September 15, 2021 Board Packet

Regular Meeting of the Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD) Board of Managers, for Wednesday, September 15, 2021, 6:00 p.m.

CRWD has returned to in-person Board of Managers meetings. The public is invited to attend in-person as well.

Currently a virtual attendance option is not available. Masks will be required for everyone attending.

Please visit www.capitolregionwd.org to get additional CRWD COVID-19 information.

Materials Enclosed REGULAR MEETING AGENDA (6:00)

I.

Call to Order of Regular Meeting (President Joe Collins) A) Attendance B) Review, Amendments, and Approval of the Agenda

II.

Public Comment A) Public Comment For Items not on the Agenda (Please observe a limit of three minutes per person.)

III.

Permit Applications and Program Updates (Permit Process: 1) Staff Review/Recommendation, 2) Applicant Response, 3) Public Comment, and 4) Board Discussion and Action.)

A) B) C) D) E) F) G) H) I)

17-002 Highland Park Elementary – Closure (Martinkosky) 18-014 Morning Star – Closure (Martinkosky) 19-018 Amber Union – Re-application/Amendment (Hosch) 20-036 Lexington Apartments – Review Period Extension (Hosch) 21-019 554 Broadway Affordable Housing – Review Period Extension (Hosch) 21-025 The Hollows – Review Period Extension (Hosch) 21-026 695 Grand – Review Period Extension (Hosch) 21-027 Como Regional Park Transportation (Kelley) 21-030 Highland Bridge Block 1 Medical Office Building (Hosch)

IV.

Special Reports – Great River Passage Initiatives - Mary deLaittre, Great River Passage Conservancy (Eleria/deLaittre)

V.

Action Items A) Approve Minutes of the September 1, 2021, Board Workshop and Regular Meeting (Sylvander) B) Approve Accounts Payable/Receivable for August 2021 (Sylvander) C) Approve Grant Agreement with the MPCA for the Implementation of the Como Lake Management Plan and Nine Key Elements Plan Phase 1 Project (Belden) D) Approve 2021 MN Stormwater Research Council Contribution (Fossum) E) Approve Board Workshop for 7:00 PM on Wednesday, September 22, 2021 Our mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District

VI.

Unfinished Business No Unfinished Business

VII.

General Information A) Board of Manager’s Updates B) Administrator’s Update

VIII. Next Meetings A) Wednesday, October 6, 2021, 6:00 PM – Workshop and Regular Meeting B) Wednesday, October 13, 2021, 7:00 PM – CAC Meeting C) Wednesday, October 20, 2021, 6:00 PM – Regular Meeting IX.

Adjournment

Our mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District

September 15, 2021 III. Permit Applications A - B. Permit Close Out (Martinkosky) DATE: TO: FROM: RE:

September 7, 2021 CRWD Board of Managers Luke Martinkosky Permit Closeouts

Background Construction activity is complete for permits #17-002, Highland Park Elementary and #18-014, Morning Star.

Issues Highland Park Elementary #17-002 This permit was issued for a building expansion of the existing elementary school at Saunders Avenue and Davern Street in St. Paul. Stormwater treatment is via one underground, sand filtration system.

Work is complete, the site is stable, and the stormwater treatment system is confirmed to be functional.

This is a public project, no surety was collected.

Morning Star #18-014 This permit was issued for two phases of a new senior housing facility at Selby Avenue and Grotto Street North in St. Paul. Stormwater treatment is provided by a manufactured treatment device (Contech Stormfilter) receiving stormwater from underground storage pipes . Work is complete, the site is stable, and the stormwater treatment system has been confirmed functional. $4,700 surety is available for return.

Actions Requested Approve Certificate of Completion for permit #17-002, Highland Park Elementary.

Approve $4,700 surety return and Certificate of Completion for permit #18-014, Morning Star.

Z:\07 Programs\Permitting\Board Memos\2021-09-15 Permit Closeout Board Memo.docx

Our Mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District.

Capitol Region Watershed District Applicant:

Peter Deanovic Buhl GTA, LP 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, MN 55346

Permit 19-018 Amber Union (fka: GTA Building) Consultant: Dan Elenbaas Kimley-Horn 767 Eustis Street Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55114

Description: Repurposing an existing office building into apartment units. The development will also consist of parking lot, utilities, landscaping, playground, area wells and stormwater BMPs. Stormwater Management: Two underground infiltration systems District Rule: —C, D, F Disturbed Area: 2.09 Acres Impervious Area: 1.24 Acres STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve with 2 Conditions: 1. Receipt of documentation of maintenance agreement recorded with Ramsey County.

2. Revise proposed HydroCAD or plans to correspond for the following: a. Pond 1P surcharges to the surface from CB 201 at an elevation of 952.83’. Revise Custom Stage Data (Storage #5) to start at this elevation and Device #5 invert to match this elevation.

These elevations are included as 952.98’ in the submitted HydroCAD. b. Revise Pond 2P routing for the broad-crested weir (Device #5) to Primary. Submitted model incorrectly routes this outflow to 18 Culvert (Device 1).

First Street Second Ave

Permit Location Permit Report 19-018

Aerial Photo Board Meeting Date: 09/15/2021

Capitol Region Watershed District Permit Report CRWD Permit #:

19-018

Review date:

September 9, 2021

Project Name:

Amber Union (fka: GTA Building) - Amendment

Applicant:

Peter Deanovic Buhl GTA, LP 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, MN 55346 612-968-3728 pete@buhlinvestors.com

Purpose:

Amendment: Repurposing an existing office building into apartment units. The development will consist of parking lot, utilities, landscaping, playground, area wells and stormwater BMPs. Permanent stormwater management consists of two underground Prinsco Chamber infiltration systems.

Location:

1667 Snelling Ave, Falcon Heights, MN

Applicable Rules:

C, D, and F

Recommendation:

Approve with 2 Conditions

EXHIBITS: 1. Civil Plans (C000, C100, V001, V002, C200, C300, C301, C400, C401, C500, C501, C502, C600, C701, C702), by Kimley Horn, dated 2/8/21, recv. 3/11/21.

2. Stormwater Management Plan, by Kimley Horn, dated 8/31/21, recv. 8/31/21.

3. SWPPP (66 Pages), by Kimley Horn, dated 8/21/19, recv. 8/21/19.

4. Operations and Maintenance Plan (20 Pages), by Kimley Horn, dated 8/9/21, recv.

8/10/21.

5. Declaration for Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities, by Kimley Horn, dated 8/21/19, recv. 8/21/19.

6. Geotechnical Evaluation Report, by Braun Intertec, dated 7/12/19, recv. 3/11/21.

7. Phase I ESA, by Braun Intertec, dated 9/28/20, recv. 3/11/21.

8. Phase II ESA, by Braun Intertec, dated 12/21/18, recv. 3/11/21.

9. Response Action Plan and Construction Contingency Plan, by Braun Intertec, dated 6/13/19, recv. 3/11/21.

10. Response Action Plan Approval, MPCA, dated 8/23/19, recv. 3/11/21.

11. Civil Plans (C500, C501, C502, C503), by Kimley Horn, dated 7/12/21, recv. 7/22/21.

12. NPDES Permit, by MPCA, dated 6/24/21, recv. 7/23/21.

W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2019\19-018 Amber Union (fka GTA Bldg)\19-018 Permit Report_R7b.doc Page 1 of 4

13. Surety check from Frana Companies, dated 7/26/21, recv. 7/27/21.

14. Civil Plans (C000, C100, V001, V002, C200, C300, C301, C400, C401, C500, C501, C502, C600), by Kimley Horn, dated 7/12/21, recv. 8/11/21.

15. Civil Plans (C000, C100, V001, V002, C200, C300, C301, C400, C401, C500, C501, C502, C503, C600), by Kimley Horn, dated 8/31/21, recv. 8/31/21.

HISTORY & CONSIDERATIONS: Approval for the initial permit application was made on September 4, 2019, with subsequent extension through September 2, 2021. This current submittal constitutes a reapplication of the permit following that recent expiration. The recent submittal also constitutes an amendment to the original plan with a different stormwater treatment type, and changes to drainage areas and modeling.

Storm sewer from this permit (#19-018) connects into storm sewer that receives flow from CRWD Permit #12-012 TIES. Braun Intertec has completed a Phase I Environmental Assessment (ESA) (dated 9/28/20), Phase II ESA (dated 12/21/18), and a Response Action Plan (RAP) and Construction Contingency Plan (dated 6/13/19).

RULE C: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Standards  Proposed discharge rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year events shall not exceed existing rates.  Developments and redevelopments must reduce runoff volumes in the amount equivalent to an inch of runoff from the impervious areas of the site.  Stormwater must be pretreated before discharging to infiltration areas to maintain the long-term viability of the infiltration area.  Developments and redevelopments must incorporate effective non-point source pollution reduction BMPs to achieve 90% total suspended solid removal.

Findings 1. A hydrograph method based on sound hydrologic theory is used to analyze runoff for the design or analysis of flows and water levels.

2. Runoff rates for the proposed activity do not exceed existing runoff rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year critical storm events. Stormwater leaving the project area is discharged into a well-defined receiving channel or pipe and routed to a public drainage system.

3. Stormwater runoff volume retention is achieved onsite in the amount equivalent to the runoff generated from 1.1-inch of rainfall over the impervious surfaces of the development. a. The amount of proposed impervious is 58,979 square feet. b. Volume retention required: 58,979 ft2 x 1.1 inches x 1 ft/12 inches = 5,406 ft3

W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2019\19-018 Amber Union (fka GTA Bldg)\19-018 Permit Report_R7b.doc Page 2 of 4

Table 1. Proposed volume retention through abstraction (i.e. infiltration, reuse).

Volume Volume Retention 1.1-inch 2.5-inch Retention BMP Provided below Runoff Runoff Required (ft3) outlet (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) Underground System 1 1,380 2,884 6,555 5,406 Underground System 2 5,311 7,262 16,504 Total 6,691 cf

4.

5.

6.

7.

c. Banking of excess volume retention not proposed. d. Infiltration volume and facility sizes have been calculated using the appropriate hydrologic soil group classification and design infiltration rate. e. The infiltration areas are capable of infiltrating the required volume within 48 hours. f. Stormwater runoff is pretreated to remove solids before discharging to infiltration areas. g. Groundwater mounding is not anticipated to affect adjacent properties and buildings.

Alternative compliance sequencing has not been requested.

Best management practices achieve 90% total suspended solids removal from the runoff generated on an annual basis.

A maintenance agreement recorded with Ramsey County has not been submitted.

Adequate maintenance access is provided for the underground systems. A sitespecific plan, schedule, and narrative for maintenance of the proposed stormwater management practices has been submitted.

RULE D: FLOOD CONTROL Standards  Compensatory storage shall be provided for fill placed within the 100-year floodplain.  All habitable buildings, roads, and parking structures on or adjacent to a project site shall comply with District freeboard requirements.

Findings 1. There is no floodplain on the property according to FEMA. 2. All habitable buildings, roads, and parking structures on or adjacent to the project site comply with CRWD freeboard requirements.

RULE E: WETLAND MANAGEMENT Standard  Wetlands shall not be drained, filled (wholly or in part), excavated, or have sustaining hydrology impacted such that there will be a decrease in the inherent (existing) functions and values of the wetland.  A minimum buffer of 25 feet of permanent nonimpacted vegetative ground cover abutting and surrounding a wetland is required.

Findings W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2019\19-018 Amber Union (fka GTA Bldg)\19-018 Permit Report_R7b.doc Page 3 of 4

1. There are no known wetlands located on the property.

RULE F: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Standards  A plan shall demonstrate that appropriate erosion and sediment control measures protect downstream water bodies from the effects of a land-disturbing activity.  Erosion Control Plans must adhere to the MPCA Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas Manual.

Findings 1. Erosion and sediment control measures are consistent with best management practices, as demonstrated in the MPCA manual Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas.

2. Adjacent properties are protected from sediment transport/deposition.

3. Wetlands, waterbodies and water conveyance systems are protected from erosion/sediment transport/deposition.

4. Total disturbed area is 2.09 acres; an NPDES permit is required. A SWPPP has been submitted.

RULE G: ILLICIT DISCHARGE AND CONNECTION Standard  Stormwater management and utility plans shall indicate all existing and proposed connections from developed and undeveloped lands for all water that drains to the District MS4.

Findings 1. New direct connections or replacement of existing connections are not proposed.

2. Prohibited discharges are not proposed.

Recommendation: Approve with 2 Conditions Conditions: 1. Receipt of documentation of maintenance agreement recorded with Ramsey County.

2. Revise proposed HydroCAD or plans to correspond for the following: a. Pond 1P surcharges to the surface from CB 201 at an elevation of 952.83’.

Revise Custom Stage Data (Storage #5) to start at this elevation and Device #5 invert to match this elevation. These elevations are included as 952.98’ in the submitted HydroCAD. b. Revise Pond 2P routing for the broad-crested weir (Device #5) to Primary.

Submitted model incorrectly routes this outflow to 18 Culvert (Device 1).

W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2019\19-018 Amber Union (fka GTA Bldg)\19-018 Permit Report_R7b.doc Page 4 of 4

K:\TWC_LDEV\Mohagen_Hansen\GTA Building\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C6-UTILITY PLAN.dwg August 31, 2021 - 5:45pm

This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

8" FIRE SERVICE

CORE DRILL AND CONNECT TO EXISTING STRUCTURE

CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE

CONSTRUCT MANHOLE OVER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER

SANITARY SEWER SERVICE

ADJUST EXISTING CASTING TO NEW RIM ELEVATION

F

G

H

I

6" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE

C

E

WETTAP EXISTING WATERMAIN WITH GATE VALVE

B

D

CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN STUB WITH GATE VALVE

GAS MAIN

TELEPHONE

UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC

STORM SEWER

STORM SEWER

SANITARY SEWER

WATERMAIN

SANITARY CLEANOUT

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

TEE

REDUCER

HYDRANT

GATE VALVE

A

CO

PROPOSED

KEYNOTE LEGEND

CO

EXISTING

LEGEND

OFF SITE IMPROVEMENT

PROPOSED TRANSFORMER REPLACEMENT, SEE ELEC

EXISTING 6" DOMESTIC

EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES.

9.

20.

19.

21. SERVICE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 8 FEET OF COVER AS PER THE ESTABLISHED GRADE FROM THE MAIN TO THE PROPERTY LINE OR, IF APPLICABLE, TO THE UTILITY EASEMENT LINE. WHEN SOLID ROCK CONDITIONS 12. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ARE ENCOUNTERED, WATER SERVICES MAY BE INSTALLED WITH 6.5 FEET OF ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON COVER. AT THIS DEPTH, THE NEED FOR INSULATION WILL BE DETERMINED BY RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, SPRWS INSPECTORS. MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE 22. ALL PIPE 2” AND SMALLER MUST BE TYPE K COPPER. APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY

11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES.

10. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES.

ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I.

LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BACKFILLING.

TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS.

6.

15.

14.

7.

8.

154.0'

EXISTING WATER SERVICE NOT PROVIDED VIA SURVEY, APPROXIMATE LOCATION DETERMINED FROM RECORD DRAWINGS PROVIDED D

17

PROPOSED HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE, PROVIDE 40 LF OF MECH. PIPE, MATCH EX. SIZE

PROPOSED GAS SERVICE AND METER

CONDUIT FOR EV CHARGING STATION

45° BEND, PROVIDE MECHANICAL JOINTS PROPOSED 8" FIRE SERVICE

EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE 23. PIPE MATERIAL FOR 8” DUCTILE IRON PIPE MUST BE CLASS 52, PIPE MATERIAL THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING FOR 6” AND 4” DUCTILE IRON PIPE MUST BE CLASS 53. THE EXTERIOR OF UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE COATED WITH A LAYER OF ARC-SPRAYED ZINC THE PLANS. PER ISO 8179. THE INTERIOR CEMENT MORTAR LINING SHALL BE APPLIED WITHOUT ASPHALT SEAL COAT. PIPE MUST BE WRAPPED IN V-BIO POLYWRAP ENCASEMENT AND SHALL BE INSTALLED UTILIZING MODIFIED METHOD A AS RECOMMENDED BY DIPRA. ENCASEMENT SHALL BE TAPED AT EACH JOINT AND AROUND THE MIDDLE OF THE PIPE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 24. MAINTAIN 3 FEET VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER AND SEWER PIPES OR 18-INCH SEPARATION INCLUDING 4-INCH HIGH DENSITY INSULATION PER CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND SPRWS STANDARD PLATE D-10 FOR TYPICAL WATER MAIN OFFSETS. ELECTRICAL PLAN. 25. REFER TO SPRWS “STANDARDS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF WATER MAINS” BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED STANDARD PLATE D-11 FOR RESTRAINED PIPE REQUIREMENT. IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 26. ALL WATER SERVICE VALVE BOXES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION AREA MUST BE ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY EXPOSED AND BROUGHT TO GRADE UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. OWNED AND MAINTAINED. 27. ALL PIPE WORK INSIDE OF PROPERTY TO BE PERFORMED BY A PLUMBER ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH LICENSED BY THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND CERTIFIED BY THE CITY OF REACTION BLOCKING. SAINT PAUL. SPRWS REQUIRES SEPARATE OUTSIDE AND INSIDE PLUMBING PERMITS FOR EACH NEW WATER SERVICE. WATER SERVICES TO BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO SPRWS “STANDARDS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF WATER MAINS. 28. WATER FACILITY PIPEWORK WITHIN RIGHT OF WAY TO BE INSTALLED BY SPRWS. EXCAVATION AND RESTORATION BY OWNER’S CONTRACTOR. A FOUR-SIDED TRENCH BOX IS REQUIRED ON ALL EXCAVATIONS DEEPER THAN 5 FEET WHERE UNDERGROUND WORK OR INSPECTION IS TO BE PERFORMED 29. THE CONTRACTOR PROVIDING EXCAVATION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING

BY SPRWS. FOR ALL WET TAPS TO BE PERFORMED BY SPRWS, A MINIMUM ALL EXCAVATION AND OBSTRUCTION PERMITS REQUIRED BY ANY GOVERNING TRENCH BOX SIZE OF 8 FEET HIGH X 8 FEET WIDE X 10 FEET LONG IS AUTHORITY. REQUIRED. LADDERS ARE REQUIRED AND MUST EXTEND 3 FEET ABOVE THE SURFACE OF THE TRENCH. SIDEWALKS, PAVEMENTS, DUCTS AND APPURTENANT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT BE UNDERMINED UNLESS A SUPPORT SYSTEM OR ANOTHER METHOD OF PROTECTION IS PROVIDED. TRENCHES IN EXCESS OF 20 FEET IN DEPTH MUST BE SIGNED OFF BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE KEPT A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET FROM THE EDGE OF THE TRENCH.

EXISTING 12" SSWR

EXISTING 8" SSWR

VERIFY EXISTING SANITARY CONNECTION TO BUILDING. TELEVISE, CLEAN AND LINE IF NECESSARY.

PROPOSED 4" DOMESTIC SERVICE

PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION

13. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES.

N THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY 16.

LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE 17.

CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 18.

21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50).

ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE).

ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS.

MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET.

ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES.

D

D



4.

3.

2.

1.

UTILITY PLAN NOTES

GAS SERVICE FOR EXTERIOR METERS

15.7'

EXISTING 8" SANITARY SERVICE. TELEVISE, CLEAN AND LINE IF NECESSARY.

EXISTING FIBER SERVICE

PROPOSED TRANSFORMER RELOCATION, SEE ELEC

D

D

15.6'

54.4'

CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN W/4" and 8" VALVE AND TAPPING SLEEVE

OFF SITE IMPROVEMENT

OFF SITE IMPROVEMENT

INFILL METER GAP WITH DIP

45° BEND

NORTH

EXISTING HYDRANT

PROJECT NAME ENGINEER REGISTRATION ISSUE RECORD DRAWING INFORMATION SHEET DESCRIPTION PHASE

D

20.0'

07/15/19

DLE

JPB

XXXXXXXXX

07/12/2021 08/17/2021 08/31/2021

CRWD/SPRWS COMMENTS

16

06/30/2021

14 ASI #001

15 17

01/07/2021 02/08/2021 04/13/2021

CONSTRUCTION SET

STORMWATER BMP

HUD REVIEW RESPONSE PERMIT SET

13 14

PART II HISTORIC AMENDMENT 2

10/16/2020 12/07/2020

GMP SET HUD REVIEW

11 12

9 10

07/15/2019

08/31/2020

PART II HISTORIC AMENDMENT 1

8

06/19/2019

09/23/2019 10/15/2019

CITY SUBMITTAL PART II HISTORIC RESUBMITTAL

6

06/05/2019

WATERSHED RESUBMITTAL

2

5 7

05/06/2019

08/21/2019

CITY SUBMITTAL CITY SUBMITTAL WATERSHED SUBMITTAL PART II HISTORIC SUBMITTAL

1 3 4

WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM

PHONE: 651-645-4197

767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST.PAUL, MN 55114

2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

September 15, 2021 III. Permits D.) Lexington Apartments Extension Request (Hosch)

DATE: TO: FROM: RE:

September 8, 2021 CRWD Board of Managers Elizabeth Hosch 5th 60-day Review Period Extension for Permit 20-036

Background The current review period for Permit 20-036 Lexington Apartments expires on 9-19-2021.

Issues The applicant requested an extension to the 60-day review period prior to the expiration. The applicant has requested the additional time to complete the permit requirements.

Requested Action Approve 60-day review period extension for Permit 20-036 Lexington Apartments to expire November 18, 2021.

W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2020\20-036, Lexington Apartments\5th Brd Memo Extension request 20-036 Lexington Apartments.docx

Our Mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District.

September 15, 2021 III. Permits E.) 554 Broadway Affordable Housing Review Extension Request (Hosch)

DATE: TO: FROM: RE:

September 8, 2021 CRWD Board of Managers Elizabeth Hosch 2nd 60-day Review Period Extension for Permit 21-019

Background The current review period for Permit 21-019 554 Broadway Affordable Housing expires on 9-15-2021.

