civil air navigation services organisation
Global Air Navigation Services Performance Report 2015 2010 - 2014 ANSP Performance Results The ANSP View
2
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
This report contains the identified ANSP performance data for 2014 and the trend over 2010-2014. The CANSO Global Air Navigation Services Performance Report 2015 is the collective effort of CANSO Member air navigation service providers (ANSP), which participate in this benchmarking effort on a voluntary basis. Editorial Team Paul Cripwell, NAV CANADA, Chair Global Benchmarking Workgroup (GBWG) Helios - CANSO Performance Benchmarking Project Team
Contributors AEROTHAI - Siree Vatanavigkit, Kunthinee Karunratanakul Airways New Zealand - Nigel Fitzhardinge ATNS - Josia Manyakoana, Sibusiso Nkabinde, Mulomoni Nesengani CAAS - Carol Teo, Ho Man Lui CANSO - Eugene Hoeven DANS - Richard Smith FAA-ATO - Dina Dolan, Aleksandra Damsz, Kristin Stadum GACA - Yousef Bagis HungaroControl - Diana Galgoczi Isavia - Sigurleifur Kristjansson JANS - Masaaki Shoji LGS - Liva Krigere, Anda Sivina LPS SR - Bronislava Kubickova NAV Portugal - Nuno Simoes, Ana Pinto, Catia Santos SE Oro Navigacija - Mindaugas Gustys Sakaeronavigatsia - Tamuna Rekhviashvili
Disclaimer This report has been compiled using data provided by the participating ANSPs. In order to facilitate comparability, data for each ANSP has been transformed to be consistent with standard definitions. The resulting data and comparisons have been produced solely for the use by ANSPs, and other interested parties, to assess and appraise performance in air navigation services provision. It is not intended that the data are used for any wider purpose, nor do the data provide a definitive assessment of any number, cost, time period or other metric relating to any ANSP’s process. December 2015
Contents
Published December 2015
3
THE ANSP VIEW Introduction to the ANSP View page 4 List of Key Performance Indicators page 5 Participants page 6 Methodology page 7 Cost Efficiency and Productivity page 9 Continental Cost Efficiency and Productivity: 2014 page 10 Oceanic Cost Efficiency and Productivity: 2014 page 18 Joint Continental and Oceanic Cost Efficiency: 2014 page 22 Price and Revenues page 25 References page 29 Acronyms and abbreviations page 30
ANNEXES Annex 1: Data Definitions page 31 Annex 2: Contextual Data page 35 Annex 3: KPI Data page 64 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 – List of participating ANSPs
Figure 2 – Cost per IFR Flight Hour (USD)
page 6
Figure 3 – ATCOs in OPS employment cost per ATCOS in OPS hour
page 10
page 11
Figure 4 – ATCOs in OPS employment cost per ATCOs in OPS hour, PPP adjusted
page 12
Figure 5 – ATCOs in OPS hour productivity
page 13
page 14
Figure 6 – Cost excluding ATCOs in OPS employment costs per IFR flight hour (USD) Figure 7 – Unit ATCO in OPS employment cost (USD)
Figure 8 – Annual Working hours per ATCO in OPS Figure 9 – IFR hours per ATCOs in OPS
page 15
Figure 10 – Cost per IFR flight hour (USD) Figure 12 – ATCOs in OPS hour productivity
page 17
Figure 11 – ATCOs in OPS employment cost per ATCOs in OPS hour (USD)
page 16 page 18
page 19
page 20
Figure 13 – Cost excluding ATCOs in OPS employment costs per IFR flight hour (USD)
page 21
Figure 14 – Cost per IFR Flight Hour (USD)
page 22
Figure 15 – Cost of capital and depreciation as a percentage of total costs (USD)
page 23
Figure 16 – Employment cost of ATCOs in OPS as a percentage of total costs (USD)
page 24
page 26
Figure 17 – ANS revenues per IFR flight hour (USD)
Figure 18 – ANS revenues per IFR flight hour (USD)
Figure 19 – Example consolidated price for 1000km Flight for A320 (USD)
© CANSO 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, or transmitted in any form, without the prior permission of CANSO. www.canso.org
page 27
page 28
4
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
Introduction to The ANSP View This report is the third part of the CANSO Global Air Navigation Services Performance Report 2015. The report contains the identified presentation of air navigation service provider (ANSP) performance indicators for 2014 and for the trend over 2010-2014. ANSPs also provided contextual comment, if applicable, including any exceptional events during the year or items that may impact the comparability of data. Additional comments on important events are provided with the contextual data, that also provide insights on the results of the participating ANSPs. For the key messages and an anonymised presentation of industry trends, please see the Executive Summary and Industry View reports.
Key Performance Indicators On the next page are 2014 and trend data for both continental and oceanic activities in line with the CANSO Performance Framework levels 1-3. Air navigation services (ANS) revenues and an example price indicator are also included.
5
List of Key Performance Indicators
KPI
Numerator
Denominator
Cost Efficiency and Productivity Performance Indicators Cost per IFR flight hour
1
ATCOs in OPS Employment cost 2A per ATCOs in OPS hour 2B 2C
3A 3B 3C
ATCOs in OPS hour productivity Cost excluding ATCOs in OPS employment costs per IFR flight hour Unit ATCO in OPS employment cost Annual Working hours per ATCO in OPS IFR hours per ATCOs in OPS
Figure References Continental 2014/Trend
Oceanic 20141
Figure 2
Figure 10
Total Cost
IFR Flight Hours
Employment costs for ATCOs in OPS
ATCOs in OPS Figure 3,4 Hours
Figure 11
IFR flight hours
ATCOs in OPS Figure 5 hours
Figure 12
IFR flight hours
Figure 13
Costs excluding ATCOs in OPS employment costs Employment cost for ATCOs in OPS
Figure 6
ATCOs in OPS Figure 7
ATCOs in OPS hours
ATCOs in OPS
Figure 8
IFR flight hours
ATCOs in OPS Figure 9
Joint Continental and Oceanic Cost efficiency Performance Continental and Oceanic Indicators 2014/Trend Cost per IFR flight IFR Flight Total Cost Figure 14 hour Hours Cost of capital and Cost of depreciation as a capital and Total Cost Figure 15 percentage of costs depreciation Employment cost of Employment ATCOs in OPS as a cost for ATCOs Total Cost Figure 16 percentage of total in OPS costs
Revenues and Price Indicators P1 P2
1
ANS revenues per IFR flight hour Example consolidated price for 1000km Flight for A320
ANS revenues
IFR flight hours
N/A
N/A
Continental 2014/Trend
Oceanic 2014/Trend
Figure 17
Figure 18
2014 - Figure 19
At this time there are not enough ANSPs with sufficient years of data in oceanic operations for any trend charts in this area. Graphics will be produced when there are sufficient data.
6
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
Participants The following ANSPs opted into this report:
ANSP
FAA-ATO NAV CANADA JANS AAI SENEAM DHMI AEROTHAI LFV CAAS NAV Portugal ROMATSA ATNS UkSATSE ANS Czech Republic HungaroControl Airways New Zealand SMATSA COCESNA Finavia LGS EANS SE Oro Navigacija SAKAERONAVIGATSIA Slovenia Control ALBCONTROL Isavia CAA UGANDA DANS
Total IFR Flight Hours 2014 (Continental) 22,896,045 2,808,978 2,067,987 2,049,846 1,373,907 1,195,497 558,650 423,388 408,604 344,536 330,193 261,846 251,592 228,991 215,515 213,679 208,499 176,615 112,013 75,102 65,420 54,177 50,102 49,500 42,113 9,580 N/A N/A
Total IFR Flight Hours 2014 (Oceanic) 1,792,804 561,126 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 226,349 N/A 10,384 N/A N/A N/A 119,259 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 222,455 N/A N/A
Figure 1 - List of participating ANSPs
Traffic Growth
0.4% 1.2% 6.5% 3.3% 5.8% 15.7% N/A 0.9% -0.7% 6.5% 8.8% -2.1% -34.8% 0.1% 12.6% 2.7% 4.3% N/A -2.4% 7.2% 4.3% 3.1% 0.9% 7.3% -0.2% -1.8% N/A N/A
7
Methodology Data collection: CANSO Members provided data for this analysis. The format of the data submission remains the same as in previous years with the addition of a general information sheet. Data on capital expenditures and net book value (NBV) of fixed assets have also been added. While asset and investment data have limited use in a one-year context, CANSO is looking to further develop related indicators after several years’ worth of data have been collected. ANSPs are able to revise data submitted in previous years. The data submission workbook includes validation calculations that ANSPs are encouraged to consult in the data collection phase. Data processing: data have been processed by the Helios CANSO Support Team. Data were subject to a one-step validation check for significant changes, potential errors or omissions. Data are subject to continued revision by participating Members. Data presentation: ANSPs are presented in the graphs in order of decreasing IFR flight hour volume, be it continental, oceanic or combined. This makes it possible to perceive relationships based on ANSP size, as expressed in IFR hours. This also places similar sized ANSPs in proximity to allow for easier comparison. Separation of continental and oceanic data: information is provided both for continental and oceanic air navigation services, where applicable. Each of these environments has different challenges associated with providing ANS. For example, it is more straightforward to provide ground infrastructure for communications and surveillance services in continental airspace than it is over vast oceans. However, in some areas there are similarities between oceanic and
continental ANS environments. Regions of land with relatively low traffic density and minimal ground-based surveillance and communications infrastructure operate under procedural air traffic control, which is similar to oceanic operations. Performance indicators are first presented for continental and oceanic services separately due to the different nature of providing oceanic compared to continental ANS. Only a few indicators are used each year, selected based on the potential utility of the KPI to the participating ANSPs. Growth rates: data are presented from 2014 and then for the one and five year trends. The five-year trend2 is calculated as the compound annual growth rate (CAGR)3. The use of a CAGR shows clearly the overall trend between 2010 and 2014. However, it extracts from the fluctuations that may have taken place over the intervening years, which are also important in understanding performance trends. The entire dataset is available to all participating ANSPs to enable closer analysis and evaluation of performance trends. The trend analysis is presented above the 2014 key performance indicator (KPI) data, presenting all information on the given indicator in the one figure. Exchange rate conversion: ANSPs submit data in their chosen currency. For KPI comparison, data are presented in USD. 2014 KPI data are converted at the Oanda 2014 exchange rate (average rate during the year). The trend data are converted at the 2010 exchange rate in line with previous years’ methodology.
