San Bernardino Press_12/16/2024 by Beacon Media News

Judges block controversial grocery merger of Kroger, Albertsons

By Joe Taglieri joet@beaconmedianews.com

Albertsons Cos. Inc. has canceled merger plans with The Kroger Co. after two judges on Tuesday sided with federal regulators who argued the deal would hinder competition, result in higher prices and be bad for grocery workers.

Albertsons then filed a multibillion-dollar lawsuit Wednesday against Kroger, alleging breach of the merger agreement for not doing enough to secure regulatory approval for the $24.6 billion deal.

Judges in Oregon and Washington issued decisions within hours of each other Tuesday that were unfavorable to the merger. The judge in Oregon agreed with Federal Trade Commission regulators who said a combined Albertsons-Kroger supermarket chain was a violation of consumer protection laws. The judge in Washington

blocked the merger hours after the Oregon decision.

The FTC, California and seven other states sued in February in an attempt to block the proposed merger.

Kroger officials countered that the alliance would enable the newly combined company to compete more effectively with large retail conglomerates such as Walmart and Amazon. Kroger claimed the merger would not cause higher prices for consumers or widespread store closures and job cuts.

To ensure existing stores continue operating postmerger, the company said it would transfer 579 stores to C&S Wholesale Grocers.

At the conclusion of a three-week trial, however, U.S. District Judge Adrienne Nelson sided with the FTC.

The Portland, Oregon-based judge ruled that the merger would eliminate competition

between two of the largest grocery chains in the U.S., resulting in higher prices, the possibility of fewer jobs and negative impacts on unionized grocery workers.

Separately on Tuesday, a Washington state court judge in Seattle ruled against the merger.

The FTC issued a prepared statement by Bureau of Competition Director Henry Liu following the rulings Tuesday:

“The FTC, along with our state partners, scored a major victory for the American people, successfully blocking Kroger’s acquisition of Albertsons,” Liu said.

“This historic win protects millions of Americans across the country from higher prices for essential groceries — from milk, to

bread, to eggs — ultimately allowing consumers to keep more money in their pockets. This victory has a direct, tangible impact on the lives of millions of Americans who shop at Kroger or Albertsonsowned grocery stores for their everyday needs, whether that’s a Fry’s in Arizona, a Vons in Southern California, or a Jewel-Osco in Illinois,” the statement continued.

“This is also a victory for thousands of hardworking union employees, protecting their hard-earned paychecks by ensuring Kroger and Albertsons continue to compete for workers through higher wages, better benefits, and improved working conditions,” Liu said.

An Albertsons spokesperson told Reuters, “We believe we clearly outlined

Lawmaker seeks probe to ferret out legislator tied to bribery scheme

DHS councilman pleads not guilty to road rage charges

Desert Hot Springs City Councilman and recent mayoral candidate Russell Betts entered not guilty pleas to a pair of charges Thursday following an alleged road rage incident.

Betts pleaded not guilty to a felony count of vandalism and a misdemeanor count of false imprisonment at the Riverside Hall of Justice on Thursday, according to case records.

The defendant is due back in court for a felony settlement conference on March 6.

He is accused of trapping and damaging another motorist’s vehicle at a 7-Eleven in charges that were filed one day before the election. Betts allegedly followed a driver whom he believed cut him off in traffic on Aug. 4, parking in a way that prevented the person’s escape and striking the other car, according to a declaration in support of arrest first obtained by the Uken Report.

According to the declaration, Betts followed the other driver shortly before 9 a.m. that day, parking behind him when only one other vehicle was in the lot. He allegedly popped the hood of his car, “pretending to have an inoperable vehicle” and confronting the other driver when the person left the convenience store. The other driver “could not get out of the situation, except to back out of the parking

School district sued over alleged actions of former math teacher

Eight young women who say they were sexually harassed and inappropriately touched by a former Hemet High School teacher ultimately convicted of felony charges are suing the Hemet Unified School District for what they say was a failure by administrators to protect them from the defendant.

The suit, filed Friday in Riverside County Superior Court, stems from the alleged actions of 33-year-old Miguel Angel Chavez Lopez of Riverside between 2016 and 2018, while he was employed as a mathematics instructor at the high school.

Lopez, who is also a named defendant in the civil complaint, was arrested in August 2018 following a Riverside County Sheriff’s Department investigation. He pleaded guilty six months later to oral copulation of a minor and penetration of a minor with a foreign object and was sentenced to 16 months in state prison.

Most of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit came forward after the criminal case was settled.

Handyman who killed fiancee in her Woodcrest home sentenced

A Ralphs supermarket in Porter Ranch. | Photo courtesy of Coolcaesar/Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Handyman who killed fiancee in her Woodcrest home sentenced

By City News Service

A40-year-old handyman who fatally beat his fiancee in a “gruesome” attack that included biting her and breaking her neck at her Woodcrest home was sentenced Tuesday to 25 years to life in state prison.

A Riverside jury last month convicted Eduardo Avalos Escoto of first-degree murder for the 2019 slaying of 42-year-old Brandie Frazier in 2019.

During a hearing at the Riverside Hall of Justice on Tuesday, Riverside County Superior Court Judge Valerie Navarro imposed the sentence required by law on Escoto.

According to a trial brief filed by the District Attorney’s Office, the defendant and Frazier met in 2018 while he was working as a handyman around her and her mother’s property in the 17000 block of Palm Road, near California Citrus State Historic Park.

Escoto and the victim began dating, culminating in his moving in with her, living in one of two

residential dwellings on the property, occupied by Frazier and her two young children, while her mother, identified only as “L.B.,” resided in the adjacent house, the brief said.

a “clear pattern of violence against women” with whom he became romantically involved, but that was unknown to the victim and her mother, according to the brief. The narrative said

The defendant, a Mexican national, exhibited

Former teacher

beaten her and threatened her life.

Exactly what happened between Escoto and Frazier on the night of Aug. 31, 2019, is uncertain, but according to court papers, the defendant turned “extremely violent.”

in a prior relationship with a woman in Mexico, he had

They’re listed only by their initials — “B.B.,” “B.K.,” “G.S.,” “K.M.,” “N.M.,” “V.N.,” “V.R.” and “W.N.” According to the suit, they’re all now in their early to mid-20s and reside in Riverside, Los Angeles and San Diego counties.

“Miguel Chavez groomed and primed the plaintiffs and other students for abuse by openly complimenting their appearances, keeping them in his classroom during break periods, lunches and afterschool hours, massaging their shoulders and brushing his body against theirs,” the suit alleges.

Hemet Unified School District officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The suit, which seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages,

alleges that Lopez had been investigated for inappropriate contact while employed at Ranch Mirage High School in 2015, yet was still hired by Hemet Unified the following year.

“Chavez had a documented history of misconduct before his abuse of the plaintiffs,” court papers allege.

“He was investigated for inappropriate behavior at Rancho Mirage High. Additionally, there were multiple `red flags’ regarding Chavez’s behavior that alerted, or should have alerted, HUSD and Hemet High to Chavez’s ... sexual abuse of children.”

The attorneys said that instead of administrators and Chavez’s supervisors taking steps to protect the plaintiffs, the defendant was allowed to “prey upon ... and victimize children.”

It was unclear why the plaintiffs did not formally accuse Chavez in 2018. Most of them were not named as victims in the original criminal complaint.

The suit alleges that HUSD and high school staff overseeing the defendant “knew or should have known or suspected that Chavez was acting inappropriately with the plaintiffs and other students ... engaging in childhood sexual abuse.”

The attorneys wrote that the school district had “received prior complaints and warnings from students and parents regarding Chavez’s improper behavior,” but staff did not address the matter.

No court dates have been set yet in the civil action.

The prosecution described the attack as a “gruesome murder,” noting that not only was Frazier “beaten violently,” but her “neck was broken, and the defendant went so far as to

bite her face,” according to the brief.

“The manner in which the murder was committed was not only violent, but extremely intimate and personal,” the document stated.

On the morning of Sept. 1, 2019, L.B. became concerned when she didn’t see her daughter and walked over to the victim’s house.

“She found her grandchildren crying and went

looking for her daughter ... whom she found brutally beaten and showing no signs of life in her bed,” according to the brief.

Escoto had fled and immediately became the prime suspect. Court papers said he stole Frazier’s “jewelry and other valuables,” which he quickly hocked at a pawn shop.

The Pacific Southwest Regional Fugitive Task Force, whose members include District Attorney’s Office investigators, discovered Escoto went to Mexico. Mexican law enforcement agencies were asked to assist in finding him.

However, in June 2022, authorities learned he had returned to the U.S. and was in Washington state before heading to Texas, where he was arrested in July 2022 by Mitchell County sheriff’s deputies at a gas station in Colorado City. Escoto was extradited to California weeks later.

Escoto had no documented prior felony convictions in Riverside County.

Fundraiser seeks donations for Hemet city employee killed by DUI suspect

By City News Service

Afundraiserseeking donations for the young son of a Hemet city employee killed by a suspected drunken driver who plowed into the victim’s work vehicle had raised over $4,300 Wednesday, with organizers hoping to reach a goal of $50,000.

Derek Holt, 40, of Hemet, was fatally injured Thursday, Dec. 5, when his Department of Public Works pickup was hit on Acacia Avenue, just west of Kirby Street.

A GoFundMe campaign was initiated by Holt’s relatives, who are seeking contributions for the support of his son, for whom the victim was the sole provider, according to organizers. There was no word regarding the child’s mother.

“Derek was a devoted single father,” according to the fundraiser. “Any help, no matter how small, will be deeply appreciated as we come together to honor his memory and support his loved ones through this unimaginable hardship.”

The account page can be found at gofundme.com/f/ support-derek-holts-family.

Noah Anthony Zapata,

27, of Menifee, was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence resulting in great bodily injury for allegedly causing the deadly crash.

Zapata posted a $50,000 bond and was released from the Smith Correctional Facility in Banning on Saturday, Dec. 7.

The collision happened on Acacia shortly before 8 a.m. Dec. 5, according to the California Highway Patrol and Hemet Police Department.

Police spokesman Alan Reyes alleged that Zapata was in a compact car going westbound and plowed straight into the truck that Holt had parked near the intersection

while carrying out his duties as a water distribution inspector.

Paramedics and patrol officers arrived within a few minutes and attempted lifesaving measures on the victim, but he was pronounced dead at the scene, Reyes said. He said that patrolmen detained Zapata and held him for CHP officers, who took over the investigation because it involved a municipal vehicle. Furtherinvestigation confirmed the suspect allegedly had been driving under the influence. He was taken into custody without incident. Background information on Zapata was unavailable.

Brandie Frazier. | Photo courtesy of the Riverside County District Attorney’s

Eduardo Avalos Escoto. | Photo courtesy of the Riverside County District Attorney’s Office

Hemet High School. | Photo courtesy of Hemet High School/Facebook

Derek Holt. | Photo courtesy of T Holyoak/Jill Forbes/GoFundMe

Editorial editorial@beaconmedianews.com

editor@hlrmedia.com

Graphics/Production production@beaconmedianews.com production@hlrmedia.com

Advertising advertising@beaconmedianews.com advertising@hlrmedia.com

Legal Advertising legals@beaconmedianews.com legals@hlrmedia.com

Business accounting@beaconmedianews.com accounting@hlrmedia.com

BEACON MEDIA ADDRESS: 820 S. Myrtle Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016

PHONE: (626) 301-1010

WEBSITE www.beaconmedianews.com

HLR MEDIA ADDRESS: 820 S. Myrtle Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016

PHONE: (626) 301-1010

www.HLRmedia.com

PRESS

editor@beaconmedianews.com editor@hlrmedia.com

A39-year-oldman is expected to be arraigned in downtown Los Angeles in the coming weeks on a federal charge for allegedly flying a drone over Vandenberg Space Force Base and photographing the military complex, officials announced Wednesday.

Yinpiao Zhou, 39, of Contra Costa County is charged with failure to register an aircraft not providing transportation and violation of national defense airspace, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

Zhou was arrested Monday, Dec. 9, at San Francisco International Airport prior to boarding a Chinabound flight and made his initial appearance Tuesday in the U.S. District Court in San Francisco. No plea was taken and his arraignment is expected to be scheduled in Los Angeles federal court in the coming weeks.

According to an affidavit, drone detection systems at Vandenberg in Santa Barbara County detected a drone Nov. 30 flying over the base. The systems detected that the drone flew for nearly an hour, traveled to an altitude of almost one mile above ground level, and originated from Ocean Park, a public area next to the base, the affidavit states.

Man charged with illegally flying drone over Vandenberg

By City News Service

Base security personnel went to the park, spoke to Zhou and another person accompanying him, and learned that Zhou had a drone concealed in his jacket -- the same one that flew over the base, officials said.

Federal prosecutors say agents later searched Zhou’s drone pursuant to a search warrant and saw several photographs of Vandenberg

taken from an aerial viewpoint. A search of Zhou’s phone showed that Zhou allegedly conducted a search for the phrase “Vandenberg Space Force Base Drone Rules” and messaged with another person about hacking his drone to allow it to fly higher than it could otherwise, court papers show.

