Comprehensive Design Studio Process Booklet Caitlin Brady & Joshua Thomas
Table of Contents Overview 01. Course Description 02. The Athenaeum & the Looking Forward Competition 03. Daniel Germain’s Submission Redesign Process 01. Redesign Goals 02. Project Requirements 03. Site Conditions 04. Climate Analysis Design Development 01. Conceptual Design 02. Site Plan 03. Floor Plans 04. Circulation Diagrams 05. Sections 06. Elevations Appendices 01. Structure Analysis 02. Thermal Analysis 03. Cost Analysis 04. Lighting Analysis Precedents 01. Culturehouse in Arnhem 02. American Folk Art Museum
3
4
Overview
5
6
Course Description
Course: ARCH 361 Title: Studio 6-1 Term: Fall 2015
Arch 361, Studio 6, expands urban design problems to include technical integration focused on both supportive and generative design methods.
Professor: Daniel Chung Team: Caitlin Brady & Joshua Thomas
This comprehensive course requires that students work in teams integrating structural, environmental, and constructional systems in the design and documentation of a complex building. Students will research building technology including precedents and how they can be utilized to positively impact design. Technical research and design integration may directly relate to the analysis/ determination of form, materials, components, codes, program, and aesthetics of the term project. The studio will examine systems integration and multiple scales within the project building and site. Building technology and sustainability are focal topics for the course and will include natural/ artificial lighting, passive/active heating/cooling, structure, enclosure, materials, and cost. Studio 6 is the comprehensive design studio with the goal of expanding architectural design to meaningfully and elegantly include technical integration within the service and/or generation of strong conceptual design. It is the objective of the course for students to learn methods and demonstrate the ability to produce a comprehensive architectural project. This project is to be designed across multiple scales through research, analysis, and iteration to create architecture that responds to relevant contextual, climatic, and cultural issues.
7
Competition: Re-Imagining the Athenaum of Philadelphia Overview: Looking Forward is not simply a design competition, it is an exploration of the future of the institution. The Athenaeum is an independent member supported library and museum that engages members, scholars, and interested general public. It is a vital on-site and on-line community that actively celebrates the cultural and intellectual life of Philadelphia with historical, design, literary, and educational activities. It grants awards and fellowships related to its goals, collections and services. Its digital presence is robust and includes a Regional Digital Imaging Center. It administers two online services, The Greater Philadelphia Geohistory Network and American Architects & Buildings, which provide access to resources on the built environment. These services are used 300,000 times daily by researchers around the world. The competition called for the redesign of a bigger, better Athenaeum for the future. Entries in the competition were judged on the quality of their ideas for the future of the institution and their design for its accommodation. In addition to considering the AthenÌum of 2014, participants were encouraged to imagine how library services in general and the AthenÌum’s services in particular may change by 2050. Major Purposes/ Functions: 1. Disseminate Useful Knowledge 2. Be the Pride and Ornament of Philadelphia 3. Serve as the Architectural Library of Philadelphia 8
Current Statistics: Lot: 50’ x 179’ Building: 3 Stories + Basement Collections: 380,000 Architectural Drawings 65,000 Books 300,000 Photographs 16,000 Periodicals 3,500 Trade Catalogues 3,000 Prints 750,000 Manuscripts (Pages) 1,200 Manuscripts (Bound Volumes) 1,500 Artifacts
9
Contest Submission: “The Athenaeum of Philadelphia” David Germain, Chicago, IL | 2014
Project Assumptions: “Library Focus: The Athenaeum has become the world leader in architectural research by offering an unique assemblage of analog and digital materials that can be viewed simultaneously.
Special Collection: Physical 3D models can be printed with extreme precision and economy. These models are equipped with electronic sensors that allow projected overlays of building systems. The Athenaeum has printed over 700 of these sophisticated models.
Special Technology: Tech companies have created virtual walkthroughs of all existing and historic buildings. The Athenaeum has acquired these walkthroughs, linked them to models, books, and drawings, and created 20 virtual theaters for their review.”
Project Narrative: “Program: Researchers move throughout the library retrieving books from the monumental book wall, models from the exterior model skin, and drawings from the analog stacks. The items are then reviewed simultaneously in the virtual theaters of the digital Hive, creating a unique and comprehensive study of architecture.
Design Story: The building is defined by a diagonal cut that separates the analog from the digital theater programs and provides a continuous cascading community reading room accessed through a compressed circulation/service zone. An exterior skin of circular niches wraps the building in a continuous display case for architectural models.”
