Advocate October 2021 by Baltimore County Bar Association

Advocate

The

October 2021

Newsletter of the Baltimore County Bar Association

VOLUME XXXI, NO. 3

100 Years

Celebrating Our Centennial

Special Thanks to the Annual Sponsors of the Baltimore County Bar Association Title Sponsor - Law Firm Albers & Associates

October 2021

Partner Sponsor - Law Firm Rice, Murtha & Psoras

Title Sponsor - Corporate Growth Solutions Team

Partner Sponsor - Corporate Sandy Spring Bank

Signature Sponsors - Corporate Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Multi-Specialty HealthCare Vallit Advisors

Supporter Sponsors - Corporate AbacusNext Health Quest The Advocate

The President’s Message from committee participation, events and leadership roles, made even easier through the My Communities link on the MYBCBA tab on our website.

Our 100-Year Membership Kickoff event, The Party in the Plaza, on the evening of Thursday, September 23rd, was “exactly what our legal community needed.” These six words, expressed to me by the Honorable Judge Dennis Robinson at our June Stated Meeting, were echoed by so many others during the event and since. But what does our legal community need exactly? Our legal community needed this celebration of service and friendships, especially after the past 18 months that we have all witnessed and to which we have adapted. Such events create a thriving bar association, which in turn promotes a unique camaraderie among attorneys and between the bench and the bar. Further, a thriving bar association cultivates leadership opportunities in a way no other platform can. And so special events, like our in-person 100Year Membership Kickoff event, afford us the opportunities to strengthen our bonds to one another safely and to create new ones as well. The Party in the Plaza was especially memorable because of the dozens of volunteers who offered their time before and throughout the evening. Fortunately, the BCBA is truly blessed with so many members willing to serve, while developing friendships and connections that last a career and beyond. Most of our volunteers step up multiple times each year, and we always welcome new faces and enthusiasm. Each member of the BCBA is afforded an array of opportunities,

We have many events scheduled for this year, especially between now and the Prom on January 27, 2022, and we will continue to assess the ever-changing risks and developments as our larger community continues to struggle to contain this pandemic. We welcome the input of our members on these and other issues. Indeed, this is also why this year is the right time to chart our course for the next 10 years with a formal Long-Range Planning Report. So, when you soon see my weekly e-mails with the link to our membership survey, please take 30 seconds or so to complete it and to share your thoughts. Your responses will provide an invaluable perspective to shape the Long-Range Planning Report, which we expect will be generated by the end of April 2022. In the meantime, we hope you like the new and improved format of The Advocate as much as we do. It is time to freshen the presentation of our monthly activities, and we would love to hear your feedback. Finally, I am so pleased that the “official” kickoff of our 100-year celebrations this year was so well-received and just downright fun. After a morning of torrential downpours following a week of ominous weather forecasts for the 23rd, the surprisingly beautiful weather by noon and throughout the party gave it a magical quality enhanced by the band, The Jury, and food and drinks and decorations, which were spectacular. We hope you will also cherish the Century Album and maybe discover something you never knew about our wonderful association. If you did not yet receive your free copy of the Century Album, please stop by the Bar Office to pick up your copy or, better yet, come to our events this year, where we also plan to bring copies for those members who have not received one. Stay well and safe.

The Advocate

- Stanford G. Gann, Jr. Your 103rd President of the Baltimore County Bar Association

October 2021

2021-22 Officers

President President-Elect Secretary Treasurer

Standford G. Gann, Jr. John G. Turnbull III Lisa Y. Settles Sondra M. Douglas

Executive Council Richard Grason VI Robert K. Erdman, Jr. Tyler J. Nowicki Michelle Daugherty Siri Alaina L. Storie Mariela D’Alessio Jay D. Miller, Immediate Past President Adam E. Konstas, Young Lawyers Chair

The Advocate Tracee Orlove Fruman Committee Chair Tommy Tompsett Committee Vice-Chair

Contributing Writers William F. Alcarese, Jr. Michael S. Barranco Tracee Orlove Fruman Dylan Gerry Wendy Meadows Judge Joseph F. Murphy, Jr. Matt Paavola Jennifer W. Ritter Raphael J. Santini, Jr. Erika C. Surock Tommy Tompsett Kathleen Wobber

Calendar of Events Please go to www.bcba.org and click on Calendar for an up-to-date listing of programs, events, and to register for all programs and events.

Inside This Edition 100 Year Celebration Recap.................................................. 10 Ask the Trial Doctor.............................................................. 32 Baseball & Crabs Event......................................................... 28 Committee Reports: Diversity & Includion........................... 19 Committee Reports: Professionalism..................................... 19 Criminal Law Update............................................................ 18 District Court Schedule........................................................... 4 Family Law Intake Process..................................................... 16 Family Law Meet & Greet..................................................... 14 In Chambers with Judge Stringer.......................................... 26 Judge Deeley Retirement....................................................... 20

The Advocate is a monthly publication of the Baltimore County Bar Association informing its members about current events relating to law. Articles do not necessarily reflect the official position of the BCBA and publication does not constitute an endorsement of views expressed.

Lawyers Assistance................................................................. 33

The contents of advertisements are the responsibility of the advertisers and are not recommendations or endorsements by The Advocate.

Spotlight on Law Clerks......................................................... 24

Publication deadline: 10th of the month preceding publication.

Wellness with Wendy.............................................................. 30

October 2021

New October 1, 2021 Laws..................................................... 5 Spotlight on Albers & Associates............................................ 23 Spotlight on New District Court Judges................................. 21

The Advocate

Court Notices October District Court Schedule BALTIMORE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT JUDGES’ ASSIGNMENT FOR OCTOBER 2021 1

8-1 #1

MWS

8-1 #2

KDP

8-1 #3

8-1 #4 8-1 #5

GJP

8-1 #7

KYW

GJP

MWS

KYW

GJP

KYW

8-1 #8

GJP

8-4 #1

PNT/pm

8-4 #2

SCZ

8-4 #3

KJR

PNT

KJR

8-4 #4

MLR

8-4 #5

8-4 #6

PNT

KMT

PNT

8-5 #1

LAP

KJR

PNT

8-5 #2

BEF

8-5 #3

MTP

DJW*

8-1 #6

Chambers

PNT/am DJW*

PNT/pm

SCZ

VJ*

SCZ

VJ*

SCZ

KJR

KMT

KJR

MLR

GJP

PNT

GJP

PNT

KMT

LAP

BEF

KJR

BEF

MTP

MWS

MTP

PNT/am DJW*

GJP

DJW*

PNT/am

GJP SCZ

PNT GJP DJW*

PNT MWS

PNT DJW*

PNT/am

PNT GJP DJW*

PNT SCZ DJW*

PNT MWS

JUDGES KYW- Kevin Y. Wiggins, KDP- Keith D. Pion, KP-Karen Pilarski, KMT-Kimberly M. Thomas, PNT-Philip N. Tirabassi, LR- Leo Ryan, MLR-Marsha L. Russell, MTP-Michael T. Pate, LAP-Lisa A. Phelps, DJW-Dorothy J. Wilson, GJP-Guido J. Porcarelli, MWS- Michael W. Siri, BEF-Bruce E. Friedman, KRJ-Krystin J. Richardson, SCZ-Susan C. Zellweger *VJ Indicates Visiting Judge to be assigned Judges’ assignments are subject to change without further notice

Please be on the lookout in early November for a Membership Survey. The BCBA annually seeks input from our members to prepare for our comprehensive Planning Report this Bar Year to enhance the good and address any concerns to help us be more successful as we proceed forward. Our goal with this important Planning Project is to implement desired changes to make the BCBA membership experience even more rewarding. If you are interested in serving on the BCBA Planning Committee or in the Planning process and the planned Retreat from which our Report will be generated, please e-mail President Gann at sgannjr@levingann.com. We hope all members will take a few minutes to complete the survey by mid-November, as it will be invaluable as we proceed. Of course, we always welcome your feedback and support within and beyond a formal survey. Thank you.

The Advocate

October 2021

New Laws Effective October 1, 2021 According to the State Constitution, approved laws take effect on the first day of June after the session in which they were passed, except when a later date is specified in the act, or the bill is declared an emergency measure. For many years, most laws took effect July 1. During the 1992 Session, however, October 1 began to be used as the standard effective date for legislation, coinciding with the start of the federal government’s fiscal year. The following synopsis is not an exhaustive report of all the laws that become effective this October 1 and may impact the actual practice of law or how you approach your next case: Civil Matters Civil Actions - Financial Exploitation of Susceptible Adults and Older Adults Senate Bill 327: Maryland SAFE Act will establish a civil cause of action that a financially exploited “susceptible adult” or “older adult” may bring against a financial exploiter of the susceptible or older adult. The cause of action authorized under the bill survives the death of the susceptible or older adult. The cause of action is also in addition to and cumulative with any other criminal or administrative claims, legal or equitable cause of action, and other remedies available to the susceptible or older adult. The bill authorizes specified individuals, as well as the Consumer Protection Division and the Division of Securities within the Office of the Attorney General, to bring an action on behalf of a susceptible or older adult. A plaintiff in such an action may recover compensatory damages, treble damages, and other specified remedies. Action for Change of Name Senate Bill 581/House Bill 39 requires a court, on motion by an individual who has filed an action for change of name under Maryland Rule 15-901, to waive the publication requirement set forth in the Rule. It should be noted that Maryland Rule 15-901 sets forth procedures for a change of name other than in connection with an adoption or divorce. Counsel Fees – Protective Order Cases House Bill 744 will prohibit a circuit court clerk from collecting a fee for docketing the appearance of a petitioner’s or a respondent’s counsel in a domestic violence protective order case.

