cities - places - objects a collection of architecture
Caleb White
contents Manhattan Arcology thesis_University of Pennsylvania adviser_Annette Fierro
Live/Work academic studio_University of Pennsylvania instructor_Simon Kim
Urban Stiches competition_Urban Land Institute team_Ramon Pena Lindsay Loftin Rule
Hudson River Natatorium academic studio_University of Pennsylvania instructor_Kutan Ayata
Epitaph design build_University of Pennsylvania director_Marcel De Lange
Shifting Hybrids academic studio_University of Pennsylvania instructor_Hina Jamelle
01 02 03 04 05 06
01
Manhattan Arcology Paolo Soleri proposed a new urban model, the Arcology, in response to the danger that the ever-expanding city posed to the earth and the soul of the urban dweller. These autonomous megastructures were imagined as self-sustaining cities within a single architecture. The instinct behind the “megastructure age” and the turn to large scale structures as a way to address humanity’s large scale problems proved to be ineffectual. The desire to establish an urban autonomy, however, remains a compelling tool to resist the forces that shape our politically and physically homogeneous cities. Which not only have the ability to destroy our planet, alienate and isolate urban dwellers based on social and economic status, but also to restrict our capacity to create unseen futures and new urban lifestyles. The “urban artifact”, or the “urban object”, at a variety of scales, is an architectural object that is programmed to serve many city functions. Rather than relying on zoning, the urban artifact relies on the architecture itself to inscribe the footprint of urban activities - the user then occupying and re-negotiating the architecture imbues it with life and vitality. This can be called, “the urban effect”. This is the aspiration of the Manhattan Arcology project, to create an architectural urbanism that is critical of the assumed urban typology that has been forged by our post-industrial, capitalistic society and which goes entirely unquestioned as it has been propagated throughout the world.
the vertical city and the vertical street_ one of the essential features of the Arcology is the three dimensional street space. On every level of the Arcology, the work and live spaces front the ramps that can be imagined as containing all the functions of a Manhattan street, only in multiple levels. This enables street life, the true “urban effect” to grow vertically.
academic thesis_University of Pennsylvania advisor_Annette Fierro
Hudson Yards Queens Midtown Tunnel
Chelsea Park
Peter Cooper Village
Holland Tunnel Exit
Manhattan Bridge / Chinatown
property value map _ the average
layered urban phenomena map _ in order to search for a
propery value by block can be segmented into layers, allowing us to find the most undervalued zones of the city.
suitable location for the Arcology it was necessary to look for underutilized urban areas, these provided the greatest opportunity for an autonomous live/work development. The chosen site is the city owned property surrounding the entrance to the Queens Midtown Tunnel. This site allowed for an independent and self sustaining development, but also encouraged specific transportation connections to material networks via the tunnel.
01 Manhattan Arcology
marcus garvey park
inwood hill park
highbridge park
fort washington park
bryant park
madison square park
hudson yards
battery park
central park
urban void map_ the open areas of the city are mapped as a gradient, the lightest colors are the most open and the dark blue represents the densest parts of the city. Traditionally, the figure void map has been used to analyze a cities public space (see Noli map) but this seems to be an incomplete reading of the city as the plan denies the multilayered quality of the city.
hardware
software
community center
convention center
public park
01_exisitng street and block urban model
02_ traditional urban network structure
amphitheater
03_coiled network structure
gallery and exhibition space
community gardens
the coil_ the coil is a reinterpretation of the
site plan _ The tunnel and the existing streets would remain operational
Manhattan street grid. It allows the city to grow in three dimensions but it does not rely on the simple extrusion of a block which creates a division between programs that are stacked vertically. Instead, the coil provides continuous vertical street space, preserving the qualities and connections of the street.
and untouched, while a new layers of urban activity, work, and residences would exist above the existing urban fabric. Each of the coils hosts certain amenities (shown above) that belong to either the residents of the arcology or the general public depending on its ease of access, its proximity to the ground plane, and its function.