Issues The applicant requested an extension to the 60-day review period prior to the expiration. The applicant has requested the additional time to complete the required conditions.

Requested Action Approve 60-day review period extension for Permit 21-019 554 Broadway Affordable housing to expire November 14, 2021.

W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2021\21-019, 554 Broadway\2nd Brd Memo Extension request 21-019, 554 Broadway.docx

Our Mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District.

September 15, 2021 III. Permits F.) The Hollows Review Extension Request (Hosch)

DATE: TO: FROM: RE:

September 9, 2021 CRWD Board of Managers Elizabeth Hosch 60-day Review Period Extension for Permit 21-025

Background The current review period for Permit 21-025 The Hollows expires on 9-18-2021.

Issues The applicant requested an extension to the 60-day review period prior to the expiration. The applicant has requested the additional time to complete the required conditions.

Requested Action Approve 60-day review period extension for Permit 21-025 The Hollows to expire November 17, 2021.

W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2021\21-025, The Hollows\Brd Memo Extension request 21-025, The Hollows.docx

Our Mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District.

September 15, 2021 III. Permits G.) 695 Grand Review Extension Request (Hosch)

DATE: TO: FROM: RE:

September 8, 2021 CRWD Board of Managers Elizabeth Hosch 60-day Review Period Extension for Permit 21-026

Background The current review period for Permit 21-026 695 Grand expires on 9-28-2021.

Issues The applicant requested an extension to the 60-day review period prior to the expiration. The applicant has requested the additional time to complete the required conditions.

Requested Action Approve 60-day review period extension for Permit 21-026, 695 Grand to expire November 27, 2021.

W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2021\21-026, 695 Grand\Brd Memo Extension request 21-026, 695 Grand.docx

Our Mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District.

Capitol Region Watershed District

Permit 21-027 Como Regional Park Transportation

Applicant:

Anne Gardner Consultant: Alex Schmidt St. Paul Parks Houston Engineering 25 West 4th Street (400 CHA) 7550 Meridian Circle North, Suite 120 St. Paul, MN 55102 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Description: Reconstruction of the parking lots at the Como Lake Pavilion and the Golf Clubhouse Stormwater Management: 5 proposed surface filtration basins.

District Rule: —C D F Disturbed Area: 5.6 Acres Impervious Area: 2.51 Acres STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve with 7 Conditions: VOLUME BANK RECOMMENDATION: Approve withdrawal of 1,037 cubic feet of volume reduction credits from the St. Paul Parks and Recreation Bank.

1. Provide approved plans signed by a professional engineer per the Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID. 2. Provide a copy of the NPDES permit.

3. Revise the landscaping plans to address report items a-c.

4. Revise Civil Plans to address report items a and b.

5. Provide project specifications to verify report items a and b 6. Revise HydroCAD model to use MnDOT recommended minimum time of concentration for existing subcatchments Golf-N2, Golf-S, Golf-SR, and North-NW to be consistent with methodology used for proposed model.

7. Revise HydroCAD model/Stormwater Report Tables or Civil Plans to correspond for proposed Pond 4P.

Permit Location Permit Report 21-027

Aerial Photo Board Meeting Date: 09/15/2021

Capitol Region Watershed District Permit Report CRWD Permit #:

21-027

Review date:

September 9, 2021

Project Name:

Como Regional Park Transportation

Applicant:

Anne Gardner St. Paul Parks and Recreation 25 W 4th St. Unit 400 St. Paul, MN 55102 (612) 266-6421 anne.gardner@ci.stpaul.mn.us

Purpose:

Replacement of three parking lots and construction of a bike/pedestrian trail and a small walk-in boat launch at Como Park in St. Paul.

Permanent stormwater management consists of four biofiltration basins.

Location:

1360 Lexington Parkway, St. Paul, MN

Applicable Rules:

C, D, and F

Recommendation:

Approve with 7 Conditions

Volume Bank Recommendation:

Approve withdrawal of 1,307 cubic feet of volume reduction credits from the St. Paul Parks and Recreation Bank.

EXHIBITS: 1. Civil Plans (30 Sheets), by St. Paul Parks and Recreation Department, dated 7/23/21, recv. 7/30/21.

2. Stormwater Management Report, by Houston Engineering, inc., dated 9/1/21, recv.

9/1/21.

3. Existing HydroCAD Report, by Houston Engineering, inc., dated 7/27/21, recv. 7/30/21.

4. Proposed HydroCAD Report, by Houston Engineering, inc., dated 7/20/21, recv. 7/30/21.

5. Geotechnical Evaluation Report, by Braun Intertec, dated 4/22/21, recv. 7/30/21.

6. Civil Plans (15 Sheets), by St. Paul Parks and Recreation Department, dated 6/30/21, recv. 9/1/21.

HISTORY & CONSIDERATIONS:

W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2021\21-027 Como Regional Park Transportation (Pavilion and Golf Lots)\21-027 Permit Report_R2.doc Page 1 of 5

The applicant claims that the South Lot portion of the project is considered mill and overlay, which is exempt from stormwater treatment. However, the project intends to treat this area anyway and apply for CRWD grant funding.

RULE C: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Standards  Proposed discharge rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year events shall not exceed existing rates.  Developments and redevelopments must reduce runoff volumes in the amount equivalent to an inch of runoff from the impervious areas of the site.  Stormwater must be pretreated before discharging to infiltration areas to maintain the long-term viability of the infiltration area.  Developments and redevelopments must incorporate effective non-point source pollution reduction BMPs to achieve 90% total suspended solid removal.

Findings 1. A hydrograph method based on sound hydrologic theory is used to analyze runoff for the design or analysis of flows and water levels.

2. Runoff rates for the proposed activity do not exceed existing runoff rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year critical storm events. Stormwater leaving the project area is discharged into a well-defined receiving channel or pipe and routed to a public drainage system.

3. Stormwater runoff volume retention is not achieved onsite in the amount equivalent to the runoff generated from 1.1-inch of rainfall over the impervious surfaces of the development. a. The amount of proposed impervious is 109,125 ft2. b. Volume retention required: 109,125 ft2 x 1.1 inches x 1 ft/12 inches = 10,003 ft3 Table 1. Proposed volume retention through abstraction (i.e. infiltration, reuse).

Volume Volume Retention 1.1-inch 2.5-inch Retention BMP Provided below Runoff Runoff Required (ft3) outlet (ft3) (ft3) (ft3) 10,003 None, filtration is proposed.

4. Alternative compliance has been requested due to poor infiltrating soils. a. The applicant did not partially comply with the volume retention standard. b. Filtration using sand media (55% credit) is proposed; filtration required: 10,003 ft3 x 1.82 credit factor = 18,206 ft3 Table 2. Proposed volume retention through filtration (i.e. sand, enhanced).

Filtration Filtration Volume 1.1-inch Volume BMP Provided below Runoff Required (ft3) outlet (ft3) (ft3) Biofiltration G-1 3,108 1,163 18,206 Biofiltration N-1 4,485 2,775

2.5-inch Runoff (ft3) 2,644 6,307

W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2021\21-027 Como Regional Park Transportation (Pavilion and Golf Lots)\21-027 Permit Report_R2.doc Page 2 of 5

Biofiltration N-2 Biofiltration S-1 & S-2 Total

469 8,720

534 6,474 16,318 ft3

1,213 14,713

i. Filtration volume and facility sizes have been calculated using the appropriate hydrologic soil group classification and design filtration rate. ii. The filtration areas are capable of filtering the required volume within 48 hours. iii. Stormwater runoff is pretreated to remove solids before discharging to filtration areas. c. The applicant proposes to comply with the volume retention standard through the use of qualified banking credits. d. The applicant has not submitted money to be contributed to the Stormwater Impact Fund. e. The project is not linear.

5. Best management practices do not achieve 90% total suspended solids removal from the runoff generated on an annual basis. If the applicant meets the volume retention requirements, the practices will likely achieve 90% removal.

6. A memorandum of agreement for maintenance of stormwater facilities exists between the City of St. Paul and the CRWD. RULE D: FLOOD CONTROL Standards  Compensatory storage shall be provided for fill placed within the 100-year floodplain.  All habitable buildings, roads, and parking structures on or adjacent to a project site shall comply with District freeboard requirements.

Findings 1. There is no floodplain on the property according to FEMA. 2. All habitable buildings, roads, and parking structures on or adjacent to the project site comply with CRWD freeboard requirements.

RULE E: WETLAND MANAGEMENT Standard  Wetlands shall not be drained, filled (wholly or in part), excavated, or have sustaining hydrology impacted such that there will be a decrease in the inherent (existing) functions and values of the wetland.  A minimum buffer of 25 feet of permanent nonimpacted vegetative ground cover abutting and surrounding a wetland is required.

Findings 1. There are no known wetlands located on the property.

RULE F: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL

W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2021\21-027 Como Regional Park Transportation (Pavilion and Golf Lots)\21-027 Permit Report_R2.doc Page 3 of 5

Standards  A plan shall demonstrate that appropriate erosion and sediment control measures protect downstream water bodies from the effects of a land-disturbing activity.  Erosion Control Plans must adhere to the MPCA Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas Manual.

Findings 1. Erosion and sediment control measures are consistent with best management practices, as demonstrated in the MPCA manual Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas.

2. Adjacent properties are protected from sediment transport/deposition.

3. Wetlands, waterbodies and water conveyance systems are protected from erosion/sediment transport/deposition.

4. Total disturbed area is 5.6 acres; an NPDES permit is required. A SWPPP has been submitted.

RULE G: ILLICIT DISCHARGE AND CONNECTION Standard  Stormwater management and utility plans shall indicate all existing and proposed connections from developed and undeveloped lands for all water that drains to the District MS4.

Findings 1. New direct connections or replacement of existing connections are not proposed.

2. Prohibited discharges are not proposed.

Recommendation:

Approve with 7 Conditions

Volume Bank Recommendation:

Approve withdrawal of 1,307 cubic feet of volume reduction credits from the St. Paul Parks and Recreation Bank.

Conditions: 1. Provide approved plans signed by a professional engineer per the Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID. 2. Provide a copy of the NPDES permit.

3. Revise the landscaping plans to address the following: a. Specify potted plants or plugs to vegetate filtration areas. Basin seeding should be avoided. b. Specify deep rooted, salt tolerant, native plants according to Plants for Stormwater Design (Shaw and Schmidt, 2003). c. Provide signage that deters snow management from using the filtration basins for snow storage.

4. Revise Civil Plans to address the following: a. Revise pretreatment design such that the drainage area to the inflow pipe of a sump shall be at least three times greater than the drainage area to the grate above per the University of Minnesota. The proposed sump CB #5 currently

W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2021\21-027 Como Regional Park Transportation (Pavilion and Golf Lots)\21-027 Permit Report_R2.doc Page 4 of 5

5.

6.

7.

8.

receives all flow through the grate, which has a higher risk or sediment resuspension. b. Revise reference for Stormwater Trail on Sheet C104 to call out Detail 2 on Sheet C107, not Sheet C108.

Provide project specifications to verify the following: a. Underdrain pipe material, perforation patterns, slotted vs. circular perforations, and orientation. Ensure that hole/slot size is smaller than surrounding rock gradation. b. Biofiltration Media Mix. Revise HydroCAD model to use MnDOT recommended minimum time of concentration for existing subcatchments Golf-N2, Golf-S, Golf-SR, and North-NW to be consistent with methodology used for proposed model.

Revise HydroCAD model/Stormwater Report Tables or Civil Plans to correspond for proposed Pond 4P (Basin N-2): a. Top of filter media elevation is 194.75’ in the HydroCAD/Stormwater Report and 194.65’ on Sheet C102 in the Plans. b. Horizontal orifice elevation (low outlet) is 195.5’ in the HydroCAD/Stormwater Report (Device #2) and 195.9’ on Sheet C105 in the plans (CB #3 RIM).

Increase volume retention to achieve the required volume noted in Table 2. A possible solution includes converting some or all the basins to use iron-enhanced media.

Alternatively, subtract 1,037 ft3 from the City’s Bank ((18,206 ft3 – 16,318 ft3)/1.82 filtration conversion factor). Note that amount to be subtracted from the City’s bank may change based on response to condition 7.

W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2021\21-027 Como Regional Park Transportation (Pavilion and Golf Lots)\21-027 Permit Report_R2.doc Page 5 of 5

IR

CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION

200

X

UGE

UGUEGE

191

UG E

UG E

UGE

4.

PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISH GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

5.

SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN PARKING LOTS, DRIVES AND ROADS INDICATE GUTTER GRADES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

6.

WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, EXISTING SOD EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING.

7.

FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SOD ALL APPLICABLE AREAS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

8.

ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR).

UGE

UGE

190

UGE %

E UG

E

UG

UG E

UGE

UGE

TREE BIRCH 8IN TRPLE

S ST

UG

U

E

GE

UGE

UGE

UGE

6 0 " R CP

185

UGE

UGE

195

UG

UGE

UG E S ST

UGE

199

196

CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING SITE FEATURES (INCLUDING TURF AND VEGETATION) WHICH ARE TO REMAIN.

No.

Date

Revision Description

STS

E

197

UGUGE E

-5.

4

E

UG

E

E

196

3.

1431 LEXINGTON PKWY N, SAINT PAUL, MN 55103

U UGE GE

195

UG E

UGE E UG

UGE

IR

195

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE (CONSTRUCTION ZONES) NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. ALL SIGNAGE LAYOUTS MUST BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED

BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES.

UG

E

196

IR 2" PVC

12" PVC TREE BIRCH 6IN DBLE

UG

TS CP S

E

195

IR

UG

S

STS

200

S

ST

LP

L

205

STS

E UG

UG

E

ST

S ST

UG

194

IR

E

UG

S ST

194

199

W

S

193

2.

IR

193

TREE BIRCH 8IN DBL

STS

GOLF COURSE & LAKESIDE PAVILION PARKING LOTS

UGE

ST

193

UG E

60" RCP

UG UGE E

UGE

192

UG E

UG E

192

IR

UGE

191

W IR

THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL PAY FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING / LAYOUT.

SAND BUNKER

1%

TREE W OAK 15IN

PROPOSED SILT FENCE

1.

UGE

UGE

FFO

IR

UGE

19 0

IR

IR

UGE

UGE %

"R

195.38TC 194.88G

.84% 347 @8"

5 19

196.09TC 195.59G

-7.7

-3.

FO

60

195.85TC 195.35G

IR

TREE CTTNWOOD 12IN

S

196.16TC 195.66G

196.19TC 195.69G

0 19

196.09TC 195.59G

STS

ST

195.14TC 194.64G

U

GE

194

S ST

194.62TC 194.12G

194.70TC 194.20G

195.45TC 194.95G 195.06TC 194.56G

195.58TC 195.08G

CB RIM 195.90 INV SW 186.30 INV NE 183.80

TS BASINSACCESS

FIELD VERIFYUGTREES AND AND PROTECT. TREES IR MAY NOT BE SHOWN IN THE SURVEY IN THIS LOCATION

TREE BSSWOOD 15IN

-17.

FO

XX

NOTES

10'

2%

Date:XX/XX/XXXX License #: XXXXX

PROPOSED ACCESS

194.00

190.00

Signature:

PROPOSED FIBER ROLL

E

TREE CTTNWD 9IN TREE CTTNWD 9IN

TREE CTTNWD 9IN

TREE W OAK 12IN

STS UGE

UGE

193.90TC 193.40G

XX

TREE APPLE 12IN

TREE CTTNWD 12IN

I HEARBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Printed Name: XXXXXX

PROPOSED STORM PIPE

0 2.5 19 2 19

UGE

E

TREE ELM 5IN

8

STS

PROPOSED BIO-FILTRATION MEDIA

UG

TREE WALNUT 10IN

FFO

W

193.48TC 192.98G

PROPOSED CURB

MAPLE 18IN

IR

STS

72" MH RIM 196.65 INV W 184.86 INV E 184.86

S ST

STS

PROPOSED BITUMINOUS

PROTECT HISTORIC BRIDGE

18

STS

STS

EXISTING FIBER OPTIC EXISTING GAS EXISTING STORM PIPE EXISTING MAJOR CONTOURS EXISTING MINOR CONTOURS PROPOSED MINOR CONTOURS PROPOSED MINOR CONTOURS

PROPOSED RIP-RAP

0 2.0 19

12" PVC

193.97TC 193.47G

IR

2 19

IR

STS

192.92TC 192.42G 193.27TC 192.77G 193.39TC 192.89G 193.15TC 192.65G

193.87TC 193.37G

IR

192.84TC 192.34G

2" PE

193.03TC 192.53G

UGE

W WOOD WALL

192.71TC 192.21G

STS

E UGUGE

IR

191.00

O IR FFO

W

RIM 191.06 INV NE 187.70

CB RIM 191.00 INV NW 187.20 INV NE 187.20 INV SW 187.20

GAS

Parks and Recreation Department 400 City Hall Annex 25 West Street Saint Paul, MN 55102

PROPOSED PERFORATED DRAINTILE

IR UEGE UG TREE

IR FFO

194.78TC 194.28G

2" PE

UGE

W STS

STS

STS

194.79TC 194.29G

194.72TC 194.22G

R

TREE ELM 18IN

194.83TC 194.33G

194.03TC 193.53G

6" PVC

IR

194.81TC 194.31G

194.03TC 193.53G

E OUT

FO

UGE

194.06TC 193.56G

UGE

STS

STS

UGE 194.74TC 194.24G

of 54'

E

194.06TC 193.56G

ICE V R E S 19 8

UG

10" PVC

STS

O FO

FO

198

192.93TC 192.43G

194.05TC 193.55G

192.64TC 192.14G 192.69TC 192.19G

UGE

E UG

E UG

199

193.03TC 192.53G

CB RIM 191.20 INV SE 187.80 INV N 187.80

192.75TC 192.25G

196.43TC 195.93G

197

E UG

FO

192.69TC 192.19G

195.62TC 195.12G 196.30TC 195.80G

193.40TC 192.90G

193.26TC 192.76G

UGE

192.72TC 192.22G

193.45TC 192.95G

196.46TC 195.96G

196 FO

194.84TC 194.34G 194.45TC 194.76TC 193.95G 194.23TC 194.37TC 194.26G 193.73G 193.87G

195.89TC 195.39G

STS

193.31TC 192.81G

195.49TC 194.99G

ALTERNATE: 4" CONCRETE

STS

19 2

194.52TC 194.02G 194.82TC 194.32G

194.54TC 194.04G

10" PVC

192.85TC 192.35G

CB RIM 193.50 INV S 188.70 FULL OF SEDIMENT

194.29TC 193.79G

193

UGE

193.22TC 192.72G 193.21TC 192.71G

193.24TC 192.74G 194.15TC 193.65G

195.49TC 194.99G 195.74TC 195.24G

EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC

UGE

STS

194.08TC 193.58G

UG E 4 19

0 19

EXISTING TREE

COMO REGIONAL PARK TRANSPORTATION

IR

BUILDING OVERHANG

195

City of Saint Paul Department of Parks and Recreation

IR

STS

LEGEND

210 215

PROJECT NUMBER

9397-0003

DATE

6-30-2021

DRAWN BY

AMZ

CHECKED BY

AS

SUPERVISOR

GB

UG

UG E

1 C100

GOLF COURSE PARKING LOT GRADING PLAN

1" = 20'

0

10'

20'

SCALE IN FEET

40' NORTH

UGE

E

S ST

UG E

DRAFT NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION GOLF PARKING LOT GRADING PLAN

C100

W SSF SOIL BORING 193.59 1015

ST

S

S WSF

SSF W W

SSF

S

EL

19 8

EV

%

-2.

0%

CE

100-YEAR HWL = 190.84 OHW = 187.0

=1 86 .8

FT .

5

195.54TC 195.04G

UG

E

B.

CB RIM 194.50 INV SW 190.90

195.57TC 195.07G

-0.1%

UG

E

E

100-YEAR HWL = 190.84

XX

10'

SCALE IN FEET

20'

FLEXAMAT PLUS, OR APPROVED EQUAL (300 SF)

No.

Date

Revision Description

UG

E

PROJECT NUMBER

9397-0003

DATE

6-30-2021

DRAWN BY

AMZ

CHECKED BY

AS

SUPERVISOR

GB

UG

E

10

'

NORTH

UGE

193

XX

5'

196.60TC 196.10G

CONCR ET WALL E

0

196.49TC 195.99G

UG

SOUTH PARKING LOT GRADING PLAN - ALTERNATE ENLARGEMENT 1" = 10'

196.27C 196.60TC 196.10G

E

PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED FIBER ROLL

196.32C

UG

PROPOSED PERFORATED DRAINTILE

195.61TC 195.11G 195.62TC 195.12G 195.52C 195.26C 195.57TC 195.07G

UGE

.6%

PROPOSED STORM PIPE

196.25TC 195.75G

UGE

GRASSPAVE2, OR APPROVED EQUAL (277 SF)

PROPOSED RIP-RAP

196.65TC 196.15G

E UG

GAS

EXISTING FIBER OPTIC EXISTING GAS EXISTING STORM PIPE EXISTING MAJOR CONTOURS EXISTING MINOR CONTOURS PROPOSED MINOR CONTOURS PROPOSED MINOR CONTOURS

195.89TC 195.39G

190

-17

PROPOSED BIO-FILTRATION MEDIA

187

195.95TC 195.45G 195.94TC 195.44G

E

FO

2 C101

EXISTING TREE

PROPOSED CURB

EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC

UGE

STS

PROPOSED BITUMINOUS

196.71TC 196.21G

UG

198

CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION

UGE

196.59TC 196.09G

196.14TC 195.64G

12 ,2 02 0

LEGEND

196.87TC 196.37G

196.43TC 195.93G

196.35TC 195.85G

E

FE

195

UG

ON

19

UGE

UG E

196.61TC 196.11G

.4 -1 E

E

UGE

NORTH

SCALE IN FEET

CURB AND GUTTER BEHIND MEDIAN TO PROVIDE DRAINAGE

S WSF

TO PO FI

40'

UG

196.92C

196.46TC 195.96G 196.36TC 195.86G 196.39TC 195.89G

196.32TC 195.82G

UG

196.95TC 196.45G

196.51C

E UG

20'

196.61C

UGE

E

10'

196.64C

196.58TC 196.08G

195.70TC 195.20G 195.67TC 195.17G

UG

19 4

196.62TC 196.12G 196.60TC 196.10G

196.58G 197.05TC 196.55G

UGE

E

UG

196.35TC 195.85G 196.32TC 195.82G 196.29TC 195.79G

195.78TC 195.28G 195.74TC 195.24G

LAKESIDE PAVILION SOUTH PARKING LOT GRADING PLAN 0

UG 197.08TCE

1431 LEXINGTON PKWY N, SAINT PAUL, MN 55103

S

ST

196.51TC 196.01G

3

1" = 20'

GOLF COURSE & LAKESIDE PAVILION PARKING LOTS

196.60TC 196.10G

19

1 C101

CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LIMITS OF WALKS AND CURBING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES. MANHOLE LOCATIONS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID PLACEMENT OF THESE STRUCTURES IN WALKS AND CURB AND GUTTER. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE STAKED TO ALLOW CURB INLET TYPE CATCH BASINS TO BE PROPERLY LOCATED IN LINE WITH CURBING.

