Presentation: Applied Planning - Downtown Sealy Revitalization

Page 1

A History of Excellence. A Future of Progress


Introduction  State of the Downtown  Potential of downtown  Heritage  Started with analysis  Vision


•Economic Analyses •Public Input •SWOT


Economic Analysis  Location Quotient  Economic Base  Shift‐Share Analysis  Central Place  Market Analysis


Location Quotient


Shift‐Share and Economic Base  Stable manufacturing sector  Wholesale and retail trade are strong industries  Rapidly Growing sectors:  Entertainment  Recreation  Food and accommodation services


Central Place  The Central Place Theory attempts to explain the distribution patterns, size,

and number of cities and towns within a region.  Central Place classifies communities in five different sizes     

Hamlet (2,000‐5,000) Village (5,000‐20,000) Town (20,000‐100,000) City (100,000‐1,000,000) R i Regional Capital (1,000,000 +) l C i l ( )

 Sealy is identified as a Village


Market Analysis  Conducted market analyses for the following

businesses:  Restaurant R  Bakery, Deli, Meat Market  Bar, Pub, Dance‐Hall B P b D H ll  Bed and Breakfast  Bike Store, Pet Store Bik St P t St  Movie Theater


Public Input  Reaching the Businesses:  Discussion with businesses  Comments Concerning:  Traffic problems  Vacancy V  Type of business wanted in downtown  Views on aesthetics  Events/activities  Historic theme


Public Input  Traffic ff  Vacancies  Downtown as an Activity Hub  Improved Streetscape & Facades


S.W.O.T. Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats

 Current businesses have a stable customer base  Stable population growth in Sealy  Historic downtown brings pride  The size of downtown can be easily revitalized  Businesses settled downtown for many years


S.W.O.T. Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats

 Downtown buildings require a high cost for repair and maintenance  Lack of public place and activities especially for kids  Lack of pedestrian and bike friendly environment  Lack of diversity in food services  Limited modes of transportation and high dependence on vehicles  Restrictive ordinances


S.W.O.T. Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats

 Infill development on existing vacant properties  The potential for downtown area to establish TIRZ and PID  Willingness to improve downtown area.  Downtown is better suited for small, more unique businesses


S.W.O.T. Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats

 Strict ordinances might discourage new businesses  Major retailers on Hwy 36 and I‐10  Vacant lots  Unsafe intersections and median parking  Restrictive parking requirements


The Downtown Revitalization Program will propose to: •Design alternatives to enhance, preserve, and promote the historic feel of downtown Sealy •Create a safe and walkable environment, improved streetscape with more public space areas •Create options to provide different food variety services p p y •Convert downtown into an activity hub.


Proposed New Boundaries


•Existing Conditions •Alternative 1 •Alternative 2 Al i •Parking •Public Transit •Traffic Calming


Existing Conditions  Inappropriate

Pedestrian Facilities  Traffic speed limit too T ffi d li i high  Inappropriate parking arrangement (median p parking) g  Lack of streetscape


Alternative 1 ‐ Roundabouts • • • • • •

Roundabouts M di Median Sidewalks Crosswalks Pavement changes Landscaping


Alternative 1 – Design Details

 Roundabout design

incorporates existing water feature  Parking Rearrangement  Exemplary Street Sections

HWY36

Main Street


Alternative 1 – Proposed Design Main St & Fowlkes St

Hwy 36 & Main St


Alternative 2 –Shared Space • Signalized

intersection at Hwy 36 and Main Street • Shared h d Space at Main Street and Fowlkes Street • Pedestrian Bulb‐ Outs


Alternative 2 – Design Details

Pedestrian bulb‐outs at Main Street

• Provide Pedestrian P id P d i

Environment – Shared Space and Bulb‐Outs

Pedestrian bulb‐outs at Fowlkes Street


Alternative 2 – Proposed Design

Hwy 36 & Main St

Shared Space Example

Main St


Alternative 2 – Proposed Designs


Traffic Calming Patterns in downtown area have revealed that there is a need to slow traffic. Traffic calming measures recommended for downtown include:        

Wider and continuous sidewalks and bicycle lanes Pedestrian traffic lights and textured pedestrian crossings Rumble Strips L d Landscaped medians serving as pedestrian islands d di i d i i l d Streetscape elements Speed tables and speed bumps Traffic roundabouts Sidewalk bulbouts


Existing Parking  Parking Assessment based on P ki A t b d

current city regulations for Downtown Sealy  Current on‐street parking exceeds parking requirements  Recommended regulation change Required Off‐ Street Parking Downtown Businesses including grocery uses + Citizens State Bank Downtown Businesses excluding grocery uses + Citizens State Bank

On‐Street Parking Total required Credit Off‐Street Parking

193

117

76

139

84

55


Proposed Parking  Proposed parking arrangement

increases the number of parking spaces in downtown to 635 maximum  Different parking configurations


Public Transit  Current situation/problem  One bus route as loop. One bus route as loop  One bus stop  Only one option for fare

Current bus route in Sealy ‐‐‐Sealy Loop


Public Transit  Redesign new bus route  Relocate bus transfer

station to downtown  New design g  Two more new bus routes are set up

Proposed Sealy bus route map


•The following elements are included in the streetscape plan: • Sidewalks and Crosswalks • Signs • Gateways and Landmarks • Street Furniture • Lighting • Plant and Landscape Design


Sidewalks and Crosswalks Existing conditions: • Vehicular versus pedestrian movements • Improper sidewalk and crosswalk design. • Restricted walkability within Downtown Sealy.


