BarTalk | April 2015

TESTAMENTARY INTENTION | NEW BC PROBATE RULES | EYE-WITNESS TESTIMONY

APR IL 2015 | bartalkonline.org

The Brave New World of the WESA

PAGE 12

news&events BARTALK EDITOR

Deborah Carfrae EDITORIAL BOARD CHAIR

Candice Alderson

EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS

Laura Cundari Janine Dethlefs Antoine Gariepy Ellen Hong Kate Jenkins David Madani Kirsten McGhee Sarah Nelligan Michael Welsh

PD NEWS

Attend a Full Day of CBABC Professional Development in Your Local Area See a complete list of CBABC Professional Development on page 28.

CRANBROOK PRESENTED BY THE BC BRANCH OF THE CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION

Date: April 17, 2015 Location: Prestige Rocky Mountain Resort

BARTALK SENIOR EDITOR

Maureen Cameron

STAFF CONTRIBUTORS

Judy Cave Zameena Dadani Tanya Galic Matthew Gruman Paula LaBrie Stuart Rennie Karen St. Aubin Jennifer Weber Judy Yen

SMITHERS PRESENTED BY THE BC BRANCH OF THE CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION

Date: May 2, 2015 Location: Perry & Company

ABBOTSFORD

The BC Branch of the Canadian Bar Association, 10th Floor, 845 Cambie St. Vancouver, BC V6B 5T3

IN PARTNERSHIP WITH ABBOTSFORD & DISTRICT, CHILLIWACK, FRASER VALLEY, AND SURREY BAR ASSOCIATIONS

Tel: 604-687-3404 Toll-free (in BC): 1-888-687-3404 bartalk@cbabc.org

BarTalk is published six times per year by the British Columbia Branch of the Canadian Bar Association and is available online at bartalkonline.org. © Copyright the British Columbia Branch of the Canadian Bar Association 2015.

This publication is intended for information purposes only and the information herein should not be applied to specific fact circumstances without the advice of counsel.

The British Columbia Branch of the Canadian Bar Association represents more than 6,700 BC members and is dedicated to improving and promoting access to justice, reviewing legislation, initiating law reform measures and advancing and improving the administration of justice.

BarTalk Publication Sales Agreement #40741008

Date: May 8, 2015 Location: Best Western Plus Regency Inn & Conference Centre

COURTENAY IN PARTNERSHIP WITH CAMPBELL RIVER, COMOX VALLEY, COWICHAN VALLEY, NANAIMO CITY, NANAIMO COUNTY, PORT ALBERNI BAR ASSOCIATIONS

Date: May 22, 2015 Location: Crown Isle Resort & Golf Community

Write Us

Advertising

Send your Letters to the Editor to:

Email: ads@cbabc.org

Deborah Carfrae – BarTalk Editor Email: bartalk@cbabc.org

Change of Address

Subscribe Online

Email: data@cbabc.org

Receive the latest issue of BarTalk directly to your inbox! Subscribe by sending your full name and email address to subscribe@cbabc.org or go to cbabc.org/bartalk/subscribe.

2 BARTALK / APRIL 2015

Lawyer Referral Service Email: lawyerreferral@cbabc.org

APRIL 2015

VOLUME 27 / NUMBER 2

Contents

Departments

4

FROM THE PRESIDENT Mid-Term Musings

by Alex A. Shorten

5

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR A Fine – Sometimes Precarious – Balance

by Caroline Nevin

6

PRACTICE TALK Death, Disability and Lawyers

by David J. Bilinsky

7

DAVE’S TECH TIPS

8

NOTHING OFFICIAL Saturday Night… Live

by Tony Wilson

10

SECTION UPDATE Wills and Trusts – Vancouver Animal Law Civil Litigation – Vancouver CBABC Aboriginal Lawyers Forum

Sections

11 SECTION & PD NEWS

Freedom of Information & Privacy Law Section & PD Conference

Features

12 THE BRAVE NEW WORLD OF THE WESA

by Fiona Hunter 13 DEALING WITH THE NEW BC PROBATE RULES

by Emma A. McArthur 14 TESTAMENTARY INTENTION AND SECTION 58

by Andrea E. Frisby 19 ELDER LAW MEDIATION

by Shauna Tucker 21 LAW WEEK 2015

Inside This Issue The proclamation of WESA on March 31, 2014, made some significant changes to the law in B.C. This issue highlights that not all of the legal boundaries have been settled due to the existence of the new Act, which may result in lawyers having to navigate, with some uncertainty, certain processes and provisions of the Act until such time as the courts or registries provide more clarity. Guest articles indicate that while eye-witness testimony continues to be inherently unreliable, self-representation may be reliable if proper preparation and assistance is provided.

News and Events 2 Attend a Full Day of CBABC Professional Development in Your Local Area 22 CLC – Calgary, Alberta

Building a Better Lawyer: The 2015 CBA Legal Conference

CBABC Young Lawyers Wellness Challenge April 7-16, 2015 23 Photo of 1922 Annual CBA Meeting

Vancouver Community College needs your help!

Rob McDiarmid and Sharon Matthews donate to TRU Faculty of Law Student Awards 24 2015 CBABC WLF Award Recipients

CLEBC Update 25 BC Legislative Update

Branch & Bar Calendar 26 Tips from Courthouse Libraries BC

Peter A. Allard, QC donates $30 million to UBC Faculty of Law

A Day at the Races

27 LAW FOUNDATION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA 28 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 29 DISPLAY ADS 30 BAR MOVES 31 NEW MEMBERS

Also In This Issue

Guests 9

EYE-WITNESS TESTIMONY

by Joan McEwen

20 LITIGANTS WITHOUT LAWYERS

by Denice Barrie

Click here for LEGAL OPPORTUNITIES and ads APRIL 2015 / BARTALK 3

FROM THE PRESIDENT ALEX A. SHORTEN

Mid-Term Musings Lessons Learned

B

y the time you read this I will be more than half-way through my year as your President. Has it ever gone by quickly. I have been reflecting on some of the lessons learned.

THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTINUITY

To have any hope of making a contribution as President you need to have worked on the Branch Executive and learned from the actions and wisdom of prior Presidents and previous Executives.

ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE

As a member of the Executive, in my case I am in my 4th year, you need to understand the history and context of the organization.

CBA IS COMPLICATED

I am also on the Board of the CBA. Last year, as Vice President, I was an observer on the Board. Without the benefit of the observer status, my contribution and perhaps the Branch’s contribution to the work of the Board would be less effective. The interaction between the CBA National and the 15 Branches is necessary, but at times can be complicated and puzzling.

NOT ALL INTERESTS ARE THE SAME

Members are not necessarily in agreement with the views of other members, Sections, Conferences or Forums, at the Branch or National levels or even with some of the priorities or activities of the organization. It is hard to please everyone.

DECISION-MAKING

Consensus is always the goal, but when you cannot reach unanimous agreement, majority rule is 4 BARTALK / APRIL 2015

how our decisions are made. Process is important, but so are results.

and she remarked that she had never encountered such dedication to an organization and to a profession.

MEMBERSHIP PROFILE IS IMPORTANT

The CBA membership numbers are declining for a number of reasons. We need to understand what former and younger members want, and how to attract and keep them in the CBA. IMPROVEMENT

Every organization needs to learn from its mistakes and become better.

COMMUNICATIONS

Communication is important at all levels, but that is easier to say than to do in a large organization with so many parts. Technology will help us improve in the area.

The impact of social media may help and can hinder.

Majority rule is how our decisions are made. Process is important, but so are results.

THE VALUE OF THE CBA IN CANADIAN SOCIETY

The CBA represents the interests of lawyers in Canada, but through its work it also protects and improves the lives of all Canadians – whether they have been here all their lives or are new arrivals.

The work of our organization is extremely important to the fabric of Canada.

Maybe you are reflecting on lessons learned as a volunteer. Feel free to share them with me or any member of our Executive.

OUTSTANDING VOLUNTEERISM

Many have given a significant amount of time every year for many years to the CBA. Recently, I was talking with someone who is not a member and not a lawyer,

Alex A. Shorten

president@cbabc.org

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CAROLINE NEVIN

A Fine – Sometimes Precarious – Balance

The challenge of being the legal profession’s advocate

T

he Canadian Bar Association is the only professional association that represents the interests of lawyers, law students and judge members across this amazingly huge and diverse country – ad mare a mari usque ad mare. Given the breadth and depth of our membership, it should be no surprise that there is an ongoing, organic debate about how the CBA considers and presents those many views, opinions and priorities.

If what we were talking about were small, benign issues then conflicting views amongst a large membership might matter less; however, it’s almost never an inconsequential issue. We’re talking about the law, justice and governance of our society – in essence, issues at the core of what it means to be Canadian. Everything in this sphere matters to someone; some things matter to many, and to many they matter a lot.

Yes, there are big issues almost every CBA member can agree on: Solicitor-client privilege? Sacrosanct. Legal representation for those who can’t pay and might suffer severely without it? Absolutely.

Outrageous attacks on judges or lawyers? Speak louder! Those are the relatively easy ones.

But what about Omar Khadr?

Terrorism/security and “tough on crime” laws – or just about anything that affects the balance between state power and individual rights?

