The Law Journal, Fall 2020

Page 1

FALL 2020 F E AT U R E D A RT I C L E S :

STAYING SAFE AND SANE AT HOME PG. 12

THINGS ARE TOUGH ENOUGH; BOARD MEETINGS DURING A PANDEMIC PG. 20 LIMITING EXPOSURE TO LIABILITY FROM USE OF COMMON AREA AMENITIES DURING THE PANDEMIC PG. 02

Let’s Avoid a COVID-19 Financial Crisis in Associations PG. 06

WHAT ACTIONS, IF ANY, SHOULD BE TAKEN WHEN A RESIDENT TESTS POSITIVE FOR COVID-19? PG. 16


Limiting Exposure to Liability from Use of Common Area Amenities During the Pandemic By Tyler Kerns, Esq.

O

Then, as California began its phased ne of the greatest challenges that associations have faced during the

COVID-19 pandemic has been keeping track of the various governmental orders, protocols, and guidelines applicable to common area amenities such as swimming pools, fitness centers, and tennis courts. For months, association boards of directors, managers, and attorneys struggled to make sense of confusing and sometimes conflicting information. Most associations closed their common area recreational amenities at the outset of the pandemic.

re-opening and counties issued their own re-opening protocols/guidelines, associations had to assess the risks involved in opening their amenities during the ongoing pandemic. As of the time of this writing, some associations have chosen to keep their recreational amenities closed, but many others have decided to re-open. Associations that chose to reopen have taken a variety of steps to reduce exposure to potential liability in the event that someone alleges to have contracted COVID-19 from using the association’s amenities. The most important thing that associations can do to limit exposure to potential liability is to comply with the applicable governmental orders, protocols, or guidelines relating to the amenities. The most obvious example is pools. Most counties have issued

2

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG


A PRACTICAL REVIEW OF COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT LAW

2020 CACM FALL LAW JOURNAL EDITORIAL COMMITTEE CHIEF EDITOR Fred Whitney, Esq. Whitney|Petchul some form of protocols or guidelines that

ATTORNEY GUEST EDITOR Jeffrey Beaumont, Esq. Beaumont Tashjian

apply to pools. Even if the “guidelines”

COMMITTEE MEMBERS

read like suggestions as opposed to

Spencer Edgett, Esq.

Jill Morgan, CCAM

requirements, associations should make

Chapman & Intrieri, LLP

Allure Total Management

every effort to comply with the guidelines

Jackie Pagano, Esq.

Eric Kazakoff, CCAM

because they establish a standard of care

Roseman Law, APC

Canyon Lake POA

Garrett Wait, Esq.

Hamlet Vazquez, MCAMHR

that the association would likely be held to if someone were to sue the association for negligence. If a court had to determine what would be a reasonable standard of

Kriger Law Firm

Katrina Solomatina, Esq.

Action Property Management

Hopkins & Carley

care that the association’s actions should be measured against, the county guidelines would provide a basic standard to apply. Accordingly, boards should carefully review any applicable county guidelines and should be mindful that there may also be applicable guidelines issued by the State or by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Boards should implement a plan to comply with any applicable governmental protocols or guidelines for operating the types of amenities available at the property.

An archive of past issues can be found under Member Resources at CACM.org. The CACM Law Journal is a digital publication distributed four times per year to all members, in addition to supporters of the California Association of Community Managers. DISCLAIMER: CACM does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of articles, events or announcements listed. Please be advised that the opinions of the authors who contribute to the Law Journal are those of the author only, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of CACM and other industry attorneys. Please note that in a constantly evolving industry there are frequently multiple interpretations of the controlling statutes and case law. The information contained in these articles is of a general nature and not intended as legal advice. If you have any questions, please discuss them

Interested in advertising in CACM’s Law Journal? Reach out to us at marketing@cacm.org

3

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG


Continued from page 3

METERNET

Sub-metering Services

The board can then add layers of further protection by implementing precautionary measures that go beyond the minimum governmental standards. For example, most

METERING SYSTEM MANAGEMENT

county guidelines describe some sort of signage

INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE

that needs to be posted, but associations can

BILLING AND COLLECTIONS

post additional signage. The CDC produced a good sign for posting at pools. Further, boards

reading, and billing services for common interest developments. We work directly with property managers and community leaders to while saving the residents and the community money in the process.

should consider posting signage warning amenity users that use of the amenities is at the users’ own risk and that the association cannot guarantee that the amenities are a virus-free environment.

800-985-1179 Sales@MeterNetUSA.com https://MeterNetUSA.com

Some boards are also asking amenity users to sign a waiver of liability agreement in order to use the association’s amenities. However, it can be logistically difficult for some associations to

Community management just got easier

condition access to the amenities upon a user signing the agreement. Nevertheless, such an agreement could offer additional protection from liability.

From setup to maintenance to reporting, Yardi Breeze is very user friendly and simple to work with.

Joseph Alessandro CFM Development

Further, some boards are adopting emergency rules relating to the use of the amenities so that the association can implement enforcement actions against owners who violate such rules. Boards should understand that adopting rules comes with a duty to enforce violations of those rules, and boards should not adopt any rules that they are not prepared to enforce.

Get your personalized demo today YardiBreeze.com | (800) 866 -1144

Additional signage, liability waivers, and adopting rules might help to reduce exposure to

4

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG


potential liability but, again, they should be

an award is granted. Boards should consult

thought of as additional layers of protection

their insurance representatives on whether

and not as a substitute for complying with

their policies would include any coverage

applicable governmental guidelines. It is

against COVID-19 related claims.

important for boards (and managers) to stay up to date with respect to the applicable

Ultimately, boards must determine the level

guidelines, which are updated from time

of risk that they are willing to accept and

to time, and to be prepared to adapt as the

what precautions to implement with respect

guidelines change.

to re-opening amenities during the pandemic. Some boards may decide that the liability

Unfortunately, even if a board does everything

risks or the unbudgeted expenses to comply

right, someone could still sue the association

with the applicable governmental guidelines

alleging that they contracted COVID-19

are too great to be able to safely re-open at

while using the association’s amenities.

a particular time. Boards should regularly

It would be difficult for someone to prove

communicate with association members

that they contracted the virus from the

through meetings, notices, etc. regarding

association’s amenities, and they would also

the status of the association’s amenities,

need to establish negligence on the part of

the guidelines applicable to the use of those

the association in order to prevail in such a

amenities, and the considerations that

lawsuit. However, boards need to be aware

have gone into the board’s decisions with

that insurance is unlikely to cover claims

respect to the precautions that the board has

related to the virus, since insurance policies

implemented.

often include exclusions for communicable diseases. Therefore, if someone were to sue the association alleging to have contracted the virus as a result of some failure on the part of the association (such as failure to comply with applicable county guidelines) and there is no insurance coverage, then the association would have to pay for its own legal defense fees instead of having those fees paid by insurance. Even if the association ultimately prevails in such a lawsuit, the unbudgeted legal expenses could be substantial, and there is no guarantee it could enforce its own attorney’s fees award, if such 5

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Tyler Kerns, Esq. of Kriger Law Firm specializes in community association law. He’s worked in the industry for 10 years and is based in La Mesa.


