Braintrust Interdisciplinary Knowledge Lab by Braintrust

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROBLEM-SOLVING FOR STUDENTS Methodologies, experiences and results from Braintrust’s ‘Interdisciplinary Knowledge Lab’

WWW.BRAINTRUSTBASE.COM

About this publication In this e-book, we have put together the methodologies, experiences, and results from the student conference â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Braintrust LIVE #1: Interdisciplinary Knowledge Labâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;, which took place on April 23rd 2013 at the University of Copenhagen. At the conference, 24 students from twelve different countries and 16 different academic disciplines, came together to develop interdisciplinary problem-solving models to address some of the grand challenges of our time. The conference was arranged by the academic think tank Braintrust, and had as its aim to give students hands-on experience in working in a team with people from disciplines different to their own. In the end of the conference, the teams presented their models at an informal reception with guests from press, business and academia. After the event, the models were evaluated by experts in interdisciplinarity and within the fields that the students had dealt with. We hope with this book to inspire readers by the efforts of conference participants and organisers, and to contribute to the organisation of more interdisciplinary student activities in the future.

Do you want to know more or host a conference in collaboration with Braintrust? Go to braintrustbase.com or contact us at braintrust@braintrustbase.com

dis·ci·pline noun \’di-sə-plən\ A field of study, a branch of learning, or scholarly instruction. Different disciplines may share a common ethos, such as a respect for knowledge and intellectual inquiry, but differences between them are vast. Disciplines often have their own approaches to understanding and investigating new knowledge, ways of working, and perspectives on the world around them, and disciplinary worlds are therefore in many ways separate and distinct cultures.

Main categories of academic disciplines: The Natural Sciences (such as Biology, Geology, Chemistry and Physics). The Social Sciences (such as Sociology, Anthropology, Psychology and Social Economy). The Humanities (such as History, Languages, Literature and Gender Studies). The Applied and Professional Fields (such as Medicine, Law, Management and Journalism).

Braintrust: Creating an Interdisciplinary Platform Braintrust is an academic think tank, whose aware of which academic tools they have at their primary purpose is to create a free environment disposal, how they can use them, and – not least – for knowledge sharing among students. On the one how they can combine them with other disciplines’ hand, the organisation pools the academic resources tools. of students in a single, common, web-based portal, thus giving students an overview of their “Students from different disciplines or own competencies while connecting them across different universities have more in common disciplines. On the other hand, Braintrust aims to than they might think.” facilitate, make fluid, and advance interdisciplinary cooperation in practice. Sigrid Bjerre Andersen, Braintrust. Ak

nie

One of Braintrust’s goals is to turn the all-toocommon phenomenon of academic memory-loss among students into awareness and self-confidence in academic skills and competencies. By doing this, Braintrust hopes to help students, and society at large, benefit from the enormous amounts of information that they have, but rarely share with one another. A lot of students are not aware of how their discipline can or does contribute to a specific real-life problem. It is part of Braintrust’s mission to make students