Building Envelope
Circulation & Service
Monumental Book Wall
Diagonal Cut: Analog-Digital
Mirror: Timeline
The Analog Stacks
3D Model Skin
Description source: http://omeka.philaathenaeum.org/LookingForward/items/show/14
10
11
Functional Concepts The architecture of the 2050 Athenaeum meets the street with a bold, white facade with transparent banding. The exterior is merely a shell, a strategically carved shelter for the resources and artifacts displayed within the building. A vast, angling interior atrium explores the conceptual notion of vantage. An ever-changing and vibrant space is created where inhabitants can simultaneously observe and be observed by others while they interact with various portions of the Athenaeum’s treasured resources. The many levels of perceived and actual privacy, or lack thereof, provide interest and many opportunities for visitors, researchers, and tourists to learn and enjoy much more than digital and analog resources each time they visit.
12
Design Concepts Intersection of Past and Present The conceptual plan separates digital and analog, uniting them through the activity that timelessly unites them both: reading. As time passes, the significance of each grows or shrinks. These changes are evidenced in the massing adjustments of floor.
Transparency and Opacity A strategically carved shell connects passerby with inhabitants and showcases interior activity. Reading, circulation, and interaction spaces, along the central diagonal, are exposed to natural sunlight with glazing. They are brighter, livelier spaces. Storage and spaces of concentration are opaque. Blurring of Viewer and Viewed Encourages interaction among users of the building through the presence of many partially exposed levels that look onto each other.
Building as a Display Storage is celebrated through the integration of shelves and display areas with the basic architectural forms of the building, an interior wall of books conceals the circulation shaft, the facade wall houses architectural models.
13
14
Re-Design Process
15
Redesign Goals Germain’s Project
Section Diagram
Plan Diagram
Project Revision
Section Diagram
Plan Diagram 16
Revisions 1. Make Germain’s project more realistic 2. Update program to fit project requirements 3. Update building to adhere to International Building Code 4. Move circulation into atrium space to facilitate movement amongst the floors 5. Remove extraneous design elements and square footages from project
Athenaeum Program
500 SF PUBLIC ENTRANCE & LOBBY 1990 SF 1910 SF REFERENCE AND
ADMINISTRATION 1130 SF CIRCULATION 1400 SF 1200 SF SUITE MEETING/ SERVICES STAFF MULTIPURPOSE 600 SF GENERAL WORKROOM ROOM BUILDING SERVICES 3990 SF 500 SF GALLERY GENERAL INFORMATION HUB
500 SF
PERIODICALS CONNECTION
COLLECTION 6000 SF ARCHIVES
17
Design Limitations Occupancy: Primary Group: A3 (Library functions) Second Group: S-1 (Reference material storage) FT
Type of Construction: Construction type: IB (Steel structure, concrete slabs, and concrete precast facade panels) Allowable Floor Area: Floor area per floor: 48,000 sf (S-1 restrictions) Height and Number of Stories: Allowed up to 5 stories Request variance for 65’ tall building, use adjacent buildings as a precedent Location of Property: North & East Facades: 25% maximum opening allowance West Facade: unlimited opening allowance South Facade: no opening allowance with current building location directly against the property line Zoning: Cultural/ Amusement Zoning CMX-4: Center City Commercial Mixed Use Maximum Occupied Area: 100%, FAR: 500% Sprinkler Systems: Sprinkler required (over 55’ and features a large atrium)
O
H
4T
36
R
70
O
FL
FT
O
D
3R
9
3 67
R
O
FL
SQ
FT
O
D
2N
T 1S
FL
63
SQ
FT T F Q 0 S 4 76 177 2 SQ
R
O
LO
F
70
R
O
T
EN
M
E AS
B Overall square footage: 29,965 18
SQ
Site Aerial: 219 South 6th Street, Philadelphia, PA CHESTNUT STREET
4TH STREET
5TH STREET
6TH STREET
7TH STREET
8TH STREET
INDEPENDENCE HALL
WALNUT STREET
WASHINGTON SQUARE THE ATHENAEUM
LOCUST STREET
SPRUCE STREET
19
Site Conditions
5TH STREET
6TH STREET
7TH STREET
JEFFERSON/ MARKET EAST GALLERY
8TH STREET
INDEPENDENCE HALL/ CHINATOWN
WALNUT STREET
OLD CITY/ PENN’S LANDING
SAINT JAMES PLACE
LOCUST STREET
South Washington Square
Pedestrian Traffic Vehicular Traffic The Athenaeum Tall Rise Building Low Rise Building Park Space 20
SOCIETY HILL/ SOUTH STREET
PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC
VEHICULAR TRAFFIC
THE ATHENAEUM
Site Conditions
A D
B
E
C
E F A G H
F
G
B
C D
H 21