Things Are Tough Enough; Let’s Avoid a COVID-19 Financial Crisis in Associations By Sandra L. Gottlieb, Esq.

F

irst and foremost, the pandemic and its effects are tragic. Decisions that need to

be made regarding collections can be hard on the heartstrings under normal circumstances and even more so during the pandemic. That said, under Corporations Code § 7231, boards

Your HOA

Banking Specialist

Treasury Services • Web-Based Payment Portal • Integration Services • Operating and Reserve Accounts • Local Lockbox Processing • HOA Loans • Placement Services for Excess Reserves •

of the association as a whole, including their obligation to collect assessments that enable the association to meet its financial obligations (even if there is a legitimate reason an owner cannot meet their financial obligations to the association).

Supporting Member of

When the federal government enacted emergency orders to place a moratorium on

A Dedicated HOA Department Here For You

Give us a call today 844.489.0999 www.HeritageBankofCommerce.bank

have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest

Member FDIC

mortgage foreclosures, many association boards wondered if they should follow suit. The reality is, however, that most associations cannot financially afford to stop collection actions for the non-payment of assessments. Associations

6

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG


are non-profit with no room in their budget

can quickly deteriorate. This can cause a loss

for excess expenses and across-the-board

of property values, an increase in breach of

deferrals of assessments. Without the means

fiduciary duty claims against board members

to meet their financial obligations, history

and their associations, the levying of special or

shows that an association’s infrastructure

emergency assessments, and much higher regular assessments later on. The economic reality is that assessments are the primary revenue stream for most associations. Failure to require the payment of assessments accelerates and compounds the financial distress

LASER BASED LONG RANGE VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION

HANDS-FREE ACCESS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN EVER Identifying visitors and guests automatically, reliably, and with a minimum contact to public property is more relevant than ever. Learn more at Barcode-Automation.com or call 1-800-528-9167

of an association, making all owners responsible for the debt of the delinquent owner(s). So, unless an association is flush with a surplus (and when that happens, everyone assumes the assessments are too high and not tied to the anticipated expenses in the annual budget), it must pursue collections during the pandemic, subject to relevant law, including applicable emergency orders. There are several ways that associations can do this.

Continued on page 8 7

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG


Continued from page 7 Before a board even starts to consider its collection options, it needs to review its collection policy to ensure that it is enforceable. The policy must conform to the governing documents and California Civil Code § 5730 and must be disclosed to the membership annually under Civil Code §5310. Also, an association must comply with the requirements of Civil Code § 5650- 5690 when collecting assessments. If the association fails to follow these statutory requirements, it may not effectively record a lien on a delinquent owner’s property until the association complies. Failure to comply may result in federal and state fair debt collection violations, resulting in significant defense costs and requiring the association, at a minimum, to restart its collection process, losing considerable time in dealing with its delinquent owners. Once a board assures itself that the collection policy and disclosures are in order, it should communicate with delinquent owners on a case-by-case basis and determine which delinquent owners are COVID-19 related and which are not. During the pandemic, one way an association can show compassion is to open the dialog with homeowners about what their options are before debts get too large. Then, follow the collection policy, timely 8

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG

MANAGE ASSOCIATIONS, NOT PAPER CLIPS AND FILE CABINETS. Automate your AP and learn more at www.avidxchange.com/strongroom


record liens to protect the association’s assets,

including the association. Thus, pursuing

don’t discriminate, consider the ability to waive

foreclosure against the property may have

late fees and interest, and approve reasonable

little financial benefit (other than a new paying

payment plans. Payment plans are the best

owner, which in the 2008/2009 economy was

option for an association to enable their

an important consideration for boards). Right

owners to catch up on their COVID-19-related

now, California property values are holding

delinquencies before the delinquency is too

steady. When the mortgage foreclosure

large for an owner to handle. If an owner had

moratorium is lifted, we may see an influx of

a good track record for assessment payments

distressed owners having no choice but to sell

before the pandemic, they will likely return to

their property quickly for under market value

good standing on the rebound.

to try to stop the bleeding, get some money out of their property, and end their ongoing

It is difficult to know how long the economic

financial commitment to an underwater

impact of the pandemic will endure. UCLA

property. Anticipating the decrease in property

Anderson Economic Forecasters predict that

values, there is no time like the present for

the recession will recover in 2022. If that is

associations to proceed with collection actions

an indication, associations need to keep tight

if their boards’ hope to get their money out of

financial constraints on its spending for that

a foreclosure action.

entire two-year period to make it through

California law affecting non-judicial and

without itself falling into financial distress.

judicial foreclosure of assessment liens can be

Typically, we recommend that associations keep

complex. Due to the economic hardships facing

payment plans to six months, even if there will

many Californians caused by the pandemic, we

be a balloon payment at the end. This is still

anticipate that courts may bend over backward

our recommendation, with the understanding

to keep homeowners from losing their

that the payment plans may have to be revisited

property. This, coupled with the anticipated

and renegotiated at the six-month mark as we

reduction of property values and equity

continue with a pandemic-caused recession

brought on by the current economic crisis, can

and the highest unemployment since the great

make assessment collection tricky. Boards

depression.

need to keep in mind the various methods of assessment collection knowing, in a distressed

In a “good” market, property appreciates,

market, they may not have a one-size-fits-

and an assessment lien with the potential of

all collection response. Make sure that your

foreclosure is likely to result in payment. In a

boards have detailed resolutions as to why they

“down market” where property values collapse

chose one method of collection over another to

due to a glut of inventory, there may not be enough equity to satisfy all debt holders, 9