What about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school? Politicization of judicial appointments (not to mention their compensation)? Corporate or other specific sector interests? How about taxation policy? International human rights abuses? Law Society regulation of notaries/paralegals/alternate business structures? The list of hotly debated topics goes on…

Every year, CBA National and its branches intervene in legal cases, make submissions to government,

courts and law societies, and advocate both publicly and privately on literally hundreds of issues. Those submissions, arguments and positions are generated through thousands of volunteer hours by passionate and intelligent members on all sides. As a result, the CBA has become a cauldron within which an amazing alchemy occurs almost daily, as many elements and perspectives merge together to form a new whole.

Often – very often – the outcome is pure gold. There are times, however, when the mix isn’t quite right, and the result leaves some members feeling disenfranchised or disconnected. That is a precarious position for a member-based advocacy organization; if it happens too frequently, we risk losing both relevance and impact. Yet, if we take no positions at all, we risk the same thing. So, the big question is: how do we ensure we’re striking the right balance?

The CBA is in the process of answering this question head-on. National President Michele Hollins created a cross-Canada Intervention Policy Review to ask tough questions of our members: When should the CBA stand up? On what basis? In what places? Who should decide? What should we do when members are strongly divided?

And what’s the right process to follow to figure these things out?

The BC Branch responded to the Review with a submission, as did many individual members and Branch Sections. Together with branches and members across the country, we’re going to help strengthen the CBA’s role as a powerful advocate, and help ensure that the profession’s influence is used to good ends and through good process. Your views on this or any other topic are always welcome at cnevin@cbabc.org.

CBA advocacy exists because the legal profession, individually and collectively, is engaged firmly at the heart of every public debate about how our society should evolve. We are all the better for it.

I hope that you will engage just as firmly in the current debate about how the CBA should evolve too.

Caroline Nevin

cnevin@cbabc.org APRIL 2015 / BARTALK 5

practicetalk DAVID J. BILINSKY

Death, Disability and Lawyers Planning for the worst…

This is the end Beautiful friend This is the end My only friend, the end... r r

“

– Lyrics by Jim Morrison, music and recorded by The Doors.

Old lawyers never die, they just lose their appeal.”

While some lawyers have a nice long career capped by a comfortable retirement, some of us are not quite so lucky. All too often disease and accidents can bring our practices to an early end, rob us of our faculties or bring our lives to an all-to-early end.

There are several things that all of us can do to at least help minimize the impact of such an event on our clients, partners, spouses, families and not the least of all, ourselves.

The first of these is to ensure that you have adequate insurance such as:

after, your files and trust accounts are properly handled and your law corporation is dealt with after your passing.

LIFE INSURANCE

All too often disease and accidents can bring our practices to an early end.

This

type of insurance principally protects your family and beneficiaries against your premature death and illness.

DISABILITY INSURANCE This

provides compensation if you are unable to work in the event of an injury, disability or accident. It can protect you and your family.

MEDICAL AND HEALTH INSURANCE Provides

coverage for costs over and above the government health plan.

Once you have adequate insurance, you need to deal with the issues arising from your practice. You need to ensure that your clients are looked 6 BARTALK / APRIL 2015

YOU SHOULD ALSO ENSURE THAT YOU HAVE A PRACTICE AND SUCCESSION PLAN IN PLACE

Only

a practising lawyer may deal with files and trust accounts. There are further complications if your practice is incorporated.

If the worst happens, you can minimize the stress on your family by having done your succession plan.

You can choose the lawyer and the financial terms governing the dealing with your practice.

Planning

can allow the net value of your practice to flow back to you or your estate (rather than being eaten by custodian fees and other costs).

IF YOU DON’T HAVE A PLAN

The

Law Society may have to arrange for practice coverage, possibly seeking court appointment of a custodian if necessary.

The appointment of a custodian may negatively affect the value of your practice.

A custodian must protect the interests of your clients, but cannot continue to represent them; and may protect the value of the practice, but will not maximize it.

Custodianship fees and expenses are paid by your practice, yourself or your estate, possibly resulting in additional debt for you or your estate.

It may bring some solace to know that you have taken the time and the steps to protect all of those whom you care for when you are facing the end.

The views expressed herein are strictly those of David Bilinsky and do not reflect the opinions of the Law Society of British Columbia, CBABC, or their respective members.

David J. Bilinsky is the Practice Management Advisor for the Law Society of British Columbia.

Email: daveb@lsbc.org Blog: thoughtfullaw.com

GO ONLINE FOR MORE INFORMATION

dave’s techtips What resources are out on the web when it comes to planning the succession of your practice or lawyers in the firm?

Here is a selection: Law Society of BC (lawsociety.bc.ca) The Law Society has a host of documents, materials, precedents and information on their succession planning pages on their website.

This is your first stop to building a succession plan and arranging practice coverage for your practice by starting with the precedents and due diligence necessary to arrange an orderly transition of your practice.

CBA’s PracticeLink (cba.org/cba/practicelink/solosmall_people/successionplan.aspx) CBA’s PracticeLink has a great article on how to get your succession plan started by Deborah Gillis. Her advice starts now with having great file organization and notes that allow for an orderly and hopefully inexpensive transition of your files.

Lawyers Assistance Program of BC (LAP) (lapbc.com/nature-of-the-profession/refirement-energizingthe-best-part-of-your-life/) The LAP has a great article on their LAPBC Blog entitled Retirement: Energizing the Best Part of Your Life. They quote an intriguing statistic: “A recent study of Oregon lawyers reveals some interesting retirement plans: 11% do not plan to ever retire, only 18% of lawyers plan to retire completely at 65 and 40% plan to work at least part-time past 70!” This article has some

very engaging advice about changing the story about yourself and looking at the process of retiring as a way to re-energize and redefine yourself.

The American Bar Association (alanet.org/careers/articles/ Law_Offices_Re_-_Examine_Traditional_Retirement_Model.pdf) The American Bar Association

has a great article aimed at law offices and managing partners in terms of re-examining the traditional retirement model. This article looks at the firm as a whole and prompts the firm to consider retirement from an overall perspective. In particular, it looks at the transfer of knowledge of retiring lawyers in order to capture and retain the technical and business acumen, rainmaking skills, social capital, economic capital and, not the least of which, the professional contacts of seasoned lawyers. They outline a series of steps for the firm to develop strong succession plans.

CNBC.com (cnbc.com/ id/100755294#) CNBC.com has an interesting article entitled The $1 Million Retirement Nest Egg Myth. While American in focus, the advice is independent of any country. It is important in terms of saying that one should not trust any headline that promotes cracking the wealth riddle in X steps.

Your steps to retirement (at least financially) have as much to do with what you are doing now than trying to match Wall Street practices. © 2015 David J. Bilinsky

APRIL 2015 / BARTALK 7

nothingofficial TONY WILSON

Saturday Night… Live

UVic Law’s 40th was more fun than a Bassomatic

I

t all started with a cryptic note rather than a voicemail. I was in a hurry. My assistant was in a hurry. Everybody had deadlines. I was frazzled. “Can you give a speech… 40th anniversary... Saturday Night… Live.” Finally, I thought… Lorne Michaels has read my BarTalk columns! Maybe he saw my article in Canadian Lawyer about Conrad Black and the Carter decision (and Lord Black’s public takedown of me). Maybe Lorne saw me play The Black Knight in Spamalot a few years back and erroneously decided I was way funnier than Advocate Editor Michael Bain.

A millisecond later, my dreams of performing Bassomatic with Dan Aykroyd, King Tut with Steve Martin, the Killer Bees, and other sketches that may or may not have involved cheeseburgers, Pepsi, sharks and more cowbell for SNL’s 40th Anniversary evaporated in a puff of reality.

In fact, I was asked to speak at the 40th Anniversary of the UVic Law School at that “other job” I very happily do. (And yes, I was embellishing the above story for comic relief.)

The speech caused me to reflect on what a great place it was to get a law degree from, and how memorable my own experience was there. When the UVic Law School was established in 1975, the university itself had around 6,000 students. The new Law School operated from the McPherson Library. When I moved back to Victoria in 1980 after getting my BA in Ontario, UVic Law had undergone a huge transformation.

A big faculty. A fabulous reputation. Clinical terms like “The Law Centre.” New teaching methods. In many ways it was (and still is) one of Canada’s most innovative law schools; boldly going where none had gone before.

Indeed, UVic Law regularly comes out on top of law school surveys, ranking it among Canada’s finest.

8 BARTALK / APRIL 2015

Fast forward 40 years. By 2015, UVic had close to 20,000 full-time and part-time students. It’s become one of Canada’s leading universities and widely recognized for leadership in research, inspired teaching and community engagement; all while being less than a mile from the Pacific Ocean. That’s a big attraction for people in all sorts of disciplines from across Canada, even law students.

When I entered UVic Law School in 1982, a brand-new building had been built, subsequently renamed The Murray and Anne Fraser building in honour of our wonderful founding Dean, Murray Fraser and his wife Anne. Murray passed away, sadly, in 1997. His bad ties were the stuff of legend.

Before my time at UVic Law, I had never heard the terms Reductio ad absurdum or mutatis mutandis until Hamar Foster used them in first-year criminal law. I use them all the time thanks to him, frustrating

some lawyers who have to look the terms up. The late great Terry Wuester, who everyone knew as “The Woo,” may have made the most memorable comment I recall from law school: “I don’t own any life insurance,” he said in his best Kansas drawl. “I want it to be a sad day for everybody when I die.” And for some reason, I remember Donovan Waters talking about “a Rose on Lady Day.” After 33 years, I still don’t know when Lady Day is or why a rose is given out that day.

