libels vs. "benpadiah"

"The Reviews Are In! And the Scape-Goat Award Goes To..." a compilation of posts about the "benpadiah" brand-name.

A Triumph!, February 25, 2009 By Richard Hawkins This review is from: The Metaphysicians' Desk Reference: Including the Revised Formal System of Metaphysics (Paperback) Are you tired of books with coherent writing, factual content and proper arrangement? Are you looking for over 500 pages of the insane ramblings of a schizophrenic so high on LSD he thinks he's found God? Do you want to read a book by a man who claims to be the last High Priest because he dropped 12 tabs and watched The Blair Witch Project? Then this book is for you! Includes loads of handwritten diagrams that explain nothing and plenty of fake maths, lofty arrogant and farcical claims by the author and sentences that run on much much longer than this one ever could. Also the writing is really bad and there's a lot of spelling mistakes.

Jason Support Desk Jon: Our conversion from Flash to HTML5 was highly publicized on scribd.com and in the media. It should not be a surprise, and it is absolutely not a prank. I'm sorry our conversion to HTML5 caused a technical issue. We're happy to work with dissatisfied users, but your ultimatums and threats of litigation are inappropriate and unacceptable. We take all threats seriously, and as such, we are immediately and permanently severing your relationship with Scribd and scribd.com. You and your documents are no longer allowed on Scribd, in any form. Your account has been removed, and the costs of documents purchased from your account have been refunded to their purchasers.

Best regards, Jason Bentley Customer Support Director @ Scribd Questions? http://scribd.com/faq Kevin Large and In Charge Location: It's not the location; it's the foundation.

Jesus - sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Lighten up, sir. That post seemed pretty judgmental to me. Someone who didn't care, wouldn't have even responded to the "flaming". Chill, Drama-rama - you're not being harassed. You came on the board and hurled judgments about not just the short, but about anyone who found the short funny, casting aspersions along the line of "you're all brown-nosers for finding this funny." That you reiterated the "brown-noser" stuff in a follow-up post could, also, be construed as "harassing" people, albeit passive/aggressively. ou went pretty far beyond expressing "I didn't like the stupid short." And when folks called you on it, you're suddenly the "STOP FUCKING HARASSING ME" guy. It's cool though Ben; I was an angst-ridden seventeen year old once, too. Of course, I wasn't 24 at the time.

Dear Sir, This Firm represents Boots & Coots. It has come to the attention of the management of Boots & Coots that you have posted a video entitled "Fade to Black (#oilslick, May 29, 2010)" on YouTube under the account "benpadiah." If you are the person posting the referenced video, this is to advise you that the information contained therein relating to Boots & Coots is untrue, false in its entirety and defamatory. Boots & Coots has had no involvement with the well at issue at any time or in any way. In addition, Boots & Coots is an independent company at this date and is not a subsidiary or affiliate of Halliburton. This is a demand that the YouTube posting and any other website posting reflecting the same or similar subject matter concerning Boots & Coots be immediately withdrawn and ceased. Failure to do so will cause grave harm and damages to Boots & Coots. Please give me a call immediately on the cell phone number listed below.

James Eloi Doyle Doyle, Restrepo, Harvin & Robbins, L.L.P. Dear Mr. Gee, Thank you for your prompt response. While it is helpful that you "Privatized" the video, Boots & Coots demands that it be completely removed. Boots & Coots does not require or want you to publish any follow-up posting relating to the video. In addition, you must also remove the video entitled "Save the Gulf" posted on YouTube on May 22, 2010 or any other video containing similar false information about Boots & Coots. This second video falsely associates the proposed acquisition of Boots & Coots

by Halliburton with the Deep Water Horizon tragedy. The existence of this video and the video "Fade to Black" causes great harm to Boots & Coots regardless of the number of people who view them. Boots & Coots will suffer harm if only one person views and believes the false statements or implications contained in the videos suggesting that Boots & Coots had some connection with the tragedy that took eleven lives and spilled countless barrels of crude into the Gulf of Mexico. The viewing by any person of these false allegations diminishes its reputation. Moreover, should any one individual bring groundless claims against Boots & Coots based upon the false information contained in the videos, Boots & Coots' reputation will further suffer and it will have to spend significant expenses to defend itself to the public and in a court of law. Mr. Gee, please take this corrective action immediately. If you have any questions, please contact me.

James Eloi Doyle Doyle, Restrepo, Harvin & Robbins, L.L.P. reply posted on 22-1-2010 @ 02:29 PM by Icerider I do apologise for the spelling mistake, but I think you understood my sentiment.

