T4: Theoretical Time-Travel Technology

:: T4 :: :: T4 :: : Theoretical Time: Theoretical TimeTravelTechnology Technology : Travel : (2018 edition)

(2014 edition)

by:by: Jonathan Barlow Gee Jonathan Barlow Gee

“T4: Theoretical Time-Travel Technology” (2018 edition) by: Jonathan Barlow Gee is hereby copyright (©) by the author this, April 13th, 2018. a publication of: www.benpadiah.com

insanity clause #23: Please do not share with others the web addresses for direct download from my site that are for sale there. However, once you have a copy of any one of my works, you are allowed, by Jonathan Gee, the author of said work, to copy it and distribute it freely. If you claim you wrote it, or that you came up with the ideas for it yourself, you should be challenged to determine if you can prove your claim with knowledge of the material superior to my own. If you can, I will concede the work to your credit, but if you cannot, then the work will remain both of ours to teach and give to whom we choose.

:: Table of Contents :: Introduction to the Premise: “The Green Door” Part 1: What is time-travel?

Part 2: Is time-travel possible?

Part 3: How does time-travel work?

Part 3: Now Known Physics of Time-Travel Part 4: The Temporal Law of Paradoxes Historical Introduction: “A Brief History of Time-Travel” Part 1: pre-history of time-travel.

Part 2: the hyper-sleeper awakens.

Part 3: dawn of the time-machine.

Part 4: modern loops & paradoxes.

Part 5: future trends & consequences.

Introductory Footnotes Part 1: Measures Part 2: The Imploding Multiverse T1 = Basic geometry intro. Time-Loops The 1-d model @ 180° The 2-d model @ 45° The 1-d model @ 90° The 3-d model @ 45° The 1-d model @ 45° The 4-d model @ 45° Other Loops T2 = Intermediate geometry Multi-Dimensional Polytopes: A “Hyperspace Alphabet” Geometric Manifolds Geometric Gnomon Further Gnomonic Geometry T3 = Advanced Geometry The 1-knot The 3-knot T4 = Creating A Wormhole Wormhole Geometry Wormhole Mathematics Stationary Gravitational Wormholes Moving Electromagnetic Wormholes T5 = Cosmology The Combined Reimann-DeSitter Metric Tensor appendix A (additional diagrams) appendix B (additional writings) appendix C (2018 extras)

Introduction to the Premise: “The Green Door” Part 1: What is time-travel?

Part 2: Is time-travel possible?

Part 3: How does time-travel work?

Part 4: Now Known Physics of Time-Travel (c. 2012 AD) Part 5: The Temporal Law of Paradoxes To introduce the premise of time-travel, it is wise to present a short series of clarifications for certain terms and implications so as to dispel any preconceived notions the audience may have as to this content. To this end, allow me to posit a few rhetorical questions about “time-travel” and attempt to answer them in an understandable manner.

Part 1: What is time-travel?

Time-travel is, by literal definition, the motion of a person or object from one point in the “spacetime” continuum to another. This can occur in any number of different ways including motion through “space” instantly - or in zero “time;” motion through “time” without changing location in “space;” motion in both “space” and “time” at once; or else becoming stationary and experiencing no motion of “space” or “time” at all.

Because all matter-energy in the spacetime continuum is in constant motion, we are all, technically, “time-traveling” always (time keeps “passing” through us even while we are relatively stationary) - only in a single, constant direction called the “standard arrow” of “entropy” or “time.” Thus, this single, ubiquitous “direction” of universal motion for all objects combined is considered the “Hubble constant” rate of universal expansion and approximated to be, on average, around the “speed of light” or “c.” This “constant rate” of omni-cosmic motions in a single, 7th (and otherwise physically “impossible”) direction signifies “time” as momentum (or acceleration) in 1/2 of a fourth “spatial dimension” (a full dimension being a scalar pair of opposite directions).

Our present cosmos has three “spatial dimensions” (each a pair of opposite directions such that: height = up/down; width = left/right; and length = front/back) but is also expanding homogeneously in a 7th direction along the “standard arrow” of time. Modern astrophysicists debate whether there is merely empty void into which our cosmos is expanding or some “strange attractor” of “exotic mass” beyond the speed of light that is pulling our cosmos outward. Some speculate it is gravity from a cosmos beyond our own.

According to modern “string theorist” quantum-astrophysicists, our cosmos as it formed from the “Big Bang” and as it exists now is only one possible format for such a cosmos that could have arisen at the beginning of local universal “time;” others may also exist.

Part 2: Is time-travel possible?

If one is already moving “past” to “future” in time at a relatively fixed-constant rate, is it possible to accelerate or decelerate and even reverse one’s motion in this direction also?

The answer to this question is obvious, but on a cosmic scale depends entirely on the overall geometric shape of - and amount of mass in - our local universe.

Earth is round, so it is noon on one side of the planet while it is midnight on the opposite side, such that the circumference of the planet’s equator takes around 24 “hours” to rotate a full “day.” A person nowadays can board an airplane and travel at ~30,000 feet above earth’s surface at around 500 miles per hour (which is about 1/2 the velocity of earth’s rotation - occurring at a rate of ~1000 MPH). If they do so traveling opposite the direction of earth’s rotation (that being from “west” to “east”), thus traveling “east” to “west,” that person will arrive in an earlier “time-zone” in the same day as they departed and, if they travel in the same direction as earth’s rotation, thus traveling “west” to “east,” they will arrive in a later “time-zone” than the one from which they started. The common result of this is “jet-lag,” where a traveler’s circadian rhythms and “biological clock” must take some time to adapt and reset to the difference in the timing of the daylight and night-time hours at their new location on earth’s spherical surface. “Jet-lag” is a symptom of adaptation to an alteration in one’s temporal environment that occurs on the scale of people traveling over the surface of planet earth, but these differences in “temporal environment” only occur on earth due to the planet’s regular rotational duration (so-called “days”) and revolutionary cycle around the sun (so-called “years”).

Because of these “closed geometric” parameters, we may experience “jet-lag” as a byproduct from a kind of “time-travel” - changing from one “hour”-long “time-zone” to another - as we traverse the spherical-geometry of planet earth.

But we do not yet know the exact dimensions nor shape of our own entire cosmos. It is held by astrophysicists and mathematicians that there maybe at least 3 different possible “shapes” the cosmos could take overall, and depending on which of these 3 “shapes” it takes (which, again, depends on its amount of mass and its velocity of propulsion) the cosmos may have 1 of 3 different types of outcome for its overall history across all time:

if the cosmos has a “closed geometry,” then the whole cosmos will eventually assume a basically spherical shape and this will expand until reaching a point of “critical mass,” at which point it will begin to collapse in on itself in what some call a “Big Crunch;” if the cosmos has a “flat geometry,” then the whole cosmos will eventually assume a basic, planar shape and this will expand until it reaches a point of “critical mass” and then simply stop exhibiting entropy (presumably “freezing” all motion into permanent stasis); and if the cosmos has an “open geometry,” then the whole cosmos will eventually assume a basic hyperbolic “saddle” shape and this could continue expanding - and even increase in the rate thereof - without any innately predetermined ending.

It is unlikely that the whole cosmos functions according to only one of these types of geometry alone in its entirety and it is more likely that the current cosmos exhibits traits indicative of all 3 of these types - differing in “geometry” in different locations of spacetime - as well as other, as of yet unpredicted and unexplored, “shapes” and geometries beyond merely these 3. What can be said with certainty, however, is that where spacetime forms regular cycles, “time-travel” between points on these may more easily occur.

Part 3: How does time-travel work?

Consider point A in spacetime (as coordinates {a1,b1,c1,T1} for its location in 3dimensions and in time) and point B in spacetime (as coordinates {x1,y1,z1,T1}) some

distance away from point A, but occurring simultaneously to point A within the same physical cosmos. Say you wanted to travel from point A to point B, leaving point A at Time-1 and arriving at point B simultaneously at T1, regardless of the distance in space between points A and B. This is popularly called “folding spacetime,” which can be done in any of a variety of patterns if one can generate a strong enough gravity-wave to attain “hyperspatial” speeds without destroying themselves and / or their surroundings in the process.

To attain “hyperspatial” or “faster than light” speeds maybe accomplished in a number of different ways as well, such as (at least): quantum-teleportation via a “wormhole,” or a gravitational engine AKA a “time-machine.” It is not thought a “traversable” wormhole would necessarily require a vessel to protect one’s body, such as a “time-machine” provides, although it is hypothesized that, to stabilize a wormhole long enough to step through it would probably require some kind of very high-energy device to accomplish.

“Hyperspace” - the energy field outside of and beyond local universal light-speed - may provide near-zero resistance and friction, but it is generally thought that, to weather the inertial distortion on a person from traveling up to such speeds, a vessel would be useful to protect one’s biological body. In this case, the “time-machine” maybe viewed as alike a “decompression chamber” preventing one from getting the “bends” after too rapid a change to environmental pressure. Perhaps it could be reasoned inanimate objects may safely traverse a wormhole, but living biological tissue is better guarded all around by some form of vessel. In theory, “inside” this vessel one may retain their own innate inertia while traveling at “near-relativistic,” “light” and even “hyperspatial” speeds.

Anything or anyone’s innate inertia (that is, its condition of being relatively more “mobile” or more “stationary”) constitutes an “open temporal lock” - that is, the inertia of the thing or person and that of their surrounding environment are the same. The individual’s “temporal key” - their inertia as an object of matter or, to the extent they are energetic, their innate “soul” or unique personal electromagnetic energy field - and their environmental “temporal lock” - the temporal cycles of their area - fit and thus form an “open” position. However, when this “key” is removed from this “lock,” not only must it adapt to fit a new and different “temporal lock,” but the “lock” it used to fit and that was formerly “open” to it “closes.” If one changes their “temporal lock” one must change their own “temporal key” to fit the new “lock,” and, if one wishes to return, one must change their own “key” to what their former “lock” has by then become. This inertia, aura or “key” itself is innately more stable than the environmental “lock” as the environment changes constantly at a much more rapid rate than the individual can usually adapt to it. The summing of all this amounts to “entropy” - the lagging of the “key” behind the “lock” until the “lock” has changed so much the “key,” even if relatively unchanging itself, no longer fits.

Part 4: Now Known Physics of Time-Travel (c. 2012 AD) From the 1600’s Enlightenment era writings of Isaac Newton came the long-held concept of “absolute” or “invariant” time: the premise that - behind all motions of matter and energy - remained a fixed, inviolable and unmoving “vacuum” or void and that this

remains - still and motionless - for the entire duration of the cosmos’ existence. By the early 1900’s, this notion had been transferred onto the concept of “ether energy” or “vacuum energy,” which a young physicist named Albert Einstein proposed was also constantly in motion itself, however at the “microwave background radiation” velocity of “c” (the constant rate symbolizing the “speed of light” or the speed of a photon in perfect vacuum, equal to one “Planck distance” per one “Planck time”).

An early example of “time variance” (as opposed to “invariant” or “absolute time”) was allowed by Einstein’s “relativity” principles (of 1905): “time-dilation” was posited as possible, such that (as in the “Twin Paradox”) a person traveling in space at nearrelativistic speeds will age slower than a person who remains on earth and likewise (due to the relativistic equivalency in effect of acceleration and gravity in vacuum-space) a clock sunk deeper into a “gravity-well” (or a core centralization of the force of gravity, such as, in an extreme case, a “black-hole”) will tick slower than another identical one, kept further away. Time as a measure of inertia changes relative to location in space.

Also allowed by the “distance metric” of Einstein’s “General Relativity,” a cosmos could come into existence, similar to our own, only universally rotating instead of expanding.

In this premise (referred to as the “Goedel metric”), the trajectories of objects may intersect themselves in “closed time-like curves,” such that a point in an object’s effective-future vector maybe found also in its causal-past trajectory. This is, in some sense, alike planetary and even electron orbits in our own cosmos, only occurring such that a future-event on any given orbit may effect a past-event along the same course.

The closest approximation to such phenomenon we find in our own cosmos (which is universally expanding rather than rotating) are wormholes - theoretically “traversable” zero-time portals that puncture the continuum to connect distant points in space to one another instantaneously. Such a wormhole (sometimes called an “Einstein-Rosen bridge”) is simply a larger version of the same effect that occurs as “quantum-tunneling” in the very small realm of sub-atomic electron orbital energy-level shells, when an electron is struck by a photon or when it changes its orbital energy-level shell.

Different amounts of electromagnetic quanta stabilize in any orbital energy-level shell around an atomic nucleus, thus forming the “classical elements” of chemistry. However, the shape of these orbits and why exactly they resonate into stable patterns only given certain electron charges remain at present (2018) mysteries of “quantum gravity.”

Very recent evidence of faster than light (or FTL) “gravity waves” may prove the long premised conjecture that matter-energy, moving faster than the speed of light, will travel “backwards” in time. The general example is of a signal pulsed at near-relativistic speeds and a signal pulsed FTL, wherein the signal pulsed at near-relativistic speeds will arrive with near-simultaneity to when it was transmitted, but the signal pulsed at FTL speeds may literally arrive prior to the moment of its initially being broadcast.

According to Greenberger and Svozil, the “uncertainty principle” apparently allowing such “quantum-tunneling” (either FTL or not) also allows a “collapse of wave-function” from a more “random” condition (such as “quantum super-position” - exemplified by “Shroedinger’s Cat” being at once both alive and dead) into a “standing wave-state,” or a relatively more “stable” condition (such as being only either alive or dead). Thus, by the criteria of their theory, the past when observed from the present “collapses” into a singular, deterministic condition, however the future when observed from the present remains in a condition of constant flux between many different possible options. When we act as choice-maker for an outcome in a situation, then the future becomes the present, the present becomes the past and our options immediately appear to have been necessary and unavoidable.

Part 5: The Temporal Law of Paradoxes Illogical things do exist and illogical acts yet persist even now - as is all too obvious looking around. Therefore, it is not possible for everything to constantly adhere to logic and, to the extent there is deviation from logic in reality, there may exist irrational, vague temporal paradoxes instead of logical, axiomatic physical laws in these mysterious regions. It is posited that “modal logic” may prove time “self-consistent” - that is to say: “if it is necessarily true that the past happened in a certain way, then it is false and impossible for the past to have occurred in any other way.” In short, if the “past” is deterministically inalterable, then a traveler to it from the “future” could only behave while in the “past” according to an increasingly unavoidable series of causes and effects which they would experience encroaching on their own independent free-will. No matter

what the traveler would do to avoid “fate,” it would only all that much more insure the “predestined” outcome. According to this “Novikov self-consistency principle” the past cannot be changed; doing so is so logically inconsistent as to be physically impossible.

The reason temporal “self-consistency” is considered a “principle” of time-travel science is that it resolves the “Grandfather paradox” without violating chronological cause-andeffect. The “grandfather paradox” results in increasing inconsistencies emerging in the future as a result of changing the past. The premise of this paradox is that, if one had a time-machine, they maybe able to travel back in time to either kill their grandfather, commit “auto-infanticide” by killing their own younger self, or otherwise attempt to prevent themselves from having traveled back in time to begin with. To the extent they could succeed, it creates a logical conundrum that apparently contradicts the physical laws of the cosmic continuum. But this paradox is just the “tip of the iceberg.”

In theory, a “time-loop” may exist wherein, when an arbitrary condition is met - such as a death experience or a clock tolling, etc. - the events begin again with one or more people retaining the memories from the previous loop. Although they may appear more similar or unique each repeat, “time-loops” always reset to the same starting point.

Another theory explains “causal loops” - which are auto-correlated, isomorphic, selforiginating, stable constants. An example of a “causal loop” would be a billiard ball striking its own past-self and directing its course into a time-machine or wormhole that ejects it so that it strikes itself and directs its course into the time-machine or wormhole, etc. etc. etc., ad infinitum. Referring to any object, person or signal whose effects include causing itself, “causal loops” appear to “come from nowhere” or to be “selfperpetuating.” The most common-name for an event that results in a “causal loop” is a “bootstrap paradox,” also called an “information paradox” or “ontological paradox.” The most telling name for the result of a “bootstrap paradox” is “Jinn,” coined by Andrei Lossev and Igor Novikov in 1992 - where objects without origin are called “Jinn of the first kind” and pure data with a similar, self-referential start are called “Jinn of the second kind.”

Another term for these “causal loops” or “Jinn” is “closed time-like curves” (or CTCs) so-called for being the result of a usually straight “time-line” becoming warped into an isomorphic knot. Stephen Hawking’s 1992 proposal of a “chronology protection conjecture” attempts to limit the influence of these “jinn” or “CTCs” as being confined to only “sub-microscopic” events, presumably accounting for such sub-atomic “interconnectivities” as proposed by the Bohm interpretation including “quantum teleportation” (quantum tunneling) and presumably resolving the “EPR paradox” (or Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox) for the effect of “quantum entanglement” (that Einstein called “spooky action at a distance”).

Along similar trajectories, in 1991 David Deutsch proposed that a time-traveler into the past whom causes change there would fall into a form of “parallel time-line” or “alternate dimension” type of scenario, modified from Hugh Everett III’s “many-worlds interpretation” (or MWI); however, such a time-traveler whom altered the past would, themselves, maintain a “self-consistent” personal time-line, thus allowing the “Novikov self-consistency principle” and the “chronology protection conjecture” to account for any extra energy thus generated (which would otherwise violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics) as being absorbed back into a primary or mainstream world-line. For this reason, the interacting “MWI” of parallel-dimensional time-lines that could be exchanged for one another through a “time-travel” (or CTC) type of event, although probably validly accurate when combined with Hawking’s premise that anti-temporal events can only occur on the smallest size-scales, remains relatively unexplored since.

Historical Introduction: “A Brief History of Time-Travel” Part Part Part Part Part

1: 2: 3: 4: 5:

pre-history of time-travel. the hyper-sleeper awakens. dawn of the time-machine. modern loops & paradoxes. future trends & consequences.

Part 1: the pre-history of time-travel (temporal relativity & time-dilation in ancient wisdom myths) The relativity of time - for which we moderns may think to credit Einstein’s discovering was known of to multiple ancient cults and cultures.

Chronologically, we must mention first the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze age Sumerians from the south of modern-day Iraq and Saudi-Arabia - during the Uruk period (~4000 to 3100 BC), who maintained a legend about 7 antediluvian sages - the Apkallu - that were sent by the Annunaki (god) of the city of Eridu named “Enki,” called also “Ea.” From fragmentary tablets found in Assur, of the late second millennium BC, and from Kassite period (14th century BC) Tell el-Amarna, we learn of Adapa - a son of Enki; from the (now yet lost) city of Dilmun; first of these 7 Apkallu sages; and who served as priest at the E’Apsu Temple in Eridu. The Apkallu were described as being partially “praradufish” (probably carp), and Adapa as being a great fisherman. One day, his story goes, he was fishing when the south-west wind, whose Annunaki god was called Puzuzu, happened by and accidentally capsized him. Adapa, in his anger, then broke the wings of Ninlil, the south wind, and cursed Puzuzu. For this, Puzuzu brought a civil suit against Adapa before Anu, then King of the Annunaki pantheon, and Adapa was called to testify before Anu. Enki, Adapa’s patron deity, advised Adapa not to imbibe any food or drink while he was in the Annunaki pantheon’s native realm, for it would be as poison to him.

However, Anu, from sympathy for Adapa following his impassioned testimony, offered Adapa the food and drink of immortality instead, but - being loyal to Enki’s warning Adapa refused to partake.

A similar story derives from the Gupta period (4th century AD) Sanskrit epic poem, the Mahabharata, written down by Vyasa - whom had been the Sage Apantaratamas in his last life, and was, as Vyasa, the grandson of the wandering Sage Parashara (who is credited with being the author of the first Purana, Vishnu Purana). The events described in the Mahabharata, however, antedate its authorship by some 600 years, stemming from Iron Age India in the 10th century - around 1,100 - BC. In the Mahabharata, King Raivata Kakudmi is described, who was able to take his daughter Revati with him and travel to Brahma-loka (the plane of existence where the Creator resides) to confer with Brahma directly. However, when Kakudmi and Revati arrived, Brahma was engaged in attending a symphony by the Gandharvas - male nature spirits, some part bird or horse, who guarded the soma and served as messengers between men and the gods - so the father and daughter politely waited for 27 chatur-yugas (each a cycle of four yugas) -

totalling 108 yugas - until the performance ended. Brahma then explained that, while they waited in Brahma-loka, such a long time had passed in their own world that all their friends and family had already grown old and died. Upon the return of father and daughter to their home-lands, the Bhagavata Purana describes, they found the race of men had become "dwindled in stature, reduced in vigor, and enfeebled in intellect."