Peace Orders – Workplace Violence Senate Bill 105/House Bill 289 will authorize an employer to file a petition for a peace order that alleges the commission of specified acts against the petitioner’s employee at the employee’s workplace. The employer must notify the employee before filing for the peace order. The bill extends most existing statutory provisions relating to the filing, issuance, and modification of peace orders, as well as the shielding of related court records, to peace orders filed by employers on this basis. An employer may not retaliate against an employee who does not provide information for or testify at a peace order proceeding. An employer is immune from any civil liability that may result from the failure of the employer to file a petition for a peace order on behalf of an employee; however, on October 1, 2023, this immunity provision terminates and is no longer applicable. Disclosure Statements – Corporate Court Filings Senate Bill 335 will require a nongovernmental corporate party to file one copy of a disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. The disclosure statement must: (1) identify any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock; (2) identify any member or owner in a joint venture or limited liability corporation; (3) identify all partners in a partnership or limited liability partnership; (4) identify any corporate member, if the party is any other unincorporated association; or (5) state that there is no such corporation. Guardian of Property of Minor or Disabled Person - Prohibition on Distribution or Disbursement House Bill 1000 will prohibit a guardian of the property of a minor or disabled person, who is not a family member of the minor or disabled person as defined below, from distributing or disbursing property without court authorization or confirmation if the distribution or disbursement would financially benefit (1) the guardian (except for specified reasonable compensation and reimbursement for expenses) or (2) a family member of the guardian. (continued on pg 6)

October 2021

The Advocate

Indecent Exposure sans Exposure

(New October 1, 2021 Laws continued)

A guardian who violates this prohibition is liable for breach of the guardian’s fiduciary duty to the minor or disabled person or to interested persons for resulting damage or loss to the same extent as a trustee of an express trust. “Family member” means a child, parent, spouse, grandparent, brother, sister, uncle, or aunt by blood, adoption, or marriage. Wills, Powers of Attorney, and Advance Directives – Electronic Execution House Bill 1261 will change the method in which wills, powers of attorney (POA), and advance directives may be executed by (1) allowing wills and POAs to be executed electronically and witnessed remotely; (2) allowing written or electronic advance directives to be witnessed remotely; (3) defining electronic presence for purposes of remote witnessing; (4) providing requirements and protections for the proper use of electronic signing and remote witnessing; and (5) establishing that wills, POAs, and advance directives executed in conformance with specified executive orders during the time they were in effect are deemed in conformity with the bill’s provisions. The bill applies retroactively to any will, POA, or advance directive executed on or after March 10, 2020. Criminal Matters Juvenile Restoration Act The MGA passed Senate Bill 494/House Bill 409, Juvenile Restoration Act (the Act). The Act first provides that mandatory minimum sentencing requirements do not apply to minors tried and convicted as adults. Similarly, the bill prohibits a court sentencing a minor convicted as an adult to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole or release. Finally, the bill provides an inmate who was convicted as an adult for an offense committed when the inmate was still a minor and has been in prison for at least 20 years an opportunity to file an additional motion for modification of sentence. A judge may not modify, meaning reduce, the sentence unless the judge finds, after a hearing, that “the individual is not a danger to the public” and that “the interests of justice will be better served by a reduced sentence.” 6

Senate Bill 270 will establish that the offense of indecent exposure includes engaging in an act of masturbation in public, whether or not the person’s genitalia are exposed. Violators will be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to the existing statutory penalty of imprisonment for up to three years and/or a $1,000 maximum fine. Sexting – Juvenile Court Under House Bill 180, “Sexting” is defined as: (1) the sending of a photograph, image, or video that depicts “sexual conduct” or “sexual excitement” of oneself to another (or depicts such content of oneself and the recipient) by mobile telephone, computer, or other electronic or digital device or (2) the receipt and retention of a photograph, image, or video meeting these requirements However, sexting does not include such conduct if: (1) the sender is more than four years older than the recipient; (2) the recipient is more than four years older than the sender; (3) the child did not consent to committing the conduct constituting the violation; or (4) the child was coerced, threatened, or intimidated into committing the conduct constituting the violation. A juvenile respondent may present as a mitigating factor in a juvenile court proceeding for a violation of § 11-203 (sale or display of obscene item to minor), § 11-207 (production or distribution of child pornography), or § 11-208 (possession of child pornography) of the Criminal Law Article that the violation involved or arose out of sexting. When making a disposition on a finding that a child committed a violation of §§ 11-203, 11-207, or 11-208, the juvenile court: •

must take into consideration whether the mitigating factor described above applies to the case;

•

may not make a disposition of community detention or commit the child to the custody or under the guardianship of the Department of Juvenile Services, the Maryland Department of Health, or a public or licensed private agency if the violation involved or arose out of sexting, unless the court finds and explains on the record, verbally and in writing, that extraordinary circumstances exist to warrant

The Advocate

October 2021

committed custody; and •

may order a child whose violation involved or arose out of sexting to participate in an age-appropriate educational program on the risks and consequences of possessing, sending, displaying, and publishing photographs, images, and videos as described above.

•

a statement as to whether the search warrant can effectively be executed during daylight hours and, if not, what facts or circumstances preclude effective execution in daylight hours; and

•

a list of any additional occupants of the premises by age and gender, as well as an indication as to whether any individuals with cognitive or physical disabilities or pets reside at the premises, if known.

Criminal Citations Under Senate Bill 671/House Bill 445, a police officer is not required to charge a defendant by citation for a misdemeanor or local ordinance that carries a penalty of imprisonment for 90 days or less if the misdemeanor or violation involves serious injury or an immediate health risk. Statute does not currently contain an exception for serious injury/immediate health risk. The bill retains the current statutory exceptions for specified offenses. The offenses for which an officer may charge by citation are expanded to include possession of a controlled dangerous substance other than marijuana. Recall of Arrest Warrants A District Court Judge or a Circuit Court Judge, on a finding of good cause, will be able to recall an arrest warrant issued by a District Court commissioner and then issue a summons in its place thanks to the passage of Senate Bill 862/House Bill 366. No Knock Search Warrants Senate Bill 178 will require written preapproval of an application for a no-knock warrant by a police supervisor and the State’s Attorney. In addition, the bill repeals the ground for issuance of a no-knock search warrant based on reasonable suspicion to believe that the property subject to seizure may be destroyed, disposed of, or secreted. An application for a no-knock search warrant will now have to contain: •

a description of the evidence in support of the application;

•

an explanation of the investigative activities that have been undertaken and the information that has been gathered to support the request for a no-knock search warrant; • an explanation of why the affiant is unable to detain the suspect or search the premises using other, less invasive methods;

•

acknowledgement that any police officers who will execute the search warrant have successfully completed the same training in breach and call-out entry procedures as SWAT team members;

October 2021

A no-knock search warrant can only be executed between 8:00 a.m. and 7 p.m., absent exigent circumstances. Possession of Ransomware Senate Bill 623/House Bill 425 will prohibit a person from knowingly possessing “ransomware” with the intent to use the ransomware for the purpose of introduction into the computer, computer network, or computer system of another person without the authorization of the other person. The bill does not apply to a person who has a bona fide scientific, educational, governmental, testing, news, or other similar justification for possessing ransomware. Violators will be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment for up to two years and/or a maximum fine of $5,000. The bill also prohibits an individual from committing a ransomware offense with the intent to interrupt or impair the functioning of a health care facility or a public school, and if the aggregate amount of the loss is $10,000 or more, an individual is guilty of a felony and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding ten years or a fine not exceeding $100,000 or both. Decriminalization of Drug Paraphernalia for Administration With the passage of Senate Bill 420/House Bill, a hypodermic syringe, needle, or any other object or combination of objects adapted to administer a controlled dangerous substance (CDS) by hypodermic injection will not be considered “controlled paraphernalia” under the Maryland Criminal Law Article. Accordingly, the bill alters an element of the criminal prohibition against possession or distribution of controlled paraphernalia to include possession or distribution of controlled paraphernalia for purposes of manufacturing, distributing, or dispensing, rather than “administering,” a CDS.

The Advocate

(continued on pg 8)

(New October 1, 2021 Laws continued)

The bill also removes a measuring spoon as an item commonly used to illegally manufacture, distribute, or dispense a CDS for purposes of establishing an unlawful intent to use controlled paraphernalia. Finally, the bill then reduces penalties related to controlled paraphernalia from a maximum penalty of four years imprisonment and/or a $25,000 fine to a maximum penalty of one year imprisonment and/or a $1,000 fine. Subsequent offender penalties for violation of the prohibitions against the use or possession of drug paraphernalia and delivery or sale of drug paraphernalia also decrease from a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment and/or $2,000 fine to a maximum penalty of one year imprisonment and/or $1,000 fine. Automatic Expungements Senate Bill 201/HB 1269 requires that any police record, court record, or other record maintained by the State or a political subdivision of the State relating to the charging of a crime or a civil offense for possession of less than 10 grams of marijuana, including a must-appear violation of the Transportation Article, must be expunged three years after a disposition of the charge if no charge in the case resulted in a disposition other than acquittal, dismissal, not guilty, or nolle prosequi, excluding a nolle prosequi with a requirement of drug or alcohol treatment. If willing to waive potential tort claims, the bill also requires the court to notify eligible defendants of the existing right to petition-based expungement under § 10-105 of the Criminal Procedure Article. The court must notify the defendant by mail if the defendant is not present in court for the disposition. The required notice by the court must include a written form for general waiver and release of all tort claims relating to the charge or charges eligible for expungement. Driving on a Canceled, Suspended, Refused, or Revoked License/Privilege

Senate Bill 17 establishes the offense of life-threatening injury by motor vehicle or vessel – criminal negligence. A person is prohibited from causing a life-threatening injury to another as a result of driving, operating, or controlling a motor vehicle or vessel in a criminally negligent manner. A violator will be guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to maximum penalties of imprisonment for one year and/or a fine of $5,000. Gender Identity – Hate Crimes “Gender identity” will be included on the list of protected classes under existing hate crime statutes thanks to the passage of Senate Bill 220/House Bill 128. “Gender identity,” as defined in § 20-101 of the State Government Article. The bills also (1) authorize a sentencing court to order a person convicted of a hate crime to complete an antibias education program and (2) require the University System of Maryland to manage the development of an antibias education program. “Gender identity” means the gender-related identity, appearance, expression, or behavior of a person, regardless of the person’s assigned sex at birth, which may be demonstrated by the consistent and uniform assertion of the person’s gender identity or any other evidence that the person sincerely holds gender identity as part of his/her core identity. Mitigation and Defense based on Discovery of Victim’s Status Senate Bill 46/House Bill 231 will establish that the discovery or perception of, or belief about, another person’s race, color, national origin, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation, whether or not accurate, (1) does not constitute legally adequate provocation to mitigate a homicide from murder to manslaughter and (2) is not a defense to the crime of assault in any degree. Child Abuse – Continuing Course of Conduct

Senate Bill 114 allows convictions for driving on a canceled, suspended, refused, or revoked license/privilege to be expunged. The bill also establishes that the subsequent offender penalty under § 16-303 of the Maryland Transportations Article only applies when a person violates § 16-303 within three years of a prior conviction under § 16-303.