197.18TC 196.68G

197.22TC 196.72G 196.74C

12" RCP

190

Date:XX/XX/XXXX License #: XXXXX

COMO REGIONAL PARK TRANSPORTATION

SSF

P

0

Signature:

City of Saint Paul Department of Parks and Recreation

192.26

SSF

18" RC

0.5

W

W 191

W

SSF 0

19

196.90C 196.78C

191

193

195.75TC 195.25G

-3

SSF

19

E

1

SSF

W 192.25

UG

195.97TC 195.47G

.0:

W

W

CB RIM 191.40 INV E 187.50

195.74C

FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SOD ALL APPLICABLE AREAS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER..

197.34TC 196.84G UGE

197.42TC 196.92G

E UG

191

193

19 3

7.

SSFW

-3.7 % -2.8%

ST S

STS

192

195.94TC 195.44G

WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, EXISTING SOD EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING.

I HEARBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Printed Name: XXXXXX

UG E

196.44TC 195.94G

196.03TC 195.53G

6.

UGE

STS

UG E

SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN PARKING LOTS, DRIVES AND ROADS INDICATE GUTTER GRADES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

UGE

19 8

STS

193

195.98TC 195.48G

5.

196.91TC 196.41G

196.48TC 195.98G

196.40TC 195.90G

S

UG E

PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISH GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

8.

197.51TC 197.01G 197.45TC 196.95G

ST

STS

192

ST S

196.44TC 195.94G

4.

Parks and Recreation Department 400 City Hall Annex 25 West Street Saint Paul, MN 55102

196.95TC 196.45G

196.63TC 196.13G

.7% -1

E

ST S

STS -3

1 .0:

CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING SITE FEATURES (INCLUDING TURF AND VEGETATION) WHICH ARE TO REMAIN.

E

194

3.

UG

1

196.91TC 196.41G

196.87TC 196.37G

UG

197.83TC 197.33G

197.45TC 196.95G

194.88TC 194.38G

19

197.81TC 197.31G

197.50TC 197.00G

194.35G

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE (CONSTRUCTION ZONES) NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. ALL SIGNAGE LAYOUTS MUST BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES.

197.77TC 197.27G

2%

UGE

195.38TC 194.88G

195.24TC 194.74G

6 19

6% -4.

15" RCP

197.68TC 197.18G

% .9 -2 194.85TC

UGE

19 0.3 0

E

-2.

198

% .3 -4 194.88TC 194.38G

E UG

195

UG

195.34TC 194.84G

195.67TC 195.17G

196

197.49TC 196.99G

196.17TC 195.67G

196.24TC 195.74G

195

197.38TC 196.88G

2.

S WSF

196.36TC 195.86G

E

THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL PAY FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING / LAYOUT.

W

196.31TC 195.81G 196.28TC 195.78G

UG

ST

196.46TC 195.96G

ROADWAY, ALTERNATE ENLARGEMENT

196.27G 196.75TC 196.25G

SSF W

196.80TC 196.30G

ST S

M 197.59 S 193.30 NW 193.50

UGE

197.02TC 196.77TC 196.52G

1.

SS WF

196.88TC 196.38G

MH RIM 197.80 INV SE 193.80

NOTES

UGE

SSF W

UG E

UGE

3' DEPTH AT END OF RAMP

DRAFT NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SOUTH PARKING LOT GRADING PLAN

C101

200

196.11TC 195.61G 196.06TC 195.56G

193

195.85TC 195.35G

12" RCP CB RIM 190.60 INV NW 187.60

195.43TC 194.93G

E

UG

191.00 195

-1.0%

E UG UGE

UGE

193.82

ALTERNATE 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL

193

UGE

STS

190

187

6" PVC INV: 187.60

E UG

12" RCP 60" RCP INV: 184.30

19 0

100-YEAR HWL = 190.84

No.

Date

1431 LEXINGTON PKWY N, SAINT PAUL, MN 55103

196.15TC 195.65G

60" RCP

UGE

UGE

Date:XX/XX/XXXX License #: XXXXX

STS

E UG

I HEARBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Printed Name: XXXXXX Signature:

1

STS

195

PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED FIBER ROLL

COMO REGIONAL PARK TRANSPORTATION

195.89TC 195.39G

193.82

195

PROPOSED PERFORATED DRAINTILE

Parks and Recreation Department 400 City Hall Annex 25 West Street Saint Paul, MN 55102

194

196.03TC 195.53G

196.31TC 195.81G

195.91TC 196 196.88TC 195.28TC 195.41G 195.72TC 197.23TC 196.38G E 194.78G 195.70TC 195.97TC 195.22G 197.28TC UG 196.73G 196.84TC 195.33TC 195.20G 195.47G 197.22TC 195.74TC 196.78G 196.34G 194.83G 196.72G 195.23TC 195.24G 195.60TC 196.69TC 194.73G 195.10G 196.19G 195.57TC 194.60TC 195.60TC 194.10G 195.07G 195.08TC 196.54TC 196.37TC 195.10G E 195.50TC 194.58G 196.04G 195.87G UG 195.49TC 195.00G 195.49TC 194.55TC -3:1 196.35TC 194.99G 197.08TC 194.99G 195.43TC 194.05G 195 194.63TC 195.85G 196.66TC 196.58G 194.93G 195.05TC 194.65 194.13G 196.27TC 195.01TC 196.16G 194.84TC 196.68TC 194.55G 195.07TC 194.96TC 195.77G 194.51G 194.34G 196.18G UGE 194.55TC 194.57G 194.46G 195.42TC 194.92TC 194.62TC 196.65TC 194.05G 194.97TC 194.92G 194.42G 194.12G 196.15G 193.00 194.47G 195.15 196.21C E 196.00TC 196.02C 193.30 UG 194.61TC 195.50G 194.11G 196.07C 196.40C

PROPOSED STORM PIPE

-5:

UGE

195.98TC 195.48G

196.71TC 196.21G

STS

6" PVC

E UG

197.11TC 196.61G

STS

STS

UGE

7

19

EXISTING FIBER OPTIC EXISTING GAS EXISTING STORM PIPE EXISTING MAJOR CONTOURS EXISTING MINOR CONTOURS PROPOSED MINOR CONTOURS PROPOSED MINOR CONTOURS

PROPOSED RIP-RAP

196

UGE

STS MATCH EXISTING TC MATCH EXISTING G

196.64TC 196.14G 196.58TC 196.08G

196.96TC 196.46G 196.92TC 196.42G 196.88TC 196.38G 196.70TC 196.20G 196.71TC 196.21G 196.67TC 196.17G 196.32TC 195.82G

EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC

195

197.21TC 196.71G

UGE

E UG

200

196.66TC 196.16G

196.97TC 196.47G

STS

MH RIM 198.50 INV SW 193.80 INV E 192.60

196.98TC 196.48G

197.26TC 197.28TC 196.76G 196.78G

E UG

U GE

197.47TC 196.97G 197.42TC 196.92G

197.11TC 196.61G 197.02TC 196.52G 197.01TC 196.51G

PROPOSED BIO-FILTRATION MEDIA

City of Saint Paul Department of Parks and Recreation

19 8 197.06TC 196.56G

STS

STS

MATCH EXISTING TC MATCH EXISTING G

EXISTING TREE

PROPOSED CURB

AY KW PAR

197.37TC 196.87G

E UG

U GE

STS

198.13TC 197.19TC 197.63G 196.69G

198.03TC 197.53G 197.59TC 197.09G

E UG

GAS

STS

198.08TC 197.58G

205

9

198.22TC 197.72G

198.17TC 197.67G 198.12TC 197.62G

197

FO

PROPOSED BITUMINOUS

GOLF COURSE & LAKESIDE PAVILION PARKING LOTS

19 8

19

UGE

CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION

XX

STS

CB RIM 200.00 INV NW 197.70

TON ING LEX N.

12" RCP

210

LEGEND

CB RIM 200.00 INV N 197.20 INV SE 197.20

XX

2

20

Revision Description

NOTES 1 C102 0

10'

LAKESIDE PAVILION NORTH PARKING LOT GRADING PLAN - ALTERNATE

1" = 20' 20'

SCALE IN FEET

1.

THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL PAY FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING / LAYOUT.

2.

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE (CONSTRUCTION ZONES) NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. ALL SIGNAGE LAYOUTS MUST BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES.

3.

40' NORTH

CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING SITE FEATURES (INCLUDING TURF AND VEGETATION) WHICH ARE TO REMAIN.

4.

PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISH GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

5.

SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN PARKING LOTS, DRIVES AND ROADS INDICATE GUTTER GRADES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

6.

WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, EXISTING SOD EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING.

7.

FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SOD ALL APPLICABLE AREAS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

8.

CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LIMITS OF WALKS AND CURBING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES. MANHOLE LOCATIONS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID PLACEMENT OF THESE STRUCTURES IN WALKS AND CURB AND GUTTER. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE STAKED TO ALLOW CURB INLET TYPE CATCH BASINS TO BE PROPERLY LOCATED IN LINE WITH CURBING. PROJECT NUMBER

9397-0003

DATE

6-30-2021

DRAWN BY

AMZ

CHECKED BY

AS

SUPERVISOR

GB

DRAFT NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NORTH PARKING LOT GRADING PLAN

C102

9/9/2021 Account: Transaction Deposit Deposit Deposit Deposit Withdrawal Transfer Deposit Withdrawal

Requested 3/4/2015 8/2/2017 1/31/2020 5/10/2018 10/1/2018 7/12/2021 9/9/2021

Volume Banking Credits St. Paul Public Schools Approved Permit Project Deposit Approved 15-005 Murray Middle School Pending 17-003 Como Park Senior High Pending 20-003 SPPS District Service Facility Addition Pending 11-014 AGAPE School 5/16/2018 16-026 St. Anthony Park Elementary 1/6/2021 16-026 St. Anthony Park Elementary 7/21/2021 16-027 RiverEast School Pending 21-027 Como Lake Parking Lots

Withdrawal 7,028 7,672 2,866 2,655 0 9,668

29,889

Balance (cf) 7,028 14,700 17,566 20,221 743 19,478 360 19,118 28,786 1,037 27,749

2,140

27,749

Capitol Region Watershed District Applicant:

Ann Duginske Cibulka Ryan Companies 533 S Third St, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55415

Permit 21-030 HB Block 1 MOB Consultant: Anthony Adams Ryan Companies 533 South 3rd Street Minneapolis, MN 55415

Description: Proposed two story medical office building (MOB) on the north portion of Block 1 at Highland Bridge Stormwater Management: Ford Redevelopment Stormwater Master Plan District Rule:—C, D, F Disturbed Area: 1.53 Acres Impervious Area: 1.3 Acres STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve with 5 Conditions: 1. Receipt of $6,400 surety.

2. Provide approved plans signed by a professional engineer per the Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID.\ 3. Revise erosion control plan to include approved inlet protection for trench drain leading to underground parking.

4. Revise SWPPP to state that silt fence or fabric placed under the grate is not an approved form of inlet protection.

5. Revise design to satisfy CRWD freeboard requirements. Low opening (809.0‘) must be a minimum of two feet above the 100-year flood elevation (808.0‘) or one foot above the emergency overflow (808.1‘).

Permit Location Permit Report 21-030

Mt. Curve

Ford

Aerial Photo Board Meeting Date: 09/15/2021

Capitol Region Watershed District Permit Report CRWD Permit #:

21-030

Review date:

August 30, 2021

Project Name:

HB Block 1 MOB

Applicant:

Ann Duginske Cibulka Ryan Companies 533 S Third St, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55415 (612) 492-4838 Ann.Cibulka@RyanCompanies.com

Purpose:

Proposed two story medical office building (MOB) on the north portion of Block 1 at Highland Bridge.

Location:

2270 Ford Pkwy, St. Paul, MN

Applicable Rules:

C, D, and F

Recommendation:

Approve with 5 Conditions

EXHIBITS: 1. HB L2B1 A_Civil Plans (14 Sheets), by Ryan Companies, dated 8/20/21, recv. 8/24/21.

2. HB Lot 2 Block 1 PPL A Stormwater Narrative, by Ryan Companies, dated 8/23/21, recv.

8/24/21.

3. Exhibit 1_Ford Site Ryan Development Plan, by Ryan Companies, not dated, recv.

8/24/21.

4. Exhibit 2_Ford Site Alternative Permitting Process by CRWD, dated 6/11/20, recv.

8/24/21.

5. Exhibit 3_Ford Site Stormwater Masterplan (573 Pages), by Barr, dated 2/21, recv.

8/24/21.

6. Exhibit 4_Recorded FORD Plat (14 Sheets), by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated 12/19/19, recv. 8/24/21.

7. Exhibit 5_L2B1 PPL Geotechnical Report, by Braun Intertec, dated 8/16/21, recv.

8/24/21.

8. Exhibit 6_L2B1 A Reference Infrastructure Plan Sheets (10 Sheets), by Kimley Horn & Sambatek, dated 5/27/20, recv. 8/24/21.

9. Exhibit 7_L2B1 A Drainage Map, by Ryan Companies, dated 6/29/21, recv. 8/24/21.

10. Exhibit 8_Highland Bridge Stormwater Impervious Design Spreadsheet, by Ryan Companies, not dated, recv. 8/24/21.

11. Exhibit 9_NPDES Permit C00056124, by MPCA, dated 6/16/20, recv. 8/24/21.

W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2021\21-030, HB Block 1 MOB\21-030 Permit Report_R1b.doc Page 1 of 4

12. Exhibit 10_SWPPP Narrative L2B1 A, by Ryan Companies, dated 8/19/21, recv. 8/24/21.

13. Exhibit 11_ Park A Basin Overflows, by Ryan Companies, dated 8/23/21, recv. 8/24/21.

HISTORY & CONSIDERATIONS: Runoff will connect to approved permanent stormwater management outlined in CRWD Permit 20-013 Ford Site Redevelopment Stormwater Master Plan.

Block 1 (2.29 ac) was subdivided in early 2020 into lots 1 (1.53 ac) and 2 (0.76 ac). Both lots are designed for 85% impervious area in the Stormwater Master Plan.

RULE C: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Standards  Proposed discharge rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year events shall not exceed existing rates.  Developments and redevelopments must reduce runoff volumes in the amount equivalent to an inch of runoff from the impervious areas of the site.  Stormwater must be pretreated before discharging to infiltration areas to maintain the long-term viability of the infiltration area.  Developments and redevelopments must incorporate effective non-point source pollution reduction BMPs to achieve 90% total suspended solid removal.

Findings 1. Stormwater runoff rate, water quality and volume retention were reviewed and approved under CRWD Permit #20-013 (Ford Site Stormwater Master Plan).

Therefore, the intent of this review is to verify compliance by comparing the amount of impervious surface approved during review of the Master Plan versus each subsequent private site development project.

Table 1. Approved vs. Proposed Impervious Area.

Approved Master Plan Site Development Block/Lot Impervious Area (ft2) Impervious Area (ft2) 1/1 56,650 56,076 a. The proposed site new/reconstructed impervious area is equal to or below the impervious area approved in the master plan. b. No additional volume retention is required for this site-specific development.

RULE D: FLOOD CONTROL Standards  Compensatory storage shall be provided for fill placed within the 100-year floodplain.  All habitable buildings, roads, and parking structures on or adjacent to a project site shall comply with District freeboard requirements.

Findings 1. There is no floodplain on the property according to FEMA. W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2021\21-030, HB Block 1 MOB\21-030 Permit Report_R1b.doc Page 2 of 4

2. All habitable buildings, roads, and parking structures on or adjacent to the project site do not comply with CRWD freeboard requirements.

RULE E: WETLAND MANAGEMENT Standard  Wetlands shall not be drained, filled (wholly or in part), excavated, or have sustaining hydrology impacted such that there will be a decrease in the inherent (existing) functions and values of the wetland.  A minimum buffer of 25 feet of permanent nonimpacted vegetative ground cover abutting and surrounding a wetland is required.

Findings 1. There are no known wetlands located on the property.

RULE F: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Standards  A plan shall demonstrate that appropriate erosion and sediment control measures protect downstream water bodies from the effects of a land-disturbing activity.  Erosion Control Plans must adhere to the MPCA Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas Manual.

Findings 1. Erosion and sediment control measures are not consistent with best management practices, as demonstrated in the MPCA manual Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas.

2. Adjacent properties are protected from sediment transport/deposition.

3. Wetlands, waterbodies and water conveyance systems are not protected from erosion/sediment transport/deposition.

4. Total disturbed area is 1.53 acres; an NPDES permit is required. A SWPPP has been submitted but is not sufficient.

RULE G: ILLICIT DISCHARGE AND CONNECTION Standard  Stormwater management and utility plans shall indicate all existing and proposed connections from developed and undeveloped lands for all water that drains to the District MS4.

Findings 1. New direct connections or replacement of existing connections are not proposed.

2. Prohibited discharges are not proposed.

Recommendation: Approve with 5 Conditions Conditions: 1. Receipt of $6,400 surety.

2. Provide approved plans signed by a professional engineer per the Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID. 3. Revise erosion control plan to include approved inlet protection for trench drain leading to underground parking.

W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2021\21-030, HB Block 1 MOB\21-030 Permit Report_R1b.doc Page 3 of 4

4. Revise SWPPP to state that silt fence or fabric placed under the grate is not an approved form of inlet protection.

5. Revise design to satisfy CRWD freeboard requirements. Low opening (809.0‘) must be a minimum of two feet above the 100-year flood elevation (808.0‘) or one foot above the emergency overflow (808.1‘).

W:\07 Programs\Permitting\2021\21-030, HB Block 1 MOB\21-030 Permit Report_R1b.doc Page 4 of 4

RYAN A+E, INC. 533 South Third Street, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax

FORD PARKWAY

WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM OWNER

C:811.72 6.0%

C:809.42

C:814.04 C:812.33

G:814.72

BW:813.32

C:812.37

% 5.0

2.7%

G:809.18

C:809.41

C:814.04

C:813.58 C:813.73

2.8%

G:815.40

C:809.42 10.7%

C:814.17

SEE C401 FOR FINE GRADING DETAILS

14.9%

G:808.21

G:807.92

CONSULTANTS

18.4%

PROPOSED BUILDING

C:809.00

C:815.50

30.2%

L1 FFE = 821.00' P1 FFE = 808.00' P2 FFE = 799.83'

G:815.55 G:818.00

GL:821.00

G:818.00

LOT 1 BLOCK 1

2%

C:821.00

C:820.56

1.

C:820.50 C:821.00

GL:821.00

C:821.00

SEE C401 FOR FINE GRADING DETAILS

C:821.00

C:821.00

C:820.50

G:818.00

C:820.85

C:816.83

C:820.74

NO PARKING

GL:820.40 GL:821.00 G:819.54

C:809.04

GL:820.78 GL:820.78 TW:821.00

0.8%

9.4%

32.3%

G:811.58

1.7%

1.4%

TC=GL:820.38

TC=GL:820.22

RIM:812.25

C:819.70

8.0%

GL:820.67 GL:820.50 RIM:820.71

GL:819.54

TC=GL:817.83

GL:820.92

KEY PLAN

2270 FORD PKWY ST. PAUL, MN 55116 PROJECT INFORMATION

HIGHLAND BRIDGE: LOT 1 BLOCK 1

4.3 %

GL:820.50 TC=GL:820.49

C:819.70

14.6%

TC=GL:817.11

GL:817.21 G:817.95

TC=GL:820.47 GL:820.55 C:809.04 C:808.79

5.2%

GL:820.55

C:817.86

GL:817.51

GL:820.39 TC:820.89

TC=GL:820.61

GL:820.10 1.7%

RIM:819.90 2.4 %

GL:820.50

1.5%

32.9%

4.3%

TC=GL:820.82

NO PARKING

GL:820.10

1.5%

G:809.53

GL:820.10

TC=GL:820.39

GL:818.61

GL:820.17

1.5%

1.1 %

1.0 %

PARK AR A R A

TC=GL:820.39

GL:820.39

% 1.0

2.

0%

GL:820.39

% 1.0

% 2.4

4.7%

C:820.89

TC:820.89 34.1%

MOUNT CURVE BLVD

7.3% G:811.50

2.9 %

G:823.28 G:823.51

0.9%

GL:820.75

GL:821.00

SWALE TO DIRECT STORMWATER RUNOFF TO THE WEST

L1=823.67 P1=812.50

LOT 2 BLOCK 1

L1=824.00 P1=814.00

© 2021 RYAN A&E, INC.

