The Heights February 20, 2017

Page 1

THE

HEIGHTS The Independent Student Newspaper of Boston College

EST. 1919

WWW.BCHEIGHTS.COM

MONDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2017

ALL TIED UP

OUR LEGACY

SPORTS

ARTS & REVIEW

Men’s hockey tied Vermont twice this weekend, putting its Hockey East lead in jeopardy.

Family and tradition inspired eclectic displays of Korean and Chinese heritage.

B1

B8

C\X_p KXcbj :fek\dgfiXip @jjl\j N`k_ =cfi`[X$9Xj\[ E\nj J`k\ @e X iXi\ `ek\im`\n# C\X_p [`jZljj\[ Kildg# jX]\ jgXZ\j 9P :FEEFI DLIG?P E\nj <[`kfi In a wide-ranging interview published on Friday by the Florida-based news site TCPalm.com, University President Rev. William P. Leahy, S.J., commented on the United States in the Donald Trump era, “softness” among some of today’s college students, and changes to higher education during his 20-year tenure. Leahy was previewing a talk he is sched-

uled to give next month at the Rappaport Center at Temple Beit HaYam in Stuart, Fla. The center was funded by Jerry Rappaport, the Boston real estate developer and philanthropist for whom the Rappaport Center for Law and Public Policy at Boston College Law School is named. University Spokesman Jack Dunn said Rappaport had asked Leahy to speak at this year’s talk, which is titled “Bridging Divides: Fostering Dialogue & Civic Engagement.” The interview was conducted by Eve Samples, a columnist for TCPalm, who will also moderate the talk next month. The candid interview is a rare occurrence lately for Leahy, who declined an interview request this fall for a Heights ar-

ticle commemorating his 20th anniversary as University president. According to the same article, he declined similar requests from the Office of News and Public Affairs and Boston College Magazine. He also declined an interview request last March from The Boston Globe for an article about BC’s struggling for-profit sports that ran on the paper’s front page, providing a statement instead. It is unclear if this interview with TCPalm was conducted in person or via written responses to questions. Leahy said in the interview that he agreed to speak at the event because he thinks there’s an intersection between religious beliefs and ongoing issues in the U.S. He said his university background makes

him optimistic about Americans’ ability to approach those issues with constructive dialogue. Leahy brought up several areas of national controversy, some of which have also received considerable attention this year at BC. “People get emotional, whether it’s around race, foreign policy, free speech, sexual orientation,” he said. “Once you have a common ground, it’s easy to engage and look at the needs of the community.” This fall, a few hundred students attended a “Silence is Violence” march through campus that specifically criticized Leahy’s lack of a response to an incident of homophobic vandalism on campus. Earlier

this semester, a group of graduate students involved in Eradicate BC Racism were sanctioned for their involvement in two unregistered protests that took place this fall. Leahy did not elaborate on specific incidents related to the issues he mentioned, but he did make several comments about general life on college campuses and how higher education has evolved. He also thinks the Trump administration will move toward the middle, gradually becoming more moderate because Republicans and Democrats will be reluctant to enact extreme legislation. He thinks bipartisan action and compromise are for

See Leahy Interview, A3

Jlim\p J_fnj Jkl[\ek M`\n f] L>9: L>9: gi\j\ek\[ [XkX XYflk `kj \]]\Zk`m\e\jj `e (' b\p Xi\Xj% 9P ?<@;@ ;FE> 8jjk% E\nj <[`kfi

JULIA HOPKINS / HEIGHTS EDITOR

=`ijk =\dXc\ ;lf <c\Zk\[ Xj L>9: Gi\j`[\ek# <MG 8Z_Xdgfe^ `j Xcjf k_\ Ô ijk ]\dXc\ 8]i`ZXe$ 8d\i`ZXe gi\j`[\ek% 9P :FEEFI DLIG?P E\nj <[`kfi Akosua Achampong and Tt King, both MCAS ’18, won this year’s race for Undergraduate Government of Boston College president and executive vice president. They will hold the offices for the 2017-18 school year. Achampong is the first African-American woman to be elected UGBC president, and she and King will be the first female duo to serve as president and EVP. The pair received 1,676 votes. Raymond

Mancini and Matt Batsinelas, both CSOM ’19, placed second with 450 votes, while Dan Wu and Jack Kelly, both MCAS ’18, placed third with 305 votes. A total of 2,431 total votes were counted this year, down slightly from 2,592 last year and 3,411 in 2015. In total, 2,640 votes were cast this year, but due to campaign sanctions some were not counted. The Elections Committee said in an email that Mancini and Batsinelas’s right to campaign on Newton was revoked due to negative campaigning on social media. They were also docked 50 votes for negative campaigning on social media. Achampong and King were docked 109 votes due to the use of