Zhou is a Chinese citizen and lawful perma-

nent resident of the United States, most recently returning to the U.S. from China in February. The person accompanying Zhou at Ocean Park most recently entered the United States from China last month, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office. If convicted, Zhou would face a possible sentence of up to four years in federal prison, prosecutors said.

State to spend $1.4B on EV chargers, zero-emission infrastructure

By Joe Taglieri joet@beaconmedianews.com

Thousands more electric vehicle chargers are on the way to California following the state Energy Commission’s approval of $1.4 billion for EV charging as well as hydrogen refueling infrastructure, officials announced Wednesday.

The new infrastructure is for light, medium and heavyduty zero-emission vehicles throughout the state, which officials said expands the most extensive charging and hydrogen refueling network

in the United States.

The funding will result in nearly 17,000 additional chargers for passenger vehicles statewide. Currently more than 152,000 public and shared private chargers are in service.

With a combination of state funding from with previous investment plans and grants from the federal government, electric utilities and other programs, officials expect California to reach 250,000 chargers

in the next few years. An estimated 500,000 chargers are installed at private residences statewide.

“An important part of achieving our clean car future is building chargers in every corner of California, especially in neighborhoods historically left behind,” Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a statement. “With this investment, and the help of the private sector, we’re building a bigger, better vehicle charging network that ensures Californians can reliably and affordably get where they’re going.”

The $1.4 billion spending plan details how the Energy Commission’s Clean Transportation Program will allocate the funding over the next four years. At least half of the funds will aim to “benefit lower-income and disadvantaged communities,” officials said.

See EVs Page 07

Photo by Jason Mavrommatis on Unsplash

HOLIDAY GUIDE

POP UP EVENTS:

The Paseo Pasadena: SOCAL ETSY GUILD MARKET

Sunday, December 22nd 12-7PM

300 East Colorado Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91101

Join us for an amazing day filled with local artists, crafters, and designers showcasing unique handmade treasures. Perfect for some early holiday shopping or just to treat yourself! FREE to attend & pet-friendly! Bring your friends, family, and furry pals for a fun shopping experience. See you there! Visit www.thepaseopasadena.com for more information.

The Paseo Pasadena: Shopping Deals

Brighton Collectibles: FREE* GLITTERING LOVE TOTE & HEARTS A FLUTTER JEWELRY CASE.

Brighton has the best gifts for the Holiday season; visit us and we’ll help you check off every name on your list, plus package them beautifully too! And as our gift to you, when you spend $150 or more in a single, same day purchase, you’ll receive our limited edition Glittering Love Tote, designed by in-house designer Britney Drumheller. Spend $250 or more, and you’ll receive both the Tote AND the Hearts a Flutter Jewelry Case.

Offer ends: ENDS 12/23

LensCrafters: 50% OFF ADDITIONAL PAIR

Receive 50% off additional complete pair purchase. Requires complete pair purchase (frame + lenses) or annual supply of contact lenses to receive 50% off additional complete pair (frame + lenses), savings applied to lenses. When purchasing one pair prescription sunglasses and one pair prescription eyeglasses/contacts, the sunglasses will receive 50% off. When purchasing two complete pairs of prescription eyeglasses or sunglasses, the pair of equal or lesser value will receive 50% off. Cannot be combined with vision insurance benefits, other offers, previous purchases, readers or nonprescription sunglasses. Valid prescription required. Items must be purchased for the same customer on the same day.

Offer ends: ENDS 12/31

Tommy Bahama: GET A $50 AWARD!

Check off your nice list at Tommy Bahama and get a $50 award with every $175 you spend—so you can treat yourself later. Restrictions apply.

Offer ends: ENDS 12/31

Visit www.thepaseopasadena.com for more information.

Photos courtesy of Canva

HOLIDAY GUIDE

Hanukkah Events in Los Angeles

Grand Menorah Lighting at The Culver Steps

The Culver Steps, 9300 Culver Blvd., Culver City, CA 90232

Thursday, December 26th | 5:00 PM – 6:00 PM

Celebrate the first night of Hanukkah with a Grand Menorah Lighting and festive celebration at The Culver Steps! This family-friendly event features a special magic show, live music, hot latkes, donuts, a caricature artist, arts & crafts, free raffles, and a special gift for every child. Best of all, it’s free to attend!

Hanukkah in the Foothills

New Hope Community Church, 10438 Oro Vista Ave., Sunland, CA 91040

Saturday, December 28th | 5:00 PM

The Annual Hanukkah in the Foothills event will be held on December 28th at New Hope Community Church. This free community gathering offers fun for all ages — and don’t forget to come hungry! Enjoy freshly made potato latkes as you celebrate the Festival of Lights.

Gelt Drop & Menorah Lighting at the Platform

Platform Park, 8806 Washington Blvd., Culver City, CA 90232

Sunday, December 29th | 4:30 PM

Don’t miss the excitement of the Gelt Drop & Menorah Lighting at Platform Park! Watch hundreds of chocolate gelt coins fall from a firetruck and enjoy a giant Menorah lighting. There will be hot latkes and donuts, arts and crafts for kids, music, and a free raffle. Admission is free!

Photo courtesy of Canva

UNLV to play Cal in LA Bowl; USC to face Texas A&M in Las Vegas Bowl

By City News Service

UNLV will face California in the fourth LA Bowl Dec. 18 at SoFi Stadium with Los Angeles native Del Alexander making his debut as the Rebels interim coach, organizers announced last week.

The 53-year-old Alexander, who was a receiver for University High School in the Sawtelle district, West Los Angeles College and USC, was appointed as UNLV’s interim coach Dec. 8 after Barry Odom resigned earlier in the day to become Purdue’s coach.

“Del has a long history with successful football programs on a national level and we have full confidence that he is the right person to lead the Rebels into what promises to be an exciting big-time bowl game in Los Angeles against Cal,” UNLV athletic director Erick Harper said in a statement.

Alexander has been the Rebels’ wide receivers coach since 2023. He began his coaching career in 1995 as an assistant video coordinator at USC after playing for the Trojans in 1993 and 1994. He was a graduate assistant in 1996 and 1997, John Robinson’s final two seasons as USC’s coach.

Alexander was also on Robinson’s staff at UNLV as passing game coordinator from 2000-2001 and wide receivers and quarterbacks coach in 2002.

Alexander has also coached at Oregon State, San Diego, Wisconsin, Arizona State, Notre Dame and Georgia Tech and was a San Diego Chargers senior offensive assistant in 1999.

The LA Bowl customarily matches a Pac-12 team against the Mountain West Conference champion. With conference champion Boise State chosen for the expanded 12-team College Football Playoff, UNLV, which lost the conference’s championship game to the Broncos 21-7, was chosen as their replacement.

The Rebels (10-3) won their first three games, their best start since 1984, then quarterback Matthew Sluka announced he would take a redshirt season to preserve his final season of eligibility, with his camp claiming he was owed thousands in name, image and likeness licensing money. UNLV said he received everything he was promised and simply wanted more.

The Rebels won their next game with his replace-

ment, Hajj-Malik Williams, at quarterback, then lost to Syracuse, 44-41, in overtime

Both of UNLV’s losses since then have been to Boise State, ranked ninth in the final College Football Playoff rankings issued Dec. 8 and bound for the playoff quarterfinal at the Fiesta Bowl, 29-24, Oct. 25, and 21-7 Dec. 6.

The LA Bowl has the fifth choice among available former and current Pac-12 teams and selected the Golden Bears (6-6) after the Sun Bowl chose Washington (6-6).

California is seeking its first winning season since 2019 when it was 8-5.

The teams have one common opponent, Syracuse, which defeated the Golden Bears, 33-25, Nov. 16, and the Rebels, 44-41, in overtime, Oct. 4.

Oddsmakers have made California a 2 1/2-point favorite. ESPN Analytics gives UNLV a 54.6% chance of winning.

The 6 p.m. game will be televised by ESPN.

USC vs. Texas A&M

USC will face Texas A&M in the Las Vegas Bowl on Dec. 27, with Lincoln Riley trying to avoid his first losing season in his eight-season head coaching career, orga-

nizers

Dec. 8.

as its coach, and defeated Fresno State, 45-20, in 2013.

The Aggies will be playing in Nevada for the first time. Texas A&M (84) has lost back-to-back

games and three of its last four.

The teams have two common opponents — LSU and Notre Dame.

The Trojans began their season at Allegiant Stadium, site of the Las Vegas Bowl, with a 27-20 victory over the Tigers Sept. 1, and concluded the regular-season with a 49-35 loss to the Fighting Irish Nov. 30.

Texas A&M lost to Notre Dame, 23-13, in the season opener for both teams Aug. 31, and defeated LSU, 38-23, Oct. 26.

The Las Vegas Bowl has the third choice among the available former and current Pac-12 teams behind the Alamo and Holiday bowls. It is among the Southeastern Conference’s “Pool of Six” bowls for the 2024 season with the ReliaQuest, Gator, Music City, Texas and Liberty bowls, that the conference makes assignments for in consultation with SEC member institutions and bowl organizers.

The Citrus Bowl has the first selection of SEC teams after the College Football Playoff.

USC has won all three of its games against the Aggies, winning 31-7 in 1964 at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum, 20-0 in the 1975 Liberty Bowl in John McKay’s final game as the Trojans’ coach, and 47-28 in the 1977 AstroBluebonnet Bowl.

The 7:30 p.m. game will be televised by ESPN.

Rose Bowl

Oregon will face the winner of a Dec. 21 firstround College Football Playoff game between Ohio State and Tennessee in the Rose Bowl on New Year’s Day, it was announced Dec. 8.

The Ducks earned the top seed and a firstround bye in the inaugural 12-team College Football Playoff with a 45-37 victory over Penn State in the Big Ten championship game Dec. 7 in Indianapolis, improving to 13-0 and remaining the lone undefeated team in the Football Bowl Subdivision.

Oregon will be making its ninth appearance in the Rose Bowl and fifth since 2010. The Ducks are 4-4 in the Rose Bowl and have won in each of their three

most recent trips, most recently defeating Wisconsin, 28-27, on New Year’s Day, 2020.

Ohio State (10-2) is seeded eighth and will play host to ninth-seeded Tennessee (10-2) on Dec. 21 for the other Rose Bowl berth.

The Buckeyes have made 16 Rose Bowl appearances, third-most all-time behind USC (34) and Michigan (21), and have a 9-7 record in the game. Ohio State was a 48-45 winner over Utah in its most-recent Rose Bowl appearance on Jan. 1, 2022.

The Volunteers have played in the Rose Bowl twice, losing to USC, 14-0 in 1940 and 25-0 in 1945.

The 111th annual Rose Bowl will begin, as is tradition, at 2 p.m. and be televised by ESPN. The game will serve as a College Football Playoff quarterfinal, with the winner advancing to play the winner of the quarterfinal between Arizona State and the winner of the firstround game between Texas and Clemson in either the Orange Bowl on Jan. 9 or the Cotton Bowl on Jan. 10.

announced

The Trojans (6-6) will be playing in the Las Vegas Bowl for the third time. USC lost to Utah, 10-6, in the 2001 game to conclude Pete Carroll’s first season

Del Alexander. | Photo courtesy of UNLV

Quarterback Jayden Maiava scores one of two rushing touchdowns in the Trojans' loss to Notre Dame. | Photo courtesy of USC Football/X

This latest large spending outlay is part of Newsom’s California Climate Commitment, which includes more than $10 billion for zero-emission vehicles and ZEV infrastructure. California has also received billions of federal dollars for clean transportation.

The funds will become available over the next four years and distributed to projects via competitive grants. Projects include direct incentive and rebate programs for businesses, nonprofits, tribes and local government agencies.

“Today’s approval of the investment plan reaffirms California’s commitment to funding zero-emission refueling infrastructure,” CEC Lead Commissioner for Transportation Patty Monahan said in a statement. “The plan prioritizes clean air benefits in low-income and disadvantaged communities that need it the most. There is no doubt — ZEVs are here to stay in the Golden State.”

ZEVs topped 26.4% of the state’s new vehicle sales in 2024’s third quarter, and the Newsom administration is prioritizing clean fuel production, public transportation and rail infrastructure enhancements, as well as “a cleaner, smarter electric grid to help power it all,” officials said.

ZEV sales totaled 115,897 in the third quarter of 2024, an average of 1,300 sold each day with 2.1 million sold in the state to date, the CEC reported. California accounts for 30% of new ZEVs sold in the U.S., according to the state Air Resources Board.

The Clean Transportation Program began in 2007 and is one of the first funding efforts focused on transportation in support of the state’s climate change policies. So far spending has totaled $2.3 billion for ZEV infrastructure, alternative fuels and advanced vehicle technologies.

Officials listed these results from the Clean Transportation Program:

63% of funding awarded in disadvantaged or low-income communities.

