

By Joe Taglieri joet@beaconmedianews.com
Californiaofficials on Wednesday filed a federal lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s use of emergency powers to enact tariffs.
The tariff plan hurts states, consumers and businesses, according to Gov. Gavin Newsom and state Attorney General Rob Bonta. Noting that California is the largest economy in the nation with the most robust manufacturing and agricultural sectors, the lawsuit argues that Trump does not have the authority to unilaterally implement tariffs by invoking the International Economic Emergency Powers Act, or IEEPA.
These tariffs have disrupted supply chains, inflated costs for the state and Californians, and inflicted billions in damages on California’s
economy, the fifth largest in the world.
“PresidentTrump’s unlawful tariffs are wreaking chaos on California families, businesses, and our economy — driving up prices and threatening jobs,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re standing up for American families who can’t afford to let the chaos continue.”
According to Bonta, “The president’s chaotic and haphazard implementation of tariffs is not only deeply troubling, it’s illegal. As the fifth largest economy in the world, California understands global trade policy is not just a game. Californians are bracing for fallout from the impact of the president’s choices — from farmers in the Central Valley, to small businesses in Sacramento, and worried families at the
kitchen table — this game the president is playing has very real consequences for Californians across our state.”
Trump has pledged to reverse free-trade policies.
“For decades, the United States slashed our trade barriers on other countries, while those nations placed massive tariffs on our products and created outrageous nonmonetary barriers to decimate our industries,” the president told reporters last week at the White House. “They manipulated their currencies, subsidized their exports, stole our intellectual property, imposed exorbitant VAT taxes to disadvantage our products, adopted unfair rules and technical standards and created filthy pollution havens. This all happened
with no response from the United States of America, but those days are over.”
The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. It seeks a court declaration to nullify the tariffs.
California officials are challenging Trump’s authority to unilaterally implement tariffs on products from Mexico, China and Canada and create an across-theboard 10% tariff.
Claiming unprecedented authority under the IEEPA, Trump has issued several executive orders placing 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada and a universal 10% tariff on every other U.S. trading partner, according to the
By Staff
Chino Airport, known for supporting recreational flying, pilot training plus firefighting and rescue missions, is opening 300 acres of prime real estate for new development, county officials announced Thursday.
The general aviation airport is regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration and operated by the San Bernardino County Department of Airports, which is now seeking “innovative aeronautical and non-aeronautical development,” according to a county statement.
Officials said the transformative move is spearheaded by Director Brett J. Godown of the airports department and aims to attract developments that enhance the airport’s growth and the surrounding community. The first phase of the county’s “Request for Qualifications” seeks proposals to develop 21 to 151 acres of land located near key roadways and surrounded by residential, commercial and industrial
See Airport Page 27
Atotal of 95 people were arrested during the first weekend of the 2025 Coachella Valley Music & Arts Festival, a 17% jump from the event’s opening weekend last year, police said Wednesday.
The largest number of arrests, 29, were for drug possession, while 22 people were arrested for drug or alcohol intoxication and 22 more for possessing false identification. There was one “property crime” arrest, while 21 other arrests were categorized solely as “other,” according to the Indio Police Department.
The first weekend of the 2024 Coachella fest saw 81 total arrests, police said.
Police said 82 citations were issued for handicapped parking violations -- a 75% increase from 47 during the first weekend of Coachella last year.
See Tariffs Page 04 See Coachella Page 27
By City News Service
Wink Martindale, who became one of the most well- known and recognized television game show hosts of his generation by helming programs such as “Tic-Tac-Dough,” “High Rollers” and “Trivial Pursuit,” died Tuesday at age 91.
According to a statement from his family, Martindale died in Rancho Mirage “surrounded by his family and his beloved wife of 49 years, Sandra Martindale.”
No cause of death was given.
Born Winston Conrad Martindale in Tennessee in 1933, Martindale started working as a disc jockey in Jackson, Tennessee, at age 17, then moved on to WHBQ in Memphis. He he made some rock n’ roll history by helping to arrange for Elvis Presley to visit the station and give his first-ever radio interview after it played the singer’s debut record “That’s All Right” in 1954.
Martindale moved to Los Angeles in 1959, working at KHJ radio, then taking over the morning show at KRLA and eventually KFWB radio. He also had stints at stations including KGIL, KKGO, KMPC, KABC and KJQI.
He made his first foray into television while still in Memphis, leading the chil-
dren’s show “Mars Patrol” and later “Teenage Dance Party,” on which Presley also appeared in 1956. But he scored his first major gig by hosting NBC’s “What’s This Song?” in 1964. That led to more than 20 other hosting gigs, including shows such as “Words and Music,” “Gambit,” “The Last Word,” “Instant Recall” and, most notably, “Tic-TacDough,” which he hosted for about a decade, ending in 1985.
After leaving that
program, he helped create and produce the game show “Headline Chasers” in association with Merv Griffin, although the show was short-lived.
He received a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame in 2006, and flowers will be placed on the star Tuesday evening in his memory.
Martindale is survived by his wife Sandra, sister Geraldine, daughters Lisa, Lyn and Laura, along with numerous grandchildren and great grandchildren.
By City News Service
The Board of Supervisors Tuesday set a public hearing for May on a series of proposed hikes to trash collection fees throughout Riverside County’s unincorporated communities, where collection costs may rise about 3% per customer under the haulers’ new rate plans.
The Department of Environmental Health is seeking across-the-board adjustments that all of the county’s trash collectors — Burrtec Waste, CR&R Inc., Desert Valley Disposal and Waste Management Inc. — want to incorporate into their current contracts with the county.
Environmental Health Director Jeff Johnson was granted a public hearing on May 20 to formally submit the rate hikes for approval. Johnson said the adjustments are necessary to keep pace with inflation. The waste haulers are permitted to seek rate adjustments every year based on rising landfill, transportation and other costs.
The board rarely denies adjustment requests. However, in 2020, thenSupervisor Kevin Jeffries opposed increases, arguing financial hardships tied to the COVID lockdowns made it an inopportune time to hike fees on county residents.
The increases were approved despite his opposition.
The Burrtec hike would boost customers’ monthly rates from an average $30.12 to $31.09.
Residents serviced by CR&R would see their bills go from between $35.49 and $37.13, to between $36.53 and $38.22.
Desert Valley Disposal customers would go from paying an average $36.72 to $37.78, and Waste Management’s new fee structure would increase from between $34.71 and $36.80, to between $35.73 and $37.88 per month for residential collections, according to the Department of Environmental Health.
In some cases, fees would increase beyond the
averages under so-called “hard-to-reach” service plans, which apply when properties are especially remote.
Waste collection for the county occurs in defined “franchise areas,” which currently number 11 and encompass communities such as Bermuda Dunes, Cabazon, Desert Center, East Hemet, French Valley, Lakeland Village, Nuevo, Thermal, Thousand Palms and Winchester. Most of the existing franchise agreements have been in place since the 1990s.
If approved at the May 20 public hearing — when anyone can speak on the proposed increases — the new fees would take effect July 1.
By City News Service
Friends of the Desert Mountains and local partners, including the Bighorn Institute, continued efforts Thursday to protect endangered desert Bighorn sheep by educating hikers about the risks posed by offleash dogs.
The desert Bighorn sheep habitat ranges from the San Jacinto Mountains to south of the U.S.-Mexico border, with the Bighorn Institute managing two herds in the San Jacinto and northern Santa Rosa mountains, the
institute said in a statement.
A pop-up visitor information tent at Homme-Adams trailhead in Cathedral City was set up Wednesday to inform visitors about proper trail etiquette, including keeping dogs leashed.
According to the Friends organization, the sheep view dogs as canine predators such as coyotes, which can cause the Bighorn to leave their feeding and watering sites.
“If Bighorn sheep habituate to dogs, they won’t teach their lambs to respond
properly and they could be killed by coyotes,” biologist Aimee J. Byard said in a statement.
To help prevent disturbance, only two dogs are permitted on-leash when entering the monuments of La Cove Oasis trailhead and the trails connecting HommeAdams park to Cahuilla Hills park in Palm Desert.
In addition, Carrizo Canyon and Dead Indian Canyon are temporarily closed to everyone from January until September for Bighorn
lambing season.
The Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy and the Bureau of Land Management also support the protection effort.
“We appreciate that many residents value access to our wonderful natural area, but that access cannot be taken for granted,” said Friends of the Desert Executive Director Tammy Martin. “The public also has a part to play protecting our endangered species in recreating responsibly.”