01 Manhattan Arcology
Manufacturing_ manufacturing
shared work spaces loading docks
community gardens
shared automated storage facility
Retail_
retail space
shared automated storage facility
Digital Industry_
Housing Units_
Studio Unit_ 1600 SF
One Bedroom Unit_
Two Bedroom Unit_
Three Bedroom Unit_
1600 SF
1600 SF
1600 SF
water input electrical input sewage / grey water output
Truck Loading Dock_
public playground
Automated Storage Facility_
internal networks_ each of the coils requires different inputs and outputs depending on the programs they contain. The manufacturing spaces require access to the truck docks, the automated storage facilities, and the common work spaces. The retail requires access to the storage facilities but also require more common public spaces for store fronts and pedestrian access to the surrounding neighborhoods to sell their goods. Each of the coils connects horizontally and vertically accordingly. The various resulting coiled connections are shown above.
01 Manhattan Arcology
A
B
C
D
1
2 3
4
B.O. ceiling structure a b
a b
B.O. ceiling structure
A
c
c d
d T.O. floor structure
A
B
C
D
Elevation
T.O. floor structure
1
2 3
4
1
Section
B.O. ceiling structure
coated aluminium panel mineral wool insulation steel structure 5/8� interior sheathing
a
b
upper
upper
interior finishes per user furring strips
lower
lower
A_Section Detail
typical coil 3D section_the modeling of a highly articulated chunk of the housing unit types _ a flat-rate module one of the coils (shown left) allows one to speculate on the architectural detail of each of the urban elements within this new vertical urbanism. So much our current urban vernacular is an architectural expression of a much larger urban system, determined by the parallelization of the city and the parcel’s relationship to the street and the city grid. When this grid is re-invented, the relationship between street and parcel changed, the resulting architecture must answer new questions. What is a house in this context? What is an office, a factory, a studio, a storefront?
could contain all of the utilities of the home, the kitchen, bathroom, heating, cooling, and electrical needs would be housed in this standardized front piece of the housing unit. The back half of the unit would contain the living and sleeping spaces of the home. Defined by the occupant, it could be as expressive and expensive as the user desires, but could also be economical and minimal if need be. This would allow all social strata and family sizes to be accommodated within the Arcology.
private rooftop patio typical 3 bedroom unit elevator core shared public spaces below typical studio unit shared rooftop patio typical one bedroom unit
shared rooftop patio typical work space elevator core shared, flexible work space ramp intersection, puclic space
01 Manhattan Arcology
b.
c.
a.
d.
housing level plan (top left)_this plan shows the relationship of the
typical coil section model_the 3D model
housing units to one another and to the coil. Some of the housing units are integrated into the rooftop of the working units, allowing for shared, semi-private patio and garden spaces. Every housing unit contains a small rooftop patio space and plater space with views to the public amenity spaces below. work level plan (bottom left)_the working spaces all front the coil, as was previously mentioned all the retail and manufacturing spaces that require the movement of goods and products are connected to an elevator core which also connects all the workspaces to shared workshops and overflow spaces in the center of the coils. These are shared workspace amenities.
(a.) highlights the idea of the “urban object”, a formalized architectural urban piece that serves many functions. (b.) shows the relationship of the housing units to the public spaces below. (c.) shows the shared workspace amenities in the center of each coil, with public green spaces on its rooftop and public athletic facilities below. (d.) shows the interlocking layers of the coil, acting as a “tissue” of street spaces and public areas stacking vertically.
typical coil section_ Shown above is the vertical streets_ An important aspect of this project that may be sectional relationship between the work spaces, overlooked is the aspiration to stretch and increase the vibrant and valuable public spaces, housing, and the existing city qualities that a city like Manhattan already has. (Shown right) the qualities of a below. The primary aspiration for this project Manhattan street are imagined multiplied vertically. This is the intersection of has not been to expand the scope of the multiple coils. architect to the scale of the city but rather to condense the qualities of the city to the scale of architecture.
01 Manhattan Arcology
02 Live/Work
The live work urban model is not a new model, it is an ancient one. One needs only to visit the Yeongdeungpo neighborhood in Seoul South Korea to witness a working version of this urban model. Over five hundred years old, the market in Yeongdeungpo weaves its way through craftsmen’s workshops and family owned store fronts that have been added on to traditional and historic Korean homes. With the new wave of large scale development surrounding the Yeongdeungpo neighborhood, the market and the assiociated way of life is at risk. The Live/ Work project is an attempt to internalize the qualities of the market and to reproduce the lifestyle of its inhabitants.
Yeongdeungpo _ the internalized and layered markets of yeongdeungpo.
academic studio_University of Pennsylvania instructor_Simon Kim
1.
2.
1.
4.