isk

l Dit TIT SPE IVE tla CivEL CIA R u Pe LE ilin de gen rse UN iør n BAC Da IVE - Ele HEL nm RSI ktr OR ark TET ote FA s Tek kno GL Ele BRA AkktrIGH nis log SEM INT ke i (20 ad FOR RUS oni ED Un EST SEN 13) em UD k SID T ive ER D E rsit isk DipDA 10 BE NN et SK (DTlom ELS CV BRA OM (DT ED U), ing ER U) INT 200eni RUS on 6-2ør OR KO T AK sso NT 011 Ele ABO AD AK ktr n (EN gen Ch oin T UN KO EMISK GLIUT MIG iør rist gen SH) MP Da IVE - Ele en E , HV Pro iør, nm RSI Pro ETE KO sen jek ktr IS TET Da ark MP gra NC ote DU Kon tpa nm FA s Tek mm ETE ER kno ark SØ sul rtne VID erin NC EleGLIGH BRA r s Tek GE nis log Pra ent EN g, ER ktr BES INT R ke i (20 Re SO ktik nis FOR RUS Ele oni ED EN KED Un SEN sea Akk ke MR 13) ant PU UD : Stu SID TVis ktro ive ER Un rch BLI Da ÅD D E ad nik den rsit ion DipDA ive , Eng BE nie KA NN , FP, Ro ER term et rsit SK Ful TIO Da lom ELS em l Dit BRA OM (DT bot ine et ED dtid edh nm ing ER isk MIN NE TEO INTGA ter, tlau erin U) Ida ark eni jæl Friv san R PRO RUS Ind CV g s Tekør Pe per Ma C, RI OG illig sat FIL ust T de KAN C+ AK rie nis- Ele riro TIT rse ME +, ABO DID AD Fic ktr ke De n Ma TO (EN UT bot AT Ca EL Un oin h ter, KO EMISK tlab DE GLI nd. Vid Mesign MIN ive gen SØ Re SH) MP , Lab enp ma rsit iør, E BAS Sti asu of Ap GN gul Re KO Ph. UN g et ilot ffn rem par sea ETE vie erin E ING i Litt (DT MP D. BAC ess ent Kom rch NC w, Kø IVE gst U), atu ETE era VH HEL benRSI Da ekn Engs mu , AnaER For of 200 TET tur DL nie OR NC hav fornik Vel els ik, edr vid l Ditt 6-2 FA ER atio lyse BES Ma ocik,Qu ags ns ens PUBOPR 011 Da chi ty Weantn, , Kva lau KED CaGLIGH Un hol BRA nm kab LIK ET Pro depbkoitat ne VID KO nd. Kor Ped ive der ER Ka INT ark ATI ces litativ end mm EN NT (20 rsit ma ED ive rek trin RUS s TekFOR ers ON De SEN AK UD 10) g turl Pol et SID enT SO entuni fac dat Me e Da RE sig i Litt ilite ain T (KU MR nis æs kat itik, D E (20 nto Mu TeaDA MIG Par MIN n BE ke nie LAT ion ring dsa er NN era ) of 11) ÅD scl Da tne Adm SK Spe r PRO , HV En tervid ELS Pro lle ER a Ba EUUn ER tur e, Kon, Log mli nie Kar rsk BRA ED inisOM ive gel Bja ED cia jek FIL vid IS l Ditt Lib 's regrsit lan ab, INT rier sul istikngtrat sk, ens ER lem arn E PR DU ens Kon tpa eria ionet De RUS entInd, og cin e lau ion Pol Kø kab akk ø OF SØ (DT kab arb Fel beh sul rtne g , Zamalfo n dan T, ben , Kø PedKonitisk Ro AK r er Bip ILE tarb and kraeho GE ent ejd lde U) Bes ABO MIN Læ Ben Stu AD SØ hav ben R ers flikt filoedbiande ske lutn ftse R ejd Dabottek (EN Ma e r lidt ling seg , Ud BAS die EN KO EM GN en , sofRo, Inte ns hav Inte te Cla nm nol e, ingUT SØG tLa nso : Stu E Civ i, bot Fra , (20 Un nsPU ING Spa rup viklmo GLIspr ark ogi Rosrnat use b. rer, info MP ISKE ive UnBLI den 12)ilsa Inte rna ingdel, SH)oce nsk s Tek TEO rrin pe No kildeiona n samrma KO rsit iveKA mfu rna tion sla Arb sse term Resea ETE , l gsp Ful n-In Bo tion TIO nis Dis RI OG et UnivDev MP t inte NC dtid nd, tion al Polnde ejd artn (KUrsitet NE edhKom rch tru ke kur FiloSun sm r, ETE ersielop ER ChUn ste ME san Na ale rfacom Eng siv er men PUBOPR sofi dga itik,, Co arkForhan jæl mu , AnaDanie ), R tet (KU Aalb Org gyr ant NC turr 200 ard ton ive ori, TO sat e Loa e me osk per (RU t els nik LIK ET org ERSam al rsit ess ani Menneou-edspoldlin BES 3-2), 200 k, atio lyse l Ditt ATI C) Pos DE Sør d ope Univ Un d fun Moet We n, , Kva lau afta itik,g, our sat In 005 5-2 ON hhv r, Mo dsv uffe (DTt-st KED ske ive this An Eur en Lau eris VID bko cer ion KO ElePro acc RE nito ide , Ala rsa . lita Ped er, rettlen EU Ka U) ruk ER ty thr 007 , act EN NT ktroces tiv ers Sydopæ Vid Olie rep igh, Nig , LAT mic ele trin (AA lism Her Damm opo rin nsk in tura on iveUd AK SO ort ede eria Pol dan isk uni nikfacilitedat en e Da ER rocontrom enr man L) nmenp g abe Bad lism Lar conly bal log T MR Ph. the Sam sk Etnolog sen ain (20 e ilot igs arkkat MIG Paritik, MINfoo s Sal r, , Univ roll etre lig iou e, trol anc y of nie EDE ion ring dsa 13) t. Som poldes Soc uel tne Adm ÅD D. s Tek vid , ErnMic aPRO er og , HV PR ling ingitik,ign Pro ersi i , Kon, Log mli lle om the EU's rsk inis ER og ens est helofsimFIL Købiolo Lan nis Bja OF jek ons ngIS e the it will of cas tet (SD Lib reg ab, trat Glo ILE kab o Fou enhgi ke sul istik harple feetes cen Soc arn DU Kon tpa ter son eria ion De ion Ben U) Pat R ave bal Unent , Felog beh ts be a bip Pol ste Lac cau ves ø Jak SØ Sto iala sul rtne , Zamalfo n Ch ivearb , Inte te Cla ori, lau lt,tingdba are ter intr ed Eco Serric Moe ns (KU r SØG obs tarb and GE Konitisk ent ckh ntro rist rsit ejd MIN comof ndedan Bes Kor SØ Inte , Mic Juddatck Rosrnat use en preodu rob R bia ske lutn Copvice ) ensflikt filonom et e rekejd ling olm pol ller InGN rpe hae ith con , Ud EN ple ssuced ot, kildeiona n sof y, Inte (DT e, a usiBAS enh Man ing this Ha en, Civ trol l Dev PU Un ogi : Stu E ted re . ThiandBo i, Inte fac INGllat l But Me U)turl Fra , viklmodel spr Sus age age (20 ilsa pro ion Ign ler, BLI ive ng ler rna æs nsk En lmtorv a Sun Univ elop TEO den to und s Filo nto men n Bus 09) mfu rna tioningsla, Arboce feailitate jec rsit Økoann KA er nar et: , atie Ma on thissho er me me dga ersi term , sofitho Ful e sse Spe r tet men turi non t two et Dis RI Aalb TIO tlab inest tho ff, Ros nom Chr rati A w is Kar ard dtid nd, tion al Polnde ejd (RU t (SE kur OG edh thethe bal use ng d is d for org des s Sch Lar NE iste sm r, Forcia v kildei is..PUB OPR pla Ch) ste ME C) san Na ale the drieran -intrusmic Sør itik,, Co lem jæl Univ R s Sal psy nse . ign effe And bas ant ori, TO ool turr Org Spe tonarkedshan Univ sat kol ce ofSam enanc eris per LIK ET akk n . Eurctiv mic sec toemeAVR iverocont al (CB Filo ers ing ed ess ani Me om ogi ersi ond asu Atm loa roll ATIFin opæLau Soc cianneou-aftapoldlin er em fun Mo Pos DE dansat Ols S) ally eneHer ty (AA Syd ons the roc sk ism tet our Læont boa ON Aar sofi let ske Stu ega d itik,g, en ion Sto iala (RU sku danaisk ss man L) re anaeotiodsv uffe t-st Sko cer son hen hus mo er und rettlen EU die Etn of RE ... segroll rd. pow er, ckh ntro C) Sam skme nde , Olie lyse ns?ide , Ala ruk mic nitoboa Univ Lea Vidpol olog sen En les Ch LATSpa rup er afs tet Univ tho Uders igh, Nig , nsk in tura Thi er olm lam Soc uel fra rvis ringrds rist enp ersi øgeede eria af Glo Møl enr ER rrin pewhich s charocont red didakt In abe Bad lism varæt i et nin are Købiolo Lan ersid i ens Un ogi tet Jon ler sec bal . ED ilot igs og r Ph. tet all gsp , The use gi cas IT-U Bus Stra (AU ska isk r, bru lig iou e, redeto en und g pol An sov D. ive en ath (SD E artn tak ondracteriroll enh dig ana ervme itik, vid , ErnMic kabg und b til ana nive ines ndg ) rsit gen ter PR er firs es (20 an U) Pat d two ave tdis Ida of inquiryere Chr ens est form et Jak OFer lyse isn d udg af hel er rsite s car boa stic and t ric skæ lyse 09) aar boa ns the erv (SE ign obs kur Ma ILE kab o enFou e of rd s andSer tet Info d Økoistin a CS og isn af ingsfoang poe rpe af ser Kat Co into ty? Ben rd (KU) viceMoe fea ) rie (ITU rma R en ste Lackancau rine ton forc ing de the tureCop Dannoma Kro spu try lse poe Ca tics sen Fic Manller the Inte te Cla Meori, lau seslt, er, en, to rløb nkt sla enh546 SØG nbo ) nd. mar i act Sus Da ou h (20 n af try Off s an d age 3age Kor ess d udg Inte , Mic Juddis og"ku me i m Rosrnat use Jon Cat Agr nie the ma rg ks ual chi spr sla ent nst d em i rek Sch Pæ kildeiona n 10) rpe læg lle eement arm nseBusmen p hae ithkut den Øko gi moann Jeg m lig Enghrin oglRo 9. (20 ath ang l turl dag But mid ere s ner-pæ Me llat ge op. Litt e an som Adm Bja ential ele 10.pirisk Bo Sun UnivDev nitoe Chr toinest ig..skil Ros nom spu ionl Ign æs ogis Aalbelsk Kjæ En for did s fort02) arn nto ler, t era Filo s Sch . de ersielop kildei ringiste me .. det akt dagkla ma er undSafran nkt , Unatie org og r Chr ke r ø turv Un inis sofi dga Safnar tæller The tet men udvælle And , hvo iske ogesse Aalb teri ntsSpe (20 ool ff, The Univ of nse ers UnivKom iste Univ ive trat ide (RU t ranrativ mig n ale ard ikle tilKar øgtFoei en iversa 10) (CB cia Filo ers rsit ion ersi Meorg rda stru r", r.Sør ersimun nse ersi nsk dev role Økores C) rier e rs nar Foe psy Ols lem ndekan S) e tet ikat et tet n poe ktu somend Univ Aar sofi Ida ab Inc elo of ratile Købnom Jen tet (AA ionn (DP en (RU Spe (RU rs kol akk eris Eur pm the for værejeg, rom hus sen Ma U) enh i Eve ogi Katreased ent C) ty U) try r,SydopæLau hvo an v psy C)visncia er Univ Lea sta rie Læ identitgivStu rda Eve You ave let rine rythsk ana sla dan isk Her (AAL) kol end ersi dis te Fic ns und ing und Glo Møl seg In man m Kun sse ete die n detryth ogi Daconfidecou in (KU tet Sam sk Etnolog sen the h (20 ing lyse De ler f IT-Ubal Bus Stra (AU n. e i trau anaerv med ers Univ cou Co Spa rup ing sk cur nie is.. Aar sthi Bak ) pe He ana Soc uel at i af velopm 