In its 40 years, UVic Law has produced some great lawyers, great judges, great legal educators and above all, lifelong friends for me and the majority of those I knew there. In fact, there’s an old story from Harvard Law School: “Look to the student on your left. Now look to the student on your right. One of them won’t make it.” At UVic Law, it was a little different. “Look to the student on your left. Now look to the student on your right. You’ll probably marry one of them.” (As I did).

And of course, the odds doubled after the Civil Marriage Act of 2005.

So, after 40 years of “boldly going where no Canadian law school had gone before,” may UVic Law live long and prosper.

The views expressed herein are strictly those of Tony Wilson and do not reflect the opinions of the Law Society of British Columbia, CBABC, or their respective members or their desire for spam, spam and more spam.

guest JOAN McEWEN

Eye-Witness Testimony

Memory manipulation and implantation

O

ne can only hope that it is, by now, a truism that evidence of eye-witness identification is inherently unreliable. Far less understood are the notions of “memory manipulation” and “memory implantation,” yet both have the potential of converting a wrongful conviction from a “miscarriage of justice” into an “abortion of justice.”1 In 1983, six of the eight women who claimed to have been sexually assaulted by wrongly-convicted Ivan Henry identified him as the culprit based on a biased, hopelessly flawed police lineup. Later that year, Henry was declared a dangerous offender. Behind bars for 27 years, he was acquitted by the BC Court of Appeal in 2010 on the basis of faulty identification evidence.2 The six women were not being dishonest; they actually believed that Henry was the perpetrator.

When I asked memory expert Elizabeth Loftus how so many people could be mistaken, she said: “Witnesses do not encode all the information that a videotape does. Instead, memory rapidly and continuously decays. A witness’ retrieval of stored ‘memory’ can be impaired and distorted by a variety of factors, including suggestive interviewing and identification procedures conducted by the enforcement personnel.”3

In the Ivan Henry case, the VPD conducted, unbeknownst to the defence, lengthy “re-interviews” – including discussion of the lineup photo – shortly before the preliminary hearing. As well, a suppressed police document refers to witnesses having been exposed to photo lineups, physical lineups and so-called “brainstorming” sessions; as well as working with “several police artists for the purposes of drawing a composite of this person.”

Given this veritable petri dish for the cultivation of memory distortion – both peer and police/state contamination – small wonder that, at trial, the complainants’ (once variegated) descriptions of the at-

Witnesses do not encode all the information that a videotape does.

Instead, memory rapidly and continuously decays. tacker had more or less coalesced.

Regarding memory implantation, we now know that the lineup photo deemed by those same six women to be “accurate” was anything but. Asked to comment, leading forensic photography expert

Greg Stutchman told me that the lineup photo produced at the preliminary hearing is a “composite of images,” and that the photo represented by the prosecutor at trial to be but an enlargement of the first photo, was in fact a re-doctored version thereof – re-doctored in order to hide the first doctoring.

Once again, how could six women honestly believe they’d seen something they had not?

In June 2010, Slate Magazine published an article about an experiment in which photos were fabricated to depict events that never happened – e.g., President Obama shaking hands with Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Though it had never happened, twenty-six percent of the participants remembered the event.4 Experts say that, though the average rate of false memories is about 30%, when visual images are used to substantiate the bogus memory, the number can increase.

Seeing is believing, even when what you’re seeing is fabricated.

Michael Naughton, The Innocent and the Criminal Justice System: A Sociological Analysis of Miscarriages of Justice (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).

2 R. v. Henry, [2010] B.C.C.A. 462 (British Columbia Court of Appeal).

3 Elizabeth Loftus, Eyewitness Testimony (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996).

4 William Saletan, “The Memory Doctor,” Slate Magazine, June 4, 2010. slate. me/KyxWOV. 1

Joan McEwen is a lawyer, labour arbitrator and author of Innocence on Trial: The Framing of Ivan Henry.

APRIL 2015 / BARTALK 9

sections SECTION UPDATE

Keep Current A review of provincial Section meetings Wills and Trusts Vancouver Meeting in Review: February 10, 2015 Speakers: Nicole Garton, Heritage Law, Amy Francis (pictured left), Legacy Tax + Trust Lawyers and Roselle Wu (pictured right), Harper Grey LLP Topic: Ethics for Trust and Estate Practitioners: Managing Conflicts of Interest

Animal Law Meeting in Review: February 12, 2015 Speaker: Anna Pippus, Director of Farmed Animal Advocacy, Animal Justice Canada Topic: Animal Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Civil Litigation Vancouver Meeting in Review: March 4, 2015 Speaker: The Right Honourable Madam Beverley McLachlin, PC, Chief Justice of Canada Topic: Civility: Why it Matters to the Modern Lawyer

Wills and Trusts Vancouver Garton began the uNicole Wills Trust – Vancouver Section meeting with a case comment and a general discussion on recent cases involving s. 58 of the Wills, Estate and Succession Act. The main presentation by Amy Francis and Roselle Wu was on the topic “Ethics for Trust and Estate Practitioners: Managing Conflicts of Interest.” Roselle provided a summary of recent jurisprudence on conflicts of interest, both generally and in the context of estates, and presented a coloured diagram illustrating the three dimensions of the duty of loyalty to the client. Amy Francis discussed some conflict of interest issues that are unique to the Estate Bar, including acting for spouses on a joint retainer to prepare wills, and the conflicts that arise when a lawyer acts as legal advisor and executor. Because of the different roles that lawyers often play in the context of the administration of an estate, conflicts of interest are a common issue, and managing them appropriately and ethically is an important part of any estates practice.

Animal Law CBABC Aboriginal Lawyers Forum Upcoming Retreat: May 1-3, 2015 Topic: Fourth Annual ALF Retreat – Cross Border: Lands and Resources Location: Tulalip Casino Resort, Washington, USA

10 BARTALK / APRIL 2015

On February 12, 2015, the

uAnimal Law Section meeting

focused on the development and creation of an Animal Charter of Rights in Canada. The talk was given by Anna Pippus, the Director of Farmed Animal Advocacy at Animal Justice Canada and Special Projects Manager at the Vancouver Humane Society.

Anna specifically spoke about animal standing in the courtroom, international efforts to have animals’ interests represented in court and the role Animal Justice Canada plays in its Animal Charter of Rights and Freedoms initiative. There were about 50 lawyers in attendance, both in person and online. Those who attended in person were treated to a tasty lunch sponsored by Boughton Law Corporation.

Civil Litigation Vancouver On Wednesday, March 4,

u2015, Civil Litigation – Van-

couver Section was privileged to host guest speaker The Right Honourable Madam Beverley McLachlin, PC, Chief Justice of Canada. This meeting was well-attended with more than 200 attendees. The Chief Justice discussed the topic of civility, including the reasons that we should be civil as lawyers and how we can practice civility. Within our modern society, we are bombarded with examples of uncivil behaviour.

Unfortunately, the common conception of how lawyers behave fits with this trend. Yet, as the Chief Justice emphasized, the fact is that great lawyers – truly successful lawyers – are civil. In the course of her remarks, the Chief Justice gave some specific examples of those who, despite enormous difficulties, achieved civility.

CBABC Aboriginal Lawyers Forum (ALF) This ALF retreat will be held

uon May 1-3, 2015 at Tulalip Casino Resort, USA. The ALF Executive has been working

hard to build on the success of past retreats to make the 4th annual retreat one to remember!

This year’s theme, “Cross Border: Lands and Resources,” features an impressive lineup of speakers consisting of leading law professors from Canada and the USA, as well as Aboriginal legal practitioners and judges. The agenda features a wide array of topics, including the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Tsilhqot’in presented by Chief Roger William, of the Xeni Gwet’in, Tsilhqot’in People of Nemiah, along with legal counsel David Rosenberg. The ALF warmly invites and welcomes you to join them! Furthermore, the ALF is hosting the 8th National Aboriginal Day Online Auction & Reception to raise funds for the CBABC’s Aboriginal Law

Student Scholarship Trust to assist Aboriginal law students. To find out more on sponsorship and donation opportunities please contact the ALF Executive.

For enrolled CBA members, more detailed information and available minutes from the Section meetings are online at cbabc.org under CBABC Sections & Forums.

UPCOMING SECTION MEETINGS Looking for upcoming Section meetings? Check the online Sections Calendar or the CBA PD Resource site regularly as new meetings are added daily.

Enrolled members automatically receive notice of their Section’s meetings by email. Enjoy the benefits of membership and enroll in Sections today. CBA members are reminded to keep their profile up to date with the Branch to ensure they receive notices.

UPCOMING CONFERENCE

Freedom of Information & Privacy Law Section & PD Conference We are pleased to announce an all-day Freedom of Information & Privacy Law Section & PD Conference to be held on May 13, 2015. This year’s conference aims to provide the legal profession with a comprehensive update of privacy law trends in the two years since our last conference in 2013. Privacy is an ever-growing field – one that is still catching up with the myriad ways in which we live our lives online. We are delighted to have Information and Privacy Commissioner Elizabeth Denham as our keynote speaker this year. In addition to Ms. Denham, the Section looks forward to the vast cross-section of topics, ranging from the use of IP addresses in litigation, to health privacy trends, to cloud computing and data hosting. As privacy and freedom of information continue to evolve on a rapid basis, so will our field of practice. We encourage you to join us on May 13th for a conference you won’t want to miss!

