Resilient Planning Engages Recycled Asphalt

The recently released “World Green Building Trends 2021” SmartMarket Report from Dodge Construction Network offers data related to strategies architects, builders, investors, and others use—or plan to use—to improve sustainability in the design and construction industry. The report dissects the attitudes and plans of construction industry members from around the world. I’d like to zero in on the “Design for Disassembly” section. The report states: “A critical way to reduce carbon and waste in the built environment is to have building products and buildings designed so that the various components can be reused when the building reaches the end of its lifecycle.”

While the report speaks to vertical construction, I wish to apply to pavements the concept of planning during the design and construction phase for disassembly and recovery. In fact, this is a concept with which the asphalt industry is already familiar. As a member of the asphalt community, you should be able to easily share the fact that asphalt pavement is the most recycled product in America. Let’s look deeper.

Asphalt pavements can be milled (disassembled) and the components (asphalt binder and aggregate) recovered for reuse in a new pavement. There are ways to perform this recycling in place or with recycling plants located near the paving site (check out the cold central plant recycling story on page 46).

Using reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP), recycled asphalt shingles (RAS), warm-mix asphalt (WMA), Ultra Lo-NOx burners, and other environmentally sound practices to design and produce asphalt pavement mixes adds “green” value to whatever rating system a construction project might be working within. The “World Green Building Trends 2021” report showed “a slight decline in the share of green projects that use a rating system” but still used nearly 80 pages to discuss the importance the construction industry places on the use of green practices, which, when applied to a rating system, increase the builder’s social score.

Most of us have heard of LEED Certification, which focuses quite solidly on buildings. Many moons ago, before AsphaltPro posted its content online, we wrote about using WMA in constructing parking lots to increase a prime contractor’s LEED score. This is still a good idea, but I now posit LEED isn’t the place to focus attention.

LEED is one blip on the radar where we can use the scientific given that the asphalt industry lowers your urban heat island score if you pave with heat-absorbing—rather than heat-reflecting—surfaces around your buildings. Albedo matters, after all. But does an asphalt contractor make enough money off a parking lot job to justify the marketing hassle of convincing project owners to use WMA around their new construction? Maybe. The better place to harness goodwill for the asphalt industry appears to be with other rating systems such as ENVISION® or ENERGY STAR®.

We can do much in the march toward net zero when we focus efforts on rating programs that assist in lowering energy consumption at the HMA facility, hauling, and so on. No matter which green rating system you find easiest to navigate, they are typically designed to offer ideas for lowering your carbon footprint while third-party certifying your successes.

As NAPA’s Richard Willis shared with me recently, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) isn’t looking at what entities have done in the past to green up their industries. The fact that the asphalt industry lowered its emissions by 97% while increasing its production by 250% from 1970 to 2001 is laudable, yes, but, in the eyes of FHWA, it’s also forgettable. It’s nice that the asphalt industry is extremely clean. Now what have we got planned for tomorrow and how will we employ our provable green practices to improve not just pavement lifespans, but our industry’s resiliency?

Stay Safe,

Sandy Lender

February 2022 • Vol. 15 No. 5

asphaltPRO

602 W. Morrison, Box 6a Fayette, MO 65248 (573) 823-6297 • www.theasphaltpro.com

GROUP PUBLISHER Chris Harrison chris@ theasphaltpro.com

PUBLISHER Sally Shoemaker sally@theasphaltpro.com (573) 823-6297

EDITOR Sandy Lender sandy@theasphaltpro.com (239) 272-8613

ASSOCIATE EDITOR Sarah Redohl sarah@theasphaltpro.com (573) 355-9775

MEDIA SALES Cara Owings cara@theasphaltpro.com (660) 537-0778

ART DIRECTOR Kristin Branscom

BUSINESS MANAGER Susan Campbell (660) 728-5007

AsphaltPro is published 11 times per year. Writers expressing views in AsphaltPro Magazine or on the AsphaltPro website are professionals with sound, professional advice. Views expressed herein are not necessarily the same as the views of AsphaltPro, thus producers/contractors are still encouraged to use best practices when implementing new advice. SUBSCRIPTION POLICY: Individual subscriptions are available without charge in the United Sates, Canada and Mexico to qualified individuals. One year subscription to non-qualifying Individuals: United States $90, Canada and Mexico $125.00. For the international digital edition, visit theasphaltpro.com/subscribe/.

WHATEVER YOU NEED WE’VE GOT YOU.

It’s a simple approach. We’ve built our business and reputation through our unparalleled focus on equipment durability, attention to detail and the ability to customize our products for each customer. We’ve spent over half of a century building world-class equipment while helping each customer’s unique business grow bigger, faster and more efficient than ever. We only succeed when you do, so trust the team that’s got your back, no matter what you need.

START A CONVERSATION