THE HAPPINESS TALKS
PICTURING KAPWA HATS OFF TO FITZ
FEATURES
ARTS & REVIEW
SPORTS
UGBC and OHP team up to promote culture of happiness and authenticity, A8
O’Neill photography exhibit examines the nuances and beauty of the Philippines, B8
Ryan Fitzgerald’s three goals power BC to 3-2 win over UConn, B1
www.bcheights.com
The Independent Student Newspaper of Boston College
HEIGHTS
THE
established
1919
Monday, January 26, 2015
Vol. XCVI, No. 3
Jesuit Institute answers call of student protesters Series of panels on race scheduled for spring semester BY GUS MERRELL Asst. News Editor In response to campus protests staged at the end of last semester—most notably a “Right on the Heights” rally and die-in in St. Mary’s Hall—the Jesuit Institute at Boston College plans to spearhead a semester-long initiative to promote student discussions about matters of race and student experiences on campus, according to Rev. James Keenan, S.J., director of the institute. The project effectively began last week with a “Race in the USA” panel, which sought to put the deaths of Michael Brown and Eric Garner—and respective non-indictment
decisions for the police officers that killed them—in context with larger national trends as well as life at BC. Keenan said that there are more panels and discussions currently being organized, beginning this week with “After Ferguson,” which is currently scheduled for Jan. 27. Keenan said that while the general consensus was that the recent panel itself was a huge success, the student-led discussions in an overflowing Fulton 511 were sensational and have prompted him to continue to try to facilitate more discussions in the future. “If I see some of the same students talking [at future panels], I want to invite them over to the Jesuit Institute to see how can we continue these discussions,” he said. The Jesuit Institute is also working
See Jesuit Institute, A3
ARTHUR BAILIN / HEIGHTS EDITOR
A BC streak: women’s hockey stays unbeaten for 24th straight game No. 1 Boston College defeated No. 3 Quinnipiac 2-1 in women’s hockey Saturday, extending its unbeaten streak to 24 games. Juniors Alex Carpenter and Haley Skarupa scored for the Eagles and freshman goaltender Katie Burt made 18 saves. See page B1.
For unregistered student organizations, an ambiguous future As BC revisits student guide, UGBC hopes for compromise on unrecognized campus clubs BY MUJTABA SYED Asst. Features Editor Talks on the revision of Boston College’s student guide began between the University and the Undergraduate Government of Boston College (UGBC) in December, the central complaint lodged by UGBC’s Free Speech and Reform team being the restriction the current guide places on groups other than registered student organizations.
The conversation initiated with the Office of Student Involvement (OSI) and the University’s Board of Directors is expected to continue this semester, with concerns about how registered organizations are to interact with unrecognized entities still mounting. Over 200 organizations at BC are identified as Registered Student Organizations (RSO), focuses on a specific category: academics/pre-professional, campus ministry,
honor societies, intercultural, music, art and performance, political, publications and media, service, or specific issues. An undocumented group of organizations, however, exists outside the parameters for RSO’s outlined by the University. When a fledgling student group attempts to become a Registered Student Organization, it must follow a set of steps outlined by OSI. According to Dhara Bhatt, vice president of student organizations for UGBC and CSOM ’15, the group must begin by submitting an application on OrgSync that includes a constitution outlining its name, mission, and vision. The group then
undergoes an interview with UGBC’s Board of Student Organization, which consists of 12 undergraduates ranging from freshmen to seniors. UGBC then provides its recommendation based on the interview with OSI, and the two parties jointly come up with an accept, reject, or deferral decision. According to Bhatt, most decisions end up being deferrals, giving organizations feedback prior to a second interview to further explore the group’s candidacy. When each group meets with the UGBC board to interview, they are evaluated based on a rubric created by UGBC in conjunction
with OSI. The rubric’s main tenants call for the organization at hand to first, enhance the BC experience and create an inclusive environment; second, to not duplicate or be repetitive of an existent organization or office on campus; and lastly, be sustainable in the long run, according to Bhatt. While these base considerations provide the basis for UGBC and OSI’s joint consideration of groups seeking to become registered student organizations, Bhatt added that other factors play a role, such as the organization’s
See Student Organizations, A8
UGBC candidates prepare for 2015 election season Elections Committee lays out timeline, expectations for four prospective teams BY ARIELLE CEDENO Assoc. News Editor EMILY FAHEY / HEIGHTS SENIOR STAFF
Full scholarship athletes are now eligible to receive stipends to cover their full cost-of-attendance, with BC providing these funds.