Sidewalks and Crosswalks Cont. Recommendations: •ADA accommodations •Patterns of crosswalks and crosswalk signs •Enhance the overall look of the downtown


Signs Existing Conditions  Lacks of signage g g  Few street signs present  Aesthetic appearance is lacking pp g  Business owners dissatisfied with the signage rules


Signs cont. Recommendations:  Layout way finding signs with street name and y y g g direction  Entrance sign and a downtown map  Flexibility and improvement in the sign regulations


Gateways and Landmarks Existing Conditions:  No current existing gateways  Minimal existing landmarks Recommendations:  Prospective locations of the gateways and the landmarks have been proposed.  Various design styles and themes have been considered g y


Street Furniture Existing Conditions:  Includes benches, trash receptacles and bike racks.  No bike racks  Very few benches and trash receptacles Recommendations:  Relocation of these items  Various architectural styles h l l


Lighting Existing Conditions •Irregular spaced lighting •Poorly lit sidewalks and streets Recommendations •Regularly spaced pedestrian & traffic lights g y p p g •Theme


Plant and Landscape Design Existing Conditions:  Existing landscape is inconsistent  No vegetation near the parking areas  Lack of standards Recommendations:  Propose regulations for planters  Consistency


•Existing Conditions •Design Recommendations


Existing Conditions  Quality building facades  Need for renovation  Colors, materials, and enhancements  Guidelines


D i R d i Design Recommendations  Building forms  Height of buildings  Human scale

No

Yes


D i R d i Design Recommendations Maintain Rhythm of Facades  Columns  Complimentary materials and colors  Patterning  Awning height and styles  Consistent setbacks and floor elevations


D i R d i Design Recommendations Infill Construction I fill C t ti  Height  Width  Alignment  Materials  Colors l


Design Recommendations Facade Features  Incorporate traditional design elements in new construction and renovations  Large first floor windows  Second story windows  Inset entry ways  Clerestory windows y  Ornamental features

 Keep these features consistent

b between buildings b ildi


Design Recommendations Wall Materials  Brick  Stone  Stucco  Glass  Wood

Accent and Trim  Same as mentioned  Pre Pre‐Cast Cast  Ceramic/Terra Cotta  Stamped/pressed metal


Design Recommendations Select Colors Appropriate to Downtown’s Historic Character  Adopt an official color scheme  Proposed scheme

Awnings  visual depth, shade, protection visual depth shade protection from elements  Fit storefront opening p g  Awning colors


Design Recommendations Signs  Sign Regulations  Sign styles Si l  Murals  Themes Murals

Historic/ Texas

Railroad

Modern


•Funding Sources • Evaluating Current Incentives • Creating New Incentives • TIRZ, PID TIRZ PID • Grants and Other Opportunities

•Phasing •Events and Marketing


Evaluating Current Incentives  Business Improvement Grant  Re‐evaluate the amount awarded in order to assist property owners in making aesthetic improvements t i ki th ti i t  Tax Abatement Policy  Develop a tax abatement program catered specifically to downtown businesses


Creating New Incentives  Neighborhood Enterprise Zone (NEZ)  Waive fees for development review (permitting and

iinspections), replat fees i ) l f  Property tax abatements available for up to 10 years  Municipal sales tax refunds  Baseline performance standards


TIRZ, PID Regional Tax Rates (per $100)

 Tax Increment

Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ)

1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80

 Public

Improvement District (PID)

0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 Austin County ((Sealy) y)

Waller Washington Harris County County (Katy) County (Houston) ((Brenham))

County

City

ISD


Grants and Other Opportunities  State  Texas Historical Commission  Department of Transportation  Department of Rural Affairs  Regionall  Houston‐Galveston Area Council  Other Opportunities for funding include:  Adopt a _____ Program (trees, benches, etc)  Downtown Beautification Committee D B ifi i C i


Phasing Phase 1: (Green) ‐ Highly visible by g y y

downtown corridors

Phase 2: (Blue) ( ) ‐ Incorporate remaining

main stretches of old downtown boundaries

Phase 3: (Yellow) ‐ Outer most regions of g

proposed boundary approaching downtown

= Gateways


Events and Marketing  Relocate the Fantasy of Lights Festival and 4th of July      

fireworks to downtown H ld bi l Hold bicycle events Hold monthly events C Consider a Polka Festival in downtown id P lk F i l i d Create a downtown brochure C t f f Create a free fare zone for public transit within the f bli t it ithi th downtown area Hold resident competitions for public involvement Hold resident competitions for public involvement.


Make downtown an activity hub and an attractive destination Redefine downtown streets, invite pedestrian activity and calm traffic activity, and calm traffic Beautification of the downtown area with attractive streetscape and facades


Summary & Conclusion

Fowlkes Street Before


Summary & Conclusion

Fowlkes Street After


Summary & Conclusion

Fowlkes Street Before


Summary & Conclusion

Fowlkes Street After


Summary & Conclusion

Optional plaza redesign concept for the SW corner of Main and Fowlkes, and more streetscape imagery

Conceptual examples of streetscape improvements


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.