Portfolio 2023

portfolio CEREN OKUMUŞ 2023 AUGUST

BLIND SKETCH “ROOMS”// FERHAN YÜREKLİ STUDIO

cv

WORKSHOP DECEMBER 2017

RECONSTURCTION OF ARCHITECTURAL ARCHETYPES THROUGH PLAY EXPERIENCES Mef University Architecture Faculty FADA 2017 Workshop Week I Workshop coordinator with Aybike Batuk, Selin Erdemirci

INSTALLATION MAY 2016

INVASIVE GARDEN ​Beşiktaş​Garden​and​Flower​Festival​ installation with anonim.istanbul

WORKSHOP AUGUST 2013-NOVEMBER 2013

LIVING CARTHOGRAPHY PARTICIPENT I DESIGN & DRAWING Section​in​Co-action​Device:​A​study​I​Artist:​İnci​Eviner​I​13th​İstanbul​ Biennial

CONFERENCE / PUBLICATION / COMPETITION CEREN OKUMUŞ [cerenokumus@gmail.com] [+49 177 1892475] 1991//TURKEY

EDUCATION PHD I (DOCTORATE) SEPTEMBER 2022 - 2023

ERASMUS EXCHANGE STUDENT UNIVERSTIY OF STUTTGART Architecture and Urban Planning Institut für Darstellen und Gestalten

PHD I JANUARY 2020 - SEP. 2023

İSTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

MASTER I AUTUMN 2016 - OCT. 2019

BACHELOR I GRADUATION DATE 2014

İSTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN Thesis Title: Production Of Space Through Alternative Practices Of Food Production: The Case Of Istanbul Advisor/Prof.​İpek​Akpinar İSTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY ARCHITECTURE 2012 Spring I Erasmus I Universita degli Studi di Trento

WORK

TURKISH ENGLISH GERMAN

LECTURER I Halic University I Interior Design Courses Basic Design Studio I- II Interior Desing Studio I-II Technical Drawing I-II Elective Courses Creative Thinking and Design

JUNE 2018 - AUGUST 2021

RESEARCH ASSIST. I Halic University I Architecture Faculty

JULY 2015 - AUGUST 2016, FEBRUARY 2017 - APRIL 2018

ARCHITECT I anonim.istanbul​office

APRIL 2014 - MARCH 2015

EDITOR I DESIGNER Trip to Design Website I Neptün​Öziş​Studio​Yacht​Design

NATIVE

(B 1 .1 ONGOING)

PHOTOSHOP ILLUSTRATOR INDESIGN AUTOCAD VECTORWORKS RHINO SKETCH UP VRAY

AUGUST 2021 - AUGUST 2022

WORKSHOPS WORKSHOP JULY 2022

WORKSHOP OCTOBER 2021

SPATIAL BODIES: EXPERIENCING SPACE WITH DRAWING AND IMPROVISATION with​the​grant​of​Halic​Universtiy​Scientific​Research​Project​ with​Burçe​Karadağ,​Tuğba​Sorgun,​Mustafa​Kemal​Yurttaş TRANSOBJECT : HOW TO EXPERIENCE OF AN OBJECT? Mef University Architecture Faculty FADA 2021 Workshop Week I workshop​coordinator​with​ilke​şahin

CONFERENCE SHORT PAPER PRESENTATION I SEPTEMBER 2021

GENERATING DIFFERANTIAL SPACE: KUÇE FOOD COLLECTIVE II. National Spatial Studies Symposium, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University

PUBLICATION SEPTEMBER 2019

A VIEV TO DEFECTIVE CONSTRUCTION : LA CONGIUNTA AND KARATEPE CANOPIES Betonart, 2019, No:60

CONFERENCE SHORT PAPER PRESENTATION I FEBRUARY 2019

REPRODUCTION OF TYPICAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECTS WITH PLAY EXPERIENCES IJADE Conference, Creating Spaces: Inclusivity, Ethics and Participation in Art and Design Education, February 2019, London, Aybike​Batuk,​Selin​Erdemirci,​Ceren​Okumuş

CONFERENCE SHORT PAPER PRESENTATION I OCTOBER 2017

FROM SOVEREIGN OF SEEING TO INTERACTION WITH BODY: A BACKYARD NARRATIVE IN HARBİYE Dakam Archtheo ‘17 / XI. Theory and History of Architecture Conference

