Aerial Urbanism_LA 302

Page 1

aerial urbanism

ivan f. velazquez billy guarino je palmer chris anderson


studio credits thi rd ye a r u nde rg ra d uate de s ig n studi o west ho l l y wood u rba n de s i g n stud y depa r t m e nt of l a n ds ca p e a rc hi tec t ure ca l i fo r ni a pol y te c hni c uni ve rs ity, po mo na

i nst r uc to r

rennie tang, associate professor

unive rs it y staff support andy wilcox, associate professor jeremy jarin, teacher assistant

swa te am

sean o’malley, managing principle pavel petrov kevin slawson evan lee nabyl macias natasha harkison miguel rivera

2


table of contents team manifesto west holly wo o d p age mapp in g + site an alysis

04

urb anism argument

29- 50

urb an design strategy

51- 63

v ision fo r west holly wo o d

64- 101

after ward

102- 106

05 08- 27

3


j eff pal m e r

3rd year undergraduate, BSLA

jp 4

bi l l y g u a ri no

3rd year undergraduate, BSLA

bg

i va n f. velรก zquez

3rd year undergraduate, BSLA

iv

c hr is a nderson

3rd year undergraduate, BSLA

ca


team manifesto

project video:

B a s e d o n t he a c k now l e dg ment o f t he i n ev i ta bl e u rba n de n s i f i cat i o n o f t he ci t y of We st H ol l y woo d we a re pro pos i ng a new, code d fo r m o f deve l o p me nt t h at e ns u res t he pu bl i c re a l m ex p a nds re l at i ve to new bui l di n g he i g ht s a n d b ri ng s fo r t h a new c l a s s i f i cat i on of o p en spa ce t h at ex i st s bot h on t he g ro u nd ( g round s ca pe s ) a n d i n t he a i r (a i rsca p e s ) . O ur ex p l orat i o n a nd re se a rc h i n t h i s pu bl i catio n atte m pt s to ex p l a i n d e ns i t y a s a co m pl ex p roc e s s t hat i s de epl y e m be dd e d i n t he a rt of c i t y m a ki n g .

A co nvent i o n a l a pp ro a c h i gnores the i mp o r ta n c e o f bu i l di ng fo o t pr i nts t hat a c k nowl edge o pen sp a c e, whic h a re severely l a c k ing in West Ho ll y wo o d as a co nseq uenc e o f desig ni n g to max i mize b uil di ng fo o tpr i nts. In stea d o f pu rsu i ng tower ty po l o g ies fo r t h e sa ke o f height, o ur a ppro a c h seeks a rc hitectural fo r ms that ca n g i ve ba c k to the pu bli c rea lm by d evel o ping open spa c e at a g ro un d level , thus ex p a nding t h e pub l i c rea lm w hile demo c rat i zi ng vi ews a nd a ir as a medi um.

T he p ur pos e i s to foc u s t he di scuss i o n on pl a n ni ng for densi ty a s i t re l ate s to t h e c i t y of West H o l l y wo o d. O ur a pproa c h has ta ke n u s fa r beyon d t ra d i t i o n a l deve l o pme nt patte rns of a n u r ba n fa br i c def i ne d by t he s i ng l e -fa mi l y re si de nce s a nd t h e cons e q uent ur ba n spraw l .

Our pro jec t ex plo res huma n dwel l i ng in a n i ntense ur b an enviro nment . Arc h itec ture a nd L a ndsca p e Arc hitec t ure sy nerg ist i ca ll y supp o r t t h e a r ti c ul ati o n a n d pro tec ti o n of o pen sp a c e by test i ng t he l im its a nd envisi o ning a st ro nger rel ati o nship bet ween these two a r ts. By fo c usi ng o n f u nc ti onality with in th e new c ity mo r ph ology we present new p o ssibi l i ti es of hu ma n intera c t i o n at a g ro und l evel a nd u p in t he a i r. 5


6

j.p.