2
The five-year trend uses 5 years of data and 4 years in growth terms.
3
The compound annual growth rate is calculated by taking the nth root of the total percentage growth rate, where n is the number of years in the period being considered.
8
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
PPP correction: salaries and the cost of living vary extensively around the world. One way to correct for this is by using purchasing power parity (PPP). Employment costs for ATCOs in OPS are corrected using the International Monetary Fund (IMF) PPP conversion rates. For countries that submit data in non-national currencies, their submission is converted to the national currency before the PPP conversion4. There are, of course, limitations to this approach, such as where the cost of living varies widely within a country and may be higher or lower in the region where ANS offices are located.  
4
The IMP PPP rates can be used only where data are in national currency.
9
Cost Efficiency and Productivity This section presents the cost efficiency and productivity indicators for continental and oceanic services in line with the CANSO Performance Framework. This section also includes a number of joint continental and oceanic KPIs. Cost efficiency provides an indication of the balance between operational effectiveness (ATCO productivity) and the cost of providing the service. For example, an operationally effective ANSP with relatively high costs can be as cost effective as a less operationally effective ANSP with lower costs, and vice-versa. The simplest indicator of cost efficiency is the cost of providing ANS services per IFR flight hour. However, there are many factors that also influence this indicator and a lower cost per flight hour is not necessarily indicative of improved overall performance. Much of the observed cost difference is due to economic differences which the ANSP may not be able control. This includes labour contracts, both salary scales and working conditions (such as hours), as well as governmental regulations on pension management and mandatory financial controls. In addition, ANSPs also have different costs per flight hour due to differences in traffic complexity. As noted in the introductory discussion on ANS performance in the Executive Summary report, the comparison of cost indicators should be considered in the context of external factors and other performance areas. The absolute cost indicator also does not account for the quality of service provided by the ANSP: there are costs associated with providing a safer and more punctual service. This report provides only part of the overall picture of the air navigation service. Costs are broken down to consider the employment cost of ATCOs in OPS per ATCOs in OPS hour and all other costs. The majority of staff cost is the cost of ATCOs in OPS, as the central safety-critical and highly-skilled staff members.
The key indicator of ANS productivity is IFR flight hours per ATCOs in OPS hour. This KPI for productivity can provide useful insights into ANS performance. However, there are also occasions when factors beyond the control of the ANSP can cause low levels of productivity. ATCOs in OPS productivity is driven by the complexity of the airspace served and on an ANSP’s ability to utilise its ATCOs in OPS resources. Flexible rostering and the adaptation of the airspace configuration to open and close sectors according to evolving traffic patterns are both key elements of this resource utilisation. Furthermore, advances in technology are now focusing more than ever on reducing the workload of the ATCOs in OPS to enable them to control more aircraft in a given period in a given volume of airspace. The flexibility of adapting sector opening hours to traffic patterns is also crucial. This requires some flexibility within rostering and a good understanding of the expected operations to ensure the right level of capacity is provided at the right time. Low productivity can result from spare capacity being provided and the low utilisation of available resources. This can be a particular problem for ANSPs controlling less dense and less complex airspace. A further contributing factor is a high level of seasonal variability, where an ANSP may find it difficult to cope with considerable differences in demand between, for example, summer and winter. Complexity of airspace is a key driver of ATCOs in OPS productivity. Lower airspace, with lots of climbing, descending and crossing traffic represents higher ATCOs in OPS workload than upper airspace where aircraft are flying at more consistent altitudes and on non-crossing routes. Therefore, an ANSP operating a high proportion of sectors in lower airspace or with numerous busy airports with complex approach sectors is likely to have lower ATCOs in OPS productivity than an ANSP focussing more on overflights at higher altitude.
10
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
Continental Cost Efficiency and Productivity: 2014 2014
Continental
Cost efficiency Indicator 1: Cost per IFR flight hour (USD)
Formula: Total Cost/IFR flight hours
Figure 2 - Cost per IFR Flight Hour (USD)
The 2014 average cost per IFR flight hour is USD 498.
11
2014
Continental
Cost efficiency Indicator 2A: ATCOs in OPS employment cost per ATCOs in OPS hour (USD)
Formula: Employment costs for ATCOs in OPS / ATCOs in OPS Hours
Figure 3 - ATCOs in OPS employment cost per ATCOs in OPS hour (USD) The 2014 average ATCOs in OPS employment cost per ATCOs in OPS hour is USD 78.
12
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
Figure 4: ATCOs in OPS employment cost per ATCOs in OPS hour, PPP adjusted
ANSPs such as AAI may appear to have lower salaries for ATCOs in OPS but the inclusion of PPP reveals that the apparent disparity is not as large.
13
2014
Continental
Cost efficiency Indicator 2B: ATCOs in OPS hour productivity
Formula: IFR flight hours / ATCOs in OPS hours
Figure 5 - ATCOs in OPS hour productivity The 2014 average ATCOs in OPS productivity is 0.61 IFR flight hours per ATCO in OPS hours.
14
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
2014
Continental
Cost efficiency Indicator 2C: Cost excluding ATCOs in OPS employment costs per IFR flight hour (USD)
Formula: Costs excluding ATCOs in OPS employment costs / IFR flight hours
Figure 6 - Cost excluding ATCOs in OPS employment costs per IFR flight hour (USD)
The 2014 average cost excluding ATCOs in operations employment cost per IFR flight hour is USD 363.
15
2014
Continental
Cost efficiency Indicator 3A: Unit ATCO in OPS employment cost (USD)
Formula: Employment cost for ATCOs in OPS / ATCOs in OPS
Figure 7 - Unit ATCO in OPS employment cost (USD) The 2014 average unit ATCO in OPS employment cost is USD 121,446.
16
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
2014
Continental
Cost efficiency Indicator 3B: Annual Working hours per ATCO in OPS
Formula: ATCOs in OPS hours / ATCOs in OPS
Figure 8 - Annual Working hours per ATCO in OPS The 2014 average annual working hours per ATCO in OPS is 1,607 hours. AEROTHAI note that the continued high growth in traffic for AEROTHAI (13.7% in IFR flight hours and 22.4% in airport movements) contributes to high number of working hours per ATCO in OPS. While regulations to roster staff to accommodate peak traffic operations and sparse traffic in provincial airports still apply, initiatives to increase productivity and efficiency of staff management for air traffic control service at provincial airports are being put in place.
17
Continental
2014 Cost efficiency Indicator 3C: IFR hours per ATCOs in OPS
Formula: IFR flight hours / ATCOs in OPS
Figure 9 - IFR hours per ATCOs in OPS The 2014 average IFR hours per ATCOs in OPS is 972 IFR flight hours per ATCO in OPS.
18
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
Oceanic Cost Efficiency and Productivity: 2014 Oceanic
2014 Cost efficiency
Formula: Total Cost /IFR flight hours
Indicator 1: Cost per IFR flight hour (USD)
Figure 10 - Cost per IFR flight hour (USD)
The 2014 average cost per IFR flight hour is USD 113. For comparison this figure, for continental flights, is USD 498.
19
2014
Oceanic
Cost efficiency Indicator 2A: ATCOs in OPS employment cost per ATCOs in OPS hour (USD)
Formula: Employment costs for ATCOs in OPS / ATCOs in OPS Hours
Figure 11 - ATCOs in OPS employment cost per ATCOs in OPS hour (USD)
The 2014 average ATCOs in OPS employment cost per ATCOs in OPS hour is USD 113. ATNS has a markedly lower employment cost since oceanic control is provided by ATSOs (air traffic service officers) with a different licence level than air traffic controllers.
20
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
Oceanic
2014 Cost efficiency Indicator 2B: ATCOs in OPS hour productivity
Formula: IFR flight hours / ATCOs in OPS hours
Figure 12 - ATCOs in OPS hour productivity
The 2014 average ATCOs in OPS productivity is 3.7 IFR flight hours per ATCO in OPS hours. As would be expected, traffic volumes in oceanic airspaces vary considerably between flight information regions (FIR). NAV CANADA and FAA-ATO exhibit the higher volumes, while ATNS has very little oceanic traffic but must still provide basic coverage at all times.
21
2014
Oceanic
Cost efficiency Indicator 2C: Cost excluding ATCOs in OPS employment costs per IFR flight hour (USD)
Formula: Costs excluding ATCOs in OPS employment costs / IFR flight hours
Figure 13 - Cost excluding ATCOs in OPS employment costs per IFR flight hour (USD)
The 2014 average cost excluding ATCOs in operations employment cost per IFR flight hour is 82 USD.
