Thursday, April 3, 2014
Vol. 124, Issue 52
Honor calls Congress
Students to join for group discussion about pressing issues facing Committee
Sodexo never submitted bid, Hogan says
Brendan Rogers Senior Writer
Kelsey Grant | The Cavalier Daily
University Chief Operating Officer said dining services provider protested by Living Wage Campaign is not one of two current bidders Senior Writer
Sodexo is not being considered as the University’s next dining services provider, Patrick Hogan, the University’s executive vice president and chief operating officer, announced last Friday to a small group of students and faculty members who are a part of the Living Wage campaign. The University’s search for a new dining services provider garnered significant attention recently after the Living Wage campaign publicly objected to Sodexo, who they claimed was being considered for the contract. The multinational French food services corporation has come under scrutiny for reclassifying workers to avoid providing health insurance under guidelines established in the Affordable Care Act. Sodexo was never officially considered, Hogan said Friday, because the company never submitted a bid for the University contract. Hogan affirmed this earlier statement again on Wednesday. “We put out a public request for
Hardy resigns from UJC PAGE 2
proposals, and Sodexo did not respond, so I presume they were not interested,” he said. “Sodexo is one of just a few companies that have the capability of providing service to a university the size of U.Va. It may well be that people just presumed Sodexo was in the bid process here. That may have been what prompted all of this communication.” The University is currently looking into two contractors, though the administration will not reveal the names of those corporations until a contract has been finalized. A committee comprised of members from the Procurement & Supplier Diversity Services Department will likely make its final recommendation to Hogan by the end of the month, he said. The decision, Hogan added, will be based primarily upon the quality of dining and cost for University students, though additional concerns — variety of meals and facility conditions, for example — will factor into the deliberation process. “We’re looking at things like that, first and foremost, with the students in mind,” Hogan said. “We don’t want to enter into a long-term con-
Bookstore to donate profits to AccessUVa PAGE 3
tract with a company who’s making promises that maybe only are good for a year or two. We are looking for long-term commitments around quality, around pricing, and around maintaining the quality of our facilities.” The University is unable to strictly impose its own policies on dining
“
Catherine Valentine
We are looking for long-term commitments around quality, around pricing, and around maintaining the quality of our facilities.
service corporations, Hogan said. “These are national companies,” Hogan said. “We’ve had a ruling from the state attorney general on this — we cannot dictate our policies to contractors. We strive to provide, to our 15,000 employees, a really attractive benefits package, attractive
Meztinger: Looking forward on Va. basketball PAGE 6
wages, and so-forth, but we are not permitted to require contractors to adopt our policies.” Sodexo has been criticized in recent years for alleged poor treatment of workers. At least eight boycotts of the dining services corporation have occurred at colleges and universities across the United States. “We received word from union organizers that Sodexo was a front runner, and that was what got us going,” said Living Wage spokesperson Caitlin Levine, a third-year College student, said. Although Sodexo did not put forth a bid for the contract, leaders of the Living Wage Campaign hope their core message is relayed to the corporation which is selected. “My hope is that the University takes some responsibility in terms of working conditions and worker treatment, and that they make that a priority when they’re choosing who to contract with and when they’re determining the language that goes into the contract,” Levine said. “Regardless of who it is, we’re just trying to urge the University to hold that contractor to high standards.”
Russo: Greek organizations and gender PAGE 10
The Honor Committee will host an open-forum for students and community members Thursday to address recent problems with the Committee identified both by committee members and fellow students. The “Honor Congress” will be held at 5 p.m. in the University’s Albert and Shirley Small Special Collections Library. The Congress will feature student small group discussions about various issues regarding the current state of honor at the University. Michelle Butler, outgoing vice chair for community relations, said she hopes this event will help guide the Honor Committee to improve the honor system going forward. “We have had an idea to do an event like this for a while,” said Butler, a fourth-year College student. “We try and deal with [problems facing the honor system] the best we can, but at a certain point it’s not just up to the Honor Committee, it’s up to the students.” Demographically-disproportionate report rates, inconsistent jury verdicts and faculty circumvention of the system by dealing with honor offenses internally raised major concern among Committee members, according to the Honor Congress’ Facebook event page. “I see these as the high-level problems that lead to daily frustrations, such as the low reporting rate and inconsistent verdicts,” said incoming Honor Chair Nick
see HONOR, page 3 A-School students design Grundy teen center PAGE 13