Hypersonic Weapon Systems - Interview John Otto

Page 1

2ND NATIONAL SUMMIT ON HYPERSONIC WEAPON SYSTEMS April 25–26, 2023 Hilton Towers Arlington VA Washington, D.C. AmericanConference.com/Hypersonic-Technology • 888 224 2480 Part of American Conference Institute’s DEFENSE & GOVERNMENT SUMMITS EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW WITH John Otto Senior Director, Advanced Hypersonic Weapons, Advanced Technologies Product Line Raytheon Missiles & Defense

Mr. John W. Otto is Senior Director of Advanced Hypersonic Weapons of the Advanced Technologies product line for Raytheon Missiles & Defense. Advanced Technologies is the growth engine and front-end product line at Raytheon Missiles & Defense, and is responsible for new and innovative products and business endeavors. The Hypersonic Weapons Directorate is responsible for developing, growing and delivering both offensive and defensive high speed hypersonic systems to future product lines.

Previously Mr. John W. Otto was the Capability Area Lead for High Speed Air Breathing systems. In this role, he was responsible for the execution of air breathing development, within the Advanced Missile Systems (AMS) product line at Raytheon Missiles Systems.

Mr. John W. Otto has 22 years’ experience with 20 of it in the Defense Industry with Hughes Aircraft Company and Raytheon. In his early career his technical roles included weapon system integration and test in addition to technology development. John supported several international programs and interfaced directly with international technical and managerial teams. He provided technical and program management leadership for multiple technology development programs that focused on improving weapons system performance through increased kinematics, lethality enhancements, and improved kill chains. He led new concept development efforts starting from initial concept design and demonstrated the ability to capture new business. John has significant experience interfacing with USAF, USN, DARPA, MDA, and the international customers. Key leadership roles include Systems Engineering Lead, Chief Engineer, Department Manager, Capture Manager, Proposal Lead, Program Manager and Director.

John W. Otto Educational background includes: BS - Mechanical Engineering, Cornell University; MS –Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering, University of Illinois; MBA, University of Arizona.

AmericanConference.com/Hypersonic-Technology • 888 224 2480

Along with the use of hypersonic missiles in the war on Ukraine, China and Russia are further developing & fielding Hypersonic Weapons that the U.S. has not kept pace with. New threats are emerging and near peer adversaries North Korea and Iran have now claimed to have also developed Hypersonic weapon’s capabilities.

With this ongoing global proliferation, the Pentagon is seeking to ramp up the pace of hypersonic weapons testing and research to develop a time critical threat for a national & global response.

Mr. Otto, we see & hear in many media outlets of the evolving threats and rapidity of the pace for HW Weapons. How is Raytheon fast tracking their engineering capabilities to meet these threats?

Digital engineering technologies enable the acceleration of hypersonic weapon development. As an example, during our flight testing for the Hypersonic Airbreathing Weapon Concept (HAWC) program, we validated our digital designs and digital engineering concepts to optimize the design and solve the challenges unique to hypersonic flight. Our model performance and our actual performance were almost exact overlays on top of each other.

As a nation, we have fairly limited experience in the hypersonic flight regime and having the power to model that environment with that kind of accuracy really speaks to the power of digital engineering. We used to rely on building and flying hardware to learn. Now we can design, fly, iterate, and ideate all in a digital environment. It’s much faster… And much more cost effective.

Our models will continue to evolve and mature, and we’ll get to a point where we will validate certain aspects of the design versus validating the entire system. Instead of a point solution, our models allow us to develop a solution across a substantial envelope. As the fidelity of our models improve across industry, and the government gets more confident in the correlations between modelled data and real flight data, the quicker we will see programs of record established to keep our warfighters, citizens and allies safe. Digital engineering is the future, and it’s how we move faster.

AmericanConference.com/Hypersonic-Technology • 888 224 2480

We have many experts working in Academia on all sorts of expanding testing capabilities. How is digitization streamlining this process for Raytheon and do you believe digital modeling is the most cost effective & efficient way ahead?

As mentioned, digital engineering and modelling & simulation are huge enablers to go faster. Let me provide another example of how it improves efficiency.