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG

Continued on page 10


Continued from page 9

start impacting operations. Keeping everyone informed of the impact that delinquent

defend against claims of disparate treatment. To determine which collection option an association should pursue, boards should

accounts have on the association helps educate homeowners on the value of their assessments and the necessity for payment.

consult with an attorney or assessment collection company to review the delinquencies to enable them to make a recommendation. These professionals can

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

advise the board if the property has other liens that may extinguish the association’s lien, whether senior encumbrances are going through the foreclosure process or whether the possibility exists of collecting funds from a

Sandra L. Gottlieb, Esq. is a community association attorney with SwedelsonGottlieb, which serves Los Angeles, Orange County, Palm Desert, San Francisco and Ventura County.

judgment. A final thought: communicate and disclose to the membership delinquency issues when they

Q: WHO’S A TOP DOG? A: WE ARE! For the 4th year in a row, we’ve been named a Top Contractor by Pavement Maintenance and Reconstruction™ magazine, and for 13 consecutive years, we’ve been rated “Highest in Quality and Helpful Expertise” by Diamond Certified. Thanks for helping us achieve these honors!

BAY AREA 510.770.1150 SAN DIEGO AREA 760.294.4944

2019 TOP

CONTRACTOR

www.BLACKDIAMONDPAVING.com

10

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG


Letter from the

Guest Editor Dear Members: While many of us hoped that Fall would mean

procedures. Finally, this edition delves into

a return to “normal,� the novel coronavirus

how to navigate board meetings during the

remains a large part of our lives. By now we

pandemic.

have all had time to adapt and transition to

As you will see, the articles provide key

virtual meetings, new common area rules

takeaways, tips and considerations for

and restrictions, social distancing, increased

addressing the multitude of challenges that

sanitization and other health/safety protocols;

managers and their associations may face in the

yet, it seems that new challenges continue

current environment. The goal of this edition

to emerge. This Fall issue takes a look at the

is to provide managers with tools and guidance

new and sometimes challenging decisions that

to keep communities operating smoothly

community leaders face during the pandemic

as we push forward through the pandemic.

and the resulting changes to association

This edition is full of excellent information

operations.

and I hope it proves to be a valuable source

In this issue, you will find insightful and useful

of information. Thank you for continuing to

information that managers can utilize while

support our great industry and stay safe.

navigating these unprecedented times. As you know, an increased number of individuals are working from home and, among other things, this has likely resulted in an increased number of complaints and violations, especially those related to nuisances and parking. This issue covers how to successfully enforce rules while avoiding exposure to liability. A few articles also discuss measures associations should consider or implement to help limit liability arising from use of common areas, residents testing positive for COVID-19, and collection 11

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Jeffrey A. Beaumont, Esq., is a senior partner with Beaumont Tashjian, and has over 20 years of experience representing common interest developments.


STAYING SAFE AND SANE AT HOME Enforcement of Rules and Restrictions During COVID-19 By Laurie F. Masotto, Esq.

D

ear HOA, please DO SOMETHING about my neighbors:

COVID day 19: Ping – pong – The neighbors are using COVID 19 to hone their ping pong skills until midnight each night! COVID day 33: College students have come home with their cars, and have no permits. There’s no place to park! COVID day 75: A new patio cover is going up next door (another COVID home project). Do they have approval?

MANAGEMENT COMPANIES Don’t let business challenges bring you down...

R ESE RV E S T UDI ES A PARTNER YOU CAN COUNT ON

C OMPLETE, DETAILED ANALYSIS B OARD COLLABORATION S INGLE SOURCE CONTACT R ESPONSIVE SERVICE S PECIALISTS ARE CAI-CERTIFIED C O N TA C T U S T O D AY ! CABUILDERSERVICES.COM O R C A L L 559.4 7 3 .2 6 9 2

12

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG

CID Insurance Programs has successfully helped CACM Members with insurance & risk management protection for more than 23 years

Phone: (800) 922-7283 Email: insurance@cacm.org www.cidprograms.com


DUTY TO ENFORCE. The CC&Rs and/ or Bylaws will set forth an association’s responsibility and authority to “enforce” the governing documents. This duty to enforce is also established by California law. See Posey v. Leavitt (1991) 229 Cal. App. 3d 1236 (an association may be held COVID day 114: Even the best music playlist doesn’t sound good at 4:30 a.m. when the neighbor exercises. When will this end?” As homes have evolved into offices, classrooms, gyms, and playgrounds during the COVID-19 pandemic, owners have increased their demands that associations “do something” to enforce violations. Even during “normal” times, determining the nature and degree of enforcement action needed is challenging. A recent television commercial in which a board president uses a chainsaw to cut down an owner’s mailbox for being two inches too tall mocks the concept of “too strict”. On the other hand, potential liability may result if a board takes little or no action, absent a reasoned and documented decision not to do so. The current pandemic does not mean enforcement should be canceled. Rather, careful but purposeful enforcement steps should be taken, in a reasonable and practical manner, to help associations avoid being sued for not doing enough.

liable for the failure to enforce); see also Civil Code § 5975(a) (covenants are enforceable). The manner and means of enforcement, particularly during the pandemic, must be considered in light of the governing documents and the law.

FOLLOW YOUR PROCESSES/ PROCEDURES. The governing documents, such as an enforcement policy, may mandate certain enforcement action, such as that a hearing “shall” be held or a fine “shall” be imposed, versus “may”. A board is required to follow its enforcement processes and procedures to obtain court relief. See Ironwood Owners Association IX v. Solomon (1986) 178 Cal. App. 3d 76. An association can be sued for failing to enforce, including for disputes involving neighbors. Cohen v. Kite Hill (1983) 142 Cal. App. 3d 642 at 653. With regard to the constant midnight ping pong game or thumping exercise routine, if the documents require a fine to be levied, do so after notice and hearing. Consider waiving or reducing the fine if the owner

Continued on page 14 13

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG


CINC-LawJournal-quarter.pdf

1

5/20/20

10:29 AM

Continued from page 13 complies within a reasonable time. Invite the owner to a hearing to discuss the problem and a possible solution, even if no fine is required. For the home-bound college students with cars, adopt emergency rules to issue additional temporary permits, with periodic review for continuing need. Strict enforcement and towing should remain for blocking fire lanes, entrances and fire hydrants.

