Newsom signs $2.5 billion funding bills for wildfire relief; banks, county agencies offer assistance to fire victims
By City News Service
Gov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday signed legislation providing $2.5 billion in relief funds to support recovery from the deadly wildfires that ravaged Pacific Palisades and Altadena.
Newsom said the money will be “made available immediately” and will help cover “ongoing operations, disaster recovery, debris removal, work on logistics, traffic management, address all the myriad of issues that we’re facing in real time.”
Sen. Ben Allen, D-Pacific Palisades, hailed the signing of the legislation.
“The long road to recovery is just beginning, and these bills are a couple of important first steps to usher us along the path,” Allen said in a statement after the signing ceremony. “Relief from these devastating fires is going to require a holistic approach, which will incorporate not just a massive financial undertaking, but strong policy that ensures the best interest of victims and survivors are upheld through the rebuilding process as well. I am grateful to see this starting to come together, and am eager to see the money start flowing as quickly as possible to this community in dire need.”
According to Allen, the bulk of the funding in the legislation will go toward cleanup efforts and removal of hazardous waste, along with remediating hazards such as water and air quality, flooding and debris flows. The money can also be used for sheltering people left homeless, expediting rebuilding efforts and replacing damaged or destroyed school facilities.
The California Latino Legislative Caucus, noting that the fires affected many people, including 74,000 Latinos, and “there is nothing
more important than acting quickly to respond to the moment.”
“Looking ahead, we are pleased to know these funds will boost emergency response and cleanup, help rebuild schools faster, and increase preparedness efforts to prevent the dangers that arise during extreme weather events,” according to the caucus.
LA County launches Business-to-Business Space Share program
Businesses that were displaced by the Southland wildfires could find a temporary workspace through a new program, county officials announced Thursday.
Los Angeles County’s Department of Economic Opportunityintroduced an initiative called the Business-to-Business Space Share, which serves as a free exchange platform connecting displaced businesses and nonprofits to temporary workspaces donated by other
businesses throughout the LA region.
Businesses interested in donating or finding space can visit the Business-to-Business Space Share portal at https:// sharespace.lacounty.gov/.
LA County Supervisor Janice Hahn said she came up with the idea after speaking with Whittier Councilwoman Cathy Warner, who has a periodontal practice in East Whittier with her husband.
Warner, who sees patients in her office three days a week, offered her space to other periodontists to use.
With this in mind, Hahn proposed using an LA County website to facilitate this exchange of goodwill and connect businesses countywide.
“If you have space, this is how you can help. Whether you can offer a space where a dentist can treat their patients, a hair stylist can
keep their appointments, a lawyer can see their clients, or any other space, you will be helping someone in need maintain their livelihood and helping our economy through this crisis,” Hahn said in a statement.
The website is maintained by the county’s Internal Services Department, and it will be available for a limited time.
Through the Space Share portal, businesses with available space can post listings with details such as location, capacity and availability. Displaced business owners can browse the listings to find workspaces that best meet their needs.
Metro approves free rides for LA County residents impacted by fires
The Metro Board of Directors on Thursday approved a proposal to expand its reduced-fare initiative and
estate agent charged in alleged price gouging of Eaton Fire victims
Donald Trump’s No. 2 pick for the EPA represented companies accused of pollution harm
By Sharon Lerner, ProPublica
This story was originally published by ProPublica. ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.
The man tapped by President Donald Trump to be second-in-command of the federal agency that protects the public from environmental dangers is a lawyer who has represented companies accused of harming people and the environment through pollution.
David Fotouhi, a partner in the global law firm Gibson Dunn, played a key part in rolling back climate regulations and water protections while serving as a lawyer in the Environmental Protection Agency during Trump’s first administration.
Most recently, Fotouhi challenged the EPA’s recent ban of asbestos, which causes a deadly cancer called mesothelioma. In a brief filed in October on behalf of a group of car companies called the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, he argued that, for the specific uses that were banned, the “EPA failed to demonstrate that chrysotile asbestos presents an unreasonable risk of injury.”
The EPA banned the carcinogen in March, long after its dangers first became widely known. More than 50 other countries have outlawed use of the mineral. The agency had worked toward the ban for decades, and workers died while lobbyists pushed to delay action, as a 2022 ProPublica investigation showed.
Less than a day after Trump’s inauguration last week, the White House webpage that celebrated the historic ban was gone.
Fotouhi’s nomination to be the EPA deputy administrator must yet be approved by the Senate.
The asbestos rule is just one of several environmental issues at the heart of the EPA’s regulatory mission on which Fotouhi has represented companies accused of polluting.
The 39-year-old lawyer, who is expected to play a critical role running the agency, represented International Paper in lawsuits accusing the firm of contamination from PFAS, or “forever chemicals”; a tire company that allegedly released a chemical known to kill endangered salmon (the firm disputed the claim and is fighting the lawsuit); and a coalition of businesses in Washington state that sued the EPA over its water quality standards for legacy pollutants known as PCBs.
Environmentalists are calling on Fotouhi to recuse himself from decisions regarding asbestos and other issues he’s recently worked on at Gibson Dunn. “Here’s a guy who wrote a very biased and one-sided attack on the EPA rule on asbestos. I would not want him to come anywhere near EPA decision-making on the asbestos rule,” said Robert Sussman, an attorney who represents the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization and served as EPA deputy administrator during the Clinton administration.
“I recused myself from everything involving former clients,” said Sussman.
Fotouhi declined to comment for this story. An EPA spokesperson said in a statement, “Every person President
A firefighter sifts through the rubble of a structure destroyed in the Eaton Fire. | Photo courtesy of Cal Fire_Official/Flickr (CC BY-NC 2.0)
Pasadena health officer issues order on removal of fire debris
By City News Service
Pasadena’s Acting Health Officer Parveen Kaur
issued an order Wednesday requiring the safe removal, transport and disposal of Eaton Fire debris and hazardous waste.
In an effort “to help protect community safety,” Kaur’s order requires the removal of fire debris “to be approved and comply with local, state, and federal laws and regulations.”
The city has requested state and federal assistance to hasten recovery efforts and ensure the safe removal of fire debris from damaged and destroyed buildings, officials said.
“Fire debris must be safely removed to prevent more harm,” according to a city statement.
The cleanup and recovery effort will happen in two phases — first is the removal of hazardous waste, then fire debris in Phase 2. The city’s Fire Debris Removal Program website has more information and updates on waste and debris cleanup operations.
“Phase 1 is mandatory
for all destroyed and heavily damaged properties,” according to the city statement.
“Phase 2 is the removal of the remaining structural ash and debris, with an opportunity to participate in a government sponsored program at no cost to property owners.”
Landowners who do not participate in the city’s debris clearance initiative must coordinate removal at their own expense, in addition to transport and disposal, “in a manner that does not endanger the community and that complies with all legal requirements,” officials said.
Exposure to debris and ash containing toxic substances may result in “acute and chronic health effects and cause long-term public health and environmental impacts,” according to health officials. “Improper handling of fire debris can expose workers to toxic materials, and improper transport and disposal of fire debris can spread hazardous substances throughout the community. Uncontrolled hazardous substances and debris also
pose significant threats to public health through inhalation of dust particles.”
Debris and ash from structural fires is likely to carry pollutants such as lead, asbestos, arsenic, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, dioxins and other materials that are especially hazardous to older adults, children and people with heart or lung ailments.
A violation of the debris removal order is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment, fine or both.
Officials advised residents to avoid unsafe structures and fire debris — freestanding portions of fire damaged structures including chimneys, walls and overhanging building remnants are potential hazards.
N-95 or P-100 respirator masks were also recommended for returning residents, as was the use of indoor air cleaning devices.
More information on things to do when retuning home after a fire evacuation is available at cityofpasadena. net/public-health.
Former Stanton city councilwoman charged with multiple felonies
By Staff
Hong Alyce Van, a former Stanton city councilwoman, has been charged with multiple felonies for allegedly forging nomination paperwork to run for reelection for a city council seat in a district in which she did not live and illegally voting in the Nov. 5 general election, the Orange County District Attorney’s Office announced last week.
Van, 40, of Anaheim, has been charged with one felony count of perjury, one felony count of offering a false or forged document to be filed, registered or recorded, one felony count of filing false nomination papers and one felony account of not being entitled to vote at an election.
Van is scheduled to be arraigned on Jan. 29 at the Stephen K. Tamura Justice Center in Westminster in Department W12. She faces a maximum sentence of six years in state prison if convicted on all counts.
“The integrity of our elections will be safeguarded and political candidates who lie and cheat the system in order to get elected will be prosecuted,” OC District Attorney Todd Spitzer said in a statement. “These are not mistakes. These are deliberate decisions to interfere with our democratic process and they will not be tolerated.”
Van was elected in November 2020 to represent Stanton’s City Council District 2, but less than a year after her election Van is accused of purchasing a home in Stanton Council District 4 with her husband and son. Despite no longer living in her district, Van did not resign as required by law and continued to
serve as the District 2 council member, prosecutors said. Van did not sell her home in District 2, which was located next to the home where her parents live, and allowed other family members to live in her former home.
While serving on the council, Van is accused of leaving her home located in Stanton Council District 4, driving to her former residence in CD 2, then walking to Stanton City Hall to attend council meetings, according to the DA’s office.
On July 23, Van submitted an “affidavit of nominee,” which she signed under penalty of perjury, to run for reelection for District 2, despite the fact that she no longer lived in the district and was therefore ineligible to run for the city council seat, prosecutors said. Van’s voter registration continued to list her former District 2 address after she moved, and she illegally cast her vote in the November 2024 election while being registered at her former address.
