6a. Design Recommendations: Corridors CHAPTER CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
87
EXPLANATION OF DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS GRAPHIC LANGUAGE
91
1
COLLEGE STREET
93
2
MELL STREET
101
3
CONCOURSES - GINN, HALEY, DUGGAR AND ROOSEVELT
112
4
SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE
122
5
MAGNOLIA AVENUE
136
6
THACH AVENUE AND CONCOURSE
144
7
PARKERSON MILL CREEK
154
8
SECONDARY CORRIDOR - DUNCAN / P.O. DAVIS DRIVE
163
9
SECONDARY CORRIDOR - WIRE ROAD
167
10
SECONDARY CORRIDOR - SAMFORD AVENUE
169
11
SECONDARY CORRIDOR - LEM MORRISON DRIVE
173
12 TERTIARY CORRIDORS - BIGGIO DRIVE, HEMLOCK DRIVE, HEISMAN DRIVE AND WAR EAGLE WAY
177
INTRODUCTION The Landscape Master Plan envisions restoring the landscape as the defining character of Auburn University. This Design Recommendations section offers a closer look at how this vision can be realized through the application of the landscape standards. This section provides both a general assessment of the existing landscape and suggests recommendations for potential improvements. These existing conditions and recommended improvements are typically illustrated in plan diagram and section form and accompanied by a series of illustrative photographs. For this exercise, the campus corridor network and four prioritized focus areas were chosen for analysis. Together these spaces illustrate a representative sample of the various landscapes across campus. Seven corridors have been identified as being primary; these are the most important in defining and maintaining the campus landscape given the importance of their function and role. Together, these primary corridors unite the campus while being expressive of the distinctive characteristics and values of Auburn University. In addition, a series of supporting, secondary and tertiary corridors have been defined which help complete the essential corridor network which connects the Auburn campus. The Primary Landscape Corridors include: 1. College Street* 2. Mell Street 3. Concourses (Ginn, Haley, Duggar and Roosevelt) 4. Donahue Drive 5. Magnolia Avenue* 6. Thach Avenue and Concourse
Figure 6-1. Parkerson Mill Creek is an underappreciated ecological gem.
7. Parkerson Mill Creek Secondary Corridors: 8. Duncan & P.O. Davis Drive 9. Wire Road 10. Samford Avenue 11. Lem Morrison Drive Tertiary Corridors: 12. Biggio Drive 13. Hemlock Drive 14. War Eagle Way 15. Heisman Drive *Note: College Street and Magnolia Avenue are not property of Auburn University; however, these corridors are of great significance to the function and aesthetic of the campus landscape. Figure 6-2. Tiger Transit in route 87
Figure 6-3. Student enters the Roosevelt Concourse through a gateway
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
PRIMARY CORRIDORS - OVERALL DIAGRAM
1 College St
1.1 Tiger Concourse at Magnolia 5 Magnolia Ave Avenue
2 Mell St
6 Thach Ave
3 Concourse
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4 Donahue Dr
Co l l e ge S t re e t M e l l S t re e t Con co urs e s Do na hu e Dr i ve M a gno l i a Ave nu e Tha c h Ave nu e Par ke rs o n M i l l Cre e k
7 Parkerson Mill Creek
Figure 6-4. Primary Corridors Diagram
Design Recommendations - Corridors
88
SECONDARY CORRIDORS - OVERALL DIAGRAM
D u n c an + P.O. Dav i s Dr i ve Wi re Ro a d S a m ford Ave nu e Lem M or r i s o n Dr i ve
8 9 10 11 9 Wire Rd
10 Samford Ave 8 Duncan Dr + P.O. Davis Dr
11 Lem Morrison Dr
Figure 6-5. Secondary Corridors Diagram 89
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
TERTIARY CORRIDORS - OVERALL DIAGRAM
B i g g i o D r i ve H e mlo c k D r i ve Wa r Ea g le Way H e i s ma n D r i ve
12.1 12. 2 12. 3 1 2.4
12.2 Hemlock Dr
12.3 War Eagle Way
12.4 Heisman Dr
12.1 Biggio Dr
Figure 6-6. Tertiary Corridors Diagram
Design Recommendations - Corridors
90
EXPLANATION OF DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS GRAPHIC LANGUAGE
Iconic Element or Structure
Downward Slope
Garden
Grass
Poorly Located Utility
Park
Ground Cover or Shrub Mass
Secondary Space
Pervious Paving
Agricultural Demonstration Area
Event Space
Visual Border: Wall or Fence
High Level Paving
Restored/Modified Gardens
Existing Spatial Boundary
Mid Level Paving
Proposed Spatial Boundary
Grass Paving
Vehicular Sign or Gate
Pedestrian Gate
Bollards
Future Transitional Area
Bike Rack Area
Master Legend Bench
View Corridor
Occupiable Shaded Area
Vehicular Traffic
Axis of Circulation
Proposed Shade Tree
Primary Pedestrian Path
Focal Element
Existing Shade Tree
Secondary Pedestrian Path
Remnant Forest
Tree in Poor Condition
Tertiary Pedestrian Path
Expanded Forest
Heritage or Significant Tree
Pedestrian Hazard
BMP Bioretention Area
Visually Obstructive Evergreen
Water Fountain or Feature
Impervious Paved Surface
Other Tree
Water Body
Forecourt
Significant View
The symbology shown in Figure 6-7 is utilized throughout the design recommendations section to diagramatically showcase the existing assessments and proposed improvements. Overall Corridor Diagrams At the beginning of each corridor segment, the general makeup of each corridor is highlighted on an overall map diagram. The diagrams all utilize the same legend. A solid blue circle indicates an important intersection along the corridor and a dashed blue circle indicates that intersection will be addressed in another corridor section. The red cut/ section lines indicate the locations of illustrative sections and their orientation. The orange line and tone indicate important, sometimes iconic, landscape areas within the corridor.
N
Note: All plans are oriented with North directed up unless otherwise indicated.
Figure 6-7. Master Legend 91
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
Performance Metrics Each of the Primary Corridors identifies an existing and proposed set of landscape performance metrics. These metrics are: landscape maintenance, pavement permeability, trees/shade, and intensity of use. Below is a description of each with an explanation of the diagramatic language utilized.
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE:
PAVEMENT PERMEABILITY:
TREE / SHADE:
INTENSITY OF USE:
Figure 6-8. Typical existing and proposed maintenance metric diagrams.
Figure 6-9. Typical existing and proposed pavement permeability metric diagrams.
Figure 6-10. Typical existing and proposed tree / shade metric diagrams.
Figure 6-11. Typical existing and proposed intensity of use metric diagrams.
Existing conditions maintenance metrics are based on observations of current maintenance regimes. The highest maintenance areas, represented by indicate areas that are highly planted, paving is well cared for and in most cases are iconic spaces for the university. Medium maintenance are typically areas adjacent to the high maintenance areas. Low maintenance areas are often ancillary in nature and may be nothing more than grass or asphalt.
Existing conditions pavement permeability metrics note locations of existing impervious pavement on campus. With the exception of some plaza areas and paths in the arboretum campus paving is for the most part impervious. Impervious surfaces are noted as .
Existing conditions tree / shade metrics note existing amount of tree canopy and approximate size. This figure ground study of available shade indicates areas where little or no shade is available. Given Auburn University’s warm climate having accessible shade is necessary for the comfort of faculty, students and staff.
Intensity of use refers to the amount of faculty, students, staff and alumni that use a space and with what frequency. Areas around major classroom facilities with high rates of traffic by students are often the most intensly used spaces on campus and as such care should be given to their finish. Considerations such as durability, scale, and quality of materials will affect these locations and their ability to accommodate amounts of traffic adequately.
Often the maintenance metrics and ‘use’ metrics are similar because areas that people use the most are often maintained to a higher standard or require more maintenance because of the use of the space. The proposed metrics shown, when coupled with the design suggestions in the landscape corridors section, suggest where areas may change in maintenance type based on use and finish. These estimates are based on square foot areas taken from the campus cad plan per landscape corridor and while they convey the intention, should be considered ‘rough numbers’. There are some areas where no physical change is proposed but because of an improvement in an adjacent landscape that will draw more use, may be suggested to increase in maintenance level. Iconic landscapes such as gateways, parks, heritage sites, etc should always receive the highest landscape level to ensure their longevity.
Design Recommendations - Corridors
The proposed permeability diagrams represents areas of potential permeable paving as . The following are areas that may lend themselves well to using pervious paving: Sidewalks Parking lots Plazas Areas where heavy trucks do not access Parks
Proposed diagrams show existing canopies being allowed to reach maturity as well as infill planting of additional trees where major gaps in the shade cover exist. Care should be given to maintain existing tree canopies. When new trees are planted they should be located close enough to pedestrian circulation to provide shade as soon as possible. Trees should also be planted at a large enough caliper (3” or more depending on species) so that canopies can mature earlier. Once trees are planted they should be protected from further disruption and allowed to fill out.
There are three levels of use; low , medium , and high . Low use areas are typically ancillary while medium and high use areas are often central to circulation or gathering spaces. Proposed architectural program such as the Central Classroom facility, Academic Success center and others will increase the adjacent intensity of use.
Greenways Permeable paving reduces the amount of surface runoff during storm events. Storm water is allowed to permeate paving and penetrate back into the ground water table ultimately reducing the amount of water discharged into adjacent creeks and drainageways. Since this water is filtered through the groundwater table it’s quality is improved. Percentages of existing and proposed are based on square foot calculations. In most cases a 50 / 50 ratio of is desirable as it is understood that not all paved surfaces can be pervious as some require higher load ratings.
92
1 COLLEGE STREET
Samford Park 1.1
Thach Avenue Gateway; see 6.1
Library Lawn 1.2
Samford Avenue Gateway; see Section 4 : Landscape Standards
Figure 6-12. College Street Overall Corridor Diagram 93
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
1.1 COLLEGE STREET: SAMFORD PARK Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
2
W MAGNOLIA AVE
1
1
2 5 2 3 6 4
9
HARGIS HALL
5
2
2
5
Major pedestrian / vehicular conflicts existed around the previous oaks at the corner of the park. The oaks were too close to the adjacent streets which created blind spots for both pedestrians and vehicles.
6
9
There is no accessible route at the mid-block crossing and crosswalk. Though lights have been installed, it is still difficult for fast moving vehicles to notice pedestrians in this crossing. The majority of existing trees are located in areas that have been mulched and often have groundcover and shrubs that prevent pedestrians from accessing available shade.
1
4
7
7
9
8
The current plaza is cut off from the rest of the park by planting and thus feels disconnected.
6 7
7
7
3
LANGDON HALL
3
8 S COLLEGE STREET
9
The main pathway from the corner aligns with Hargis Hall. Samford Hall is only visible obliquely. The existing paths in Samford Park are often cut off from areas of open lawn by adjacent planting making access to the lawn circuitous. There are multiple paths leading to similar destinations with no real hierarchy between the paths, their widths or paving materials.
8
The existing shrub and groundcover beds employ a variety of mulch types that provide no consistency between planting areas.
9
Adjacent ancillary spaces are thick with shrubs and groundcover which makes them feel separated and inaccessible to the rest of the park.
Samford Park is the setting for Auburn’s most iconic building and a place where many visitors to Auburn first arrive on campus. It is currently characterized by obstructed viewsheds, a lack of pedestrian connectivity and a landscape fragmented by a redundant path network (see Figure 6-13). Usable lawn spaces are largely inaccessible due to dense shrub planting along path edges (see Figure 6-16). As the setting for an Auburn icon and a main entrance to campus, Samford Park should be a place where visitors, students and faculty orient themselves to campus. Starting here, one should be able to easily navigate to further destinations.
9 4
9
Primary view of Samford Hall Tower is obscured by large evergreen shrubs and trees.
Proposed improvements (see Figure 6-18) include combining paths and opening viewsheds to assist with wayfinding. Also, consolidating landscape spaces to provide continuous areas of occupiable shade. Finally, provide clearings that further emphasize views to iconic spaces and destinations.
7
4
Figure 6-14. Aerial view of Samford Park Source: MapData: Google SAMFORD HALL
7
4
W THACH AVE
Figure 6-13. Samford Park Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
Design Recommendations - Corridors
Figure 6-15. Existing infrastructure is not screened from view
Figure 6-16. Inaccessible groundcover and planting beds
Figure 6-17. Mid-block crosswalk is not ADA accessible 94
1.1 COLLEGE STREET: SAMFORD PARK Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
2
1
Remove dense evergreen shrub and tree masses to allow views from the corner to the clock tower at Samford Hall.
2
Move the replacement oaks back from the street and open up the corner to reduce pedestrian and vehicular conflicts caused by blind spots.
3
Provide graded transition to the crosswalk accompanied by pedestrian scale lighting and signage. Make the existing painted crosswalk into a traffic table with iconic paving to slow vehicles. Use consistent street tree planting to provide shaded walks along the perimeter of the park (reference matrix for suggestions).
4
Open up accessible shaded areas by reducing the amount of shrubs and groundcover. Allow pedestrian access to shaded lawns and views to iconic buildings.
5
Replace the existing oaks with large replacement trees. Open up the existing plaza by removing adjacent evergreen trees and shrubs. Expand the boundary of the plaza for more gathering space.
6
Align the new path with the Samford Hall clock tower and widen it so that it is the predominant path through the park.
7
Reduce the amount of paths through the park by combining them into a few key paths that focus on iconic views and existing forecourts. Vary the paving material so there are primary, secondary and tertiary material expressions of paths.
8
Make landscape treatment and maintenance consistent across the park. Use one type of mulch consistently.
9
Open up secondary spaces for use by relocating dense gardens to areas that relate directly to Samford Hall. Use secondary spaces for smaller, more intimate gatherings.
5 2
1
9
9 6 7 9 9
3
4
Figure 6-19. Open lawn space in Samford Park is cut off by path lined hedges
9
Figure 6-20. Limited views
Figure 6-21. Oak to be replaced
8
Figure 6-18. Samford Park Potential Improvements Plan Diagram Figure 6-22. Existing view to Hargis Hall; Samford Hall slightly visible 95
Figure 6-23. View to Langdon Hall steps
Figure 6-24. View through the gates
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
1.1 COLLEGE STREET: SAMFORD PARK
1
2 3
Figure 6-25 Samford Park Existing Conditions Section
1
Views to iconic buildings are obscured by dense shrubs and evergreen trees. These planting also prevent pedestrians from accessing shaded areas.
2
Planting adjacent to College Street is sparse and street trees are inconsistently sized or spaced. Also, there is only stone mulch where shrubs and groundcover should be.
3
The current crosswalk has stairs leading to it that pedestrians and bicycles have bypassed creating trails on either side.
3
2
1
Figure 6-27. Existing sweeping pathway
Figure 6-26. Brick banded walk
1
Figure 6-28. Existing Mid Block crossing misaligned
2 4
Figure 6-29. Samford Park Proposed Improvements Section
1
Remove and thin existing evergreen trees and shrubs to provide views to iconic buildings and allow access to shade for pedestrians.
2
Remove stone mulch and plant native, low maintenance groundcover to define edge of path. Replace missing street trees with trees of equal or greater size than the adjacent street trees to provide shaded walk for pedestrians.
3
Replace current crosswalk with traffic table to slow vehicles and allow pedestrians to cross more safely.
4
Replace current sidewalk with 10’ wide multiuse path. This path is to be straight and parallel to College Street along its length.
1
Figure 6-30. The iconic sign
Design Recommendations - Corridors
2
Figure 6-31. Path to be parallel to College
3
Figure 6-32. Raised crossing 96
1. 2 COLLEGE STREET: LIBRARY LAWN Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
1
Sidewalk along College Street is contained by a bollard and chain that prohibits pedestrians from accessing the lawn adjacent to the parking garage. This section of sidewalk is also largely unshaded and exposed to heavy, fast moving traffic along College Street.
2
The most shaded pedestrian gathering areas are taken up by large masses of shrubs resulting in minimal occupiable shade.
3
There is only one break in the surrounding bollard and chain that allows pedestrians into the lawn area. This has created a dirt trail that is muddy and inaccessible when the weather is inclement.
4
Minimal screen planting allows views to the side of the parking garage from College Street.
5
Existing Roosevelt Street alignment breaks from the orthogonality of the block. Eastern end aligns with a much smaller, residential scale section on the East side of College Street.
6
Steep slopes around the library prevent pedestrian access to lawn areas.
7
Existing branch of Parkerson Mill Creek is underground in a culvert.
Typical of many spaces in the academic core, shaded areas are unoccupiable due to an under planting of dense shrubs. Access to usable space is further impeded by steep slopes and a continuous line of bollards at the perimeter. This space represents the headwaters of the Parkerson Mill Creek watershed, the main natural hydrologic resource of Auburn’s core campus. It is currently piped in this location, suppressing its potential ecological value. There is a tremendous opportunity to improve the health of the waterway and the quality and utility of the landscape by daylighting and restoring Parkerson Mill Creek in this location. As part of the campus front yard on College Street, this project could become a usable, beautiful and memorable campus space, as well as emblematic of Auburn’s commitment to ecological restoration and sustainable landscape practices. The restoration of the creek would be integrated with usable lawn spaces, as well as a lower-maintenance landscape of native grasses and shrubs.
1 6 2
1
Figure 6-35. Bollards and chains surround the lawn
4 7 3
6
2
5 3
Figure 6-36. View of the underutilized lawn space
4 5
Figure 6-33. Library Lawn Existing Conditions Plan Diagram 97
Figure 6-34. Aerial view of the library and surrounding site Source: MapData: Google
Figure 6-37. View of the sidewalk adjacent to the roadway
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
1. 2 COLLEGE STREET: LIBRARY LAWN Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
2
1
Create a planting strip between the sidewalk and back of curb to contain a low maintenance native grass buffer. The bollard and chain system should be located within this planting strip. Plant a row of street trees on either side of the sidewalk to create a shaded walk along College Street between Thach and Samford Ave.
2
Formalize occupiable lawn for pedestrian gathering while keeping shade trees.
3
By moving the sidewalk to the park side of the bollards, pedestrians are able to access the open space.
4
Plant large shade trees, understory trees and shrubs along the eastern face of the parking garage to screen views from College Street.
5
Realign Roosevelt Drive to align with Roosevelt Concourse and the pedestrian gateway. Plant street trees along Roosevelt Drive to provide a shaded pedestrian route.
6
Provide access from the upper levels of the park (around the library) via stairs to accessible lawn areas. Other steep slopes should be planted with native, low maintenance shrubs and groundcovers.
7
Daylight Parkerson Mill Creek to re-create ‘Tiger Pond’. This impounded section of Parkerson Mill Creek would have braided wetland edges to increase bank stabilization and would flow over a series of weir walls as it drops in elevation. A meandering path would connect the sidewalk along College Street, past and through the braided wetland benches, to the pedestrian gateway at the Roosevelt Concourse.
1
6 2 3
4
7
3 Figure 6-39. The Dell at UVA Source: NBW Landscape Architects
1 7 5
Figure 6-38. Library Lawn Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
Design Recommendations - Corridors
Figure 6-40. The Dell at UVA Source: NBW Landscape Architects Example images of the potential for a restored Parkerson Mill Creek
Figure 6-41. The Dell at UVA Source: NBW Landscape Architects 98
1. 2 COLLEGE STREET: LIBRARY LAWN
2 1 Figure 6-42. Library Lawn Existing Conditions Section
1
When excavation was performed for the construction of the Library, there were small walls built around the existing trees and the critical root zone of those trees has been compromised with additional fill material. This is unsustainable for the trees.
2
Large, loose shrubs under the trees prevent pedestrians from taking advantage of the shade.