Nearly 34,700 EV chargers installed or planned.

96 public hydrogen fueling stations installed or planned.

Creation of the California Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Project to provide streamlined incentives for EV chargers.

$100 million to fund 120 projects for truck and bus charging and refueling via the ZeroEmission Commercial Vehicles Project.

2,300 clean school buses funded along with 1,100 ZEV school buses currently in service.

40 ZEV and ZEV-related manufacturing projects that support in-state economic growth.

Workforce training for more than 32,000 individuals, “helping prepare workers for the clean transportation economy,” officials said.

The governor’s office characterized the ZEV funding as “a major milestone on California’s path to a clean transportation future.”

A list of infrastructure projects in communities throughout the state is online at build. ca.gov.

SCAN TO VIEW OUR HOLIDAY GUIDE

Electric vehicle chargers. | Photo courtesy of the California Energy Commission

How to reduce formaldehyde exposure in your home

This story was originally published by ProPublica. ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prizewinning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox. ProPublica spent months investigating how a single underregulated toxic chemical — formaldehyde — creates an inescapable cancer risk for everyone in America. It’s in the air outside, at levels that fail to meet the public health goals set by the Environmental Protection Agency. And it’s in our homes, coming from our couches, our clothes and our babies’ cribs — sometimes at levels that can trigger breathing problems, allergic reactions and asthma.

We modeled pollution data and deployed our own air monitors to measure formaldehyde levels around us. We interviewed more than 50 experts and read thousands of pages of scientific studies and EPA records. During it all, we kept in mind the single question we knew readers would most want answered: How can I reduce my exposure?

The following are some common sources of the chemical and suggestions for reducing your risk, as informed by our reporting.

Wood Furniture and Floors

Be careful when buying new furniture. One of the most significant sources of formaldehyde in the home has traditionally been furniture made with composite wood that uses glues to bind strands, particles, fibers or boards together. The adhesives used in this type of furniture can contain formaldehyde, which goes through a process called off-gassing, where the chemical is released into the air over time. Federal regulators have set limits on how much of the chemical some composite woods can release. But those limits, set more than a decade ago, are still well above the level that EPA scientists recently established to protect people from asthma, allergic reactions and other breathing problems.So, at the very least, you want to look at the item’s packaging for a label that shows it is compliant with the standards set under the Toxic Substances Control Act.

The law covers goods made of hardwood plywood, medium-density fiber-

By Topher Sanders, ProPublica

board and particleboard. All products covered by the law must feature some sort of label saying they comply with TSCA, though the labels can look different from product to product. Compliance does not mean the item is formaldehyde free. It means the company is certifying that any formaldehyde emissions are at a low enough concentration to meet TSCA’s requirements. Some types of composite woods aren’t covered by the law, and while those are used mainly for structural projects, they can also be used to make furniture and shelving. So if you are unsure what type of composite wood a piece of furniture is made from, make sure to ask a salesperson or company representative before you purchase. Another label you can look for is the California Air Resources Board Phase 2. That, too, doesn’t mean the furniture or flooring is free of formaldehyde, but that it adheres to the state’s emission standards, which are similar to the TSCA rules. Some manufacturers include this on their labels for goods sold in and outside of California. Two other labels to look for are “no-added formaldehyde” (NAF) or “ultra-low-emitting formaldehyde” (ULEF). Those mean the manufacturer’s product has gone

through additional testing. If you do buy furniture you suspect contains formaldehyde, environmental experts suggest you allow the item to air out for as long as one full week in a highly ventilated area, such as a garage, however impractical that may be. If that isn’t possible, leave the windows open near the furniture to improve ventilation. It can take as long as two years for items to release most of their formaldehyde, so buying secondhand could be better for your health as well as your wallet. Purchasing solid wood furniture, while expensive, is the best alternative when trying to avoid high levels of formaldehyde.

Cosmetics and Personal Care

Inspect the ingredients in your personal care products. The European Union banned formaldehyde in cosmetics, but in the U.S., the Food and Drug Administration has yet to follow suit. Hair straighteners, particularly those marketed to Black women, have been found to contain formaldehyde. The chemical helps to form links with the amino acids in hair and, when heat is added, typically from a flat iron, the links are made stronger and the hair is straightened. But that heat can also turn formaldehyde into a gas and release it into the air.

When reading the ingredients labels, of course you should look for formaldehyde, but also watch out for formalin or methylene glycol, which are formaldehyde-related ingredients that release the chemical when heated. Those same three ingredients can also appear in nail care products. In nail hardeners, formaldehyde helps them bond to the keratin in nails. Also some nail polishes contain a toluenesulfonamide-formaldehyde resin that’s used to make the polish more resilient and adhere better to fingernails. That resin can release formaldehyde as it dries.

Candles, Indoor Fireplaces and Gas Stoves

Flames mean formaldehyde. The chemical is a byproduct of combustion, so anytime there is a fire, there is formaldehyde. This is as true for huge forest blazes as it is for lit candles or burning cigarettes. In the home, fireplaces and gas stoves can be a significant source of formaldehyde.

ProPublica reporters learned this firsthand earlier this year when they took formaldehyde readings at various places around New York and New Jersey. One of the highest concentrations was measured during a dinner party where candles were burned and a gas stove was operating.

Multiple studies have also documented increased formaldehyde exposure when smoking cigarettes and vaping. Those who smoke can reduce indoor formaldehyde levels by doing it outdoors, but they will still be breathing in the chemical themselves.

As is true whenever formaldehyde is present, ventilation is crucial. If possible, open windows and doors when candles, fireplaces or stoves are used. Make a habit of turning on the stove vent when you cook. And while it’s expensive, if you’re able to, consider replacing your gas stove with an electric stove, which generally produces less formaldehyde. Naturally you might ask: Do air purifiers help? Researchers are still investigating how well air purifiers reduce formaldehyde. One study suggested that some air purifiers could even create formaldehyde as a by-product. Scented air fresheners can also introduce formaldehyde into the air.

Clothes

Sometimes formaldehyde is even in our clothes. Clothes that are designed to resist wrinkles or stains are more likely to contain the carcinogen. The chemical is used during the dyeing process and to help reduce shrinkage, mold growth and wrinkles. The use of

formaldehyde in clothes can irritate skin conditions, such as eczema. But it’s often very difficult to tell whether clothing was made using the chemical. Labels generally won’t tell you. Clothes woven from natural fibers like linen, wool and cotton are less likely to have been made using formaldehyde than synthetic fabrics, like polyester. Washing all your new clothes before you wear them can help reduce your exposure. One recent study found formaldehyde in 20% of the cotton clothing researchers examined, but it was gone after the items had been washed.

Cars

Formaldehyde adhesives can be found in vehicle dashboards, seat coverings, flooring materials, carpeting, door trim, window sealant and armrests. And similar to furniture, the highest levels of formaldehyde are often found in new vehicles. To reduce your exposure to formaldehyde in cars, you should again rely on ventilation. On particularly hot days, you’ll want to allot time to roll down your car windows and allow the vehicle to air out. ProPublica found that not only do new cars contain levels of formaldehyde higher than the EPA calculated to protect people from breathing problems, allergic reactions or asthma symptoms, but cars as old as four years can continue to release potentially harmful levels of the chemical, particularly on hot days. Set your car’s air conditioner to allow outside air to circulate through the vehicle.

There is one throughline in all of the advice and research on reducing formaldehyde exposure indoors — ventilation. Opening windows and doors, turning on fans and ventilators, and leaving products in open spaces for long periods of time so they can release formaldehyde all allow the chemical to vent away from us. Formaldehyde’s ubiquity means there isn’t a way to absolutely wall ourselves off from it. But opening the window may be our cheapest and best course of action.

Sharon Lerner and Al Shaw contributed reporting. Republished with Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

One of the most significant sources of formaldehyde in the home has traditionally been furniture made with composite wood that uses glues to bind strands, particles, fibers or boards together. | Photo by Mr.TinMD CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Starting a new business? Go to filedba.com

Monrovia City Notices

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NOTICE TO VENDORS CALLING FOR PROPOSALS

RFP# M-25-202 MUSD UPS REFRESH FY2025

Monrovia Unified School District, hereinafter referred to as the District, is seeking competitive proposals for an Uninterruptable Power Supply (UPS) Refresh, including hardware, software and physical installation. In addition to issuing this Request For Proposals (RFP) and in conformity with the FCC Schools and Library Division (SLD), “Universal Service Fund” (also known as E-Rate funding), MUSD will post a Form 470 to seek E-Rate discounts for the services sought by this RFP.

The Form 470 will be posted on December 9, 2024, and can be found on the EPC portal and at the following website: https://data. usac.org/publicreports/Forms/Form470Rfp/Index or https://data. usac.org/publicreports/Forms/Form470Detail/Index

Bids accepted until 2:00 p.m on January 21, 2025. All bids shall be submitted in the format and method specified within the RFP. All bids will be opened no earlier than the day following the bid deadline. All questions must be submitted in the format outlined in the RFP by December 20, 2024.

No bidder may withdraw a submitted bid for a period of ninety (90) days after the time set for opening proposals.

The District and Board of Education reserve the right to reject any and all bids, and to waive any irregularities or informalities in any bid or in the bidding procedure.

By: Arin Golestani

Director of Information Technology

By authority of the Governing Board of Monrovia Unified School District, Monrovia, County of Los Angeles, State of California

Publishing Dates: December 9 and December 16, 2024 MONROVIA WEEKLY

EL Monte City Notices ORDINANCE NO. 3038

AN ORDINANCE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA INCREASING TO THREE-QUARTERS OF A PERCENT (3/4%) THE CITY’S EXISTING GENERAL PURPOSE HALF-PERCENT (1/2%) TRANSACTIONS (SALES) AND USE TAX CODIFIED UNDER TITLE 3, CHAPTER 3.14 OF THE EL MONTE MUNICIPAL CODE AND EXTENDING THE SAME INDEFINATELY UNTIL ENDED BY THE VOTERS

actions and use tax must be approved by ordinance approved by two-thirds of all the members of the City Council (i.e., by at least 5 “yes” votes), subject also to approval by El Monte voters by a simple majority of votes cast (50% plus 1) at a City election that is consolidated with a regularly-scheduled General Municipal Election for members of the City Council; and

WHEREAS, at its Regular Meeting of July 16, 2024, the City Council, in compliance with Government Code Sections 53723 and 53724(b), Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7285.9, and Section 2(b) of Article XIIIC of the California Constitution, approved this Ordinance, subject to voter approval its regularly-scheduled November 5, 2024 General Municipal Election which was consolidated with the statewide general election of the same date administered by the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles (hereinafter, “the County”); and

WHEAREAS, at the same July 16, 2024 Regular Meeting, the City Council approved City Resolution 10561 which (i) called and gave notice of the submission to El Monte voters of a ballot measure to increase the City’s ½% transactions and use tax to 3/4% and to extend the tax indefinitely; (ii) acknowledged approval of this Ordinance by the City Council; (iii) ordered that the ballot measure be submitted as part of the City’s November 5, 2024 General Municipal Election which was consolidated with the County-administered General Election of the same date; (iv) requested inclusion of the ballot measure with the City’s prior consolidate request; (v) requested the County provide administrative services and support for its General Municipal Election, inclusive of the ballot measure; and (vi) setting priorities for the submission of arguments and rebuttals and ordering the preparation of the City Attorney’s Impartial Analysis; and

WHEREAS, the ballot measure seeking approval of this Ordinance was given the letter designation Measure “EM” which presented the following question to El Monte voters:

Keep El Monte Sales Tax Revenues Local Measure To preserve and stabilize funding for various City services and goals such as police and fire protection; graffiti removal; street and sidewalk repair; park maintenance and enhancements; youth and senior programs; building “rainy day” reserve funds and for any other general governmental purpose, shall the City’s 1/2% transactions and use tax be increased to 3/4% and extended indefinitely until ended by voters to raise an additional $10.5 million annually?

WHEREAS, as required by Government Code Sections 53723 and 53724(b), Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7285.9, and Section 2(b) of Article XIIIC of the California Constitution, the ballot measure seeking approval of this Ordinance was approved by a majority of votes cast at the City’s General Municipal Election of November 5, 2024 by a margin of 11,885 votes in in favor of the measure (or 55.23% of votes cast) and 9,633 votes in opposition to the measure (or 44.77% of votes cast).

quarter commencing 110 days after the adoption of Ordinance No. 3038.

3.14.030 Purpose.

This Chapter is adopted to achieve the following, among other purposes, and directs that the provisions hereof be interpreted in order to accomplish those purposes:

A. To impose a retail transactions and use tax in accordance with the provisions of Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 7251) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code and Section 7285.9 of Part 1.7 of Division 2 which authorizes the City to adopt this tax ordinance which shall be operative if a majority of the electors voting on the measure vote to approve the imposition of the tax at an election called for that purpose.

B. To adopt a retail transaction and use tax ordinance that incorporates provisions identical to those of the Sales and Use Tax Law of the State of California insofar as those provisions are not inconsistent with the requirements and limitations contained in Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.