DISCRETION TO PURSUE LEGAL ACTION. If internal enforcement efforts fail, the board can decide whether or not to pursue a lawsuit. See Beehan v. Lido Isle Community Association (1977) 70 Cal. App. 3d 858. During

Helping CAM Companies Grow WE SPECIALIZE IN THREE AREAS: • Knowledgeable Acquisition Guidance • Attractive Acquisition Financing to Fund Your Growth • Helping You Prepare to Sell Your Business for Maximum Return

Robin L. Storey Managing Director

770.365.3331

robin@cinccapital.com

cinccapital.com

the pandemic where residents need to work, learn or exercise at home, and the courts are backlogged, a board needs to weigh the costs and benefits of a lawsuit taking into consideration the severity of the violation, the association’s chance of prevailing, and prospect for recovery of attorneys’ fees. Any reasoned decision to proceed, or not proceed, should be clearly documented in a board resolution.

TIMING. The board has some discretion as to timing of enforcement efforts. See Pacific Hills v. Prun (2008) 160 Cal. App. 4th, in which an owner installed a mechanical gate without

We’re here for you. In these times of change, stability matters more than ever, and you can rely on our Community Association Banking team.

Visit cit.com/CAB Brendan Concannon

Lisa Ann Rea

Roxanne Jolicoeur

619.261.6643

805.907.8452

925.963.9733

Brendan.Concannon@cit.com Lisa.Rea@cit.com Roxanne.Jolicoeur@cit.com

association approval. Enforcement was pursued over several years before a lawsuit was filed. The owner argued the association 14

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG

©2020 CIT Group Inc. All rights reserved. CIT and the CIT logo are registered trademarks of CIT Group Inc. Deposit and loan products are offered through CIT Bank, N.A., the FDIC-insured national bank subsidiary of CIT Group Inc. MM#8215


waited too long. However, the court found no

USE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. The

prejudice, as from day one the board and its

pandemic will inevitably tighten budgets,

legal counsel informed the owner the gate was

leaving less funding available for

in violation. Thus, the ability to try to resolve

enforcement efforts. Use the IDR meet and

violations over a period of time may be helpful

confer process between a board member

during COVID-19. Document all enforcement

and owner and/or their designee at no

efforts and any basis for extensions of time to

cost. If the dispute persists, formal dispute

comply, especially based on delays due to the

resolution is available, often at a lower cost

virus (e.g. a delay in completing construction or

than usual by video or phone conference.

landscaping). However, discuss with your legal counsel any firm dates by which action must be

COMMUNICATE. Tell owners that the

taken, including relevant statutes of limitation.

board appreciates their cooperation,

IMMEDIATE ACTION MAY BE NEEDED.

compliance and courtesy for one’s neighbors more than ever before, and that the strength

The primary function of an association is

and success of the community depends

to preserve the value and aesthetics of the

on it! Remind owners about architectural

community. See Cohen v. Kite Hill (1983) 142

requirements, and not to modify the

Cal. App. 3d 642. During COVID-19, planting

common area.

flowers in the common area may warrant a violation letter. However, if an owner embarks

Engaging in enforcement on a reasonable

on an unauthorized room addition or wants

and practical level, and documenting each

to pour concrete within the entire front

step in writing, will go a long way to help

yard, impacting drainage and appearance,

reduce liability during these challenging

then a more significant and swift response is

times.

warranted. Have legal counsel send a cease and desist letter. A temporary restraining order may be needed in order to prevent long-term irreparable harm. For the patio cover COVID-19 project already completed over the weekend, pursuant to the Ironwood case, an association must still review and render a written decision after the fact. The association can pursue removal or modification if it violates architectural standards.

15

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Laurie F. Masotto, Esq. of Community Legal Advisors, Inc., has worked in the industry for 27 years, representing residential and commercial common interest developments in Orange and San Diego counties.


What Actions, If Any, Should be Taken When a Resident Tests Positive for COVID-19?

With this in mind, a common question that boards and managers might have is, “What do we do if there has been a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 or some other communicable disease within the community?” At the outset, given the unprecedented nature of this pandemic, and the health and safety risks posed by COVID-19, the board is entitled to require members and residents to inform the association (via phone or email) if in fact they have contracted or tested positive, or have traveled to what health organizations (the CDC, WHO or others) might consider a “high-risk” location. Note that while boards must be sensitive to confidentiality and privacy, associations

By A.J. Jahanian, Esq.

U

ndoubtedly, the novel coronavirus

Community Legal Advisors Inc. COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS

(COVID-19) pandemic has interrupted

the normal routines and operations of associations and their boards and management. While state and local health officials’ orders may be lifted or relaxed (or tightened in some cases), General Counsel

depending on the rise and fall of the infection rate, we can expect many of the last several months’ changes to association operations to stay intact for some time. The board’s and management’s due diligence and consideration for how to mitigate the possible transmission of

Serving Orange County, San Diego County, Inland Empire and Coachella Valley

the virus within their communities will continue

Toll Free 833.938.1877

to be relevant, even once virus-related orders are

AttorneyforHOA.com

completely lifted. 16

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG

• • • • • • •

ADA & DFEH Compliance CC&R & Bylaw Amendments Architectural Matters Contracts & Insurance Elections & Recalls Employment Law Legal Opinions

Assessment Collection • • • •

Timely Status Reports Responsive Paralegals Collectibility Analysis Judicial or Non-Judicial Foreclosures • Money Judgment Lawsuits • Small Claims Assistance • Post Judgment Recovery


are not subject to the privacy protections in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). These protections apply to healthcare providers only, such as doctors, hospitals, pharmacies, dentists and the like.

“POSITIVE” COVID-19 If confirmed, the association should conduct a

SPECIALTY DEPOSITS The strength of experience. The convenience of control.

phone interview with the resident, asking: a) When

City National® has supported homeowners associations and property management companies for more than 40 years.

they in fact tested positive and when they began

Contact us today to get started.

engaging in self-isolation, if at all; b) Where they

Gerard LoBue | SVP Team Leader (949) 223-4090

have walked within the community (i.e., elevators, parks, fitness center, etc.); and c) If they have been in close contact with another resident or personnel of the association within the last fourteen (14) days since exposure (or whatever length of time the virus/communicable disease is considered

City National Bank Member FDIC. City National Bank is a subsidiary of Royal Bank of Canada. ©2020 City National Bank. All Rights Reserved. CNB.com 207117-04

alive and infectious, pursuant to health officials’ recommendations). Additionally, the board should consider sending a mass communication to all homeowners and residents, informing them of the confirmed case within the community, without divulging any personal information of the resident. While confidentiality should be maintained in the mass communication to the entire community, it may be reasonable in some situations, especially for senior communities, for the association to divulge to all residents of a particular floor/building cluster that