COMPETITION 2014

FIRST AID KIT: TAKSIM Çuhadaroğlu​Aluminium​Student​Project​Competition​/​ Encouragement​Award​with​Umut​Atlı​and​Ozan​Özvatan

COMPETITION 2011

STAND DESIGN Bursa Stand Design Student Competition 1st​Mansion​Award​with​Umut​Atlı​and​Ozan​Özvatan

COMPETITION 2010

KINALIADA / VIEWING DECK Mimed​Architectural​School​Projects​Competition 1st Year Category / Jury’s Special Award

GRAPHIC DESIGN LOGO 2022

FOR AAÇ DESIGN OFFICE

LOGO / SOCIAL MEDIA VISUALS 2020

FOR ART.HIT.ECT INSTAGRAM ACCOUNT

LOGO / STATIONERY 2020

FOR UNIQUE DESIGN OFFICE

LOGO / 2016

FOR NO8 MULTI FUNCTIONAL BUILDING with​anonim.istanbul​//​Aslı​Şener

PICTOGRAMS 2015

FOR ISTANBUL’S INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE PROJECT employer DGA Architecture

PORTFOLIO DESIGN AND PRINT 2015

DGA ARCHITECTURE employer DGA Architecture

HOW TO KNOW A TEXTILE? University of Stuttgart A Design Research PhD Project Erasmus Exchange Program 2023 Summer Semester Institute of Arts - IDG Advisor// Prof. Sybil Kohl

Abstract This research explores various ways of understanding textile using the drawing method. It also seeks to uncover methods for capturing the sensation of wrinkling as an action. While both the tactile experience of wrinkling and the actual textile wrinkling are used as initial reference points in the research, drawing serves as a means to intimately acquaint oneself with the material. This process highlights the shared characteristics between the material and the individual engaging in the drawing.

Consequently, drawing transforms into a representation of the dynamic interplay between the material and the person sketching. Instances of formless forms stand out as examples where this interaction becomes apparent. The research conducted at the University of Stuttgart centered around the techniques for generating formless forms, delving into how these techniques manifest across various scales of bodily movement.

PRODUCTION OF SPACE THROUGH ALTERNATIVE PRACTICES OF FOOD PRODUCTION: THE CASE OF ISTANBUL Istabul Technical University Architectural Design Master Program// Master Thesis October 2019 Advisor/Assoc.​Prof.​İpek​Akpınar

Abstract Today, in order to make more profit, the production practices are separated from the natural and human, and unnatural methods and practices that are harmful to human health are adopted for economic growth. Alternative practices of food production that are examined in this thesis propose alternative methods to the ongoing production system in the city. Alternative production methods are therefore no longer a dream or a utopia, and by the production of solidary spaces what is thought to be a dream or a utopia is made visible. At this point the necessity of looking at the space comes to the fore. Just as in food production system, production of space has become a commodity which is a tool for maintaining the dynamics of capitalism. It has been used as an oppression mechanism of power-holders and has been separated from living and human. How is it possible to produce another kind of space in such an environment?

Hence, the idea of discovering the possibilities of another space and architecture, which is the main motivation of the study, emerges. It is thought that looking at alternative practices of food production spatially may create a basis for a living-leading production of space and at the same time it may become a potential for non- hierarchical design practice. Thus, the main question of the study is revealed: what kind of potentials have been produced in the context of another way of producing/designing space by alternative practices of food production? Rather than finding a direct answer to this question, this thesis aims to understand how life experience and perceiving the space as a process make changes in design practice and space. In this context, in the second part of the thesis that follows the introduction, examples which are accepted as authoritarian attitudes in the production of space are examined. In opposition to these authoritarian attitudes, the method of looking at the space as a process and the spaces established with living that allow another way of producing space are proposed. It is emphasized that this process is designed by the user that produces an alternative to traditional methods in spatial production. The production of space by the user also questions the authority of the architect, who is regarded as the “producer of the space”. Therefore, it is thought that the examples where the architect is in a user-related position also have potential with regards to alternative ways of producing space. Consequently, the architect who creates space for the user and the user emerge as important

actors for alternative ways of producing space.

