2014 election guide

2014 Election Guide Brought to You by

County Attorney

County Coroner Laura Sundstrom for Campbell County Coroner

Lisa Finkey for County Attorney Grew up in Idaho small town of 500 people, Georgetown Went to same elementary school that mom and grandma went too One year in Junior College in Southern Utah 3 out of 4 undergraduates in Wisconson Moved to wyoming took a job with the forrest service Then moved north of Rock Springs and worked oil field for awhile Went to Laramie too law school after Took the bar right after grad in and was licensed in October 2008

Bar has 50% fail rate, passed first time around.

After lawschool moved to Gillette working for Judge Price clerking for the District Court Also working with Judge Perry and Judge Degan “I think all attorneys should be required to clerk for a judge, what an extrordanary learning experiance” “Could not have asked for a better teacher than Judge Price” clerked for 3 years, then was at county attorney’s office just under 2 years, and now is a circut court majistrate

Ron Wirthwein Running for County Attorney What makes a defense lawyer run for County Attorney?

Fatherhood.

“Not that I didn’t like being a defense attorney, I believed in the system.

That’s how you represent people whom you know did bad things, is you believe in the system and the workings of that system.

You believe why that system was set up and why it has evolved into what it is today.” Now, Mr. Wirthwein can come home to his children and instead

of saying that he helped bad guys walk, he can come home proud that he is helping to put bad guys where they belong. That is his main reason, but not the only one.

“I thought there was a need in the County Attorney’s Office for there to be someone with experience in trials. That experience can be the difference between a serious criminal getting off the hook or not.”

After attending University of Wyoming (and law

school in Sacramento) Wyoming is now Ron’s adopted home. He moved around a lot as a kid, his mom being a nurse and his dad a disabled bet.

Now, because of the community which he is now aiming to serve, he has found a permanent home to raise his seven children.

And of course, with seven children, there aren’t really much time for hobbies, so tennis for Ron and his wife will have to do as the only one.

1: In what ways do you plan on running the department budget if elected?

Lisa Finkey: Conservatively. If I am elected, my goal for the budget is to keep it from increasing any more than it already has. Over the last 12 years, the budget has gone from $1.7 million to over $3.4 million dollars. While much of that increase was due to the addition of staff, which was needed, the rapid increase of the department budget has to stop. The County has been very generous to the County Attorney’s Office when it comes to the budget. Now it is time for the County Attorney’s Office to be generous to the taxpayers and manage the budget wisely to save the taxpayers money.

The new technology requirements that are being put in place by the Supreme Court will require time and money on behalf of the County Attorney’s Office. In order to stop the budget from increasing, I plan to take a serious look at the budget and determine where cuts can be made. I believe there are ways to manage the budget more efficiently.

For example, instead of sending one employee to a national training, which cost the County thousands of dollars in conference fees, mileage, hotel costs, and per diem, I believe an effective training program could be implemented that involves bringing retired judges from around the state into the office to train multiple employees at the same time in relevant, Wyoming law and procedure.

Ron WirthThe wein: largest percentage of the budget is personnel costs. Many factors can influence the office’s staffing needs.

Population growth, high profile or complex cases, technological advances or changes in statutory requirements can all affect staffing needs. The County Attorney’s Office currently has 31 employ-

ees. There is the county attorney, 10 deputy county attorneys, 14 legal secretaries, three crime victim witness coordinators and three employees in the Juvenile Diversion Office that are overseen by the county attorney. Currently, two of the attorney positions are not filled. There is a need to fill at least one of the positions at this time, due to workload. The workload numbers are fewer than a couple years ago, however, indications are that Campbell County is entering another boom cycle. There has been an increase in high profile and complex cases in the past year or two. Other costs of the office seem to be fairly stable and do not fluctuate greatly.

One way the County Attorney’s Office has worked on streamlining costs is through technological advances by streamlining tasks and paperwork.

Just recently, and working closely with the courts, attorneys have been generating orders simultaneously with the court hearing, allowing the judge’s immediate review and distribution to the parties minutes after the hearing. This is freeing up time for staff to do other tasks. Eventually, through continued efforts to increase efficiency, this could lead to fewer staffing needs.

torney’s Office is prosecution of crime. Timely and accurate charging decisions, skilled staff, fair decisions and a commitment to justice have to be at the forefront of a successful office.

2. More active presence in preventative measures to reduce crime: Be more actively engaged with preventative measures to reduce crime, including evaluation of a “care cab” bus system to reduce drunk drivers, increasing the use of the Alive at 25 program, possible discussions on the renewal of misdemeanor DUI Drug Court, increased awareness of mental health and domestic violence issues in our community and partnerships with various agencies to work on lessening these incidents.

3. Renewed focus on fighting drugs: Wyoming has done a great job in fighting meth. Everyone knows how drastically meth can hurt your health, job prospects and family.

In working with law enforcement, treatment providers and others, work on educating about prescription drug abuse, heroin, etc.

4. Use of technology to improve courtroom presentations, increased use of technology to draft documents simultaneous with hearings to increase efficiency, and ultimately time and money and familiarity with new court filing process: With the court system moving to an electronic filing system, we will need to be ready for the change. We have recently started moving toward orders being generated in the courtroom, simultaneous with the court hearing.

This is already showing increased productivity for the courts, County Attorney’s Office and attorneys, and a reduction in staffing needs for the County Attorney’s Office.

Technology in the courtroom during trials continues to be used, and ways to improve presentations are always evaluated.

5. Continued commitment to county civil issues: The County Attorney’s Office has done a good job

2: What is your highest priority to accomplish while holding this elected office?

Ron WirthThe wein: same priority I have today is the same priority I will have as an elected official, to provide the highest level of service to the citizens of Campbell County, through prosecution of crime, protection of abused and neglected children, justice for sexual assault and domestic violence victims, sound legal advice to county officials and departments, and greater presence in prevention of crime in our community.

1. Prosecution of crime: The primary function of the Campbell County At-

in representation of county civil issues, boards and departments.

Lisa Finkey: My number one priority if I’m elected would be to improve the efficiency of the office and earn the respect of the legal community. I believe that with a few minor adjustments, cases can be charged out quicker and more effectively. Justice is not served when it takes months or even years to bring cases to court. I am a highly organized person, and I would want to run the office in a highly organized manner.

I believe that our County Attorney’s Office can be one of the best County Attorney’s Offices in the state and a model of efficiency and effective justice. I also believe that improving the channels of communication between the County Attorney’s Office and the legal community will lead to a more effective system of justice.

3: The County Attorney may see some holes, laws, or more in our system that may result in the harm of citizens. How would you propose and/ or push for changes necessary to fix these problems?

Lisa Finkey: I think advocacy and education are two very important parts of the County Attorney position. I think that as County Attorney, you are obligated to participate in discussions with other criminal justice agencies and attorneys throughout the state to develop new and innovative ideas as well as proposed legislative changes to improve the criminal justice system. I also think that a County Attorney can directly bring change to the local system through persuasive arguments in court on legal issues and by appealing matters of law that need clarification or further review by a higher court.

If I am elected County Attorney, I would make advocacy a key part of my role and would want to actively

participate on committees that seek to address needed changes in the law.

I also think it is important to develop an open line of communication with local legislative leaders to exchange information on how and why the law needs to improve. I would also want to take a more active role in appealing decisions that warrant review by a higher court.

Ron Wirthwein: Routinely, the County Attorney’s Office identifies areas of the law that need modified to better fit circumstances that arise. In the past, and in the future, the Campbell County Attorney’s Office has worked closely with legislators, commissioners, county department heads, and the Courts in seeking change to laws that are outdated or need modified. By way of example, changes to the controlled substance statutes were made several years ago to include spice as a controlled substance, increase the penalties for use of a controlled substance, creating a burglary charge for those entering a residence to harm someone, etc. With an ever changing society, and increases in technology, gaps in the law are always identified. Statewide, the Wyoming County and Prosecuting Attorneys’ Association, with the Campbell County Attorney being a member, identifies legislative changes each year, speaks during legislative sessions on those topics, and works with legislators to encourage the changes identified to better improve the laws to meet the changing needs of Wyoming citizens.

4: What qualifications, experience, and/or training do you have?

Ron Wirthwein: I went to the University of Wyoming where I graduated in 2002 with a B.S. in Political Science and a minor in History.

Continued on Page 2

Laura Sundstrom is a mother of two, and a nine-year resident of Campbell County. She is a former small business owner who is active in her community through several civic groups, like The Lions Club and AFSP-Wyoming (American Foundation for Suicide Prevention) where she is currently a board member. Having personally had a negative experience with a coroner in another state, Laura chose to pursue her passion for forensics through the coroner’s office. She is currently a deputy coroner in Crook County and is a former deputy coroner for Campbell County.

1: In what ways do you plan on running the department budget if elected?

Laura Sundstrom: As a former business owner, I understand the necessity of maintaining a strict budget.

I know the coroner’s office is funded by your tax dollars and I will do everything I can to keep costs down without sacraficing the quality of service provided. I would also like to get grant money brought into Campbell County. Other coroner’s have been able to receive equipment and funds for training with grant money.

2: Describe how, if elected, your role in investigations into determining causes of death.

Laura Sundstrom: Gathering Information from several sources including, but not limited to family, co-workers, neighbors, doctors, hospital records, police and other emergency service workers. Contact with family is vital as they often have important information that can aid the investigation.

3: The Coroner has to work closely with many different entities, including outside forensics, multiple police departments, the hospital, and more.

Describe how you would establish a relationship with these entities.

Laura Sundstrom: As a deputy coroner, I know firsthand how important proper investigation is to our local law enforcement community.

I have an excellent working relationship with Gillette Police Department, Campbell County Sheriff’s Office, Campbell County Attorney’s office and all other entities involved. I will continue to maintain these important relationships.

4: What qualifications, experience, and/or training do you have?

Laura Sundstrom: I am currently a deputy coroner and have more professional experience and certifications than any other candidate.

Administrative Management of a Medicolegal Death Investigators Office.

Medicolegal death investigation Crime scene investigation Detective training Homicide investigation Disaster and mass fatality training Suicide prevention Toxicology: Pills and Particles Trace evidence Fingerprint identification: Reliability and accuracy Latent fingerprints: Reducing erroneous exclusions Latent fingerprints: Developing methods and new technology

Blood stain documentation and collection methods Cold Case Safety Net -Missing and unidentified persons Falling Into decay - Postmortem interval and molecular autopsy Missing and Unidentified Persons Collecting footwear and tire impressions in snow Crime scene imaging: A practitioner’s perspective Death Investigation in the elderly Answering the NAS: The ethics of leadership and the leadership of ethics How to be a good expert witness Expert testimony training for the prosecutor or scientist Fluorescense of blood impressions with acid yellow An introduction into the world of the American Board of Forensic Toxicology Investigating sexual violence: Emerging solutions and best practices Investigative Strategies: Missing and unidentified persons cases Tarnished gold standard: Limited quality and degraded DNA- Part 1 Offender profiling: Psychology contributions to behavioral crime scene analysis Opioids and pain management Pills and particles Falling into Decay: Postmortem interval and molecular autopsy I Falling into Decay: Postmortem interval and molecular autopsy II Recreation Asphyxia: Chemical Recreation Asphyxia: Mechanical Investigating Sudden Death: Cause of death scenarios that mimic one another Sudden, Unexplained Infant Death Investigations: Death Scene Re-creation Using Generic Results to Identify Human Remain 5: What makes you the most qualified for this position?

Laura Sundstrom: I have been a certified deputy coroner for 2 years. During this time I have taken numerous classes and have numerous certifications in determining cause and manner of death, crime scene investigation, evidence collection. I have learned a variety of investigative techniques regarding blood spatter, firearm trajectory, results of blunt force trauma and much more.

Because of my past experience as a deputy coroner in Campbell County, I definitely have the most experience and feel I am the most prepared and qualified candidate to take on the duties of Campbell County Coroner. If elected, I will be an active working coroner in addition to administrative duties. With my experience, I will be able to hit the ground running, fulfilling the duties of the coroner, instead of having to learn what to do and how to do it.

October 31 - November 7, 2014 • Page 2

Campbell County Observer/Election Guide 2014

Governor 1. Many state residents believe that the EPA and other government agencies are gaining too much influence in the State of Wyoming. Do you agree? If so, what is your strategy to battle these federal agencies?

Matt Mead: I agree the EPA and other federal agencies are reaching beyond their authority to unduly affect coal-producing states and western public lands states like Wyoming. I believe the Obama Administration has been trying, in concerted fashion, to avoid Congress and advance its progressive agenda through federal agency action. The resulting glut of federal regulatory activity affects many aspects of our lives. Federal agency proposals purport to regulate everything from farming activities to property rights and more - they are pervasive and hurtful.

I have combated the challenges posed by the Administration in D.C. throughout my time in of-

fice and will continue to do so if reelected. My strategy is multifaceted.

One, I work to make sure state plans for resource management and environmental programs are the best possible - so we are prepared to lead in areas where the state has primacy or should control the matter at hand.

Our new baseline water quality rules are an example. Second, I work cooperatively when federal agencies are willing to proceed responsively and responsibly. For example, I negotiated a plan with Secretary of Interior Salazar which resulted in wolf delisting and turnover of wolves to state control.