3
A narrow sidewalk with adjacent bollard and chain system forces pedestrians along College Street to walk directly adjacent to five lanes of moving traffic. It also prevents them from accessing the lawn and shade between the parking garage and the library. This section of sidewalk along College Street is unshaded and very unwelcoming for pedestrians.
4
The sidewalk on the eastern side of College Street is confined between a small, steep grass planting strip and a bollard and chain system leaving pedestrians feeling exposed to traffic.
3
2
1
Figure 6-43. Existing Tree Ring
4
4
3
Figure 6-44. Existing Shrubs
Figure 6-45. Existing Barrier
Figure 6-46. Existing Walkway
2 1
Figure 6-47. Library Lawn Proposed Improvements Section
1
Remove the walls around the trees and slope grade. Provide proper drainage so water is not collected.
2
Remove and thin the existing shrub mass to create more occupiable space for people to gather. Add internal pathways for pedestrian circulation. Provide seating areas for people to stop, study or gather.
3
Create a 10’ wide multiuse sidewalk that is inward from the edge of College Street and provide a planting strip between the sidewalk and curb. Move the bollards and chain to the back of curb and plant planting strip with native, low maintenance shrubs and groundcovers. Plant large shade trees on either side of the relocated sidewalk to improve the pedestrian experience along College Street.
4
Plant a continuous hedge in the planting strip on the eastern side of College Street to give pedestrians a sense of protection from adjacent traffic. Move the bollard and chain system to the back of curb. 99
4
3
1
2
3
Figure 6-48. Opporunity space for gathering
Figure 6-49. Existing wlakway
4
Figure 6-50. Aerial view Source: MapData: Google
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
1. 3 COLLEGE STREET: CORRIDOR METRICS
Existing Proposed Figure 6-51. College Street Landscape Maintenance Diagram
Existing Proposed Figure 6-52. College Street Pavement Permeability Diagram
Existing Proposed Figure 6-53. College Street Tree / Shade Diagram
Existing Proposed Figure 6-54. College Street Intensity of Use Diagram
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Existing: 63% Low Maintenance 23% Medium Maintenance 14% High Maintenance
PAVEMENT PERMEABILITY Existing: 1% Pervious Pavement 99% Impervious Pavement
TREES / SHADE Existing: 27% Canopy Cover Proposed: 43% Canopy Cover
INTENSITY OF USE Existing: 77% Low Use 20% Medium Use 3% High Use
Key
Proposed: 61% Low Use 14% Medium Use 25% High High Key
Proposed: 49% Low Maintenance 16% Medium Maintenance 35% High Maintenance Key
Proposed: 20% Pervious Pavement 80% Impervious Pavement Key
Low Maintenance
Impervious Pavement
Medium Maintenance
Pervious Pavement
High Maintenance
Design Recommendations - Corridors
Canopy Cover
Figure 6-55. College Street Plan Diagram
COLLEGE STREET MASTER PLAN 1,555,975 SF or 35.7 Ac
Low Use Medium Use High Use 100
2 MELL STREET
Ross Square
2.1
North Mell Street
2.2
Roosevelt Concourse Gateway
2.3
Central Mell Street
2.4
Garden of Memory
2.5
South Mell Street
2.6
Davis Arboretum
2.7
Figure 6-56. Mell Street Overall Corridor Diagram 101
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
2.1 MELL STREET: ROSS SQUARE Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
4
1
Main pedestrian connection between the corner of Samford Park / Downtown Auburn and the Thach Concourse is circuitous and not obvious.
2
The center of the square is in disrepair with broken or missing paving, benches and a fountain in need of restoration.
3
Existing large trees block views of adjacent iconic buildings (Ross and Samford)
4
Surrounding parking and traffic patterns conflict with pedestrian circulation and disconnect the square from its context.
5
Dense planting of understory shrubs and groundcovers prevent pedestrians from accessing shaded areas.
1 5
3
5 4
2
Ross Square is a key intersection of main pedestrian routes connecting the core campus to Toomer’s Corner. Major foot traffic moves diagonally between the southwest and northeast corners, yet the direct route is obstructed by trees and shrubs that restrict views from adjacent pedestrian approaches. In addition, the loop road around the square creates dangerous conflicts between vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Proposed improvements to the square include removing the formal loop road to limit vehicular traffic to ADA and emergency vehicle access. Also, propose a clear the path for the major diagonal desire line by shifting the planting. This will improve the wayfinding experience and open views from the pedestrian approaches. Figures 6-57 and 6-58 show existing conditions and potential improvements for Ross Square.
5
5
1
4
Figure 6-57. Ross Square Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
Figure 6-59. View of Ross Square with Ross Hall in the background Proposed Improvements Plan Diagram
ROSS HALL
3
1
Create obvious site circulation that acknowledges the walk between Samford Park Corner and the Thach Concourse.
2
Open up the center of the square and restore plaza to reinforce its axial location.
3
Acknowledge views to and from adjacent iconic buildings and accentuate the view to and from Ross Hall.
4
Expand the boundaries of the existing square, limit vehicular circulation around the square to ADA and emergency vehicle access and connect the square to its context. Locate shrubs and understory planting at periphery of square and provide accessible shade for pedestrians to gather.
4 3
5
4
4
2 FOY UNION CIRCLE
1
SAMFORD HALL
1
5
Figure 6-60. Drake Field circa 1900 Source: Auburn Football by E. Schafer 2004; Arcadia
Figure 6-61. Aerial view of Ross Square Source: MapData: Google
5 W THACH AVE
MELL STREET
3
Figure 6-58. Ross Square Proposed Improvements Diagram
Design Recommendations - Corridors
MARTIN HALL
Figure 6-62. Missing pavers in the square
Figure 6-63. View into the concourse
Figure 6-64. Heavy planting in shade 102
2. 2 MELL STREET: NORTH MELL STREET Mostly open lawn in full sun, North Mell Street lacks shaded walks and well defined, comfortable areas for gathering (see Figure 6-66). Potential improvements include adding trees and shrubs to help distinguish gathering spaces from the spaces of vehicular and pedestrian transit. Also, take advantage of the slopes as usable space by adding seat walls. Finally, increase ecological performance by utilizing rain gardens to filter runoff from the street and slopes (see Figure 6-69).
3 2 1
1
Figure 6-65. North Mell Existing Conditions Section
1
Sidewalks along Mell Street are contained by bollards and lack continuous shade.
2
Existing slope from Mell Street to Harper Hall and Broun Hall is steep and underutilized.
3
The Library Plaza has planting beds which are mulched, but do not contain planting. These beds do little to define the space.
Figure 6-66. Planting beds contain only mulch; need planting to soften space and define plaza
Figure 6-67. Aerial photo with section location Source: MapData: Google
3
4 2
1
Figure 6-68. North Mell Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
Separate sidewalk from the back of curb along Mell Street and remove bollards to provide room for planting strip and street trees for shade.
2
Plant the existing slope with shade trees and provide low seat / retaining walls for informal gathering / study areas.
3
The current library plaza is renovated as an entrance plaza for the proposed academic success center.
4
Locate a rain garden at the bottom of the slope and direct stormwater runoff from Mell Street into it so that the water is filtered prior to entering the storm sewer system.
Figure 6-69. Steep slope down to the quad is underutilized 103
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
2. 3 MELL STREET: ROOSEVELT CONCOURSE GATEWAY The vehicular travel lanes, pedestrian paths, and the entrance to the Roosevelt Concourse cannot be easily distinguished from one another (see Figure 6-70). Adding a distinctive material to differentiate the pedestrian walk will help provide visibility to the crossing (see Figure6-73). This will aid both the pedestrians in finding their way, as well as the people in vehicles watching for pedestrians. The addition of canopy trees will help clarify the gateway as a threshold into the campus core and improve the comfort of usable space.
Figure 6-70. Existing Roosevelt Concourse gateway is currently unshaded and open to Tiger Transit and typical vehicular circulation. Roosevelt Drive does not align with Roosevelt Concourse.
Figure 6-72. View down Mell Street with typical sidewalk adjacent roadway
Figure 6-71. The proposed Roosevelt Concourse gateway should define the pedestrian hierarchy by using a standardized brick traffic table in place of typical painted crosswalks. This will help minimize the pedestrian / vehicular conflicts. Adding shade trees to pedestrian gathering areas will encourage additional use and help frame the gateway to the concourse.
Figure 6-73. Pedestrian crossings need to be better defined
Design Recommendations - Corridors
104
2.4 MELL STREET: CENTRAL MELL STREET
1
2
3
1
Figure 6-74. Central Mell Existing Conditions Section
1
On the east side of Mell Street the sidewalk is protected by a bollard system, but it has no shade. On the west side, the bollard and chain system is between the pedestrians and the lawn / open space.
2
Existing impervious concrete provides an unshaded walk from the main sidewalk to several building entrances. The associated secondary sidewalk doesn’t connect through to the Roosevelt Gateway. The front yards of the buildings along Mell are underutilized.
3
The impervious parking area in front of Comer Hall is visible to pedestrians and vehicles moving up and down College Street.
Figure 6-76. Birdseye image showing location of section. Source: MapData: Google
2
1
1
3
Figure 6-75. Central Mell Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
Remove the bollard and chain system on both sides of Mell Street (see Campus Bollard Plan figure X.XX). If bollards must remain then they should bee relocated to the back of curb. Move the path away from the back of curb on the western side of the street to allow space to plant an allee of street trees on either side of Mell Street linking Ross Square to the Arboretum with a shaded pedestrian walk on either side of the street.
2
Replace impervious concrete with porous paving on all pedestrian walks. Any path that connects the main sidewalk along the street to a building entrance should be lined with shade trees. Connect the front yards of the buildings along Mell Street with a series of shaded, occupiable gardens that connect back to the Roosevelt Gateway.
3
Where possible, replace impervious parking spaces with porous paving to encourage groundwater infiltration. Use native, low maintenance shrubs to screen views of parking from the street. Figure 6-77. Limited shade along the eastside path. Bollard and chain system prohibits use of lawn space.
105
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
2.5 MELL STREET: GARDEN OF MEMORY Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
3 2 4
1
5
1
Current entrance is hidden from the street by parked cars and does not have a relationship to the other elements in the garden.
2
There are no clear circulation routes through the garden.
3
Open lawn areas are poorly defined.
4
The existing pond is shallow, appears stagnant, has minimal planted buffer around its banks and could be better located.
5
Site circulation between adjacent elements, like the ‘Hill Dorms’, is not clear.
6
Planted slope has plants that are spaced too far apart from each other and were too small at installation.
7
Existing lawn gathering space is poorly defined and shaded areas are often mulched preventing pedestrian occupation.
8
Garden is disconnected from the arboretum.
9
Existing stream bank lacks diversity and is incised.
The Garden of Memory is intended as a contemplative and relaxing space for students though that potential is undermined by its current condition (see Figure 6-78). Although adjacent to the Hill dorms and the Arboretum, the entrances to the Garden are poorly defined or nonexistent, as is the path network. This ultimately has negative impact on its use and utility. The many landscape types within the garden lack definition and clear boundaries. The stream and pond are degraded, the ornamental gardens loosely planted, the lawn edges undefined and the forest under run with invasive species.
Figure 6-79. Aerial view of the Garden of Memory Source: MapData: Google
6
Figure 6-80. Parked cars hide the garden entrance
7 9 8
Figure 6-78. Garden of Memory Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
Figure 6-81. Existing pond needs buffer improvements to increase water quality and repair eroded banks
Design Recommendations - Corridors
106
2.4 MELL STREET: GARDEN OF MEMORY Proposed Improvements Plan Diagram
1 2
Create threshold and walk from Samford Avenue.
3
Reshape central lawn into defined oval.
4
Redesign and reposition primary reflecting pool area (center on entry axis, create a series of small pools, improve aeration and circulation with modest recirculating pump / fountain).
5
Maintain and reinforce the ceremonial center line and connect through to Hill Dorms on the west side.
6
Design and improve gardens and ornamental planting area.
7
Occupiable lawn with existing shade trees.
3
8
Create southern threshold and walk with connection to the Davis Arboretum.
5
9
Steep stream bank to be treated as a preservation and restoration planting corridor.
10
Create a western threshold and walk with connection to the hill dorms.
1
2
10
4
Create a continuous looping path system.
The garden has potential to become one of the great campus landscape spaces. See Figure 6-82 for a series of proposed improvements. For instance, if linked more strongly to the Arboretum, the Garden of Memory could be appreciated in the series of campus landscapes that display Auburn’s plant collections. If better linked to the Hill dorms, the garden can become a highly desired natural escape. The path network should be formalized to make these connections. In addition, the path network should be used to reshape, reinforce and distinguish different landscape spaces – ornamental gardens, forest, occupiable lawn and restored stream corridor. Water can be better integrated and improved as part of the contemplative experience. Through the restoration of the stream corridor and redesign of the pond, the ecological function and appearance within the gardens will be greatly improved. Another key improvement would address the ornamental collections along the eastern edge. This area has much potential to be further developed and diversified.
6
2 7 8 9
Figure 6-83. Opportunity to restore stream corridor
Figure 6-84. Stagnant water needs improved aeration and circulation
Figure 6-85. Garden trees shed leaves in the fall
Figure 6-82. Garden of Memory Proposed Improvements Plan Diagram
Figure 6-86. Panoramic view of the garden’s understory planting 107
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
2.6 MELL STREET: SOUTH MELL STREET
1
2 3
Figure 6-87. South Mell Existing Conditions Section
1
On the east side of Mell Street the sidewalk is protected by a bollard and chain and has minimal shade due to small trees that have been placed too far apart from each other.
2
On the west side there is an informal, dirt footpath at the top of a slope that drains towards the arboretum.
3
The existing slope draining towards the arboretum is under-utilized and terminated by a chainlink fence.
1 2
1 1
1
2 3 3
Figure 6-89 Aerial Photograph noting location of section. Source: MapData: Google
Figure 6-88. South Mell Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
Decrease the spacing of the trees so that tree canopies will provide continuous shade. When trees are planted they should be 4” caliper or larger at installation so that a more mature canopy is achieved more quickly.
2
Provide a 10’ wide multi-use path separated from the back of curb by 12’. This path should start at the corner of Garden Drive and Mell and continue south along Mell / Lem Morrison to Wire Road.
3
Conceal chainlink fence and slope with native shrubs to that tie back to the understory of the existing forest at the Davis Arboretum.
Figure 6-90. Dirt path and lack of shade on either side of South Mell Street.
Design Recommendations - Corridors
108
2.6 DAVIS ARBORETUM Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
1
1
Existing site entrances aren’t well marked and often have vehicles parked in front of them creating pedestrian hazards.
2
Existing interpretive center is undersized and not clearly marked.
3
Existing open or grassed areas are minimal resulting in reduced visual connectivity and edge condition.
4
While this is one of the most intact remnants of the original forest, there is a lack of diversity in species and habitat.
5
Disparate collections don’t necessarily relate to their existing conditions topographically or hydrologically.
6
Arboretum edge is defined by a fence and dissolved groups of remnant street trees. The arboretum does not connect back to the adjacent context of the Hill Dorms, President’s House and the Garden of Memory.
2 5 3 6 4 6
5
As an educational collection, the Davis Arboretum has potential to represent diverse plant communities of the eco-region with an emphasis on forest ecologies. However, the current collection lacks diversity and is dispersed without regard to native hydrologic and topographic contexts of the plants. Over time, the collection should be carefully curated to diversify the species and forest structure. See Figures 6-91 and 6-92 for existing conditions and proposed improvements for the Davis Arboretum. To increase the educational value and health of the collection, the plants should be located with respect to their native environment. This in turn would require articulating a range of solar conditions and hydrologic contexts. Since the arboretum is also a space designed to be occupied, the usable lawn space, forest, perennial and shrub collections should be more clearly defined and delineated. Providing distinct areas will assist in creating a more inviting and relaxing environment. The arboretum is one in a series of landscapes, including the adjacent Garden of Memory and the nearby Agricultural Heritage Park, that demonstrate the ecological types and landscape strategies used throughout the wider campus. This list includes restored natural systems, emphasis on native plants, sustainable agricultural practices and integration of urban ecology. An expanded interpretive center at the arboretum could provide an opportunity for studying and developing these interconnected landscape systems.
Figure 6-91. Davis Arboretum Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
Proposed Improvements Plan Diagram
1
1 2
1
Create thresholds at arboretum entrances.
2
Potential building / interpretive center expansion zone.
3
Keep open as a series of interconnected landscape spaces, clearings, lawns, meadows, etc., that weave in and out of the woods and plantations north to south while preserving existing shade trees.
3
7
4 5 1
6
Figure 6-92. Davis Arboretum Proposed Improvements Plan Diagram 109
4
Preserved core and eastern edge. Maintain and enhance as representative forest ecosystem of this eco-region with maximum diversity of native species. Include special pockets / areas of site, soil, water and shade specific planting.
5
Proposed visitor center location including bus drop-off, assembly plaza, and outdoor classroom space.
6
Proposed location of relocated maintenance facility with nursery and propagation area that is visible to visitors.
7
Arboretum edge / interface with Mell Street and the larger campus; major point of intersection.
Figure 6-93. Founder’s Oak with marker
Figure 6-94. Typical classification signage
Figure 6-95. Path terminus at lawn
Figure 6-96. Room for expanded biodiversity in many areas of the arboretum
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
2.7 MELL STREET: METRICS
Existing
Proposed
Existing
Proposed
Figure 6-97. Mell Street Landscape Maintenance Diagram
Figure 6-98. Mell Street Pavement Permeability Diagram
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Existing: 68% Low Maintenance 17% Medium Maintenance 15% High Maintenance
PAVEMENT PERMEABILITY Existing: 91% Impervious Pavement 9 % Pervious Pavement
Proposed: 37% Low Maintenance 41% Medium Maintenance 22% High Maintenance Key
Proposed: 51% Impervious Pavement 49% Pervious Pavement Key:
Low Maintenance
Impervious Pavement
Medium Maintenance
Pervious Pavement
High Maintenance
Design Recommendations - Corridors
110
Existing
Proposed
Existing
Proposed
Figure 6-99. Mell Street Trees / Shade Diagram
Figure 6-100. Mell Street Trees / Shade Diagram
Figure 6-101. Mell Street Plan Diagram
TREES / SHADE Existing: 44% Canopy Cover
MELL STREET MASTER PLAN 1,838,436 SF or 42.2 Ac
Proposed: 67% Canopy Cover
INTENSITY OF USE Existing: 77% Low Use 16% Medium Use 7% High Use
Key
Proposed: 25% Low Use 68% Medium Use 7% High Use Key Canopy Cover
Low Use Medium Use High Use
111
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
3 CONCOURSES - GINN, HALEY, DUGGAR AND ROOSEVELT
Ginn Concourse at Magnolia Avenue
3.1
Ginn Concourse and Thach Concourse Intersection
3.2
Haley Concourse
3.3
Campus Green
3.4
Duggar Concourse and Samford Avenue Intersection
3.5
Duggar Concourse to South Quad
3.6
South Quad and Old Rotation
3.7
Figure 6-102. The Concourses Corridor Diagram
Design Recommendations - Corridors
112
3.1 CONCOURSES: GINN CONCOURSE GATEWAY AT MAGNOLIA AVENUE Although a major threshold into campus, this gateway is characterized by a string of misaligned pedestrian crossings and minimal shade (see Figure 6-103). The multiple crossings should be concentrated into a single alignment. This new path should be more visible through the use of special paving. Additional shade trees will further improve the visibility of the pedestrian gateway and wayfinding function. These improvements (as shown in Figure 6-104) can help increase the safety of the crossing at this crucial campus entrance.