C. To adopt a retail transactions and use tax ordinance that imposes a tax and provides a measure therefore that can be administered and collected by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration in a manner that adapts itself as fully as practicable to, and requires the least possible deviation from, the existing statutory and administrative procedures followed by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration in administering and collecting the California State Sales and Use Taxes.

D. To adopt a retail transactions and use tax ordinance that can be administered in a manner that will be, to the greatest degree possible, consistent with the provisions of Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, minimize the cost of collecting the transactions and use taxes, and at the same time, minimize the burden of record keeping upon persons subject to taxation under the provisions of this ordinance.

3.14.040 Contract with State

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL MONTE, ACTING WITH THE CONSENT OF THE VOTERS FOLLOWING A NOVEMBER 5, 2024 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION, HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Prior to the operative date, the City shall contract with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration to perform all functions incident to the administration and operation of this transactions and use tax ordinance; provided, that if the City shall not have contracted with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration prior to the operative date, it shall nevertheless so contract and in such a case the operative date shall be the first day of the first calendar quarter following the execution of such a contract.

3.14.050 Transactions and Use Tax Rate.

SECTION 1. The title of Chapter 3.14 (Temporary Transactions and Use Tax) of Title 3 (Revenue and Finance) of the El Monte Municipal Code is hereby renamed as follows:

Chapter 3.14 TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL MONTE, ACTING WITH THE CONSENT OF THE VOTERS FOLLOWING A NOVEMBER 5, 2024 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION, HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 2. Section 3.14.010 (Title) through Section 3.14.130 of Chapter 3.14 (Transactions and Use Tax) of Title 3 (Revenue and Finance) of the El Monte Municipal Code are hereby amended in their entirety to now state the following:

WHEREAS, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7285.9 et seq., the City of El Monte (“City”) has the authority to collect a local transaction and use tax and to increase that transactions and use tax; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code Section 9222, the El Monte City Council (“City Council”) has the authority to submit measures to be considered by El Monte voters at a municipal election; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 3.14 (Temporary Transactions and Use Tax) of Title 3 (Revenue and Finance) of the El Monte Municipal Code, the City currently levies a voter-approved half-cent ($0.005) or half-percent (1/2%) transactions and use tax, the proceeds of which are deposited into the general fund to be used for any general municipal purpose, including but not limited to providing services, such as police and fire service; and street, sidewalk, parks and recreation program, infrastructure maintenance etc.; and

WHEREAS, the City’s half-percent (½%) transactions and use tax was set to sunset on March 31, 2029 unless extended by El Monte voters; and

WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to submit to the voters an ordinance extending the life of the City’s existing transactions and use tax indefinitely until ended by the voters and increasing the tax rate, currently set at a half-percent (½%), by an additional one-quarter of a percent (1/4%) such that the new tax rate will be three-quarters (3/4%); and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Sections 53723 and 53724(b), Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7285.9, and Section 2(b) of Article XIIIC of the California Constitution, any proposed increase or extension of the City’s general purpose trans-

SECTION 1. The title of Chapter 3.14 (Temporary Transactions and Use Tax) of Title 3 (Revenue and Finance) of the El Monte Municipal Code is hereby renamed as follows:

3.14.010 Title.

Chapter 3.14 TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX

This chapter shall be known as the "El Monte Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance." The City of El Monte hereinafter shall be referred to as "City." This Chapter shall be applicable in the incorporated territory of the City.

3.14.020 Operative Date and Indefinite Duration of Tax

A. The transactions and use tax codified under this Chapter was first approved by El Monte voters at its General Municipal Election of November 4, 2008 and pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7265 became operative on the first day of the calendar quarter commencing 110 days after its adoption, April 1, 2009 (hereinafter, the “operative date”)

3.14.010 Title.

This chapter shall be known as the “El Monte Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance.” The City of El Monte hereinafter shall be referred to as “City.” This Chapter shall be applicable in the incorporated territory of the City.

3.14.020 Operative Date and Indefinite Duration of Tax.

B. At the City’s General Municipal Election of November 5, 2024, El Monte voters approved ballot Measure EM, which approved Ordinance No. 3038 which increases the City’s transactions and use tax rate from a half percent (1/2%) to three-quarters of a percent (3/4%) and which also repeals the taxes March 31, 2029 sunset date such that the tax has become indefinite and will only end (expire) when repealed by El Monte voters. Paragraph A of this section notwithstanding, the operative date of the increased three-quarters percent (3/4%) transactions and use tax rate shall, pursuant to Revenue and Taxations Code Section 7265, be the first day of the calendar quarter commencing 110 days after the adoption of Ordinance No. 3038

3.14.030 Purpose.

For the privilege of selling tangible personal property at retail, a tax is imposed upon all retailers in the incorporated territory of the City at the rate of three-quarters of a percent (3/4%) of the gross receipts of any retailer from the sale of all tangible personal property sold at retail in said territory on and after the operative date of the ordinance codified in this chapter.

3.14.060 Place of sale.

For the purposes of this Chapter, all retail sales are consummated at the place of business of the retailer unless the tangible personal property sold is delivered by the retailer or his agent to an out-of-state destination or to a common carrier for delivery to an out-of-state destination. The gross receipts from such sales shall include delivery charges, when such charges are subject to the state sales and use tax, regardless of the place to which delivery is made. In the event a retailer has no permanent place of business in the State or has more than one place of business, the place or places at which the retail sales are consummated shall be determined under rules and regulations to be prescribed and adopted by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration.

3.14.070 Use of Tax Rate.

An excise tax is hereby imposed on the storage, use or other consumption in the City of tangible personal property purchased from any retailer on and after the operative date of this ordinance for storage, use or other consumption in said territory at the rate of three quarters of a percent (3/4%)of the sales price of the property. The sales price shall include delivery charges when such charges are subject to state sales or use tax regardless of the place to which delivery is made.

3.14.080 Adoption of provisions of state law.

Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter and except insofar as they are inconsistent with the provisions of Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, all of the provisions of Part 1 (commencing with Section 6001) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code are hereby adopted and made a part of this ordinance as though fully set forth herein.

3.14.090 Limitations on Adoption of State law and collection

In adopting the provisions of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code:

A. Wherever the State of California is named or referred to as the taxing agency, the name of this City shall be substituted therefor. However, the substitution shall not be made when:

1. The word “State” is used as a part of the title of the State Controller, State Treasurer, State Treasury, or the Constitution of the State of California;

2. The result of that substitution would require action to be taken by or against this City or any agency, officer, or employee thereof rather than by or against the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, in performing the functions incident to the administration or operation of this Ordinance.

3. In those sections, including, but not necessarily limited to sections referring to the exterior boundaries of the State of California, where the result of the substitution would be to:

a. Provide an exemption from this tax with respect to certain sales, storage, use or other consumption of tangible personal property which would not otherwise be exempt from this tax while such sales, storage, use or other consumption remain subject to tax by the State under the provisions of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, or;

b. Impose this tax with respect to certain sales, storage, use or other consumption of tangible personal property which would not be subject to tax by the state under the said provision of that code.

4. In Sections 6701, 6702 (except in the last sentence thereof), 6711, 6715, 6737, 6797 or 6828 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.

B. The word “City” shall be substituted for the word “State” in the phrase “retailer engaged in business in this State” in Section 6203 and in the definition of that phrase in Section 6203.

1. “A retailer engaged in business in the District” shall also include any retailer that, in the preceding calendar year or the current calendar year, has total combined sales of tangible personal property in this state or for delivery in the State by the retailer and all persons related to the retailer that exceeds five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000). For purposes of this section, a person is related to another person if both persons are related to each other pursuant to Section 267(b) of Title 26 of the United States Code and the regulations thereunder.

3.14.100 Permit not required.

If a seller’s permit has been issued to a retailer under Section 6067 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, an additional transactor’s permit shall not be required by this chapter.

3.14.110 Exemptions and exclusions.

A. There shall be excluded from the measure of the transactions tax and the use tax the amount of any sales tax or use tax imposed by the State of California or by any city, city and county, or county pursuant to the Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law or the amount of any state-administered transactions or use tax.

B. There are exempted from the computation of the amount of transactions tax the gross receipts from:

1. Sales of tangible personal property, other than fuel or petroleum products, to operators of aircraft to be used or consumed principally outside the county in which the sale is made and directly and exclusively in the use of such aircraft as common carriers of persons or property under the authority of the laws of this State, the United States, or any foreign government.

2. Sales of property to be used outside the City, which is shipped to a point outside the City, pursuant to the contract of sale, by delivery to such point by the retailer or his agent, or by delivery by the retailer to a carrier for shipment to a consignee at such point. For the purposes of this paragraph, delivery to a point outside the City shall be satisfied:

a. With respect to vehicles (other than commercial vehicles) subject to registration pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 4000) of Division 3 of the Vehicle Code, aircraft licensed in compliance with Section 21411 of the Public Utilities Code, and undocumented vessels registered under Division 3.5 (commencing with Sec-

LEGALS

tion 9840) of the Vehicle Code by registration to an out-of-City address and by a declaration under penalty of perjury, signed by the buyer, stating that such address is, in fact, his or her principal place of residence; and

b. With respect to commercial vehicles, by registration to a place of business out-of-City and declaration under penalty of perjury, signed by the buyer, that the vehicle will be operated from that address.

3. The sale of tangible personal property if the seller is obligated to furnish the property for a fixed price pursuant to a contract entered into prior to the operative date of this ordinance.

4. A lease of tangible personal property which is a continuing sale of such property, for any period of time for which the lessor is obligated to lease the property for an amount fixed by the lease prior to the operative date of this ordinance.

5. For the purposes of subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this section, the sale or lease of tangible personal property shall be deemed not to be obligated pursuant to a contract or lease for any period of time for which any party to the contract or lease has the unconditional right to terminate the contract or lease upon notice, whether or

of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code with re spect to the sale to the person of the property the storage, use or other consumption of which is subject to the use tax.

3.14.120 Amendments.

All amendments subsequent to the effective date of this chapter to Part 1 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code relating to sales and use taxes and which are not inconsistent with Part 1.6 and Part 1.7 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, and all amendments to Part 1.6 and Part 1.7 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, shall automatically become a part of this ordinance, provided however, that no such amendment shall operate so as to affect the rate of tax imposed by this ordinance.

3.14.130 Enjoining collection forbidden.

No injunction or writ of mandate or other legal or equitable process shall issue in any suit, action or proceeding in any court against the State or the City, or against any officer of the State or the City, to prevent or enjoin the collection under this chapter, or Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, of any tax or any amount of tax required to be collected.

SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance relates an increase to the City’s transactions (sales) and use tax rate from a half-percent (1/2%) to three-quarters of a percent (3/4%) and the elimination of its March 31, 2029 sunset date such that the tax at the new increased rate will be for an indefinite duration (i.e., an indefinite term) and will only end when repealed by El Monte voters. The foregoing notwithstanding, this Ordinance will become operative only if approved by a majority of El Monte voters at the City’s General Municipal Election to be held November 5, 2024. If approved by the voters, the transaction and use tax rate set forth under Chapter 3.14 of the El Monte Municipal Code will increase to three-quarters of a percent (3/4%) and the March 31, 2029 sunset (expiration) date will be repealed such that the tax at the new increase rate will be for an indefinite duration (term) and will continue until repealed by El Monte voters. If the measure fails, this Ordinance shall be rendered inoperative and void, however, the defeat of the measure shall not operate extinguish or amend the existing transaction and use tax as presently constituted and last approved by El Monte voters at the City’s General Municipal Election held

CEQA. This Ordinance and the contemplated levy of the transactions and use tax referenced herein is not a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Action codified as 21000 et seq. of the California Public Resources Code (“CEQA”) because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment nor does it involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.

The City Council finds that the Recitals to this Ordinance are true and correct and that this Ordinance may properly be adopted by the City Council in that Measure EM was approved

Notice of Public Hearing and Comment Period for the 2025-2029 Five Year Consolidated Plan

TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the El Monte City Council will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, January 21, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, to gain citizens’ input on the upcoming draft five-year 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan.

Applications

The public hearing will be conducted as part of a City Council meeting to be held on Tuesday, January 21, 2025, starting at 6:00 p.m. in the El Monte City Hall (West), 11333 Valley Blvd., El Monte, CA 91731.

incomplete, have an inadequate number of copies, exceed the prescribed response limits, have content errors or deficiencies, or submitted after the deadline, will be rejected. Once submitted, proposals may not be amended, unless the amendment has been requested by the City. The City, at its sole discretion, with or without cause, and without liability to any applicant, reserves the right to accept or reject and/or all proposals, cancel this NOFA at any time, and/or take any action in the best interest of the City.

