Эко-курс — часть четвертая: Экодеревни в Норвегии

Hurdal/Ryskova l l l l

Hurdal ecovillage.

Consensus.

Premade/selfmade.

Challenges

Hurdal Ecovillage l

History

l

Vision

l

Consensus

l

Members

Historikk 1998 - 2006

- History 1998-2008

- 1998 Kilden Ă˜kosamfunn/ The Source ecosociety - Survey of about 50 propertys.

- 2001 Hurdal Ecovillage is founded - 2002 We buy the farm Gjøding Gürd from the local authority and start the work with the regulation plan.

- 2003 Members building houses and move to the farm..

- 2006 The regulationplan is acceptet by the local authority - 2006-2008 Working with organisation, and planning/projecting the development of the ecovillage.

Hurdal Ecovillage- a national arena for ecological and alternative lifestyle.

Spring 2003‌

Byggingen er igang

Tunet sommeren 2005

Gjøding gård - Hurdal prestegård

119 daa. beiter

350 daa.skog

163 daa. jord

Regulation plan

Building area 1

Vision l

To be the first ecovillage in Norway

l

A national arena for ecological and alternative lifestyle

l

To be independendent from every ism and religion.

l

To try out and use consensus as a desicion tool.

l

A new way of living together/social platform

If it`s not fun, it`s not sustainible !

Craig Gibson

What is consensus l

An old desicion system ( used by the quakers).

l

A method for equals.

l

The most democratic method.

l

Consensus is more than the ideas of the individuals in the group

Basic philosophy l

There is as many truths as it is people around a table.

l

Non competetive

l

Non violent

l

Give place for each individual

l

Conflict is desirable

If war is the violent resolution of conflict, then peace is not the absence of conflict, but rather, the ability to resolve conflict without violence.

C.T. Butler

Necessary to use consensus l

Trust

l

Respect

l

Unity of purpose

l

Nonviolence

l

Self empowerment

l

Cooperation

l

Conflict resolution

What can stop consensus l

Unpatience

l

Social prejudice

l

Violence

l

External hierarchical structures

l

Unequal access to power

l

Lack of training

l

passivity

Premade/selfmade

Halmhus

Premade •Control of costs.

•Work efficient.

•Less unexpected happenings.

•Short building time.

•Not weather dependent •Need for importing materials.

•Monotonuos look.

•Transport more or less?

•Less possibilities to use recycled materials.

•All costs at one time.

Selfmade • Personal look.

• Easy to use recycled materials.

• Work when you can.

• Possibilities to spread the costs over time.

• Use of local materials • Work intensive.

• Long building time.

• Less control of costs • Weather dependent

Challenges • Byrocrasy.

• Funding.

• Interpersonal relationships • What to do first. Activities/planning.