Figure 6-103. Existing conditions photograph
Figure 6-105. Birdseye view of existing conditions Source: MapData: Google
Figure 6-104. Potential improvements rendering
Figure 6-106. Potential for increased shade tree planting 113
Figure 6-107. View down concourse
Figure 6-108. View through brick gateways onto Magnolia Avenue
Figure 6-109. Existing crosswalk at Magnolia Avenue
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
3. 2 CONCOURSES: GINN CONCOURSE AND THACH CONCOURSE INTERSECTION
G NN GINN
This intersection of two main pedestrian corridors could be an iconic campus place to meet up and gather. Currently, many of these spaces are poorly defined by irregular boundaries, contain a scattering of unsightly utilities and transformers, and offer a complete lack of occupiable shade. Figure 6-112 shows a typical example at the intersection of Ginn Concourse and Thach Concourse.
GINN G NN
2 1
THACH
To improve these areas (see Figure 6-111), first establish a unified square through regular edges and special paving. Next, move utilities out of sight to help with defining these junctions. Finally, encourage gathering with benches and large canopy trees.
2
3
T HACH A H
2
2 1
3
To increase legibility of the pedestrian corridors, campus wide standards should enforce the hierarchy of pathways utilizing distinct material transitions. See Section 4: Landscape Standards for campus paving standards. This is the main bicycle intersection on campus. If bicycle use continues to increase on campus then improvements such as lane delineation, bicycle corral locations and pedestrian / cyclist interactions will need to be taken into consideration.
2 2 4
H ALEY HA HALEY LE
Figure 6-110. Ginn and Thach Intersection Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
HALEY H ALE L EY
Figure 6-111. Ginn and Thach Intersection Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
1
Large undefined intersection does not reflect the importance of the preeminent pedestrian intersection on campus.
1
Remove overarticulated / less occupiable intersection corners and associated fencing / utilities to allow space for pedestrians to gather.
2
Larger existing trees are too far from pedestrian gathering and circulation areas to be helpful for shading.
2
3
Existing large transformers, utility equipment, fences and vender vehicles detract from the aesthetics of what should be an iconic intersection.
Locate large shade tree groves in the corners of the intersection and provide benches and opportunities for pedestrians to gather. Line pedestrian concourses with shade trees to decrease the effect of high spring, summer and fall temperatures.
3
Relocate existing, misplaced utilities and vendors to more appropriate areas.
4
Relationship of the intersection plays to the four quadrant spaces.
Figure 6-112. Panoramic view of the Thach Concourse and Tiger Concourse intersection
Design Recommendations - Corridors
114
3. 3 CONCOURSES: HALEY CONCOURSE
2
3 1 Figure 6-115. Potential improvements can address the lack of shade trees and large expanses of pavement
The Haley Concourse is one of the most important pedestrian thoroughfares on campus. Current conditions include a lack of shade, vast expanses of pavement, and few pedestrian scaled spaces (see Figure 6-115). The large expanses of impervious paving also contribute to the heat island effect and campus stormwater issues. Opportunities exists to utilize this major pedestrian corridor as a comfortable and functional space. Figure 6-113 shows existing conditions across a section of the concourse.
Figure 6-113. Haley Concourse Existing Conditions Section
1
Wide expanse of dark colored, impervious paving with no shade for pedestrians.
2 3
Small planting stock with too much space between planting. Few adjacent shrubs leave groundplane undefined.
Proposed improvements, as shown in Figure 6-114, would include: Increase comfort and use through the addition of an allee of canopy trees Improve the urban ecology with additional planting of native trees and shrubs Integrate pervious pavement and stormwater storage to improve run-off Provide comfortable gathering spaces along the edges of the corridor
2
3 3 1
Figure 6-114. Haley Concourse Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
Plant shade trees in concourse. Use low albedo, porous paving material. Capture rainwater for irrigation.
2 3
Larger, more diverse planting stock at installation for more immediate shade. Increase diversity of groundcover and shrubs and employ low maintenance, native species. Figure 6-116. Aerial indicating location of section Source: MapData: Google
115
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
3.4 CONCOURSES: CAMPUS GREEN Generally well defined and well used, this space could be improved through the addition of shade and some hierarchy of navigation to the path network. See Figures 6-117 and 6-118 for existing conditions and potential improvements to the campus green area. Existing trees should be given extra care to ensure their health. They should be allowed to mature and eventually grow into a closed canopy grove. Navigation would be improved through the addition of special paving. This paving can be used to clearly define major paths. New tree planting can also assist navigation by screening the parking garage and directing views inward towards the campus buildings and landscape spaces.
3 4
2
2
1
1
3
Figure 6-118. Campus Green Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
Figure 6-117. Campus Green Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
1
Wide expanse of unshaded turf allows undesirable views to adjacent parking garage.
1
Add screening / shade trees to provide shaded gathering areas and screen views of the parking garage.
2
Poorly defined area with too little shade and awkward path and slope conditions. Large mulch rings prevent pedestrians from accessing shade.
2
Allow existing trees to mature. Provide extra care so they have the opportunity to form a shaded grove. Allow pedestrian access by removing existing bollard and chain.
3
Paths have no hierarchy of material even though this area is a major campus crossroads. Well defined and well used space.
3
Separate expanses of concrete with brick borders. No more than 100 s.f. of concrete should be exposed between brick borders.
4
Figure 6-119. Large expanses of pavement need to be broken up
Design Recommendations - Corridors
Figure 6-120. Erosion beneath the chain
Figure 6-121. Long paths need more trees for definition and increased shade
Figure 6-122. Usable lawn space separated by bollard and chain
116
3.5 CONCOURSES: DUGGAR CONCOURSE AND SAMFORD AVENUE INTERSECTION
2
As evidenced at Dugger Concourse and Samford Avenue, existing pedestrian crossings on campus are typically understated (Figure 6-125) and create uncomfortable, unsafe passages. To avoid conflict with vehicular travel, these pathways need to be more clearly defined. The majority of campus crosswalks are standard white traffic stripe on grade. Although this standard is sufficient in most transportation scenarios, it is less than ample in a campus environment where pedestrian traffic is dominant.
2
1
1
3
Figure 6-123. Duggar and Samford Intersection Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
1
Major pedestrian / vehicular intersection where pedestrians are forced to emerge from between parked cars along Samford.
2
Small planting stock with too much space between planting and massive expanses of mulch. No shade on pedestrian concourse.
3
Skewed crosswalk confuses pedestrian flow.
To create safe, comfortable crossings in the campus environment, high contrast between the roadway and the crossing is critical. Visual boundaries can be created through the use of paving material contrasts. In many cases, the contrast of a brick and concrete crossing can be sufficient. For areas with heavy vehicular conflicts, a raised table crossing (see Figure 6-126)can help better identify pedestrian zones.
3
Figure 6-124. Dugger and Samford Intersection Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
1
Increase the size of the existing traffic table where concourse crosses Samford Ave. Carry its length through the median and adjacent parking lot to establish a clear connection between the concourses.
2
Increase size of trees at installation and decrease spacing on shrubs and groundcovers to minimize expanses of mulch areas. Provide more shade along pedestrian concourse and street trees to shade parked cars and walkways.
3
Relocate existing, misplaced utilities and vendors to more appropriate areas.
This major pedestrian and vehicular intersection presents a number of safety conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles. The crossing is a long one. Pedestrians must cross two street corners, a median and a parking lot entrance before reaching the other side of the path (see Figure 6-123). Figure 6-124 shows suggested improvements. This should include making the crossing more visible and substantial by unifying it into a single alignment and applying special paving and increasing the size of the raised traffic table.
Figure 6-125. Existing crosswalks lack definition Source: MapData: Google
117
Figure 6-126. A raised brick crosswalk highlights the pedestrian zone
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
3.6 CONCOURSES: DUGGAR CONCOURSE TO SOUTH QUAD In between the dormitories and the Terrell Dining Hall (see Figure 6-129), the Duggar Concourse is a linear walk with numerous adjacent interstitial spaces that can be taken advantage of as informal areas for student gathering (see Figure 6-130). Recommended improvements include allees of canopy trees to bring shade and comfort to the concourse. Also suggested is the addition of parallel raingardens to improve the ecological function and appearance of the space. Where possible, small garden spaces for student gathering and study can be added. Figures 6-127 and 6-128 show existing and proposed cross sections of the Dugger Concourse.
3 2
1
Figure 6-127. Duggar Concourse Existing Conditions Section
1
Narrow concrete walk. No hierarchy of materials or sizes of paths.
2 3
No diversity of shrubs or groundcover. Existing drains in lawn. No rainwater collection from adjacent paved areas.
Figure 6-129. Linear connection between the dorms and Terrell Hall
3
3 1
2
Figure 6-128. Duggar Concourse Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
10’ wide brick lined porous concrete path directs subsurface drainage towards adjacent planting. Shade trees enhance pedestrian experience.
2 3
Employ low maintenance, native species of groundcovers and shrubs to define outdoor gathering areas. Create rain gardens and bioswales near existing drains to filter runoff before it enters the stormwater pipe. Figure 6-130. Potential for small gathering spaces
Design Recommendations - Corridors
Figure 6-131. Bicycle parking adjacent to the concourse 118
3.7 CONCOURSES: SOUTH QUAD AND OLD ROTATION
BOYD HALL
Divided by a parking garage, parking lots and associated vehicular access, the existing South Quad landscapes are fragments rather than designed spaces serving to emphasize and integrate the academic buildings. The pedestrian experience is designed around vehicular parking and access, rather than intentional safe and direct pathways to campus destinations. As a result, the prominent views are of parking spaces with no relationship to overall campus navigation. Figure 6-132 shows existing conditions.
3
3
1
POULTRY SCIENCE
5 3
1 4
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
5
The large scale of the fields plus an existing forest fragment provides an opportunity for restoration of the forest ecosystem. This restoration would also serve to screen views of the garage. While the current path network terminates on the north side of Lem Morrison Drive, the network could extend to include the Old Rotation through trail access and open views from the north. This would highlight and provide interpretation of this ongoing experiment emblematic of the university’s agricultural heritage. Figure 6-133 shows potential improvements for the area.
1 4
2
2
Figure 6-134. Aerial view of South Quad and Old Rotation Source: MapData: Google
PARKING DECK
1
6
1
E
IV
ON
DR
IS
R OR
M
M
LE
6
Figure 6-132. South Quad Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
1
Existing interstitial lawn provides undesirable views to the side of the parking garage.
2
Current site drainage is ineffective.
3
Remnant forest has no understory and is thin in appearance. Existing lawn does not relate to contextual architecture. Misplaced utilities interrupt sidewalks and viewsheds. Existing planting is undersized and does not provide adequate shade for pedestrians.
4
5
Current pedestrian connection to PO Davis and to Southern Duggar Concourse is ineffective and confusing. Multiple circulation routes lack hierarchy.
6
Existing north / south pedestrian route dead ends into planting bed. No pedestrian connection to Lem Morrison. 119
Figure 6-133. South Quad Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
1 2 3
4
Expand limits of remnant forest through reforestation to screen views to parking garage. Add low maintenance, native understory to increase biodiversity. Redesign drainage area as a raingarden to relate to adjacent pedestrian pathway.
Figure 6-135. Eroded planting bed areas
Figure 6-136. Lawn area with minimal shade trees
Figure 6-137. Manhole in odd location
Widen path and create an accessible route across PO Davis. Adjacent slope is steep and will be a challenge to navigate accessibly, potential to use the architecture to provide and accessible route. Redesign lawn to relate to main architectural element. Increase plant sizes at installation and decrease plant spacing to provide shaded pedestrian route.
5
Reduce parking lot and move away from main pedestrian corridor.
6
Extend main pedestrian corridor south across Lem Morrison and through the Old Rotation to a potential interpretive site that would serve as a terminus.
Figure 6-138. Lawn space lacks relationship to the architectural surroundings
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
3.7 CONCOURSES: GINN, HALEY, DUGGAR, AND ROOSEVELT METRICS
Existing
Proposed
Figure 6-139. Concourses Landscape Maintenance Diagram
Existing
Proposed
Figure 6-140. Concourses Pavement Permeability Diagram
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Existing: 100% Medium Maintenance
PAVEMENT PERMEABILITY Existing: 100% Impervious Pavement
Proposed: 41% Low Maintenance 38% Medium Maintenance 21% High Maintenance
Proposed: 77% Impervious Pavement 30% Pervious Pavement
Key
Key Low Maintenance
Impervious Pavement
Medium Maintenance
Pervious Pavement
High Maintenance
Design Recommendations - Corridors
Existing
Proposed
Figure 6-141. Concourses Trees / Shade Diagram TREES / SHADE Existing: 14% Canopy Cover
Existing
Proposed
Figure 6-142. Concourses Intensity of Use Diagram
Proposed: 38% Canopy Cover
INTENSITY OF USE Existing: 35% Low Use 25% Medium Use 40% High Use
Key
Proposed: 10% Low Use 30% Medium Use 60% High High Key Canopy Cover
Figure 6-143. Concourses Plan Diagram CONCOURSES MASTER PLAN 1,066,639 SF or 24.49 Ac
Low Use Medium Use High Use 120
This page intentionally left blank
121
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
4 SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE
South Donahue Drive at Magnolia Avenue Gateway 4.1 South Donahue Drive
4.2
South Donahue Drive and Thach Concourse Intersection
4.3
West Stadium Parking and Tiger Walk Terminus
4.4
South Donahue Drive / Tiger Walk
4.5
South Donahue Drive and Parkerson Mill Creek Intersection
4.6
South Donahue Drive South of Samford
4.7
Ag Heritage Park / Forestry Preserve
4.8
Figure 6-144. Donahue Drive Corridor Diagram
Design Recommendations - Corridors
122
4.1 SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE: SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE AT MAGNOLIA GATEWAY Donahue Drive is one of the foundation corridors of the landscape framework, a main vehicular route as well as a ceremonial spine. See Figure 6-148 for an existing aerial view of the corridor. The main entrance to this ceremonial street currently lacks clarity and distinction as shown in Figure 6-145. Also, the gateway feature is currently on the western side of the road only as seen in Figures 6-147 and 6-148. This could be improved by formalizing the street with allees of large canopy trees on the sides and central median, and adding symmetry to the entrance with an additional pedestrian gate on the eastern corner. See Figure 6-146 for a view of the gateway if these proposed improvements were applied.
Figure 6-145. Existing threshold lacks defined Gateway
Figure 6-146. Proposed improvements increase gateway feel and provide shade allee along path network
Figure 6-148. Aerial view of the existing gateway and spine Source: MapData: Google
Figure 6-147. Eastern side lacks gateway identity
Figure 6-149. Existing gateway is provided on western side only
123
Figure 6-150. Narrow sidewalk receives nice shade
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
4. 2 SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE: SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE The layout of North Donahue Drive prioritizes vehicular traffic. The pedestrian experience is defined by adjacent parking and traffic with no buffer in between (see Figure 6-155). By shifting the paths away from the street and parking edges, North Donahue could accommodate both vehicular and comfortable, shaded pedestrian walks that integrate raingardens to capture stormwater runoff from the parking to the west. See Figure 6-151 and Figure 6-152 for existing and proposed improvement sections for North Donahue Drive.
3
1 2
Figure 6-151. South Donahue Existing Conditions Section
1
Distance of pedestrian walk from back of curb varies and in some cases is connected to the back of curb placing pedestrians too close to adjacent traffic.
2
As the major north / south campus corridor, Donahue Drive is understated and nondescript. It lacks hierarchy with other campus roads that connect to Magnolia Avenue. Large expanses of parking are visible from the road detracting from the vehicular and pedestrian experience.
3
Figure 6-153. Vehicular traffic takes priority over pedestrian connections
3
1
2
Figure 6-154. Native shrub planting could screen the parking lots from view
Figure 6-152. South Donahue Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
Separate pedestrian walks from back of curb and provide planting strip with shade trees. Create 10’ wide multi-use path on either side of South Donahue Drive.
2
Widen roadway to allow 12’ median to be planted with shade trees.
3
Use low maintenance native shrubs to screen views to adjacent parking areas and define the street section. Figure 6-155. Sidewalk adjacent to road is uncomfortable, room to create effective pedestrian pathways
Design Recommendations - Corridors
124
4. 3 SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE: SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE AND THACH CONCOURSE INTERSECTION This intersection combines two of the major thoroughfares on campus. Thach, the main east / west pedestrian route and Donahue, the main north / south vehicular access. In addition, Donahue is a threshold to the athletic core. A pedestrian overpass would reduce the pedestrian and vehicular conflicts, allowing for both types of traffic to be continuous. See Figure 6-156 for existing conditions and Figure 6-157 for proposed solution to relieve the vehicular / pedestrian conflicts.
Figure 6-156. Current pedestrian / vehicular intersection is hazardous due to the large amount of Tiger Transit busses moving north / south and pedestrians moving east / west.
Figure 6-158. Busy vehicular and pedestrian intersection
Figure 6-159. Tiger Transit and other vehicles crossing the major pedestrian thoroughfare
Figure 6-157. Providing a grade separated crossing for Thach Concourse would reduce the amount of pedestrian / vehicular conflicts and provide for a continuous Thach Concourse while creating a vehicular threshold to the athletic core of the campus.
125
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
4.4 SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE: ARENA PARKING LOT / TIGER WALK TERMINUS Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
5
1
Existing tree canopy is inconsistent. Trees have not been replaced where they have died and been removed.
2
The eastern side of the western stadium parking lot consists of unoccupiable, steep slope with few shade trees. While there is internal north / south pedestrian circulation, east / west pedestrian circulation between the parking lot and the stadium is limited.
3
Existing impervious asphalt parking lot surface doesn’t allow storm water dissipation or filtration before it enters existing storm water inlets. This increases the quantity, pollution and velocity of storm water as it empties into nearby Parkerson Mill Creek. The parking lot provides minimal shade for parked cars and pedestrians and is used to full capacity for special events only.
4
The northern terminus of Tiger Walk is undefined and requires spectators to gather on steep slopes, areas covered with rock mulch and in existing, unshaded parking lots. This intersection is also a major pedestrian / vehicular conflict zone due to the high amount of north / south traffic along Donahue Drive.
5
High potential for pedestrian / vehicular conflicts where Thach Concourse crosses Donahue Drive.
1
3
Parking lots at Auburn have seasons that correspond to the athletic calendar - they are not only for parking, but are important to campus culture as prime tailgating locations on game days. All other times of year, the utility of this lot is reduced to the single function of parking. On days when people depend on trees for shade, this large expanse of asphalt provides little comfort. This lot also includes the end to the ceremonial Tiger Walk, but is not designed to comfortably support the gathering crowds. See Figure 6-160 for an existing conditions diagram. Most of the stormwater runoff goes directly into the storm system, taking all of the pollutants
2
4
Figure 6-160. Arena Parking and Tiger Walk Terminus Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
Design Recommendations - Corridors
Figure 6-161. Large expanses of mulch. Potential for planting in place of the bollard chains
Figure 6-162. Brick bands in need of repair
Figure 6-163. Aerial view of the large athletics parking area Source: MapData: Google
126
4. 3 SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE: ARENA PARKING LOT / TIGER WALK TERMINUS Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
1
1
Reinforce existing canopy by filling in gaps in street trees along Donahue Drive.
2
Remove paving, install shaded allee that will create a linear park to improve the pedestrian experience between the Western Thach Concourse and Heisman Drive. Could serve as gameday tailgating area, potential farmers market location or other special events space.
3
Reduce size of paved parking lot. Replace some existing asphalt with porous concrete. Replace failing pavement and some existing asphalt with reinforced turf or porous paving to allow overflow parking during special events. Locate large shade trees in bioswale parking islands to convey storm water down-slope to a rain garden for filtering and and recharging the groundwater table.
4
Rainwater / water filtration / infiltration garden.
