FREEWAY PRECEDENTS
Central Freeway
Halfway across town is another boulevard where yet another highway damaged in the ’89 quake once stood. Octavia Boulevard replaced what was known as the Hayes Valley portion of the Central Freeway, a spur off of I-80. Then-mayor Jerry Brown closed this unsafe part of the Central Freeway in 1992. A decade later, it reopened as a landscaped boulevard that accommodates pedestrians and cyclists as much as it does cars.
Before the destruction of the Central Freeway, condominium prices in the Hayes Valley neighborhood were 66% of San Francisco average prices. However, after the demolition and subsequent replacement with the new Octavia Boulevard, prices grew to 91% of city average. Beyond this, the most dramatic increases were seen in the areas nearest to the new boulevard. Furthermore, residents noted a significant change in the nature of the commercial establishments in the area. Where it had been previously populated by liquor stores and mechanic shops, soon the area was teeming with trendy restaurants and high-end boutiques.
Embarcadero Freeway
Highway removal in San Francisco is not without precedent. Following a 1989 earthquake that damaged the elevated Embarcadero Freeway, city officials opted to tear the structure down instead of repairing it. The result: An inviting six-lane boulevard along the city’s eastern waterfront flanked by bike lanes and 25-foot-wide sidewalks. A February 2012 report from the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy has a good rundown of the history and after effects of the Embarcadero removal.
49
2. Railtracks
MissionBaySouth
50
BAY DISCONNECTION
PotreroHill
MISSION
33.5’ 5’ 30’ 45’ 80’ south bound north bound south bound north bound MissionBaySouthMissionBaySouth
Mission Bay South
51
Mission Bay North
MISSION BAY DISCONNECTION
3. Mission creek
MISSION BAY PLANNING
In the late 1990s, a master plan to revive and convert over 300 acres into a planned community was roduced by the city. Known as the Mission Bay Project, it is the largest urban development initiated by San Francisco since the construction of Golden Gate Park in the late 1800s. After completion, Mission Bay will become home to a mix of residential and commercial properties. Apartments, condiminums, retail stores, restaurants, corporate and science businesses will all be anchored by the already completed AT&T Ballpark and a new research campus for UCSF. Within these developments will be 49 acres of open space for parks and recreational facilities.
The development program for Mission Bay also includes 6 000 housing units with 1,700 (28%) affordable to moderate, low, and very low-income households. Dealing with the cities gentrification and housing issues Mission Bay may turn out to be the San Francisco neighborhood with the most socioeconomic integration, with wealthier and lower-income homeowners and tenants living side-by-side.
“Here, after all, is a giant canvas of largely undeveloped waterfront acreage in a major U.S. city and has been labeled to be the best parcel of undeveloped land between San Diego & Seattle“
“Just a mile or so from the main bussiness district it is the largest development in the history of SF, a $4 billion plan spread over 303-acres offers one of the last opportunities for major development in the city.”
“Mission Bay is predicted to be the new hot spot in 2-3 years. Right now the entire neighborhood is under construction, but soon enough this neighborhood is predicted to be full of life and the talk of the town.
Mission Bay today is fast becoming a bit of suburbia implanted in San Francisco. The developer and landowner of Mission Bay, Catellus, to facilitate their exclusive development rights over their enormously valuable real estate, they donated 40+ acres to the University of California to build its new biomedical campus, which in turn greatly increased the value of the surrounding acreage.
Since breaking ground in 1999, the development of the $3 billion Mission Bay campus is considered the single most important endeavor that UCSF has undertaken in its nearly 150-year history and it’s one of the nations biggest university expansions.
“The leading university exclusively focused on health, the Mission Bay campus will eventually be of the world’s leading centers for innovative health sciences,”
“In the heart of it all, serving as the anchor tenant every development needs, sitting on 43 acres of land donated by the developer and the city, is a second campus for the economic engine of San Francisco, UCSF Medical School”
J. Michael Bishop, MD Chancellor, UCSF
CHAPTER 2.3 URBAN RESEARCH
“Any institution that aims to illuminate the processes of life must be more than an observer. It must be a driver, a risk-taker, an exploiter of opportunities that promise to improve the health of humanity.”
