Phase 1 Mounds Blvd cons & opps 20171011 web

Page 1

METRO

Gold Line BRTOD Plans

Mounds Station Constraints and Opportunities

District 4- Dayton’s Bluff Community Council Work Session October 11, 2017


Agenda 1. PRESENTATION  Project Overview  Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Bus Rapid Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Fundamentals  Mounds, Earl, & Etna Station Areas – Background & Constraints/ Opportunities 2. DISCUSSION 3. NEXT STEPS


BRT Project Overview


BRT Project Process Completed

Current

Transit needs analysis

Analysis to identify routes

Finalize route, general station locations, and transit type (bus rapid transit)

2010

2012

2016

BRTOD planning (18 Months) Project Engineering (42 Months)

Gold Line construction

Gold Line opening day 2024

Public Engagement

4


Locally Preferred Alternative Route and Station Locations

Gold Line BRT— Draft Environmental Assessment Plan (2016)

5


St Paul Station Area Plans (2016)

6


BRT Project Process Completed

Current

Transit needs analysis

Analysis to identify routes

Finalize route, general station locations, and transit type (bus rapid transit)

2010

2012

2016

BRTOD planning (18 Months) Project Engineering (42 Months)

Gold Line construction

Gold Line opening day 2024

Public Engagement

7


Bus Rapid Transit Project Engineering (Guideway and Station design) led by:

Metro Transit

I-494

I-94

METRO Gold Line BRT Project


Bus Rapid Transit Project Engineering (Guideway and Station design) led by:

Metro Transit

I-494

I-94

Bus Rapid Transit Oriented Development Plans (1/2 mile of the stations)

Partner Cities, & Washington/Ramsey Counties

METRO Gold Line BRT Project


BRTOD Project Overview


BRTOD Project Funding Gateway Corridor Commission  TOD planning grant from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA)

11


ST PAUL (5 Stations)

RAMSEY COUNTY

I-494

Downtown St Paul

McKnight Rd. N

I-94

Gateway Corridor – 10 Stations, 5 Cities, 2 Counties


District 4 Stations Dayton’s Bluff Community Council

District 1 Stations Community Council

RAMSEY COUNTY

I-494

Downtown St Paul

McKnight Rd. N

I-94

Gateway Corridor – 10 Stations, 5 Cities, 2 Counties


BRTOD Project Objectives: 1. Establish a multi-modal corridor (walking, biking, transit & auto) 2. Increase potential ridership (transit access & new development) 3. Enable station areas to achieve their development potential (capture latent market demand & improve quality of life) 4. Identify infrastructure investments and policy changes (ensure funding priorities and policies encourage development)

14


BRTOD Planning Process 18 months Stakeholder Engagement

Phase

1

2

3

4

p la ns a d o p tio n

Purpose

Identify Opportunities Issues, & Concerns

Goal

Establish Specific Station Area Goals

Review Preliminary Land Use and Circulation Alternatives

Identify Alternatives for Further Refinement

Review Preferred Alternative

Identify Preferred Alternative Refinements

Review Draft BRTOD Plans

Finalize BRTOD Plans & Implementation Strategies

BRTOD/ Small Area Plans Adoption


What is BRT?


BRT Characteristics—Bus-Only Lanes

Special roadways or lanes dedicated to the exclusive use of buses. Often considered most like light rail transit.

17


BRT Characteristics —Frequent Service

Fewer stops (1/2 mile apart)

Transit priority signal

Bus-only lanes


BRT Characteristics—Train-Like Features

Level boarding to vehicle

Fare payment at the station


BRT Characteristics—Enhanced Stations High Quality Amenties    

Shelters Seating Paving Landscaping Electronic Reader Boards


BRT Characteristics— Specialized Vehicle

Streetcar-like comfort

More passengers per bus


BRT Characteristics—TOD Potential

Lower TOD Potential Business Access Transit (BAT) Lanes Bus and car share ‘turn lane’

Higher TOD Potential Exclusive Guideway


BRTOD Fundamentals


Fundamentals – Ideal TOD  Grid of Streets  Complete Streets

24


Grid of Streets

Appropriate - Fine-Grained Grid

Inappropriate - Large Sized Blocks


Complete Streets

Pedestrians

Autos

Bicycles

Transit


HIGH

LOW

INCOMPLETE STREETS

COMPLETE STREETS

Complete Streets – Design Priorities


Complete Streets – Accommodate Essential Functions


Complete Streets – Designed for the Most Vulnerable


Fundamentals – Ideal TOD  Station Neighborhood  Station Hub

30


Great Townhomes

Townhomes


Apartments Great Rental Apartments


Parks and Open Space


Fundamentals – Ideal TOD  Station Neighborhood  Station Hub

34


Station Hub: Mix of Uses Residential and Office Use over Retail/Commercial Storefronts

18 Hour Activity


Station Hub: Retail & Commercial

Neighborhood Serving — Dining and Entertainment


Station Hub: Retail & Commercial

Neighborhood Serving — Sale of Goods


Station Hub: Residential

Apartments and Condominiums


Station Hub: Plaza


Beyond TOD


5 Minute Trips


Potential Bicycle Facilities

Protected Bikeways (Cycle Track)

Bike Lanes

Mixed Traffic Lanes (Bike Boulevards)


Pedestrian-friendly Wide Sidewalks

Curbside Parking

Travel Lanes Protected Bikeway

Protected Bikeway — Lincoln, Nebraska


Constraints & Opportunities

Mounds Station Area


Station Planning Area ½ Mile Radius

Conway St.