22
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
Joint Continental and Oceanic Cost Efficiency: 2014 2014
Continental and Oceanic
Cost efficiency Indicator 1: Cost per IFR flight hour (USD)
Formula: Total Cost /IFR flight hours
Figure 14 - Cost per IFR Flight Hour (USD) The 2014 average cost per IFR flight hour is USD 445. Compare this average value to that from Figure 2 where the average value is USD 498, reflecting the influence of a small number of ANSPs that have oceanic services with lower unit costs. In the chart there are seven ANSPs with oceanic control areas: FAA-ATO, NAV CANADA, AAI5, NAV 5
Portugal, Airways New Zealand, ATNS and Isavia. NAV Portugal notes that, despite having a high level for the indicator ATCO in OPS employment cost per ATCO in OPS hour, their cost per IFR flight hour is considerably lower than the sample mean and is decreasing at a rate of approximately 7% over the four years 2011 to 2014.
AAI provides some oceanic control but does not report this separately from continental services.
23
2014
Continental and Oceanic
Cost efficiency Indicator 2: Cost of capital and depreciation as a percentage of costs
Formula: Cost of capital and depreciation / Total Cost
Figure 15 - Cost of capital and depreciation as a percentage of total costs (USD)
The 2014 average cost of capital and depreciation as a percentage of costs is 22%.
24
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
2014
Continental and Oceanic
Cost efficiency Indicator 3: Employment cost of ATCOs in OPS as a percentage of total costs
Formula: Employment cost for ATCOs in OPS / Total Cost
Figure 16 - Employment cost of ATCOs in OPS as a percentage of total costs (USD)
The 2014 average employment cost of ATCOs in OPS as a percentage of total costs is 27%.
25
Price and Revenues The two key performance indicators analysed for this key performance area are: —— ANS revenue per IFR flight hour. —— The example consolidated price per 1000 km for an Airbus A320. The charging mechanism for ANSPs is generally designed to generate sufficient revenue over a given period of time, usually a year, to cover the forecast costs. This is known as full cost recovery. Charging mechanisms generally follow ICAO’s Policies on Charges for Airports and Air Navigation Services, Doc 9082, which outlines the principle of ‘user pays’. ANSPs generally allocate costs such that a user only pays for the services they consume. The costs for the year are generally forecasted based on the actual costs of the previous complete financial year and updated according to the latest information available. However, the number of flights and service units over which that cost will be recovered is not known and is based on traffic forecasts. Differences between actual and forecast traffic lead to the ANSP generating more revenue (over-recovery) or less revenue (under-recovery) than planned. Not all ANSPs are subject to the same formulae for cost recovery either in terms of full cost recovery or whether using previous or future costs and revenues in the process. NAV CANADA, for example, uses full cost recovery based on a future year. The process uses a forecast of costs and revenues, whereby both are adjusted, as necessary, to achieve the required balance. Many ANSPs are subject to economic regulation related to ANS charging. Such regulations place restrictions on the charges passed on to airspace users, by either capping the revenue that an ANSP may generate or the charge that an ANSP may levy on a flight. Economic regulation can also involve risk sharing, where the ANSP and airspace users
share the risks associated with traffic fluctuations. For example, an ANSP over-recovering its costs would be expected to share this revenue, or a percentage of it, with the users in the following year, whereas an ANSP would only be able to pass on a proportion of an under-recovery of costs to the users. Upper and lower limits are usually placed on risk sharing to limit the exposure of ANSPs to the risks of drastically lower traffic than forecast.
26
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
Revenues and Price Indicators: 2014 2014
Continental
Cost efficiency Indicator P1: ANS revenues per IFR flight hour (USD)
Formula: ANS revenues / IFR flight hours
Figure 17 - ANS revenues per IFR flight hour (USD) The 2014 average ANS revenue per IFR flight hour is USD 587. While there has been a 3% increase in the revenue per IFR hour for NAV CANADA, this is not due to a change in rates. Detailed analysis of the data has revealed this increase is due to larger aircraft, which
would increase the average revenue for a flight. A second factor is an increase in average speed which translates to a lower number of IFR hours for the same distance charged. NAV Portugal’s growth in revenue is directly related to changes in the charging regulations for EU ANSPs, applicable to route segment from 2012.
27
Oceanic
2014 Cost efficiency Indicator P1: ANS revenues per IFR flight hour (USD)
Formula: ANS revenues / IFR flight hours
Figure 18 - ANS revenues per IFR flight hour (USD) The 2014 average ANS revenue per IFR flight hour is USD 161. For comparison this figure, for continental flights, is USD 587.
28
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
Continental and Oceanic
2014 Cost efficiency Indicator P2: Example consolidated price for 1000km Flight for A320 (USD)
Figure 19 - Example consolidated price for 1000km Flight for A320 (USD) The 2014 average example consolidated price for 1,000km flight for A320 is USD 762. However, this statistic is not necessarily a useful tool for comparisons. Several participating ANSPs have stated that it is rare or even impossible for there to be 1000km flights in their airspace. As a result, they have had to extrapolate or provide the figure
based on limited data and so their results are not necessarily an accurate portrayal of their price. On the other hand, some ANSPs have average flight distances greater than 1,000 km and their results are also, necessarily, skewed. Different maximum take off weights (MTOW) may also have been used further impacting the comparability of this data and we are therefore looking at standardising these figures.
29
References Definitions: EUROCONTROL Specification for Economic Information Disclosure V2.6 EUROCONTROL Specification for Economic Information Disclosure V3.0 Oanda exchange rate data: www.oanda.com/currency/historical-rates/ IMF World Economic Outlook database: www.aci.aero/Data-Centre/Annual-Traffic-Data MTOW of A320: www.airbus.com/aircraftfamilies/passengeraircraft/a320family/a320/specifications/
30
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
Acronyms and abbreviations
A320 ACC AG ANS ANSP APP ASG ATC ATCO ATSO BN CAA CAGR CANSO FTE GBWG IATA IFR IMF KPI M MTOW NBV OPS PPP Q1, Q2 TWR VAT VFR USD
Airbus A320 aircraft Area control centre Annual growth Air navigation services Air navigation service provider Approach control Aeronautical Standards Group Air traffic control Air traffic control officer Air traffic service officer Billion Civil Aviation Authority Compound annual growth rate Civil Air Navigation Services Organisation Full time equivalent Global Benchmarking Workgroup International Air Transport Association Instrument flight rules International Monetary Fund Key performance indicator Million Maximum take-off weight Net book value Operations Purchasing power parity First quartile, second quartile Tower control Value Added Tax Visual flight rules United States Dollar
31
Annex 1: Data Definitions Activity
Data Element
Definition
Total IFR flight hours
Total number of controlled IFR flight hours in continental and oceanic airspace.
IFR flight hours (continental)
The sum of IFR flight hours (non-oceanic) controlled by an ANSP's en-route centres (ACC) and approach control centres (APP). For any given flight, the flight hours controlled are derived from the difference between the entry time and the exit time (as derived from the last flight plan received) in the controlled airspace. Where measurement entry time and exit time differ from wheels-up and wheels-down, the ANSP may apply a factor of one minute per continental arrival and departure (revised from two minutes to one minute in May 2007 based on clarification from EUROCONTROL and Aeronautical Standards Group (ASG)).
IFR flight hours (oceanic)
The sum of oceanic IFR flight hours controlled by an ANSP's en-route centres (ACC). For any given flight, the flight hours controlled are derived from the difference between the entry time and the exit time (as derived from the last flight plan received) in the oceanic controlled airspace.
IFR airport movements controlled by ANSP (continental)
The number of movements, arrivals and departures at all controlled facilities for the ANSP. This number will be used to add one minute to the IFR hours for ANSPs that do not record IFR hours from take-off to touch-down.
32
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
Cost (Local Currency)
Data Element
Definition
Total costs
The sum of operating costs, cost of capital and depreciation/amortisation.
Operating costs
Operating costs include: direct and indirect employment costs; non-staff operating expenses; and other costs incurred through the purchase of goods and services directly used to provide ANS services. This should include outsourced services such as communications, IT and external staff on short-term assignments. Other items that are usually included in operating costs include materials, energy, rent, and facilities and maintenance. The cost of providing meteorological services is excluded.
The cost of capital falls into two categories. The first is the interest paid to the providers of debt capital. The second is the appropriate cost of capital applied to equity capital.
Cost of capital
Depreciation/amortisation
1. For ANSPs with both categories the cost of capital is the interest expense on debt capital plus the cost of capital on equity built into the ANSP charges. 2. For ANSPs with only debt capital, the cost of capital is the interest expense. 3. For ANSPs with only debt capital, where the interest expense is borne by the government and not reflected in the accounts of the ANSP, the cost of capital can be imputed by applying the interest rate on overall government borrowing to the ANSP capital.
Depreciation and capital lease amortisation expenses related to the total fixed assets in operation associated with providing ANS services. Depreciation is the decrease of an asset in value due to wear and tear through use, action of the elements, inadequacy or obsolescence, normally over a predetermined period (depreciation period/book life of the asset.) Amortisation is the gradual extinguishment of the cost of an asset by periodic (annual) charges to expenses, usually applicable to intangible asset (e.g. development costs). It excludes depreciation/ amortisation costs associated with meteorological services.