University of California San Francisco
Carl Warnecke I.M Pei
Envisioned a set of high rise buildings on either side of Mission Creek. The Density & Space of Offices on the masterplan seemed with its image so different and seemingly unconnected in plan or economic pattern to the city, it had a short life.
Attempted to maximize the waterfront by carving out an oval shaped channel south of Mission Creek, resulting an island. This plan was also opposed for its density and like the Wernecke plan before it, the scheme lacked in open space along the waterfront.
Dan Solomon Skidmore Owings Merrill
Was an elegant Beaux-Arts scheme that provided a clear hierarchy of streets arranged around a linear park and was pleasing as a graphic design, but was considered to have confusion on the ground level because streets were constantly changing in direction.
The scheme by the giant architeture firm SOM was an inelegant copy of the one by Dan Solomon. This plan offered a extension a bay front linear park and providing more space for commercial construction. The scheme was seen as a very poor attempt by SOM.
Fain started work on Mission Bay in 1996, after being hired by the private developer Catellus. The construction of Mission Bay redvelopment started in 1998 and today nearly half of the project is built or under construction. The great success with the scheme is to knit Mission Bay into the existing fabric of the city, rather than previous schemes with setting it appart as a separate “campus” or mini city of its own. Most of the site is organized with the north-south grid of the city, while the diagonal streets are limited to either side of the channel. Fain designed after research of block structure of SF and other cities throughout history to establish the optimum block dimension for Mission Bay.
MISSION BAY PLANNING 52 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
John
“The history of planning efforts at Mission Bay shows the tensions between the need to integrate the area into the city, while creating a memorable place in itself.”
1996 1978 1985 1987 1989
Johnson Fain
Mission Bay Plan Distribituion
53 0 1 500 3 000 4 500 5 250 3 750 2 250 750 6 000 1994 2004 2002 2000 1998 1996 2012 2010 2008 2007 Completion of 3000 Units SF’s Need 2014 2004
SF Completed Housing Units
35% Housing 5% Hotel 10% Service 30% Commercial 20% UCSF 6 000 Housing Units 1 700 (28%) Affordable Units (Modarate, low, very low-income) City and Neighborhood-Serving Retail 2.65 million sq.ft new campus on 43 acres donated land 4.4 Million sq.ft office, life science, biotechnology 500 Room Hotel
55 University of California San Francisco University of California San Francisco University of California San Francisco 16thStreet 3rdStreet Upper Level Green Space Second Level Research Medical Center Retail Campus Community Parking CATELLUS City and County of San Francisco City and County of San Francisco City and County of San Francisco TM CATELLUS TM CATELLUS TM CATELLUS TM 1.1993 Offers to sell the land in Mission Bay for $200 million which the city cant afford. 2.1995 Identifies the need for a new site. Of the three locations identified only Mission Bay is within the city. 3.1996 Approaches Catellus with a last attempt to keep UCSF within the city A lease is signed where Catellus donates 29.2 acres to UCSF and the City donates 13.2 after that UCSF convinces that the land donation would be an investment through triggering economic & community development that would would increase the value of adjecent land. UCSF is also supposed to give 13 acres back in form of green space. City and County of San Francisco City and County of San Francisco 3.1997
54 25 000 20 000 15 000 10 000 5 000 0 30 000 City & County SF UCSF Wells Fargo & Co. California Med Center State of California SFUSD US Postal Service PG&E Charles Schwab & Co. City College of SF Gap Inc. Kaiser Permanente Top Employers San Francisco Research Harvard University Stanford University John Hopkins University University of California - San Francisco University of Pennsylvania 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 100 89 87 86 86 U.S News Top Medical Schools 2013 Primary Care University of North Carolina University of Washington Oregon Health and Science University University of California - San Francisco University of Colorado - Denver 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 100 99 93 88 87 Urgent Care Homeless Clinic Health Education Smoking Cessation Women’s Clinic Support Group Management Services Dermatology Clinic Medical Students Nursing Students Medical Residents Physicians 1992 University of California San Francisco
MISSION BAY URBAN PROPOSAL
The issue at this point is quite clear, because of its booming economy, mostly due to the growing tech industry, San Francisco has a natural rising popularity and population. A great quality of life and a lot of high paying professional jobs means that a lot of people want to live here but the city does not currenly supply its housing need to keep up with the demand.