Monte llevará a cabo una audiencia pública el martes 21 de enero a las 6:00 p.m., o tan pronto como se pueda conocer el asunto para obtener la opinión de los ciudadanos sobre el próximo borrador del Plan Consolidado de cinco años 2025-2029. La audiencia pública se llevará a cabo como parte de una reunión del Concejo Municipal que se llevará a cabo el martes 21 de enero , a partir de las 6:00 p.m. en el Ayuntamiento de El Monte (Oeste), 11333 Valley Blvd., El Monte, CA 91731.

El Departamento de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano de los Estados Unidos (HUD, por sus siglas en inglés) requiere que la Ciudad complete el Plan Consolidado (ConPlan) y el Análisis de Impedimentos para la Elección Justa de Vivienda cada cinco años. Además, se requiere que la Ciudad lleve a cabo una audiencia pública para recibir comentarios y proporcionar orientación sobre el borrador del Plan Consolidado de Cinco Años para la asignación de fondos del programa de Subsidios en Bloque para el Desarrollo Comunitario (CDBG) y la Asociación de Inversión HOME (HOME).

El propósito del ConPlan es identificar las necesidades, prioridades, metas y estrategias de vivienda y desarrollo comunitario de El Monte y estipular cómo se asignarán los fondos a las actividades de vivienda y desarrollo comunitario durante los próximos cinco años. El Programa CDBG proporciona fondos federales para proyectos y programas de mejoras locales. Las actividades asistidas con fondos CDBG deben cumplir con uno de los tres objetivos nacionales: beneficiar principalmente a personas de ingresos bajos y moderados, ayudar en la prevención o eliminación de barrios marginales y deterioro, o satisfacer otras necesidades de desarrollo comunitario que tengan especial urgencia. El Programa HOME proporciona subsidios de fórmula, a menudo en asociación con grupos locales sin fines de lucro, para financiar una amplia gama de actividades, incluida la construcción, compra y / o rehabilitación de viviendas economicas o brindar asistencia directa para el alquiler a personas de bajos ingresos. HOME es el mayor subsidio federal en bloque para gobiernos estatales y locales diseñado exclusivamente para crear viviendas economicas para hogares de bajos ingresos.

Telephone (626) 355-4422

12/9, 12/12, 12/16/24

CNS-3876661# MONROVIA WEEKLY

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: WILLIAM MICHAEL MAES

CASE NO. 24STPB13038

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of WILLIAM MICHAEL MAES.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by BEATRICE PADILLA in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that BEATRICE PADILLA be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 01/17/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 44 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 01/08/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 67 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

As an entitlement jurisdiction, the City is required by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to complete the Consolidated Plan (ConPlan) and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice every five years. Furthermore, the City is required to conduct a public hearing to receive input and provide direction concerning the draft Five-Year Consolidated Plan for the allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) program funds.

Potential applicants are encouraged to attend an application technical workshop on Wednesday, January 8 2025 via zoom Zoom information will be given after applicants RSVP by clicking the links below Two application technical workshops will be held to accommodate potential applicants Workshop #1 CDBG: 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. (Public Service & Capital Improvement Projects) • ��

The City will evaluate proposals for CDBG and HOME eligibility. After the proposals are evaluated, City staff will make recommendations for the total amount of CDBG and HOME funds for consideration in the City’s Draft Action Plan The City Council will hold public hearings to consider funding allocation recommendations in the Draft Action Plan The El Monte City Council approves final CDBG and HOME allocations

La Ciudad da la bienvenida a cualquier recomendación por escrito, sugerencia u otros aportes para su consideración en el desarrollo del Borrador del Plan Consolidado 2025-2029. Después de la audiencia pública, se elaborará un borrador del ConPlan. Se llevará a cabo un período de comentarios públicos y una audiencia pública posteriores antes de que el Concejo Municipal adopte el Plan.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

Community residents are invited to complete an online community survey by visiting the following link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ElMonte-Community

The purpose of the ConPlan is to identify El Monte’s housing and community development needs, priorities, goals, and strategies and to stipulate how funds will be allocated to housing and community development activities over the next five years. The CDBG Program provides federal funds for local improvement projects and programs. Activities assisted with CDBG funds must meet one of the three national objectives: principally benefit low and moderateincome persons, aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight, or meet other community development needs having particular urgency. The HOME Program provides formula grants - often in partnership with local nonprofit groups - to fund a wide range of activities including building, buying, and/or rehabilitating affordable housing or providing direct rental assistance to low-income people. HOME is the largest Federal block grant to state and local governments designed exclusively to create affordable housing for low-income households.

The City welcomes any written recommendations, suggestions, or other input for consideration in the development of the 2025-2029 Draft Consolidated Plan. Following the public hearing, a draft ConPlan will be prepared. A subsequent public comment period and public hearing will occur prior to City Council adoption of the Plan.

It is the intent of the City of El Monte to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you should need special assistance, please contact Vanessa Sedano, Housing Manager, at (626) 2588831, or via vsedano@elmonteca.gov TDD/Voice (626) 580-2078.

City Contact: For more information and to RSVP, contact Vanessa Sedano, Housing Manager Phone: (626) 258-8831 Email: vsedano@elmonteca.gov

Published: December 16, 2024

The El Monte Examiner

AVISO PÚBLICO CIUDAD DE EL MONTE

Aviso de Audiencia Pública y Período de Comentarios para el Plan Consolidado de Cinco Años 2025-2029

A TODAS LAS PARTES INTERESADAS:

POR LA PRESENTE SE NOTIFICA que el Concejo Municipal de El

Es la intención de la Ciudad de El Monte cumplir con la Ley de Estadounidenses con Discapacidades (ADA). Si usted necesita asistencia especial, comuníquese con Vanessa Sedano, Gerente de Vivienda, al (626) 258-8831, o a través vsedano@elmonteca. gov TDD/Voice (626) 580-2078.

Contacto de la ciudad: Para obtener más información y confirmar su asistencia, comuníquese con Vanessa Sedano, Gerente de Vivienda

Teléfono: (626) 258-8831

Correo electrónico: vsedano@elmonteca.gov

Publicado: 16 de diciembre de 2024

El Examinador de El Monte

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: JUDY ANN NOVELL

CASE NO. 24STPB13553

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of JUDY ANN NOVELL.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by PATRICK J. HEGARTY in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that PATRICK J. HEGARTY be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests the decedent’s WILL and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The WILL and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 01/10/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 29 lo-

cated at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

Attorney for Petitioner

THOMAS O. HOFFMAN - SBN 100881

LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS O. HOFFMAN

302 W. SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD SIERRA MADRE CA 91024

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

Attorney for Petitioner

VICTORIA P. MARTIN - SBN 277116

ARCHANGEL ESTATE PLANNING & TRUST SERVICES 16191 KAMANA ROAD, STE. #202 APPLE VALLEY CA 92307 Telephone (760) 946-2233 12/9, 12/12, 12/16/24 CNS-3876669# ROSEMEAD READER

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: ANA DAMARIS SANTANA CASE NO. 24STPB13399

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of ANA DAMARIS SANTANA.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by BLANCA AMER in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that BLANCA AMER be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

In Pro Per Petitioner BLANCA AMER 285 SAINT NICHOLAS AVE., #22 NEW YORK NY 10027 12/9, 12/12, 12/16/24 CNS-3876802# ROSEMEAD READER

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: UMA AYYAR DEPERALTA CASE NO. 24STPB13611 To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of UMA AYYAR DEPERALTA.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by SANJEEV AYYAR in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that SANJEEV AYYAR be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests the decedent’s WILL and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The WILL and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 01/03/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 9 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

Probate Notices

Monterey Park City Notices

ORDINANCE NO. 2254

AN ORDINANCE, WITHOUT INCREASING TAXES ON RESIDENTS, UPDATING/SIMPLIFYING CITY OF MONTEREY PARK’S 35-YEAR-OLD BUSINESS LICENSE TAX RATES, ENSURING FAIRNESS TO ALL BUSINESSES AND HELPING FUND GENERAL CITY SERVICES, INCLUDING KEEPING PUBLIC/ BUSINESS AREAS SAFE/CLEAN; PREVENTING CRIME/ THEFTS; STRENGTHENING THE LOCAL ECONOMY; BY REVISING THE TAX RATE TO 0.00075 PER $1,000 OF GROSS RECEIPTS ($75 YEARLY MINIMUM TAX), GENERATING APPROXIMATELY $1,200,000 ANNUALLY UNTIL ENDED BY VOTERS, REQUIRING SPENDING DISCLOSURE, FUNDS LOCALLY CONTROLLED

ORDINANCE NO. 2254

implement this Ordinance by taking all steps possible to cure any inadequacies or deficiencies identified by the court in a manner consistent with the express and implied intent of this Ordinance, and then adopting or reenacting such portion as necessary or desirable to allow imposition of the tax.

SECTION 6: Construction. This Ordinance must be broadly construed in order to achieve the purpo0ses stated in this Ordinance. It is the intent of the voters that the provisions of this Ordinance be interpreted or implemented by the City and others in a manner that facilitates the purposes set forth in this Ordinance.

SECTION 7: Validity of Previous Code Sections. lf this entire Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, any repeal of the MPMC or other regulation by this Ordinance will be rendered void and cause such MPMC provision or other regulation to remain in full force and effect for all purposes

be extinguished only by payment to the operator or to the city. The transient must pay the tax to the operator of the hotel at the time the rent is paid. If the rent is paid in installments, a proportionate share of the tax must be paid with each installment. The unpaid tax is due upon the transient’s ceasing to occupy space in the hotel. If for any reason the tax is not paid to the operator of the hotel, the license officer may require that such tax be paid directly to the license officer.”

SECTION 2: Environmental Analysis. This Ordinance is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 2100, et seq., “CEQA”) and CEQA regulations (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.) because it establishes rules and procedures to implement government funding mechanisms; does not involve any commitment to a specific project which could result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment; and constitutes an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. Accordingly, this Resolution does not constitute a “project” that requires environmental review (see specifically 14 CCR § 15378(b)(4-5)).

AN ORDINANCE, WITHOUT INCREASING TAXES ON RESIDENTS, UPDATING/SIMPLIFYING CITY OF MONTEREY PARK’S35-YEAR-OLD BUSINESS LICENSE TAX RATES, ENSURING FAIRNESS TO ALL BUSINESSES AND HELPING FUND GENERAL CITY SERVICES, INCLUDING KEEPING PUBLIC/BUSINESS AREAS SAFE/CLEAN; PREVENTING CRIME/THEFTS; STRENGTHENING THE LOCAL ECONOMY; BY REVISING THE TAX RATE TO 0.00075 PER $1,000 OF GROSS RECEIPTS ($75 YEARLY MINIMUM TAX), GENERATING APPROXIMATELY $1,200,000 ANNUALLY UNTIL ENDED BY VOTERS, REQUIRING SPENDING DISCLOSURE, FUNDS LOCALLY CONTROLLED

SECTION 8: Voter Approval. This Ordinance will enact and impose a general tax. Accordingly, it will be submitted to a general election on November 5, 2024, for voter approval. lf A MAJORITY of voters vote in favor of this Ordinance, it will become valid and binding on the date that the City Council certifies the election results. Should the provisions of Government Code §§ 53720, et seq. or California Constitution Article XlllC be repealed or amended or interpreted by the courts so that voter approval is not required for enacting this Ordinance, then this Ordinance will take effect as provided for all other City ordinances and may be amended in the same manner as all other City ordinances.

The People of the City of Monterey Park do hereby ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. Monterey Park Municipal Code (“MPMC”) § 5.12.200 is amended to read as follows: “§ 5.12.200. Fees levied—Businesses, trades and professions.

The People of theCity of Monterey Park do hereby ordain asfollows:

SECTION 1 Monterey Park Municipal Code (“MPMC”) § 5.12.200 is amended to read as follows:

“§ 5.12.200.Fees levied Businesses, trades and professions.

SECTION 9: City Council Authority. Pursuant to Elections Code § 9217, the People authorize and direct the City Council to promptly take appropriate actions needed to implement this Ordinance including, without limitation, adopting all regulations needed to effectuate this Ordinance by ordinance.

A. All persons engaged in or carrying on any profession, trade, calling, occupation or business in or into the city as classified in Section 5.12.110, 5.12.120, 5.12.130, 5.12.140, 5.12.150, 5.12.160 and 5.12.190, unless specifically provided otherwise in this chapter, must procure a business license and pay an annual fee as follows:

A. All persons engagedin or carryingonany profession, trade, calling, occupation or business in or into the city as classified in Section 5.12.110, 5.12.120, 5.12.130, 5.12.140, 5.12.150, 5.12.160and5.12.190, unless specifically providedotherwise in this chapter, must procurea business license and pay an annualfee as follows:

Categories Base Rate for Gross Receipts of $500,000 or less

Additional Rate Per $1,000, or portion thereof, of Gross Receipts in excess of $500,000

not

B. Theterm “gross receipts,” as used in this sectionhas the same meaning as set forth inSection5.12.045 of this Title.”

B. The term “gross receipts,” as used in this section has the same meaning as set forth in Section 5.12.045 of this Title.”

SECTION 2 MPMC § 5.12.210 isamended in its entirety to read as follows:

§ 5.12.210. Contractors.