west hol l y wo o d, ca West Hollywood, a city born at the base of the Santa Monica Mountains, experiences a shifting, ever-changing nature that historically has supported an eccentric environment. This incessantly changing sense of place has began to accommodate several, distinct historical periods all of which overtime have further defined the city. During each of these eras the community at large opposed the emerging lifestyles that ensued, however these later became identifiable factors of the city at large. Our team pursued this transitional mentality as an opportunity to build upon the nature of the city and further present an additional model that would later serve the current state of West Hollywood. Expanding the concept of these historical shifts led our team to further begin to question how the city began to physically house these various phases and even more specifically how the urban fabric would address the eminent rising population of urban dwellers. Research led us to discover that West Hollywood currently is severely lacking open space, a characteristic that allows for city growth both physically as the population grows as well as spatially that increases the health and well being of its inhabitants. Horizontal developmental patterns, which are a direct effect of the surrounding single-family residences whose view have defined the morphology of the city, are a main cause of this diminishing value of open space. Furthermore, the car culture and the Romanticized idea of “cruising the Sunset Strip� that has remained a basis of the culture within West Hollywood has greatly encouraged this mindset. By focusing on this horizontal approach as a means to combat the increasing urban population, which exists both globally and regionally, the city is limiting its ability to accept these residents and is currently depriving its inhabitants of open space in its true form. The mindset needs to shift. West Hollywood as a city has accepted many different cultures and environments and the stage is set for a new approach to be introduced that prioritizes the value of open space.

7


title

8

j.p.


geographical cultural transit open space

site invento r y + m apping The investigation and analysis of the 8950 Sunset Blvd site in West Hollywood further identiďŹ es trends that shaped the city as it is today.

9


geographical shifts

hot springs

wetlands

agriculture

10

b.g.


sunset blvd

“ santa monica blvd

Our report concludes that a freeway is urgently needed in a generally east-west direction in the Beverly Hills area. Secondly, we conclude that a freeway through the City of Beverly Hills and along the Santa Monica Boulevard right-of-way, fully depressed and concealed as indicated in your City Council Statement of Policy, is both practical and feasible. As a matter of fact, the preferred freeway presents certain advantages over the several alternative geometric designs which we investigated.

proposed beverly hills freeway

alternate route with alternate connections

Evolution of West Hollywood as a city began when Los Angeles was finding its place. Cahuenga Valley or “The Cahuenga” as it began, was once settled by indigenous Tongva People where wetland marshes, tar pits, hot springs, and citrus groves dotted the landscape. A place that was fit well for agriculture at the base of the Hollywood Hills provided growers with a frost-free winter crop that could then be shipped to the North and the East. A comforting environment with mountainous-oceanic views, soon thereafter became a settlement for rail workers when Moses H. Sherman and his brother-in-law Eli P. Clark help build the extension of the Pasadena & Pacific Rail, the first electric railway that interconnected Los Angeles to the beach in Santa Monica. “Sherman” the town became known as, was independent until it was joined to Los Angeles’ street grid in 1922. However, the town persevered its interdependency and became known as West Hollywood in 1925 in effort to make a name for itself. When “parkways”, now called freeways, were beginning to be built across the Los Angeles landscape permanently manipulating the terrain, West Hollywood and Beverley Hills were in the picture. Reading the old maps produced by the traffic planners, the Beverley Hills Parkway was intended to traverse the land between the 101 freeway and the 405 freeway in a concealed fashion. Although the developers of Westwood, Century City, and Beverley Hills were in support of the freeway being built, the residents in these areas were not and were quite vocal during decision making processes. Year after year the proposal got postponed due to funding and eventually in 1971 the freeway was erased off of the Los Angeles freeway maps. West Hollywood became a city in 1984 and now has celebrated 30 years of independence. By not submitting to traffic engineer impulsiveness, the city of West Hollywood was not shaped by a freeway, rather it has been shaped by Sunset Boulevard and Santa Monica Boulevard and the culture that these arteries support. A dynamic city is poised to set new trends for what urbanity can be in relation to density, growing populations, public realm expansion, and open space liveliness in support of the transitional nature West Hollywood withholds. Masters, Nathan. ‘Why Isn’t There A Freeway To Beverly Hills?’. KCET. N.p., 2015. Web. 24 Mar. 2015. Masters, Nathan. ‘How The Town Of Sherman Became The City Of West Hollywood’. KCET. N.p., 2015. Web. 24 Mar. 2015.