Today San Francisco is down zoned by the city, meaning the density of housing or expansion of construction to go taller is at a minimum. This has been enforced to protect the city’s charming character with its views and hills. Because the city is an approximately 7 x 7 mile portion of land, and is geographically bound in the East and North by the San Francisco Bay, the west by the Pacific Ocean, and the South by the Peninsula, only 1,500 units have been constructed within the past two decades. This deficient growth in housing has clearly accelerated the rise in housing and rental prices and made low and middle income earners not be able to afford housing.
The city’s relatively fixed housing today makes the rich and the poor compete for the limited housing units, forging a huge gap between the rich and the poor. And, unprecedented housing vacancy rates unfortunately drive this gap even further. To address this divide, San Francisco must create more affordable housing options.
San Francisco is today a very fascinating city with its diverse and unique neighborhoods compressed within and around a very dense and vibrant core. The new masterplan of Mission Bay area will seek to mimic the successful urban design of its city with a new neighborhood focusing towards dealing with its urban issues such as housing and gentrification. The intention will be to create a modern, multifunctional mixed use development with all the possibilites and services required for a new vibrant and diverse neighborhood in San Francisco. This will include affordable housing as well as public housing, schools, local shops, businesses and public park spaces. The goal will be to create a mixed-income housing where the ratio of public housing and affordable housing will be as close to 1:1 as possible. This will be a very important move for the community as a whole as it will ensure homes for workers and keep the economic development on a stable level as well as keep the Mission Bay area diverse, making it possible for the working middle class incomers to live close to where they work.
With the new planned gentrification in the Mission Bay area the traffic counts in the area will raise between now and the built development. The aim with the new masterplan will also be to reconnect the Mission bay to its eastern and northern neighborhoods.
WHY AFFORDABLE HOUSING?
In order to keep San Francisco what it stands for today, a liberal and diverse city where all types of people can live the barriers to adding more housing needs to get removed. We’ve seen the social consequences of what happens otherwise, low income earners gets pushed out of their homes and long term renters and elderly are getting evicted by landlords so that rents can be raised. This simply due to that housing in San Francisco has become the most costly in the nation and has brought an affordability problem to the city because far more people now want to live here than it currently can fit which is simply the reason the city has gone into this housing crisis.
Today we have come to a point where the high cost of housing is making homelessness not a choicebut a must for most of the homeless San Franciscans. The important issue moving forward is addressing how San Francisco will deal with this devistating urban issue.
As said, in order to keep San Franciscos as the liberal and diverse city where all types of people can live, the city needs to become what it once used to be, affordable for most people. A place where a young person or an immigrant can move to pursue their dreams or a place a parent can raise kids without needing to spend every minute at work, San Francisco is today in need of specifically affordable housing.
With more affordable housing in San Francisco the city will maintain its diverse and vibrant soul, with individuals from all backgrounds. It will secure the local jobs and support for a better transportation choice where residents can live near where they work.
MISSION BAY
CHAPTER 3.1
URBAN DESIGN PROPOSAL
Urban Green Space
Program Along Waterfront
Physical Urban Connection
City Growth Pattern
58
1:350 150 50 350
MISSION BAY MASTERPLAN
SCALE
Connecting Neighborhoods Through Program
WORK WORK WORK PROGRAM
Program Along Waterfront
Sport Clubs
Aquatics & Outdoor Rec.