In this thesis, the definition of differantial space, a notion that is coined by Henri Lefebvre who explains the spatial production as a process, constitutes the conceptual infrastructure. This notion is used because of its potential for an alternative spatial production. Lefebvre is preferred within the relevant spatial literature since he describes space as a process rather than perceiving it as a static object and sees this process as a social production. His explanation allows the transition from a rigid, untouchable, self-existent understanding of space to a lived space concept, and the space that is shaped by lived experience also constitutes a potential for breaking the hierarchical system in the design practice. Differential space also has the potential for resistance to hierarchical structures within the city and architecture. It is considered an alternative way of spatial production that can be formed by the change of designing and realization methods both inside and outside the design practice. The conceptual set proposed by Lefebvre in order to create spaces of difference is considered within the framework of the user and the architect depending on the user. In this context, the user is seen as the liberating actor of space production in the design practice. Thus, Lefebvre’s conceptual set is chosen for this study. This set is: solidary relations of production, simultaneous production and use, need/desire and imagination, usage, occupation, and appropriation. Each concept contains content related to the other concepts, so the axes are not seen as a definite dividing tool. With that, examination of the samples in the third part are aimed to be easier. While examining the samples, two different actors are used as an examination tool: first, the user-user and user-space relations are examined, then the methods of the architect as an actor liberated by the user are examined. Thus, the two-layered structure established by the conceptual set, consisting of actors and actions, is revealed. Chosen concepts can be explained as the following: solidary production relations refer to the production of collective or solidary space by joint actions. When creating a space with solidary production relations, the space can be realized with a cooperation between the users, as well as by cooperation between the architect and the user. Simultaneous production and use refers to the lack of expertise in space production, which can also be understood as space production arising

from usage and needs. The production of space with the absence of specialization also references participatory practices. Need/desire and imagination: Need is the motivation that brings about the usage and it becomes desire as time passes, and imagination allows realization of the space created by the dialectic of need and desire.

Usage, occupation, ownership: Usage can be defined as theatricalization, the emergence of potential energy and the emergence of desires. Ownership, similar to usage constitutes a contradiction, and the domination established on space becomes ownership in different spaces.

Among the alternative food production practices operating in Istanbul, Piyalepaşa Kent Bostanı (Piyalepaşa City Garden), Kuçe Yemek Kolektifi (Kuçe Food Collective) and Çatı Çiftliği (Roof Farm), were selected for examination as they are thought in the third chapter to constitute alternative spatialities. On-site observation and interview with users and participants are the methods used to study the selected samples. First, characteristics of the sample (physical, organizational) are put forward, and then the sample is examined with conceptual axes defıned in the second section, which allow us to understand space as a process. While examining the samples a drawing method, in which each color and conceptual axes are matched to allow understanding of life through photography, was used. Differentiation of this method from traditional architectural representation was especially preferred and visualization of differentiated space creation methods was given importance. After examination, each sample’s unique resistance method, life, organization style were discovered and the findings were diagrammed to allow a comparative reading.

As a result, it can be said that the samples examined within the scope of the thesis produce a resistance or offer an alternative method in the city. While Piyalepaşa Kent Bostanı is a place that generates resistance against construction activities in the city, Kuçe Food Collective produces resistance against gentrification in the city, and the roof farm offers an alternative to the density of buildings in the city.

Each practice has its own unique form of organization, and they do not produce equally hierarchical and participatory organizations and spaces. In all of the samples examined, it can be seen that the production of space is realized by actions. This cyclic state leads us to the conclusion that space and actions feed each other. Thus, it is possible to discuss the potentials of living to create space.

References Acar, C. (2017). İstiklal Caddesi: İstanbul Kent Savunması ve Beyoğlu Kent Savunması İle Söyleşi. GaiaDergi. Erişim 28 Temmuz, 2019, https:// gaiadergi.com/istiklal-caddesi-istanbul-kent-savunmasibeyoglu-kentsavunmasi-ile-soylesi/ Akın, H. (2019a). İstanbul’un karma kullanımlı yapılarında sürdürülebilir yaşam alanları potansiyeli ve bir AVM projesi (Master tezi). İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Mimari Tasarım Programı, İstanbul, ss.

117-129.

Akın. H. (2019b). Kişisel görüşme. 25 Ağustos, İstanbul.

