President's Message \IEWSLETTER DFTHE : a n a d ia n b a r ASSOCIATION, 3.C. BRANCH
SEPT. 1991 VOLUME 3 NUMBER 6
It is traditional, I understand, for the Branch President to outline in BarTalk plans and priorities for the coming year, in a sort of "state of the nation" address. Before doing so, I want to recognize on behalf of all British Columbia lawyers, the contribution of Past-President Terry La Liberte. Terry has been a competent, credible and intensely committed spokesperson for lawyers in British Columbia in the past year; and a good friend to all of us. Warm appreciation Terry!
The British Columbia Branch of the Canadian Bar Association is a means by which lawyers in this Province can work together HIGHLIGHTS to promote the interests of the profession, the better administration of justice and the SECTIONTALK/3 rule of law. The Branch Executive and Provincial Council have expressed concern about the current state of health LEGISLATIVE UPDATE/5
and hapJaQ^JifOddi^profession. A major surveyUF lawyers about career satisfaction, first conducted by the American Bar Association in 1986 and repeated in 1990, appears to substantiate the considerable anecdotal evidence that lawyers are working more and enjoying it less. This view has been echoed by senior representatives of the legal profession in Canada, including CBA National PastPresidents John Jennings and Wayne Chapman and, recently, Mr. Justice John Sopinka of the Supreme Court of Canada. They have spoken out about their concern for the loss of professionalism and the possible loss of voluntaryism in our profession. Recent statistical information suggests that there are increasing problems with alcoholism, substance abuse, family problems, physical and mental health crises as the most
Wendy G. Baker, QC President 1991/92
extreme results of the loss of ability by lawyers to cope with the pressure of practice. In the Barrister's Room and in law firm corridors, we hear lawyers talk about an apparent loss of collegiality and professional courtesy among other counsel and solicitors. Lawyers are dropping out of this profession in significant numbers, including a disproportionate number of women. The Please turn to page 9
Judicial appointments and complaints process feature of Council meeting
PRACTICE STANDARDS ADVISOR/8
The CBA (B.C. Branch) Provin cial Council held its first meet ing of the year on Saturday, September 21,1991.
NATIONAL CBA A special presentation by Chief PRES/9 Justice Esson and Chief Judge Diebolt focused on judicial ap pointments and complaint proc esses. PAISLEY PAPERS/10 Chief Justice Esson emphasized the importance of the independ ence of the judiciary and the re V DATES/12 sults of changes to the contempt of court law which has resulted in increased criticism. He outlined the duties of the
Canadian Judicial Council and noted that the Council fields complaints about federally ap pointed judges but has no pow er to impose punishment. Re moval of a supreme court judge requires an order of the Senate and the House of Commons. Chief Judge Diebolt explained appointment of Provincial Court judges and noted that judges must be called to the bar for a minimum of five years, must make application, are re viewed by an appointment committee, are interviewed by the provincial Judicial Council,
and are appointed by cabinet by an order in Council once the name is taken forward by the Attorney General. Regarding complaints against Provincial Court judges, Chief Judge Diebolt explained that complaints must be in writing. If it is a complaint against a de cision, the complainant is di rected to the appeal process. If the Chief Judge deems the com plaint valid, he acknowledges the complaint and advises the judge of the complaint. He will Please turn to page 2