Editorial editorial@beaconmedianews.com
editor@hlrmedia.com
Graphics/Production production@beaconmedianews.com production@hlrmedia.com
Advertising advertising@beaconmedianews.com advertising@hlrmedia.com
Legal Advertising legals@beaconmedianews.com legals@hlrmedia.com
Business accounting@beaconmedianews.com accounting@hlrmedia.com
BEACON MEDIA ADDRESS: 820 S. Myrtle Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016
PHONE: (626) 301-1010
WEBSITE www.beaconmedianews.com
HLR MEDIA ADDRESS: 820 S. Myrtle Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016
PHONE: (626) 301-1010
www.HLRmedia.com
PRESS
editor@beaconmedianews.com editor@hlrmedia.com
By City News Service
odger Stadium and Long Beach will be Olympic venues for the 2028 Summer Games and are preparing Wednesday to host baseball games and volleyball matches.
LA28 unveiled its updated venue plan for the 2028 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games Tuesday, adding Dodger Stadium to the list and moving beach volleyball to Long Beach.
LA28, the organizing committee for the Games, announced the venue plan for most events after it was approved last week by the International Olympic Committee Executive Board. Organizers said the updated list will showcase the best that L.A. has to offer.
Hoover said in a statement.
The Duarte Dispatchhas been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number GS 013893 City of Duarte, County of Los Angeles, State of California. The Rosemead Readerhas been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number GS 048894 City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, State of California. The Alhambra Press has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number ES016581 City of Alhambra, County of Los Angeles, State of California. The Baldwin Park Press has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number KS017174 City of Baldwin Park, County of Los Angeles, State of California.
The Burbank Independent has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number ES016728 City of Burbank, County of Los Angeles, State of California.
The Glendale Independent has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number ES016579 City of Glendale, County of Los Angeles, State of California.
The Monterey Park Press has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number ES016580 City of Monterey Park,
“This plan brings the Games to all corners of our city like never before -- from the Sepulveda Basin to the iconic shores of Venice Beach, our world-famous neighborhoods as well as our hidden gems will be on full display for all to experience and enjoy,” Mayor Karen Bass said in a statement. “And as we come together to prepare, we will help small businesses, create local jobs and implement lasting environmental and transportation improvements that will leave a legacy in our city for generations to come.”
Preliminary matches for boxing will be in the Peacock Theater, with the finals taking place at the Crypto.com Arena. The arena will also host artistic gymnastics, which were initially planned for the Kia Forum in Inglewood.
Rhythmic gymnastics will take place at USC’s Galen Center, where badminton will also be played, adjacent to the Memorial Coliseum. Baseball will make its Olympic return at Dodger Stadium.
Venice Beach will serve as the new home for the triathlon, relocating from Long Beach. Venice will also be the official starting location for the marathon and cycling road courses. LA28 is expected to confirm and announce the courses and finishes for both these events at a later date.
In an Olympic-first for the San Fernando Valley, LA28 added 3x3 basketball and modern pentathlon to competitions slated for the Sepulveda Basin Recreation Area alongside BMX and skateboarding.
“We’ve promised the world an incredible Olympic Games and today we’re proud to share the plan that will make it happen,” LA28 Chief Executive Officer Reynold
“Los Angeles is the epicenter of sports, culture and entertainment, and every venue selected for the 2028 Games will provide athletes and fans the best possible experience,” Hoover added. “The 2028 Olympic venue plan invites communities from across the region to celebrate the Games coming to their backyard with the most exciting sports staged at some of the world’s top-tier existing stadiums and arenas, famous beaches and purpose-built temporary structures.”
Five new sports for the 2028 Games had their venues set as well. Squash will make its debut in the San Fernando Valley at the Universal Studio lot. Cricket will be at the fairgrounds in Pomona. Softball, which will make its first appearance since 2008, will head to Oklahoma City’s Devon Park.
The city of Long beach will host 11 events, showcasing beach volleyball at Alamitos Beach after talks broke down between Santa Monica and LA28. Coastal rowing will make its first Olympic appearance at the nearby waterfront.
Target shooting will take place in the Long Beach Convention Center and sport climbing will be at the site’s parking lot, alongside water polo and artistic swimming at a temporary pool.
Sailing will return to Long Beach’s Belmont Shore, the previous site of the event in 1984.
“Long Beach is now confirmed to serve as a premier waterfront venue for the 2028 Games. We are thrilled and honored to have beach volleyball join the list of acclaimed sporting events to be held on our iconic coastline, from sailing to water polo, and we are excited to open our doors to the world and showcase the culture, diversity and spirit of our community,” Long Beach Mayor Rex Richardson said in a statement.
“We are proud to share our unique waterfront with athletes and fans from across the globe as we unite to celebrate the power of sport. This presents a generational economic opportunity for our city, and we look forward to working with LA28 as we continue to prepare for this monumental experience,” he added.
The city of Carson will host archery at Dignity Health Sports Park, along with the rugby tournament. Nearby areas will host tennis, track cycling and field hockey.
Meanwhile, Orange County will host indoor volleyball at Anaheim’s Honda Center and surfing will take place at Trestles Beach in San Clemente.
Santa Anita Park is formally slated to hold equestrian events, as it did in 1984. The event was previously planned for Temecula’s Galway Downs.
LA28 is still working to finalize soccer preliminary rounds and mountain biking events. Soccer is expected to be held in stadiums across the country with the final rounds slated for the Rose Bowl.
All confirmed sports and venues are available at www. la28.org.
Temecula’s Galway Downs scratched from venue list
An apparent move by planners for the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles to scratch Galway Downs near Temecula as a prospective venue for equestrian events elicited a sharp response earlier this month from Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Temecula, who questioned the basis for the “arbitrary” action.
“I’m deeply disappointed to learn that Galway Downs is reportedly no longer LA28’s proposed host site for equestrian events at the 2028 Olympic Games,” Issa said in a statement April 11. “At this time, a satisfactory reason has yet to be offered.”
Details on the LA28 Board of Directors’ decision to nix Galway Downs’ opportunity to serve as a site were not available at the time of the announcement. A request for comment was not immediately answered.
“This abrupt move appears arbitrary, unwarranted and our community deserves a clear explanation of the process that led to this change,” Issa said. “It must be said that for several years, the state-of-the-art facility at Galway Downs, the city of Temecula and the Riverside County community have prepared to host these important events and showcase the very best that all three have to offer.
“Significant investments in time, material and preparation have already been dedicated to serving as the host site, and Galway Downs is the only equestrian venue in the greater Los Angeles region with the existing infrastructure to accommodate all equestrian events, including a full-length cross-country course,” Issa continued. “I look forward to productive and informative conversations and a more comprehensive, transparent process that provides fundamental fairness to Galway Downs and unifies our Southern California community.”
Earlier this week, the congressman joined other regional lawmakers in a letter to the Los Angeles City Council and the International Olympic Committee, expressing strong support for the council’s March 28 decision to include Galway Downs in the Venues Plan for equestrian activities during the Summer Games.
Joining Issa were Rep. Ken Calvert, R-Corona, Riverside County Supervisor Chuck Washington, Assemblywoman Kate Sanchez, R-Murrieta, state Sen. Kelly Seyarto, R-Murrieta, and Temecula City Councilman Matt Rahn.
“Equine culture has especially deep roots in the Temecula Valley, and the Southern California community has prepared for years to amplify and sustain the momentum generated by the tourism, viewership and celebration that comes with hosting the Olympic Games,” their letter stated.
Galway Downs boasts 242 acres of competition rings, pasture and trails, with a 1-mile round track, 14 arenas and 400 horse stalls. There are events held there yearround.
By City News Service
A45-year-oldman suspected of trying to arrange a sexual encounter with a young girl — who was in reality an undercover law enforcement officer — he met online was out of custody Thursday.
Ryan Hagen of Anaheim was arrested and booked into the Robert Presley Jail in Riverside Wednesday afternoon on suspicion of communicating with a minor for illicit purposes and sending pornographic material to an underage person. Hagen posted a $55,000 bond and was released from the downtown jail a few hours later.
According to the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department, earlier this month, investigators assigned to an undercover unit that focuses on predator stings were allegedly contacted by the suspect at a social media account the team set up to make it appear as though it belonged to a 13-year-old girl.
“During several weeks of communication, Hagen asked for sexually gratifying pictures and numerous sex
acts and agreed to meet (with the girl),” Sgt. David Ruiz said.