Life Threatening Injury Involving a Motor Vehicle – Criminal Negligence

Senate Bill 505/House Bill 277 establishes that an individual who engages in a continuing course of conduct that includes three or more acts of second-degree child abuse will now be a violation of the State’s prohibition on first-degree child abuse. A violator can be found guilty of a felony and subject to imprisonment for up to 25 years.

The Advocate

October 2021

Worth Noting Minor Consent to Mental Health Treatment Senate Bill 41/House Bill 132 establishes that a minor who is at least age 12 and is determined by a health care provider to be mature and capable of giving informed consent, has the same capacity as an adult to consent to consultation, diagnosis, and treatment of a mental or emotional disorder by the health care provider or a clinic. A minor younger than age 16, however, may not consent to the use of prescription medications to treat a mental or emotional disorder. Involuntary Admission Application – LCWS Senate Bill 466/House Bill 689 authorizes a licensed certified social worker-clinical (LCSW-C) or a licensed clinical professional counselor (LCPC), in conjunction with a physician, to (1) certify an individual for involuntary

admission to a facility or a Veterans’ Administration (VA) hospital and (2) assent to the voluntary admission of a minor to the child or adolescent unit of a State facility. Currently, both psychologists and psychiatric nurse practitioners are able to sign such certificates so long as they are joined by a licensed physician. This bill would add the highest level of professional social workers to the list of people authorized to join with doctors in signing such a certificate. Disclosure of Notary’s Address and Phone Number Senate Bill 132 was introduced to shield the home address or home telephone number of notaries public by requiring that a custodian of a public record can only allow inspection of the part of a public record that includes this information only if the notary public has not provided the custodian with a business address or business telephone number. – Tommy Tompsett

Baltimore County Bar Association Judicial Selections Committee Are you applying for a judicial vacancy? Or interested in the judicial selection process? Want to get more involved in the BCBA and our legal community? We have an exciting opportunity for you! The BCBA has recently established a Judicial Selections Committee to provide input on applicants to judicial vacancies throughout Baltimore County. What does this mean? If you’re an applicant, please make sure to add “Baltimore County Bar Association” on page 3 of the application where it lists which organizations you wish to receive a copy of your Questionnaire.

If you’re interested in joining the Committee please submit an application by clicking HERE. You must be a member in good standing of the BCBA and not currently an applicant for a judicial vacancy. Space is limited. Applications for Committee membership must be received no later than October 19th. Committee members will participate in virtual interviews of applicants as vacancies arise and help provide recommendations to the Judicial Nominating Commissions. The interview and recommendation process is confidential and all members must consent to a Confidentiality Policy.

For questions or more information, please reach out to Rachel Ruocco at rruocco@bcba.org. October 2021

The Advocate

100th Year Celebration

bcba celebrates

100 Years with a party in the plaza

On Thursday, September 23, 2021, the weather forecast was ominous, but nothing could dampen our spirits as preparations forged ahead for the BCBA’s “Party in the Plaza. Finally, as 5 p.m. approached, the clouds gave way to a beautiful, early fall evening, just in time to welcome BCBA members and guests to the beautifully renovated Patriot Plaza in front of the Circuit Courthouse. Balloon arches festively marked the entrances, a step-and-repeat stood at the ready for partiers to mark the occasion with photographs, and food trucks lined up along the street. It was the perfect way to celebrate 100 years of the BCBA. “The Party in the Plaza was a great way to start off the bar year. We saw seasoned BCBA members and were able to sign up many new members. It was so exciting to be a part of the centennial event and kudos to everyone involved in the planning,” said Laurie Wasserman, BCBA member and event volunteer. The planning committee outdid themselves with every aspect of the event. There was a delicious cupcake tower, live music provided by The Jury, swag bags and prizes, a Century Album, and enough food and drink for all in attendance. No detail was spared for this momentous occasion. Even the first 100 attendees received royal blue umbrellas emblazoned with the BCBA’s logo (and when 100 people carry around umbrellas, Murphy’s Law dictates that the rain will stay away). One of the many highlights of the evening was the BCBA memorabilia available for perusal. Many photo albums filled with photographs of BCBA members past and present lined multiple tables. At a time when in-person gatherings have been limited due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was a treat to revisit BCBA events from when we took for granted the frivolity of being together indoors, without masks and social distancing requirements. Guests could even take home a print of the historic courthouse.

The Advocate

October 2021

Michelle Siri, who attended with her family, including the Honorable Michael Siri, said, “It was wonderful having an opportunity to get together and celebrate the Bar Association. So many people worked so hard to make it happen and the hard work paid off. From the band, to the cupcakes, to the yearbooks - everything was a perfect testament to why we love the BCBA - even the weather turned out perfect!” Judging from the smiles and laughter around the plaza, everyone in attendance shared Ms. Siri’s sentiments. Thank you to our volunteers who offered their time to plan and execute such a wonderful event: Michael Barranco, Cooper Beeson, Marc DiSimone, Suzanne Farace, Tracee Fruman, Stan Gann, Jr., Richard Grason, Syeetah Hampton-EL, Ari Kodeck, Christine Malanga, Jay Miller, Tyler Nowicki, Hoss Parvizian, Jane Rausenberger, Jennifer Ritter, Michelle Siri, Debra Thomas, Laurie Wasserman, and Kiernan Waters. The BCBA also extends our sincere thanks to Building Services, Sheriff Jay Fisher and his staff, Councilman David Marks, Congressman Dutch Ruppersberger, and our annual and Century Album sponsors. An extra special thank you goes to Rachel Ruocco and Amber Gaines, our wonderful BCBA staff. Thank you to our vendors who kept the attendees entertained and well-fed: Boss Burger, LLC, Dizzy Cow Pizzeria, FRESH Bakery, Mae Marie Events, Maryland Signs and Graphics, The Cow, The Jury, and Troyer’s Liquors. – Tracee Orlove Fruman

Photos Courtesy of Robyn Brody and Terri Beck

October 2021

The Advocate

Features

“Our 100-Year Membership Kickoff Party in the Plaza on September 23rd was a huge success thanks to our incredible BCBA team led by Rachel Ruocco and the dedication of so many volunteers, along with our vendors and sponsors. The surprisingly perfect weather was an added gift from above.” – Stanford G. Gann, Jr. BCBA President

The Advocate

October 2021

The Advocate

Court Notices Useful Family Law Tips Abound at the Family Law “Meet & Greet” Each year the Family Law Committee sponsors a “Meet and Greet” with the judges and magistrates. The event on September 9 was to be the first Family Law Committee in-person program since COVID, but unfortunately was derailed by Hurricane Ida, and rescheduled as a Zoom. Thankfully our intrepid organizer, Christine Malanga, defied the laws of boring Zoom meetings and presented a fabulous event! The event opened with Judges Jakubowski, Cavanaugh, and Epstein (formerly known as Magistrate Schenker) and Magistrates Woods, Paliath, and Polley providing a brief personal introduction that included their current assignments. What followed was a program (exactly one hour in length!) offering the following extremely helpful tips from the bench for family law practitioners: 1. Joint Statement of the Parties Concerning DecisionMaking Authority and Parenting Time (R. 9-204.2) Judge Cavanaugh started off the evening discussing the helpful hints in authoring and utilizing the Joint Statement regarding the children. Understanding that the Parenting Plan Tool and Joint Statement were rolled out just before COVID in January 2020, both the bench and bar did not have the opportunity to finetune how the documents would be used. Although the Joint Statement is filed prior to the settlement conference, just like another Joint Statement we all know and love, the bench also finds it useful to determine points of agreement and disagreement involving the children at a contested hearing. Judge Cavanaugh shared that the 9-204.2 Joint Statement helps her frame the issues and is an opportunity for counsel to give a written, “silent opening statement.“ It was noted that the disagreement section is most helpful in assisting a fact-finder in crafting a schedule for the children, particularly when the parties are very specific as to schedule provisions that are important to them. For example, parties should list important holiday traditions, if a unique work schedule exists that may indicate a less traditional access schedule, or if a party’s child has step- or half-siblings who might want to be together on the same schedule as the child. While the Rules require the Joint Statement be filed, the judges indicated that they would proceed through a hearing without one. However, Judge Jakubowski noted that she would not start a trial without a Statement of Marital and Nonmarital Property 9-207. Many months may pass between the time the 9-204.2 Joint Statement is filed before the settlement conference and the trial itself; thus, Judge Cavanaugh encouraged pre-trial amendments to the pleading.

The takeaway: Do not lose this valuable opportunity to advocate

for your client’s child custody and access position.

2. Baltimore County Visitation Center - The Visitation Center is staffed by judiciary employees who are either vaccinated or who (as of September 27, 2021) must provide weekly proof of a negative COVID test before they are permitted to interact with the public. After each visit and before the next family is permitted to utilize the space, the toys and the area are cleaned thoroughly, rendering the Visitation Center a safe space for families. While the Visitation Center currently has limited capacity due to COVID protocols, please note that there is currently no backlog in scheduling visits. If you are concerned about a client’s ability to access the Visitation Center, the panel agreed it would be appropriate to ask for language in an Order which allows for general supervised visitation without identifying the Visitation Center. 3. Custody Evaluation Process - Due to a large COVID backlog, custody evaluations requested in September are being scheduled in April 2022. Briana Shirey, Family Support Services Coordinator, shared that she is hiring additional staff and adjusting schedules to deal with the backlog. The judges agreed that a custody evaluation process might not be a useful tool if a family needs more immediate results. It was suggested that, in lieu of a custody evaluation, a BIA may be requested because the judges are becoming more “stingy“ with custody evaluations given the limited court resources. 4. BIA List Update – The BIA roster is being updated, and all who desire to be on the next BIA list, including current BIAs, are required to apply and update their information. If you wish to be included as a BIA on the court list you must provide your proof of training, résumé, proof of liability insurance, and indicate your willingness to take pro bono or “court pay” ($200/hr. with $2,000 limit) cases. If you are appointed as a pro bono or court-pay BIA, it was noted that you will be next on the list for a paid case. Unless otherwise agreed by counsel, BIA‘s are selected by the judges on a rotating basis. 5. Helpful Hint from the Clerk’s office - NEVER, EVER file an “Amended Judgment of Absolute Divorce,” as it creates confusion. If an amended judgment is needed, title it either “Amendment to Judgment of Absolute Divorce Nunc Pro Tunc” or the more favored “Supplemental Order“ (two words only, no other words in the title). When

The Advocate

October 2021

amending a judgment, please do so only by interlineation. For example, “In paragraph X of the Judgment of Absolute Divorce Dated September 1, 2021, Plaintiff’s surname should be corrected to ‘Smith.’ “

Editor’s Note: Given the possibility that your judgments may

need to be amended, numbering paragraphs in proposed judgments may be a helpful practice. 6. Mediation of Financial Issues (including child support) – Anna Walsh, Director of the Office of Family Mediation, shared that the parties and/or counsel must expressly consent to the mediation of financial issues, including child support, that they wish to discuss during the course of a child access mediation. The OFM routinely provides a “Consent to Extend Scope of Mediation” form in such circumstances and appreciates counsels’ prompt return of the signed form. 7. DCM Tips – If a party requests expanded services (home study, custody evaluation, etc.) during a scheduling conference, parties and counsel may not receive a pendente lite hearing date or settlement conference date until sometime after the scheduling conference. If this occurs, the DCM office will contact counsel via email with suggested dates. Please note that the dates will be automatically set if counsel does not reply in three business days. The takeaway: Do not let the DCM emails pass you by!

