i
I Can’t Do Maths! Why children say it and how to make a difference Professor Alf Coles and Professor Nathalie Sinclair
ii
BLOOMSBURY EDUCATION Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 50 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3DP, UK 29 Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland BLOOMSBURY, BLOOMSBURY EDUCATION and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published in Great Britain, 2022 by Bloomsbury Publishing Plc This edition published in Great Britain, 2022 by Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Text copyright © Alf Coles and Nathalie Sinclair, 2022 Alf Coles and Nathalie Sinclair have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as Authors of this work Bloomsbury Publishing Plc does not have any control over, or responsibility for, any third-party websites referred to or in this book. All internet addresses given in this book were correct at the time of going to press. The author and publisher regret any inconvenience caused if addresses have changed or sites have ceased to exist, but can accept no responsibility for any such changes All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN: PB: 978-1-4729-9267-3; eBook: 978-1-4729-9269-7; ePDF: 978-1-4729-9270-3 Typeset by Newgen KnowledgeWorks Pvt. Ltd., Chennai, India To find out more about our authors and books visit www.bloomsbury.com and sign up for our newsletters
iii
Contents
Acknowledgements
iv
Introduction
1
Dogma A: ‘Maths is a building block subject’ Putting into practice A: Early learning of algebra
5 17
Dogma B: ‘Maths is always right or wrong’ Putting into practice B: Symbolically structured environments
27
Dogma C: ‘Maths is culture-free’ Putting into practice C: Mathematics for real-world contexts
53
Dogma D: ‘Maths is for some people, not others’ Putting into practice D: Towards a communal mathematics
77
Dogma E: ‘Maths is hard because it is abstract’ Putting into practice E: Learning number
103
Epilogue
129
References Index
135 137
43
67
91
119
iv
Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the contributions of Sandy Bakos and Annette Rouleau, who read drafts of the book and provided excellent advice on how to make our arguments both more convincing and more accessible. Their own longstanding experiences as primary school teachers provided a precious contribution. To David Pimm, we thank you for your generous reading of the book, always attentive to potential connections and clear turns of phrase. And to Caroline Ormesher, thank you for the invaluable comments on early chapters, which helped set us on our way. We would also like to thank our editor Cathy Lear for the care taken with the full manuscript and the many suggestions to improve the flow and readability of the writing.
1
Introduction ‘My pupils won’t understand if it’s not made concrete.’ We’ve all heard this idea before. These words are almost always said about maths. If the problem is that maths is abstract, then the solution seems obvious: we need to make it more concrete. Almost everyone agrees with this. Around the world, new approaches, new curricula, new tasks, new teaching strategies, new manipulatives and new technologies are suggested, often aiming to fix the problem in the same way – by making maths concrete. But what if that’s not the problem? What if there were other ways to explain the fact that so many people worldwide struggle to understand school maths? The premise of this book is that the chronic, long-standing failures in the maths classroom – which have significant consequences for children’s wellbeing and for teachers’ wellbeing as well as for the planet’s wellbeing – are not the result of the maths-is-too-abstract problem. In fact, we think that although this problem and a few others have driven change in the maths education system, they all need rethinking. From our experiences working in maths education over the last 25 years, we have distilled the following five dogmas – core assumptions that are generally believed to be true about maths: A. ‘Maths is a building block subject.’ B. ‘Maths is always right or wrong.’ C. ‘Maths is culture-free.’ D. ‘Maths is for some people, not others.’ E. ‘Maths is hard because it is abstract.’ We feel sure that you’ve come across these ideas before, though perhaps in slightly different forms.We call them dogmas because they seem
2
incontestable to almost everyone – obvious statements about learning maths. It’s true that if they were completely wrong, they might not be quite so pervasive. But in this book, we argue that they represent beliefs, rather than facts.We show how, through history, these beliefs have evolved, and why they are so hard to even question. We offer different perspectives, different ways of thinking and of working, which show the limitations of these dogmas. We aren’t proposing these are the only five dogmas, but we think they’re pretty major ones. Importantly, we’re not claiming that the dogmas are all entirely wrong and that educational change can only happen if we overturn them. For at least a century, people have swung between opposing views on how to teach maths and tried to replace one system with another, usually its opposite. That is how we’ve had problem-solving replacing exercises, or conceptual maths replacing procedural maths, or student-centred replacing teacher-centred teaching, and back again. These are false dichotomies. All these approaches can be effective and valid in one context or another. So even though we present other perspectives that challenge these five dogmas, we’re not trying to convince you to turn your back on them completely. But we hope that you might be surprised by some of our alternative perspectives. We hope that, after reading this book, you’ll recognise cases of dogmatic ways of thinking about maths teaching and learning, and be able to make a more informed choice. Most importantly, we hope that you respond differently if you find yourself or your pupils thinking ‘some people can’t do maths’ or ‘maths is the same everywhere’ or ‘I can’t teach this person without them understanding the basics first’. We hope to show that the challenges you’re facing aren’t quite so obvious. One reason these dogmas are so pervasive is that they draw on deeply ingrained ways of thinking that we use, not just when thinking about maths, but in many other contexts as well. For example, the second dogma (‘Maths is always right or wrong’) represents a kind of binary thinking that runs deep in Western logic and shapes how we think about many things. We associate the dogmas with visual ways in which we imagine relationships. In the case of the dogma that maths is always right or wrong, this might be the image of a balance which tips one way or the other. For example, we think of time passing between night and day. These two things – night and day – become opposites of each other, binary choices, and we come to believe that it’s either night or day (exclusively
2
I Can’t Do Maths!