5
Formalize the Northern terminus of Tiger Walk. Reshape the existing slope on the northwest corner of the intersection to allow low, terraced walls that could be used for spectator seating during the Tiger Walk event. Stitch the existing large trees together by creating an arc or circle of trees that would encompass the terminus of the Tiger Walk allowing more gathering space as well as a green / open space adjacent to the new Health and Wellness Center.
6
Reduce pedestrian / vehicular conflicts by providing a grade separated pedestrian crossing where Thach Concourse crosses Donahue Drive.
7
Provide clear pedestrian access from parking area to the Recreation and Wellness Center.
6
1
3 2
from the parking lot straight into Parkerson Mill Creek. An area as large as the arena parking lot would better serve the campus if it provided more than one year-round use. With additional rows of canopy trees over grass paving and large rain gardens to filter stormwater runoff, it could provide ecological value as well as become more adaptable to a wider range of campus functions. Not only a park for cars, but a comfortable place for people, whether they are gathering in small groups in the off-season or en masse tailgating before a game. See Figure 6-164 for a diagram displaying these potential improvements.
1 4 7 5
Figure 6-164. Arena Parking and Tiger Walk Terminus Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
127
Figure 6-165. Narrow sidewalk crammed between the building and roadway
Figure 6-166. Clearly delineated pedestrian crossings needed
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
4.5 DONAHUE DRIVE AT TIGER WALK Currently along Donahue Drive, there is not a continuous pedestrian experience along both sides. As evidenced by Figure 6-169, the single sidewalk is squeezed up against the stadium to the east and absence of any pedestrian path to the west. Replacing the single row of trees to the west with an allee framing a sidewalk would improve the overall pedestrian connectivity of Donahue Drive while also providing additional gathering space for the special event of the Tiger Walk. See Figure 6-168 for a section showing this proposed improvement.
2
1
3
Figure 6-167. TigerWalk Existing Conditions Section
1
Existing shaded area is covered in coarse rock mulch making it difficult for pedestrians to use this for circulation.
2
Existing adjacent parking lot is impervious and drains directly to Parkerson Mill Creek. There are no shade trees in the parking lot for cars or pedestrians.
3
Stadium is too close to the sidewalk and road.
Figure 6-169. Lack of pedestrian paths to the west. Narrow walk to the east
2
1
3
Figure 6-168. Tiger Walk Section Showing Potential Improvements
1 2 3
Remove parking spaces on the outside of the arena parking lot to Increase width of area between Donahue Drive and the parking lot to allow for additional shaded gathering space for the Tiger Walk event. Replace existing stone mulch with iconic paving and shade trees in tree grates to enhance the pedestrian experience. Maintain existing trees in this area and intersperse with large new trees of the same species. Provide shade trees in parking lot and replace impervious paving with pervious paving to decrease pollution and storm water runoff quantities into nearby Parkerson Mill Creek. Define edges of pedestrian paths and screen parking lot with evergreen hedge.
Design Recommendations - Corridors
Figure 6-170. Tiger Walk crowds fill Donahue Drive
Figure6-171. Potential for shaded Tiger Walk spectator area 128
4.6 SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE: SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE AND PARKERSON MILL CREEK INTERSECTION
4
This intersection combines a ceremonial and main vehicular axis with an opportunity for restored ecology. See Figure 6-172 for existing conditions. Some issues in the area are shown in Figures 6-175, 6-176, 6-177 and 6-178.
4 1
1
5
5
2
2
5
5 5
3
Figure 6-172. South Donahue and PMC Intersection Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
Figure 6-173. South Donahue and PMC intersection Proposed Improvements Plan Diagram
1
Existing asphalt parking lot doesn’t provide enough shade for pedestrians and parked cars. It is impervious and does not slow or filter storm water runoff causing it to drain directly into Parkerson Mill Creek.
1
2
Currently this is the furthest northeast branch of Parkerson Mill Creek that isn’t conveyed in a pipe. Its banks are filled with invasive, non-native species and the channel banks are steep and severely incised. There are multiple exposed utility pipes that cross the channel. It is currently fenced off and inaccessible.
2
3
Contextual new construction does not address this stream section as anything more than something to be piped and it is seen as ‘back of house’ surrounded by utilities and parking.
4
While a few large street trees remain, there are large holes in the existing canopy decreasing the amount of shade available for pedestrians.
5
Existing headwalls are exposed concrete and are penetrated with multiple pipes and other associated infrastructure.
Figure 6-175. This section of PMC has been cleared though additional planting and bank stabilization is needed. 129
3
Decrease the size of the adjacent impervious surfaces by reducing their extents and replacing impervious surfaces with porous surfaces. Install bioswales in parking islands to filter water as it is conveyed toward Parkerson Mill Creek. Expand the boundaries of this area so the existing stream channel can be widened and restored. Include upslope raingardens to filter and slow runoff from adjacent parking areas. Create occupiable spaces for pedestrians that take advantage of the proximity to water. Include native shade trees and wetland benches for increased habitat and diversity while stabilizing the stream channel banks.
3
Expose (daylight) piped section of Parkerson Mill Creek on the eastern side of Donahue Drive. Locate shade trees along the pedestrian route between the baseball stadium and the new dorms. This area could be used as a park like front yard for the new dorm.
4
Fill gaps in street trees and expand their extents with an allee of trees along the Tiger Walk route.
5
Include a 10’ wide multi-use path connecting the Central Classroom facility, through this site and to a poroposed PMC greenway that would connect central campus to the intramural fields to the south of campus.
Figure 6-176. View down Donahue Drive shows few shade trees
This plan proposes to improve adaptability and ecological function of the creek while creating more comfort for parking lots. It is also important to make Parkerson Mill Creek visible to both vehicular and pedestrian users, celebrating it’s natural functions. See Figure 6-173 for the proposed improvements diagram. Potential improvements include enhancing ecological function through bioswales and reduced impervious area. Also, by widening and restoring the stream channel with terraced banks and native plants. Create interconnected systems, joining urban ecology and natural systems, to improve the health of the waterway and the pedestrian experience. Make a place out of a ditch, shaping an area for people to experience water and the restored natural system. Reshape topography and create upslope raingardens to allow for more diversity and filtration of runoff before it reaches the stream. Enhance allees where needed along Tiger Walk for continuous shade. Provide a park that bridges Donahue Drive, providing potential for park access to the new dorms to the east and a series of interconnected water spaces to the west.
Figure 6-174. Aerial view. Source: MapData: Google
Figure 6-177. Stream bank requires further stabilization.
Figure 6-178. Exposed pipe
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
4.7 SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE: SOUTH OF SAMFORD DRIVE The outfall of Parkerson Mill creek is a detention basin with no ecological value. The grass is mown to the edge providing no plant diversity and no attraction for wildlife. Also, there are no shaded walks to attract users to the water. The outfall is blocked with sediment from upstream. See Figure 6-179 for a section of the existing conditions and Figure 6-183 for the existing conditions plan diagram.
1
2 3
The potential improvements as shown in Figure 6-180 provide two paths, both shaded. Allees also formalize this stretch of road through campus, highlighting an important route. Improve ecology of stream through a series of forebays and native planting, providing habitat for birds and allowing sediment to be trapped. Improve the ecology and appearance of the stream with native plants and healthy water.
Figure 6-179. South Donahue South of Samford Existing Conditions Section
1
Existing pedestrian pathway on east side of road lacks shade and there is no pedestrian pathway on the western side of the road.
2 3
The upstream section of the Parkerson Mill Creek tributary is very incised and has little or no stream bank stabilization available. The current headwall and pipes are basic concrete and in poor repair. There is no forebay to contain sediment coming from sources upstream. Therefore the channel leading to the pond is choked with sediment. The channel is lined with riprap and the pond edges are mown to the water surface resulting in a lack of diversity in the edge condition.
1
1 2
3
3 Figure 6-181. Pond provides no ecological value
Figure 6-180. South Donahue South of Samford Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
Add pedestrian path to the Western side of Donahue Drive. Add allee of shade trees on either side of the road to provide shaded walk for pedestrians.
2
Restore the existing stream channel and reinforce with native understory planting. Clad headwalls with brick to match the material language employed elsewhere on campus.
3
Install weir walls downstream of the outfall to create forebays that will catch sediment suspended in the water and allow it to settle before entering the pond. Plant hydric species of low maintenance, native vegetation around pond edge to encourage diversity and filter water as it flows into the pond. Native species of hydric trees will help to stabilize the pond edge. Figure 6-182. Incised stream banks in need of stabilization
Design Recommendations - Corridors
130
4.8 SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE: AGRICULTURAL HERITAGE PARK Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
9
1
Tributary of Parkerson Mill Creek is very incised upstream and downstream of the pond. The adjacent Forestry Building was located too close to the existing incised stream. The resulting erosion has been poorly stabilized by spreading out rip rap and covering it with loosely placed concrete.
2
The current headwall is exposed concrete and rip rap. Views of this structure detract from the experience of the park.
3
The existing traffic table / crosswalk does not connect sidewalks. It covers a drainage pipe and connects one area of rip rap to another creating a confusing pedestrian conflict.
4
The existing pond edge is mown to the water surface leaving the edge condition without diversity.
5
The stream outfall into the pond is heavily silted and clogged with sediment. There is no forebay to capture sediment allowing it to build up on the upstream side of the pond forcing incoming water to change course and scour the banks of the stream channel.
6
The dilapidated asphalt road is a remnant and does not connect anything on site.
7
Remnant forests are full of invasive species and disconnected from their context.
8
Gaps exist in the current street tree planting. There is no consistency in size or spacing.
9
The fields adjacent to the Heardsman House are underutilized.
3
10
1 4
8 5 2
10 10
1 7
The Agricultural Heritage Park is a place where the agricultural and land grant heritage of the entire university can be celebrated. It is also a big campus landscape with adjacencies to many other campus landscapes, the stream ecosystem of Parkerson Mill Creek, forest remnants and open agricultural fields. This intersection of agricultural, cultural and natural landscapes is a unique moment on campus, but is a common occurrence in large scale agricultural ecologies. As such, it offers an opportunity to demonstrate best practices for integrating agricultural systems with natural systems in a sustainable and beautiful way that supports the function of the agricultural production while enhancing the quality of the natural ecosystems. See Figure 6-188 for potential improvements. In doing so, the park should be developed to define the structure and borders of these different landscape types, rendering the connections and relationships between them more legible.
Existing unshaded grass fields and gravel / asphalt parking areas are uncomfortable for people to occupy during special events like gameday gatherings and farmer’s markets.
7 6 8
Figure 6-183. Agricultural Heritage Park Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
Figure 6-184. Structure collects upstream sediment 131
Figure 6-185. Stream banks lack diversity
Figure 6-186. View of the multi-use path and the Ag Heritage Pond in the background
Figure 6-187. Outfall with poorly placed riprap
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
4.8 SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE: AGRICULTURAL HERITAGE PARK Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
9 3
1
Restore Parkerson Mill Creek channel. Widen it so that it can contain peak flows. Plant the banks with native, hydric species to stabilize the soil. Locate a pedestrian path adjacent to the restored channel to connect the Hill Dorms, Ag Heritage Park and the intermural sports fields.
2
Clad the headwall with brick to tie it into the contextual materiality.
3
Extend the traffic table / crosswalk to the west so pedestrians can access the parking area.
4
Plant large, native, low maintenance shade trees to form a shaded grove around the pond edge. Use native, low maintenance shrubs and ground covers to stabilize the edge. Filter water before it enters the pond and focus access to the waters edge to spaces where that is intended.
5
Install weirs to create a forebay to collect sediment before it enters the pond. This area should be heavily planted at the ground plane to slow incoming stormwater flows and help filter water before it enters the pond.
6
Remove the asphalt road and associated fence to allow for additional screen planting.
7
Expand the boundary of the existing remnant forest to increase habitat and diversity. Provide wildlife corridor connection to adjacent remnant forest on the east side of Donahue Drive.
8
Replace missing street trees so that size and spacing are consistent along Donahue Drive and Lem Morrison.
9
Locate demonstration agricultural fields here to bring the land grant agricultural heritage of the university closer to the campus core.
10
Replace gravel and asphalt parking areas with reinforced turf to allow storm water infiltration and overflow parking during special events. Provide shaded grove for gameday parking of RVs and cars. Area should feel like a shaded park, not a field.
10
8
4
1
5 2
1 10
7
6
Figure 6-188. Agricultural Heritage Park Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
Figure 6-189. Erosion problems below fence
Design Recommendations - Corridors
Figure 6-190. Sediment collection is poorly maintained
Figure 6-191. Aerial view of the pond Source: MapData: Google
Figure 6-192. Unattractive erosion solution 132
4.9 SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE: METRICS
Existing
Proposed
Existing
Proposed
Figure 6-193. South Donahue Landscape Maintenance Diagram
Figure 6-194. South Donahue Pavement Permeability Diagram
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Existing: 100% Medium Maintenance
PAVEMENT PERMEABILITY Existing: 100% Impervious Pavement
Proposed: 94% Low Maintenance 2% Medium Maintenance 4% High Maintenance
Proposed: 50% Impervious Pavement 50% Pervious Pavement
Key
Key Low Maintenance
Impervious Pavement
Medium Maintenance
Pervious Pavement
High Maintenance 133
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
4.9 SOUTH DONAHUE DRIVE: METRICS
Existing
Proposed
Existing
Proposed
Figure 6-195. South Donahue Trees / Shade Diagram
Figure 6-196. South Donahue Intensity of Use Diagram
Figure 6-197. South Donahue Plan Diagram
TREES / SHADE Existing: 28% Canopy Cover
DONAHUE CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN 3,621,086 SF or 83.13 Ac
Proposed: 48% Canopy Cover
INTENSITY OF USE Existing: 80% Low Use 19% Medium Use 1% High Use
Key
Proposed: 75% Low Use 16% Medium Use 9% High Use Key Canopy Cover
Low Use Medium Use High Use
Design Recommendations - Corridors
134
This page intentionally left blank
135
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
5 MAGNOLIA AVENUE
5.3 Western Magnolia Section
5.2 Eastern Magnolia Section
Campus Gateway at Samford Park; see 1.1
5.1 Crosswalks Magnolia Gateway at Donahue; see 4.1
Magnolia Gateway at Tiger Concourse; see 3.1
Samford Park; see 1.1
Figure 6-198. Magnolia Avenue Corridor Diagram
Design Recommendations - Corridors
136
5.1 MAGNOLIA AVENUE: MAGNOLIA AVENUE CROSSWALKS Pedestrian connections between the Auburn campus and the adjacent community are the paths along which people entering Auburn first orient themselves to the campus. As such, they should be clear, highly visible and well lit, aligned with campus destinations and of a consistent material. The existing crossings along Magnolia lack consistency having one or more of these characteristics; poor visibility, multiple materials, multiple alignments, and lack of shade. See Figures 6-199 through 6-204 for existing conditions at various crossings along Magnolia Avenue. These crossings should be unified under the campus-wide standards adopted for all pedestrian thresholds to campus. See
Section VI: Landscape Standards for the Extended Campus Core. Crossings should be aligned with other sidewalks when possible to increase legibility and continuity of the pedestrian network. As thresholds to campus and gateways that often serve as meeting places, they should be shaded and comfortable, adding canopy trees where possible to offer comfort and further improve the visibility of the campus entrances. See Figures 6-205 through 6-210 to see how these ideas can be applied to the various Magnolia Avenue connections.
Figure 6-199. Existing Conditions at Wright Street at crosswalk
Figure 6-200. Existing conditions at Engineering Drive crosswalk
1 2 2 1
Figure 6-201. Existing Conditions Crosswalk at Wright Street Source: MapData: Google
1
137
Current crosswalk lacks adequate shade.
1 1
Figure 6-202. Proposed Crosswalk at Wright Street Source: MapData: Google
2
Figure 6-203. Existing Conditions Crosswalk at Engineering Drive Source: MapData: Google
Figure 6-204. Proposed Crosswalk at Engineering Drive Source: MapData: Google
1
Plant sizeable shade trees to provide adequate shade to crossing pedestrians.
1
Current crosswalk lacks adequate shade.
1
Plant sizeable shade trees to adequately shade both the crosswalk and the adjacent campus sidewalk.
2
Provide a raised table crossing at the crosswalk.
2
Adjacent campus sidewalk lacks shade and is not a welcoming threshold to the University.
2
Provide a raised table crossing at the crosswalk.
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
5.1 MAGNOLIA AVENUE: MAGNOLIA AVENUE CROSSWALKS
Figure 6-205. Existing conditions at Wilmore Drive crosswalk
Figure 6-206. Existing conditions at Shelby Center crosswalk
2
2
1 1 2
1
Figure 6-207. Existing Conditions Crosswalk at Wilmore Street Source: MapData: Google
1
Current crosswalk lacks presence and shade.
Design Recommendations - Corridors
1
Figure 6-208. Proposed Crosswalk at Wilmore Street Source: MapData: Google
1
Plant sizeable shade trees on either side of the crosswalk.
2
Provide a raised table crossing at the crosswalk.
3
Figure 6-209. Existing Conditions Crosswalk at Shelby Center Source: MapData: Google 1 Current crosswalk does not align with the axis of Shelby Center and plaza.
2
The plaza lacks adequate shade to remain comfortable in warmer weather.
Figure 6-210. Proposed Crosswalk at Shelby Center Source: MapData: Google 1 Realign crosswalk with the axis of Shelby Center and plaza. It may be necessary to modify the adjacent driveway.
2
Plant trees of adequate size to provide occupiable shade in the plaza.
3
Provide a raised table crossing at the crosswalk. 138
5.1 MAGNOLIA AVENUE: MAGNOLIA AVENUE CROSSWALKS
Figure 6-211. Existing conditions at Cox Street crosswalk
1 2 1
Figure 6-212. Existing Conditions Crosswalk at Cox Street Source: MapData: Google
139
1
2 1
Figure 6-213. Proposed Crosswalk at Cox Street Source: MapData: Google
1
Current crosswalk does not align with adjacent campus sidewalk.
1
Align crosswalk with adjacent campus sidewalk.
2
Trees in median are too small to provide any shade for pedestrians.
2
Plant trees of sufficient size to provide shade for crossing pedestrians.
3
Provide a raised table crossing at the crosswalk.
Figure 6-214. Existing Conditions Crosswalk at Business School Source: MapData: Google
1
Current crosswalk does not align with adjacent stairway.
Figure 6-215. Proposed Crosswalk at Business School Source: MapData: Google
1
Realign crosswalk with adjacent stairway.
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
5. 2 MAGNOLIA AVENUE: EASTERN MAGNOLIA SECTION
Figure 6-218. View across the open Magnolia Avenue
2
1
Figure 6-216. Eastern Magnolia Existing Conditions Section
1
Pedestrian sidewalk lacks shade.
2
Bollards are overwhelming in the landscape and are used too frequently.
Figure 6-219. Groundplane lacks interest and diversity
Turf is the predominant ground plane planting currently installed on campus. Although turf can be a very useful surface, providing occupiable and adaptable outdoor space, it has little ecological value, requires regular maintenance, mowing, the use of fertilizers and is only marginally more effective than asphalt or concrete in managing stormwater. In locations such as eastern Magnolia Avenue, where the areas of turf are not appropriate for gathering, it is recommended to transition the groundcover from turf to low-mow (and low-maintenance) native grasses and native shrubs. Once established, this plant regime requires significantly less maintenance in terms of mowing, irrigation and fertilization. Along eastern Magnolia Avenue, it is also recommended to provide occupiable shade along the walks by planting parallel rows of mature canopy trees. See Figures 6-216 and 6-217 for sections along eastern Magnolia Avenue which represent these existing conditions and potential improvements.
1
3 2
Figure 3-192. Figure 6-217. Eastern Magnolia Potential Improvements Section
1
Install street trees along Magnolia Avenue to provide continuous pedestrian shade.