the Pasadena and Pacific

11


12


cul tural shift s Before the 1900’s sprawling poinsettia fields and avocado groves blanketed The Sunset Strip and surrounding hills. As the city’s morphology began to emerge between California’s iconic Hollywood region, Beverly Hills, and the Los Angeles County, it became a playground for the rich and famous. During the 1940’s and 1950’s the city became known for its gang activity while it suffered from a major transit system transformation. Another shift that marked the history of West Hollywood was the rock and roll era where clubs such as the Rainbow and Whiskey-a-go-go were known to have a line around the corner on several nights of the week. What had began as an agriculture town transformed itself into a mantra of music venues, discotheques, and clubs during the 1980’s. Currently, the city is disguised form its neighboring cities because of its morphology and plurality.

13


5 cultural shifts

+ entertainment + gambling

1

1900’s

1920’s -1930’s

+ records

4

1980’s

14

i . v.


+ transit system

+rock and roll

2

3

1960’s - 1970’s

1940’s -1950’s

+ sunset strip = plurality

5

2010’s

15


influence of the car culture

3

4

5

16

i . v.


2

1

co nnective no de 1

downtown LA

2

101 freeway

3

hollywood

4

miracle mile

5

405 freeway 17


system inputs S A N

F E R N A N D O

V E N T U R A

M A L I B U

S A N T A

M O N I C A

C U L V E R

C I T Y

West Hollywood is a destination city with visitors coming not only from all over the Los Angeles region but from points national and international as well. Part of the reason for this is that WEHO maintains an iconic status related to the Sunset Strip’s importance in the history of the music business, proximity to Hollywood and the celebrity culture of the film industry, and its long time position as a bastion of LGBT culture in Southern California. How residents and visitors get to West Hollywood and how they get around once there is something that city officials are looking to change. “Since incorporation in 1984, the City has had as a primary stated goal the creation of a pedestrian community.” - West Hollywood General Plan 2035, Mobility However, a mapping study of existing transit in West Hollywood compared with the city’s goals goals for transit as expressed in the city plan reveals that they are a long way off from where they want to be. Although WEHO has its own regional shuttle bus route and plans to build upon its existing bike lane network, “The single-occupancy passenger vehicle is the default mode of travel in the City and the region, so encouraging the use of other modes requires a combination of incentives and management strategies…Making other modes more convenient, affordable, or comfortable in comparison to driving and parking will increase their viability. Conversely, placing demand constraints on driving through a variety of disincentives such as demand-responsive parking pricing, will make walking, biking and transit more attractive.” - West Hollywood General Plan 2035, Mobility The Aerial Urbanisim development code that we are proposing can help WEHO achieve its goal of an increase and prioritization of non-automotive transit.

18

j.p.


H O L L Y W O O D

D O W N T O W N

I N L A N D

E M P I R E

automotive inputs L O N G B E A C H V E R N O N

Proposed new percentages of open space, in the form of both groundscapes and airscapes, will help to grow and develop a healthy network of public open space which will tie in to the existing infrastructure of city streets and sidewalks. This network will promote pedestrian culture and the community vitality that comes with it. “…public rights-of-way such as streets, alleys and sidewalks make up 26% of the City’s total land area, far more land area than parks, schools, open spaces, and public property combined.” - West Hollywood General Plan 2035, Mobility Additionally, a major factor in developing mass public transit that WEHO desires is higher building and housing densities which make large scale non-automotive transit viable. In his book “A Country of Cities,” author Vishaan Chakrabarti proposes that urban densities able to support rapid mass transit start at a minimum of 30 dwelling units per acre and go up from there. We are proposing that intensifying FARs will further de-emphasize automotive transit as other options become more convenient and attractive to users. Residents can stay in town, and walk, bike, or take public transit where they need to. Visitors will have will have the ability to get to WEHO via mass transit and once there, can get around without needing a car to do so. Increases in both open space and development density associated with our proposed code will serve as key factors in the development of non-automotive transit in West Hollywood.