Site Conditions 39° 57′ North Latitude 75° 10′ West Longitude Average Min & Max Temperatures 11° 42° January 13° February 51° 23° 59° March 32° 71° April 41° 81° May 53° 87° June 60° 95° July 60° August 89° 53° September 84° 37° October 80° 26° 78° November 21° 57° December
Rain and Humidity (9am | 3pm) 59 | 52 % 219 in January 222 in February 66 | 58 % 291 in 55 | 50 % March 59 | 53 % 406 in April 57 | 50 % 589 in May 789 in June 62 | 54 % 947 in July 59 | 48 % 926 in 68 | 55 % August 71 | 59 % 796 in September 61 | 48 % 509 in October 395 in November 66 | 55 % 69 | 61 % 270 in December 22
Solar Access Southern facade receives the most sun No glazing on south facade in current design Receives the most sun in the summer, shading or light filtering devices would be necessary Solar Opportunities Adjust massing within building to allow more light to flow through to the lower levels Introduce skylights or erode the building mass to allow clerestory windows Wind Access Summer winds blow from the southwest All other seasons have consistently strong winds from the north east Wind Opportunities Removes upwardly rising heat in the summer Flushes the building at night to maintain a healthy interior environment Overview Building isn’t significantly impacted by weather conditions Some passive systems can be implemented, but to no great, larger design effect, especially because the southern facade- which would receive the most sunlight exposure- is opaque due to zoning restrictions
January 9am
January 12pm
January 4pm
Winter Wind
March/ September 9am
March/ September 12pm
March/ September 4pm
Spring/ Fall Wind
July 9am
July 12pm
July 4pm
Summer Wind
N
Indicates building is covered in shadow 23
24
Design Development
25
Concept Adaptation Strong, horizontal bands grab the attention of occupants. Repetitious shelving units line the staircase, providing an additional rhythm that reinforces the pull forward into the building. These lines disappear into the building’s depths, upwards to a public exterior space. Occupants are overcome with a sense of curiosity to discover what lies in deeper portions of the building, a quest for the knowledge that can only be quenched by the Athenaeum’s extensive collections.
26
Architectural Tools:
Repeating Elements
Oversized Spaces
Primary Concept:
Secondary Concept:
Obscured Depth
Inwardly Focused Spaces
Curiosity
Total Immersion Loss of Time
Experiential Narrative Views
Layered Facade
Sheltered Entry
The Draw Forward
Hidden Help
Directed Circulation
Stairway Reading
A Look Back
New & Displayed Items
View through the Shades
Seating & Reading
Top of the Stairs
Gallery Views 27
View from Washington Square Park
28
SOUTH RANDOLPH STREET
SOUTH 6TH STREET
Site Plan
SAINT JAMES PLACE
29
Floor Plans
A
Floor 1
Floor 2
30
Interior View A
31
Floor Plans
B
Floor 3
Floor 4
32
Interior View B
33
Circulation
Public Zone Floor 1 34
Floor 2
Floor 3
Floor 4
Staff Zone Public Route Staff Route
Egress
FOURTH FLOOR 87’ - 0” MAX TRAVEL DISTANCE TO STAIR TOWER
THIRD FLOOR 100’ - 0” MAX TRAVEL DISTANCE TO STAIR TOWER
SECOND FLOOR 115’ - 0” MAX TRAVEL DISTANCE TO STAIR TOWER
FIRST FLOOR 128’ - 0” MAX TRAVEL DISTANCE
35
Latitudinal Section Perspective (A)
36
Latitudinal Sections
Media Collection and Storage
Atrium New Book and Display Area
Non-Fiction and Seating
Administration Reference Building Collection Services
Seating/ Copy Area
Administration
Building Services
Atrium Circulation Desk
Multipurpose Building Staff Lounge Room Services
Reference Desk
Section A
Section B A
B
Public
Public Private (members) Private (Members) Staff Service Service 37
Longitudinal Section Perspective (C)
38
Longitudinal Section
Section C
C
Public Public Private (Members) Private (members) Staff Service Service
39
Elevations
East Elevation Goals: 1. Create repetition 2. Direct light and shade interiors 3. Frame views 4. Emphasize vertical circulation
40
West Elevation
North Elevation How: 1. Show off interior atrium with glazing 2. Obscure depth - layer shading elements and opaque and transparent planes 2. Bring in some of Germain’s original ideas: emphasize the atrium spaces on the exterior facade, white exterior, separate and wrap different portions
South Elevation 41
42
Appendices
43
First Floor
W10x49
W12x190
Fourth Floor W10x49
W12x190 W12x190 W12x190
W12x190
W10x49system for The structural W12x190 our building is a typical steel Fourth Floor frame system with two typical bays: 20’ x 30’ in the large atrium spaces and 9’ x 20’ toward the building exterior.