Long Beach police release surveillance video of rape suspect
By City News Service
LongBeachpolice have released surveillance video of a man suspected of raping a woman on the west side of the city.
The video taken Jan. 17 shows the man wearing a dark hoodie, gray sweatpants and black shoes as he walks in the area of West 10th Street and Pacific Avenue, where a woman was walking near an alley around 1 a.m. when the
suspect approached and sexually assaulted her.
The suspect ran north on Pacific and detectives believe he may have struck a second woman in the upper body about 9 that morning in the 1200 block of Long Beach Boulevard. The suspect was described as Black, 25-30 years old, 5 feet, 8 or 9 inches tall, 180-200 pounds, with medium-
length dreadlocks and facial hair.
“This abhorrent crime is disturbing and intolerable,” said Long Beach Chief of Police Wally Hebeish. “I’m urging the public to please review the provided video and help us identify the suspect responsible for committing this crime. Please follow our safety tips, maintain awareness of your surroundings and if
you have any information or think you might know the suspect, please contact LBPD detectives immediately.”
Anyone with information about the crime or suspect’s identity is urged to contact the Sex Crimes Detail at 562-570-7368. Anonymous tips may be submitted through Crime Stoppersat1-800-222-8477.
Police released this surveillance video image of a rape suspect. | Photo courtesy of the Long Beach Police Department/YouTube
| Image courtesy of the city of Pasadena
Hong Alyce Van. | Photo courtesy of the city of Stanton
Editorial editorial@beaconmedianews.com
editor@hlrmedia.com
Graphics/Production production@beaconmedianews.com production@hlrmedia.com
Advertising advertising@beaconmedianews.com advertising@hlrmedia.com
Legal Advertising legals@beaconmedianews.com legals@hlrmedia.com
Business accounting@beaconmedianews.com accounting@hlrmedia.com
BEACON MEDIA ADDRESS: 820 S. Myrtle Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016
PHONE: (626) 301-1010
WEBSITE www.beaconmedianews.com
HLR MEDIA ADDRESS: 820 S. Myrtle Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016
PHONE: (626) 301-1010 www.HLRmedia.com
PRESS
editor@beaconmedianews.com editor@hlrmedia.com
TGLAAD nominees announced for March 27 awards show in LA
he Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, the world’s largest LGBTQ media advocacy organization, announced nominees Wednesday for the 36th GLAAD Media Awards, honoring “outstanding fair, accurate, and inclusive representations of LGBTQ people and issues in film, television, gaming, publishing, stage productions, music, podcasting, journalism, and more.”
Wednesday’s announcement, made from New York, comprised 303 nominees across 33 categories. The awards ceremony will take place March 27 in Los Angeles.
“The GLAAD Media Awards were created nearly four decades ago to champion LGBTQ stories amid a deeply hostile and unsafe time for our community. Today, this mission holds true and ever-more important as attacks against LGBTQ people are not only growing, but finding new avenues,” GLAAD President & CEO Sarah Kate Ellis said.
“Whether it’s rampant misinformation or defa-
LBy City News Service
mation of transgender people, LGBTQ youth, or the shocking corporate rollback of policies and programs that keep LGBTQ people seen and safe in a workforce, what will always prevail is our truth and talent,” Ellis added.
“This year’s nominees for the 36th GLAAD Media Awards represent the best of our vibrant community, spanning across all media, genres and mediums, and send a loud and global
message to industry leaders that our stories are not only popular and entertaining, but necessary and culturechanging.”
The nominees reflect work published, released or broadcast between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2024.
Each year, the organization also presents non-competitive honors to projects across entertainment and media that do not fit into existing or traditional GLAAD Media Awards categories.
Those Special Recognition honors were announced for the following recipients: “DRAG: The Musical,” “La Verdrag” (Canal Once), OUTLOUD, “Red Ink: A Tribute to Cecilia Gentili,” the Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center, “The Q Agenda” (LatiNation), and the 2024 WNBA champion New York Liberty. A full list of 2024’s nominees is online at glaad. org/releases.
December unemployment rate in LA County holds steady, drops in IE
os Angeles County’s seasonallyadjusted unemployment rate held steady at 6% in December, the same rate as November, according to figures released Friday by the state Employment Development Department.
The 6% rate was above the rate of 5.2% in December 2023.
The December unemployment rate in Orange County was 3.8%, down from a revised 4% in November and the same rate as December 2023.
Statewide, California’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate was 5.5% in December, up from 5.4% in November and up from 5.1% in December 2023. The comparable estimates for the nation were 4.1% in December, 4.2% in November and 3.8% in December 2023.
Total nonfarm employment in Los Angeles County increased by 11,400 jobs between November and
By City News Service
December to reach nearly 4.66 million.
The trade, transportation and utilities sector showed the largest month-overmonth gain, adding 7,700 jobs.
Inland Empire
Payroll gains outweighed losses across the regional economy last month, pushing Riverside County’s unemployment lower, according to figures released Friday by the EDD.
The countywide jobless rate in December, based on preliminary EDD estimates, was 5%, compared to 5.4% in November.
According to data, the December rate was onetenth of a percentage point below the year-ago level, when countywide unemployment stood at 5.1%.
The combined unemployment rate for Riverside and San Bernardino counties — the Inland Empire — was 4.9%, down from 5.3% in November, the EDD said.
Bi-county data indicated payrolls expanded by the widest margin in the trade and transportation sector, mainly in retailing and warehousing, which added 1,600 positions amid the holiday shopping season.
The financial services, information technology and manufacturing sectors grew by an aggregate 900 posi-
tions, according to figures. Payrolls shrank in the agricultural, construction, health services and professional business services sectors, which altogether shed an estimated 3,800 jobs. The hospitality, mining and public sectors were unchanged, along with miscellaneous unclassified industries, according to data.
| Image courtesy of GLAAD
| Photo courtesy of Canva
“ EmiliaPérez”made
Oscar history Thursday, capturing a leading 13 nominations as nods for the 97th Academy Awards were announced — with “The Brutalist” and “Wicked” picking up 10 nominations each, followed by “Conclave” and “A Complete Unknown” with eight apiece, “Anora” with six and “Dune: Part 2” with five.
Among the historic haul of nods for “Emilia Pérez” on Thursday was a nomination for best picture, joining “Anora,” “The Brutalist,” “A Complete Unknown,” “Conclave,” “Dune: Part Two,” “I’m Still Here,” “Nickel Boys,” “The Substance” and “Wicked.”
“Emilia Pérez” — the gender-bending Spanishlanguage, French- produced crime musical — also became the most-nominated nonEnglish-language film in Academy Awards history, topping 2000’s “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon” and 2018’s “Roma,” which each got 10 nods.
“Emilia Pérez” tells the story of a drug cartel leader played by Karla Sofía Gascón who hires a lawyer to help Gascón fake her death so she can transition to being a woman and live as her real self. The film also garnered Gascón a nomination for best actress, making her the first openly transgender woman nominated for an Academy Award.
Joining Gascón in the best actress category were Cynthia Erivo in “Wicked,” Mikey Madison in “Anora,” and Golden Globe winners Demi Moore in “The Substance” and Fernanda Torres in “I’m Still Here.”
Best actor nominations went to Globe winner Adrien Brody in “The Brutalist,” a 3 1/2-hour, post-World War II epic, Timothée Chalamet
‘Emilia Pérez’ makes Oscar history with 13 noms; ‘Brutalist,’ ‘Wicked’ grab 10
By City News Service
in “A Complete Unknown,” Colman Domingo in “Sing Sing,” Ralph Fiennes in “Conclave” and Sebastian Stan in “The Apprentice.”
Zoe Saldaña picked up a best supporting actress nomination for her role in “Emilia Pérez” after capturing a Globe in that category earlier this month. Joining her for Oscar nods Thursday were Monica Barbaro in “A Complete Unknown,” Ariana Grande in “Wicked,” Felicity Jones in “The Brutalist” and Isabella Rossellini in “Conclave.”
Best supporting actor nominations went to Yura Borisov in “Anora,” Kieran Culkin in “A Real Pain,” Edward Norton in “A Complete Unknown,” Guy Pearce in “The Brutalist” and Jeremy Strong in “The Apprentice.”
The Oscars’ other
glamour category — best director — brought nominations to Jacques Audiard for “Emilia Pérez,” Sean Baker for “Anora,” Brady Corbet for “The Brutalist,” James Mangold for “A Complete Unknown” and Coralie Fargeat for “The Substance.”
Among companies releasing films in 2024, Netflix garnered the most Oscar nominations with 16, followed by A24 with 14, Universal with 13, Focus Features with 12 and Searchlight with 10.
In addition to its nominations for best picture, actress, supporting actress and director, the Netflix-produced “Emilia Pérez” also took nominations for cinematography; film editing; international feature film; makeup and hairstyling; original score; original song both “El Mal” and “Mi Camino”; sound; and adapted screenplay.
Noteworthy snubs abounded in the best actress category, including for A-Listers Angelina Jolie in “Maria,” Nicole Kidman in “Babygirl,” Tilda Swinton in “The Room Next Door,” Kate Winslet in “Lee” and Pamela Anderson in “The Last Showgirl.”
Other snubs included Denzel Washington for his role in “Gladiator II,” along with Margaret Qualley, who played Moore’s younger body double in “The Substance,” about an aging actress who discovers a black-market drug that restores youth — but with all manner of side-effects and complications. Edward Berger, who directed the papal thriller “Conclave,” was also shut out in the director category.
Notable absences on the best picture nomination list were “A Real Pain,” the Jesse Eisenberg vehicle,
and “September 5,” about the murder of the Israeli Olympic team in Munich in 1972 — both pictures having been among the nominees for the Producers Guild of America Award, an honor that traditionally foretells success on Oscar night.
