
Allojtrue-
l«S«-
Statu uQdcr direct faculty cootroi, by lUo New York Muaeum of- Art.
• ait dcpftftmcnt hai been csUblUlitcl at Bl*ek Mountain tots.
col-
let:* at
Blue RItJgo ntMt hfw,
pTOlcasor and Frsu Alb«r* > ver; until rrctntly mcinb«n ol Ibe tacultT Of the Baubaua adiool In Dt*-
months
— during which time moved
Alberses
to Berlin,
the
they hved in an apartment at
202. Asheville Citizen,
1933-36
where
As the Bauhaus was forced close,
203. Josef
Black Mountain College,
of their
28 Sensenburgerallee in the suburb
of Charlottenburg
from
—
it
a disused factory
near Asheville, North Carolina,
building in
was searching
the Steiglitz neighborhood. April
1933, the
II,
On
school was again
forced to close after the National
gained control of the
Socialists
national government. Mies van
der
Rohe protested and obtained
official
consent to reopen the
school four months
a new, small, experimental college,
operated
later,
but the
its
art
someone
for
program. Philip Johnson
M.M. Warburg,
and Edward
Museum
Modern Art
of
both
new
fledgling curators at the
New
in
through
York, learned of
this
Theodore (Ted)
Dreier,
one
of the
schools founders. Johnson and
Warburg had both
visited the
conditions that accompanied this
Dessau Bauhaus, and Johnson was
permission were so onerous that
in Berlin in the
summer
of 1933.
the decision of the faculty to close
very great
who now has a name, then we knew as a
the school officially and
somewhat
spoiled, ifiteresting student
on August
"Anni
at
10, 1933,
he announced
finally.
age thirty-four and
her husband at age forr\'-five were sucidenly without jobs and had little
work
hope in
of
continuing their
an atmosphere rapidly
becomin"
hostile to abstract art."'"
Philip Johnson,
from Harvard. in Berlin
.
.
.
.
He
.
.
.
was
and I had made
.
.
experiments with different materials, strawlike materials. visiting Lilly Reich,
.
.
.
who
He was .
.
.
was
of the weaving Philip was there
practically in charge
workshop.
.
.
.
[at Lilly Reich's apartment],
5,
and he
was shown materials, and somehow
163
and Anni Albers on the
Uving quarters
Campus ca. 1937.
head
to
December
1933.
to
of Black
at
steps
the Blue Ridge
Mountain College,
204-
Anni
Albers, Black
Mountain
College, ca. 1935.
205. Josef Albers
in the
doorway I met him at
Reich's,
on the deck outside
the dining hall at the Lake
Eden campus
of Black Mountain College,
206. Student dance
ca. 1935.
on the verandah
of Robert E. Lee Hall
at
the Blue Ridge
and I said,
Would you be to
photographed by Josef Albers.
us!'
and they
big,
do with practical
all
had
"
and and so them and
with various transparencies
"Now who made them?
on.
"
And in he
said,
that.
America?
the door
And it
United
tickets.
to
was just the high time For instance, the
closed.
kind of background
I
had the wrong
in Hitler's
and so on and we said,
States.
Johnson
Johnson
Warburg
recalls, "It
was the
about Black Mountain and the
to
It
come I
"Well,
America
to
said, 'Let's get
to
work.
them
want .
.
.
over.'
seemed the most natural thing
in the world. all
the
I
think he [Eddie]
money
couple arrived in the S.S. Europa 1933. Josef
Bauhaus was
164
left,
come
17, 1933,
Black Mountain College, to come
paid
when he like to
August
"
for us to leave.
ideas
"...
"Would you
to
them, on behalf of the trustees of
So
And I said, "No, they are mine." And he said, "But she never me about
come
to
idea that the AJberses might
I saw
these at Lilly Reich's.
told
after six weeks
combination of Eddie knowing
cleaned in some specific way,
said,
was
it
asking us
agreed to fund their steamship
ideas, strawlike
looked at
letter
wrote to the Alberses, inviting
to the
to
material that could be brushed off or
And he
On
I would love
to show you also some of my things. And he came in the afternoon and I put out my wall hangings. They
were all
we got a
this neivly founded college."'
interested in corning
a cup of tea with
campus of Black Mountain College, ca. 1937,
of course. "And
Lilly
"Oh, you are here.
late.
New
The
York on
on November
24,
wrote to Kandinsky,
"We were met by colleagues.
out."'"
We
four Bauhaus
were twelve hours
Four hotels had been booked.
Four journalists were waiting to
known
interview us. First niglit dinner at
of her designs,
the Dreiers'
.
.
.
with Miss Katherine
Dreier. Very lively.
.
.
.
Museum
of Modern Art very good. Brancusi
not only tor the uniqueness
which
directly 'into the material' but for
her experiments with materials.' is
not enough that
It
should
textiles
exhibition very beautiful. Arranged
be
Duchamp who we met on this occasion. A wonderful person.""
almost fearfully
at the
lavish tapestries
of the hotel lounge.
by
Albers spoke to the press on
behaU
who was not conHe says that i>i
o{ Josef,
versant in English: this
country at
last
free atmosphere.
.
he will find a
.
He says
.
and that
that
no longer possible
is
in Germany. There a professor
must
no regard Bauhaus but
and
at the
related to the use
same time
of the
textile.'""
Speaking of the Alberses' Black Mountain, I^arbara
arrival at
(Bobbie) Dreier, wife of led
New
Sim reported:
York
and vivacious, Frau
more
like a
like the leader of a
movement,
and speaks English slowly and solemnly
much
recalls that Josef
dinner with
student
of
create patterns close to the
materials
ofgovernment."
"Tall, slim
poem
we
We
are not hostile to industry
forwarding the
Albers looks
than
for the fitness of that
is
The
their
designs off the paper, nicln't with
ideal
thinks
German
somewhat
'Most commercial houses take
teach only the art that the govern-
ment
she exclaimed, looking
design for a given place.
art must have freedom in which to
grow,
pretty!',
in
"had
I^reier,
hanksgiving
1
my husband s
parents
Brooklyn Heights the night
before.
1
hey put him on the train
with his nice wife and
.
.
.
they
as a child recites a
'by heart.'
.
.
.
Today she
207 and 208. Anni Albers lilack
woven
are
is
165
Mountain College,
in the cornficlcls, ca. 1937.