Architecture & Engineering Asset Management & Reserve Studies ■ Consulting Energy Efficiency Solutions ■ HOA Solutions Project Planning & Construction Management

there has been a confirmed case on their floor or in their building cluster. Going any further exposes the association, board and management to liability claims. Remember, all residents should assume each

Continued on page 18 17

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG

Serving all of California

(800) 262-4047 ■ GoCM2.com


What information the association/ management will be gathering and divulging to residents, in the interest of health and safety and the common welfare of the community;

What the resident’s notification requirements are for leaving the unit, using association facilities (i.e., elevators, etc.), etc.;

Continued from page 17 have the virus; thus, all residents should be required to social distance, wash their hands and wear masks. The resident should be reminded again to practice self-isolation, and he or she may be required to schedule garbage pickups, dog walks, or other activities which may impact the community as a whole. Specifically, and especially in high-density communities, it is reasonable for the resident to be required to contact management at least thirty (30) minutes prior to leaving his/her residence, so that management can make arrangements to clean/disinfect the common areas after his/ her use or walk-through. The resident should also be required to wear a mask and gloves when in the common area. It is recommended that the resident be required to sign a privacy authorization form, which outlines, among other things:

How the resident will interact with the board, management, staff, etc., e.g., how packages/deliveries will be handled.

“HIGH RISK” RESIDENTS, WITHOUT AN OFFICIAL DIAGNOSIS If a member or resident has come into contact with someone who has tested positive for COVID-19, but has not yet been diagnosed, he or she may be considered “high-risk”, and should be asked to self-isolate for a period of fourteen (14) days, as well as keep the association apprised as to their condition periodically and beyond the fourteen (14) day incubation period. The resident should be required to only enter common areas for ingress and egress and for essential services (i.e., medical reasons, shopping for groceries, etc.). Note that these procedures by and large hold true for infected staff members and guests of the community. Determining the date of infection and locations in the community that the individual had contact with is essential, in

18

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG


order to engage in the foregoing notice protocols, as well as thoroughly sanitize and disinfect the common areas. The staff member or guest should, similarly, be asked to practice self-isolation for fourteen (14) days before returning to the community. Staff, specifically, may be asked to provide the association with a negative diagnosis from a testing facility, depending on the severity of his/her illness and likelihood of contact with other members in the community; note though, the CDC recommends the time-based quarantine approach, because sometimes tests will still show positive, even if the person has recovered. All in all, 2020 has caused our community leaders to rethink how business and operations are handled. Many of the changes we are all working through are either uncomfortable or simply not

Your Future is Our Business!

feasible to implement. With the advice of legal counsel and upon the recommendations of public health officials, it is critical to determine which, if any, of the foregoing procedures are necessary and practicable to implement, based upon your community’s unique needs. Boards and managers should get ahead of these issues by establishing clear guidance early on, before infections are confirmed. Be proactive and stay safe!

RESERVE STUDIES INC. Guaranteed 3-Year Discounted PricingNo Commitment! Component Inventories Condition Assessments Life and Valuation Estimates Fund Status Building Diagnostic & Litigation Support Maintenance Advice & Planning 800.485.8056

19

www.ReserveStudiesInc.com

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

A.J. Jahanian, Esq. is an associate attorney with Beaumont Tashjian, where he devotes his time servicing the unique needs of the firm’s clients throughout California.


Board Meetings During a Pandemic The Pros and Cons of Telephone and Video Conferencing. By Dyanne L. Peters, Esq. and Tiffany N. Smith-Nguyen, Esq.

L

iving in the age of COVID-19 has

making traditional board meetings impractical

presented a multitude of challenges for

if not outright impossible. Even without these

associations to overcome. Chief among these

prohibitions, boards are forced to consider

are the impact of guidelines at the state and

whether in-person meetings are worth the

county levels limiting or banning gatherings

health and safety risk to themselves, their

involving people of different households,

20

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG

Continued on page 22


Sustainability starts at the top. Learn how Duro-Last can help earn sustainability points:

(888) 496-2849

Established since 1983

duro-last.com/sustainability

Contact us today! Email: info@hlei.us

NSF/ANSI 347

- Landscape Maintenance - Arbor Care - Landscape/Enhancement Design

Proudly Serving Orange, Inland Empire, San Diego and Los Angeles Counties! CSLB C27 and D49

- Water Conservation and Rebates Programs - Real Time reporting with Customer Portal

Product Manufacturing (714)-693-8100 www.hlei.us

Corporate Governance

Product Design Membrane Durability Innovation

21

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG

8030 E. Crystal Drive Anaheim, CA 92807


laptops, and webcams, many have access to

Continued from page 20

a video capable device. Various platforms families, and the rest of the community. So, what is an association supposed to do in this new age of COVID-19? Options include postponing meetings indefinitely or limiting attendance and taking precautions, such as mask wearing and social distancing. Another is to delegate decision-making authority to a minority of board members so they can act without a board meeting. Admittedly, none of these are great options and each create liability exposure. If the board can’t meet, the association can’t function.

previously developed for remote business solutions allow for holding meetings via telephone or video conference. This article will focus on the pros and cons of holding association meetings via such teleconference or video meeting platforms.

THE OPEN MEETING ACT LIMITATIONS Before we dive into exploring teleconference and video meetings, we have to discuss whether or not these types of meetings are even allowed under current law. The Open Meeting Act, beginning at Civil Code §4900, imposes various requirements on board meetings.

Luckily, we’re living in the digital age. The vast majority of people have internet access and between cellphones,

Section 4910(b) prohibits the association (except for cases of emergency) from holding board meetings through “…a series of electronic transmissions, including, but not limited to, electronic mail…” Until the pandemic, the primarily concern was with unauthorized meetings via email, however, the law obviously considers other types to exist.

Continued on page 24

22

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG


License #0E02075

License # 1035078

Services Full Painting Services Wood Replacement Welding & Wrought Iron Repair Deck, Drywall & Stucco Repair Maintenance Projects/Maintenance Programs Consulting & Project Management Services Specialty Coatings

SPECIALIZING IN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INSURANCE Patrick Prendiville (949) 487-9696 CIRMS Patrick@prendivilleagency.com

www.HOAville.com 24661 Del Prado, Suite 3, Dana Point, CA 92629

23

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG

Call us today: (888) 900-9323 Find us at:

www.pilotpainting.com Follow us on:


when writing and passing these laws. What we do know is that the underlying purpose of the Open Meeting Act is to

PROFITABILITY

promote transparency in association governance and to allow association

TECHNOLOGY

Not all resale platforms are created equal.