SECTION 10: Reconciliation with Competing Ordinance. In the event another ballot measure (a “Competing Ordinance”) appears on the same ballot as this Ordinance that seeks to adopt, impose, or amend any limitations or restrictions, or other regulations or requirements, including, without limitation, those with respect to the actions authorized by this Ordinance, that differ in any respect to or supplement, those contained in this Ordinance, the People declare their intention that, if both the Competing Ordinance and this Ordinance receive a majority of votes cast, the Competing Ordinance and this Ordinance be fully adopted except to the extent that specific provisions contained in each measure are deemed to be in direct conflict with each other on a “provision by provision” basis pursuant to Yoshisato v. Superior Court (1992) 2 Cal. 4th 978. With respect to any such directly conflicting provisions, the specific provisions of the Ordinance receiving the greater number of votes will prevail.

SECTION 11: Miscellaneous.

SECTION 3: Interpretation. This Ordinance must be interpreted so as to be consistent with all federal and state laws, rules, and regulations. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase, part, or portion of this Ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision does not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The voters declare that this Ordinance, and each section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase, part, or portion thereof, would have been adopted or passed irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub-sections, sentences, clauses, phrases, part, or portion is found to be invalid. If any provision of this Ordinance is held invalid as applied to any person or circumstance, such invalidity does not affect any application of this Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid application.

SECTION 4: Severability. If any portion of this Ordinance is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances will not be affected thereby. We the People indicate our strong desire that: (i) the City Council use its best efforts to sustain and reenact that portion, and (ii) the City Council implement this Ordinance by taking all steps possible to cure any inadequacies or deficiencies identified by the court in a manner consistent with the express and implied intent of this Ordinance, and then adopting or reenacting such portion as necessary or desirable to allow imposition of the tax.

SECTION 5: Construction. This Ordinance must be broadly construed in order to achieve the purposes stated in this Ordinance. It is the intent of the voters that the provisions of this Ordinance be interpreted or implemented by the City and others in a manner that facilitates the purposes set forth in this Ordinance.

SECTION 2. MPMC § 5.12.210 is amended in its entirety to read as follows: “§ 5.12.210. Contractors.

A. Any contractor applyingfor abusiness license must certify to the license collector the appropriate subclassification in which such contractor is to be classified.

A. Any contractor applying for a business license must certify to the license collector the appropriate subclassification in which such contractor is to be classified.

B.Every general contractor must require all subcontractors for the performance of any work on each project in the city under its control or direction, whether the subcontract is written or oral, to have a business license as herein provided for the year or years in which such subcontractor’s work is to be done at the time such subcontract is made and before permitting such subcontractor to begin to perform services on any project of said general contractor. Failure of such general contractor to comply with the foregoing provisions of this subsection renders such general contractor liable to the city for an additional license fee equal to the amount of such subcontractor’s unpaid license fee, plus any penalties for delinquency accruing thereon.

C.Each general contractor must furnish the building division with a list of all subcontractors who are to do work on any project of such general contractor in the city upon forms furnished by the city.”

SECTION 3: Environmental Analysis. This Ordinance is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 2100, et seq., “CEQA”) and CEQA regulations (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.) because it establishes rules and procedures to implement government funding mechanisms; does not involve any commitment to a specific project which could result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment; and constitutes an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. Accordingly, this Resolution does not constitute a “project” that requires environmental review (see specifically 14 CCR § 15378(b)(4-5)).

SECTION 4: Interpretation. This Ordinance must be interpreted so as to be consistent with all federal and state laws, rules, and regulations. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase, part, or portion of this Ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision does not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The voters declare that this Ordinance, and each section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase, part, or portion thereof, would have been adopted or passed irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub-sections, sentences, clauses, phrases, part, or portion is found to be invalid. If any provision of this Ordinance is held invalid as applied to any person or circumstance, such invalidity does not affect any application of this Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid application.

SECTION 5: Severability. If any portion of this Ordinance is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances will not be affected thereby. We the People indicate our strong desire that: (i) the City Council use its best efforts to sustain and reenact that portion, and (ii) the City Council

A.lf any portion of this Ordinance is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, we the People indicate our strong desire that: (i) the City Council use its best efforts to sustain and reenact that portion, and (ii) the City Council implement this Ordinance by taking all steps possible to cure any inadequacies or deficiencies identified by the court in a manner consistent with the express and implied intent of this Ordinance, and then adopting or reenacting such portion as necessary or desirable to permit the planning and development of the Project.

B.This Ordinance must be broadly construed in order to achieve the purposes stated in this Ordinance. lt is the intent of the People that the provisions of this Ordinance be interpreted or implemented by the City and others in a manner that facilitates the purposes set forth in this Ordinance.

SECTION 12: The Mayor will sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk will attest and certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance if a majority of the voters voting in the City’s general election on November 5, 2024, approve it.

SECTION 13: Pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code § 7265, this Ordinance will become operative on the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing more than 110 days after the adoption of this Ordinance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of December, 2024. Thomas Wong, Mayor, ATTEST: Maychelle Yee, City Clerk, APPROVED AS TO FORM: Karl H. Berger, City Attorney APPROVED BY VOTES OF THE PEOPLE – NOVEMBER 5, 2024 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION, MEASURE BE

Publish December 16, 2024

MONTEREY PARK PRESS

ORDINANCE NO. 2255

AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FUNDING FOR CITY OF MONTEREY PARK’S GENERAL SERVICES SUCH AS MAINTAINING 911 EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND FIRE PROTECTION; INCREASING NEIGHBORHOOD POLICE PATROLS; MAINTAINING PARKS; SUPPORTING YOUTH, AFTERSCHOOL, AND SENIOR PROGRAMS; REPAIRING STREETS AND POTHOLES; BY INCREASING THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK’S TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX, PAID ONLY BY HOTEL/MOTEL AND SHORT-TERM RENTAL GUESTS, FROM 12% TO 13%, PROVIDING APPROXIMATELY $500,000 ANNUALLY UNTIL ENDED BY VOTERS; REQUIRING SPENDING DISCLOSURE, FUNDS LOCALLY CONTROLLED

The People of the City of Monterey Park do hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Monterey Park Municipal Code (“MPMC”) § 3.26.020 is amended to read as follows: “§ 3.26.020. Tax imposed. For the privilege of occupancy in any hotel, each transient must pay a tax in the amount of 13% of the rent charged by the operator. Such tax is a debt owed by the transient to the city, which debt may

SECTION 6: Validity of Previous Code Sections. lf this entire Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, any repeal of the MPMC or other regulation by this Ordinance will be rendered void and cause such MPMC provision or other regulation to remain in full force and effect for all purposes

SECTION 7: Voter Approval. This Ordinance will enact and impose a general tax. Accordingly, it will be submitted to a general election on November 5, 2024, for voter approval. lf A MAJORITY of voters vote in favor of this Ordinance, it will become valid and binding on the date that the City Council certifies the election results. Should the provisions of Government Code §§ 53720, et seq. or California Constitution Article XlllC be repealed or amended or interpreted by the courts so that voter approval is not required for enacting this Ordinance, then this Ordinance will take effect as provided for all other City ordinances and may be amended in the same manner as all other City ordinances.

SECTION 8: City Council Authority. Pursuant to Elections Code § 9217, the People authorize and direct the City Council to promptly take appropriate actions needed to implement this Ordinance including, without limitation, adopting all regulations needed to effectuate this Ordinance by ordinance.

SECTION 9: Reconciliation with Competing Ordinance. In the event another ballot measure (a “Competing Ordinance”) appears on the same ballot as this Ordinance that seeks to adopt, impose, or amend any limitations or restrictions, or other regulations or requirements, including, without limitation, those with respect to the actions authorized by this Ordinance, that differ in any respect to or supplement, those contained in this Ordinance, the People declare their intention that, if both the Competing Ordinance and this Ordinance receive a majority of votes cast, the Competing Ordinance and this Ordinance be fully adopted except to the extent that specific provisions contained in each measure are deemed to be in direct conflict with each other on a “provision by provision” basis pursuant to Yoshisato v. Superior Court (1992) 2 Cal. 4th 978. With respect to any such directly conflicting provisions, the specific provisions of the Ordinance receiving the greater number of votes will prevail.

SECTION 10: Miscellaneous.

SECTION 11: The Mayor will sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk will attest and certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordi-

nance if a majority of the voters voting in the City’s general election on November 5, 2024, approve it.

SECTION 12: Pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code § 7265, this Ordinance will become operative on the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing more than 110 days after the adoption of this Ordinance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of December, 2024. Thomas Wong, Mayor , ATTEST: Maychelle Yee, City Clerk, APPROVED AS TO FORM: Karl H. Berger, City Attorney APPROVED BY VOTES OF THE PEOPLE – NOVEMBER 5, 2024

GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION, MEASURE LG

Publish December 16, 2024

MONTEREY PARK PRESS

Glendale City Notices

City of Glendale NOTICE INVITING BIDS

Specification No. 4005

For Citywide Pools & Splash Pad Maintenance

Three (3) sets of a sealed Bid (one original and two copies) must be received before 2:00PM on Wednesday, January 22, 2025, in the City Clerk’s Office, located at 613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206. Late Bids will not be accepted. There will be a mandatory Pre-Bid Job Walk on January 7 at 9AM.

Copies of Specification 4005 (“Specification”) will be made available from noon on December 11th, 2024 until noon on January 7th, 2025. To receive an electronic copy, please send an email request to the City’s contact listed below.

Refer to the Specification for complete details and Bid requirements. The Specification and this Notice shall be considered a part of any contract made pursuant thereunder. Bidders shall submit all questions regarding the scope of services, Specification, and Bid process by email with the Subject “Request for Clarification – Citywide Pools & Splash Pad Maintenance”. All Requests for Clarifications shall be submitted before 3PM on January 13th, 2025.

City personnel to contact regarding this Bid: Community Services & Parks

Gabrielle Goglia, Community Services Manager 613 E. Broadway, Room 120 Glendale, CA 91206 (818) 937-7444

ggoglia@glendaleca.gov

The Citywide Pools & Splash Pad Maintenance Services per this Specification are anticipated to start on or about March 1, 2025.

Publish December 12 & 16, 2024

GLENDALE INDEPENDENT

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE

On December 3, 2024, the Council of the City of Glendale, California adopted Ordinance No. 6032, entitled “AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 1.04.020 OF THE GLENDALE MUNICIPAL CODE, 1995, RELATING TO GENERAL PROVISIONS, AND AMENDING SECTION 9.28.020 RELATING TO CAMPING”. A copy of said Ordinance is on file and available for public inspection in the office of the City Clerk.

In substance, this Ordinance amends Chapter 1.04 to define the term “civic center square” for purposes of the Glendale Municipal Code and all ordinances of the city; and amends Chapter 9.28 to remove the limitation that certain camping-related activities in or on public property are prohibited only at nighttime, and to remove the limitation that storage of personal property in or on public property is prohibited only during nighttime.

Suzie Abajian, Ph.D. City Clerk of the City of Glendale Publish December 16, 2024 GLENDALE INDEPENDENT

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE

On December 3, 2024, the Council of the City of Glendale, California adopted Ordinance No. 6033, entitled “AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 5.20.010 AND ADDING SECTION 5.20.110 OF THE GLENDALE MUNICIPAL CODE, 1995, RELATING TO THE SIDEWALK VENDOR LICENSE”. A copy of said Ordinance is on file and available for public inspection in the office of the City Clerk.

In substance, this Ordinance amends Chapter 9.28 to define the term “sidewalk vending items”; to enumerate four alternative circumstances in which a sidewalk vendor’s sidewalk vending items may be impounded; to prescribe the procedures by which impounded sidewalk vending items shall be removed, stored, and retrieved; and to identify the procedures by which a sidewalk vendor may administratively appeal the impoundment of their sidewalk vending items.

Suzie Abajian, Ph.D. City Clerk of the City of Glendale

Publish December 16, 2024

GLENDALE INDEPENDENT

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE

On September 17, 2024, the Council of the City of Glendale adopted Ordinance No. 6030 entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 2.36.010 OF THE GLENDALE MUNICIPAL CODE, 1995, PERTAINING TO TERMS OF BOARD MEMBERS AND COMMISSIONERS

A copy of said Ordinance will be on file and available for public inspection in the office of the City Clerk.

In substance, said Ordinance provides that, with the exception of the Civil Service Commission (whose members serve 4 years per the Charter), the term of each member of a board or commission will be four years but coterminous with the term of the councilmember in Column One of the panel that nominates them. Upon the commencement of a new councilmember term (whether the nominating councilmember or a successor), that board or commission spot opens up and must be filled by reappointment or replacement.

Suzie Abajian PhD City Clerk

Publish December 16, 2024

GLENDALE INDEPENDENT

LEGALS

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE

On July 30, 2024, the Council of the City of Glendale adopted Ordinance No. 6029 entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 2.36.010 OF THE GLENDALE

MUNICIPAL CODE, 1995, PERTAINING TO TERMS OF BOARD MEMBERS AND COMMISSIONERS

A copy of said Ordinance will be on file and available for public inspection in the office of the City Clerk.