2 3
Remove bollards and use planted landscape strip and enforcement to prevent vehicular access to the campus core. Use native, low maintenance trees, shrubs and groundcovers to plant the ‘Front Yards’ of the academic buildings along Magnolia Avenue. Weave internal connective paths through these gardens.
Design Recommendations - Corridors
140
5. 3 MAGNOLIA AVENUE: WESTERN MAGNOLIA SECTION
1
2
Figure 6-223. Path shifts from back of curb at road to back of curb at the parking lot
Figure 6-220. Western Magnolia Existing Conditions Section
1
Inconsistent street trees do little to block views of the adjacent parking lot from Magnolia Avenue.
2
The existing sidewalk is attached to the back of curb in the parking lot providing little separation between pedestrians and adjacent vehicles.
Figures 6-220 and 6-221 show how similar improvements can be applied to areas along western Magnolia. Recommendations include continuing the rows of canopy trees along Magnolia Avenue, transitioning areas of turf to low-mow native grasses and improving the pedestrian experience by shifting the path at the parking lot to the north and fill with a buffer of native shrubs.
1 2
Figure 6-221. Western Magnolia Potential Improvements Section
141
1
Replace missing street trees to establish a consistent landscape edge along Magnolia Avenue.
2
Move the sidewalk away from the back of curb and plant low maintenance shrubs to screen views to the parked vehicles.
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
5.4 MAGNOLIA AVENUE: METRICS
Existing
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Existing: 63% Low Maintenance 32% Medium Maintenance 5% High Maintenance Proposed: 47% Low Maintenance 48% Medium Maintenance 5% High Maintenance Key Low Maintenance
Proposed
Medium Maintenance High Maintenance
Figure 6-224. Magnolia Landscape Maintenance Diagram
PAVEMENT PERMEABILITY Existing: 100% Impervious Pavement Existing Proposed: 79% Impervious Pavement 21% Pervious Pavement
Key: Proposed
Impervious Pavement Pervious Pavement
Figure 6-225. Magnolia Pavement Permeability Diagram
Design Recommendations - Corridors
142
TREES / SHADE Existing: 12% Canopy Cover Existing
Proposed: 41% Canopy Cover
Key Canopy Cover Proposed
Figure 6-226. Magnolia Tree / Shade Diagram
Existing
INTENSITY OF USE Existing: 59% Low Use 32% Medium Use 9% High Use Proposed: 56% Low Use 35% Medium Use 9% High Use Key
Proposed
Low Use Medium Use
Figure 6-227. Magnolia Intensity of Use Diagram
High Use
MAGNOLIA MASTER PLAN 555,390 SF or 12.75 Ac
Figure 6-228. Magnolia Plan Diagram
143
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
6 THACH AVENUE AND CONCOURSE
6.5 Western Thach Section
6.7 Western Thach Parking
6.6 Thach and Wire Road Intersection
Donahue and Thach Concourse Intersection; see 4.3
6.4 Arena Plaza
Thach and Haley Intersection; see 3.2
6.3 Eastern Thach Section
Ross Square; see 2.1
6.2 Cary Hall Lawn
6.1 Thach Gateway at College Street
Figure 6-229. Thach Avenue and Concourse Corridor Diagram
Design Recommendations - Corridors
144
6.1 THACH AVENUE AND CONCOURSE: THACH CONCOURSE GATEWAY AT COLLEGE STREET The entrance to Thach Concourse at College Street is one of the major thresholds to campus. This location is identified as a Core Campus Gateway in Section 4: Landscape Standards. See these general guidelines on how this gateway can be adapted to better improve its effectiveness. On a site specific basis, other potential improvements might include: Draw on new campus standards for crossings to improve visibility and safety of pedestrian crossings with a raised table paved in brick. Plant canopy trees to frame entrance and provide shade for pedestrians. Remove planters from corners. Figures 6-230 and 6-233 show existing views through the gateway into Thach Concourse. Figure 6-231 shows how the potential improvements listed can increase legibility and safety at this critical intersection.
Figure 6-230. Existing Conditions
Figure 6-232. Utility poles detract from the plaza
Figure 6-231. Proposed Improvements
145
Figure 6-233. View down Thach Concourse through the gateway
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
6. 2 THACH AVENUE AND CONCOURSE: CARY HALL LAWN Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
1
Undersized trees don’t provide shade so the lawn is underutilized.
2
Existing quad has confusing circulation, unoccupiable shade and sloping topography.
3
Existing quad is under used and has large utilities in major viewsheds.
3 2
1
1 As lawn spaces along the primary pedestrian spine of campus, this series of greens is potentially useful as gathering spaces, although the existing lack of shade and/or inaccessible shade discourages gathering (see Figure 6-234). Adding accessible shade to these greens is the primary goal for future improvements (see Figure 6-235), through the addition of mature canopy trees. Also, clearing out the shrub layer is necessary to allow for pedestrian connectivity under trees. Framing both spaces with rows and allees of mature canopy trees will provide occupiable shade at the edges and open interiors adaptable as informal gathering areas.
Figure 6-234. Cary Hall Lawn Existing Conditions Plan Diagram Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
5
1 2
5
1
Figure 6-236. Lack of shade limits use of the lawn
Design Recommendations - Corridors
Allow the size of canopy to increase so that shaded gathering areas exist along each side of the Lawn.
2
Open up the quad to allow shaded gathering areas (informal) and better connection to future transitional areas.
3
Add trees to increase accessible shade for pedestrians.
4
Maintain view corridor to Ross Hall.
5
Use a similar landscape palette to unite these three spaces.
3 5
Figure 6-235. Cary Hall Lawn Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
1
4
Figure 6-237. Aerial view of the lawn Source: MapData: Google
Figure 6-238. Pedestrian crossing at corner of Thach and Mell. Open areas could be more shaded to increase use by pedestrians. 146
6. 3 THACH AVENUE AND CONCOURSE: EASTERN THACH CONCOURSE SECTION
Figure 6-241. Brick band acts as visual buffer between path and roadway
3
2 1
Figure 6-239. Existing Conditions Eastern Thach Concourse Section
1
Piece of Thach Avenue has been closed to vehicular traffic and is used by pedestrians as part of the Thach Concourse. This is currently covered in asphalt and lacks shade.
2 3
Bollard and chain system prevents pedestrians from accessing the shade provided by adjacent trees.
Figure 6-242. Corridor is at vehicular scale
Figure 6-243. Pedestrian feel can be improved upon
Existing infrastructure (lights, bollards, adjacent sidewalks) are scaled for a vehicular street and are not suited for the current use.
Although it has been closed to vehicular traffic, the material and scale of this section is more indicative of a space for vehicles than of a comfortable and useful space for pedestrians (see Figures 6-241, 6-242 and 6-243). See Figure 6-239 for an existing cross section through the corridor. Replacing the asphalt with porous pavers and adding rows of mature canopy trees would continue to improve it as a pedestrian corridor, distinguish spaces for foot and bicycle transit and provide a sense of continuity with the rest of Thach Concourse. See figure 6-240 for a section including these proposed improvements.
1
3
2
Figure 6-240. Eastern Thach Concourse Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
Repave this section of the Thach Concourse with pervious paving and include street trees (on the south side of the concourse) in tree grates for shade along the route.
2
Remove bollard and chain system and locate a linear raingarden at the toe of the adjacent slope to filter stormwater runoff from areas uphill before it enters the storm sewer system and ultimately, Parkerson Mill Creek.
3
Replace current vehicle scaled infrastructure with pedestrian scaled infrastructure. Remove sidewalks on either side of the concourse.
147
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
6.4 THACH AVENUE AND CONCOURSE: ARENA PLAZA Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
1
Current bench locations don’t take advantage of adjacent shade.
2
Entrance on north elevation of the arena is not clearly marked making circulation to and from confusing.
3
Utilities are poorly located and very visible to pedestrians.
1 The general layout of Arena Plaza works well to connect Thach Concourse to the numerous athletic destinations to the south, although the visibility of the arena entrance and hierarchy of paths could be more clear by reinforcing them with planting. New planting of canopy trees would distinguish main paths from clearings and secondary paths, adding structure, legibility and comfort to the path network. See Figures 6-244 and 6-245 for before and after diagrams of the Arena Plaza space.
3
2 Figure 6-244. Arena Plaza Existing Conditions Plan Diagram Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
1
Increase size of trees at installation to provide more immediate shade.
2
Make clear the hierarchy of entrances by emphasizing the route with trees and iconic paving.
3
Move utilities so they are combined with service areas and not visible to pedestrians. Figure 6-246. View across the Arena Plaza
1
3
2
Figure 6-245. Arena Plaza Potential Improvements Plan Diagram Figure6-247. Bench locations don’t fully take advantage of shade opportunities
Design Recommendations - Corridors
Figure 6-248. Potential to distinguish clear paths as primary and secondary 148
6.5 THACH AVENUE AND CONCOURSE: WESTERN THACH CONCOURSE SECTION
2 2
Figure 6-250. Opportunity to divide spaces along the corridor
3
3 2
The Thach pedestrian corridor is at its widest between the Village dorms, although the usable space is currently concentrated on the paved concourse. See Figure 3-244 and 3-245 for views down the open corridor. If the concourse is defined as the entire space between building facades, there are multiple opportunities to develop interstitial spaces for gathering, study and play. This approach can redefine this pedestrian space on campus, developing it as a vibrant urban boulevard with a transit core layered with diverse outdoor spaces for student life. The expansive section also provides underground opportunities for harvesting rain water to irrigate the expanded landscape. The existing and proposed improvements are highlighted by typical sections in Figures 3-242 and 3-243.
2 1
Figure 6-249. Existing Conditions Western Thach Concourse Section
1
Current concourse lacks shade.
2 3
Rainwater from adjacent roofs and runoff isn’t filtered but put straight into pipes to PMC.
Figure 6-251. The wide open corridor lacks shade
Shrub and groundcover areas are very close to buildings and aren’t experience by pedestrians.
2 2
1
3
3
Figure 6-249. Western Thach Concourse Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
Install trees that are larger at installation along major pedestrian routes to provide more immediate shade.
2 3
Capture rainwater runoff from roofs to use for irrigation. Create stormwater gardens to filter runoff from impervious surfaces prior to discharging into PMC. Use shade trees and low maintenance shrubs and groundcovers to create gathering areas where students can study, eat, etc. 149
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
6.6 THACH AVENUE AND CONCOURSE: THACH CONCOURSE AND WIRE ROAD INTERSECTION Existing Conditions
1
Current concourse has no protection from the sun.
2
Paths terminate at adjacent sidewalk but don’t continue across the road.
3
The view down the concourse terminates in a view of a large utility transformer.
1
3
As this terminus / beginning of Thach Concourse is solely pedestrian, the visibility of this entrance as well as connections to the wider campus pedestrian network should be improved. To help achieve better legibility, the distinctive arc path should be emphasized with mature canopy trees (see Figures 6-254 and 6-255). Crossings should be formalized to improve pedestrian safety and wayfinding. See Figures 6-252 and 6-253 for existing and potential treatments of the intersection.
2
2
Figure 6-252. Thach and Wire Intersection Existing Conditions Source: MapData: Google
Potential Improvements
1
3 2
1
Plant large trees in concourse and main pedestrian walks to provide shade.
2
Provide crosswalks where needed and light with pedestrian scaled lighting. Add shade trees.
3
Use this location for an iconic element such as a sculpture. Remove utilities and locate with other service equipment.
Figure 6-254. Arc paths should continue across the road
2
Figure 6-253. Thach and Wire Intersection Potential Improvements Source: MapData: Google
Figure 6-255. Arc path lacks definition. Line with large canopy trees
Design Recommendations - Corridors
150
6.7 THACH AVENUE AND CONCOURSE: WESTERN THACH PARKING Existing Conditions
1 3
2
Large amounts of impervious asphalt prevent water from filtering or dispersing prior to being directed into adjacent branch of PMC.
2
Parking islands contain areas of mown grass with undersized trees that provide little or no shade.
3
Existing branch of PMC is heavily incised and lacks diversity. There is no planted buffer or bank reinforcement.
The western Thach Concourse parking area is one of the largest surface parking lots on campus. This expanse of impervious pavement lies adjacent to a branch of Parkerson Mill Creek. It currently sheds all its water into the storm system without filtration of pollutants. This process contributes to the volume of peak water flows and the pollution of the hydrologic network. See Figure 6-256 for a view of the existing conditions at the western Thach Concourse lot.
1 Potential improvements for the parking area are shown in Figure 6-257. Updated with permeable paving and graded to filter water through rain gardens before discharge into PMC, this lot can be updated to improve rather than degrade the quality of PMC without sacrificing its utility.
Figure 6-256. Western Thach Parking Existing Conditions Source: MapData: Google Potential Improvements
1 2
3 1
Replace asphalt paving in parking spaces with pervious pavement to encourage infiltration.
2
Replace mown grass with native, low maintenance hydric groundcovers and shrubs to filter the water before it flows into PMC.
3
Restore the stream channel and provide 100’ planted buffer along either side with pedestrian trail.
Figure 6-258. View over PMC with small bridge crossing
Figure 6-257. Western Thach Parking Potential Improvements Source: MapData: Google
Figure 6-259. Large expanses of mown lawn area around the creek. Potential for diverse stream banks 151
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
6.8 THACH AVENUE AND CONCOURSE: METRICS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Existing: 100% Medium Maintenance Existing
Proposed: 42% Low Maintenance 47% Medium Maintenance 11% High Maintenance
Key Low Maintenance Proposed
Medium Maintenance High Maintenance
Figure 6-260: Thach Landscape Maintenance Diagram
PAVEMENT PERMEABILITY Existing: 100% Impervious Pavement Existing Proposed: 77% Impervious Pavement 33% Pervious Pavement
Key Proposed
Impervious Pavement Pervious Pavement
Figure 6-261: Thach Pavement Permeability Diagram
Design Recommendations - Corridors
152
TREES / SHADE Existing: 22% Canopy Cover Existing
Proposed: 32% Canopy Cover
Key Canopy Cover Proposed
Figure 6-262: Thach Trees / Shade Diagram
Existing
INTENSITY OF USE Existing: 33% Low Use 37% Medium Use 30% High Use Proposed: 33% Low Use 20% Medium Use 47% High Use Key
Proposed
Low Use Medium Use
Figure 6-263: Thach Intensity of Use Diagram
High Use
THACH MASTER PLAN 1,264,124 SF or 29.02 Ac
Figure 6-264: Thach Plan Diagram 153
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
7 PARKERSON MILL CREEK
Parkerson Mill Creek near Western Thach Parking
7.1
7.2
Parkerson Mill Creek at Old Fraternity House Site
Library Lawn; see 1.2
Parkerson Mill Creek near CDV Parking
7.3 7.4
Parkerson Mill Creek at Future Transitional Area
Donahue Drive and Parkerson Mill Creek Intersection; see 4.6 Parkerson Mill Creek near Athletic Fields
7.5
7.6 Parkerson Mill Creek near Forestry Building 7.7
Agriculture Heritage Pond
Figure 6-265. Parkerson Mill Creek Corridor Diagram
Design Recommendations - Corridors
154
7.1 PARKERSON MILL CREEK: NEAR WESTERN THACH PARKING In general, the stream corridors of Parkerson Mill Creek have largely been ignored and neglected. As a series of corridors that travels north / south and also east / west, the stream infrastructure could play a huge part in developing a continuous pedestrian network throughout the core campus. This northwest section (see Figure 6-266) is characterized by an understory choked with non-native invasive species and an incised and eroded stream channel, likely due in part to the volume of runoff from the adjacent parking. It is also one of the few places with an intact grove of trees, providing an opportunity to restore the forest ecology. By managing this forest / stream corridor for invasive species, restoring the stream and replanting with native species (see Figure 6-267), these ecosystems could be restored while also creating restful restorative environments for the campus community. Figures 6-268 through 6-271 highlight some of the current stream conditions near the western Thach Concourse parking area.
2
1
Figure 6-266. PMC near West Thach Parking Existing Conditions Section
1
Existing stream channel is incised and unable to effectively control storm flows. There is a lack of diversity in the stream channel edge condition.
2
The forest understory is a combination of turf and non-native invasive species that do little to stabilize the channel banks or filter water before it enters the channel.
Figure 6-268. Eroded stream channel needs diverse bank planting
2
3
2
3
1
Figure 6-269. Outfall with rip rap
Figure 6-270. Pedestrian bridge crossing
Figure 6-267. PMC near West Thach Parking Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
Widen the stream channel to allow space for storm flows. Regrade the channel walls and plant them with native, low maintenance species to stabilize them and increase diversity along the stream corridor.
2
Remove existing non-native, invasive species and replace with low maintenance, native understory trees, shrubs and groundcovers.
3
Locate pedestrian and bicycle pathways on either side of the restored stream channel to connect areas along the stream corridor. Figure 6-271. Stream approach does little to filter water
155
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
7. 2 PARKERSON MILL CREEK: AT OLD FRATERNITY HOUSE SITE This section of PMC is little more than a ditch between two culverts (see Figures 6-274 and 6-275). Although there are a few trees, this existing condition is more like a piped stream than a functioning ecosystem, designed for quick transport of water offsite and downstream. Expanding the stream channel and restoring the landscape as a forest/floodplain ecosystem will not only create an attractive pedestrian oriented space, but slow the water at the headwaters of this branch, improving the water quality before it heads downstream. See Figure 6-273 for a section showing the potential improvements. Existing Conditions
1
Existing stream channel is incised where it isn’t contained in the existing culvert (remnant of the old fraternity house foundation)
2
Lawn area does little to slow or filter stormwater runoff before it enters the stream channel.
3
Existing understory has a large amount of non-native invasive species.
3 2 1
2
Figure 6-272. PMC at Old Fraternity House Existing Conditions Section Figure 6-274. Stream channel acts more as a ditch than as a functioning ecosystem
Potential Improvements
3
4
2 1
Figure 6-273. PMC at Old Fraternity House Section Showing Potential Improvements
Design Recommendations - Corridors
1
Construct forebay with weir wall to contain sediments before they flow downstream. Regrade existing stream channel to provide flood plains on either side for increased stormwater flow capacity.
2
In place of turf, plant low maintenance, native groundcovers and shrubs along stream corridor to serve as buffer and filter water before it enters the stream.
3
Remove invasive species from existing forest and introduce / encourage native species of understory planting.
4
Provide walking, jogging and biking trails to increase use of the shady green corridor.
4 Figure 6-275. Stream channel should be widened and restored to it’s natural meandering shape 156
7. 3 PARKERSON MILL CREEK: NEAR CDV PARKING This is one of the most incised sections of PMC (see Figure 6-276). Due to discharge from adjacent parking, the stream channel is characterized by steep and deeply eroded banks. It is overgrown with a stand of forest which is physically and visually impenetrable. A series of proposed improvements (see Figure 6-277) would reconfigure the parking lot and slope to demonstrate how urban ecologies can link with natural systems. First, provide permeable paving at the parking lot to infiltrate more water. Then provide a raingarden to filter any remaining runoff. Stabilize the banks with terracing and native plants. Also, widen the stream channel so that it may function more naturally. Finally, create pedestrian paths throughout so that the restored ecologies can be experienced. Existing Conditions
1
Existing stream channel is incised and contains construction debris and trash.
2
Existing asphalt parking lot drains directly into stream channel with no opportunity for filtration.
3
Existing forest is overgrown with kudzu and other non-native invasive species.
2 3 1 Figure 6-276. PMC near CDV Parking Existing Conditions Section
Figure 6-278. Overgrown stream channel Potential Improvements
4
157
Restore / widen stream channel to allow enough room to adequately manage storm flows. Establish native, low maintenance, hydric species along the stream channel banks to stabilize them.