Arıkan, B. (2019). Kişisel görüşme. 1 Eylül, İstanbul.

Ayalp Karakaya, E. (2018). Güncel Gıda Hareketinin Alternatifliği: Kavramsal ve Eleştirel Bir Derleme. Beyond.İstanbul, Mekanda Adalet ve Gıda, sayı 3, s.67-72.

Bartu Candan, A. Özbay, C. (2015). Yeni İstanbul Çalışmaları: Yersiz, Havasız, Mülksüz Kent. Ayfer Bartu Candan, Cenk Özbay (Ed.) Yeni İstanbul Çalışmaları içinde (s.11-15). İstanbul: Metis.

Bostan Hikayeleri (2019). Erişim 4 Temmuz, 2019. http://bostanhikayeleri. com/ Bostan’dan Tatavla’ya (2019). Kişisel görüşmeler. Mart-Ağustos, İstanbul.

Colective. (Kolektif). (t.y.). Lexico Oxford dictionary içinde. Erişim tarihi: 1 Ağustos 2019. Erişim adresi: https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/ collective Dayanışma. (t.y). Türk Dil Kurumu güncel Türkçe Sözlük içinde. Erişim tarihi: 1 Ağustos 2019. Erişim adresi: http://sozluk.gov.tr/ Doğançayır, C. M., ve Kocagöz, U. (2019). Kent-Kır Arasında ve Ötesinde: Yerleşik ve Yeşeren Gıda Ağları, beyond.istanbul. Erişim 29 Temmuz 2019, https://beyond.istanbul/kent-kır-arasında-ve-ötesinde-yerleşik-veyeşeren-gıda-ağları-9799a4665d26 Doğançayır, C. M., ve Kocagöz, U. (2018). Alternatif Gıda İnsiyatifleri Söyleşileri. Beyond.istanbul Mekanda Adalet ve Gıda, Sayı 3, s.72-117. İstanbul Herkes İçin Mimarlık (2019). Erişim 25 Temmuz, 2019. https:// herkesicinmimarlik.org/en/ Holt-Giménez, E. (2018). Gıda ve Kentler. Beyond.istanbul Mekanda Adalet ve Gıda (Umut Kocagöz, Çev.), Sayı 3, s.118-122. İstanbul.

Ekoharita (2015). Erişim 2 Eylül 2019. https://www.ekoharita.org/ekolojiharitasi/.

Fırat, B. Ö. (2018). Küresel Hareket Döngüleri ve Müşterekleşme Hareketleri. Müşterekler, Erişim 3 Ağurstos, 2019, https://musterekler. sehak.org/2018/12/07/kuresel-hareket-donguleri- ve-mustereklestirmehareketleri-begum-ozden-firat/ Fitting, P. (2002). Urban Planning/Utopian Dreaming: Le Corbusier’s Chandigarh Today. Utopian Studies, 13(1), 69-93. Erişim 12 Temmuz, 2019, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20718410 Forty, A. (2004). Words and Buildings. London, Thames & Hudson.

Harvey, D. (2013). Asi Şehirler. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.

Harvey, D. (2013). Sosyal Adalet ve Şehir. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.

Kaldjian, P. (2004). Istanbul’s Bostans: A Millennium of Market Gardens.

Geographical Review , 94 (3), 284-304.

Kuçe Yemek Kolektifi. (2019). Kişisel görüşme. 2 Ağustos. İstanbul.

Kuçe. (2018). Erişim 25 Haziran 2019. https://www.facebook.com/pg/ kuceyemekkolektifi/about/?ref=page_i nternal Jacobs, J. (2011). Büyük Amerikan Şehirlerinin Ölümü ve Yaşamı. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları, s. 34.

Latour, B., Yaneva, A. (2014, Temmuz 1). Mimarlık Dergisi. (C. Gündüz, Dü.) Mart 10, 2019 tarihinde mimarlikdergisi: http://www.mimarlikdergisi. com/index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik&DergiSa yi=392&RecID=3438 adresinden alındı.

Lefebvre, H. (2016). Mekanın Üretimi. İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık. s.68, s.191, s.364.

Leary, M. E. (2009). The Production of Space through a Shrine and Vendetta in Manchester: Lefebvre’s Spatial Triad and the Regeneration of a Place Renamed Castlefield. Planning Theory & Practice , 10 (2), 189-212. s.