HILLCREST AVE

0

20

SCALE

IN

40

DRAWN BY ZRJ

CHECKED BY ATA

JOB NO. 701107

DATE 08.20.2021

FEET

LEGEND: EXISTING

PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR

N

STORM SEWER PIPE

TWO-POINT PERCENT GRADE SLOPE RATIO PAVEMENT ELEVATION CONCRETE ELEVATION GUTTER LINE ELEVATION

P FO RE R LIM CO I NS NAR TR Y UC T

STORM CLEANOUT ONE-POINT PERCENT GRADE

T

STORM MANHOLE

NO

R:\Projects\701\100\701-107 Highland Bridge MOB\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\701107 C400 GRADING PLAN.dwg

STORM INLET

FLARED END SECTION

IO

SOLID DRAINTILE PERFORATED DRAINTILE

TOP OF CURB ELEVATION TOP OF CURB=GUTTER LINE TOP OF WALL ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION GROUND ELEVATION FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION STRUCTURE RIM ELEVATION

DD SET 8.20.2021

GRADING PLAN

SOIL BORING BENCHMARK

C400

September 15, 2021 Board Meeting IV. Special Report – Great River Passage Initiatives – River Learning Center and River Balcony (Eleria/deLaittre)

DATE: TO: FROM: RE:

September 9, 2021 CRWD Board of Managers Anna Eleria, Division Manager and Mary deLaittre, Great River Passage Conservancy Great River Passage Initiatives – River Learning Center and River Balcony

Background In 2013, the City of Saint Paul adopted the Great River Passage Master Plan, a comprehensive framework for creating vibrancy in the City’s 3,500 acres of parkland along a 17-mile stretch of the Mississippi River.

Three guiding principles – more natural, more urban and more connected, underpin the many goals, objectives and strategies of the plan. The Great River Passage Conservancy (GRPC), an independent, nonprofit fundraising and advocacy organization, was created to support capital projects in this parkland including the River Learning Center and River Balcony.

Issues The City, GRPC and other partners are proposing the River Learning Center at Watergate Marina in Crosby Farm Regional Park that will combine an indoor/outdoor space for hands-on programming about the culture, history and ecology of the river with the National Park Service MNRRA Headquarters.

Preliminary feasibility studies of the site have been completed including a technical study supported by CRWD in 2017. GRPC is currently fundraising for schematic design of the River Learning Center and anticipates starting design in early 2022.

The River Balcony is a 1.5-mile promenade that will connect a series of cohesive public spaces, civic landmarks and development sites along Downtown Saint Paul’s river bluff. The promenade extends from the west at the Xcel Energy Center/RiverCentre to the east at Lower Landing Park. A master plan for the River Balcony was approved by the City in 2017. Schematic design of the River Balcony shall commence this fall with a significant stakeholder and community engagement process. While the fundraising goals for architectural and technical design have been reached, additional funds are still being sought for a robust community engagement effort.

At the September 15th Board meeting, Mary deLaittre, Executive Director of GRPC, will give an overview of the two projects, highlight results of preliminary work and outline the next steps and schedule for schematic design of each project. At the following Board meeting on October 6th, CRWD staff will request approval of a grant to GRPC to support schematic design and community engagement. Both projects are identified in the 2021-2030 Watershed Management Plan and the preliminary 2022 budget and workplan.

Action Requested None, for your information only Enc.

Great River Passage Capital Projects – Self-Guided Tour Brochure

W:\08 Orgs-Cities-Agencies\St. Paul\Great River Passage Initiative\Board Memos\BM Great River Passage Special Report 09-15-2021.docx

Our mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District.

BUILDING THE RIVER CAPITAL

Phalen Blvd

Mississippi St

Dale St

Snelling Ave

Prior Ave

m

oA ve

3rd St

University Ave Three Capital projects will transform Saint Paul’s riverfront into centers of river-oriented activity accessible to all.

Wa rne Wa rnr Red r

Ro

ad

Up

per

Afto

nR

d

EAST SIDE RIVER DISTRICT

ve dA

Grand Ave

Snelling Ave

n Gra

R d

St. Claire

ar ep

d

nR

fto

rA

we

Lo

Smith Ave

RIVER BALCONY Robert St

ep

ar

d

R

oa

Randolph Ave

Annapolis Ave

Sh

Highland Pkwy

George St

d

Jefferson Ave

Sh

W

7t h

St

d

Cleveland Ave

Mississippi River Blvd

Mississippi River Boulevard

West River Blvd

Summit Ave

McKight Rd

Burns Ave

Marshall Ave

t

Ruth St

Co

Minnehaha Ave

White Bear Ave

E 7th St

W at

er

St

Ford Pkwy

Cleveland Ave

Montreal Ave

RIVER LEARNING CENTER W

7th

St

Road Path

RIVER LEARNING CENTER/NATIONAL PARK SERVICE MNRRA HEADQUARTERS The gateway to the Mississippi River, welcoming residents and visitors to this national feature with four-season programming that promotes stewardship and teaches the culture, history, and ecology of the river.

RIVER BALCONY

EAST SIDE RIVER DISTRICT

A 1.5-mile promenade that extends along Downtown Saint Paul’s signature Mississippi River Bluff and down to the river. The Balcony transforms urban infrastructure into public space that connects parks, civic landmarks and private development the length of Kellogg Boulevard.

A complex, dynamic 1,000-acre riparian landscape that knits together historically incompatible uses such as industry, infrastructure, wildlife, and culture to create an educational and experiential landscape focused on restoration, conservation, and resilience.

For more information, visit GreatRiverPassage.org.

RIVER LEARNING CENTER/NATIONAL PARK SERVICE MNRRA HEADQUARTERS Experience the land + water + culture of the Mississippi River

RIVER BALCONY

EAST SIDE RIVER DISTRICT

Reimagining Saint Paul’s unique perspective of the river

Reveal, Heal, Connect, Protect a complex river landscape

5 ay w Hi

gh

Sh

C

A

ep

ar

d

Ro

ad

A

G E

D

s Mis

iss

ipp

iR

ive

H

r

F Min

o nes

ta R

ive

B I

G

A

B

EXPLORE WHAT IS

EXPLORE WHAT IS

EXPLORE WHAT IS

D

E

C

r

C

F D

H

G

B

A. Two Rivers Overlook B. Historic Fort Snelling C. Hidden Falls Regional Park D. Watergate Marina and two bays E. Crosby Farm Regional Park F. Pike Island/Witatanka G. B’dote

IMAGINE WHAT COULD BE

A. Xcel Energy Center/RiverCentre B. Science Museum of Minnesota C. Public Library D. District Energy E. City Hall F. RiversEdge development G. Kellogg Mall Park H. Union Depot I. Viking River Cruises

IMAGINE WHAT COULD BE

E F

A. Wakan Tipi B. DNR Regional Headquarters C. Barge Terminal 1 D. Super Fund Sites E. Pig’s Eye Heron Rookery F. Red Rock Barge Terminal G. Pig’s Eye Regional Park H. Waste Water Treatment Facility IMAGINE WHAT COULD BE

• World class, forward-thinking architecture and landscape design

• A signature landscape and urban design celebrating the river and bluff

• Reveals the complex systems and stories of the area

• Four-season indoor/outdoor space for hands-on programming that teaches the culture, history, and ecology of the river

• A year-round regional destination that is a convergence of experiences

• Heals an environmentally compromised landscape

• Safe water access

• Connects the landmarks and institutions along Kellogg Blvd. to one another and the river

Project Phase: Fundraising for Schematic Design

Project Phase: Schematic Design

• Connects to and throughout the area on yearround, safe and accessible roads and trail systems • Protects sacred and significant Dakota sites Project Phase: Fundraising for Schematic Design

September 15, 2021 Board Workshop V. Action Item A) Approve Minutes of September 1, 2021 Workshop & Regular Board Meeting

(Sylvander)

Board Workshop of the Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD) Board of Managers, for Wednesday, September 1, 2021, 5:00 p.m. (Board Workshop) BOARD WORKSHOP MINUTES I.

A)

Call to Order of Board Workshop (President Joe Collins)

Managers Joe Collins Shawn Murphy Rick Sanders Hawona Sullivan Janzen Mary Texer absent w/notice B)

Staff Present Mark Doneux, CRWD Bob Fossum, CRWD Anna Eleria, CRWD

Public Attendees Nick Anhut, Ehlers James Mogen, Ramsey County Attorney’s Office

Review, Amendments and Approval of the Agenda.

Motion 21-162: Approve the Workshop Agenda of September 1, 2021. With no changes.

Murphy/Sanders Unanimously Approved II.

Discussion Items A)

Redemption of 2007A Bond and Refunding of 2013A Bond

Administrator Doneux provided a review of the 2007A Bond and refunding (refinancing) of the 2013A Bonds. The District has used debt as a form of financing for select projects since 2007. Currently, the District has bonds issued in 2007, 2013 and 2018 and an MPCA Clean Water Loan from 2014. The option to prepay (call date) the 2007A bonds started in 2017. While the call date for the 2013A is approaching in 2022, the repayment amount of over $2,000,000 may make it infeasible, at this point, to repay in full. The 2018A bonds have a balance of over $8,000,000 and its call date is in 2027. The MPCA loan only has a $50,000/year payment plan and will be fully repaid in 2023. Given the current estimated 2021 year-end Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Fund Balance of over $5,000,000, it is recommended that the District fully prepay the 2007A bonds that is approximately $615,000. This prepayment would save the District approximately $76,000 over the final six years of the debt schedule.

Funds would come from the CIP Fund Balance. The actual payment would be made in October of this year. By retiring this debt early, the District will be able to reduce its debt service each year by approximately $120,000 and apply that savings to the 2013A payments.

In addition to prepaying the 2007A bonds, the Finance Committee along with our Financial Planner, Nick Anhut from Ehlers, reviewed the feasibility of refunding (refinancing) the 2013A bonds. At current interest rates, Mr. Anhut estimates that by refunding the 2013A bonds, the District could realize savings of approximately $118,000 over the next 12 years of the debt schedule. Administrator Doneux recommend that the District use the approximately $120,000 of freed levy capacity, from prepaying the 2007A debt, and apply it to accelerate repayment on the refunded (refinanced) 2013A bonds. Doing this, the District would be able to shorten the repayment to 8 years and increase net interest cost savings to $208,500. The debt still retires 4 years early without incurring any new levy burden.

Mr. Nick Anhut from Ehlers was in attendance and provided a review of the pay back process of bonds.

President Collins inquired about the interest rate. Mr. Anhut replied that by refinancing the 2013A, he anticipates a lower interest rate of about 1%. Mr. Anhut added that a review of the 2018A debt can be done in the future for additional savings. President Collins inquired about the Districts credit rating. Mr. Anhut replied that the District already has a very high desirable rating and paying off the 2007A Bond only adds to the credibility of the District. Administrator Doneux asked for any questions. Manager Murphy inquired about the Districts rating and its ability to pay debt. Mr. Anhut replied that the District has a large tax base and ability to levy. Mr. Anhut added that the fund balance is a factor in the credit rating.

B)

Preliminary 2022 Budget and Levy

Administrator Doneux provided a review of the 2022 Budget and Levy and recommended that the Board restore the 2022 debt service back to $1,056,439. In previous budgets, it was reduced by approximately $120,000 in anticipation of a lower debt service. Administrator Doneux also recommended the additional $121,985 be applied towards the 2013A bonds to accelerate repayment to eight years. Staff is recommending the preliminary budget of $825,550 for Administration, $3,769,328 for Programs, $1,564,882 for Projects for a total Operations Budget of $6,159,760 and $4,532,822 for Capital Improvement Projects. This results in a total Preliminary 2022 Budget of $10,692,582. This is an increase of $1,288,518 from the adopted budget for 2021. The proposed 2022 tax levy is $8,774,361.

This includes $7,717,922 for the operations and capital levy and $1,056,439 for debt. This levy is 6% greater than 2021. Manager Sullivan Janzen recommended a correction in the date of the memo.

C)

2021 Employee Handbook

Administrator Doneux provided a presentation reviewing the process of updating the 2021 Employee Handbook. Handbooks for other watershed districts were reviewed to compare benefits. Administrator Doneux provided details about the major changes outlined in the handbook including: 1. Increase Paid Time Off for all staff and provide 16 hours of PTO to new staff upon hiring.

2. Provide 4 consecutive weeks of Paid Family Medical Leave 3. Provide 200 hours of Work Off Site time each year (post COVID-19 restrictions).

4. The Cell Phone Allowance (increased to $50/month) and Apparel Allowance (increased to $100/year) were increased to reflect present day costs.

Manager Murphy inquired about PTO balance and how it is distributed at the time an employee would leave the District. Administrator Doneux replied that PTO is paid out in one lump sum, and it is not considered a retirement program. Manager Sullivan Janzen asked for clarification of the apparel allowance. Administrator Doneux replied that the cell phone allowance is $50 a month and the apparel allowance increased from $50 a year to $100 a year. Administrator Doneux added that appendices will be updated every year with benefits for open enrollment. Manager Murphy inquired about other Districts recognizing the Work Off Site policy. Administrator Doneux replied that other districts that were reviewed did not have a Work Off Site policy in place. President Collins added that the City of St. Paul has a Work Off Site policy. Mr. Fossum added that Ramsey County, Hennepin County, St. Paul, and Minneapolis have a policy for paid family medical leave of four weeks. Administrator Doneux thanked Mr. Fossum and Ms. Bromelkamp for all their hard work on the handbook. President Collins added that the handbook is very well done.

D)

2021 MAWD Resolutions

Administrator Doneux provided a review on three possible resolutions drafted for the 2021 MAWD Resolutions.

1. Amend Session law Section 6, (a) (2) to state “seven-county metropolitan groundwater or watershed management plans that have a board-approved and local-government-adopted plan as authorized in Minnesota Statutes, section 103B.” 2. Redirect Clean Water Funds from SWCD Local Capacity Services to BWSR Accelerated Implementation of Watershed Based Implementation Funding. Current Session Law Section 6, (q) provides “$12,000,000 the first year and $12,000,000 the second year are for payments to soil and water conservation districts for the purposes of Minnesota Statutes, sections 103C.321 and 103C.331.

From this appropriation, each soil and water conservation district shall receive an increase in its base funding of $100,000 per year.” The title of this resolution was changed to be more specific on how the funds should be reallocated to BWSR Accelerated Implementation of Watershed Based Implementation Funding rather than solely on opposing the capacity funding.

President Collins added that Clean Water Funds were not supposed to fund operating expenses.

Administrator Doneux added that this money was not intended for local government funding.

3. Require State Agencies to seek review and comment from affected local units of government on new or amended water management policies prior to adoption.

President Collins stated that language should consider final approval by affected local government units.

Administrator Doneux added that an approval period could help clear up this problem. Administrator Doneux added that he expects that this will be supported by other watershed districts. These resolutions are not just for CRWD, but have metro and statewide impact. President Collins thanked Administrator Doneux. No Action was taken, the workshop was for information and discussion only.

III.

Adjourn Board Workshop

Motion 21-163: Adjournment of the September 1, 2021, Discussion Board Workshop at 6:00P.M.

Murphy/Sanders Unanimously Approved Respectfully submitted, Michelle Sylvander

September 15, 2021 Board Workshop V. Action Item A) Approve Minutes of September 1, 2021 Workshop & Regular Board Meeting

(Sylvander)

Regular Board Meeting of the Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD) Board of Managers, for Wednesday, September 1, 2021, 6:00 p.m. (Regular Meeting) at the office of CRWD, 595 Aldine Street, St. Paul, Minnesota.

REGULAR MEETING MINUTES I.

A)

Call to Order of Regular Meeting (President Joe Collins)

Managers Joe Collins Shawn Murphy Rick Sanders Hawona Sullivan Janzen Mary Texer absent w/notice

B)

Staff Present Public Attendees Mark Doneux, CRWD Nick Anhut, Ehlers Elizabeth Hosch, CRWD Anna Eleria, CRWD Lindsay Schwantes, CRWD Bob Fossum, CRWD

Review, Amendments and Approval of the Agenda.

Motion 21-164: Approve the Agenda of September 1, 2021, with no changes.

Murphy/Sanders Unanimously Approved II.

Public Comment

No comments were made.

III.

Permit Applications and Program Updates A)

21-002, Mississippi River Boulevard Subdivision – Review Period Extension (Hosch)

Ms. Hosch reviewed permit #21-002, Mississippi River Boulevard Subdivision. The current review period for the permit expires on 9-12-2021.The applicant requested an extension to the 60-day review period prior to the expiration. The applicant has requested the additional time to complete the required conditions, with particular attention to City of St. Paul permitting needs.

President Collins asked for any questions or comments. No comments were made.

Motion 21-165: Approve 60-day review period extension for Permit 21-002 Mississippi River Blvd Subdivision to expire November 11, 2021.

Murphy/Sanders Unanimously Approved B)

21-028, Highland Bridge Lot 2, Block 1B Emma Norton – Project for Pride in Living (Hosch)

Ms. Hosch reviewed permit #21-028, Highland Bridge Lot 2, Block 1B Emma Norton. The applicant, Project for Pride in Living, will reconstruct a 60-Unit Affordable Housing Building located near the southeast corner of Block 1 at Highland Bridge, now referred to as Lot 2 Block 1B. The applicable rules are Stormwater Management (Rule C), Flood Control (Rule D), and Erosion and Sediment Control (Rule F). The disturbed area of this project is 0.33 acres with 0.65 acres impervious surface.

President Collins asked for any questions or comments. There were no comments.

Motion 21-166: Approve permit #21-028 Highland Bridge Lot 2, Block 1B Emma Norton with 4 Conditions: 1. Receipt of $1,500 surety.

2. Provide approved plans signed by a professional engineer per the Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID. 3. Revise erosion control plan to include the following: a. Construction entrance b. Inlet protection for catch basin(s) to the west of the proposed building across the driveway.

4. Revise SWPPP to state that silt fence or fabric placed under the grate is not an approved form of inlet protection.

Murphy/Sanders Unanimously Approved C)

21-029, Highland Bridge Lot 2, Block 1A Nellie Francis Court – Project for Pride in Living (Hosch)

Ms. Hosch reviewed permit #21-029, Highland Bridge Lot 2, Block 1A Nellie Francis Court. The applicant, Project for Pride in Living, will construct a 75 Unit Affordable Housing Building located near the southwest corner of Block 1 at Highland Bridge, now referred to as Lot 2 Block 1A. The applicable rules are Stormwater Management (Rule C), Flood Control (Rule D), and Erosion and Sediment Control (Rule F). The disturbed area of this project is 0.43 acres with 0.65 acres impervious surface.

President Collins asked for any questions or comments. There were no comments.

Motion 21-167: Approve permit #21-029, Highland Bridge Lot 2, Block 1A Nellie Francis Court with four conditions: 1. Receipt of $1,800 surety.

2. Provide approved plans signed by a professional engineer per the Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID. 3. Revise erosion control plan to include inlet protection for five additional catch basins.

4. Revise SWPP to state that silt fence or fabric placed under the grate is not an approved form of inlet protection.

Murphy/Sanders Unanimously Approved IV.

Special Reports – No Special Reports

V.

Action Items A)

AR: Approve Minutes of the August 18, 2021, Regular Meeting (Sylvander)

Manager Sullivan Janzen suggested the Board delay approving the minutes until a workshop could be held to discuss the goal, purpose, and level of detail the Board desires in meeting minutes. Manager Collins stated the Board could approve the minutes now as is or hold them over until after a workshop. Manager Sullivan Janzen asked if previously approved minutes could be amended later after a future workshop.

Manager Collins stated he believed the Board could amend minutes at a later date. The Board discussed the need for the workshop and to clarify what should be included in the minutes. Administrator Doneux noted that due to the fact the minutes are the official record for permits, approval of agreements and other important actions, approval of the minutes as quickly as possible following a meeting is important. He also noted that the Board may provide greater direction to staff on preparing minutes, however it is still somewhat of a judgement call on staff’s part on what is a significant comment. Manager Sullivan Janzen noted that in her role as Board Secretary to provide and recommend minutes for approval. She noted that there have been statements that, in her view, were important but were missing and in other cases the context to a statement was not included. She used an example from the August 18th meeting as an example.

Manager Sanders said he supported the idea of a workshop and noted that he also does not know what to expect from the meeting minutes. He also noted that the Board has always been open and flexible to adding or amending the minutes at the meeting. Manager Sanders stated he would be comfortable approving the minutes as is but would like a workshop. Manager Sullivan Janzen noted that part of the issue may be the short turnaround time to get draft minutes ready for the next Board meeting. Manager Collins stated that if he notes an error or omission, he provides staff with his notes for an amendment to the minutes. Manager Murphy said he also agreed a workshop to provide greater clarity would be good. He also stated that he also is generally comfortable with the level of detail in the minutes and can appreciate the limits on staff time to turnaround the minutes and noted staff still have to use some judgement on what to include in the draft minutes for the packet.

Manager Collins called the question to see if the Board was comfortable approving the August 18, 2021, Board Meeting minutes. Manager Sullivan Janzen stated she was if there was some additional statements clarifying and adding context to the discussion about handouts at CRWD events or when we are tabling at other events.

Motion 21-168: Approve the Amended Minutes of August 18, 2021, Regular Meeting.

Murphy/Sanders Unanimously Approved B)

Authorize Redemption of 2007A Bond and Refunding of 2013A Bond (Doneux)

Administrator Doneux provided a summary review of the 2007A Bond.

Motion 21-169: Adopt a Resolution providing for the redemption of Series 2007A watershed district tax supported bonds.

Murphy/Sanders Unanimously Approved Administrator Doneux provided a summary review of the 2013A Bond.

Motion 21-170: Adopt a Resolution providing for the Sale of $2,020,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2021A. Murphy/Sanders Unanimously Approved C)

Adopt Preliminary 2022 Budget and Levy (Doneux)

Administrator Doneux provided a summary review of the Preliminary 2022 Budget and Levy.

Motion 21-171: Adopt Resolution approving the Preliminary 2022 Budget and Levy and direct the Treasurer and Administrator to certify the levy with Ramsey County.

Murphy/Sanders Unanimously Approved D)

Adopt 2021 Employee Handbook (Doneux)

Administrator Doneux provided a summary review of the 2021 Employee Handbook.

Motion 21-172: Adopt 2021 CRWD Employee Handbook.