Each category got five nominees, except best picture, which got 10.
A total of 323 feature films were eligible for consideration, including 207 that met the criteria for consideration for best picture. More than 9,900 Academy voters were eligible to cast ballots for nominations across the 23 categories. Final voting for the Oscars will take place from Feb. 11-18.
The nominations for Hollywood’s biggest night were announced by actor/ writer/comedians Rachel
Sennott and Bowen Yang during a livestream event from the Academy’s Samuel Goldwyn Theatre in Beverly Hills.
The Oscar nominations ceremony, originally set for Jan. 17, was first postponed to Jan. 19 due to the Los Angeles-area wildfires, and later rescheduled again to Thursday. In addition, the nomination voting period was extended to Jan. 17.
Earlier this week, Academy CEO Bill Kramer and President Janet Yang released a statement saying, “We are all devastated by the impact of the fires and the profound losses experienced by so many in our community. The Academy has always been a unifying force within the film industry, and we are committed to standing together in the face of hardship.”
The statement went on to say, “Our members always share how important it is for us to come together as a community, and we are determined to use this opportunity to celebrate our resilient and compassionate industry.
“We also look forward to honoring our frontline workers who have aided with the fires, recognizing those impacted, and encouraging people to join the Academy in supporting the relief efforts.”
The 97th Oscars are set for March 2 at the Dolby Theatre at Ovation Hollywood and will be televised live at 4 p.m. on ABC and streamed live on Hulu. Conan O’Brien is set to host the show, making his debut in the role.
For a complete list of the nominations visit oscars. org.
Oscar trophies. | Photo courtesy of Thank You (25 million views)/Flickr (CC BY 2.0)
Californians are leaving for these states
By Jaclyn DeJohn, SmartAsset via Stacker
Californiawelcomed 254,935 new residents from across the nation between 2021 and 2022. But, 399,138 Californians also moved out to other states during that same time. In total, the Golden State lost 143,554 households. Many people leaving California could have been incentivized by lower costs of living, lower taxes, less competitive housing markets and business opportunities elsewhere.
With this in mind, SmartAsset analyzed the latest IRS data to explore where Californians are headed, as well as from which states new transplants are entering.
Key findings
Texas is the most popular destination for Californian transplants California lost the most residents to Texas with 54,136 households leaving for the Lone Star State. These households had an average AGI of $146,000. The net loss was 30,820 households after accounting for the 23,316 Texan households that moved into California. However, these households coming into California had a substantially lower average AGI of $106,196. Less affluent Californians moved to Arizona. Arizona is the second-most popular destination for Californians leaving, with 32,864 households moving out, or a net loss of 16,749. Those moving to Arizona earned the lowest average AGI of the top 10 most popular destinations for Californian transplants at $100,399. Of the 16,115
States are ranked by the gross number of households that moved in from California between 2021 and 2022.
1. Texas
Households moving into California: 23,316
Individuals moving into California: 39,032
AGI, households moving into California: $106,197
Households leaving California for Texas: 54,136
Individuals leaving California for Texas: 106,882
AGI, households leaving California for Texas: $145,960
Net households moved into California: -30,820
Net individuals moved into California: -67,850
2. Arizona
Households moving into California: 16,115
Individuals moving into California: 25,677
AGI, households moving into California: $77,002
Households leaving California for Arizona: 32,864
Individuals leaving California for Arizona: 57,857
households moving in from Arizona, the average household AGI was just $77,002.
More than 30,000 Californian households cross the state border to Nevada. Like Texas, Nevada offers the benefit of no state income tax, potentially saving ex-Californians thousands of dollars per year. Nevada was the thirdmost popular destination for Californians, with those leaving taking an average AGI of $134,796 with them. At the same time, 14,518 households with $86,040 AGI moved to California.
New York transplants bring the most money to California. New York sent 19,708 households to California, made up of 26,821 individuals, with the highest average AGI among in-migrants at $171,829. However, migration between New York and California cancels each other out, with 19,656 households (25,453 individuals) with an AGI of $170,781 moving in. New York ranked as the sixthmost popular destination for Californians moving out.
The richest Californians are leaving for Wyoming. A popular destination for the ultra-wealthy, Wyoming attracted 1,368 Californian households that had an average AGI of $284,133. New Hampshire ($204,605) and Florida ($187,025) attracted the second- and third-highest earning Californian households, but only Florida ranked among the top 10 popular destinations for Californians.
Top 10 states where Californians are headed
Individuals leaving California for Florida: 42,412
AGI, households leaving California for Florida: $187,025
Net households moved into California: -10,947
Net individuals moved into California: -22,484
6. New York
Households moving into California: 19,708
Individuals moving into California: 26,821
AGI, households moving into California: $171,829
Households leaving California for New York: 19,656
Individuals leaving California for New York: 25,453
AGI, households leaving California for New York: $170,781
Net households moved into California: 52
Net individuals moved into California: 1,368
7. Oregon
Households moving into California: 10,550
Individuals moving into California: 15,806
AGI, households leaving California for Arizona: $100,399
Net households moved into California: -16,749
Net individuals moved into California: -32,180
3. Nevada
Households moving into California: 14,518
Individuals moving into California: 23,983
AGI, households moving into California: $86,040
Households leaving California for Nevada: 30,571
Individuals leaving California for Nevada: 52,332
AGI, households leaving California for Nevada: $134,796
Net households moved into California: -16,053
Net individuals moved into California: -28,349
4. Washington
Households moving into California: 18,275
Individuals moving into California: 29,096
AGI, households moving into California: $162,665
Households leaving California for Washington: 27,550
Individuals leaving California for Washington: 44,160
AGI, households leaving California for Washington: $139,927
Net households moved into California: -9,275
Net individuals moved into California: -15,064
5. Florida
Households moving into California: 13,064
Individuals moving into California: 19,928
AGI, households moving into California: $120,948
Households leaving California for Florida: 24,011
$104,753
Net households moved into California: -8,738
Net individuals moved into California: -14,615
8. Colorado
Households moving into California: 9,895
Individuals moving into California: 14,929
AGI, households moving into California: $105,770
Households leaving California for Colorado: 15,585
Individuals leaving California for Colorado: 24,864
AGI, households leaving California for Colorado: $129,118
Net households moved into California: -5,690
Net individuals moved into California: -9,935
9. Tennessee
Households moving into California: 3,450
Individuals moving into California: 5,598
AGI, households moving into California: $106,019
Households leaving California for Tennessee: 13,086
AGI, households moving into California: $93,067
Households leaving California for Oregon: 19,288
Individuals leaving California for Oregon: 30,421
AGI, households leaving California for Oregon:
Individuals leaving California for Tennessee: 27,295
AGI, households leaving California for Tennessee: $144,543
Net households moved into California: -9,636
Net individuals moved into California: -21,697
10. North Carolina
Households moving into California: 6,495
Individuals moving into California: 10,734
AGI, households moving into California: $82,228
Households leaving California for North Carolina: 11,482
Individuals leaving California for North Carolina: 21,983
AGI, households leaving California for North Carolina: $113,972
Net households moved into California: -4,987
Net individuals moved into California: -11,249
Data and methodology
SmartAsset examined the latest IRS data, which comes from the 2021 and 2022 tax years to determine the number of individuals and households moving out of and into California, where they are coming from and going to within the U.S., as well as the average adjusted gross income they bring with them.
This story was produced by SmartAsset and reviewed and distributed by Stacker. The article was copy edited and retitled from its original version. Republished with CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
| Image courtesy of SmartAsset/Stacker
The second Trump White House could drastically reshape infectious disease research. Here’s what’s at stake.
By Anna Maria Barry-Jester, ProPublica
Lifesaving HIV treatments. Cures for hepatitis C. New tuberculosis regimens and a vaccine for RSV.
These and other major medical breakthroughs exist in large part thanks to a major division of the National Institutes of Health, the largest funder of biomedical research on the planet.
For decades, researchers with funding from the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases have labored quietly in red and blue states across the country, conducting experiments, developing treatments and running clinical trials. With its $6.5 billion budget, NIAID has played a vital role in discoveries that have kept the nation at the forefront of infectious disease research and saved millions of lives.
Then came the COVID-19 pandemic.
NIAID helped lead the federal response, and its director, Dr. Anthony Fauci, drew fire amid school closures nationwide and recommendations to wear face masks. Lawmakers were outraged to learn that the agency had funded an institute in China that had engaged in controversial research bioengineering viruses, and questioned whether there was sufficient oversight. Republicans in Congress have led numerous hearings and investigations into NIAID’s work, flattened NIH’s budget and proposed a total overhaul of the agency.
More recently, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump’s nominee to run the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the NIH, has said he wants to fire and replace 600 of the agency’s 20,000 employees and shift research away from infectious diseases and vaccines, which are at the core of NIAID’s mission to understand, treat and prevent infectious, immunologic and allergic diseases. He has said that half of NIH’s budget should focus on “preventive, alternative and holistic approaches to health.” He has a particular interest in improving diets.
Even the most staunch defenders of NIH agree the agency could benefit from reforms. Some would like to see fewer institutes, while others believe there should
be term limits for directors. There are important debates over whether to fund and how to oversee controversial research methods, and concerns about the way the agency has handledtransparency. Scientists inside and outside of the institute agree that work needs to be done to restore public trust in the agency.
But experts and patient advocates worry that an overhaul or dismantling of NIAID without a clear understanding of the critical work performed there could imperil not only the development of future lifesaving treatments but also the nation’s place at the helm of biomedical innovation.