W12x190
W12x190
W12x190
Fourth Floor W10x49
W12x190
W12x190 W10x49
W10x49
W10x49 W12x190
W10x49
W12x190
W12x190 W10x49 W10x49
W12x190
W10x49
W10x49
W10x49
W12x190
W12x190 W10x49
Third Floor
W10x49
W10x49
W12x190
Third Floor W10x49
W10x49
W12x190
W12x190
W12x190
W10x49 W10x49
W10x49
Second Floor
44
W12x190
Second Floor
W10x49
W10x49
W12x190
Third Floor
W12x190
Fourth Floor
W12x190
W10x49
First Floor
W10x49
Third Floor
W10x49 W10x49
W12x190
W10x49
Second Floor
Third Floor
W12x190
W12x190
W10x49
W10x49
The floor to floor height is 15’ which helps to conceal larger structural elements. The girders are W12 x 190 and the beams are W10 x 49. The columns are nominal 1’ x 1’ squares.
W12x190
W10x49
W10x49
W12x190 W10x49
W12x190
W12x190
W12x190
W10x49 W12x190
W10x49
W12x190
W10x49
W12x190
W10x49
First Floor
W10x49
Structural Analysis
Wall Section
rd
mas
ion
on
This wall section represents a compromise between an assembly that is both functional and inexpensive. The main structural element of the system is a 5 ½” steel stud backup wall with ½” gypsum board on the interior, ⅝ inch plywood on the exterior, two layers of vapor/air barrier, and a 5” stamped concrete panel. This wall assembly yields an R value of 22.85. Elevation
Elevation
Wall Section
Section
Wall Section
45
but overall a fairly good system. Concrete Thermal Analysis panels on a steel stud wall. but overall a fairly good system. Concrete panels on a steel stud wall.
W ll Alt
W ll Alt ti 1 Using Air Using Air Changes Per hour of 0.6
Wall - Base LineWall - Base Line Material Thickness R-Value Material Thickness R-Value Outside Air Film Concrete Panel 5" Air Gap 1.5" Vapor Barrier 2 layers 5" Plywood Sheathing 5/8" 1.5" Steel Stud & Batt insulation 5-1/2" 2 layers1/2" GWB Inside Air Film -
Outside Air Film Concrete Panel Air Gap Vapor Barrier Plywood Sheathing Steel Stud & Batt insulation GWB Inside Air Film
5/8" 5-1/2" 1/2" -
0.17 0.65 0.17 0.9 0.12 0.65 0.77 0.9 19.11 0.12 0.45 0.68
0.77 19.11 22.85 0.45 0.68
Wall - Base Line Line Wall - Base Area Area Roof N.Roof Wall N. Wdw Wall E.N. Wall E.N. Wdw Wdw W. Wall E. Wall W. Wdw S.E. Wall Wdw S. Wdw
7472.00 6909.00 3847.00 918.00 2200.00 918.00 2220.00 10756.00 168.00
UA infiltration = ACH volume(f UAx infiltra R-Value U-Value UA R-Value U-V 20.00 0.05 373.60 UA infiltration = 0.6 x 525,000 x 22.85 0.04 302.36 7472.00 20.00 UA infiltra 3.00 0.33 1282.33 5670 BTU/h F UA infiltration = 6909.00 22.85 22.85 0.04 40.18 3.00 0.33 733.33 3847.00 3.00 UA infiltra 22.85Insulation 0.04 = 40.18 Solar 918.00 22.85 3.00 0.33 740.00 22.85 0.04 = 1.125 470.72 2200.00 3.00 Q internal gains BTU/h-ft^2 918.00 22.85 UA gains skin: = 3982.70 BTU/h F Solar Insu Q internal 1.125 BTU/h-ft^2 UA inf: 5670.00 BTU/h F 2220.00 3.00 UA gains total: = 9652.70 BTU/h+F Q internal 24,710 BTU/h
W. Wall W. Wdw ystem. Concrete S. Wall 22.85 UA inf: 10756.00 5670.00 BTU/h F Q internal Wall - Base Line Using Air Changes Per hour of 0.6 all. S. Wdw 168.00 Q internal gains = 30,374 BTU/h UA total: 9186.75 BTU/h F Area R-Value U-Value UA UA Roof 7472.00 20.00 0.05 373.60 = ACH x volume(ft^3) x 0.018 Alt tiUA infiltration 1 Q internal Total R: W ll 22.85 N. Wall 6909.00 22.85 0.04 302.36 UA Using Air Changes Per hour of 0.6 T balance point = T interior temp - Q UA infiltration = 0.6 x 525,000 x 0.018 N. Wdw 3847.00 3.00 0.33 1282.33 UA E. Wall 918.00 22.85 0.04 40.18 Q internal T balance point (Base Line) = 70 Wall -2200.00 Base Line E. Wdw 3.00 0.33 733.33 UA infiltration = 5670 BTU/h F UA infiltration = ACH x volume(ft^3) x 0.018 e Thickness W. Using Air Changes Per hour