WSDOT Presentation on Regional Center Planning

Page 1

Regional)Center) Planning)in)the)Central) Puget)Sound)2 Washington State Department f Transportation Public Transportation Conference August 27, 2012


The$Project+ •  Land Use Planning studio at the University of Washington •  Project for the Puget Sound Regional Council •  Planning policy evaluation of: 27 Regional Growth Centers and 8 Manufacturing and Industrial Centers


Overview+ •  Designated Centers •  Evaluation Methodology •

Current state of center planning…


Centers+ Regional$ Growth$Centers+ + Manufacturing$/ Industrial$ Centers+


Benefits$of$Growth$Centers+ •  Community and economic benefits as gathering places. •  Easy access to jobs, services, shopping, and entertainment. •  A mix of uses and pedestrian-friendly design. •  Less reliance on single occupancy vehicles.


Planning$Regional$Centers+

2008+


Centers$Checklist$Elements+ (no)housing)element)for)Manufacturing/Industrial)Centers)2

•  •  •  •  •  •  •

Plan concept Environment Land use Housing Economy Public services Transportation


What$we$reviewed:+ Comprehensive$Plans+

Research+ and+ Evaluation+

Sub=Area)Plans2

Land$Use$Codes+

What$we$did$not$review:+ Commute$Trip$Reduction$Plans+ Transit$Master$Plans+ Transit$Agency$Plans+ LongKRange$Transportation$Plans+

`


Studio$Review$Example+ Regional)Growth)Center2


Centers$and$Public$Trans.+ •  Focal points for high capacity transit and regional networks •  Centers can get priority funds from the PSRC •  Local jurisdictions should plan land uses to support transit


North$Tukwila+ Ballard$Interbay+

Manufacturing$ /$ Industrial$ Centers+

Kent+ Duwamish+

Frederickson+

Port$of$Tacoma+ Paine$Field+

South$Kitsap+


Manufacturing/Industrial$Centers+ Checklist items relating to transit: •  •  •

Employee commuting Working with transit agencies Mode split goals


Lynnwood+ Tacoma$Mall+ Auburn+ Downtown$SeaVle+ Totem$Lake+ Overlake+ Downtown$Bellevue+ EvereV+

Regional+ Growth+ Centers+

Burien+ Uptown$Queen$Anne+ Downtown$Puyallup+ Lakewood+ South$Lake$Union+ Federal$Way+ Kent+ Silverdale+ Northgate+ First$Hill$/$Capitol$Hill+ SeaTac+ Canyon$Park+ Bremerton+ Downtown$Redmond+ Tukwila+ University$Community+ South$Hill+ Downtown$Tacoma+ Renton+


Environment+ “Include strategies and programs to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions” •  •

Mostly though benefits of CTR programs Little center specific discussion


Land$Use+ “Establish residential and employment growth targets that accommodate a significant share of the jurisdiction’s growth, as well as residential densities and building intensities” •

Most jurisdictions did not create numeric targets for centers


Land$Use+ “Include design standards for pedestrianfriendly, transit-orientated development and other transit-supportive planning that orients land use around transit” •  •

About half of the Centers have design standards addressing TOD Example: “Avoid making pedestrians walk across expansive parking lots to reach transit stops.”


Trans.$Physical$Design+ ``

“Promote on-street parking” •  •  •

On-street parking is not a prominent concern for any cities in the region Addressed minimally by some Maybe better to address relationship of on-street to off-street?


Trans.$Physical$Design+ ``

“Reduce/mitigate parking effects” •

Nearly all cities recognize design problems associated with parking and are seeking to mitigate/reduce their effects Strategies including landscaping, screening, and other design elements


Additional$Trans.$Issues+ ``

“Include a parking management strategy” and “Manage the supply of parking” •  Only some cities plan for parking with a specific parking management strategy •  Parking policies tend to relate to urban centers


Additional$Trans.$Issues+ ``


Additional$Trans.$Issues+ ``

“Include detailed design criteria that advances transit-supportive land uses” •

Center planning should inherently address this item •  Residential density •  Employment density •  Develop transit networks to and within centers •  Manage the supply of parking


Additional$Trans.$Issues+ ``

“Include provisions for context-sensitive design of transportation facilities” •  •  •

Few jurisdictions have policy guiding facility design specific to the center Neighborhood character Ties in to environment, land use, and design policies


Additional$Trans.$Issues+ ``

“Address relationships to regional highcapacity transit (including bus rapid transit, commuter rail, light rail, and express bus) and local transit by working with transit agencies” •  •

Most centers encourage collaboration with transit providers to improve access Do transit agencies have reciprocal policies?


Additional$Trans.$Issues+ ``

“Develop mode-split goals” •  Specific goals for centers are rare •  Parking management is one tool


Project$Conclusions+ ``

•  Why does planning policy for centers matter for transit? •  PSRC prioritizes transportation funding in centers •  The PSRC checklist supports good planning for transit, which helps build ridership


Conclusions$for$Transit+ ``

•  How should cities be planning in centers to support transit? •  Parking management •  Transit supportive design •  High density •  TDM and CTR programs


Thank$you+ Melanie)Mayock2 mmayock20@gmail.com Jonathon)Morrison)Winters2 jfmorrisonwinters@gmail.com Catherine)Silva2 catsilva@uw.edu


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.