January 4, 2023
Marine Corps Force Design
Modernizing in Support of the Joint Force
Brigadier General Mark H. Clingan
Assistant Deputy Commandant, Capabilities
Development; Combat Development & Integration
Headquarters Marine Corps
March 2023
The overall classification of this brief is: UNCLASSIFIED
Pacing Threat Modernization: 2025
The Character of War Last 100 years
38th Commandant’s Planning Guidance
Force Design
Warfighting
Education and Training
Core Values
Command and Leadership
“What do the Fleet Commanders want from the Marine Corps, and what does the Navy need from the Marine Corps?”
General Berger, 38th Commandant of the Marine Corps
Threat Informed, Concept Based, Capability Development
Stand-in Force Concept
Designed specifically to operate across the competition continuum to impose challenges the adversary cannot ignore.
Strategically placed where they can collect targeting data, strike and close choke points, or herd adversaries to areas where Naval and Joint Forces can bring more weapons to bear.
In day to day activity, SIF deter potential adversaries by establishing the forward edge of a partnered maritime defense in depth that denies the adversary freedom of action.
Purpose of SIF is to enable the Fleet and the Joint Force to win the reconnaissancecounter reconnaissance battle at every point along the competition continuum.
Sensors
• G/ATOR
Kill Web Capabilities
• MUDRACE
• MADIS
• SIGINT
• Minotaur
• Unattended Maritime Sensors
• Tactical Remote Sensor System
C2 Relay
• CAC2S SFF
• NOTM
• SERPNT
• UAS Group 2 3 ISR
• C5 ISRT
• Space
• EABs/ANBs
• Naval Surface Platforms
“Shooters”
Lethal & Non Lethal Marine
• NMESIS
• 35
• MEGFOS Joint
• Cyber • Space
• LRUSV – OPF M
• Naval Aviation
• Naval Surface
• Naval Subsurface
Competition to Conflict
Logistics in the Littoral Wargame [23-27 Aug 2021]
Iterative Future Infantry Bn Series Wargames [Oct 2021Feb 2022]
Exercise NATIVE FURY 22 [Mar 2022]
CNA Study on Prepositioning [March 2022]
Iterative MLR Series Wargame [Mar-Jun 2022]
EW22 Wargame #1 [7-11 Mar 2022]
Supporting Establishment TTX [Mar 2022]
Operational Logistics Wargame [Apr 2022]
AGILE-22 Wargame [18-22 Apr 2022]
Naval Contested Logistics Wargame II [2-6 May 2022]
EW22 Wargame #2 [16-20 May 2022]
Exercise VALIANT SHIELD 22 [Jun 2022]
Advance Base Wargame MALTESE DRAGON [15-26 Aug 2022]
Global Positioning Network IPT [12-23 Sept]
Naval Services Game [OPLOG focus; 17-21 Oct 2022]
Enterprise Log IPT II [29 Nov – 9 Dec]
Contested Logistics S&T Wargame [27 Jan -3 Feb]
Advance Base Wargame #2 MALTESE DRAGON [Apr 23]
PACSENTRY [Jun 23]
Contested Logistics
In the future operating environment Logistics and Sustainment is not just a supporting effort, it is a tool for competition and deterrence
Partners and Allies
The impact of working with allies and partners cannot be overstated; it is key to undermining the adversary’s plans and is a primary reason stand-in forces’ presence must be persistent.
SIF provide ways and means to assist allies and partners in securing their maritime sovereignty.
Coupled with partnered operations, bilateral exercises, and combined staff training, SIF represent the leading edge in defense in depth.
By building and strengthening relationships we achieve the first step in integrated deterrence.
Talent Management
Seven decades after its creation, the Marine Corps personnel system is overdue for a fundamental redesign. Our organization, processes, and approach to personnel and talent management are no longer suited to today’s needs and incompatible with the objectives of Force Design 2030. Transitioning to a talent management focus, and system, is required. Without profound improvements made at speed, the deficiencies in the current system will result in the failure of broader service modernization efforts.