33
Staffing and Hours
Data Element
Definition
Total ATCOs in operations
The number of FTE ATCOs participating in an activity that is either directly related to the control of traffic or is a necessary requirement for ATCOs to be able to control traffic. Such activities include staffing a position, refresher training and supervising on-the-job trainee controllers, but do not include participating in special projects, teaching at a training academy, or providing instruction in a simulator. This includes first-line supervisors but does not include onthe-job training.
Total employment cost for ATCOs in operations
Total employment costs including gross wages and salaries, payments for overtime and other bonuses, employer contribution to social security scheme and taxes, pension contributions and other benefits for ATCOs in Operations. This should exclude: mission related expenditures, including travel expenditures and training fees, as these should be considered operating costs.
Average annual working hours for ATCOs in operations
The number of hours ATCOs in operations spend on duty in operations, including breaks and overtime. This figure could be available from a time-recording system (using for example first clock-in and last clock-out times); it could be computed from the roster plan; or it could be calculated by adding the average overtime worked in operations to the contractual working hours and subtracting the average time an ATCO is not on duty in operations.
ATCO in operations hours
6
6
Average annual working hours for ATCOs in operations multiplied by the number of ATCOs in operations (continental).
Participating Members may also submit this figure and the average annual working hours per ATCO in OPS will be calculated by dividing total hours by the number of ATCOs in OPS.
34
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
Price and Income
Data Element
Definition
Total ANS revenue (continental)
ANS revenue (continental) is ANS revenue (before adjustments from previous years) from the provision of enroute and terminal ANS services. Revenue is exclusive of oceanic ANS services, and non-ANS revenue sources.
Total ANS revenue (oceanic)
ANS revenue (oceanic) is ANS revenue (before adjustments from previous years) from the provision of oceanic ANS services. Revenue is exclusive of continental ANS services, and non-ANS revenue sources.
Example consolidated price per 1000 km flight for A320
The sum of en-route, approach, and terminal navigation charges for a theoretical continental flight of 1000 km (i.e. the distance between two airports is 1000 km). An ANSP with location-specific pricing will apply pricing related to highest IFR traffic (high demand) city-pair. ANSPs with a national pricing regime will apply these charges to the theoretical continental flight. Amount excludes taxes, such as value added tax (VAT).
Assets and Capital Expenditure
Data Element
Definition
Capex in the year
Capex in the year is capital expenditure in the year, including capitalised labour, for assets relating to the provision of ANS services. It is the sum of capital expenditures for land and buildings, systems and equipment and intangible assets
NBV of fixed assets
NBV of fixed assets is the net book value at the end of year of assets related to the provision of ANS services. It corresponds to the gross book value of assets minus the cumulative depreciation at the end of year.
35 Annex 2: Contextual Data
Data Element IFR hours per sq. km
Definitions This is the result from dividing the number of IFR hours for the current year of data by surface area (sq. km).
The size (surface area) of the airspace for which ANSPs are responsible. This should include the area where ANS have been delegated to the ANSP by Sq. km – oceanic another provider, and exclude the area in which ANS have been delegated to and continental another ANSP. The sq. km here is consistent with ACC coverage with respect to total area. % surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
Proportion of airspace under surveillance coverage (radar and other technologies).
Number of FIRs
Flight Information Region is an airspace of defined dimensions within which flight information service and alerting service are provided.
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
The total flight hours controlled by an ANSP in a year is the sum of all the flight hours during the year of the flights controlled by a given ATC operational unit (ACC, APP or TWR). For any given flight, the number of flight hours is the difference between the entry time and the exit time in the controlled airspace (of the relevant operational unit) of the flight trajectory. This is divided by the movements in a year. The number of movements in a year is defined as the number of IFR flights that have been controlled over the year by the ANSP; wherein a flight may cross several ACCs. The average flight hours per flight is the average flight hours for all activities (flights) and provides an indication of the average time a flight is in the ANSP controlled airspace.
IFR Tower Movements (take-offs and landings only)
Number of IFR tower movements; one movement each for arrivals and departures. Touch and go or go around is counted as one movement. This includes helicopters (if they are IFR).
Total VFR Tower Movements
VFR (visual flight rules) counts at towers. VFR counts should be one for each take-off, for each landing and for each touch and go. Overflights should be excluded unless this is not possible in which case a comment should be provided.
ACCs
Number of ACCs facilities i.e. ATC units providing ATC services to en-route traffic in control areas under its jurisdiction. Part of an ACC may also provide approach services.
Approach/ACCs
Number of co-located ACC and approach facilities. An approach control unit is an ATC unit providing ATC services to arriving, departing and over-flying flights within the airspace in the vicinity of an airport.
36
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
Approach Facilities
Number of stand-alone approach facilities.
Combined Approach/Tower
Number of co-located approach and tower facilities. A tower control unit is an ATC unit at an airport responsible for the provision of ATC services in respect of flights that are landing and taking off and other traffic that is on the active runway(s).
Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
Number of co-located approach, tower and ACC facilities. The definition of each unit is as above.
Standalone Towers
Number of stand-alone towers.
Total ATCOs in Ops
This value is the sum of the ATCO in ACCs, co-located ACCs and approach facilities, stand-alone approach facilities, co-located approach and tower facilities and stand-alone tower facilities. ATCO in OPS is an employee participating in an activity that is either directly related to the control of traffic or is a necessary requirement for an ATCO to be able to control traffic. Such activities include staffing a position, refresher training and supervising on-the-job trainee controllers, but do not include participating in special projects, teaching at a training academy, or providing instruction in a simulator.
ATCOs in ACCs
Number of ATCOs deployed to ACCs
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
Number of ATCOs deployed in co-located ACC and Approach facilities
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs - Approximate en-route ATCOs
The approximate number of co-located ATCOs in ACC and Approach facilities that provide en-route services
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs - Approximate APP ATCOs
The approximate number of co-located ATCOs in ACC and approach facilities that provide approach services
ATCOs in Approach
Number of ATCOs deployed to stand-alone approach facilities
ATCOs in Combined Approach/Tower
Number of ATCOs deployed to co-located approach and tower facilities
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
Number of ATCOs deployed to co-located approach/tower/ACC facilities
ATCOs in Towers Number of ATCOs deployed to stand-alone towers
37
ANSP: AEROTHAI Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? High traffic growth continues to be the major factor that impacted performance, especially the fast growth in low cost carrier operations at Dong Muang airport. Legal status: A government entity empowered to manage and use the revenues it generates through charges for the services it provides. Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
0.72
N/A
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
777,760
0
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
99.64
0
4
Number of FIRs
1
0
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
0.91
0
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
878,812
N/A
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
189,880
Each individual touch and go/ go around/ formation flight cannot be extracted if filed within one flight plan Each individual touch and go/ go around/ formation flight cannot be extracted if filed within one flight plan
Facilities 8
ACCs
1
0
9
Approach/ACCs
0
0
10
Approach Facilities
1
0
6
0
14
0
0
11
Combined Approach/Tower
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
13
Standalone Towers
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
751
15
ATCOs in ACCs
178
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
0
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
0
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
0
ATCOs in Approach
40
17 18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
442
91
The number of co-located approach/ tower and stand-alone towers and their respective numbers of ATCOs do not reflect actual facilities. These numbers are split by the currently available data, of which some physical stand-alone towers maybe represented.
38
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
ANSP: Airports Authority of India Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? N/A Legal status: A government entity empowered to manage and use the revenues it generates through charges for the services it provides. Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
0.21
0
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
3,570,000
6,400,000
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
100
100
4
Number of FIRs
1
3*
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
1.02
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
1,747,082
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
9.602 million Sq. km
* Partially continental and oceanic
N/A
137,238
Facilities 8
ACCs
13
9
Approach/ACCs
0
10
Approach Facilities
48
11
Combined Approach/Tower
48
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
13
Standalone Towers
0
These 13 ACCs have APP and TWR units also.
7
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
1,700
15
ATCOs in ACCs
138
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
1102
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
772
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
330
17
ATCOs in Approach
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
216
244
0 ml,np,bn
39
ANSP: Airways New Zealand Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? This reported year was the first year of the current three-year pricing agreement with customers which incorporated funding of an increased capital works program. Legal status: A corporatised entity with special status, not governed by normal commercial law but by a specific founding law or statute (and wholly owned by the government).
Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
0.25
0.0041
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
863,100
28,790,000
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
100.00
4
Number of FIRs
1
1
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
0.87
1.83
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
518,453
N/A
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
Oceanic - 100% for FANS1A certified aircraft however approx. 40% of oceanic operations are FANS1A equipped
446,827
Facilities 8
ACCs
0
1
9
Approach/ACCs
1
0
10
Approach Facilities
0
0
11
Combined Approach/Tower
7
0
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
0
0
10
0
13
Standalone Towers Workforce
14
Total ATCOs in Ops
300
26
15
ATCOs in ACCs
0
26
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
147
0
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
43
0
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
104
0
ATCOs in Approach
17
0
0
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
43
0
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
0
0
110
0
20
ATCOs in Towers
Figure entered is for ATC controlled aerodromes. Total IFR movements = 521,929
40
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
ANSP: ALBCONTROL Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? N/A Legal status: An autonomous public sector corporation/company that is separate from the executive arm of the government (but wholly owned by the government). Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
1.17
N/A
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
36,000
N/A
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
>200%
N/A
4
Number of FIRs
1
N/A
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
0.21
N/A
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
18,056
N/A
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
It is covered by two of our radars, plus we share and gather data even from our neighbours.