3
one or the other). But if we stop a moment, we realise that over the course of a 24-hour period, there are times when it is in between night and day, like dusk or dawn. You could even see the 24-hour period as a continuum between having no light from the sun and having maximum light from it. This example might not seem very important, but we think that moving away from binary thinking can have significant effects in the maths classroom. This will become apparent in Dogma B, where we show that mathematics is not always just right or wrong. It will also be relevant to Dogma D, where we challenge the binary in which you are either good at maths or not. For each dogma, we’ve provided images that represent it and possible alternatives. We start each Dogma chapter with a story that’s helped our own thinking about how these dogmas function and how they might be expanded upon. Following each Dogma chapter, we discuss related classroom-based activities and case studies in a Putting into practice chapter. You could decide to read a Putting into practice chapter first, and then go back to the associated Dogma chapter for more historical context. As society becomes ever more technological and driven by algorithms, we think that maths education is critical for helping people to be conscious of the way their societies are organised, and to be aware of the role maths plays in decision-making. For example, as change in the climate occurs at an ever-increasing pace, we see a vital role for maths education in supporting citizens to have the tools to track and communicate about those changes and model possible futures. In the UK, we can’t afford to continue letting the roughly 20 per cent of each cohort of school students reach the age of 16 feeling they have failed in maths.We’ll surely need everyone to play an active role as a citizen in the changing and precarious times to come. We were both teachers, before moving to our current roles in universities. We don’t lay blame for the levels of underachievement in maths at the door of teachers and schools. In our experience in England, Canada and across the world, we meet teacher after teacher who is committed and dedicated to their students and works all hours to support their learning. What we see as problematic are widespread assumptions about teaching and learning – assumptions which have become dogmas that work against the aims of schools and of teachers – which affect the expectations of policy-makers, parents and even children.
Introduction
3
4
We’re writing this Introduction at a moment, in England, when there is a push towards ‘mastery’ teaching in mathematics. This push could be seen as one of the swings mentioned above. The ambition of mastery teaching is to eradicate underachievement in maths. This is a fantastic ambition and aim. But we believe it will only succeed in the long term if it brings with it a rethinking of some of the dogmas described in this book. We’ll cover ideas of mastery teaching at points throughout the book. If you’re reading this book, it is probably because you had suspicions of your own about the five dogmas. Or, you’re not sure how you can help a child saying to you, ‘I can’t do maths!’ Or, maybe you feel that way yourself. We’re not offering simple solutions, because each child’s reason for saying this will be different. However, we hope that the new perspectives we offer will extend your ideas, and provide stories and images which will be helpful in thinking about maths for yourself and in your conversations with others. We’re convinced that every child who speaks their home language has all the skills they need to be successful in primary school maths. But there’s no magic bullet; we don’t claim to know what every child needs or that it’s easy to find out. There will be ideas in this book which can be tried out immediately, i.e. actions you can test, as well as an invitation to reflect on actions – and it’s the combination of action and reflection which is needed for any lasting change.
4
I Can’t Do Maths!