Incidentally 'slander' is a spoken defamation - what you are complaining about is referred to as liable. Seems your ignorance easily out does my small typo. And actually, as far as I can see your ARE peddling quackery, for whatever end - maybe you just like feeling superior to us ignorant, psychically asleep, mortals. Maybe you really believe what you're proclaiming to be some kind of truth. The worst thing is its a hotch-potch at best, and its all plagiarised! At least try to be orginal with you're ancient secrets. Actually, your not related to David Icke, are you? reply posted on 22-1-2010 @ 04:16 PM by Mr Mask People like this "guy" should be outed and arrested. This guy's entire story is "badly written bunk" intended to swindle the lower crust of humanities' dumbest. This guy's entire story is "badly written bunk" intended to swindle the lower crust of humanities' dumbest. How the heck do people like this get away with one sentence of

BS around here? Charlie Manson had more "credible things to say", and with more "facts" backing him. Good luck swindling those "lost enough" to seek your information and guidance. I truly hope no one gets hurt placing trust in your obviously "self-serving" agenda and self-created tomfoolery. Boo to you sir. Doubleboo, even. I have read as much of you as I could stomach. Your nature here is far too obvious and bloated on long-winded and meaningless passages of gibberish. You are a snake-oil salesmen with no store or shelves to place your oils. Seriously "guy", your attempts here are laughable. Reading more and more of your work, I am becoming very aware of your madness. You got some REALLY crazy stuff in here and some of it can be seen as criminal. Your content is "at best" maniacal creativity. First off, if Crowley or Lavey were alive today, you would be sued. You are BLATANTLY stealing crazy talk from dead crazy folk and then calling it your own. Since you are working with "other's people's" work, it is easy to see what you are trying to accomplish. You are trying to be the next Crowley/Lavey/add-guru-here. You seek to do so by stealing the work of other wack-nuts who successfully suckered "gullible" people and then apply "said work" to your own agenda. Probably just trying to lull me close so you can drain my bank account. Are you asking me to return to your nonsensical collection of rambling thoughts and incoherent speculations on magic? Sorry...you won't be getting a download from me. Never mistake me for a person who gives a damn what a liar/scam-artist approves or disapproves of. You are selling "lies and fantastical impossibilities" and painting them as fact and worthy of attention. We both know what caliber of "mind" would gravitate towards your rubbish. We both know you are here seeking nothing but zealots and idiots to buy into your little fantasy world created ONLY to support you...The Pope of Atlantis. Seriously...are you above the age of 12? If not, I forgive you for this little game of make believe. "You are a rip off con artist using this website for gullible folks, knowing full well how many flock here daily. You are a con-man...and a horrible one at that, seeing as your scams could only "net" you "one type of sucker"...the gullible kind. And I am TELLING you right to your cyber face...you are a scammer as far as any untrained eye can tell. Add to that my personal "research and understanding" of cults, and my eye becomes less "untrained" and more "aware" to this type of crap. Hows it feel to know that you have sold ALMOST "none of these books"? I meet many people like you very often. Some go to jail, some just go away, Grant-Antony Zeebroek to Jon Gee 5:05 PM Right here's a few things I have to say so far, seeing as I sorta had to stop reading, no offense First the prologue, Hitler and Leatherface Etc. there was absolutely no need for that and it's pushing boundaries far too much, it added nothing to the overall thing and felt far too random, it also wouldn't be allowed in a film without a ban Second, the dialogue is very cheesy, and not in the way the original did it, it drags and it's in interesting, the characters basically ramble Third, a lot of random events, that don't see, connected at all, to make it worse you've got kids in it, that would instantly stop this movie being made due to the subject matter Fourth, the names of characters DunAjew etc. is very cheesy in again a bad way Overall I stopped reading at page 20 as it had all the marks of a very amateur piece of work It's not obvious t all you enjoy the franchise as quite frankly this is a butchery, it's awful to read and that means when translated to screen it'll be damn-near unwatchable, even Texas Chainsaw 3D which many say was awful had an amazing screenplay. On that everyone agrees, yet the actual product was mediocre and a letdown, so think how yours would translate to screen In the end, I'd SH you're not even a fan of the series as this screenplay destroys everything in the canon etc. so far I can tell straight away you've tried going on from ideas in Next Generation; awful idea especially as

you wanted Hooper involved who hates all the movies after the second excluding 3D which he helped to write I may come across as harsh but really, this screenplay was an insult and it rally angered me, it's weird for no reason other than you wanting it to be like a Rob Zombie film, the dialogue is awful. If I was to compare it to any other movie/script I'd say " Ax'Em " search it I don't begrudge you for trying but really, you need a bit more discipline For example, I can tell you was trying to develop the characters but you did it through the wrong means, there was nothing to make us sympathise or hate them to. from: Shek Singhal to: Rodin Coil Google Group date: Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:34 PM subject: MarkedForDeletion - benpadiah - T4 time-travel technology You said you would welcome a debate as to why I say that "time travel is impossible".