8. M e d i a t i o n / Family Services Intake Interviews – Beginning in October 2021, in conjunction with a research study being conducted by Indiana University, all family law cases that are set in for a scheduling conference will be screened prior to the conference (approximately two weeks out) for indications of Intimate Partner Violence and other high conflict issues. These “intake interviews” will be conducted either via Zoom as an interview with a staff member from the Office of Family Mediation or the Office of Family Services or as a self-administered, online questionnaire. Parties and counsel will receive a notice along with the scheduling conference notice that indicates the format for the interview. The interview is confidential, and attorneys do not participate. If a high level of IPV or risk of harm is indicated, the screener will provide the party with the contact information for the House of Ruth and the Women’s Law Center and advise the party to let their lawyer know they’ve received a referral. No counseling or legal advice will be provided. The screener will make a recommendation to the magistrate as to the appropriateness of mediation and whether the case should be further screened at the scheduling conference by a social worker. Parties’ responses to the interview questions will be protected as confidential mediation communications pursuant to Title 17. However, a client’s responses can be provided to respective counsel with the client’s consent. As OFM undertakes this new process, feedback from the Bar is welcome and can be directed to Anna Walsh at Anna. Walsh@mdcourts.gov. At the end of the meeting, a “prize wheel” was spun, and a few lucky attendees who stayed until the end received gift cards. Those who did not win gift cards nevertheless received valuable practice tips and a chance to informally Zoom with the judges and magistrates! – Kathleen M. Wobber

October 2021

The Advocate

Court Notices New Intake Process for Family Law Cases Beginning in October 2021, all family law cases set in for a scheduling conference will be screened prior to the conference (approximately two weeks out) for indications of Intimate Partner Violence and other high conflict issues. These “Intake Interviews” will be conducted either via Zoom as an interview with a staff member from the Office of Family Mediation or the Office of Family Services or as a self-administered online questionnaire. The interview is confidential, and attorneys do not participate. If a high level of IPV is indicated, the screener will provide the party with the contact information for the House of Ruth and the Women’s Law Center for purposes of domestic violence counseling and advise the party to let their lawyer know they’ve received a referral. No counseling or legal advice will be provided by the screener. A recommendation will be made to the Magistrate as to the appropriateness of mediation and whether the case should be further screened at the scheduling conference by a social worker for services such as a Child Access Evaluation. This new protocol is part of a research study with Indiana University on the use of the Mediator’s Assessment of Safety and Concerns-Short with Danger Assessment (MASIC-S with DA), a screening tool used to identify the existence of various types of abuse (e.g., physical violence, stalking, coercive control, etc.), and lethality indicators in cases prior to their referral to mediation. As part of the study, all family law cases involving child access will be screened using the MASIC-S with DA prior to the scheduling conference date. The screen will be administered in one of two ways: as a Zoom interview conducted by an OFM or Family Support Services staff member, or as a self-administered online interview to be completed independently by the party. Cases will be randomly assigned to one screening format or the other. Notices will be sent to each party (with counsel copied) assigning the method of screening and the appointment for the party’s Zoom interview or date by which the self-

administered online interview must be completed. These notices will start going out in late September for cases set in for scheduling conferences in October 2021. The staff of the Office of Family Mediation and the Office of Family Support Services will receive specialized training on the administration of the MASIC-S with DA as well as ongoing support from the research team at Indiana University. The MASIC-S is derived from the MASIC (Holtzworth-Monroe et al., 2010), which is a longer, empirically validated IPV screening tool. The MASIC-S with DA additionally incorporates items from the Danger Assessment (Campbell et al., 2009; Messing et al., 2017), a lethality risk assessment tool. In the event that a party’s responses indicate a heightened level of abuse or risk of danger, the party will be given a referral to the House of Ruth or other local IPV agency and encouraged to contact them for domestic violence counseling services. The screener will not provide counseling or legal advice. Represented parties will be told to let their attorney know that a referral was made for domestic violence counseling; there is no requirement that the party follows up on the referral. Attorneys are not expected to participate in the intake interview. All interview responses will be confidential and will be treated as confidential mediation communications under Title 17 of the Maryland Rules of Procedure, and therefore not subject to discovery; nor will they be shared with the court. However, a party’s responses can be shared with that party’s attorney upon request and with the party’s express consent.

Questions about the process should be directed to Annamaria Walsh, Director of the Office of Family Mediation, at anna.walsh@mdcourts.gov. – Annamaria Walsh

Save the Date Memorial Service November 18th at 3:30 16

The Advocate

October 2021

Get Back on Track with the Vision You Once Had for Your Business Now is the time to regain perspective and become strategic to make your vision a reality. Become the CEO of your firm, your career and your life. Now is the time to face reality, identify exactly where you want to take your practice and map out a course of action to make it happen. Our Small Business Advisory is a coaching and accountability program delivered quarterly in which we provide the structure and tools necessary for you take a step back and see the “big picture.”

Growth Solutions Team’s Small Business Advisory Program provides you: Structure to map out your vision, goals and a plan to achieve them

Real world, “Boots on the Ground” help from our Team to get your practice where you want to go

Content designed to further your knowledge and apply it immediately in your role as the leader in your organization

Private, individual coaching sessions to hold you accountable

Interact with colleagues to share ideas and gain insight from their experiences

Direction on how to leverage your resources Strategies to seize opportunities and reach your potential

Accountability is your KEY to success! Growth Solutions Team offers a wide variety of coaching solutions and tools for your practice to establish goals and help you meet them. Contact us today to determine the right solution for your practice. Because your practice is a BIG deal.

Phone: 443-501-2201 | Email: oﬃce@GSTeammail.com | GrowthSolutionsTeam.com

October 2021

The Advocate

Criminal Law Update This month the Court of Special Appeals addressed the issue of the proof necessary to satisfy the force or threat of force element in a conviction for a sexual offense based on that theory of prosecution. The case is Brown v. State, No. 1103, September Term, 2019. In 2013, the defendant, Dru Darren Brown, moved in with the victim’s family. He was the victim’s mother’s boyfriend. When the victim was 15 years old, the defendant began sexually abusing her. At trial, the victim described the first incidence of abuse. She testified that the defendant came to her room, which was isolated in the attic of the home. He offered her a massage, which she refused. He attempted to get her to take her clothing off but she refused and stated that she could defend herself. The defendant then put his hands around her neck, knocked her to the ground, and strangled her for several minutes. Because the defendant was so much larger than the victim, she tried but was unable to get away. After she stopped resisting, the defendant instructed her to take her clothing off, put a towel on the bed, and then he sexually abused her. The victim did not resist further out of fear of being strangled again. The abuse continued for the next year via the same modus operandi involving the act beginning as a massage and putting the towel on the bed. The defendant did not use actual force during any of the additional incidences. The defendant was convicted of Sexual Abuse of a Minor, CR 3-602, and 31 counts of sexual offenses in the Second Degree, CR 3-306, Rape, CR 3-304, and Third Degree Sex Offense, CR 3-307. The issue before the court was whether the evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant of the acts that occurred after the first incident in light of the fact that no force or threat of force was established in the subsequent acts. The court reviewed the history of force and threat of force in the case law and concluded that there were two required elements. The first required element focuses on the perpetrator. “The evidence must demonstrate that the conduct and words of the perpetrator ‘were reasonably calculated to create in the mind of the victim . . . a real apprehension, due to fear, of imminent bodily harm,

serious enough to impair or overcome [the victim’s] will to resist.’’ Brown, slip op at 19 (quoting Hazel v. State, 221 Md. 464, 469 (1960)). The second prong focuses on the victim. “The evidence must support a finding that the victim’s fear of imminent death or serious bodily harm must be both genuine and reasonable.” Brown, slip op. at 19 (quoting Rusk v. State, 289 Md. 230, 243-44 (1981)). The court went on to emphasize that “’threats of force need not be made in any particular manner’ and that ‘conduct, rather than words, may convey the threat.’” Id. When the threat of force is conveyed by conduct alone, the circumstances as created by the defendant will be considered. Examples of circumstances that convey intimidation or threat of force include but are not limited to: “(1) the status of the perpetrator as a figure of authority, (2) the physical appearance of the perpetrator, (3) the isolated or secluded nature of the location of the sexual assault, (4) the familiarity of the victim with such location, (5) the availability of assistance, (6) the opportunity to escape, (7) the time of day or night, (8) the nature of the sexual acts performed, and (9) the sobriety of the victim.” Brown, slip op. at 19-20 (citing Martin v. State, 113 Md. App. 190 249-50 (1996); Walter v. State 9 Md. App. 385, 392 (1970)). The circumstances as viewed from the victim’s perspective are to be considered when determining whether the victim’s subjective belief of threat of force was “’reasonably grounded.’” Brown, slip op. at 20 (quoting, Rusk, 289 Md. at 244). Applying the standard to the facts in Brown, the Court of Special Appeals concluded that actual force was used during the first assault. The subsequent assaults, conducted in the same modus operandi as the first where actual force was used, coupled with the isolated location of the victim’s bedroom, the position of authority the defendant held in the household, statements he made to indicate no one would believe her or come to her assistance, and the defendant’s physical size, all combined to equal the threat of force necessary to support the conviction. – Jennifer W. Ritter

Stated Meeting of the Baltimore County Bar Association Thursday, October 21, 2021 | 4:30pm Ceremonial Courtroom 5 Outdoor reception following at Barley’s Backyard on York Road 18

The Advocate

October 2021

BCBA Committee Reports Professionalism Report

Diversity & Inclusion Report

Attorneys belong to one of the most honorable professions by advocating for others during difficult times. From initial consultations to closing case files and everything in between, attorneys are always looking to improve their skills by staying current on recent developments related to the practice. Yet, professionalism, something preached to attorneys as soon as they became members of the bar, often becomes an afterthought.