3.
site strategy _ the existing historic Yeongdeungpo market(1.) is a unique urban confluence of retail, residential, and manufacturing spaces that produce an urban island in a rapidlychanging urban context. The existing market winds through a dense residential area that also hosts small manufacturing and light industry. In this project, the irregular dispersion(2.) of these existing live work spaces is reorganized into a heirarchy of paths(3.) and grouped by similiar scales and program types in a three dimensional verison of the existing urban fabric(4.).
02 Live/Work
5. 3. 1.
4.
2.
ground level plan _ on the ground level, the towers are separate programmatic entities. Manufacturing spaces (1.) and retail spaces (2.) front the market (3.) while the residences(4.) can be found in the internal semi-private court yard spaces(5.).
live and work _ the market spaces act as a connecting component to the various vertical live/work spaces. In section, the woke spaces, which front the market, are a buffer to the interior of the towers which are domestic in nature.
02 Live/Work
3. 5. 1. 4.
2.
upper level plan_ the upper level of the building is where the inter-mixing and hybridization of the programmed live/work spaces occurs. The market (3.) no longer follows the city grid, but instead serves to connect disperate programmed spaces. The courtyards (5.) remain a semi-private access to the residences (4.)
work spaces_ the stores and workshops (1.) vary in scale and type depending on the program, each one has an associated residence (2.) or residences depending on the scale of the work space.
02 Live/Work
1 B
A
C
19’ 0” storage level
19’ 0” storage level
2 14’ 0” living level
14’ 0” living level
0’ 0” working level
0’ 0” working level
Section
B
C B
1 B
A
D
C
3
2 Living Area
19’ 0” storage level
19’ 0” storage level
2.
2 14’ 0” living level
Loading Dock
14’ 0” living level
A
Lower Storage Area
1.
Work Area
0’ 0” working level
Section
2
0’ 0” working level
B
1.
1
C B
Plan
D
D
B
3
2 Living Area
3
Loading Dock
Lower Storage Area
Work Area
5.
3.
5.
2
Plan
D
3.
B
3.
long section_ the market spaces(3.), acting as retail program and as primary circulation through the building, exist in many different conditions. Acting as bridge, as tunnel, and as intersticial space, they connect all of the work spaces throughout the building. The semi-private internal courtyard spaces(5.) are entirely domestic. This dileniation between work and life happes in section, between the thickened skin of the towers.
market spaces _ these spaces unify the towers which have different programs and uses, the market is both exterior and interior, connecting different parts of each tower on each level.
02 Live/Work
market spaces_ these spaces are places of commerce, but more importantly they aspire to the street qualities of the existing Yeongdeungpo markets.
03
Urban Stitches
This large scale redevelopment proposal of the New Orleans Lafitte greenway corridor attempts to hybridize the landscape features with neighborhood amenities that allow a localized development of the greenway in each neighborhood rather than imposing a master plan. From the Treme neighborhood where a public library and swimming pool will inhabit the greenway to the French Quarter where an outdoor music venue will be developed, the amenity being proposed is accompanied with site specific landscape features that address the water treatment needs and provide additional capacities. In the neighborhood areas there are spaces for community gardens and athletic fields while the commercial areas provide needed public green space and hardscaping to compliment the performance area and commercial street fronts. The greenway can be seen as a flexible and adaptive space meeting neighborhood specific needs. southern elevation _ the warm tones of the aging corten cladding complements the abundant foliage that surrounds the site.
competition_Urban Land Institute team members_Caleb White, Ramon Pena, Lindsay Rule
6.
C
7.
6.
8.
03 Urban Stitches
8.
A
B
11.
12. 2.
10.
9.
10. 9.
4.
8.
3.
8. 9.
9.
9.
5. 8.
9.
9.
9.
Site Plan _ both the amenities in the greenway and the built 9. development along its edge are different depending on the neighborhood and it’s needs.
1. hydrology and education center 2. boutique hotel 3. museum / cultural center 4. market 5. grocery store 6. athletic facilities 7. public library
8. residential 9. mixed use residential / retail 10. office 11. parking structure 12. retail
9.
1.
Phase I Residential: 300,000 SF Retail: 450,225 SF Comercial: 0 SF
residential retail
hotel
museum
grocery store
Phase II Residential: 426,950 SF Retail: 100,000 SF Comercial: 125,000 SF
residential
retail retail
office space
Phase III Residential: 125,000 SF Retail: 0 SF Comercial: 0 SF
residential
swimming pool
library
Phase IV Residential: 0 SF Retail: 0 SF Comercial: 0 SF
performance
education
Development Phasing _ phasing of the development corisponds to the amenities that are introduced in the greenway.