“The importance of NIAID cannot be overstated,” said Greg Millett, vice president and director of public policy at amfAR, a nonprofit dedicated to AIDS research and advocacy. “The amount of expertise, the research, the breakthroughs that have come out of NIAID — It’s just incredible.”
To understand how NIAID works and what’s at stake with the new administration, ProPublica spoke with people who have worked for NIAID, received funding from it, or served on boards or panels that advise the institute.
Decisions, Decisions
The director of NIAID is appointed by the head of the NIH, who must be approved by the Senate. Directors have broad discretion to determine what research to fund and where to award grants, although traditionally those decisions are informed by recommendations from panels of outside experts.
Fauci led NIAID for nearly 40 years. He’d navigated controversy in the past, particularly in the early years of the HIV epidemic when community activists criticized him for initially excluding them from the research agenda. But in general until the pandemic, he enjoyed relatively solid bipartisan support for his work, which included a strong focus on vaccine research and development. After he retired in 2022, he was replaced by Dr. Jeanne Marrazzo, an HIV researcher who was formerly the director of the division of infectious diseases at the University of Alabama at
Birmingham. She has spent much of her time in the halls of Congress working to restore bipartisan support for the institution.
NIH directors typically span presidential administrations. But Donald Trump has nominated Dr. Jay Bhattacharya to lead NIH, and current director Dr. Monica Bertagnolli told staff this week that she would resign on Jan. 17. A Stanford professor, Bhattacharya has spent his career studying health policy issues like the implementation of the Affordable Care Act and the efficacy of U.S. funding for HIV treatments internationally. He also researched the NIH, concluding that while the agency funds a lot of innovative or novel research, it should do even more.
In March 2020, Bhattacharya co-authored an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal arguing that the death toll from the pandemic would likely be far lower than predicted and called for lockdown policies to be reevaluated. That October, he helped write a declaration that recommended lifting COVID-19 restrictions for those “at minimal risk of death” until herd immunity could be reached. In an interview with the libertarian magazine Reason in June, he said he believes the COVID-19 epidemic most likely originated from a lab accident in China and that he can’t see Trump’s Operation Warp Speed, which led to the development and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines at unprecedented speed, as a total success because it was part of the same research agenda.
Bhattacharya declined an interview request from ProPublica about his priorities for the agency. A recent Wall Street Journal article said he is considering how to link “academic freedom” on college campuses to NIH grants, though it’s not clear how he would measure that or implement such a change. He’s also raised the idea of term limits for directors and said the pandemic “was just a disaster for American science and public health policy,” which is now in desperate need of reform. Where the Money Goes Grants from NIAID flow to nearly every state
and more than half of the congressional districts across the country, supporting thousands of jobs nationwide. Last year, nearly $5 billion of NIAID’s $6.5 billion budget went to U.S. organizations outside the institute, according to a ProPublica analysis of NIH’s RePORT, an online database of its expenditures.
In 2024, Duke University in North Carolina and Washington University in Missouri were NIAID’s largest grantees, receiving more than $190 and $173 million, respectively, to study, among other things, HIV, West Nile vaccines and biodefense.
Over the past five years, $10.6 billion, or about 40% of NIAID’s budget to external U.S. institutions, went to states that voted for Trump in the 2024 presidential election, the analysis found. Research suggests that every dollar spent by NIH generates from $2.50 to $8 in economic activity.
That money is key to advancing medicine as well as careers in science. Most students and postdoctoral researchers rely on the funding and prestige of NIH grants to launch into the profession.
New Drugs and Global Influence
The NIH pays for most of the basic research globally into new drugs. The private sector relies on this public funding; researchers at Bentley University found that NIH money was behind every new pharmaceutical
approved from 2010 through 2019.
That includes therapies for kids with RSV, COVID-19 vaccines and Ebola treatments, all of which have key patents based on NIAIDfunded research.
Research from NIAID has also improved treatment for chronic diseases. New understandings of inflammation from NIAID-funded research has led to cuttingedge research into cures for Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, and a growing body of evidence shows how viruses can have long-term impacts, from multiple sclerosis to long COVID. When private companies turn that research into blockbuster drugs, the public benefits from new treatments, as well as jobs and economic growth.
The weight of NIAID’s funding also allows it to play quieter roles that have been essential to advancing science and the United States’ role in biomedicine, several people said.
The institute brings together scientists who are normally competitors to share findings and tackle big research questions.
Having that neutral space is essential to pushing knowledge forward and ultimately spurring breakthroughs, said Matthew Rose of the Human Rights Campaign, who has served on multiple NIH advisory boards. “Academic bodies are very competitive with one another. Having NIH pull the grantees together
is helpful to make sure they talk to one another and share research.”
NIAID also funds researchers internationally, ensuring the U.S. continues to have an influential voice in global conversations about biosecurity. NIH has also been working to improve representation in clinical trials. Straight, white men are still overrepresented in clinical research, which has led to missed diagnoses for women and all people of color, as well as those in the LGBTQ+ community. Rose pointed to a long history of missing signs of heart conditions in women as an example.
“These are the type of things commercial companies don’t care about,” he said, noting that NIH helps to set the agenda on these issues.
Nancy Sullivan, a former senior investigator at NIAID, said that NIAID’s power is its ability to invest in a broad understanding of human health. “It’s the basic research that allows us to develop treatments,” she said. “You never know which part of fundamental research is going to be the lynchpin for curing a disease or defining a disease so you know how to treat it,” she said.
Sullivan should know: It was her work at NIAID that led four years ago to the first approved treatment for Ebola. Republished with Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).
This story was originally published by ProPublica. ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.
Ross Marklein, Ph.D., a post-doctoral research fellow at FDA, examines images of stem cells in an FDA laboratory on the National Institutes of Health campus in Bethesda, Md. | Photo courtesy of U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Based on independent testing, Edmunds’ 6th annual Top Rated Awards honors the best electric- and gas-powered vehicles of 2025
By Jodi Tourkow, Edmunds via Stacker
Edmunds drives, tests, and evaluates more than 300 vehicles every year. Editors rack up tens of thousands of miles on racetracks, mountain roads, and highways alike, all in the quest to help you find that perfect ride. Some are great; some are disappointing, but only a few rise to the standard that earns them Edmunds’ highest honor: The Edmunds Top Rated Award. Our winners for 2025 are here, and each has risen to the top through a mix of quality, functionality, livability, and value.
1. Top rated car and best of the best 2025: Honda Civic Hybrid
The latest Civic may be the best Honda has ever produced. It’s available as a sedan or roomy hatchback, is fun to drive, and has a topnotch interior. It’s even more compelling with its new-for2025 hybrid powertrain, which returned an astounding 49 mpg in Edmunds’ real-world testing.
The Civic Hybrid is a perfectly balanced compact sedan and might be all the car you ever need. Frugal,
fun, and affordable, this is one of those rare instances where buyers get to have their cake and eat it, too.
2. Top rated SUV 2025: Toyota Grand Highlander
It’s in a class of one. The Grand Highlander Hybrid is a three-row SUV with impressive fuel economy. The base powertrain gets an EPAestimated 36 mpg combined driving.
But its biggest selling point is its third row, which is comfortable enough that adults can sit there without staring daggers into the back of the other passengers’ heads. Plus, it comes with Toyota’s latest comprehensive suite of advanced driver aids and Toyota’s voice recognition system — which is one of the best.
3. Top rated Truck 2025: Ford Ranger
The latest Ranger is so much more refined than the previous generation you would barely believe they shared a lineage. In the past, if you wanted a pickup with a nice interior, you needed to go shopping for a fullsize.
But the Ranger bucks
that trend by offering a quality interior, keeping plenty of physical buttons and knobs to go along with the Ranger’s easy-to-use touchscreen and adding driver aids that we longed for on the previous generation.
4. Top rated electric car 2024: Tesla Model 3
The Tesla Model 3 has always been a good but not great EV. But a major facelift in 2024 brought improvements everywhere, including more range, a better ride quality, sharper handling and a nicer interior with — finally — professional build quality.
Even better, none of this came with a price hike; the Model 3 is still one of the most affordable EVs out there.
5. Top rated electric SUV 2025: Kia EV9
The Kia EV9 is a repeat Edmunds Top Rated winner. Why? It’s a mix of utility, affordability, and plenty of space for, well, everything couldn’t be beaten over the last 12 months. The EV9 remains a seriously impressive SUV, fully electric or
otherwise.
There are other threerow fully electric SUVs for sale, but none are so thoroughly well designed inside and out, yet all of them cost thousands more. The EV9 achieves all of this without feeling sloppy or lazy on the road and while maintaining peak levels of comfort. For big families going electric, there simply isn’t a better car for the job right now.
6. Top Rated electric truck 2025: Rivian R1T Rivian has spent the last
few years refining its flagship with little software updates here and there, but the result of its major update for the 2025 model year was the most transformative by far. Though it doesn’t look like it from the outside, updated powertrains, improved software, new features, and more options at more price points mean the R1T is an honest-to-goodness allrounder.
There are now more trims to pick from, far more maximum range than before,
and an easier-to-use interface. The R1T’s inherent sharp handling and brisk acceleration from every trim, regardless of power output, make piloting this truck a joy. It isn’t just a more competitive offering; it is simply the best electric truck you can buy, bar none. This story was produced by Edmunds and reviewed and distributed by Stacker. The article was copy edited and retitled from its original version. Republished with CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Preliminary damage costs for LA fires at $385M, expected to rise
By Jose Herrera, City News Service
Damages and emergencyresponse costs related to the early days of the multiple wildfires that burned in Los Angeles are anticipated to reach $385M with that figure expected to grow, according to a preliminary report issued Wednesday.