10) nive ines ndg ) lle nce rse visn . hus stor iz Lun lyseisningudg øge ren In countri ton rrin run ma fort is Illu lyse iolo Lan ersitet Jon ie Chr Bja Køb r rsite es, all gsp or ang Univ Miri t ds ath ent ou aar s bru gi cas ntri der tisk æll min An sov (SD dis ing af desforløb spu arn inc tet Info d Økoistin Unan afenh ersi gen sov es it is Agr artn ter Digi am kut en, und e situe og ate U) rea ø op. (ITU rma Pat ave ive Stu of inquiryere Hel tet to Jak nkt af reg ereignsha est eem er Dannoma Kro (20 sed tics ric Købtal des ena ns the ers atio hav rsit die Her "ku me Serd .. eres og den ign obs nbo ) 10) mar i poeard ty, ll plaabl ent Kat Co into enh ign Wis ning et s øgt ner eviceMoe (KU nst d i em dem ske det ish en ty? Cat rg ks rine ton (SE Car ave og trei s did ner9. 10. piri try e jegCop enManller ) ocrof , hvo (AU ptic Sch Pæ thewhile n the ed, betwe the Me og enh at sla ns kom ch Enghrin ) Da ou aticm thre Økoina dag HE) mid ismrda akt -pæ kla sk ma e Off Sus on ir on age age ... en Cap (KU mun Jon d udg nie Agress ogis Aalbelsk Kjæ t i dane the ow the the men ? n iske dag sse teriprin Ros nom n Bus lle eement pele ) Økoann Ro entlig ikat ess othn dev one EU org og r Chr ke (20 ath ang poe stru The oge r. Me ale cipsku kildei ial e skil Adm Bja an n ion inest The Ros nom Chr UnivKom iste Univ les ent er, elo han Sør spu try tokturer", d hen fort02) arn ent ele Univ de and s Sch iste kildei , andial me ersimun nse ersi som afs tetnde sla focr, has Økores undSafran nkt ø Økoen Møl ersi Un inis e tet The nse ikat r- elethis pm d, udvælle And the æt m us nts (20 red with ool Univ ers Foei en ive trat Købnom Jen tet (AA ionn (DP tet var i fra the me sha ent tha theFilo n formonkab Købnom ler ikle til ers 10) (CB sen dev rol rsit ion øgt res Thi (RU ersi U) enh i ineto en et rule nts ll stra t theACsofi U) enh i rd the Ols ndekan e rs nar S) You er recg be et tet C) ave Aar P Inc elo e of rati thepon en ave Wo sta en (RU og ent (RU und dontegiesAC of of hum pm the ns for værejeg, rom hus sib kan vpla ns ir We Kun sse P law Katreased ent teforc yea C) (KU psy C) ere ilityrld. ses ide giv hvo an Eve f (KU sta aser, . Thi an inLeain allUniversi Aar sthi Bak rine ) nni kol ste givThi læg ntit endrda ) rs Møl dis te due Glo In hus stor iz ogi rn en s tenthe bee ete e n rythng s isrigh Daconfidecou in tet the ler det inghas De Univie Miri sk don to ge IT-U ts,bal Bus n. i trau cou Co cur nie denkey n Stra (AU the He ana at ersi lle nce rse ren see ors dev cy pro an Digi am Lunvelopm ... nive ines ndg ) countri ton run ma fort is Illu inc Hel tet Chr lyse Bja , vid elo rsite es, tal or n t is ds ou aar s Køb des ena der tisk æll min a wh rea Her sov ntri arn inc tet Info d Un ent af ere ping see er of sin Økoistin enh ign Wis ning es it is Agr und e situe og aterev ø rea ive Stu iva bud coun in ‘de g Dannoma Kro (ITU rmatics reg ere sha Car ave og trei est eem (20 sed (AU ers atio hav d ign rsit die l, and get ntry an vel ten mar i ns nbo ) kom ch 10) Økoina demard ty, ll plaablishent HE) et s øgt ner e ske inc opm Cap (KU mun Catden ks rg (SE en e jeg Ros nom an sup gov rea ent ocrof thewhile n the ed, bet cy Pæ ptic Sch pele ) og at ikat Enghrin ) kildei inc por ern sed atic thre on ir on we dag mid ism n ion ... en rea t and meAalbelsk’ einKjæ Sør ogis t prin e the ow the the Univ ? sed og r Chr ke The Økoen Møl ersi cip ess othn dev one EU lonntsorg UnivKom iste Univ foc The les ent er, elo han and tet g-tefrom Købnom ler to re has usØkores (RU , andial ersimun nse ersi foc enh i e Jen tet ikat n tet on. rm elethis pm d, the us with C) the ave Købnom (DP the me sha ent tha .. sen (AA ion AC ns res Thi on U) enh i U) rule nts ll bestra t the P rd thein rec (KU You ave thepon Wo sta ) dontegiesAC ent of of hum ns sib Kun sse P law (KU pla ir We ilityrld. te e yea f . Thi an in in all Aar sthi Bak ) nni ste givThi as due hus stor iz ng rn en s tenthe rs bee s isrigh has don to denkey n Univie Miri thets, ersi see ors dev cy pro an Digi am ... Hel tet n a , wh elo is vid increa Købtal des ena Her rev ere ping see er of sin enh ign Wis ning iva bud coun in ‘de g Car ave og trei (AU l, and get ntry an vel ten ns kom ch Økoina HE) inc opmden Cap (KU mun Ros nom an sup gov rea ent cy pele ) ikat kildei inc por ern sed ’ n ion in rea t and me Sør Univ sed Økoen Møl ersi lonnts foc g-tefrom tet Købnom ler us (RU enh i on. rm C) ave .. ns SKR