1. section C (top) _this section cuts across the elevated highway, showing the open air market below (1.). The museum plaza (2.) and the grocery store (3.) are on either side of the market.
03 Urban Stitches
2.
1.
2. section B (bottom) _ this section highlights the transition from the new comercial district(1.) to the water retention areas(2.) and the boutique hotel(3.) across the park.
3.
3.
04
Hudson River Natatorium
The natatorium on the Hudson could be seen as an extension and an invasion of Manhattan’s urban parts into the Hudson river, but it could also be viewed as an internalization of the water in the Hudson, an architecturalization of the natural features that surround the island city. Within a series of articulated modules, there are a variety of aquatic programs extending the Hudson River Greenway amenities onto pier 26. Each module is internally articulated for the specific auquatic program that occupies it. Of the aquatic amenities there are two lap pools, a dive tank, a series of leisure pools, hot tubs, and a sauna.
inhabiting the Hudson _ the surface of the pier, which is always open to the public, becomes an extension of the park and pathways that run along the Hudson River Greenway.
academic studio_University of Pennsylvania instructor_Kutan Ayata
dive tank support volume
support volume
lap pool volumes
cafe volume
spa volume
programmed pier surface
existing pier structure
complete assembly
assembly diagram _ the blue volumes contain the featured aquatic programs while the green volumes are support spaces for these programs, including circulation, mechanical spaces below, and storage.
04 Hudson River Natatorium
joined “super panels�
exterior sheathing structural frame
unit assembly model_ Each module consists of a concrete tube that caries the weight of the module to the foundations below the pier, precast pool parts sit on top of this tube, and steel frame rests on top of these concrete parts.
1.
A
4.
1.
main level plan _ the main level features a leisure pool with seating alcoves (1.) as well as a leisure pool that weaves its way through multiple modules and merges with the dive tank(2.). Also seen on this level are the changing rooms(3.) and a cafe for use by the general public with views over the Hudson River (4.).
04 Hudson River Natatorium
B
3. 2.
2.
section A_ the long section reveals how the ground level of the pier becomes an articulated landscape allowing users to move under and around the featured programs on the site. the leisure pools(1.) are generally suspended above the ground level while the dive tank(2.) goes below the pier to the foundations.
3
1.
2.
04 Hudson River Natatorium
Skylight
Metal Panel Type I
Metal Panel Type II
Lower Level Window
130' 0" Pool Level
116' 0" Changing Level
100' 0" Existing Pier Level
Concrete Pier Precast Concrete Structure
59' 6" T.O. Piers
Elevation 1/4� = 1’
elevation_ the panelization of the modules is hierarchical in that there are a series of super panels based on the curvature of the surfaces, each of these super panels has a grid of smaller panels within it.
section B _ the transverse section of the module shows the relationship of the support spaces, circulation(1.) and mechanical(2.), to the primary aquatic features (3.)
05 Epitaph
This small storage facility was designed to house historic tombstones which were unearthed over the years within Boulder’s most historic burial ground, Columbia Cemetery. With nowhere in the cemetery for these stones to be stored, they were held off site. This building allowed the stones to be brought back to the site and to be permanently on display for preservationists and the general public to visit. In addition to housing the stones, the project was imagined as a destination from which to explore the historic and beautiful site. The space between the stone storage area and the tool storage area was left open as a covered space to provide cover as visitors view the listing of all the stones that were present and also as a spot for tours (which regularly pass through the site) to meet.
southern elevation _ the warm tones of the aging corten cladding complements the abundant foliage that surrounds the site.
extra-curricular design build_University of Colorado instructor_Marcel De Lange
(1.)
(3.)
(2.) (1.) plan _ The building is split into a storage area for the historic tomb stones, and a storage area for the cemetery’s tools. (2.) section _ The structural bays are aligned to a 4 foot grid, allowing the 12 foot cavity between the programs as well as the 8 foot expanded bay for tool storage. (3.) programming _ The cavity between the tool storage area and the historic tomb stone display area is utilized as a gathering space for historic site tours and as a viewing area for the general public to see the historic stones.
05 Epitaph
1.
4.
7. 2.