In a typical design environment, there’s a mechanical model to evaluate things like computational fluid dynamics to see what that structure looks like in an airflow. Then there’s a thermal model to identify where the heating will occur…. What temperatures to expect on the leading edges of the intakes, wings, and fins… The types of materials that will be needed… And then there’s a performance models to understand how far the missile will fly… How much maneuverability it might have… And even how survivable it is in a threat environment.

Typically, we take the results from one model and feed it into another. The issue with this dated approach is that its serial nature drives you to a series of iterations because you are continuing to update models after you’ve passed them to the next step in the analysis. This is time consuming.

In our digital engineering environment, all those models are brought together. Using a true digital thread, we can now get to a more robust part of the design envelope faster.

Do you see the United Stated (DoD) becoming the leader in developing & ready with a HW weaponry arsenal ready any time soon? If not, what still needs to be done first & foremost to give America the edge we seek?

Hypersonic and counter-hypersonic systems are among the DoD’s top technical modernization priorities, and it’s a critical national imperative to advance this capability. We must continue to innovate breakthrough hypersonic technologies to maintain offensive and defensive capabilities against current or future global threats. At Raytheon Missiles & Defense, we acknowledge the tremendous responsibility our customers entrust us with and understand how important it is to get these critical capabilities into the hands of our warfighters as fast as possible.

On the offensive side, Raytheon Missiles & Defense, in partnership with Northrop Grumman, has been selected to develop the Hypersonic Attack Cruise Missile for the U.S. Air Force. HACM is a first-of-its-kind weapon developed in conjunction with the Southern Cross Integrated Flight Research Experiment (SCIFiRE), a U.S. and Australia project arrangement. Under this contract, our team will deliver operationally ready missiles to the USAF.

AmericanConference.com/Hypersonic-Technology • 888 224 2480

On the defensive side, we’re supporting the development of a new interceptor to bridge a crucial gap in hypersonic missile defense known as the Glide Phase Interceptor, or GPI. GPI is designed to counter threats in their long glide phase after launch. In its requirements for GPI development, the MDA has stipulated that “any prototypes designed will fit into the current Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense system” which fires from a naval vessel’s vertical launching system. Here, Raytheon Missiles & Defense has a key advantage: Its capabilities have been integrated with that system for around two decades. Our Standard Missiles and Aegis are already tightly coupled. They talk to each other; they exchange messages with each other. We’re able to tweak and reuse a lot of that interface for GPI.

Additionally, the missile defense mission is exponentially more challenging today. Hypersonic missile systems alter warfighting on a strategic and tactical level and can deliver payloads farther and faster than ever before. They move nimbly enough to avoid detection and dodge defensive countermeasures. Unlike the traditional BMD system, which was built for ballistic missile threats with a clear and predictable trajectory, like throwing football, the future architecture needs to evolve to account for proliferation of unpredictable, survivable threats which can quickly change course and can occur simultaneously to evade our sensors.

A key strategy to success is getting eyes on the threat through networked sensors from space to ground to create a better threat picture. Raytheon Missiles & Defense’s softwaredefined apertures can perform multiple missions near-simultaneously in any domain. Advanced sensors, such as LTAMDS and SPY-6, can perform multiple missions near simultaneously in any domain and are important advancements. But sensors like AN/ TPY-2 and U/EWR, which also work together, will remain cornerstones of missile defense, and there is an opportunity to advance them to support hypersonic defense.

Continued bipartisan and allied support and funding are necessary for this crucial work to move forward. Testing and fielding of these weapon systems needs to happen in concert with allied countries around the world. Our international partnerships ensure we share knowledge, infrastructure, testing capabilities, human resources, and the funding needed to address this threat together.

Academic partnerships and STEM education are crucial to develop the right skills and talent base to secure our lead for our defense and national security. This collaborative effort will have cascading effects that will generate economic and strategic benefits to our country for years to come.

AmericanConference.com/Hypersonic-Technology • 888 224 2480

WEAPON SYSTEMS

April 25–26, 2023

Hilton Towers Arlington VA • Washington, D.C.

With the proliferation of hypersonic systems increasing with both emerging and near peer adversaries the speed at which the U.S. needs to research, develop and advance U.S. hypersonic weapon technologies is at a critical stage. This summit will address these critical needs in advancement as well as how to use these technologies to further develop & enhance our global posture.