Although the “book of watchers” and “astronomical book” contained in the apocryphal gospel of Enoch - the antediluvian Hebrew patriarch and great-grandfather of Noah were likely finalized only as early as the 3rd century BC, the “book of dreams” - which describes an allegorical history of Israel until the period of the Maccabean Revolt (from 167 - 160 BC) - might not have been composed until then. Again, however, the events described in the work are antedated long prior to its probable era of actual authorship, and involve a canonically biblical character supposedly from prior to the Mesopotamian flood. In the Enochian “book of watchers” and “book of dreams,” Enoch is transported out of his body and shown a vast vista of geography and a very long duration of time, both compressed into a series of brief visions wherein Enoch is able to travel and perceive events occurring much faster than in his usual waking body. The archangel Uriel provided Enoch with an annual calendar based on astronomical observations and measurements of the surface of the earth that was 364 days long (12 months of 30 days each plus 4 holidays) and that was being used to mark the Jubilee festivals by the Essene sect at Qumran around the 3rd century BC. Whether the “book of Enoch” is authentically antediluvian in origin - as maintained to this day by the Ethiopian Orthodox Church - or not, it does present a very detailed description of a series of events we might consider, in modern terms, as alike an extraterrestrial abduction. The ability to accurately interpret dream-symbolism - alike the later Prophets of Israel - appears to be a unique aspect of the apocryphal Enochian literature, which should also be placed in the Hebrew Merkaba literary tradition, along with the stories of “Jacob’s Ladder” and “Ezekiel’s Wheels” wherein are described the ascent of the soul and descent of angels amidst the hierarchy later described in great detail in the Zohar.

Lastly among the “time-travel” type of literary genre from works about times prior to the lifetime of Christ and Pythagorean year zero, we come to 7th or 6th century BC Greek seer and philosopher-poet, Epimenides, whom, according to 3rd century AD biographer of the Greek philosophers, Diogenes Laërtius (in his work Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, book 1.109–115), was tending sheep near his home in Knossos, on the isle of Crete, when he wandered after a stray but, unable to find it, fell asleep in a cave of Mt. Ida, sacred to Zeus. When Epimenides awoke, according to Diogenes, 57 years had passed, and Epimenides found his younger brother was, by then, an old man.

Epimenides, then a contemporary of Pythagoras and Solon, is credited as gifted with prophecy and as a founder of Orphism; when he died, his skin - which was covered in tattooed writing alike the Greeks’ slaves of the time - was preserved at the courts of the ephores in Sparta. In Sura Al-Kahf of the Holy Quran, a similar story is recounted about the “7 sleepers of Ephesus” - a group of early Christians who hid in a cave in 250 AD to escape the persecutions of Roman Emperor Decius, but fell into a “miraculous sleep.”

When they awoke, some 200 years had passed, and they emerged during the reign of Theodosius II (401 - 450 AD) to discover the whole empire had become Christian.

So, whether as “time-dilation” - as experienced by Adapa while in the court of Anu, or by Kakudmi and Revati while in the Brahma-loka - or as “time-invariance” - as experienced

by Enoch in his prophetic, visionary dreams - or even as “suspended animation,” “cryogenic stasis” or “hyper-sleep” - as in the peculiar cases of Epimenides and the “7 sleepers of Ephesus” - we can find almost as many examples of differing methods and results in ancient literature for, as we can possible examples of, the “time-travel” genre therein.

Part 2: time-travel & the dark ages (the “hyper-sleeper” & “forward” time-travel in fairytales & folk-lore) Over the last aeon - since around the lifetime of Christ - the “hyper-sleeper” model has been the primary foible used to explore the premise of “forward” time-travel, and has sprung up, either diffusely or independently, in a wide variety of cultures around the world.

In the modern state of New York, northeast America, a Seneca native legend from an unknown date of origin preserves a tale of a young squirrel hunter who spends a night with “Little People,” only to discover this “night” lasted a whole year.

In Orkney, an archipelago in the Northern Isles of Scotland, there is an apocryphal legend of a drunken fiddler whom passes 50 earth-years in 2 hours - while attending a party of trolls under the Salt Knowe burial mound adjacent to the Ring of Brodgar before he returned home to Stenness a stranger.

According to the Irish story of Niamh and Oisin, Oisin - the female Niamh’s male lover rides her magic horse back to Ireland after escaping on it with her to Tir Na nOg, “land of the ever-young;” upon his return to Ireland, he discovers 300 years have passed, and when he stoops to help some men trying to move a boulder, he falls off his magic horse and ages those 300 years while falling to the ground.

The Talmudic Mishnah, Taanit 19a, states that, around 60 AD, a Hebrew “miracleworker” named Honi ha-M'agel (meaning Honi the “circle-maker”), fell into a coma concealed inside a rock-formation beneath a carob tree for 70 years - the length of time it takes a carob sprout to reach fruition; then, when he awoke, no one believed his identity, so he prayed for mercy and died.

Dating from the 4th century AD, "The Mountain of the Rotten Axe Handle" is a Chinese legend about a woodcutter named Wang Chi who ventured into the woods of Lanke Mountain and encountered 2 old men (the gods Bei Dou - the Big Dipper - and Nan Dou the stars of Sagittarius), who were seated playing the board-game “go” on a rock set between them; 1 of them gave Wang Chi something like a date and he fell into a trance after waking from which he found the 2 old men had vanished, his axe-handle had turned to dust and he himself had grown a long beard.

In the 720 AD, Fudoki for Tango Province, Nihon Shoki, and the Man'yōshū, is an otogi banashi (Japanese fairy-tale) about Urashima Tarō - a fisherman whom rescues a turtle that takes him to the Dragon Palace (Ryūgū-jō) beneath (or beyond) the sea and whom spends what he thinks is a few days there, returning only to find 300 years have gone past in his world and - when he opens a forbidden origami “tamatebako” box - he instantly becomes an old man.

Compiled originally from the 18 Maha Puranas of Veda Vyasa, author also of the Mahabharata, describing events in the 10th century BC - the Bhagavata Purana, written down around 1030 AD, records the story of Muchukunda - whom aided the devas (deities) against the asuras (demons) and was rewarded by Indra (king of the devas) with uninterrupted sleep - following the resolution of their prolonged conflict by Hari Krishna. So Muchukunda, the warrior in heaven (where 1 year lasts 360 earth-years), fell into a deep coma inside a cave in either Mount Girnar in the state of Gujarat, or Ananthagiri hills in the state of Telangana, and was only awakened later by Kalayavan, the great Yavana warrior king - whom was burnt to ashes by Muchukunda’s waking gaze for doing so.

In 1800, the work by German Protestant theologian Johann Karl Christoph Nachtigal published pseudonymously as “Otmar” - called “Volkssagen” (German for “folk-tales”), contained the story “Peter Klaus the Goatherd” - about a German goatherd from the fictional village of Sittendorf whom, while searching for strays, finds a party of gamers in the woods and, after imbibing their wine, wakes from a coma 20 years later.

The German folk-tale, “Peter Klaus,” and the Orkney tale of Salt Knowe informed Washington Irving’s 1819 publication of his short-story, “Rip Van Winkle,” from whence this ancient moral about “hyper-sleep” and “time-dilation” appears to have entered our modern lexicon.

Part 3. The dawn of time-machines (“backward” time-travel & the first time-machine in modern science-fiction) In 1733 AD, Irish author Samuel Madden wrote the satirical work of speculative fiction “Memoirs of the Twentieth Century” - a dossier of diplomatic correspondences between British diplomats abroad in Constantinople, Rome, Paris and Moscow and a “Lord High Treasurer” under King George VI in London, England. In Madden’s hypothesized 20th century, a Jesuit Papacy under Pope Paul IX has achieved world-wide dominance - with Spain, the Holy Roman Empire, King Louis XIX of France, large estates in Africa, China and Paraguay - all beholden to rule from a unified Italy. Constantinople has fallen to Tartar rule, and Russia has become expansionist as well, annexing Finland, Poland, and parts of Persia and Turkey. “Memoirs” is the first work in which information from the future is imagined as being accessible in the past; Madden has his narrator attribute this method of writing “news from the future” to being delivered the articles in the figurative past by his personal “guardian angel.” A similar motif - a “good fairy” - was used to explain the phenomenon of “forward” time-travel in the 1781 work, “Anno 7603,” by Johan Herman Wessel - Danish-Norwegian poet and playwright - wherein Leander and

Julie, the plot’s main-characters, are transported to a distant future where Amazonian gender-roles prevail, and only women are soldiers.

The 1836 work by Russian novelist, Alexander Veltman - called in Cyrillic: “Predki Kalimerosa: Aleksandr Filippovich Makedonskii,” or in English: “The Forebears of Kalimeros: Alexander, son of Philip of Macedon” - uses a “hippogriff” (a fictional zoomorph combining the front of an eagle with the hind of a horse) as the “macguffin” that enables “backwards” time-travel to forward the plot-line. In this work, the narrator meets Aristotle and Alexander the Great, accompanies the latter on a military mission, and then returns to his home in the 19th century.

Another “backwards” time-travel tale from this era was published anonymously in the 1838 “Dublin Literary Magazine” as the short story, “Missing One’s Coach: An Anachronism,” in which the narrator waits beneath a tree in Newcastle upon Tyne, north-east England, for the coach out of town but is inexplicably transported (perhaps via dream, although it is not specified) backwards in time over 1000 years. He contacts the Venerable Bede (672 - 735 AD), then an English monk at the monastery of St. Peter and its companion monastery of St. Paul in the Kingdom of Northumbria of the Angles (contemporarily Monkwearmouth–Jarrow Abbey in Tyne and Wear, England), and attempts to explain to him the events of the coming centuries.

In the early 1800’s AD, the aforementioned American author, Washington Irving, brought the legend of the “hyper-sleeper” into the modern age with his work, inspired by the contemporary popularity of Jonathan Swift’s “Gulliver’s Travels,” called in turn “Rip Van Winkle,” and in the middle 1800’s came another comparable “classic of western literature” apparantly featuring time-invariance - alike in the apocryphal Book of Enoch English author Charles Dickens’ 1843 novella, “A Christmas Carol.” In this work, the antihero and recalcitrant protagonist, elderly miser Ebenezer Scrooge, is haunted by 4 apparitions on Christmas Eve - the ghosts of his former business partner, Jacob Marley, the ghosts of “Christmas Past,” “Christmas Present,” and “Christmas Yet to Come,” modeled ostensibly on the Hindu Trimurti pantheon - Brahma the creator, Vishnu the preserver and Shiva the destroyer - but with distinctly western characteristics (such as the grim reaper standing in for the role of Shiva as “Christmas Yet to Come”).

Yet another, clearly “backwards” time-travel story, was the 1861 book, “Paris avant les hommes” (Paris before Men), by the French botanist and geologist Pierre Boitard published posthumously - in which the protagonist is transported to the prehistoric past by a “lame demon” (a French pun on Boitard’s own name), where he encounters and interacts with a plesiosaur and an ape-like pre-human ancestor.

In 1881, two works about time-travel were released that would change the face and set the tone for almost all works of this burgeoning science-fiction sub-genre to follow.

Edward Everett Hale, an American Unitarian minister, published his short-story, “Hands Off,” about an unnamed being - possibly the soul of someone recently deceased (it is left unspecified) - whom interferes with ancient Egyptian history, preventing Joseph’s enslavement, and thereby creating an “alternate history” in a “parallel time-line;” this

was the first literary work to propose this, now commonplace, trope of “backwards” timetravel theory. The “New York Sun” daily newspaper published in that same year, 1881, the short-story by Edward Page Mitchell, the “Sun’s” editor, called “The Clock That Went Backward” - about two boys who find that, when they reverse the rotation of the hands on their Aunt Gertrude's antique 16th century clock, the “flow of time” is reversed, allowing the boys to time-travel to Leiden, south Holland in the 1500s to help relieve the Spanish siege that occurred there then. Although a machine - a clock - is used to allow “backwards” time-travel to occur, its method of working is not explained, and so this story remains only a precursor to the first tale of a true “time-machine.”

The first tale of a true “time-machine” - that is, a mechanical vessel for transporting a person’s biological body both “backwards” and “forwards” through time - was published in 1887 in Barcelona, Spain, by Spanish diplomat Enrique Gaspar y Rimbau, and was called “El anacronópete” (a neologism, explained to mean "who flies against time”). In this work, the “anacronópete” is an enormous cast iron box, propelled opposite earth’s rotation by electricity, which drives four large pneumatical devices ending in tubes for travel, as well as powering other machinery, including a device that produces the “García fluid,” or “fluid of inalterability,” which causes the passengers not to grow younger as they travel backwards in time. Written in the format of a zarzuela (light opera), the main-body of the work is made up of 3 primary acts, each with its own destination and adventure in past history. At the end of the 3rd act, the protagonist, don Sindulfo García, awakens to find himself in a theater watching a play by contemporary fellow sciencefiction author, Jules Verne (1828 - 1905). For point of reference, the “Time Machine” by HG Wells, which greatly popularized this concept, was not written and published until 1895, some 8 years chronologically following the “anacronopete.”

Part 4: modern time-travel (loops, spirals, ripples & other paradoxes of causality on film) As of the time I am writing this, in mid-October 2017, there are at least 42 films to have been released yet that deal specifically with the causality-conundrum of “time-loops” based largely on Einstein’s 1931 “grandfather” paradox - in which, by going back in time and killing one’s own grandfather, one creates an “impossible feedback loop” in the time-stream, where a causal paradox manifests itself as an obstacle to logic: for you to travel back in time, your grandfather lived and sired your parent, who sired you; but having travelled back in time, and killed your grandfather prior to his doing so, you would cease to have ever existed, and thus could not have travelled back in time to kill your grandfather, causing yourself to cease having existed, etc. etc. etc. It should be noted, also, I am personally no expert on this science-fiction, time-travel, time-loop subsub-genre; I have only seen 15 out of these ~42 films myself. Of these, however, I’d like to discuss a few in detail.

“La Jetée” (French for “the Jetty” - specifically referring to an outdoor viewing pier at an airport), a science-fiction short-film by French director, Chris Marker (1921 - 2012), was released in 1962 and won the Prix Jean Vigo for short-film. It is 28 minutes long, shot in black and white and - constructed almost entirely from still photos - it tells the story of a

post-nuclear war experiment in time travel. The plot-line of “La Jetee” is ultimately somewhat subjective due to its unique handling of the filmic medium, however a general plot-line can be established, as such: A prisoner (played by Davos Hanich) is living underground in the Palais de Chaillot galleries in post-WW3 Paris, France, and his captors use him in time-travel experiments, sending him back to the pre-war era, where he meets and falls in love with a woman he remembered seeing once as a child on the “jetty” of Orly airport, when he had also seen a man die. After being sent to the farfuture to retrieve an energy-source for the people of the post-war era, he realizes his captors mean to execute him. He is contacted by the people of the far-future, but asks them to send him to the pre-war past, to return him to the woman on the jetty. They do so, and, just as he realizes his own, younger self is present in the same crowd, he is approached by an agent of his captors and he realizes the man he had seen die on that jetty when he was a child was actually himself now that he was older. This film also led to the 1995 American neo-noir science-fiction film directed by Terry Gilliam, scripted by David and Janet Peoples, called “12 Monkeys,” under Universal Studios, and an, even more recent, 2015-18 TV series of the same name, produced by Atlas Entertainment, which produced the film, and Universal Cable Productions. Both the film and TV series “12 Monkeys” continue to fascinate me personally, and I mention them so briefly here only so I may (hopefully) address them more thoroughly later on.

“The Butterfly Effect” is a 2004 American psychological-thriller / supernatural-fiction film written and directed by Eric Bress and J. Mackye Gruber, inspired and influenced by the science-fiction short-story - by American novelist Ray Bradbury, published in the June 28, 1952, issue of Collier’s magazine - called “A Sound of Thunder” - in which a backwards time-traveling protagonist finds he accidentally altered the distant past resulting in at first subtle, but gradually more extreme alterations to his own original time-line. Bradbury’s ’52 “Thunder” had been a contribution to the study of what has since come to be called the “butterfly effect” of “chaos theory,” which states, in essence: “small causes can have larger effects.” In the ’04 film, starring Ashton Kutcher and Amy Smart, the protagonist discovers he has the ability to psychically regress himself into his own younger self, displacing his younger-self’s ego; this effect had caused “black-outs,” “missing time” and “memory blocks” in the childhood character, but these were thus explained as instances when the adult character was mentally inhabiting his own, younger self’s body. Ultimately, the plot-line is driven by the truism that altering the past results in (albeit highly unpredictable) alterations to the “present,” and thus, each time the main character returns to his adult-self, he finds increasingly horrible repercussions awaiting him having resulted from his misadventures into his own personal past.

“Looper” is a 2012 American neo-noir science-fiction thriller-film written and directed

by Rian Johnson, and produced by Ram Bergman and James D. Stern. In the most direct manner possible, this film cuts to the heart of what a “time-loop” is, and how it effects the psychologies (and physiologies) of the people it involves. Set in 2044 - in a future where time-travel will be invented (and instantly outlawed) 30 years later, and where a small percentage of the population have mutated to develop slight telekinetic capabilities - future criminal syndicates send targets for assassination back to the

“present” (in 2044), where so-called “loopers” are paid in solid silver bars to pull the trigger on them. When a “looper” eventually ends up assassinating their own, older self, it is called “closing their loop,” and pays off once in bars of solid gold. The penalties for a “looper” who “loses his loop” are, as we quickly learn, severe. Grossing $176 million in revenues on a $30 million production budget - while being nominated for 22 different international film awards, and of these winning 6, 5 of which went to writer / director Rian Johnson - “looper” ties its science-fictional strings of “psychokinesis” and “timetravel” together in an elegant and efficient way using a character-driven story-line.

Honorable mention in this category must include the 2014 Australian science-fiction thriller-film written and directed by Michael and Peter Spierig, called “Predestination” an adaptation of “dean of American science-fiction authors,” Robert Heinlein’s 1958-59 short-story, “All You Zombies.” The plot of both the ’59 short-story and ’14 featurelength film involves a protagonist whom we discover, as the plot progresses, was born by caesarian section as a female but, after being courted, impregnated and abandoned by an older stranger as a young woman, she suffers complications during the delivery of her baby that reveal she has both functional female and dormant male genitalia - a “true hermaphrodite.” She undergoes non-consensual “sexual reassignment surgery” and is made a male. The now-male protagonist seeks work as a writer, and eventually finds himself in a bar telling the bartender his story. The remainder of the plot-line revolves around the use of time-travel and trickery to lure this young male writer into the folds of the “Temporal Bureau,” a time-traveling secret police force that manipulates events in history.

Part 5: the future of time-travel (ethical considerations behind a veil of pure paradox) In order to better portray the premise of time-travel in our cultural arts and humanities, we must better understand the science that surrounds it and in order to better understand the science surrounding the probability of real-life time-travel, we must play out scenarios involving it in our cultural arts and humanities. In this way any topic, such as time-travel, maybe used to symbiotically and dialectically progress the “leading edge” of cultural development - in relation to both the “arts” or humanities and to the “crafts” or technological sciences.

In the “crafts,” or technological sciences, the progress of western knowledge about material reality - from Euclid to Newton - has developed a set of rules or “laws of physics” that govern all matter-energy in the space-time continuum. However, as 20th century quantum-mechanics has demonstrated, this certainty in “principles” cannot be applied to the sub-atomic size-scales of “particle-wave-packets” such as, for example, electrons and photons, existing in environments such as, for example, the “quark-gluon plasma” inside an atomic nucleus. Therefore, while such “rules” may apply as unbreakable “laws” in 3-dimensional material reality, in the extra dimension of “time” itself, these “rules” and “laws” may not only begin to break down, but they may become inapplicable altogether. In fact, at the moment of this writing, 3 paradoxes are all that we know of as governing the temporal dimension: 1. The “ontological,” “predestination” or

“boot-strap” paradox, also called a “causal loop,” occurs when a “future” event is the “cause” of a “past” event; 2. The “grandfather” or “consistency” paradox occurs when the past maybe changed, thus creating a contradiction; and 3. The “Fermi” paradox, which can be adapted for this topic, poses the question: “if time travel is possible, where are all the time-travelers?” It should be duly noted however that these “paradoxes” are literally exact polar opposites of strict, “written in stone” laws - such as those governing material physics. A paradox presupposes a causal conundrum coming into being only IF and WHEN certain conditions occur. Thus, “temporal navigation” must learn to steer between and around these “gravity wells” and “mass shadows” in “hyperspace” that are, literally, cyclically warped space-time contorted into an isomorphic knot or, more complexly, into self-referential, 4th dimensional “hyper-shapes” - so-called “metaforms.”