Third, I work to build a strong record to support the state’s position. For example, I testified for the first time as Governor at an EPA hearing to support Wyoming’s regional haze plan, and I have commented pointedly in opposition to numerous EPA proposals. Fourth, I fight in court - engaging the state in 13 lawsuits against the EPA alone.

When federal agen-

cies are wrong, unreasonable, intransigent, I fight aggressively using all options available. The Obama Administration should not be doing an end run around Congress to negatively impact our state, our lives, and our businesses through federal agency action.

Don Wills: The federal government is winning the battle with Wyoming concerning land management, wildlife management and water management because federal agents know that the Governor of Wyoming will simply accept whatever the federal government dishes out via the federal judiciary ... that is, unless somebody steps up and says NO, we’re not going to take it any more. As governor, I will do just that.

2. Is there a problem with Wyoming’s current pension plan? Why, and if so how do you plan to fix that problem?

Don Wills: There are two

problems - underfunding and structure. First, Wyoming government employee pension programs are only funded at about 70% of the amount that will be required in the future to pay benefits. That must be fixed immediately or the problem will just get worse. Second, the existing defined benefit pension system is not sustainable. It must be converted to a defined contributions system like the 401K program available in the private sector.

Matt Mead: I have worked with the Legislature to move the various public employee retirement plans toward full funding. Increases in employee and employer contributions were required in 2013 and 2014 legislation, HB 250 and HB 46 respectively, and I supported them in order to make Wyoming’s pension plans stronger. I keep tabs on the retirement plans and, if additional action becomes necessary on any of them, I will work with the Legislature again

on retirement plan issues as I did in 2013 and 2014.

3. There is much talk by state legislators and legislature candidates about returning federal owned lands back to the state of Wyoming. Do you support this, and if so what is your strategy to perform this task?

Matt Mead: I believe the state of Wyoming would do better than the federal government in managing and stewarding public lands; however, I do not believe we can wrest these lands from federal ownership by force. As the federal government gets deeper and deeper in debt, I believe there is a chance to consolidate checkerboard lands and increase state and private ownership through land exchange or purchase.

As federal resources become more and more constrained, I believe the opportunity will also arise for Wyoming to offer management in exchange for compensation. The state operates more efficiently than

Don Wills Seeks Governor Seat

The State of Wyoming is under attack by federal judges who have decided issue after issue in favor of federal government regulators, and against the right of the people of Wyoming to decide issues that are none of the business of the federal government. The 10th Amendment to the US Constitution is very clear - the federal government possesses only those powers delegated to it by the states in the US Constitution.

In Federalist Paper 45, James Madison wrote: “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.”

Unfortunately, Madison’s statement is meaningless today.

I call on Gov. Mead to defy federal Judge Skavdahl by ordering Wyoming County Clerks to continue to uphold Wyoming law regarding the issuance of marriage licenses. But of course you know that, as a lawyer, Gov. Mead believes in the absolute authority of the federal government in all issues whenever the federal government says so. That’s not the way the federal system was intended to work. But that’s what Matt Mead believes. As a matter of fact, there is nothing in the US Constitution that even gives judges any authority to decide constitutionality, let alone sole authority. The Supreme Court sim-

ply stated they were the final authority in the Marbury vs. Madison decision of 1803 - there is no constitutional basis whatsoever to back up that decision.

According to announcements from the Governor’s office, Wyoming marriage licenses will be issued to homosexuals starting on Thursday.

Judge Skavdahl, echoing other federal judges, has decided, 146 years after its enactment, that now the 14th amendment protects marriage between homosexuals as a fundamental human civil right. Talk about rewriting history!

Such an interpretation of the 14th amendment is ridiculous - the 14th amendment was about ending slavery and its effects. As George Orwell warned us, when words lose all meaning, any words can be redefined to mean anything - “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.” And that’s what has happened now. The words of the 14th amendment are being redefined to implement the progressive agenda, just like what has happened with the Supremacy Clause, the Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause. Federal judges are simply agents of a progressive conspiracy to put an end to state authority on most issues, including land management, water management, guns, education, healthcare, wildlife management, social issues and almost everything else.

On our current path, the Wyoming legislature

won’t have much to do other than increase taxes and spending as all other issues will be decided in Washington DC. Issues of substance concerning criminality, property ownership and use, gun rights and social issues will be decided by the federal tyranny in the form of agents dressed in black robes.

So what can you do about this tyranny? Not much if Gov. Mead is reelected. He has made it very clear that he agrees that federal judges have authority over all of the affairs of the people of Wyoming.

If I am elected, I will stop this tyranny. I will defy those laws and judgements that are clearly outside the authority of the federal government. In the case of marriage licenses, I will direct County Clerks to continue to enforce Wyoming laws, and to ignore federal court orders. If County Clerks defy that order, I will start impeachment proceedings against them for failing to uphold their oath of office to enforce the laws of the State of Wyoming.

I need your help in getting out my message. I have created an eight page tabloid newspaper that discusses all of the issues. You can read the PDF of the newspaper on my web site at www.electdonwills.org. Just click on the image of the newspaper on that web page. 75,000 copies of the newspaper have been distributed as inserts in several Wyoming newspapers.

Volunteers are going door-to-door distributing these newspapers. If you would like to help, I can send you as many copies of the newspaper as you can distribute along with plastic bags to hang the newspapers on door knobs.

Contact me at don.wills@defendwyoming.org or 307.245.3140 and I’ll make sure you get as many as you can distribute. Yards signs are also available.

Most importantly, please vote for me. I will not let you down if I am elected Governor.

County Attorney Continued from Page 1 I attended law school at the University of Wyoming, and graduated with honors in 2006. During law school, I enjoyed trial advocacy and earned the UW Excellence in Advocacy Award.

After law school, I moved to Gillette and clerked for the Sixth Judicial District Judges: Honorable Dan R. Price II, Hon. John R. Perry, and Hon. Michael N. Deegan from 2006-2008. In 2008, I joined the Public Defender’s Office. My passion has always been with trial work. I had the opportunity to sit as lead chair on a number of different types of trials. In 2010, I joined The Nick Carter Law Firm where I worked as an associate. In 2012, I began work at the Campbell County Attorney’s Office, and was promoted to Chief Deputy in October, 2013.

I have extensive experience as an attorney in complex or high profile cases including: murder, attempted murder, aggravated vehicular homicide, sexual assault and abuse, kidnapping, stalking, and drug possession. I work daily with victims of crime. I handle the majority of criminal cases involving child victims in the office.

In addition to my experience as a trial attorney, my experience as a leader in the office will be helpful in guiding the County Attorney’s Office into the future. It is a passion of mine to work closely with the younger attorneys as they prepare for trials or other Court hearings.

As the Chief Deputy, I have developed strong working relationships with law enforcement and community agencies.

Lisa Finkey: I graduated from the University of Wyoming College of Law in 2008, after which I took a position as a law clerk with the District Court in Gillette. I clerked for three years,

after which I went to the Campbell County Attorney’s office and prosecuted for a little less than two years. After that I went into private practice, and I currently serve part time as a Guardian ad Litem representing children in abuse and neglect cases.

I spend the remainder of my time running a general legal practice, which includes criminal and juvenile defense, probate, and a limited amount of family law cases. I also serve as a Circuit Court Magistrate and fill in for the Judges when they are unavailable, including being the Substitute Judge for the Juvenile and Family Drug Court.

Since graduating from law school, I have actively participated in continuing legal education. I have had the opportunity to present at several statewide conferences, and I have provided local trainings to the Department of Family Services and the Court Appointed Special Advocates. The paramount educational experience I have had since graduating from law school was to spend a week at the National Judicial College in Reno, Nevada, to spend a week with Judges from around the country learning about the Drug Court process.

I have appeared at every level of the Wyoming court system, from Municipal Court all the way up to the Wyoming Supreme Court. I have handled juvenile, misdemeanor, and felony cases, including jury trials in all three areas.

I am also involved with several community organizations. I am a member of the Campbell County Prevention Council, President of the Board of Directors for Energy Capital Habitat for Humanity, and I serve as a board member on the Juvenile and Family Drug Court board. I also am a member of the GAL Program Advisory Committee, the statewide oversight committee for the GAL program. In the past I have worked with the Gillette Animal Shelter, CASA, and I have served as a volun-

teer EMT and fire fighter.

5: What makes you the most qualified for this position?

Lisa Finkey: I’m a wellrounded individual with natural leadership abilities who is dedicated to doing any job before me well. I have a good work ethic, great people skills, and a genuine concern for the well-being of the community. I approach everything I do with a large dose of forethought and common sense. I value the input of others and desire to earn the respect of the community and those I serve.

Ron Wirthwein: I have been a Deputy Attorney with the Campbell County Attorney’s Office since September 2012. In October, 2013, I was promoted to the Chief Deputy position. As a result, I help oversee the office and handle primarily the complex cases in the office, including aggravated vehicular homicide, murder, attempted murder, sexual assault and abuse, kidnapping, and stalking. During the past 2 years, I have assisted the County Attorney in administrative duties, including the oversight of 31 employees. I assist in training staff, and am comfortable handling any of the other aspects of the office including: misdemeanors cases, juvenile cases, civil issues, and involuntary commitment cases.

I am a seasoned trial attorney and administrator, who is committed to the office, as evidenced by prosecuting the difficult cases, making the difficult decisions, and remaining at the office.

the federal government and such an arrangement would be mutually beneficial. In sum, I advocate for a measured, reasoned approach to make headway when and where we can.

Don Wills: Yes, I support this endeavor.

However, just asking nicely for the federal government to give the lands to Wyoming will not accomplish anything. As governor, I will just take control of the land by directing county clerks to issue deeds to the state of Wyoming for BLM and NFS lands.

4. WOTUS (Waters of the United States) will soon be an issue that the Governor of Wyoming will need to face.

Do you plan on supporting or working with this plan? If not, how do you plan to stop it?

Don Wills: Again, hoping for the best when dealing with the federal government is naive.

The full force of Wyoming government needs to resist such takings of private water rights.

Matt Mead: I have already written the EPA and Corps of Engineers opposing the socalled Interpretive Rule. I believe the rule cuts into

the statutory exemption from permitting under the Clean Water Act for normal farming activities. I believe the rule unduly burdens farmers and adds hugely to bureaucratic red tape by bringing the NRCS into the picture. And that’s just for starters.

I believe the underlying proposal to expand the definition of WOTUS is contrary to law and adverse to Wyoming interests, and I will be commenting in detail before the comment deadline this fall. I believe Wyoming will have company - a number of states and organizations - opposing the WOTUS proposals. Hopefully, the federal agencies will see the light and withdraw these ill-conceived proposals. If not, we litigate.

5. With a part-time legislature, the Governor has more executive power throughout the year than many other states. What is the role and limitations of the unique position of the Governor’s office when the legislature is out of session?

Matt Mead: I believe the Governor ’s role does not change with a part-time legislature. The powers and duties of the Governor, except where bills are involved, are set forth in Art. 4, Sections

4 and 5 of the Wyoming Constitution, and they remain the same yearround.

Don Wills: Actually, that’s not true. The governor in Wyoming is moderately weak compared with other states.

The power actually resides with the bureaucracy in Cheyenne that essentially dictates to both the legislature and governor how state policy and spending will change. The bureaucracy needs to be neutered before any real change can occur.

6. Do you support the re-visiting of a Governor appointed director of education? Why or why not?

Don Wills: Nope. I don’t think it will ever come up again, for two reasons. First, Gov. Mead will have his handpicked assistant in charge when Jillian Balow is elected.

And second, the legislature is fearful of a backlash like what happened after SF-104.

Matt Mead: Any change in the Constitutional role of the elected State Superintendent must be brought before Wyoming’s voters.

Governor Matt Mead for Re-Election

Matt Mead, the state’s 32nd governor, is a lifelong Wyoming resident. Born in Jackson, he was raised on the family ranch in Teton County. Mead believes his success is attributable to his upbringing. Growing up, he was expected to pitch in on the ranch.

By working on the ranch throughout his childhood, he learned the ropes of running a business. A 4th generation rancher, Matt has stayed involved in ranching to this day. He and his wife Carol have a ranch in Albany County and a farm in Goshen County.

“I’ve learned many lessons on the ranch,” Mead says. One particular task that he remembers fondly was riding the fences to check on the security of the herd.

His mother, Mary, called this “riding the

longest loop,” meaning not to take shortcuts that could result in a job poorly done.

Matt’s grandfather Cliff Hansen taught about stewardship-leaving more blades of grass-meaning land should be passed along in better condition for the future. “Lessons like these are about more than ranching.

They are about life and work and leaving a good legacy.”

Growing up, Mead became a sportsman and outdoor recreationist. He snowmobiled, skied, played football, and hunted. He climbed the Grand while in high school. “These experiences and others like them available in our big, beautiful state are character-building and just plain fun.”

Campbell County Observer

October 31 - November 7, 2014 • Page 3

US Senator 1: Is there a Federal debt crisis, and if so what is your strategy to fix the problem?

Mike Enzi: Our debt crisis is caused by a spending crisis.

With a national debt sitting at more than $17.6 trillion, Washington simply cannot continue to spend more than we have. Wyoming families have to manage their budgets and balance their checkbooks, and they expect Washington to do the same.