Murphy/Sanders Unanimously Approved E)

Approve 2021 MAWD Resolutions (Doneux)

Administrator Doneux provided a summary review of the 2021 MAWD Resolutions.

Motion 21-173: Approve 2021 MAWD Resolutions.

Murphy/Sanders Unanimously Approved F)

Approve Plans and Authorize Bidding for TBI St. 28+65 to 52+80 Repair Project (Eleria)

Ms. Eleria reviewed that in June 2020, CRWD’s Board of Managers approved an engineering work order for the repair designs of in approximately 2,000 feet of the Trout Brook Storm Sewer Interceptor near Phalen Boulevard and I-35E in Saint Paul. The deficiencies in this section of TBI include deteriorating concrete, exposed reinforcement, holes, cracks and fractures, and sediment build up in the tunnel.

Barr Engineering has completed the design of repairs for TBI Station 28+65 to 52+80. Primary repairs involve filling cracks with grout, sealing exposed reinforcement, repairing eroded concrete tunnel and invert, and repairing access hatches. In addition, there is a bid alternate for placing soil cover over a 40foot section of tunnel that is exposed at the surface. This section is located on BNSF Railroad property, and we have applied for a BNSF temporary occupancy permit. Based on conversation with local BNSF staff, we anticipate no issues obtaining the permit by the time of construction, however, as a precaution, this repair item is a bid alternate.

The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost is $1.02 million with range from $914,000 to $1.17 million. The 2021 engineering and construction budget is $950,000 (Fund #415-20820) and the proposed 2022 budget is $640,000. CRWD staff anticipates bid letting in early September and holding a three-week bidding period. Construction of the repairs may commence in mid-fall 2021 and extend through early winter 2022. Ms. Eleria asked for any questions. Manager Sanders asked if CRWD ensures that people cannot access or get into the Trout Brook tunnel, noting he knew one of the individuals that recently died in a St. Paul storm sewer. Ms. Eleria noted that the District ensures that access points are secured and locked. Manager Sanders asked for clarification on CRWD’s responsibility for the outlet. Ms. Eleria replied that the last ½ mile is owned by the City of St. Paul. Ms. Eleria added that inlets are inspected on a regular basis.

Motion 21-174: Approve plans and authorize bidding for the TBI Repair Project – Station 28+65 to 52+80.

Murphy/Sanders Unanimously Approved G)

Authorize Field Guide for Working with Artists (Schwantes)

Ms. Schwantes provided a review of the field guide of working with Artists. In 2010, the Board of Managers approved engaging the services of Public Art Saint Paul and Christine Bauemler as CRWD Watershed Artist in Residence. As part of this initiative, a report was drafted called The Watershed Language of Art to help provide direction on how art can enhance the District’s mission.

Art and artistic consultation have since been integrated into many District projects and programs including the Green Line green infrastructure practices, Midway Peace Park and many elements in our new office as well as adding a Public Art Program to our annual budget.

In July 2020, former Board Manager Seitu Jones, CRWD Watershed Artist in Residence, Christine Baeumler, Mark Doneux, Anna Eleria, Jessica Bromelkamp, Lindsay Schwantes from staff, and CAC member Pat Cavanaugh participated in a Ripple Mapping Exercise evaluation of CRWD’s Public Art Program with the goal of providing direction on how best art can further our mission. Artist in Residence, Christine Baeumler, used the exercise to draft a set of recommendations and guidance for enhancing the District’s Public Art Program and improving the integration of art into other projects and programs and these Public Art Program Guiding Principles were approved by the Board in September 2020.

These Guiding Principles led to the development of a Field Guide for Working with Artists. This document was drafted by CRWD Artist in Residence with input from staff and members of the Communications and Community Committee of the Board with the goal of providing CRWD staff, Board and CAC as well as partners, a framework for how art and artists can be integrated into our projects and programs to further our mission. This includes programs like the Artist in Residence model as well as other ways of working with artists for CRWD to consider through the Public Art Program.

Following a meeting with Managers Murphy and Sullivan Janzen in March 2021, we continued to finalize the text and pursue artistic elements as part of the final field guide. A digital copy of the final draft of Capitol Region Watershed District’s Field Guide for Working with Artists is attached and two hard copies of this final draft will be available at the September 1 Board meeting to pass around. Staff will present this document at the meeting as well as any final edits that have been suggested by staff, CRWD’s Artist in Residence and the Communications and Community Committee members from the Board.

President Collins reference page 15 regarding the safety training. Administrator Doneux suggested some revised wording. Ms. Schwantes noted the change and has been made aware of edits noted from Manager Murphy. Manager Sullivan Janzen provided some clarification of the title Artist in Residence.

Ms. Schwantes noted the term “residence” may cause some confusion as used in the artist community.

Motion 21-175: Approve CRWD Field Guide for Working with Artists.

Murphy/Sanders Unanimously Approved H)

Authorize Minnesota Water Stewards (Schwantes)

Ms. Schwantes provided a review of the Minnesota Water Stewards program. The program trains, certifies, and supports community leaders to install pollution prevention projects that educate community members and reduce polluted runoff. CRWD recruited its first class of Stewards in 2016 and currently has six cohorts and 18 active stewards. Freshwater updated the program name to Minnesota Water Stewards and transitioned to an online training curriculum in 2021 in response to feedback from partner organizations as well as challenges with in-person gatherings due to COVID-19. Freshwater was also able to reduce the

sponsorship fee per steward from $2,500 to $1,500 with these changes. The training is now held fully online with opportunities for scheduled in-person or virtual check-ins and kick-off and closing gatherings hosted

by Freshwater with training taking place January – May. Motion 21-176: Authorize the Administrator to enter into an Agreement with Freshwater to host up to six Minnesota Water Stewards for the 2022 program year at a cost of $1,500 per steward with a total not to exceed $9,000.

Murphy/Sanders Unanimously Approved VI.

Unfinished Business A)

Covid-19 Update (Doneux)

Administrator Doneux updated the Board about the reinstated mask mandate in the office. The full return to the office has been moved back to October 5th. Out of the abundance of caution, the CAC tour has been cancelled.

B)

Como Lake – Aquatic Plant Management (Belden)

Mr. Fossum provided an update on a native plant transplanting event. Mr. Fossum shared how herbicides were applied to Como Lake in 2020 and 2021. CRWD is working with the DNR. Several native plants will be transplanted from a donor lake and planted in Como Lake.

VII.

General Information A)

Board of Managers’ Updates

President Collins attended the BWSR Annual Field Tour meeting last week. President Collins shared that BWSR and MAWD are getting closer in understanding the Metro Watershed Based Funding.

President Collins felt it was a good discussion.

President Collins shared that Manager Texer had surgery on Monday and is doing well.

B)

Administrator’s Update

Administrator Doneux shared there is a heavy agenda on September 15th and suggested a workshop for the meeting minutes on Wednesday, September 22nd. Administrator Doneux will send out an email to determine if Wednesday, September 22nd will work for all the Managers.

Administrator Doneux shared that Mr. Wes Saunders Pearce will be leaving the City of St. Paul and going to work for the Department of Natural Resources.

VIII. Next Meetings

A) B) IX.

Wednesday, September 8, 2021, 5:00 PM – CAC Annual Tour - Cancelled Wednesday, September 15, 2021, 6:00 PM – Regular Meeting

Adjournment

Motion 21-77: Adjournment of the September 1, 2021, Regular Board Meeting at 6:45 P.M. Murphy/Sanders Unanimously Approved Respectfully submitted, Michelle Sylvander

September 15, 2021 Board Meeting V. Action Items – B) Accounts Payable & Budget Updated (Sylvander)

DATE: September 15, 2021 TO: CRWD Board of Managers FROM: Michelle Sylvander, Office Manager RE: July 2021 Accounts Payable/Receivable and Administrative/Program Budget Report _________________________________________________________________________________

Enclosed are the Accounts Payable/Receivable and the Administrative/Program Budget Reports for the Month of August 2021.

Summary of Budget Report: (August Only Expenses) Administrative Budget (100’s) Program Budget (200’s) Project Budget (300’s) Capital Improvement Budget (400’s) Debt Service (500’s)

$ $ $ $ $

120,190.54 119,057.64 65,990.87 23,312.40 614,496.42

TOTAL

$

943,047.87

Summary of Accounts Payable/Receivable Report through August 31, 2021: (Past, present and future months) (August 2021 Only)

Accounts Payable Accounts Receivable

$ $

981,282.68 31,287.92

Request Action Approve August 2021 Accounts Payable/Receivable and Budget Report and direct Board Treasurer and President to endorse and disperse checks for these payments. enc:

August 2021 Accounts Payable August 2021 Budget Report

2021 Operations and CIP Monthly YTD Expenditures to Budget $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $Jan

Feb

March

April

May

Jun

July

August

Sept

Oct

2021 Operations Budget

Operations Cumulative Expenditures

2021 CIP Budget

CIP Cumulative Expenditures

W:\02 Budget and Finance\Board Memos\Board Memos 2021\BD Memo AP Budget Report 09152021.docx

Nov

Dec

Capitol Region Watershed District

Check Register For the Period From September 1, 2021 - September 30, 2021

Date 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21

Payee Adobe Anchor Solar Investments, LLC ArchKey Technologies Barr Engineering Benefit Extras, Inc. Bond Trust Services Corporation C Lanphear Design CBS Construction Services Christine Baeumler Cinch Web Services Circle K City of Saint Paul Assessments Colonial Life Comcast - Business ESRI, Inc. Forrest J. Kelley Gopher State One HealthPartners Holiday Fleet Kisters Lindsay Brice Maintenance Team, Inc. Marco - HP Macro - Minolta McCaren Designs, Inc. Menards Metro Blooms Midway Ford Mike Danielson Minnesota State Auditor Onset Orkin, LLC Pioneer Press Pitney Bowes - Financial Services Pitney Bowes - Purchase Power PLM Lake and Land Management Corp.

Prescription Landscape Ramsey County - Attorney Redpath & Company, Ltd. Resource Environ.Solutions Great Lakes Rymark Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Staples Business Advantage Syscon, Inc. Tierney Brothers, Inc. Van Bergen & Markson, Inc.

Total $8,638.84 172.01 940.00 56,898.99 96.00 614,496.42 255.00 4,700.00 455.00 99.00 179.33 2,305.59 844.20 454.20 7,285.00 1,800.00 35.10 31,730.27 130.32 8,747.00 1,541.00 5,079.52 8,544.00 329.68 555.28 303.81 2,500.00 427.02 1,050.00 14,650.50 29.00 280.00 627.10 273.75 99.91 2,400.00 5,861.47 1,032.00 4,455.07 4,820.00 3,953.75 5,496.25 492.68 37.50 644.64 1,177.80

Check # 21581 21582 21583 21584 21585 21586 21587 21588 21589 21590 21591 21592 21593 21594 21595 21596 21597 21598 21599 21600 21601 21602 21603 21604 21605 21606 21607 21608 21609 21610 21611 21612 21613 21614 21615 21616 21617 21618 21619 21620 21621 21622 21623 21624 21625 21626

Page 1 of 2

Description Annual License Solar Leasing Fix Alarm/Door Locking/Alarm Monitoring Program Engineering Expense Employee Benefits Bond Payment - Series 2007A Design Work Surety Release Field Guide Meetings/Review Website Security/Maintenance Fuel for Vehicles Storm Sewer System-Thomas/Aldine Employee Benefits Voice & Internet GIS Desktop/ArcGix Online Storyteller License Office Cleaning Email Tickets Employee Benefits Fuel for Vehicles Annual Support/Maintenance Stewardship Grant/Rain Garden HVAC Repairs/Maint./Tech/Clean Windows Software Solution-Mfiles/Discovery/Design Copier Contract Monthly Horticulture Services Supplies 2021 Blue Thumb Dues Repairs/Maintenance Stewardship Grant/Cistern 2020 Audit HOBO Waterproof Shuttle Monthly Pest Control Legal Notices Postage Meter Lease Postage SePRO FasTest Water Quality Monitoring BMP Maint./Urban Bed Maint/Greenline/Landscape Attorney Fees Accounting & Payroll Services Como Lake Development Managed Services Como Lake Fishery Monitoring/Erosion/Sediment Printer Ink/Office Supplies/Date Stam Sage Support Mississippi Room Tech Services Carbon Blocker Filter

Capitol Region Watershed District

Check Register For the Period From September 1, 2021 - September 30, 2021

Date 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21 09/15/21

Payee Verizon Wireless Viking Industrial Center Walters Xcel Energy Xcel Energy Xcel Energy 975 Xcel Energy 976 ZoneOne Locating/Hance Utility Services US Bank MetLife SUB-TOTAL AP AUGUST A/P:

AUGUST PAYROLL/BENEFITS: AUGUST TOTAL:

Total 698.63 930.59 528.42 3.28 3.96 3,536.31 185.00 186.20 3,083.48 960.34

Check # 21627 21628 21629 21630 21631 21632 21633 21634 21635 21636

Description Monthly Cell Phone Service Sleeve Anchor/Supplies/Clear Safety Glasses Trash/Recycling Electrical Service-Maryland Ave. Electrical Service-Kittson St. Monthly Electric Monthly Electric Locate Labor/Travel/Mileage Monthly Credit Card Expense Employee Benefits

$817,040.21

164,242.47 $981,282.68

APPROVED FOR PAYMENT:

9/15/2021

AUGUST, 2021 RECEIPTS Midway Shopping Center M.A. Mortenson Company M.A. Mortenson Company Science Museum of Minnesota 4M Fund-General AUGUST RECEIPTS:

$2,000.00 500.00 10,000.00 18,700.00 87.92 $31,287.92

Page 2 of 2

Permit Fee Permit Fee Surety Grant Income August Interest

Capitol Region Watershed District August 31, 2021 Comparison

Check Register Totals Accounts Payable Checks:

$817,040.21

Payroll & Benefits:

164,242.47

TOTAL:

$981,282.68

Pre-Paid Expenses

($33,534.81)

Surety Release

($4,700.00)

AUGUST ONLY:

$943,047.87

Pre-Paid Expenses: Colonial Life - Ck. #21593 HealthPartners - Ck. #21598 MetLife - Ck. #21636

$844.20 31,730.27 960.34 $33,534.81

CBS Construction Services - Ck. #21588

$4,700.00

Surety Release:

Page 1 of 1

CAPITOL REGION WATERSHE DISTRICT JOB COST RECAP FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 1, 2021 ‐ AUGUST 31, 2021

JOB COST #/NAME 21890 ‐ Safety Program 21895 ‐ Diversity & Inclusion Program 20970 ‐ General Administration 21970 ‐ General Administration 20975 ‐ Aldine Operations 21975 ‐ Aldine Operations 21976 ‐ 1736 Thomas Operations 21978 ‐ MAWD 21980 ‐ Citizens Advisory Committee 21985 ‐ External Funding Opportunities 00000 ‐ Administration Allocation TOTAL GENERAL ADMINISTRATION: 200 ‐ Administration 208 ‐ Regulatory Program 210 ‐ Grants Program 211 ‐ Monitoring, Assessment & Research 220 ‐ Communications & Engagement 222 ‐ Facility Management Program TOTAL PROGRAMS: 300 ‐ Administration 302 ‐ Groundwater Projects 305 ‐ Como Lake Subwatershed 310 ‐ Lake McCarron's Subwatershed 313 ‐ Loeb Lake Subwatershed 315 ‐ Trout Brook Subwatershed 325 ‐ Wetland, Stream & Ecosystem Restoration 332 ‐ Mississippi River Confluence Subwatershed 333 ‐ Mississippi River Downtown Subwatershed 370 ‐ Watershed Management Plan 375 ‐ Watershed‐Wide Planning, Assessment & Implementation TOTAL PROJECTS: TOTAL OPERATING FUND: 405 ‐ Como Lake BMP's 410 ‐ Lake McCarron's BMP's 413 ‐ Loeb Lake BMP's 415 ‐ Trout Brook BMP's 431 ‐ Mississippi River Gorge Subwatershed BMP's 432 ‐ Mississippi River Confluence Subwatershed BMP's 433 ‐ Mississippi River Downtown Subwatershed BMP's 440 ‐ Special Projects & Grants TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT: 475 ‐ Watershed‐Wide Capitol Improvement Projects TOTAL DEBT SERVICES:

2021 ANNUAL BUDGET 35,000.00 15,000.00 ‐ 744,700.00 ‐ 150,000.00 85,800.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 5,000.00 (251,400.00) $799,100.00 165,924.00 556,620.00 929,700.00 761,150.00 792,460.00 420,580.00 $3,626,434.00 85,476.00 0.00 170,050.00 100,700.00 20,850.00 211,110.00 162,770.00 46,250.00 ‐ ‐ 145,580.00 $942,786.00 $5,368,320.00 412,400.00 ‐ ‐ 950,250.00 96,750.00 911,440.00 610,450.00 ‐ $2,981,290.00 1,054,454.00 $1,054,454.00

CURRENT MONTH EXPENDITURES 674.39 59.26 ‐ 102,054.18 ‐ 16,034.16 1,368.55 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $120,190.54 ‐ 26,273.31 16,054.92 38,311.23 22,621.09 15,797.09 $119,057.64 ‐ 91.65 15,356.30 372.47 ‐ 29,045.10 ‐ 2,959.13 611.39 10,240.72 7,314.11 $65,990.87 $305,239.05 643.58 312.61 ‐ 19,330.37 2,588.53 ‐ 116.46 320.85 $23,312.40 614,496.42 614,496.42

TOTAL ALL FUNDS:

$9,404,064.00

$943,047.87

$4,907,473.16

$4,496,590.84

52.18%

TOTAL FUND BALANCE:

Fund Balance @ 12/31/20 2,930,932.62 5,418,792.06 229,722.40 $8,579,447.08

2021 Fund Transfers ‐ ‐ ‐ $0.00

Year‐to‐Date Revenue 2,535,442.12 1,344,299.90 545,556.16 $4,425,298.18

Year‐to‐Date Expenditures $2,679,353.74 636,560.03 1,591,559.39 $4,907,473.16

Fund Balance @ 08/31/21 2,787,021.00 6,126,531.93 (816,280.83) $8,097,272.10

FUND BALANCES

Operations Capital Improvement Debt Service

YEAR‐TO‐DATE EXPENDITURES 12,835.28 707.16

6,203.09 766,211.52 2,505.89 113,449.10 19,027.92 ‐ 1,180.00 ‐ ‐ $922,119.96 ‐ 266,752.59 433,102.74 353,616.95 205,944.02 142,923.82 $1,402,340.12 ‐ 924.11 88,117.86 18,091.17 ‐ 134,769.81 1,564.03 37,721.71 1,565.02 28,798.14 43,341.81 $354,893.66 $2,679,353.74 461,921.68 1,959.14 44.20

67,061.86 95,662.27 ‐ 2,747.09 7,163.79 $636,560.03 1,591,559.39 $1,591,559.39

BALANCE OF BUDGET REMAINING 22,164.72 14,292.84 (6,203.09) (21,511.52) (2,505.89) 36,550.90 66,772.08 5,000.00 8,820.00 5,000.00 (251,400.00) ($123,019.96) 165,924.00 289,867.41 496,597.26 407,533.05 586,515.98 277,656.18 $2,224,093.88 85,476.00 (924.11) 81,932.14 82,608.83 20,850.00 76,340.19 161,205.97 8,528.29 (1,565.02) (28,798.14) 102,238.19 $587,892.34 $2,688,966.26 (49,521.68) (1,959.14) (44.20) 883,188.14 1,087.73 911,440.00 607,702.91 (7,163.79) $2,344,729.97 (537,105.39) ($537,105.39)

% OF BUDGET EXPENDED ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐

‐‐‐

‐‐‐ ‐‐‐

‐‐‐ ‐‐‐

‐‐‐

4.71%

102.89% 75.63% 22.18% 0.00% 11.80% 0.00% 0.00% 115.39% 0.00% 47.92% 46.59% 46.46% 25.99% 33.98% 38.67% 0.00% 51.82% 17.97% 0.00% 63.84% 0.96% 81.56% 29.77% 37.64% 49.91% 112.01% 7.06% 98.88% 0.00% 0.45% 21.35% 150.94% 150.94%

Page 1 of 6

CAPITOL REGION WATERSHE DISTRICT JOB COST DETAIL FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 1, 2021 ‐ AUGUST 31, 2021

JOB COST #/NAME 21890 ‐ Safety Program 21895 ‐ Diversity & Inclusion Program 20970 ‐ General Administration 21970 ‐ General Administration 20975 ‐ Aldine Operations 21975 ‐ Aldine Operations 21976 ‐ 1736 Thomas Operations 21978 ‐ MAWD 21980 ‐ Citizen Advisory Committee 21985 ‐ External Funding Opportunities 10000 ‐ Administration Allocation TOTAL GENERAL ADMINISTRATION: 20000 ‐ Administration Allocation 20099 ‐ District Permit Program 21000 ‐ District Permit Program 21102 ‐Coordinated Erosion & Sediment Control 21103 ‐ Permittee Post‐Construction BMP Inspections 21104 ‐ Engagement Activities & Permitees 21105 ‐ Rules, Evaluations & Updates 21107 ‐ Illicit Discharge & Elimination 21109 ‐ Industrial Stormwater Permittee Coordination 21111 ‐ Water Reuse Policy Support ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐ Permits 20143 ‐ Stewardship Grants 21143 ‐ Stewardshhip Grants 20144 ‐ Partner Grants 16147 ‐ TWP Blvd. Rain Gardens 21150 ‐ ROW Projects‐Boulevard Rain Gardens 21152 ‐ Stewardship Grant Outreach 21153 ‐ Grant Project Inspection & Maintenance 21155 ‐ Well Sealing Grants 21160 ‐ Large Scale Site Planning Grants 20200 ‐ Baseline Monitoring Data Collection 21200 ‐ Stormwater Monitoring & Data Collection 20205 ‐ Lake Monitoring & Data Collection 21205 ‐ Lake Monitoring & Data Collection 20210 ‐ Villa Park Monitoring & Data Collection 21215 ‐ Wetland Biological Integrity Monitoring 21220 ‐ Monitoring Database & Reporting Tool 21221 ‐ Monitoring Trend Analysis & Reporting 21225 ‐ Citizen Science Monitoring Program 21228 ‐ Research Program 21230 ‐ BMP Performance Monitoring 20230 ‐ BMP Monitoring 21235 ‐ Emerging Containments & Water Quality 20250 ‐ General Outreach & Communications 21250 ‐ General Communications & Engagement