The planned rendezvous point was on West Park Avenue in Redlands, Ruiz said.
He said that deputies coordinated with Redlands Police Department officers to carry out the sting operation, and when Hagen showed up, he was taken into custody
without incident.
“Several communication devices were also located and collected as evidence,” the sergeant said.
Background information on the suspect was unavailable.
The case was expected to be submitted to the District Attorney’s Office with a request for felony charges against Hagen.
lawsuit.
Trump has also “goaded China into a full-blown trade war, with tariffs reaching 145% on Chinese goods, and China imposing reciprocal 125% tariffs on U.S. goods,” according to a statement from Bonta’s office. The president also has imposed reciprocal tariffs of up to 50% on nearly 90 specific countries that are currently on hold for 90 days before taking effect.
“Once the 90-day ‘pause’ expires, the harms will only compound further,” according to the AG’s office. “And new tariffs are being contemplated or announced nearly every day.”
The IEEPA, enacted in 1977, gives the president authority to take certain actions if he declares a national emergency in response to threats to national security, U.S. foreign policy or the economy. The law specifies the actions the president can take, but imposing tariffs is not one of the options.
“This is the first time a president has attempted to rely on this law to impose tariffs,” according to Bonta’s office.
A key argument in the lawsuit relies on the U.S. Supreme Court’s “major questions doctrine,” which holds that during uncommon circumstances of heavy economic and political significance, federal agencies and the president must have authorization from Congress.
State officials pointed to recent Supreme Court decisions regarding President Barack Obama’s Clean Power Plan and President Joe Biden’s student loan forgiveness initiative. Justices ruled that executive actions that have broad impacts on the national economy can’t be based on unclear legal authority.
“It is difficult to imagine a more economically significant set of actions than the one Trump is taking on
tariffs, which have inflicted hundreds of billions of dollars in economic losses on a whim, using a statute that doesn’t mention tariffs,” according the statement from Newsom’s office.
California’s gross domestic product was $3.9 trillion in 2023, 50% larger than the GDP of the nation’s second-largest state, Texas.
Newsom’s office noted that California “sends over $83 billion more to the federal government than it receives in federal funding.”
Last year, California engaged in nearly $675 billion in two-way trade, which officials said supported millions of jobs statewide. California is heavily dependent on international trade, particularly with Mexico, Canada and China, the state’s top three trade partners. More than 40% of imports to California come from those countries, totaling $203 billion of the
over $491 billion in goods in 2024.
Mexico, Canada and China are also the state’s top three destinations for nearly $67 billion in California exports, which was over one-third of the state’s $183 billion in exported goods last year.
Bonta’s office noted the impacts of “Trump’s dizzying array of tariff plans have already wreaked havoc on our financial systems: the U.S. stock market suffered the largest two-day loss in its history in the two days following the announcement of ... Trump’s most sweeping tariffs. These actions and the near-daily threats to impose new tariffs have already inflicted and continue to inflict serious financial harms on California.”
A copy of the lawsuit’s court filing is available on the internet at tinyurl.com/ bdf4w8as.
By City News Service
Basketball Hall of Famer KareemAbdul-Jabbar sharedrecollections of Jackie Robinson Tuesday at the Dodgers’ annual “team reflection” on Jackie Robinson Day.
“It’s great to be here on this day, especially, because he was a hero of mine from Day 1 when I became aware of him,” Abdul-Jabbar said, telling stories about becoming a fan of the Brooklyn Dodgers because of Robinson and then getting to meet him for the first time in 1969.
“Jack always had the idea that he was an equal human being to everybody else. I’m very proud of being able to emulate Jackie in the right way. You can do things the wrong way but Jackie showed us how to do it the right way and I’m very thankful for that.”
The Dodgers joined the rest of Major League Baseball in marking Tuesday’s 78th anniversary of Robinson breaking baseball’s color line, including gathering with the Colorado Rockies at the statue of Robinson in Dodger Stadium’s Centerfield Plaza to hear speeches about him.
The Dodgers have been gathering at the statue on Jackie Robinson Day annually since 2021 to hear manager Dave Roberts and others talk about Robinson. In 2023, they began being joined by their opponent.
Two of Robinson’s granddaughters, Sonya Pankey and Ayo Robinson, were in attendance as were Jackie Robinson Foundation scholars.
Robinson’s widow, Rachel Robinson, founded the foundation in 1973, the
year following her husband’s death at the age of 53. It provides four-year college scholarships to disadvantaged students of color.
The Jackie Robinson Foundation is among the beneficiaries of the Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation, the team’s charitable arm whose mission is “to improve education, health care, homelessness, and social justice for all Angelenos.”
Pankey threw the ceremonial first pitch preceding the Dodgers’ 6-2 victory.
Jackie Robinson Foundation scholars made the announcementpreceding every Dodger game at Dodger Stadium, “It’s time for Dodger baseball.”
Abdul-Jabbar was born in Harlem on April 16, 1947, the day after Robinson’s debut.
In a 2010 interview with ESPN when he was also at Dodger Stadium on Jackie Robinson Day, Abdul-Jabbar said Robinson was his hero and while he was in high school he received a letter from Robinson “telling me that UCLA would be a good place for me to go to school.”
In 1969, when the then-Lew Alcindor won his third consecutive national player of the year award as a Bruin, he was finally able to meet Robinson at an awards dinner.
“I was in awe,” AbdulJabbar said. “I was sitting with Jackie Robinson and Bill Russell and I was just in awe. I didn’t say much, I just let them say what they had to say.”
All players, coaches and managers wore Robinson’s No. 42 for all of Tuesday’s
major league games as they have done on each Jackie Robinson Day since 2009, with all teams using Dodger blue for their “42” jersey numbers regardless of their primary team colors for the fourth consecutive year.
All players, coaches, managers and umpires wore caps with a “42” side patch.
A special tribute video, produced by MLB Network featuring AJ Andrews, the former LSU and professional softball player who hosts the network’s Saturday morning show, “Play Ball,” was shown in all ballparks.
The No. 42 was retired throughout Major League Baseball in 1997, on the 50th anniversary of Robinson’s April 15, 1947, debut with the Brooklyn Dodgers.
Robinson -- who was raised in Pasadena and attended Muir High School, Pasadena City College and UCLA -- went hitless in four at-bats in his major league debut, but scored what proved to be the winning run in Brooklyn’s 5-3 victory over the Boston Braves in front of a crowd announced at 25,623 at Ebbets Field.
Robinson played his entire major league career with Brooklyn, helping lead the Dodgers to six National League pennants during his 10 seasons, and, in 1955, their only World Series championship in Brooklyn.
Robinson’s successful integration of Major League Baseball is credited with helping change Americans’ attitudes toward Black players and being a catalyst toward later civil rights advances.
By James Lartey, The Marshall Project via Stacker
OnMarch15,three planescarrying approximately200 Venezuelan migrants left the U.S., bound for a mega-prison in El Salvador. The Trump administration justified the deportation by saying most of the men on the planes were members of the Tren de Aragua criminal gang.
Lawyers for some of the men say their clients were misidentified as gang members, in many cases, because of tattoos unrelated to Tren de Aragua, or TdA. In one case, a lawyer says the tattoo may have been a reference to the logo for the popular Real Madrid soccer team.
None of the men had the opportunity to argue against the administration’s assertion in court because they were deported under the Alien Enemies Act, which President Donald Trump had invoked on March 14. The act gives the government the power to expel foreigners from hostile nations during wartime or an invasion, without due process.
The U.S. is not at war with Venezuela or TdA, nor is the gang a country — one of several reasons federal judge James Boasberg ordered the planes to turn around on March 15. Boasberg concluded that the administration likely did not have the legal authority to make the deportations.
Despite the order, the planes landed, and the men were taken into the custody of the Salvadoran prison, complete with online taunting by Trump administration figures. The episode set off a legal and political
firestorm over whether the administration had openly defied a federal court order, and what would come next if so.
“If anyone is being detained or removed based on the administration’s assertion that it can do so without judicial review or due process,” Jamal Greene, a law professor at Columbia, told The New York Times, “the president is asserting dictatorial power and ‘constitutional crisis’ doesn’t capture the gravity of the situation.”
There are about 1,700 federal judges in the U.S., and all are appointed by presidents and confirmed by the U.S. Senate — not elected, The Marshall Project explains. Trump and his allies have argued that it is, in effect, antidemocratic that any single judge, from any district, can overrule the will of the president on a national level.