,
Âť
209.
Anni Albers with Ted and Bobbie
Dreier en route to Florida and Cuba, 1935.
>
\,r>
came.
We settled
V
them
and they
in
adjusted to the completely different
that they
life
found there
in this
.
we were not knowing .
.
.
.
.
a big festival at the
had only fifty
.
.
.
was
there
be thankfitl for
was
it
and
really
.
.
a
.
a day
to
ive celebrated it."
and Josef was
life,
was
interesting to see
sor
166
and
fibers.
They
reflected
Anni
Albers's
modest
appearance and blend into the
Alberses rapidly
part of the Black
became
Mountain College
community. "Black Mountain
"Drawing upon
wunderbar" Albers wrote
the early
of 'playful pro-
felt
rather than purely
primarily black, white, and natural
The
a profes-
Bauhaus model, Albers promoted ductivity' She
they
background.'""*
was a professor.'"
method
States,
for their limited range of colors,
in
and interesting to see a professor hammer in his hand. This
teaching
on the thread
objects that should be
a new
with a
didn't exist in Europe. There
throughout the United
aesthetic that 'textiles are serving
appointed Professor of Art. It
the Art
Institute of Chicago, the Black
coloristic or textural effects
Albers was appointed Assistant Professor of Art,
Academy of Art, and
at
Cranbrook
were recognized for their emphasis
great event that was Thanksgiving.
Arid we thought
.
distinctive textiles. Exhibited
college, ivhich
or sixty students,
.
Mountain program produced
very
And so we got there and
after three or four days
.
that serves functional or
the Institute of Design,
Chancellery in Germany burned and everything was in ruins and
much.
work
were similar weaving programs
I think, ip33. Just when the
then
to
aesthetic ends."'" "Although there
November 24
arrived on
unencumbered
experimentation with materials
great big Robert E. Lee Hall.""
We
progress from
^
that srudents
a
a letter
dated December
in
3,
1933,
carbon copies oi which were received by several of their friends in
Barely a year
in
Cuba. Bobbie Dreier
to
go
to
.
.
.
.
.
.
to put
all
for
whv
a sort
way
to
a boat.
of a
Key West
And
We
went.
"'
"When
they
can take
the car over and everything.'
we
And
in 1934
the Alberses drove through Florida
with their
new good
friends
an
altitude
though
it
occurred to
Anni, that the two couples might venture toward the source of
[Pre-Columbian]
art
and
Mexico the following
travel to
year.""
summer of 1935 the made the first of fourteen
In the
Alberses visits to
.
.
.
we arrived
it is so
climate.
no
far south
cool,
And a
a
it is
truly refreshing
country for
art, like
wonderfd ancient
other,
barely yet discovered
new
at
is
meters, so even
of 2,^00
marvelously
art, frescoes:
Rivera, Orosco
you
[sic],
.
.
.
art,
much know
a>ul
surely
and others,
then
Merida, the talented abstract painter, Crespo
—
art
is
the most important
thing in this country. Imagine that.
Theodore and Barbara Dreier en route to Havatia,
in Mexico.
mountains. Mexico City [to
you come,
don't
goodness sake?
mer here
convertible.
here in our car after traveling for
had
the
them on
said, 'Well,
A
wotulerful sion-
seven days, at times through high
them down
We
We have had a
recalls,
Christmas vacation [and then] we took them
Dreiers
in the
had invited
Cuba, and we
offered to drive Florida].
and Bobbie
December
later, in
was invited to lecture
"Clarita Porcet
them
210 and
Albers, 1955.
secondhand Model
Germany.'
1934, Josef
Oaxaca and Acapulco with Ted
I
hey became collectors of
I're-C'olumbian
art:
During our nmny jourteen in
duration
all,
trips to
Mexico
—
some of three months'
and dating back
as far
— we had gathered
as 19^6 [sic]
and
'
there material covering
here
some
Mexico, traveling to
167
ill. Boliliic I^rcicr
.md Anni
212.
Anni Albers and her
father, Siegfried
Fleischmann, Mexico, 1937, photographed
of the
diverse early cultures
by Josef Albers.
pieces
came
to us
prehistoric sites offering
them
on our
fom
to us
visits to
boys
little
were also held up for
and goats
sale.
the fragments
As we
ofpottery,
which included subtly formed heads and,
alas, usually
we could not our hands
1937-38 In 1937 the Alberses put
broken figurines,
believe that here in
On March Walter and
We showed our late
little
Ise
17 ot that year
New
Albers went to
York and met
Gropius
as they
arrived in the United States. (Walter
Gropius was taking up an appoint-
ment
at the
of Design
at
Graduate School
Harvard University,
Cambridge, Massachusetts.)
ivere century-old
when plowing
Black Mountain College.
art at
Pre-Columbian pieces found by the peasants
their fields.
treasures to the
George Valliant, the authority
Albers's parents arrived in
Veracruz, Mexico, on June
on
their third
Mexican
trip)
in
excavating at the time on the outskirts
Toni Fleischmann wrote
City,
and he confirmed
their authenticity. Yes, here
a country whose earth such
art.'''
still
was yielded
18,
meeting the Alberses (who were
on Mexican archaeology, who was
ofMexico
Mayan
together an exhibition of
through the car
ivindow, just as turkeys
examined
of this
Our first small
ancient country.
Mexico City the following
diary,
"Now
I
am
day.
in her
eagerly looking
forward to Anke [Anni] and Jup [Josef].
Tomorrow
at last
we
will
see each other again after almost
month Ann is
four years!"" For the next the Alberses introduced
parents to the major sites in
Mexico: "June
23.
We
Tenayuca Pyramid.
.
.
drive to the .
Juppi and
Pap again buy small heads of gods,
which
168
are
still
being discovered,
and rhey cost only
few cents.""
a
return to Berlin via Albers's
will see
[Toni's
York,
mother wrote: "Farewells
Who
quite difficult.
we
New
knows when
each other again. Juppis
nickname
for
Anni and
213. Aiini Albc-rs .uui lu-r p.nx'nis,
1939 Albers became a United States
After the Fleischmanns departed to
citizen
on May
Josef did likewise In
June they traveled
to
College
set
showed
us.""'
Josef wrote to Bayer,
Bayer assemble material for
there, unless a
the exhibition Bauhaus 1919-1928
intervenes."''
