Monday, April 21, 2014 *Revenue increase from out-of-state students. This does not include changes to AccessUVa or differential tuition for any undergraduate student. These calculations reflect the tuition increase’s impact if it occurred this year.
Vol. 124, Issue 56
61.9% revenue increase from out-of-state students*
38.1%
revenue increase from in-state students
University to increase tuition
Commonwealth’s Supreme Court says ATI FOIA request stifles academic discourse Owen Robinson Associate Editor
Graphic by Jasmine Oo | The Cavalier Daily
In-state tuition to rise 4.3 percent, out-of-state to go up 5.9 percent during 2014-15 school year Caelainn Carney Senior Writer
University officials and student leaders met Friday to discuss implications of the proposed tuition hike for the 2014-15 academic year. The budget, which puts forth a 4.3 and 5.9 percent increase in overall tuition and fees for instate and out-of-state undergraduate students, respectively, will be put to vote at this coming Wednesday’s Board of Visitor’s meeting. The proposed change will increase in-state tuition by $540, to $12,998, and out-of-state tuition by $2,340, to $42,184, excluding the consideration of room and board, dining and other academic costs such as books. When adjusted to include these factors, the change represents a 3.6 percent increase for in-state and a 5 percent increase for out-of-state students. Mark Hampton, assistant vice president for budget and financial planning in the University budget office, said his
WHICH GRADUATION OPTION WILL YOU CHOOSE? PAGE 9-10
office began work on this budget this past summer. Though tuition must be adjusted for increases in inflation, Hampton said much of the increases stem from increasing costs in faculty salaries, staff salaries, health care and retirement plans for faculty and staff, as well as construction projects for the University’s buildings and facilities. “We are still very vulnerable to the risk of losing the people who make U.Va. a great place to work and study,” Hampton said. “We have to maintain our student to faculty ratio.” Hampton said despite increases in tuition, the budget office has worked to streamline unnecessary costs for the University. “We have $11.5 million in targeted savings,” Hampton said. According to Hampton, $5.5 million of these savings will come from more efficient health care plans, while the other $6 million will come from strategic workforce planning, strategic sourcing and process simplification, the deferment or elimi-
TOP 10 THINGS YOU’LL SEE AT FOXFIELD PAGE 14
Va. court protects Mann’s emails
nation lower priority expenses and the negotiation savings on procurement contracts. During the meeting, some students raised concerns about what the tuition hikes will mean for AccessUVa, and how the University plans to manage growing costs, particularly for low-income students. Colette Sheehy, vice president for management and budget, said though the current plan is to have students without financial needs pay more for this increase through their tuition, the University is looking for alternate solutions. “We are looking for more private sources to fund AccessUVa,” Sheehy said. When asked at the meeting why students only had the opportunity to comment on the proposed tuition increases less than a week before the Board of Visitors vote, Hampton and Sheehy said the anticipated increases in cost are not discretionary. “We are very sensitive to make sure that students are engaged,” Hampton said. “The big
NEW HEART OF MEDICINE INITIAVE PAGE 13
cost drivers tend to affect faculty and staff more directly.” “We typically don’t consult students at the front-end,” Sheehy said. Hampton said, overall, it costs the University about $100,000 per year to educate an undergraduate student. Student tuition and fees only pay for 32.9 percent of this cost. “It is actually pretty modest, relatively speaking,” Hampton said. Sheehy said much of the trouble in minimizing tuition costs comes from the state government’s treatment of higher education funding. “Unfortunately, higher education is a pretty discretionary part of the state’s budget,” Sheehy said. “We try to promote higher education as an economic engine for the commonwealth.” Hampton said state funding for higher education has seen a net decrease since 2000. “It has just gone down, down, down and has had to be made up by tuition increases,” Hampton said.
LOVE CONNECTION: SIZZLE THEN FIZZLE PAGE 15
The Virginia Supreme Court ruled Thursday to uphold the decision to deny the American Tradition Institute access to the emails of Michael Mann, a climate scientist and former University professor, staying consistent with the Prince William County Circuit Court’s previous ruling. The American Tradition Institute, now E&E Legal, said it has the right to receive the documents under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. The Court, however, ruled this circumstance fell under one of FOIA’s exemptions, arguing the disclosure of Mann’s correspondences may bring to light some of the University’s research, thereby reducing its competitiveness. The lawsuit began in 2011 after ATI filed against the University for failing to disclose documents within a previously agreed upon time frame. David Schnare, ATI’s lead attorney in the case, said the institution suspected misconduct in Mann’s research work — dismissed as misrepresentation by University faculty — based on emails the University released. ATI said it wanted further evidence to supplement its suspicions, which were only bolstered by the University's failure to release the additional emails.
see MANN, page 2 NO. 1 BASEBALL WINS TWO OF THREE PAGE 5