Health & Fitness Center
Team Building / Leadership
Kids Sport Club
Public Programs
Public Green Spaces
Food Courts
Public Library
Community Services Center
Educational Centers
After School Recreation Program
Child Care Center
Adult Education Program
Language School
UCSF Medical Clinics
Mini Medical School for the Public
Cancer Care Rehabilitation Center
Library
Student Rec. Program
59
60 N
MISSION BAY MASTERPLAN
61 4 000 New Housing Units 6 000 Planned Housing Units 10 000 Housing Units 3 000 (30%) Affordable Units (Modarate, low, very low-income) Pedestrian Access Vehicular Access Public Transportation
T T T
63
Diagram
Ground Primary Vehicular Connections 3rd St Primary Pedestrian Connections Future Ferry Terminal Location SF Bay Trail
Spatial
Figure
SITE
64 16th St 4th St 3rd St 4th St 16th St SCALE 1:100 0 50 T SF & Housing
Major Intersection Pedestrian Connection Vehicular Connection Parking Structure Koret Park Genentech UCSF Medical Hospital Warriors Stadium O ces Gatehouse Main Plaza Main Plaza O ces
SELECTION ANALYSIS
Pedestrian Flow To 3rd St from West
65
Building Entrances & Circulation
66 UCSF Campus Global Health Sciences Commercial / Biotech N
SITE SELECTION ANALYSIS
GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCES
UCSF Global Health Sciences (GHS) is dedicated to improving health and reducing the burden of disease in the world's most vulnerable populations. It integrates UCSF expertise in all of the health, social, and biological sciences, and focuses that expertise on pressing issues in global health.
From free children’s health screenings to providing care for the low-income, homeless and under-insured, from innovative partnerships attacking the roots of poor health care to cutting-edge biotechnology that will cure some of the most pernicious diseases, UCSF GHS brings significant resources to an public mission and not only does so every day, but has done so for nearly 150 years.
MISSION STATEMENT
- To address the ineffective short-term homeless program of San Francisco, a broader long-term vision that includes job training, work internships, and transitional housing is critical for the successful placement of homeless individuals back into society. An Innovative building typology has been laid out through programmatic strategies to provide an alternative approach.
Case Example -
Anyone can become homeless. One example is Trevor Condon which in the homeless category Group 2 / Sickness. He had a successful job in San Francisco with even savings in the bank. Which was until he got diagnosed with leukemia. Unfortunately, he had no insurance and the cost of the treatment he had to undergo took away all his savings which also in the longer run meant loss of job. With no money or job, he was homeless until a helpful woman rented him a room on a "you can pay me when you can" basis. After an unsuccessful job search, Trevor received security guard training. He patrolled dangerous construction sites in the middle of the night for $5 an hour -- a salary that would never be enough to afford a home in San Francisco. Eventually with time, Trevor found himselfon the streets and had no longer a place he could call home. Trevor seeked help at the Mission Bay Homeless Support & Training Center and qualified as being unintentional homeless after going through the application process. He was provided with temporary housing at site and went at the same time through the recreation program. Today, Trevor has a steady job as a campus security at Academy of Art Universities multiple campuses.
% 37
Said that not having clean clothing and a shower prevented them from finding employment
“Homeless people don’t need one helping hand or homeless shelters. They need access to a whole support system”
HOMELESS SUPPORT & TRAINING CENTER
The masterplan will include a Homeless Support & Training center which will have a concept of helping homeless people back into society through offering them education, work and temporary housing. Supportive housing is a thought as a temporary lifeline for homeless individuals, giving them a secure and caring home environment while going through the recreation program is critical to improve their stability in the society and to eventually reconnect them to the community at large.
Many homeless people lack the career skills necessary to find a job while other homeless people suffer from low-self esteem, not enough wage or mentall illness. The recreation center will aim the focus towards earlier discussed minority groups from group 2 to group 6, people that unintentionally became homeless. The program will be specifically crafted towards people who will go through a process to determine their eligibility for the recreation through showing determination and willingnessto get back into the community.
Homelessness remains a chronic problem in the city of San Francisco that has been driven by financial inequality and unprecedented property and rental costs. Each year $200 million is allocated by the city to address this issue, but, unfortunately, statistics show that the population of homeless inhabitants has not changed over the last decade. The current proposal provides a blueprint to guide the transition of homeless individuals back into society though job training, work/internship, and transitional housing programs.
