OBAMA, CAMERON MEET TO DISCUSS SECURITY, PRIVACY Page 3
KERRY VISITS PARIS, SHOWS SOLIDARITY WITH HOLLANDE Page 8
On Top Of The News Email:news@arubatoday.com website: www.arubatoday.com Tel:+297 582-7800 Saturday, January 17, 2015
Courting History
Supreme Court Takes On Gay Marriage Gay rights advocate Vin Testa waves a rainbow flag in front of the Supreme Court in Washington. The U.S. Supreme Court said Friday, January 16, 2015, it will decide whether same-sex couples nationwide have a right to marry under the Constitution, setting the stage for a potentially historic ruling. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
MARK SHERMAN Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court says it will decide whether samesex couples nationwide have a right to marry under the Constitution, setting the stage for a potentially historic ruling. The justices will take up gay-rights cases that ask them to overturn bans in four states and declare for
the entire nation that people can marry the partners of their choice, regardless of gender. The cases will be argued in April, and a decision is expected by late June. Proponents of samesex marriage said they expect the court to settle the matter once and for all with a decision that invalidates state provisions that define marriage as between a man and a woman.
Attorney General Eric Holder said the Obama administration would urge the court “to make marriage equality a reality for all Americans.” Advocates for traditional marriage want the court to let the political process play out, rather than have judges order states to allow same-sex couples to marry. “The people of every state should remain free to af-
firm marriage as the union of a man and a woman in their laws,” said Austin R. Nimocks, senior counsel for the anti-gay marriage group Alliance Defending Freedom. Momentum has shifted dramatically in the United States in recent months in favor of gay marriage. Same-sex couples now can marry in 36 states and the District of Columbia.
That number is nearly double what it was just three months ago, when the justices initially declined to hear appeals from five states seeking to preserve their bans on same-sex marriage. The effect of the court’s action in October was to make final several pro-gay rights rulings in the lower courts. Continued on page 4