I-94

Station Neighborhood ¼ Mile Radius

Mounds Station — Planning Area


Mounds Station

Two Station Locations (Environmental Assessment)

Mounds Station— BRTOD Constraints


Approximate Station Location (Option)

Approximate Station Location (Option)

Mounds Station — Location

47


Approximate Station Location (Option)

Approximate Station Location (Option)

Mounds and Kellogg/Third

Third and Maria

Mounds Station — Location

48


Constraints


Mounds Station— Constraints


Freeway & Steep Slopes Barriers

Prohibits pedestrian and bicyclist access to transit; approximately ½ of potential BRT riders are lost

Mounds Station— Constraints


Poor Mounds Boulevard Connection

Inadequate sidewalks and no bike lanes between housing and businesses south of the freeway and the future station

Mounds Station— Constraints


Station Access from Downtown and Nature Park Long crosswalk at busy Mounds Blvd. makes pedestrian and bicycle access difficult

Station Access from Mounds Blvd. Inadequate sidewalks and no bike lanes between residences south of the freeway and the future station

Mounds Boulevard — Constraint


Maple Street Bridge Long crossing distance exposes pedestrians and cyclists to freeway noise

Mounds Station— Constraints


Bridge Safety No escape routes on long and narrow crossing

Bridge Connection Long crossing distances exposes pedestrians and cyclists to freeway noise

Maple Street Bridge — Constraint


Hostile Station Environment

Poor walking and biking environment with heavy traffic and freeway noise

Mounds Station— Constraints


High Traffic Volume Streets

Poor air quality and noise create an unhealthy and uncomfortable environment when waiting for a bus Approximate Station Location

Hostile Station Platform Environment – Constraint

57


Third Street E Poor Station Access Narrow Sidewalks adjacent to busy street, inadequate pedestrian lighting and no bike lanes

Hostile Station Platform Environment – Constraint

58


Limited Infill Development Opportunities

Largely built-out neighborhood with some historic properties—few potential development sites

Mounds Station— Constraints


Historic Properties Low density single family neighborhood is stable and not envisioned to be redeveloped

Few Vacant Potential BRTOD Sites Limited opportunities, especially adjacent to the Mounds Blvd. station platform

Constraints — Limited Infill Development Opportunities

60


Highly TransitSupportive Use

Mostly outside a 5minute walking distance to the station

Mounds Station— Constraints


Bicyclist Unfriendly

No bike lanes on Maria or other connecting streets

Pedestrian Unfriendly

Narrow sidewalks, inadequate lighting along Maria

Long Walk to Station along Maria Avenue — Constraint

62


Transit-Dependent Population No current strategy to stabilize neighborhood

Mounds Station— Constraints


Opportunities


Mounds Station— Opportunities


Existing Station Area Plan

Advance adopted plan concepts

Mounds Station— Opportunities


Primary TOD Area

Connections & Lighting Priorities

Advance Mounds Station Area Plan – Opportunity

TOD Zoning


High Potential Ridership

Consider new walk and bike connections between the 11,000 student campus and the station

Mounds Station— Opportunities


Improve Station Access

Consider improved walk and bike connections between the recreation center and station

Mounds Station— Opportunities


Potential Gold Line Corridor Trail

Consider shared walking and biking trail and improvements to existing pedestrian and bike bridge

Potential Gold Line Corridor Trail

Consider shared walking and biking trail connection to downtown

Mounds Station— Opportunities


Improve Station Access Consider new walk and bike connections between the park and station

Improve Station Access Consider new walk and bike connections between the park and station

Mounds Station— Opportunities


Mounds Boulevard Connection

Consider walking and biking improvements to the station

Mounds Station— Opportunities


Mounds, Earl & Etna Station Areas

Constraints & Opportunities Response Sheet

73


Mounds StationScenario – Response Sheet Sheet Preferred Development – Response


Mounds, Earl, & Etna Stations Preferred Development Scenario––Response Response Sheet Sheet


Next Steps

76


BRTOD Plans Schedule St Paul Stations- 18 Month Process Phase 1-

Issues/Concerns Identification

October (2017)

Phase 2-

Preliminary Station Area Land Use & Circulation Alternatives

January (2018)

Phase 3-

Identify Preferred Station Area Land Use & Circulation Alternatives

April (2018)

Phase 4-

Review Draft BRTOD/Small Area Plan

June (2018)

PLAN ADOPTION

September (2018)


METRO

Gold Line BRTOD Plans

Mounds, Earl, & Etna Stations Constraints and Opportunities

District 4- Dayton’s Bluff Community Council Work Session October 11, 2017


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.