Skepticism of the federal courts on these grounds is not a distinctly Republican or conservative preoccupation: In the aftermath of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the 2022 Supreme Court decision that struck down Roe v. Wade, prominent Democrats also complained about the undemocratic nature of rulings by unelected judges. A few even made the case for defying judicial rulings they disagreed with.
More broadly, presidents have long jockeyed with the courts over power. Franklin D. Roosevelt’s unrealized plan to expand the Supreme Court to up to 15 justices to add members sympathetic to his New Deal programs
Dozensofdisaster preparedness projects across California will be interrupted or canceled because the Trump administration is canceling a grant program.
The Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program was created during the first Trump administration. It has distributed $5 billion to
is just one memorable example.
However, Trump’s attacks on the judiciary are unprecedented in some ways, especially the extent to which they’ve been directed at individual judges.
Trump has called Boasberg — who was first appointed to the Washington, D.C., bench by President George W. Bush — “a radical left lunatic” and called for his impeachment. Almost immediately, some Republican House members introduced articles of impeachment against Boasberg. The effort is unlikely to go far, as it would require support from Senate Democrats to convict. Still, some experts see it as an escalation in Trump’s longstanding conflict with the judiciary. To date, no federal judge has ever been removed from office “because of dissatisfaction with his or her rulings,” a former judge told NPR.
The personalized and agitated tenor around judges has some of them fearing for their personal safety and that of their families. That was true even before the recent controversy over the deportation flights.
Congressional Republicans are pursuing legislation that would prevent district courts from issuing sweeping national injunctions altogether. Earlier this month, Trump also called for the Supreme Court to curtail the power of district court judges to issue national injunctions.
If either came to fruition, it would massively untether the administration from
judicial checks. According to The Washington Post, there are 13 active cases where a federal judge paused or reversed a Trump administration policy. That means about once every four days since Trump’s inauguration, a judge has concluded that the administration likely broke the law.
Trump officials have denied that they are defying the courts, and on March 19 “border czar” Tom Homan said that he will let the legal battle over the Alien Enemies Act play out before using it for more deportation flights. But at the same time, Boasberg has ruled that administration lawyers evaded some of his questions about the deportations or gave “woefully insufficient” answers.
If the Trump administration were to simply
begin ignoring the courts, it’s unclear what could be done to stop it. Federal court orders are generally enforced by the U.S. Marshals Service — an agency under the Department of Justice. As Vox’s Ian Millhiser wrote this week: Trump could simply tell the U.S. attorney general to instruct marshals not to enforce court orders against his administration.
While Congress could impeach Trump if he blatantly ignores the law, that outcome is unlikely for the same partisan reasons that will probably save Boasberg from removal.
Still, some argue that the point isn’t necessarily defiance — it may be just as much about the spectacle of defiance and punishment. In a post this week, historian Timothy Snyder opined that
By Suzanne Potter, Producer, Public News Service
local governments and tribal nations for projects to help recover from natural disasters. But now, a statement from FEMA calls the BRIC program “wasteful, ineffective and more concerned with climate change than disaster response.”
Em Donahoe, a policy specialist for resilient coasts and flood plains at the National Wildlife Federation,
said funding disaster response should be a nonpartisan issue.
“Every dollar invested in natural-disaster resilience and preparedness saves approximately $13 in longterm economic savings and damages and costs avoided, post-disaster,” she said. “So, it’s really just a bad investment decision.”
In the meantime, Sonoma County, for example, is
partway through a $48 million wildfire resilience program to harden structures, cut back dry vegetation and create defensible space. Nevada County, near Tahoe, is in the early stages of a program to create fire fuel breaks near Woodpecker Ravine.
Donahoe said BRIC has also funded many naturebased hazard-mitigation
projects.
“Examples of this range from things like restoring coastal wetlands and creating living shorelines to implementing green roofs or permeable pavement, or urban green spaces,” she said.
Donahoe said BRIC also helps communities improve their disaster planning and update their building codes
elements of the standoff seem designed more for public consumption than to achieve any discrete immigration enforcement goal.
“They are deliberately associating the law itself with people, the deportees, who they expect to be unpopular,” Snyder wrote. “In this way they hope to get popular opinion on their side as they ignore a court order. But if they succeed in making an exception once, it becomes the rule.”
This story was produced by The Marshall Project, a nonpartisan, nonprofit news organization that seeks to create and sustain a sense of national urgency about the U.S. criminal justice system, and reviewed and distributed by Stacker. The article was copy edited from its original version. Republished with CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
to make them more resilient in the long term.
Disclosure: National Wildlife Federation contributes to Public News Service’s fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Endangered Species & Wildlife, Energy Policy, Water. If you would like to help support news in the public interest, visit publicnewsservice.org/ dn1.php.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 3.24 (PURCHASING SYSTEM) OF TITLE 3 (REVENUE AND FINANCE) OF THE EL MONTE MUNICIPAL CODE AND OTHER RELATED AND INTERCONNECTED MUNICIPAL CODE PROVISIONS
WHEREAS, Chapter 3.24 (Purchasing System) of Title 3 (Revenue and Finance) of the El Monte Municipal Code (“Chapter 3.24”) sets forth the City of El Monte’s policies for the vetting and awarding of various contracts; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to update, refine, and clarify the City’s purchasing procedures, including provisions regulating City management’s ability to respond quickly to emergency events.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL MONTE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 3.24.020 (Purchasing officer – Duties and responsibilities) of Chapter 3.24 (Purchasing System) of Title 3 (Revenue and Finance) of the El Monte Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition of a new paragraph (C) which shall state:
C. The City Council may adopt and from time to time amend and/or modify a procedures manual, (the “Purchasing Policy and Procedures Manual”) setting forth additional administrative policies and procedures that are not in conflict with this chapter for the vetting, advertising and awarding of contracts, agreements, purchase orders and other like instruments covered under this chapter.
SECTION 2. Chapter 3.24 (Purchasing System) of Title 3 (Revenue and Finance) of the El Monte Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition of a new section 3.24.035 entitled “Approved Methods for Signing Contracts”, which shall now state the following:
3.24.035 Approved Methods for Signing of Contracts.
All City contracts, agreements, purchase orders and other like instruments covered under this chapter may be signed by the person authorized to sign such documents on the City’s behalf by means of a wet signature or, to the extent permitted by law, by means of a digital signature as may be provided elsewhere under the El Monte Municipal Code and subject to the City’s compliance with all State laws governing the use of digital signatures.
SECTION 3. Paragraph (B) of Section 3.24.040 (General procurement) of Chapter 3.24 (Purchasing System) of Title 3 (Revenue and Finance) of the El Monte Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to now state the following:
B. City Manager/Assistant City Manager Approval. Without prior approval of the City Council, the City Manager, or the Assistant City Manager if the City Manager is unavailable, shall have authority to approve and sign on behalf of the city:
1. Any contract (including purchase orders) for:
a. Any single purchase of supplies, materials or equipment for sums of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less per single purchase; and
b. The performance of general services for sums of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) or less for the preparation, completion and delivery of specific, tangible work product or other deliverables or for the performance and completion of discrete, project-specific tasks on or by specified dates.
2. Any fixed-term contract (including purchase orders) for:
a. The purchase of supplies, materials or equipment at specified rates as requested by city over the term of the contract, where the total compensation paid to the seller exceeds the aggregate sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) over the term of the contract. The term of the contract is inclusive of any automatic extension terms or extensions terms which may be authorized administratively without further approval by the City Council;
b. The performance of ongoing and/or as-needed general services for sums in excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) over the term of the contract, inclusive of any automatic extension terms or extensions terms which may be authorized administratively without further approval by the City Council.
3. Any indefinite term contract (including purchase orders) for:
a. The purchase of supplies, materials or equipment at contractually specified rates, as requested by city over the life of the contract;
b. Ongoing and/or as-needed general services, for
contracts with an actual or estimated annual compensation sum in excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) per fiscal year;
c. Ongoing and/or as-needed general services, for contracts with an actual or estimated annual compensation sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less per fiscal year, if such contract can only be terminated for cause or can only be terminated for convenience and without cause upon prior notice that is greater than thirty (30) calendar days.