1,396
Facilities 8
ACCs
1
N/A
9
Approach/ACCs
1
N/A
10
Approach Facilities
1
N/A
11
Combined Approach/Tower
0
N/A
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC 1
N/A
N/A
13
Standalone Towers
Co-located with ACC operational unit.
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
55
15
ATCOs in ACCs
38
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
17
ATCOs in Approach
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
17
38 are in ACC and 17 APP+TWR
41
ANSP: ANS Czech Republic Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? N/A Legal status: A corporatised entity with special status, not governed by normal commercial law but by a specific founding law or statute (and wholly owned by the government).
Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
2.94
0
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
77,100
0
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
100
0
4
Number of FIRs
1
0
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
0.3
0
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
136,646
N/A
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
47,893
Facilities 8
ACCs
1
0
9
Approach/ACCs
nil
0
10
Approach Facilities
nil
0
11
Combined Approach/Tower
4
0
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC nil
0
13
Standalone Towers Workforce
14
Total ATCOs in Ops
192
0
15
ATCOs in ACCs
93
0
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
0
0
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
0
0
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
0
0
ATCOs in Approach
0
0
99
0
0
0
17 18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
Comments
42
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
ANSP: ATNS Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? N/A Legal status: A corporatised entity with special status, not governed by normal commercial law but by a specific founding law or statute (and wholly owned by the government).
Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
0.028
0.00082
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
9,279,080
12,720,920
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
95%
0%
4
Number of FIRs
2
1
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
0.631768
3.440439
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
323,566
N/A
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
Oceanic airspace 100% surveillance by ADS-C
240,248
Facilities 8
ACCs
0
0
The oceanic control does not have a standalone facility but is integrated in the FAJA ACC facility
9
Approach/ACCs
0
0
The oceanic control does not have a standalone facility but is integrated in the FAJA ACC facility
10
Approach Facilities
0
0
11
Combined Approach/Tower
9
0
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
2
13
Standalone Towers
One of these facilities (FAJA ACC) houses the oceanic control
10
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
15
ATCOs in ACCs
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
17
ATCOs in Approach
355
Oceanic is provided by air traffic service officers and not ATCOs
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
112
Includes 21 ATCOs in the tower/approach/ ACC Centres
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
185
Approximate en-route ATCOs = 98, APP ATCOs = 59, tower ATCOs = 28
20
ATCOs in Towers
58
43
ANSP: CAA Uganda Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? N/A Legal status: A government entity empowered to manage and use the revenues it generates through charges for the services it provides.
Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
N/A
N/A
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
0.8
N/A
4
Number of FIRs
1
N/A
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
N/A
N/A
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
N/A
N/A
Facilities 8
ACCs
9
Approach/ACCs
10
Approach Facilities
1
11
Combined Approach/Tower
1
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
13
Standalone Towers
1
3
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
0
0
15
ATCOs in ACCs
16
0
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
0
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
0
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
0
17
ATCOs in Approach
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
N/A
0
5
0
20
0
Comments
44
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
ANSP: CAAS Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? In 2014, there was a decrease in costs following the decommissioning of the older ATC system. This followed after a year of concurrently running two ATC systems in 2013 to ensure seamless transition to the new ATC system. Headcount in 2014 was also increased following a review in 2013 to ensure continued safe and efficient ATM operations. Legal status: A government entity empowered to manage and use the revenues it generates through charges for the services it provides. Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
0.49
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
840,326
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
69%
4
Number of FIRs
1
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
0.62
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
344,640
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
42,708
Facilities 8
ACCs
1
9
Approach/ACCs
0
10
Approach Facilities
1
11
Combined Approach/Tower
0
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
0
13
Standalone Towers
2
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
305
15
ATCOs in ACCs
120
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
0
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
0
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
0
17
ATCOs in Approach
80
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
0
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
0
20
ATCOs in Towers
105
ADS-C services provided covers the whole of the Singapore FIR
N/A
45
ANSP: COCESNA Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? N/A Legal status: International organization of Central American integration, non-profit and public service, with legal status and financial autonomy; providing services in the areas of air navigation, security and training. Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
0
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
2,639,054
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
55
4
Number of FIRs
1
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
1.08
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
0
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
N/A
N/A
0
Facilities 8
ACCs
1
0
9
Approach/ACCs
0
0
10
Approach Facilities
0
0
11
Combined Approach/Tower
0
0
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC 0
0
13
Standalone Towers Workforce
14
Total ATCOs in Ops
58
0
15
ATCOs in ACCs
38
0
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
0
0
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
0
0
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
0
0
ATCOs in Approach
0
0
0
0
0
0
17 18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
CENAMER ACC provides en route ATC to continental and oceanic airspace.
46
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
ANSP: DANS Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? N/A Legal status: A company established as a public-private partnership to provide the services on behalf of the government, and part-owned by the government. A private sector company that is owned and/or operated by private interests to provide the service on behalf of the government, either by statute or contract.
Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
4
Number of FIRs
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
N/A
N/A
1 Approach and towers only 480,330
N/A
12,932
Facilities 8
ACCs
9
Approach/ACCs
10
Approach Facilities
11
Combined Approach/Tower
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
13
Standalone Towers
1
2
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
15
ATCOs in ACCs
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
17
ATCOs in Approach
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
133
61
72
0
Dubai airport was restricted to 1 runway ops for 80 days during the summer of 2014 for runway refurbishment, resulting in a 26% reduction in movements for this period.
47
ANSP: DHMI Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? Turkey is the one of the States most affected by the Ukraine crises: overflights increased by 40% in 2014 compared with 2013. Legal status: A government entity empowered to manage and use the revenues it generates through charges for the services it provides. Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
1.22
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
982,000
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
100
4
Number of FIRs
2
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
58
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
1,173,454
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
N/A
N/A
87,075
Touch and go not included
Facilities 8
ACCs
2
9
Approach/ACCs
3
10
Approach Facilities
11
Combined Approach/Tower
31
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
3
13
Standalone Towers
Ankara and İstanbul ACC. İzmir ACC controlling southern part of İstanbul FIR.
10
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
15
ATCOs in ACCs
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
17
ATCOs in Approach
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
1,120
680
0
48
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
ANSP: EANS Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report?
Legal status: A corporatised entity with special status, not governed by normal commercial law but by a specific founding law or statute (and wholly owned by the government). Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
4
Number of FIRs
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
N/A
N/A
N/A
Facilities 8
ACCs
9
Approach/ACCs
10
Approach Facilities
11
Combined Approach/Tower
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
13
Standalone Towers Workforce
14
Total ATCOs in Ops
15
ATCOs in ACCs
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
17
ATCOs in Approach
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
52
0
Comments
49
ANSP: FAA-ATO Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? N/A Legal status: A government department or authority that is subject to government accounting and treasury rules, and staff are employed under civil service pay and conditions. Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
1.54
0.03
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
14,832,411
60,628,411
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
100%
4
Number of FIRs
21
5
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
1.51
1.88
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
24,957,117
N/A
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
Includes departures, arrivals, touch and go (as 1). Excludes overflights
Facilities 8
ACCs
21
9
Approach/ACCs
4
10
Approach Facilities
27
11
Combined Approach/Tower
132
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
13
Standalone Towers
Includes combined ACC/approach/tower: Honolulu, Guam, Puerto Rico, and Joshua Control Facility
131
No FAA-ATO contract towers
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
12,959
179
Number is calculated based on scheduled FTE
15
ATCOs in ACCs
5455
171
Includes full time certified professional controllers and operations supervisors
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
110
Includes full time certified professional controllers and operations supervisors
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
17
ATCOs in Approach
1814
Includes full time certified professional controllers and operations supervisors
3110
Includes full time certified professional controllers and operations supervisors
2479
Includes full time certified professional controllers and operations supervisors
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
50
ANSP: Finavia Corporation Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? Large airspace restructuring project in last quarter of 2014 caused decrease in capacity. Legal status: A corporatised entity with special status, not governed by normal commercial law but by a specific founding law or statute (and wholly owned by the government). Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
0.27
N/A
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
411,000
0
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
100.00
0.00
4
Number of FIRs
1
0
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
0.47
0.00
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
235,694
N/A
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
162,046
28 minutes
Includes general aviation airport HelsinkiMalmi and Military
Facilities 8
ACCs
1
9
Approach/ACCs
0
10
Approach Facilities
0
11
Combined Approach/Tower
7
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
13
Standalone Towers
Including military
18
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
183
15
ATCOs in ACCs
55
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
0
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
0
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
0
17
ATCOs in Approach
0
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
78
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
0
20
ATCOs in Towers
50
0
AFIS officers not included
51
ANSP: HungaroControl Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? N/A Legal status: A corporatised entity with special status, not governed by normal commercial law but by a specific founding law or statute (and wholly owned by the government). Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
2.1
N/A
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
104,000
0
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
100
4
Number of FIRs
2
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
0.30
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
86,401
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
N/A
Facilities 8
ACCs
2
9
Approach/ACCs
1
10
Approach Facilities
11
Combined Approach/Tower
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
13
Standalone Towers
1
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
173
15
ATCOs in ACCs
97
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
17
ATCOs in Approach
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
37
39
0
Hungary and KFOR sector as HungaroControl is providing air navigation services in the upper airspace over Kosovo from the 3rd April 2014.