The Support & Training centers first job training program will seek to bring people back into the society through hands on job training, internships, mentoring, job placement and social service support. The hands on job training will include being a worker at the site of mission bay, potentially housing managers, farmers, construction workers, cleaners.
CHAPTER 3.2 ARCHITECTURAL PROPOSAL
TYPES OF HOMELESS PEOPLE
70
Veterans Addiction Sickness No Support Network Job Loss Not Enough Wage
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group 6
58% 42%
There are many ways people become homeless. It is usually a series of events, such as loosing a job, getting divorced, dropping out of college, facing a death or tragedy, drug addiction, mental illness, etc. With that being said I want to break down the different people that you see on the street into some logical groups.
Group 1 ADDICTION Group 1 SICKNESS
One of the most common stereotypes of homeless people is that they are drug and alcohol addicts, U.S cities report that 58% of the homeless people has addiction as their largest cause of homelessness. This group is likely to return to homelessness no matter what kind of help they get except help to deal with the addiction.
A serious illness can mean lose of a lot of money and some people finds themselves on the streets after undergoing a treatment which will in a longer run also mean lose of job and possible savings in the bank. On ther other hand, serious mental illnesses prevent people to live and carry out a daily life and without assistance these people have a very little chanc e to stay stable and will soon be on the streets.
Group 3 No Support Network Group 4
Some homeless people have no social network of friends and family to ask for help when times get hard. This category of individuals can be a result of long stemming histories of verbally or physically abusive family lives and/or family deaths/tragedies. In addition to these life altering circumstances some people in this group have made the concious discission to be homeless due to an unexplained feeling of disengagement from society.
A job loss can leave individuals and families in desperate circumstances. Unemployment benefits and savings eventually run out, leaving people homeless who never thought it could happen to them.
Group 5 LOW WAGES
Group 6 VETERANS
This group of individuals simply can't afford to have a home because minimum wage is not a living wage.
It has been estimated that one-third of adult homeless men have served in the armed forces and 200,000 veterans may be homeless on any given night in the US. Additionally, veterans are considered to be at risk of poverty and can lack support from family and friends.
To summarize these groups Group 1 / Addiction represents the majority population of homeless individuals in the city (58%). Treatment programs that treat the root causes of addiction is needed as a first step for these people. The other 42% in the minority groups are all people who are both willing to work hard and know how to work hard but they lack the skills or support to get a job to pay rent and afford food and utilities.
Above all else, homelessness is a human issue. The people on our streets are mothers, fathers, sons and daughters. They are not strangers to be ignored and passed by. Homelessness is an issue that affects us all, and I believe these people are in need of a helping hand to get back into society. Therefore it is time we have a renewed focus on the issue.
71
JOB LOSS
Homeless Support & Training Center
JOB TRAINING
Adult Education Program
Employment Assistancy
TRANSITIONAL HOUSING
WORK & INTERNSHIP
Skilled Trades & Apprenticeship Education
On-Site Mission Bay
Transitional Housing / Affordable Housing
MEDICAL CARE RECREATION & CARE
Medical Care & Counseling
Child Care Center
Before & After School Recreation Program
73
PROGRAM STRATEGIES
72
EDUCATION WORK CARE
HOUSING
GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCES
IMPROVING HEALTH & POVERTY THROUGH RESEARCH , EDUCATION & CARE
SAN FRANCISCO
Homeless Support & Training Center
1. Research
With a mission of advancing health worldwide, UC San Francisco’s Global Health Sciences Department (GHS) is dedicated at every level to serving the public. GHS, as one of the world’s most esteermed health science research and teaching institutions, will uses it’s experience and expertise across multiple disciplines to address the needs of disadvantaged populations in San Francisco, United States, and Worldwide.
As a relatively new organization (founded 2003), GHS aims to continue the rich legacy of international health programs and projects in the training and research established by the UCSF faculty. Today GHS work on a growing number of educational, research, and action-oriented projects under way in more than 50 countries around the world.