Topics Covered in this Summit Include:

• Defining mission requirements

• Advancements in R&D

• Emerging testing and fielding

• Necessary mission requirements

• The way forward as hypersonic weapons are further adopted into a joint operational doctrine

Hypersonic-Technology • 888 224 2480
AmericanConference.com/
2ND NATIONAL SUMMIT ON HYPERSONIC

Summit Chairmen

Lt Gen (USAF-ret) Bruce “Orville” Wright President & CEO Air & Space Forces Association

Dr. Tom Karako

Senior Fellow, International Security Program and Director, Missile Defense Project Center for Strategic & International Studies

Keynote Speakers:

Dr. Yvette S. Weber, SES

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Science, Technology and Engineering

Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics)

Marcia Holmes

Deputy Director, Hypersonic, Directed Energy, Space and Rapid Acquisition

Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology), Redstone Arsenal

Dr. Victoria Coleman

Chief Scientist

United States Air Force

Speakers:

Lt. Colonel Gary Goff

USAF, Materiel Leader, Space Layer Resilient Missile Warning, Missile Tracking, (SNR), Space Sensing Directorate U.S. Space Force

Dr. Nathan R. Tichenor

Director of Hypersonic Facilities | Bush Combat Development Complex Texas A&M University System

Dr. Jeffrey C. Boulware

Technical Director

Joint Integrated Air and Missile Defense Organization (JIAMDO)

John Otto

Senior Director, Advanced Hypersonic Weapons, Advanced Technologies Product Line Raytheon Missiles & Defense

Dr. Eric Marineau

Program Officer, Hypersonics, Aerothermodynamics, High Speed Propulsion and Materials

Office of Naval Research (ONR)

Dr. Rodney Bowersox

Director, Texas A&M National Aerothermochemistry and Hypersonics Laboratory

Texas A&M

Tim Wadhams

Senior Research Scientist, and the Vice President CUBRC Aerosciences Sector, CUBRC Aerosciences Group

Dr. Erica Corral

Associate Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, Associate Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Associate Professor, BIO5 Institute, University Distinguished Scholar in Materials Science and Engineering

University of AZ Tucson

Dr. Marco Panesi

Director of the Center for Hypersonics and Entry Systems Studies (CHESS)

University of IL Urbana-Champaign

Lt Col Jared Thompson, USAF Chief, Advanced Capabilities Integration Branch USSTRATCOM J875

Dr. Kelly Stephani

Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Kritzer Faculty Fellow, Co-Director, University Consortium for Applied Hypersonics (UCAH) Center for Hypersonics & Entry Systems Studies, (CHESS)

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Dr. Valero Viti

Aerospace & Defense Team Lead Ansys

Christopher Gettinger

Director, Advanced Propulsion and Systems Northrop Grumman Defense Systems

Dr. Luca Maddalena

Professor, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

Dept, The University of Texas at Arlington

Director, Aerodynamics Research Center

AmericanConference.com/Hypersonic-Technology • 888 224 2480

John “JV” Venable

Senior Research Fellow for Defense Policy, Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy The Heritage Foundation

Dr. Daniel Millman (LtCol (USAF-ret))

Chief Technology Officer

Stratolaunch, LLC

CAPT (USN-ret) David “Dave” McFarland

Senior Director, Integrated Defense Solutions

BAE Systems Intelligence and Security

Geoff Adams

Senior Mission Architect, Missile Defense L3 Harris Space & Airborne Systems

Dr. Scott Morton

Fellow, AIAA and Royal Aeronautical Society

Associate Director of the U.S. DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program

Dennis Helmich

Director of Integrated Military Systems, Sandia National Laboratories

Mark Glenn

Director, OSD Joint Hypersonic Transition Office Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, (OUSD R&E)

Dave Waterhouse CEO

Hypersonix

Dr. Roberto Furfaro

Deputy Director Space4 Center

Director of UA Space Systems Engineering Laboratory, Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, and Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering

University of Arizona

Anthony Hazlett

Senior Engineering Leader, Hypersonic Propulsion & Power Systems, Edison Works Emerging Technologies

GE Edison Works

DOWNLOAD THE AGENDA AmericanConference.com/Hypersonic-Technology • 888 224 2480

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Hypersonic Weapon Systems - Interview John Otto by C5Group - Issuu