On September 2, 2021 at 5:30 pm, the Diversity and Inclusion Committee hosted our first speaker of the year, Associate Dean Jose Bahamonde-Gonzalez, of the University of Maryland School of Law and Chief Diversity and Inclusion and Professional Development at Miles and Stockbridge, P.C. Dean Bahamonde-Gonzalez has been an active member of the National Association for Law Placement since 1992. He earned his B.S. in Management from the University of Massachusetts and his J.D. from the Syracuse University College of Law.

Attorneys, presumably, are aware of the Maryland Attorney’s Rules of Professional Conduct set forth at Md. Rule 19-300.01, et seq. Although, perhaps not as well known, the Ideals of Professionalism are in Appendix 19-B of the Maryland Rules too. Additionally, our BCBA has a Code of Professionalism too. From time to time, attorneys should review the Ideals of Professionalism and the Code of Professionalism and do a self-check to ensure they are conducting themselves appropriately. There is no monetary commitment involved with following the Ideals of Professionalism and the Code of Professionalism, only a personal commitment that will pay dividends. These principles are relatable across the profession, and in our personal lives too. Civility and integrity should apply in our interactions with other members of the bar as well as all the people we interact with on a day-to-day basis including a client, a self-represented litigant, office staff and courthouse personnel. Your reputation will always precede you. It takes a long time to build your reputation and a moment of indiscretion to tear it all down. Keep this in mind when confronted with a predicament. Consult the Ideals of Professionalism and the Code of Professionalism for guidance, if needed. As mentioned by Michael Barranco, Esq. in the September issue of The Advocate, the BCBA’s Code of Professionalism is being reviewed to consider whether it needs to be updated by the Professionalism Committee. If you would like to make suggestions, please submit an e-mail to Mike at mbarranco@frankdailylaw.com.

Dean Bahamonde-Gonzalez spoke about his personal experience as a native Spanish speaker and the challenges he encountered. The example he gave was not being allowed to use a dictionary while taking an exam in English. He also discussed how Miles and Stockbridge has implemented procedures and reviews in order to create and include a positive work environment for all employees. Dean Bahamonde-Gonzalez used a PowerPoint presentation which emphasized the definition of various terms: diversity, inclusion, equality, etc. I found most interesting the difference between equality and inclusion. All must be included, however, because of personal situations, the acclamation does not have to be equal. The example he gave was of a person in a wheelchair. The person in the wheelchair has to be given a larger office with accommodation to conduct business in a dignified and similar way to his co-employees. The other employees do not need a similar amount of space. Then Dean Bahamonde-Gonzalez presented a hypothetical for discussion in which the audience participated. The ensuing discussion was very thought-provoking and eyeopening. The Diversity and Inclusion Committee thanks Dean Bahamonde-Gonzalez for his time and for his help educating us. Please join us on October 7, 2021 by Zoom at 5:30 pm when our speakers will be Administrative Judge for Baltimore County, Dorothy Wilson and Administrative Clerk for Baltimore County, Maria Fields.

Additionally, the Professionalism Committee is currently seeking nominations for the J. Earle Plumhoff Professionalism Award. Nominations will be accepted through November.

– Raphael J. Santini, Chairperson

– William F. Alcarese, Jr.

October 2021

The Advocate

BCBA Spotlight The Retirement of the Hon. C. Carey Deeley, Jr. Judge Deeley’s extensive involvement with the Circuit Court for Baltimore County preceded his 2016 judicial appointment by many years, beginning with his service as law clerk to the Honorable Austin W. Brizendine from 1978 to 1979. It continued with his litigation practice at Cook, Howard, Downes and Tracy, and – after the Cook firm merged with Venable LLP in 1989 – in Venable’s Towson office. During his outstanding private practice, Judge Deeley’s contributions to the Maryland State Bar Association included service on its Board of Governors. His contributions to the Baltimore County Bar Association included service on the Executive Council and as president from 1996 to 1997. In 2006, Judge Deeley received the Judith P. Ritchey Award for outstanding service to the Baltimore County Bar Association. As was the case with Judge Brizendine, who was appointed to the circuit court at age 63, Judge Deeley brought to his judicial service the wisdom accumulated during his distinguished litigation practice, as well as the “people skills” of civility, courtesy, empathy, effective communication, and patience. It was, therefore, no surprise that Judge Deeley “hit the ground running” and provided such exemplary service to the citizens of Baltimore County.

Although Chesterton was a very astute man of letters, he was never a barrister or a solicitor or a magistrate or a judge. It is, therefore, no criticism of his observation about public officials to point out a fact that is known by few persons other than lawyers and judges: THE VERY BEST JUDGES NEVER GET USED TO IT! Judge Brizendine never did! Judge Deeley never did, and he never will! There has never been – and there never will be – an unimportant case or an unimportant person in Judge Deeley’s courtroom. Fortunately, (pursuant to the “call back” statute that permits the Court of Appeals to approve “constitutionally senile” judges for “retired, specially assigned” service), the Court of Appeals has approved Judge Deeley to serve in all of the Maryland circuit courts. The citizens of Maryland are fortunate that Judge Deeley will continue serving wherever he is needed. May he continue to do so for many, many years! – Judge Joseph F. Murphy, Jr.

Retired, Specially Assigned

Over 100 years ago, in On Tremendous Trifles, the great G. K. Chesterton observed: “[T]he horrible thing about all legal officials, even the best, … is not that they are wicked (some of them are good), not that they are stupid (several of them are quite intelligent), it is simply that they have got used to it. Strictly they do not see the prisoner in the dock; all they see is the usual man in the usual place. They do not see the awful court of judgment; they only see their own workshop.”

The Advocate

October 2021

Welcoming the Honorable Krystin Richardson The Honorable J. Krystin Richardson, newly appointed Associate Judge for the District Court of Maryland for Baltimore County, succeeds retired Judge Sally C. Chester. Judge Richardson served as an administrative law judge with the Office of Administrative Hearings from 2018 until her appointment. Prior to her appointment, she worked as an Assistant State’s Attorney in Baltimore County. Judge Richardson grew up in Prince George’s County and attended Fairmount Heights High School. While in high school, Judge Richardson was involved in several school activities. She was a cheerleader, a writer for the school newspaper, a member of the student government association and, most impressive of all, she was the valedictorian of her class. Judge Richardson attended the University of Maryland, Eastern Shore on a full academic scholarship where she graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in English, summa cum laude. Outside of the classroom, Judge Richardson was actively involved in the UMES community. She was a member of the cheerleading team, Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Incorporated, and the Sigma Tau Delta English Honor Society. In her senior year, Judge Richardson held the title of “Miss UMES.” Miss UMES, as “campus queen” is a student who is expected to be a person of high moral conduct and a student who shows a great deal of school spirit and pride. The role includes public speaking as a University spokesperson and serving as both a student role model and a new student recruiter. Judge Richardson used her platform as Miss UMES to partner with a school in Washington, D.C. that experienced loss from the 9/11 tragedy. Throughout and after college, Judge Richardson interned at Dickstein, Shapiro, Morin & Oshinsky, LLP where she screened new incoming business for any potential conflicts. After graduating from UMES, Judge Richardson attended the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law. After graduating from law school in 2007, Judge Richardson became a law clerk at the Baltimore County State’s Attorney’s Office. In 2008, after passing the bar exam, Judge Richardson transitioned from being a law clerk to an Assistant State’s Attorney in district court. She then went on to prosecute juvenile cases from 2011 to 2012 and then joined the circuit court trial team. In 2013, Judge Richardson prosecuted domestic violence and elder abuse cases for three years until she returned to district court in 2017 to serve as unit chief. As unit chief, Judge Richardson enjoyed being able to October 2021

Krystin Richardson mentor young Assistant State’s Attorneys and to help them learn how to try cases in district court. In 2018, Judge Richardson went on to serve as an administrative law judge with the Office of Administrative Hearings. She presided over a wide variety of hearings ranging in complexity from motor vehicle suspensions to multi-day special education hearings. While at OAH, Judge Richardson served on the hiring and ethics committees. She also worked on a committee that helped pilot remote OAH hearings during the pandemic. Judge Richardson enjoyed serving as an administrative law judge because she was able to expand her knowledge and breadth of the law. OAH played a significant role in Judge Richardson’s appointment to the bench and was a safe place for her to transition from being an advocate to a trier of fact. On June 14, 2021, Judge Richardson received the highly anticipated phone call from Governor Larry Hogan appointing her as associate judge for the District Court of Maryland for Baltimore County. As if that phone call wasn’t exciting enough, on that same day, Governor Hogan happened to be at OAH for an anniversary event and took the time to acknowledge and announce that Judge Richardson had been appointed in front of all her coworkers. It’s safe to say that Judge Richardson will never forget the moment she found out she had been appointed to the bench. Judge Richardson is extremely grateful for her experiences at the State’s Attorney’s Office and the Office of Administrative Hearings. As a newly appointed district court judge, her greatest hope is that everyone that appears before her leaves the courtroom feeling as though they had the opportunity to be heard, regardless of the outcome. She wants to make sure she never lets the citizens of Baltimore County down.

The Advocate

– Erika C. Surock 21

BCBA Spotlight Welcoming the Honorable Susan C. Zellweger The Honorable Susan C. Zellweger, newly appointed Associate Judge for the District Court of Maryland for Baltimore County, is an easy choice for this role. She has lived in and around Maryland since middle school, including residing in Montgomery County and attending Gaithersburg High School. Judge Zellweger attended the University of Delaware, where she pursued a bachelor’s degree in criminal justice. While at the University of Delaware, Judge Zellweger interned at the police department in Newark, Delaware and worked as a teaching assistant for a criminology class. Between college and law school, she worked as a paralegal for a real estate firm. After graduating from college, Judge Zellweger found her way back to Maryland and started law school at the University of Baltimore School of Law in 1994. While in law school, she studied abroad in Scotland during her first year. She also gained legal experience in law school while clerking for Richard Karceski, Esquire. After law school, while awaiting her bar exam results, Judge Zellweger served as a law clerk for the Honorable Alfred L. Brennan, Sr. in the Circuit Court from Baltimore County. After passing the Maryland bar exam, Judge Zellweger started as an assistant public defender at the Maryland Office of the Public Defender for Baltimore County, where she dedicated 23 years of her legal career to public service. As a public defender, Judge Zellweger thoroughly enjoyed being in court frequently and being a zealous advocate for her clients. She was able to quickly learn how to think on her feet and to adapt to each and every client’s story and situation. Outside of the courtroom, Judge Zellweger also helped the public defender’s office to give back to the community through supporting various BCBA charities. She facilitated adopting a family through The Y and providing school supplies to Baltimore County Public Schools. Judge Zellweger always believed that it was important to give back to the community and extend what the public defender’s office does in the courtroom throughout the community.