3. 6. 5.
assembly_ (1.)corrugated corten steel (2.)10mm polycarbonate panels (3.) 2X8 LVL Engineered Lumber (4.) 1/4� steel stress plate (5.) concrete mat-slab foundation (6.) 2X6 pressure treated lumber (7.) reclaimed beetle kill lumber
8
2X g rru
ed er er ine b l ng um tee L LE ns LV rte co ed
co
at 1/4” steel plate 2X8 LVL Engineered Lumber
1/4” steel plate 2X8 LVL Engineered Lumber 1/2” steel base plate
1/4” A36 stainless steel bolt
#4 Rebar
05 Epitaph
connection details _ 1/4� laser cut steel plate
translucent ends _ polycarbonate panels
components connect the LVL trusses together the steel tension rod completes the assembly.
cap the ends of the shed illuminating the space with daylight during the day.
06
Shifting Hybrids
This hotel, residence, and music venue, in TriBeCa New York challenges typical mixed-use architectural typologies through the hybridization of its parts from one programmatic feature to the next. A seam on the facade, the line that was a simple material break, becomes surface, and surface becomes volume which can contain an entire apartment. Some of these seems, those between the residences and the hotel rooms, contain shared spaces such as recording and practice spaces for visiting musicians. The maximum expression of these shared spaces is the small music venue in the lower levels of the building. As hotel guests and residents move through the building they are given the opportunity to sample the musical performances that occur within these hybrid spaces.
undulating surface _ the seam as programatic device. Apartments, hotel rooms, and shared spaces scale on a gradient from studio apartment to lobby.
academic studio_University of Pennsylvania instructor_Hina Jamelle
Hotel Units
Residential Units
H3 hotel suite
R3 two bedroom
H2 hotel double
R2 one bedroom
H1 hotel single
R1 studio
600 SF
600 SF
375 SF
375 SF
250 SF
250 SF
Total: 54 units
Public Spaces
Hotel Room - Single 250 SF
R1 R3
H1
level 9
R3
H3
R2
Residence - Studio 300 SF R2
H2
level 8
level 7
H2 R2
R3 level 6
R1
H3
H1
R1
Residence - One Bedroom 375 SF
level 5
level 4
R
H
Hotel Units
Hotel - Suite 600 SF
Residential Units
H3 hotel suite
R3 two bedroom
H2 hotel double
R2 one bedroom
H1 hotel single
R1 studio
600 SF
level 2
600 SF
375 SF
375 SF
250 SF
level 1
250 SF
Total: 54 units
Public Spaces
program diagram _
inter-relationship _ the gradient scale of units stack vertically,
R1
R3
creating a seam of expansion, showing the transformation from one unit type to the next H1
R3
H3
R2
R2
H2
H2 R2
R3 R1
level 3
H3
H1 R1
06 Shifting Hybrids
facade _ the undulating seems of the facade depict the programmatic transformations from one part of the building to the next.
06 Shifting Hybrids
B
A
C
D
E
F
DN
1.
DN DN
1 DN
3. 1 2
32” min.
32 ”m in.
3
2.
1.
2.
1.
2
3
2.
3.
Typical Floor Plan
12°
A
B
C
A
B
C
level 9 1’=1/8”
D
E
F
E
D
F
DN
DN
1
DN DN
DN
32” min.
32” min.
1.
1
2 DN
3 DN
DN
2
2.
3
1.
A
B
C
D E F
(top) typical floor plan _ this plan depicts a typical floor of the building with a distribution of hotel rooms(1.) and apartments(2.). On each floor, there is a shared sound controlled space that can be used for practice or recording(3.). This area doubles as an elevator lobby so that hotel guests and residents can sample the music as they move through the building.
(bottom) ground floor plan _ the entry to the performance venue and the hotel(1.) are along Greenwich Street. The apartment entrance(2.) fronts Vestry Street.
1.
2. (1.) typical residence interior _ the seam of the facade define the division between units and materials, the seems also define the interior conditions of the unit - hard versus soft, wet versus dry.
(2.) one bedroom residence_
06 Shifting Hybrids
5. 1.
6.
2.
7.
3.
4.
3D section _ the cut through the seam reveals a stack of the practice and recording spaces(1.) that are accoustically isolated by the thickened walls of the seam. Adjacent to these spaces on each floor are the elevator lobbies(2.). As you move vertically through the building, these practice and recording spaces increase in scale, culminating in the auditorium(4.) in the lower level of the building.
8.