The Next Steps TM2030
Rebalance Recruiting and Retention
• Retention Task Force
• Total Force Retention
• Retention Ecosystem Modernization
Multiple Paths to Career Success
• Human Performance Strategy
Yesterday’s Industrial Age Model
o The Urgency of Change
Tenets of a Talent Management System
o Marines are individuals, not inventory
o Talents can be identified and evaluated
o Talents can be developed
o Matching talents to duties maximizes performance
o Incentives power the system
o Always a boat space for talent
o Data drives decision-making
New Models for Recruiting Talent
o Rebalance recruiting and retention to mature the force
o Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Talent Management
o Specialized recruiting for individuals with critical skills
Assignments
o Creating a talent marketplace
o Reduce PCS Frequency
• Cmd vs Staff Track
• Technical Career Paths
Human Resource Information System
• Hire to Retire System
• Data Strategy OPT
• Cradle Grave Data Analytics
• Lateral Entry/Reserve Permeability
o 360-degree Feedback
Increasing Career Flexibility
o Promotion Opt-out
o Creating a path for Talented Staff Officers
o Lateral move retention incentive
o Retaining High Performing Officers
o Enhancing Parental Leave
• Enlisted Indef EAS
• NET MOD OPT
Adopting Modern Digital Tools, Analytics, and Processes
o Prioritizing data and employing better analytics
o Decision support tools for promotion and selection boards
o Upgrading HR Systems
Marine Corps Armored Vehicles
Maritime Crisis Response
Marine Corps Remains The Nation’s Premier Global Crisis Response Force
Modernization across all warfighting functions enhances our ability to remain a global crisis response force in a 21st century operating environment.
Key Takeaways
The character of war is changing Force Design 2030 is a holistic modernization effort to adapt the force to win a 21st century conflict
2030 is a way point, not the end of modernization
Our emerging concepts and modernized capabilities will continue to be molded through rigorous experimentation and analysis.
Our doctrine of maneuver warfare places a premium on individual judgment and action
To compete at peak effectiveness we must recruit, invest-in, and retain the right people, with the right skills, for the right duties
The Marine Corps remains the nation’s premier global crisis response force
Discussion
Acronym List
AAV – Amphibious Assault Vehicle
ACV – Amphibious Combat Vehicle
ANB – Advanced Naval Base
AUGV- Armed Unmanned Ground Vehicle
CAC2S SFF– Common Aviation Command & Control System Small Form Factor
CESAS II – Communication Emitter Sensing and Attacking System II
C5 ISR-T – Command, Control, Computers, Communication, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance Reconnaissance Targeting
EAB - Expeditionary Advanced Base
G/ATOR – Ground/Air Task-Oriented Radar
HIMARS – High Mobility Artillery Rocket System
HMMWV – High Mobility Multi-wheeled Vehicle
LAV-25 – Light Armored Vehicle
LAW/LSM – Light Amphibious Warship/Landing Ship Medium
LCAC – Landing Craft Air Cushion
L-MADIS- Light-Marine Air Defense Integrated System
LRUSV – Long-range Unmanned Surface Vessel
MADIS - Marine Air Defense Integrated System
M-ATV – MRAP All-Terrain Vehicle
MEGFOS - Multi-function Electromagnetic warfare
Ground Family of Systems
MRAP – Mine Resistant Ambush Protected
MRIC – Medium Range Intercept Capability
MST – Maritime Strike Tomahawk
MUDRACE – Multi-domain Radar for a Contested Environment
NMESIS – Navy Marine Corps Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System
NOTM – Network on the Move
NSM – Naval Strike Missile
OPF-M – Organic Precision Fires – Mounted
ROGUE – Remotely Operated Ground Unit for Expeditionary for Fires
SCAR – Secure Commercial Agile Reach back
SERPNT – Secure Expeditionary Resilient Position
Navigation & Timing
SIGINT – Signals Intelligence
sUAS – Small Unmanned Aviation System
UAS – Unmanned Aviation Systems