In substance, said Ordinance provides that, with the exception of the Civil Service Commission (whose members serve 4 years per the Charter), the term of each member of a board or commission will be four years but coterminous with the term of the councilmember that nominates them. Upon the commencement of a new councilmember term (whether the nominating councilmember or a successor), that board or commission spot opens up and must be filled by reappointment or replacement.

Note that for purposes of term limits, Section 2.36.010 provides a board member or commissioner who serves 24 months or more of a term shall be deemed to have served a full term. Staff also recommends adding back into the Code a provision that if a term is 24 months or more due to the inaction of a nominating councilmember or the Council to make a nomination and appointment, then that term shall still count as a term for purposes of term limits, i.e. the person serves 24 months or more of a councilmember’s term.

Suzie Abajian PhD City Clerk

Publish December 16, 2024

GLENDALE INDEPENDENT

Probate Notices

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:

KATHRYN A. SMITH

CASE NO. 24STPB13580

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of KATHRYN A. SMITH.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by IRENE M. KLANGOS in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that IRENE M. KLANGOS be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 01/08/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 67 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1)four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

Attorney for Petitioner M.LISA ODOM, ESQ. - SBN 233860

KATHLEEN N. KEAN, ESQ. - SBN 331045 ODOM LAW GROUP

24801 PICO CANYON ROAD, SUITE 100 STEVENSON RANCH CA 91381

a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

Attorney for Petitioner RENEE L. SPIECKERMANNSBN 279111

LAW OFFICES OF RENEE L. SPIECKERMANN

25101 THE OLD ROAD

STEVENSON RANCH CA 91381

Telephone (661) 255-5411

12/9, 12/12, 12/16/24

CNS-3876603# ANAHEIM PRESS

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:

KATHY K. GARCIA

Telephone (661) 367-1699 12/9, 12/12, 12/16/24 CNS-3876696# GLENDALE INDEPENDENT

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: TIMOTHY JON STEINER CASE NO. 30-2024-01441147-PR-PWCMC

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of TIMOTHY JON STEINER.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by MICHAEL TODD STEINER in the Superior Court of California, County of ORANGE.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that MICHAEL TODD STEINER be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests the decedent’s WILL and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The WILL and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 01/16/25 at 1:30PM in Dept. CM07 located at 3390 HARBOR BLVD., COSTA MESA, CA 92626

NOTICE IN PROBATE CASES

The court is providing the convenience to appear for hearing by video using the court’s designated video platform. This is a no cost service to the public. Go to the Court’s website at The Superior Court of California - County of Orange (occourts.org) to appear remotely for Probate hearings and for remote hearing instructions. If you have difficulty connecting or are unable to connect to your remote hearing, call 657-622-8278 for assistance. If you prefer to appear in-person, you can appear in the department on the day/time set for your hearing.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1)four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as

the WILL or estate, or both of SILVANA GRYGORYAN.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by EDWARD GRIGORYAN in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that EDWARD GRIGORYAN be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

CASE NO. 24STPB13120

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of KATHY K. GARCIA.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by NADIA KELLY in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that NADIA KELLY be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 12/26/24 at 8:30AM in Dept. 99 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1)four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

Attorney for Petitioner R. CHAD HALES - SBN 288858 LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT E. HALES, APC 1341 E. CHAPMAN AVENUE ORANGE CA 92866

Telephone (714) 771-7671

12/9, 12/12, 12/16/24

CNS-3876600# BELMONT BEACON

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: SILVANA GRYGORYAN CASE NO. 24STPB13480

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 01/08/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 29 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1)four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

Attorney for Petitioner

THOMAS R. BARNES, CFLS 161825 4223 GLENCOE AVENUE, STE. C106 MARINA DEL REY CA 90292

Telephone (310) 821-7745 12/9, 12/12, 12/16/24 CNS-3876809# GLENDALE INDEPENDENT

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: ANGELA JACQUELINE RADALJ CASE NO. 24STPB13567 To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of ANGELA JACQUELINE RADALJ. A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by JOHN RADALJ in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that JOHN RADALJ be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20240008896 Pub: 10/07/2024, 10/14/2024, 10/21/2024, 10/28/2024, 11/04/2024, 11/11/2024, 11/18/2024, 11/25/2024 San Bernardino Press

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT

FBN20240009443

File No.

The following persons are doing business as: Money Hacking Mama, 7847 Lion Street, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Mailing Address, 7847 Lion Street, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Prosperous Media Group, LLC (CA, 7847 Lion Street, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730; Rachel Jimenez, President. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a limited liability company (llc). Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ Rachel Jimenez, President. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on November 16, 2024 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20240009443 Pub: 11/25/2024, 12/02/2024, 12/09/2024, 12/16/2024 San Bernardino Press

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. FBN20240009645

The following persons are doing business as: MR.KEYS MOBILE, 392 S Mountain Ave, Upland, CA 91786. Mailing Address, 392 S Mountain Ave, Upland, CA 91786. MR.KEYS INC (CA, 392 S Mountain Ave, Upland, CA 91786; DARLENE SARINANA, CEO. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino

This business is conducted by: a corporation. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 62506277). /s/ DARLENE SARINANA, CEO. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on October 18, 2024 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change

in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20240009645 Pub: 11/25/2024, 12/02/2024, 12/09/2024, 12/16/2024 San Bernardino Press

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. FBN20240010753

The following persons are doing business as: Avalos Equestrian Center, 4014 Philadelphia St, Chino, CA 91710. Mailing Address, 14762 Cherry Cir, Chino Hills, CA 91709. Kassandra Avalos, 14762 Cherry Cir, Chino Hills, CA 91709. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino

This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on November 1, 2024. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ Kassandra Avalos, Owner. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on November 25, 2024 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20240010753 Pub: 12/02/2024, 12/09/2024, 12/16/2024, 12/23/2024 San Bernardino Press

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. FBN20240010157

The following persons are doing business as: Great Spines Chiropractic, 337 N Vineyard Ave Suite 400, Ontario, CA 91764. Mailing Address, 337 N Vineyard Ave Suite 400, Ontario, CA 91764. Enrique Guerena Villegas, 337 N Vineyard Ave Suite 400, Ontario, CA 91764. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on October 24, 2024. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ Enrique Guerena Villegas. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on November 4, 2024 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious

LEGALS

Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20240010157 Pub: 12/02/2024, 12/09/2024, 12/16/2024, 12/23/2024 San Bernardino Press

The following person(s) is (are) doing business as Daniel and Son Plumbing 22956 Joy Ct Wildomar, CA 92595

Riverside County Koch Plumbing LLC (CA, 22956 Joy Ct, Wildomar, CA 92595

Riverside County This business is conducted by: a limited liability company (llc). Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. I declare that all the information in this statement is true and correct. (A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code, that the registrant knows to be false, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousands dollars ($1000).)

s. Genirro Mazzocchio, President Statement filed with the County of Riverside on November 25, 2024 NOTICE: In accordance with subdivision (a) of section 17920, a fictitious name statement generally expires at the end of the five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the county clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any changes in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 Et Seq., business and professions code). I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Peter Aldana, County, Clerk File# R-202414710 Pub. 12/02/2024, 12/09/2024, 12/16/2024, 12/23/2024

Riverside Independent

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT 20246703956. The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: JJ Fire Protection, 2295 N Tustin St Unit 80, Orange, CA 92865. Full Name of Registrant(s) Jimmy Desbiens, 2295 N Tustin St Unit 80, Orange, CA 92865. This business is conducted by a individual. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on January 1, 2024. /S/ Jimmy Desbiens. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of Orange County on December 2, 2024. Publish: Anaheim Press 12/09/2024, 12/16/2024, 12/23/2024, 12/30/2024

The following person(s) is (are) doing business as VISISTA COLLECTIONS

6770 Belynn Ct EASTVALE, CA 92880

Riverside County

SRIANA INVESTMENTS LLC (CA, 6770 Belynn Ct, Eastvale, CA 92880 Riverside County

This business is conducted by: a limited liability company (llc). Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. I declare that all the information in this statement is true and correct. (A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code, that the registrant knows to be false, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousands dollars ($1000).)

s. SUDHIR POTTURI, MANAGING

MEMEBER Statement filed with the County of Riverside on December 4, 2024

the statement pursuant to section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 Et Seq., business and professions code). I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Peter Aldana, County, Clerk File# R-202414992

Pub. 12/09/2024, 12/16/2024, 12/23/2024, 12/30/2024

RIVERSIDE INDEPENDENT

The following person(s) is (are) doing business as MBI Welding & Fabrication 1229 Columbia Avenue Unit C1 Riverside, CA 92507 Riverside County Juiced Rite, LLC (CA, 1229 Columbia Avenue Unit C1, Riverside, CA 92507 Riverside County This business is conducted by: a limited liability company (llc). Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. I declare that all the information in this statement is true and correct. (A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code, that the registrant knows to be false, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousands dollars ($1000).)

s. Stephanie Bryan, CEO Statement filed with the County of Riverside on December 4, 2024 NOTICE: In accordance with subdivision (a) of section 17920, a fictitious name statement generally expires at the end of the five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the county clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any changes in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 Et Seq., business and professions code).

I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office.

Peter Aldana, County, Clerk File# R-202414993 Pub. 12/09/2024, 12/16/2024, 12/23/2024, 12/30/2024 Riverside Independent

The following person(s) is (are) doing business as (1). California Realty and Mortgage Group (2). California Realty Group (3). California Mortgage Group (4). Calrmgroup 37948 Sawleaf Place Murrieta, CA 92562

Riverside County California Mortgage Group, Inc. (CA, 37948 Sawleaf Place, Murrieta, CA 92562

Riverside County

This business is conducted by: a corporation. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on October 1, 2024. I declare that all the information in this statement is true and correct. (A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code, that the registrant knows to be false, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousands dollars ($1000).) s. Joakim L Torehov, President Statement filed with the County of Riverside on November 20, 2024

NOTICE: In accordance with subdivision (a) of section 17920, a fictitious name statement generally expires at the end of the five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the county clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any changes in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 Et Seq., business and professions code). I hereby certify that this copy

is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Peter Aldana, County, Clerk File# R-202414429 Pub. 12/09/2024, 12/16/2024, 12/23/2024, 12/30/2024

Riverside Independent

The following person(s) is (are) doing business as 19K Security Solutions 7091 Deer Canyon Eastvale, CA 92880 Riverside County Gustavo Jimenez Jr, 7091 Deer Canyon, Eastvale, CA 92880

Riverside County

This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. I declare that all the information in this statement is true and correct. (A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code, that the registrant knows to be false, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousands dollars ($1000).) s. Gustavo Jimenez Jr Statement filed with the County of Riverside on December 11, 2024 NOTICE: In accordance with subdivision (a) of section 17920, a fictitious name statement generally expires at the end of the five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the county clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any changes in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 Et Seq., business and professions code).

I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office.

Peter Aldana, County, Clerk File# R-202415258 Pub. 12/16/2024, 12/23/2024, 12/30/2024, 01/06/2025 Riverside Independent

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. FBN20240011359

The following persons are doing business as: Nice Jump, 2908

S Whispering Lakes Ln Apt 10, Ontario, CA 91761. Mailing Address, 2908 S Whispering Lakes Ln Apt 10, Ontario, CA 91761. Ashley E Pioquinto, 2908 S Whispering Lakes Ln Apt 10, Ontario, CA 91761. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 62506277). /s/ Ashley E Pioquinto. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on December 12, 2024 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20240011359 Pub: 12/16/2024, 12/23/2024, 12/30/2024, 01/06/2025 San Bernardino Press

www.Notiecfiling.

Lawmaker seeks probe to ferret out legislator tied to bribery scheme

By City News Service

ARiversideCounty lawmakersaid

Thursday that he’s filed a legislative ethics complaint, requesting that the state Assembly and Senate open an investigation to identify the unnamed legislator mentioned in documents connected to a federal bribery scheme and determine whether and how many ethics violations the person may have committed.

“A member of the California Legislature has been accused by the U.S. Department of Justice of soliciting and accepting bribes up to $200,000,” Assemblyman Bill Essayli, R-Norco, said. “Although this person’s name has not been made public, I am calling on our Legislature to immediately initiate an investigation to determine who this person is, and to take the appropriate actions if it’s determined they, in fact, did engage in unlawful conduct.”

Essayli, a former federal prosecutor, said the episode reflects the “rotten culture of corruption in Sacramento,” and he called on Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, D-Salinas, and Speaker Pro Tem of the Senate Mike McGuire, D-Eureka, to direct the Assembly and

Senate ethics committees to examine whether there were violations of the California Government Code, mainly provisions that comprise the Code of Legislative Ethics.