In the “arts,” or self-expressive humanities, we can (and some would say must) contemplate a “multiverse” of transfinite possible outcomes and reasonably extrapolate from this loom a tapestry of only certain threads, our own “personal preference settings” for a psychic-filtration system - how we see the world - and then turn around and mimetically pass this pattern along to others. The role of modern “artists” and “entertainers” - whether musicians or movie-directors, or whomever, etc. - should be reexamined in light of the ancient role of “shaman” or “medicine man” as tribal healer.

After all, it will be on the theatrical stage (modern cinema screens) where we will watch our heroized unconscious archetypes play out their roles at disentangling and unfurling the standards for our collective, socio-cultural future. And so, it will be in the arts and humanities where the ethical conversation about applying new technologies will be held.

So, if we CAN use “time-travel,” SHOULD we? It is apparent, from human study of this specific field for the last 150 years or so, that time-travel is fraught with paradoxes.

These make up the already known geographic terrain of time, and, however mercurial and ever-shifting this maybe, it IS possible to graph a map of time, for however fleeting and futile a moment such may last. Because we can map time, we can explore it more easily, however, before we do so, it is right we should pause to ask what we should do “Is exploring time truly something humanity should be doing?” and if so, “why should we be doing so?” and “what are the most likely negative consequences of doing so, so that we maybe prepared to counter them as or if they do, indeed, end up occurring?” If we are able to do a thing, usually sooner or later we will do it; if we are able to physically time-travel, eventually we will. So, before this occurs, let us draw our maps and calculate our best course, avoiding all averse contingencies.

Introductory Footnotes Part 1: Measures Part 2: The Imploding Multiverse Part 1: Measures The relation among the units of length can be explained by the ratio 15:16:17:18 among the four fundamental feet and cubits. Before I arrived at this discovery, Decourdemanche and Oxé discovered that the cubes of those units are related according to the conventional specific gravities of oil, water, wheat and barley.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megalithic_yard The common cubit was the length of the forearm from the elbow to the tip of the middle finger. It was divided into the span of the hand (one-half cubit), the palm or width of the hand (one sixth), and the digit or width of the middle finger (one twenty-fourth) and the span or the length between the tip little finger to the tip of the thumb. The Sacred Cubit, which was a standard cubit enhanced by an extra span—thus 7 spans or 28 digits long— was used in constructing buildings and monuments and in surveying in ancient Egypt; it may have been based on an astronomical measurement.

The introduction of the yard (0.9144 m) as a unit of length came later, but its origin is not definitely known. Some believe the origin was the double cubit, others believe that it originated from cubic measure. Whatever its origin, the early yard was divided by the binary method into 2, 4, 8, and 16 parts called the half-yard, span, finger, and nail.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_measurement The royal cubit (524 mm, or 20.62 inches) was subdivided in an extraordinarily complicated way. The basic subunit was the digit, doubtlessly a finger’s breadth, of which there were 28 in the royal cubit. Four digits equaled a palm, five a hand. Twelve digits, or three palms, equaled a small span. Fourteen digits, or one-half a cubit, equaled a large span. Sixteen digits, or four palms, made one t’ser. Twenty-four digits, or six palms, were a small cubit.

The smallest division, 1/16 of a digit, was equal to 1/448 part of a royal cubit.

The Egyptian weight system appears to have been founded on a unit called the kite, with a decimal ratio, 10 kites equaling 1 deben and 10 debens equaling 1 sep.

Egyptian liquid measures, from large to small, were ro, hin, hekat, khar, and cubic cubit.

- source: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1286365/measurement-system/ 13608/Early-units-and-standards

18 hands = 6 feet so 18 X 5 digits = 6 feet 90 digits = 6 feet.

4 x 4 x 4 MI cube weighs 4 pounds when filled with barley seeds a 6 MI sphere holds a liter and weighs a kilo a 60 MI sphere 10 x 10 x 10 holds a cubic metre and weighs a metric tonne the speed of light is (by definition) exactly 299,792,458 m/s, very close to 300,000,000 m/s. This is a pure coincidence, as the meter was originally defined as 1/10,000,000 of the distance between the Earth's pole and equator along the surface at sea level, and the Earth's circumference just happens to be about 2/15 of a light-second. It also roughly equals to one foot per nanosecond (the actual number is 0.9836 ft/ns). The polar diameter of the Earth is equal to half a billion inches, to within 0.1%.

-source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_coincidences 1 greek foot equals 30.861 centimeters 1 cubit = 1&1/2 feet 1 meter = 3 and one 37th inches more than one yard (3 feet) 100 greek foot = 30.8 meters = one second of arc 1 furlong = 660 feet (8 furlongs in a mile) 5280 feet in a mile, 1760 yards in a mile

The original dimensions were 440 by 440 royal cubits (9,072.8 inches^2 = 82,315,699.84 square inches or 1,299.1745555556 square miles). The measures for the “New Jerusalem” in Egyptian feet given in Revelations are described by Michell as a cube of the same volume as the sphere of the earth so the circumference of earth is relative to the span of the square of the cube.

Is the square of 144 cubits in area equal to the same span as the diameter of the earth's circumference in miles?

(Earth’s diameter = 7,920 miles) / (“New Jerusalem” side = 1,500 miles) = 5.28. each of its 6 faces = 1,440,000 square furlongs (2,250,009.000009 miles) in area.

1 side = 12,000 furlongs (1,500.003 miles) in length. volume of “New Jerusalem” cube = 3,375,020,250.040500027 cubic miles. earth's circumference = 24,883.2 miles (199,065.2042 furlongs). the diameter of earth = 7,920 miles (63,359.87 furlongs) = 1 side in length. each face of earth’s cube = 62,726,400 miles (501,810,202.21 furlongs) in area. volume of earth’s cube = 496,793,088,000 cubic miles.

6000 greek feet = 1.85222 kilometers = 1minute of arc polar circumference 360,000 greek feet = 111.1333 kilometers = 1degree of arc polar circumference 129,600,600 greek feet = 40,007.988 km = the polar circumference of earth 1 modern second of time = 1,500 greek feet 1 modern minute of time = 90,000 greek feet 1 modern hour of time = 5,400,00 greek feet 1 day equals = 129,600,00 greek feet the polar circumference of Earth is around 40,008 kilometers, which is 40,008,000 meters. a degree is one 360th of this, which is 111,133.33 meters. the greek foot is 30.861 centimeters in length and this divides into 111,133.33 meters 360,109 times.

Part 2: The Imploding Multiverse The cosmos is 13.8 billion LY old. [1] The sun is 4.5 billion LY old, [2] and will burn on for another 8.5 billion LY. [3] The cosmos will be 22.3 billion LY old when the sun burns out. The Andromeda galaxy is 2.5 million LY away from earth. [4] When we see the light reaching us now from the Andromeda galaxy, it is the light that left the Andromeda galaxy 2.5 million LY before now. If the average life-span of a main-sequence star is around 50 billion LY, and if the average star in the Andromeda galaxy appears now to be at least as old as our own sun (4.5 billion LY), and if the Andromeda galaxy is 2.5 million LY away from us in space-time, then the average star in the Andromeda galaxy would have been around 4.5 billion LY old around 2.5 million LY ago; this means that, when we see the stars in Andromeda, they are not 4.5 billion LY old stars at a distance from us of 2.5 million LY away from us, but instead: 2.5 million LY ago, the stars we see now were (on average) around 4.5 billion years old, but that, by now, these same stars have aged

5.75 billion LY. This means that, for the average star in the Andromeda galaxy, the cosmos will only be 21.05 billion LY old when stars (alike our sun) in the Andromeda galaxy begin to burn out, but that we will not see this happening until 2.5 million LY later (around 7.95 billion LY from now, or 55 million LY before our own sun will burn out).

[1] ""The current measurement of the age of the universe is 13.799Âą0.021 billion years"" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe [2] ""Our sun is 4,500,000,000 (four and a half billion) years old.""

- http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/sun-age/en/ [3] ""Stars that are 10 times the mass of the Sun will last about 100 million years. Stars with about the Sun's mass last about 13 billion years, and stars about one tenth the mass of our Sun last 100 billion years or longer. The average star has a mass of about half that of our Sun, so that means that the average star in our galaxy will live about 50 billion years or so.""

- http://www.astronomycafe.net/qadir/q607.html [4] ""2.537 million light years = Andromeda Galaxy, Distance to Earth"" cf. ""a list of known galaxies within 3.59 mega-parsecs (11.7 million light-years) of our Solar System, in ascending order of distance.""

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nearest_galaxies cf. ""This list contains all known stars and brown dwarfs at a distance of up to 5 parsecs (16.3 light-years) from the Solar System. In addition to the Solar System, there are another 54 stellar systems currently known lying within this distance. These systems contain a total of 56 hydrogen-fusing stars (of which 46 are red dwarfs), 14 brown dwarfs, and 4 white dwarfs.""

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nearest_stars_and_brown_dwarf

eventually, to transcend physicality’s limitations and to associate our self-concept with the products of these mentations, and thus to, effectively, travel into the future multiverse or the past of our local universe. In short, T4 is Time-Travel.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------T4: T1 = basic Basic geometry Geometry -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Primary to attaining time-travel comes understandingthethe patterns of geometry Primary to applying the T-4 model is understanding patterns of geometry underlying it.

Consider the idea of representing the single-dimension of time linear underlying it. Consider again the idea of representing the single-dimension as of a time as aplane-space linear or flatform. plane-space The singularity or “Zero-Point” from and or flat Time’s form. singularity or “Zero-Point” (viewed (viewed from 180°) 180°) and the (viewed “standard arrow” from 90°)on of time are both based on this of a “standard arrow” from 90°)(viewed are both based this fundamental concept fundamental concept of a single, half-spatial, dimension time. Thus, by depicting single, half-spatial dimension of time.

By depicting theof single dimension of time the single-dimension of time separately from the other 3-spatial dimensions, we can separately from the other 3-spatial dimensions, we can depict the single, temporal depict the single, temporal dimension as if it were space-like, and thus deal with it dimension as if itspatial-dimension. were space-like, By and thus atdeal with it a separate, form, spatiallike a separate, looking variations onlike the single-space dimension.

By looking at variations on the single-space form, we can arrive we can arrive at observations regarding the addition of these findings to the regular at observations regarding the addition of these findings the regular of 3dimensionality of 3-space in the form oftomotions over dimensionality time. space in the form of motions over time.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the 1-d model @ 180° the 1-d model @ 180° ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------begin with, here thesimplest simplest model model of time linear, singular To To begin with, here isisthe timerepresented representedininthe the linear, singular dimensional space itsmost mostbasic basic geometrical geometrical pattern, dimensional space asasits pattern, the the centroid centroidpoint, point,the theradial radial line, and the circular circumference, where the centroid = the past, the radius = the line, and the circular circumference, where the centroid = the past, the radius = the present, and the circumference = the future. present, and the circumference = the future.

Picture the above circle divided into 12 parts of 30° each and you will arrive at the Picture the above circle divided into 12 parts of 30° each and you will arrive at the familiar gnomon of the clock-face. As the radius (hand) of the circle (clock) revolves familiar gnomon of the clock-face. radiuswill (hand) of the (clock) revolves around the centroid, each of the As 12 the divisions be passed in circle turn. However, the around centroid, each of the are 12 passed divisions passed in turn.

However, the order orderthe in which these divisions bywill the be radial “clock’s hand” will depend on whether radius are rotates around theradial centre“clock’s “clockwise” (beginning rightward in which thesethe divisions passed by the hand” will depend on whether the top), or “counter-clockwise” (beginning leftward rightward from the top). return the from radius rotates around the centre “clockwise” (beginning fromTo the top), or “counter-clockwise” (beginning leftward from the top). To return

to the standard clock-face, “clockwise” would count 1 -> 12, while “counter- clockwise” would rotate 12 -> 1. It is important to be able to see that, whether the “clock’s hand” is rotating “clockwise” or “counter-clockwise” will also depend on which side of the “clock” one is facing. If you are facing the “front” of the “clock- face,” the “clock’s hand” will move “clockwise,” however, if you are facing the “back” of the “clock-face,” the same motion of the “hand” rotating around the centre will be seen as moving in a “counterclockwise” direction, even though the motion of the “hand” on the “clock” remains the same either way, and all that is different is your own perspective on it.

“clock’s hand” is rotating “clockwise” or “counter-clockwise” will also depend on which side of the “clock” one is facing. If you are facing the “front” of the “clockface,” the “clock’s hand” will move “clockwise,” however, if you are facing the “back” of the “clock-face,” the same motion of the “hand” rotating around the centre will be seen as moving in a “counter-clockwise” direction, even though the motion of the “hand” on the “clock” remains the same either way, and all that is different is your own perspective on it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the 2-d model @ 45° -----------------------------------------------------------------------------the 2-d model @ 45° -----------------------------------------------------------------------------Consider plotting the “clockwise” motion as one pole on a sphere, and the “counterclockwise” motion as the opposite pole on the same sphere. Here we see the centralConsider theinto “clockwise” motion as the onesphere, pole onconnecting a sphere, and “counterpoint will beplotting extended the radial axis of thethe twin poles, and clockwise” motion as the opposite pole on the same sphere. Here we see the centralthat the 12 “clock” units can be expressed as lines that spiral ever outward from one point will be extended into the radial axis of the sphere, connecting the twin poles, pole and ever to the opposite Here, as ourlines example is theever following 1-d,from planeand that theinward 12 “clock” units can bepole. expressed that spiral outward space “Mobius graphed ontoopposite the simplest surface, theissphere.

Note that, one pole and strip” ever inward to the pole. 3-space Here, our example the following 1-d, as the plane-space spiral at one pole rotates one direction, thesimplest spiral at the opposite rotates the “Mobius-strip” graphed onto the 3-space surface,pole the sphere.

Note that, as the spiral at one pole rotates one direction, the spiral at the opposite pole opposite direction. rotates the opposite direction.

We can conceptualise time, in its simplest form, as a single dimension of moving We can conceptualize time, in its simplest form, as a single dimension of moving space space that acts independently, although as an addendum to, the other 3-dimensions of that acts independently, although as an addendum to,as the other 3-dimensions unmoving space. Whether we map this single dimension a line (or circle) on a flat of unmoving space.

Whether we map this single dimension as a line (or circle) on aaflat plane-space, or as a flat plane-space “brane” wrapped around a 3-space form (like plane-space, orsame as ageometric-patterned flat plane-space “brane” wrapped around a even 3-space form (like sphere), the properties will apply to it, if the form it a takes shifted from a flat surface to a measure of depth sphere), the may samebegeometric-patterned properties will apply to it, and evenvolume. if the form it takes may be shifted from a flat surface to a measure of depth and volume.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------the 1-d model @ 90° -----------------------------------------------------------------------------If we turn the basic “clock-face,” circular circumference sideways, so that we are looking at the flat, 2-d plane-space from along the edge, we can depict the dual nature of the “clockwise” and opposite “counter-clockwise” rotating poles with a single twist, thus rendering twin “loops” around a central mid-point between them.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------If we turn the basic “clock-face,” circular circumference sideways, so that we are looking at the flat, 2-d plane-space from along the edge, we can depict the dual nature of the “clockwise” and opposite “counter-clockwise” rotating poles with a single twist, thus rendering twin “loops” around a central mid-point between them.

The depiction of such an angle on our initial, “clock-face,” model is most familiar as The depiction of such an angle on our initial, “clock-face,” model is most familiar as the the symbol for the concept of “infinity.” Thus this symbol, even moreso than the symbol for the concept of “infinity.”

Thus this symbol, even morenature so than the simple simple circular model, expresses the “recursive” and “cyclical” of time as circular expresses the “recursive” and “cyclical” nature of timetoasthe both unilinear both model, unilinear and auto-correlated, such that the “end” reconnects “start.”

In andthis auto-correlated, such that the “end” reconnects the “start.” this the manner, the binary (or di-polar) nature of time to is expressed inIn 1-d on manner, a flat, 2-d, plane-space as a double-loop around a single, central point or node. binary (or dipolar) nature of time is expressed in 1-d on a flat, 2-d, plane-space as a double-loop around a single, central point or node.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------the 3-d model @ 45° the 3-d model @ 45° ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The conceptual equivalent to basic, the basic, “clock-face,” circular model The conceptual equivalent to the flat, flat, “clock-face,” circular model waswas thethe sphere sphere in three dimensions comprised of a flat “skin” outer-surface that could in three dimensions comprised of a flat “skin” outer-surface that could be “peeled”be along “peeled” along the same number of divisions in which the flat “clock” was originally the same number of divisions in which the flat “clock” was originally divided. Thus, if divided. Thus, if the “clock” was divided in 4 quadrants, then, as shown, the “skin” of the “clock” was divided in 4 sphere quadrants, then, as shown, the “skin” of the sphere would the would “peel” into 4 “strips.” “peel” into 4 “strips.”

Likewise, for the edge-on view or “infinity” symbol, the conceptually equivalent model in the higher-dimension would be thethe single “tube-torus,” depicted here in Likewise, for the next edge-on view or “infinity” symbol, conceptually equivalent model in the form of one orbital revolution comprised of 4 “strips” that are “peeling” or of the next higher-dimension would be the single “tube-torus,” depicted here in the form rotating outward around the central circumference of the “tube” torus. Here, we see one orbital revolution comprised of 4 “strips” that are “peeling” or rotating outward these 4, flat, 2-d, plane-spatial “strips,” “peeling” in a circle, to form a round “tube.” around the central circumference of the “tube” torus. Here, we see these 4, flat, 2-d, This tube then folds or “auto-correlates” into a circle to form the tube “torus.” plane-spatial “strips,” “peeling” in a circle, to form a round “tube.” This tube then folds or “auto-correlates” into a circle to form the tube “torus.”

Also, just as the plane-space “clock-face” model, when topologically graphed onto a sphere, presents the duality of “clockwise” or “counter-clockwise” motion on the flat circle as opposite rotations at the twin poles of the sphere, so does the “tube” torus depicted here demonstrate the same type of “recursive” and “cyclical” geometric pattern as the “infinity” symbol, or “clock-face” edge, taken up to the next higher dimension, as we can see the diameter of the “tube” is perpetually increasing or

Also, just as the plane-space “clock-face” model, when topologically graphed onto a sphere, the duality of“clock-face” “clockwise”model, or “counter-clockwise” ononto the aflat Also, presents just as the plane-space when topologicallymotion graphed sphere, presents rotations the duality “clockwise” or of “counter-clockwise” motion the flat circle as opposite atofthe twin poles the sphere, so does the on “tube” torus circle here as opposite rotations the twin of the sphere, so does the “tube” torus depicted demonstrate theat same type poles of “recursive” and “cyclical” geometric pattern depicted here demonstrate the same edge, type of “recursive” and “cyclical” as the “infinity” symbol, or “clock-face” taken up to the next higher geometric dimension, as pattern as the “infinity” symbol, or “clock-face” edge, taken up to the next higher we can see the diameter of the “tube” is perpetually increasing or decreasing depending dimension, as we can see the diameter of the “tube” is perpetually increasing or on decreasing whether one follows the around or counter-clockwise.

Thus, depending oncircular whether“torus” one follows theclockwise circular “torus” around clockwise the “tube” torus, too, is a model of “infinity.” or counter-clockwise. Thus, the “tube” torus, too, is a model of “infinity.”

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the 1-d model @ 45° the 1-d model @ 45° ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The most complex form necessary to be dealt with prior to making a more thorough investigation into theform finernecessary complexities bothwith hyperspace and the atime-travel models The most complex to beofdealt prior to making more thorough investigation into the finer of both and In theflat time-travel that make use of 4-manifolds is complexities the cross-section of hyperspace a “tube” torus.