Well here is my debate, granted it is a bit esoteric so you can choose for yourself whether to accept my means of debate or not. My means of debate is this: 1. When I set up my human body (which I recognize to be a portal to the multidimensional universe) as a truth machine and ask the universe (source) - "Time travel is possible" - the response I receive is 'false" (or "fiction" in the terminology of "Formal System of Metaphysics"). 2. Therefore - it is. I would love to include links to your books on vortexmath.com as you had originally submitted, but I am unable to because your taking about time travel directly contradicts the vortex math movement explicitly stating several times that "time travel is not possible". This is a fact stated several times by all the people who you might consider to be representative of vortex math.

So I would love to have you be "one" with us at the vortex math movement - but you will never be unless: 1) You figure out that your method of ascertaining truth was wrong, and you re-evaluate your truth test. 2) I somehow figure out that my method of ascertaining truth was wrong - and I re-evaluate my truth-test. Your page is marked for deletion within 48-hours: http://vortexspace.org/display/~benpadiah/T4++Theoretical+Time+Travel+Technolog y Reason: Vortex Math explicitly states that time travel is NOT possible. Your posting about time travel on vortex math official servers is drawing negative and contradictory attention to the vortex mathematics movement. We do not want readers to be given contradictory messages - so you are urged if you want to talk about time travel please do it elsewhere. Within 48-hours, you are asked to either: 1) Please delete all content related to time travel from vortex math related servers. 2) Appeal to the other members on this group for them to support and voice their agreement to your above page. Thanks, Shek I have noticed your website as well as the amount of information produced in the youtube videos on the website. Although it is quite complicated to understand some of the material located on the videos, seeing as the articles of information are only expressed in youtube videos. As a recommendation I would highly advise you to provide articles on your website containing this information in extensive detail, along with adding revised videos outlining information regarding atlantean democracy, enochian language and symbolism, telepathy, the r = 0 domain, and how this fits in with using the enochian language system in order to create an international telepathic system. (This has already been discussed in one of the paragraphs I have typed in this post. Thus you can use that as one of the articles for your website.) Additionally the information regarding funding can also use some revision as stated in this post in one of the paragraphs above. Rather then having people giving you donations, how about you take note on what the AOI has done

regarding funding for their main goal. The AOI have created ebooks online containing information (some of which had been mentioned on the AC website, and most of which has not), using that information they produced and sold these ebooks to people, via amazon.com. It would be highly effective towards gaining funding if you also produced some novels containing more of the information regarding what is on your videos and articles, and revealing some information that cannot be found on the website or the videos. Note: The videos should be in slideshow format, as well as containing some articles of information. An example of this format can be seen in videos produced by the readers of the AC website. Your website can also use some improvements in the aspects of design, logos, and color-scheme. I will advise you to make the site more mature looking site with a color scheme similar to that of the AC website. Also the it would look very mature and professional if you utilized the same format for your articles as we use on our facebook page. If you would like me to assist you in producing such a site then I would be glad to assist. As for your claims of being ''The Pythagorean Illuminati'' as made in this statment you sent to our page: Greetings from the ''Pythagorean Illuminati''. You are not considered the Pythagorean Illuminati until otherwise proven. If you can provide enough evidence of those claims to be considered true then you deserve to be called that title.

Otherwise you are claiming plagerism by taking the Pythagorean Illuminati's name.

Hopefully this information and suggestions assist you in the aspects of becoming a more mature looking society. Regards -N- Illuminated Philosopher via @Bill Allin Jonathan, has zen made you as crazy as this? This is nothing but babbling nonsense. my mind is open, but not scrambled eggs. I have had several mystical experiences, but also seen drug damaged genius gone crazy. Spewing meaningless drivel is not high intelligence or enlightenment, but insanity. Drugs do not make anyone special.

Jonathan is not sane. I do not need protection. You have misled only yourself. If I am presumptuous it is only because I based my conclusions on a limited few of your statements, which are indeed meaningless drivel. Maybe you are not insane. Prove it.

Act like it. Speak like it.

Dracon wrote: I've tried watching a few, but his monotone and hesitant speech really bugs me :/ as for the content, some of it seems legitimate, but the comments say otherwise.

Cosine wrote: One criticism I saw in the video comments quite often was that he, far too frequently, repeats himself. This gives him the appearance of just trying to fill-out a video with words/etc. to try to lengthen things artificially. In other words, quite a few videos could probably be shortened significantly if he just cut-down on repetition of ideas and concepts. Apart from the metaphysical-themed videos I also watched his Star Wars videos. They were neat, but I cringed every time he used "light-year" as a measure of time rather than distance crowdk0ntrol wrote: It's like he's on to something but on a tangent of a tangent universe.