People in Wyoming are frustrated by Washington spending and are looking for solutions. I’m continuing to champion policies in Washington that will rein in spending and begin to pay down the debt. I recently re-introduced the “the One Percent Spending Reduction Act of 2014,” a bill that would balance the budget in three years by cutting spending by one percent each year. We must address Washington’s outof-control spending habits before our debt becomes an insurmountable burden for future generations.

Charlie Hardy: The debt has grown to $17 trillion while Enzi sat on the finance committee, now he calls for a one cent plan. Well Charlie Hardy is calling for a two cent plan that asks the voters to use their two cents to not reelect Enzi who got us into the mess in the hopes of getting us out.

Is there a debt problem?

Yes, although economists have re-evaluated the evidence on how bad having a debt this high is and Enzi is behind the times on the economics. The solution, stop flushing money and lives down the toilet in the Middle East, tax the billionaires, tax their billion dollar corporations, raise the minimum wage and cut small businesses a break.

Curt Gottshall: Yes, Wa s h i n g t o n has a spending problem caused by the lack of fiscal responsibility of our leadership. Our current leadership has no concept of money, budget or any sense of how to stop the problem. We need to start spending responsibly and address every program that is federally funded that does not fall under the purview of the constitution. The programs that are not authorized by the constitution should be put on a track to be reduced annually with the final target of zero over the next ten years. The overall size of the federal government should be cut. There are too many unnecessary federal agencies meddling into the states affairs like the EPA for example. This

agency should be stripped of a lot of its self appointed overreach of authority and should be advisory in nature and only have an active role in the event that an issue crosses state lines. The 10th amendment allows the states to govern themselves on all issues not covered in the constitution and I would be a strong proponent for returning the power to govern back to the states.

Over the last 3 terms (18 years) with Senator Enzi in Washington, the national debt has gone from 5.2 to 17.7 Trillion dollars.

I can’t fathom how a 1% reduction for 3 years is going to fix this problem that he was part of creating.

2: What do you plan to oppose and/or approve in the President’s 2015 budget proposal?

Charlie Hardy: That’s a big document that needs to be gone through with a fine tooth comb. First off the spy agencies need their budgets cut by about 50-75%. They shouldn’t be spying on Americans.

Next Veteran benefits need a major boost including for education. Finally there must be full incorporation into the budget of the costs of the war and the Congress needs to use the power of the purse to force the Executive Branch to pull out of foreign entanglements.

Lastly Charlie Hardy will make sure that any special deals that Enzi has tried to give pharmaceutical companies that cost seniors money don’t make it into the budget like section 632 of the Tax Payer Relief Act. Curt Gottshall: President Obama has proposed to: Cut Defense Spending, which I would Strongly Oppose. He really appears to have no knowledge or savvy when it comes to commanding the military, but to try to stay on point he has proposed to cut our military to pre WWII levels and retire the A-10 aircraft which is very unique aircraft when it comes to air to ground combat, for example exactly what we need now in Iraq.

The “Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013,” which is a long name for his plan to grant amnesty to people who broke the law and could not follow the proper immigration process. Opposed.

Pre-Kindergarten, Head Start Program. Opposed, not in the purview of the constitution. The area of education falls into the jurisdiction of the state government and should not be funded or mandated by the federal government.

He proposes to make several Tax changes including: Taxing large banks with “Financial Crisis Responsibility Fees.” This I am Strongly Opposed to, as it will have a direct impact to every person with a bank account. President Obama has tried to impose this user fee on us before and it appears that he has not given up on it yet. These fees will be directly passed on to us by our banks and applied to every transaction we make. This is just another one of Obama’s attempts to rename a tax a fee.

Increasing taxes with the “Buffett Tax” which will impact the following: Large estates, Financial Institutions, Tobacco products, airline passengers and managers of private investment funds. So apparently any one out there who buys an airline ticket or a pack of cigarettes is as rich as Buffett. Perhaps he was thinking of Jimmy instead of Warren when he named this one.

Opposed!

I would agree to close the loop holes in the tax code and make it fair for all through the implementation of the “Fairness Tax,” which is a flat federal sales tax that would replace income tax , and that as the name says would be fair for all.

Mike Enzi: I have a number of concerns regarding the Obama Administration’s FY2015 budget request and the unsustainable spending levels it proposes. During a Senate Budget Committee Hearing in March, I pressed former Director of the Office of Management and Budget Sylvia Mathews Burwell on spending on health programs as well as eliminating ineffective and duplicative programs from the budget. Spending on Medicare, Medicaid and other health programs is expected to double over the next 10 years, which is simply not sustainable. I pushed then Director Burwell on how the Administration planned to make these programs sustainable, or if they had any desire to do so. I also asked the Administration why they were not considering eliminating ineffective and duplicative preschool programs before proposing a massive new one.

There are several other areas for concern in the President’s Budget which proposing spending money we do not have.

I’m continuing to fight in Washington to ensure our nation begins to live within its means.

3: Do you believe bureaucracies and federal

Mike Enzi for US Senator Mike Enzi and his wife Diana have lived in Gillette for more than 40 years. Together, they raised their three children Amy, Emily and Brad while operating three small businesses, NZ Shoes. Enzi served eight years as Mayor of Gillette during a major boom that doubled the size of the population and grew Wyoming’s energy industry exponentially. He has also worked as an accountant and safety training manager in oil well servicing. Enzi was elected to the state legislature where he served as a State Representative and State Senator.

As a member of the U.S. Senate, Enzi has been a relentless champion of Wyoming’s energy industry, promoting coal and natural gas while fighting back burdensome rules and excessive regulations.

He’s helped pass legislation that allowed for the development of the coalbed methane gas industry in Wyoming. Enzi has used his senior role on the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee to improve access to quality education and healthcare. A steadfast opponent of Obamacare, Enzi has fought to repeal, defund and dismantle the law at every opportunity. He’s helped pass bills that allow small business owners to grow and expand and been an outspoken advocate for 2nd Amendment rights. Enzi has worked to promote state’s rights and been a relentless defender of the constitution. As

a member of the Committee on Finance, Enzi is also working on tax reform.

In addition to the HELP Committee and Finance Committee, Enzi serves on the Committee on Budget, Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, and Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs.

Enzi is an avid fly fisherman and proud grandfather to Megan, Allison, Trey and Lilly.

agencies, like the IRS, EPA, NFS (and many more) have become overbearing? If so, what is your strategy to rein them in?

Curt Gottshall: Yes to all.

The IRS can be reigned in through the implementation of the “Fairness Tax.” By going to a flat federal sales tax, there will no longer be then need for citizens to file income tax.

This would reduce the size of the IRS staff by roughly 75%. The only people who would have to collect and deal with taxes are retailers, who already do so on a state level.

The EPA should have their authority reduced to interstate matters.

The information it produces should be advisory in nature and enforced through the state government.

The NSA is violating our privacy without legal basis.

They are domestically collecting all of our data from the internet, spying in on our phone calls and text all the while wasting billions of dollars to collect and store the information.

This is all being permitted through the courts misinterpretation of the “Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. “ An act that was passed before the internet was even on the horizon and all under the watchful eyes of our current leadership. This issue needs to be dealt with head on through proper

legislation, not sidestepping the law.

I’m not sure about the rest of you but, I am personally tired of the excuses coming out of Washington, It’s the Republicans fault, It’s the Democrats fault, Harry Reid stole my parking spot. Sounds like a group of misbehaved kids at daycare. Quit the bitching and start working, or get out of the way and let someone else get the job done!

Mike Enzi: A b s o l u t e l y.

The overreach of the federal government has run rampant under the current Administration. President Obama is using agencies like the EPA to skirt the legislative process altogether - taking power out of the hands of American citizens and giving it to bureaucrats in Washington.

To stop this, we need more votes from leaders in Washington committed to legislating instead of deal making and who are willing to fight for a return to regular legislative order - as intended by the Constitution. Under Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, bills are brought to the floor with little to no time for public review and without committee hearings or debate. Senators are denied the opportunity to offer amendments.

And instead of considering issues one at a time,

Continued on Page 4

Curt Gottshall running for US Senator

Like many others, I am concerned about how the people of Wyoming and their interests are being represented in Washington D.C. My objective is to bring more of the Wyoming constituent’s concerns and beliefs to the work done on their behalf in the Senate. I seek to find bipartisan solutions that best serve Wyoming.

The decision to come forward and answer the calling for change has given me the opportunity to represent the constituents of Wyoming by taking their opinions to D.C. By electing me to U.S. Senate,

you would have a person representing you that posses a lot of qualities that are rarely found in most politicians; Accountable, Energetic, Ethical, Hard Working, Honest, Honorable, Intelligent, Motivated and a Never-Quit Attitude.

These attributes will surely stimulate some change in the Senate.

Home & Family: Originally, I am from a small town in Pennsylvania about the same size as Laramie. I attended Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University receiving a B.S in Aeronautical Science. I live in Laramie, Wyoming

with my wife Katrina. I currently work as an international airline pilot and Katrina is in the last year of her Ph.D in Molecular Biology. We have one son, Cole, born January 28, 2014.

Political Party: Independent Occupation: International Airline Captain. I have Captained the Boeing 747, 737 & DC-10.

Education: Bachelor of Science in Aeronautical Science from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.

Where Your 1% Optional Tax Goes

October 31 - November 7, 2014 • Page 4

Campbell County Observer

State Senator #23

US Senator Continued from Page 3 Senate leaders lump spending bills and unrelated legislation together to consider on a single vote. This is not how our founders intended the Senate to work. We must return to regular order to ensure lawmakers have the opportunity to represent their constituents and begin reining in federal agencies.

Charlie Hardy: Bureaucracies are a problem of government. Of course they are a problem of generally being large and complicated also. Large corporations and banks have the same problem as well. Anyone who has worked for one can tell you that. Have you read Dilbert? Charlie thinks that these agencies have a need to be overbearing towards the big corporations but should be nothing but helpful to individual people and small business and it feels like it is the other way around. Not surprisingly because these agencies are often run by former corporate honchos of industries that need regulation. These honchos turn a blind eye to the big corporations they used to work for and then try and crush the small business competition. That ain’t right!

4: It’s getting harder and harder to run small businesses in the U.S. because of the seemingly never-ending paperwork, rules, and regulations from the Federal Government forcing these small businesses to use more money, time and resources to keep up. What do you propose to ease the burden on these businesses?

Charlie Hardy: Enzi, like most every politician, once the voters choose Charlie Hardy, will be hired as a lobbyist for a major corporation. In his case, most likely a pharmaceutical corporation since they have donated so much to his campaign. The big corporations lobby for bureaucratic rules and regulations so that only the biggest can succeed and the small businesses get consumed in paperwork. Charlie has no strings attached having accepted zero from corporations and PACs so he’ll vote every time against such corruption. Charlie stands for small business that employ over half of working people.

Curt Gottshall: Back to the “Fairness Tax,” which is a flat Federal Sales tax that would replace income tax. If we impose the “Fairness Tax,” it would close all of the cumbersome loopholes in the everchanging IRS tax code by scrapping it. Simplify the collection and payment of both federal and state taxes thus streamlining the process of doing business. This would also cut the advantages that were legislated on behalf of Big Business, by the politicians that they have been buying and sending to Washington for decades.

The impact of the Affordable Care act has definitely cripples the small business from being able to afford and keep employees. Bigger corporations like Wal-Mart are skirting this law by cutting back hours and only employing parttime employees. This is not a tactic that the small business owner can employ. Small business are normally a run by local citizens and operate on a more ethical small town set of values, instead of the heartless corporations bottom line mentality. In order to level the playing field if we cannot repeal Obamacare, then I would suggest addressing the issue of multiple part-time employees for the sure sake of dodging benefits.

I must say that I would prefer a repeal and redo on the issue of affordable health care. Some times when something is so flawed and broken it is much easier to completely start over Opposing the “Internet Sales Tax,” that Senator Enzi is for. This would be a logistical nightmare.

Every merchant would have to know every tax code for every state and municipality that they do business in and that is only for the people doing business in the USA. How do we control the retailers from the rest of the world?

Next, who would regulate it? Do we create another branch of our ever so beloved “IRS,” that was a touch of sarcasm incase you missed it. This idea is ridiculous, unless your sole intent was to create an even bigger bureaucracy and or the need for a few thousand more accountants and tax codes. Wake up Enzi.

Mike Enzi: As a former small business owner, I bring a unique understanding and appreciation of the challenges faced by Wyoming small business owners to the United States Senate. That’s why

I’ve advocated for fair tax and employment policies for small businesses, and worker­-training programs critical to ensuring employees have the skills and expertise they need. Just last month I helped pass an important workforce training bill ­-­- the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act. The reauthorization of this legislation will help people learn the skills they need to obtain meaningful jobs.

As a member of the Senate Small Business & Entrepreneurship Committee, I’ve also helped implement Small Business Administration programs that provide funding and other resources for small businesses. In addition, I’m on the Budget Committee and push for the Penny Plan to balance the budget. I’m on the Finance Committee and will finally get to have a major role in making taxes fairer and simpler.

To help spur innovation and small business growth, I host an annual “Wyoming Inventor’s Conference” that gives entrepreneurs the opportunity to share ideas and helps them launch small businesses. I’ve hosted eleven conferences that have aided more than 500 small business owners and inventors. In addition, I host an annual procurement conference in Wyoming to help bring the federal government to small business owners so that they can learn first­-hand what government contracting opportunities are available.