Susan C. Zellweger It was when the Honorable Robert J. Steinberg retired that Judge Zellweger decided she wanted to become a judge. While practicing as a public defender in district court, Judge Zellweger had the opportunity to appear in front of Judge Steinberg and wanted to emulate his knowledge of the law and both his demeanor and presence in the courtroom. When asked what she is looking forward to most as a district court judge, Judge Zellweger said that she “hopes everyone will leave the courtroom feeling as though they had the opportunity to be heard.” She is dedicated to treating every party who appears before her with “kindness and respect,” because “at the end of the day, it doesn’t cost anything to be kind.” – Erika C. Surock

Your ad could be here! Contact Rachel Ruocco at rruocco@bcba.org or 410-337-9103 22

The Advocate

October 2021

Albers & Associates is a full-service Maryland law firm focusing on personal injury, DUI/DWI, criminal defense, family law and other matters. The firm was founded by Ross Albers six years ago and has now grown to its present size of eight attorneys with multiple office locations. Mr. Albers states that he likes to think of his firm as not only a provider of quality legal services, but also as a personal professional development company for lawyers. He and his firm are constantly looking to grow and provide the environment to develop “future leaders in the legal community” and within the Albers firm. To date, Mr. Albers has grown the firm by joining forces with other solo and small firm practitioners, providing the administrative support required to run a firm, and in some cases providing, in essence, pre-retirement practice succession for experienced attorneys. Mr. Albers’ interest is in knowing what attorneys aspire to achieve in their practices and then helping them achieve their goals. In his words, “[i]t’s about wowing people around a vision” of growth of the firm. “We are looking for people to come join us, and to be leaders.” In addition to the firm’s current main practice areas, Mr. Albers is looking to grow the firm in other areas, such as estate planning and representing and counseling business owners. This is the firm’s first year as a BCBA Title Sponsor. Mr. Albers and the firm decided to become a Title Sponsor for several reasons. First, Mr. Albers wants to give back to the Association because it helped him get his start professionally. He fondly recalls the early days of his practice, often sitting

Ross Albers, Founder in the BCBA Lawyer Referral & Information Service office, taking the incoming telephone calls from potential clients. This helped him get his start. Secondly, the firm is always looking for new case and client referrals and is actively seeking to recruit new attorneys to join the firm. Lastly, Mr. Albers says that he believes in the mission of the Association and recognizes that it is important for people to attend BCBA events so as to have a vibrant Association. Simply put, he recognizes the importance of supporting the organization, both financially, as well as through participation in committee activities. More information about the firm can be found on its website: www.rossalbers.com – Michael S. Barranco

Don’t Forget to Support All of Our Annual Sponsors

Albers & Associates Growth Solutions Team Rice, Murtha & Psoras Sandy Spring Bank Minnesota Lawyers Mutual October 2021

Multi-Specialty HealthCare Vallit Advisors AbacusNext Health Quest

The Advocate

BCBA Spotlight Law Clerk Spotlight - Isabel Jorrin Garcia Isabel Jorrin Garcia is currently serving as judicial law clerk for the Honorable Dennis M. Robinson. Ms. Jorrin Garcia was born in Cuba and moved to the United States when she was in fifth grade. She moved to Baltimore County when she was a teenager and attended Dulaney High School. Ms. Jorrin Garcia went on to pursue a bachelor’s degree in Criminal Justice at the University of Maryland, College Park. While at UMCP, Jorrin Garcia was a member of the College Park Scholars Public Leadership Program where she gave back to the community through public service. She was a Team Leader for Partners in Print, where she was able to utilize her fluency in Spanish to help teach immigrant parents skills to assist their children with homework. Ms. Jorrin Garcia was also an intern at the Spanish Speaking Community of Maryland, Inc., where she helped translate legal documents, including family petitions, name change applications, and political asylum documents. While at UMCP, Ms. Jorrin Garcia was awarded a citation in public leadership through her dedication to giving back to the Spanish-speaking community. Ms. Jorrin Garcia graduated from UMCP in 2018 and began law school at the University of Baltimore School of Law that same year. While at UB, she continued her work in public service as a law clerk for the Immigrant Rights Clinic, where she led client interviews relating to asylum matters and assisted in drafting and filing applications for relief. She was also a student attorney for the Bronfein Family Law Clinic where she represented clients in various family law matters. In addition to participating in two clinics at UB, Ms. Jorrin Garcia also served as president and community service chair for the Latin American Law Students Association. While at UB, Ms. Jorrin Garcia not only had one of her articles published in the University of Baltimore Law Forum, but she went on to become the Editor-in-Chief of the journal in her third year. Ms. Jorrin Garcia graduated from UB in May 2021 as a distinguished scholar. She was a member of the Royal Graham Shannonhouse III Honor Society and was a Dean’s Citation recipient. After having a great experience while serving as a judicial intern for the Honorable Douglas R. M. Nazarian on the Maryland Court of Special Appeals while in law school, Ms. Jorrin Garcia knew that she wanted to pursue a judicial clerkship after graduating from UB. She is looking forward to meeting new people, networking, and working on her 24

Isabel Jorrin Garcia writing skills this year as a law clerk. Ms. Jorrin Garcia hopes to gain a better understanding of what sort of legal career she wants to pursue after her clerkship. – Erika C. Surock

BETTER LATE THAN NEVER! YOU ARE SUMMONED TO APPEAR ON OCTOBER 14, 2021 6:30-9:30 PM MARTIN'S VALLEY MANSION 594 CRANBROOK RD le with C O C K E Y S V I L L E , M D

b availa option rchase u Zoom p ticket

Acknowledging the Retirement of the Honorable Sally C. Chester

She truly was and is a Judge for the People! Full dinner and drinks served Tickets: $75 Court Clerks: $50 Contact James Crawford: justicejec@comcast.net or 443-829-1446, Abigail Beichler: abigail@jamescrawfordlaw.com or 443-955-2283 or via email at chesterretirementgala@gmail.com for info and tickets

The Advocate

October 2021

Law Clerk Spotlight - Michael Hart Michael Hart is currently serving as a law clerk for the Honorable Andrew M. Battista. Mr. Hart was born and raised here in Baltimore County and is the middle child of five children. Michael has two brothers and two sisters. Mr. Hart attended St. Paul’s School for Boys, followed by Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut. In college, Michael majored in public policy and law and played club ice hockey and lacrosse. Mr. Hart always had an interest in pursuing a career in law, as he dealt with a lot of food safety and compliance work for his family’s business. Mr. Hart’s family business, Hart Industries, was founded around 1969 in Baltimore City, and is a paper packing manufacturer that provides paper packaging for various food, industrial, and hygiene products. Given his background helping out with the family business, Michael decided to pursue a law degree and attended the University of Baltimore School of Law. During law school Mr. Hart was an active member of the student body and after completing his favorite class, Antitrust, he was asked to be the professor’s research assistant. As a research assistant, he read and reviewed various cases, including litigation involving Facebook and Google. In addition to being a research assistant, Mr. Hart was the Recent Developments Editor for the University of Baltimore School of Law’s Law Forum Journal. In order to gain valuable hands-on experience, Mr. Hart enrolled and completed the Civil Advocacy Clinic. Michael then went on to complete the Corporate Counsel Externship program, working with Mariner Finance, a consumer finance company, all before graduating this past May. In July of 2021, Mr. Hart sat for the bar exam, and is awaiting results. In the meantime, he advised that he loves clerking for Judge Battista. Mr. Hart states that he enjoys

Michael Hart learning from Judge Battista and appreciates his mentorship and teaching. Mr. Hart also enjoys watching cases and seeing the different styles litigators bring to court. While Mr. Hart was a very accomplished law student and has fully immersed himself in the law clerk life, he has interests beyond work. Mr. Hart can be found organizing events for “iRise,” a foundation that helps support young women who have been diagnosed with breast cancer. Additionally, Mr. Hart plays in an adult hockey league, and is an avid sports fan. His favorite teams are the Washington Capitals and the Baltimore Ravens. Finally, when Michael is not in court or on the ice, he can often be found with his two yellow Labradors, Murphy and Bo. Congratulations on your graduation, best of luck with the bar exam, and welcome to the legal profession! – Dylan Gerry

Check out our YouTube channel! Follow us and receive notifications when we post a video. bit.ly/BCBAYouTube October 2021

The Advocate

Features In Chambers with Judge Pat Stringer: What You See Is What You Get I had the unique privilege of spending 90 minutes in an uninterrupted, informal, and relaxed Advocate interview with Judge Pat Stringer. You might have guessed he was very different from the courtroom Judge Stringer. He was not. He is unpretentious inside the courtroom and out. Any lawyer who has been before him in the courtroom would agree that he listens carefully, comprehends quickly, answers succinctly, and cuts to the chase. And when His Honor in court sometimes tilts his head quizzically, purses his lips, and wonders aloud whether he grasps the niceties of the oral argumentation, he is not feigning confusion just to put counsel on the defensive. He really means it. He wants to get it right. Guess what? He’s the same way in private. Judge Stringer is a nose-to-the-grindstone jurist with a hardworking blue-collar mentality. Candidly, I had a hard time securing this interview because he wants to stay focused on his judicial decision-making process.

Judge H. Patrick Stringer

BALTIMORE FOREVER, HON!

THY LAW IS MY KEEPER

Judge Pat Stringer is a Baltimorean through and through. One could even refine it further to say he is a Towsontown lifer. He was born to Harry and Marion Stringer in Towson, attended primary and secondary school in Towson, communed and worshipped at the Immaculate Conception Catholic Church, and has for all intents and purposes lived and worked his entire adult life in the vicinity of the Baltimore County Circuit Court. A 1970 graduate of the “Hall,” young Stringer enjoyed football. His biggest high school challenge was making the team as a “scrawny” 14-year-old. He even met his future wife on a blind date and took her to his senior prom, which was held, no surprise here, in Towson. Together they raised and educated five children, three boys and two girls, in this same area. Pat Stringer did, however, travel a few miles down Charles Street to attend The Johns Hopkins University. He was recruited to play football but ended up being a starter on Coach Bob Scott’s 1974 national championship lacrosse team. Endurance and speed were his ticket to the starting lineup. That was his highlight. Needless to say, his social sciences curriculum proved to be a challenge at this internationally acclaimed university. But, making the lacrosse team for Scott’s perennial powerhouse was even more of a challenge because, incredibly, Pat Stringer did not play lacrosse in high school.