See Achampong and King, A3

Over 1,300 students—14.5 percent of the overall undergraduate population—responded to a survey sent out by the Undergraduate Government of Boston College last October. The survey’s purpose was to gauge student perception of UGBC, as well as what students would like to see more of from the organization. The survey was closed near the end of January. UGBC met on Sunday evening for its general meeting to discuss, mainly, the results of the survey. Created by Chris Liu and Derek Xu, both MCAS ’19, it presented students with statements and asked if students “strongly agree,” “agree,” “remain neutral,” “disagree,” or “strongly disagree” on whether “UGBC actively addresses” the issue in the statement. There was also an option to participate in a one-on-one interview with a member of UGBC. The link to the survey was included in several of UGBC’s weekly email newsletters. Students who completed the survey were entered into a raffle for a $150 Uber Gift card. The statements addressed 10 areas of student life: race and culture, religion and ideology, gender and sexual identity, disabilities, health promotion, club development and maintenance, transition to BC, communication with student body, awareness of UGBC

events and initiatives, as well as overall representation of the student body. The survey garnered 1,315 responses. Freshmen made up 28.4 percent of total responses. Seniors made up 27.7 percent of the responses, sophomores made up 23 percent of the responses, and juniors accounted for 20.9 percent of the responses. The breakdown of respondents’ race, graduating year, and school closely mirrored the actual demographics of BC, which Liu and Xu believe means the results of the survey accurately portray the sentiment of the student body as a whole. Liu and Xu started their presentation by stating that each of the questions was aimed at giving feedback to different committees of UGBC. Overall, the survey showed that students believe UGBC actively addresses many issues of student life. Of the 10 categories surveyed, disabilities and transitioning into the BC community were the only two categories that received “neutral” rankings by the majority of responders. How UGBC has been addressing disabilities on campus saw about 35 percent of respondents answer “neutral” while about 36 percent of respondents answered either “agree” or “strongly agree,” and about 29 percent of respondents answered either “disagree” or “strongly disagree.” “I think a lot of people aren’t affected themselves, personally, and so they don’t see that apply to them as often, and so when they answered this question that kind of translates onto there,” Liu said. After touching on the positives that the response data showed for the

issue of disabilities—general acceptance of disabled by the student body, willingness to help, and the existence of UGBC’s Council for Students with Disabilities (CSD)—Liu discussed the negative responses they received. “There is not enough awareness of UGBC resources,” Liu said. “There is awareness of CSD and other resources on campus, however, it is also limited in serving populations. Some people just don’t know it exists.” Within the category of UGBC’s role in transitioning students into the BC community, about 37 percent of respondents answered “neutral,” while about 36 percent of students answered either “agree” or “strongly agree,” and about 27 percent of students responded either “disagree” or “strongly disagree.” Xu attributed the “neutral” responses to a general lack of awareness of what UGBC does during move-in for freshmen and transfer students. “As the student government representing the student body, if we don’t have that initial connection and first impression with the new students that come in, then it’s only going to get harder when we ask for their opinion and input because they don’t necessarily feel integrated on the onset,” Xu said. For the topic of gender and sexuality, about 71 percent of the student population either agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that “UGBC actively addresses gender and sexual identity issues and concerns at BC.” Liu acknowledged UGBC ’s successes in this area of student life, but

See Survey, A3

9fjkfe JZ`\eZ\ IXccp <eZfliX^\j Jlggfik\ij kf ÊJkXe[ LgË Dfi\ k_Xe ,#''' X[mfZXk\j ^Xk_\i\[ e\Xi Ki`e`kp :_liZ_% 9P N@CC@8D 98K:?<CFI 8jjk% D\kif <[`kfi Early Sunday afternoon, crowds of over 5,000 scientists and environmental advocates congregated in Copley Square to stand up for science. Building on an amalgamation of many other scientist-led efforts following the election of President Donald Trump in November, the Rally to Stand Up for Science featured a series of speeches that called out the new administration for their skepticism toward climate change. Groups of ralliers flocked to the square shortly after 11 a.m. chanting, “Stand up for science,” and engaging in passionate discus-

INSIDE

THIS ISSUE

sions about the environment. Among a slew of anti-Trump posters, demonstrators held up signs reading “Science not silence” and “Science is real,” pleading for politicians to accept that science must be included in policy-making decisions. The rally united environmental groups like ClimateTruth.org, Union of Concerned Scientists, and 500 Women Scientists, all with the common goal of defending the truth in science. The rally comes at a turbulent time in which many see the new administration as anti-science. In the months following the election last November, protests and rallies erupted throughout Boston. From the Women’s March on Inauguration Day, to protests over the executive order, Bostonians have continued to exercise their right to free speech. The crowd at the rally included students, professors, retirees, and scientists who donned

white lab coats. For spectator Annie Fuentes, concern over the current political climate and the denouncing of science brought her to the rally. “I think it’s really important to keep this momentum going,” Fuentes said. “We need to keep up local efforts to make this known as much as possible.” By noon, thousands of scientists, science advocates, and supporters had gathered in front of a small stage next to Trinity Church, and speeches commenced. Highly-respected and prominent scientists took to the stage to voice their concern that science is under attack. Astrid Caldas, a Ph.D. Climate Scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists, kicked the event off by advocating for the integration of science in the decision-making

WILLIAM BATCHELOR / HEIGHTS EDITOR

See Science Rally, A3

On Sunday, demonstrators held up signs such as “Science not silence” and “Science is real.”

NEWS: Concussions and Clicks

FEATURES: Super Man

New York Times sportswriter Ben Shpigel talks career covering pro football...............A3

RA and CSON student Nick Raposo goes against the grain at BC with a smile...........A5

INDEX Vol. XCVIII, No. 10 © 2017, The Heights, Inc. www.bcheights.com

NEWS.......................... A2 SPORTS......................B1 FEATURES...................A4 ARTS & REVIEW............B8 OPINIONS................... A6


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.