Like many Americans, I am also very concerned about the detrimental impact of Obamacare particularly on small businesses.

That’s why I am working to repeal and replace several policies in Obamacare that will have a disastrous impact on Wyoming small businesses, including a measure to define “small business” under Obamacare the same way the SBA calculates the definition. I am also working to change how “full­-time” is defined under Obamacare and adjust the aggregate rule” which makes many small businesses unable to grow and expand.

5: As a Federal legislator representing the State of Wyoming, what strategy do you have to help get the shipping ports on the west coast open for Coal exports?

Mike Enzi: According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, coal exports totaled nearly 118 million short tons in 2013, a number that has more than doubled since 2006. Each million short tons of exported coal contribute an estimated 1,320 total jobs in the U.S. economy. For Wyoming and our nation, coal exports are critical to driving local revenues and job creation.

I am a strong proponent of coal exports and have been leading the fight against efforts by the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) to do all encompassing NEPA reviews.

In part because of my efforts, the ACOE announced it would not be conducting these cumulative reviews. This is not only good for Wyoming coal exports, but is consistent with our international trade laws. I was pleased that this year, Wyoming’s state budget included $500,000 in state funds to be used for legal expenses related to ensuring access to additional port capacity in the Northwest.

For Wyoming, coal is an essential part of our local and state economies, and critical to keeping electricity prices down. I’ve been a champion for coal since I was Mayor of Gillette, Wyoming - a town at ground zero of the war on coal. Since that time, I’ve work hard to cut through the EPA’s seemingly endless red tape and stop excessive regulations that hurt our energy producers.

I’ve helped pass legislation that improves mine safety for energy workers. I’ve also been instrumental in working with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to ensure that the agency regularly schedules coal lease sales.

These sales are absolutely critical to the future of coal in Wyoming and to keeping taxes low for Wyoming families.

I also meet one­-on­-one with my Republican and Democrat colleagues to build support for our energy industry. We’ve made a lot of progress with energy­-state Democrats who realize that what the President is doing will put thousands of people out of work and drive energy prices through the roof.

Curt Gottshall: Compel these West coast states to open their port though the Interstate Commerce Act that is already on the books or threaten them with sanctions

and penalties. This should have already been done. No 80/20 or Wyoming Works B.S. We need Washington to work and do its job.

This is the job of our federal representation and there is no excuse for it not being handled.

Charlie Hardy: That’s ridiculous, do conservative Republican voters in this state actually believe that exporting coal to CHINA is good for Wyoming?! Wyoming is going to be mining coal until it’s all mined and Charlie supports that as the reality. He wants good prices, safe work places and minimized health effects from power plants but forget shipping it to China it’s a bad idea. Why ship coal to communist China so that they can have cheap power and steal US manufacturing away so that we can buy back cheap products that could have been made here? That’s not conservative, that’s the will of these big corporate executives trying to get richer at the expense of the interests of the United States.

6: What is your stance on WOTUS (Waters of the United States) proposal by the EPA, and how will you help Wyoming and her citizens if the program is implemented?

Curt Gottshall: I will oppose this proposal till the bitter end and at the same time do my best to reign in the overreach of the EPA not allow them to grasp for more. If this program were to somehow miraculously be implemented, I would support Wyoming in its efforts to challenge and deny the authority of the EPA. Charlie Hardy: Charlie is 75 years old and has seen Wyoming through a lot of water debates. Republican Nixon passed the Clean Water Act and WOTUS is a response to tough times for water. Charlie will fight for Wyoming water rights, responsible use and protection.

Mike Enzi: The Waters of the United States proposal would grant the EPA expanded say over waterways, which could include puddles and areas of run­-off on private property. However, that far exceeds the authority the agency was granted by Congress and is another example of how out­of­-touch and out­-of­-control government has become under this Administration. To fight this, I’ve joined several of my colleagues in the Senate in sending multiple letters to EPA administrator Gina McCarthy pointing out the dubious legal and scientific basis for the proposed rule, asking for the maximum comment period to hear from affected Americans and calling on the EPA to refrain from moving forward with their controversial proposal.

In June, I joined Senator Barrasso and several of my colleagues in the Senate to introduce the Protecting Water and Property Rights Act of 2014 to stop the EPA from taking over all private water in the United States. The bill would prevent the EPA and the Army Corp of engineers from finalizing their March 2014 proposed rule, which would significantly expand federal authority under the Clean Water Act. I will continue to fight any attempt by the federal government to have complete control of our water rights and dictate what we can or cannot do with water on our private property.

7: Rate the Federal Government’s transparency efforts and where can transparency be improved?

Curt Gottshall: On a scale of one to ten, I would have to give it a zero for the entire Federal Government. Not just our CommanderIn-Chief and his “Affordable Care Act(Obamacare),” which was anything but. The budget is overly classified to keep the American people from seeing how their money is being wasted. Through agencies like the NSA, EPA IRS and any other group of initials that the federal government has turned into an acronym for wasteful government spending. I do however want to acknowledge some very useful websites that are helping shed the light on the campaign contribution and spending side of things, like: www. opensecrets.org which allows you to see where all of our U.S. politicians get their campaign funding from to www.fec.gov that shows where it came from and where it was spent. I think that our technology may someday soon give us the transparency we desire if we can keep the government from standing in the way.

Mike Enzi: I’d rate the current Administration’s transparency efforts as disastrous. Over the last six years, President Obama has led one of the least transparent administrations in recent history destroying the American people’s faith in government altogether.

From Benghazi, to Obamacare, to judicial nominees and everything in between, the Obama Administration has made transparency the rare exception instead of the rule. This lack of transparency has become rampant in the U.S. Senate as well where Senate leaders have continuously side sidestepped the legislative process to pass bills with little to no time for public review or input from other lawmakers. Legislation is brought to the floor without committee hearings or debate. Senators are denied the opportunity to offer amendments. And instead of considering issues one at a time, Senate leaders lump spending bills and unrelated legislation together to consider on a single vote. This is not how our founders - or the Constitution - intended the Senate to work. Returning to regular order is essential to improving transparency and productivity in Washington. I’ve worked hard to improve transparency in government and sponsored bills to force lawmakers to quit deal making and start legislating.

Charlie Hardy: Edward Snowden has done more for US transparency then the US Senate ever has. It is a horrible thing that the US has gotten so secretive and controlled that it takes whistleblowers to shed light instead of law makers. Enzi is part of the problem on this after 18 years of growing secrecy.

8: There have been meetings

by State Legislators discussing the possibility of a Constitutional Convention. Do you think one is needed? Why or why not?

Charlie Hardy: A Constitutional Convention can be really good or awful. How do we keep the special interests from changing the Constitution from “We the people” to “We the corporations.”? It’s not going to be easy. If anything happens I hope the process is participated in by all people with massive amounts of public discourse and a long amount of time for thoughtful deliberation. Fundamentally I see no problem with a Constitutional Convention as much has changed and there are severe structural problems that could be fixed.

Mike Enzi: Article 5 of the Constitution, which lays out the process by which the Constitution can be altered, is my favorite part of the Constitution. The article provides for “equal suffrage in the Senate,” which means rural states, like Wyoming, will always have equal representation in the U.S. Senate.

While there could be several positive outcomes to a Constitutional Convention, such as a balanced budget amendment or an amendment giving states the right to reject federal laws such as Obamacare, I think the decision on whether to hold a Constitutional Convention should come from the states.

At this point I hope that we can resolve our issues in the ballot box, which is why I have decided to run. Our hard working American Citizens are on the brink of their breaking point, put there by their current representation. I hope that “We the People,” can make a change and elect a new generation of honest ethical leaders to represent us in Washington and put an end to the corrupt broken system we currently have in D.C. The days of politicians being bought and paid for by corporations, lobbyist and packs needs to become a thing of the past. Our Nation’s moral compass is so far out of calibration the unethical leaders we have can’t see the forest for the trees. In the event that we can not elect new leaders and change our representation in Washington, then I am not sure that there would be much success in a Constitutional Convention either and fear that my son will not have the chance to enjoy the United States of America that I had the pleasure of growing up in. I fear that without significant change our nation could soon be on the forefront of a domestic turmoil.

Jeff Wasserburger for Wyoming Senate District 23 Born in Lusk, Wyoming, Jeff Wasserburger grew up on a ranch 32 miles north of Lusk.

He remembers having horses, cattle, and sheep. Jeff was constantly busy working on the ranch throughout his youth. After graduating high school, he went to Chadron State College to get his degree in secondary social studies education then moved to Gillette and the bright young age of 22.

He fondly remembers the day he married his wife. “One of the biggest memories I have is when Tracy and I got married on December 31st.” She worked at the Campbell County Memorial Hospital at the time.

When asked why he was running for state senator 23, Wasserburger commented, “I have 12 years of experience with the Wyoming government. I believe that I am capable of helping out the people of Wyoming.”

1: There have been meetings by state legislators from many states about the possibility of a Constitutional Convention. If one is presented, how do you propose the choosing of delegates and what if any restrictions would you put on them?

Jeff Wasserburger: First, the U.S. Constitution has been amended twenty-seven times and over 4,000 proposed amendments have been introduced in Congress. It is very difficult to amendment the US Constitution.

In order to call a constitutional convention, state legislators must follow Article Five of the US Constitution. Article Five requires that three-fourths of the state legislatures (38 states) must vote with a two-thirds majority in each house to call a constitutional convention. These requirements are extremely difficult to achieve, in fact, a constitutional convention has never been called in the history of our nation. Congress will never allow a constitutional convention to be called by the states because of the fear of a run away convention. If more and more states pass a resolution to call a constitutional convention, Congress would yield to political pressure and pass the amendments that the people are supporting. I am in favor of two amendments to the United States constitution. I support a balanced budget amendment and a line item veto for the president. I would support a constitutional convention and I would look for political sages of Wyoming to be our delegates to the convention. They would be the Benjamin Franklin’s of the convention.

I would support political leaders in our state like Dick Chaney, Alan Simpson, and Jim Geringer. Political leaders with real knowledge in government and the ability to make the right choices for the future of our country at the convention. I would not put any restrictions on them and would allow them to represent our state freely at the convention. But, I doubt that a convention would ever be called, it is virtually impossible to do so, in my opinion.

2: Is there a problem with Wyoming’s current pension system? Why, and if so how do you plan to fix that problem?

Jeff Wasserburger: Over the years, the Wyoming legislature has expanded its retirement costs in two ways.

First, the legislature added all law enforcement officers to the Wyoming Retirement System. Second, the legislature has increased salaries for public employees and for teachers increasing the states liability when retirees reach the Rule of 85. Furthermore, the baby boomers are retiring at a rapid rate and so the Wyoming Retirement System is paying out more than it is generating in investments. Currently, the Wyoming Retirement System has $4.2 billion dollars and is under funded $1.8 billion dollars to meet all the payments to retirees. There are two ways that the legislature has dealt with this problem. First, the legislature increased the percentage of the contribution to state employees and employers. This will add additional revenues to the retirement account. The legislature did this last year to state employees and employers by increasing their contribution to the system by 2%. This slight increase is incremental and will be done over the next two years. Second, the legislature will not allow any COLA’s until the fund reaches 110% which should be in twenty-two years.

I believe that the Wyoming legislature has solved this issue in the last session but I will continue to monitor this issue if I am elected.

3: There is much talk by state legislators and legislature candidates about returning federal owned lands back to the state of Wyoming. Do you support this, and if so what is your strategy to perform this task?

Jeff Wasserburger: I would support the federal government giving federal lands back to Wyoming. As I understand the issue, some states have won lawsuits with the federal government and been given back federal lands. I would support the Governor and the Attorney General pursuing this issue through the federal court system. My role

as a State Senator would be work with the Governor’s office to ask them to bring a lawsuit against the federal government and to support the Attorney General’s office with funding for this lawsuit.

4: WOTUS (Waters of the United States) will soon be an issue that the Governor of Wyoming will need to face.

Do you plan on supporting or working with this plan? If not, how do you plan to stop it.

Jeff Wasserburger: The Environmental Protection Agency using the Clean Water Act is attempting to expand the definition of wetlands and navigable waters of the United States. I oppose the expansion and federal overreach of the EPA and its definition of “navigable waterway” and would voice my concerns to the Governor. I would ask that the Attorney General of the State of Wyoming side with other states against the federal overreach of the EPA. I would support the State of Wyoming in a lawsuit fighting the EPA and its definition. I would support siding with another party or state and filing an amicus curiae brief supporting another states lawsuit against the EPA. My role as a State Senator would be to fund the increased lawsuit costs for battling the EPA and its expansion of the meaning of navigable waterways.

5: Are there current firearm laws in the state statutes that you would remove or change? If not, are there firearm laws that you would like to see implemented?

Jeff Wasserburger: No, I support the Second Amendment, open carry, and the laws of the State of Wyoming for firearms.

6: There is talk of the legislature revisiting SF-104 or another variant. Do you support this? Why or why not?

Jeff Wasserburger: I did not support SF 104 at the time. However, the Supreme Court has declared S.F. 104 unconstitutional. Now, the legislature must examine how to put the education governance system back together. I support the legislature responding to the Supreme Court decision. Currently, the Legislative Management Council has directed the Joint Education Committee to undertake a review of state-level governance and administration of Wyoming public education. The Joint Education Committee has contracted with Cross & Joftus to conduct a survey of Wyoming stakeholders on the state of Wyoming education.