SECTION 4. Section 3.24.060 (Exemptions from competitive or informally competitive procedures) of Chapter 3.24 (Purchasing System) of Title 3 (Revenue and Finance) of the El Monte Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to now state the following:
3.24.060 Exemptions from competitive or informally competitive procedures.
The following varieties of procurements are exempt from the competitive bidding requirements of Section 3.24.050, above, and any other semi-competitive or informally competitive procedures set forth in this chapter or in the city’s Purchasing Policy and Procedures Manual:
A. Single-source or sole-source procurements or purchases of materials, supplies, equipment, software or general services (i) that can obtained from only one manufacturer, vendor or service provider including single-patented, proprietary or copyrighted items; (ii) that have only one distributor authorized to sell in this area; (iii) that perform a unique function or for which there is no comparable, commercially available product or service; or (iv) where compatibility or warranty requirements require the use of a specific brand of materials, supplies, equipment, software or general service.
B. Piggyback or cooperative purchases of materials, supplies, equipment, software or general services where such procurements (1) have already been made using applicable competitive or semi-competitive solicitation procedures of another public agency; or (2) are conducted in accordance with the procedures of a cooperative purchasing or piggyback purchasing organization or association like the California Multiple Award Schedules Program; the U.S. General Services Administration; the United States Communities Government Purchasing Alliance; or any other similar cooperative purchasing program. The foregoing notwithstanding, in order to qualify as a piggyback purchase or cooperative purchase under this chapter (1) the cost or unit pricing of the supplies, materials, equipment, software or general services procured must be equal to or less than the cost or unit pricing paid by the public agency, organization or association with whom the piggyback purchase or cooperative purchase is made; and (2) the specifications and/or other characteristics of the materials, equipment, software or general services must be same as provided to the public agency, organization or association with whom the cooperative purchase is to be made.
C. The procurement of items for which there is no competitive market such as memberships in professional organizations or industry organizations; registration fees for conferences, meetings or other like business-related events; or subscriptions to professional or trade journals and/or periodicals.
D. Emergency procurements of supplies, materials, equipment or general services subject to the terms and conditions set under this paragraph (D). To qualify as an emergency procurement, exempt from the formal competitive bidding requirements of this chapter, the procurement must be made for the purpose of responding to an “emergency” within the meaning of Public Contract Code Section 1102. All emergency procurements shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth under Government Code Section 22050. As authorized pursuant to Government Code Section 22050(b)(1) and pursuant to City Council Ordinance No. 3047, approved by no less than 4/5 vote of the City Council on March 26, 2025, the City Manager and the Purchasing Officer are both delegated the authority to order any action pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Government Code Section 22050, subject to all reporting obligations and City Council review requirements set forth under Government Code Sections 22050(b)(3) and 22050(c).
E. Professional consulting services within the meaning of Section 3.24.140(A)(6) of this chapter. This exemption is inclusive of any requirement for the solicitation of multiple quotes or proposals as may be set forth in this chapter or in the Purchasing Policy and Procedures Manual.
F. Any procurement of supplies, materials, equipment, software or general services, in which the City Council shall find, by resolution adopted by not less than four-fifths (4/5) of its full membership, that such procurement may be more economically and efficiently effected by (1) the waiver of solicitation procedures otherwise required by this chapter or the Purchasing Policy and Procedures Manual; or (2) the use of an alternative transactional process
or alternative procurement procedure. This exception may not be applied to public projects which are subject to mandatory competitive bidding under applicable state law or any mandated informal bidding authorized under the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act.
G. The engagement of individual(s) as musicians, musical groups, singers, dancers, and other performing artists providing live entertainment for City organized or city sponsored events or functions; or the engagement of individuals(s) as artists for the creation and installation of original and unique works of art commissioned by the city as works for hire (e.g., murals, paintings, photographs, sculptures, animation etc.).
SECTION 5. Paragraphs (B) and (C) of Section 3.24.070 (Professional consulting services) of
B. City Manager/Assistant City Manager Approval. Without prior City Council approval, the City Manager, or the Assistant City Manager if the City Manager is unavailable, shall have authority to approve and sign on behalf of the city:
1. Any contract for professional consulting services for the preparation, completion and delivery of specific, tangible work product or other deliverables or for the performance and completion of discrete, projectspecific tasks on or by specified dates for sums of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less;
2. Any fixed-term contract for ongoing and/or as-needed, professional consulting services for sums of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less over the term specified in the contract, inclusive of any automatic extension terms or extensions terms which may be authorized administratively without further approval by the City Council;
3. Any indefinite term contract for ongoing and/or asneeded professional consulting services, for contracts with an estimated annual compensation sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less per fiscal year, provided such contract may be terminated by the city for convenience and without cause upon no more than thirty (30) calendar days prior written notice. City Council approval shall be required for any annual actual expenditures in excess of the fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) limit set forth herein. All engagements of professional services under this subsection B. shall be undertaken in compliance with the purchasing procedures set forth in the Purchasing Procedures Manual.
C. City Council Approval. The City Council shall approve:
1. Any contract for professional consulting services for the preparation, completion and delivery of specific, tangible work product or other deliverables or for the performance and completion of discrete, projectspecific tasks on or by specified dates for sums in excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). With respect to any professional services contract required incident to, and in the furtherance of, a specific, City Council-approved capital improvement project, City Council approval shall be required for any such contract in excess of the City Manager’s expenditure authority set forth under subsection B.1. of this section, above.
2. Any fixed-term contract for ongoing and/or as-needed, professional consulting services for sums in excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) over the term specified in the contract, inclusive of any automatic extension terms or extensions terms which may be authorized administratively without further approval by the City Council.
3. Any indefinite term contract for ongoing and/or asneeded professional consulting services:
a. For contracts with an actual or estimated annual compensation sum in excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) per fiscal year;
b. For contracts with an estimated annual compensation sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) or less per fiscal year, if such contract can only be terminated for cause or can only be terminated for convenience and without cause upon prior notice that is greater than thirty (30) calendar days. With respect to the types of professional consulting services contracts described under this subsection, above, the following subset of contracts shall be awarded following the city’s issuance of a request for qualifications or proposals as provided under the Purchasing Procedures Manual, unless such requirement is waived by the City Council:
i. Any contract for professional consulting services for the preparation and completion of specific, tangible deliverables or other work product and the performance of related services and tasks for sums in excess of one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000);
ii. Any fixed-term contract for ongoing and/or asneeded, professional consulting services for sums of in excess of one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) over the term specified in the contract, inclusive of any automatic extension terms or extensions terms which may be authorized administratively without further approval by the City Council;
iii. Any indefinite term contract for ongoing and/or as-
needed professional consulting services, for contracts with an estimated annual sum in excess of one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000).
SECTION 6. Section 3.24.090 (Surplus and/or obsolete sup plies, materials and equipment) of Chapter 3.24 (Purchasing Sys tem) of Title 3 (Administration and Personnel) is amended in its entirety to now state the following:
3.24.090 Surplus and/or obsolete supplies, materials and equipment.
A. Each City department or division shall submit to the Purchasing Officer, at such times and in such form as the Purchasing Officer shall prescribe, re ports showing all supplies, materials and equipment which are no longer used or which have become obsolete or worn out. The Purchasing Officer shall have authority to sell or otherwise dispose of all supplies, materials and equipment which cannot be used by a department, or which have become un suitable for City use. The Purchasing Officer may also exchange the same for, or trade in the same on, new supplies, materials and/or equipment.
B. Disposition of surplus and/or obsolete items may include some form of recycling or reuse such as do nation to public bodies, charitable, civic or nonprofit organizations and may include City property which has no commercial value or for which the estimat ed cost of continued care, handling, maintenance or storage would exceed the estimated proceeds of sale. Sales procedures may include negotiated sales, acceptance of sealed bids or public auction. Services of a paid auctioneer may be used, as ap propriate. City Council is required for the sale or other disposition of supplies, materials or equipment when the total estimated value the specific supply, material or equipment exceeds ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00).