During a discussion with City Council members, City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo said numerous facilities and public infrastructure were damaged as a result of the fires. He anticipated that the city will be eligible for at least partial reimbursement by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
The estimate covered damages incurred from the start of the fires on Jan. 7 to Jan. 10. Of that $385 million, $350 million is associated with damages to infrastructure and city properties.
Separately, Szabo estimated more costs are expected from the period of Jan. 7-17, which could reach at least $24
million just for staffing and overtime.
Some of the major costs include at least $75 million in damages at the Department and Water and Power related to distribution stations, equipment and wiring. Additionally, damages to DWP-owned streets and outdoor lighting are costing nearly $20 million.
The LA Public Library has reported at least $55 million in damages, partly due to the loss of the Pacific Palisades Library and its books. Significant smoke, ash and dust impacted HVAC filters at 73 city libraries, according to Szabo.
LA Sanitation reported nearly $50 million in damages with full replacement of stormwater structures and pumping plants accounting for the majority of that cost.
Street lightning reported about $16 million in damages, and the Department of Recreation and Parks estimates another $150 million.
The city is expected to
front 100% of the costs for damages and its emergency response. But under FEMA’s reimbursement model, officials anticipate recovering 75% of that money. Typically, the remaining 25% would be reimbursed by
the state, Szabo added. Former President Joe Biden previously announced that the federal government would cover certain costs for 180 days, which Szabo noted covers two categories — staffing and debris removal.
The city is expected to refine its damage assessments, apply for disaster relief and meet with FEMA officials in late February.
City Councilwoman Monica Rodriguez highlighted the city’s financial challenges Wednesday and questioned how the costs would impact the reserve fund.
In response, Szabo noted his office is working to identify funds to protect the reserve fund, which is already below the city’s 5% policy. Particularly, the city is looking through special funds that could be used to front costs while money from FEMA comes in.
That process could drag out for a year or sometimes several years, Szabo added.
“We do the best that we can to have our applications ready to go, ready for reimbursement,” Szabo said.
With Los Angeles facing a budget deficit as a result of overspending, liability payouts and labor contracts,
Councilman John Lee emphasized that the city can “no longer be business as usual. We need to make sure that, starting with this budget, we really focus on the core services — what the city of Los Angeles expects from their tax dollars,” Lee said.
Councilwoman Traci Park, who represents the 11th District, which encompasses the Pacific Palisades, urged the CAO to develop plans for adequate staffing and resources needed for burn areas.
“As we are beginning the repopulation efforts, there is a ton of opportunity to get more workers on the ground,” Park said. “We need to look at every potential resource of getting bodies on the ground to get this toxic waste mess off the ground.”
In the city’s jurisdiction, the Palisades Fire burned 23,448 acres, and was among multiple fires that erupted in Los Angeles in the week of Jan. 7.
The top electric truck of 2025 is the Rivian R1T, according to Edmunds. | Photo courtesy of Edmunds
Will Rogers’ former ranch house was destroyed by the Palisades Fire. | Photo courtesy of California State Parks.
File your DBA with us at
EL Monte City Notices
URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 3044
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL MONTE AMENDING SECTION 2.04.010(A)(1) OF THE EL MONTE MUNICIPAL CODE TO CHANGE THE DATE AND TIME OF REGULAR MEETINGS TO THE SECOND AND FOURTH WEDNES DAY OF EACH MONTH STARTING AT 6:00 PM
WHEREAS, the City of El Monte (“City”) is a municipal corpo ration and general law City; and
WHEREAS, the El Monte City Council (“City Council”), by ordi nance, set the official date and time for regular meetings of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, City Council meetings are currently set for the first and third Tuesday of each calendar month starting at 6:00 pm; and WHEREAS, with the expansion in the size of the City Council in recent years and change in membership with recent elections, a new date and time for meetings is warranted to ensure maximum participation by City Council members; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 36937(b) authorizes the adoption of ordinances that take effect immediately for the pur pose of preserving the public peace, health or safety, provided such ordinances are approved by four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Coun cil.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOL LOWS:
SECTION 1. The Recitals, above, are true and correct.
SECTION 2. In accordance with Government Code Section 36937, the El Monte City Council hereby approves this Urgency Or dinance by four-fifths vote. The immediate adoption of this Urgency Ordinance is necessary in light of the expansion of the City Council in recent years and the recent election of new members to ensure that all members of the City Council are able to fully participate in regular meetings and in turn represent the interests of the constitu encies they represent. There is also concern that given the current start time of regular meetings, such meetings are more likely to end later in the evening when certain members of the public – especially those who must wake up early to go to work the next day – and as such reduce the ability of the public to fully participate in such meet ings. An earlier start time will promote meetings that end earlier, thereby allowing more members of the public to participate.
on January 27, 2025
Probate Notices
NOTICE OF PETITION TO
terested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 02/10/2025 Time: 8:30AM Dept: V. Room: 620. The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive weeks prior to the day set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general circulation, printed in this county: Arcadia Weekly DATED: December 27, 2024 Virginia Keeny JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Pub. January 6, 13, 20, 27, 2025 ARCADIA WEEKLY
SECTION 3. Paragraph (A)(1) of Section 2.04.010 (Regular meetings) of Chapter 2.04 (City Council Meetings) of Title 2 (Administration and Personnel of the El Monte Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to now state the following:
“Regular meetings of the City Council shall be held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each calendar month commencing at 6:00 p.m. If the day fixed for holding any such regular meeting falls upon (i) any legal holiday specified by Government Code Sections 6700 or 6701, (ii) upon any of those holidays specified in Section 2.68.010(B) of the El Monte Municipal Code, or (iii) the date of any general or special municipal election of the city, then said regular meeting shall be held on the next business day immediately following and such meeting shall be considered a regular meeting pursuant to subdivision (a) of Government Code Section 54954 for all intents and purposes to the extent permitted by law.”
SECTION 4. Any provision of the El Monte Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Urgency Ordinance are hereby repealed or modified to the extent necessary to affect the provisions of this Urgency Ordinance but no further.
SECTION 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Urgency Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Urgency Ordinance. Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Urgency Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of this Urgency Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 6. The City Council finds that adoption of this Urgency Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3 Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment; and Section 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in section 15378.
San Gabriel City Notices
SECTION 7. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall Published January 27,2025
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Gabriel, California Amending Title XV, Chapter 153 (Zoning) of the San Gabriel Municipal Code Relating to Definitions
Section 153.003 of the San Gabriel Municipal Code (SGMC) pro vides definitions for terms used throughout the Zoning Code to cre ate consistency in the application of those terms when consider ing development standards and permitted uses. Due to changes in housing trends, new businesses, and a lack of definitions for terms found in the Zoning Code, staff is proposing this text amendment to improve the understanding and interpretation of zoning regulations. New terms being defined for residential use include ‘bedroom’, ‘live-work’, ‘hedge,’ and ‘primary use’. Similarly, new commercial use classifications include ‘retail food establishment’, ‘small instructional services’, ‘large instructional services’, ‘office’, and ‘manufacturing’. Proposed terms and definitions that apply to development standards include ‘lot depth’ and ‘lot line’. Terms such as ‘greenhouse’ and ‘hoophouse,’ which are listed in Section 153.003 will also be revised for clarification purposes. A subsequent zone text amendment will be completed to amend other relevant sections within the SGMC where the new terms would apply.
Ordinance No. 717 was approved for introduction and first reading at the City Council Regular Meeting of January 21, 2025, by a vote of 5-0.
Ayes: Councilmember(s)- Ding, Chan, Herrera Avila, Menchaca, Wu Noes, Abstain, Absent: Councilmember(s)- None
The Ordinance will be considered for adoption by the City Council at its February 4, 2025, regular meeting held at 6:30 p.m. Anyone having questions may contact the City Clerk at (626) 308-2816 or cityclerk@sgch.org.
San Gabriel City Council
Public Notices
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Daughter Eden Rose Banayan by & through her parents Nicole & Shahab Banayan FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 24VECP00613 Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 6230 Sylmar Ave, Van Nuys, Ca 91401 Northwest Judicial District TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS:
1. Petitioner (1. Daughter Eden Rose Banayan by & through her parents Nicole & Shahab Banayan, (2. Daughter Eden Rose Banayan by & through her parents Nicole & Shahab Banayan, (3. Daughter Eden Rose Banayan by & through her parents Nicole & Shahab Banayan, (4. Daughter Eden Rose Banayan by & through her parents Nicole & Shahab Banayan filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Eden Rose Banayan to Proposed name Megan Rose Banayan 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons in-
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Dhiiraj Kumar Singhal FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 24STCP04024 Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 111 North Hill Street, Room 118, Los Angeles, Ca 90012, Central Judicial District TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner Dhiiraj Kumar Singhal filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Dhiiraj Kumar Singhal to Proposed name Raa Rosho 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 03/17/2025 Time: 9:30AM Dept: 45. Room: 9 The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive weeks prior to the day set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general circulation, printed in this county: Duarte Dispatch DATED: December 11, 2024 Virginia Keeny JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Pub. January 6, 13, 20, 27, 2025 DUARTE DISPATCH
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Tran, Quang Hien; Tran, Quang Minh by and through Tran Vy Thao FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 24NNCP00830 Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 300 East Olive, Burbank, Ca 91502, North Central Judicial District TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner Tran, Quang Hien; Tran, Quang Minh by and through Tran Vy Thao filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Tran, Quang Minh to Proposed name Tran, Max Minh ; b. OF Tran, Quang Hien to Proposed name Tran, Harry Hien 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 03/07/2025 Time: 9:00AM Dept: A. The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive weeks prior to the day set for hearing on the petition in the
City of San Gabriel Summary of Ordinance -
MONTE EXAMINER
Julie Nguyen, City Clerk Published
GABRIEL SUN
Starting a new business? Go to filedba.com
Glendale City Notices
NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL APPEAL HEARING APPEAL OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DECISION NO. PDR 002532-2023
LOCATION: 1000 Sandringham Drive, Glendale, CA 91207
APPELLANT: Christopher Smee
APPLICANT: Malekian and Associates
OWNER: Garnik Hovsepyan/GTS Investment Group LLC.