The study is to examine the education governance system and what would better serve the needs of students and schools and insure accountability for schools and teachers. The study is to be completed

by November or December 2014 and presented to the Joint Interim Committee. I do not know if I will support the bill drafted by the Joint Interim Committee until I have had the opportunity to read it closely. I will advocate for an education governance system that better serves the students of Wyoming and increases student achievement.

7. The Campbell County School District is estimating it will pay $60.1 million to the state as part of a recapture formula to fund school operations throughout Wyoming this year. They will be receiving 2 dollars back. We lead the recapturing funds with 829mil total so far. If this issue of recapturing comes up in the next two legislative sessions, will you support it? If not, what is your proposed alternative?

Jeff Wasserburger: If I am elected, I will introduce a constitutional amendment to return recaptured rebate money to the local school districts. I will do all I can to return the money generated in our community to our students and local district. I will work closely with the Legislature Service Office to draft an amendment to the state constitution that meets constitutional muster. I will drop the bill into the hopper on the first day of the session.

Campbell County Observer

October 31 - November 7, 2014 • Page 5

Secretary of State 1: Because of the Secretary of State being the Lt. Governor, please give us an overview of your stances on EPA, Federal Lands back to state control, WOTUS, 2nd Amendment rights, and the current Medicaid/Medicare system.

Ed Murray: I have grave concerns about the EPA. From seeking to eliminate the coal industry to stopping hydraulic fracing and now regulating our water, the EPA is taking measures that will effectively destroy Wyoming’s economy and put our citizens at the mercy of unnecessary, overreaching rules and regulations. I firmly believe we need to hold the line on this federal intrusion. Over the course of my campaign, I have toured multiple mines and power facilities and met with industry leaders to gain their insight on the future of coal, and I believe that Wyoming can set the standard for preserving our coal industry while investing heavily in research for clean coal technology at the University of Wyoming. We must do everything in our capacity as a state government to protect our mining industry.

I am opposed to the EPA’s efforts to rewrite the Clean Water Act and redefine “Waters of the United State” to include nonnavigable waters such as ponds, thereby expand-

ing the jurisdiction of the Clean Waters Act. I fully support efforts to return federal lands back to control by the State of Wyoming.

Considering the mismanagement of our federal lands, there is no question that western states should be given the opportunity to have greater control and ownership of the lands that are within our boundaries.

As we look at the overall cost of Medicaid and Medicare, I applaud the resistance to accept the expansion with federal assistance. As we have seen with Wyoming’s AML, PILT, and Secure Rural Schools money, the federal government does not always live up to its commitments. To address healthcare funding shortfalls we need to begin to first look at cost savings through finding efficiencies and stopping waste, fraud and abuse.

I believe that the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land. In the Constitution, the right to keep and bear arms is preserved. I believe the right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right of the people, and as a society we have nothing to fear from law abiding citizens who decide to carry firearms for whatever reason, concealed or unconcealed. I am an ardent supporter of 2nd amendment rights.

2: What is your stance on Wyoming’s current

3rd party ballot access laws? What, if anything, would you change about them?

Ed Murray: I believe that lowering the threshold for third party ballot access from five percent to two percent was an important step in allowing greater participation in the electoral process. I am inclined to keep the current threshold at two percent, which I view as a fair standard for the existence of a third party ballot line.

3: Are there any corporate laws that you would work to change?

Why? Ed Murray: I want to continue the efforts spearheaded by current Secretary of State Max Maxfield to eliminate shell companies and other instances of fraud and abuse in Wyoming.

The good name of our state should not be tarnished by a few bad actors, and we need to protect the integrity of legitimate Wyoming businesses.

State will be keeping Wyoming as business friendly as possible in light of everdeveloping challenges, including an overreaching federal government, fraud from shell companies trying to operate in Wyoming, and burdensome rules and regulations that stifle free enterprise. I will respond to these challenges by implementing new technology to modernize and enhance the services provided by the Secretary of State, increasing the transparency of Wyoming’s regulatory climate, and advocating for successful, conservative business principles in state government, which I have honed over 30 years of experience as a businessman. We have an unparalleled quality of life in Wyoming, but decisions made outside of Wyoming can have a chilling impact on our state’s economy and our lives. We need a strong, conservative business leader for Wyoming’s business office. I will serve as a steadfast ambassador for Wyoming.

4: Describe how business friendly (or not friendly) the State of Wyoming is compared to other states, and what would you try to change to make it even more so?

Ed Murray: Wyoming is very business-friendly compared to other states in terms of our low taxes, but I believe that one of the biggest challenges facing the next Secretary of

5: What is your stance on Wyoming’s current Independent ballot access laws? What, if anything, would you change about them?

Ed Murray: As the Chief Elections Officer, my priorities include fostering greater political participation and maintaining total transparency in our elections system. I believe that the current two percent threshold for signatures is

appropriate, but I would be open to lengthening the amount of time for the gathering of Independent ballot access signatures.

As Secretary of State, I also pledge that my elections division will work to expedite the approval of the petition used for signature gathering.

6: What makes you the best candidate for this position?

Ed Murray: The Secretary of State functions as the business office of Wyoming, and I believe we need a business leader with proven business experience in this office.

I have spent the past 30 years in the private sector building my own business from the ground up; in my capacity as a business owner, I have created hundreds of opportunities for housing, schools, open spaces, businesses, churches, and new and improved infrastructure for Wyoming residents. I have a track record of success in business, which I attribute to an intimate understanding of successful, conservative business principles, an acute attention to detail, uncompromising integrity, and a genuine desire to lead positive change. As a business leader and fourth generation Wyoming native, I am prepared to put my experience to use to better serve the people of Wyoming in the Secretary of State’s office.

Superintendent of Public Instruction

• Maintained an open door for parents to observe, question, and discuss teaching and learning.

• Mentored new teachers through internships and district programs.

• Took advantage of opportunities to improve student outcomes by serving on and chairing committees, attending trainings, and leading groups of students and adults.

• Recognized that teaching and learning occurs in and out of the classroom and served in my community as a volunteer and role model in many capacities.

• Understand that the greatest impact on students is not standards, curriculum or accountability but, rather, excellent teaching. All structures in education should support teaching and learning.

• Eight years in administration...

• As an administrator at

1: How do you view the roll and duties of Superintendent of Public Instruction?

Jillian Balow: The role of the Superintendent of Public Instruction is clearly lined out in our Wyoming Constitution. I will uphold those duties, as an elected official. As State Superintendent and in addition to Constitutional duties, I will assure the most important decisions about education are made by parents and within communities. The role of the Wyoming Department of Education should be to support local efforts, decisions and control of education, to distribute funds allocated for education, and to advocate for a quality education system in Wyoming. Additionally, the State Superintendent sits on a number of boards related to economic development. On those boards, I will make decisions based on ensuring that all Wyoming communities achieve their goals and have the flexibility to make decisions about economic development. I will also advocate for maximized multiple use and reduced permitting and bureaucracy related to lands.

the State Dept. of Education, I managed programs designed to increase local control. I regularly sought feedback and data from school districts and proposed changes to the legislature in response to what was working or not working in school districts.

• As a state administrator at the Department of Family Services I worked to ensure that communities, not just the state, benefit from all funding sources. I have declined to participate in programs that Wyoming cannot sustain without federal funding and redirected state efforts to the local communities.

• As an administrator at the Department of Family Services, I managed multiple programs with multimillion dollar budgets. In two years: i. Prioritized programs for return on investment and relevance; ii. Required competitive

2: What is your stance on Common Core, and what will you do to expand, reduce, or eliminate the program?

Jillian Balow: We need high standards set forth in a framework by the state to assure our kids are competitive and ready for college, career and military. Common Core is not right for Wyoming. A small group made a big decision and the Common Core was implemented and sold as a bill of goods. Further, every step into Common Core is a step away from local control. Wyoming is statutorily required to review and adopt new standards in 2017. As State Superintendent, I will assure that these standards are the result of an inclusive and public process and build on what Wyoming schools are doing.

3: With federal funds coming in to Wyoming Education comes federal guidelines and programs that may or may not be good for our education system. Do you think Wyoming should keep receiving these funds? Why or why not?

Ed Murray is a fourth-generation Wyoming native, an experienced businessman, and a family man.

For the past thirty years, Ed has devoted his career to private enterprise in Wyoming. He has focused on building small businesses, growing the economy, creating jobs, and improving communities.

Ed has led numerous development efforts in Laramie County, resulting in hundreds of opportunities for housing, schools, open spaces, businesses, churches, bike paths and new and improved infrastructure for Wyoming residents.

Ed’s track record proves that he is capable of building an honest, thriving business from the ground up. His success can be attributed to his keen entrepreneurial spirit, acute attention to detail, uncompromising integrity, and genuine desire to lead positive change.

As Wyoming’s Secretary of State, he is prepared to bring his edge to the way Wyoming does business, centering on transparency, innovation, and efficiency.

In addition to being a business veteran, Ed is a community servant and supporter of charitable causes. He has served as a consultant and on the board of directors for numerous organizations, including the Laramie County Community College Foundation (where he served as president) and the Cheyenne-Laramie County Corporation for Economic Development (where he was instrumental in assembling the property for the North Range Business Park where companies like Sam’s Distri-

bution Center and Microsoft Data Center are now situated). In addition, Ed and his wife, Caren, are strong advocates of education, having contributed property for school sites and funding for scholarships and endowments for LCCC cultural series.

Born and raised in Laramie County, Ed graduated from Central High School in 1976 and went on to receive a degree in business administration with dual majors in finance and real estate. Following his college graduation, Ed earned his J.D. at the University of Wyoming College of Law before returning to Cheyenne to put his education to use by starting his own business.

Above all, Ed’s priority has been bringing up his family with his wife of 28 years, Caren.

Ed and Caren have raised four daughters in Cheyenne: Meghan (27), Erin (25), Kelley (22), and Frannie (19).

The Murray family has been a lifelong member of St. Mary’s Parish. Ed calls it a privilege to have raised four daughters in the Equality State. He believes that Wyoming – its unparalleled uniqueness, traditions, and freedom – played an indispensable role in allowing his daughters to grow into the individuals they are today.

Ed summarizes his motivation to run for Secretary of State with a quote from Thomas Jefferson regarding the duty of public service: “A tour of duty in whatever line he can be most useful to his country is due from every individual.” It would be an honor for him to serve Wyoming in the office of Secretary of State.

Jennifer Young running for Secretary of State

Jillian Balow running for Superintendent of Public Instruction

As a parent, teacher, state administrator, and private sector consultant, I fully understand that the job of the Superintendent is to make sure that Wyoming reaps the benefits of being in a well-funded education system. Here’s a little more about me...

• Ten years in the classroom...

• As a parent, teacher, state administrator, and private sector consultant, I fully understand that the job of the superintendent is to make sure that Wyoming reaps the benefits of being in a well-funded education system.

• Spearheaded the development of many enrichment programs for kids K-12 and encouraged children to grow beyond the traditional classroom walls.

• Regularly shared data and student progress with parents coupled with strategies for boosting student success.

Ed Murray for Wyoming Secretary of State

bids for contract work; iii. Streamlined programs; iv. Increased measurable efficiencies by reducing error rates more than 50%; v. Eliminated a significant budget deficit within one year without reducing permanent state employee positions.

• Education and More...

• Campbell County High

Jillian Balow: Federal funds for education, or any purpose, must be thoroughly evaluated. If there are strings attached that remove our power as a state or don't align with what we are doing, we should not take them.

As a state executive administrator, I have turned away from federal funds when this is the case.

Some funding from the federal government for education is okay (e.g. Special Education).

4: Rate, in our opinion, our current education system (using your own scale). For struggling ratings, what will be your strategy to improve?

Jillian Balow: Citizens in Wyoming are not seeing an adequate return on their substantial investment in education. We can do better. As a system, I rate a 2.5.

There is much work to do to coordinate our system including reducing assessments for children, increasing graduation rates, and focusing on career and technical education. As State Superintendent, I'll lead with vision and integ-

School graduate.

• University of Wyoming graduate (B.A. in Elementary Education) • Secondary and Middle School English/Language Arts endorsements from Black Hills State University • Master’s degree in Education (M.Ed.) from Regis University

rity to improve our system. On the other hand, there are some great reforms happening locally that should be shared.

5: Do you believe this position should be elected or appointed? Why? Jillian Balow: Elected. This is public education and the public should choose the State Superintendent.

6: What is your opinion of the current Public Instruction budget and programs? Where would you cut or add programs or funding?

Jillian Balow: Adding to education or funding at the state level is not the right move. Education is well-funded. I think there are opportunities to move away from federal programs, like No Child Left Behind, that will free up state funds to be reallocated where they have more impact on student success. No Child Left Behind is a failed piece of legislation and I will work to move Wyoming away from it quickly.

I am Jennifer Young, County Liaison for the Constitution Party of Wyoming, main sponsor for the referendum to repeal 2013 Senate File 104, and 2014 Candidate for the Office of Wyoming Secretary of State As a grassroots candidate, I have a proven, positive leadership record. I have served as Secretary in each of the following organizations, and President/Chairman for some: Junior Chamber of Commerce Search and Rescue Constitution Party of Wyoming In 2013 I coordinated over 300 volunteers around Wyoming as we gathered nearly 22,000 signatures in less than 70 days to repeal Senate File 104. I traveled the State, sought out, and engaged the Citizens of this great State.