19


historical shifts in open space

1937

1960s

8.5 ACRES

5.3

ACRES

histo ri ca l shi fts i n par k size shifts extend past the common trends that are seen on and off the sunset strip. park size over time clearly displays the diminishing availability and lacking concern for public parks and open space within the city of west hollywood. 2009 however shows a spike, or trend, to make use of the given confined space that the city offers, a trend that can be drawn and built upon. reprioritizing and maximizing open space within the city of west hollywood became the crucial piece of the narrative and the overall focus of our team’s concept. 20

c.a.


1989

1996

0.75

0.5

ACRES

ACRES

2009

0.16 ACRES

0.15

2009 - 2010

0.14 ACRES

ACRES

0.11 ACRES

21


current open space

1/2

roject site from p dius a r e mil

ius from project sit rad e ile m 4 1/

22

c.a.


n e e d e d

3 acres

per 1000 people 3 4 , 3 9 9

p o p u l a ti o n

c u r r e n t

0.45 acres

per 1000 people t o t a l

p a r k

a c r e a g e

acres 15.61 total acres 1207.68 total of west hollywood

plummer park west hollywood park

=

1.2%

open space in acres

veterans memorial havenhurst pocket park crescent heights triangle

william s. hart park kings road park

formsa pocket park

23


vacant lot opportunities

1/2

from dius e ra mil

project site

s from project s ite adiu le r i 4m 1/

24

c.a.


p o s s i b l e

n e e d e d

0.40 acres

3 acres

per 1000 people t o t a l

p a r k

15.61 total acres acres 1207.68 total of west hollywood

per 1000 people

a c r e a g e

=

t o t a l

1.2%

open space in acres

l o t

acres 13.8 total 1207.68

of west hollywood

13.8 acres

m o r e a d a p t i b l e

a c r e a g e

total acres

=

1.14% open space in acres

5.05 1.87 2.23 1.02 0.78 0.62 acres acres acres acres acres

acres

0.45 0.32 0.29 0.25 0.48 0.44 acres acres acres acres acres acres

2.90 acres

l e s s a d a p t i b l e

0.87 0.46 0.46 0.29 0.20 acres

acres

0.19 0.17 acres

acres

acres

acres

0.16

0.10

acres

acres

acres

25


opportunity for increasing open space

1/2

from dius e ra mil

project site

s from project s ite adiu le r i 4m / 1

26

c.a.


n e e d e d

3 acres

per 1000 people t o t a l

p a r k

15.61 total acres acres 1207.68 total of west hollywood

a c r e a g e

=

1.2%

open space in acres

p o s s i b l e

0.85 acres

per 1000 people t o t a l

p a r k

acres 29.41 total 1207.68

of west hollywood

total acres

a c r e a g e

=

2.4%

open space in acres

increasing the availability of public open space is an identifiable concern within the city of west hollywood. our team’s approach began by identifying a series of vacant lots that became opportunities to expand the public realm while also being mindful of future development that would eventually ensue. while addressing the lack of open space that the city is currently facing and the opportunities this creates, our team aims to refocus the city development towards to a mindset that places a great value on open space and its influence in creating healthy cities.

27


28


density trends case studies exploration of developmental patterns challenging great views

i ntense ur banism a rg um ent our teams acknowledges, explores, and embraces the inevitablity of urban densiďŹ cation in cities and begins to build upon this quality as it relates to the diminishing value of open space within the city of west hollywood.

