CAUSE OF EFFECT ESSAY RUBRIC
* I WILL USE THIS
RUBRIC ON THE FINAL DRAFT Name:________________________________ CONTENT Presenting Subject / 5 points
Proposed Causes or Effects
/ 10 points
Support for Conjectures / 20 points
“A” PAPER
“B” PAPER
“C” PAPER
“D/F” PAPER
Presents subject thoroughly and creatively, anticipating audience familiarity correctly; author chooses a significant trend, phenomenon or event and thoroughly proves its merit for examination.
Presents subject thoroughly, mostly anticipating audience familiarity; author chooses a recognizable trend, phenomenon or event and argues for its merit for examination.
Overall conjectures are compelling, clear and stated early in the paper; causes/effects are creative, yet plausible, convincing and soundly justified; reader is brought to new insight about subject being discussed
Overall conjectures are clear and stated early in the paper; majority of causes/effects are creative, yet plausible, convincing and soundly justified; reader may find new understanding about subject being discussed
Presents reasonably significant subject with little depth; somewhat shows a degree of audience awareness; subject is questionable as a relevant trend, phenomenon or event; some suggestion for meriting examination Overall conjectures are clear and stated early in the paper; causes/effects are questionable or non-arguable; author spends too much time describing rather than arguing to convince reader of plausibility; Little insight is brought to the reader about the subject
Develops and supports judgment masterfully through relevant research, effective examples and sound logic; skillfully uses a variety of expert evidence to support conjectures
Develops and supports judgment through many effective, relevant details, examples and sound logic in key places of the paper; uses a variety of evidence in discerning ways
Subject background missing; displays little to no awareness of audience familiarity; trend, phenomenon or event is unclear and/or lacks substance for discussion; argument for examination is weak or nonexistent Majority of conjectures are vague or confusing / does not appear early enough; causes/effects are not speculative or plausible; arguments are not argued well or convincingly or are weakly justified; reader is left confused or without any new understanding of subject Weak development and support: lacks reasons, contains irrelevant details, ineffective examples or logic is generally faulty; evidence is overall unconvincing or isn’t used in key places of argument
Develops and supports judgment through some relevant details and examples, one or two instances of faulty logic; relies too much on one type of evidence or uses research in noneffective ways. Misses opportunities to use helpful research