EFFICIENCY

members to witness the board’s decisionmaking process. Allowing members the opportunity to call into meetings held via telephone or video call achieves this purpose. Boards should keep in mind the

PRODUCTIVITY

THE INDUSTRY’S TRUSTED BUSINESS PARTNER

fact that meetings held via these methods

CONTINUITY OPTIMIZATION

FLEXIBILITY

are not clearly addressed and do carry some risk of liability.

MANAGING RISK If your board decides to implement

homewisedocs.com | sales@homewisedocs.com

telephonic or video meetings, there are ways to manage the risk of liability

Continued from page 23 So, are video calls considered a “series of electronic transmissions”? Furthermore, §4925(a) specifies that in the event of a telephonic meeting, “…that meeting or [open] portion of the meeting shall be audible to the members in a location specified in the notice of the meeting.” (Emphasis added.) Does the law require a line on speaker phone at a physical location? Or is providing call-in access information to the members sufficient? The short answer to these questions is, no one knows for certain because we are in unprecedented territory. The current pandemic has presented a situation not contemplated by the state legislature 24

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG

exposure for potentially violating the Open Meeting Act. Boards should obtain a written legal opinion regarding conducting board meetings via telephone or video conference. This allows the board to rely on the advice of an expert. This is an important defense consideration in the event a lawsuit is filed. Another step to manage risk is to make sure all owners have appropriate notice of meetings and clear instructions on how to access them. Including meeting links and call-in numbers on meeting notices ensures owners who wish to observe the meetings have the opportunity to do so, thus meeting the underlying purpose of the Open Meeting Act.


If possible, and a willing volunteer is

However, there are downsides to holding

available, associations may consider holding

meetings via telephone conference. There

meetings via telephone conference and

is a lack of control over who can attend/call

noticing a physical location where owners

into the meeting. Because the call-in number

may attend. The volunteer will attend the

is required to be posted with the meeting

meeting at the noticed physical location and

notice, people who are not members of the

place the telephone conference on speaker,

association (i.e., tenants, guests, the press,

allowing any owners present to listen to

outside public, etc.) may have access to

the meeting, satisfying Civil Code §4925(a)

“attend” the meeting without any way for the

(as discussed above). When choosing

board to screen the caller.

a physical location, the board should consider taking safety precautions, such

Another issue is that it is often difficult to

as whether an outdoor location is possible,

communicate effectively via teleconference

requiring masks, requiring social distancing,

due to the lack of visual cues, which may

etc. Although this option satisfies the

result in misunderstandings and confusion,

requirements of the Open Meeting Act,

and it becomes difficult to identify who is

the association may risk liability exposure

speaking and create an inability to control

should anyone attending the meetings contract COVID-19.

PROS AND CONS OF TELEPHONIC MEETINGS If an association decides to minimize health and safety risk by foregoing inperson meetings during the pandemic, the association should consider whether to hold meetings via telephone or video conference. Boards and members are probably more familiar and comfortable with telephone conferencing, which would make telephonic meetings an enticing option. Furthermore, holding a telephonic meeting may satisfy legal requirements, if conducted as described above.

25

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG

Continued on page 26


Continued from page 25

the decorum and candor of meetings. This is a real problem for associations who have that

These functions provide better control over

one member who argues every issue (there is

who attends the meeting. For example, if

at least one in every community!), or when

the association wants to limit attendance to

a meeting gets heated over a controversial

members, a moderator can check participants’

topic.

names against a master member list when allowing participants to join the video in a

PROS AND CONS OF VIDEO MEETINGS

waiting room.

An association may alternatively consider video conferencing. An advantage of video

Communication is more effective and efficient,

meetings is that they provide options to

it is easier to identify a speaker, and video

control meetings more efficiently. Most

conferences can share visually as well as verbally

of the platforms allow for a moderator to

via screen sharing.

control the meeting, including, muting attendees, holding the meeting in panel or

However, video conferencing also raises its

webinar mode, and options for a moderator to

own concerns. In order to utilize video meeting

“kick out” attendees for disruptive conduct.

platforms, participants need to have access to

Seeing is believing.

email, a device with speakers and microphone (i.e., computer, tablet, or smartphone), and internet. Additionally, some people may find the technology to be confusing and difficult to work with if they are not tech savvy. The association will also need to ensure that all participants are downloading the correct platform.

Community Control

Another concern is security bugs, for example, Elevate your access control with Smart Community Access

CAPXLV (CAPXL with video) elevates community entry access from a stand-alone function to a connected, scalable access solution with video monitoring capabilities. Powered by myQ®, CAPXLV is designed with both property managers and residents in mind with customizable applications that help streamline the management of buildings, residents and community access points and provide clear visuals for safety and convenience. *formerly myQ Business

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG

an outside person hijacks and disrupts the video meeting. Associations should also be aware that many of the useful features on video platforms require a paid subscription. Finally, as described above, there is a question regarding whether holding a video conference complies with the

PRO 0254-1729

26

meeting bombing. Meeting bombing is where

requirements of the Open Meeting Act.


BEST PRACTICES To avoid some of the pitfalls of holding a meeting via video conferencing, there are some best practices an association should consider. The association should not use a

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

public channel on the video platform. A private

Dyanne L. Peters, Esq. and Tiffany N. SmithNguyen, Esq. specialize in providing common interest developments with corporate counsel and litigation services at Delphi Law Group, LLP. Peters has worked in the industry for three years and Smith-Nguyen for five years. Their primary office is in Carlsbad, but the firm services San Diego County, Orange County, LA County, the Inland Empire, and the Coachella Valley.

channel which can only be accessed by those with a unique password should always be set up. Concerns about unauthorized access can be addressed by holding the meeting in webinar or panel mode and having a moderator. The moderator has more control over who enters the meeting by putting attendees in a waiting room and permitting only members to join the meeting. Alternatively, a moderator can mute all participants and unmute only board

ONESTOP SHOP FOR ALL YOUR HOA NEEDS

members or only select members during a homeowner forum. It is imperative associations review their options and develop a long-term strategy to address how meetings will be held. Consistency and communication with the membership will help members feel more comfortable and foster confidence in the board given the uncertainty and ever-changing dynamics and guidance amid the pandemic.