Museum
New York.
were included
of Modern Art
Albers's
weavings
in the exhibition,
about our
and
I
two years
article,
"Work with
was published
Mountain College, in
November.'"
Material,"
in the leaflet
"Black
Bulletin 5"
meet
to
moving
European explosion
Toni Fleischmann I
wrote a diary
first trip to
Mexico 1
would
country again. Now,
"The Weaving Workshop"
the
are
plan to 3
never imaiiined that
see that
to the
who
reported, "In 1937
and she contributed the essay exhibition catalogue.' Another
"We
go to Mexico about June Anni's parents,
in
Germany,
out for Mexico once more.
helped the Gropiuses and Herbert
at the
Mexico
Tlalpan. Albers's
in
about everything, and marvelous
The following year Albers
12.
again for Josef to teach at Gobers
parents, forced to Hee
the things the)'
b\' loset
on December
Josef] were touching, so concerned
all
Teotihu.ican, Mexico, 1937, photograjihcd
and
17, 1939,
later to the day,
we
begin
same journey on the same
boat, the 'Orinoco,
but under
totally different circumstances.
At that time
was
it
children again
it
is
a
native land,
a trip to see
our
and through them
to see a distant
Today
and
Siegfried .wid loni Hleischm,)nn,
lovely country.
departure from our
which we must
leave
forever."" Albers wrote of the
169
Albers.
214 and
215.
Anni Albers
at the
loom and
with a student, Black Mountain College, ca. 1937.
trip to
Our
Mexico
to
was fine.
trip
meet her parents: .
.
.
1940-49
We have
In the 1940s Albers began to
pyramid, one market, one fresco,
make small-scale weavings, which she mounted on linen bases and
and last
framed.
seen all ready [sic] quite
a
lot;
one
had our first party; and Americans
night
with painters
/ developed there [at Black
and all of it a little crazy. Rivera who was supposed to come was not there, naturally. We expect
Mountain
my family sometime
Bauhaus was meant
.
and plan Cruz
to drive
[sic] to
meet
.
.
next iveek
down
to Vera
them!''
College] gradually these
what I call Which was
"
"pictorial weavings. really
not what the to do.
.
.
Gropius never quite forgave
I went into the art
side.
.
.
.
the one thing that gradually
me a
little
It ivas [a>i]
materials
more known.
.
.
.
me
that
It tvas
made
.
inventive use of new
and constructions that had many centuries.
not been used in
.
.
[Josef] wasn't terribly interested in
But he thought that
textiles.
it
was nice that I did something.^'
Her weavings were exhibited widely in the 1940s, and she
was
in
demand
lecturer,
and
as a teacher, a
a writer
during
time." In an article that tic
this
drew caus-
responses from traditional
handweavers, Albers stated that
handweaving should he seen
170
.
as
more than
romantic attempt
'a
perdu
to recall a 'temps
":
If
conceived as a preparatory step
to
machine production the work will
be more than the revival of a
lost
and will take responsible part a new development^
skill
in
In the spring ok 1941 the
Many
Massachusetts.
were
sold.
One
of the pieces
reviewer exclaimed:
"Modern times have produced a number of new and sometimes strange things. But
now
'til
we'd
never heard of utilizing electricians' supplies,
bathroom
fixtures,
plumbers" accessories, and
a
hard-
Aiberses went to Harvard, where
ware merchants stock to make
Josef taught at the Ciraduate
jewelry!
"Maybe
School of Design.
On May
5
of that year an
its
another of those
on
things brought
what we have.
had made with
proving 'smart.' ...
a student, Alex
.
.
.
conserving
b\'
And
exhibition of jewelry that Albers
It
.
.
.
it's
comes from
Reed, from curtain rings, hairpins,
the hands of Anni Albers, exponent
paper
of Art
clips, bottle caps, glass
in the
Black Mountain
drawer knobs, clay insulators, metal
School
washers, and other household items,
a fertile imagination
opened
main
New
at
the Willard Ciallery in
Kuh
Gallery,
of North Carolina
requisite for
"One
York. The exhibition traveled
to the Katherine
[sic]
pieces
.
.
.
of the
was
.
.
.
seems to be the
its
creation.
.
.
.
most interesting
a plaque
formed by
Chicago; the Addison Gallery of
using a perforated sink strainer at
American
the
Art, Andover,
end
of a
Massachusetts; the Fitchburg Art
and hanging
Center, Fitchburg, Massachusetts;
clips
and the College,
Museum
ot Art,
Northampton,
in
a fringe
of paper
from the lower edge of
The
Smith
shower curtain chain
it!""
jewelry was included
Modern Handmade Jewelry, an
exhibition organized by the
171
216
and
217.
Anni Albers,
ca. 1937,
photographed by Josef Albers.
2i8. Installation
Anni Albers
The Museum of Modern
New
Museum
view of
Textiles,
of Modern Art
Art,
fifteen other
museums
New
in
York and shown there and
Germany
in 1942. After the war,
however, they returned to Mexico,
at
across the
taking an extended sabbatical
York, 1949.
country beginning in 1946. Albers
wrote to the exhibitions organizer, Jane Sabersky, from
New
Mexico:
Of course you can keep our necklaces for further exhibitions. Glad
to
We found the perfect place to rent and quick, with marvelous food too. We will stay here until spring and then continue learn
into
it is
a
success.
from October 1946 to November 1947 and traveling there via Canada, the Midwest, California, Texas,
Philip
Johnson
She recuperated
in the pictorial
who
for the Rockefeller
in
position
the unusual combination of cotton chenille with white plastic
copper a
foil to
and
create a curtain with
calm appearance during the day
that transformed into a sparkling
Alberses traveled
less
between 1940 and 1945, possibly because they could no longer go to
Mexico
172
after
it
allied itself
with
and
falter,
/.
Josef,
October 1948, resigned from that
on March
14, 1949.
At the
end of the semester the Alberses
left
Black Mountain College for the
last
time and traveled to Mexico City,
where Josef taught
at the University
of Mexico. In August they moved to
New
York.
Edgar Kaufmann,
surface at night.
The
weaving La Luz
reluctantly agreed to be rector
on East Fifty-second York. Albers chose
New
La Luz,
Utopia of Black Mountain
College began to
from Albers
New
in
Mexico, and celebrated her recovery
guest house Street in
Mexico. In El Paso,
weeks and underwent surgery.