SECTION 7. The definition of the term “general services” as defined under subsection (4) of paragraph (A) of Section 3.24.140 (Definitions) of Chapter 3.24 (Purchasing System) of Title 3 (Admin istration and Personnel) is amended in its entirety to now state the following:
4. The term “general services” means and includes any work performed or services rendered by an inde pendent contractor, with or without the furnishing of materials, including but not limited to the following:
a. Maintenance or nonstructural repair to City build ings, structures or improvements which do not re quire engineering plans, specifications or design, including but not limited to, unscheduled replace ment of broken window panes, fire extinguisher maintenance, minor roof repairs, plumbing services, elevator maintenance, custodial services and pest control;
b. Repair, modification and maintenance of City equip ment and software;
c. Cleaning, testing, moving, removal or disposal (oth er than by sale) of City supplies, materials or equip ment;
d. Repainting, care or maintenance of public grounds, including, but not limited to, trees, shrubbery, flow ers, lawns;
e. Providing temporary clerical/administrative support services;
f. Providing other miscellaneous services to facilitate city operations;
SECTION 9. Section 2.12.120 (Contract authority) of Chapter 2.12 (City Manager) of Title 2 (Administration and Personnel) is hereby amended in its entirety to now state the following:
g. Performing repair, demolition or other work required to abate nuisances under the El Monte Municipal Code;
h. Licensing software;
i. Leasing or rental of equipment (personal property) for use by the City;
j. A maintenance agreement for equipment owned or leased by the City;
k. The engagement musicians, musical groups, sing ers, dancers, and other performing artists providing live entertainment at City organized or City spon sored events or functions; or the engagement of art ists for the creation and installation of original and unique works of art commissioned by the City (e.g., murals, paintings, photographs, sculptures, anima tion, etc.).
The term “general services” does not include “pro fessional consulting services.” The definition of the term “general services” may in certain instances overlap with the definition of the term “public project” and where such is the case the work or services in question shall be awarded and contracted in accor dance with those provisions of this Chapter govern ing “public projects.”
CITY OF EL MONTE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING and NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT AN INITIAL STUDY-MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Hablamos Español favor de hablar con Jeni Colon (626) 258-8626
LEAD AGENCY: City of El Monte Planning Division
PROJECT TITLE: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 84432/Subdivision (SUB) No. 2-2024, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Nos. 6-2024, 7-2024, & 8-2024, Minor Variance (MV) Nos. 8-2025, 9-2025, & 10-2025, & Design Review (DR) No. 4-2024.
PROJECT LOCATION: 3600 Peck Road (APNs 8567-015055,-057, and -059) (A full legal description of the property is on file in the office of the El Monte Planning Division).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is the Notice of Intent (NOI) of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-MND) to notify the public that the City of El Monte, as the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has prepared an IS-MND for the 3600 Peck Road Project (project), which involves the redevelopment of three of the six existing commercial buildings on the project site. The redevelopment would involve demolition of the existing vacant Denny’s (6,000 sf), Big 5 Sporting Goods (7,800 sf), and vacant China Buffet (11,047 sf); and construction of Starbucks (2,400 sf), In-N-Out (3,886 sf), and Raising Cane’s (3,612 sf) coffee/fast-food restaurants that would each provide a drive-thru facility. The project would reduce the total size of the commercial center from 52,268 sf to 37,319 sf. Each of the proposed restaurant buildings would include a drive-thru, paved parking spaces, and landscaping. The proposed Starbucks building would include outdoor seating and bike racks, 19 parking stalls, and a trash enclosure. The proposed In-N-Out building would include two outdoor seating areas, bike racks and lockers, 62 parking stalls, and a trash enclosure. The proposed Raising Cane’s building would include two outdoor seating areas, bike racks and lockers, 37 parking stalls, and a trash enclosure. Construction activities for the proposed project is estimated to start in August 2025 and end in May 2027. Construction activities for the project would include demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. Because the proposed project consists of a redevelopment, it would involve 4,565 cubic yards (cy) of cut soil from building foundation demolition and removal and 293 cy of imported soil. Construction work would occur Monday through Friday from approximately 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Weekend construction is not anticipated. Construction equipment would be staged on site, and construction workers would also park on site.
SECTION 8. The title of Section 2.12.100 (Cooperator with City Manager) of Chapter 2.12 (City Manager) of Title 2 (Adminis tration and Personnel) is hereby amended to now state:
2.12.100 Cooperation with City Manager.
APPLICANT: Merlone Geier Partners
PROPERTY OWNER: MGP XI EL MONTE CENTER LLC
PLACE OF HEARING: Pursuant to State Law, the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to receive testimony, orally and in writing, on the IS-MND and on the proposed project. The hearing is scheduled for:
Date: Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Time: 7:00 p.m.
Location: City Hall Council Chambers
11333 Valley Boulevard El Monte, California 91731
PUBLIC REVIEW/COMMENT PERIOD:
The City of El Monte Planning Division invites written comments on issues related to potential environmental impacts during the 30-day comment period, which starts on April 23, 2025, and will conclude on May 23, 2025.
A hardcopy of the IS-MND and related documents are available for review at the followinglocations during the regular business hours:
City Hall West
Planning Division
11333 Valley Boulevard
El Monte, CA
7 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
(Monday thru Thursday)
El Monte Library
3224 Tyler Avenue
El Monte, CA
12 p.m. to 8 p.m. (only Tues)
10 a.m. to 6 p.m. (Wed thru Sat)
Norwood Library
4550 Peck Road
El Monte, CA
12 p.m. to 8 p.m. (only Tues)
10 a.m. to 6 p.m. (Wed thru Sat)
Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your response must be sent at the earliest possible time but no later than 30 days after receipt of this notice, and no later than 5:00 PM on May 23, 2025. Please send written/typed comments (including a name, telephone number, email, and any other contact information) to the following:
Sandra Elias, City Planner
626-258-8621
City of El Monte Planning Division
11333 Valley Boulevard
El Monte, California 91731
You may also email your response to selias@elmonteca.gov
Published on: Monday, April 21, 2025
EL MONTE EXAMINER
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF JAMES PATRICK GARCIA
Case No. 21STPB04737
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of JAMES PATRICK GARCIA
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Christie Young in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PRO-
BATE requests that Christie Young be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held on May 7, 2025 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 9 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issu-ance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for petitioner:
DARRELL G BROOKE ESQ SBN 118071 THE BROOKE LAW GROUP PC
525 S MYRTLE AVE STE 204 MONROVIA CA 91016
CN115743 GARCIA Apr 14,17,21, 2025 AZUSA BEACON
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:
VERONICA VAWA SO CASE NO. 25STPB03644
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of VE-
RONICA VAWA SO.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by FRANCIS KWOK CHUEN SO in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that FRANCIS KWOK CHUEN SO be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority. A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 05/02/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 2D located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner AMIR ABDIZADEH, ESQ. - SBN 298114
AMIR LAW GROUP P.C. 18231 HIGHWAY 18, STE 4 APPLE VALLEY CA 92307
Telephone (760) 242-6527 4/14, 4/17, 4/21/25 CNS-3914859# SAN GABRIEL SUN
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:
DENNIS MARTIN CRUZ AKA
DENNIS M. CRUZ AKA
DENNIS CRUZ CASE NO. 25STPB03950
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of DEN-
NIS MARTIN CRUZ AKA DENNIS M. CRUZ AKA DENNIS CRUZ.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by BEN YAMAGATA in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that BEN YAMAGATA be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 05/09/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 9 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner
JENNA GLASSOCK, ESQ. - SBN 274379
LAUREL TRUST LAW LLP
12750 VENTURA BLVD., SUITE 201 STUDIO CITY CA 91604
Telephone (818) 651-7593 4/14, 4/17, 4/21/25 CNS-3915106# SAN GABRIEL SUN
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:
JOHN GAMBLE LEWIS CASE NO. 25STPB00215
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of JOHN GAMBLE LEWIS.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by MARK W. LEWIS in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that MARK W. LEWIS be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests the decedent’s WILL and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The WILL and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 05/12/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 11 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner CLAYTON D. WILSON - SBN 40339 WILSON & WILSON 414 S. FIRST AVENUE ARCADIA CA 91006 Telephone (626) 574-1890 4/14, 4/17, 4/21/25 CNS-3915108# ARCADIA WEEKLY
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: JAMIE LOU GARIS AKA JAMIE L. GARIS CASE NO. 25STPB03804
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of JAMIE LOU GARIS AKA JAMIE L. GARIS.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by TJ GARIS in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that TJ GARIS be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 05/05/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 62 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person in-
terested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner
ARIELLE BASICH - SBN 358096
HAHN & HAHN LLP
301 E. COLORADO BLVD., 9TH FLOOR
PASADENA CA 91101
Telephone (626) 796-9123
4/14, 4/17, 4/21/25
CNS-3914880#
TEMPLE CITY TRIBUNE
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: ERIC JACK
CASE NO. 25STPB04020
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of ERIC JACK.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by BRADLEY JACK in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that BRADLEY JACK be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests the decedent’s WILL and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The WILL and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 05/19/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 67 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner SCOTT T. HOLMAN, ESQ. - SBN 315487 HOLMAN LAW GROUP, APC 316 W. FOOTHILL BLVD. MONROVIA CA 91016 Telephone (626) 358-1218 4/17, 4/21, 4/24/25 CNS-3915948# MONROVIA WEEKLY
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: DAVID C. SCOTT CASE NO. 25STPB04076
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of DA-
VID C. SCOTT. A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by AIDA V. SCOTT in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that AIDA V. SCOTT be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests the decedent’s WILL and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The WILL and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 05/23/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 99 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250.
AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING THE MONTEREY PARK GENERAL PLAN BY AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE MONTEREY PARK MUNICIPAL CODE (“MPMC”) CONCERNING ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, REPLACEMENT HOUSING, AND ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMITS (ZCA-25-01), AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY ESTABLISHING THE RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVE ZONE (ZA-25-01)
The Monterey Park City Council introduced Ordinance No. 2261 at the March 19, 2025 regular City Council meeting. The Ordinance implements the Monterey Park 2040 Land Use Element (“LUE”) and Housing Element (“HE”) by: (1) aligning the MPMC with State accessory dwelling unit laws; (2) requiring replacement housing for units affordable to the same or lower income level as a condition of development on a nonvacant site; (3) resolving inconsistencies in the Administrative Use Permit (“AUP”) approval requirements for accessory use of on-site and off-site alcohol sales; and (4) establishing the Residential Incentive Zone (“RIZ”) and changing the zoning designation for specific properties allowing certain housing developments without any discretionary approvals.
Second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 2261 took place at the April 16, 2025 regular City Council meeting at 6:30 p.m., in the City of Monterey Park, California.
For a copy of Ordinance No. 2261, please contact the City Clerk’s office at (626) 307-1359.
Approved as submitted above:
Justin A. Tamayo, Assistant City Attorney
ATTEST: Maychelle Yee, City Clerk
Publish Apri 21, 2025 MONTEREY PARK PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF JAMES F. SWEENEY, JR.
Case No. 25STPB03890
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of JAMES F. SWEENEY, JR.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Jennifer Bowman in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Jennifer Bowman be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held on May 7, 2025 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 9 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person
must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner
ARIANA A. BURRIS - SBN 267371
SARAH BREWSAUGH - SBN 267359
BURRIS LAW APC
488 SOUTH GLASSELL STREET
ORANGE CA 92866
Telephone (714) 941-8122
BSC 226698
4/14, 4/17, 4/21/25
CNS-3914369# ONTARIO NEWS PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF JESSE RENE ACEBAL
Case No. 25STPB02159
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of JESSE RENE ACEBAL
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Clifford S. Acebal and Jesse Rene Acebal, Jr. in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for petitioner: JASMIN ARYA ESQ SBN 347469
THE BURBANK FIRM L C 2312 WEST VICTORY BLVD STE 100 BURBANK CA 91506
CN115745 SWEENEY Apr 14,17,21, 2025
GLENDALE INDEPENDENT
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: VICTOR MANUEL OSORIO ROJAS
CASE NO. PROVA2500289
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of VICTOR MANUEL OSORIO ROJAS.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by VICTOR OSORIO, JR. in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN BERNARDINO.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that VICTOR OSORIO, JR. be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 05/20/25 at 9:00AM in Dept. F1 located at 17780 ARROW BLVD., FONTANA, CA 92335
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: JOYCE M. CHAPMAN CASE NO. 25STPB03791
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of JOYCE M. CHAPMAN.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by MARGARET DEARTH in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that MARGARET DEARTH be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests the decedent’s WILL and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The WILL and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 05/07/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 29 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Clifford S. Acebal and Jesse Rene Acebal, Jr. be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.)
The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held on May 29, 2025 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 5 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for petitioner: CAMERON SANCHEZ ESQ SBN
unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.)
The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held on May 2, 2025 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 44 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issu-ance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for petitioner:
ested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner
ANDREW BETHEL - SBN 335880 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. BETHEL 631 NEW JERSEY ST., STE. 101 REDLANDS CA 92373
Telephone (909) 307-6282 4/14, 4/17, 4/21/25 CNS-3915626# PASADENA PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF LYDIA VIRGINIA MARQUEZ aka LYDIA MARQUEZ Case No. 25STPB04069 To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of LYDIA VIRGINIA MARQUEZ aka LYDIA MARQUEZ A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Pauline Frances Irene Morales in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Pauline Frances Irene Morales be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests the decedent’s will and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner
MICHAEL G. EBINER, ESQ. - SBN 183499, EBINER LAW OFFICE 100 N. CITRUS ST., #520 WEST COVINA CA 91791 Telephone (626) 918-9000 4/14, 4/17, 4/21/25 CNS-3914941# WEST COVINA PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF VERA JANE CONTRERAS aka VERA CONTRERAS aka VERA J. CONTRERAS Case No. 25STPB03326
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of VERA JANE CONTRERAS aka VERA CONTRERAS aka VERA J. CONTRERAS
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Deborah Lynne Ellison in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Deborah Lynne Ellison be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons
DARREN G REED ESQ SBN 273351 REED & REED APC 1901 AVENUE OF THE STARS STE 1100 LOS ANGELES CA 90067 CN115932 CONTRERAS Apr 14,17,21, 2025 GLENDALE INDEPENDENT
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: ROBYN E. FARLEY AKA ROBYN ELIZABETH FARLEY CASE NO. 25STPB03943
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of ROBYN E. FARLEY AKA ROBYN ELIZABETH FARLEY.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by DEBRA ROSWELL in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that DEBRA ROSWELL be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 05/09/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 4 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person inter-
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held on May 21, 2025 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 67 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for petitioner: KATHRINE D STAPLETON
zones.
“Our vision for Chino Airport is to shine as the crown jewel in the communities it serves,” Godown said in a statement.
Spanning over 1,115 acres in the southwest part Chino, the vacant land will be available for development through a multiphase process of fielding RFQs.
Officials said the RFQ process is “a formal way of requesting submissions from development entities to establish their interest and qualifications for developing land.”
Supervisor Curt Hagman, whose 4th District contains the airport, said in a statement, “By unlocking this prime land for lease, we are not only supporting the expansion of Chino Airport but also fostering job creation, attracting new businesses, and enhancing infrastructure that will benefit the surrounding community for years to come.”
A key requirement for RFQ is proposals is the inclusion of a development concept that will enhance the quality of life for the community closest to the airport and future development sites.
Terry Thompson, director of the county Real Estate Services Department, is at the helm of the RFQ process.
“There are creative ideas in development. Our plan is to involve the community throughout the process,” Thompson said in a statement. “We want to build something the community views as an asset that everybody can enjoy and be proud of.”
One promising approach, according to Thompson, is “buffer developments” — designing land use that benefits both the airport and the surrounding community. Store fronts such as a dry
cleaner or car wash along Kimball Avenue could serve as sound and visual barriers while complimenting land uses for aviation, officials said.
While the FAA has the final approval on nonaeronautical land uses, Thompson emphasized that creative ideas for development are “open for discussion.”
Known for its contributions during World War II and LA-close location, officials said the airport is “thriving,” logging more than 200,000 operations last year with expectations for even more activity in 2025.
“This is a good time given all the confluence and improvements going on in the Inland Empire and around Chino,” Thompson said. “I think it is really a good time to embark on this.”
Chino Airport is 35 miles from Los Angeles and accessible via the 60, 10 and 71 freeways. Officials said the airport “is uniquely positioned to thrive as similar
(general aviation) airports in the region face closures. It’s not just history that sets this airport apart — from hosting WWII pilot training to being home to aviation museums and thriving businesses, Chino Airport is poised to embark on an exciting new era in aviation culture.”
For more information on the RFQ process, email Lyle Ballard from Real Estate Services, Lyle.Ballard@res. sbcounty.gov.
Chino Airport was the base for the Cal-Aero Flight Academy in the early 1940s, training more than 10,365 fighter and bomber pilots during World War II. Currently the airport hosts aviation-related companies and businesses, including full-service fixed operations, aircraft management and maintenance, charters, flight training and aircraft restoration. The airport also has two aircraft museums, Planes of Fame Air Museum and Yanks Air Museum as well as the longstanding diner Flo’s Café.
By City News Service
A40-year-old man who allegedly declared he wanted to detonate explosives at the Coachella Valley Music & Arts Festival in Indio last weekend pleaded not guilty Wednesday to falsely reporting a bomb.