Then came law school, after three gap years following his 1974 Hopkins graduation, a few miles further south on Charles Street, at the University of Baltimore. Judge Stringer pursued law when he sensed a “higher calling” to do something that might fortify the constitutional framework of this country. With framed portraits of Lincoln and Jefferson adorning his chamber walls as we spoke, Judge Stringer always admired the Founding Fathers and figured law school might help him to do something that advances our form of democracy. This ended up being no easy endeavor. While attending law school full time, the newly married future judge had to study and wait tables for income. Eventually, he took on a demanding clerkship for an energetic Judge J. Harold Grady. And did I mention that he and his wife enjoyed the birth of their first child during law school, while still completing his degree in the standard three years in 1980? After a brief stint with a private practitioner, Judge Stringer landed at Mudd, Harrison and Burch. His focus was civil litigation. He enjoyed trips to the many different historical courthouses throughout the State of Maryland. He liked observing the diversity of judicial decision-making styles. Judge Stringer enjoyed comparing judges to the well-honed and admirable skills of Judge Grady. A seed was planted that would later sprout a great harvest that the future judge would consult to formulate his own approach. But reaping that harvest would have to wait 24 years in private practice before being called to the bench.

The Advocate

October 2021

THE COURT-SHIP BEGINS

BUCKET LIST

That opportunity arose in 2006. As Judge Stringer likes to point out, no one comes knocking on your door. You have to sense the calling and work behind the scenes to get the nod. But, upon reflection, Judge Stringer felt he had the experience and the wisdom; he knew he was reasonably intelligent and could picture himself being fair and impartial. It is important to have good judges, reasoned Judge Stringer, then in his fifties, so he put his name in the hat and with due diligence made it to the proverbial “short list,” with four others from Baltimore County who were interviewed by then Governor Robert Ehrlich. One by one the Governor selected the others before Stringer. Resigned to the distinct possibility that he might not get “the call,” the Republican governor finally called Stringer, a Democrat, and the rest is history. Hats off to the former governor for choosing wisely outside of party allegiances! Sworn into the office in 2006, Judge Stringer has enjoyed the challenge ever since. He does not favor one type of docket over another. All bring their rewards and challenges but, when pushed, he allowed that business litigation might be his favorite subject matter. His biggest surprise? The vast variety of cases that necessitate careful listening, an attention to detail and homework outside of the courtroom. “I derive great satisfaction,” reflects the judge, “in helping people fairly resolve a problem. I very much want to make the right decision.” He knows that not everyone will accept his final verdict, but he aims to make every litigant feel like they were heard in the framework of a fair proceeding. “All of the cases are important to the people involved,” reasons His Honor, “and I want them to know their case is important to me.”

Baltimore County will sadly lose this judge to mandatory retirement on January 10. What is on his bucket list? Nothing; he’d rather be working. When pushed he listed some possibilities: senior judgeship, charitable service, “at risk” child tutoring, and post-secondary teaching. This list, predictably for this no-nonsense jurist, looks like work assignments. Finally, after more prodding, he paused, looked aimlessly out the big courthouse window, and allowed for the possibility of more time for family, travel with his wife and golf !

October 2021

“A DISTINCT AND DEFINABLE CHARM” I recently heard Seinfeld on an old rerun describe a character as having “a distinct and definable charm.” It made me think of Judge Stringer. Even his office mate, Judge Nancy Purpura slipped into our room to punctuate the occasion. She described the judge as “someone you would want your daughter to marry.” Judge Purpura already rues the idea of his retirement and wonders who might replace him. In short, he is charming in his simplicity. Take his title for example. He insisted I delete the formal first letter and the “Honorable” in his title and shorten his first name. As the subtitle to this article observes, what you see is what you get. – Matt Paavola

The Advocate

Features

Baseball & Crabs Saturday, August 21 | Ripken Stadium at Leidos Field in Aberdeen

The Advocate

October 2021

The Advocate

Wellness with Wendy This is a difficult piece to write. Especially for an audience that saw me grow up as a lawyer. Especially in front of a bench and bar for which I have great respect and thus, a little intimidation writing this article. You have known me since I was fresh out of law school to when I became a partner in a well-regarded firm, to when I became a solo practitioner to now. Now? What is now? In order to explain the “now,” please allow me to lay the foundation. I cannot tell you the number of times I have had one of the following conversations:

What do you do for a living? I am a family law lawyer.

God bless. I could never do that kind of work.

three years yet? And that it is still going? That is too long for any lawyer to be in a family law case.

What kind of law do you practice? Family law. Oh man. I have been there. I used to practice family law too, but I burned out. I just could not take the stress anymore. Or

I practice family law. Me too!

***Insert - Knowing glances – war stories with the theme of difficult clients, difficult opposing counsel, stress, burnout, clients unable to pay, insane legal fees where, while we have worked for and earned every single penny, and can account for every .1, we still feel some guilt because we have charged our client tens and tens of thousands of dollars because trial is just insanely expensive*** I have prided myself on being a trial attorney for the last 16 years. I have marketed myself by telling clients that while I believe mediation and settlement is the answer, sometimes cases need to be tried, and I would sit with them at the trial table and serve as their fierce advocate. Sixteen years later and I am burned out. Sixteen years later and I detest the fact that when I am in “trial mode,” my whole family knows it. I turn into a shell of a wife and a mom. I’m not home. My brain and heart are fully engaged in trial. I eat, sleep, and breathe it, and when it is all over, I come home wrung out and exhausted. And as you all know, “trial prep” is not just limited to the week before and the week of trial. Trial prep starts to creep in well before trial. With family law cases, we aren’t typically in and out in a few months. In fact, the last case I handled lasted three years. Three years and guess what? It is still going. Did I mention 30

As family law attorneys, during our tenure in a matter, we are on the phone with our client (a lot), putting out fires, fielding motions (sometimes frivolous), building our case, pouring over documents, and finding themes for our case. We are, unfortunately, battling it out with our client along the way, attempting to rein in expectations. We are on the phone engaging in settlement talks/arguments/shouting matches with opposing counsel that every once in a while, end up going so sideways that you have damaged your friendship with a fellow lawyer whom you considered part of your inner circle. The truth is a lot of us are burned out on a case long before we see the inside of a courtroom. In the last few years, I have slowed down my spigot of litigation. How? By growing the pipeline of cases that “speak” to me. By asking and receiving for more mediation clients. By crowding out the “big” cases with many small ones that I can get in, out and done in a period of just a few months. By working on new, related “happy” matters like “re-adoption.” By representing more and more kids. In turn, I felt my stress levels lower. I started to reclaim more weekends. I started to reclaim my heart for my family. Life became a little sweeter when I spent my time and energy laser-focused on resolution over trial work. Before I get to what is “now,” I need to say this: I have great respect for family law attorneys, especially those who can try a case with zeal, but still maintain collegiality. I have respect for the bench, who only sees the tail end of the case. I have respect for the impossible tasks before the bench and the loss of sleep that goes along with determining what should happen to the kids. I also respect those who have gone before me and can’t touch these cases anymore.

The Advocate

October 2021

So, what is “now?” Before you fret, no, I am not leaving the practice altogether. I am not leaving Baltimore County. I am not leaving the bar. But once I have finished the litigation in my pipeline, you aren’t going to see me sitting across from you in the courtroom unless I am there as a Best Interest Attorney (BIA) or Child Advocate. You are not going to be on the receiving end of angry phone calls from me (well, I guess if you have knucklehead clients, you may get a frustrated call from me in my role as BIA). But I am no longer taking on litigation. I am no longer taking cases where I get so sucked into a family’s drama that my own family is placed in the backseat. Where will you see me? I am still here. I am still serving as child’s counsel. I am still serving as a Parent Coordinator. I am growing my mediation practice, enjoying settling matters and keeping them out of court. I have grown an ability to spot a case that is destined to settle and if the client is right, I will take that case and help them obtain an uncontested divorce. I have simply turned off the litigation spigot. But wait . . . there’s more!

tease out the underlying issues, call out BS when necessary, motivate, inspire, celebrate the wins, brainstorm options, and give baby-step homework so that my client can start living the life she wants. Each client is different, and each client needs an ear, a heart, and someone on the other end to guide them step-by-step so that eventually she reaches her goals and begins living the life she desires. In my role as coach, I have found that we are all suffering from similar issues and problems, we just don’t like to advertise it. That is where I come in. I am a safe space. I am a listening ear. I get it because I have lived it. I get it because I am still living it. It is effective because rarely does anyone get one-on-one time with a professional devoted to them in a space that has been created to make their life better in a way that is unique to that individual. If you want to know more, I am happy to share. Please book a complimentary introductory call with me here: calendly.com/wendy-lawfullylean/introductory-call.

Until then, see you around Towson, but a little less in the courthouse.

I was asked to write this piece to announce, and perhaps explain my new business venture, which has me literally jumping out of bed in the morning. This new business venture has been on my heart for years and is a huge reason why I went “solo,” as I knew this piece was coming. As of September 10, 2021, I am a Certified Life Coach. My website is officially up and running and I am open for business: wendysmeadows.com

– Wendy Meadows wendy@wendymeadowslaw.com

My main client? My fellow burned-out, tired, stressed, lawyer mom. I have clients (already!) all over the country. Some are family law attorneys; some are business lawyers; some are law moms trying to get back to practicing law; and some are law moms merely recharting their path, as I have. Each client has her own unique issues and I work with them one-onone so that they can practice law efficiently and effectively. I work with each client to help them manage their lives so they can dig out of their proverbial hole and start living the life they hoped to live when they envisioned going to law school. No issue is off the table. We talk all things – family, work, stress, health, kids, husbands, wives, the practice of law, happiness, really, all the things. Just like no family law case is the same, no life coaching client is the same. There is no cookie-cutter solution. My role is to listen, October 2021

The Advocate

Ask The Trial Doctor Don’t Let Your Exhibits Slow You Down A flustered lawyer writes in…

Dear Stuck,

“Dear Trial Doctor,

It sounds too easy to be true, but simply having an extra copy of the exhibit for counsel will almost always avoid this delay. The best course is to have provided the exhibits to your opponent prior to trial or prior to the examination of the witness. That isn’t always possible, but a little preparation and extra copies of the exhibits will do the trick. I suggest three or four copies of the exhibits-one for your use, one for the court to be introduced as evidence, one for your witness, and, at a minimum, one for opposing counsel.