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
52
ANSP: Isavia Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? No special factors that impacted our ANSP performance in 2014. Legal status: A corporatised entity with special status, not governed by normal commercial law but by a specific founding law or statute (and wholly owned by the government). Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
N/A
N/A
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
100
30
4
Number of FIRs
1
2
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
0.67
1.70
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
64,877
N/A
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
5.4 million
43,397
Facilities 8
ACCs
1
9
Approach/ACCs
1
See comments above
10
Approach Facilities
0
No standalone APP
11
Combined Approach/Tower
1
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
0
13
Standalone Towers
1
0
2
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
48
58
15
ATCOs in ACCs
4
58
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
13
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
4
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
18
17
ATCOs in Approach
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
5
26
58
Isavia has 1 ACC serving both oceanic and continental. In the centre is approach control unit serving two airports. Therefore it can be stated that there is one ACC with continental, oceanic and APP sectors.
53
ANSP: JANS Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? The (actual) flight hours in Fukuoka FIR have increased 7% compared to the previous year. In particular, the international flights and the over flights have grown 9% and 13%, respectively. These trends are expected to continue. Legal status: A government department or authority that is subject to government accounting and treasury rules, and staff are employed under civil service pay and conditions. Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
0.25
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
8,400,000
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
100.00
4
Number of FIRs
1
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
1.33
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
2,643,415
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
N/A
N/A
249,979
Facilities 8
ACCs
4
9
Approach/ACCs
0
10
Approach Facilities
0
11
Combined Approach/Tower
14
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
0
13
Standalone Towers
19
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
1,262
15
ATCOs in ACCs
556
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
0
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
0
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
0
17
ATCOs in Approach
0
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
551
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
0
20
ATCOs in Towers
155
0
Comments
54
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
ANSP: LGS Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? No. Legal status: A corporatised entity with special status, not governed by normal commercial law but by a specific founding law or statute (and wholly owned by the government). Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
0.79
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
95,600
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
100
4
Number of FIRs
1
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
0.3
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
66,137
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
N/A
N/A
270
Facilities 8
ACCs
0
9
Approach/ACCs
1
10
Approach Facilities
0
11
Combined Approach/Tower
0
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
13
Standalone Towers
1
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
93
15
ATCOs in ACCs
34
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
66
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
63
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
32
17
ATCOs in Approach
0
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
0
27
0
Comments
55
ANSP: LPS Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? Significant traffic increase after the crash of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 in July 2014, as flight paths had been altered to divert from eastern Ukraine. Legal status: A corporatised entity with special status, not governed by normal commercial law but by a specific founding law or statute (and wholly owned by the government). Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
1.91
N/A
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
48,700
0
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
4
Number of FIRs
1
0
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
0.22
0
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
26,590
N/A
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
no data available
15,262
Facilities 8
ACCs
1
0
9
Approach/ACCs
0
0
10
Approach Facilities
0
0
11
Combined Approach/Tower
2
0
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
0
0
3
0
13
Standalone Towers Workforce
14
Total ATCOs in Ops
82
0
15
ATCOs in ACCs
41
0
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
0
0
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
0
0
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
0
0
ATCOs in Approach
17
0
0
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
41
0
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
0
0
0
0
20
ATCOs in Towers
including ATCOs in stand-alone towers
see line No. 18
56
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
55
ANSP: NAV CANADA Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? N/A Legal status: A private sector company that is owned and/or operated by private interests to provide the service on behalf of the government, either by statute or contract. Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
0.18
0.18
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
15,601,538
3,070,462
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
100
4
Number of FIRs
7
1
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
2,185,475
N/A
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
960,374
Data covers tower traffic only to remain in context with the benchmarking report. Flight service station traffic is NOT included. Local movements, (touch and goes) are NOT included. Data covers tower traffic only to remain in context with the benchmarking report. Flight service station traffic is NOT included. Local movements, (touch and goes) are NOT included.
Facilities 8
ACCs
7
9
Approach/ACCs
0
10
Approach Facilities
0
11
Combined Approach/Tower
0
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
13
Standalone Towers
The Gander ACC is considered as a single centre that controls both the Gander Domestic FIR and the Gander Oceanic FIR.
41
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
1,524
60
15
ATCOs in ACCs
1006
60
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
17
ATCOs in Approach
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
518
57
ANSP: NAV Portugal Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? The most important factors were: unexpected and significant increase in traffic demand; the general economic situation in Portugal; the national Economic Adjustment Program. Following the North Africa situation, Lisbon ACC has experienced unexpected and significant traffic demand growth along last years, mostly in 2013 and 2014, with traffic patterns to/from the Canary Islands developing in a way that is affecting Lisbon FIR. Legal status: A corporatised entity with special status, not governed by normal commercial law but by a specific founding law or statute (and wholly owned by the government). Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
0.51
0.044
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
671,000
5,180,000
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
0.92
0.13
4
Number of FIRs
1
1
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
42
109
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
311,234
N/A
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
52,041
Facilities 8
ACCs
0
1
9
Approach/ACCs
1
0
10
Approach Facilities
0
0
11
Combined Approach/Tower
3
4
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
0
0
3
0
13
Standalone Towers Workforce
14
Total ATCOs in Ops
245
38
15
ATCOs in ACCs
0
38
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
119
0
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
88
0
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
31
0
17
ATCOs in Approach
0
0
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
87
0
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
0
0
39
0
20
ATCOs in Towers
Area controlled: Lisboa FIR and Santa Maria FIR
Average transit time (minutes)
58
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
ANSP: SE Oro navigacija Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? Due to the crisis in Ukraine there were traffic changes from July 2014. Also, all performance is affected by the Performance Scheme. Legal status: A corporatised entity with special status, not governed by normal commercial law but by a specific founding law or statute (and wholly owned by the government). Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
0.73
N/A
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
74,600
0
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
100
4
Number of FIRs
1
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
0.24
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
48,064
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
N/A
2,454
Facilities 8
ACCs
1
9
Approach/ACCs
0
10
Approach Facilities
0
11
Combined Approach/Tower
3
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
0
13
Standalone Towers
1
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
87
15
ATCOs in ACCs
33.7
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
0
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
17
ATCOs in Approach
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
45.46
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
0
20
ATCOs in Towers
7.9
0
Comments
59
ANSP: ROMATSA Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? N/A Legal status: A government entity empowered to manage and use the revenues it generates through charges for the services it provides. Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
1.3
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
254,000
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
100
4
Number of FIRs
1
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
0.55
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
141,793
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
N/A
N/A
46,162
Facilities 8
ACCs
1
9
Approach/ACCs
0
10
Approach Facilities
2
11
Combined Approach/Tower
0
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
13
Standalone Towers
16
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
448
15
ATCOs in ACCs
207
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
0
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
0
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
0
17
ATCOs in Approach
70
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
0
170
0
Comments
60
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
ANSP: SAKAERONAVIGATSIA Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? N/A Legal status: A corporatised entity with special status, not governed by normal commercial law but by a specific founding law or statute (and wholly owned by the government). Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
0.56
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
88,700
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
300
4
Number of FIRs
1
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
0.52
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
12,603
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
N/A
Decimal time N/A
Facilities 8
ACCs
1
9
Approach/ACCs
1
10
Approach Facilities
nil
11
Combined Approach/Tower
nil
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
13
Standalone Towers
nil
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
102
15
ATCOs in ACCs
42
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
64
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
42
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
22
17
ATCOs in Approach
22
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
80
58
0
61
ANSP: Slovenia Control Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? N/A Legal status: A company established as a public-private partnership to provide the services on behalf of the government, and part-owned by the government. Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
0
N/A
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
20,400
0
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
100
0
4
Number of FIRs
1
0
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
11.00
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
28,693
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
N/A
0
No statistics
Facilities 8
ACCs
1
0
9
Approach/ACCs
0
0
10
Approach Facilities
11
Combined Approach/Tower
2
0
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC 1
0
13
Standalone Towers Workforce
14
Total ATCOs in Ops
0
0
15
ATCOs in ACCs
64
0
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
0
0
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
0
0
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
0
0
17
ATCOs in Approach
0
0
35
0
6
0
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
ACC Ljubljana also provides RDR APP service for Ljubljana airport
62
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
ANSP: SMATSA Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? No. Legal status: Limited liability company, 100% state-owned (92% owned by Serbia and 8% owned by Montenegro). Integrated civil/military ANSP. Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
1.62
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
129,099
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
100
4
Number of FIRs
1
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
0.38
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
82,980
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
N/A Data on the size of the controlled airspace is calculated by the SMATSA AIS/ cartography department. The size excludes Kosovo airspace.