David Solomon Darvish of Santa Monica was arrested Saturday following a Cathedral City Police Department investigation.
Darvish was arraigned on the felony count during a hearing Wednesday before Riverside County Superior Court Judge Dean Benjamini, who scheduled a felony settlement conference for April 25 at the Larson Justice Center in Indio.
Darvish’s public defender argued during the arraignment that his client’s actions
did not pose a credible threat to the community because he had nothing in his possession that would have constituted a threat, and instead the entire episode approximated a “crank call.”
The judge was unsympathetic to the argument and relied on a CCPD bail-setting declaration indicating that Darvish did represent a threat, ordering the defendant held without bail at the Smith Correctional Facility in Banning.
Police said that shortly before 11 a.m. Saturday, Darvish told Agua Caliente Casino security guards that he intended to bomb the festival. The guards then alerted the police department, telling 911 dispatch-
ers the defendant had left the resort in a Tesla, providing a complete description of the car and driver. Festival security personnel were additionally advised to be on the lookout for the defendant and vehicle.
Around noon Saturday, Palm Springs police officers spotted the Tesla in the area of Calle El Segundo and Saturnino Road, prompting them to stop the defendant and search his vechicle, which contained no incendiary materials, authorities said. Darvish was taken into custody without incident, initially booked in lieu of $1 million bail. He has no documented prior felony convictions in Riverside County.
Marines killed in NM crash, including Riverside native, publicly ID’d
By City News Service
Two Camp Pendletonbased Marines who were killed earlier this week in a vehicle accident while deployed in New Mexico, including one from Riverside, were publicly identified Thursday.
The opening of this year’s festival was plagued by complaints of long lines and wait times up to 10 to 12 hours for vehicles trying to get to the camping area. According to Indio police, “Our neighboring cities and local law enforcement partners assisted with traffic during camping arrivals. However, because campers arrived earlier than expected, the flow of cars never let up and created delays.”
A representative for festival producer Goldenvoice, speaking to the La Quinta City Council this
week, apologized for the chaos and said changes will be implemented this weekend when the event
continues. Additional toll plazas will be added, creating additional entry points for vehicles.
Lance Cpl. Albert A. Aguilera, 22, of Riverside, and Lance Cpl. Marcelino M.Gamino, 28, of Fresno, died Tuesday following a solo vehicle crash near Santa Teresa, New Mexico.
The Marines, both combat engineers with 1st Combat Engineer Battalion, 1st Marine Division, were in the area supporting southern border operations, with the crash occurring during a “convoy movement,” according to a U.S. Marine spokesperson.
Aguilera and Gamino were pronounced dead at a hospital in El Paso, Texas, while a third
Marine from 1st Combat Engineer Battalion remains hospitalized in critical condition.
The cause of the crash remains under investigation.
“The loss of Lance Cpl. Aguilera and Lance Cpl. Gamino is deeply felt by all of us,” said U.S. Marine Corps Lt. Col. Tyrone A. Barrion,
commanding officer for 1st Combat Engineer Battalion and Task Force Sapper. “I extend my heartfelt condolences and prayers to the families of our fallen brothers. Our top priority right now is to ensure that their families, and the Marines affected by their passing, are fully supported during this difficult time.”
By City News Service
Home prices continued to rise across California last month, but sales dipped as consumers grew increasingly concerned about their financial outlook in the year ahead, the California Association of Realtors announced Thursday.
Statewide, seasonally adjusted sales numbers fell 2.3% month-to-month, from 283,540 in February to 277,030 in March, but are still up 4.9% compared to one year ago.
“Home sales slowed in March as both buyers and sellers grew more concerned about the ongoing tariff situation and its potential impact on their personal finances,”
CAR President Heather Ozur said.
Sales of existing, singlefamily homes in the Inland Empire rose 23.4% from February to March, an increase of just 0.1% year-over year.
Riverside County’s sales rose 25.2% month-overmonth and 0.9% year-overyear, while San Bernardino
Jurors in the retrial of a 23-year-old man who fatally shot a neighbor and wounded the victim’s brother during a confrontation at a girl’s coming-ofage party could not reach a unanimous verdict on a murder charge, but convicted him Tuesday of other counts.
The Riverside jury tasked with deciding the fate of Gael Ian Cazares deliberated nearly three days before informing Riverside County Superior Court Judge Steven Counelis that an impasse on the murder allegation against him could not be overcome, prompting the judge on Tuesday to declare a mistrial on that count. The jury was in favor of conviction by a vote of 11-1.
Jurors did find Cazares guilty of attempted voluntary manslaughter, as well as sentence-enhancing gun and great bodily injury allegations.
County’s sales rose 24.7% month-over-month and 2.8% year-over-year.
Localized data is not seasonally adjusted, accounting for the discrepancy between their increase and the statewide decrease in sales.
Meanwhile, home prices dipped slightly in Riverside County and the Inland Empire. The median sale price of an existing, singlefamily home in Riverside County dropped 1.2% in March, from $646,840 to $638,810 — up 1.4% from last year’s $630,000. San Bernardino’s median price increased 6.7% last month, from $490,000 to $522,700 — 11.1% higher than last year’s $470,420.
Overall, the Inland Empire saw a .3% drop in the median price monthover-month, from $611,290 to $609,230 — which is 2.5% higher than last year’s median price of $594,250.
Statewide, the median
price rose 6.7% last month, from $829,060 to $884,350, a 3.5% increase from last year’s $854,370.
“Despite mortgage rate swings and financial market volatility, housing conditions remained stable in March,” CAR Senior Vice President Chief Economist Jordan Levine said. “Although slower open-escrow sales point to a sluggish start for the spring season, increased inventory and modest price growth offer hope for buyers seeking more options and improved affordability.”
The most expensive counties for existing singlefamily homes were San Mateo and Santa Clara, with median prices of $2.26 million and $2.12 million, respectively. The cheapest was Del Norte County with a median price of $185,000. Del Norte, located at the far northwest of the state, also saw the steepest decline in sales year-over-year at -61.1%.
The CAR report that found that pending home sales across the state declined in March for the fourth straight month,
“reflecting continued weakening in housing sentiment. Fluctuating mortgage rates and rising recession fears likely contributed to the
By City News Service
drop in demand. With rates expected to remain volatile, pending sales may stay soft as the spring home-buying season begins.”
“Our office is still reviewing this and has not yet made a decision whether we will retry the murder count,” District Attorney’s Office spokesman John Hall told City News Service.
Even without another trial, Cazares’ minimum mandatory sentence is 25 years in state prison based on the felony charge for which he was convicted, compounded by the enhancements.
He’s being held without bail at the Robert Presley Jail.
He fatally shot 22-yearold Manuel Villaman in 2021 and wounded the victim’s younger brother.
In November 2022, a separate jury deadlocked after three days of deliberations in his first trial, unable to reach a unanimous verdict on any counts.
According to a trial brief filed by the prosecution, Cazares and Villaman
Counelis scheduled a tentative sentencing hearing for June 12 at the Riverside Hall of Justice. The hearing will double as a retrial conference in which prosecutors will announce whether they intend to proceed with trying the case for a third time in the hope of obtaining a murder conviction.
had prior conflicts, including arguments about the defendant’s reckless driving on their street. Cazares also held a grudge over the victim’s relationship with a woman they both knew.
On the night of May 29, 2021, the men and others were invited to a quinceanera for a girl at a residence in the 4900 block of Rutile Street, near Birmingham Avenue. Cazares allegedly went to the party armed with a self- assembled Glock “ghost” pistol.
Witnesses told investigators the defendant arrived looking for trouble, and when he encountered Villaman near the entrance to the house, he accosted him angrily, then pushed him into the driveway, prompting Villaman to push back, culminating in a shoving match that spilled into the street, according to prosecutors.
They said Villaman’s younger brother, whose identity was not disclosed, tried to break it up and was himself shoved by the defendant.
“When (Villaman’s
brother) attempted to intervene a second time, he saw the defendant pull out a gun,” according to the brief.
“He immediately tried to run away when he heard three gunshots.”
The young man was hit in the abdomen, and his brother was shot
once through the chest and another time in the buttocks, the brief said.
Cazares jumped into a car and raced home.
Villaman was pronounced dead at the scene. His brother was taken to Riverside Community Hospital, where he under-
went surgery and ultimately recovered.
Witnesses identified Cazares as the assailant, and he was taken into custody without incident the following day.
He had no documented prior felony convictions in Riverside County.