2021 ANNUAL BUDGET 35,000.00 15,000.00 ‐ 744,700.00 ‐ 150,000.00 85,800.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 5,000.00 (251,400.00) 799,100.00 165,924.00 ‐ 209,770.00 193,900.00 72,730.00 6,220.00 20,690.00 42,490.00 4,970.00 5,850.00 ‐ ‐ 510,550.00 225,000.00 38,670.00 17,380.00 74,040.00 10,430.00 53,630.00 ‐ 393,120.00 ‐ 106,460.00 14,390.00 26,280.00 19,450.00 9,250.00 46,850.00 131,350.00 ‐ 14,000.00 ‐ 236,310.00

CURRENT MONTH EXPENDITURES 674.39 59.26 ‐ 102,054.18 ‐ 16,034.16 1,368.55 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 120,190.54 ‐ ‐ 12,985.28 6,739.27 119.66 ‐ ‐ 1,115.63 ‐ ‐ 5,313.47 ‐ 11,334.98 ‐ 425.18 ‐ 334.87 3,766.24 56.17 137.48 ‐ 25,798.17 ‐ 574.87 ‐ 62.71 8,779.28 ‐ 24.89 394.47 2,676.84 ‐ ‐ ‐ 9,902.26

YEAR‐TO‐DATE BALANCE OF EXPENDITURES BUDGET REMAINING 12,835.28 22,164.72 707.16 14,292.84 6,203.09 (6,203.09) 766,211.52 (21,511.52) 2,505.89 (2,505.89) 113,449.10 36,550.90 19,027.92 66,772.08 ‐ 5,000.00 1,180.00 8,820.00 ‐ 5,000.00 ‐ (251,400.00) $922,119.96 ($123,019.96) ‐ 165,924.00 4,094.51 (4,094.51) 115,232.26 94,537.74 28,843.43 165,056.57 1,688.28 71,041.72 ‐ 6,220.00 5,588.15 15,101.85 13,366.54 29,123.46 ‐ 4,970.00 49.50

5,800.50 97,889.92 (97,889.92) 17,745.68 (17,745.68) 158,137.70 352,412.30 1,336.93 (1,336.93) 208,254.77 16,745.23 18,515.63 20,154.37 2,167.79 15,212.21 23,585.90 50,454.10 1,854.56 8,575.44 1,503.78 52,126.22 10,327.92 (10,327.92) 288,085.54 105,034.46 249.18 (249.18) 7,482.33 98,977.67 (2,768.00) 2,768.00 1,725.59 12,664.41 10,232.83 16,047.17 ‐ 19,450.00 2,517.05 6,732.95 4,237.49 42,612.51 28,710.29 102,639.71 2,816.73 (2,816.73) ‐ 14,000.00 2,722.95 (2,722.95) 94,760.45 141,549.55

% OF BUDGET EXPENDED 36.67% 4.71% ‐‐‐ 102.89% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 22.18% 0.00% 11.80% ‐‐‐ 0.00% 115.39% 0.00% ‐‐‐ 54.93% 14.88% 2.32% 0.00% 27.01% 31.46% 0.00% 0.85% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 30.97% ‐‐‐ 92.56% 47.88% 12.47% 31.86% 17.78% 2.80% ‐‐‐ 73.28% ‐‐‐ 7.03% ‐‐‐ 11.99% 38.94% 0.00% 27.21% 9.04% 21.86% ‐‐‐ 0.00% ‐‐‐ 40.10%

Page 2 of 6

CAPITOL REGION WATERSHE DISTRICT JOB COST DETAIL FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 1, 2021 ‐ AUGUST 31, 2021

JOB COST #/NAME 21252 ‐ Project Communications 21255 ‐ Clean Streets 21260 ‐ Maintenance Workshops for Clean Water 21262 ‐ Youth Outreach Programs 20265 ‐ Sponsorships & Partnerships 21265 ‐ Sponsorships 21267 ‐ Partnerships 20268 ‐ Adopt A Drain 20270 ‐ Website 21270 ‐ Digital Communications 20271 ‐ Master Water Stewards 21271 ‐ Volunteer Programs 17274 ‐ TWP Communications 21275 ‐ Events 21278 ‐ Public Art Program 21279 ‐ Partner Grant Program 21280 ‐ 595 Aldine Communications & Engagement 20285 ‐ Awards Program 21285 ‐ Awards Program 20303 ‐ BMP Database 21303 ‐ BMP Database 21305 ‐ District Owned Facility Management 21310 ‐ Shared Ownership Facility Management 21315 ‐ Partner Owned Facilities 20333 ‐ Public Art Program 20396 ‐ Safety Equipment

2021 ANNUAL BUDGET 28,190.00 46,340.00 15,420.00 20,720.00 ‐ 31,500.00 20,800.00 ‐ ‐ 63,900.00 ‐ 36,260.00 ‐ 24,390.00 31,000.00 170,480.00 51,060.00 ‐ 16,090.00 ‐ 45,930.00 234,150.00 53,440.00 87,060.00

TOTAL PROGRAMS: 30000 ‐ Administration Allocation 21402 ‐ Seeps & Springs Study 20421 ‐ Como BMP Maintenance 21423 ‐ AIS Management 20424 ‐ Como Lake Aquatic Plant Management 21424 ‐ Como Lake Aquatic Plant Management 21425 ‐ Como Lake Fisheries Management 18427 ‐ Como Lake Management Plan 21427 ‐ Shoreline Management 19428 ‐ Como Lake Aquatic Plant Management 21430 ‐ Street Sweeping Program 21434 ‐ Water‐Based Recreation Management 21436 ‐ Como Subwatershed Infrastructure Management 21440 ‐ Future Stormwater Management Planning 21470 ‐ Lake Vegetation & AIS Management 18476 ‐ Upper Villa Maintenance 19476 ‐ Upper Villa Maintenance 21476 ‐ Villa Park Wetland System Evaluation 19477 ‐ TWP ‐ Lake McCarron's Management Plan 21479 ‐ Lake McCarron's Shoreline 21480 ‐ Watershed Hydraulic & Hodrologic Modeling 11513 ‐ Loed Lake Stormwater Pond Improvements 20550 ‐ TBI Inspection and Maintenance 21550 ‐ TBI Inspection & Maintenance 14552 ‐ TBI Easement Verification & Documentation 21554 ‐ TBI Model Update

$3,626,434.00 85,476.00 ‐ 15,740.00 ‐ 12,370.00 9,870.00 ‐ 25,370.00 22,740.00 22,370.00 50,110.00 11,480.00 20,110.00 ‐ 20,480.00 20,000.00 40,110.00 20,850.00 ‐ ‐ 50,850.00 150,140.00

CURRENT MONTH EXPENDITURES ‐ 155.12 ‐ 165.29 ‐ 2,500.00 144.62 ‐ ‐ 2,862.05 ‐ 1,500.75 ‐ 1,641.99 1,202.68 2,496.58 ‐ ‐ 49.75 ‐ 1,509.07 11,109.69 ‐ 3,178.33 ‐ ‐ $119,057.64 ‐ 91.65 ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,680.29 3,913.06 2,454.49 5,308.46 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 372.47 ‐ ‐ 10.89 3,893.72 ‐ 25,140.49

YEAR‐TO‐DATE BALANCE OF EXPENDITURES BUDGET REMAINING 1,000.11 27,189.89 885.59 45,454.41 45.59

15,374.41 336.48 20,383.52 36.16

(36.16) 8,157.77 23,342.23 2,859.91 17,940.09 108.47 (108.47) 397.38 (397.38) 31,332.58 32,567.42 216.64 (216.64) 14,759.65 21,500.35 96.30

(96.30) 8,924.42 15,465.58 10,851.94 20,148.06 24,356.32 146,123.68 56.39

51,003.61 3,721.99 (3,721.99) 316.93 15,773.07 30.88

(30.88) 33,019.99 12,910.01 64,912.18 169,237.82 682.89 52,757.11 43,762.93 43,297.07 36.16

(36.16) 478.79 (478.79) 1,402,340.12 $2,224,093.88 ‐ 85,476.00 924.11 (924.11) 3,450.00 (3,450.00) ‐ 15,740.00 281.62 (281.62) 17,425.36 (5,055.36) 25,031.75 (15,161.75) 23,229.26 (23,229.26) 14,169.80 11,200.20 1,972.00 (1,972.00) 720.20 22,019.80 ‐ 22,370.00 584.17 49,525.83 1,253.70 10,226.30 55.01

20,054.99 9,210.87 (9,210.87) 64.65 (64.65) 5,283.71 15,196.29 842.76 (842.76) 2,634.17 17,365.83 ‐ 40,110.00 ‐ 20,850.00 89.44 (89.44) 27,569.23 (27,569.23) ‐ 50,850.00 103,716.20 46,423.80

% OF BUDGET EXPENDED 3.55% 1.91% 0.30% 1.62% ‐‐‐ 25.90% 13.75% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 49.03% ‐‐‐ 40.71% ‐‐‐ 36.59% 35.01% 14.29% 0.11% ‐‐‐ 1.97% ‐‐‐ 71.89% 27.72% 1.28% 50.27% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 38.67% 0.00% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 0.00% ‐‐‐ 140.87% 253.61% ‐‐‐ 55.85% ‐‐‐ 3.17% 0.00% 1.17% 10.92% 0.27% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 25.80% ‐‐‐ 13.17% 0.00% 0.00% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 0.00% 69.08%

Page 3 of 6

CAPITOL REGION WATERSHE DISTRICT JOB COST DETAIL FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 1, 2021 ‐ AUGUST 31, 2021

JOB COST #/NAME 21570 ‐ NPDES MS4 Stormwater Program 19605 ‐ Lower Phalen Creek/Rush Line 21605 ‐ Phalen Creek Daylighting Feasibility Study 21610 ‐ Willow Reserve Signage & Access 21615 ‐ Wetland Restoration Planning 19621 ‐ Snelling Midway Redevelopment O & M 20621 ‐ Snelling Midway Redevelopment O & M 18622 ‐ Ford Site Planning 18623 ‐ Ford Site Area C 18624 ‐ CCLRT BMP Maintenance 20624 ‐ Geenn Line BMP Maintenance 21640 ‐ Sears Redevelopment Project 18650 ‐ 2020 Watershed Management Plan 21651 ‐ Partner Agency Plan Review 21652 ‐ GIS Program 21655 ‐ St. Paul Watershed Governance 21656 ‐ District Chloride Assessment & Prevention Plan 21658 ‐ Great River Passage 16660 ‐ TWP Grant Admin 16 20660 ‐ Special Grants ‐ Project Development 19662 ‐ 1919 University Avenue 19665 ‐ Science Museum Feasibility

2021 ANNUAL BUDGET 10,120.00 ‐ 53,450.00 30,960.00 78,360.00 ‐

16705 ‐ TWP Como BMP McMurray 19706 ‐ Como Lake Alum Treatment 16710 ‐ TWP Como BMP McMurray 21711 ‐ Como Pavillion BMP's 21712 ‐ Gotfried's Pit Improvement 16715 ‐ TWP Como Sr. High 16720 ‐ Willow Reserve Restoration Project 16752 ‐ TWP ‐ McCarrons BMP ‐ Parkview 20820 ‐ TBI Repair ‐ Station 28+65 ‐ 50+72 16853 ‐ Victoria Park 16886 ‐ Lauderdale Subwatershed Stormwater Improvement Project 19890 ‐ Midway Peace Park 20891 ‐ Ford Site 20892 ‐ Science Museum of Minnesota 16917 ‐ Swede Hollow Construction 16920 ‐ TWP Grant Administration 19925 ‐ Springboard for the Arts Headquarters 19940 ‐ Zero Abuse Project 16950 ‐ New Office Facility TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT: 14960 ‐ Watershed‐Wide Capitol Improvement Projects TOTAL DEBT SERVICES:

‐ 150,000.00 50,700.00 ‐ ‐ ‐ 950,250.00 105,480.00 96,750.00 560,000.00 805,960.00 50,450.00 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $2,981,290.00 1,054,454.00 $1,054,454.00

CURRENT MONTH EXPENDITURES ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,959.13 ‐ ‐ ‐ 611.39 10,240.72 29.11 7,285.00 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $65,990.87 $305,239.05 445.56 ‐ ‐ 198.02 ‐ ‐ ‐ 312.61 19,330.37 ‐ 2,588.53 116.46 ‐ ‐ ‐ 320.85 ‐ ‐ ‐ $23,312.40 614,496.42 614,496.42

TOTAL ALL FUNDS:

$9,404,064.00

$943,047.87

23,125.00 23,125.00 ‐ ‐ 20,100.00 30,470.00 10,060.00 54,950.00 30,000.00

‐ ‐ TOTAL PROJECTS: $942,786.00 TOTAL OPERATING FUND: $5,368,320.00 211,700.00

YEAR‐TO‐DATE BALANCE OF EXPENDITURES BUDGET REMAINING 3,394.94 6,725.06 821.37 (821.37) ‐ 53,450.00 ‐ 30,960.00 742.66 77,617.34 99.01

(99.01) 2,524.84 (2,524.84) 28,155.19 (5,030.19) 707.09 22,417.91 4,635.58 (4,635.58) 1,600.00 (1,600.00) 1,565.02 (1,565.02) 28,798.14 (28,798.14) 1,975.18 18,124.82 11,119.80 19,350.20 ‐ 10,060.00 ‐ 54,950.00 1,075.99 28,924.01 124.80 (124.80) 925.95 (925.95) 406.56 (406.56) 27,713.53 (27,713.53) 354,893.66 $587,892.34 $2,679,353.74 $2,688,966.26 86,201.29 125,498.71 4,116.51 (4,116.51) 99.02

(99.02) 1,094.04 148,905.96 ‐ 50,700.00 370,410.82 (370,410.82) 44.20

(44.20) 1,959.14 (1,959.14) 67,061.86 883,188.14 ‐ 105,480.00 95,662.27 1,087.73 2,747.09 557,252.91 ‐ 805,960.00 ‐ 50,450.00 44.20 (44.20) 705.80 (705.80) 739.07 (739.07) 182.72 (182.72) 5,492.00 (5,492.00) $636,560.03 $2,344,729.97 1,591,559.39 (537,105.39) $1,591,559.39 ($537,105.39) $4,907,473.16

$4,496,590.84

% OF BUDGET EXPENDED 33.55% ‐‐‐ 0.00% 0.00% 0.95% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 121.75% 3.06% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 9.83% 36.49% 0.00% 0.00% 3.59% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 37.64% 49.91% 40.72% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 0.73% 0.00% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 7.06% 0.00% 98.88% 0.49% 0.00% 0.00% ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 21.35% 150.94% 150.94% 52.18%

Page 4 of 6

CAPITOL REGION WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 1, 2021 ‐ AUGUST 31, 2021 PERMIT NUMBER 9012 10009 10028 11014 13003 14027 14031 16007 16016 16019 16025 16027 17001 17003 17013 17020 17023 18002 18003 18007 18008 18009 18014 18017 18018 18020 18022 18023 19005 19006 19009 19010 19011 19012 19013 19015 19016 19017 19018 19020 19021 19024 19025 19026 19028 19029 19030

PERMIT NAME School District Service Facility Como Park HS Ramsey County Crisis Center AGAPE School MN Pass HealthPartners MOB Seven Corners Community School of Excellence Willow Reserve Habitat of Humanity Roselawn Cemetary Snelling Midway River East School Horace Mann Elementary Como Park Sr. High School Great River Schools Transfer Road Storage Weyerhaeuser Apts.

Menards Trnasload Terminal Marydale Park Improvements Woodlawn Jefferson Vomela Beacon Bluff Seal Island at Como Zoo Morning Star Cathedral Hill Payne Building Development Albion Senior Community Rivoli Phase III Roseville Aldi Midway Peace Park McCarrons Hill St. Thomas Iverson Center Raymond Station Summit Avenue Bridge Reconstruction UST 2nd Year Housing St. Paul Gateway Mixed Use Waterford Bay Dale Street Bridge Reconstruction Urban Academy Addition GTA Building Harambee Elementary School Audit Como Animal Hospital Lexington Parkway Realingment Lower Landing Tumble Fresh Coin Operated Laundry Hidden Falls Flood Clean Up Como Avenue Trail Project Five Star Storage

PERMITTING BUDGET ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

CURRENT MONTH YEAR‐TO‐DATE BALANCE OF PERMIT EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES BUDGET REMAINING ‐ 41.82 ‐ 320.00 ‐ ‐ 41.82 ‐ 41.82 ‐ ‐ 187.22 ‐ ‐ 41.82 ‐ ‐ 83.64 ‐ 209.13 ‐ ‐ 57.62 ‐ 59.82 1,198.01 ‐ ‐ 207.57 ‐ ‐ 41.82 ‐ ‐ 41.82 ‐ ‐ 1,008.85 ‐ ‐ 179.00 ‐ ‐ 175.75 ‐ ‐ 1,478.80 ‐ ‐ 446.92 ‐ ‐ 153.50 ‐ ‐ 213.25 ‐ ‐ 2,084.51 ‐ 62.34 509.16 ‐ ‐ 172.80 ‐ ‐ 245.25 ‐ 1,026.00 5,055.33 ‐ ‐ 115.33 ‐ ‐ 364.69 ‐ ‐ 426.50 ‐ ‐ 100.85 ‐ 738.50 4,371.35 ‐ ‐ 41.82 ‐ ‐ 115.21 ‐ ‐ 57.63 ‐ ‐ 342.20 ‐ ‐ 115.24 ‐ 104.69 1,546.33 ‐ 74.78 264.38 ‐ ‐ 14.40 ‐ ‐ 806.50 ‐ ‐ 171.50 ‐ ‐ 201.65 ‐ 14.96 449.50 ‐ ‐ 14.40 ‐ ‐ 494.75 ‐ ‐ 28.81 ‐ ‐ 1,838.65 ‐ ‐ 805.57 ‐

% OF PERMIT BUDGET EXPENDED ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Page 5 of 6

CAPITOL REGION WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 1, 2021 ‐ AUGUST 31, 2021 PERMIT NUMBER 20001 20002 20003 20004 20005 20007 20009 20011 20013 20014 20016 20017 20018 20019 20020 20021 20023 20024 20025 20026 20027 20028 20029 20031 20033 20035 20037 21001 21002 21003 21004 21006 21007 21008 21009 21010 21011 21012 21013 21015 21016 21018 21019 21020 21022

PERMIT NAME Dickerman Park Site Improvements Tedesco St. Paving Project SPPS Service Facility Addition Griggs‐Scheffer Street Project Washington Tech HS Field Improvement Xcel County Road B Ford Site Redevelopment Randolph Square ‐ Riverbend Business Ford Site Redevelopment Stormwater University & Dale Affordable Housing Ayd Mill Road Hamm's Brewery 2227 University Mixed Use Marshall & Finn Apartments Wilder Square Hope Community Academy 2383 University Seminary Pond Wetland Highland Bridge Lot 1 Block 3 Hmong Academy Middle School Hidden Falls South Gillette POP22 Fairview & University Highland Bridge Rowhomes Model Exeter Territorial Road North End Community Center Cleveland Avenue (CSAH 46) The Enclave at McCarrons Lake Mississippi River Boulevard Subdivision St. Paul City School Lexington Landing Phase II Western Highland Bridge Blk 19 & 2 Wakan Tipi Center Griggs Scheffer Phase II Highland Bridge Lot 1 Blk. 6 Highland Bridge Lot 1 Block 7 MnDOT I94 & 35E Highland Arena Parking Lot Improvement Highland Bridge Rowhomes 1A & 1B Cretin‐Derham Hall Addition Xcel CR B Phase 3 Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit 554 Broadway Affordable Housing HB Lot 2 Block 3 Larpenteur Pipe Failure Repair

21000

Sub‐Total: Permits General Permitting

PERMITTING BUDGET ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ TOTAL PERMITS: 209,770.00

CURRENT MONTH EXPENDITURES ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,657.06 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 537.25 ‐ 89.73 ‐ ‐ 422.25 ‐ 89.73 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 89.73 ‐ ‐ 89.73 ‐ ‐ ‐ 89.73 ‐ ‐ 104.43 62.74 ‐ ‐

YEAR‐TO‐DATE EXPENDITURES 41.82 625.50 2,269.75 914.50 1,543.09 41.82 5,043.13 478.76 2,277.41 172.90 172.92 635.50 163.76 3,724.50 27.50 1,740.61 2,939.33 28.81 812.09 331.29 28.81 3,169.58 659.03 639.11 1,714.05 934.25 1,322.50 4,669.19 3,833.06 3,643.38 1,868.25 935.43 3,648.50 2,342.75 978.10 729.50 2,598.31 3,750.75 962.49 3,373.50 646.50 2,258.84 907.74 486.50 880.32

5,313.47 12,985.28 18,298.75

97,889.92 119,326.77 217,216.69

BALANCE OF PERMIT BUDGET REMAINING ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

% OF PERMIT BUDGET EXPENDED ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ($7,446.69) 103.55%

Page 6 of 6

September 15, 2021 Board Meeting V. C. Action Items— Approve Grant Agreement with the MPCA for the Implementation of the Como Lake Management Plan and Nine Key Elements Plan Phase 1 Project (Belden)

DATE: TO: FROM: RE:

September 9, 2021 CRWD Board of Managers Britta Belden, Water Resource Project Manager Approve Grant Agreement with the MPCA for the Implementation of the Como Lake Management Plan and Nine Key Elements Plan Phase 1 Project

Background In 2019, CRWD was selected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to receive a 319 Small Watersheds Focus grant for Como Lake. The grant program is funded under the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) federal Clean Water Act Section 319 and administered by the MPCA to provide funding to states to address nonpoint source water pollution in watersheds. The grant provides funding for clean water projects for a four-year period (2022-2025) for a total of $590,760, with 60% provided by the grant ($354,456) and a 40% match required from CRWD ($236,304).