2
Reduce the amount of impervious paving. Use pervious paving at parking spaces to allow rainwater to infiltrate back into the groundwater table (see Figure 6-279.
3
Locate raingardens between the parking areas and the stream to help slow and filter stormwater runoff before it enters the stream.
4
Locate recreational trails adjacent to the stream channel to connect the northwestern part of campus to the southeastern part of campus.
3
1
Figure 6-277. PMC near CDV Parking Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
2
Figure 6-279. Impervious paving does not allow stormwater to infiltrate
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
7.4 PARKERSON MILL CREEK: AT FUTURE TRANSITIONAL AREA The restoration of this section of PMC provides a chance to upgrade the pedestrian network and define it as a green corridor flanked with parallel paths (see Figures 6-280 and 6-281). By shifting the existing path closer to the stream and developing future access on the south bank, this section can be defined as a green corridor, with pedestrians able to take advantage of the shade as well as enjoy views to the interior.
Existing Conditions
1 3
2
1
Existing stream channel is incised and overgrown with non-native, invasive species.
2
Adjacent parking areas have no way to filter or slow the stormwater runoff and drain directly into the stream.
3
Current pedestrian routes are unshaded and surrounded by hot, asphalt parking lots.
Figure 6-280. PMC Future Transitional Area Existing Conditions Section Potential Improvements
2
3
1
Widen the steam channel and regrade to allow for increased storm flow. Plant low maintenance, native, hydric species to stabilize the stream channel banks.
2
Move Biggio drive away from the stream channel and make narrower. Replace existing asphalt parking lot with pervious paving to permit groundwater infiltration.
3
Provide 10’ wide walking, jogging and biking trails to increase use of the proposed green corridor.
3 1
Figure 6-281. PMC Future Transitional Area Potential Improvements Section
Figure 6-282. View of the stream channel edge
Design Recommendations - Corridors
Figure 6-283. Overgrown channel at headwall
Figure 6-284. Invasive species to be removed and replaced with ecologically beneficial planting 158
7.5 PARKERSON MILL CREEK: NEAR ATHLETIC FIELDS See Figure 6-285 for an existing section view of Parkerson Mill Creek near the Athletic Fields. The restoration of PMC in this location would involve the removal of fencing to open up views and physical access to the adjacent athletic fields, potentially providing east/west connectivity across the athletic core which is currently divided by the creek corridor. Where the available land for stream restoration is too narrow to install a proper flood plain the stream could be narrowed and use weirs to navigate the elevation difference while reducing water velocity. See Figure 6-286 for a section view with the potential improvements realized.
4
Existing Conditions
2
3
2
3
1
Existing stream channel is incised and contains construction debris and trash.
2
Adjacent intramural field and impervious track surface drain directly into Parkerson Mill Creek.
3
Existing forest is overgrown with non-native, invasive species.
4
Existing sports lighting
1 Figure 6-285. PMC near the Athletic Fields Existing Conditions Section Potential Improvements
2
4
3
3
4
1
Widen the stream channel and construct banks that are reinforced with native planting to stabilize them against heavy storm flows.
2
Place rainwater gardens adjacent to the existing intermural field and track to slow and filter runoff before it enters the creek.
3
Remove invasive species from existing forest and introduce / encourage native species of understory planting.
4
Provide walking, jogging and biking trails to increase use of the shaded, green corridor.
2
1 Figure 6-286. PMC near the Athletic Fields Section Showing Potential Improvements
Figure 6-287. View of the wooded edge adjacent to the Track 159
Figure 6-288. Stream channel adjacent to the Hutsell-Rosen Track
Figure 6-289. Highly eroded channel needs restored stream banks
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
7.6 PARKERSON MILL CREEK: NEAR FORESTRY BUILDING In this location the restoration and expansion of PMC is restricted by adjacent development, and a more constructed method is recommended. Reinforcing the expanded creek terraces with walls will help stabilize the banks and prevent erosion. In addition, the creek-wide strategies of restoring native plant communities and adding pedestrian paths should be applied. See Figures 6-290 and 6-291 for existing and proposed sections of PMC near the Forestry Building.
Existing Conditions
1
2
1
Existing stream channel is incised (see Figure 6-292). The Forestry and Wildlife Sciences Building is very close to the stream channel. The channel has been poorly reinforced with rip rap and concrete.
2
The adjacent sewer line has been exposed by erosion and is visible.
3
The channel is flanked with turf and non-native, invasive species of groundcover.
3
Figure 6-290. PMC Near the Forestry Building Existing Conditions Section
Potential Improvements
2
3
1
Construct terraced channel walls to contain storm flows and keep the channel from eroding the adjacent soil.
2
Backfill against the channel walls to bury the exposed sewer line.
3
Plant the areas adjacent to the channel with native, low maintenance trees, shrubs and groundcovers to reinforce the soil and keep stormwater flows from causing further erosion.
4
Provide walking, jogging and biking trails to increase use of the shaded, green corridor.
Figure 6-293. Aerial view of the forestry area Source: MapData: Google
4
1 Figure 6-291. PMC Near the Forestry Building Potential Improvements Section
Figure 6-292. Stream banks severely incised
Design Recommendations - Corridors
Figure 6-294. Unburied pipe and rip rap clutter along fence
160
7.7 PARKERSON MILL CREEK: AGRICULTURAL HERITAGE POND
3
3
2
2 1
Figure 6-295. Agricultural Heritage Pond Existing Conditions Section
1
The existing pond is shallow and appears stagnant. There is little or no thermal turnover to circulate the water.
2
The area around the pond is turf that is mown to the waters edge decreasing the opportunity for biodiversity and increasing maintenance.
3
Since there is no landscape buffer around the pond or forebay upstream, stormwater flows wash sediment into the pond. Figure 6-296. View of the existing pond’s shallow depth
3 2
1
2
Figure 6-297. Agricultural Heritage Pond Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
Excavate the pond to increase its depth. Create a ‘deep pool’ in the center of the pond to increase the water temperature variation and encourage water turnover.
2
Create wetland shelves at the edge of the pond to increase diversity and habitat in the edge condition and to help filter water as it enters the pond. Provide access to the waters edge via a boardwalk and pedestrian path.
3
Establish at a minimum 100’ landscape buffer around the pond that would be planted with low maintenance trees, shrubs and groundcovers. Create a forebay upstream to reduce the amount of sediment that enters the pond.
Figure 6-298. View of the existing outfall 161
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
7.8 PARKERSON MILL CREEK: METRICS
Existing
Existing
Existing
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
Figure 6-299. PMC Continuous Wildlife Corridors Diagram
Figure 6-300. PMC Stream Channel Conditions Diagram
Figure 6-301. PMC Water Edge Accessibility Diagram
CONTINUOUS WILDLIFE CORRIDORS Existing: 25% of total land area
STREAM CHANNEL CONDITION Existing: 87% Poor Condition 13% Average Condition
WATER EDGE ACCESSIBILITY Existing: 27% ACCESSIBLE 73% INACCESSIBLE
Proposed: 11% Poor Condition 89% Good Condition
Proposed: 84% ACCESSIBLE 16% INACCESSIBLE
Key
Key
Figure 6-302. PMC Plan Diagram PARKERSON MILL CREEK MASTER PLAN 5,483,080 SF or 125.87 Ac
Proposed: 63% of total land area
Key Existing Wildlife Corridors
Poor Condition
Accessible Edge Condition
Proposed Wildlife Corridors
Average Condition
Inaccessible Edge Condition
Good Condition
Design Recommendations - Corridors
162
8 SECONDARY CORRIDOR - DUNCAN DRIVE + P.O. DAVIS DRIVE
Bibb Graves Amphitheatre
8.1
Duncan Drive and Samford Avenue Intersection
8.2
Duncan Drive Section
8.3
Duncan Drive and P.O. Davis Drive Intersection
8.4
P.O. Davis Drive Improvements
8.5
Duncan Drive and Lem Morrison Drive Threshold; See 11.1 Figure 6-303. Duncan Drive + P.O. Davis Drive Corridor Diagram 163
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
8.1 BIBB GRAVES AMPHITHEATRE Graves Amphitheater is one of the iconic landscapes on campus. Figure 6-304 shows a view across the shaded amphitheater. Over time, the amphitheater’s remote location and lack of regional connectivity have contributed to reduced awareness of this space. Campus development has generally focused on the urban core and has left this space off the beaten path. Figure 6-306 diagrams some existing conditions which detract from the space. Figure 6-307 offers suggestions on how the amphitheater can once again become activated. With the introduction of important classroom developments adjacent to the amphitheater, pedestrian networks can connect this space with more potential users.
Future Academic Success Center and STEM
6
1
5
3
2
2 1
2
4
4
1
3
5
2
Figure 6-304. Graves Amphitheater looking southeast towards Dudley Hall and Goodwin Hall
2
5
8. 2 DUNCAN DRIVE AND SAMFORD AVENUE INTERSECTION
1
6
The intersection at Duncan Drive and Samford Avenue signifies a clear transition from the northeast urban core to the southeast “big landscapes” zone of campus. Thus, the intersection offers another opportunity to better define campus regions with wayfinding signage. The existing column structures (see figure 6-305) are out of scale for this location and are therefore ineffective. The intersection will increase in importance as the new STEM Building reaches completion. This too will bring an increase in vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The functionality of the intersection in terms of wayfinding legibility, pedestrian connectivity and vehicular management must increase proportionally as well.
6
5
1
2
6
Figure 6-306. Graves Amphitheater Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
Figure 6-307. Graves Amphitheater Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
Potential Improvements Plan Diagramv
1
Limited views to amphitheater from adjacent buildings.
1
Restoration of amphitheater areas.
2
Minimal pedestrian connectivity to amphitheater, no connection to larger regional network.
2
Provide pedestrian connectivity to greater regional network and create destination along major corridors.
3
Rail along Duncan Drive sidewalk prevents access to the amphitheater space.
3
Align future Central Classroom Facility and College of Science and Math to axis of amphitheater to create visual connection.
4
Areas of the amphitheater have deteriorated.
4
Service drive to be removed and replaced with pervious paving to strengthen pedestrian connection to amphitheater area.
5
Lack of next generation trees, only large pines.
5
Next generation trees planted to fill in understory and break up vast openness.
6
Views provided into amphitheater from surrounding areas to draw people in.
Figure 6-305. Existing column structures improperly used in this location
Design Recommendations - Corridors
164
8. 3 DUNCAN DRIVE SECTION AT LEISCHUCK HALL DORMITORY
3 2
1
Figure 6-310. View of existing pedestrian path along Duncan Drive
Figure 6-311. Large expanses of turf and minimal building foundation planting
Figure 6-312. Duncan Drive - view toward Samford Avenue
Figure 6-313. Duncan Drive - view towards Lem Morrision Drive
Figure 6-308. Existing Conditions Duncan Drive Section
1
Excessively wide sidewalk immediately adjacent to roadway. Uncomfortable and uninviting due to lack of shade and proximity to roadway.
2 3
Large expanses of turf require excessive maintenance. Minimal building foundation planting.
This corridor prioritizes vehicular traffic with the pedestrian experience defined by a single wide expanse of concrete on one side of the road (see Figure 6-310). For the majority of its length, it is adjacent to parallel parking and traffic with no buffer between. By reducing the width of the pathway, shifting the path away from the street and adding a landscape strip between, Duncan Drive could accommodate both vehicular and comfortable, shaded pedestrian walks.
3
1
2
The area between Duncan Drive and Leischuck Hall Dorm illustrates a typical structure placed “on” the landscape rather than “within” the landscape (see Figure 6-311). Minimal planting around the building’s foundation do little to soften the transition from site to structure. This also creates a high maintenance area through the excessive use of turf. Replacing these turf areas with Low-maintenance native shrub and tree beds and increasing foundation planting around the building would significantly reduce maintenance, increase building aesthetic and create a more pedestrian friendly environment.
Figure 6-309. Duncan Drive Section Showing Potential Improvements
165
1
Provide landscape strip with street trees between vehicular and pedestrian travel ways.
2 3
Create low-maintenance planting areas by replacing turf with native tree and shrub beds. Increase building foundation planting to soften transition from site to structure.
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
8.4 DUNCAN DRIVE AND P.O. DAVIS DRIVE INTERSECTION A piped tributary of Parkerson Mill Creek daylights at this location. Restoration and expansion of the creek is restricted due to development near the Forestry Building and the layout of the Patterson Greenhouses. A constructed method of streambank restoration is recommended. Reinforce the expanded creek terraces with naturalized walls to stabilize the banks and help prevent erosion. In addition, utilize the creek-wide strategy of restoring native plant communities and adding pedestrian use areas and paths. There is no clear pedestrian crossing currently offered at the intersection. A clearly delineated crosswalk should extend, from the primary dorm walkway on the north side of the parking areas, across Duncan Drive. The walkway which currently runs parallel along the west side of Duncan Drive should be extended to meet this point. See Figure 6-314 for an aerial view of the intersection at Duncan Drive and P.O. Davis Drive highlighting the proposed improvement.
3
2
1
Figure 6-318. Existing Conditions P.O. Davis Drive Section
1
Large slope with only sod, no relief for runoff.
2
Trees are pin oaks, which are not well adapted to climate on campus and are being phased out. Sod is also in poor shape due to cut through nature of the median.
3
Minimal building foundation planting.
Figure 6-315. Erosion problems created at curbside / parallel parking
1 3 2 Figure 6-314. Proposed pedestrian crossing improvement at the Duncan Drive P.O. Davis intersection Source: MapData: Google Figure 6-319. Proposed P.O. Davis Drive Section
8.5 P.O. DAVIS DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS Figure 6-316. View of P.O. Davis Drive
As a spur connector between Lem Morrison Drive and Duncan Drive, P.O. Davis Drive caters to vehicular traffic (see figure 6-316). Only a small section of sidewalk exists at the eastern end of P.O. Davis Drive. The pedestrian experience is defined by parallel parking on both sides of the road against a double bay parking area. Landscape medians between the two are compacted and eroded leading to significant decline in the health of the trees within the median (see figures 6-318 and 6-319).
1
Properly vegetate around the proposed College of Education facility
2 3
Provide edge band and concrete cut throughs at key points, revegetate remainder with planting. Provide more landscape interest adjacent to building.
Proposed improvements include providing a 2’ edge band within the median to accommodate existing car passengers, replacing declining pin oak trees within medians and providing native shrub beds to direct pedestrian traffic toward paved cut throughs to minimize erosion.
Figure 6-317. Erosion / compaction issues within medians contributes to severe decline of trees
Design Recommendations - Corridors
166
9 SECONDARY CORRIDOR - WIRE ROAD
Old Fraternity House Site; see 7.2
Wire Road and Heisman Drive Intersection
9.1
Wire Road Pedestrian Improvements
9.2
Wire Road and Lem Morrison Gateway; see 11.1
Figure 6-320. Wire Road Corridor Diagram 167
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
9.1 WIRE ROAD AND HEISMAN DRIVE INTERSECTION
9. 2 WIRE ROAD PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS
Many University users approach the campus from it’s western boundary via Wire Road. One important node along Wire Road occurs at the Heisman Drive intersection. This intersection defines the transition point for Wire Road’s two distinct character zones. The stretch along the campus core and it’s southwest extension which escorts traffic away from the heart of Auburn. The Heisman Drive intersection allows vehicular and pedestrian traffic to cut east into campus.
Despite it’s role as the major thoroughfare along the western side of campus, Wire Road is currently defined by its openness and lack of pedestrian connectivity (see Figure 6-324). The corridor is generally geared to vehicular use, except between Samford Avenue and Webster Road where bicycle facilities were recently added. In addition, the long row of bollards bordering its pavement demand a strict point to point travel plan for users. Wire Road has the opportunity to become an important pedestrian and bicycle corridor as it connects so many important nodes along western campus.
This intersections role as an important node needs to be better defined. Vegetation can be used to accent the intersection’s role as a core campus boundary. Specifying certain street tree species on either side of the transition can assist with this notion. In addition, clear demarcation of the pedestrian connections should be made. A paving system can provide clear contrast from the asphalt. See the Figures 6-321 and 6-322 below for some potential improvements that could be made at this hub.
A view down the corridor shows the potential for pedestrian connections. Wire Road’s openness is not inhibited by many roadside obstacles allowing sufficient room for a multi-use path. A landscape area between the path and the vehicular travel lanes will provide added comfort to pedestrian users. Shade trees planted along the corridor will help define the roadway system, relieving the openness (see Figure 6-325). These trees will also provide shade for the multi-use path and encourage activity throughout the hotter months. Trees planted here will need to be coordinated to avoid conflicts with adjacent utilities above and below ground. Refer to the utility guidelines in Section 4: Landscape Standards.
Figure 6-324. View down Wire Road showing lack of pedestrian connectivity
As shown in the Heisman Drive intersection graphics, pedestrian crossings can be improved to better define connection points. A typical paving system, as defined in section 4: Landscape Standards, can be utilized at all Wire Road intersections to improve the pedestrian usability along this corridor.
Figure 6-321. Existing crosswalk at Wire Road and Heisman Drive intersection
Figure 6-322. Proposed crosswalk at Wire Road and Heisman Drive intersection
Design Recommendations - Corridors
To better improve the aesthetic of this corridor, the bollards should be removed and replaced with strategic landscape planting. The bollards are in place to restrict vehicles on game days, a mere seven weekends of the year. This negative impact on the campus aesthetic; however, is year round. The planting will perform the role of restricting gameday parking while contributing to the campus aesthetic year round.
Figure 6-323. Aerial view of Wire Road and Samford Avenue intersection Source: MapData: Google
Figure 6-325. Shade trees needed to provide relief from the openness
Figure 6-326. Crosswalk leads to nowhere 168
10 SECONDARY CORRIDOR - SAMFORD AVENUE
Samford Avenue and Lem Morrison Drive Threshold; see 11.1 10.1 Samford Avenue West Section Samford Avenue and College Street Threshold; see 11.1
10.3 Samford Avenue East Section 10.2 Samford Avenue Central Section
Figure 6-327. Samford Avenue Corridor Diagram 169
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
10.1 SAMFORD AVENUE WEST SECTION
3
1
2 Figure 6-330. Aerial view of West Samford Avenue Source: MapData: Google
Figure 6-328. Existing Conditions Samford Avenue West Section
1
Redundant pavement (multi-use path / bike lane).
2 3
Turn lane is under utilized and has potential for reduction of impervious surface.
Samford Avenue is a major east / west connector that bisects the Auburn University campus between South College Avenue and Shug Jordan Parkway creating three distinct sectors. The western sector (see figures 6-328 and 6-329) between Wire Road and Shug Jordan Parkway is the most ‘rural� of the sectors. It is characterized by clear cut wooded edges, an underutilized center lane and redundant pavement (multi-use path directly adjacent to an on road bike lane, see figure 6-331). Vehicular traffic in this area flows at greater speeds than other sectors of Samford Avenue with little or no separation between vehicular and pedestrian uses. Improvements to this sector include reducing impervious surface and providing separation between vehicular and pedestrian uses by slowing traffic by converting the turn lane into a landscaped median with deceleration center lanes at key points, and increasing biodiversity by utilizing a diverse palette of native species planting at woodland edges and within the landscaped medians and strips.
Clear cut wooded edges lack ecotone transition which is key to biodiversity of woodland edge species.
3 1
2
Figure 6-329. Samford Avenue West Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
Reduce impervious impacts by replacing hard surfaces with additional landscape areas with shade trees.