2- space, the models of that make of 4-manifolds is the cross-section of a “tube” In flat 2- of diameters the twinuse sides of the “tube” torus’ circumference appeartorus. on either side space, the diameters of the twin sides of the “tube” torus’ circumference appear on the ellipse between them which would, in the most basic, 2-space, “clock” model be either side of the ellipse between them which would, in the most basic, 2-space, measured as the circumference of the “clock-face.” “clock” model be measured as the circumference of the “clock-face.”

It should notedthat thatthis this flat flat cross-section cross-section of posesses thethe same It should bebe noted of the the3-space 3-spacetorus torus posseses same vectors, or directions of motion, as the “tube” torus itself; one “tube” circumference vectors, or directions of motion, as the “tube” torus itself; one “tube” circumference will will rotate either “clockwise” or “counter-clockwise” in the opposite direction of the rotate either “clockwise” that or “counter-clockwise” in of thethe opposite direction of the “tube” circumference is on the opposite end toroid-circumference.

If “tube” the circumference that is on the opposite end of the toroid-circumference. If the “circle” on the right is rotating “clockwise,” the one on the left will rotate “counter- clockwise,” or vice-versa, depending on whether the central circumference of the ellipse between them is revolving in one direction or the other.

This particular depiction demonstrates this concept by extending along the toroidal cross-section the original 12 divisions of the circular, “clock-face” model, numbered beginning at Roman Numeral “4” (IV) on the top of the left circumference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------the 4-d model @ 45° ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

cross-section the original 12 divisions of the circular, “clock-face” model, numbered beginning at Roman Numeral “4” (IV) on the top of the left circumference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------the 4-d model @ 45° -----------------------------------------------------------------------------The preceding double-twisted cross-section of a tube-torus drops down one dimension to depict the 3-space torus as a flat, 2-d ellipseofseen from thedrops edge.down If youone were to inflate The preceding double-twisted cross-section a tube-torus dimension thatto flat, 2-d cross-section into a 3-space shape itself, the result would be the depict the 3-space torus as a flat, 2-d ellipse seen from the edge. If you were “tube” to trefoil.

The flat, 1-d2-d “infinity” symbol depiction has two itself, loops the around a would centralbe crossing inflate that flat, cross-section into a 3-space shape result the trefoil.

The2-d, flat,toroidal 1-d “infinity” symbolhas depiction has two loops around point “tube” or node and the cross-section three loops, separated by twoacrosscrossing pointWhen or node the 2-d, toroidal cross-section three loops, overcentral junctures or nodes. theand two-twisted, three-looped, 2-spacehas cross-section of the separated by two cross-over junctures or nodes. When the two-twisted, three-looped, “tube” torus is expanded, or “fleshed out,” from a single line into a circumferential 2-space cross-section of the “tube” torus is expanded, or “fleshed out,” from a single “tube”line itself, retain these “tube” essential geometric properties; that is, the “tube” trefoil intoitawill circumferential itself, it will retain these essential geometric has the same geometry as the 2-space crosssection of a 3-space “tube” torus: a doubleproperties; that is, the “tube” trefoil has the same geometry as the 2-space crosstwist and a triple loop. section of a 3-space “tube” torus: a double-twist and a triple loop.

“cross-over junctures” or “nodes” may apparent “tube” The The twintwin “cross-over junctures” or “nodes” may notnot be be so so apparent in in thethe “tube” trefoil trefoil form; the surface, or “skin” of the “tube” trefoil revolves around twice form; the surface, or “skin” of the “tube” trefoil revolves around twice between any one between any one point on the “skin” and when, following a vector along the surface, pointit on the revolve “skin” around and when, following a vector along the surface, it the would revolve would to the same spot.

This mimics, at the level of “tube” around to the same spot.

This mimics, at the level of the “tube” trefoil’s geometry, trefoil’s geometry, the same “counter-rotation” perceived all along, throughout all the the “counter-rotation” other levels, in the perceived form of dual “di-polar” orientations interior rotation, same all or along, throughout all the of other levels, in the as form wellor as “dipolar” the addition to this at a angle of the same “duality” motionto inthis the at a of dual orientations ofright interior rotation, as well as the of addition overall revolution the outer circumference. right angle of the same “duality” of of motion in the overall revolution of the outer circumference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------T2 = Intermediate Geometry -----------------------------------------------------------------------------Multi-Dimensional Polytopes: A “Hyperspace Alphabet�

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There are various ways to define what constitutes an "ideal form" in any dimension. For example: if one begins with the "zero dimension" of one corner-point, and proceeds next to the two types of 1-dimensional extension of such a point: the straight line and the semi-circular arc. However, these lower dimensions are not usually included in the list of "ideal forms," which begins, most commonly, with 2-dimensional planar faces in the

form of the three regular polygons (triangle, square, pentagon). However, the circle, comprised of a single completed arc, can also be counted as a shape at this stage, as the sphere can be in three-dimensions, although it is usually excluded. In 3-dimensions, the "ideal forms" are the regular polyhedra: the tetrahedron (or simplex) of 4 triangles, the octahedron (or orthoplex) of 8 triangles, the cube (or hexahedron) of 6 squares, the icosahedron of 20 triangles and the dodecahedron of 12 pentagons. In 4-space these have corresponding geometrical forms as well; there are 6 "4-space" regular polytopes: the 5-cell (hyper-tetrahedron), the 8-cell (tesseract), the 16-cell (hyper-octahedron), the 24-cell (self-dual), the 120-cell (4-d icosahedron) and the 600-cell (4-dodecahedron).

The circle and sphere also have a correspondent 4th spatial dimensional form, the torus or hypersphere. In all dimensions greater than 4, only 3 types of "meta-form" ideal shapes exist; these are extensions of patterns formed in the first three 3-d solids: the simplex (hyper-tetrahedron), the orthoplex (hyper-icosahedron) and the tesseract (hypercube). Therefore, in the 5 extra-spatial dimensions from the 5th through the 10th dimension, there are only 15 "ideal forms."

To assemble the 5 "ideal forms" in 3-dimensions, and do so each one at a time, one would only need as many components (corners, edges and faces) as the largest / most complex of the solid forms - in 3-dimensions this being the dodecahedron of 20 corners, 30 edges and 12 pentagonal faces; in 4-dimensions the 600-cell of 120 corners, 720 edges, 1200 faces and 600 solid shapes. However, if you wanted to assemble all of the solids in all of the dimensions simultaneously, one would require 190 components (50 corners, 90 edges and 50 faces) in 3-dimensions, and 49990 elements (773 corners, 1362 edges, 2082 faces and 773 solid "cells") in 4-dimensions. Thus, for all the "ideal forms" in both 3 and 4 spatial dimensions to be all assembled one next to the other in a line would require 5180 parts (823 corners, 1452 edges, 2132 faces and 773 solid "cell" shapes). The total of all these parts assembled into shapes along this line, however, is only 11 "ideal forms" in the 3rd and 4th dimensions, excluding the sphere and torus.

To assemble the 15 "ideal forms" in the 5th through the 10th spatial dimensions, and do so each one at a time, one would only need as many components (corners, edges and faces) as the largest / most complex of the "meta-forms" - in 10 dimensions this being the hypercube of 59,048 components). However, if you wanted to assemble all of these meta-solids in all of the dimensions from 5 thru 10 simultaneously, one would require a total of 4,020 components for the "simplex" model (the "hyper-tetrahedron"), 88,446 components for the "tesseract" model (the "hyper-cube") and 88,446 components alike for the "orthoplex" or "cross polytope" (the "hyper-octahedron"). This means, to assemble these 15 shapes altogether would require a total of 180,912 components to complete.

To assemble 1 each of the 26 "ideal forms" in the first 10 dimensions, one would therefore need 186,092 components.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------T4: intermediate geometry ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------T4: intermediate geometry ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------T4: intermediate geometry Geometric Manifolds -----------------------------------------------------------------------------T4:geometric intermediate geometry manifolds ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------geometric manifolds ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------geometric manifolds Following are the 4 essential geometric forms corresponding to the three spatial and -----------------------------------------------------------------------------geometric manifolds one temporal dimension.

Following are the 4 essential geometric forms corresponding to the three spatial and -----------------------------------------------------------------------------one temporal dimension.

Following are the 4 essential geometric forms corresponding to the three spatial and -----------------------------------------------------------------------------one temporal dimension.

Following are the 4 essential geometric forms corresponding to the three spatial and one temporal dimension.

Following are the 4 essential geometric forms corresponding to the three spatial and one temporal dimension.

A 2D 2D “auroborus” “ouroboros” wormhole wormhole (or (or “time-loop”) “time-loop”) manifold manifold with with 2-loops 2-loops and and 2-nodes.

2-nodes.

A A 2D “auroborus” wormhole (or “time-loop”) manifold with 2-loops and 2-nodes.

A 2D “auroborus” wormhole (or “time-loop”) manifold with 2-loops and 2-nodes.

A 2D “auroborus” wormhole (or “time-loop”) manifold with 2-loops and 2-nodes.

A 3D “trefoil” (or 3-twist “brane”) manifold with 3-loops and 3-nodes.

A A 3D 3D “trefoil” (or 3-twist “brane”) manifold with 3-loops and 3-nodes.

A 3D “trefoil” (or 3-twist “brane”) manifold with 3-loops and 3-nodes.

A 3D “trefoil” (or 3-twist “brane”) manifold with 3-loops and 3-nodes.

A 4D “tube torus” (or infinite “tube”) manifold with 2-loops (tube) in 2-nodes (torus).

A 4D “tube torus” (or infinite “tube”) manifold with 2-loops (tube) in 2-nodes (torus).

“tube”) manifold manifold with with 2-loops 2-loops (tube) (tube) in in 2-nodes 2-nodes (torus). (torus).

A 4D “tube torus” (or infinite “tube”) A 4D “tube torus” (or infinite “tube”) manifold with 2-loops (tube) in 2-nodes (torus).

3 “tori” mapped around 1 “trefoil” manifold plus 1 central axis = (5D).

3 “tori” mapped around 1 “trefoil” manifold plus 1 central axis = (5D).

3 “tori” mapped around 1 “trefoil” manifold plus 1 central axis = (5D).

33 “tori” “tori” mapped mapped around around 1 1 “trefoil” “trefoil” manifold manifold plus 1 central axis = (5D).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------geometric gnomon Geometric Gnomon -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

According to the Merriam-Webster english dictionary, a “gnomon” is "the remainder of a According to the Merriem-Webster english dictionary, a “gnomon” is "the remainder parallelogram after the removal of a similar parallelogram containing one of its of a parallelogram after the removal of a similar parallelogram containing onecorners." of its - source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gnomon+ corners."

- source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gnomon+ Here is a depiction of the square root of two gnomon, which is the basic replication Here isextractable a depictionfor of the the model. square root of two gnomon, which is the basic replication sequence sequence extrapolatable for the T4 model.

original html context: http://www.benpadiah.com/MISC_diagrams/pages/equations.html#holognomon original html context: http://www.benpadiah.com/MISC_diagrams/pages/equations.html#holognomon -----------------------------------------------------------------------------further gnomonic geometry -----------------------------------------------------------------------------Further Gnomonic Geometry -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This geometric graph represents the motions involved in the above depicted gnomon.

This geometric graph represents the motions involved in the above depicted gnomon.

Space, labeled “S” and Time, labeled operate at right angles to one another.

As Space, labeled “S” and Time, labeled “t,” “t,” operate at right angles to one another.

As Space Space from extends from “S1” (red, top center-point) to (black, “S2” (black, upper-most left point) extends “S1” (red, top center-point) to “S2” upper-most left point) over over “t2” (green, upper left, horizontal line) we see (green, point) “A” marking the “t2” (green, upper left, horizontal line) we see (green, point) “A” marking the mid-point. mid-point. As “t2” (green, horizontal line, upper-left) arcs around (blue semi-circle, As “t2” horizontal line, upper-left) around semi-circle, left) the to connect left)(green, to connect “S1” (red, above center)arcs to “S3” (red,(blue central nadir-point), mid“S1” (red, center)point) to “S3” (red,(green, central nadir-point), the becomes mid- point (green, pointabove “A” (green, of “t2” left horizontal line) “B”“A” (red, point) of “t2” (green, left horizontal line) becomes “B” (red, central-most point), the central-most point), the mid-point of the (red, central vertical) line between “S1”mid(above) S3central (below).

The (green, left horizontal) world-line of “t2” as (red) point of the and (red, vertical) line between “S1” (above) and S3 (below).

The mid(green, point “B,” the Present, continues to midrotate counter-clockwise around S1 (red, left horizontal) world-line of “t2” as (red) point “B,” the Present, continues to rotate uppermost point), to connect “B” point), (red, center point) between S1 “B” (red,(red, counter-clockwise around S1 (red,mid-point uppermost to connect mid-point above) and S3 (red, below) to mid-point “C” (blue, right point) of world-line “t1” center point) between S1 (red, above) and S3 (red, below) to mid-point “C” (blue, right (blue, right horizontal line). point) of world-line “t1” (blue, right horizontal line). The lines in black represent the respective lengths, expressed square-roots, of the expressed distances and durations involved; The lines in black representas the respective lengths, as square-roots, of the the distances durations and AB and BC areinvolved; equal to the durations square- root 1/2, AC is equal to durations AB of and BC the are distance equal to the squareroot of 1/2, distance AC measurement, is equal to the S4 square rootlower-left of 1, and point) the final the square root of 1,the and the final (black, measures measurement, S4 (black, lower-left point) measures the unit distance the unit distance squared (expressed as the square root of 2). The “face”squared of the (red, (expressed as the square root of 2). The “face” of the (red, central) circle (diameter = central) circle (diameter = “1”), expresses the flat, 2D plane-space of 180° line “1”), expresses the flat, 2D plane-space of 180° line “t” (measured as the square root “t” (measured the 90°. square of 1), seen(d from 90°.equals 1/2 of(green, (red) circle (dblue, = “1”) equals of 1), seen as from 1/2root of (red) circle = “1”) left; or right) (green, left; or with blue,radius right)=half-circles with radius = sq.(d rt.=1/2; circle (d = half-circles sq. rt. 1/2; twice (red) circle “1”) twice equals(red) (green, right; “1”) equals (green, right; blue, “1.” The entire mechanism of blue,left) left)semi-circle semi-circle arcs, arcs, r = “1.” motion for this model measures “t2” or “A” as it progresses through a counter-clockwise entire motion forthen this model measures “t2” “A” it progresses arc,The first frommechanism “S2” to “S3”ofor “B,” and from there to “t1” or or “C.” Asas stated, time and through a counter-clockwise arc, first from “S2” to “S3” or “B,” and then from space operate perpendicularly to one another, and the motion of time (duration)there acts to to “t1” or “C.” As stated, time and space operate perpendicularly to one another, and conserve (by angular momentum) the squared (exponential) expansion of space the motion of time (duration) acts to conserve (by angular momentum) the squared (distance).

“A,B,C” expansion = (Past -> of Present Future). Distance = Present duration (exponential) space -> (distance).

“A,B,C” = (“S4”) (Past -> ->(square Future).root ofDistance 1) squared; thus distance (square “S4” = “1” squared. (“S4”) = duration root of 1) squared; thus distance “S4” = “1” squared.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

T3 =advanced Advanced Geometry T4: geometry ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Any recursive cycle can be graphed as a knot. A knot is self-referential, ie. “autoAny recursive cyclethat can the be graphed as the a knot.

A knot is self-referential, ie. “auto-and if correlating,” meaning ending of surface re-connects to the beginning, correlating,” meaning that the ending of the surface re-connects to the beginning, one were to follow a vector on the knotted topology, one would eventually arrive back and if one were to follow a vector on the knotted topology, one would eventually where one began. knot is a Aclosed usually, although not necessarily arrive back whereAone began. knot issurface, a closedand surface, and usually, although not always, is depicted as a pair, cluster, or grouping of topological “handles” that are necessarily always, is depicted as a pair, cluster, or grouping of topological “handles” connecting inare such a way as to that connecting in form such one, a waycontinuous as to form surface. one, continuous surface.

When depicting T4 hypothesis for relationships such relationships the Einstein When depicting the T4 the hypothesis for such as theasEinstein “grandfather” “grandfather” paradox, it is necessary to depict the single, extra-dimension ofas time paradox, it is necessary to depict the single, extra-dimension of time not only its own not only as its own individual, separate, and autonomous spatial surface, but to depict individual, separate, and autonomous spatial surface, but to depict this surface as a knot. this surface as a knot. The optical illusion of overlapping points on a knotted surface The optical illusionserves of overlapping points on a knotted surface being connected serves being connected the function of creating a “worm-hole,” node or “crossingthe function creating a “worm-hole,” node orsurface “crossingover” from pointthe where a vector on over” point of where a vector on the continuous can break continuous symmetry to can “cross-over” to a the different point on the continuous surface. thesurface’s continuous surface break from continuous surface’s symmetry to “crossWhileto this “symmmetry breaking” violates the surface. rules of the continous surface inbreaking” 3D, it over” a different point on the continuous While this “symmetry is both natural and necessary for such “symmetry breaking” to occur in 4D. violates the rules of the continuous surface in 3D, it is both natural and necessary for

such “symmetry breaking” to occur in 4D. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the 1-knot the 1-knot ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The simplest form of knotted surface is called the “limacon” or “snail” spiral, and is a The simplest form of knotted surface is called the “limacon” or “snail” spiral, and is a knot with only one loop inside an otherwise circlular cycle. The lesser-loop inside knot with only one loop inside an otherwise circular cycle. The lesser-loop inside the the greater-arc acts to conserve the dimensions of the circle into the shape shown greater-arc acts here, to conserve the dimensions of or the“crossover” circle into the shape shown here, with with 2-loops and 1-node, juncture.

2-loops and 1-node, or “crossover” juncture.

The “limacon” or “1-knot” is essentially a depiction of the “Infinity” symbol, or 1- node,

dual-looped expression of the edge of a flat, circular surface. In the “Infinity” symbol, both loops appear the same size, with the node central between them. In the 1-knot, the larger-arc appears closer than the smaller-loop, and the node connecting them is to one side.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------the 3-knot -----------------------------------------------------------------------------The 3-knot is a specific kind of knot that has six loops and six nodes. The following depiction of the 3-knot was modeled by Stan Tenen of the Meru Foundation (www.meru.org), and animated by Vincent Cunetto. In this image, the shape of the 3knot can be made out clearly: it is the green knot, while the red loops meet the green 3knot at the 6 yellow dots in exactly specific points where the three different axes of rotation pass through them both.

The fact there are 6 points of intersection indicates that this type of knot has 3 axes of symmetry as well as 3 loops, which is why this configuration is called a “3-knot.”

Although the three axes are perpendicular to one another near the central origin point around which the mechanism can pivot, the same axes of symmetry can all be mapped accurately onto the global coordinates of a sphere and still intersect. When viewed from an angle along one of these axes of symmetry, the “optical illusory” nature of the 3-knot as a method for expressing the paradoxical “symmetry breaking” in 4D becomes more apparent.

The next model is based on removing a special case of “tube” torus (seen at a 45° angle) from within the center of the 3-fold knot. Note that there are also 12 stations of the figure depicted on the loops of the 3-knot (labeled with circled numbers 1 - 12), indicating that a vector-point with 4-fold symmetry will undergo three rotations as it follows a contour around the 3-knot. The correlation between the 12 stations of the “clock-face” and the 12 stations of the 4-sided, rotating vector point on the 3- knot’s loops is not coincidental. It indicates a direct correspondence between the 12 stations on the torus (labeled by the 12 houses of the zodiac) and the 12 stations of the 3-knot

(labeled by the circled numbers) that constitutes a form of “lock” between these conceptual objects. Here is the basic shape of the 3-knot when viewed from above one of the three axes of symmetry, labeled with the 12 stations of the “clock- face” mapped onto the interior and exterior of the central 45° angle torus.

As As stated, the two the two two perpendicular perpendicularlines linesallall operate at right stated, the twovertical verticalpoles poles and and the operate at right angles totoone when mapped mapped onto ontothe theglobal globalcoordinates coordinates angles oneanother, another,yet yetall all intersect intersect when ofof a a sphere, indicated by the semi-circular arc on the right.