ULS-A – Unmanned Logistics System - Air VBAT – VTOL Bat
VMAX – Not an acronym – a system used by SIGINT Marines to survey the field from electromagnetic perspective and offers electronic attack capabilities
VTOL- Vertical Take Off and Landing
A THREAT-INFORMED, CONCEPT-BASED, CAMPAIGN OF LEARNING
PRE 2020 2020 2021
STRATEGIC GUIDANCE THREAT ANALYSIS CONCEPTS
STUDIES & ANALYSIS
WARGAMING EXPERIMENTATION
DISTRIBUTED MARITIME OPERATIONS
• JOINT FORCE OPERATING SCENARIO (JFOS) 2.2
• GBASM
• PACFLT 11
• JSF B/C
• GRND RADAR
• INTEGRATED NAVAL FORCE STRUCTURE
LITTORAL OPERATIONS IN A CONTESTED ENVIRONMENT
• JFOS 2.2 NAVAL SERVICES EXCURSION
• FMF SELF AND POINT DEFENSE
• ARV ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
EXPEDITIONARY ADVANCE BASE OPERATIONS
• CONNECTOR GAPS IN LOCE
• MOBILITY CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS
• FUTURE NAVAL FORCE STUDY
• GHOST FLEET
• GHOST FLEET 2
• ENDER’S SHADOW
• PACIFIC SURPRISE
• POM-22
• BLACK SHEEP
• OP WG SYS
• TRIDENT JUNCTURE-19
• SLTE
• RIMPAC-20
• PACFLT 12
• GO WARGAME
• EW 20
• NSG 20
• VALIANT SHIELD-20
• IBX-30
• STEEL KNIGHT-20
• PROVIDENT FORGE
• OIE
• III MEF
• MLR SERIES
JOINT WARFIGHTING CONCEPT
• JFOS 2.1 CAMPAIGN ANALYSIS
• III MEF FD IMPACT
• FORCE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
• LOGISTICS C2
• C2 ENABLERS
• FORWARD ENGAGEMENT CONCEPT 2.0
• MEU SERIES
• POM-24
• LITTORAL MANEUVER
• LITTORAL LOG
• EW -21
• ENIGMA SERIES
• PACFLT 13
• PACFLT 14
• LSE-21
• TALISMAN SABER
• PROJECT
CONVERGENCE-21
• IBX-30
• MWX
INTEGRATED PLANNING TEAMS
• MLR PT.1
• MEU PT.1
• RESERVE PT.1
• INFANTRY BATTALION
• BISOG MANPOWER
• AVIATION PT.1
• LOGISTICS ISO FMF
• ARTILLERY
• MEDIUM RANGE AIR DEFENSE
• TRAINING & EDUCATION
• COMMAND ARRANGEMENTS
• GROUND COMBAT & TACT VICS
• RECON / X-RECON
CAMPAIGN OF POMS
POM-21
A PIVOT TO FORCE DESIGN
• LITTORAL MANEUVER & SUSTAINMENT
• PREPOSITIONING
• NAVAL TACTICAL GRID
• ANTI-SHIP CAPABILITIES
• SYNCHRONIZATION
• ENTERPRISE LOGISTICS
• ISR ENTERPRISE PT.1
• MLR PT.2
• C5ISRT / X-C5ISRT
• MEU PT.2
• RESERVE PT.2
POM-22
FORCE DESIGN
2022
SECNAV POM-24
STAND-IN FORCES
• JFOS 2.2040 CAMPAIGN ANALYSIS
• II MEF IAMD
• AMPHIB FLEET
• SURFACE MOVEMENT CAPABILITIES
• FORWARD
RECON / COUNTERRECON
• GLOBAL 21
• THREAT TTX
• AVIATION
• OIE
• EW -22 PT.1
• EW -22 PT.2
ENGAGEMENT CONCEPT 3.0
• ARV MARITIME
QUARTERBACKING
• MAGTF FIRES
• FUTURE INF BN TRNG
• MUX FoUAS PT. 2
• GLOBAL 15
• RXR
• PACIFIC CASCADE
• MLR SERIES
• NSG-22
• RIMPAC-22
• VALIANT SHIELD-22
• PROJECT CONVERGENCE-22
• IBX-30
• INSTITUTIONAL SAP
• INTEGRATED AIR & MISSILE DEFENSE
• LITTORAL MANEUVER
• SYNCHRONIZATION
POM-23
MATURING KILL WEBS
• AVIATION PT.2
• COMPONENCY
• STEEL KNIGHT-22
• MWX
• COLD RESPONSE
• ARTIC EDGE-22
• ALL-DOMAIN C2
• MCISRE PT. 2
• COMMUNICATIONS FORMATIONS
• SERVICE RETAINED FORCES
• NEF
• ISR ENTERPRISE PT.2
• SYNCHRONIZATION
• GPN
• sUAS
• ENTERPRISE LOG PT. 2
POM-24
SET & SUSTAIN
THE STAND-IN FORCE
Concepts
Modernized Efforts Under Proven Process
Wargaming
Explore emerging concepts using simulations and qualitative models, methods, and tools (MMT) in order to identify areas for follow-on study and analysis.
Operations Analysis
Scenario & Threat
Conduct operations research and analysis using quantitative MMT in order to inform programmatic decisions.
Systems / Kill – Chain Analysis
Force Design
Carry out systems analysis using scientific MMT in order to inform programmatic and budgeting decisions.
Experimentation
Future Force Assessment
• Roles & Missions
• CONEMPS
• Mission Threads
• Capabilities
• Capacities
• Risk
Concepts
Deception
Deception seeks to achieve surprise in support of a commander’s objective.
Deception is one of three ways to achieve surprise; ambiguity and stealth.
Intent is to give the enemy a clear picture of the situation, but the wrong picture.
MCDP 1 Warfighting, p. 43 44
Deception is an art, not a science –
It does not depend on technology but rather is enabled by it