ZONE: R1R (Restricted Residential) Zone, Floor Area Ratio District III
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PM 144-4-5 Lot A Ex Land Description in document 2447914,051011, in the City of Glendale, County of Los Angeles, State of California
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Appeal of the Design Review Board's April 25, 2024, approval of the construction of a new, two-story, 5,067 SF single-family residence with an attached three-car garage on a 31,290 SF lot.
REQUESTED ACTIONS: The appellant is requesting that the City Council overturn the Design Review Board’s decision to approve of Design Review Case No. PDR 0025322023.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The project is exempt from CEQA review as a Class 3 “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures” exemption, pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines, because the project involves the construction of a single-family dwelling in a residential zone.
PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: The City Council will conduct a public hearing in the City Council Chambers, 613 East Broadway, Second Floor, Glendale, CA, on February 11, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible.
The hearing will be in accord with Glendale Municipal Code, Title 2, Chapter 2.88, related to the uniform appeal procedure. The purpose of the hearing is to hear comments from the public with respect to design review concerns.
CONTACT: If you desire more information on the proposal, please contact Roger Kiesel, AICP in the Community Development Department at (818) 937-8152 and (818) 548-2115 or rkiesel@glendaleca.gov, where the files are available.
Staff reports are accessible prior to the hearing through hyperlinks in the “Agendas” section. Website: www.glendaleca.gov/agendas.
Any person having any interest in the Project described above may appear at the public hearing listed above either in person or by counsel or both and may be heard in support of their opinion. Any person protesting may file a duly signed and acknowledged written protest with the City Clerk at, or prior to the public hearings. "Acknowledged" shall mean a declaration of property ownership (or occupant if not owner) under penalty of perjury. If you challenge the Project described above, per Government Code Section 65009, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearings described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Glendale at, or prior to, the public hearings. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, please notify the Community Development Department at least 48 hours (or two business days) for requests regarding sign language translation and Braille transcription services.
Dr. Suzie Abajian
City Clerk of City of Glendale
Publish January 27, 2025 GLENDALE INDEPENDENT
Probate Notices
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF DENIS LEE BASTIAN CASE NO. 25STPB00282
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of: DENIS LEE BASTIAN
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by CLEMENT A. BASTIAN JR. in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that CLEMENT A. BASTIAN JR. be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act with full authority . (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.)
The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held on 02/11/2025 at 8:30AM in Dept. 44 located at 111 N. HILL ST. LOS ANGELES CA 90012 STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
LEGALS
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by LINDA SZKLARSKI in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that LINDA SZKLARSKI be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 02/14/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 2D located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mail-ing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner JOHN L SHAW - SBN 58283
LAW OFFICE OF JOHN L SHAW 5816 TEMPLE CITY BLVD. TEMPLE CITY CA 91780
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner: BRITTANY BRITTON (SBN:303084) 2312 W. OLIVE AVENUE, SUITE D, BURBANK, CA 91506 (626)3905953, Telephone: 6263905953 1/16, 1/20, 1/27/25 CNS-3886811# BURBANK INDEPENDENT *10080
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: SARAH ANN MATTHEWS CASE NO. 25STPB00406
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of SARAH ANN MATTHEWS.
objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for petitioner: Kristine M. Borgia SB#276777
Kristine M. Borgia Law Corporation 3963 11th Street Suite 202 Riverside, Ca 92501
951.823.5138
January 20, 23, 27, 2025
SAN BERNARDINO PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: ARPI MATOSSIAN CASE NO. 25STPB00310
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of ARPI MATOSSIAN.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by GREG GARABEDIAN in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that GREG GARABEDIAN be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
Attorney for Petitioner
KALLE MIKKOLA - SBN 307203
GAVRILOV & BROOKS
2315 CAPITOL AVE
SACRAMENTO CA 95816
Telephone (916) 504-0529
1/20, 1/23, 1/27/25
CNS-3887723#
BURBANK INDEPENDENT
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF GEORGE T. KELLY CASE NO. 25STPB00224
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of GEORGE T. KELLY
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by CAROLINE KELLY HARRIS & MARISA KELLY LUSSIER in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that CAROLINE KELLY HARRIS & MARISA KELLY LUSSIER be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held on FEBRUARY 11, 2025 at 8:30 A.M. in Dept.: “11” located at: 111 N. Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, Stanley Mosk Courthouse
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
ity to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 02/18/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 11 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mail-ing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner
Telephone (626) 286-3710 1/20, 1/23, 1/27/25 CNS-3887463# PASADENA PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF Jennie Martin Stewart aka Jennie Ann Martin-Stewart Case No. PROV2500034
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of Jennie Martin Stewart aka Jennie Ann Martin-Stewart
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Lucrezia Underwood in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN BERNARDINO. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Lucrezia Underwood be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held on 02/24/2025 at 9:00 AM in Dept. F2. located at 17780 Arrow Boulevard, Fontana, Ca 92335.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 02/10/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 4 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
OTHER CALIFORNIA statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a formal Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
ALISHA J. WALKER, SB# 283350
THE LAW OFFICE OF ALISHA J. WALKER 4326 Atlantic Avenue Long Beach, CA 92807
PNSB# 107444
Published in: Belmont Beacon
Dates Pub: January 20, 23, 27, 2025
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:
JUANA AVALOS ALBANO
AKA JUANA AVALOS CASE NO. 25STPB00516
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of JUANA AVALOS ALBANO AKA JUANA AVALOS.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by ELIZABETH AVALOS ALBANO in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that ELIZABETH AVALOS ALBANO be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests author-
JENNIFER A. NAKAMURA - SBN 337144 J NAKAMURA LAW, APC 18000 STUDEBAKER ROAD, STE. 700 CERRITOS CA 90703
Telephone (310) 853-0473 1/23, 1/27, 1/30/25 CNS-3888501# PASADENA PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF RUSSELL LUTMAN CASE NO. 30-2025-01453015-PR-LACMC
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of: RUSSELL LUTMAN
A Petition for Probate has been filed by NEIL LUTMAN in the Superior Court of California, County of ORANGE. The Petition for Probate requests that NEIL LUTMAN be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. The Petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority. A hearing on the petition will be held in this court on February 27, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. in Dept. CM07 located at 3390 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1554, Costa Mesa Justice Complex. The court is providing the convenience to appear for hearing by video using the court’s designated video platform. This is a no cost service to the public. Go to the Court’s website at The Superior Court of California - County of Orange (occourts.org) to appear remotely for Probate hearings and for remote
Social Worker Inc. (CA 5054678, 1317
W Foothill Boulevard 226, Upland, CA 91786; Elsa Matsumoto, CEO. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a corporation.
Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein.
By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct.
A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ Elsa Matsumoto, Chief executive officer. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on December 30, 2024 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20240011805 Pub: 01/13/2025, 01/20/2025, 01/27/2025, 02/03/2025 San Bernardino Press
FILE NO. FBN20240011723 NEW FILING - this is a: FILING
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT THE FOLLOWING PERSON(S) IS (ARE) DOING BUSINESS AS: COLTON DRY CLEANERS, 294 NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE COLTON CA 92324; MAILING ADDRESS: 294 NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE COLTON CA 92324 County of SAN BERNARDINO. The full name of registrant(s) is/ are: SUNG B KIM. This Business is conducted by a/an: INDIVIDUAL. The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name/names listed above on: NOT APPLICABLE.
I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. (A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000).
/s/ SUNG B KIM, OWNER
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of SAN BERNARDINO County on 12/26/2024 indicated by file stamp above. NOTICE--in accordance with subdivision (a) of section 17920, a Fictitious name statement generally expires at the end of five years From the date on which it was filed in the office of the county clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14411 et seq., business and professions code) ORD-3082543 SAN BERNARDINO PRESS 1/13, 1/20, 1/27, 2/3/2025
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. FBN20240011701
The following persons are doing business as: Sushi Miguel Style VI, 15329 Palmdale Rd, Ste V, Victorville, CA 92392. Mailing Address, 15329 Palmdale Rd, Ste V, Victorville, CA 92392. ROA & KA LLC (CA, 15329 Palmdale Rd, Ste V, Victorville, CA 92392;
be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ Larry H Johnson, Secretary. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on December 23, 2024 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20240011701 Pub: 01/13/2025, 01/20/2025, 01/27/2025, 02/03/2025 San Bernardino Press
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. FBN20240011727
The following persons are doing business as: (1). Envirokleen USA (2). 411serviceprovider.com (3). Enviro Kleen USA , 2314 S Vineyard Ave Suite #A, Ontario, CA 91761. Mailing Address, 2910 S Archibald Ave #A228, Ontario, CA 91761. 411ServiceProvider Inc (CA, 2314 S Vineyard Ave Suite #A, Ontario, CA 91761; Joniece Johnson, CFO. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino
This business is conducted by: a corporation. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on October 5, 2012. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct.