The Roman Numerals (I sphere, indicated by the semi-circular arc on right. The Roman Numerals (I - IV)IV) indicate 4-space topology of the central torus asrelates it relates to the overall 3-knot. indicate the the 4-space topology of the central torus as it to the overall 3-knot. meanings of the terms "gate," "lock" "portal" labels of the TheThe meanings of the terms "gate," "lock" andand "portal" (the(the labels on on thethe leftleft of the innerinner-torus) are extremely important for understanding both the astronomical torus) are extremely important for understanding both the astronomical alignments alignments spanning zodiacal Aeons in our solar system - and thus how to time travel spanningonzodiacal Aeons solar systemdigital - and thus howintothe time travel on earth - as earth - as well in as our the microscopic changes analog cosmic environment - and thus how one moment becomes the next: as digital, physicalchanges over a binary, analog duration; in the short-term, some things change, while other things do not. Eventually, given a long enough time-line, everything will change.

well as the microscopic digital changes in the analog cosmic environment - and thus how one moment becomes the next: as digital, physical- changes over a binary, analog duration; in the short-term, some things change, while other things do not. Eventually, given a long enough time-line, everything will change.

The "portal" is the interior ellipse of the 45° angle torus, while the "Gate" is the exterior circumference of the same 4-manifold.

Inthe short-hand we could say, "the The "portal" is the interior ellipse of 45° anglenotation torus, while the "Gate" is theportal is the interior of the torus,ofand gate is the exterior of the torus." exterior circumference the the same 4-manifold.

In short-hand notation we could say, "the portal is the interior of the torus, and the gate is the exterior of the torus."

As before, the primary component of this diagram is the dual direction of space and As before, the primary component of this diagram is the dual direction of space and time, where space moves linearly, and time moves in a higher-dimension opposite it. time, where space moves linearly, and time moves in a higher-dimension opposite it.

This is theisnature of the For aFor lock to occur, youyou must have an an alignment between This the nature oflock. the lock. a lock to occur, must have alignment dipolar opposites.

Alignment between dual opposites is called "inversion." between di-polar opposites. Alignment between dual opposites is called "inversion."

When alignmentoccurs occurs naturally, wormhole, or "temporal When suchsuch an an alignment naturally, a atemporary temporary wormhole, or "temporal singularity" forms in nature.

When such an alignment is forced upon reality by the singularity" forms in nature. When such an alignment is forced upon reality by the mind, it is not necessarily subject to otherwise naturally occuring checks and mind, it is not necessarily subject to otherwise naturally occurring checks and balances. balances. What we are talking about at this point is controlled quantum tunneling.

This means the ability to use the power of the mind alone to directly and immediately shape and form any matter imagainable from the existing ambient energy of any environment or area.

You would be about able toatsap a small of thequantum existing energy and This return a What we are talking this point percent is controlled tunneling. means the transformative that thattoamount energy.

In short, shape you would be ability to use the process power of themultiplies mind alone directlyofand immediately and form to manifest. Manifestation is said to occur "negentropically," or negative to the anyable matter imaginable from the existing ambient energy of any environment or area. temporally past -> future flowing timestream of entropy. That is why, in order to manifest a wormhole, you have to use "inversion," or the ocassional (and sometimes You would be able to sap aalignments small percent of dual the opposites. existing energy and return a random) between transformative process that multiplies that amount of energy. In short, you would be able to manifest.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Manifestation is said to occur "negentropically," or negative to the temporally past ------------------------------------------------------------------------------> future flowing time-stream of entropy. That is why, in order to manifest a wormhole, you have to use "inversion," or the occasional (and sometimes T4: creating a wormhole random) alignments between dual opposites.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------T4: Creating A Wormhole -----------------------------------------------------------------------------wormhole geometry Wormhole Geometry -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Modern science regarding the statistical probability of creating a wormhole usually Modern science regarding the statistical probability of creating a wormhole usually attempts to apply technology (such as harnessing “exotic matter”) to stabilize the “timeattempts to apply technology (such as harnessing “exotic matter”) to stabilise the tunnel” between point A here and / orand now/ and point there Band / or then. “time-tunnel” between point A here or now andB point there and / or However, then. the same effect can be accomplished using “operant observer principle” effecting waveHowever, the same effect can be accomplished using “operant observer principle” effecting wave-function collapse from probabilistic to statistical function collapse from probabilistic “uncertainty” to “uncertainty” statistical “certainty,” without “certainty,” use of any form of artificial technology or matter. making use of anywithout form ofmaking artificial technology or matter.

The reason this is possible has been overlooked by modern astro / quantum The reason this is possible has been overlooked by modern astro / quantum engineers engineers due to the fact that they are concentrating their attention exclusively on due the to the fact that they are concentrating their attentionatexclusively onofthe interior of interior of the “time-tunnel” inside the worm-hole, the expense exploring the “time-tunnel” inside the worm-hole, at the expense of exploring the causes for the the causes for the distortion to the over-all space-time continuum that allow such distortion toto the over-all space-time continuum that to allow such the events to occur. events occur.

In short, by asking only “how” harness random eventInofshort, quantum-fluctuation, havethe neglected understand fully “why” such random by asking only “how” to they harness randomtoevent of quantum-fluctuation, they have in the first place. neglected to understand fully events “why” occur such random events occur in the first place.

As I have said, the primary component of the worm-hole is the “inversion” between As the I have said, the primary component of the worm-hole is the “inversion” between temporal “locks” at either end of the interior “time-tunnel” itself. However, whatthe temporal “locks” attoeither end of the interior “time-tunnel” However, what has been failed be recognised thus far is that, when theseitself. “locks” occur (or are has been failed to be recognized thus far is that, when these “locks” occur (or are caused), it caused), it is reflected as a distortion to the entire surrounding space-time is reflected as a distortion to the entire continuum. surrounding space-time continuum.

Here is a depiction the standard concept of a “stabilized” worm-hole it is Here is a depiction of theof standard concept of a “stabilized” worm-hole as it as is expressed expressed currently by astro-physicist John Gribbin: currently by astro-physicist John Gribbin:

The “time-tunnel” component of the wormhole (the tube connecting the upper- branesurface to the lower brane-surface, on the left) is, however, only half of the important The “time-tunnel” component of the wormhole (the tube connecting the uppercomponents of the wormhole in this diagram. While most modern engineers focus only brane-surface to thecomponent lower brane-surface, on the (the left) tube is, however, onlythe half of the The “time-tunnel” of the wormhole connecting upperon the formation and stabilization of the “time-tunnel” (on the left), they neglect important components of the wormhole in this diagram.

While most modern brane-surface to the lower brane-surface, on the left) is, however, only half of the to understand why the space-time continuum brane is also warped (on the right) to form engineers focus only on theof formation and stabilisation of the “time-tunnel” (on the a important components the wormhole in this diagram.

While most modern single surface, allowing the “time-tunnel” to connect one event in the space-time left), they neglect to understand why the space-time continuum brane is also warped engineers focus only on the formation and stabilisation of the “time-tunnel” (on the (onthey thewith right) toto form single surface, thecontinuum “time-tunnel” to connect one left), neglect understand why theallowing space-time brane is also warped continuum another inathe same brane-surface. event in the space-time continuum with another in the same brane-surface. (on the right) to form a single surface, allowing the “time-tunnel” to connect one event inthis the pattern space-time in the same brane-surface. stable Nevertheless, forcontinuum expressionwith of another the (so-called) “intra-universal,” Nevertheless, this pattern for expression of the (so-called) “intra-universal,” stable wormhole has become part of theofrelative “collective unconscious” of modern culture to wormhole has the relative “collective unconscious” of modern Nevertheless, thisbecome patternpart for expression of the (so-called) “intra-universal,” stable theculture extent that is even replicated inreplicated modern “op-art” furniture Consider to theithas extent that it is even in modern “op-art”designs. furniture designs.this wormhole become part of the relative “collective unconscious” of modern depiction same surface coffee-table: Consider this of the sameinsurface as“op-art” a coffee-table: cultureof tothe the extent that depiction itas is aeven replicated modern furniture designs.

Consider this depiction of the same surface as a coffee-table:

Here, then, is the T4 Alternative version of this model of the “intra-universal” wormhole: Here, is then, is the T4 Alternative version this model the “intra-universal” Here, then, the T4 Alternative version of thisof model of the of “intra-universal” wormhole: wormhole:

In the T4 wormhole model, the distortion to spacetime geometry interior to the “timetunnel” portion of the wormhole is caused by an alignment of the poles of a black- hole (C) between two distant events in spacetime (A and B). The gravity of the black- hole’s poles warps quantum subspace to create a deep-space Gamma Ray burst, ie. a “temporary” (naturally occurring) wormhole. This effect generally only occurs when the poles of one black-hole (such as at the center of any given spiral galaxy, including our own Milky Way) align with the poles of another black-hole. The exchange between the poles of these black-holes is gravitational and constitutes the re- orientation of one black-hole to another in a process, similar to neural cathexis, that forms the gravitational super-string conjoining all the filaments of galaxies. Wormholes that form from these realignments do not occur nearby the black-holes whose poles align with one another, but instead occur in the depths of the void between galaxies, and last only so long as the poles of one black-hole remain aligned with another. Thus, this kind of “temporary” wormhole differ from their (relatively) “permanent” counter-parts that form the surface of a black-hole’s exterior surface.

The black-hole’s poles act as a lens, focusing gravity on a point mid-way between two random events where, while the black-holes’ poles align, a Gamma Ray portal opens, connecting one event to the other at an angle asymptotically approaching 90°.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Wormhole Mathematics -----------------------------------------------------------------------------There are two kinds of wormholes: 1) the non-charged or un-moving temporalsingularities that cover the surface of a galactic-core black-hole; 2) the charged and moving, apparently random Gamma ray bursts in pairs at different locations (and often different times) in the intergalactic void.

To measure either type of wormhole you must use the concept of statistical doubling, whereby each (present) event can yield no fewer than two possible (future) results; but we must apply the governing dynamics of “statistics” to each form of wormhole differently.

To measure the type of statistical doubling that occurs for the first kind of wormhole, we can construct a 3-space model of 6 co-ordinate pair vectors, then measure the multiplication of re-combinations of these when we move them in a fourth direction.

To measure the type of statistical doubling that occurs for the second kind of wormhole, we construct a 2-space model of 4 co-ordinate pair vectors, then measure their different re-combinations as they would occur individually.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Stationary Gravitational Wormholes -----------------------------------------------------------------------------The first type of wormhole to consider is the type that forms on the surface, or “event

horizon” of a black-hole, like those at the core of any spiral galaxy, such as our own Milky Way. This form of wormhole serves as an inter-universal tunnel, connecting our own local spacetime continuum to the parallel dimensionality of the “baby” universe inside the singularity at the core of the black-hole. This type of wormhole is created due to the light-speed surface of the black-hole being coiled up around its equator by the rotation of its polar axis. The same process that causes sun- spots to form in pairs in opposite hemispheres on a star also applies to a black-hole.

There are also black-holes that occur in deep-space that do not exert super-gravity and accumulate a spiral galactic accretion disc around their equator. This type of black-hole is often called a “hairless” black-hole, and should not be confused with the deep-space, Gamma ray type of wormhole. The difference between the “hairless” black-hole and the Gamma ray wormhole is that the deep-space black hole has no electrical charge. Also, unlike the other type of black-hole, which accumulates a spiral galactic accretion disc and forms a “baby” universe of “inverted” matter- energy (ie. anti-matter and “dark” energy), the “hairless” black-hole does not rotate around a polar axis. Because “hairless” black-holes do not have worm-holes on their surface, we will not cover this type in discussing wormholes.

The type of wormhole that forms on the surface of a rotating black-hole has two components: an exterior and an interior. These act similarly to the “looking glass” that allowed Alice to return from “Wonderland” at the end of the fable by Lewis Carrol: on the surface, it appears to reflect the world exterior to it, however it also acts as a window or door that one can pass through into a world interior to it. Thus, if you enter a wormhole on the external surface of a gravitational black-hole, you can connect either intra-universally to a deep space, Gamma ray wormhole, or you can connect interuniversally to the interior of the black-hole.

Thus, to measure this type of wormhole, we include 6 vectors (each representing a coordinate pair) to represent the destination, either in local space-time or in the multiverse of baby universes beyond, as well as another direction of motion to represent the originpoint, the stationary black-hole itself. Thus, we depict this model in 3-space, with 6 coordinate vectors, and then add a 4th-dimension of motion.

The following diagram expresses the mathematics of such a model and is labeled according to ratios of space / time as distance^2 = duration^3 at light-speed.

represent the origin-point, the stationary black-hole itself. Thus, we depict this model in 3-space, with 6 co-ordinate vectors, and then add a 4th-dimension of motion.

The following diagram expresses the mathematics of such a model and is labeled according to ratios of space / time as distance^2 = duration^3 at light-speed.

As with previous models expressing these ratios of space relative to time, we depict these two primary components as operating at right-angles to one another, such that the plane of 3D space, line AB, would be seen to move in the direction of time, line AC. Thus, the relationship between point A and the relativity of point B to point C, will be used to measure a single unit, called an “event,” in the spacetime continuum. There are, then, three primary components of any given “event” in spacetime: point A) the beginning of the event, expressed here as 00:00; line BC) the semi-circular arc that connects the future of the event in space to the “future” in time, expressed here as the radii expanding outward from the origin-point A connecting B to C; line CB) the “squared” ratio of twin linear extensions from points B (the “end” of space) and C (the future of time), connecting at a point (C^2) beyond the circumferential arc describing the singularity of the event-horizon. The difference between the “squared” parameter of the “event” and the “event-horizon” perimeter of the “event” measures the “squared” area of the “circle,” such that the intersection of lines connecting space (horizontal line AB) to time (vertical line AC), would form a square with equal area to the semicircular arc describing the connection of B to C at the square-root point between the arc BC and the corner of C^2.

Taking apart the primary components of this 3D model (that is, this depiction in 2space of 3, paired, co-ordinate directions of vector: point A, arc BC, and square CB), and applying a 4th co-ordinate pair of directions for an additional vector, we can generate a base-16 grouping of statistical double outcomes. Here is a depiction of 14 of these 16 recombinations (the pair of first and last examples being merely stationary A or simultaneously motive BC and CB):

space of 3, paired, co-ordinate directions of vector: point A, arc BC, and square CB), and applying a 4th co-ordinate pair of directions for an additional vector, we can generate a base-16 grouping of statistical double outcomes. Here is a depiction of 14 of these 16 re-combinations (the pair of first and last examples being merely stationary A or simultaneously motive BC and CB):

TheThe blue horizon from Past represents the theforward forwardmomentum momentum blue horizon from Past(P) (P)to to Future Future (F) represents of of a a plane-space through time.

The redarc arcconnecting connecting P to (+)(+) or or plane-space through time.

The red to FFmeasures measuresclockwise clockwise counter-clockwise (-) rotation the plane-space plane-space inina semi-spherical direction, counter-clockwise (-) rotation of ofthe a semi-spherical direction, representing combined temporal momentum and spatial inertia.

The green diaganol representing combined temporal momentum and spatial inertia. The green diagonal from the top of the red arc measures the motion from space toward time or time from the top of the red arc measures the motion from space toward time or time toward space as the revolution of the plane-space in an elliptical orbit, representing temporal inertia. The black line represents the motion of a vector on the blue, horizontal plane-space, as either AB: in the same direction of motion of the plane- space through time; or as BA: opposite the direction of this motion. The interior numerical ratios represent the # per combination of these vectors that originate either on the left or right side. We can see here that the two primary orientations of the model (4:0 and 0:4, above) represent the standard-arrow motion of spacetime, from 4-past toward zerofuture (on the left), and the opposite of this, the negentropy of time-space, from 4-future toward zero-past (on the right). From these two main models follow the two on the left and the two on the right of the next row down. All the black-line vectors from the past to the future follow from the “standard” model on the left, while all those vectors that move opposite the “standard” arrow model follow from the model on the right. As explained, the models depicting “zero-point” motion (or space) and motion in all coordinate directions at once (or time) are not depicted, however it should be noted the total # of these statistical doubles is 16, that is 4^2; or the # of co-ordinate pairs per 3space and 1-time dimensions (the directions for motion of a vector) twice, that is 8 X 2.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Moving Electromagnetic Wormholes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When the poles of a black hole (such as the one in the middle of spiral galaxies like our own Milky Way) align with the poles of another black hole, no matter how far away these two are from one another, a pair of Gamma ray burst wormholes will appear in deep space between the galactic filaments at a distance equal to both one another and to both the pole-aligned black-holes.

In plotting a graph of the relevant components involved in the T4 model for a Gamma ray wormhole in deep space, we thus plot a point for each black-hole, and between these and opposite one another a point for each wormhole. Thus, we can graph these coordinates in the same manner as we can for a hyperspace co-ordinate system connecting any one point in spacetime (here, now) to any other point in spacetime (there, then).

The graph for a dual co-ordinate pair (2 black-holes, 2 wormholes) is equivalent to the graph connecting any two points in space (x, y) at two points in time (P, F). What we see here, then, is the graph for the various connections between 2 points in space (xP = black-hole A, yP = black-hole B) and 2 points in time (yF = wormhole A, xF = wormhole B).

Each of these 4 “corner” points or “nodes” corresponds to an arc formed between it and its opposite “corner” by a semi-circle with the given point as its origin. Thus, to calculate a course through hyperspace, that is, to travel through sub-space faster than light by entering the multiverse of n-dimensions parallel to our local universal linear timestream, we take into account the influence on our course of those objects possessing gravity (black-holes) or electromagnetism (wormholes) that would tend to distort the vector of any object moving between them. We use the relationship between each “corner” point and its opposite arc to trace the mid-point of intersection between the plane of space and the linear motion of time, and plot our course through hyperspace around this central origin.

Here, as usual, we see two points in space (x, y) as forming two parallel vectors when Here, as usual, we see two points in space (x, y) as forming two parallel vectors when applied to the direction of motion of time (P, F), alsoalso form twotwo parallel lines (time) applied to the direction of motion of time (P, which F), which form parallel lines that operate at a(time) 90° angle to the first two (space). that operate at a 90° angle to the first two (space). plot hyperspace charts each possible type re-combinationbetween betweenany To To plot outout thethe hyperspace charts forfor each possible type ofofre-combination any two points in space (x, y) at any two points in time (P, F), we would use statistical two points in space (x, y) at any two points in time (P, F), we would use statistical doubling to break apart above graph into constituent components. look doubling to break apart thethe above graph into its its constituent components.

ToTo look at at each each possible course in hyperspace one could take between these 4 points, we would possible course in hyperspace one could take between these 4 points, we would graph graph the arc connecting them and its angle from the central intersection point. The the arc connecting and its angle fromwith the the central intersection linear point. motion The following following chartsthem represent only motion forward-flowing of charts represent only motion with the forward-flowing linear motion ofinverted spacetime spacetime (depicted progressing from left to right). A second set of exactly charts isprogressing applicable for travel hyperspace to set an earlier pointinverted in time ascharts well. is (depicted from leftthrough to right).

A second of exactly applicable for travel through hyperspace to an earlier point in time as well.

In the same graphs a black-hole’s event horizon surface wormhole In the same wayway thatthat the the graphs for for a black-hole’s event horizon surface wormhole function to relate three spatial vectors with a fourth direction of motion, so we see function to relate three spatial vectors with a fourth direction of motion, so we see here here too that the graphs for a Gamma ray wormhole in deep space function to relate too two thatpoints the graphs forover a Gamma wormhole in deep function to relate in space a linearray direction of time.

Both, space however, make use of the two points in space over a linear direction of time.

Both, however, make use of the process process of statistical doubling to extrapolate various potential outcomes from any oneof statistical doubling to extrapolate various potential given present event. outcomes from any one given present event.