29


the inevitability of cities

Earth’s population is now around 7 billion people and is expected to jump to 9 billion within the next 30 years. The number of people moving to cities is increasing steady. The 2010 US census states that over 80% of Americans live in urban areas, and in California that number jumps to 95%. To speak of the further urbanization and densification of our cities as inevitable is almost an understatement. But the fact remains that LA lacks enough quality public open space and that problem will worsen without changes in the approach to development and in the attitude towards the value of public open space. Bearing this in mind and based upon our research of West Hollywood, our design team has responded with a coded strategy in which the public realm is not relegated to the shadows of future development, but will instead be found growing alongside that development in symbiotic partnership. Old urbanization models consisting of frenzied development driven by population booms and subsequent pressure for new housing have not been kind to cities like Los Angeles whose sprawling geographic footprint seems at odds with its status as a “park poor� region. This kind of development has often left behind unconsidered interstitial outdoor spaces which fail to engage the public realm.

30

j.p.


31


density trends

32

c.a.


g lo bal po pulati o n living in cities

reg io nal po pulati o n living in cities

33


case studies

34

c.a.


tok yo, ja p a n

dubai, uae

l os a ngeles, ca

35


title

tokyo, japan population: 37,883,000 size: 3,328,000 acres relativity: 2,560,000 football fields consi d eratio ns • density addressed by explorations of structural height • issue of density is greatly influenced by lack of available land • surrounding terrain constraints that limit the ability for development to expand horizontally • ever-growing population with 11,000 people per square mile • efficient transportation particularly the train system • “higher density areas use less energy per capita” - A Country of Cities

36 blog.roomertravel.com

c.a.


allen jacobs. great streets

37


dubai, uae population: 2.106 million size: 1,016,320 acres relativity: 781,784 football fields consi d eratio ns • fast growing city • density created through the exploration of height • rapid development patterns occurred due to the absence of a democratic system • “prosperous and sustainable” centralized city that is sustained by tourism not based off of its natural resources • private development focused on creating more exotic architecture used to serve as landmarks to attract visitors world wide, displaying a lack of meaningful planning and consideration for the city. • “good planning should be guided by desired objective rather prescribed physical outcomes..” - A Country of Cities

38 sftwins.com

c.a.


39


los angeles, ca population: 3.884 million size: 3,041,280 acres relativity: football fields consi d erati2,339,446 o ns • slow growing nature • focused on horizontal developmental patterns of growth • allowance of time to accommodate for meaningful and considerate planning to address imminent densification. • “evidently, los angeles is changing from the automobile-oriented, smog-belching, ever-congested metropolis we have come to know into the dense, sustainable, thriving city it is destined to become.” - A Country of Cities

40 img credit: ivan f velazquez

c.a.


allen jacobs. great streets

41


density addressed via height

gas company tower

doheny west towers

two california plaza

luckman plaza

aon center

9000 building

u.s. bank tower

sunset tower hotel

los angel es, ca m ax bui l di n g he i g ht : 1 0 1 8 ’ we st hol l y wood , ca m ax bui l di n g he i g ht : 3 6 0 ’

42

wilshire grand tower

sierra towers

almas tower

elite residence

23 marin

duba i , ua e max building height

i . f.


2,550’ 2,400’ 2,250’ 2,100’ 1,950’ 1,800’ 1,650’ 1,500’ 1,350’ 1,200’ 1,050’ 900’ 750’ 600’ 450’ 300’ 150’ 0’

na

princess tower

burj khalifa

tokyo midtown metropolitan tower government building no. 1

toranomon hills

tokyo tower

tokyo skytree

to kyo, j apan :

2, 7 2 0’

max buil di n g heig ht:

2,080’

43


rethinking great views

44

i . f.


the value of a view has dictated the shape of west hollywood Single family residences have shaped west hollywood as a city resulting in a mindset that focuses on horizontal development patterns. Hillside views limit the city’s ability to build vertically to accommodate for the increasing density related to the population growth. As a result views are only available for those who can afford it. But, what is a great view? Great views for aerial urbanism involve landscapes where human interaction and infrastructure coexist. A great view invites the public through physical and phenomenological transparency revealing itself to their perceivers. Beauty and materiality enhance the views on the streets while creating a collective understanding of the surroundings that compose it. “...low-rise neighborhoods alone cannot supply. The buzz phrase of development today is ‘collaborative space,’ which is often characterized by large column-free expanses... where views are at a premium...” - A Country of Cities

45


horizontal development patterns

current west hollywood

90:10 A disproportionate relationship of building mass to public realm exists with aproximetely 90% architecture and 10% landscape. How can a city who is determined to be unique follow along with traditions that are ineecient, uneective, and unhealthy for the people who live and reside in cities?