APRIL 2015 / BARTALK 11

features FIONA HUNTER

The Brave New World of the WESA And its effect on your practice

T

he proclamation on March 31, 2014 of the Wills Estates and Succession Act (the “WESA”), along with Part 25 of the Supreme Court Civil Rules, has brought significant changes to estate planning and administration. The new court forms, not to mention the myriad of new substantive law provisions in the WESA, create considerable uncertainty in the practice. It is therefore crucial that lawyers reconsider the standard advice they give to clients.

This article outlines two discrete issues in advising a personal representative (PR) on the proper steps to administer an estate.

First, the definition of a “record” in s. 58 of the WESA (which may represent testamentary intentions) requires something more than a search through the personal papers of the will-maker. The PR must now also review emails, documents and perhaps even videos saved in the deceased’s electronic devices in order to swear (as required in the court forms) that “a diligent search for a testamentary document of the deceased has been made in each place that could reasonably be considered to be a place where a testamentary document may be found.”

This search is, of course, only the first step. If the PR finds a “record” which might represent a

12 BARTALK / APRIL 2015

“testamentary instrument,” what then? Is it the PR’s duty to bring this document to the court’s attention (as was done in Estate of Young, 2015 BCSC 182)? Can the PR reply upon

a lawyer’s opinion on the efficacy of the document (and is a lawyer prepared to give that opinion, absent case law on the subject)? There are no easy answers, and much will depend upon the nature and potential effect of the record. Whilst it may be possible in some circumstances to reach an agreement amongst those beneficiaries affected, in others a court application with its attendant costs will be required.

Second, problems may arise where the will-maker’s marital status is uncertain. The law of giving notice to a spouse has not changed, but PRs must now consider s. 2 of the WESA. The test for a “spouse” has been somewhat simplified: marriage, or a “marriage-like relationship for at least two years” prior to death. However, the definition

of ceasing to be a spouse is trickier. For married spouses, it is when “an event occurs that causes an interest in family property, as defined in Part 5 [Property Division] of the Family Law Act (FLA), to arise.” For unmarried spouses, it is when “one or both persons terminate the relationship.”

The PR must make the appropriate inquiries, and where there is doubt, consider whether his or her duties to the beneficiaries

named in the will conflict with those owed to a putative spouse.

Moreover, where the spouse is separated, that spouse will have rights under the FLA, which may include an interest in the deceased’s property. This in turn will affect the valuation of the deceased’s interest in the property.

There are many other pitfalls in the new regime, and it will be several years before estates and wills lawyers regain the comfort level they previously may have enjoyed.

Until then, best practices must be carefully reviewed and, in many situations, updated.

Fiona Hunter, partner at Horne Coupar in Victoria, BC. Fiona practises exclusively in the area of wills, trusts and estates.

EMMA A. McARTHUR

Dealing with the New BC Probate Rules

How to make the forms work for you

I

n conjunction with the new Wills, Estates and Succession Act, Rules 21-4 and 21-5 of the Supreme Court Civil Rules were repealed and replaced by Supreme Court Civil Rules, Part 25.

Part 25 introduced new forms for estate proceedings. While these forms now provide a standardized application process aimed at making the probate process more accessible to the public, the forms are not as intuitive and userfriendly as one might have hoped.

Although it might be tempting to make minor amendments to the forms to fix grammatical issues or improve syntax, try to resist.

It is time-consuming and frustrating for the registry staff who must comb through your documents to see if the changes are substantive.

In some circumstances, however, amendments to the forms are unavoidable: to correct errors, to suit the specific facts of the estate or simply to remove irrelevant sections.

The following is a summary of some (by no means all) of the more common amendments that will need to be made: FORM P2: Submission for Estate

Grant. Each paragraph has mul-

tiple options; delete any options not selected. When providing information about the deceased, list all aliases in which the deceased held property and indicate the property held in each name. Do not use “N/A” if there

is no person or property fitting a particular description – use “Nil” or “None.” Applications using “N/A” are being consistently bounced by most registries.

FORM

P9: Affidavit of Delivery.

Each person who receives notice must be listed in the P9 Affidavit of Delivery, and it is helpful to add a descriptor identifying each person’s relationship to the testator. Although there is no designated space for including the date on which notice was sent, it must be added to the form so that the registry can calculate the 21-day notice period.

Although it might be tempting to make minor amendments to the forms to fix grammatical issues or improve syntax, try to resist.

In addition, the Rules referred to under “Delivery Information” are incorrect and must be changed: the reference to Rule 25-3(2) in column 2 should be 25-2(2) and the reference to Rule 25-3(6), (8) or (10) in column 3 should be Rule 25-2(8), (11) or (12). It is important to

note that this affidavit must be sworn by the person who actually puts the envelope in the mail – the registry will not accept an amendment to the affidavit stating that the person swearing the affidavit “caused the notice to be mailed” as was formerly standard practice.

FORM

P10: Affidavit of Assets and Liabilities for Domiciled Estate. The value of all prop-

erty of the deceased, along with the liabilities that charge or encumber that property, must be disclosed on this form. The registries will no longer accept “To be Determined” as an asset value. If third parties refuse to provide asset information, the incomplete application will need to be filed along with a Form P18: Authorization to Obtain Estate Information.

There is no form of supplementary affidavit provided for circumstances such as an application to dispense with notice. Wherever a supplementary affidavit is required, Form P4 can be used as a template and then amended to suit the scenario at hand.

If you are in doubt about whether a particular amendment to the forms will be acceptable to the registry, consult your fellow practitioners. We are all working hard to master the new forms and should provide assistance and support to our colleagues in these uncertain times.

Emma A. McArthur, lawyer in the Private Wealth group at Farris, Vaughan, Wills & Murphy LLP, Victoria office.

APRIL 2015 / BARTALK 13

feature ANDREA E. FRISBY

Testamentary Intention and Section 58 A remedy to cure all wills

S

ection 58 of the Wills, Estate and Succession Act (the “WESA”) permits the court to cure a non-compliant will and to declare that any “record, document or writing or marking on a will or document” has testamentary effect if satisfied that the “record, document or writing” embodies the testamentary intention of the deceased. A record is defined to include data that (i) is recorded or stored electronically, (ii) can be read by a person, and (iii) is capable of reproduction in a visible form.

Increased responsibility falls on the executors who must, in an application for probate, swear to having searched diligently for other testamentary documents.

Executors are advised to make an exhaustive hunt for writing or records of the deceased, which may include handwritten notes, a printed document, email correspondence and digital records on computers and tablets, in the event that a document exists that includes testamentary intentions of the deceased. If any such record, document or writing is found, that document, however unorthodox, should be put before the court.

In Estate of Young, 2015 BCSC 182, the court made its first section 58 judgment. In that case, three testamentary documents were put before the court: a formally executed will and two later

14 BARTALK / APRIL 2015

documents, one signed by the deceased and one unsigned. The court rejected the third document as a non-binding expression of wishes since it was not signed by the deceased nor provided to her personal representatives.

The Young court articulated a twoprong analysis based on the Manitoba authorities: (1) is the non-compliant document authentic? and (2) does the document record “a deliberate or fixed and final expression of intention as to the disposal of the deceased’s property upon death?” Factors supporting testamentary intention include the presence of the deceased’s signature, the deceased’s handwriting, witness signatures, revocation of previous documents and the title of the document.

While this analysis supports a relatively rigorous approach to testamentary intention, it is not clear yet where the boundaries of “stored,” “read” and “capable of reproduction” will fall. A deceased’s electronic devices and computers will require scrutiny and the deceased’s access may be of critical importance in future estate administrations.

In other jurisdictions with similar curative provisions, an electronic document named “Will.doc”

that was left on a deceased’s computer with the deceased’s name typed at its end, a testamentary disposition stored on an iPhone, and a DVD recording made by the deceased in contemplation of death and labelled “My Will” have all been admitted to probate (Australia: Alan Yazbek v. Ghosn Yazbek & Anor, [2012] NSWSC 594, Re Yu, [2013] QSC 322 and Mellino v. Wnuk & Ors, [2013] QSC 336). Similarly, a New Zealand court has used its curative provisions to find solicitor’s notes along with an email from the deceased were sufficient proof of the “skeleton for a will” expressing the testamentary intentions of the deceased (Estate of Feron, [2012] NZHC 44).

Already various handwritten lists and annotated copies of wills are emerging where the deceased has died after WESA; the executor does not know which document or documents comprise the will. Indeed, it is quite possible that a “record, document or writing” made subsequent to the will, for example a hand-annotated copy of the will signed again by the deceased or an iPad document with the deceased’s name typed at its conclusion, could purport to change the appointed personal representative, creating an even more difficult set of decisions at the front end of the administration.

Andrea E. Frisby is an associate at Legacy Tax + Trust Lawyers. Estate planning and administration is the primary focus of Andrea’s practice.

WHAT IS THE BC ADVANTAGE? UNLIMITED RESOURCES UNLIMITED SAVINGS UNLIMITED ACCESS Turn the page and learn more about CBABC membership.

CBABC.ORG/ADVANTAGE

#5

#1

#2

UNLIMITED ACCESS

COMPLIMENTARY PD

CBABC Membership includes unlimited access to all 78 BC and 41 National Sections and Forums.

CBABC has created a free online PD module to fulfill your required ethics and practice management obligation.