Despite initial vote, BC to cover athlete costs BY TOM DEVOTO Heights Editor Boston College Athletics director Brad Bates confirmed that the University intends to cover the full cost-of-attendance for full scholarship student-athletes—as calculated by the Office of Student Services—as early as August, according to an article published by ESPN. This decision comes less than a week after BC cast the only vote against an NCAA measure, passed 79-1, that will allow universities to issue stipends to student athletes on full scholarship, covering their full calculated cost-of-attendance beyond tuition, housing, books, and food. The stipend will cover cost-of-living expenses, which include school supplies, laundry, and travel back home, among other minor expenses, as calculated by the University. Bates said that BC will comply with the legislation, but wanted to raise certain issues that were found within it, notably furthering the distinction between regular students and student-athletes, as well as putting an unnecessary burden on financially strapped athletic departments. The cost-of-attendance gap at BC is reported to be around
$1,200, which is tied for the lowest in the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) with the University of Notre Dame. The higher amounts in the ACC hover around $5,000. The ESPN story cited a report published by the NCAA in August 2014, which claimed that only 20 Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) programs generated a profit. More than 100 other FBS programs relied heavily on subsidies from their universities. “A lot of those subsidies come from student fees at many institutions,” Bates said in a phone interview from earlier this week. “So with increased costs of higher education, we keep passing legislation that’s increasing our costs. We’re putting a lot of pressure on athletic departments to really seriously look into eliminating sports, which ultimately hurts student-athletes rather than helps.” Bates added that 15 schools have eliminated a combined 66 sports since 2010, despite the fact that the NCAA has lucrative television and sponsorship deals. The University of Alabama-Birmingham became the first school to eliminate football—the sport that generally raises the most revenue for universities—since Pacific University
in 1995. Additionally, Bates was worried about the fact that cost-of-attendance figures might serve as a recruiting advantage, offering a hypothetical scenario in which football powerhouse University of Alabama would not let its rival, Auburn University, surpass its institution’s cost of attendance. “With the research we’ve done, we’ve seen the highest amount of difference in cost of attendance is a little over $6,000,” Bates said on the Tim Brando Show on Sirius XM. “Some schools are going to be able to give the students over $6,000 per student per year. Other schools are less than $1,000. There’s already an inherent disadvantage, based on what your cost-of-attendance is.” The cost-of-attendance legislation allows collegiate institutions to offer, on average, $2,000 to $5,000 to its student-athletes in addition to the traditional full scholarship. Bates agrees that covering full cost-of-attendance is beneficial in principle, but had concerns that the NCAA rushed its decision to pass this legislation. “I’m not sure that everyone fully comprehended the types of issues we’re talking about right now,” Bates said.
Prospective candidates for president and executive vice president in the upcoming Undergraduate Government of Boston College (UGBC) elections met with the Elections Committee on Thursday night, in preparation for UGBC’s sanctioned campaign season, which begins Feb. 9. Of the teams represented at the mandatory meeting, there were two confirmed as seeking candidacy for president and executive vice president, respectively: Cassidy Gallegos, LSOE ’16, and Michael Keefe, A&S ’16; Thomas Napoli, A&S ’16, and Olivia Hussey, A&S ’17. Ryan Quirk and Nico Varano, both CSOM ’16, did not attend the meeting, but were confirmed as a team by the Elections Committee. James Kale, LSOE ’16, and Jose Altomari, A&S ’16, are unconfirmed bids to run in the upcoming election, but were also in attendance Thursday. The meeting, led by Dan Ahern and Kiera Keller, co-chairs of the Elections Committee and both A&S ’15, discussed the necessary qualifications for nomination in the upcoming election and the procedural guidelines for campaigning. To secure candidacy and a nomination on the election ballot, each team must gather 250 signatures by Jan. 26. The Elections Committee also
highlighted the Presidential Elections Code, which the prospective candidates must adhere to for the duration of their campaign. The code outlines general campaign procedural guidelines, as well as behavioral expectations for the campaign team and the candidates. “Candidates, along with their campaign teams, are expected to act with integrity throughout the entirety of the campaign season,” reads Section 1, Part A of the elections code. “As leaders of the Boston College community, it is in the best interest of all candidates to act as role models both within and outside of campaigning.” Among these guidelines are rules for appropriate campaigning, campaign materials, electronic communications and social media, and residential life. The elections code also features a Sanction Guideline that details the handling of disqualification, violations, and complaints relating to campaign season. There were minor revisions made to the elections code for the upcoming campaign season. This year, candidates must have campaign team members formally approved through the Elections Committee on Orgsync. This was done to reduce the issue of extraneous campaign team members that candidates have faced in years past, and to foster greater candidate oversight over their campaign team. The candidates are also newly required to have an elections liaison, with the purpose of handling communication between the candidates and the Elections Committee. Unlike years past, primary elections will not be held this elections season.
See UGBC, A4