With the new addition of San Francisco Homeless Support & Training Center to the Global Health Sciences Department in collaboration with the City of San Francisco, UCSF will now work locally to solve San Francisco’s biggest social issue as being “the homeless capital of America.” A title based on the staggering number of homeless people per capita at 1 in 64.
Based on these credentials, the goal of the current research program will be to develop a blueprint to guide the transition of homeless individuals back into society through job training, work and internships, as well as transitional housing programs. This opportunity will act as a win-win solutions for both the GHS faculty and homeless individuals enrolled in the educational programs at the training center. Further, faculty and underepresented individuals will now have a chance to work side by side to learn from eachother.
PROGRAM STRATEGIES 74
2. Education
Adult Education Program
This program will be for specific needs of individuals and provide on campus education support and assist in defining and completing specific educational goals. Classes and one-on-one tutoring will be provided in reading, writing, math and computer literacy. Classes in the GHS department will also be available to educate individuals about health sciences. Available ciricula will include: GHS 208 - Women's Health and Empowerment, GHS 210 (A,B) - Emerging Topics in Global Health, GHS 202B - Chronic Diseases and the Environment, and GHS 201A - Foundations of Global Health
Employment Resource Center
Will provide job readiness training to best prepare individuals for employment opportunities in the community. Some examples of skills taught will be: resume and cover letter building, interviewing skills, job searching and applying. Counseling and supervised job search will also be part of this program.
Skilled Trades & Apprenticeship Education
This program will be designed to prepare and train individuals for careers in the skilled trades and crafts. Apprenticeship combines on-the-job experience with technical classroom training. For some apprentices the classroom training can be taken upfront through a educational system, followed by on-the-job training.
After completing both the classroom and the on-the-job training, apprentices can receive a certificate of qualification allowing better employment prospects and increased opportunities for individuals. Available curricula will be Culinary Arts, Plant Nursery, Desktop Publishing, Medical Assistant Professions, Public Safety, Construction Trades, Carpentry & Welding.
The main purpose of the this training program is to stimulate and assist individuals in training programs designed to provide the skilled workers needed to compete in a global economy, but this program will also allow for a collaboration with the GHS Faculty, where ideas from the GHS Students can become a reality with the skills individuals will gain while attending the apprenticeship training program and lead to developments in new tools and technologies.
3. Care
Transitional Housing
This program will provide temporary residence for individuals and families qualifying for the Support & Training Center Program. Housing will be provided throughout the education and until people will develop stability in their lives.
Medical Care & Counseling
Homelessness is hazardous to a persons health and the experience of homelessness causes health problems and therefore a Medical Care & Counseling program will be available on site which will provide comprehensive medical services including primary care & treament, screening & health education.
Child Care center
Before & After School Recreation Program
Offering a before and after School Recreation Program throughout the school year would engage whole families. The program provides students with recreational, educational, and social opportunities in a safe environment while their parents get trained.