The
commissioned drapery material
New
Albers was hospitalized for several
Old Mexico.''"
Around 1944
and
Jr.,
director
of the Department of Industrial
Design
at the
Museum
of
Modern
Art
New
in
York, had
come
Black Mountain College lecture
you
.
1948 to
in
Summer And he saw some of my And he said, "Wouldn't
on design
Institute. things.
textures, small expermiental textile
to
.
at the
.
Art?"
.
.
And
.
it
turned out the museum was ready
to
do that
textile
.
.
.
and I was the only had ever shown.'
person they
Albers met with Philip
Johnson
at
Johnson
museum
the
"As far as
recalls,
interest in textiles
[Albers].
H. of
And
I
all
of the
the
arts.
out
textiles.'
said,
.
.
Anni
that
October
30, 1949,
presentation of the
showed mainly
me.
And that
rials that usually
was using mate-
were not used for
I used synthetics
textiles.
.
.
.
And also
and plastic had the
I
of making materials that are
usually not existent, that
ones.
.
.
Of
""'
.
I
made
is,
partitions
six or eight differ-
Albers's invoK'ement,
Johnson remembers: wasn't a person to
Textiles,
was the
also things
ent transparencies.'"
plugged the
Alhers
way
exhibition.
in rooms, rather transparent
total picture of
I
[It]
idea
which was held from September to
.
'You cannot leave
... So
exhibition,
.
my
that were at one time ofgreat inter-
her
idea of doing a textile show."
The
.
materials.
.
in the
/ was very happy with the
had an
Museum
Art] seriously
he wanted ... a I
was
it
I
1949.
took Alfred [Alfred
Barr, director
Modern
14,
museums
[Johnson] took on
est to
to discuss
on January
the exhibition
the exhibition trav-
United States and Canada.
show your things at the
like to
Museum ofModern
samples, yard materials, pictorial
From 1950-53
n
P.
m
R.
And shed
do
"I felt
she
a lot of
always need help
that regard.
Hrst
work of a sinshown at
gle textile artist to be
the
museum.
It
Anni
Albers, 1935,
photographed by Josef Albers.
weavings, and hanging screens.
eled to twent)'-six
219.
included studies of
173
220 and
221.
Anni Albcrs
at
her loom,
observed in 1995:
1950-59
1943-
"It
was ironic
chairman of the Department of
way that Harvard was giving more recognition as a creative
Design of Yale University and the
artist
In 1950 Josef was appointed
moved
Alberses
New
to
a
Haven,
I
Connecticut. At their home, at 8
North Forest
Responding
from Gropius
first
I
think he could have been."
Albers continued her experi-
ments with
time.
textiles for
production,
and worked with the manufacturer
commission
for his
candor,
don't think Josef was entirely
And
Circle, Albers
to a
all
sympathetic to her concerns.
played the role of housewife as well as artist for the
than Yale. ... In
in
her
Harvard Law
Knoll on the realization of her
The
School building, she created
designs as yard materials.
bedspreads and partitions for the
majority of her pictorial weavings (twenty-four of the thirty-six
dormitories.
One of the
was a
in quite a great quantity. It
and white one, with jute. Gropius had the idea that it
black
.
.
.
to
.
decade, and she taught at art
this .
schools across the United States. / was often asked
.
should be very masculine.
had
known works) were made during
materials was done
be heavy
.
.
.
.
.
.
and have
here,
at
Yale, to
They
give a few seminars to the architec-
this
tural students.
And what intrigued
strong structure so that you didn't see
me
immediately, "Oh, he didn't ivipe his
think something should be reversed
feet,
and here
Frank from I
like to be
is
a
cigarette hole from
last year still."
.
.
.
So
on the practical side."'
Charles Sawyer,
Dean
of the
Yale School of Art at the time.
174
in regard to teaching
in teaching. ture,
We
was that I
always, in architec-
or ivhatever you do,
you
start
and
try to
from what
there
explain
While I was trying
it.
is
today
to set
m ." i
ikjM-
a
task,
put the students on absolute Nothing
zero, in the desert, in Peru. is there.
have
to
What
is
the first thing you
think of? And build up?
And maybe, for instance,
of the students
.
.
is
.
.
like
it like this,
the brick,
.
like this,
you know?"
During the
her Hrst svna"c)gue
com-
"The article
textiles for industr)',
in Perspecta, a journal
Architecture, in 1957.' 0>i Designing, a compilation of Albers's writings,
1950s, the AJberses
Press in
was published by Pellango
New Haven
in 1959.
Also in 1959 the exhibition
returned several times to Latin
America, traveling to Mexico and
Anni Albers,
Cuba
presented by the Massachusetts
in 1952
and
to Peru
Chile in 1953 and 1956.
and
In 1954
they traveled to Hawaii, where
Institute
Pictorial Weavings
was
of Technolog)', Cambridge,
Massachusetts, before
it
traveled
Josef taught at the University of
to the
Honolulu and Albers had an exhi-
Technology, Pittsburgh; Baltimore
Museum
bition of her weavings at the Ht)n()lulu
Also
Academy
in 1954 Albers
Josef to
Art
ol Arts.
accompanied
Ulm, Germany, where he
gave a course
Hochschule
in
design at the
Carnegie Institute of
of Art; Yale University
Ciallery,
New
Haven,
Connecticut; and Contemporary Arts
Museum, Houston.
new
Kir Gestaltung.
175
at 8
in
North Forest
Haven, Connccticiu.
Mexico,
by Albers based on her work
appeared
New
and Anni Albers
workroom
223. Joset
Pliable Plane: Textiles
published by the Yale School of
a
and we build but how we arrive at
done
Temple Emanu-El
mission, were installed.
designing
.
also the idea of not being told
brick
in Dallas,
Anni's
in Architecture," a lengthy
You gradually develop something,
inventions, as you go along.
And some
panels for
something
far fishing, or something for the roof.
222. Josef
In January 1957 Albers's ark
and Anni Albers, Monte
1952.
Circle,
ca. 1955.
