VOL . LV NO. 51
DEC . 20, 2019
IN THIS ISSUE
Beverly Hills Public Library Reopens Grand Reading Room 4
THE NEWSPAPER OF RECORD FOR BEVERLY HILLS
BHCOURIER .COM
Arrest Made in Nessah Synagogue Vandalism Case BY BIANCA HEY WARD
Courier Connoisseur: Holiday Champagne Finds at Héritage Fine Wines 1 0
Nessah Synagogue on Dec. 14. Photo by Lisa Bloch
The Beverly Hills Police Department has made an arrest in connection with the desecration and vandalism at the Nessah Synagogue during the early hours of Dec. 14. Anton Nathaniel Redding, 24, of Millersville, Pennsylvania, was identified as a suspect on Dec. 17 after exhaustive review of video surveillance and forensic evidence. The Beverly Hills Police Department, working with other local and federal law enforcement agencies, tracked down Redding in Kona, Hawaii, where he was arrested and charged with vandalism of a religious property and commercial burglary. Those charges include a penalty enhancement for a hate crime under the California Penal Code. According to published reports,
detectives with an Hawaiian Special Enforcement Unit located Redding in the early afternoon of Dec. 18 on Ali‘i Drive in downtown Kona by the pier. Concurrently, two detectives and two sergeants from Beverly Hills arrived on O‘ahu, believing Redding to be there. But, after they landed, they learned Redding had moved on to Kona. Beverly Hills law enforcement followed suit, arriving at 3 p.m. Redding has had prior brushes with the law. In 2013, he was charged with possession of marijuana and underage drinking. Redding is currently in custody in Hawaii and was arraigned on Dec. 19, with bail set at $250,000. (Synagogue continues on page 12)
Beverly Hills Adopts Interim Beverly Hills Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Officials Detail Health Services For Homeless
Board of Education Installs New Board 1 6
BY L AUR A COLEMAN
News 4 The Scene 6 Arts & Entertainment 9 Courier Connoisseur 1 0 Courier Calendar 1 1 Food & Wine 14 Education 1 6 Community 1 7 Birthdays 1 8 Courier Kibble 1 9 Classifieds 2 7 Fun & Games 3 1
THE WEATHER, BEVERLY HILLS
Friday
74° | 48°
Saturday
70° | 49°
Sunday
62° | 51°
Monday
56° | 47°
Tuesday
58° | 46°
Wednesday
57° | 46°
Thursday
57° | 47°
SINCE 1965
The Beverly Hills City Council unanimously approved an interim ordinance on Dec. 17 to prohibit residential development projects that fail to comply with inclusionary housing requirements. The 45-day urgency ordinance is set to be replaced by a permanent one during that timeframe. The ordinance comes in tandem with a state-mandated requirement that Beverly Hills must build hundreds of new housing units in the next decade under the State Housing Law. The precise number of units will be determined by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) in 2020. “The question is, what can we do to preserve some sort of affordability so that we have a balance,” posited Mayor John Mirisch, who has consistently touted the City’s desire to institute a robust inclusionary housing program with linkage fees. “When you get to what percentage that should be, that is an economic and a financial decision, but it is a philosophical one as well.” California currently ranks 49th in the nation for the number of housing units per capita, with market rate housing in Beverly Hills essentially translating to luxury housing. According to Assistant Director of Community Development Ryan Gohlich, the City has a built a “very small number of units” in recent years. “We tend to average fewer than 10 to 20 units a year and some years we don’t have any units,” he said.
Per the ordinance, which went into effect at midnight on Dec. 18, developers of multifamily residential projects will now be required to include affordable units in new projects or pay an affordable housing fee in-lieu of providing the units depending on the size of the project. Any multifamily housing project with fewer than five units would be exempt. Longtime resident and developer Lenny Rosenblatt was the only member of the community to speak out against the ordinance during public comment. “To me, this ordinance is horrible,” he said, noting that it could discourage developers to undertake new projects. “It should be for certain projects. If I build a building by-right, you shouldn’t take my right away.” The ordinance states that multifamily housing projects with five to nine units would be required to provide one affordable housing unit. For projects with 10 or more units, the City will require 10 percent of units to be restricted for affordable housing. For projects that will be required to provide one affordable unit, it can be for low income, very low income or moderate housing. For projects needing to provide two or more affordable units, the units can alternate between the different affordability types. (City Council continues on page 13)
BY SANDR A SIMS
Services for the homeless population are in the spotlight this week, in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's refusal to hear a case involving the homeless. The Supreme Court declined to hear a case from Boise, Idaho which challenged a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decison that held criminal sanctions against the homeless for sleeping outdoors on public property unconstitutional, if accessible alternative shelter is not available. Specifically, the appellate ruling held that such a criminalization of homelessness violated the 8th Amendment’s ban against cruel and unusual punishment. The Supreme Court’s action in letting the 9th Circuit ruling stand is considered a major victory for homeless advocates and a blow to city officials in California who argue the ruling may hinder their power to regulate encampments on sidewalks. The 9th Circuit ruling applies to municipalities in California and eight other western states. (Homeless continues on page 15)
$145 PER YEAR — $3.00 PER COPY