Lar

s Sal

TIT CivEL ilin

BAC

HEL

(KU

)

SØ G

“

In the new innovation strategy (...) there is a lot of focus on education as an important element. But it’s kind of a neglected link: we haven’t succeeded in connecting innovation with education. Braintrust is a really good example of trying to do that. We have a goal of making students innovation-resources, and therefore it is very relevant to see what comes out of putting students from different countries together to solve some of these grand challenges.

”

Jesper Risom, Department of Education, working with innovation strategies, Expert Evaluator at the Interdisciplinary Knowledge Lab #1.

Interdisciplinarity: Why Bother? In 2002, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics to psychologist and researcher Daniel Kahneman. The prize was given to him for applying findings from cognitive psychology to the field of behavioural economics. These findings showed that, contrary to what economists traditionally had assumed, people systematically make decisions in non-rational ways under conditions of risk. Applying this simple, but consistent finding from psychology to the field of economy has, in the long run, probably saved societies, businesses and people vast amounts of money, time and energy, as well as saving all future generations of economists from scratching their heads, wondering why their scenarios for economic development consistently turn out slightly off the mark. Kahneman and his close colleague Amos Tversky published an article on their theory, called “Prospect Theory,” in Econometrica, arguably the most prestigious economic journal, where it remains the most cited article to date.

“His work has inspired a new generation of researchers in economics and finance to enrich economic theory using insights from cognitive psychology into intrinsic human motivation.” ― The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences’ announcement of psychologist Daniel Kahneman’s Nobel Prize in Economics.

Psychologist Daniel Kahneman, winner of 2002 Nobel Prize in Economics

“

The real-world research problems that scientists address rarely arise within orderly disciplinary categories, and neither do their solutions.

”

– Carole L. Palmer (Work at the Boundaries of Science: Information and the Interdisciplinary Research Process, 2001, p. vii).

“In fact, researchers have settled on what they believe is the magic number for true expertise: ten thousand hours.” ― Malcolm Gladwell, Outliers: The Story of Success, 2008.

Interdisciplinarity: What is it? Interdisciplinarity means integrating knowledge great scientific advancements. However, it has not and modes of thinking drawn from two or more ensured a “connecting of the dots” between the areas disciplines to produce a cognitive advancement – of knowledge, which has rather, historically, been left such as explaining a phenomenon, solving a problem, to polymaths who have had the time, opportunity, creating a product or raising a new question – in and mental faculties to master several disciplines ways that would have been unlikely through single- and integrate their insights. disciplinary means. By now, we have to go several centuries back to find Because single disciplines specialize in the study of the “last man who knew everything,” namely Thomas one aspect of the social or natural world, they can Young: inventor, scientist, linguist, Egyptologist and attain an extensive knowledge of that aspect. They physiologist. He died in 1829. can rarely, however, describe the full complexity of problems in the “real world.” In real life, taking the From 1800 to year 2000, the worldwide rate of full complexity of a problem into account is often publication of print books has skyrocketed from necessary to ensure that a solution to that problem about 15.000 to 700.000. Even the amount of text will succeed. published on the Internet in a single day would take more than a lifetime for one person to read. When Since the beginning of scientific inquiry into the it comes to the amount of scientific knowledge workings of the universe, areas of investigation have available today, the sheer amount of it means that been categorized and specialized by theme or focus. specialization in one field alone is a very timeThis specialization has allowed for the detailed and demanding enterprise. in-depth investigation of a multitude of areas and

â&#x20AC;&#x153;

New solutions to problems can come from seeing things from a different perspective than your own, and from seeing how others approach it. In academia today, interdisciplinarity is therefore perceived as a key to solving some of the great challenges society is facing, in innovative ways. Students should of course also be included in this proces. Sigrid Bjerre Andersen, Braintrust

â&#x20AC;?

Thomas Young: inventor, scientist, linguist, Egyptologist and physiologist.

Interdisciplinary Knowledge Lab #1 On April 23rd, 2013, Braintrust arranged the first ever Interdisciplinary Knowledge Lab, bringing together 24 students from 21 different disciplines and 16 different countries, and matching them in six interdisciplinary teams. Braintrust wished to create an experimental space for interdisciplinary learning, and to put their vision into practice – namely to show how students benefit from sharing their knowledge with each other and working together in a common space, be it social or virtual. The Live Interdisciplinary Knowledge Lab gave students a chance to do something they rarely do, which is to put their specific academic skills to use, and work with students from other disciplines on finding possible solutions to specific problems. Academics tend not to be trained to think in terms of visual models, so a group of visual consultants were at the participants’ disposal at the Interdisciplinary Knowledge Lab, to give ideas and suggest angles

to the solution models the teams came up with. The visual consultants are associates of Braintrust trained in disciplines such as architecture, graphic design and industrial design. Braintrust also invited 9 expert evaluators from the private and public sector to come and see the solution prototypes of the interdisciplinary collaborations, and to give their expert opinion on their viability. Braintrust had the interdisciplinary teams focus on solution-models for creating better societies, as outlined in the European Union’s Horizon 2020 framework. Horizon 2020 is the EU’s framework program for research and innovation, outlining the major challenges facing Europe and, in many cases, the world at large, in the years to come. Horizon 2020 is designed to help bring more good ideas to the market, and has three main objectives, namely to create excellent science, competitive industries and better societies.

“I want to see how it is to work with people from different disciplines. I have experienced difficulties with interdisciplinary work in the business where I worked, and I want to see if there’s a better way of doing it.”

“

Jean Kalmus, Telecommunications/IT at Technical University of Denmark, from France.

“I expect to exchange ideas, and network with people.” Krasimira Atanasova, IT and Cognition, University of Copenhagen, from Bulgaria.

“It’ll be interesting to get a peak of the insides of different disciplines. And I’m curious to see if interdisciplinarity works, if we can come up with something innovative and new at the end of it.” Eva Spiekerman, Global Studies, Roskilde University, from Portugal/Germany.