I have studied Zoology/ Physiology and Bio-Electrical Engineering at the University of Wyoming and received a Bachelor of Science in 1999 “The true statesman values principle above popularity, and works to create popularity for those political principals which are wise and just.” 15th U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Ezra Taft Benson

JENNIFER YOUNG IS A HOME MAKER HOME BASED BUSINESS OWNER HOME PRE-SCHOOL GRANDMOTHER AND A GRASS ROOTS ACTIVIST WITH A PROVEN LEADERSHIP RECORD IN WYOMING COMMUNITIES

Subscribe Now Mail this form, along with payment, to our office at 707 W. Third St. Gillette, WY 82716

26 Weeks - $25.00 52 Weeks - $50.00

Name Address Phone Number To Pay with a Credit/Debit Card, please call our office at (307) 670-8980 or visit our website at www.CampbellCountyObserver.com

Campbell County Observer

October 31 - November 7, 2014 • Page 6

School Board Dave Foreman Seeks School Board Seat Well, Dave may have a nervous election night like all candidates, but he is confident in the under-18 vote. When he was asked if his kids would vote for him, he said he was confident that he would win over the Twin Spruce Middle School vote.

If you have gone through Twin Spruce middle school anytime during the last 30 years, you probably had Mr. Foreman as your principal. And, you probably liked him. He has won multiple awards and honors for his time as principal, but that is not why he stayed on that career path for so long. He did it

for the education. His own daughter, now a businesswoman, was one of his students, and education was always more than a job.

He also spends his time giving to charities, helping boys and girls basketball teams, reading nonfiction books, and hiking.

And why is this honored and valued retired public servant of our community running for school board?

“I believe that I can still do a lot of valuable work in our education system.

I have retired from being a principle, and now I am ready to take the next step.”

1: What is your opinion on the State of Wyoming’s Recapturing Program, and if it needs to be changed what do you propose?

Andrea Hladky: The State of Wyoming’s recapture program ensures all school districts throughout the State of Wyoming are funded equally. I would like to see impact money returned to Districts with a high rate of transitional students.

Anne Oach: The recapture program has caused the loss of local control over educational decisions in Wyoming. I would like to see recapture districts being allowed an additional 10% of their allocation in order to deal with impact in their schools.

2: What is your stance on Common Core, and what will you do to expand, reduce, or eliminate the program?

Anne Oach: Currently, the Common Core standards are the standards for Wyoming. The State Board of Education adopted the standards and until they are revised, they are the standards for our state. Local school boards cannot change the state standards.

These standards set a baseline for what each student should know by the end of each school year. Our teachers in Campbell County still determine what textbooks to use, how to teach, and how to assess each area of our curriculum.

Andrea Hladky: Common Core is the set of standards adopted by the State of Wyoming 2012. I will always be a supporter of higher standards whether it’s Common Core or any other standards adopted by the State of Wyoming. I want Wyoming students who are able to compete on a national and global level. Additionally to be an accredited school district in Wyoming we

have to adopt the standards put in place by the State which requires we adopt the Common Core standards. However, Common Core dictates teaching methodology, not curriculum.

Locally, we teach using that methodology, but we have control of the curriculum taught at our schools. The curriculum is put together by local facilitators in each subject or grade level and from this curriculum our teachers create their daily lesson plans.

3: With federal funds coming in to Wyoming Education comes federal guidelines and programs that may or may not be good for our education system. Do you think Wyoming should keep receiving these funds?

Why or why not?

Andrea Hladky: Federal Funding in Wyoming supports Title programs, which give disadvantaged students the support needed to be successful; specifically, Special Education for kids with disabilities and Free and reduced lunches. These programs are vital to the success of Wyoming Students, if these programs can continue to be funded on a State or Local level to the degree they are currently funded, I would support the decision to reduce our dependence on Federal Funding and keep more local and state control.

Anne Oach: The state determines what funds to accept from the federal government. Many of the federal guidelines are based on urban areas and are not applicable to rural states like Wyoming.

I would prefer not to receive federal dollars and all of the strings that go along with accepting their money….but, that decision rests with the Legislature.

4: Rate, in our opinion, our current district education system (using your own scale). For struggling ratings, what will be your strategy to improve?

prove.

Andrea Hladky: I would give CCSD a B+/A- grade. There is always room for improvement; student achievement is an area where CCSD can continue to im-

Anne Oach: AO u r school district and staff do an excellent job of preparing our students for success. There is always room for improvement and I believe that we are always looking for ways to better meet the educational needs of our kids.

5: What is your opinion of the current Public Instruction budget and programs?

Where would you cut or add programs or funding?

Anne Oach: The district does a good job of budgeting…over 85% of the budget is for salaries and benefits. I would like to see the state increase funding to the districts in the area of technology.

Andrea Hladky: CCSD has seen reduced funding received by the State caused by lack of External Cost Adjustment. In light of this, the district has been very fiscally responsible. The non-salary and benefits portion of CCSD operations budget was reduced by 5% this fiscal year and the district has one less administrative position than last year. Campbell County School District needs to continue to grow our CTE program to be able to attract and retain quality educators to work with kids.

The Campbell County Observer would like to apologize for not publishing Mr. Foremans answers. There were glitches, ghouls, and ghosts messing with the process...maybe it was just Halloween when we published, or maybe something else....But Mr. Forman did submit his answers on time to us and the answers will be posted on our website and facebook page ASAP

Andrea Hladky running for School Board

Running for her first, Andrea Hladky is passionate about her position on the Campbell County School District Board. To her, Campbell County is a wonderful community and she wants to be a part of it. That is why she is running for office, giving back to the community that she was raised in.

Mrs. Hladky didn’t always live here however, she did go away for a

while to college at Pacific University on a basketball scholarship earning her bachelor’s degree in Science and exercise science. But after that brief time away from home she came back to Campbell County, got married, and started raising children ever since. Currently, they are 6th and 8th graders in the same district she is running for, giving her a personal interest in the

education of the students.

And as most of us know, a stay-at-home-mom is not an easy job. She has started and sold her own business, as well as stayed very active in the classrooms, schools, and the PTO. Why is she running for school board? “I grew up here, my kids are growing up here, and I want to give back.”

10 Reasons to Advertise

1. Advertise to Reach New Customers. Your market changes constantly. New families in the area mean new customers to reach. People earn more money, which means changes in lifestyles and buying habits. The shopper who wouldn’t consider your business a few years ago may be a prime customer now. Remember...20% of families will move this year, 5 million people will be married and 4 million babies will be born*.

2. Advertise continuously. Consumers don’t have the loyalty they once did. You must advertise to keep pace with your competition. The National Retail Merchants Association states: “Mobility and non-loyalty are rampant. Businesses must promote to get former customers to return and to seek new ones.

3. Advertise to Remain With Shoppers Through the Buying Process.

Many people postpone buying decisions. They often go from store to store comparing prices, quality and service. Advertising must reach them steadily through the entire decision-making process. Your name must be fresh in their minds when they ultimately decide to buy.

4. Advertise Because Your Competition is Advertising. There are only so many consumers in the market who are ready to buy at any one time.

You’ll need to advertise to keep regular customers and to counterbalance the advertising of your competition. You must advertise to keep your share of customers or you will lose them to the more aggressive competitors.

5. Advertise Because it Pays O Over a Long Period. Advertising gives you a long-term advantage over competitors who cut back or cancel advertising. A ve-year survey of more than 3,000 companies found...Advertisers who maintain or expand advertising over a ve-year period see their sales increase an average of 100%. Companies, which cut advertising, averaged sales decreases of 45%.

6. Advertise to Generate Trac. Continuous trac to your business is the rst step toward sales increases and expanding your customer base. The more people who contact your business, the more possibilities you have to make the sale and sell additional merchandise or services. For every 100 items that shoppers plan to buy, they make 30 unanticipated “in the store” purchases, an NRMA survey shows.

7. Advertise to Make More Sales. Advertising works! Businesses that succeed are usually strong, steady advertisers. Look around. You’ll nd the most aggressive and consistent advertisers in your market are the most successful.

8. Advertise Because There is Always Business to Generate. Your doors are open. Sta are on the payroll. Even the slowest days produce sales. As long as you’re in business, you’ve got overhead to meet and new people to reach. Advertising can generate customers now...and in the future.

9. Advertise to Keep a Healthy Positive Image. In a competitive market, rumors and bad news travel fast. Advertising corrects misleading gossip, punctures “overstated” bad news. Advertising that is vigorous and positive can bring shoppers into the marketplace, regardless of the economy.

10. Advertise to Maintain Employee Morale. When advertising and promotion are suddenly cut or canceled, your staff may become alarmed and demoralized. They may start false rumors in an honest belief that your business is in trouble. Positive advertising boosts morale. It gives your staff strong additional support.

Campbell County Observer

October 31 - November 7, 2014 • Page 7

State Representative #31 1: There have been meetings by state legislators from many states about the possibility of a Constitutional Convention. If one is presented, how do you propose the choosing of delegates and what if any restrictions would you put on them?

Scott Clem: If our country were to have a constitutional convention, Wyoming would have to be careful who they send as delegates. My initial thought is to involve Wyoming citizens as much as possible. I believe the legislature should decide how many delegates to send.

Outside of this, I believe an election by the people and for the people would be the best route. I do believe that the legislature should be able to call back a delegate if they feel he/she is not working for the best interests of the state.

2: Is there a problem with Wyoming’s current pension system? Why, and if so how do you plan to fix that problem?

Scott Clem: I believe there are problems with Wyoming’s current pension system. As of February 2013, the retirement system was projected to be 72.8 percent funded, meaning that it could cover that portion of its liability to retirees 30 years from now, but would not be cover retirees beyond that. Additionally, annual projected returns have stayed around 8%, when they should be projected to a lower number. In order for the system to be 100% funded the system needs more money.

The big question is, where should this money come from?

I’m going to use the Public Employee Pension Plan as an example. As of July 1st, 2014, the total contribution for a single employee is 15.87%. Here is how it breaks down: Employee out-of-pocket: 2.055%;

Amount state pays for state employers: 6.195%; Employer contribution: 7.62%. As you can see, the out of pocket expense for employees is very little.

A person making $100k is only contributing $2055 of his/her own money. In order to make the system for solvent, employees should be contributing more outof-pocket, which is no different than those who work in the private sector.

3: There is much talk by state legislators and legislature candidates about returning federal owned lands back to the state of Wyoming. Do you support this, and if so what is your strategy to perform this task?

Scott Clem: Some people say that this movement for the transfer of our public lands is about selling them off to the rich, or that we cannot afford to manage our own lands.

But the only people making these arguments are the ones who want to increase federal control over our lands. This is about a failed federal lands policy that is killing western communities, draining education resources, closing off recreation and grazing access, and locking up billions of in natural resources/minerals.

Don’t our citizens deserve the same opportunities to fund education, grow our economy, and control our natural resources/minerals as citizens in states east of Wyoming do?

Today 48% of WY public lands, and 67% of our minerals, are controlled by the federal gov’t. This is land we can’t tax, use to fund education, use to build our local economies, and land where we don’t control our own natural resources/ minerals. Mineral royalties on federal lands in WY go directly into federal coffers, about $1 billion/year. But Wyoming only gets back about 45% of that amount.

What if Wyoming controlled 97% of public lands, like North Dakota, and we

could expand mineral production? On state land we get 100% of the royalties. Imagine the revenue we would collect. Instead, the feds restrict access to minerals in Wyoming, and permits on federal lands are backlogged for months.

As CC Commissioner Mark Christenson said before a U.S. Senate committee in July, producers go to other places like ND if they cannot get a timely permit in Wyoming.

The solution? We must leverage our voices with resolutions and legislation.

Resolutions must come from city councils, county commissioners, chambers of commerce, etc. This is why I went to our city council and school board this last spring, asking them to pass a resolution. I’ve received an invitation to speak to our commissioners in September. As the energy capital of the nation, our delegation should spearhead this effort. WY, UT, NV, MT, AZ, ID, NM and even SC have taken legislative action. Utah has been leading the charge, passing the Transfer of Public Lands Act (TPLA). I am prepared to pass similar legislation in Wyoming.

4: WOTUS (Waters of the United States) will soon be an issue that the Governor of Wyoming will need to face. Do you plan on supporting or working with this plan? If not, how do you plan to stop it?

Scott Clem: WOTUS is a proposed rule by the EPA under the Clean Water Act. Its purpose, claims the federal gov’t, is to clarify protections for streams and wetlands. It is worded to sound noble and not controversial, yet it is full of controversy.

Under the Obama administration, American’s have witnessed the Executive branch of gov’t execute powers that only the Legislative branch is permitted to do. Namely, the power to create legislation/laws.

The EPA has passed and enforced many rules (laws/ legislations), in which they are not authorized by the constitution to do so. Only Congress has the power to create laws, but this hasn’t stopped the EPA. This last year the EPA had Wyoming’s boundaries re-drawn and gave 1 million acres of land to the Wind River Reservation, including the entire town of Riverton. This was done unilaterally by the stroke of a pen of a bureaucrat in Washington D.C. The EPA has also tried to garnish wages from citizens who were fined by the EPA, without a court order. WOTUS is another example of gov’t overreach.