75
PROGRAMMATIC COMPOSITION
Skilled Trades & Apprenticeship
Program Space Requirements
Fabrication Shop
Welding Shop
Wood Shop
Gardens
Kitchen & Dining
Computer Lab
Workstations
Classrooms
Auditorium
Conference Room
Library
Reception
Open O ces
Private O ces
Medical Rooms
Consulting Rooms
Adult Education
Program Employment Res. Center
Medical Care & Counseling
Spatial Concept Diagrams
TRANSITION
INTERACTION
PHASING
SUPPORT
76
77 Lobby Adult Education Program Medical Care & Counseling Skilled Trades & Apprenticeship Education Direct Relationship Indirect Relationsip Sunlight Need Direct Relationship Indirect Relationsip Wood Shop 3000 SF Fabrication Shop 4000 SF Lobby / Exhibition Area 4000 SF Library 2000 SF No Sunlight Need Restaurant 1000 SF Private Garden 1000 SF Public Garden TBA Mission Hall Ground Floor Auditorium 2500 SF Conference Room 800 SF Computer Lab 500 SF Kitchen 500 SF 10 xClassroom 2000 SF 4 x Med. Room 800 SF 4 x Con. Room 480 SF 6 x O. O ce 720 SF 6 x P. O ce 720 SF Welding Shop 3000 SF Employment Resource Center SkilledTrades&Apprenticeship EducationMedicalCare& Counseling 10000SF 7240SF AdultEducation Program EmploymentResource Center Library Auditorium 7200SF Mission Hall Ground Floor ClassroomsComputerLab Fabrication Shop Welding Shop Wood Shop Gardens Kitchen & Dining Computer Lab Workstations Classrooms Auditorium Conference Room Library Reception Open O ces Private O ces Medical Rooms Consulting Rooms Skilled Trad. & Apprenticeship Adult Edu. Program Employment Res.Center Med. Care & Counseling
3.1 3.2 Private Public Public Space
FORM DEVELOPMENT
FORM GENERATION
79
GROUND FLOOR SECOND FLOOR
81 SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/32”=1’ 0” N
Classroom 2. Conference Room 3. Computer Lab 4. Auditorium 5. Wood Shop 6. Sheet Metal & Fabrication Shop 7. Welding Lab 8. Open Work Area 9. Interior Exhibition 10. Coffeshop & Deli Fresh 11. Public Park 12. Exterior Exhibition 13. Shared Courtyard 14. Waiting Area & Lounge 15. Medical & Counseling 16. Private Offices 17. Electrical & Janitorial 18. Storage 19. Book Storage 20. Library 21. Observation Deck 22. Rooftop Gardens SECTION A-A SCALE 1/8”=1’ 0” SECTION SCALE 1/8”=1’
1.
FLOOR
80 GROUND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/32”=1’ 0” N
PLANS
82 SECTION A-A SCALE 1/8”=1’ 0” SECTION SCALE 1/8”=1’ NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/8”=1’ SECTION SCALE 1/8”=1’ SECTION B-B SCALE 1/8”=1’ 0” SOUTH EAST ELEVATION SECTION C-C SCALE 1/8”=1’ 0” SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/8”=1’ 0” SECTION A-A SCALE 1/8”=1’ 0” NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/8”=1’ 0” SECTION B-B SCALE 1/8”=1’ 0” EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/8”=1’ 0” SECTION A-A SCALE 1/32”=1’ 0” SECTION B-B SCALE 1/32”=1’ 0” SECTION C-C SCALE 1/32”=1’ 0”
SECTIONS & ELEVATIONS
83 SOUTH ELEVATION ELEVATION ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/8”=1’ 0” EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/8”=1’ SECTION SCALE 1/8”=1’ SECTION B-B SCALE 1/8”=1’ 0” SOUTH SCALE 1/8”=1’ EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/8”=1’ 0” WALL SECTION A-A SECTION C-C SCALE 1/8”=1’ 0” SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/8”=1’ 0” NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/32”=1’ 0” EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/32”=1’ 0” SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/32”=1’ 0”
ATMOSPHERIC RENDERINGS
WALL SECTION A-A
84
R.1
R.3
R.2
R.5
R.4
85 R.1
ATMOSPHERIC RENDERINGS
R.2
86
R.3 87
ATMOSPHERIC RENDERINGS
R.4
88
89 R.5
STRUCTURAL PLANS
SECOND FLOOR FRAMING
90 OPEN OPEN W16 W12 W12 W16 W16 W16 W16 W12 W12 W12 W16
PLAN SCALE 1/24”=1’ 0”