I’m here first and foremost to see how much creativity you can find in students working together, but also to give the commercial aspects a check. And I think I can. As you can see today, people are extremely varied in their ideas. Some of the ideas might never work in real life, but there are a few of them that actually could go all the way, and that could be commercially viable, in addition to helping people. Thomas Bjerre, Expert Evaluator, The Advanced Technology Foundation

”

Included in the “better societies” aim are broad challenge-areas such as ‘Longer and Healthier Lives’, ‘Reliable, Clean and Efficient Energy’, ‘Efficient Use of Resources for Protection of our Planet’, ‘Inclusive Innovation and Secure Society’, ‘Safe, Secure Food Suppy’, and ‘Smart, Green Transport’. These challenges will receive special research focus and funding from the EU in the years to come. The reason why the Knowledge Lab was set in this framework was, in part, because the event was supported by EU’s Youth in Action programme, but also out of a desire to focus on the broad and complex issues that today’s students will be compelled to solve over the coming decade and beyond. It is Braintrust’s belief that many of these challenges will require multiple types of skills and insights to solve, and will require a complex interaction and cooperation between different disciplines. One of the posters used to market the conference.

Creating analogies and freeing the Students from different disciplines from the langauge and semantics of their fields can enable better cross disciplinary cooperation, and allow them to view the problems and solutions in new ways.

A Visual ‘Lingua Franca’ Braintrust’s key aim is “knowledge without borders,” and interdisciplinary cooperation is the driving concept in achieving this. However, the different disciplinary ‘languages’ create barriers to understanding, communicating with, and ultimately cooperating with those outside your own disciplinary field. Visualisation, from drawing to model-making, can be an indispensible tool in helping to overcome such barriers. At the most basic level, it can act as a sort of visual ‘lingua franca’ – as a kind of language making communication possible between people not sharing a ‘disciplinary tongue.’ Indeed, even discussions between relatively similar disciplines that have distinct semantic differences between them can be made more fluent and effective when using visual symbols and models that pertain to a shared concept. Visualization, combined with using analogies for a particular problem, can encourage members of an interdisciplinary team to look at a familiar problem with fresh eyes, and make connections between

analogous solutions to other problems in ways that might not have appeared obvious. It can also make the team work more ‘democratically’– allowing each member to contribute in their own, appropriate way. Finally, visualization can help with problem solving: when you can ‘see’ the problem, you will also be more able to visualise the solution. Making a problem – especially an abstract one – tangible, for instance to build a three-dimensional model of a problem (or an analogy of a problem) allows the team to literally walk around the problem and see it from different angles.

Read more about Braintrust’s tools and inspiration for developing a Visual Lingua Franca: http://issuu.com/ braintrustbase/docs/ lingua_franca1

â&#x20AC;&#x153;

In some cases, building a model was a catalyst in itself for solving the problem at hand. In all of the groups, the finished models made their solution more accessible for people who were not part of their process, and also increased the opportunity for people of different disciplines to be able to describe their particular elements of the end solution.

â&#x20AC;?

David B. Earle, Visual Consultant at the Braintrust Live Interdisciplinary Knowledge Lab #1

An example of a Feynman Diagram (here showing the decay of a netron into a proton). First developed by theortical Physicist Richard Feyman in 1948, they provided a framework by which the complex mathematical expressions which govern the behaviour of sub-atomic particles could be visualised. First used solely in the field of quantum field theory, it is now used in many other fields of physics. It has been said that enabling the visualisation of these complex fields has revolutionized nearly every aspect of theoretical physics.

MINS

Mapping STAGE 1

PROBLEM BRAINSTORMING: GENERATING IDEAS FOR PROBLEMS TO WORK ON “Our theme was...very, very broad. So I think the challenge is really narrowing it down.” Marie Blønd, team 7

“I think we did a good job. It was a very short time-interval we had, but we came up with a lot of ideas.” Gunnar Helgi Gunnste, team 4

“I liked the fact that the tasks have time limits. It makes you move faster, and that’s nice.” Ksenia Bellmann, team 7

“Especially in the mappingprocess where we tried to conceptualize a problem, we used some approaches from political science and economics. We had an engineer here, who provided the technical knowledge.” Sven Hilgers, team 4

Braintrust get the teams themselves to decide on a problem within their assigned challenge-area, in order to ensure that they are working on a problem they are interested in. This is because an important factor in problem-solving is that you are engaged by the problem and motivated to solve it. A lot of ideas that initially seem unfeasible might turn out to be good ones, or can, in a group setting, inspire other ideas that work better. Therefore, it is important to get all ideas out on the table. By facilitating uncritical thinking, people tend to generate more ideas than if they think critically. Academics are trained to see flaws and holes in theories, and can do the same with their own ideas. The brainstorming exercise forbids that, in order to get as many, and as diverse ideas as possible. It’s a way of broadening the scope and horizon of how we view a subject.

IMPORTANT TASKS FOR THE FACILITATORS IN THIS EXERCISE: Reminding the teams of the seven rules of brainstorming. Correcting critical attitudes/responses to ideas. Encouraging dialogue and thinking out loud. Helping teams come up with problems that are as concrete as possible. Keeping the time.

“

Remember to say out loud what you write on your post-its. You’ll create more dialogue and probably more ideas.

”

Henrik Chulu, Facilitator

THE MAPPING-STAGE OF THE PROCESS IS DESIGNED TO FIND OUT WHICH PROBLEM THE INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAMS ARE MOTIVATED TO SOLVE, AND WILL FOCUS THEIR COLLABORATIVE PROCESS ON.