Here are the hyperspace charts for the standard, forward-flowing, arrow of entropy:

Here are the hyperspace charts for the standard, forward-flowing, arrow of entropy:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------T4: cosmology -----------------------------------------------------------------------------T4: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------T5:cosmology Cosmology ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the Combined combined Reimann Reimann / / DeSitter De SitterMetric metricTensor tensor The -----------------------------------------------------------------------------the combined Reimann / De Sitter metric tensor ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In flatIn“Minkowski space” (special relativity conditions), thethe Lorentzian metric tensor flat “Minkowski space” (special relativity conditions), Lorentzian metric proposed

by Einstein for “general withr^u co-ordinates, proposed tensor

by Einstein for “general relativity,” withrelativity,” co-ordinates, -> (x^0, x^1, x^2, flatx, “Minkowski space” (special relativity the Lorentzian r^uis-> (x^0, x^1, x^2, x^3) = (ct, conditions), x, y, z), is expressed here: metric x^3) In = (ct, y, z), expressed here: tensor proposed by Einstein for “general relativity,” with co-ordinates, r^u -> (x^0, x^1, x^2, x^3) = (ct, x, y, z), is expressed here:

the same Lorentzian metric solves for flat, Minkowski spacetime “n,” covering R^4 The same Lorentzian metric solves forthe flat, Minkowski “n,” +covering R^4 with with co-ordinates (t, x, y, z), and metric: ds^2 =spacetime -dt^2 + dx^2 dy^2 + dz^2. the same Lorentzian fords^2 flat, =Minkowski spacetime covering R^4 co-ordinates (t, x, y, z), metric and thesolves metric: -dt^2 + dx^2 + dy^2“n,” + dz^2. with co-ordinates (t, x, y, z), and the metric: ds^2 = -dt^2 + dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2.

According to Michio Kaku, in his work, “Hyperspace,” Einstein’s “general relativity” Reimann metric tensor (top left, above) with added dimensions yields “superAccording to Michio Kaku, in his work, “Hyperspace,” Einstein’s “general relativity” symmetry.”

According to Michio Kaku, in his work, “Hyperspace,” Einstein’s “general relativity” Reimann metric tensor (top left, above) with added dimensions yields “superReimann metric tensor (top left, symmetry.” above) with added dimensions yields “superAccording to Kaku’s model in this work, “Super-gravity” can fulfill the key position, symmetry.” substituted for the Einstein “general relativity” equations. The complete diagram According to Kaku’s model inofthis work,elemental “Super-gravity” canforces: fulfill gravity, the key electroposition, describes the expansion all four universal substituted for the Einstein “general relativity” equations.

The complete diagram According to Kaku’s model in this work, “Super-gravity” can fulfill the key position, magnetic (photic), weak nuclear and strong nuclear (quarks and leptons). describes the expansion of all four elemental universal forces: gravity, electrosubstituted for the Einstein “general relativity” equations. The complete diagram magnetic (photic),ofweak nuclear and strong nuclear (quarks and leptons). describes the expansion all four elemental universal forces: gravity, electro- magnetic (photic), weak nuclear and strong nuclear (quarks and leptons).

Until now, to my knowledge, nobody other than me has proposed the following solution Until Until now, now, to to my my knowledge, knowledge, nobody nobody other other than than me me has has proposed proposed the the following following to the blankto squares in the “scalar” vector of the initial we were If to apply the solution the squares in “scalar” vector of the were solution to the blank blank squares in the the “scalar” vector of“matrix.” the initial initialIf“matrix.” “matrix.”

If we we were four of matter-energy our local universal continuum to the to apply four forces matter-energy in local spacetime toelemental apply the theforces four elemental elemental forces of ofin matter-energy in our ourspacetime local universal universal spacetime initialcontinuum Reimann metric, as Kaku proposes, theas result leaves the empty square spaces at to Reimann metric, Kaku proposes, result still continuum to the the initial initial Reimann metric, as Kakustill proposes, the result still leaves leaves square spaces corners of intersection between columns and empty square spaces at at the the corners ofvertical intersection between the vertical verticalrows columns and theempty corners of intersection between the columns and the horizontal attributed horizontal rows attributed to each of the elements.

These “empty squares” can be horizontal rows attributed to each of the elements.

These “empty squares” can be to each of the elements. These “empty squares” can be “filled” by substituting a “filled” “filled” by by substituting substituting aa hyperbolic hyperbolic geometry geometry for for the the flat, flat, 2D 2D geometry geometry of of hyperbolic geometry for the flat, 2D geometry of Minkowski space.

Specifically, we would Minkowski Minkowski space. space. Specifically, Specifically, we we would would refer refer to to the the static static De De Sitter Sitter metric metric for for refer to the static De Sitter metric for asymptotically curved spacetime, such as Stephen asymptotically asymptotically curved curved spacetime, spacetime, such such as as Stephen Stephen Hawking Hawking and and Roger Roger Penrose Penrose Hawking andpropose Roger Penrose propose be the horizon of a blackwould found inside event horizon of aa black-hole. propose would be be foundwould inside the thefound eventinside horizon ofevent black-hole. hole.

- source: "Stephen Hawking, Roger Penrose: the Nature of Space and Time" source: "Stephen "Stephen Hawking, Hawking, Roger Roger Penrose: Penrose: the the Nature Nature of of Space Space and and Time" Time" -- source: http://www.benpadiah.com/otherstuff/elib/HawkingNatureOfSpaceTime.pdf http://www.benpadiah.com/otherstuff/elib/HawkingNatureOfSpaceTime.pdf The combination of the “super” Reimann metric tensor and the static De Sitter tensor (368 KB), KB), page page 49 of the .pdf (368 yielded the following diagram from very early49 onof inthe my.pdf research.

The combination of the “super” Reimann metric tensor and the static De Sitter tensor yielded the following diagram from very early on in my research.

-original context: -original context: http://www.benpadiah.com/MISC_diagrams/pages/originalMISC.html#MISC3 http://www.benpadiah.com/MISC_diagrams/pages/originalMISC.html#MISC3 In this model, the De Sitter static metric appears as the squares arranged diagonally from In this model, the De Sitter static metric appears as the squares arranged diaganolly thefrom upper to the right.

We see the De Sitter stands for the theleft upper leftlower to the lower right.

We see the Destatic Sittermetric static itself metric itself in stands “fifth element” pentagram); followed

by Einstein’s relativity” equations in for the(the “fifth element” (the pentagram); followed“general

by Einstein’s “general describing the force of gravity; followed by the Maxwellfollowed equations relativity” equations describing the force of gravity; by for the photic Maxwellelectroequations for followed photic electro-magnetic radiation; followed Yang-Mills magnetic radiation; by the Yang-Mills equations for by thethe weak nuclear force; equations for the weak nuclear force; followed by the (at the time followed by the (at the time unsolved) equations governing the strong unsolved) nuclear force of equations governing the strong nuclear force of quarks and leptons; followed at last quarks and leptons; followed at last by my own notion of universal “critical mass,” the by my own notion of universal “critical mass,” the maximum expansion of spacetime maximum of spacetime it begins to bubble intoofthe before itexpansion begins to bubble into thebefore n-dimensional “baby” universe the n-dimensional multiverse. “baby” universe of the multiverse.

At each dimensional layer of matter-energy vibrational frequency, graphed as the De dimensional Sitter static tensors at matter-energy the intersections of each pair of verticalgraphed column as andthe De At each layer of vibrational frequency, horizontal row per each of the 4 universally elemental forces, the manifold surface Sitter static tensors at the intersections of each pair of vertical column and horizontal of per spacetime should a different form.forces, Each universal elemental force row each of the 4assume universally elemental the manifold surface of assumes spacetime its own geometric topology governing its particles in spacetime. should assume a different form. Each universal elemental force assumes its own geometric topology governing its particles in spacetime.

Here is a brief synopsis of the application of the T4 model to any and every (known) level of matter-energy, thus allowing any form of matter-energy to time-travel and be able to become materially manifest out of other, lighter forms of energy.

Here is a brief synopsis of the application of the T4 model to any and every (known) level of matter-enegy, thus allowing any form of matter-energy to time-travel and be able to become materially manifest out of other, lighter forms of energy.

The expresses 2-knot expresses the dimensions of spacetime the geometrical level The 2-knot the dimensions of spacetime on the on geometrical level equivalent to equivalent to the physical level of matter-energy comprised of the quarks andstrong the physical level of matter-energy comprised of the quarks and leptons of the leptons of theThe strong nuclear force. The expresses the geometry spacetime nuclear force. trefoil expresses the trefoil geometry of spacetime for of the Yang-Mills for the Yang-Mills equations, governing the weak nuclear force (radioactive particle equations, governing the weak nuclear force (radioactive particle decay). The Maxwell decay). The Maxwell equations governing photic electromagnetic light are graphed equations governing“tube” photictorus. electromagnetic light graphed particle as a 4-manifold “tube” as a 4-manifold The (as of yet onlyare theoretical) form of the torus. (as of yet only thus, theoretical) particle form of the of gravity thus, forceThe of gravity would, be attributed the triple tori force around a trefoilwould, geoemtry of be a 5-space manifold. attributed the triple tori around a trefoil geometry of a 5-space manifold.

The geometry of the square-root of 2 gnomon is the skeletal framework upon which the physics of the combined DeSitter / Reimann metric-tensor is based:

The geometry of the square-root of 2 gnomon is the skeletal framework upon which the physics of the combined DeSitter/Reiman metric-tensor is based:

This basically ties the physics model on the right to the geometric pattern on the left This by basically ties the model on the “e right to(the the “inversion” geometric pattern onmatter the left by describing the physics relationship between = M” between and describing theat relationship “e = M” (thein “inversion” between matter and energy energy the border between of the local universe “general” relativity) and “c^2” (the law" universe of the propagation of relativity) photons atand the “c^2” speed (the of light in a perfect at the"inverse border square of the local in “general” "inverse square vacuum).

In other words, what we are looking at in both the "e = M" model on the law" of the propagation of photons at the speed of light in a perfect vacuum). In other right and the "c^2" model on the left is the same.

The "e = M" model renders a words, what we are looking at in both the "e = M" model on the right and the "c^2" quantum or asymptotically auto-terminating finitude. The "c^2" model renders a model on the left is the same. The "e = M" model renders a quantum or asymptotically cosmological or asymptotically expanding infinitude. auto-terminating finitude. The "c^2" model renders a cosmological or asymptotically expanding infinitude.

Again we see that space (the 45° diaganol extending from the upper center to the lower right corner) and time (the 45° diaganol extending from the upper center to leftspace corner) operate at 90° toextending one another, while, in space, Againthe we lower see that (the 45° diagonal fromand thethat upper center to thethere lower are three possible directions, in addition to the “speed of light squared” expressed as right corner) and time (the 45° diagonal extending from the upper center to the lower the edge of the multiverse beyond the local spacetime continuum, there remain only left corner) operate at 90° to one another, and that while, in space, there are three the 3 primary stations of the separate dimension of time (past, present, future). possible directions, in addition to the “speed of light squared” expressed as the edge of the multiverse beyond the local spacetime continuum, there remain only the 3 primary -----------------------------------------------------------------------------stations of the separate dimension of time (past, present, future).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------T4: conclusion and further implications -----------------------------------------------------------------------------T4: conclusion and further implications ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------original graphic context: original graphic context: http://www.benpadiah.com/MISC_diagrams/time_diagrams.jpg original html context: http://www.benpadiah.com/MISC_diagrams/time_diagrams.jpg http://www.benpadiah.com/MISC_diagrams/pages/time_diagrams.html#TIME original html context: http://www.benpadiah.com/MISC_diagrams/pages/time_diagrams.html#TIME

Here is a diagram that introduces a basic hypothesis of the natural law upon which T4 is Here is a diagram that introduces a basic hypothesis of the natural law upon which based. to that this introduces diagram, the (x,y,z) axes are allthe perpendicular to one Here isbased. a diagram a basic hypothesis of natural law upon which T4 isAccording According to this diagram, the (x,y,z) axes are all perpendicular toanother one is based. (as According to this diagram, the (x,y,z) are of allaperpendicular to one co(asT4 representing the three, intersecting planes of axes a three-dimensional Cartesian another representing the three, intersecting planes three-dimensional another (as representing the three, intersecting planes of aangle three-dimensional ordinate system) and are seen from above 45° above angle them.

At their Cartesian co-ordinate system) and are seen afrom abetween 45° between them.origin At Cartesian co-ordinate system) and are seen from above a 45° angle in between them.

At their origin point, representing any given point of intersection 3-space, is a point, representing any given point of intersection in 3-space, is a fourth axis, “t,” their origin point, representing anyperpendicular given point of intersection in 3-space, is a fourth axis, “t,” representing time, alllocal the other of local representing time, perpendicular to all the other threetoof space.three “t” conserves the fourth “t,” representing time, to all the other-> three space. “t” axis, conserves the set (x,y,z) pastperpendicular -> future in 3-D, and future pastof inlocal 4D, with set (x,y,z) -> future in (x,y,z) 3-D, and -> past in and 4D, future with an space. “t” past conserves the velocity set pastfuture -> future in 3-D, -> infinitely past in 4D,divisible with an infinitely divisible asymptotically approaching the inertial variable “K.” velocity asymptotically approaching the inertial variable “K.” an infinitely divisible velocity asymptotically approaching the inertial variable “K.”

It should also be noted that the trefoil idea (on the right, below) is merely another It should also noted that the trefoil idea (on the right, below) is merely another Itexpression should alsobe noted thatof trefoil idea (on the right, below) merely another ofbe the binding time inside the three dimensions ofisspace, only, in a expression of the binding of time inside the three dimensions of space, only, in expression of the inside-out binding offrom timethe inside the three dimensions ofright). space,The only, in a way, way, turned previous expression (above, trefoil way, turned from thedimension previous expression (above, right).

The trefoil turned inside-out from the previous expression (above, The trefoil expresses time expresses time inside-out as a single, spatial and the 3right). spatial dimensions as events, expresses time as a single, spatial dimension and the 3 spatial dimensions as events, or locations in 4-D time. as a single, spatial dimension and the 3 spatial dimensions as events, or locations in 4-D or locations in 4-D time. time.

The geometric graph on the left depicts the skeletal frame-work of the trefoil manifold geometric graph thegraph left depicts skeletal frame-work of the trefoil on theThe right.

The label of on this assertsthe the essential T4 time-travel hypothesis, The geometric graph on the leftofdepicts the skeletal frame-work of the trefoil manifold on the right.

The label this graph asserts the essential T4 time-travel expressed: "in 4D, X4 operates at right angles to t, with inertia K." 4D refers here to the manifold on expressed: the right. The labelX4ofoperates this graph asserts the essential time-travel hypothesis, "in 4D, at right angles to t, withT4 inertia K." 4D three spatial and additional dimensions of angles local spacetime.

X1, X2 X3 are hypothesis, expressed: "in temporal 4D, X4 operates at right todimensions t, with inertia K."&4D refers here to the three spatial and additional temporal of local “events,” or locations in space-time, along a single timeline.

X4 refers to a given nadir refers here three and temporal dimensions localtimespacetime.

X1, to X2the & X3 are spatial “events,” oradditional locations in space-time, along a of single X1, X2in& X3 are “events,” locations in space-time, along or spacetime. “perigee” event another time-line that is parallel toinX1 and X3, butaissingle perpendicular line. X4 refers to a given nadir oror “perigee” event another time-line thattimeis a given orX3, “perigee” event in another time-line that is to X2. line. X4 refers to parallel to nadir X1 and but is perpendicular to X2. parallel to X1 and X3, but is perpendicular to X2.

As "t" (time) moves forward linearly [(L) -> (R) = (p) -> (f)] (alike the ground under a wheel), X4 (like a spoke on the wheel) revolves around and, at the point of utmost

As "t" (time) moves forward linearly [(L) -> (R) = (p) -> (f)] (alike the ground under a wheel), X4 (like a spoke on the wheel) revolves around and, at the point of utmost perigee, motion of of time. time.Thus Thuswe wecan can say that perigee,rotates rotates“clockwise,” “clockwise,”yet yet opposite opposite the the motion say that X4X4 operates "at right angles" to 4D world-line “t” at point X2, and we can further premise operates "at right angles" to 4D “t” at point X2, and we can further premise that X4X4operates world-set of of (x,y,z), (x,y,z),conserved conservedinto into line “t,” that operatesparallel parellelto to the the 3D world-set line “t,” as as thethe of line “t,” that is, as inertia “K.” velocity of line “t,” that velocity is, as inertia “K.” In the final T4 paradigm we see that X1 (spacetime = the local universe) and X3 In the final T4 paradigm we see that X1 (spacetime = the local universe) and X3 (time(timepsace = the multiverse) act like event-horizons, each tapering off toward 1D at space = end the multiverse) act like between event-horizons, each off towardwe 1Dassociate at eitherX2 end either of the 2D time-line past and the tapering future. Therefore, of the 2D time-line between past and the future.

Therefore, we associate X2 with space, with space, and X4 with time. and X4 with time.

Here we see the final model of the initial X4 premise, now called the T4 model. We see Here we see the final model of the initial X4 premise, now called the T4 model. We see that past for space is future for time, and that future for space is past for time, because that past for space is future for time, and that future for space is past for time, time because and space opposite another, the linear of matter acting to time move and space move one opposite one another, the motion linear motion of matter conserve gravitational entropy, the and simultaneous friction friction of the of n-the dimensional acting to conserve gravitic and entropy, the simultaneous nmultiverse invisibly overlapping our own localour universe in the form in ofthe sub-quantum, dimensional multiverse invisibly overlapping own local universe form of sub-quantum, superluminal superstrings acting to increase entropy. superluminal superstrings acting to increase entropy. arcs represent the “standard arrow” or “forward-flowing” of time as the The The red red arcs represent the “standard arrow” or “forward-flowing” of time as the overlapping exchange between future and past. The green circle between the overlapping exchange between future and past. The green circle between the alternating alternating realities of space and time connects a lock in space (X2) to a lock in time realities of space and time connects a lock in spacein(X2) to a and locknow. in time (X4). X2 is (X4).

X2 is where we actually exist, physically, the here X4 then where we actually our exist, physically, in the recedes here and now. and X4 then represents represents "higher self," which higher higher the moreour we "higher mentally associate ourselves with it.

The goal of this model is to show how to reverse self," which recedes higher and higher the more we mentally associate ourselves with it. space (below) and time (above) by the motion of gravitic "torsion” between them.

The goal of this model is to show how to reverse space (below) and time (above) by the motion of gravitational "torsion” between them.

The last model we will consider here will be the complete T4 world-model.

The last model we will consider here will be the complete T4 world-model.

The final T4 world-model is an attempt to express solely temporal components as a flat The final T4 world-model to express temporal a flat 2-space graph representingisa an 3Dattempt form. The exteriorsolely sphere has an components exterior andasinterior 2-space graph representing a 3D form.

The exterior sphere has an exterior and surface. Its exterior surface is time-space (tS), and its interior surface is spacetime (St). interior surface. Its exterior surface is timespace (tS), and its interior surface is The interior toroid has event “x” on one side of the central intersection of (horizontal) spacetime (St). The interior toroid has event “x” on one side of the central space and (vertical) time, andspace on the opposite side event can be thought of as intersection of (horizontal) and (vertical) time, and“y” on that the opposite side event operating 90°beand in the direction itsindipolar dual statistical “y” thatat can thought ofopposite as operating at 90°as and the opposite direction double, as its di-eg. polarthree dual circumferences statistical double, The three“tube” circumferences of the 4-manifold “x.” The of eg. the“x.”

4-manifold torus represent, from below to “tube” torus represent, from below to above: Past, Present and Future.

As “x” and “y” above: Past, Present and Future. As “x” and “y” move opposite one another, it conserves move opposite one another, it conserves the angular momentum of the events of the angular momentum of the events of these circumferences to result in counterthese circumferences to result in counter-rotation from one to the next. Thus, rotation from one to the next. Thus, plotting a vector on the revolving and rotating event plotting a vector on the revolving and rotating event as it changes pereptually from as the it changes from to theto present, and frominthe to the future toperpetually the present, and the fromfuture the present the past, results an present arc opposite past, inpoint. an arc opposite the “corner” point.

The entire Past, the results “corner” The entire model combines Past, Present and model Future combines in one event.