2 3
Turn lane replaced with median to break up impervious surfaces. Allow landscape and median strip planting to provide ecotone transition for wooded edges. Utilize diverse palette of native species. Figure 6-331. Redundant pavement created by providing both a multi-use path and a bike lane
Design Recommendations - Corridors
170
10. 2 SAMFORD AVENUE CENTRAL SECTION The sector of Samford Avenue between South Donahue and Wire Road passes through the southern end of the “athletics core”. Similar to the western sector, the central sector exhibits an excessive amount of pavement with an underutilized turn lane and multi-use path directly adjacent to on-road bike lane. Pedestrian paths are uninviting and uncomfortable due to the absence of shade and destination (crosswalk exists but does not lead to another pathway). Also, mid-block crossings create dangerous conflicts between vehicular and pedestrian traffic on this corridor. Mid-block crossings should be eliminated and pedestrian crossings should be re-routed to signalized intersections. In addition, there are some missed opportunities to help improve ecological performance. Improvements include reducing pavement by converting the turn lane into landscaped medians with turns at key points, utilizing slopes as functional spaces by adding native shrubs and trees to help slow runoff and adding raingardens at the toe of these slopes to help filter storm water, replacing or planting larger species of trees to help shade pedestrian pathway and assuring access from crosswalks. See Figures 6-336 and 6-337 for sections highlighting existing conditions and some potential improvements.
4 2
5 3
1
Figure 6-336. Existing Conditions Samford Avenue Central Section
Figure 6-332. Multi-use path
1
Excessive pavement / underutilized turn lane
2 3 4 5
Unsightly fencing, needs to match standard fencing per Section 4: Landscape Standards Runoff from slope across multi-use path Small tree species do not provide adequate shade for multi-use path Unsightly steel pins during football season / minimal landscape
Figure 6-333. Pedestrian crossing
4 3
2
5 1
Figure 6-337. Samford Avenue Central Section Showing Potential Improvements
Figure 6-334. Samford Avenue - unsightly “No Parking” steel pins placed during football season, excessive pavement, minimal landscape 171
Figure 6-335. Multi-use path in full sun, little to no shade
1
Reduce pavement by converting turn lane to median with turns at key points
2 3 4 5
Plant “green screen” on standard fence with flowering evergreen vines to increase opacity and increase interest Vegetative swales catch water before reaching multi-use path to filter water before returning to creek Larger tree species planted to increase shade on multi-use path to create a more inviting alternative transportation route Remove steel pins and plant with low shrubs to discourage parking and increase interest
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
10. 3 SAMFORD AVENUE EAST SECTION The eastern sector of Samford Avenue, from South College Avenue to South Donahue Drive, is sandwiched between a student residential area (Hill Dorms) and classroom buildings. There is a significant amount of back and forth pedestrian traffic as well as vehicular traffic. While vehicular needs such as parking are at a premium, they should not diminish the residential atmosphere. Minimal tree and landscape planting lessens the “residential� nature of the sector. See Figure 6-338 for these existing features. Potential improvements include reducing pavement by eliminating parallel parking in front of dorms, decreasing the width of the excessively wide path to accommodate a widened planting area between Samford Avenue and the parking area, and providing larger planting areas in front of the dorms. Figure 6-339 offers a view of these potential improvements in place.
4
3
2 1
Figure 6-338. Existing Conditions Samford Avenue East Section
1
Extremely narrow planting area
2 3 4
Excessive asphalt and concrete pavement Sidewalks lined with steel pin bollards Minimal foundation planting at buildings
4
2 3
1
2
Figure 6-339. Samford Avenue East Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
Expand landscape median to accommodate shade trees and shrubs
2
Reduce pavement by eliminating parallel parking and decreasing width of concrete path. Provide landscape strip between building and parking to increase shade along walkway and provide aesthetic interests. Add wheel stops to protect landscape
3 4
Remove steel pin bollards and add native shrubs to discourage parking and jaywalking Improve building foundation planting with diversified native planting to soften transition from site to structure Figure 6-340. Narrow landscape strip
Design Recommendations - Corridors
Figure 6-341. Excessive pavement and lackluster landscape at building 172
11 SECONDARY CORRIDOR - LEM MORRISON DRIVE
Lem Morrison Drive and Samford Avenue Threshold; see 11.1
Lem Morrison Drive and Wire Road Threshold; see 11.1 11.1
11.2
Lem Morrison Drive Section
Typical Internal Threshold Lem Morrison Drive and Donahue Drive Threshold Lem Morrison Drive and Duncan Road Threshold; see 11.1
Figure 6-342. Lem Morrison Drive Corridor Diagram 173
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
11.1 TYPICAL INTERNAL THRESHOLD
3
3 1
1
2 3
2
3
3 2
1
3
2
3 2
4
1
4
Figure 6-343. Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
Figure 6-344. Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
Existing Conditions Plan Diagram
Potential Improvements Plan Diagram
1
Gameday overflow / student / contractor parking
1
Replace gravel with reinforced turf or grasspave to allow water infiltration. Provide shaded grove for overflow parking and game day parking of RV’s and cars
2
Current intersection poorly defined
2
Extend crosswalks to all corners to provide pedestrian connection and include pedestrian push-button signalization; screen parking / define intersection with landscape; provide signature plants
3
Poor pedestrian connections
3
Provide sidewalks to north, multi-use paths to south and along Lem Morrison to allow for better pedestrian connections
4
Future improvements per the Master Plan include the Health Science Sector to the southwest and a recreational fields expansion to the southeast
Figure 6-347. Lem Morrison Drive and Donahue Drive Intersection Source: MapData: Google
Lem Morrison Drive and Donahue Drive intersection (Figure 6-347) is a significant pedestrian / vehicular threshold although there is nothing that distinguishes it as such. The four corners of the intersection do little to help define it with student / gameday parking / tailgating located on three corners and the fourth corner being a wooded lot. However, with the future Health Science Sector proposed for the southwest corner lot and the recreation fields expansion proposed for the southeast lot, the importance of this intersection will greatly increase in the near future. The pedestrian connections currently exist only through crosswalks located within the intersection. Pedestrian crossing signalization is also absent at the intersection. Improvements to the pedestrian experience should include pedestrian signalization and the extension of walkways in all directions. This includes extending pathways in both east and west directions along Lem Morrison Drive. It also includes providing sidewalks on the north side of Donahue Drive, and a multi-use path to the south. Additionally, wayfinding signage should be located at the intersection to announce it as an internal threshold. Proposed improvements to the parking areas would reconfigure the parking lots in a series of landscape spaces to take advantage of the ecological system. Permeable paving or grass paving would replace dirt lots to help infiltrate more water and reduce erosion, raingardens could be installed to help filter runoff and rows of canopy trees would provide shade. These parking areas could then function as gathering areas during the athletic season or function with a park like atmosphere during the off season. See Figures 6-343 and 6-344 for diagrams on existing conditions and potential improvements.
Figure 6-345. View of the overflow parking lots
Design Recommendations - Corridors
Figure 6-346. Cowpath created due to lack of pedestrian connections 174
11. 2 LEM MORRISION DRIVE SECTION
4
3
2
1
3
Figure 6-348. Lem Morrison Existing Conditions Section
1
Nonexistent pedestrian connectivity
2 3 3
Nonexistent or little shade Concrete swales do not allow for infiltration of stormwater Insized stream / eroded banks
2
4
2
3
3 1
1
Figure 6-349. Lem Morrison Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
Provide multi-use path on north side of road to connect to multi-use path at Donahue Drive. Provide sidewalk on south side of road to improve pedestrian connections
2 3 4
Provide shade trees along road for increased shade and aesthetics Remove concrete swale and plant vegetation to allow filtration of stormwater prior to reentry at Parkerson Mill Creek Restore stream banks 175
Figure 6-350. Lem Morrison Drive looking east with concrete swale on either side of the road
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
Existing conditions and potential improvements for Lem Morrison Drive are highlighted in Figures 6-348 and 6-349. Currently, Lem Morrison Drive is lacking a continuous pedestrian experience along both sides of the road. This is evidenced by the absence of pedestrian paths from Biggio Road to Duncan Drive. Providing a multi-use trail on the north side of the road to tie into the multi-use path at Donahue Drive and Lem Morrision Drive, and a pedestrian sidewalk on the south side of the road with a repetition of shade trees on either side, would improve the overall pedestrian connectivity of Lem Morrison Drive. Additionally, existing concrete swales on either side of the road collect and quickly carry storm water away from the road but leave little option for infiltration (see Figure 6-350). Replacing the concrete swales with vegetated swales filled with native species would slow down storm water runoff and allow for it to be filtered prior to being discharged back into Parkerson Mill Creek (Figure 6-351). These improvements should adjust as needed due to spatial limitations at the creek crossing and west of Biggio Drive.
Figure 6-352. Parkerson Mill Creek
Figure 6-353. Lem Morrison looking East
Figure 6-351. Parkerson Mill Creek
Design Recommendations - Corridors
Figure 6-354. Lem Morrison looking West 176
12 TERTIARY CORRIDORS - BIGGIO DRIVE, HEMLOCK DRIVE, HEISMAN DRIVE AND WAR EAGLE WAY
Hemlock Drive
12.2
War Eagle Drive
Heisman Drive
Biggio Drive
12.3
12.4
12.1
Figure 6-355. Tertiary Corridors Diagram 177
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
12.1 BIGGIO DRIVE
12. 2 HEMLOCK DRIVE
Predominantly in full sun, the southern sector of Biggio Drive is an area that sees substantial pedestrian traffic due to the location of the intramural fields, yet there is no pedestrian connectivity. Users either utilize the unshaded parking area or create cow paths along the perimeter of the intramural fields to get to their destinations. These existing conditions are represented in Figure 6-356.
Hemlock Drive acts as an important north / south connection between Magnolia Avenue and Samford Avenue. This corridor is predominantly utilized by residents and visitors of New Fraternity Row and University Housing. Also notable, Parkerson Mill Creek branches out around Hemlock. With the proper restoration of PMC’s banks (see Figure 6-361), this area can be highlighted to increase interest along the Hemlock Drive corridor.
Recommended improvements are shown in Figure 6-357. First, provide pedestrian pathways on both sides of the road. Next, vegetate the turf areas near the parking lot with native trees and shrubs. This will help direct pedestrian traffic and minimize erosion and runoff. Finally, provide parking islands with large shade trees per Section VI: Landscape Standards for the Extended Core Area. This will help minimize the heat island effect within the parking area and improve aesthetics.
Pedestrian connections are lacking along Hemlock Drive (see Figure 6-362). The introduction of formal multi-use pathways would encourage walking from the residences to the campus via Hemlock Drive.
Figure 6-358. Biggio Drive expansive paving
1
2
2 3
Figure 6-356. Biggio Drive Existing conditions section
1
Large expanse of open pavement with no trees to shade. Parking creates heat island effect
2
No pedestrian connections on either side of Biggio Drive
3
Turf requires heavy maintenance and offers no filtration
1
2
Figure 6-359. Biggio Drive lack of pedestrian connections
Figure 6-360. Exposed conveyance system is unattractive
1
2 3
Figure 6-361. Stream channel lacks bank planting to filter water
Figure 6-362. Cow paths created due to lack of formal pedestrian paths
Figure 6-357. Biggio Drive Potential improvements section
1
Provide landscape parking islands and plant with shade trees and ground cover
2 3
Provide 6’ wide concrete path to improve pedestrian connections Provide native shrubs and groundcovers to decrease maintenance and provide additional interest and control pedestrian traffic
Design Recommendations - Corridors
178
12. 3 HEISMAN DRIVE Heisman Drive is generally a well defined and highly used corridor. The addition of shade trees and landscape buffers to separate pedestrian and vehicular spaces should be included during future improvements. Existing trees should be allowed to mature and given extra care to provide a closed canopy along pedestrian walkways. Recommendations also include a transition of the groundcover from turf to low-maintenance, native grasses and shrubs. See Figures 6-363 and 6-364 for sections showcasing these recommendations.
1
4 3
5 2
3
Figure 6-363. Heisman Drive Existing Conditions Section
1
Significant pavement
2 3 4 5
Little or no landscape on slopes with excessive compaction causing tree decline
Figure 6-366. Ample buffer space between road and path
No landscape below trees Little to no foundation planting at building Excessive pavement causes heat island effect
2 3 4
Figure 6-367. Path needs more shade
5
3 1
Figure 6-364. Heisman Drive Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
Opportunity to capture and filter storm water below plaza expanses
2 3 4 5
Provide landscape on slope for interest and pedestrian traffic control Provide landscape with tree islands at plaza to soften hard surfaces and provide interest Provide native trees and shrubs at building foundation to soften transition from site to structure Provide landscape parking islands to minimize heat island effect and provide shade for adjacent walkway 179
Figure 6-365. Haley Center crosswalk / plaza
Figure 6-368. Bike lane along Heisman Drive
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
12.4 WAR EAGLE WAY
3
1 2
1
4
2
Predominately in full sun, War Eagle Way lacks comfortable pedestrian walking areas. However, there have been extensive shade tree plantings in the past seven years, so this will continue to improve as these plantings mature. Walks are directly adjacent to vehicular and transit lanes (see Figure 6-372) and display an absence of shade and small gathering areas. Improvements include separating vehicular and pedestrian spaces by creating vegetated buffers, taking advantage of wider lawn expanses to create inviting gathering areas and softening hard surfaces (such as building facades) with native landscape materials. Figures 6-369 and 6-370 show potential improvements in relation to existing conditions for War Eagle Way. The intersection of War Eagle Way and Wire Road has been identified as a problem for buses. Currently, the intersection does not provide the adequate turning radius space for Tiger Transit to make the turning movement while cars are stopped at the stop sign. The corner radius should be expanded to relieve this conflict.
Figure 6-369. War Eagle Way Existing Conditions Section
1
Pedestrian path directly adjacent to roadway with little to no shade or comfort zone
2 3 4
Large expanses of lawn area with increased maintenance required Minimal foundation planting Open parking areas with little to no shade creates heat island effect
Figure 6-371. Large lawn expanses
Figure 6-372. Pathway at road with minimal shade
Figure 6-373. Excessive use of bollards
Figure 6-374. Nicely landscaped zone
3 1 2
2
4
Figure 6-370. War Eagle Way Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
Move walkway off road and provide landscape area with shade trees and native shrubs
2 3 4
Reduce maintenance requirements by decreasing lawn areas and increasing landscape beds of native trees, shrubs and groundcovers Move sidewalk away from building to provide landscape area with shade trees, native shrubs and groundcovers Parking lot is future residential site
Design Recommendations - Corridors
180
This page intentionally left blank
181
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
6b. Design Recommendations: Focus Areas CHAPTER CONTENTS INTRODUCTION
286
1
SAMFORD PARK
287
2
THE ACADEMIC SUCCESS CENTER
291
3
PARKERSON MILL CREEK
295
4
THACH CORRIDOR
299
INTRODUCTION A series of focus areas was selected for greater in-depth analysis and to further illustrate recommendations for future campus landscape design and development. Detailed plans for these areas provide recommendations for future improvements along with a better understanding of how the Campus Landscape Master Plan landscape vision and guidelines are to be applied at the project level. These focus area plans also offer the University a tool against which they can evaluate future design proposals. The focus areas include: Thach Concourse, Samford Park, the Academic Success Center and Parkerson Mill Creek (see Figure 6b-1). Samford Park is the front door to campus and includes iconic elements at Toomer’s Corner and Samford Hall. Currently the park denies access to available open spaces and shaded seating with the overuse of understory planting along pathways. The proposed solution opens up the ground plane to encourage students to embrace and more actively utilize this front campus gem. The Academic Success Center will ultimately provide much needed classroom space at the southern edge of the campus’s urban core. This development will bring with it many exciting landscape vision opportunities including the potential to restore natural ecological processes to the campus core. This focus area plan reintroduces Parkerson Mill Creek and its hydrologic processes as a celebrated centerpiece of the proposed facilities. Parkerson Mill Creek existed in this place long before there was an Auburn University. It is an important natural system which has been severely degraded over the years. Fortunately, the University now recognizes its value and plans to preserve, protect and enhance it in coming years. To further demonstrate the importance of returning the Parkerson Mill Creek corridor as a central feature on campus, a portion of Parkerson Mill Creek has been analyzed on a focus area level. This area highlights how a key stretch of Parkerson Mill Creek, near the intersection of Biggio Drive and Samford Avenue, can be modified to create a restored stream with nearby park and trail features. Thach Concourse acts as the major East/West pedestrian corridor connecting much of the campuses urban core. Recently closed to vehicular travel, this portion of the concourse is lacking in pedestrian friendly design amenities. The concourse currently exhibits an absence of shade, a large amount of impervious surfaces, a lack of clear definition of the promenade, and a shortage of comfortable gathering spaces. Potential improvements to the concourse include the introduction of stormwater management systems, shade trees to define the path and a series of gathering spaces along the corridor.
183
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
1. Samford Park
4. Thach Concourse
2. ASC - Academic Success Center
3. Parkerson Mill Creek
Figure 6b-1. Focus Areas Diagram
Detail Focus Areas
184
1
SAMFORD PARK
HARBERT CENTER
LANGDON ANNEX DAVIS HALL
SAMFORD HALL
LANGDON HALL BIGGIN HALL
HARGIS HALL
N
O.D. SMITH HALL
INGRAM HALL
Figure 6b-2. Samford Park Proposed Plan Diagram 185
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
13
10
13
1
Create raised traffic table at the vehicular intersection to slow vehicles down and herald the gateway to the University. This will stitch the university together with the downtown and allow pedestrians to pass more easily between the two areas. This could also incorporate a gateway arch over the road that could be used to ‘roll’ during celebrations.
2
Widened area along path paved in Type ‘A’ - Special Paving - Granite with specialty benches that could offer donor or memorial opportunities as well as defining areas to sit for special events. Refer to Section 4: Landscape Standards.
3
A 15’ wide arcing path paved in brick with granite banding defines the main path from Toomer’s Corner through Samford Park to Thach Avenue. This path should be lined with stately native trees (single species) such as Quercus phellos or Quercus virginiana. These trees should be installed at a significant size (6” cal. or greater) so their impact is more immediate.
4
Existing path should be removed in this area to place emphasis on the main entry points into Samford Park. The understory should be free of shrubs and groundcover and consisting of a durable turf grass such as Tifway 419 Bermuda or Emerald Zoysia so that users can take advantage of existing and proposed shade trees.
5
Access to College Street along the length of the path should be limited and consolidated into one accessible crossing that aligns with the Langdon Hall Courtyard. This crossing should be a Type ‘B’ Paved Crossing and have clear pedestrian crossing signs, signals and traffic calming paving such as brick banding. This crossing should align with the center line of Langdon Hall.
6
Secondary paths to and from the main arcing path should be Type ‘C’ - Concrete with Brick Bands. These paths should have clear directionality to make wayfinding for pedestrians obvious. They should have specialty benches placed along for pedestrians to sit and enjoy shade provided from existing and proposed trees. These benches could also provide donor or memorial naming opportunities.
7
The existing lawn should be formalized and made symmetrical by adjacent framing paths. This lawn will be free of shrubs and groundcover to allow pedestrians access to shade. The paths defining the central lawn should be moved so that they align with the front doors of Samford Hall and are perpendicular to College Street. The northern most path should align with the front door of O.D. Smith Hall.
8
A significant ‘heritage’ planting should be located where the main arcing path diverges to head east and west along Thach Avenue.
9
Smaller, separate courtyards created by adjacent buildings should be tree lined and offer shaded gathering spaces. These areas should be largely turf and accessible from adjacent pathways for special events and daily use by students and faculty.
12 12 13
13
9
12
11 9
8 3 7 12
4
2
6 4
1 5
Figure 6b-3. Samford Park Proposed Plan ID Diagram
N
Detail Focus Areas
10
The space between Samford Hall and Langdon Hall offers opportunity for a memorial walk that connects Samford Park to Ross Square. This area should be more heavily planted with a few species of medium sized flowering shrubs such as Hydrangea quercifolia, Itea virginica, and Aesculus parviflora to create a defined, fragrant, beautiful walkway. The historic lathe sets a precedent for marking historical events in this area.