WWW.PROTEC.COM

18005572217 

 GOPROTEC

B803435 | C33 | C36

27

THE LAW JOURNAL | W W W. C AC M . O RG


2020 LEGAL DIRECTORY

ASSESSMENT COLLECTION SERVICES

ATTORNEYS

ALLIED TRUSTEE SERVICES Assessment Collection & Judgment Recovery Services Stefan Murphy Serving All of California For Over 27 Years 990 Reserve Dr., Ste. 208, Roseville, CA 95678 (800) 220-5454 smurphy@alliedtrustee.com • www.alliedtrustee.com

General Counsel and Assessment Collection Services Jeffrey A. Beaumont and Lisa A. Tashjian Woodland Hills, Laguna Hills, San Luis Obispo, Palm Desert, San Diego 21650 Oxnard St., Ste. 1620, Woodland Hills, CA 91367 (866) 788-9998 • Fax (818) 884-1087 info@HOAattorneys.com • www.hoaattorneys.com

ALTERRA ASSESSMENT RECOVERY

BERDING | WEIL

Assessment Collection Services Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq. Your Association’s Assessment Collection Partner 27101 Puerta Real, Ste. 250, Mission Viejo, CA 92691 (888) 818-5949 ramona@tinnellylaw.com • www.alterracollections.com

BEAUMONT TASHJIAN

Construction Defect Litigation, General Counsel and Community Association Law Steve Weil | Tyler Berding l Chad Thomas | Andrea O’Toole Walnut Creek | Costa Mesa | San Diego 2175 N. California Blvd., Ste. 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (800) 838-2090 • Fax (925) 820-5592 jjackson@berdingweil.com • www.BerdingWeil.com

FELDSOTT & LEE, A LAW CORPORATION Community Association Law Stanley Feldsott, Esq. Laguna Hills | San Diego 23161 Mill Creek Dr., Ste. 300, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 (949) 729-8002 • Fax (949) 729-8012 feldsott@gmail.com • www.cahoalaw.com

CHAPMAN & INTRIERI, LLP General Counsel & Construction Defect Litigation John W. Chapman, Esq. & Mark G. Intrieri, Esq. Alameda l Roseville l Orange County l San Diego 2236 Mariner Square Dr., Ste. 300, Alameda, CA 94501 (510) 864-3600 • Fax (510) 864-3601 jchapman@cnilawfirm.com • www.cnilawfirm.com

FIORE RACOBS & POWERS, A PLC Community Association Law and Assessment Collections Jacqueline D. Foster, Esq., Peter E. Racobs, Esq., & John R. MacDowell, Esq. The Recognized Authority in Community Association Law Orange County | Inland Empire | Coachella Valley l San Diego County (877) 31-FIORE • Fax (949) 727-3311 dweissberg@fiorelaw.com • www.fiorelaw.com

UNITED TRUSTEE SERVICES Trusted Partners In Assessment Collections Lisa E. Chapman Trusted Partners in Assessment Collections 696 San Ramon Valley Blvd., Ste. 353, Danville, CA 94526 (925) 855-8554 • Fax (925) 855-8559 lisa@unitedtrusteeservices.com www.unitedtrusteeservices.com

28 THE LAW JOURNAL | WWW.CACM.ORG

COMMUNITY LEGAL ADVISORS, INC. General Counsel & Assessment Collections Mark Guithues, Esq. & Mark Allen Wilson, Esq. Inland Empire | Orange County | San Diego 509 N. Coast Hwy., Oceanside, CA 92054 (760) 529-5211 • Fax (760) 453-2194 mark@attorneyforhoa.com • www.attorneyforhoa.com

DELPHI LAW GROUP, LLP Attorneys James R. McCormick, Jr., Esq., CCAL Southern California 1901 Camino Vida Roble, Ste. 100, Carlsbad, CA 92008 (844)- 4DELPHI • Fax (760) 820-2696 jmccormick@delphillp.com • www.DelphiLLP.com

EPSTEN, APC Community Association Law, Construction Defect, Litigation & Assessment Recovery Jon Epsten, Esq. & Susan Hawks McClintic, Esq. San Diego | Inland Empire | Coachella Valley 10200 Willow Creek Rd., Ste. 100, San Diego, CA 92131 (858) 527-0111 • Fax (858) 527-1531 jepsten@epsten.com • www.epsten.com


ATTORNEYS CONT’D FIORE RACOBS & POWERS, A PLC Community Association Law and Assessment Collections Jacqueline D. Foster, Esq., Peter E. Racobs, Esq., & John R. MacDowell, Esq. The Recognized Authority in Community Association Law Orange County | Inland Empire | Coachella Valley l San Diego County (877) 31-FIORE • Fax (949) 727-3311 dweissberg@fiorelaw.com • www.fiorelaw.com

GURALNICK & GILLILAND, LLP Association Law, Assessment Collections, General Counsel Wayne S. Guralnick, Robert J. Gilliland Jr. Serving Community Associations for Over 30 Years 40004 Cook St., Ste. 3, Palm Desert, CA 92211 (760) 340-1515 • Fax (760) 568-3053 wayneg@gghoalaw.com • www.gghoalaw.com

HICKEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Community Association Law David E. Hickey, Esq. 27261 Las Ramblas, Suite 120, Mission Viejo, CA 92691 (949) 614-1550 • Fax (949) 748-3990 dhickey@hickeyassociates.net • www.HickeyAssociates.net

HUGHES GILL COCHRANE TINETTI, PC Community Association & Construction Defect Law Michael J. Hughes, Esq., John P. Gill, Esq., Amy K. Tinetti, Esq. Complete representation of community associations 2820 Shadelands Dr., Ste. 160, Walnut Creek, CA 94598 (925) 926-1200 • Fax (925) 926-1202 atinetti@hughes-gill.com • www.hughes-gill.com

THE MILLER LAW FIRM Construction Defect Analysis & Litigation Thomas E. Miller, Founding Partner Rachel M. Miller, Senior Partner Serving Homeowners Associations Statewide for Over 40 Years San Francisco | Bay Area | LA | Orange County | San Diego | Inland Empire (800) 403-3332 rachel@constructiondefects.com www.constructiondefects.com

PRATT & ASSOCIATES, APC Community Association Law Sharon Glenn Pratt Los Gatos, CA 634 North Santa Cruz Avenue, Suite 204, Los Gatos, CA 95030 (408) 369-0800 • Fax (408) 369-0752 spratt@prattattorneys.com • www.prattattorneys.com