#6

SOLOLINK

DISCUSSION BOARDS

Get help when you need it. SoloLink connects sole practitioners, in-house counsel and lawyers in small firms.

Every Section and Forum has a discussion board on the CBABC website to discuss ideas, post questions and more.

#9

#10

MEMBER SAVINGS

JOB BOARD

Use your Membership ID for discounts on travel, sporting events, gym memberships, investment advice and more.

Looking for a new job or a new hire? Visit our job board for new opportunities and member-discounted listings.

JOIN NOW AND SAVE Join the CBABC now! Start enjoying the benefits of CBABC Membership and ask for the BC Advantage today!

#3

#4

SECTION MEETINGS

NETWORKING

Get organized. CBABC Membership lets you register for meetings and receive all of the latest information for free.

Looking to meet judges, fellow practitioners, and in-house counsel? The CBABC will help you get connected.

#7

#8

ON-DEMAND CPD

LEGAL DIRECTORY

Catch up with CPD on your schedule. Webinar repeats are available on-demand to keep you up to date.

CBABC Members have free access to the Online Legal Directory and discounted rates on print copies.

#11

NEWS AND JOBS Every Tuesday we send an exclusive update to Members with the latest news, jobs, PD, events and volunteer opportunities.

CONTACT US TODAY Submit this special application or call us and we can help you personally.

1 (888) 687-3404 (604) 687-3404 cbabc.org/Advantage

CBABC EXPRESS MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION All information must be completed. Once this application has been processed, you will receive a follow up email or phone call from CBABC Member Services to activate your CBABC membership profile.

First Name(s) Last Name

PREFERRED ADDRESS & PROFILE Telephone Address City

Date of Birth

Email Prov

Year of First Call/Anticipated Year of First Call

Middle Initial

Firm

 Work  Home

Postal Code

(year/month/day)

Province of First Call

BC ADVANTAGE CBABC Membership includes unlimited access to all 78 BC and 41 National Sections and Forums, offering you the ability to earn all 12 CPD hours, including ethics, from a variety of Sections. To ensure you receive notifications on news relevant to your preferred Sections, you need to enroll in those Sections.

MEMBERSHIP FEES

The CBABC Membership year runs September 1 – August 31. New members can join at any time – contact us today to discuss the option that is best for you to start enjoying the benefits of CBABC membership.

Special 50% discounts are available for non-practicing, part-time, and retired lawyers. Other membership categories may qualify for discounts up to 75%. Check online at cbabc.org/Advantage.

Call us at (604) 687-3404 or toll-free in BC at 1 (888) 687-3404, or email us at membership@cbabc.org  Cheque enclosed, made payable to: The Canadian Bar Association  VISA  Mastercard  AMEX Card no.

Name on card

Signature

Expiry

MAIL TO: CBABC Branch, 10th Floor - 845 Cambie Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 5T3 FAX TO: (604) 669-9601 or toll-free in BC 1 (877) 669-9601 NEED MORE INFO? (604) 687-3404 or toll-free in BC 1 (888) 687-3404, or email membership@cbabc.org The CBABC reserves the right to change its membership fees at any time, without notice.

BT0415

feature SHAUNA TUCKER

Elder Law Mediation

Encompassing a broad range of issues

T

he Wills, Estate and Succession Act (the “WESA”) came into force two years after new statutory requirements were put in place concerning advance planning, substitute decision making and adult guardianship. Stopping to consider, “WESA, one year later” (which is the theme for this issue of BarTalk) is also an invitation to be reminded of these and other changes to ensure that the field of elder law is considered as a whole.

The topic of “Elder Mediation” demonstrates the need to watch the forest and the trees.

Elder Mediation can encompass a broad range of issues, from very “legal” matters such as succession planning, substitute decision making and the distribution of estates, to more family systems based matters such as developing care plans for aging adults with declining health who wish to stay in their homes.

In other words, at one level, Elder Mediation is simply a dispute resolution mechanism whose time has come. It is the place where the demographics of an aging population and the increasing popularity of Alternative Dispute Resolution converge.

As legislative change has come to elder and estates law, two critical questions have arisen in the face of this trend, neither of which has yet been fully answered.

First, who is the elder mediator?

Alternatively stated, should Elder Mediators, like Family Mediators,

be subject to qualification and certification? Elder Mediation can involve law from a myriad of areas, including real estate, estates, family, insurance and health. Unique questions arise from working with one or more aging adults such as elder abuse and ageism, complex health issues, late in life marriage and the right to have sex in a care facility. Unlike most other mediations, elder mediations typically involve multiple parties and require work with “collaterals.” The relative complexity of Elder Mediation suggests that professional standards and education should inform an elder mediation practice.

Second, should the Elder Mediator have an official place in guardianship disputes? In 2007, the BC Legislature passed Bill 29, the Adult Guardianship and Planning Statutes Amendment Act, 2007. In the result, in 2011, the Adult Guardianship Act, the Health Care (Consent) and Care Facility (Admissions) Act, Power of Attorney Act and Representation Agreement Act were, more or less, substantially amended.

One significant change proposed by Bill 29, however, has not happened. If the Bill 29 amendments to the Adult Guardianship Act had come fully into force, the Patients Property Act would have been repealed and the province

would have a different legislative regime for determining how and whether to appoint a guardian over an individual’s affairs. The regime would require mandatory mediation of the adult guardianship issue in certain circumstances.

Whether Elder Mediators should be subject to certification or other regulation is a stand-alone question, but is also linked to the second question. There are concerns that guardianship mediation should not become mandatory until there are standards or mandatory training in this field. In the bigger picture, there are questions about whether “mandatory” guardianship mediation is a model of dispute resolution that should be included within guardianship legislation. The drafters of Bill 29 clearly felt one way about this issue, but the fact that the Bill has not been proclaimed in its entirety means that many disagree.

There is fairly universal opinion that the Patients Property Act is outdated and requires replacement.

It also seems fairly clear that Elder Mediation is going to continue to grow as a practice area and to evolve to meet the demands of an aging population. How and whether the practice area will develop practice standards and play a role in the area of guardianship should be intentional and part of the ongoing review and discussion that takes place in the Elder Law community.

Shauna is a lawyer with Brown Henderson Melbye. She is a certified Family Mediator, with a Certificate in Advanced Elder Mediation from Marathon Mediation in Toronto.

APRIL 2015 / BARTALK 19

guest DENICE BARRIE

Litigants Without Lawyers

Self-representation has its benefits

C

ommon myth has it that being a SelfRepresented Litigant (SRL) in the justice system doesn’t work

for anyone.

From a lawyer’s perspective, SRLs are even more difficult than the usual opposing party. For starters, they are not required to adhere to the same standards of conduct, nor are they accountable to an organization which governs their behaviour. And being unfamiliar with both substantive and procedural law they are prone to misunderstanding it or, just as annoying, asking opposing counsel to explain it to them. Many seem to have simply never heard of the concept of chronology in preparing pleadings, and when it comes to evidence, rather than entering what’s relevant, the “kitchen sink” approach frequently prevails.

Over and over again SRLs make it clear that in almost every respect, they do not speak the language of the law.

Proof of the increasing pressure SRLs create goes beyond the anecdotes of frustrated counsel. Based on feedback she received from 49 Supreme Court Justices and 7 Masters, in 2013 Madam Justice Victoria Grey reported that the mistakes SRLs make with their evidence “cost the court system money, delay decisions, cost opposing litigants time and money, and cost Justices and Masters time.”

20 BARTALK / APRIL 2015

SRLs, on the other hand, largely appear to experience the justice system quite differently. Dr. Julie Macfarlane found that many report feeling like an “outsider” – shut out by unfamiliar courtroom customs and procedures and a language they don’t understand.

Often they do not believe they were taken seriously by the judge, who preferred to talk with a lawyer and viewed them as a nuisance and irritation.

This confluence of dissatisfaction has the potential to create a perfect storm for the administration of justice in Canada. On the flip side, with the number of SRLs growing at an exponential rate, it also presents new possibilities for

Many report feeling like an “outsider” – shut out by unfamiliar courtroom customs and procedures. lawyers willing to consider practising in a different way.

Since 2007, I have provided coaching and support to SRLs. I refer to this service as Assisted Self-Representation (ASR) because it goes beyond simply unbundling or acting on a Limited Scope Retainer: At its heart is a translation

function for those who find themselves facing the justice system without a lawyer, and must of necessity become conversant with its language and procedures. I have found that with strategic professional assistance, SRLs can achieve good outcomes and benefit in other ways as well from representing themselves. Some recent feedback perhaps captures this best: “I went from scared of the legal system, my Ex’s lawyer and my Ex, to empowered. I have won many legal victories in the past year and many personal victories as well.”

Although not everyone may fare quite as well, this client’s story echoes that of many who have benefitted not just professionally, but also personally from the coaching and support they received from a lawyer.

Some people will always be able to afford the services of counsel, while others will continue to qualify for legal aid. But for the growing “sandwich class,” ASR provides a viable alternative. It frees up access to a system which SRLs might otherwise find overwhelming, and for the supporting lawyer, is gratifying to watch from the wings.

Much as we may not want to admit it, SRLs are here to stay. Acknowledging the legitimacy of their presence creates new opportunities for lawyers and is the first step in helping litigants without lawyers achieve a better quality of justice.

Denice Barrie is the president of Waymark Law, which focusses on providing coaching and support to Self-Represented Litigants.

