Vol. 54 No. 34
Saturday, August 24, 2019
$1.25
Alliance, pols back ad hoc against MTA Like a lot of us in life, the Co-op City Ad Hoc Committee Against Bus Cuts may get by with a little help from its friends. It’s gonna try with a little help from its friends. With its 50-page bus route redesign counterproposal in Metropolitan Transportation Authority hands as of two weeks ago, the ad hoc committee, co-chaired by shareholders Aaron Carnegie and Blossom Johns, has been looking for ways to shore up support for its cause as well as the means to bolster the evidence its proposal is a better one than the MTA’s. There’s the bus service survey — available in CSO offices and elsewhere in this newspaper — that enables shareholders to tell the MTA exactly how and when BY JASON CHIREVAS
they use existing bus routes. So far, the number of returned surveys resides in the hundreds but Mr. Carnegie and Ms. Johns have said they’d like to see as many as 5,000 surveys filled out and shown to the MTA. This is important, Ms. Johns said, because a 2014 MTA survey on bus service only polled 1,400 Co-op City residents and then used that data as the basis for service reductions. The ad hoc committee survey, she said, needs to garner significantly more responses than that to be a better representative sample of how Co-op City uses, and needs, its buses. “We want to humanize Co-op City since they only know us by computers and maps,” Ms. Johns told the Co-op City Times.
The ad hoc committee was formed at the behest of Riverbay Board President Linda Berk in response to a June proposal from the MTA — part of a larger redesign plan for all the buses in the Bronx — that would essentially see Co-op City’s bus routes streamlined beyond the point of inconvenience to a degree some Riverbay officials called it dangerous. As a community of more than 50,000 people without ready access to trains, Co-op City is more reliant on bus service than many areas of the Bronx. After weeks of work, the Research and Proposal Subcommittee of the greater group of about 25 cooperators created a proposal that would, in essence, split most of the existing Co-op City bus routes between
Cost for Co-op City apartments increase effective Sept. 1 Funds earmarked for capital projects
Riverbay Corporation received approval from NYS Division of Housing and Community Renewal (HCR) to raise the per room equity for Co-op City apartments 22% during the recently completed budget review process for Mitchell-Lama developments. The higher equity becomes effective Sept. 1, 2019, and results in payments of $5,500 per room for incoming and transferring shareholders, from the current $4,500 per room level. HCR also approved concurrent carrying charge increases in the amount of 1.9%
BY ROZAAN BOONE
(Continued on page 2)
Clarifications to Board directors’ viewpoints
A Board director stated in their viewpoint published in the Aug. 10, 2019 Co-op City Times that they had “filed formal written complaint with both the New York State Attorney General’s office and DHCR against four Board members… However, at this point, I have been informed that it is not appropriate for me to discuss my complaints while the investigation is ongoing.” Riverbay general counsel’s office acknowledges there is no “investigation” being conducted by the Attorney General of New York State of four Riverbay Board directors. A request was made by the individual Board director which was sent by the AG’s office to New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (HCR) and HCR has requested a report from Riverbay’s General Counsel. In addition, another director’s viewpoints have included statements that the Riverbay Fund can receive $150,000 annually from Riverbay Corporation. The Riverbay Fund was established to provide educational, cultural and recreational programming for the benefit of the community. The majority of its funding comes from grants, elected officials and shareholders’ donations to the recycling bins located at the garages. While Resolution 16-45, passed by the Board in July 2016 authorizes Riverbay Corporation to make “annual allocations up to $150,000 for the purpose of establishing a supported Youth and Community Program Department,” the Fund has to request the money and justify its use.
for current shareholders for each fiscal year, the first of which will be implemented Sept. 1, 2019, followed by the second increase on Sept. 1, 2020. These increases raise carrying charges for Co-op City shareholders by $4.27 per room, per month this September and by $4.35 per room, per month in September 2020. The increase in equity was identified in Riverbay’s fiscal year budgets for 2019/20 and 2020/21 as an additional income source to help alleviate financial impact on current shareholders and to raise funding for the community’s $159 million capital improvement plan. These improvements address infrastructure concerns that could potentially result in more costly (Continued on page 4)
Termite Infestation Spreads to Sections of Co-op City 20 trees will be removed from area
Crab Apple trees removed during the week from the Dreiser Loop area.
Earlier this Spring, residents were informed about the removal of Crab Apple trees specifically near Building 9; this time, all Crap Apples trees in all five sections of the community will be cut down. According to Building and Grounds director, Michael Ambo, the department has found termites inhabiting the trees. The Buildings and Grounds department plans on removing 20 trees while working with exterminators to treat affected areas to prohibit the spread of termites. “This isn’t just an issue of removing trees, but most importantly, a safety concern,” said Mr. Ambo. The termites feed starting from the root of the tree
BY TORIEA McCAUSELAND
and from the inside out – leaving the tree hollow, which can cause falling trees in heavy winds, being a potential danger to residents. According to Mr. Ambo, the entire project of removing trees should take about two weeks, weather permitting. Every tree that is taken out will be replaced with new 7 to 10-foot trees next spring.
Photo by Michael Ambo
Bx. Councilman Faces New Ethics Charges (See page 27 for story)