URBA

N

46

L W A SPR b.g.


results of urban sprawl INCREASE

air pollution due to vehicular traffic of commuters

OVER CONSUME

water by distributing drastically more areas

LOSE HABITAT

for wildlife because wider buildings require more space on the ground

RISK

obesity and disease due to decreased efforts to walk to destinations

DEGRADE COMMUNITY 47


vertical development patterns

proposed west hollywood

DENSITY

60:40

48

A proportional relationship of building massing to public realm is what Aerial Urbanism is proposing. Development all starts with the landscape in which people circulate through on the ground plane. A beneďŹ ciary of this is enough open space to provide permeable situations at building entry ways and multiple program interactions in between architecture. Then built architecture can begin to form around the open space with verticality as its main direction.

b.g.


results of vertical density PROMOTE

air circulation within the city

PROTECT

underground water sources by capturing more rainfail & runo

BIO-INCREASE

diversity of wildlife & vegetation due to more land

REDUCE

air pollution due to more vegetation & produce more oxygen

BUILD COMMUNITY 49


50

j.p.


presentation of amened code groundscape qualities airscape qualities tower typology matrix application of code on test site programing groundscape groundscape network

ur ban desig n st rateg y + architect ural appro ach as a means to further strengthen the concept of applying a series of tower typologies throughout the urban framework of sunset boulevard, our team began to focus on the form of these structures as they related to natural and pedestrian systems. the following is an exploration of groundscape and airscape qualities and application of these qualities on to a series of tower forms that respond to these systems and displays the variety of architecture that results. 51


52


urb a n desig n st rateg y statem ent Due to the lack of open space within the city of West Hollywood, the focus of the project is to break traditional development patterns of city making by identifying, defining, and connecting open spaces. Our approach is to set a new framework for development by beginning to reimagine open space and further define a balance between architecture and landscape across scales to meet the ever-changing city environment that defines West Hollywood. This understanding serves as a model for the future growth of cities to which the preservation of open spaces becomes a dominant element. Required within this code is a set of ordinances that requires developers to leave 40% of the ground plane on the site undeveloped and accessible to the public realm. This model goes along with cultural trends of city dwelling, which forces development to construct without a restriction on building height while also protecting the public realm. As a means to combat the eminent opposition to the increases in building heights as it relates to the surrounding neighborhoods, the project seeks to challenge our cultural interpretation of views. Traditionally as a culture we are transfixed on views because of the association with a higher-class living, however it lacks a sense of interaction. Aerial urbanism provides a new sense of “a view� that encourages a more personal interaction with one’s surroundings both on the ground and in the open air-scape found within the structures. Air becomes an important factor within our urban model because of the added benefit of increased sunlight and air circulation expressed through the exploration of tower typologies as they relate to both current and future systems. This developmental model is further applied within a half-mile radius of the site, located at the edge of West Hollywood, on a series of parcels that will serve as a catalyst for future development within the city. 53


amended development code

ding code

70 bu

60 percent building footprint 40 percent groundscape

70 percent building

54

30 percent airscape

j.p.


building

open spaces will connect to each other

half of airscape

will be accessible to the public

55


exploring groundscape qualities

56

c.a.


corrido r • • • •

connective multi-nodal continuous passage

pl a za • • • • • • • •

large gathering space bounded form social engagement accessible to sunset strip non-centralized singular use flatworks angular space

venue / par k • • • • •

accessible to sunset strip hosts multiple programs easily programible space expressed manipulated landform organic shape / form

pocket space • • • •

intimate social activated niche spaces open to the sky 57


exploring airscape qualities

58

i . f.