I had my client on the stand in a family law case, and I think I was really making headway with her testimony. We were about to get into an important topic, and I approached the witness with an exhibit that I knew would hammer the point home. On my way to the stand, I paused to show the exhibit to opposing counsel and…Egad! Everything came to a dead stop as counsel read, reviewed, and reread each of the eight pages of the exhibit. It took forever while I had to stand there helplessly waiting for counsel to finish. By the time I got the exhibit back, the flow of my examination was completely interrupted and everyone, including me, had forgotten where we were in the process. I know opposing counsel has a right to look at the exhibit, but what can I do to avoid throwing an anchor like this into my examination?” Stuck in Court

So, as you confidently approach the witness with the exhibit, gracefully delivering a copy to opposing counsel on the way, your examination can proceed unhindered, without the jarring request “Your Honor, may I see the document that counsel is showing the witness?” You will appear both prepared and professional and be able to maintain a crisp pace in your examination. – The Trial Doctor

MVLS volunteers are responding, right now, to the civil legal crisis made worse by the pandemic. If you would like to join the effort, visit:

MVLSLAW.ORG/PROBONOPORTAL

For event Info visit:

MVLSLAW.ORG/CPB2021

The Advocate

October 2021

Stuart Axilbund Mary Chalawsky Marissa Joelson William Kerr Richard Lynas Jay Miller Gary Miles

October 2021

saxilbund@axulbund.com chalawsky@gmail.com MJoelson@lawpga.com wlawkerr@verizon.net lynas.richard@yahoo.com JMiller@lawpga.com gary@lawhjm.com

Jose Molina Sam Moxley Joseph Murtha Karen Pilarski Bill Saltysiak Thomas Tompsett, Jr.

The Advocate

jamolinalaw@gmail.com smoxley@baltimorecountymd.gov jmurtha@mpllawyers.com karenapilarski@gmail.com wsaltysiak@gmail.com tommy.tompsett@mdlobbyist.com

Baltimore County Bar Association Family Law Committee

Modification or Termination of Alimony Upon Retirement; Case Law and Considerations Wednesday, October 6, 2021 12:00pm-1:00pm

SPEAKER

Leon W. Berg, Esquire

PROGRAM CHAIR

Christine Malanga, Esquire

LOCATION

Zoom

BCBA Members, Free: Non-Members, Free

COST

REGISTRATION

Registration Required. Click HERE to register. Link emailed upon registration.

The Advocate

October 2021

Baltimore County Bar Association Real Property, State, Local Laws, and Zoning Committee Virtual Meet and Greet Happy Hour with Board of Appeals Thursday, October 7, 2021 | 5:00-6:00pm SPEAKERS Members of the Board of Appeals PROGRAM CHAIR Brady Locher LOCATION Zoom COST BCBA Members, Free REGISTRATION Members Only; Registration Required. Click HERE to register. Link emailed upon registration.

A casual meet and greet with some discussion of best practices for in-person and virtual hearings.

Diversity & Inclusion Committee

What Diversity Means to Me Thursday, October 7, 2021 | 5:00-6:30pm SPEAKERS Judge Dorothy J. Wilson, Administrative Judge for Baltimore County District Court Maria R. Fields, Administrative Clerk PROGRAM CHAIR Raphael J. Santini LOCATION Zoom COST BCBA Members, Free; Non-Members, Free REGISTRATION Registration Required. Click HERE to register. Link emailed upon registration. What diversity means to me and how it is being implemented in their practice, specifically in the Baltimore County District Court.

October 2021

The Advocate

Young Lawyers Circuit Court Chambers Chat October 18, 2021 12:00p.m. W it h H o n . R u t h A n n J a k u b o w s k i a n d H o n . D e n n is M . R o b i n s o n

When:Monday, Monday,October October18, 18, 2021 2021 at When: at 12:00p.m. 12:00p.m. With Baltimore County Circuit Court With Baltimore County Circuit Court

Judge Jakubowski and Judge Robinson

Judge Jakubowski and Judge Robinson Where: Zoom Meeting Meeting Where: Virtual Virtual Zoom Registration Required. Click HERE to to register. Registration Required. Click HERE register.Link Link emailed upon registration emailed upon registration TheChamber ChambersChat Chatisisan anopportunity opportunity for have a a The for young younglawyers lawyerstoto have casual conversation conversation with brains best casual withjudges, judges,pick picktheir their brainabout about best practices in the courtroom, and gain somesome valuable insightinsight for theirfor careers. practices in the courtroom, and gain valuable their This event event will during lunchtime. careers. This willbe beheld heldremotely remotely during lunchtime. Please Please email any questions that you have for the judges email any questions you have for the judges ahead inofadvance time to to againes@bcba.org, by Friday, October 15, 2021. againes@bcba.org, by Friday, October 15, 2021. 36

The Advocate

October 2021

Baltimore County Bar Association Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Committee

Basics of the MASIC (aka the new screening process for Family Law cases in Baltimore County) Wednesday, October 27, 2021 12:00-1:00pm SPEAKERS

PROGRAM CHAIR

Annamaria Walsh, Director, Office of Family Mediation for the Circuit Court of Baltimore County Briana Shirey, Coordinator, Office of Family Services for the Circuit Court for Baltimore County Annamaria Walsh

LOCATION

Zoom

COST

BCBA Members, Free; Non-Members, Free

REGISTRATION

Registration Required. Click HERE to register. Link emailed upon registration.

The Baltimore County Circuit Court is implementing the use of the Mediator’s Assessment of Safety Issues and Concerns - Short, with Danger Assessment (MASIC-S w/DA) in an effort to identify issuess of Intimate Partner Violence in child access cases prior to the parties’ appearance at the Scheduling Conference. Attendees will be given a demonstration of the MASIC-S w/DA screening tool, with the opportunity to ask questions and provide feedback.

October 2021

The Advocate

Baltimore County Bar Association Professionalism Committee

Professionalism From the Bar: A discussion regarding Professionalism and the Internet Thursday, November 4, 2021 5:00-6:30pm

SPEAKERS

Timothy Gunning, Esquire Laurie Wasseman, Esquire And more!

PROGRAM CHAIR

Jennifer W. Ritter, Esquire

LOCATION

Zoom

COST

BCBA Members, Free; Non-Members, Free

REGISTRATION

Registration Required. Click HERE to register. Link emailed upon registration.

A discussion regarding the need for professionalism and civility in online communications including social media and how what you say on the Internat can impact you professionally. If you wouldn’t say it in person, don’t say it in an email or on social media!

The Advocate

October 2021

The Advocate

October 2021

The Advocate

October 2021

Baltimore County Bar Association

SAVE the DATE

Stated Meetings: 10/21/21 2/17/22 6/16/22

  Aberdeen Ironbirds Game and Crab Feast August 21 6pm

Party in the Plaza: Celebrating 100 Years of the BCBA

Law Clerk Orientation & BCBA Happy Hour The Pointe, Towson September 30

Ravens Tailgate October 17

September 23

National Adoption Day

Memorial Service Zoom November 18 3:30p.m.

Holiday Party December 9

November 20 11 am

Black Tie Banquet Martin's Valley Mansion

Bowling Outing February TBD

January 27

Bar Wars Team Trivia Barley’s Backyard in Towson April 5

October 2021

Law Day Breakfast & Noon Ceremonies May 2

Golf Tournament TBD

Young Lawyers Holiday Lunch December 2 12-2pm

BCBA Chopped Champion Live Results Show March 9 6pm

Young Lawyers Field Day TBD

The Advocate

Baltimore County Bar Association

Presort Standard U.S. Postage PAID Permit No. 1262 Baltimore, MD

100 County Courts Building 401 Bosley Avenue Towson, MD 21204-4491 (T) 410-337-9103 (F) 410-823-3418 www.bcba.org

Member Advertisements OFFICE SPACE AVAILABLE CATONSVILLE

Office Space Available; 1007 Frederick Road; one to four rooms. Prime location along Frederick Road with signage. Call 410-744-3256. Office Space for Rent. 1002 Frederick Road, 2nd floor office. Private entrance, semi-private restroom, use of conference room and kitchen on first floor. Free parking. Would be a great satellite office. Please contact Lou Weinkam, Jr. at 410-744-3256, ext 103.

OWINGS MILLS

Offices to rent: Share space with two solo Family Law practitioners. One or two offices available in a convenient office park off Red Run Boulevard. Includes use of conference room, kitchen, and in suite bathroom. Call Steven at 410-979-8250

PIKESVILLE For Rent: 1306 Reisterstown Road, 2nd Floor, approx 700 sq. feet, separate entrance and parking. $500 per month. Call Arnold Silbiger 410-242-1616.

TOWSON

Two offices to rent. We are a block from the courthouse. Use of office, telephone, copier, and fax, plus secretarial space are included. Call Frank at 410-296-6820. First floor office space and parking available a block from circuit court. 402 West Pennsylvania Ave. Contact Carl Gold cgold@carlgoldlaw. com or 410-337-5545. Nicely furnished office space with parking, half block from circuit court. Pete McDowell 410-960-2536. Furnished office available in beautifully appointed suite in the heart of Towson. Use of conference room and other amenities. Contact Susan at 410-583-7007. Two to three offices within existing office space, just below 695, free parking, furnished if desired, use of telephone, copier, fax, conference room, Internet, paralegal/secretarial help available. Anne 410-337-8577

303 W. Pennsylvania Avenue, Towson across Bosley Avenue from the Circuit Court Building, three offices with bathroom on the second floor, 3rd floor four offices available, conference room, bathroom, and kitchen on first floor, free parking space available, rent negotiable $50-$100 less than comparable spaces. $400-$500 per office, great satellite office with possibility of overflow work. Contact Joe Glass at 410-823-4214 or 410-790-1980.

HIRING Small firm in Towson looking for an experienced, part-time legal assistant/ secretary two to three days a week. Any experienced candidates should contact Robert Jacobson at 410-583-8883.

FOR SALE Set of Maryland Reporter, Volumes 1-875 (2005) available for free. Call Neil at 443-632-9060.