of 0.6 Wall 918.00 22.85 0.04 40.18 R-Value Area R-Value U-Value UA T balance point (Base = 66.7 W. Wdw 2220.00 3.00 0.33 740.00 QLine) internal Project Information: R-Value Roof U-Value UA22.85 7472.00 20.00 0.05 373.60 Solar Insulation = 792 BTU/day ft^2 x south wdw area/24 hours S. Wall 10756.00 0.04 470.72 UA infiltration = 0.6 x 525,000 x 0.018 S. Wdw0.17 20.00N. Wall 168.00 7472.00 0.05 - 373.60 infiltration = ACH x volume(ft^3) x 0.018 6909.00 22.85 0.04 UA302.36 29,965 Project Floor Area (SF): Solar Insulation = 792 BTU/day ft^2 x 168 ft^2/24 hours UA skin: 3982.70 BTU/h F 5" 6909.000.65 22.85N. Wdw 0.04 302.36 34,752 Exterior Surface Area (SF): 3847.00 3.00 0.33 UA inf: 5670.00 BTU/h F UA infiltration = 1282.33 5670 BTU/h F 525,000 Volume (cubic feet): 1.5" UAInsulation infiltration = BTU/h0.6 x 525,000 x 0.018T balance 3847.00 0.9 3.00E. Wall0.33 1282.33 UA total: 9652.70 BTU/h F 918.00 22.85 0.04Solar 40.18= 5544 15.1 Volume / Exterior Surface Area: 2 layers 918.000.12 22.85E. Wdw 0.04 40.18 15' floor to ceiling heights 2200.00 3.00 0.33Q internal 733.33 gains = 1.125 BTU/h-ft^2 x office type areas + 0.708 x storage ar T balance 5/8" 0.77 2200.00 3.00W. Wall 0.33 733.33 UA infiltration = 5670 BTU/h F 918.00 22.85 0.04 40.18 Solar Insulation = 0 Q internal gains = 1.125 BTU/h-ft^2 x 21965 + 0.708 x 8000 + 5544 n 5-1/2" 19.11 22.85W. Wdw 918.00 0.04 40.18 2220.00 3.00 0.33 740.00 T balance 1/2" 2220.000.45 3.00S. Wall0.33 740.00 internal gains = 24,710 BTU/h + 5664 BTU/h + 5544 BTU/h 10756.00 22.85 0.04Q = 470.72 Project Information: Q internal gains 1.125 BTU/h-ft^2 x office type areas + 0.708 x s Solar Insulation = 792 BTU/day ft^2 x south wdw 10756.000.68 22.85S. Wdw 0.04 470.72 168.00 Q internal gains = 35,918 BTU/h 168.00 UA gains skin: = 3982.70 BTU/h F x 21965 + 0.708 x 8000 + 0 29,965 Project Floor Area (SF): Q internal 1.125 BTU/h-ft^2 Total R: 22.85 Solar Insulation UA skin: 3982.70 BTU/h F 5670.00 BTU/h= F 792 BTU/day ft^2 x 168 ft^2/24 point = T interior temp - Q internal gains / UA total 34,752 UA inf: T balance Exterior Surface Area (SF): UA inf: 5670.00 BTU/h F UA gains total: = 9652.70 BTU/h+F5664 BTU/h Volume (cubic feet): 525,000 Q internal 24,710 BTU/h T Solar balance Insulation point (Base Line) - 35 35,918 918 / 9652 9652.70 70 UA total: 9652.70 BTU/h F = = 70 5544 BTU/h Volume Exterior Surface Area:of 0.6 15.1 46 Using/Air Changes Per hour point (Base Line) = 66.2 F 15' floor to ceiling heights Q internal gainsT balance = 30,374 BTU/h Q internal gains = 1.125 BTU/h-ft^2 x office type a Total R:
ion
U/h F ): U/h F U/h F Area:
5-1/2" 1/2" -
19.11 0.45 0.68
Total R:
22.85
W. Wdw S. Wall S. Wdw
2220.00 3.00 0.33 740.00 10756.00 22.85 0.04 = 1.125 470.72 Q internal gains BTU/h-ft^2 x office type areas + 0.708 168.00 UA gains skin: = 3982.70 BTU/h F x 21965 + 0.708 x 8000 + 0 Q internal 1.125 BTU/h-ft^2 5670.00 BTU/h F but overall a fairly good system. Concrete UA inf: panels on a steel stud wall. UA gains total: = 9652.70 BTU/h+F5664 BTU/h Q internal 24,710 BTU/h
Using Air Changes Per hour of 0.6 Wall - Base Line Material
UA infiltration = UA UA
Q internal gains = 30,374 BTU/h Wall - Base Line
Thickness R-Value
ACH x volume(ft^3) x 0.018
Outside Air Film Concrete Panel 5" infiltration Air = Gap 0.6 x 525,000 x1.5" 0.018T Vapor Barrier 2 layers Plywood Sheathing 5/8" T infiltration Steel = Stud 5670 BTU/h F & Batt insulation 5-1/2" GWB 1/2" Inside Air Film T
0.17
0.65 balance 0.9 0.12 0.77 balance 19.11 0.45 0.68 balance
TotalxR:south22.85 Solar Insulation = 792 BTU/day ft^2 wdw
