Active Shooter Seminar
Friday
June 28, 2019 T: 582-7800 | F: 582-7044 www.arubatoday.com
Page 13
Aruba’s ONLY English newspaper
Justices: Partisan gerrymandering none of our business By MARK SHERMAN and JESSICA GRESKO WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that partisan gerrymandering of congressional and legislative districts is none of its business, a decision that leaves state officials free from federal court challenges to their plans to shape districts to blatantly help their parties. The court's conservative majority, including the two justices appointed by President Donald Trump, prevailed in a 5-4 ruling that dealt a huge blow to efforts to combat the redrawing of district lines to benefit a particular party. The decision, on the last day before the justices' long summer break, has no effect on racial gerrymandering challenges. Courts have barred redistricting aimed at reducing the political representation of racial minorities for a halfcentury. But the outcome brings an immediate halt to lawsuits that sought to rein in the most partisan districting plans that can result when one party controls a state's
In this April 1, 2019, file photo, Mindy Nagel poses for a photograph at the threshold of her home in Cincinnati. Nagel's home is split by two House districts. Associated Press
legislature and governor's office. In the short term, Republicans are the prime beneficiaries of the ruling. They
made dramatic political gains in the 2010 election just before the last round of redistricting, so they have controlled the process in
many states. Democratic voters had persuaded lower courts to strike down districting plans in Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio and
Wisconsin. The one Republican suit came in Maryland, against a single congressional district.
Continued on Page 5