Present and Future in one event.

appendix A (additional diagrams) Here we see a measurement system that uses a multi-origin point method (multi- centroid graph, or combined horizontal and vertical "slide" rules) to measure the values (both "absolute," denoted by "bar / value / bar" AND "relative," denoted by "parenthesis, value, comma, value, parenthesis") of various variables. The values ascribed to the variables (such as "+" or "-" and integer values) relate to the variable's distance from the primary vertical axis at a right angle to the horizontal mid-point. The structure is here applied to measuring the "values" of variables "X" and "Y," where the values given for one occur "from the perspective," or "from the POV" of the other. Thus, for example, the value in the middle of the left-most side, "Y = -3" denotes the value of "Y" from the POV of "X" is "-3." In this arrangement we see that X is the individual, and Y the group or collective of any given society or culture of the same species as X. Thus, the middle vertical axis measures the minimum values of X to Y and of Y to X, and the further from this, the greater their perceived values relative to one another become. The top-most arc intersecting the central vertical axis is symbolic of the free market of exchange between the individual and the society or group, and constitutes a graphic depiction of our elevated, though arbitrary, over-inflated valuation of imaginary commodities in this market-place, where the very currency of exchange itself is, perhaps even necessarily so, fake. Below the central horizontal axis are the mind-states of those individuals more prone toward an "individualist mind-set," perspective or POV (on the left), and those more prone to a "collectivist mind-set," perspective or POV (on the right). The measure at the lowestmost middle-point symbolizes the "Absolute Value of Reality" as being comprised of twin 1/2s, one the perspective of the individual (labeled the absolute value of X), the other that of the collective, society or group (that of Y). Additional labels indicate the polarization influencing a toroidal counter-rotation that causes the shift in the centroid “zero sum” value at the origin point for the chart to drift from a single fixed location can be classified according to traditional moral binary units of “good” (+) and “evil” (-) though paired and duplicated among themselves, such that the outer-most ring of the complete system revolves clock-wise from “good/good” (the upper right) to “good/evil” (the lower right) to “evil/evil” (the lower left) to “evil/good” (the upper left) In this manner, “good” and “evil” are rendered subjective concepts relative to the social construct as a totality in itself.

Where "space" is measured as a horizontal axis at a right angle to positive (above) and negative (below) entropy, the density of "space" is determined according to a "lag" in the distance travelled by various quanta given an equal duration of time. This pattern, present also in the solar plasma sheath's extension of penumbral EM coiling, reflects a "lag" or discrepancy in pacing of purely solid matter vs. purely plasma energy, and results in the accumulation of additional mass / density (=matter) such that the otherwise more "sinusoidal" wavelength pattern here assumes a more "covalent" wavefront (akin to a "phi" spiral pattern). We see in this diagram as matter (black arc, left side of chart) accumulates positive entropy, eventually it generates life (blue arc), which curbs the rate of entropy, followed by "psi" (symbolic of sentience, green arc) a very brief hyperacceleration of entropy, followed by the EM spectrum's (purple arc, center) decline toward negative entropic zero-point of "c" (the speed of photons in a void), followed by an increase through tachyons (c^2, red arc) into "ZPE" (black arc, right side). The points A-G should constitute a 7 note "chromatic" spectral scale. The points Roman Numerals I-VI are considered "levels of clearance" in the "T4 program."

document 1. the seasons of the continuum

document 1. the seasons of the continuum

In this diagram, the “continuum” is measured as a span of 18 units of equal length. What we are In thisis diagram, theor“continuum” is entire measured as since a span 18 units of“big equal length. seeing the progress evolution of the cosmos the of moment of the bang” until What we are seeing is the progress or evolution of the entire cosmos since the the cosmos has fizzled out into a “nulliverse” of pure “zero point energy,” when, perhaps, another moment of the “big bang” until the cosmos has fizzled out into a “nulliverse” of pure “big bang” may spark another cosmos to form where ours once was. What we are also seeing is the “zero point energy,” when,amount perhaps, another bang” may or spark another cosmos distance covered in the same of time by the“big various particles waves of the different to form where ours once was.

What we are also seeing is the distance covered in the types of matter or energy being measured. In other words, in one unit of time, “matter” (a bososn) same amount of time by the various particles or waves of the different types of has travelled 3 units (from left to right) while “energy” (a tachyon) has travelled 18 units. The matter or energy being measured.

In other words, in one unit of time, “matter” (a four elemental forces (beginning, in this case, with “fusion,” first from left to right and ending with bososn) has travelled 3 units (from left to right) while “energy” (a tachyon) has “gravity” rather than, as they divided during the first Planck-time moment following the “big travelled units.

The forces in the this case,from with“matter” “fusion,” bang,” with18 gravity first andfour fusionelemental occurring last) are(beginning, associated with phases on first from left to right and ending with “gravity” rather than, as they divided during the left to pure “energy” on the right, with “Psi” symbolizing the “6th sense” or “mental energy” the first Planck-time moment following “big bang,” with point gravity first or and fusion force and “ZPE” symbolizing the 5th universalthe elemental force, “zero energy” tachyons. occurring last) are associated with ofthe phases from “matter” on the pure That this diagram IS valid as a depiction what it shows us cannot be denied.

Whyleft this to diagram “energy” the itright, with “Psi” symbolizing the what “6thit shows sense”usor “mental DOES show on us what does remains a mystery because why occurs for theenergy” cosmos force and “ZPE” symbolizing universal elemental force, “zero point energy” at all remains a mystery.

If we plotthe this5th graph as between twin vertical poles of “positive” entropy or tachyons.

That IS valid as a depiction of what shows us cannot be (or increased rate of this decaydiagram from matter into energy) at one point, above,itand “negative” entropy (or decreased decay from order into us chaos) at it another point, below, and thenbecause extend these denied.

Whyrate thisofdiagram DOES show what does remains a mystery why twin poles horizontally as acosmos measurement of time, a this graph appears as an accurate whatvertical it shows us occurs for the at all remains mystery.

If we plot this graph depiction of the natural phenomenon occur showing the (or way increased they do. However, there is as between twin vertical poles ofthat “positive” entropy rate ofagain, decay from no explanation for WHYatthis happens occur in just“negative” this way. Why, for example, do the elements matter into energy) one point,toabove, and entropy (or decreased rate of form “arcs”order from “pivot points” at thatanother are in the opposite endand of the entropic spectrum decayas from into chaos) point, below, then extend these from twin themselves; if thehorizontally “arcs” symbolize we actually see thengraph what invisible vertical poles as what a measurement ofoccurring, time, this appearsinfluence as an do these “pivot points”ofimply in opposition to thethat obvious?

What causes the of accurate depiction the exists natural phenomenon occur showing thepolar way location they do. these “pivotagain, points”there to shift “positive” to “negative” betweento“fusion” “fission,” However, is from no explanation for WHY entropy this happens occur and in just this and back between and “electromagnetism,” to “pivot “negative” entropy way.then Why, foragain example, do “Psi” the elements form as “arcs”back from points” thatbetween are in “electromagnetism” “gravity,” and spectrum then back from again to “positive” entropy betweensymbolize “gravity” the opposite end and of the entropic themselves; if the “arcs” and and forth, and forth; why?what Thereinvisible is no obvious explanation within what“zpe,” we back actually see back occurring, then influence do implied these “pivot the diagram.

When we break it apart intotoitsthe constituent components, as shown on the location facing page, points” imply exists in opposition obvious?

What causes the polar of we perceive descrepancy forming “what perceive” entropy (the impact of “Psi” on the these “pivotthe points” to shift from between “positive” to we “negative” between “fusion” spectrum) and “what actually (where the impact “Psi” is conserved byback that to of and “fission,” and we then back perceive” again between “Psi” and of “electromagnetism,” “electromagnetism”).

We do not see this pattern repeated at the later phase of “what we have yet “negative” entropy between “electromagnetism” and “gravity,” and then back again to If this pattern is “so below,” is there an “as above”? to perceive.” “positive” entropy between “gravity” and “zpe,” back and forth, back and forth;

why? There is no obvious explanation implied within the diagram. When we break it apart into its constituent components, as shown on the facing page, we perceive the descrepancy forming between “what we perceive” (the impact of “Psi” on the spectrum) and “what we actually perceive” (where the impact of “Psi” is conserved by that of “electromagnetism”). We do not see this pattern repeated at the later phase of “what we have yet to perceive.” If this pattern is “so below,” is there a “as above”?

This is the standard graph of above and below the limit of photic light which defines This is the standard graph of above and below the limit of photic light which defines

time as the standard arrow of entropy.

Below, time progresses left to right, and above, This is the standard graph of above and below the limit photic light which defines time as the time as the standard arrow of entropy.

Below, timeofprogresses left to right, and above, opposite this.ofNAM (destiny) and NAM.TAR (fate or free will) increase and decrease in standard arrow entropy.

Below, time progresses left to right, and above, opposite this. opposite this. NAM (destiny) and NAM.TAR (fate or free will) increase and decreaseNAM in direct relationship to one another.

The pastand is increasingly fixed (permanance) (destiny) and NAM.TAR (fate or free will) increase decrease in direct relationship to direct relationship to one another. The past is increasingly fixed (permanance) one while the future is ever-morefixed in flux (change). At either "end" of the timeline is a another.

The is is increasingly (permanance) future is ever-more while thepast future ever-more in flux (change). Atwhile eitherthe "end" of the timeline isina flux singularity connecting the above and below. (change). At either "end" singularity of the timeline is a singularity connecting the above and below. connecting the above and below.

When standard graph is mapped onto a sphere, the relationships above When the the standard graph is mapped onto a sphere, the relationships betweenbetween above and below When the standard graph is mapped onto a sphere, the relationships between above photic becomeentropy even clearer, as the apparent are revealed as only a andentropy below photic become even clearer,"twin" as thesingularities apparent "twin" singularities and below photic entropy become even clearer, as the apparent "twin" singularities singleare polar axis, and the future andpolar past below connect to theirand counterparts above around revealed as only a single axis, and the future past below connect to the are revealed as only a single polar axis, and the future and past below connect to equator,their which is NAM between the around two hemispheres of NAM.TAR. or permanence are then counterparts above the equator, which isChange NAM between the two their counterparts above around the equator, which is NAM between the two seenhemispheres as the direction rotation. Change or permanence are then seen as the direction of of of NAM.TAR. hemispheres of NAM.TAR. Change or permanence are then seen as the direction of rotation. rotation.

This model represents the static DeSitter metric, which, as Hawking points out,

This model represents the static DeSitter metric, which, as Hawking points out, describes a This model represents the static DeSitter which, as Hawking out, describes a cosmology similar to ametric, black DeSitter, it points is exponentially empty and at cosmology which is similar to which a blackis hole.

In DeSitter, it is hole. emptyIn and will expand describes a cosmology whichatisasimilar to a black hole.

In DeSitter, itpoints is empty and will expand exponentially fixed temperature.

While Hawking out the a fixed temperature. While Hawking points out the difference between this and the observed will expandbetween exponentially at the a fixed temperature.

While Hawking pointsfull outand the a difference this full and universe (which is relatively universe (which is relatively and observed a non-fixed temperature) the DeSitter metric may yet difference between this and the observed universe (which is relatively full andofa non-fixed temperature) the DeSitter metric may yet describe the properties describe the properties of underlying super-symmetric strings or branes which comprise the fabric non-fixed temperature) the DeSitter metric may yet describe the properties super-symmetric strings or branes which comprise the fabric of of the of the underlying space-time continuum's geometric surface.

underlying super-symmetric or branes which comprise space-timestrings continuum's geometric surface. the fabric of the space-time continuum's geometric surface.

Here model the initial X4 premise, now called the T4 We see Here we we see see the the finalfinal model of theofinitial X4 premise, now called the T4 model.

Wemodel. see that past for Herethat we see the final model of the initial X4 premise, now for called theisT4 model.

We see past for space is future for time, and that future space past for time, space is future for time, and that future for space is past for time, because time and space move that pasttime for space is future foropposite time, and that future the for linear space is past for time, because and space move one another, motion of matter opposite one another, the linear motion of matter acting to conserve gravitic entropy, and the because time and space move opposite one another, the linear motion of matter actingfriction to conserve entropy, and the simultaneous friction of our the nsimultaneous of thegravitic n- dimensional multiverse invisibly overlapping own local acting to conserve gravitic entropy, and supertrings the simultaneous friction in ofentropy. the form ndimensional multiverse invisibly overlapping our own acting local universe the of universe in the form of sub-quantum, superluminal to increase

dimensional multiversesuperluminal invisibly overlapping ouracting own local universe in the form of sub-quantum, supertrings to increase entropy. sub-quantum, superluminal supertrings acting to increase entropy.

The red arcs represent the overlapping exchange between the future and the past. The green circle The the redalternating arcs represent theofoverlapping exchange between the future past. between realities time and space connects a lock in space (X4)and to athe lock in time The red represent thethe overlapping exchange between the future and represents the past.

The green between alternating realities ofhere timeand and space a lockour (X2).

Now X4arcs iscircle where we actually exist, physically, in the now.

X2 connects then The green circle between realities of and ourselves space connects lock in space torecedes a lock higher in the timealternating (X2).

Nowthe X4higher is where we actually exist, physically, inthe "higher self," (X4) which and higher wetime associate with it. aThis is in space (X4) to a lock in time (X2).

Now X4 is where we actually exist, physically, in the version here and now. thenhowever represents ourexist "higher self," more whichcomplicated recedes higher and simplest of the T4X2 model, others with much explanations. the herethe and now. we X2 then represents ourwith "higher self," recedes higherof and higher higher associate ourselves it. This is which the simplest version the higher the higher we associate ourselves with it.

This is the simplest version of T4 model, however others exist with much more complicated explanations.the T4 model, however others exist with much more complicated explanations.

document 2B shows how an arc-length of “matter” or a boson vector (symbolized as

document 2B shows how an arc-length of “matter” or a boson vector (symbolized as 1/8th a circle 1/8th in green in the lower-left corner, labeled by thesymbolizing elemental “fusion”) sign of in greenaincircle the lower-left corner, labeled by the elemental sign of “earth,” “earth,” symbolizing “fusion”) and an arc-length of “energy” or a fermion and an arc-length of “energy” or a fermion vector (symbolized as 1/4th a circle in red vector in the (symbolized as 1/4th in red sign in the upper-left corner,“fission”) labeled collide by the upper-left corner, labeled aby circle the elemental of “fire,” symbolizing if elementalinsign “fire,” “fission”) collide if the combined in this ratio, and combined this of ratio, and symbolizing shows us, expanded in the center, combination of the mattershows quanta us, expanded in the center, the collision combination the 8 matter-energy quanta energy following the “boson/fermion” as they of revolve times each until they following the “boson/fermion” collision as they revolve 8 times each until align again and then, as shown on the right-side of the model, they split apart again, only they this aligninagain and directions then, as than shown onwere the travelling right-sideinofthe the model, they split apart of again, time, different they beginning.

On the right-side the only this time, directions than they were travelling the fermion, beginning. model, symbolic of in the different phase post-disassociation of the matter boson from the in energy we On the theunit right-side of the symbolic post-disassociation of the in matter see of “matter” thatmodel, had been in greenof onthe the phase lower-left is measured by “gravity” blue boson from the energy fermion, see the unit “matter” hadupper-left been in isgreen on the upper-right, while the unit ofwe “energy” that hadofbeen in red that on the now on the lower-left is measured in bypurple “gravity” in lower-right. blue on the while measured by “electromagnetism” on the In upper-right, this manner we see the that unit the of “energy” that is had been in central red expansion on the of upper-left is now measured by “static DeSitter metric” formed as the the single instant of particle collision “electromagnetism” in purplearcs oneach the for lower-right.

In particle this manner weDocument see that2Bthe into the cycle of 8 revolutionary the combined and wave. is “static DeSitter metric” is formed as shows the central expansion of the single instant of essentially a “Feynman” diagram that also arc-lengths of revolution symbolizing distances particle over collision into the cycle of 8 revolutionary arcs each for the combined travelled equal durations.

particle and wave. Document 2B is essentially a “Feynman” diagram that also shows arc-lengths of revolution symbolizing distances travelled over equal durations.

Would the of documents 1 and1 2and shown here as here document 3 result in3the doubling of Would thecombination combination of documents 2 shown as document result in the document of 1 inside of document 2 such that not only is it present in document 3, doubling document 1 inside of document 2 such that notonce, onlyasisshown it present once, as but alsoin“as above, so3,below,” such “matter” and “energy” would arise in the“energy” opposite shown document but also “asthat above, so below,” such that “matter” and direction following from the arc-lengths of “time” and “space,” flowing from “energy to matter” would arise in the opposite direction following from the arc-lengths of “time” and above as it does “matter to energy” “space,” flowing from “energy tobelow? matter” above as it does “matter to energy” below?

document 4D: existence as is document 4D: existence as is

shows the “exterior” worlddocument governed4D: byexistence the 4 elements as “seasons” in a cycle. as is shows “exterior” worldgoverned governed by by the asas “seasons” in ain cycle. shows thethe “exterior” world the44elements elements “seasons” a cycle. document 4A: existence of essence

document 4A: existence of essence

document 4A: existence of essence

shows the “interior” world governed by the 5 senses as “directions” on a compass. shows the “interior” world governed by the 5 senses as “directions” on a compass. shows the “interior” world governed by the 5 senses as “directions” on a compass. facing page: document 4 showing documents 4A and 4D combined. facing page: document 4 showing documents 4A and 4D combined. the combination of the “interior” and -> “exterior” worlds a “social soul” unit. facing page: document 4 showing documents 4A as and 4D combined. shows the combination of the “interior” and -> “exterior” worlds as a “social soul” unit.

shows the combination of the “interior” and “exterior” worlds as a “social soul” unit.

document 5: the “social soul” unit below combined with the “T4” model above. document 5: the “social soul” unit below combined with the “T4” model above.

document 5: the “social soul” unit below combined with the “T4” model above.

document 6: for complete explanation see page 38, above. document 6: for complete explanation see above.

shows a modelofof“society” “society” as as aa holistic system. shows a model holisticvalue value system.

document 6: the “social soul” unit combined with the model of “society.” document 6: the “social withthe themodel model “society.” document 6: the “socialsoul” soul”unit unit combined combined with of of “society.”

document 7: the model ofof“society” combinedwith with the “T4” model above. document 7: the model “society” below below combined the “T4” model above. document 7: the model of “society” below combined with the “T4” model above.

appendix B (additional writings) Part 1: further musings on time Part 2: time’s tides Part 1: further musings on time There are obviously, multiple methods of time travel. The method we will discuss here is in the form of a "thought experiment," therefore it renders an excercise in "mental-only" time travel methodology. However, theoretically, if one were to build a ship as a transtemporal vessel, the same rules could be applied to navigating such a physical craft to transport their body as described here "mentally-only."

Targetting of time-tunnel: This method involves "attacking" an, exactly as possible, estimated arrival time from a given (equally only relatively constrained) "window" of departure. If your "jump- time" takes 5 seconds, your "arrival-time" will also last 5 seconds. Thus, this 10 seconds must be factored into the equation of duration = distance to be "travelled" across time, also.

Imagine you wanted to make a "time-jump" from 2012 to 1905, and to be able to return.

You would need to establish a stable time-tunnel, "portal" or worm-hole between these two dates in time. The worm-hole, in this case, would be 107 years long. It would have to "slice" or "cut" through and around the events during this intersecting portion of time in a manner so as not to effect changes in them; it would also have to "bend" or "warp" over and around the targetted destination location's exact position as it changed position over the intervening time. The most obvious course to avoid interference and re-connect only at the most distant location (the targetted destination location) would be an arc.

An arc can be defined as like an arched bow, it has an ascending node, a central atipode point, and then a descending node. In the ascending node, the arc-shape of the wormhole is travelling both away from the "jump-point" as well as "backwards" in time.

In the descending node, the arc-shape of the wormhole is travelling toward the "targetpoint" as well as "backwards" in time. Because in the ascending-node time moves somewhat more slowly than the time in the descending node of the parabollic arc, one also must factor this into their time-travel equations.

At the "central antipode" or "mid-point," between the "jump point" and the "ascending node" of the "time-arc" on the one side and the "descending node" toward the "targetpoint" on the other, will occur an event (already known in the later date) that will largely determine the nature of the "time-jump" one will be making between point A in the future and point B in the past, or vice versa. This "central event" occurs due to the "time-tunnel's" warping of the quanta underlying space- time.

For example, all forms of "worm-holes" already exist, in potential. When they become activated and while being used, they exist. The rest of the time, they do not exist, not in

any standard way we would experience them. However, while we are going through a "worm-hole" or "time-tunnel," we are going from point A to point B at a nearly instantaneous speed, although point A may have happened a long time later than point B, and not even at the same exact location in space either. This is all related to the natural facts about "quantum-teleportation," that it occurs in the absence of the "operant observer principle," such that whenever photons cease striking electrons, the electrons return to a condition of "quantum uncertainty," where they seem to inhabit multiple locations simultaneously in an "orbital cloud" around an atom's nucleus. When any particle smaller or faster than a photon strikes an electron-cloud it does not disturb its state of "uncertainty" or alter its condition of probability. We call "superluminal" energy a spectrum of "anti-matter" particulates, and include "anti-particle" counterparts for many actual sizes of stable matter-energy quanta. However, super-lumunal matter we call the "energy" field of the "nulliverse," where all is pure tachyonic light, so-called "Cerenkov radiation" in the modern scientific vocabulary. Inside the diameter of the time-tunnel, we physically become particles travelling faster than light-speed, in order to pass from one point in spacetime to another at a speed faster than we could, even travelling at the speed of light.