29,965 Wall - Base Line 34,752 Area Roof 525,000 N. Wall N. 15.1 Wdw E. Wall E. Wdw W. Wall W. Wdw S. Wall S. Wdw
W ll Alt ti 1 Using Air Changes Per hour of 0.6
UA infiltration = ACH x volume(f R-Value U-Value UA Roof 7472.00 20.00 0.05 373.60 UA infiltration = 0.6 x 525,000 x N. Wall 6909.00 22.85 0.04 302.36 N. Wdw 3847.00 3.00 0.33 point = T interior temp - Q internal gains UA 5670total BTU/h F UA infiltration = /1282.33 E. Wall 918.00 22.85 0.04 40.18 E. Wdw 2200.00 3.00 0.33 733.33 point (Base Line) = 70918.00 - 30,374 / 9186.75 W. Wall 22.85 0.04 = 40.18 Solar Insulation W. Wdw 2220.00 3.00 0.33 740.00 S. Wall 10756.00 22.85 0.04 = 1.125 470.72 Q internal gains BTU/h-ft^2 point (Base Line) = 66.7 FS. Wdw 168.00 UA gains skin: = 3982.70 BTU/h F Q internal 1.125 BTU/h-ft^2 area/24 hours UA inf: 5670.00 BTU/h F UA gains total: = 9652.70 BTU/h+F Q internal 24,710 BTU/h Area
Using Air Changes Per hour of 0.6 Solar Insulation = 792 BTU/day ft^2 x 168 ft^2/24 hours
Q internal gains = 30,374 BTU/h R-Value U-Value UA 7472.00 20.00 0.05 373.60 UA infiltration = ACH x volume(ft^3) x 0.018 6909.00 22.85 = 0.04 302.36 Solar Insulation 5544 BTU/h UA infiltration = 0.6 x 525,000 x 0.018T balance point = T interior temp - Q 3847.00 3.00 0.33 1282.33 918.00 22.85 0.04 40.18 T balance 3.00 UA infiltration 5670 BTU/hareas F Q2200.00 internal gains =0.33 1.125733.33 BTU/h-ft^2 x office type areas + 0.708= x storage + solar point gain(Base Line) = 70 918.00 22.85 0.04 40.18 T balance point (Base Line) = 66.7 2220.00 3.00 0.33 740.00 Project Information: Q10756.00 internal 22.85 gains =0.04 1.125470.72 BTU/h-ft^2 x 21965 + 0.708Solar x 8000 + 5544 Insulation = 792 BTU/day ft^2 x south wdw area/24 hours 168.00 29,965 Project Floor Area (SF): Solar Insulation = 792 BTU/day ft^2 x 168 ft^2/24 hours UA skin: 3982.70 BTU/h F 34,752 Exterior Surface Area (SF): Q internal gains BTU/h UA=inf:24,710 5670.00 BTU/h + F 5664 BTU/h + 5544 BTU/h 525,000 Volume (cubic feet): UA total: 9652.70 BTU/h F Solar Insulation = 5544 BTU/h 15.1 Volume / Exterior Surface Area: 15' floor ceiling heights Q internal gains = to35,918 BTU/h Q internal gains = 1.125 BTU/h-ft^2 x office type areas + 0.708 x storage ar Q internal gains = 1.125 BTU/h-ft^2 x 21965 + 0.708 x 8000 + 5544 internal T balance point = T interior temp - Q internal gains / Q UA totalgains = 24,710 BTU/h + 5664 BTU/h + 5544 BTU/h
T balance point (Base Line) = 70 - 35 35,918 918 / 9652 9652.70 70 T balance point (Base Line) = 66.2 F
Q internal gains = 35,918 BTU/h T balance point = T interior temp - Q internal gains / UA total T balance point (Base Line) = 70 - 35 35,918 918 / 9652 9652.70 70 T balance point (Base Line) = 66.2 F
47
PROJECT Brady & Thomas
Prep: Date: Revised:
ARCH 361 . STUDIO 6-1 Fall 2015 DREXEL UNIVERSITY
Cost Analysis
12/5/2015
SUMMARY - ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE
Group
Description
A
SUBSTRUCTURE
B
SHELL
C10 C20 C30 D
D10 D20 D30 D40 D50 E
E10 E20 F
F10 F20 G
G10 G20 G30 G40 G50
INTERIORS Interior Construction Staircases Interior Finishes SERVICES Conveying Systems Plumbing HVAC Fire Protection Electrical EQUIPMENT & FURNISHINGS Equipment Furnishings SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION Special Construction Security System and Internal Security Gates BUILDING SITEWORK Site Preparation Site Improvements Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities Site Electrical Utilities Other Site Construction SUBTOTAL General Requirements
$
109,592
$
2,463,450
$
892,420
$
2,619,665
$
215,000
$
46,000
$
130,000
$
6,476,126
$ 1,388,634 $ 932,039 $ 142,777