“It’s unacceptable for

during the proceedings how the proposed merger would expand competition, lower prices, increase associate wages, protect union jobs, and enhance customers’ shopping experience.”

Albertsons and Kroger issued statements on Albertsons’ lawsuit filed Wednesday in the Delaware Court of Chancery.

“A successful merger between Albertsons and Kroger would have delivered meaningful benefits for America’s consumers, Kroger’s and Albertsons’ associates, and communities across the country,” Tom Moriarty, Albertsons general counsel and chief policy officer, said in a statement. “Rather than fulfill its contractual obligations to ensure that the merger succeeded, Kroger acted in its own financial selfinterest, repeatedly providing insufficient divestiture proposals that ignored regulators’ concerns. Kroger’s self-serving conduct, taken at the expense of Albertsons

current Democrat regime,” the assemblyman said. “We need major reforms and accountability for our state elected officials.”

Essayli’s complaint is based on revelations that

legislators to financially benefit from abusing their powers, while everyday Californians are struggling just to survive under the

came to light after a plea agreement between former Baldwin Park City Attorney Robert Manuel Nacionales Tafoya and federal prosecu-

tors was unsealed two weeks ago.

Tafoya, 62, of Redondo Beach, pleaded guilty to federal bribery and tax evasion charges. He reached a pretrial agreement at the same time former Commerce City Manager Edgar Cisneros, 42, of Montebello, entered into one, pleading guilty to a

Grocery merger

federal bribery charge.

“Within the agreement, the U.S. Department of Justice describes in detail a ‘Bribery Scheme Involving Person 20,’” according to Essayli. “’Person 20’ is described as an unindicted co-conspirator, who received $30,000 in illegal cash payments to his or her campaign for state elected

office, and was subsequently successful in being elected to the Legislature. ‘Person 20’ is also accused of soliciting a bribe payment in the amount of $200,000 to secure a marijuana dispensary permit from Baldwin Park.”

Essayli said that regardless of the lack of identification, “there is sufficient information contained within the record to warrant an immediate investigation by the Assembly and Senate ethics committees.”

According to federal prosecutors, Cisneros helped a company obtain a marijuana permit and related approvals through about $45,000 in bribes, and the company promised to pay Cisneros at least $235,000 to help secure the permit.

Tafoya facilitated a separate bribery scheme involving former Compton City Councilman Isaac Galvan, in which Galvan sought to obtain a marijuana permit for his consulting client through bribes to thenBaldwin Park City Councilman Ricardo Pacheco. Tafoya further admitted to evading payment of about $650,000 in federal tax liability, according to court documents.

and the agreed transaction, has harmed Albertsons’ shareholders, associates and consumers. We are disappointed that the opportunity to realize the significant benefits of the merger has been lost on account of Kroger’s willfully deficient approach to securing regulatory clearance.

“We are taking this action to enforce and preserve Albertsons’ rights and to protect the interests of our shareholders, associates and consumers,” Moriarty continued. “We believe strongly in the merits of our case and look forward to presenting it to the Court to hold Kroger responsible for the harm it has caused.”

Kroger, which is the parent company of Southern California grocery giant Ralphs, Food 4 Less and other stores, responded to the lawsuit filing:

“Albertsons’ claims are baseless and without merit,” according to a company statement Wednesday. “Kroger refutes these alle-

gations in the strongest possible terms, especially in light of Albertsons’ repeated intentional material breaches and interference throughout the merger process, which we will prove in court. This is clearly an attempt to deflect responsibility following Kroger’s written notification of Albertsons’ multiple breaches of the agreement, and to seek payment of the merger’s break fee, to which they are not entitled.

“Kroger looks forward to responding to these baseless claims in court. We went to extraordinary lengths to uphold the merger agreement throughout the entirety of the regulatory process and the facts will make that abundantly clear,” the statement continued. “We are incredibly proud of the Kroger team for how they worked through the merger process with the highest degree of integrity and commitment. We are confident in Kroger’s value creation model to drive sustainable growth.

“Kroger’s Board of Direc-

tors is currently evaluating next steps that serve the best interests of Kroger’s customers and associates, and create value for shareholders,” the statement concluded.

Following the court rulings enjoining the proposed merger and Kroger’s alleged failure to complete the merger before the contractual deadline, Albertsons’ lawsuit contends the company is entitled “to an immediate $600 million termination fee and removes contractual constraints on Albertsons’ ability to pursue other strategic opportunities,” according to the company’s statement.

“In addition to the $600 million termination fee, Albertsons is entitled to relief reflecting the multiple years and hundreds of millions of dollars it devoted to obtaining approval for the merger, along with the extended period of unnecessary limbo Albertsons endured as a result of Kroger’s actions,” company officials said. “Albertsons further seeks to

recover certain expenses and costs.”

Officials from the United Food and Commercial Workers Union, which represents grocery workers, said the merger “would be disastrous for shoppers who deserve competition that leads to better choices and lower prices.”

According to the union, “The merger would be detrimental to our communities, would harm farmers and suppliers who deserve a healthy balance to negotiate fair prices for their hard work. Instead, the proposed merger would create an outof-balance system that drives up prices, drives out competition, and drives down wages and safety standards.”

California Attorney General Rob Bonta praised the merger cancelation.

“Halting the Kroger and Albertsons megamerger is a win for California households and communities,” Bonta said in a statement Tuesday. “As many families continue to feel the burden of

inflation, fighting corporate consolidation that threatens to increase grocery prices is more important than ever. In some markets in Southern California, Kroger-Albertsons would have been the only one-stop grocery option, leaving consumers limited choice over where to shop — and for workers in this industry, where to work. I am tremendously proud of the work of my office and our partners across the state and country in raising the alarm about what this merger would have meant for our communities.”

The planned merger was announced in 2022 and aimed to consolidate ownership of Ralphs, Albertsons, Vons and other supermarket chains. Kroger reported the merged company would include nearly 5,000 stores, 66 distribution centers, 52 manufacturing plants, 3,972 pharmacies and 2,015 fuel centers.

More than 710,000 people work for Kroger and Albertsons.

Assemblyman Bill Essayli. | Photo courtesy of billessayli/Instagram

Robert Tafoya. | Photo courtesy of the city of Baldwin Park

“ Dune: Part Two” director Denis Villeneuve will receive the Visionary Award at the 2025 Palm Springs International Film Festival.

Organizers announced Wednesday evening that the Canadian filmmaker would be honored for the second part of his science fiction series based on the work of Frank Herbert. Villeneuve received a pair of Critics Choice Awards nominations on Thursday for the film in the Best Director and Best Adapted Screenplay categories.

The movie, which released in March, has garnered more than $700 million at the box office, the fourth-highest total of the year. It continues the cautionary tale about the sudden rise to power of Paul Atreides, played by Timothée Chalamet — another PSIFF honoree, on account of his lead performance in “A Complete Unknown.”

In addition to Chalamet, the gargantuan ensemble

Denis Villeneuve to receive Visionary Award at PSIFF ‘25

By City News Service

cast of “Dune: Part Two” includes Zendaya, Rebecca Ferguson, Josh Brolin, Austin Butler, Florence Pugh, Dave Bautista, Christopher Walken, Léa Seydoux, Stellan Skarsgard, Charlotte Rampling and Javier Bardem.

“Denis Villeneuve has once again pushed the boundaries of cinematic storytelling with `Dune: Part Two.’ His visionary direction and unparalleled attention to detail have not only brought Frank Herbert’s epic saga to life but also set a new standard for what film can achieve,” festival chairman Nachhattar Singh Chandi said in a statement. “A true visual masterpiece, Villeneuve’s work transcends entertainment, immersing audiences in a universe where every frame is a testament to his artistry and innovation.”

Villeneuve is no stranger to the awards conversation, with a trio of Academy Award nominations on his resume. He was in contention for Best Director for the

2016 sci-fi drama “Arrival,” along with Best Picture and

Best Adapted Screenplay for “Dune,” the first installment of the series, which won six Oscars in other categories.

The Québécois director’s career started with Frenchlanguage films such as “Polytechnique” and “Incendies.” In 2013, he released a pair of English movies for the first time, “Enemy” and “Prisoners,” both of which starred or co-starred Jake Gyllenhaal. Villeneuve’s next three projects — “Sicario,” “Arrival” and “Blade Runner: 2049” — earned a combined 16 Academy Award nominations.

He confirmed earlier this year that a third film in his soon-to-be trilogy, based on Herbert’s “Dune Messiah,” was in development, expected to release in late 2026.

Presented to a filmmaker “who breaks boundaries in the art of cinema,” the Visionary Award has previously been granted to Alfonso Cuarón (Gravity) and Michel Hazanavicius (“The Artist”),

both of whom won Best Director at the Oscars in the same year. Richard Linklater, Tom McCarthy, Martin Scorsese and Quentin Tarantino are also recent recipients of the festival prize.

Villeneuve joins Ariana Grande (Rising Star Award), Timothée Chalamet (Chairman’s Award), Kieran Culkin (Breakthrough Performer Award), Angelina Jolie (Desert Palm Achievement Award, Actress), Nicole Kidman (International Star Award), Adrien Brody (Desert Palm Achievement Award, Actor), the cast of “Conclave” (Ensemble Performance Award), Mikey Madison (Breakthrough Performance Award), Colman Domingo (Spotlight Award, Actor) and the cast and director of Netflix’s “Emilia Pérez” (Vanguard Award) as announced recipients of honors at PSIFF 2025.

After the ceremony on PSIFF 2025’s second day, the film festival will continue through Jan. 13.

Felon charged with smuggling controlled substances into jail

By City News Service

Aconvictedfelon accused of smuggling drugs into a Riverside County jail, where inmates sold the contraband, was charged Thursday with transporting controlled substances into a correctional facility.

Shaun Manuel Adamson, 31, of Fontana, was arrested Tuesday following a Riverside County Sheriff’s Department investigation that also led to the arrests of four other people.

Adamson was slated to make his initial court appearance Thursday afternoon at the Southwest Justice Center in Murrieta. He was being held on $500,000 bail at the Byrd Detention Center — the facility into which he allegedly smuggled the narcotics.

According to sheriff’s Sgt. Spencer Rustad, the Correc-

tions Investigations Bureau initiated a probe in June after uncovering evidence of a drug trafficking ring within the county correctional system.

Deputies at the Byrd Detention Center seized methamphetamine, which resulted in the identification of the alleged traffickers, Rustad said.

Adamson was confirmed to be the alleged supplier, conspiring with 40-yearold Eric Wesley Johnson of Fontana, Violeta Lopez, 38, of Pomona, Chantelle Neal, 33, of Riverside, and 34-yearold Rigoberto Plasencia of Riverside, Rustad alleged.

Search warrants were obtained and served at properties Tuesday, netting “2.5 pounds of fentanyl, 3.5 ounces of methamphetamine, 2.5 ounces of

cocaine, a semi-automatic handgun, .75 grams of heroin and $5,000 believed to be proceeds from narcotic sales,” the sergeant said.

Plasencia was transported to state prison for a felony conviction that occurred before the investigation concluded, according to the sheriff’s department.

Johnson was arrested on suspicion of possession of controlled substances and possession of drug paraphernalia, but he posted a $10,000 bond and was released from the Smith Correctional Facility in Banning Tuesday.

Lopez was arrested on suspicion of possession of controlled substances, but she posted a $5,000 bond and was also released form the Smith jail Tuesday.

Neal was arrested on

suspicion of conspiracy, transportation of drugs for sale and probation violations. She was released from the Robert Presley Jail Tuesday after posting a $5,000 bond.

“This investigation was part of the sheriff’s office’s ongoing mission to prevent

Councilman

narcotics from entering our correctional facilities,” Rustad said. “The diligence of our deputies during searches, implementation of the non-intrusive sensor and scanning device known as the ‘Tek-84,’ and comprehensive criminal investigations such as this are among

measures the sheriff’s office has taken to combat the supply of narcotics into our jail system.”

Court records show Adamson has a prior conviction for receiving stolen property. Background information on his alleged co-conspirators was unavailable.

space,” investigator Lauren Swirsky, contacted by the Desert Hot Springs Police Department, said in a statement.

The councilmember had allegedly parked his car

with about four feet of room for the other driver to back up. According to the declaration, after the other driver backed up twice while trying to escape, striking Betts’ car with “minimal force” the

second time, Betts allegedly kicked the passenger side of the vehicle and hit it twice with his hand.

On his third attempt to reverse from the situation, the driver was “able to make

the right turn to get out of the parking lot.”

Damage estimates that Swirsky acquired from West Coast Auto Collision showed over $3,200 in repair costs, according to the declaration. When asked for comment, Betts texted the Uken Report that the information on the charges were “new to (him).”

Betts has served as

a councilmember since 2007. Incumbent Desert Hot Springs Mayor Scott Matas, seeking reelection for another four-year term, declared victory on Dec. 4 following a close race.

Denis Villeneuve. | Photo courtesy of Katia Temkin/PSIFF

The Cois M. Byrd Detention Center in Murrieta. | Photo courtesy of the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department