Therefore, at the "mid-point" of the "time-arc," when the time-traveller begins to return from their journey outside of time and turns back toward the "main-stream" sequence of events, this corresponds to an event in that "main-stream" sequence of events that occurs at the "mid-point" date and time stamp between points A (the "jump" point) and B (the "target" destination). This event serves as an "omen" that can help pre-determine the natural course comprising the series of events the "time- jump" will consist of.

For example, say I want to leave on midnight between December 20th and 21st, EST, from Tallahassee, Florida, and travel back 107 years to 1905 and visit Nikola Tesla in his Wardencliffe laboratory in Shoreham, Long Island. First I would measure the distance from here to there. Then I would super-impose an equal "length" symbolising the duration (107 years, approximately) to travel. Following this, I would compute this measurement as upon an arc, or as alike the pattern of a "solar prominence" that forms in the magnetic field of the sun. I would ascertain the mid- point in terms of a date and time, and I would ascertin the mid-point in terms of a location of distance, both between A & B. I would have to compare the overall events of the world in the "mid-point" date to the events in the world occuring at the "mid- point" location to be able to ascertain an "omen" about the nature of the particular "time-jump" involved, and, obviously, this would differ based on each different "jump."

Because the "omen" can be known before the "time-jump" is under-taken, it has an influence on the natural course of events in the "time-jump" to the same extent the "time-jump" will change the natural events that occured in the past. In this case, I would be looking for an event that would occur somewhere around the eastern coast of the USA, perhaps in South Carolina, in the sixth month of the year 1958. This is because the "time-tunnel" is 107 years long, and 1/2 of 107 is 53.5 or 53 years and ~6 months (1/2 or 0.5 of a year).

One cannot determine if the "omen" is "positive" or "negative" about the impact of the "time-jump" on those under-taking it, at least not until after one has taken the "jump" and followed the natural course of events of doing so. Only after one returns to their own "altered" future event's time will one know if the changes one made while in the past are "positive" or "negative."

PEACE! - Jon Gee Tallahassee, Florida, USA. Monday, 10:45 pm. November 26, 2012.

Part 2: time's tides.

August 24, 2014 “Forever is an island blind lovers swim to, swimming blindly through the sea of time.

Who do they hope to meet upon those timeless shores?

Some reflection of the time they've already lost."

- a poem by Jon Gee, 1996.

I can see a future were nano-technology on the sub-atomic level has given us all almost unlimited physical and mental powers.!People have extremely heightened sensory awarenesses and are able to run extremely fast, leap off cliffs, jump off buildings, bridges, airplanes, etc. and survive, just get up and walk away. People are instantly aware of all new information as it becomes available from anywhere on earth. Mankind has replaced our once and future idea of "gods." And we stand in this future on the brink of using these miniature robots to turn back time and travel, only as minds at first, but ultimately with our bodies as well, back in time to a moment prior to our leaving.

In this future, there will be no "net" as we know it now, no more "wires" connecting point A up-line to point B down-line. The internet as a "series of tubes" will burst until its information-contents fill to capacity the equilibrium state of their natural environment in this case that being, like water in an aquarium, earth's electromagnetic field itself.

This field will become the internet, and people will not access it using primitive gadgetry like they do today. Nanites, sub-atomic machines running "quantum computing" programming languages (involving "trinary" rather than "binary," in which a third, "maybe" state is produced using quantum-level uncertainty probabilities) will inhabit all of us, as well as all the earth's gravity well, and they will instantaneously synch a link from anyone anywhere to anyone anywhere else; the result of this will be identical in all respects to "controlled telepathy" or, more exactly, a 2-way form of non-verbal communication between distant brains using electromagnetic impulses of encoded data alone.

In this future, such telepathic communication will occur via the networked nanobots virtually instantaneously to anywhere on the globe, and all knowledge will be instantly accessable, via mind alone, on the global electromagnetic telecommunications network.

Likewise, these nanites will have the ability to replicate using the elements in their

surrounding environment, meaning they will be able to clone and replicate tissue cells at an adjustable rate, and thus provide the useful ability of being able to heal any injuries.

"Better living through nanite technology" will provide the appearance of immortality, but at the cost of humanity's soul. All our inner-most thoughts will become publicly available on a telepathic internet that has no concept of personal privacy or individual boundaries. No one will have any secrets anymore, but we will all be physically indestructible.

Eventually, we will each have our own automatically provided "channel" on a cyborgintegrated, telepathic telecommunications form of the modern internet, each providing non-stop, constantly streaming footage of our everyday, mundane, daily lives. Some will begin staging their own "reality shows," while others will atrophy from activity into a silent audience, watching the social "players." Our shows will begin to compete with one another and a massive, global ratings system will be devised to determine, from one instant to the next, whose channel is the "most popular." This global ratings system for "weighing all souls" will be called the "Enochian communications system" (or "ECS" for short).

And, eventually, those operating it will begin to see the use for it in establishing a form of "global government," where the "most popular" channels are combined in one group setting to solve all the world's problems. This is what happened in ancient Atlantis. The group presented their findings to the world of their era in the form of "Atlantean Democracy" - the way things should have been done all along, but never were. Then, the flood swept over. time cycles. these cycles have ebbs and flows. these cycles fluctuate over time. time has tides; there is matter governed by entropy that may be imagined as forwardly mobile, our "expanding cosmos," etc. and there is zero-point energy governed by unknown laws of physics, and this "ether" energy may be imagined as moving opposite the flow of entropy, and thus causing "negentropic" loops, eddy-currents and cycles in time to occur. If the "tides" of time are that "time flows forward AND backward simultaneously" (so to speak) then not only does this imply there is an effect greater than "time" that causes and influences this effect to occur, as the moon causes earth's tides, but it means that, by torsion between counter-rotating opposite polarities, we can harness the friction created between "matter" (bosons) and "zero- point energy" (tachyons and any other form of superluminal fermions). If we apply counterrotation of electromagnetic fields we can definitely generate a large amount of potentially kinetic energy. If we can spark this and harness that spark by harnessing the counter-rotation's friction, we have completed the model. again, think in terms defined as laid out in T4: if space is "3-dimensional," that is, the entirety of all matter-energy that can be measured in any single given moment by "width, breadth and depth" in 3 opposite right-angled directions; then time is 1dimensional; it is the dimension added to space when matter-energy moves over time.

Space would still be space if time stopped or ceased having ever existed. But if you remove time from space, you reduce time to one long noodle, the "time-stream," a 1-

dimensional point, extended into a 2-dimensional line, expanded into a 3-dimensional plane, and this square cubed to yield the tesseract symbolic of 4th-spatial dimensional "time." Time is a mobius strip if separated from the 3-dimensions of space. Time is a single ribbon, a super-symmetric fiber of super-gravitational tachyons passing from one spiral galactic synapse to the next along the intergalactic filaments. The garden of forking paths seems to have many roads. In truth, there is only one. if in our future we develop time-travel into the distant past, we could open a worm- hole from the future into the past, and ship tools and supplies and workers through this worm-hole into the past, to construct massive underground facilities, the so- called "DUMBs." We would then leave these in the past, and allow them to be discovered only by the "right people" along the intervening way, until, later, we would develop them into the modern "DUMBs" where we would experiment with ways to create time-travel. If DUMBs form such a "temporal tautology" in the PAST, perhaps "God" is a similar such "temporal tautology" in the FUTURE? life is that element that can walk between moments. It exists, suspended eternally (and just in jest, upside down as well it seems) between past and future. imagine three puddles of paint; one is red and symbolic of the future; one is blue and symbolic of the past; one is yellow and between the other two and is symbolic of the present. Then time sweeps through. It smudges the yellow paint puddle into the blue paint puddle. But it also smudges the red paint puddle into the yellow paint puddle. The result is, of course, a meaningless mess, unless you study which paint puddle has smudged by how much into which other paint puddle. After a moment of time, there will be 1/2 as much red puddle, the yellow puddle will be orange and beginning to tint purple, and the blue puddle will be purple and 4X its original size. So are the "past," the "present" and the "future" like paint puddles.

The "past," the "present" and the "future" are therefore NOT separate things-inthemselves. They act as though they are, and divisible they may be, but also indivisible and one. And in this regard, though they MAY be multiple, a plenum, they MUST be a unity and a solitude. If there were no such a thing as a future, again, the present and past could still exist. If there were no future, nor any past, the present may yet exist. But if one exists, all MAY exist; and if all MAY exist, then one MUST exist. Again, the existence of the different facets or phases of time may or may not exist; but the existence of time itself, as a singular force, cannot be denied as existent. If there were no time, there would be no movement, no motion, no changes at all. Since we see around us movement, motion and changes occur, we infer their cause to be the existence of time.

Consider the various parts of time: 1. the past. 2. the present. 3. the future. but there are also two other parts: A. entropy (past to future flowing matter-time). B. negentropy (future to past flowing energy-time). There is also the singular unity of all these traits into the one concept of "time" itself. Therefore, the tetraktys begins to form: I. TIME. A. entropy. B. negentropy. 1. past. 2. present. 3. future. So we see the 6 traits of time, and how they may combine (if past, present and future are compared to "salt, sulfur and mercury," the alchemical stages of matter, akin to "ice, vapor and fluid" phases of

substance) with the 4 elements of tetragrammaton to form the complete tetraktys of Pythagoras.

Such is time not only a singular directional additional dimension tacked onto space's 3dimensions in the form of animation, movement, motion, change, etc. but a combination of multiple traits (each on their own level or dimension of correspondences), and therefore of multiple dimensions in itself. Time is the 4th- dimension: as a force, this means time is a single-directional, additional dimension tacked onto space in the form of motion; as a geometry, however, this implies time has "shapes" and "forms" within its own set of physics, and exists as an entire additional dimensional cosmos that overlaps our own invisibly, full of complex and geometrically "impossible" loops and cycling patterns. In this "hyperspace" dimension of 4-dimensional space that IS "time" itself, there are "gravity shadows" of 3-space shapes (such as comets, planets, stars, blackholes, etc.) but there are also OTHER shapes (which I've called elsewhere "metaforms") that simply float about, existing, in this 4-dimensional "hyperspace" soup of zero-point energy. These hypershapes or "metaforms" are like prismatic lens flares that form OVER TIME (or rather, along the directional axis of time's overall motion to the cosmos) as a result of "zero-point" (or superluminal) energy emanating originally from the future, and thus flowing opposite the entropic flow of time for matter as it decays into energy from past to future. This superluminal, tachyonic Light from the future casts a shadow into the past from the matter-energy that exists as our present cosmos, and this shadow not only accounts for the additional "mass" (the "dark matter" causing inflationary expansion) of the cosmos unseen by telescopes, but takes the form, very specifically, of a tesseract over a torus.

appendix C (2018 extras)

Nous (realm of the body and of matter), Psyche (realm of mind and being) and Gnosis (the realm of QBLH and pure energy) as the 3 parts or "degrees" of the spirit within the universe. Aura is shown as the outside of the Chakras, as Chi energy is to the soul; and where the soul and aura overlap (in the realm of Psyche), the "holy ghost" / Atman controls the Merkabah of Karma. Tao (below) leads to Zen (above).

"Gee coil" model 1A, partially inspired by the "vortex math" works of Marko Rodin and Randy Powell.

model of the 7 planetary "rulers" (color coded) as vertical, latitudinal arc-radians, describing twin hemispheres (above and below) around an equatorial band marked by the 12 signs of the zodiac. Note, in this model, the zodiac may rotate (as per one sign per aeon) but the order of the planets remains the same.

"the Seasons of the Pope" color-coded to the prismatic spectrum of 7 hues (ROYGBIV).

Representations of the 16 combinations of EVERY POSSIBLE VIEW OF A SPHERE as GRAPHIC, GRID and SYMBOL arrays for mnemonic memorization.

The simplest regular polygon is the triangle, and when plotted on a sphere, the minimum number of triangles there can be (each having 3 right-angles) is 8 (one for each 1/4th or quadrant of each 1/2 or hemisphere). Thus, there are exactly 16 locations + rotations that can be combined to yield EVERY POSSIBLE VIEW OF A SPHERE.

To "Jump" from space-time origin location I to space-time target destination point II, one must align points A, B & C in I and A, B & C in II, and then match the rate of "inertia" between I & II. The effect is like leaping between two trains that are moving on parallel tracks in opposite directions.

The same rules and physical laws that apply to a particle/wave within a larger, less dense energy/mass also apply to an event of space-time (of any size-scale) within the field of ZPE ("ether"). Thus, the "wake" caused by a particle/wave within a field is equivalent, in the context of event and ZPE, to ripples of "influence" that obey the "inverse square law" and the "doppler effect" on their rate of dispersion. Causality collapses these in on the event.

Centrifugal gravity causes the conservation of angular momentum.

Future events can have an influence on present and past events gravitationally but this effect is diminished by the conservation of angular momentum's greater influence on the present.

The Effect of Conservation of Angular Momentum on Probabilities. In this diagram, Entropy flows from right to left and Causality from left to right.

Effect of Conservation of Angular Momentum on Trajectories. The force of Entropy ("Ether-drift") pushes from right to left, and Causality ("negentropy") pushes from left to right.

labeled according to the "6 fundamental questions of reasoning" (who, what, when, where, why and how) and color-coded according to the 7 color spectrum of a prism (ROYGBIV), we see here the 6 "alternate universes" surrounding our cosmos as they relate to (in green at the core) our own.

wave-mechanical vectors plotting motion on 6 spheres expanded in each possible direction of 3 dimensional space.

matrix mathematical expression for "wave-mechanical" vectors of 6 spheres, 1 in each direction possible in 3 dimensional space.

when the radius of the torus of hyperspace surrounding the local universe is equal to the diameter of the local universe, then the 6 oldest "emanations" - originally waves of energy, become particles of mass, accumulating to form planets, then stars, then supernova, black-holes, gravitational singularities, and inside these baby universes - will form 6 perpendicular "parallel dimensions" around our own central reality. These are seen here color-coded to the 7 color spectrum of white light divided in a prism, beginning with red below, then orange and yellow around, green central, then blue and indigo around opposite, and finally violet at the top. there are, thus, 6 "parallel" world-lines, or rather, there is a "multiverse" of 6, equalsized, "offspring" universes surrounding our own. These interact with our own in the form of choices, presenting themselves to our consciousness in the form of the 6 "fundamental questions of logical reasoning." These cosmoses can be depicted, as here, color-coded to the 7 color spectrum, but more significantly can be titled according to the

"flavors" of quarks. Thus, the "red" cosmos could be called the "down" cosmos, the "violet" cosmos the "up" cosmos, the "blue" cosmos the "charmed," the "orange" cosmos the "strange," the "indigo" cosmos the "top" and the "yellow" cosmos the "bottom." The reasoning for applying these labels thus is that the "blue" or "charmed" cosmos is akin to the direction "forward" or "front," while the "orange" or "strange" cosmos is alike the direction "backward" or "behind." While the "up" and "down" cosmoses are the "better" and "worse" time-lines "parallel" to our own, the "right" cosmos is "indigo" or "top" because right-handedness is genetically dominant, while the "left" cosmos is "yellow" or "bottom" because left-handedness is genetically recessive.

from "the mysteries of 6" chapter in "principia numerologica: mysteries of number theory"

on one level, the key is given: where C is given as "local cosmos," B as "galactic location" and A as roughly "planetary system." Thus, to build inertia enough to travel intergalactically, one must propel oneself using the momentum of one's neighboring environments; however that, by doing so, one CAN leave the confines of the "local universe" itself. on another level, the key is given: C is "local cosmos," B is "offspring cosmos," and "A" is subjective self within world-line defined by B relative to C. If one wants to get out of the "main nerve," one must exercise some knowledge of simple trajectory physics involving differentially paced rotating orbits.

Clockwise and counter-clockwise pairs of clocks are here associated with each of the 6 cardinal directions in 3-dimensional space. The reason for this association of double clocks with each direction is that, if a clock is held in front of an observer and facing them, and another, identical clock is held in front of the observer, but facing away from them, these clocks will appear to function in opposite directions (clockwise or counterclockwise) to each other. This process can be repeated in all 6 directions simultaneously,

and the relationships between the clocks in these directions is depicted (roughly) here.

The "clocks" have only 6 interval increments, 1 for each direction, but there are 12 "clocks" shown (6 "inner" clockwise and 6 "outer" counter-clockwise). The clocks, obviously, will all keep the same time as each other (such that, even if set to a staggered rate, they will all still eventually synchronize), but the "time" modeled by the 6 "outer" clocks will run "opposite" that measured by the 6 "inner" clocks. This model is meant to demonstrate how the 4th (temporal) dimension "runs and returns" throughout the 3spatial dimensions by displaying it "running" in a "clockwise" motion from within looking out, and "returning" apparently "counter-clockwise" from outside looking in, in each of the 6 cardinal directions of 3-space.

This diagram shows why there can only be 3 time-lines. By the 4th bifurcation, we find the dividing realities from one time-line have begun to overlap with those dividing from another time-line. Thus, for this type of bifurcation to occur, the "middle" or "trunk" time-line must bifurcate only at every other interval.

This diagram shows the 3 types of time-lines - the "better" (in which things improve), the "static" (in which all remains the same) and the "worse" (in which all things deteriorate).

Here "time" would be measured as moving from left to right, while "luck" would be measured from down to up. The idea that "time" and "luck" comprise right-angled attributes of "entropy" should not be taken lightly, considering that "luck" may act as an "a-causal connecting principle" at a right-angle to the standard arrow of "cause and effect."

mathematical nature of the diagonal lengths for the sequence of the first 5 squares arranged along a gnomon. Apply Pythagorean theorem, reduction of square roots methods, and the formula for the diagonal of any width perfect square. Results are (as noted by "Cylon" the Pythagorean cult exile) for the "unit square" with sides equal to 1 each, the diagonal is the √2. Thus, according to the formula for the diagonal of perfect squares, each further iteration is the width of one side of the square multiplied by √2.

According to application of the Pythagorean theorem, we arrive at √(2^2 + 2^2) = √8 (where 2^2 = 4), which reduces to the same amount expressed as 2√2. Likewise, for 3√2 = √18, of 4√2 = √32, and of 5√2 = √50. This is due to the Pythagorean theorem (a^2 + b^2 = c^2, or √ leg squared plus leg squared = √ hypotenuse), wherein √(5^2 [=25] + 5^5) = √50.

from an upcoming introduction to an edited ebook on Euclid, Newton and Einstein, focusing solely on their equations and the use of geometric diagrams to model them. (not necessarily a final copy.)

According to the double-slit experiment, a particle with mass that is vibrating at the frequency of light speed is simultaneously a particle of matter AND a wave of energy. A photon (a quantum of light) will pass through BOTH slits "left" AND "right" as a wave and leave an intraference pattern on film behind them. Likewise, the mind is a field of electricity, and CAN thus, if obedient to the same laws as light, exist in a "wave" / potential-energy form in between events during which it becomes more focused into a physical form of "particles" / kinetic-energy. The mind MAY, as light, exist outside the physical body.

Because light can be either, and is both, particle AND wave, a mind can be either, and is both, two places at once. The mind exists as a field shared between multiple physical bodies in parallel time-lines. Just as a photon, whether acting as particle OR wave, is still a photon, likewise, if you meet a stranger coming toward you, you will still be "you" whether you pass them on your "left" OR "right." The evidence of the mind being a field of potential-energy shared between alternate physical bodies in parallel time-lines is that, if the stranger dropped their wallet, you would return it (or not - based on your personality) regardless of wether you had passed them on your "left" OR "right." A photon is BOTH particle AND wave. Just so, you are BOTH a mind AND a body.

light is time is gravity.

:: T4 :: :: T4 :: : Theoretical Time: Theoretical TimeTravelTechnology Technology : Travel : (2018 edition)

(2014 edition)

by: Jonathan Barlow Gee