Milgrom, R. (2009). Lucien Kroll: Design, Difference, Everyday Life.

Kanishka Goonewardena, Stefan Kipfer, Richard Milgrom and Christian Schmid ( Ed ). Space, Difference, Everyday Life içinde (s. 264-281). New York: Routledge.

Otorite, Hiyerarşi ve Cinsiyetçiliğin Olmadığı Bir Kolektif: Kuçe Y emek Kolektifi. (2019). Erişim: 25 Haziran 2019. https://meydan.org/ gundem/2019/03/otorite-hiyerarsi-ve- cinsiyetciligin-olmadigi-bir-kolektifkuce-yemek-kolektifi/ Piyalepaşa Bostanı Tescilli Bir Kültür Varlığı (Eylül-Ekim 2015). Arkeologlar Derneği Bülteni, Sayı 5, Erişim 1 Haziran, 2019, http://arkeologlardernegi. org/ Petrescu, D., Trogal, K. (2017). The Social (Re)production of Architecture in ‘Crisis-Riddled’ Times. Doina Petrescu, Kim Trogal (Ed.) The Social (Re) production of Architecture, Politics, Values and Actions in Contemporary Practice içinde (Bölüm 1). London: Taylor and Francis Sadri, H. (Mayıs-Haziran 2012). Meslek Etiği: Mimarlık ve İnsan Hakları (1), Mimarlık, 365, Erişim 2 Temmuz, 2019, http://www.mimarlikdergisi.com/ index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik&DergiSa yi=379&RecID=2952 Stanek, L. (2012). Architecture as Space, Again? Notes on th Spatial Turn, Le Journal Spéciale Z. Schmid, C. (2009). Henri Lefebvre’s Theory of the Production of Space.

Shields, R. (2005). Lefebvre, Love and Struggle : Spatial Dialectics, (s. 141185). New York: Routledge.

A.g.y. (2005). Lefebvre, Love and Struggle : Spatial Dialectics, s. 183. New York: Routledge.

Spatial Agency. (n.d.) Erişim Temmuz 10, 2019, http://www.spatialagency. net/ Stavrides, S. (2018). Müşterek Mekan: Müşterekler Olarak Şehir (Cilt 1). (C. Saraçoğlu, Çev.) İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık.

Tanyeli, U. (2017). Yıkarak Yapmak: Anarşist Bir Mimarlık Kuramı İçin Altlık. İstanbul: Metis.

Tschumi, B. (1994). Event-Cities. New York: MIT Press.

Yalçıntan, M. C., Çalışkan, O., Çılgın, K., Dündar, U. (2014). İstanbul Dönüşüm Coğrafyası. Ayfer Bartu Candan, Cenk Özbay (Ed.) Yeni İstanbul Çalışmaları içinde, (s.47-70). İstanbul: Metis

Rectangular forms must be designed to reduce the heat loss in the cold climate.

REPRODUCTION OF TYPICAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECTS WITH PLAY PRACTICES* IJADE Conference, Creating Spaces: Inclusivity, Ethics and Participation in Art and Design Education, February 2019, London, Aybike​Batuk,​Selin​Erdemirci,​Ceren​Okumuş

There must be less windows particularly on northern facades in order to provide natural lighting and ventilation.

*This research was produced within the scope of Istanbul Technical University Architectural Design Master Program Project I Course

Abstract This article discusses the potentials of play practices in terms of spatial production and the possibilities to reshape The Typical Elementary School Project applications with those potentials. The research argues the subject into two main lines; the first is taking school as ‘free’ space, and the second is to approach the play phenomena as a multiplier of possibilities. Initially, the historical background and spatial arrangements of the Typical Elementary School Project are investigated. The Design Manual for Elementary Schools, which prepared by the Ministry of Education (Turkey) for constructing The Typical Elementary School in 2015, defines rational design principles based only on numerical and mathematical data. After discussing the theoretical framework of the play as a generator of new potentials and possibilities, the rules of the design manual are compared with play practices. The comparison of typical school design principles and children’s play practices reveals a contradiction between the spatial organization of the typical school projects and playing experiences of children.

The rules of the Design Manual and the play practices were diagrammed. These two contradictory diagram sets have been juxtaposed to multiply the possibilities of spatial production.