ca ntilever • • • •

view points extended facades airscape gathering spaces

terra c e • • • • •

semi-public space green space private programing accessible from sunset strip flat plane

ra m p • • • • •

accessible from sunset strip program includes a journey provides access can be sensorial provides a visual experience

a rca de • • • •

passageway sense of enclosement covered predetermined architecture 59


tower typology matrix title street edge

circulation

air movement

light

interconnected

multi-use 60

fragmented


left / right

centralized

co nsiderat i o ns • • • • •

relationship to sunset strip public realm no height limitation circulation natural systems

61


groundscape network developing an interconnected system

1/2

ject site om pro r f s diu e ra l i m

from project site dius a r le i 4m / 1

62

c.a.


a key aspect of this concept is the formation of a networked system of groundscapes, which create a series of fragmented open spaces that are embedded within the urban fabric of the city. additionally this concept embraces a more walkable and accessible network that uses the existing sidewalks and streets as the central arteries as a means to connect these spaces.

central nodes secondary nodes primary connections secondary connections

63


64


test site programing the groundscape 40 year city morphology airscape possibilities tower functions groundscape experience airscape experience

im ages + render ing s t he follow ing displays t he v isions a n d applicat ion of our concept as it per tains to t he groundscape and airscape sp ace s . addit ionally t he explorat ion succes s io n o f west holly wood’s urban fabric t hro ugho ut t he nex t several decades show n here is a direct result from t he implementatio n o f our coded system.

65


application of amended code

test site location: 8950 sunset blvd, west hollywood,ca square footage: 48,000 sf (1.15 acres) surrounding nodes: 5 freeway, 2 freeway, 101 freeway, santa monica, los angeles, hollywood

66

c.a./i.v


lot square footage: 4 8 , 0 0 0 s f.

36,000 sf

75% 25%

of the total lot square footage building footprint

open groundscape building square footage: 470,000 sf

150,000 sf

30% 70%

of the total building oor square footage programable by developer

open airscape 67


programing the groundscape on test site

re si dential

cultura l

• commu ni t y bel ow sunset bl vd • ho l l y wood hi l l s co mmuni t y

• we st holly wood e le m e nta r y • cath olic church • m us ic ve nue s

retai l

comme rcia l

• suns et pl a za • re sta u ra nt s • pr ivatel y own e d busi nesses

• corp orate offi ce building s • s m a ll bus in e s s offi ce s • pu blic b a nks

68

c.a.


condiminiums large singel family residenece

condominium complex

housing

resort roof pool sports basketball

unpretentious pacific hills sunset plaza

community catholic church

residential hotel apartments bus stop dinning dinning piercing store residential residential dinning bus stop residential restaurants/hotels parking garage housing

sunset plaza

housing

sunset plaza

apartments residential residential shopping shopping

coorporate building coffee shop residential apartments computer and software store residential villas bus stop coffee shop hotel apartments

residential residential commercial residential

residential bank dinning dinning book store book store

residential

music venue hotel residential restaurant

commercial residential commercial/retail residential music venue

bank residential community music venue / bar bank residential residential residential restaurant

bus stop bank restaurnt / makret night club

office space small business (coffee shop) small business grocery store

single family residence office space

residential gas station residential

commercial/retail

residential WEHO elemetary school residential residential

commercial/office

activated street corner apartment complex commercial business apartment complex retail store retail store residential community restaurant

commercial apartment complex apartment complex bus stop

commercial office space single family residece

car dealership car dealership

multi use building

primary access point

apartment complex

condiminium complex

residential community

• building zoning • relationship to open space • transportation • public systems

69


west hollywood - 2015

70

b.g.


71


2025 model

72

b.g.


73


2035 model

74

b.g.


75


2045 model

76

b.g.


77


2055 model

78

b.g.


79


airscape possibilities

80

b.g.


81


possible tower functions

1

1

wildlife habitat biodiversity

2

carbon assimilation + oxygen production

3

scaolding

earthquake support vertical gardens

sunset boulevard 82

b.g.