Law Week 2015

BCLAWWEEK.ORG

u 2015 Law Week’s theme is Access to Justice: What does it mean to YOU? This year twelve locations across British Columbia are participating in Law Week activities, celebrating the 33rd anniversary of the Charter of Rights on Law Day, April 16. Check out BCLAWWEEK.ORG for all the details! Join the conversation on Facebook and Twitter (@bclawweek) using hashtag #bclawweek.

Province-Wide Activities CRANBROOK April 14 Key City Theatre

Activities include: The always popular Mock Trial where the audience gets to be the jury

COWICHAN VALLEY April 16 Duncan Courthouse Activities include: Mock Trial Information kiosks Presentations and Q&A

FORT ST.JOHN April 25 Activities include: Mock Trial Emergency vehicle displays Justice System Partner information tables

KAMLOOPS April 15 Kamloops Law Courts Activities include: Mock Trial RCMP Dogs and Forensic Unit demonstrations Detective Treasure Hunt for kids Courthouse and Sheriffs’ cell tours

KELOWNA April 25 Activities include: Girl Guide arrests and Mock Trial

NANAIMO April 18 Activities include: Mock Trial RCMP Presentation: Drugs on the Streets Meet a Sheriff and tour the cells and van

NORTH SHORE April 18 North Vancouver Courthouse Activities include: Open House Mock crime scene Court orientation for newcomers to Canada

PENTICTON April 17 Activities include:

Two Mock Trials

TERRACE April 24

Activities include: Mock Trial Community service organization displays

VERNON April 18 Activities include: Mock Trial Law-related groups information tables

VICTORIA April 18 Victoria Courthouse

Activities include: Mock Trial Tours of Sheriff’s cells and vans Victoria Police Department’s K-9 Unit demonstration Judges’ presentation

Province-Wide DIAL-A-LAWYER DAY Saturday, April 18 10-11:45 am, 12:15-2:00 pm 604-687-3221 or 1-800-663-1919

Residents in British Columbia are invited to call and speak with a lawyer for up to 15 minutes at no cost in the following areas of law: Family, Wills & Estates, Tort & MVA, Immigration, Business and Criminal

LAW WEEK 2015

Partners

VANCOUVER Throughout April

Activities include: “Meet the Chiefs” forum with the three Chiefs, CBC’s Ian Hanomansing and local high school students Tours of the courthouse Free public law classes throughout the Lower Mainland, with the support of the People’s Law School Barry Sullivan Law Cup public speaking competition for secondary school students from across BC

vancouver bar association

APRIL 2015 / BARTALK 21

news&events CHALLENGE

CBABC Young Lawyers Wellness Challenge April 7-16, 2015

NATIONAL NEWS

Building a Better Lawyer: The 2015 CBA Legal Conference There’s no doubt: we could all be better. Better people. Better lawyers, who help build better practices and work for the betterment of Canada’s legal profession.

And that’s precisely what this year’s CBA Legal Conference will help you achieve.

For three days this summer in Calgary, August 14 to 16, you’ll have a rare opportunity to meet colleagues from across the country in a dynamic setting that features the three most vital dimensions of your career: the practice, the profession and the personal.

We’ve taken great steps to ensure every professional development stream offers tangible benefits to keep you at the top of your game. We’ve assembled compelling 22 BARTALK / APRIL 2015

speakers to challenge and inspire you, plus added a greater focus on emerging ideas shaping the future of Canadian law.

Join lawyers, corporate counsel, judges and law students from across Canada at this year’s CLC to explore the challenges facing your profession through interactive problem-solving sessions, practical in-depth workshops and presentations from the industry’s elite.

It’s a chance to connect, to grow, to learn and to thrive. Stay tuned for exciting updates in the coming months!

Do yourself justice – find out more or register today at: cbalegalconference.org

Do you have a wellness goal? Why not share your achievements with your colleagues and challenge them to be well, too? For ten days in April, the CBABC Young Lawyers Wellness Committee is encouraging all members of the legal profession to dedicate some time to wellness in any area of life and to post about it on Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. We hope your achievements will motivate and inspire each other to become excited about treating yourself well.

You will receive more than just the admiration of your colleagues and personal benefits of devoting time to wellness – there are prizes and a fun wrap-up event too!

Stay tuned for more details about the challenge and wrapup event. For now, start brainstorming ideas and challenge your friends and colleagues to participate!

cbabc.org/wellness

A blast from the past — 7th Annual CBA Meeting — August 16-18, 1922

MENTORING OPPORTUNITY

Vancouver Community College needs your help! They are looking for practicum hosts for their Legal Administrative Assistant students. In order to get practical experience and use their new skills, students will work for free from June 15 to 26.

If you can mentor a student in a variety of office activities, please contact Helen Roberts at 604-871-7000 ext. 8525 or hroberts@vcc.ca for more information.

NEWS

Kelly Maw (left), a third year law student and TRU Law Society president, thanks Rob McDiarmid and Sharon Matthews for their gift of $50,000 toward the TRU Faculty of Law Student Awards on Jan. 23, 2015.

Read more

APRIL 2015 / BARTALK 23

news&events CBABC WLF NEWS

2015 CBABC WLF Award Recipients The CBABC WLF is pleased to announce that The Honourable Judge Patricia L. Janzen is the recipient of our WLF Award of Excellence and Carla L. Forth, QC is the recipient of our Debra Van Ginkel, QC Mentoring Award.

Prior to her appointment to the Provincial Court in 2012, Judge Patricia Janzen was associate counsel with Harris & Co., specializing in the areas of labour law and human rights. Throughout her career, she has worked to raise awareness for sound harassment, discrimination and maternity policies in the workplace.

In 1989, she was the first female partner of Fasken Martineau to take maternity leave, and helped create that firm’s maternity leave policy. Judge Janzen also worked with the Law Society to help develop its model maternity leave policy and its Ombudsperson program. Coupled with her commitment to her family and community, Judge Janzen truly exemplifies the ideals of the WLF Award of Excellence.

Carla Forth, QC has actively mentored women lawyers through the WLF Mentoring program for many years. She has practised in the areas of professional malpractice, health law and disability insurance with Guild Yule LLP for 28 years. Ms. Forth recently obtained her Masters in Law, specializing in Health Law. Her contributions to the profession were recognized in 2014 when she was awarded the Queen’s Counsel designation. Ms. Forth has devoted countless time, energy, compassion and commitment to her mentees.

By maintaining a busy law practice with humour and common sense, and dedicating herself to her family, she has been an inspiration to her mentees.

Please join us to recognize our award recipients and hear our guest speaker, The Right Honourable Kim Campbell, at the WLF Awards Luncheon on April 23, 2015 at the Hyatt Regency.

For more details and registration information

NEWS

CLEBC Update KEEPING UP TO DATE WITH WESA CLEBC editors and trusted volunteers are working hard to ensure that all our wills and estates publications contain the latest developments under WESA. This spring, subscribers will receive updates to our four key wills and estates publications: The BC Probate and Estate Administration Practice Manual is the only practice-oriented guide for BC legal

24 BARTALK / APRIL 2015

professionals working in probate and estate administration.

Wills and Personal Planning Precedents has a new title to reflect the addition of important new content. Immensely popular since it was first published, this collection of will clauses and documents includes representation agreements and other BCfocused precedents. The book’s online version includes the document builder, allowing users to select clauses, create document templates and download the complete document.

The BC Estate Administration and Wealth Preservation Practice Manual is a comprehensive guide

to effective estate planning strategies and tools.

Annotated Estates 2015 is the 11th edition of our popular consolidation of core wills and estates law materials, which is annotated by prominent estates lawyers who have prepared succinct summaries of the most relevant decisions.

Some copies of CLEBC’s Wills, Estates and Succession Act Transition Guide are still available for those who need to get up to speed on the sweeping changes.

Contact CLEBC customer service for more information.

BC LEGISLATIVE UPDATE

ACTS IN FORCE

Current from December 17, 2014 to March 3, 2015 Legislative Update is provided as part of the CBABC legislative and law reform program. It is a service funded by CBA membership fees, and is therefore provided as a benefit of CBA membership. The full version of Legislative Update is now only published online and is available exclusively to CBA members at cbabc.org.

ANIMAL HEALTH ACT, S.B.C. 2014, C. 16 (BILL 19) The Act, except section 34(2) to (7), is in force January 19, 2015

CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY (STONE AND TIMBER) SETTLEMENT ACT, S.B.C. 2014, C. 27 (BILL 3) The Act is in force December 22, 2014

CONTAINER TRUCKING ACT, S.B.C. 2014, C. 28 (BILL 5) The Act is in force December 22, 2014

FORESTS, LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCE OPERATIONS STATUTES AMENDMENT ACT, 2014, S.B.C. 2014, C. 7 (BILL 5) Sections 65(a), 66 to 69, 72, 77 to 80, 82(a), (c) and (e) and 83 are in force April 1, 2015

JUSTICE STATUTES AMENDMENT ACT, 2012, S.B.C. 2012, C. 11 (BILL 33) Sections 1, 4, 5, 6, other than as it amends section 3(2) of the Enforcement of Canadian Judgments and Decrees Act, and 8 to 12 are in force February 4, 2015

JUSTICE STATUTES AMENDMENT ACT, 2014, S.B.C. 2014, C. 9 (BILL 14) Section 39 is in force March 3, 2015

LABORATORY SERVICES ACT, S.B.C. 2014, C. 8 (BILL 7) Sections 96 and 100 to 103 are in force December 22, 2014

LIQUOR CONTROL AND LICENSING AMENDMENT ACT, 2014, S.B.C. 2014, C. 13 (BILL 15) Section 21 is in force December 22, 2014

MISCELLANEOUS STATUTES AMENDMENT ACT, 2003, S.B.C. 2003, C. 7 (BILL 11) Section 4 is in force January 19, 2015

For a complete list of Acts in Force go to cbabc.org.