11
The plaza in front of Samford Hall should be paved with Type ‘A’ - Special Paving - Granite to create a defined space for special events.
12
Large existing trees should be protected and remain.
13
The area directly adjacent to Samford Hall should be planted in medium sized shrubs and groundcovers to mask the base of the building and provide a foreground. This will also help keep pedestrians away from the base of the structure and adjacent windows. Any lighting of Samford Hall should happen from this planted area so that the planting can screen the lights from view during the daytime.
186
3
2
1
Figure 6b-4. Samford Park Existing Conditions Section
1
Existing shrubs and groundcover prevent pedestrians from accessing shade created by trees in Samford Park.
2
The current path system in Samford Park lacks hierarchy and the paths most used offer the least amount of shade.
3
The current lawn area has multiple paths that course through it and between the paths and the shrub planting the current lawn is fractured into many, less usable spaces.
3
2
1
Figure 6b-5. Samford Park Section Showing Potential Improvements
187
1
Remove shrubs and groundcover to provide access to shade in Samford Park.
2
Create a clear main path through the park that connects the Corner at Toomer’s through the park towards Thach Ave. This path should have a high material finish like brick with granite banding or similar. Large, shade providing trees should be planted in an allee to create a memorable, cloistered walk.
3
Arcing the path further to the north opens up more lawn for use and creates a defined foreground for Samford Hall. This arcing path defines the edge between the formal lawn and the informal planting beds and adjacent gathering spaces.
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
Figure 6b-6. View down the proposed arcing pathway towards Samford Hall. The path is lined with an allee of live oaks - descendents from the original Toomer’s Corner Oaks
Figure 6b-7. Samford Park Existing vs. Proposed Diagram
Detail Focus Areas
Figure 6b-8. Samford Park Bicycle / Pedestrian Diagram Pedestrians and Bicycles being walked Pedestrians and Bicycles being ridden 188
2
ACS - ACADEMIC SUCCESS CENTER
STADIUM PARKING DECK
JORDAN - HARE STADIUM
CHILLED WATER PLANT
PROPOSED ACADEMIC SUCCESS CENTER FACILITY
GRAVES AMPHITHEATER
STUDENT CENTER
PROPOSED ACADEMIC SUCCESS CENTER FACILITY OWEN HALL
KELLER HALL
N
DUDLEY HALL Figure 6b-9. Central Classroom Facility Proposed Plan Diagram 189
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
13
1
Straighten Haley Concourse between the Student Center and the ASC complex. The south end of this section of concourse forms an intersection between the ASC courtyard entrance to the south, the Tiger Lawn to the west and the historic Quads / Roosevelt Concourse to the east. This section of concourse should be paved with Type ‘B’ - Decorative Brick and be lined on the sides with standard benches. Trees should be planted at a large enough size at installation to create instant shade (6” cal.+) and be a single species of shade tree like Quercus alba or Fraxinus pennsylvanica.
2
Graded bowl provides elevational transition between the intersection of the concourses to the north and the ASC courtyard to the south. The grade transition in this area allows the existing Duggar Concourse to remain in its current location by using the eastern side of the proposed eastern building to retain grade. This area would consist of a durable turf grass such as Tifway 419 Bermuda or Emerald Zoysia and provide informal gathering space as well as outdoor classroom space.
3
An arcing path provides an accessible route to the ASC courtyard while defining the northern edge of the graded, turf bowl. This path would be paved with Type ‘C’ - Concrete with Brick Bands. This path creates the northern most end of what eventually turns into the Parkerson Mill Creek Greenway Trail.
4
Steps that provide pedestrian access along the north side of the building would be concrete risers with brick treads. These steps would be lighted by recessed lighting from the adjacent building and separated into separate sets of risers no more than 5 risers tall so as to not require handrails.
5
The courtyard / entrance for the eastern building would be paved with Type ‘B’ - Decorative Brick and would contain shade trees in grates flush with adjacent pavement. Non-fixed seating would be placed in this courtyard to accommodate students coming and going from classes as well as informal areas for gathering, studying and socializing. This courtyard would be flanked by teaching gardens on the north and west that would be terraced and structured by faculty to describe the process of water filtration and conveyance.
6
The stairs that provide direct access from the concourse intersection to the main ASC courtyard would be a combination of brick and granite and would be illuminated by recessed lighting based in framing cheek walls. These cheek walls would be brick clad with granite caps. Adjacent to these steps would be a small outdoor amphitheater framed by the stair tower of the building. The seating for this amphitheater would be the same material as the adjacent stairs and should appear as they are connected.
7
A forebay collects the water at the outfall of the culverted Parkerson Mill Creek to filter out sediment and trash before it enters the main section of the pond. This forebay is contained by a weir that keeps the water elevation in the forebay approximately 8” higher than the elevation of the main pond. This also serves as a pedestrian path connecting the north and south edges of the pond.
8
The main pond stores and slows water during storm events and protects the downstream section of Parkerson Mill Creek from scouring and erosion. This pond also provides a peaceful setting around which to walk, gather, sit, converse, study, dine and be in nature.
9
A terraced courtyard provides an accessible route to the building entrance while offering shaded, grade separated rooms for students and faculty to study, dine and gather in. These terraces would contain grids of mid-canopy shade trees such as Lagerstroemia, Cornus florida, or Acer buergeranium with non-fixed seating and tables for informal gathering by groups of varying scales. The terraces would be supported by brick clad walls with granite caps.
10
A pedestrian bridge connects the courtyard to the beginning of the Parkerson Mill Creek Greenway Trail. This bridge would be light in its structure, possibly steel with timber decking and a stainless steel guardrail.
11
An informal, meandering path with Type ‘D’ - Concrete Paving, would connect the eastern courtyard to the Parkerson Mill Creek Greenway Trail. This path would be bordered with medium sized shade loving trees and shrubs such as Hydrangea, Aesculus, Magnolia stellata, Betula nigra and Cornus florida. This edge of the pond would be more wild and natural while the opposite side (adjacent to the building) would be more urban and constructed.
12
The building entrance plaza would be paved with Type ‘A’ - Special Paving - Granite and would have a guardrail along the pond edge to match that used on the bridge. The paving from this entrance plaza would carry through to the terraced courtyard.
13
The beginning of the Parkerson Mill Creek Greenway Trail would be paved in Type ‘D’ - Concrete Paving and would be lined with mid-canopy tree species that tie into what is used in the courtyard. This path would have informal benches at regular intervals along its length.
13
12 10
12 9
8 11
7 12
6 3
5
1 4
2
Figure 6b-10. Academic Success Center Facility Proposed Plan ID Diagram
N
Detail Focus Areas
190
1
3 2
Figure 6b-11. Academic Success Center Facility Existing Conditions Section
1
Graves Drive has parking along its edge without consistent pedestrian routes.
2
Parkerson Mill Creek is in a culvert behind Parker / Allison Hall. This culverted section of the creek results in high velocity outflows where the culvert discharges near Biggio Drive.
3
Pedestrian circulation to the sunken area between the Tiger Lawn and Graves Amphitheater is difficult to navigate accessibly. There is little accessible or usable space for pedestrians in this area.
1
3 2
Figure 6b-12. Academic Success Center Facility Section Showing Potential Improvements
191
1
Removing the parking along Graves Drive allows for a more natural, shaded walkway that connects users from Duggar Concourse through the courtyard of the new ASC complex to the proposed Parkerson Mill Creek Greenway Trail.
2
By daylighting Parkerson Mill Creek and impounding the water to create a pond, velocities at the outfall are reduced and a forebay is created that will help improve water quality and quantity. In addition to improving the health and viability of Parkerson Mill Creek, the proposed pond creates a new amenity and focal point for the campus.
3
By using the proposed ASC building to retain grade adjacent to Tiger Lawn, a space on the south side of the proposed building is created that allows use by pedestrians. This space would be shaded by groves of understory trees and terraced to provide an accessible route to the proposed pond’s edge.
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
Figure 6b-13. View from pedestrian bridge looking north towards proposed ASC building and courtyard with pond and forebay to the right.
Figure 6b-14. ASC Existing vs. Proposed Diagram
Detail Focus Areas
Figure 6b-15. ASC Bicycle / Pedestrian Diagram Parkerson Mill Creek multi-use pathway Pedestrians and Bicycles being walked Pedestrians and Bicycles being ridden 192
3
PARKERSON MILL CREEK
MCWHORTER CENTER
SOCCER FACILITY
TRACK AND FIELD FACILITY
N
Figure 6b-16. Parkerson Mill Creek Proposed Plan Diagram 193
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
1
Removing the gravel contractor lay down area at the eastern side of Biggio Drive and moving Biggio Drive to the west would allow room to provide a restored creek section and Parkerson Mill Creek Greenway trail that connects to the intramural fields and agrarian landscape beyond.
2
An informal greenway trail could connect the proposed CCF facility, new recreation facility and the urban campus core to the intramural fields. This path could be crushed stone and would follow the restored grade of the creek. This edge would be more natural in character and would be flanked by native, hydric plant and tree species.
3
Creating a series of check dams or weirs along the length of Parkerson Mill Creek would help reduce the amount of scouring as a result of storm events and would provide a controlled method of discharging storm flows downstream. These weirs could be clad in stone and would have several levels of outfalls including normal pool, and storm flow sizing.
4
A realigned Biggio Drive on the south side of Lem Morrison Drive allows space for stormwater gardens to be created on either side of the drive. These gardens would capture runoff from the adjacent gymnastics parking lot as well as a proposed intramural parking lot on the south side of Biggio Drive. These gardens would filter and slow runoff before it enters Parkerson Mill Creek, therefore improving the water quality and reducing the potential for erosion. These gardens would be planted with hydric species such as Quercus bicolor, Cyrilla racemiflora, Iris, and Asclepias tuberosa.
5
A bridge crossing the restored Parkerson Mill Creek would be light in construction and not require major earthwork or disruption during installation. This bridge could be prefabricated, constructed of steel and have a timber deck and top rails.
6
A renovated parking lot at the gymnastics building would be constructed to accommodate the realignment of Biggio Drive. This parking lot would retain the current number of parking spaces and would grade the parking lot to drain to the southeast toward the proposed stormwater gardens. Paths that bring users from the parking lots to the gymnastics building would be a porus Type ‘D’ - Concrete paving and would guide visitors through shaded parking islands towards the building.
7
A proposed parking area for the intramural fields is able to be created by the realignment of Biggio Drive. This parking area would be similar to the gymnastics parking lot in that it would slope towards Biggio and the adjacent stormwater garden. The runoff from this parking lot would be captured, filtered and released in a controlled manner back into Parkerson Mill Creek. Pedestrian pathways from this parking lot would be porous Type ‘D’ - Concrete Paving and would bring visitors towards the soccer facility via the aforementioned bridge, toward the intramural fields, or south along the Parkerson Mill Creek Greenway trail.
8
This area is reserved for a potential future pavilion that could be a base for outdoor gatherings, cookouts, intramural field event organization or other informal events. This setting would be park-like and a pavilion in this location would need to be constructed to be light on the land and visually penetrable.
9
An arcing path connecting the intramural fields to the soccer facility and adjacent parking would form an edge between the natural condition of the Parkerson Mill Creek Park and the parking facilities that serve it. This path would be lined with Quercus lyrata that would relate to the existing Quercus lyrata planting along Lem Morrison Drive. The line of trees that bisect this arc from the north, running past the gymnastics center to the proposed pavilion site, would be Quercus falcata.
10
Similar to item #5, this would be a light bridge structure that would be informal in nature. Likely a prefabricated steel bridge with timber decking, this structure would span the restored Parkerson Mill Creek section and provide access from Parkerson Mill Creek Park, south towards the continuation of the Parkerson Mill Creek Greenway trail.
11
This area should be cleared of existing invasive species, the ground plane opened and a lawn created for use as an informal park. This would be able to be used by students for informal gatherings and special events. The restored Parkerson Mill Creek creek section would be bordered by a proposed Parkerson Mill Creek Greenway trail that would be informal in nature and constructed of crushed stone. This path will connect the urban core with the more agrarian landscape to the south.
13
12 11
6
8 9 7
10
4
5 1 3
2
Figure 6b-17. Parkerson Mill Creek Proposed Plan ID Diagram
N
12 13
Detail Focus Areas
Additional ‘head-in’ parking would be established along the edge of Biggio Drive adjacent to the intramural fields. These parking spaces would be constructed out of porous concrete and sloped to drain towards the western branch of Parkerson Mill Creek. 194
3 1
2
Figure 6b-18. PMC Existing Conditions Section
1
Parkerson Mill Creek is incised as it flows next to the existing Biggio Drive. Its banks contain many invasive species and it is prone to erosion and scouring due to its culverted condition upstream.
2
Biggio Drive and the adjacent informal gravel parking area are very close to the edge of Parkerson Mill Creek and allow untreated stormwater runoff to flow directly into the creek.
3
The slope that leads up to the old track facility is well shaded but barren and eroding. This slope is highly visible from the adjacent Lem Morrison Drive.
3 2
1
Figure 6b-19. PMC Section Showing Potential Improvements
1
Restoring the Parkerson Mill Creek stream section will allow seasonal storms to be conveyed without causing erosion. Removing invasive species and replacing them with native, hydric species will reinforce the stream slopes.
2
Removing the informal gravel parking area on the western side of Parkerson Mill Creek and moving Biggio Drive to the west allows more room to regrade the slopes of the creek to lessen their steepness and reinforce the banks of the stream. This also affords the opportunity to locate a pedestrian greenway trail along the slope to provide an informal connection from the center of campus to the more agrarian landscape to the south. A more traditional shaded sidewalk should also be located at the edge of Biggio Drive to provide a street level pedestrian connection to the new recreation center.
3
Establishing a shade tolerant native understory at the slope adjacent to the old track facility will help the appearance of this intersection from Lem Morrison Drive and reduce the amount of erosion and subsequent sediment that washes into Parkerson Mill Creek. 195
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
Figure 6b-20. View from the proposed Parkerson Mill Creek Greenway Trail located between Biggio Drive and Parkerson Mill Creek. The location of the practice field fence would remain the same.
Figure 6b-21. PMC Existing vs. Proposed Diagram
Detail Focus Areas
Figure 6b-22. Bicycle / Pedestrian Diagram Pedestrians and Bicycles being walked Pedestrians and Bicycles being ridden 196
4
THACH CORRIDOR
MILLER HALL
WALKER BUILDING
PETRIE HALL
THACH HALL
TICHENOR HALL
FOY HALL
HALEY CENTER
CATER HALL Figure 6b-23. Thach Corridor Proposed Plan Diagram
N
197
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
6 8
7
5
4
3
Realign paths in the space to the east of Cater Lawn so the pedestrian circulation is oriented to the center of Cater Lawn. These paths should be Type ‘C’ - Concrete with Brick Bands. Tree planting should be formalized along Mell Street and Thach Avenue. These should consist of species like Quercus phellos and installed at 6” cal. or more so that they provide more immediate shade.
2
Cater Lawn should remain largely as is, though a simplification of the beds and trees along either side is suggested. These trees are currently in isolated mulched rings and the lawn between has informal edges. It is proposed that the lawn should be made into a formal ‘panel’ and the area under the trees, on either side, be mulched and planted with an appropriate understory. This understory could consist of masses of Fothergilla gardenii and Hydrangea macrophylla framed by clipped Ilex glabra (maintained at 4’ tall). The trees should be maintained in good health and if replacement is needed, the replacement should be of equal size to the adjacent trees.
3
The park-like area to the west of Cater Lawn is currently divided by a multitude of smaller, meandering paths that lack hierarchy. It is proposed to simplify this path network with fewer, wider, paths that logically connect through to Cater Lawn and Thach Concourse. These paths would be Type ‘C’ - Concrete with Brick Bands. Existing trees planted in this area should remain and be allowed to grow to maturity in order to provide an informal shaded lawn for students to gather between classes.
4
The current intersection of the Thach, Tiger and Haley Concourses is not well defined and has too much exposed utility infrastructure around its edges. It is proposed to square off the corners of this major pedestrian intersection to provide area for shade trees in decorative tree grates with standard benches for people to sit and gather. This intersection should be paved with Type ‘B’ - Decorative Brick. The intersections along the Thach Concourse will distinguish themselves from the rest of Thach Concourse by their paving and tree species (Quercus coccinea).
5
The section of Thach Concourse to the north of Haley Center will be widened to accommodate a double row of shade trees with standard benches below them. The paving should be Type ‘C’ - Concrete with Brick Bands and will have 20’ clear to accommodate emergency vehicle access. The intersection between Thach Hall and Haley Center will be similar to the Concourse intersection but have a reduced paving pattern scale since the size of the intersection is smaller. The trees planted along the concourse, not in the intersections, should be Quercus shumardii.
Detail Focus Areas
1
N
Figure 6b-24. Thach Corridor Proposed Plan ID Diagram
1
2
6
Small bioswales along the northern edge of Thach Concourse will capture runoff from the upslope side of the Concourse, filter and release it back into the stormwater system at a controlled rate to reduce discharge velocities and subsequent erosion downstream. These bioswales should be planted with hydric species that can tolerate periods of drought such as Acer barbatum and Quercus bicolor. The understory and groundcover should also be able to tolerate brief periods of inundation and may contain species such as Cyrilla racemiflora, Iris, and Asclepias tuberosa.
7
Along the western part of Thach Concourse the current asphalt roadway, a remnant of when this part of the concourse was still accessible to vehicles, should be removed and replaced with impervious paving. Shade trees (Quercus shumardii) should be planted in decorative tree grates and have standard benches located in between. Placing these trees on the southern side of the path will provide ample shade to pedestrians while still allowing 20’ clear access for emergency vehicles. Pedestrian scaled lighting should be located in relation to the shade trees but on the northern edge of the paved surface.
8
A pedestrian bridge should be located along the concourse to provide a grade-separated crossing over Donahue Drive. This bridge should be grounded on either end with cheek walls extending to the ground and would be clad in brick. The guardrail should be a standard steel rail with pickets at 4” o.c. and a steel top rail. This bridge should be designed so that grades are 5% max not requiring a handrail.
198
3
2
1
Figure 6b-25. Thach Corridor Existing Conditions Section
1
The current west Thach Pedestrian Concourse is an asphalt road with adjacent sidewalks. There is little shade or places to sit for users and the paving is impervious to up slope runoff.
2
There is little to slow or catch runoff from the adjacent hillside before it flows onto the concourse.
3
Adjacent grass areas in front of academic buildings have few trees that provide usable shade. These areas are often blocked from users by bollards with chains running between them.
3 1 2
Figure 6b-26. Thach Section Showing Potential Improvements
199
1
By removing the existing asphalt and replacing with a pervious, low albedo pavement and installing shade trees along the southern side of the concourse with benches for seating, a more pedestrian scaled walking experience is made available to users.
2
Incorporating small raingardens adjacent to the concourse and between connecting sidewalks will help capture runoff from grass slopes and filter it before releasing in a controlled manner back into the stormwater system.
3
Removing the bollard and chain system from between the concourse and adjacent grass areas and providing larger and more closely spaced shade trees in these lawn areas will create an accessible, enjoyable space for faculty and students.
Auburn University Landscape Master Plan, Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Update 2014
Figure 6b-27. View widened pedestrian intersection looking west. A line of trees on the south side of the pedestrian concourse provides shade for users while maintaining access for emergency vehicles.
Figure 6b-28. Thach Corridor Existing vs. Proposed Diagram
Figure 6b-29. Thach Corridor Bicycle / Pedestrian Diagram Pedestrians and Bicycles being walked Pedestrians and Bicycles being ridden
Detail Focus Areas
200