A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 62506277). /s/ Joniece Johnson, CFO. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on December 26, 2024 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20240011727 Pub: 01/13/2025, 01/20/2025, 01/27/2025, 02/03/2025 San Bernardino Press
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. 20240011705
The following persons are doing business as: ELECTRONICS FOR LIFE, 302 Alabama St Suite 7, Redlands, CA 92373. Mailing Address, 33969 Telstar Rd, Yucaipa, CA 92399. Enoc HERNANDEZ ESCOBAR, 33969 Telstar Rd, Yucaipa, CA 92399. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on November 17, 2017. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ Enoc HERNANDEZ ESCOBAR. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on December 23, 2024 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A
LEGALS
Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: 20240011705 Pub: 01/13/2025, 01/20/2025, 01/27/2025, 02/03/2025 San Bernardino Press
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
NAME STATEMENT File No. FBN20240011762
The following persons are doing business as: L BAR, 280 E. 8th St, Upland, CA 91786. Mailing Address, 280 E. 8th St, Upland, CA 91786. Elleanna N Freeman-Aguilera, 280 E. 8th St, Upland, CA 91786. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ Elleanna N Freeman-Aguilera. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on December 26, 2024 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20240011762 Pub: 01/13/2025, 01/20/2025, 01/27/2025, 02/03/2025 San Bernardino Press
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as LHC REFERRALS 200 N Sunrise Way Suite B Palm Springs, CA 92262
Riverside County Mailing Address, 248 W Vereda Norte, Palm Springs, CA 92262. Riverside County LEASKOU HIGGINS CORPORATION (CA, 248 W Vereda Norte, Palm Springs, CA 92262
Riverside County This business is conducted by: a corporation. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. I declare that all the information in this statement is true and correct. (A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code, that the registrant knows to be false, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousands dollars ($1000).)
s. Benjamin J Leaskou, President/CEO Statement filed with the County of Riverside on December 31, 2024 NOTICE: In accordance with subdivision (a) of section 17920, a fictitious name statement generally expires at the end of the five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the county clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any changes in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 Et Seq., business and professions code). I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the
original statement on file in my office.
Peter Aldana, County, Clerk File# R-202415946 Pub. 01/13/2025, 01/20/2025, 01/27/2025, 02/03/2025 Riverside Independent
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
NAME STATEMENT
File No. FBN20240008238
The following persons are doing business as: CEGAA TAX SERVICES, 2553 S EUCLID AVE, ONTARIO, CA 91762. Mailing Address, 2553 S EUCLID AVE, ONTARIO, CA 91762. CLARA E GUTIERREZ, 2553 S EUCLID AVE, ONTARIO, CA 91762. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on September 1, 2019. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ CLARA E GUTIERREZ, Owner. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on September 13, 2024. Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20240008238 Pub: 10/17/2024, 10/24/2024, 11/07/2024, 11/14/2024, 11/21/2024, 11/28/2024, 12/05/2024 San Bernardino Press
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT 20256707306. The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Stellar Academy Irvine, 8 Rue Fontaine, Foothill Ranch, CA 92610. Full Name of Registrant(s) Bahram Seifi, 8 Rue Fontaine, Foothill Ranch, CA 92610. This business is conducted by a individual. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. /S/ Bahram Seifi. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of Orange County on January 17, 2025. Publish: Anaheim Press 01/27/2025, 02/03/2025, 02/10/2025, 02/17/2068
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as Booked with Honey 960 Randall Ranch Rd Corona, CA 92881 Riverside County Agnes Hyunin Lee, 960 Randall Ranch Rd, Corona, CA 92881 Riverside County This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on December 26, 2024. I declare that all the information in this statement is true and correct. (A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code, that the registrant knows to be false, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousands dollars ($1000).)
s. Agnes Lee
Statement filed with the County of Riverside on January 7, 2025
NOTICE: In accordance with subdivision (a) of section 17920, a fictitious name statement generally expires at the end of the five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the county clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any changes in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 Et
Seq., business and professions code). I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Peter Aldana, County, Clerk File# R- 202500230 Pub. 01/27/2025, 02/03/2025, 02/10/2025, 02/17/2025 Riverside Independent
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. FBN20240011716
The following persons are doing business as: Uranus27, 555 Foothill blvd unit 10, Upland, CA 91786. Mailing Address, 10722 Brookfield Dr, Riverside, Ca 92505. Synith Leav, 10722 Brookfield Dr, Riverside, CA 92505. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino
This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on December 18, 2024. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 62506277). /s/ Synith Leav, Owner. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on December 23, 2024 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20240011716 Pub: 01/27/2025, 02/03/2025, 02/10/2025, 02/17/2025 San Bernardino Press
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. FBN20250000488
The following persons are doing business as: Catalyst Cannabis Dispensary San Bernardino, 506 Inland Center Drive, San Bernardino, CA 92408. Mailing Address, 401 Pine Ave, Long Beach, CA 90802. Catalyst – San Bernardino LLC (CA, 401 Pine Ave, Long Beach, CA 90802; Elliot Lewis, Managing Member. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a limited liability company (llc). Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ Elliot Lewis, Managing Member. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on January 17, 2025 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20250000488 Pub: 01/27/2025, 02/03/2025, 02/10/2025, 02/17/2025 San Bernardino Press
www.Notiecfiling. com
Real estate agent charged in alleged price gouging of Eaton Fire victims
By City News Service
Areal estate agent is facing a criminal charge for allegedly attempting to price gouge a couple who lost their home in the Eaton Fire, officials announced Wednesday.
The investigation into Mike Kobeissi began when a complaint was filed with the California Department of Justice after the couple tried to rent a home after the governor’s emergency order, which protects fire victims from price gouging, went into effect on Jan. 7, state Attorney General Rob Bonta said.
The state Justice Department has also sent at least
500 warning letters to hotels and landlords who have been accused of price gouging. In addition, the office has more active criminal investigations into price gouging underway, Bonta said.
“As I have said repeatedly, the price gouging must stop,” the AG said in a statement.
“Today, we are making good on our promise to hold price gougers accountable, with more to come. I have been urging the public to report any such incidents to local authorities, or to my office.
... May this announcement serve as a stern warning to those who would seek to
pain.”
Kobeissi was charged in Superior Court with misdemeanor price gouging on Tuesday after having allegedly “unlawfully raised the rental price advertised, offered, and charged” for housing in La Cañada Flintridge to prospective tenants by more than 10% on Jan. 11, days after Gov. Gavin Newsom issued the state of emergency declaration.
The investigation allegedly revealed that the couple applied to rent the home, but that after the application was received, they were informed that the price increased by 38%, according to Bonta.
Westminster councilwoman accused of bribery
By City News Service
WestminsterCity Councilwoman
Amy Phan West is facing a misdemeanor charge of using her political influence to avoid having her husband’s car towed by the city, prosecutors said Thursday.
Phan West, 42, was charged Tuesday with a misdemeanor count of offering a bribe to a public officer. She was scheduled to be arraigned
Feb. 24 in the West Justice Center in Westminster.
The councilwoman was operating a car rental business through the Turo application around Dorothy Street and Melanie Lane in the city, which drew about 20 calls for service regarding “dirty, unregistered or abandoned vehicles” in the area in 2023, according to the Orange County District
Attorney’s Office.
When two parking control officers ordered a tow of a Jeep registered to the councilwoman’s husband on April 21, 2023, she asked them not to tow the vehicle and said she would move it herself. Prosecutors said she also told them she “loves” the police department and was “close friends” with the
police chief and was advocating for pay raises for the department as its union was negotiating a new contract.
Phan West also showed the parking officers a police department keychain, prosecutors alleged. The parking officers canceled the tow, prosecutors said.
An effort to reach Phan West for comment was not immediately successful.
to pursue other measures in support of fire survivors throughout the LA region.
In a unanimous vote, the board instructed Metro CEO Stephanie Wiggins to modify the eligibility of the LIFE reduced fare program for at least six months. County residents displaced by the fires who enroll will receive 20 free rides every month or a discounted pass on another participating transit agency.
LA County Supervisor and Metro Board Chair Janice Hahn introduced a motion last week calling for measures to support fire victims. It was co- authored by Board of Supervisors Chair Kathryn Barger, Supervisor Lindsey Horvath, LA Mayor Karen Bass, Supervisor Hilda Solis and Whittier Councilman Fernando Dutra, who are all members of Metro’s Board of Directors.
“This is an all-hands-ondeck moment for Los Angeles County and we are putting Metro resources to work as we respond to these wildfires, support survivors and plan for recovery,” Hahn said.
“As residents who lost their homes try to rebuild their lives over the next few months, the last thing they should have to worry about is whether they can afford to take the train or bus,” she added.
Metro staff will conduct outreach and ensure displaced residents, as well as Metro employees, can sign up for the reduced fare program, if they wish.
“Thousands of residents are now without reliable means of transportation and our Metro system may play a crucial role as an option for residents to get to work and to our Disaster Recovery Centers to access support,” Barger said in a statement.
Additionally, the motion authorized Wiggins and staff to identify potential financial assistance the agency could provide to its employees who lost their homes. At least 19 Metro employees reported they lost their homes, and at least 46 employees reported being displaced due to evacuation orders or related challenges.
The transit agency will also look at ways to help in the recovery efforts. It may consider ways to use its fleet, services, expertise and properties to help those in need.
“This motion ensures we are leveraging every resource available to provide impacted residents and Metro employees access to reduced fare programs, disaster assistance and direct outreach and support,” Horvath said in a statement.
State banks, credit unions offer mortgage relief for fire survivors
More than 270 state banks, credit unions and lenders will provide mortgage relief for property owners impacted by the wildfires in Los Angeles and Ventura counties, Gov. Newsom announced Thursday.
Homeowners will have a 90-day forbearance on their mortgage payments, without reporting these payments to credit reporting agencies and the opportunity for additional relief.
The governor noted this decision will provide survi-
vors with the time and relief to address their immediate needs.
“I thank each of the financial institutions that are offering this help for Californians recovering from this catastrophic firestorm,” Newsom said in a statement. “California will continue working with all stakeholders to support survivors, expedite recovery and provide relief.”