BRANCH & BAR

Calendar

APRIL

1-29 LAP: Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction & Meditation for Lawyers — Vancouver — Wednesday 1, 8, 22 & 29 6-12 Make-A-Will Week 8 CBABC PD Webinar: Deja-Vu Part 2: PST, GST and HST – Double Taxation on Legal Services 9 Kamloops Bar Association Bench & Bar Cocktail Reception — Kamloops 10 Victoria Battle of the Bar Bands — Victoria 10-May 1 LAP: Boundaries for Lawyers — Vancouver — Friday 10, 17, 24 & May 1 13 Freedom of Information & Privacy Law Section & PD Conference — Vancouver 14 CBABC PD Seminar: Drafting Effective Affidavits — IN PARTNERSHIP

WITH CBABC YOUNG LAWYERS-LOWER MAINLAND SECTION — Vancouver 14 CBABC PD Webinar: Target June 1, 2015: You and the BC Limitation Act 15-May 2 CBA Ontario Foreign Conference Trip to South China — Toronto and South China, ON 16 Law Day 2015 17 CBABC PD Seminar: Dealing with Change and Learning to Love it! — Vancouver 21 CBABC PD Seminar: Dealing with Change and Learning to Love it! — Victoria 21 CBABC PD Webinar: Keys to the Castle: Starting Your Successful Solo Law Practice 23 WLF Awards Luncheon 28 CBABC PD Webinar: Unmasking Haters, Baiters and Trolls: Canada’s New Cyberbullying Law 29 CBABC PD Webinar: Who’s Going to Bark For Me? Pet Housing and Veterinary Negligence 29-May 2 The Lawyer Show 2015 – Dirty Rotten Scoundrels — Waterfront Theatre (Granville Island, Vancouver)

MAY

13 CBABC PD Seminar: Full Day Professional Development Conference — IN PARTNERSHIP WITH CBABC FREEDOM OF

INFORMATION & PRIVACY LAW SECTION — Vancouver 15 Executive Committee Meeting — Vancouver 27 CBABC PD Seminar: DIY Justice: Dealing with Self-represented and Vexatious Litigants — IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE DEPARTMENT

OF JUSTICE — Vancouver 28 CBABC PD Seminar: Technology for the Rest of Us — IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE KELOWNA BAR ASSOCIATION — Kelowna 31 A Day at the Races CBABC Law School Scholarship Fundraiser — Vancouver APRIL 2015 / BARTALK 25

news&events TIPS FROM

Drafting a will to combine clients’ instructions and legislative requirements into a readable document is a fine art.

The assistance you provide your client doesn’t need to end there. A will is just one of many important legal documents that your clients can make to get their affairs in order. There are also many options for how these documents can be stored and accessed in the future, during the very situations for which these documents are made in contemplation of. Here are a couple of great tools to help you bring all of this together for your clients: CLE’S DOCUMENT BUILDER FOR WILLS & ESTATES: This handy tool makes it simple to draft a will or power of attorney that matches your client’s instructions. Visit any Courthouse Libraries BC location to access CLE Online for free. You’ll find the Document Builder within Wills Precedents, located in the Practice Manual collection. For a short video tutorial on how to access and use the Document Builder, visit the Courthouse Libraries’ Training and Tutorials page or follow this link: bit.ly/CLBCWillsVideo.

NIDUS: You probably already know about the Wills Registry, but did you know that Nidus has an online registry for wills and personal planning documents? Nidus allows individuals or an appointed representative to create an online Personal Planning Registry Account where documents such as wills, memorial arrangements, representation agreements, powers of attorney and other personal documents can be stored in their entirety, in PDF format. With a Nidus account, the user has control over which third parties can access information about uploaded documents. Access rights can be granted to authorized third parties, such as provincial Health Authorities, the Public Guardian and Trustee or a personal representative. For more information visit nidus.ca/registry.

NEWS

Peter A. Allard, QC donates $30 million to UBC Faculty of Law

UBC Law alumnus Peter A. Allard, QC, has donated $30 million to UBC’s Faculty of Law, the largest gift ever to a Canadian law school. In recognition of his gift, which will enable the faculty to build on its reputation for championing human rights and social justice, the university will rename the law school the Peter A. Allard School of Law. In addition, UBC’s law school has launched a $10-million fundraising campaign to encourage alumni and friends to join Allard in supporting the law school.

Read more

A Day at the Races CBABC fundraiser for law school scholarships Sunday, May 31 Hastings Racecourse, Vancouver 1:30 pm (first post time 1:50 pm) Includes Cold Buffet, Silent Auction, and more… $60 + gst cbabc.org/races Join the cheering crowds as your favourite horse thunders home, and help support students at BC’s three law schools.

Derby attire is encouraged!

26 BARTALK / APRIL 2015

grantsapproved LAW FOUNDATION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

The following grants were adjudicated at the March 7, 2015 Board of Governors’ meeting.

Funding totalling $5,000,000 was approved for the following 29 continuing programs: COMMUNITY LEGAL ASSISTANCE SOCIETY $870,000 Major Programs $60,000 David Mossop QC, Public Interest Articling Fellowship $450,000 BC PUBLIC INTEREST ADVOCACY CENTRE Social and Regulatory Justice Programs

$125,000 WEST COAST DOMESTIC WORKERS’ ASSOCIATION Legal Advocacy Program

$75,000 VANCOUVER ISLAND NORTH WOMEN’S RESOURCE SOCIETY Advocacy Services Centre Program

$90,000 POVNET SOCIETY PovNet Program

$60,000 UPPER SKEENA COUNSELLING & LEGAL ASSISTANCE SOCIETY Advocacy Program

$85,000 COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS SOCIETY OF SOUTHEAST BC Travelling Poverty Law Advocate Program $75,000 ATIRA WOMEN’S RESOURCE SOCIETY Legal Advocacy Program $75,000 BATTERED WOMEN’S SUPPORT SERVICES Legal Advocacy Program $75,000 BC CENTRE FOR ELDER ADVOCACY AND SUPPORT Legal Advocacy Program

$425,000 WEST COAST ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ASSOCIATION Programs and EDRF

$75,000 DZE L K’ANT FRIENDSHIP CENTRE SOCIETY Legal Advocacy Program

$415,000 ACCESS PRO BONO SOCIETY OF BC Major Programs

$75,000 MAPLE RIDGE/PITT MEADOWS COMMUNITY SERVICES Poverty Law Advocacy Program

$360,000 BC LAW INSTITUTE Program Grant $330,000 PEOPLE’S LAW SCHOOL SOCIETY Major Programs $225,000 TENANT RESOURCE AND ADVISORY CENTRE SOCIETY Tenants’ Legal Advocacy Program $190,000 JUSTICE EDUCATION SOCIETY OF BC Major Programs $175,000 WEST COAST LEAF ASSOCIATION Litigation and Law Reform Program $160,000 MEDIATE BC SOCIETY Major Programs

$75,000 NORTH SHORE COMMUNITY RESOURCES SOCIETY North Shore Legal Advocacy Program $75,000 QUESNEL TILLICUM SOCIETY Legal Advocacy Program $75,000 SHARE FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Poverty Law Advocacy Program SOURCES COMMUNITY RESOURCES SOCIETY $75,000 Legal Information and Advocacy Program $75,000 Poverty Law Advocacy Program $75,000 TERRACE AND DISTRICT COMMUNITY SERVICES SOCIETY Poverty Law Advocacy Program

$20,000 UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN Native Law Centre $60,000 LAW FOUNDATION GRADUATE FELLOWSHIPS Alison Yule Anna Fitzgerald Brian Bird Christopher Albinati Helene Love Kathryn Thomson

Funding totalling $415,000 was approved for the following four grants: $200,000 BC CENTRE FOR ELDER ADVOCACY AND SUPPORT Elder Law Clinic $75,000 VERNON WOMEN’S TRANSITION HOUSE SOCIETY North Okanagan Legal Advocacy Program $75,000 WATARI RESEARCH ASSOCIATION System Negotiator Program $65,000 WACHIAY FRIENDSHIP CENTRE Wachiay Advocacy Outreach Program

Funding totalling $27,500 was approved for the following grant: $27,500 JUSTICE EDUCATION SOCIETY OF BC Schools Program Needs Assessment

For details of all programs and projects that received funding, please visit lawfoundationbc.org.

APRIL 2015 / BARTALK 27

professionaldevelopment

WEBSITE: CBAPD.ORG \\EMAIL: PD@CBABC.ORG \\

CBABC Professional Development offers a full range of CPD opportunities that provide a valuable skillsimprovement forum and an opportunity to exchange ideas with colleagues and Bar leaders from across Canada and around the world. Our conferences and seminars offer specialized resources and networking opportunities to advance your career, your practice and your business. For a full list of CBABC’s Professional Development offerings, please visit cbabc.org/CPD.

Upcoming In-person Seminars (See more Full Day Courses offered in your local areas on page 2.)