Alb.in,
224- Josef Circle,
and Anni Albers
New
at 8
North Forest
1960-69
Haven, Connecticut, 1968,
photographed by Henri Cartier-Bresson.
a
In 1961 Albers received a second
was hanging around,
useless wife,
head of the work-
until June Wayne,
me
synagogue commission, for ark
shop, asked
panels for Congregation B'nai
myself I found that in
Israel,
Woonsocket, Rhode
A to
Island.
commission for a work that
is
the image
is
a most gratifying one.
though any ivork we do to relate ourselves to
is
For,
an attempt
a source ofspecial satisfaction
it is
my first print,
suspected."'
"Now, there
is
nothing of the technique.
They supplied the technicians!' Albers was invited back to
Tamarind
toward something we hold
produced Line Involvements,
as a fellow in
That same year the American of Architects recognized
the significance of Albers's
work
AIAs Craftsmanship
her with the
Medal.
.
.
made with a craft; when is
considered
Although she would continue
threads,
art.
.
.
.
.
was asked
to
work
Tamarind Littwgraphic
Workshop in Los Angeles where
176
of work. As a
comes more
as
result,
easily
lotiged-for pat I,
me
The multiplication and exactness of ofprintmaking allow
for broader exhibition
.
it's
Prints gave
.
almost by chance, to printmaking.
when
considered
a greater freedom ofpresentation.
the process
My great breakaivay came
it's
on paper,
it's
work at her loom for a few more years, in 1963 Albers turned, to
at the
a
Once having discovered this new freedom, I was never able to let go. I find that, when the work .
within their profession and honored
my husband
1964 and
portfolio of seven lithographs.
reverence!"
Institute
some"
able to participate in a task directed in
made
thing open, interesting to follow.
be
to
medium
I began to think, after I
And I knew
something
meaningful in a general sense,
this
of threads could project
a freedom I never
be part of a building devoted to
ivorship
to try lithography
and oiunership
recognition
and happily,
on the
the
shoulder.''^
Albers had been commissioned to write an entry
weaving
for a
on hand-
new
In 1970,
edition of the
Encyclopedia BritdHnicn pubHshcd in 1963, first
and
this
on
"textile
fundamentals
and methods" published by Wesleyan University Press
Prayers, a
orative tapestry
the Jewish
in 1965.
in
commem-
New
um
to
produce a scriptural
which would bring texts.
.
.
.
to
for
York.
medi-
effect
mind sacred
These paneb are
on rigid backgrounds effect
uses his
to
of commemorative
New
/ could not stand the idea aiiytnore
long
the yarns
mounted
produce the
and looms.
took too
It
and it always produced just one .
.
way. It
all the
I just outgrew
.
it
some
in
annoyed me and I can't do
anymore.
.
.
.
And then
boms and all the
An
/ used the threads themselves as
a sculptor or painter
808 Birchwood Drive in
to
altogether in favor of printmaking.
piece.
commissioned
Museum
New
the Alberses
Orange, about ten miles from
ofall
The following year she
completed Six
moved
when
Haven, Albers gave up weaving
became the
chapter of 0>i Weaving, her
treatise
225. Josef Albers at 8
1970-94
it
away
I gave yarns.
''
exhibition of Albers's
â&#x20AC;&#x201D; her major show Europe â&#x20AC;&#x201D; was shown
work
first
in
at the
Kunstmuseum at
in l^iisseldorf
and
the Bauhaus-Archiv, Berlin,
in 1975.
'"
She continued her experi-
stelae.
ments
in
printmaking, working
with Ken lyler
from Tamarind) G.E.L. at
in
(whom at
she
knew
Gemini
Los Angeles and
Tyler Graphics in
later
New York,
and extending her techniques into screenprinting
During
and etching.
these years, until 1994,
she was honored with degrees and
177
North Forest
C'ircic,
Haven, Connecticur, 1968,
photographed by Henri Cartier-Brcsson.
226. Maximillian Schell
and Anni Albers,
Yale University Art Gallery,
New
awards from numerous institutions, including honorary doctorates in
Haven, Connecticut, 1978. fine arts
227.
Anni Albers and her
Hans Farman, and on
sister,
brotlier,
Lotte BenFey,
Albers's eighty-fifth birthday,
Bethany, Connecticut, 1984.
from the Maryland
histitute College
in 1976;
of Hartford
and the University
in 1979;
and an
In
March
1976, just after
New
Haven, Connecticut,
and Albers began
to
Gold Medal in New York. She responded: As to name calling, '
experimenter. In 1982, at a meeting of the
in 1973.
his eighty-eighth birthday, Josef
died in
with the American Craft Council
instead of visionary, I suggest
honorary doctorate of law from York University, Toronto,
to Albers as
a "visionary" as he presented her
of Art, Baltimore,
in 1972; the Philadelphia College
of Art
In 1981, the textile artist Jack
Lenor Larsen referred
assume
College Art Association in
New
York, she participated with Louise
Nevelson, John Cage, and others
on
a
panel entitled
five
"The
considerable responsibility as the
Art/Craft Connection: Material as
primary guardian of
a
his legacy.
In 1977 the Brooklyn
Museum
presented Anni Albers: Prints and Drawings, a comprehensive exhibition of her works on paper.
Albers designed a range of fabrics for Sunar, a textile in the 1980s, that
remained
in
has
production ever since.
Despite her disavowal of femi-
Women's C^aucus
lor Art
presented Albers with an award for
outstanding achievement
178
How rial,
do we choose our
in 1980.
specific
mate-
our means of communication?
"Accidentally. to us,
"
Something speaks
a sound, touch, hardness or
and asks us to We are finding our language, and as we go along we learn to obey their rules and their
softness, it catches us
company,
nism, the
Metaphor." During the panel,
she stated:
be formed.
limits.
.
.
Students worry about
.
choosing their way. I always
tell
drawings, and prims, together with a selection ol Josef's work,
exhibited in Josefand Anni Albers,
anywhere.
organized by Albers's close
"
Albers continued to travel,
Maxiniillian Schell, at the
visiting Fairope several rimes
Stuck
during these
at the
years. In 1983 she
presided over the opening oi the Josef Albers
Germany,
Museum
in
Bottrop,
Josef's birthplace.
Connections, a portfolio of
nine screenprints,
some based on
Bauhaus, was published
in
by Fausta Squatriti Edirore
A
Milan in 1984.
retrospective exhibition,
The Woven and Graphic Art of Anni Albers, was presented at the Renwick Gallery of the National
Museum
of
American
Art, Smithsonian Institution,
Washington, D.C.,
in 1985
In 1990 Albers traveled to
and
to accept an
honorary
doctorate from the Royal College
of Art. Also
in
1990 she received
an honorary doctorate from the Island School ot Design,
Providence. Albers's in the
work was again seen of Modern Art in
Museum
1990, this time alongside works
by one of her former Bauhaus colleagues, in the exhibition Stolzl.