According their own definition, the EPA seeks to control, “All waters which are currently used, were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide… waters on a case-specific basis, and other waters (at the EPA’s discretion).”

They are basically wanting to control all surface area waterways. This will have a far-reaching and negative impact on farmers, ranchers and others with agricultural interests in Wyoming. How can more regulations be helpful, especially when the EPA’s general attitude toward agriculture is negative? The EPA can’t even make up its mind about what permits farmers need, and they want total control of waterways?

Another question is how this will match up against Wyoming’s constitution?

Article 1, section 31 gives Wyoming control of all water within its boundaries. If the rule is passed, it must be challenged. Our governor and attorney general must sue. I am prepared to do whatever it takes in the legislature to protect Wyoming’s water, to limit the EPA in our state, and to fight for those who make their livelihood in agriculture.

5: Are there current firearm laws in the state statutes that you would remove or change? If not, are there firearm laws that you would like to see implemented?

Scott Clem: Article 1, section 24 in our Wyoming Constitution says, “The right of citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and of the state shall not be denied.” This is basically the same as the second amendment in our U.S. Constitution. I am a lifetime member of the NRA and a fierce advocate for gun rights. I am proud of Wyoming’s conceal and carry law and believe our state does a fine job of educating firearm safety in hunter’s education courses.

I am supportive of legislation that would permit Wyomingites to purchase and own certain fully automatic firearms. Our gun rights were given not so much for hunting than they were for protection. Our founders believed that men ought to own the best firearm they could, should they have to battle with an enemy. I believe that premise still holds true today. Guns are a great deterrent.

6: There is talk of the legislature re-visiting SF-104 or another variant. Do you support this?

Why or why not?

Scott Clem: I am absolutely opposed to SF-104 and have been since the beginning. Article 4, section 11 of Wyoming’s constitution describes the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) as one of five elected executive offices. The fact of the matter is that SF-104 was a knee jerk reaction to allegations of wrongdoing in the SPI’s office. SF-104 presumed that the SPI was guilty and was drafted to strip away her powers. The power was then transferred to a newly created Director of Education. This was a posi-

Scott Clem for Wyoming House of Representatives District 31 Who is the person you will vote for this November? I’ve made my stances known by the questions I’ve answered, but who am I personally? It’s been said that a man is molded by his past and the decisions he makes. Reflecting on this I would like to share with you decisions I’ve made, both good and bad, in an effort to inform who you are electing.

There are some decisions that I didn’t make, but they affected me profoundly. My parents divorced when I was seven. Though 1200 miles separated us, my father made determined to be a part of my life. The decisions he made we life changing, but he didn’t quit in his support of my sister and I, and I gained a second wonderful mother. I could be bitter at my dad, but what good would that do? Instead I choose to see the blessings God has given in a difficult situation. I choose to see the efforts he made, and the love he gave. His example has helped me as a father of (soon to be) four.

My mother is one of my greatest examples. She is a fighter. I’ve seen her knocked down, but I’ve never seen her defeated. She still makes me think that there is no obstacle too big that can’t be overcome. Much of who I am today is because of her and my second father. Words can’t begin to describe her love and dedication to me and my family. I want to be that type of example to my wife and kids. I have friends, I have hobbies, but my family comes first. When I’m not at work, serving in our church, or serving in the community, I’m at home. Why? Because that is where I belong. My wife and my children need me. I do it because I love them. There is no greater accomplishment a man can make than being a faithful and loving husband, and a man who raises his children unto the Lord—by giving them his greatest gift: his time.

Can a man give his time to both the legislature and his family? Yes. There is a time and season for everything. There’s a time to work, a time to play, a time to serve, a time to rest, a time with family, and a time with others. Time is our most valuable commodity. I choose to manage my time and spend it wisely.

My second father taught me how to work hard. I was stubborn many times, but he broke me like a horse. Having a poor attitude or working half-heartedly was unacceptable to him. Those same things are now unacceptable to me. As a kid he taught me how to split wood with a maul. I broke a few handles because my aim was off. He made me pay for the replacements. I learned that a proper stance was necessary to avoid mistakes, and precision was needed if you wanted to get the job done right. Politically, I stand on traditional, biblical, and conservative values.

In high school I worked hard academically and graduated as salutatorian of CCHS in 2002. I played football where I learned the value of teamwork and the value of resistance. Body builders don’t get strong by lifting 10 pound weights. They need the resistance of heavy weights to exercise their muscles in a way that will make them stronger. Having practices and games where my mind and body met resistance helped me to be an overcomer. We won a championship my junior year, but lost the championship my senior year. I’ve learned there is a right way to win and a right way to lose, and there is value in both.

Almost 11 years ago I was paralyzed. Decisions have consequences. I made a bad decision by being too aggressive while alpine skiing. It’s not God’s fault, or the mountain’s fault, it was my fault. But the lessons of

tion that was appointed by the Governor and was not accountable to the people.

It was later struck down the Wyoming Supreme Court and the SPI received her powers again.

Call me crazy, but I thought due process of law entailed that a person was presumed innocent until proven guilty? We have a normal process for dealing with those in government who abuse their powers.

It’s called impeachment or elections. The legislature should have conducted its investigation right away.

If they found wrong doing they could have impeached her. If the public felt the SPI was doing a poor job they could elect someone else.

The fact of the matter is that SF-104 was embarrassing.

Now some in the legislature want to amend our Wyoming Constitution and remove the SPI, making it an appointed position by the governor instead of an elected position by the people. I am opposed to making the SPI an appointed position. The SPI is the chairperson for the

Wyoming Board of Education. All board members, except for the SPI, are appointed by the Governor.

The one person who is accountable to the people is the SPI. To make the SPI an appointed position by the Governor is an effort to silence Wyoming citizens, and make the entire board of education appointed by the Governor.

7. The Campbell County School District is estimating it will pay $60.1 million to the state as part of a recapture formula to fund school operations throughout Wyoming this year. They will be receiving 2 dollars back. We lead the recapturing funds with 829mil total so far. If this issue of recapturing comes up in the next two legislative sessions, will you support it? If not, what is your proposed alternative?

Scott Clem: There is no question that the wealth of our county is supporting schools else-

State Representative #32 Norine Kasperik for Wyoming House of Representatives District 32 Hello. I’m Norine Kasperik and I am running for a third term to the Wyoming State House District 32. I was first elected in 2010 on a platform of individual rights, low taxes, free enterprise & economic diversity. I believe in fiscal responsibility and support local control in protecting Wyoming’s valuable resources. I intend to continue with this platform.

I’m very proud to serve Gillette and Campbell County as a State Representative. My experience in working with our community on boards & foundations has given me a wide breadth of knowledge about what we need. I served for many years on the CCHCF which benefits the health of our community in many ways.

I’m a past board member of the Chamber of Commerce and I have participated in several advisory groups. My experience in Nursing & Nursing education has allowed me to give back to our community as a volunteer for the American Cancer Society, as a nurse at CCMH and as a Nurse Educator at Gillette College.

I believe the biggest threat to Wyoming

business is the continued avalanche of Presidential and EPA administrative orders which burden our extractive industries with oppressive regulation that lacks economic rationale.

1: There have been meetings by state legislators from many states about the possibility of a Constitutional Convention. If one is presented, how do you propose the choosing of delegates and what if any restrictions would you put on them?

Norine Kasperik: Each state will need to determine how a delegate will be chosen and any guidance for that delegate’s participation.

This can be accomplished through legislation.

under Wyoming’s control. The FNRM Team I serve on has discussed this issue with the Bureau of Land Management, the US Forest Service, and has invited the U.S. EPA to the table to discuss this with us – they have refused. We have made comments to the EPA related to their overreach into state’s rights. I support vigorous opposition to this.

2: Is there a problem with Wyoming’s current pension system? Why, and if so how do you plan to fix that problem?

Norine Kasperik: Current funding is sustainable but fragile. Changes have been made over the past 4 sessions that have improved the large fund sustainability. It will continue to require monitoring. A decision to move from a defined benefit to a defined contribution needs continued discussion in the Legislature.

my past helped me to overcome this adversity. I met resistance in my mind and body, but I worked hard. I was knocked down, but I wasn’t defeated. Friends and family supported me. Even when I felt alone God was there to lift me up.

Choosing to follow Jesus was the best decision I ever made.

So who are you voting for if you choose me as your representative? You’re choosing a man who is following the Lord’s leading the best that he can. You’re choosing a man who is conservative in his political philosophy. You’re

choosing a man who has met resistance, but doesn’t fold under pressure. You’re choosing a man who serves in many different capacities, but makes his family priority. You’re choosing a man who, despite being in a wheelchair, is the primary breadwinner of his home. You’re choosing a man who reasons logically and objectively. You’re choosing a man who takes responsibility and puts himself under the accountability of others. I’m Scott Clem, and I would be grateful for your vote on November 4th.

where in the state. Article 7 of our Wyoming Constitution makes it clear that the state is to provide funding for public education, and that each student should have equal opportunity to learn, but not all schools and towns are equal.

Living in Gillette is more expensive than living in Sundance. Due to higher medium incomes, everything from homes to constructions material is priced higher. In order for our school district to remain competitive in Campbell County’s economy they need pay a competitive wage for all their employees, from the janitor to the school psychologist.

This recapture formula needs constant observation/review as to make sure that Campbell County is not being shortchanged. We are a generous community and its good to be generous with school districts less fortunate in our state, but we shouldn’t be forced to be generous at the peril of our own students, teachers and families in Campbell County.

3: There is much talk by state legislators and legislature candidates about returning federal owned lands back to the state of Wyoming. Do you support this, and if so what is your strategy to perform this task?

Norine Kasperik: I’ve attended many meetings to understand this issue. There is no question that Wyoming controls less of its land than many eastern states. I serve on the Select Federal Natural Resources Management (FNRM) Committee and this is an issue that we have taken on. We will be meeting in November to address this issue and any actions. I support continuing to look at how Wyoming can achieve primacy over its land.

4: WOTUS (Waters of the United States) will soon be an issue that the Governor of Wyoming will need to face.

Do you plan on supporting or working with this plan? If not, how do you plan to stop it.

Norine Kasperik: Management of Wyoming’s water is set in our State Constitution and needs to remain

5: Are there current firearm laws in the state statutes that you would remove or change? If not, are there firearm laws that you would like to see implemented?

Norine Kasperik: I have supported personal gun right in my time in the legislature and will continue to support our rights under the 2nd amendment.

6: There is talk of the legislature revisiting SF-104 or another variant. Do you support this? Why or why not?

Norine Kasperik: I do not support another version of SF-104. I look forward to open discussion and collaboration related to educational issues between the Legislature and the newly elected Superintendent of Public Instruction in 2015.

7. The Campbell County School District is estimating it will pay $60.1 million to the state as part of a recapture formula to fund school operations throughout Wyoming this year. They will be receiving 2 dollars back. We lead the recapturing funds with 829mil total so far. If this issue of recapturing comes up in the next two legislative sessions, will you support it? If not, what is your proposed alternative?

Norine Kasperik: Funding of Wyoming schools is among the highest in the nation –Wyoming provides a block grant which allows local control over the funds, facilities construction and 100% funding for transportation. The court system has set guidance for how we fund schools. I would be open to discussion on how we go forward with school funding that is responsible and appropriate while allowing for local control and leading to results we can all be proud of. I do not believe we have achieved that.

October 31 - November 7, 2014 • Page 8

Campbell County Observer/Election Guide

City Council - Ward 3

City Council - Ward 1

Julie Simon for Gillette Caleb Nygaard for City Council Ward 3 City Council Ward 01 Julie Simon, President/CEO of the Campbell County Chamber of Commerce announced today her intention to run for City Council Ward 3. Ms. Simon, 54, has resided in Gillette since 1993. She has served on several Boards in the community: Powder River Symphony, Gillette Community Theatre, CASA for the Sixth Judicial District, Gillette Main Street, Women in Business, Wyoming Workforce Development, Razor City Toastmasters, and 8 years on the Gillette Public Access Board, 2 years as President. She is currently a precinct committeewoman for the Republican Party and has served as a delegate to the State Republican Convention. Simon is also a member of the United States Chamber of Commerce, American Chamber of Commerce Executives, Wyoming Chamber Partnership, Wyoming Chambers of Commerce Health Benefit Association, and the United States Chamber of Commerce, Energy, Clean Air, and Natural Resources Committee.

Ms. Simon has a B.A. in Communications from the University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma and M.A. (ABT) in Communications from the University of Wyo-

1: Do you think the City of Gillette spends too much money, and how would you advocate change in that spending?

Julie Simon: I believe what you are asking is if they are fiscally conservative and I believe that they listen to the constituents as well as make the best decisions possible, with the knowledge and information that they receive.

I don’t believe you can answer this question well unless you are heavily involved in the process. I view the Council’s role as one that provides infrastructure and creates an atmosphere that allows for expansion and growth. Our population continues to grow and with that growth comes additional needs for the community. We have a young population with a tremendous child birth rate plus the addition of retirees that have decided to stay in Gillette, as well as new families moving in to fill our need for employment. All of these factors weigh in a decision to do projects, and they would weigh heavily in my decisions, should I be elected.