IN PARTNERSHIP WITH CBABC YOUNG LAWYERS-LOWER MAINLAND SECTION

Date: April 17, 2015 Location: Law Courts Inn, Vancouver Date: April 21, 2015 Location: Marriott Inner Harbour, Victoria

28 BARTALK / APRIL 2015

to

ta

Deja-Vu Part 2: PST, GST and HST - Double Taxation on Legal Services

Target June 1, 2015: You and the BC Limitation Act

k

ulin

PRESENTED BY THE BC BRANCH OF THE CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION

ho

Po

Speaker: Dennis Hilton – Facilitator, Trainer, Consultant and Speaker

eka Breder ’s dog Te ro.

P

te

Dealing with Change and Learning to Love it!

Reb

Upcoming Webinars

Date: April 8, 2015 Speakers: Alexander Coombes, Dentons Canada LLP; Katherine Zilinas, Couzin Taylor LLP

Pe

Date: April 14, 2015 Location: Law Courts Inn, Vancouver Speakers: Master Heather M. MacNaughton, Supreme Court of British Columbia; Chilwin C. Cheng, Partner, Legal Process Solutions

Date: May 13, 2015 Location: SFU Segal Building, Vancouver

by

Please join us in this practical and informative session. Our speakers will share useful tips and advice on how to properly draft an affidavit, and on what pitfalls to avoid.

Full Day Professional Development Conference

en

Drafting Effective Affidavits

IN PARTNERSHIP WITH CBABC FREEDOM OF INFORMATION & PRIVACY LAW SECTION

Date: April 14, 2015 Speakers: Vanessa Gauthier, Lindsay LLP; H. William Veenstra, Jenkins Marzban Logan LLP

Keys to the Castle: Starting Your Successful Solo Law Practice

Date: April 21, 2015 Speakers: Kathryn S. Sainty, Sainty Law; Marina L. Sedai, Sedai Law Office

Unmasking Haters, Baiters and Trolls: Canada’s New Cyberbullying Law

IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

DIY Justice: Dealing with Self-represented and Vexatious Litigants

Date: May 27, 2015 Location: Best Western Plus Chateau Granville, Vancouver IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE KELOWNA BAR ASSOCIATION

Technology for the Rest of Us

Date: May 28, 2015 Location: Royal Anne Hotel, Kelowna

Correctly define all of the Internet slang terms in the course title for a chance to win a PRIZE!

Date: April 28, 2015 Speakers: Eric V. Gottardi, Criminal Defence Counsel, Peck and Company; Jim Hughes, Chief Legal Technology Counsel, BC Ministry of Justice, Criminal Justice Branch

Who’s Going to Bark For Me? Pet Housing and Veterinary Negligence Date: April 29, 2015 Speakers: Rebeka Breder, Boughton Law Corporation; Amber Prince, LLM (Animal Law), Atira Women’s Resource Society

displayads

EMAIL: ADS@CBABC.ORG \\

Click here for LEGAL OPPORTUNITIES and ads

Sidhartha Rao JD, LLM Warren Dueck CPA, FCA Lori Lui CPA, CGA Steven Flynn CPA, CA Daren Raoux CPA, CA

US AND CROSS-BORDER TAX IS OUR BUSINESS. LET US HELP YOU WITH YOURS.

• • • •

US citizens in Canada Cross-border business Investing in the US US tax return preparation

VANCOUVER • RICHMOND • CALGARY

T: 604.448.0200 • Toll Free: 1.855.448.0200 • wldtax.com

WCB & CPP

DISABILITY APPEALS

GC 390 Howard Ave. Burnaby, B.C. V5B 3P8 Canada

604.591.8187

Preferred Supplier of:

info@gosalandcompany.com www.gosalandcompany.com

l

GC

www.progroupbc.ca

GOSAL & COMPANY BARRISTERS & SOLICITORS

Sarj Gosal B.A., LL.B.

254 - 12899 76th Ave. Surrey, BC V3W 1E6

Sometimes, your next move is obvious.

op

ONPOINT LEGAL RESEARCH

Lawyers helping lawyers for over 15 years.

www.onpointlaw.com

604.879.4280

info@onpointlaw.com APRIL 2015 / BARTALK 29

barmoves Who’s Moving Where and When Lisa Martz

Heather Hettiarachchi

has moved her diverse commercial and public law litigation practice, which includes real estate, contract disputes of all kinds, technology and aboriginal rights from McCarthy Tétrault LLP to Gudmundseth Mickelson LLP.

joined Kent Employment Law on February 2, 2015. Heather practises extensively in the areas of employment and labour law, and also provides employers with general human resources support.

Thomas McLachlan

Carl May

joined Reed Pope Law Corporation as a new associate.

joined Hammerberg Lawyers LLP as an associate lawyer practising in the areas of strata property and commercial litigation.

John McLeod

Arielle Lavender

joined Reed Pope Business Lawyers in Victoria, BC where he acts as associate counsel and continues to advise clients on corporate and commercial matters.

has joined Synergy Business Lawyers.

Her practice focuses on general business law with a focus on corporate and commercial law, acquisitions and divestitures, real estate and wills and estates.

Jean-Marc Hébert

Gradin Tyler

joined Whitelaw Twining Law Corporation as litigation counsel in the Personal Injury Claims group.

Mr. Hébert is fluent in French.

joined the partnership of Mathews Dinsdale & Clark LLP on January 1, 2015. Grady’s practice continues to focus on labour, employment, and human rights law.

Andrea Greenwood

Katie Van Nostrand

joined Branch MacMaster LLP, practising primarily in the areas of class actions and insurance litigation. Andrea articled at Richards Buell Sutton LLP and practised with Thorsteinssons LLP before joining Branch MacMaster.

has continued her immigration practice at Mathews Dinsdale & Clark LLP, which commenced February 16, 2015.

30 BARTALK / APRIL 2015

SPACE IS AT A PREMIUM AND AVAILABLE ON A FIRST-COME FIRST-SERVED BASIS SO SEND YOUR BAR MOVE (MAX. 30 WORDS) AND A HIGH-RESOLUTION PHOTO TO BARTALK@CBABC.ORG NOW. TO VIEW ALL BAR MOVES GO TO CBABC.ORG/BT/BM_1504

Natasha Jategaonkar joined Mathews Dinsdale & Clark LLP as an associate upon completing a clerkship with the BC Supreme Court.

She is practising in the areas of labour and employment law.

newmembers January & February 2015 Regular Members

Andrew Mildenhall

Hannah J. Askew

Dharmasena L. Yakandawelo

West Coast Environmental Law Vancouver

Law Students

Claire Hong

Wassan S. Aujla

Sandeep K. Mann

Heidi Boudreau

Port Moody joined Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP as partner. Jennifer practises in all areas of intellectual property, with emphasis on prosecuting patent applications in biotechnology and chemistry.

Vancouver Coastal Health Authority Vancouver Silas Polkinghorne

Vancouver

Kelsey A. Robertson

Veronica Law Vernon

Matthew J. Straw

Adam J. Barker has joined Edwards, Kenny & Bray LLP as an associate. He has a general corporate and commercial solicitor’s practice. He previously worked at another downtown Vancouver firm.

Eyford Macaulay Shaw & Padmanabhan LLP Vancouver Mandy M.F. Versi

McMillan LLP Vancouver

Gareth O. Williams

Lawson Lundell LLP Vancouver Martina Zanetti

Vancouver

Paul G. Kent-Snowsell joined the partnership of Lindsay Kenney LLP practising civil litigation with an emphasis on contractual and tort litigation and “white-collar” criminal defence. Paul works primarily in the Langley office.

Matthew J. Straw joined Eyford Macaulay Shaw & Padmanabhan LLP as an associate in November, 2014. He is practising in the areas of personal injury, insurance defence, and general civil litigation.

Coquitlam

Wannakuwattewaduge Ransiri Fernando

Vancouver

Jennifer Marles

Lawson Lundell LLP Vancouver

Articling Students Tara Busch

Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP Vancouver Anna Xi Chen

Fasken Martineau Vancouver Deborah W. Flood

Whitelaw Twining Law Corporation Vancouver Kerry D. Kaukinen

Fasken Martineau Vancouver

Brendan P. Lindsay

Surrey

Fredericton

Jessica Buffalo

Vancouver

Lockhart G M Fulton

Calgary

Laura Jacquard

Kamloops

Sukhdarshan S. Kaile

Penticton

Jamil Ladha

Richmond

Katherine B. Lawrence

Vancouver

Renata Lutke

West Kelowna Sarah Mansfield

Vancouver

Joshua Nobleman

Edmonton

Kas Pavanantharajah

Vancouver

Geneve Say

Kamloops Kevin So

Toronto

Peter Stauffer

Victoria

Sunita Syal

Vancouver

Edmond G. Tetrault

Vernon

Kristy Tymos

Vancouver

Emma Wilson

Delta

Max Wolinsky

Vancouver

Rush Crane Guenther Vancouver

Pei Yi Yeh

Asaf Mallek

Alison M. Yorke

Vancouver

Surrey

Vancouver

APRIL 2015 / BARTALK 31

Help your clients plant their legacy today. Be informed.

Find out how at vancouverfoundation.ca/beinformed or call Kristin at 604.629.5186

vancouverfdn

RETURN REQUESTED TO: The Canadian Bar Association, BC Branch, 10th Floor, 845 Cambie Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 5T3