Anni
Gunta
Albers.
Anni Albers died
in
Orange,
Mav
9,
1994.
Connecticut, on
traveled to the Yale Universit)'
Art Ciallery,
New
Haven, Con-
necticut, in 1986. In
December
229.
Anni AUkts
1984.
1989, a selection
of her textiles, pictorial weavings,
179
,11
ilic
Roy.il (!ollcgc
of Art graduation ceremony to accept
an honorary doctorate,
London, lune
Munich and subsequently Josel Albers Museum.
Rhode
her earlier designs from the
frienci \'illa
in
London
Anni AlbcTs, Mil.m,
was
them, "You can go anywhere from '
liS.
29, 1990.
Notes
1.
Nicholas Fox Weber, "Anni Albers to
and Graphic Art of
Date," in The Woven
Anni Albers
(exh. cat.;
Washington, D.C.:
Smithsonian Institution 2.
Press, 1985), p. 15.
Conversation with Hans and Betty
Farman, Bethany, Conn., June 3.
4.
8,
The
in the late
and Anni
Josef
Albers Foundation archives, Bethany,
Conn.
Maximillian Schell, interview with Anni
The
transcript in
Josef and Anni Albers
Foundation archives.
7.
Nicholas Fox Weber, "Anni Albers to
with Anni Albers,
Fesci, interview
Haven, Conn., July
1968, Archives
5,
New York;
The Josef and Anni
transcript
Albers Foundation
archives.
Walter Gropius, Programm des
Staatlichen Bauhauses in
Weimar (Weimar,
April 1919), p. 4.
Feb. 23, 1920,
letter to
Weimar
quoted
259, 48;
in
Annie Weil,
State Archives no.
Anja Baumhofif, "Gender,
Art and Handicraft
Bauhaus," Ph.D.
at the
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore,
diss.,
Schell, interview with Albers,
Dec.
16,
1989.
Wortmann
Weltge, interview
with Anni Albers, Orange, Conn., Feb.
1987; transcript in
21,
Anni Albers Foundation
Artist as Lawgiver," Arts
21,
1987.
Fesci, interview
with Albers,
1968.
5,
24.
Schell, interview
with Albers,
16, 1989.
Reminiscences by Lotte Benfey,
25.
with Albers,
26.
Fesci, interview
July
5,
27.
Weltge, interview with Albers,
Feb.
1968.
21,
1987.
28.
Weber, "Anni Albers to Date,"
29.
Schell, interview with Albers,
Dec.
Weber and Pandora
Tabatabai Asbaghi, interview with Philip
Johnson,
New
Canaan, Conn.,
July 26, 1998. 31.
Josef Albers, letter to Vasily Kandinsky,
Dec.
12, 1933, in
Kandinsky-Albers:
(Paris:
des annees trente
Centre Pompidou, 1998),
Teach," Brooklyn Daily Eagle, Nov. 26, 1933, p. 8A.
The Josef and
33.
"One of Germany's Foremost Textile Comes Here to Teach in
Designers
archives.
Ibid.
Southern Mountain School,"
Annelise Fleischmann,
Sun, Dec. 4, 1933, p. 34.
special
Bauhaus supple-
Neue Frauenkleidung und
to
appeared
article,
in a special
"Bauhausweberei,"
Bauhaus number of
the journal /;/ÂŤ^f Menschen 8 (Nov. 1924), p. 188.
Albers:
Gemeinsames Leben, gemeinsame
Arbeit," in Josef Helfenstein
and Henriette
MemWi, Josef und Anni Albers,
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;
Amerika, Kiinstlerpaare (exh. cat.; Bern:
1998), p.
Etiropa
und
Kiinstlerfreunde
Kunstmuseum
Bern,
31.
Anni Albers, "Design: Anonymous and
16.
Timeless" (1947), in
On
Schell, interview
Dec.
with Albers,
16, 1989.
Richard Polsky, interview with Anni
Albers, Orange, Conn., Jan.
11,
Research Office, Columbia University,
New
York; transcript in
Anni Albers Foundation
The
Josef and
archives, p. 35.
Mary Jane Jacob, "Anni Albers: A Modern Weaver as Artist," in The Woven and Graphic Art ofAnni Albers
37.
(Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian
Designing
Institution Press, 1985), p. 67.
Tapis et Tissus, Art
International dAujotird'hui 17
and
18.
\^
(1926), plates
Albers,
"Weaving
at the
(Sept. 1938, revised July 1959), in
180
Bauhaus"
On
Mary
Mountain
MIT 39.
19.
Anni
1985,
"American Craftspeople Project," Oral
38.
{i<)z6).
Albers
Foundation archives. 35.
Press, 1971), p. 2.
Ofjietj
1996;
14,
The Josef and Anni
(Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan Universit)'
17.
York
Frederick A. Horowitz, interview with
transcript in
36.
Nicholas Fox Weber, "Anni und Josef
15.
34.
New
Barbara (Bobbie) Dreier, June
Frauenkultur (Karlsruhe, 1924). Albers 's
second published
p. 17.
"Art Professor, Fleeing Nazis, Here to
14.
"Wohnokonomie,"
p. 20.
16, 1989.
Nicholas Fox
13.
ment
(1957),
^x (Sept. 1977), pp. 122-27.
July
32.
Sigrid
12.
The
Une Correspondence
1994, p. 82. 11.
Feb.
30.
Walter Gropius,
10.
4
Designing, p. 19.
late 1970s.
p. 16.
of American Art,
9.
On
Weltge, interview with Albers,
22.
Dec.
Ibid.
in
Bauhaus:
23.
6.
Savim
Pliable Plane:
Marcel Franciscono, "Paul KJee in the
21.
Magazine
Albers, Orange, Conn., Dec. 16, 1989;
8.
"The
Albers,
pp. 36-41; reprinted in
1970s; transcript in
New
Anni
20.
Reminiscences by Lotte Benfey, recorded
Date,"
Textiles
1993). PP- 98-99-
Textiles in Architecture," Perspecta
1998.
Ibid.
by her grandson Phihp Benfey
5.
p. 2.