As part of the announcement, qualified borrowers will receive:
-- 90-day mortgage payment forbearance periods, streamlined processes for requesting initial relief without submitting forms or documents, payment options that do not require immediate repayment of unpaid amounts, i.e. no balloon payments, at the end of the forbearance period;
-- Relief from mortgagerelated late fees accruing during the forbearance period for 90 days;
-- Protection from new foreclosures or evictions for at least 60 days; and
-- Institutions will not
The couple decided not to rent the house due to the price increase.
Violators of the price gouging statute are subject to criminal prosecution that can result in one-year imprisonment in county jail and/or a fine of up to $10,000. Violators are also subject to civil enforcement actions including civil penalties of up to $2,500 per violation, injunctive relief and mandatory restitution, according to the DOJ.
To report possible price gouging, visit oag.ca.gov/ LAfires or call 800-9525225.
report late payments of forborne amounts to credit agencies.
Relief is available for qualified residents living in these LA County ZIP codes: 90019, 90041, 90049, 90066, 90265, 90272, 90290, 90402, 91001, 91104, 91106, 91107 or 93536.
Additionally, the governor’s office noted that not all state-chartered or other institutions operating in the state serve customers in the designated zip codes.
California Bankers Association, the California Credit Union League and the California Mortgage Bankers Association have expressed their support for these relief efforts.
Borrowers must contact their mortgage servicer to obtain relief.
“These wildfires have caused immense trauma, and it’s imperative we step up to provide a safety net for those affected, administering continued relief and compassionate financial support as they navigate this challenging time,” Scott Simpson, president and CEO of California
and Nevada Credit Union Leagues, said in a statement.
“By offering a lifeline to credit union members who need it most, we can help prioritize their current financial needs and empower them on the long road to recovery,” Simpson added. The announcement is similar to action taken by five major banks last week — Bank of America, Citi, JPMorgan Chase, U.S. Bank and Wells Fargo.
State Sen. Sasha Renée Pérez (D-Glendale), who represents communities impacted by the Eaton Fire, supported Newsom’s action.
“This relief offers a muchneeded respite for those facing a long recovery, and I’m grateful to California lenders for understanding the extraordinary hardships their customers are enduring,” she said in a statement.
Newsom has also extended the state tax filing deadline to Oct. 15 for LA county residents. Under another order, homeowners have until April 2026 to file their property taxes.
Wildfire relief
further victimize those who have lost everything. DOJ is aggressively and relentless-
ly pursuing those who are trying to make a quick buck off of someone else’s
Mike Kobeissi. | Photo courtesy of Mike Kobeissi/X
Westminster Councilwoman Amy Phan West with husband Jeremy West. | Photo courtesy of Amy Phan West/Facebook
OMan pleads guilty in ‘swatting’ scheme involving West Covina resident
ne of two men charged in a “swatting” spree in which the culprits gained access to a dozen Ring home security door cameras nationwide — including one in West Covina — and placed bogus emergency phone calls designed to elicit an armed police response that was livestreamed on social media pleaded guilty Thursday to federal charges.
Kya Christian Nelson, 23, of Racine, Wisconsin, entered a plea to three felony charges: conspiracy and two counts of unauthorized access to a protected computer to obtain information, according to the
U.S. Attorney’s Office. Nelson, who is serving time in a Kentucky state prison for an unrelated case, has been in federal custody since August 2024. He is facing up to 15 years in federal prison when he’s sentenced May 1, prosecutors noted.
Nelson and James Thomas Andrew McCarty, 22, of Kayenta, Arizona, were each charged in December 2022 in Los Angeles federal court.
Prosecutors said that for one week in November 2020, Nelson and McCarty gained access to home security door cameras sold
Trump nominates for the US EPA will work with the career employees in the EPA Ethics Office to ensure that all applicable ethics obligations are addressed.”
Government ethics law calls for attorneys to recuse themselves for a year from matters on which they provided services in the previous year.
The issue may be a mere formality in an administration that in its first day took steps to roll back environmental and health protections put in place by the previous administration. Within hours of his inauguration on Monday, Trump ordered the withdrawal of the U.S. from the Paris climate accords, halted the approval of leases for new offshore wind projects in federal waters and revoked several executive orders relating to climate change.
It is not unusual for political appointees to the EPA to have ties to industry, especially in Republican administrations. Among the people returning to the agency from Trump’s first term are Nancy Beck, a former lobbyist for the American Chemistry Council, the influential industry trade group; Aaron Szabo, a lobbyist who represented the American Petroleum Institute and contributed to the Project 2025 chapter on the EPA; and Lynn Dekleva, who also
worked for the American Chemistry Council and DuPont.
In announcing his nomination of Fotouhi on Truth Social earlier this month, Trump wrote that “David will work with our incredible EPA Administrator, Lee Zeldin, to advance pro Growth policies, unleash America’s Energy Dominance, and prioritize Clean Air, Clean Water, and Clean Soil for ALL Americans.” His expertise could be essential for Zeldin, the former U.S. representative from Long Island whom Trump nominated to run the agency and who has little experience with environmental issues.
While working at the EPA in the first Trump administration, Fotouhi served as deputy general counsel and acting general counsel. He played a central role in a revision of the Waters of the U.S. rule that removed federal protections from wetlands and streams. He later described it as some of his most important work. His Gibson Dunn online biography says he also “played a critical role in developing the litigation strategy to defend” the agency’s decision not to impose financial requirements on companies that extract minerals and ore from rock. Environmentalists had pushed for the requirements to protect taxpayers from being held
By City News Service
by Ring LLC, a Santa Monica-based home security technology company. They also acquired username and password information for victims’ Yahoo email accounts, the indictment states.
In the West Covina case, Nelson and an accomplice accessed the victim’s Yahoo and Ring accounts then placed a hoax telephone call to the West Covina Police Department. Prosecutors said the caller posed as a minor child and reported her parents were drinking and shooting guns inside the residence.
The series of nation-
wide swatting incidents prompted the FBI in late 2020 to issue a public service announcement urging users of smart home devices with cameras and voice capabilities to use complex, unique passwords and enable two-factor authentication to help protect against swatting attacks.
McCarty was sentenced in June 2024 to seven years in federal prison both for his role in this case, and on additional charges in the District of Arizona. In connection with the Ring swatting incidents, McCarty pleaded guilty to the same conspiracy charge as Nelson.
Pollution harm
responsible for costly environmental cleanups.
Fotouhi also advocated for landfills and ponds that contain coal ash to be deemed “clean” even though they didn’t meet the agency’s usual standards — a position favorable to the coal industry, according to one waste expert who worked with him during the Trump administration. “Dave was adamant about that issue,” said the former colleague, who asked not to be named to avoid public involvement in political discussions. The former colleague described Fotouhi as a brilliant lawyer who knows the environmental statutes but “doesn’t hesitate to get creative” to find a way to use them to take industry-friendly positions.
A Harvard-educated attorney, Fotouhi led an office of hundreds of
lawyers at Gibson Dunn and has defended clients and provided legal counsel under every major environmental law, according to his bio on the firm’s website. He represented International Paper in two suits over PFAS, persistent industrial chemicals that cause cancer and other diseases. The chemicals were at the heart of two cases in which the company was accused of spreading PFAS-containing biosolids in Maine. The biosolids, or sludge, have been found to contribute to PFAS contamination of food and water throughout the state. (Gibson Dunn is representing ProPublica pro bono in a case against the U.S. Navy.)
Nathan Saunders, a plaintiff in one of the suits, learned in 2021 that his well water in Fairfield, Maine, had extremely high levels of the
chemicals. After he learned that PFAS were linked to kidney damage, the discovery made sense to the lifelong Maine resident, whose wife had developed kidney failure more than a decade earlier.
Fotouhi succeeded in getting his client dismissed from the Saunders suit by arguing that there wasn’t information to tie the company’s conduct to the water contamination.
Saunders’ attorney, Elizabeth Bailey, described the legal strategy as common among companies facing PFAS contamination suits and difficult for plaintiffs to overcome without access to internal company information. “They say, ‘Yes, there’s contamination, but there’s no way for you to show whose contamination it was and — oh, by the way, if you can’t specifically identify how our contamination got from our location to your client’s location at the very beginning of the lawsuit, we shouldn’t be in this case at all,’” said Bailey.
Fotouhi also attempted to overturn EPA’s water quality standards for toxic chemicals known as PCBs, which have been linked to cancer. In December 2023, he filed a suit against the agency on behalf of Washington state business groups that claimed that the standards are impossible to meet.
If the EPA chooses not to
continue fighting the case, those standards could be overturned. The loss would be devastating to waterways, according to Katelyn Scott, water protector at Spokane Riverkeeper, an advocacy organization devoted to protecting the river and its watershed. “Without the EPA at the helm fighting to protect them, our river would be vulnerable to higher levels of pollution that would really put our fish and our people at risk of harm,” she said.
Phillip Landrigan, a physician who has spent decades working to protect public health from environmental threats, said the potential consequences would be similarly dire should the EPA choose to overturn the asbestos ban.
“President Trump came into office saying that he was going to make life better for working Americans,” said Landrigan. Reversing the decades-in-the-making asbestos ban, he said, “would expose working American women and men to a known human carcinogen and fly in the face of that promise.” Kirsten Berg contributed research.
Update, Jan. 22, 2025: This story was updated to include a statement that an EPA spokesperson provided after publication. Republished with Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).
Workers complete asbestos removal. | Photo courtesy of U.S. Department of Energy via Flickr
Kya Christian Nelson. | Photo courtesy of the Kentucky Department of Corrections