THE SEVEN RULES OF BRAINSTORMING1 The teams on the Interdisciplinary Knowledge Lab are instructed to:

Defer judgement Encourage wild ideas Build on the ideas of others Stay focused on the topic

One conversation at a time Go for quantity Be visual

4 6

5 IDEO’s ‘Human Centered Design Toolkit’ (2nd Edition) 1

PROBLEM SELECTION: AGREE To choose which idea to work on, the teams should agree on 3-5 criteria that their problem should live up to, and then chose the problem that contains the most of these criteria. In the Interdisciplinary Knowledge Lab, the criteria were: “it must be within EU’s Horizon 2020 framework”; “it must affect people from more than one country”; “it must be a widely known problem”, or; “it must be an underrepresented problem.” People can get emotionally attached to ideas quite quickly – especially their own. By using selection-criteria, this exercise puts rationality into the decision-making process. The criteria can also serve to change a team’s problem formulation to a sharper one, or help them become clear on why they want to solve that particular problem. At the same time, what participants should be aware of, is the tendency to try to fit the criteria to one’s favorite idea, instead of choosing an idea based on the criteria.

“This is a big, vague idea. We need to narrow it down.” Simon Bager, team 1

“The most helpful part for arriving at a problem definition, was having a fixed time, so we had to force ourselves through the process.” Lilian Parker Kaule, team 7

“We had some problems reaching the set of criteria, but when we’d settled that, we fairly quickly settled on a problem to solve.” Morten Jensen, team 7

“

It was very full of discussions. And the main thing it taught me was how to persuade people and how to push your ideas, and listen to others’ ideas as well.

”

Ksenia Bellmann, team 7

ON A PROBLEM TO WORK ON Important tasks for the facilitators in this exercise: Helping sort the ideas by criteria, for instance by outlining a matrix for putting the post-its according to how many criteria they live up to. Reminding groups to try not to tailor the criteria to their “problem-darling”. Helping negotiate differences of opinion through stimulating constructive dialogue. Keeping the time.

MINS

The analogy of tools comes from carpentry. While a carpenter has concrete tools to do his job, academics tend to have non-tangible ones to do theirs, and, as a result, are often not even conscious of them themselves. In order to make the participants’ disciplinary and personal tools more visible, Braintrust introduced the “toolboxing” exercise.

Toolboxing STAGE 2

INTERVIEW EXERCISE: WHAT TOOLS HAVE YOU IN YOUR TOOLBOX? Important tasks for the facilitators: Pair the participants up with someone they don’t know. Inform them of the fruitfulness of open-ended questions. Instruct them to write down skills/ tools on post-its while they talk.

MINS

Each participant is paired with a participant from a discipline different from their own. The two interview one another for 5 minutes each, about what specifically academic skills they have in their methodological toolbox, and how these can be applied in relation to the problem at hand. By explaining their skills to a person with a completely different background, the interviewee is forced to re-evaluate, re-formulate and translate them in a way that increases their own disciplinary awareness. By using open-ended questions such as ‘What’, ‘Who’, ‘How’, and ‘Why’, the interviewer gets the interviewee to not only draw from his or her usual disciplinary vocabulary, but to unfold and explain what for instance ‘action research’ or ‘regression analysis’ means in practice, and how it can be used. Each skill is written down on post-its, one skill per note, to be kept for later.

“

The most positive experience during the workshop was presenting a person I’ve been interviewing.

”

Participant answer in evaluation questionnaire.

PRESENTING EACH OTHER’S SKILLS/TOOLS Important tasks for the facilitators: Keeping the time. Getting out of the way.

MINS

Participants here took turns at presenting their interviewee to the double team. The idea is that presenting someone else’s skills takes humbleness out of the equation. It’s an awareness process to interview and be interviewed by someone, and to have a stranger sum up your skillbase after five minutes of conversation. Most people like opportunities to talk about themselves to an interested listener. This exercise brought about lively chat around the room, as the participants got to interact person to person. At the end of this exercise, the participants were aware of the tools they and their teammates had at their disposal, and this is a good starting-point for deciding on a solution model.

“

How about a radio-newspaper? C 1 get the information out there? .. 2 to focus on that. ...This is ridicul this brainstorming thing is not a selecting ideas while you’re gen 5 lose out on a lot of ideas.

” Ideation

STAGE 3

BRAINSTORMING: POSSIBLE SOLUTION MODELS Important tasks for the facilitators: Making sure participants follow the seven rules for brainstorming. Trying to involve quiet team members by asking them directly what they think. Making sure participants verbalize their ideas to stimulate dialogue. Encouraging participants to write down the ideas, and to draw while talking.

MINS

A variety of ideas were needed again. For the solution brainstorming, teams were advised to use the group’s skills as inspiration. The solution model could be anything from a policy, a business model, a campaign, a website, an app, a research program, a method, a technical solution, an event, an organization, or something completely different. The brainstorming again followed the seven rules of brainstorming (see page 15).

Cause I’m thinking how can we ..What do we need? We need 3 lous! ...‘You’re not being fair, 4 about saying ‘no’ ...If you start nerating ideas, you’re going to Participant from team 1 Second participant from team 1 3 One participant to two others discussing an idea. 4 The reply to the above. 5 Henrik Chulu, Main facilitator. 1 2

SELECTION: CHOOSING THE MODEL TO WORK ON Important tasks for the facilitators: Encouraging teams to focus on criteria in an objective way, and not be colored too much by a favorite solution model. Helping teams sort their solution models by how many of the criteria the model lives up to, by making a matrix for placing the ideas. Helping groups overcome disagreements over which criteria are most important by reflecting with them and summing up the different point of views.