With all of that said, I am fiscally conservative about the amount of money that is spent; however, I also believe in vision and preparing for the community and workplace of the future. That may vary in our community; however, all indicators point to the fact that our growth will remain stable.

2: In recent years there have been multiple utility rate hikes on City residents. Do you believe these rate increases justified? Why or why not?

Julie Simon: The utility business currently ran by the City is considered a business, just like any other commercial business. Rates are determined by growth or the utility, growth of the usage, and the demand. It is also governed by overhead, amount of employees that is takes to run the business, etc. We have had several rate hikes; however, there has also been a fair amount of maintenance and growth of the utility that has occurred.

While we are paying more, we still pay less that a lot of other places and the City has purchased power in bulk to keep the costs

ming. She is also a graduate of the U.S. Chamber’s Institute of Organization Management, the Gillette Area Leadership Institute and a certified notary public with the State of Wyoming. She has served as President/CEO of the Campbell County Chamber of Commerce for 8 years.

Ms. Simon says she is running for office to serve the community, Ward 3 constituents, and to bring the voice of business to the council. She believes that the council can benefit from her skills, talents, and resources on issues that affect jobs, the economy, and the people who live and work here.

“Emphasis should always be focused on serving the community by maintaining and developing infrastructure that makes sense and drives economic development,” commented Ms. Simon.

Ms. Simon and her family have always been avid supporters of the community. Her husband, John, works for Yates Petroleum and has served on City and County Boards. Her sons, Jordan, 12, and Joshua, 10, are active in school clubs and community organizations.

down. Again, I don’t think that unless you are a part of that process and understand what it takes to run that business, that you can comment. In any business, you have to make a profit in order to continue to run the business. This could be a place where a public/private partnership could be formed and possibly look at controlling the cost in another way.

3: The Madison Pipeline 1% tax will be sunsetting soon when the pipeline is paid off. Will you be advocating to reinstitute the tax through a County vote to provide the infrastructure that will be needed to handle the extra water capacity? If not, how do you propose to pay for the future necessary water and waste water infrastructure?

Julie Simon: My understanding was that maintenance of the system was included in the plan for the pipeline. If additional money is necessary for maintenance, it would only make sense to make sure that we didn’t just build the pipeline to sit there and not be able to maintain it. As in any tax that sunsets, if additional money is necessary, it does have to go before the people for a vote. I would have to be more in the loop and the discussion to advocate one way or the other. I would certainly research and gain knowledge about the various options before making a decision.

As I mentioned in Question # 2, in order to run the business of utility, it has to make sure to cover costs, so if additional costs were necessary, we would have to view the various options and decide which one would be best, whether that is increasing customer rates or if there is another way that achieve what is needed to maintain and/or grow the system.

4: The Field of Dreams is now being built in phases. Do you support following through with all phases? Why or why not?

Julie Simon: I believe in providing a quality of life that keeps workers here and attracts other workers, their family and friends to be a part of our community. I believe in assessing the needs of the community and providing the

necessary infrastructure to allow our community to grow and still maintain stability. If all phases are deemed necessary to accomplish this, I would support. However, it depends on the timing and funding available. Another place that I believe could include a public/private partnership.

5: Are there any current ordinances that you plan on presenting, changing, or getting rid of?

Julie Simon: I can’t say that I have particular ones in mind. What I would like to review would be those that affect our businesses and may stand in the way of expansion and growth.

I also believe in personal property rights within reason; however, they also have to be balanced with safety and not interfere with the rights of another.

6: Define your opinion on the role of City Government and what constitutes a luxury or necessity when spending tax dollars.

Julie Simon: I believe that anyone defining those two words is in a no-win situation. It would be the same as you defining them at home with your family. One person would see it as a necessity and the other a luxury. It’s no different in City Government. However, I reiterate that I believe the City Government exists to provide infrastructure and quality of life for all citizens, and as a citizen, I expect that my tax money will be spent on programs and services that I don’t use; however, a whole group of others may benefit from that particular program or service. I believe in sitting down and talking things over, putting all the available knowledge on the table and making the best decisions you can for the community as a whole. I believe in finding the best deal possible and budgeting your money, just like a business. We can look into the future and plan accordingly; however, it takes all kinds of decisions to continue to make a City desirable to live and work there and we compete on a national basis in that area. So, to me, a necessity may differ at any time from a luxury, depending on the set of circumstances.

Caleb Nygaard was born May 12, 1976 in Bismarck ND He moved with his mom, dad and little brother to Gillette in 1981 He started kindergarten here and graduated Gillette High School in 1995 Caleb has always has been community oriented belonging Boy Scout Troop 64 He has been married to his wonderful wife Candy for 14 years, they have 2 beautiful children, a son

1: Do you think the City of Gillette spends too much money, and how would you advocate change in that spending?

Caleb Nygaard: To state it simply, Yes. In a narrow sense money going to the “Field of Dreams” is a huge waste of spending. The “Field of Dreams” is a grandiose dream of a selected few who refused to listen to the people. It should have been put up for a vote by the people, not the city council.

Statues and flower beds, though I find them personally nice to look at, we don’t really need them, tax payers money should not be used for them. Things like the above mentioned should be moved to the private sector.

We need to focus the budget on BILLS first, getting maintenance around town caught up and kept up. Getting our debt paid down, and making sure we put some into a safety fund net for the city.

Nathaniel (almost 6) and a beautiful little girl, Penelope 2 1/2 Caleb works for Kissacks Water and Oil driving truck..

Caleb served in the national guard for 9 years and received an honorable discharge Caleb owns only his home (and Lot) and does not have any businesses, nor does he own investment property therefore he Has no conflict of interest.

bills. It is my belief that if the budget is manage properly, that we could cut some of the unnecessary spending, we could keep our rates low. We do not need raise our rates just because another municipalities rates have gone up.

Just the opposite, we need to see about keeping them the same or lowering them to convince people and business to move to move to this great city we have: Gillette!

3: The Madison Pipeline 1% tax will be sun-setting soon when the pipeline is paid off.

Will you be advocating to re-institute the tax through a County vote to provide the infrastructure that will be needed to handle the extra water capacity? If not, how do you propose to pay for the future necessary water and waste water infrastructure?

Caleb Nygaard: First, I would like to say that this should have been thought of during the conception of the Madison Pipeline. That being said, Yes I would advocate a 1% tax VOTED ON BY THE PEOPLE, and if it passes I will make sure that it is spent only on what it was meant for. And end it as soon as possible.

2: In recent years there have been multiple utility rate hikes on City residents. Do you believe these rate increases justified? Why or why not?

Caleb Nygaard: Being a new home owner I am really just now discovering the effect of these rate hikes. I am afraid to open my utility

4: The Field of Dreams is now being built in phases. Do you support following through with all phases? Why or why not?

Caleb Nygaard: NO! Only what we have contracts for and NO MORE! Reason #1: NOBODY, “I” have spoken to wants it.

Those that do want it, want it for themselves only. This was a project that MORALLY should have been put up before the voters and again, no just those sitting on the city council.

Reason #2: It’s a money pit.

Money being wasted on it could be money spent on infrastructure, improvement or expansion of current parks.

Reason #3: We could use that money on keeping our rates low.

The Maintenance on the “FIELD OF DREAMS” is going to come back and bite us financially!

5: Are there any current ordinances that you plan on presenting, changing, or getting rid of?

Caleb Nygaard: Nuisance Ordinance 13-1c 7: unlicensed vehicles. This portion should be removed from the ordinance. Then there is Nuisance Ordinance 13-1 8: this is in regard to how tall your grass is .I believe these over reaching, it interferes with personal and business rights.

Knife reference Ordinance ref.

14-33a: This refers to concealing a knife with a blade over 8”. This

is pointless since we can carry a concealed weapon in the state of Wyoming.

Ordinance in reference to the Jake Brake 3061: That is removing the ability for the trucks to use a factory built braking device.

6: Define your opinion on the role of City Government and what constitutes a luxury or necessity when spending tax dollars.

Caleb Nygaard: The role of the city government is to build the infrastructure needed to help the city grow. To maintain streets, water also so we have a safe community, a affective police force to enforce the laws and keep the peace. Fire and health to keep us safe and healthy.

My opinion of a luxury would be things like the rec center, city pool, the field of dreams. Such luxuries should be put before the people for a vote. Basically if it is not a project that does not encourage growth, I believe that a lot of what the city does could be out sourced for less money and done much faster.

For necessities we should be able to provide power, water (Good water) and disposal (landfill) for low rates. And with all the mineral taxes that we have there should be no problems obtaining these goals without putting more taxes on the citizens of Gillette.

City Council - Ward 2 1: Do you think the City of Gillette spends too much money, and how would you advocate change in that spending?

Mike Conway: Yeah, I think it really does.

I think the City does have a little bit of a problem with “Ooo, shiny” syndrome in what it chooses to do with its money, and I also think it could stand to reevaluate where its spending the money and perhaps adopt a “shop around and use coupons”-style of approach, if it’s not doing that already.

2: In recent years there have been multiple utility rate hikes on City residents. Do you believe these rate increases justified?

Why or why not?

Mike Conway: Perhaps it’s just me, but it seems like many of these rate hikes occur during periods of increased use, such as when weather is about to turn really hot or really cold, which tells me that the rates are being hiked to take advantage of demand, rather than just enjoying the fact that more use equals more money.

“Oh, you want to be able to keep your family warm this winter? Well, it sure is getting cold, and if you want to be warm you’re going to PAY FOR IT!” I have trouble believing that utilities are having this much trouble functioning without increasing rates, and increased rates put an undue pressure on lower-income families, often leading to hard choices, such as between heating the home and buying medicine, for instance. For these reasons, no, I do not believe they’re justified.

3: The Madison Pipeline 1% tax will be sun-setting soon when the pipeline is paid off. Will you be advocating to re-institute the tax through a County vote to provide the infrastructure that will be needed to handle the extra water capacity? If not, how do you propose to pay for the future necessary water and waste water infrastructure?

Mike Conway: I’d be interested evaluating the costs first before re-instituting a tax.

I’m not opposed much to the idea of the tax, but if it’s not

necessary and the pipeline is selfsustaining, why have it?

4: The Field of Dreams is now being built in phases. Do you support following through with all phases? Why or why not?

Mike Conway: We started this thing, and it would be silly to stop in the middle. I feel having a half-finished Field would be a testament to failure on seeing it through. I’m favor of continuing the Field of Dreams project to completion, but I really want to see where all of our money is going first and seeing if there’s some ways to cut costs and achieve the same end goals with less money.

5: Are there any current ordinances that you plan on presenting, changing, or getting rid of?

Mike Conway: I would like to introduce an ordinance for local business owners whereby if they don’t live in the city but do business here, they should be able to vote in local elections and have a say in how city issues are handled, the same as any citizen. I would also like to propose legislation that would make it easier for homeowners Campbell County to have front-yard gardens, personal in-city farms as well as being able to acquire raw milk for personal consumption.

6: Define your opinion on the role of City Government and what constitutes a luxury or necessity when spending tax dollars.

Mike Conway: I consider infrastructure and utilities as necessities, whatever it takes to make the city go.

Beyond that, there are some gray areas, such as city beautification, which is not a necessity, but it adds an attractiveness that has a benefit on citizen morale and on visitor perception. Such a thing then is not a luxury, but it’s still something that has benefit. Luxuries are the things that could be considered “flash in the pan” things that are fads and don’t really add any benefit. Those are the things to be aware of.

Mike Conway for City Council Ward 02 Born in Port Washington, Wisconsin, Mike Conway grew up in Wyoming. When he was still very young, his father, Joseph Conway, moved out to Wyoming and absolutely fell in love and moved his family to Lander where he worked in cable television and real estate. After eight years there, they moved to Kansas for four years. His father was still in love with The Cowboy State so he got a job with TCI Cablevision in Gillette and moved back.

He has many fond memories of his childhood. “TCI went to Yellowstone to plant trees after the big Yellowstone fires… people from all over the state planted over 20,000 trees over a few years. Most of them died off, but it made a difference. For my mom, my dad, and me it was a big deal.” Many of Mike’s childhood memories also come from his father taking him to many historic sites, forever instilling in him a love for history. His favorites include Fort Laramie, Cody, and the Dubois History Museum of Prehistoric Animals.

Mike, himself, moved to Colorado to go to school and to be with his girlfriend at the time, and he spent 14 years down there before learning of his father’s death, which brought

him back to Gillette, this time to stay, where he helps his mother around the house and provides income with his job at Jimmy John’s.

Mike has a 19-year-old daughter that he met only nine years ago. “I spent years trying to actually find her, but my best friend Jude helped me find her.” She was adopted by her mother’s parents and had lived with them the majority of her life.

“Her grandparents told me she had been asking about her father at the time I had contacted them about seeing her,” he mentioned.

“I was approaching their trailer and saw her head pop up above their car and almost turned around, but I didn’t.”

When asked why he was running for city council ward 2, he became very passionate. “Gillette has been very good to me in the past four years, and I figure it’s time I start giving back…

I’ve always watched politics, [but] when you watch politics you can only do so much. I’m also doing this to carry on my father’s legacy. It’s also to prove that someone with learning disabilities and Tourette’s can overcome that and work as a public official.”

Need to market Need to market your business? your business?

This space could be yours!!

This space could be yours!!

Call for details Anne Peterson 307.299.4662 Call for details Anne Peterson 307.299.4662