Keywords: :Typical School Project, Juxtaposition, Child, Play Practices, Production of Space

References Agamben, G. (1993) Infancy and History: The Destruction of Experience.

London, New York: Verso, pp. 69-70.

Atay, G. (2014) Mekân Kurucu Öğe Olarak “Oyun”: Kurgusuz Oyunun “Sınırsız” Mekânları, Saraydan Sokağa Oyun, İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi, pp.161-178, 166.

Breton, A. (1969) Manifestoes of Surrealism, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Ciravoğlu, A. (2004) Anaokulları İnternet Taraması, Mimarist, Vol. 4, No. 11, pp. 69-74.

Available at; http://www.mimarist.org/mimar-ist-sayi-11-bahar-2004/ (accessed 4 June 2018).

Huizinga, J. (1949) Homo-Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp.3-5.

Ko, Christie. (2008) “Politics of Play: Situationism, Détournement, and AntiArt”. FORUM:​ University​ of​ Edinburgh​ Postgraduate​ Journal​ of​ Culture​ & The Arts, August. Available at; http://www.forumjournal.org/article/ view/599 (accessed 4 September 2019).

Köse, Ç. & Barkul, Ö. (2012) A Study on The Problems of The Implementation of Project Type Primary Structures, Megaron, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 94-102 (online). Available at; http://www.megaronjournal.com/tr/jvi.

[Shape 1 & 2] The rules of the Design Manual and the play practices were diagrammed.

There must be no arrangements made Rectangular modules that to be helpful to formed by one or climb the roof two blocks must between the trees and school windows. be built in the warm climate zones.

The surfaces must be generally flat.

Manager rooms must be placed in such a way that the students can be easily watched during their activities.

The outer surfaces must be uniform, have integrity between the shape and dimension.

Console stairs must be avoided.

All the stairs must be continuous until the basement floor.

Play Practices Diagrams

[Shape 3 ] We juxtaposed these diagrams and tried to discover the production of different variations by different matchigs to reveal the possibilities of multi-probability spatial situations and the spaces produced by these spatialities.

Design Manual Diagrams

Juxtaposition Diagrams (Play Practices x Design Manual)

Spatial Intervention produced by diagrams

[Shape 4] When this diagram space turned into spatiality, the wide openings with the sense of flying in the typical elementary school building had appeared.

[Shape 5] Implementation of the diagrams in the school spaces has resulted in non-linear openings that make similar senses discovered in excitementspace analogies.

[Changing Levels]

Principal’s rooms will be located in such a way that students can be easily monitored, especially during extracurricular activities and between classes.

[Shape 6] 7-J As a result of 7-J juxtoposition, the monitoring rule turned inside-out and playing areas in the school building produced.

ESENTEPE NO 8 MIXED USED BUILDING anonim.istanbul architecture July 2015 - August 2016

Location: İstanbul / Gayrettepe Team: Aslı Şener, Burcu Serdar Köknar, Niyazi Erdoğan, Ceren Okumuş, Hande Kalender, Artun Agbulut, Yağmur Yenice, Murat Usta Sinan Kolip, Burak Can

No8 project, is the latest phase in transforming a building, which went through several renovations since it was built. It is located in Gayrettepe, İstanbul. While the building was being transformed, all interior and exterior parts were renovated except for the strengthened construction system. The building, which was previously used as an office building, has gained different uses such as a cafe, restaurant, office, fitness area, recreational roof, and hobby areas with its new design. The air conditioning system was a difficult part of the design due to the low ceiling height, so the air conditioning pipes were placed inside the mesh façade design. I took part in conceptual design, technical design & drawing and construction processes.