Since being awarded the grant, CRWD staff have worked with the MPCA to develop a Nine Key Element (NKE) Plan that was approved by the EPA in February 2021. Following approval of the NKE Plan, CRWD staff developed a project workplan and budget for “Implementation of the Como Lake Management Plan and Nine Key Element Plan Phase 1” which was approved by the EPA in September 2021. The project workplan and budget (see attached) includes funding for four major project areas from the CRWD’s Como Lake Management Plan—1) Como Lake monitoring and data collection, 2) Como Pavilion parking lot reconstruction projects, 3) Shoreline stabilization and restoration projects, and 4) Como Lake educational signage and kiosk development and installation.

Issues With the approval of the project workplan and budget, CRWD has been authorized by the EPA to move forward with executing a grant agreement with the MPCA for the “Implementation of the Como Lake Management Plan and Nine Key Elements Plan Phase 1 Project”.

Requested Action Approve the Implementation of the Como Lake Management Plan and Nine Key Elements Plan Phase 1 Project Grant Agreement and authorize the Board President and Administrator to execute the agreement, subject to the review and approval of the Ramsey County Attorney. enc: Implementation of the Como Lake Management Plan and Nine Key Elements Plan Phase 1 Project Grant Agreement, Workplan and Budget W:\02 Budget and Finance\Grants\2020\MPCA 319 Small Watershed Focus\Board\Brd Memo_Implementation of the Como Lake Management Plan and Nine Key Elements Plan Phase 1 Project Grant Agreement_9-9-21.docx

Our Mission is to protect, manage and improve the water resources of Capitol Region Watershed District

Grant Agreement

State of Minnesota

Doc Type: Contract/Grant

SWIFT Contract Number: 200103 Agency Interest ID: 112044 Activity ID: PRO20210001 This Grant Agreement is between the state of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 (“MPCA” or “State”), and Capitol Regions Watershed District, 595 Aldine Street, Saint Paul, MN 55104 ("Grantee") Recitals 1. Under Minn. Stat. § 116.03, subd. 2, the State is empowered to enter into this grant.

2. The State is in need of the Implementation of the Como Lake Management Plan and Nine Key Elements Plan Phase 1 Project.

3. Grantee will comply with required grants management policies and procedures set forth through Minn. Stat. § 16B.97, subd. 4(a)(1).

4. The Grantee represents that it is duly qualified and agrees to perform all services described in this grant agreement to the satisfaction of the State. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, subd. 1, the Grantee agrees to minimize administrative costs as a condition of this grant.

Grant Agreement 1. Term of Grant Agreement 1.1 Effective date: October 1, 2021, Per Minn. Stat.§16B.98, Subd. 5, the Grantee must not begin work until this grant contract agreement is fully executed and the State's Authorized Representative has notified the Grantee that work may commence. Per Minn.Stat.§16B.98 Subd. 7, no payments will be made to the Grantee until this grant contract is fully executed.

1.2 Expiration date: December 31, 2025 or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first.

1.3 Survival of terms. The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this grant agreement: Indemnification; State Audits; Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property; Publicity and Endorsement; Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; and Data Disclosure.

2. Grantee’s Duties The Grantee, who is not a state employee, will perform the duties specified in Attachment A, which is attached and incorporated into this grant agreement.

3. Time The Grantee must comply with all the time requirements described in this grant agreement. In the performance of this grant agreement, time is of the essence.

4. Consideration and Payment 4.1 Consideration. The State will pay for all services performed by the Grantee under this grant agreement as follows: (a) Compensation. The Grantee will be paid according to the breakdown of costs contained in Attachment A which is attached and incorporated into this grant agreement. Grantee certifies they will provide no less than 40% (forty percent) of the total project cash as cash match or in-kind services, using non-federal funds and/or resources. (b) Travel expenses. Reimbursement for travel and subsistence expenses actually and necessarily incurred by the Grantee as a result of this grant agreement will not exceed $0.00; provided that the Grantee will be reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses in the same manner and in no greater amount than provided in the current "Commissioner’s Plan” promulgated by the Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget (MMB). The Grantee will not be reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred outside Minnesota unless it has received the State’s prior written approval for out of state travel. Minnesota will be considered the home state for determining whether travel is out of state. (c) Total obligation. The total obligation of the State for all compensation and reimbursements to the Grantee under this grant agreement will not exceed $354,456.00 (Three Hundred Fifty-four Thousand Four Hundred Fifty-six Dollars and Zero Cents).

4.2

Payment (a) Invoices. The State will promptly pay the Grantee after the Grantee presents an itemized invoice for the services actually performed and the State’s Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. Invoices must be submitted timely and according to the following schedule: at least quarterly, along with the updated workplan budget showing current expenditures and budget balances, and be received within 30 (thirty) days from the end of each quarter.

Invoices must be emailed to mpca.ap@state.mn.us, and contain the following information: • Name of Grantee • Grantee project manager • Grant amount • Grant amount available to date • Invoice number • Invoice date • MPCA project manager • SWIFT Contract No. • Invoicing period (actual working period) • Subcontractors invoices, if applicable • Itemized labor, equipment, lab fees, shipping expenses, mileage and subcontractor charges, etc.

• Time and material breakdown of invoice. Amount billed to date for work, including this invoice • Receipts for supplies, shipping, lab fees and any other subcontractor invoices must be attached

• •

Per diem expenses submitted on travel expense forms and receipts may be requested to be submitted with invoice Matching fund summary

If there is a problem with submitting an invoice electronically, please contact the Accounts Payable Unit at 651-757-2491.

The Grantee shall submit an invoice for the final payment within 15 (fifteen) days of the original or amended end date of this grant contract. The State reserves the right to review submitted invoices after 15 (fifteen) days and make a determination as to payment. (b) Federal funds. Payments under this grant agreement will be made from federal funds obtained by the State through Section 319 (h), CFDA number 66.460 of the Federal Clean Water Act. The Grantee is responsible for compliance with all federal requirements imposed on these funds and accepts full financial responsibility for any requirements imposed by the Grantee’s failure to comply with federal requirements. https://www.epa.gov/grants/grant-terms-and-conditions (c) Unexpended Funds. The Grantee must promptly return to the State any unexpended funds that have not been accounted for annually in a financial report to the State due at grant closeout.

4.3

Contracting and Bidding Requirements Per Minn. Stat. §471.345, grantees that are municipalities as defined in Subd. 1 must follow the law. (a) For projects that include construction work of $25,000 or more, prevailing wage rules apply per Minn. Stat. §§177.41 through 177.44. These rules require that the wages of laborers and workers should be comparable to wages paid for similar work in the community as a whole.

The grantee must not contract with vendors who are suspended or debarred in Minnesota: http://www.mmd.admin.state.mn.us/debarredreport.asp

5. Conditions of Payment All services provided by the Grantee under this grant agreement must be performed to the State’s satisfaction, as determined at the sole discretion of the State’s Authorized Representative/MPCA’s Project Manager and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. The Grantee will not receive payment for work found by the State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal, state, or local law.

6. Authorized Representative The State's Authorized Representative/Project Manager is Jordan Donatell, 520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, MN 55155, (651) 757-2254, jordan.donatell@state.mn.us, or their successor, and has the authority to monitor the Grantee’s performance and to accept the services provided under this agreement. If the services are satisfactory, the MPCA’s Project Manager will certify acceptance of each invoice submitted for payment.

The Grantee’s Authorized Representative is Britta Belden, 595 Aldine Street, Saint Paul, MN 55104, (651) 644-8888, bbelden@capitolregionwd.org, or their successor. If the Grantee’s Authorized Representative changes at any time during this grant agreement, the Grantee must immediately notify the State.

7. Assignment, Amendments, Change Orders, Waiver, and Grant Agreement Complete 7.1 Assignment. The Grantee shall neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this grant agreement without the prior written consent of the State, approved by the same parties who executed and approved this grant agreement, or their successors in office.

7.2

Amendments. Any amendments to this grant agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original grant agreement, or their successors in office.

7.3

Change orders. If the State's Project Manager or the Grantee’s Authorized Representative identifies a change needed in the workplan and/or budget, either party may initiate a Change Order using the Change Order Form provided by the MPCA. Change Orders may not delay or jeopardize the success of the Project, alter the overall scope of the Project, increase or decrease the overall amount of the Contract/Agreement, or cause an extension of the term of this Agreement. Major changes require an Amendment rather than a Change Order.

The Change Order Form must be approved and signed by the State's Project Manager and the Grantee’s Authorized Representative in advance of doing the work. Documented changes will then become an integral and enforceable part of the Agreement. The MPCA has the sole discretion on the determination of whether a requested change is a Change Order or an Amendment. The state reserves the right to refuse any Change Order requests.

7.4

Waiver. If the State fails to enforce any provision of this grant agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or the State’s right to enforce it.

7.5

Grant agreement complete. This grant agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the State and the Grantee. No other understanding regarding this grant agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party.

8. Indemnification The Grantee must indemnify, save, and hold the State, its agents, and employees harmless from any claims or causes of action, including attorney’s fees incurred by the State, arising from the performance of this grant agreement by the Grantee or the Grantee’s agents or employees. This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies the Grantee may have for the State's failure to fulfill its obligations under this grant agreement.

9. State Audits Under Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, subd.8, the Grantee’s books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the Grantee or other party relevant to this grant agreement or transaction are subject to examination by the State and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this grant agreement, receipt and

approval of all final reports, or the required period of time to satisfy all state and program retention requirements, whichever is later.

10. Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property 10.1 Government data practices. The Grantee and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by the State under this grant agreement, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Grantee under this grant agreement. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the Grantee or the State. If the Grantee receives a request to release the data referred to in this Clause, the Grantee must immediately notify the State. The State will give the Grantee instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. The Grantee’s response to the request shall comply with applicable law.

10.2 Intellectual property rights (a) Intellectual property rights. The State owns all rights, title and interest in all of the intellectual property rights, including copyrights, patents, trade secrets, trademarks, and service marks in the Works and Documents created and paid for under this grant agreement. Works means all inventions, improvements, discoveries (whether or not patentable), databases, computer programs, reports, notes, studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings specifications, materials, tapes, and disks conceived, reduced to practice, created or originated by the Grantee, its employees, agents, and subcontractors, either individually or jointly with others in the performance of this grant agreement. Works includes “Documents.” Documents are the originals of any databases, computer programs, reports, notes studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings, specifications, materials, tapes, disks, or other materials, whether in tangible or electronic forms, prepared by the Grantee, its employees, agents, or subcontractors, in the performance of this grant agreement. The Documents shall be the exclusive property of the State and all such Documents must be immediately returned to the State by the Grantee, at the Grantee’s expense, upon the written request of the State, or upon completion, termination, or cancellation of this grant agreement. To the extent possible, those Works eligible for copyright protection under the United States’ Copyright Act will be deemed to be “works made for hire.” The Grantee assigns all right, title, and interest it may have in the Works and the Documents to the State. The Grantee must, at the request of the State, execute all papers and perform all other acts necessary to transfer or record the State’s ownership interest in the Works and Documents. (b) Obligations.

(1) Notification. Whenever any invention, improvement, or discovery (whether or not patentable) is made or conceived for the first time or actually or constructively reduced to practice by the Grantee, including its employees and subcontractors, in the performance of this grant agreement, the Grantee shall immediately give the State’s Authorized Representative written notice thereof, and must promptly furnish the Authorized Representative with complete information and/or disclosure therein.

(2) Representation. The Grantee must perform all acts, and take all steps necessary to ensure that all intellectual property rights in the Works and Documents are the sole property of the State, and that neither Grantee nor its employees, agents, or subcontractors retain any interest in and to the Works and Documents. The Grantee

represents and warrants that the Works and Documents do not and will not infringe upon any intellectual property rights of other persons or entities. Notwithstanding Clause Liability, the Grantee shall indemnify, defend, to the extent permitted by the Attorney General, and hold harmless the State, at the Grantee’s expense, from any action or claim brought against the State to the extent that it is based on a claim that all or part of the Works or Documents infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others. The Grantee will be responsible for payment of any and all such claims, demands, obligations, liabilities, costs, and damages, including, but not limited to, attorney fees. If such a claim or action arises or in Grantee’s or the State’s opinion is likely to arise, the Grantee must, at the State’s discretion, either procure for the State the right or license to use the intellectual property rights at issue or replace or modify the allegedly infringing Works or Documents as necessary and appropriate to obviate the infringement claim. This remedy of the State will be in addition to and not exclusive of other remedies provided by law.

(3) License. The State hereby grants a limited, no-fee, noncommercial license to the Grantee to enable the Grantee’s employees engaged in research and scholarly pursuits to make, have made, reproduce, modify, distribute, perform, and otherwise use the Works, including Documents, for research activities or to publish in scholarly or professional journals, provided that any existing or future intellectual property rights in the Works or Documents (including patents, licenses, trade or service marks, trade secrets, or copyrights) are not prejudiced or infringed upon, that the Minnesota Data Practices Act is complied with, and that individual rights to privacy are not violated. The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State for any claim or action based on the Grantee’s use of the Works or Documents under the provisions of Clause 10.2(b)(2). Said license is subject to the State’s publicity and acknowledgement requirements set forth in this grant agreement. The Grantee may reproduce and retain a copy of the Documents for research and academic use. The Grantee is responsible for security of the Grantee’s copy of the Documents. A copy of any articles, materials or documents produced by the Grantee’s employees, in any form, using or derived from the subject matter of this license, shall be promptly delivered without cost to the State.]

11. Workers’ Compensation The Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minn. Stat. § 176.181, subd. 2, pertaining to workers’ compensation insurance coverage. The Grantee’s employees and agents will not be considered State employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act on behalf of these employees and any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of these employees are in no way the State’s obligation or responsibility.

12. Publicity and Endorsement 12.1 Publicity. Any publicity regarding the subject matter of this grant contract must identify the State as the sponsoring agency and must not be released without prior written approval from the State’s Authorized Representative. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the Grantee individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from

this grant contract. All projects primarily funded by state grant appropriations must publicly credit the State of Minnesota, including on the grantee’s website when practicable.

12.2 Endorsement. The Grantee must not claim that the State endorses its products or services.

13. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue Minnesota law, without regard to its choice-of-law provisions, governs this grant agreement. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this grant agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota.

14. Termination 14.1 Termination by the State. The State may immediately terminate this grant agreement with or without cause, upon 30-days’ written notice to the Grantee. Upon termination, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed.

14.2 Termination for cause. The State may immediately terminate this grant agreement if the State finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this grant agreement, that reasonable progress has not been made or that the purposes for which the funds were granted have not been or will not be fulfilled. The State may take action to protect the interests of the state of Minnesota, including the refusal to disburse additional funds and requiring the return of all or part of the funds already disbursed.

14.3 Termination for insufficient funding. The State may immediately terminate this grant agreement if: (a) Funding is withdrawn by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (b) It does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature. (c) Or, if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination must be by written or fax notice to the Grantee. The State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination. However, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available.

The State will not be assessed any penalty if the agreement is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source, not to appropriate funds.

The State must provide the Grantee notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of the State’s receiving that notice.

15. Data Disclosure Under Minn. Stat. § 270C.65, subd. 3, and other applicable law, the Grantee consents to disclosure of its social security number, federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action requiring the Grantee to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any.

To protect Grantee’s personal data, Grantee is strongly encouraged to obtain and use a Minnesota tax identification number.

16. Reporting Requirements The Grantee shall submit to the State for review and approval Semi-Annual reports in a format prescribed by the State. These reports shall be due to the State each February 1 and August 1 throughout the life of this grant agreement.

If water quality monitoring is applicable, all monitoring data collected during the project must be submitted annually and reported in EQuIS (MPCA’s monitoring database) each November 1 throughout the life of this grant agreement. The MPCA has developed an EQuIS format for an Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD). This format is called the MPCA LAB_MN and is available at the following: http://www.earthsoft.com/products/edp/edp-format-for-mnpca/. Analytical data must be provided in the MPCA LAB_MN format within the first year of the grant agreement.

If Best Management Practices (BMPs) are installed, a summary of the reporting year’s BMPs and pollutant load reductions must be entered annually into the eLINK (supported by the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources) database each February 1 throughout the life of the grant agreement.

No later than thirty days before the end date of this grant agreement, the Grantee shall provide the State with one electronic copy of all final products produced under this grant agreement, including reports, publications, software and videos.

A Final Progress and Financial Report, in a format prescribed by the State, shall be due no later than 30 (thirty) days before the expiration date of the grant agreement. Final payment will not be made to the Grantee until the final report is received and approved by the MPCA’s Project Manager.

Payments may be withheld from grantees until all reporting requirements have been met.

17. Quality Assurance No costs for environmentally related measurements or data generation can be incurred by any entity other than the MPCA, until quality assurance practices for the project are documented and approved by the MPCA. If quality assurance practices are approved, costs for environmentally related measurements or data generation shall be reimbursable. [40 C.F.R. 31.45.]

All water monitoring programs and projects that involve environmental data acquisition from direct measurement activities or laboratory analysis must have an approved Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) to ensure that the data collected are of known and suitable quality and quantity. The Contractor shall cooperate in the State’s development of the QAPP, as necessary, and comply with the requisite elements of the plan.

Signatures Title

Name

Signature

Date

\t1\

\n1\

\s1\

\d1\

\t2\

\n2\

\s2\

\d2\

\t3\

\n3\

\s3\

\d3\

\t4\

\n4\

\s4\

\d4\

\t5\

\n5\

\s5\

\d5\

\t6\

\n6\

\s6\

\d6\

Attachment A

Project Workplan Doc Type: Contract

Project Title:

SWIFT

200103

AI:

112044

Activity ID:

PRO20210001

Implementation of the Como Lake Management Plan and Nine Key Elements Plan Phase 1

1. Project Summary: Organization: Contractor contact name: Title: Address:

Capitol Region Watershed District Britta Belden Water Resource Project Manager 595 Aldine St. Saint Paul, MN 55104

Phone:

651-644-8888

E-mail:

bbelden@capitolregionwd.org

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) contact: MPCA project manager: Title: Address:

Jordan Donatell Environmental Specialist 520 Lafayette Road Saint Paul, MN 55155

Phone:

715-441-0068

E-mail:

Jordan.donatell@state.mn.us

Project information Total cost:

Grant: $354,456 Match: $290,240, Total: $644,696

2. Statement of Problems, Opportunities, and Existing Conditions Como Lake, a 70.5 acre shallow urban lake located in St. Paul’s 348 acre Como Regional Park, is one of the most popular lakes in the region. Unfortunately, Como Lake has experienced poor water quality for decades due to excessive phosphorus and associated algal blooms. Algal growth has led to odor problems, reduced oxygen conditions in the lake, and winter fish kills. Phosphorus is the primary driver of water quality problems in Como Lake.

Como Lake has consistently exceeded the Minnesota state shallow lake water quality standard in this region for phosphorus (60 µg/L).

The long-term mean (1984-2019) total phosphorus (TP) concentration in Como Lake is 173 µg/L, which is three times the state standard.

Previous studies and analyses have determined that a 60% reduction in watershed TP loads, and a 95% reduction in internal TP loads will be required to meet the state water quality standard (EOR, 2010; LimnoTech, 2017; CRWD, 2019).

The Como Lake watershed (1,711 acres) includes portions of three cities (St. Paul, Roseville, and Falcon Heights) and has 13 major subwatersheds that generate runoff to an extensive network of storm sewer pipes that discharge directly to Como Lake through twentytwo storm sewer outlets. The characteristics of the watershed have significant influence on the amount of runoff and what pollutants are being delivered to the lake. The watershed contributes a significant portion of TP to Como Lake through stormwater runoff in addition to other pollutants of concern including chloride, sediment, and trash, making the watershed a pollutant source.

In addition, internal phosphorus loading has become a significant contributor to poor water quality in Como Lake. Phosphorus has built up in the lake bottom over time by chemically binding to sediment particles. During low-oxygen conditions, phosphorus is able to break its bond with sediment particles and release into the water for algae to consume. This process of phosphorus release from the bottom www.pca.state.mn.us • e-admin9-38 • 3/11/16

651-296-6300

•

800-657-3864

•

Use your preferred relay service

•

Available in alternative formats Page 1 of 6

sediments is the primary mechanism of internal loading in Como Lake.

Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD) is committed to improving water quality in Como Lake. In fact, CRWD was formed in 1998 after a group of community members who were concerned for Como Lake’s health submitted a petition to the State to start a watershed district. In 2002, CRWD assisted in the development of the Como Lake Strategic Management Plan which sought to reduce phosphorus in Como Lake through watershed management strategies. Through this plan, the implementation of several structural watershed best management practice (BMP) projects reduced external phosphorus loading to the lake by approximately 20% since 2002. Despite these efforts, water quality in Como Lake remains poor.

In 2019, CRWD developed a revised Como Lake Management Plan (CLMP) with the goal of utilizing a holistic and adaptive management approach for achieving Como Lake water quality goals. The CLMP identifies in-lake and watershed management strategies that are based on the latest science, technology, and community input to serve as a framework for meeting water quality goals. The life of the plan is defined as 20 years (2019-2039) to allow enough time for Como Lake to respond to in-lake and watershed management actions and achieve ecological balance. Como Lake has been degraded for several decades and it will take significant effort and time to improve water quality.

The CLMP defines five overarching goals with measurable objectives, each of which developed using input from both the community and agency staff. Management goals set a vision for Como Lake, and associated objectives provide a mechanism to measure progress towards meeting those goals. The five overarching management goals for Como Lake and its watershed include: •

Goal 1: Como Lake will be managed as an ecologically healthy, shallow lake.

•

Goal 2: Maintain healthy shoreline areas that can support a variety of wildlife and contribute to the ecological health of Como Lake.

•

Goal 3: Maintain a variety of year-round recreational opportunities that are appropriate for a shallow urban lake.