2

3

9000

83


a l aye re d ci t y massing diagram

views

proposed zone for a new landscape

proposed zone for an expanded landscape

84

b.g.


views

views

proposed building heights 500’ - 800’

current building heights 100’-350’

realm of sprawl

85


groundscape vision

86

c.a.


groundscapes are envisioned to provide relief from the everchangiing, intense nature of the sunset strip through the meaningful programing of these spaces by actively considering the site’s adjacencies.

87


groundscape experience

88

c.a.


one of the typological forms of groundscapes that was explored was the park or venue. these spaces host multiple programs and can serve as functional vegetated spaces that can withhold community or city events.

89


groundscape interaction

another typological form that was explored in the test site was the plaza. these spaces usually are singular programs that provide the opportunity for social engagements and are characterized as large gathering spaces.

90

c.a.


91


interconnected groundscape spaces

92

i . f.


our vision begins in the sky with the articulation of tower typologies and open groundscapes that interconnect with each other serving as a relief to the intensity of the sunset strip.

93


activated pocket spaces

94

b.g.


pocket spaces within this urban fabric establish a strong connection at the pedestrian scale to break up the intensity of a tall building on a small site. these sorts of spaces allow for welcoming and permeable relationships at the building entry zones to transition occupants from exterior to interior.

95


ground plane experience

96

b.g.


an important consideration is what the pedestrian views in this new landscape from the ground plane. a city is an organism which lives and grows over time. new growth vertically rather than horizontally establishes a stronger relationship on the ground for walkability and multiple uses.

97


airscape vision

98

c.a.


another bold statement that is suggested within our code is the democratization of views. where a view itself becomes a medium that triggers a new way of interaction between public and private spaces.

99


futuristic vision

100

i . v.


101


afterward

102


intense urbanism i nte n se urba n i s m wa s a new ma ni festati o n fo r t h is stu dio, wh i ch re qu i re d us to e nga ge st udi es o f the pu bli c rea lm, u r ba n co des, and a rchi te c t u re , f rom a l a nds ca pe a rc hi tec ture po i nt o f vi ew. we do not se e k l a nds ca p e a rc hi te c t ure a s a n exc l usi ve f ield, no r do we intend to o ccu py t he p re mi s e s o f o th er disc i pl i nes but rat her we seek new hybr i d forms of col l a borati o n i n t he a r t o f c ity ma k i ng . l a st , i ntense ur ba ni s m i nf u s e d our i ntell ec t ua l a n d emo ti o na l energ i es that l i be rated i n t h e form of a er i a l u r ba ni sm. T he p urpos e i s to foc u s t he di sc ussi o n o n pla nn ing fo r den si ty as it re l ate s to t he c i t y of We st Ho ll y wo o d. Our a pp ro a c h ha s ta ken us far beyo nd t ra di t i ona l deve l o pment patter n s o f a n ur b a n fa br i c defined by t h e s i ng l e -fa mi l y re s i denc es a nd the co n sequent ur ba n spraw l.

103


final thoughts

the col l aborat ion bet ween t he intense urbanism studi o a nd SWA has been a memorable experience that gave us t he opport unit y to be able to learn a nd ex pl ore urban design. we value t he mult iple profe ssi o nal point s of v iew t hroughout our process of ex pl orat ion, understanding FA R, tak ing a posit ion, str uc tur ing a narrat ive, and defending argument s f rom both poet ic and pragmat ic point s of v iew. de si gni ng a st rategy w it h t he help of professionals strengthens our values about t he public realm and wi thi n the complexit y of urban design and landscape a rc hi te c t ure.

104


special t hanks SWA laguna beach rennie tang andy w ilcox jeremy jarin stephanie reich (cit y of west holly wood) ray mond cheng (cedars-sinai medical cente r ) michael woo sarah lorenzen & neut ra VDL house staff members of midterm rev iew and final rev i ew megan mcdanel and t he rest of t he intense urbanism st udi o

105


chris anderson c hri sa nders791@gmail.com billy guarino bguarino01@yahoo.com jeff palmer groundplain@gmail.com ivan f. velรกzquez i ve l a zq uez4295@gmail.com

aerial urbanism


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.