FRIDAY NOVEMBER 30, 2018 THE NEW STAMFORD AMERICAN VOL. 10, ISSUE 28 STAMFORD AMERICAN VOLUME 97, ISSUE 34 STAMFORD LEADER VOLUME 113, ISSUE 35
americannewspapers.net
Greg Arnwine Resigning as Jones County Sheriff BY KAY SPEARS On Monday, November 26, 2018, Jones County Commissioners Court held its regular meeting at the Jones County Courthouse in Anson, TX. In attendance were Judge Dale Spurgin, County Commissioners James Clawson, Steve Lefevre, Ross Davis, Joe Whitehorn, with County Clerk Lee Ann Jennings as recorder. The minutes of the last regular meeting held on Wednesday, November 14, 2018 were approved. SEE COURT, PG 15 Jones County Commissioner Joe Whitehorn & Sheriff Greg Arnwine leaving jobs at the end of 2018.
facebook.com/stamamerican
@stamamerican
Bulldogs Named to All District Teams District 3-2A Division 1 All District Teams were released this week. Numerous Bulldogs were among the honorees. FIRST TEAM OFFENSE: Trace Edward-WR; Zachary Duran-WR; Riley Gomez-OL; D’Marcus Barber-RB; Tre Mitchell-WR/RB FIRST TEAM DEFENSE: Ethan Medina-CB; D’Marcus Barber-LB; Tre Mitchell-CB; Garrett Arendall-DL; Carson Holt-LB 2ND TEAM OFFENSE: RJ Smith-WR; Shavaris Cooper-RB; TJ Kuenstler-C; Garrett Arendall-OL; Josh Mueller-WR 2ND TEAM DEFENSE: Cade Lefevre-OLB; RJ Smith-S; Josh Mueller-S; Christian Cardenas-DL; Quinton Adkins-DL HONORABLE MENTION OFFENSE: Nolan Baker-OL HONORABLE MENTION DEFENSE: Korey Villanueva-DL; Keyven Mueller-LB; Lane Patton-CB; Keith Richards-LB
Capital Murder Jury Bonded BY KAY SPEARS “It was the hardest thing any of us has ever done. Those images will never leave us”, so began a group interview on November 15th with members of the jury from the State vs. Compton capital murder trial. The interview was the first time the jurors had gotten together since the trial wrapped up on November 6, 2018 with Dillion Compton going to death row to await his execution for the murder of Correctional Officer Marianne Johnson in 2016. The jury members had ground rules
for speaking with The New Stamford American. Those stipulations included their names were not to be used and there were certain things the lawyers asked them not to share. The meeting was informal, being held in a jury member’s home. The members in attendance wanted it to be known that they worked diligently every day of the trial to keep their minds open and to be sure that justice was done. The members at the interview were impressed by the professionalism and knowledge of both the defense and prosecution teams. The prosecution “drove it home, that last day.” They
were impressed by some witnesses and questioned the credibility of others. “I don’t think that anybody has mentioned the Judge much, but he did one hell of a job.” The group was curious and asked what they missed when the Judge sent them out of the courtroom. The answer was there were several times when a point of law needed to be argued or one side wanted to argue for or against a piece of evidence to be introduced. “We went in there to do our job and our job was ‘this man is innocent until proven guilty’.” “Until we heard the last piece of
evidence, he was innocent.” One juror explained, “my own thoughts in the guilt/innocence phase, I was for him. I was looking to see that his constitutional rights were met. During the punishment phase my thoughts were not for him, rather for the victims and the families and potential other victims.” “We did have the second question, which was is there any mitigating circumstances and that is the only time I looked to see if there is anything we could find that would, for lack of a better word, justify what he had done. We couldn’t find anything, and we looked SEE JURY, PG 2 hard.”