MINS

The groups were once again instructed to agree on a set of criteria to select their solution model. Examples of criteria were that ‘the model must fit their disciplinary toolbox’; ‘It must be achievable within a reasonable time scale’; ‘it must be utopian and technically feasible’. The groups were to sort their problems according to their criteria, and finally agree on a solution-model to develop, write it down and clear the table. Some of the groups were drawing while discussing. Some seemed to already have decided on a solution model that they wanted to use, and were adapting the criteria to the solution.

Stage 3: Ideation

OUTLINE NARRATIVE SCENARIOS: A VISUAL STORY IN THREE ACTS In this exercise the teams draw a cartoon in three panels, of how their model helps to solve the problem they have selected. It also starts the teams truly thinking in visual terms.

Important tasks for the facilitators in this exercise:

Panel one shows the problem. Panel two shows the team’s solution. Panel three shows the consequence of their solution.

Helping sort the ideas by criteria, for instance by outlining a matrix for putting the post-its according to how many criteria they live up to.

If possible, the teams are encouraged to incorporate the stakeholders as well as their toolbox into the narrative.

Reminding groups to try not to tailor the criteria to their “problem-darling”.

If time allows it, a fourth panel can be drawn which shows what will happen if nothing is done about the problem.

Helping negotiate differences of opinion through stimulating constructive dialogue. Keeping the time.

“The creative and visual aspect of making a model was good for reflecting on the solution. You’re building it, but at the same time you’re kind of rethinking the solution again and again and again: ‘does it really show how it’s supposed to work?’ And so you’re really rethinking the idea just because you’re trying to visualize it. And then the time-constraint made it a little bit more fun.” - Jan Zumbach, team 5.

MINS

Prototyping STAGE 4

The final part of the process has the participants visualize the problem-solving model they have arrived at. The visualization can be by drawing, building 3D models, making flow-charts, or any other way that comes to mind. At the teams’ disposal during this exercise, are Braintrust’s visual consultants, cardboard, paper, scissors, glue, thread, colored paper, and clay - tools that are highly unusual in academic work, but that are standard working-tools in creative disciplines. The teams explain their solution models to Braintrust’s visual consultants, whereupon the visual consultants suggested a way of visualizing it. The teams then work at developing their hitherto theoretical solution-models into tangible, concrete models. This exercise physically activates the participants. In addition, the visualization makes the teams zoom in on details of their solution models, rethink aspects of it and, not least, see ways of connecting different team-members’ ideas.

Important tasks for the visual consultants at this stage: Help the teams crystallize their solution models, explaining the essence and details of it. Contribute with ideas to- and practical knowledge of model building and visualization. In cases where there is a more dominant idea from one member of the team, help enable other ideas from the team being included in the final model, by suggesting physical “addon’s.”

“ What is important now, is to show people what it is about ”

Wojciech Dziadkowiec, Visual Consultant

“Ok, that sounds great! Why don’t you build one?”

lovely three dimensional way of expressing the whole of your ideas.”

- David Earle, Visual Consultant.

“Ok, I think one way to do it, if you want a table where people are sitting, you can actually make it out of cardboard. And make little silhouettes too. And all of them would have some symbol on them. Because that would give you a little bit more space to draw on, and it would maybe be easier to grasp the message. And on the table you can have like the European flag or whatever you wanted.”

“How will we create this?”

Bojana Romnic, Visual consultant.

“It’s just that there are so many complex ideas going on here. If we had a three dimensional box plus a smaller version of the same thing, cause its scalable, and then if we make with pins and pieces of paper, little signs all over the model, saying what’s happening here and what are the benefits, I think it would be a

- Burak Bican, Architecture, team 6.

“If you do it this way, it’ll maybe be easier to understand” Ragnhild Hagström, Visual consultant

“There was a lot of discussion of how to visualize our idea. It made us more aware that we still need a physical space to be active because we are people who need to interact somewhere and with someone.” - Ksenia Bellmann, (Migration & Ethnic Relations), team 7

Presentation STAGE 5

The presentation stage of the interdisciplinary collaboration is a kind of “show-and-tell-exercise,” where teams present their solution, and explain how it helps solve their chosen problem and how they would carry it out. The teams are “selling” their solution models to their audiences and, at the Live Interdisciplinary Knowledge Lab #1, to a team of expert evaluators, too, inasmuch as they have to explain why their solution is needed and why it would work, in other words; it’s selling points. Presenting the solution model prototype in this way brings together the team’s different disciplinary tools and knowledge, with the stakeholders map.

Important tasks for facilitators/ visual consultants at this stage: Help teams prepare display; clarify what symbolizes what, and how the bits are connected.

Acknowledgements This e-book is the result of a project organised by the Braintrust Association (Foreningen Braintrust), and sponsored by the EU’s Youth in Action Programme and the University of Copenhagen.

Authoring: Kitty Elisabeth Byng

Editing and lay-out: David B. Earle

Foreningen Braintrust 2013. The book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Thanks to the following for contributing to the realisation of the Interdisciplinary Knowledge Lab: Academic consultants: Katrine Lindvig (University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Humanities) Bente Merete Stallknecht (University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Science) Bojana Romic (Malmö University) Mathias Munch (Copenhagen Business School) Trine Villumsen Berling (Centre for Advanced Security Theory, University of Copenhagen) Ida Meisling (Roskilde University) Visual consultants: Wojciech Dziadkowiec Ragnhild Hagström David B. Earle Facilitators: Henrik Chulu Ida Marie Fich Katrine Danielle Bjaarnø Julie Richard Fjeldsted Sigrid Bjerre Andersen

BRAINTRUSTBASE.COM

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.