N/A
9,511
Facilities 8
ACCs
9
Approach/ACCs
10
Approach Facilities
11
Combined Approach/Tower
7
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
0
13
Standalone Towers
1
1
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
15
ATCOs in ACCs
16
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
16.1
Approximate en-route ATCOs
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
17
ATCOs in Approach
277 156 18
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
95
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
0
20
ATCOs in Towers
26
0
63
ANSP: UkSATSE Were there any factors that impacted your individual ANSP performance in your fiscal year 2014, as shown in the KPIs in this report? N/A Legal status: A government entity empowered to manage and use the revenues it generates through charges for the services it provides. Contextual Data Element
Continental
Oceanic
Comments
Operational data 1
IFR hours per sq. km
0
2
Sq. km – oceanic and continental
776,442
3
% surveillance coverage @ 30,000Ft
100
4
Number of FIRs
5
5
Average flight hours per flight (decimal hours)
6
IFR Tower Movements (takeoffs and landings only)
7
Total VFR Tower Movements
N/A
5 FIRs + 1 UIR
N/A
Facilities 8
ACCs
4
9
Approach/ACCs
0
10
Approach Facilities
0
11
Combined Approach/Tower
4
12
Combined Approach/Tower/ ACC
13
Standalone Towers
14
Workforce 14
Total ATCOs in Ops
0
0
15
ATCOs in ACCs
16 16.1
ATCOs in Approach/ACCs
555
0
Approximate en-route ATCOs
400
0
16.2
Approximate APP ATCOs
155
0
17
ATCOs in Approach 142
0
213
0
18
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower
19
ATCOs in Combined Approach/ Tower/ACC
20
ATCOs in Towers
64
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
Annex 3: KPI Data Continental 1
Trend -1
CAGR -1
2A
2A_PPP
Trend 2A
CAGR 2A
FAA ATO
465.13
1.89%
0.99%
109.50
109.50
-0.18%
0.99%
NAV CANADA
320.56
2.70%
0.56%
122.76
109.06
3.26%
1.98%
JANS
604.55
-4.76%
42.84
44.43
2.55%
AAI
122.33
5.95%
22.56
77.76
8.68%
SENEAM
144.08
8.19%
44.74
74.35
12.13%
DHMI
428.42
4.62%
70.52
132.07
5.35%
AEROTHAI
404.48
24.96
65.53
LFV
617.84
1.88%
CAA Singapore
311.59
0.50%
NAV Portugal
447.38
-9.74%
-7.68%
145.65
179.92
-13.85%
-1.01%
ROMATSA
619.59
-6.49%
1.16%
114.52
224.37
18.32%
15.23%
ATNS
347.77
5.86%
10.88%
37.74
76.61
-3.51%
2.02%
UkSATSE
350.24
45.03%
16.18%
27.23
79.73
-7.63%
12.47%
ANS Czech Republic
661.08
5.08%
1.17%
109.43
169.46
7.58%
1.03%
HungaroControl
538.98
-10.93% -0.50%
122.27
225.32
6.59%
8.14%
Airways New Zealand
462.58
6.47%
3.42%
92.23
75.41
-1.20%
2.20%
SMATSA
533.94
11.52%
5.66%
69.65
151.57
16.73%
6.70%
COCESNA
136.45
108.53
211.53
Finavia
788.06
7.03%
5.25%
117.54
96.16
25.64%
2.71%
LGS
388.35
-6.26%
-5.79%
46.14
48.96
-19.11%
7.47%
EANS
392.80
24.26%
11.21%
72.18
98.89
0.06%
10.30%
SE Oro navigacija
609.18
-2.61%
3.80%
58.85
97.33
8.12%
6.47%
SAKAERONAVIGATSIA
532.93
13.28%
8.84%
11.41
23.65
-1.96%
-5.22%
Slovenia Control
812.05
-4.90%
0.79%
107.33
132.80
4.82%
1.60%
ALBCONTROL
679.68
-1.02%
3.24%
56.24
130.27
17.72%
19.81%
Isavia
1,232.26 6.60%
85.81
73.48
3.96%
117.93
171.35
10.21%
DANS
5.48%
5.59%
-0.38%
65
Continental 2B
Trend 2B
CAGR 2B
2C
Trend - 2C
CAGR 2C
3A
FAA ATO
0.97
-0.88%
-1.24%
352.00
2.33%
0.58%
199,752.55
NAV CANADA
1.14
3.74%
3.12%
212.00
4.59%
1.48%
199,330.05
JANS
0.81
10.14%
552.00
-4.59%
AAI
0.80
2.04%
94.00
5.04%
SENEAM
1.00
-0.01%
99.00
7.14%
DHMI
0.82
7.98%
342.00
6.42%
AEROTHAI
0.26
LFV
0.55
8.76%
CAA Singapore
0.74
-6.23%
NAV Portugal
0.78
2.65%
4.26%
260.00
-4.41%
-9.35%
263,211.35
ROMATSA
0.60
11.84%
5.86%
429.00
-11.20%
-1.54%
140,172.70
ATNS
0.44
-8.43%
-9.24%
263.00
5.99%
10.39%
62,609.70
UkSATSE
0.22
-37.48%
-5.01%
226.00
43.46%
15.06%
34,363.10
ANS Czech Republic
0.76
-0.76%
-1.25%
517.00
4.27%
0.86%
171,696.75
HungaroControl
0.80
10.69%
1.57%
386.00
-13.60%
-2.70%
190,011.30
Airways New Zealand
0.52
0.29%
-1.19%
286.00
12.16%
3.50%
125,795.64
SMATSA
0.65
-0.25%
-2.95%
427.00
10.20%
4.73%
80,231.32
-1.95%
86,322.72 33,867.31 4.51%
63,569.06 91,954.50
310.00
70,572.15 0.69%
COCESNA
187,533.67
Finavia
0.40
0.22%
-3.65%
494.00
-1.60%
4.53%
180,182.47
LGS
0.58
-14.26%
1.86%
309.00
-6.42%
-7.88%
63,715.58
EANS
0.80
2.96%
5.98%
303.00
35.87%
13.90%
112,963.76
SE Oro navigacija
0.40
1.82%
1.46%
462.00
-5.14%
3.48%
91,833.55
SAKAERONAVIGATSIA
0.26
-8.70%
-6.88%
489.00
13.85%
9.61%
21,366.15
Slovenia Control
0.38
9.73%
3.32%
531.00
-5.02%
2.24%
153,055.23
ALBCONTROL
0.53
1.54%
1.29%
574.00
-3.64%
1.33%
81,242.07
Isavia
0.11
-2.52%
435.00
6.27%
DANS
159,079.46 171,710.44
66
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
Continental Trend 3A
CAGR - 3B 3A
FAA ATO
3.13%
1.63%
NAV CANADA
3.76%
2.25%
JANS
2.55%
2,015.00 0.00%
1,638.66 10.14%
AAI
8.76%
1,501.00 0.07%
1,205.79 2.11%
SENEAM
17.33%
DHMI
5.68%
8.19%
Trend 3B
CAGR 3B
3C
1,824.00 3.28%
0.63%
1,766.76 2.41%
-0.63%
1,624.00 0.50%
0.26%
1,843.16 4.24%
3.39%
1,421.00 4.64%
2.47%
Trend 3C
1,420.79 4.63%
1,304.00 0.31%
1,067.41 8.31%
AEROTHAI
2,828.00
743.87
LFV
1,651.00 0.30%
900.83
CAA Singapore
1,819.00 0.00%
1,339.69 -6.23%
NAV Portugal
-14.25%
-0.59%
ROMATSA
18.22%
ATNS
1.38%
UkSATSE
-1.21%
ANS Czech Republic
0.47%
9.09%
0.42%
1,406.27 2.18%
4.70%
12.24% 1,224.00 -0.08%
-2.60%
737.04
11.75%
3.11%
4.99%
2.91%
737.59
-3.79%
-6.60%
10.98% 1,262.00 6.95%
-1.32%
276.47
-33.14%
-6.26%
10.18%
1.38%
1,569.00 2.42%
0.34%
1,192.66 1.64%
-0.92%
HungaroControl
7.21%
8.12%
1,554.00 0.58%
-0.02%
1,245.75 11.33%
1.56%
Airways New Zealand
-1.20%
2.20%
1,364.00 0.00%
0.00%
712.26
0.29%
-1.19%
SMATSA
15.42%
4.02%
1,152.00 -1.12%
-2.50%
752.70
-1.37%
-5.38%
3.77%
612.09
0.81%
-0.01%
COCESNA
1,807.00 -0.50%
CAGR 3C
1,659.00 5.07%
1,728.00
Finavia
26.38%
6.59%
1,533.00 0.59%
LGS
-4.28%
5.68%
1,381.00 18.34% -1.67%
807.55
1.46%
0.16%
EANS
-2.50%
8.46%
1,565.00 -2.55%
-1.67%
1,258.08 0.33%
4.21%
SE Oro navigacija
9.37%
5.99%
1,561.00 1.17%
-0.44%
622.30
3.00%
1.00%
SAKAERONAVIGATSIA 1.96%
-1.51%
1,872.00 4.00%
3.91%
491.19
-5.05%
-3.24%
Slovenia Control
4.74%
1.31%
1,426.00 -0.07%
-0.28%
543.96
9.66%
3.03%
ALBCONTROL
15.68%
14.91% 1,445.00 -1.70%
-4.08%
765.69
-0.21%
-2.85%
Isavia
0.32%
199.58
-5.93%
DANS
10.21%
1,854.00 -3.49% -0.10%
1,456.00 0.00%
0.28%
67
Oceanic 1
2A
2A_PPP 2B
2C
FAA ATO
99.86
144.97
144.97
5.50
74.00
NAV CANADA
71.22
122.22
108.58
6.21
52.00
NAV Portugal
190.44
151.02
186.55
3.53
148.00
Isavia
139.14
147.62
126.42
3.39
96.00
Airways New Zealand
68.05
101.63
83.10
3.36
38.00
11.78
23.91
0.18
ATNS
68
Global ANS Performance Report 2015 The ANSP View
Continental and Oceanic CO1
Trend
CAGR
CO2
CO3
Trend
CAGR
FAA ATO
438.61
1.54%
0.74%
0.10
0.24
-1.02%
1.24%
NAV CANADA
279.04
2.55%
0.85%
0.10
0.33
-2.94%
-1.68%
JANS
604.55
-4.76%
0.36
0.09
-2.25%
AAI
122.33
5.95%
0.23
0.54%
SENEAM
144.08
8.19%
0.13
0.31
3.66%
DHMI
428.42
4.62%
0.27
0.20
-6.74%
AEROTHAI
404.48
0.10
0.23
LFV
617.84
1.88%
CAA Singapore
311.59
0.50%
NAV Portugal
345.51
-9.32%
-7.08%
0.11
0.38
-6.21%
2.97%
ROMATSA
619.59
-6.49%
1.16%
0.15
0.31
13.13%
7.61%
ATNS
334.51
5.67%
10.60%
0.13
0.25
0.30%
0.84%
UkSATSE
350.24
45.03%
16.18%
0.56
0.35
1.87%
1.91%
ANS Czech Republic
661.08
5.08%
1.17%
0.24
0.22
3.17%
1.14%
HungaroControl
538.98
-10.93%
-0.50%
0.15
0.28
8.12%