Wortmann Weltge, Bauhaus (London: Thames and Hudson,
Sigrid
19.
Emma
Harris, The Arts at Black
College (Cambridge, Mass.:
Press, 1987), p. 24.
Copies of
this letter are in
and Anni Albers Foundation
The
Josef
archives.
Nicholas Fox Webcr, telephone con-
40.
versation with Bobbie Dreier, July 29. 1998.
Nicholas Fox Weber, preface, in Karl
41.
54.
Anni
"Handweaving loday
Albers,
Work
Textile
BLick Mountain C'ollege,"
at
The Weaverb. no.
1
(Jan. -Feb. 1941).
Taube, The Josef and Anui Albers Collection
pp. 1-4. In response to this article,
of Pre-Columbian Art (New York: Hudson
M.
Hills Press, 1988), p. 9-
home-weaving course,
Anni
42.
Albers, letter to Vasily
Kandinsky, Aug.
Kaiulimky-
22, 1936, in
Une Correspondance
Alhers:
and Nina
des annees
Anni Albers, Pre-Columbian Mexican
43.
(New
Pretty
translated by Fleischmann's grandson
57.
and Anni
Josef
Anni Albers,
New
58.
and Albers,
46.
Ibid., July 16, 1937.
Department
47.
Anni
"The Weaving Workshop," Gropius, and
Ise
Herbert Bayer, Bauhaus 1919-1928 (exh.
New
cat.;
Museum
York:
of Modern Art,
"
p. 29.
Reprinted
48.
at
the
Designing, pp. 38-40.
in
Colkge Art Journal
no. 2 (Jan. 1944), pp. $1-54;
and
in
61.
Weber and Asbaghi,
On
Polsky, interview with Albers, Jan.
62.
"The Reminiscences
49. Josef Albers, letter to Herbert Bayer,
pp. 31-32.
May
63.
Ibid., pp. 17-18.
64.
"The
Black Mountain College
North Carolina
State Archives,
Toni Ullstein Fleischmann, "Thrown
Off the Track"
(1939),
unpublished account
of the Fleischmanns emigration from
Germany
to the
United
transcript, translated
Anni
in
The
Josef and
C'ollege
16, 1989.
"Designing," Craft Horizons
(May
5,
1943), pp. 7-9;
2,
Design 46, no. 4 (Dec.
in
On
New York:
p. 7.
Polsky, interview with Albers, Jan.
68.
Ibid.
69.
Preface,
On
Wearing (Middletown, Press, 1965),
"We Need 12,
Statement by Anni Albers
70.
release issued
Museum, New
the
1944), pp. 21-22
"One Aspect of Art Work,"
Designing, pp. 30-33); "Constructing
York; copy in
and Anni Albers Foundation 71.
an
The
Josef
archives.
Schell, interview with Albers,
Dec. 72.
in
by the Jewish
16, 1989.
Anni Albers,
letter to
Jack Lenor
Textiles," Design 47, no. 8 (April 4, 1946)
Larsen, July 23, 1981; The Josef and
(reprinted in Alvin Lustig, cd., Visual
Albers Foundation archives.
Communication [New York,
On
1945],
and
in
Designing, pp. 12-16); "Design:
Anonymous and ofArt ^o. no. "Fabrics," Art 1948), p. 33;
73.
Transcript in
The
Anni
Josef and Anni
Albers Foundation archives.
Timeless," The Magazine
2 (Feb. 1947),
On
(reprinted in
11,
"The Reminiscences of Anni .Mbers,"
1985;
undated press
no. 2
Crafts for Their Contact with Materials,"
(reprinted as
(exh. cat.;
Brooklyn Museum, 1977),
p. 15.
Albers's publications in the 1940s were:
53.
Baro, interview with Anni
Anni Albers
Conn.: Wesleyan University
Schell, interview with Albers,
Dec.
Gene
p. 21.
State Archives,
Raleigh. 52.
Anni Albers, unpublished typewritten
67.
Anne Mangold,
Mountain
North Carolina
65.
Albers, in
archives.
Albers, letter to
1939; Black
15,
Papers,
Pliable Plane: Textiles in
statement, June 1962; The Josef and Anni
66.
by Fleischmann's
Anni Albers Foundation
June
11,
Anni Albers,"
Albers Foundation archives.
States; English
grandson Theodor Bcnfcy,
51.
ot
Architecture," Perspecta 4 (1957), pp. 36-41.
Raleigh. 50.
interview with
Johnson, July 26, 1998.
),
1985;
Papers,
11,
The Reminiscences of Anni Albers,"
Designing, pp. 50-53.
12, 1939;
files.
and Design,
of Architecture
Polsky, interview with Albers, Jan.
60.
"Weaving
as
On
in
Jan. 14, 1949, exhibition
Johnson, July 26, 1998.
1985;
Bauhaus,"
11,
The Museum of Modern Art, New York. 59. Weber and Asbaghi, interview with
1938, 1952), pp. 141-42; revised in July 1959
and reprinted
The
Report of meeting between Johnson
Ibid.
Albers,
Jane Sabersky,
Mexico, Jan. 20, 1947;
Polsky, interviesv with Albers, Jan.
45.
Walter Gropius,
18, 1941.
letter to
1985, p. 28.
Albers Foundation archives.
in
p. 13.
Josef and Anni Albers Foundation archives.
English transcript,
The
Art?" The Wearer 6,
Dorothy Randall, "Hardware, Plumbing
La Luz,
in
Is It
55.
44. Toni Ullstein Fleischmann, travel
Theodor Bentcy,
â&#x20AC;&#x201D; But
(July-Aug. 1941),
3
Sun-Telegraph. Nov.
York: Praeger, 1970),
17, 1937;
flincy
I
no.
56.
June
â&#x20AC;&#x201D;
industry would consider this a big joke!"
unpaginated.
diary,
"The
scoffed:
for industry
Gadgets Make Jewelry," The Pittsburgh
Miniatures: The Josef and Anni Albers Collection
making of models
"It's
trente, p. 77.
Mary
Arwater, the originator of a popular
pp. 51-53
Designing, pp. 1-9);
and Architecture
b}
(March
and "Weavings," Art and
Architecture (>6 (Feb. 1949). p. 14.
181
The Solomon
R.