WALL SECTION A-A SCALE 1/4”=1’ 0” FILTER FABRIC COARSE DRAINAGE DRAIN PIPE F L O O R F I N I S H RAISED FLOOR SYSTEM CONCRETE SLAB MOISTURE BARRIER SAND BASE COARSE DRAIN MAT RIGID INSULATION DAMP PROOFING FOUNDATION WALL EXPANSION JOINT 2% SLOPE PERFORATED COPPER MESH JOINT SEALANT WITH BACKER ROD TYP. HEAD W16 WIDE FLANGE BEAMS METAL DECKING CONCRETE TOPPING RADIANT FLOOR HEATING GYPSUM BOARD FINISHED FLOOR W16 WIDE FLANGE BEAMS METAL DECKING CONCRETE TOPPING BALLAST PLYWOOD DECK VAPOUR BARRIER INSULATION WATERPROOF MEMBRANE PROTECTION LAYER DRAINAGE FILTER LAYER GROWING MEDIUM VEGETATION OPERABLE SLIDING WINDOW DETAIL A-A-1 DETAIL A-A-2 STRUCTURAL WALL DETAILS 92
W16 WIDE FLANGE BEAMS METAL DECKING CONCRETE TOPPING RADIANT FLOOR HEATING GYPSUM BOARD FINISHED FLOOR
WIDE FLANGES BEAMS WELDED TOGETHER & TO THE COLUMNS
MOMENT CONNECTION
DETAIL A-A-1
SCALE 1/2”=1’ 0”
Z CLIP CONNECTS PANELS TO BEAMS
BUILDING SYSTEMS
1. Green Rooftop
2. Reduced Heat Island Effect
3. Diffused Daylighting
4. Operable Windows
5. Natural Cross & Stack Ventilation
6. Daylight Sensors
7. Stormwater Collection & Re-use
8. High Performance Glazing System
9. Perforated Copper Facade
10. Daylight Acess to Save Energy
4 6 3 1 5 7 8 9 10 2
94
Diffused Daylight into Major Atrium Space through Parametric Skylights
XDirect Sunlight
X Interior Glare
X Interior Overheating
X Not ideal in working spaces due to high level of distraction.
Perforated openings enable interior spaces to benefit from Diffused Natural Light, filtered in such a way that it reduces the glare of direct sunlight and resulting in an environment that is conducive to relaxation and working.
LEED Standard
Blocking Direct Sunlight
Provides insulation during Winter & Reduction of heat gain in Summer
95
3
Green Rooftop - Transforming Dead Space into Garden Space 1
1.1 Thermal Mass Effect - Poorly insulated roofs, as found on many existing buildings, will lead to overheating of spaces beneath them during summer, and excessive heating demand during the winter. The Green Roof will provide thermal insulation helping keep the conditioned space cooler in the summer and warmer in the winter while reducing energy costs.
1.2 Lessen the Urban Heat Island effect - Like most big cities, San Francisco is a hot spot. The solar energy absorbed into the concrete buildings and asphalt street surfaces is transformed into heat, making it significantly hotter than surrounding rural areas. Green Roofs absorbs the energy from the sun and converts it to sensible heat.
1.3 Local Grown Organic Food - The Green Rooftops will provide natural and organic food options for the local community to buy in the Deli Fresh Market located at the corner of 3rd and 16th street. This will reduce transportation emissions being used in roof-to-plate deli fresh market concept and establish a business model by selling locally grown organic food.
2.1 - Rainfall Retention- Green roofs significantly reduce stormwater runoff, typically retaining 65% in dry season and 30% in wet season of the annual rainfall in San Francisco and retarding the runoff of most of the remainder.
2.2 - Stormwater Collection - A Stormwater Management system is added to supply the buildings irrigation system and grey water requirements. 1. Gutters will collect and funnel the water to the pipes. 2. Pipes channels the water to a filtration system. 3. The filtered water flowing under gravity fills a underground water storage tank, this process of filling requires no external power. 4. The building requires water pressure which is provided by a pump and water is provided by the storage tank.
2.2 - Rainwater Re-use - After treatment the rainwater will be re-used in toilet flushing in the building and to irrigate the green roofs which will reduce use of city water up to 286 000 gallons per year.
96
BUILDING SYSTEMS
1.1 1.2
100 F 80 F 2.1 2.2
1.3 97
Vegetation Growing Medium Filter Layer Drainage Protection Layer Waterproof Membrane Insulation Vapour Barrier Plywood Deck
2.3