7.00%
Airways New Zealand
321.26
4.87%
2.27%
0.22
0.39
-6.18%
1.10%
SMATSA
533.94
11.52%
5.66%
0.27
0.20
4.93%
4.06%
Finavia
788.06
7.03%
5.25%
0.13
0.37
17.12%
1.28%
LGS
388.35
-6.26%
-5.79%
0.28
0.20
0.64%
12.00%
EANS
392.80
24.26%
11.21%
0.18
0.23
-21.79%
-6.41%
SE Oro navigacija
609.18
-2.61%
3.80%
0.19
0.24
9.03%
1.10%
SAKAERONAVIGATSIA
532.93
13.28%
8.84%
0.42
0.08
-5.21%
-6.48%
Slovenia Control
812.05
-4.90%
0.79%
0.17
0.35
0.44%
-2.44%
ALBCONTROL
679.68
-1.02%
3.24%
0.40
0.16
17.13%
14.57%
Isavia
184.27
1.41%
0.08
0.41
-0.67%
COCESNA
136.45
0.29
0.45
5.48%
2.10%
0.16
69
Revenues and Price P1_ Continental
Trend
CAGR
P1_Oceanic
P2
Trend
CAGR
NAV CANADA
380.41
2.70%
0.85%
74.24
943.98
0.00%
0.00%
JANS
600.22
-1.83%
AAI
188.72
2.37%
218.00
0.00%
SENEAM
126.15
5.44%
358.00
4.29%
4.28%
DHMI
483.62
2.35%
AEROTHAI
492.61
LFV
695.52
4.31%
CAA Singapore
268.49
-13.03%
NAV Portugal
577.35
8.06%
-7.93%
6.60%
-4.05%
ROMATSA
768.82
6.31%
-0.48%
1,009.07 2.22%
ATNS
455.25
10.46%
16.33%
637.59
13.93%
17.24%
UkSATSE
788.95
41.35%
13.76%
743.53
48.32%
10.56%
ANS Czech Republic
783.79
13.56%
3.42%
1,172.16 2.26%
0.90%
HungaroControl
793.36
6.29%
8.23%
1,328.26 4.57%
5.75%
Airways New Zealand
532.39
8.83%
6.18%
945.17
3.61%
SMATSA
608.75
12.96%
10.09%
Finavia
794.25
21.52%
10.31%
LGS
436.93
-5.12%
-0.65%
EANS
413.69
7.80%
6.59%
390.83
SE Oro navigacija
685.71
5.03%
3.91%
1,153.81 0.08%
1.45%
SAKAERONAVIGATSIA
644.52
1.95%
2.27%
830.11
86.95%
16.47%
Slovenia Control
958.84
1.69%
0.87%
ALBCONTROL
710.30
5.36%
1.44%
Isavia
1,273.13
5.14%
174.27
5.55%
COCESNA
222.15
1.38%
778.01
259.65
152.93
909.81
-0.60%
1,037.20 5.43%
156.03
324.00
8.39%
4.43%
70
71
CANSO Members CANSO – the Civil Air Navigation Services Organisation – is the global voice of air traffic management (ATM) worldwide. CANSO Members support over 85% of world air traffic. Members share information and develop new policies, with the ultimate aim of improving air navigation services (ANS) on the ground and in the air. CANSO represents its Members’ views to a wide range of aviation stakeholders, including the International Civil Aviation Organization, where it has official Observer status. CANSO has an extensive network of Associate Members drawn from across the aviation industry. For more information on joining CANSO, visit www.canso.org/joiningcanso.
civil air navigation services organisation
Full Members - 88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Aeronautical Radio of Thailand (AEROTHAI) Aeroportos de Moçambique Air Navigation and Weather Services, CAA (ANWS) Air Navigation Services of the Czech Republic (ANS Czech Republic) AirNav Indonesia Air Traffic & Navigation Services (ATNS) Airports and Aviation Services Limited (AASL) Airports Authority of India (AAI) Airports Fiji Limited Airservices Australia Airways New Zealand Albcontrol Austro Control Avinor AS AZANS Azerbaijan Belgocontrol Bulgarian Air Traffic Services Authority (BULATSA) CAA Uganda Cambodia Air Traffic Services Co., Ltd. (CATS) Civil Aviation Authority of Bangladesh (CAAB) Civil Aviation Authority of Botswana Civil Aviation Authority of Mongolia Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal (CAAN) Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines Civil Aviation Regulatory Commission (CARC) COCESNA Croatia Control Ltd DCA Myanmar Department of Airspace Control (DECEA) Department of Civil Aviation, Republic of Cyprus DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH (DFS) Dirección General de Control de Tránsito Aéreo (DGCTA) DSNA France Dubai Air Navigation Services (DANS) Dutch Caribbean Air Navigation Service Provider (DC-ANSP) ENANA-EP ANGOLA ENAV S.p.A: Società Nazionale per l’Assistenza al Volo ENAIRE Estonian Air Navigation Services (EANS) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Finavia Corporation General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA) Ghana Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA) HungaroControl Pte. Ltd. Co. Instituto Dominicano de Aviacion Civil (IDAC) Israel Airports Authority (IAA) Irish Aviation Authority (IAA) ISAVIA Ltd Japan Air Navigation Service (JANS) Kazaeronavigatsia Kenya Civil Aviation Authority (KCAA) Latvijas Gaisa Satiksme (LGS)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Letové prevádzkové Služby Slovenskej Republiky, Štátny Podnik Luchtverkeersleiding Nederland (LVNL) Luxembourg ANA Maldives Airports Company Limited (MACL) Malta Air Traffic Services (MATS) National Airports Corporation Ltd. National Air Navigation Services Company (NANSC) NATS UK NAV CANADA NAV Portugal Naviair Nigerian Airspace Management Agency (NAMA) Office National de LÁviation Civile (OFNAC) Office National Des Aéroports (ONDA) ORO NAVIGACIJA, Lithuania PIA “Adem Jashari” - Air Control J.S.C. PNG Air Services Limited (PNGASL) Polish Air Navigation Services Agency (PANSA) Public Authority for Civil Aviation - Oman (PACA) ROMATSA Sakaeronavigatsia Ltd SENEAM Serbia and Montenegro Air Traffic Services Agency (SMATSA) Serco skyguide Slovenia Control State Airports Authority & ANSP (DHMI) Sudan Air Navigation Services Department Swaziland Civil Aviation Authority Tanzania Civil Aviation Authority Trinidad and Tobago CAA The LFV Group Ukrainian Air Traffic Service Enterprise (UkSATSE) U.S. DoD Policy Board on Federal Aviation Viet Nam Air Traffic Management Corporation (VATM)
Gold Associate Members - 11 — — — — — — — — — — —
Airbus ProSky Anhui Sun Create Electronics Co., Ltd. Boeing Exelis, inc. FREQUENTIS AG GroupEAD Europe S.L. Inmarsat Plc Lockheed Martin Raytheon Selex ES Thales
Silver Associate Members - 70 — — — — —
42 Solutions B.V. Adacel Inc. Aeronav Inc. Aireon Air Traffic Control Association (ATCA)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ALES a.s. Association Group of Industrial Companies “TIRA” Corporation ATAC ATCA – Japan ATECH Negócios em Tecnologia S/A Aveillant Aviation Advocacy Sarl Aviation Data Communication Corp (ADCC) Avibit Data Processing GmbH Avitech GmbH Bayanat Engineering Group Brüel & Kjaer EMS CGH Technologies, Inc. Comsoft GmbH CSSI, Inc. Airbus Defence and Space EIZO Technologies GmbH European Satellite Services Provider (ESSP SAS) Emirates ENAC Entry Point North Era Corporation Esterline Etihad Airways Exelis Orthogon Guntermann & Drunck GmbH Harris Corporation Helios Honeywell International Inc. / Aerospace IDS – Ingegneria Dei Sistemi S.p.A. Indra Navia AS Indra Sistemas INECO Integra A/S Intelcan Technosystems Inc. International Aero Navigation Systems Concern, JSC Jeppesen JMA Solutions Jotron AS LAIC Aktiengesellschaft LEMZ R&P Corporation MDA Systems Ltd. Metron Aviation Micro Nav Ltd The MITRE Corporation – CAASD MLS International College MovingDot NEC Corporation NLR Northrop Grumman NTT Data Corporation PASSUR Aerospace Quintiq Rockwell Collins, Inc. Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG RTCA, Inc. Saab AB Saab Sensis Corporation Saudi Arabian Airlines SENASA SITA Snowflake Software Ltd STR-SpeechTech Ltd. Tetra Tech AMT Think Research Limited
Membership list correct as of 11 December 2015. For the most up-to-date list and organisation profiles go to www.canso.org/canso-members