B10 Superstructure B20 Exterior Closure B30 Roofing C
Total Cost
$ 100,100 $ 9,492
A10 Foundations A20 Basement Construction
48
Subtotal
$ 150,813 $ 312,000 $ 429,607 $ 95,000 $ 97,500 $ 1,213,583 $ 164,808 $ 1,048,775 $ 75,000 $ 140,000 $ 36,000 $ 10,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 65,000 $ 30,000 $ ‐
20%
$ 1,295,225
$'s/SF $ 3.66 3.34 0.32 $ 82.21 46.34 31.10 4.76 $ 29.78 5.03 10.41 14.34 $ 87.42 3.17 3.25 40.50 5.50 35.00 $ 7.18 2.50 4.67 $ 1.54 1.20 0.33 $ 4.34 1.17 1.17 2.17 1.00 ‐ $ 216.12
$ $ 97,500 95,000 $ 1,213,583 $ 97,500 $ 164,808 $ 1,213,583 $ 1,048,775 $ 164,808
D20 Conveying Systems D10 Plumbing HVAC D30 Plumbing D20 Brady & Thomas PROJECT Protection HVAC D30 ARCHD40 361 Fire . STUDIO 6-1 Fall 2015 Electrical D50 Fire Protection D40UNIVERSITY DREXEL
E
& FURNISHINGS Electrical D50 EQUIPMENT Equipment E10 E EQUIPMENT & FURNISHINGS Furnishings E20 E10 Equipment SUMMARY - ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE
F
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION Furnishings Special Construction F SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION Security System and Internal Security Gates Special Construction Group Description G BUILDING SITEWORK and Internal Security Gates F20 Security System Preparation G10 Site G BUILDING SITEWORK A SUBSTRUCTURE Site Improvements G20 Site Preparation G10 A10 Foundations Site Utilities G30 Site Civil/Mechanical Improvements G20 Construction A20 Basement Site Electrical Utilities G40 Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities G30 SHELL B Other Site Construction G50 Site Electrical Utilities G40 B10 Superstructure Other Site Construction G50 B20 Exterior Closure SUBTOTAL B30 Roofing General Requirements 20% SUBTOTAL C INTERIORS SUBTOTAL GeneralConstruction Requirements 20% Interior C10 Bidding/ Costing Contingency 10% SUBTOTAL Staircases C20 SUBTOTAL Bidding/ Costing Contingency 10% Interior Finishes C30 Escalation to the Mid Point of Construction 4% SUBTOTAL D SERVICES (12 Months @ 4% per year) Escalation to the Mid Point of Construction 4% Conveying Systems D10 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (12 Months @ 4% per year) D20 Plumbing TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST HVAC D30 OTHER/SOFT COSTS: Fire Protection D40 Design & Construction Management Fees OTHER/SOFT COSTS: Electrical D50 Construction Contingency Design & Construction Management Fees Furnishings E EQUIPMENT & FURNISHINGS Construction Contingency Project Management Costs E10 Equipment Furnishings PROJECT COSTS Furnishings E20 TOTAL Project Management Costs F SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION TOTAL PROJECT COSTS F10 Special Construction BuildingGates Square Footage 29,965 SF F20 Security System and Internal Security G BUILDING SITEWORK Building Square Footage 29,965 SF G10 Site Preparation DISASTER RELIEF CENTER G20 Site Improvements DISASTER RELIEF CENTER Utilities Civil/Mechanical G30 Site PROJECT TEAM G40 Site Electrical Utilities ARCH 361 . STUDIO 6-1 Fall 2015 PROJECT TEAMSite Construction G50 Other DREXEL UNIVERSITY ARCH 361 . STUDIO 6-1 Fall 2015 DREXEL UNIVERSITY SUBTOTAL
E20 F10 F20 F10
General Requirements
20%
$ 1,048,775 $ $ 75,000 $ $ 140,000 $ 75,000
$ 140,000 $ 36,000 $ 10,000 $ 36,000 Subtotal $ 10,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 100,100 $ 65,000 $ 35,000 $ 9,492 $ 30,000 $ 65,000 $ ‐ $ 30,000 $ 1,388,634 $ ‐ $ 932,039 $ 142,777
Prep: Date: 215,000 Revised: 215,000
$
46,000
$
46,000
$
Total Cost
130,000
$
130,000 109,592
$
2,463,450
$
6,476,126
$ 1,295,225 $ 6,476,126 $ $