RAGGHIANTI FREITAS LLP Community Association Law, Construction Defects & Mediation David F. Feingold, Esq. & Matthew A. Haulk, Esq. Serving Bay Area Communities Since 1986 1101 Fifth Ave., Ste. 100, San Rafael, CA 94901 (415) 453-9433 • Fax (415) 453-8269 dfeingold@rflawllp.com • www.rflawllp.com

RICHARDSON OBER DENICHILO Community Association Law, General Counsel, Assessment Recovery Kelly Richardson, Matt Ober, Robert DeNichilo Throughout California 234 E. Colorado Blvd., Ste. 800, Pasadena, CA 91101 (877) 446-2529 matt@rodllp.com • www.rodllp.com

SWEDELSONGOTTLIEB THE JUDGE LAW FIRM Collection services, general counsel and mediation James A. Judge, Esq. Arbitrators & Mediators, Assessment Collection Services 18650 MacArthur Blvd., Ste. 450, Irvine, CA 92612 (949) 833-8633 • Fax (949) 833-0154 info@thejudgefirm.com • www.thejudgefirm.com

KRIGER LAW FIRM Community Association Law and Assessment Collections Bradley Schuber, Esq. 8220 University Ave., Ste. 100, La Mesa, CA 91942 (619) 589-8800 • Fax (619) 589-2680 bschuber@krigerlawfirm.com • www.krigerlawfirm.com

29 THE LAW JOURNAL | WWW.CACM.ORG

Community Association Law, Construction Defect, Assessment Collection David C. Swedelson, Esq. & Sandra L. Gottlieb, Esq. Los Angeles | Orange County | Palm Desert | San Francisco l Ventura 11900 W. Olympic Blvd., Ste. 700, Los Angeles, CA 90064 (800) 372-2207 • Fax (310) 207-2115 slg@sghoalaw.com • www.lawforhoas.com

TINNELLY LAW GROUP Community Association Law Richard A. Tinnelly, Esq. & Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq. Orange County | Los Angeles | Palm Desert | San Francisco | San Diego 27101 Puerta Real, Ste. 250, Mission Viejo, CA 92691 (949) 588-0866 • Fax (949) 588-5993 ramona@tinnellylaw.com • www.tinnellylaw.com


ATTORNEYS CONT’D WHITE & MACDONALD, LLP COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION LAW, CONSTRUCTION DEFECT LAW Steven M. White, Esq., Rob D. MacDonald, Esq. & James P. Hillman, Esq. COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONS BASED ON EXPERIENCE 1530 The Alameda, Ste. 215, San Jose, CA 95126 (408) 345-4000 • Fax (408) 345-4020 info@wm-llp.com • www.wm-llp.com

WHITNEY PETCHUL APC General Counsel Dirk Petchul, Esq. / Fred Whitney, Esq. 27 Orchard, Lake Forest, CA 92630 (949) 766-4700 • Fax (949) 766-4712 info@whitneypetchul.com • www.whitneypetchul.com

THE NAUMANN LAW FIRM, PC Construction Defect Litigation William H. Naumann, Esq. Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Riverside | San Bernardino 10200 Willow Creek Road, Ste. 150, San Diego, CA 92131 (844) 492-7474 • Fax (858) 564-9380 elaine@naumannlegal.com • www.naumannlegal.com

RESERVE STUDY FIRMS ASSOCIATION RESERVES Reserve Study Firm Carol Serrano Reserve Studies for Community Associations 6700 Fallbrook Avenue, Suite 255, West Hills, CA 91307 (800) 733-1365 cserrano@reservestudy.com • www.reservestudy.com

WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP Community Association Law Michael W. Rabkin, Esq. 11400 W. Olympic Blvd., 9th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90064 (310) 478-4100 • Fax (310) 479-1422 mrabkin@wrslawyers.com • www.wrslawyers.com

CONSTRUCTION DEFECT ANALYSIS BERDING | WEIL Construction Defect Litigation, General Counsel and Community Association Law Steve Weil | Tyler Berding l Chad Thomas | Andrea O’Toole Walnut Creek | Costa Mesa | San Diego 2175 N. California Blvd., Ste. 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (800) 838-2090 • Fax (925) 820-5592 jjackson@berdingweil.com • www.BerdingWeil.com

THE HELSING GROUP, INC. Reserve Study Firm Ryan Leptien Serving All of California 4000 Executive Pkwy., Ste. 100, San Ramon, CA 94583 (925) 355-2100 • Fax (925) 355-9600 reservestudies@helsing.com • www.helsing.com

SCT RESERVE CONSULTANTS Reserve Study Firm Mike Graves, RS Finding Solutions, maintaining Communication, and providing Triage P.O. Box 890129, Temecula, CA 92589 (951) 296-3520 • Fax (951) 296-5038 info@sctreserve.com • www.sctreserve.com

VENDOR COMPLIANCE

FENTON GRANT MAYFIELD KANEDA & LITT, LLP Construction Defect Litigation & CID Education Charles R. Fenton, Esq. & Joseph Kaneda, Esq. California & Nevada 2030 Main Street, Ste. 550, Irvine, CA 92614 (877) 520-3455 • Fax (949) 435-3801 cfenton@fentongrant.com • www.fentongrant.com

THE MILLER LAW FIRM Construction Defect Analysis & Litigation Thomas E. Miller, Founding Partner Rachel M. Miller, Senior Partner Serving Homeowners Associations Statewide for Over 40 Years San Francisco | Bay Area | LA | Orange County | San Diego | Inland Empire (800) 403-3332 rachel@constructiondefects.com www.constructiondefects.com 30 THE LAW JOURNAL | WWW.CACM.ORG

ASSOCIATION SERVICES NETWORK Vendor Compliance David Jeranko Vendor Compliance & Risk Management 24000 Alicia Pkwy., Ste. 17-442, Mission Viejo, CA 92691 (949) 300-3702 • Fax (877) 404-2008 davidj@asn4hoa.com • www.asn4hoa.com


Southern California

October 27th

Managers who are interested in playing may play free! RSVP here

November 5, 2020 A One-Day Virtual Summit Cost: $225

We're going virtual for this event and taking you on virtual tours of high rise & large scale properties! CCAM, CAFM and MCAM members earn 5 CEUs.

Being hosted virtually in


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.