•

Goal 4: Achieve strong sustained community engagement and stewardship to improve and protect Como Lake.

•

Goal 5: Utilize the best science, partnerships, and resources to ensure successful implementation of the CLMP over the life of the plan (20 years).

Recommended management actions are actual projects, programs, events, or organized efforts that will work toward achieving each CLMP goal and measurable objective. The CLMP proposes a combination of in-lake, watershed, and community-based management actions to be carried out over the life of the plan to achieve each goal. Lake management actions will seek to control internal phosphorus loads and enhance ecological integrity. Watershed management actions will include structural and non-structural BMPs that reduce phosphorus loads from stormwater runoff. Community-based management actions will work to help build stewardship and pride in Como Lake. The recommended CLMP management actions will be implemented over the life of the plan using the adaptive management framework.

The funding received through the MPCA 319 Small Watersheds Focus grant will greatly assist in the implementation of a number of recommended actions identified in the CLMP (adopted May 2019) and the Environmental Protection Agency Nine Key Element (NKE) Plan (approved April 2021). This work plan details which recommended actions will be carried out between 2022-2025 and how the 319 funding will be applied to them as well as a 40% match from CRWD.

3. Goal, Objectives, Tasks and Subtasks Goal: Implement the recommended actions in the CLMP and NKE plan to meet goals for phosphorus reduction, water quality improvement, ecosystem health, shoreline function, recreational opportunities, and community engagement.

Objective 1: Como Lake will be managed as an ecologically healthy shallow lake.

An ecologically healthy shallow lake is one where phosphorus levels are maintained at sufficiently low levels (60 µg/L or lower) to minimize algae nuisances, the rooted aquatic plant community is dominated by a diverse assemblage of native species, and a balanced aquatic food web is maintained.

Task 1A: Meet and maintain in-lake total phosphorus concentrations at <60 ug/L (summertime surface water average) by reducing internal phosphorus loads by 95% and watershed phosphorus loads by 60%.

Phosphorus is the primary driver of water quality in Como Lake. A total maximum daily load (TMDL) has indicated that internal phosphorus loads need to be reduced by 95% and external phosphorus loads reduced by 60% to meet State shallow lake water quality goals.

Subtask 1A-1: Monitoring and Data Collection The data collected through monitoring activities are critical for understanding the response of the internal dynamics of www.pca.state.mn.us • e-admin9-38 • 3/11/16

651-296-6300

•

800-657-3864

•

Use your preferred relay service

•

Available in alternative formats Page 2 of 6

Como Lake and measuring the effectiveness of the management plan actions. Lake monitoring and data collection will include bi-monthly sampling of Como Lake (April-Nov) by Ramsey County Public Works (RCPW) for a suite of water quality parameters (nutrients, solids, metals, bacteria, zooplankton, and phytoplankton). CRWD will operate three multi-parameter sondes in Como Lake to continuously measure temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and conductivity to test the effectiveness of implemented BMPs. For all in-lake monitoring activities, three stations (Sta. 102, Sta. 201, Sta. 202) have been established in Como Lake (Figure 1). Data has been collected in Como Lake since 1984 by Ramsey County. CRWD also collects data at three major outfalls to Como Lake during storm events. The data is used to calibrate the watershed model and to determine BMP effectiveness over time.

Subtask 1A-1 Timeline: Annually through the length of the agreement, April-November Subtask 1A-1 Cost: Grant: $79,200, Match: $52,800, Total: $132,000 Subtask 1A-1 Deliverables: Annual water quality data, analysis, and data report Subtask 1A-1 Measurable Outcomes: Collection and analysis of up to: 52 TP, SRP, Turbidity lake samples/year, 38 Cl- lake samples/year, 40 TKN, NH3, NO3, NO2 lake samples/year, 32 Chl-a lake samples/year, 11 phytoplankton/zooplankton samples/year, six TSS/VSS lake samples/year; approximately 72,000 continuous hypolimnetic sonde data points per year (temp, DO, pH, Sp. Cond.); 45 full water quality stormwater samples (nutrients, solids, metals, 12 bacteria stormwater samples, approximately 53,000 continuous stormwater level and velocity measurements; one annual water quality summary report

www.pca.state.mn.us • e-admin9-38 • 3/11/16

651-296-6300

•

800-657-3864

•

Use your preferred relay service

•

Available in alternative formats Page 3 of 6

Figure 1: Como Lake in Saint Paul, MN. Three monitoring stations are located from North to South and are positioned at varying depths (shallow (6'), deep (15.5'), intermediate (12').

www.pca.state.mn.us • e-admin9-38 • 3/11/16

651-296-6300

•

800-657-3864

•

Use your preferred relay service

•

Available in alternative formats Page 4 of 6

Subtask 1A-2: Como Pavilion Parking Lot BMPs (South Lot) The parking lot on the south side of the Como Lake Pavilion is being repaved in Fall 2021 by the City of Saint Paul which presents a unique opportunity to incorporate runoff management practices as part of the overall project. The parking lot being repaved is outside of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) and presently drains from the parking lot surfaces directly to Como Lake, which is adjacent to the lot. CRWD proposes the construction of a number of best management practices (BMPs) to capture the pollutant-laden runoff being generated from the parking lot, including a rain garden (approximately 760 sq. ft.), a rock channel (approximately 40 ft), and two educational signs to explain flow networks, urban watershed processes, and the impact of runoff on lake water quality. These practices will help reduce external phosphorus loading to Como Lake and work toward external load reduction goals from the TMDL. Subtask 1A-2 Timeline: October, 2021-December 31, 2021 Subtask 1A-2 Cost: Grant: $102,360, Match: $88,240, Total: $190,600 Subtask 1A-2 Deliverables: Rain garden, rock channel, educational signage Subtask 1A-2 Measurable Outcomes: approximately 760 sq. ft. rain garden, approximately 40 ft. rock channel, two educational signs Subtask 1A-2 Estimated reductions: five lbs of phosphorus removed by rain garden Subtask 1A-3: Como Pavilion Parking Lot BMPs (North Lot) The parking lot on the north side of the Como Lake Pavilion is being repaved in 2023 by the City of Saint Paul. CRWD would like to incorporate runoff management practices into the parking lot design, including a rain garden (approximately 320 sq. ft.) and one educational sign. This parking lot is outside of the MS4 with all runoff draining directly to Como Lake which is adjacent to the lot. These practices will help reduce phosphorus loading to Como Lake and work toward external load reduction goals from the TMDL. Subtask 1A-3 Timeline: October, 2023-December 31, 2023 Subtask 1A-3 Cost: Grant: $64,800, Match: $43,200, Total: $108,000 Subtask 1A-3 Deliverables: Rain garden, educational signage Subtask 1A-3 Measurable Outcomes: approximately 320 sq. ft. rain garden, one educational sign Subtask 1A-3 Estimated reductions: Two lbs of phosphorus removed by rain garden Objective 2: Maintain healthy shoreline areas that can support a variety of wildlife and contribute to the ecological health of Como Lake.

Como Lake’s entire shoreline was restored in the early 2000s by converting turf grass to a mix of native grasses, forbs, and trees. It plays a critical role in maintaining water quality (i.e. runoff capture, erosion control, water temperature regulation, geese control), providing wildlife habitat (i.e. shore nesting areas, pollinator plants), and improving the overall aesthetic of the lake to visitors.

Upkeep of the shoreline to maximize its numerous functions and benefits is both time consuming and costly. In 2020, a shoreline inventory was completed to document existing conditions, plant community assemblages, invasive species, wildlife habitat areas, erosive banks, and areas for expansion. In summer 2021, this information is being utilized to inform the development of the Como Lake Shoreline Management Plan which will guide the long-term management (both maintenance and site-specific projects) of the entire shoreline.

Task 2A: Enhance areas of native vegetation along the shoreline to capture surface runoff, minimize shoreline erosion, and promote wildlife habitat.

Dense and diverse native perennial vegetation in the shoreline zone is necessary for capturing surface runoff, promoting bank stabilization, and providing wildlife habitat. Currently, Como Lake’s shoreline varies in its condition and integrity.

Subtask 2A-1: Shoreline Stabilization and Improvement Projects The Como Lake Shoreline Management Plan will provide a framework for enhancement practices and site-specific projects to support Como Lake’s shoreline to maximize its many functions and benefits including: restoring compromised areas of shoreline vegetation, erosion control/bank stabilization projects, invasive species removal, enhancing vegetation assemblages to capture surface runoff, and wildlife habitat improvements.

Subtask 2A-1 Timeline: Annually through the length of the agreement, approximately April-November Subtask 2A-1 Cost: Grant: $69,096, Match: $60,000, Total: $129,096 www.pca.state.mn.us • e-admin9-38 • 3/11/16

651-296-6300

•

800-657-3864

•

Use your preferred relay service

•

Available in alternative formats Page 5 of 6

Subtask 2A-1 Deliverables: Annual shoreline projects; annual progress report summary Subtask 2A-1 Measurable Outcomes: Stabilization of up to 845 feet of shoreline (10% of shoreline), up to 17,000 sq. ft. of vegetation enhanced.

Objective 3: Achieve strong sustained community engagement and stewardship to improve and protect Como Lake.

Public support through sustained community engagement and stewardship is critical for the improvement and protection of Como Lake. Having committed community groups and members that can help further the initiatives of the CLMP and support the work of CRWD and its partners is essential for success.

Task 3A: Increase community knowledge and understanding of Como Lake.

Information, education, and understanding of Como Lake, its issues, and the work to improve it help form the foundation that supports stewardship. Outreach to the many different communities and user groups of the lake provides an opportunity to increase the number and diversity of the people working to improve Como Lake.

Subtask 3A-1: Develop and Install a Como Lake Water Quality Kiosk An interactive kiosk will be developed, installed, and maintained at an outdoor location near the Pavilion and will serve as the primary information hub for Como Lake. The kiosk will communicate information relevant to Como Lake’s water quality and on-going improvement efforts, e.g. monitoring data, science, information, updates, real-time data, available activities, and maps. A professional designer will be utilized for the development and design of the kiosk. The kiosk will include additional languages to effectively reach the many user groups of Como Lake.

Subtask 3A-1 Timeline: January, 2022-November 30, 2022 Subtask 3A-1 Cost: Grant: $9,000, Match: $6,000, Total: $15,000 Subtask 3A-1 Deliverables: Interactive Water Quality Kiosk for Como Lake Subtask 3A-1 Measurable Outcomes: Develop and install one water quality kiosk at Como Lake Subtask 3A-2: Develop and Install New Educational Signage Around Como Lake Signage will be installed at key locations around Como Lake to enhance user experience and understanding of the lake’s ecosystem, its history, water quality improvement efforts, and shoreline management. A professional designer will be utilized for the development and design of the signs. The signs will include additional languages to effectively reach the many user groups of Como Lake.

Subtask 3A-2 Timeline: January, 2022-November 30, 2022 Subtask 3A-2 Cost: Grant: $30,000, Match: $40,000, Total: $70,000 Subtask 3A-2 Deliverables: 8-10 interpretive signs around Como Lake Subtask 3A-2 Measurable Outcomes: Develop and install 8-10 interpretive signs around Como Lake

4.

Project Budget (attached)

www.pca.state.mn.us • e-admin9-38 • 3/11/16

651-296-6300

•

800-657-3864

•

Use your preferred relay service

•

Available in alternative formats Page 6 of 6

Attachment A - Budget SWIFT: AI: Activity ID:

Project name: Implementation of the Como Lake Management Plan and Nine Key Element Plan Organization name: Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD)

Objective Objective 1: Managing Como Lake as an healthy shallow lake Task 1A: Reduce external and internal phosphorus loading Subtask 1A-1: Effectiveness Monitoring and Data Collection Subtask 1A-2: Como Pavilion Parking Lot BMPs (South Lot) Subtask 1A-2 CRWD Staff Subtask 1A-2 CRWD Staff Subtask 1A-3: Como Pavilion Parking Lot BMPs (North Lot)

Cost category

319 Cost-share 319 Cost-share Water Resource Project Manager Division Manager 319 Cost-share

Unit cost Grant

variable variable variable* variable* variable

OBJECTIVE 1 - TOTAL

200103 112044 PRO20210001

Budget Total

Match

$ $

79,200.00 102,360.00

64,800.00

$ $ $ $ $

52,800.00 68,240.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 43,200.00

$ $ $ $ $

132,000.00 170,600.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 108,000.00

$ $

246,360.00

$

184,240.00

$

430,600.00

$

69,096.00

$ $ $

40,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00

$ $ $

109,096.00 10,000.00 10,000.00

$

69,096.00

$

60,000.00

$

129,096.00

$ $

9,000.00 30,000.00

$ $ $ $

6,000.00 20,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00

$ $ $ $

15,000.00 50,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00

$

39,000.00

$

46,000.00

$

85,000.00

$

354,456.00

$

290,240.00

$

644,696.00

OBJECTIVE 2: Develop and implement projects to maximize native shoreline function Task 2A: Enhance native shoreline vegetation, minimize erosion, and promote wildlife habitat Subtask 2A-1: Shoreline Stabilization and Restoration Projects 319 Cost-share Subtask 2A-1 CRWD Staff Water Resource Project Manager Division Manager Subtask 2A-1 CRWD Staff

variable variable* variable*

OBJECTIVE 2 - TOTAL OBJECTIVE 3: Achieve strong commmunity engagement and stewardship to improve Task 3A: Increase community knowledge and understanding of Como Lake Subtask 3A-1: Develop and Install a Como Lake Water Quality Kiosk Subtask 3A-2: Develop and Install New Educational Signage Around Como Lake Subtask 3A-2 CRWD Staff Subtask 3A-2 CRWD Staff

319 Cost-share 319 Cost-share Water Resource Project Manager Division Manager

OBJECTIVE 3 - TOTAL

*not to exceed $65/hour

PROJECT TOTAL

variable variable variable* variable*

September 15, 2021 V. Action Items, D) Approve 2021 MN Stormwater Research Council Contribution (Fossum)

DATE: TO: FROM: RE:

September 9, 2021 CRWD Board of Managers Bob Fossum, Division Manager Approve 2021 MN Stormwater Research Council Contribution

Background Funding for Research has been included in CRWD’s Budget and Workplan in each year from 2014— 2021. Multiple small-scale research projects have been funded and completed by District staff as well as through partnerships with local research institutions.

Since 2017, CRWD has contributed to the MN Stormwater Research Council to jointly fund applied stormwater research.

Issues Over the past 4 years, the Managers have approved an annual $25,000 contribution to the MN Stormwater Research Council. This money along with funding from other organizations has totaled nearly half a million dollars and has funded over two dozen research projects. This level of effort would not be possible without the collective approach being implemented.

Staff request approval of a contribution of $25,000 for the next round of funding that is currently being solicited.

Fiscal Note: 2021 Budget for 228-21228 District Research Program is $46,850.

Requested Action Approve 2021 MN Stormwater Research Council Contribution in an amount not to exceed $25,000. enc:

MN Stormwater Research Council Request for Funds

W:\07 Programs\Research\MN Stormwater Research Council\2021\Brd Memo, MNSRC - 9-9-2021.docx

Minnesota Stormwater Research Council

Research Funding Support Request Join us as a financial partner to achieve or surpass the 2021 goal of

$175K

The Minnesota Stormwater Research Council (Council) in partnership with the University of Minnesota Water Resources Center (WRC) is soliciting funds to complete collaborative applied research to address priority stormwater management needs for Minnesota.

Over the past four years, more than $493K was contributed and pooled together from watershed units, cities, organizations and private businesses. These were then leveraged with Clean Water Legacy funds to support 23 research projects and support the use of that information by professionals, practitioners, and policy makers. This collective and collaborative work helps prevent, minimize and mitigate the impacts of urban stormwater runoff across Minnesota.

Program Highlights summarizes the research completed and

The accompanying recognizes the partners that have made it possible.

Why contribute?

These investments in research result in discoveries that help Minnesota professionals, practitioners, and policymakers across cities, watersheds, counties, and private businesses Evaluate and design more effective stormwater practices Manage urban runoff to prevent or reduce impacts to lakes, streams, rivers and groundwater Maintain investments in stormwater infrastructure for continued effective operation.

Your organization’s financial contribution to the Council directly supports research important to you.

Pooling resources adds up and provides a mechanism for completing work together.

Join the growing list of watersheds, cities, private businesses and organizations supporting urban stormwater research.

Use the online form HERE to indicate your organization’s financial support by October 31st.

How your contribution will be invested in the future

Your 2021 contribution to the research funding pool will support a new suite of research projects to be solicited in late 2021 and chosen in early 2022. A competitive application process is used to solicit proposals.

About the Minnesota Stormwater Research Council Learn more about how cities, watersheds, consultants, state agencies, and research institutions are coming together to guide stormwater research in the Minnesota Stormwater Research Council Framework.

Management and use of funds

✔ The use of pooled applied research funds will be managed by the Advisory Board of the Council in partnership with the Water Resources Center. ✔ Submissions and projects will be reviewed, ranked, and awarded as determined by the Advisory Board of the Council and by the Center. ✔ All researchers, professionals, and experts from Minnesota will be invited to submit proposals.

Organizations contributing funds and their staff are eligible to apply. ✔ Acknowledgement of funding partners is required by the researchers for each project and on Center and Council reports, website and other publications.

Please contact one of the following Council Advisory Board Members for more information.

Ross Bintner, City of Edina Lisa Volbrecht, City of St. Cloud

RBintner@edinamn.gov Lisa.Vollbrecht@ci.stcloud.mn.us

952-903-5713 320.650.2834

Bob Fossum, Capitol Region Watershed District

bob@capitolregionwd.org

651-644-8888

Rena Weis, WENCK/Stantec

rweis@wenck.com

763-252-6889.

John Bilotta, Water Resources Center

jbilotta@umn.edu

612-624-7708

This letter is distributed on behalf of the Minnesota Stormwater Research Council Advisory Board.

Minnesota Stormwater Research Council &

Minnesota Stormwater Research Program 2021

HIGHLIGHTS

Advancing science, technology and management of stormwater in Minnesota by investing in and facilitating research to prevent, minimize, and mitigate the impacts of runoff from the built environment.

wrc.umn.edu/stormwater

The Stormwater Research Program in partnership with the

Minnesota Stormwater Research Council

?

This collaboration pools financial resources to support research, shares research outcomes and engages stakeholders to determine research needs.

Visit wrc.umn.edu/msrc to learn more, view the Advisory Board members, and subscribe to our mailing list.

CURRENT STORMWATER RESEARCH PROJECTS

Can spent lime from water treatment facilities be used to control phosphorus release from urban stormwater ponds?

How can soil mixes in biofiltration practices impact phosphorus capture and release and plant growth?

How prevalent are pathogens, viruses and bacteria in stormwater reuse systems?

Will city-specific climate change reports provide more precise information for future stormwater infrastructure planning and management?

Are underground sand filters performing as designed and what type of future maintenance is needed?

Will the addition of biochar help filter practices remove bacteria and dissolved contaminants?

How can we improve monitoring of the first flush and concentrations of pollutants?

At what level are gross organic solids contributing to stormwater pollutant loading?

Can we combine stormwater monitoring data from various cities, watersheds and agencies to more specifically characterize urban runoff quantity and quality?

wrc.umn.edu/projects/stormwater

Recent Achievements

COMPLETED RESEARCH PROJECTS

Final reports and additional project information can be found on our website.

Example discoveries...

• Detecting phosphorus release from urban stormwater ponds Discovered that many urban stormwater ponds are stratified, with low dissolved oxygen that may result in phosphorus release rather than phosphorus capture. The project also revealed that duckweed and wind sheltering by trees and vegetation are important pond characteristics that need to be considered for a complete picture of what is happening with phosphorus in stormwater ponds.

• Developing a street sweeping credit for stormwater phosphorus source reduction Discovered that higher tree canopies can be an indicator of mass and nutrient pollution loads on streets. The research was used by the team and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to develop a street sweeping credit calculator cities and other MS4s can use to determine phosphorus removal for their unique street sweeping practices.

• Pathogens and antibiotic resistant genes in urban stormwater reuse systems Discovered that some antibiotic resistant genes, virus, E.coli and other bacteria are making their way into stormwater reuse systems. Levels of detection occurred both before and after treatment. No seasonal dynamics were detected. More importantly this study revealed we need more data. Therefore phase II of this project is currently underway.

• Inspiring Community Action for Stormwater Management Discovered Minnesota water scientists, policymakers and managers can accelerate progress towards clean water by listening to new and diverse audiences and changing the way we discuss water with citizens.

The value for urban stormwater research discoveries Discoveries from research help Minnesota professionals, practitioners and policymakers: □ Evaluate and design more effective stormwater practices □ Manage runoff to prevent or reduce impacts to lakes,

rivers, streams and groundwater □ Maintain investments in stormwater infrastructure for

continued operation wrc.umn.edu/projects/stormwater

Financial Partners

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

for the Stormwater Research and Technology Transfer Program is provided by the Clean Water Fund from the State of Minnesota’s Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment. Additional support comes from the Minnesota Stormwater Research Council and it’s member cities, watersheds, private businesses, The University of Minnesota Water Resources Center, the College of Food, Agriculture, and Natural Resource Sciences, and the National Institutes for Water Resources funded by the US Geological Survey.

JOIN US as a financial partner to achieve or surpass this year’s goal:

2021 GOAL

$175K

Thank you to the following cities, watershed organizations, and private sector businesses which provide, or have provided, financial support for the Program and Council beginning 2017: • • • • • • • • •

Barr Engineering Company Capitol Region Watershed District City of Bloomington City of Edina City of Minnetonka City of Woodbury Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District Minnesota Cities Stormwater Coalition Mississippi Watershed Management Organization

Contact: John Bilotta Senior Research and Extension Coordinator jbilotta@umn.edu, 1.612.624.7708 wrc.umn.edu/projects/stormwater

• Nine Mile Creek Watershed District • Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District • South Washington Watershed District • Upper Mississippi River Source Water Protection Project • Valley Branch Watershed District • Wenck Associates