892,420
$ $
8,548,487 2,619,665
$ 95,000 $ $ 97,500 $ $ 1,213,583 $ 164,808 $ 1,048,775
8,890,426
$
215,000
$ 75,000 $ 140,000 $
8,890,426
$ $
46,000 8,890,426
$
130,000
$
Prep: Date: Prep: Revised: Date:
7,771,352 $ 1,295,225 $ 150,813 $ 777,135 7,771,352 $ 312,000 $$ 8,548,487 $ 777,135 $ 429,607 $ 341,939
$ 341,939
$ 36,000 $ 10,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 65,000 $ 30,000 $ ‐
8,890,426
6,476,126
Revised: $ 1,295,225
3.25 3.17 40.50 3.25 5.50 40.50 12/5/2015 35.00 5.50 $ 7.18 35.00 $ 2.50 7.18 4.67 2.50 $ 1.54 4.67 1.20 $ 1.54 0.33 $'s/SF 1.20 $ 4.34 0.33 $ 1.17 4.34 3.66 1.17 1.17 3.34 2.17 1.17 0.32 1.00 2.17 $ 82.21 ‐ 1.00 46.34 ‐ 31.10 $ 216.12 4.76 $ 216.12 $ 29.78 $ 259.35 5.03 $ 259.35 10.41 $ 285.28 14.34 $ 285.28 $ 87.42 3.17 $ 296.69 3.25 $ 296.69 40.50 5.50 35.00 $ 7.18 2.50 $ 296.69 4.67 $ 1.54 $ 296.69 1.20 0.33 $ 4.34 1.17 1.17 2.17 1.00 ‐ 10/25/2013
10/25/2013 $ 216.12
49
Lighting Analysis
illuminance studies were taken at June 21st at 12 noon. Natural light is concentrated mostly along the North wall and also through the skylight. Our intention was to the gallery to make it glow. It draws your eye as you enter, and leads you up the stairs. The lower light levels in the rest of the project would further our concept by would enhance the repition of elements in the project.
First Floor
50
Third Floor
t 12 noon. e North tion was to
as you ight levels ncept by
e project.
These Illuminance studies were taken June 21st at noon. Diffuse natural light comes through the many windows in the north wall. Light also comes in through a large clerestory skylight.
oon. th was to
The lighting scheme aimed to flood the fourth floor with light, making it glow in comparison to the rest of the building. This effect would draw visitors up through the building to the fourth floor.
u evels t by
ject.
Fourth Floor
51
52
Precedents
53
Precedent 1 Name: Culturehouse in Arnhem Client: City of Arnhem Stadhuisplein Location: Arnhem, The Netherlands Program: Library, heritage center, art centre, and community college Concept: Interior urban street Area: 12,000 sqm Project Year: 2013 Architects: Neutelings Riedijk Architects Architectural Engineering: ABT Adviesbureau voor Bouwtechniek, Velp Structural Engineering: Van de Laar bv, Advies- en ingenieursbureau voor bouwconstructies, Eindhoven Artist Collaboration: Catalogtree, Arnhem General Contractor: Bouwbedrijf Wessels Rijssen, Rijssen Building Costs: â‚Ź31 million
54
~28’
15’ FLOOR TO FLOOR ~28’ ~69’ DEEP ~28’ ~78’ DEEP ~30’ ~18’
~23’ ~16’ ~30’
~16’
~16’ ~16’
~25’
~16’
5 4 3 2 1 B
The atrium was the focus of our precedent study. We looked at the proportions, spacing, and rhythms of the grand staircase and modeled our project to have similar views. We knew that Germain’s design did not provide the views we desired, so we looked to the successfully executed Culturehouse in Arnhem. We set back the upper floor plates and elongated the staircase to provide larger and more frequent landings. This staggering of building mass allows first floor inhabitants to see all the way up to the fourth floor gallery. 55
Precedent 2 Name: American Folk Art Museum Client: American Folk Art Museum Location: New York City, New York Program: Museum Concept: Layered views and display spaces Area: 30,000 sqft Project Year: 2001 Architects: Tod Williams + Billie Tsien
56
We studied on the use of layered vertical and horizontal planes in the Folk Art Museum to create similar perceptions of depth. The many obscured features invoke a sense of curiosity and a need to further explore the building.
57
58