Guggenheim
Trustees
Foundation
Giovanni Agnelli Jon Imanol Azua
Honorary
Trustees in Perpetuity
Solomon
R.
Justin K.
Thannhauser
M. Brant Mary Sharp Cronson Elizabeth T. Dingman Peter
Guggenheim
Peggy Guggenheim
May
Gail
Engelberg
Daniel Filipacchi
Honorary Chairman
Barbara Jonas
David H. Koch
Peter Lawson-Johnston
Thomas Krens Chairman
Barbara Lane
Peter B. Lewis
Peter Lawson-Johnston
Samuel Ronald O. Pereiman
Peter Littmann
Wendy
L-J.
McNeil
Edward H. Meyer
Vice-Presidents
Wendy
L-J.
John
Wadsworth,
S.
LeFrak
J.
Peter B. Lewis
President
McNeil
Ronald O. Pereiman Frederick
Jr.
W. Reid
Richard A. Rifkind Vice-President
and
Denise Saul
Treasurer
Stephen C. Swid
Terry Semel
James
Sherwood
B.
W Sidawi
Director
Raja
Thomas Krens
Seymour
Slive
Stephen C. Swid
John
Secretary
Edward
F.
Wadsworth,
S.
Michael
F.
Wettach
Honorary Trustee
John Wilmerding
Claude Pompidou
William
Trustees
Ex
Jr.
Cornel West
Rover
T. Ylvisaker
Officio
Dakis Joannou Luigi Moscheri
Director Emeritus
Thomas M. Messer
Photo
credits (by figure
number):
21-23, 29. 39' 41-46, 49. 50,
64-67, 132-47, 153-57.
Nighswander;
Munich;
5,
7, 38:
6:
Department
4,
53. 54-
56-58,
161, 174. 175:
Tim
Die Neue Sammlung,
Michael Nedzweski,
Museum
of Library Services,
of Natural History,
52, 68, 69,
73-82, 84,
85,
American
New
95-106,
126, 128-32, 158:
©1998 The Metropolitan
Museum
New York;
of Art,
59:
Lee
©The Jewish
©President and Fellows of Harvard
Stalsworth; 60:
John
College, Harvard University, Cambridge,
Museum, New
York; 61-63: Ellen
Mass.;
8, 9,
11-20, 40, 70-72, 83, 86-94,
107-18, 120-23, I25' '-7' '59' '60, 180, 202:
Art,
New York;
Blackink Architectural Photography,
Dallas; 165, 223: Getulio Alviani; 171:
Katherine Newbegin; 172, 201:
David Mathews,
10:
Parnell,
Labenski; 150, 164, 168: John Hill; 162, 163:
©1999 The Museum of Modern
York;
119, 124,
Wide World
©President and Fellows of Harvard
Photos
College, Harvard University, Cambridge,
Research Library, Getty Research Institute,
Mass.; 24, 25,
GmbH, 27:
191:
Thomas
©ARS, New
York;
Lunt, Department ot Library
Services,
American
History,
New
Museum
of Natural
York; 28: R.E. Logan,
Haacke;
189, 198:
Los Angeles. Front cover: ©1998 The
Bauhaus-Archiv
Berlin; 26, 30:
Inc.; 181: Faith
Metropolitan
Museum
of Art,
New
York.
Back cover: ©1947 Nancy Newhall. The
Beaumont and Nancy Newhall
estate.
Courtesy of Scheinbaum and Russek Ltd.
Guggenheim Collection
I'^ggy
Family committee
^^ggy Guggenheim Collection Advisory Board
Christian Haberniann
M. W. Harrison
Jacques Hachuel Gilbert
David Helion
President
Fabrice Helion'*'
Peter Lawson-Jtjhn.stun
W. Lawrence Heisey William M. Hollis, Jr.
Vice-President
Jacques E. Lennon
Evelyn Lambert
Nicolas Helion
Laurence and S.indro Riimncy
The
Clovis Vail Julia Vail
and
Karolc
B. Vail
Mark
P.
Vail
BriiLC
Earl Castle Siewarl
Mnuland
Samuel H. Lindenbaum Jime Lowell
Hoiioniry C.hiiinnun
Cristiano Mantero
Claude
Achille
Maramotti
Valeria
Monti
Poiiijiidou
Honorary Vice-Chairman
H. R. H. The Grand Duchess of
Luxembourg
Luigi Moscheri
Raymond D. Nasher Christina
Newburgh
Giovanni Pandini Honorary Member
Annelise Ratii
Olga Adamishina
Benjamin
Rauch
B.
Richard A. Rifkind
Members
Nanette Ross Miles Rubin
Luigi Agrati
Steven
Ames
Aldo Sacchi
Giuseppina Araldi CluiiKiti
Gheri Sacklcr
Maria Angeles AriMraiii
Sir
Rosa Ayer
Denise Saul
Marchese Annlbalc
Bcrlingieri
Alexander Bernstein Patti
Cadby
Birch
Timothy
Sainsbur;-
Evelina Schapira
Hannclore
B.
Schulhof
James B. Shenvood
Mary Bloch
Riki Taylor
Wilfred Cass
Roberto Tronchetti Provera
The
Melissa Ulfane
Earl Castle Stewart
Claudio Cavazza
Leopoldo
Fausto Cereti
Jean Wagener
Sir Trevor
Chinn
Franca Coin
Dingman Ehrmann
Nancy
Villarcal
Pierce Watts
Ruth Westen Pavese
Elizabeth T.
Christine
Emeritus Members
Isabella del Frate Eich
Enrico Chiari
Rosemary Chisholni Feick
William Feick,
Mary Gaggia
Umberto Nordio
David Gallagher
Anna
Danielle Gardner
Kristen Venable
Patricia
Gerber
Marino
Golinelli
F.
Jr.
Scotti
'•/I 1
-
;
I.J
,
•
i.
,
r-
.
,
i^
.^>h;-
'•'•
^.n
'''6'X
•>it-c-
W'i" f,
.
t^
*
.».'
.
t
r.
•/<---"•. '
''j'^' *'f .*i
.^^h:--*/-'
^•''--V-ii'"
fHr
-
'•
•
^'-!'
>"
llii r (
<
> Distributed by Harry N.
^^ ^^
Abrams
loo Fifth Avenue
New
Jacket design by
York,
New York loou
Nathan Garland
ISBN 0-8109-6923-8
90000
9
780810"969230