Bar TAl k MEWSLETTER DFTHE pANAJilAftBAR
*C . BRANCH
VOLUME 3 NUMBER 4
IHIGHLIGHTS
BC Branch Past Presidents meet and reflect on Bar's past and future
iLEGISLATIVE UPDATEI5
At the recent Past Presidents no-host dinner, each person attending was given the opportunity to speak on a subject of his/her choice. Topics included changes in practice, where the Bar is going, and humorous nostalgic moments. In attendance were: (Back row-left) Richard Vogel, Q.C. 1973/74; Alf Eddy,
PRO BONO \REQUEST/8 MEMBER SERVICES/10
former Executive Director B.C. Branch; W.P. Lightbody, Q.C., 1979/80; Alec Robertson, Q.C., 1985/86; L.M. Little, Q.C., 1984/85; J.J. Camp, Q.C., 1983/ 84; Terry La Liberte, President, 1990/ 91; Robert Smethurst, Q.C., Branch Executive Director; W.M. Leckie, 1982/ 83; Hon. Mr. Justice Charles Locke,
Q.C., 1968/69; PaulFraser, Q.C., 1976/ 77. (Front from left) Peter Manson, Q.C., 1974/75; Barbara Nelson, Q.C., 1986/87; M.F.M. Hermann, 1978/79; Bryan Williams, Q.C., 1977/78; Marlene Scott, Q.C., 1980/81; Russell Lusk, Q.C., 1989/90; James Vilvang, 1988/89; E.F. Horsey, Q.C., 1981/82
Legal aid job action withdrawn; Bill C-89 dies, reports President On June 6, the Legal Aid Action Committee announced an end to the withdrawal of services to legal aid cases.
Through the efforts of the At torney General in providing CALGARY AGM/12 additional funds in a time of fis cal restraint and a significant one-time contribution from the Law Foundation of B.C., the settlement increased payment for legal aid cases to about onehalf the rate generally paid by private clients. Both the Law Foundation and the govern ment will contribute an addi tional $6 million each to legal aid funding.
While this falls short of the 1984 Legal Aid Task Force and the 1988 Justice Reform Committee recommendations which gave a target of 75 per cent of market rates for legal aid work, it pro vides a 100 per cent increase to the criminal, family, immigra tion and duty counsel rates. The Branch's Joint Legal Aid Liaison Committee, co-chaired by myself and Law Society Deputy Treasurer Peter Leask, met on several occasions with the Attorney General and his representatives. I am confident that this Committee's on-going
dialogue with the government provided a unified and coordi nated appeal to increase legal aid funding. Further work by this joint com mittee will continue to ensure that on-going commitments to legal aid funding closes the gap between the task force reports and the current tariff levels. If payment for legal aid falls too short of market rates, the fun damental principal of access to justice is compromised by in adequate representation. Please turn to page 9