INSIDE www.nilesbugle.com
SPORTS Dons move to 4-1 Page 11
SCHOOLS Niles North, union reach tentative agreement
Page 8
Our Village, Our News
SEPTEMBER 27, 2012
Vol. 56 No. 51
Niles Lawsuit denied Cook County Court Rules Against Niles Term Limits
By Alex V. Hernandez Staff Reporter
Despite a Cook County judge’s ruling against including a term limit referendum question in Niles ballots during this year’s November general elections, some Niles citizens continue to pressure the Niles Board of Trustees for term a limit referendum. On Monday, Judge Edmund Ponce de Leon said that the Citizens Subcommittee of the Niles Board of Ethics, which brought a lawsuit against the village of Niles in an attempt to have a judge rule that the question should be on the November ballot, did not meet the “substantial compliance” standard they sought to win the case. “The petition for the referendum had to comply with state statute,” village of Niles Attorney Joseph Annunzio said. “Substantial compliance is a very weak argument. It means ‘almost right.’” Substantial compliance essentially means that if a good faith attempt was made to perform the requirements of a
“It can be done here and
now! Yes it can! Introduce a Referendum for Tuesday’s [Niles Trustee] Board Meeting and pass it.” Joseph Makula, Citizens Subcommittee
contract, but failed to exactly meet the specifics and if the essential aim of the contract had been met, the contract will still be considered as having been correctly completed. On July 27, Joseph Makula, a member of the Citizens Subcommittee of the Niles Board of Ethics, presented the village clerk of Niles with more than a thousand signatures calling for a ballot measure to be included in the upcoming November election.The measure would See LAWSUIT, page 3