Model & Image : Ceren Okumuş Programs used: Sketch Up, Adobe Photoshop

photos: YERÇEKİM

entrance

entrance cafe

scullery

kitchen

massage area work&eat fitness area

restaurant

changing rooms

garden office

meeting room

office

office

meeting room

office

entrance & cafe

meeting room

work & eat

welcome desk

office

cafe&restaurant plans

restaurant

hobby area

office

meeting room carpark

Drawings & Images : Ceren Okumuş Programs used: AutoCAD, Adobe Photoshop

a-a section

office plans

Drawings : Ceren Okumuş, Yağmur Yenice Programs used: AutoCAD

façade / catwalk / air-conditioning system One of the most important aspects of the project was the new facade design. The old facade was teared apart and rectangular shaped mesh structure applied. With the catwalks placed on the new facade system, the offices were accessed to the outside. The pipes for the HVAC system were placed in between space with the building walls and the mesh facade. The air distubuters were hidden inside the interior seperators.

old façade

new façade

section drawing

F3-F3 kesiti su yalıtımı, TPO F2 membran (0,25 cm) ısı yalıtımı, mukavemetli taş yünü (4+4 cm) poliüretan buhar kesici (0,1 mm) trapez sac levha (5 cm) eğim profili (%1) çelik kutu profil kiriş 2UNP140

4

cafe & restaurant kitchen

1

D24

2.5 17 70.9

D24

A6: Kapaklı yapılacak.

D

D22 D21

buzdolabı 75.7

47.8

B26

2UNP 140 profil

54.7

95

SERAMİK

A7 A8

özel büküm saç elektrik kanalı u profil (armatür montajı yapılacak) 100x200x5 mm

A6 A9

A5

seramik (6 mm) yapıştırıcı (3 mm) 663.3 şap (12 cm) asmolen döşeme (32 A2 cm) sıva (2 cm)

A1

masif parke (14 mm) yapıştırıcı (6 mm) şap (11 cm) asmolen döşeme (32 cm) sıva (2 cm)

30*30

B23

seramik (2cm) yapıştırıcı (5 mm) su yalıtım membranı eğim betonu (5-12 cm) geotekstil (0,5 cm) ısı yalıtımı (3 cm) asmolen döşeme (32 cm) sıva (2 cm)

masif parke (14 mm) yapıştırıcı (6 mm) şap (11 cm) asmolen döşeme (32 cm) sıva (2 cm)

A3

F4

equitone fibre cement kaplama malzemesi

B20

231.1

B22

D19

B28

484.6

148.8

F4

A12

574.7

12

seramik (6 mm) yapıştırıcı (3 mm) şap (12 cm) asmolen döşeme (32 cm) sıva (2 cm)

A11

90

90

A14

BULAŞIKHANE

1.2

104 6,8m2

kutu profil 120x120x5 mm

12

A13

9

B27

388.4

masif parke (14 mm) yapıştırıcı (6 mm) şap (11 cm) asmolen döşeme (32 cm) sıva (2 cm)

A11: Verilen ölçüden daha kısa yapılacak.

+5.94

12

+5.94

masif parke (14 mm) yapıştırıcı (6 mm) şap (11 cm) asmolen döşeme (32 cm)elektrik sıva (2 cm) şaftı

100x200x5 mm

POS Q

sebil borusunun yeri tekrar konuşulacak.

D23

D22 The cafe & restaurant is designed to serve D21 both office users and non-office users. It is reached from the street level and has 2UNP 140 profil kutu profil 120x120x5 mm özel büküm saç eating and different options for different elektrik kanalı u profil seramik (2cm) (armatür montajı working conditions. yapıştırıcı (5 mm) yapılacak) su yalıtım membranı eğim betonu (5-12 cm) geotekstil (0,5 cm) ısı yalıtımı (3 cm) asmolen döşeme (32 cm) D20 sıva (2 cm)

mutfak konstrüksiyonu arka kolonlar kaldırıldı mı? son karara göre kapama genişliği belirlenecek.

D23

343.9

D

F1

su yalıtımı, TPO membran (0,25 cm) ısı yalıtımı, mukavemetli taş yünü (4+4 cm) poliüretan buhar kesici (0,1 mm) trapez sac levha (5 cm) eğim profili (%1) çelik kutu profil kiriş 2UNP140

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1

ANKASTR

B20 B21 B22 B23 B24 B25 B26 B27 B28

1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2

BULAŞIK

ANKASTR ANKASTR EKMEKLİK DUVAR DA

ÖNÜ AÇIK SETÜSTÜ ELEKTRİKL COMBİ OV DUVAR RA

1 EVYELİ ÇÖP ÜNİTE DUVAR RA SOĞUK TE

SOĞUK TE

60 LS/S Ç 1 EVYELİ ÖN YIKAM T.ALTI BU DUVAR RA

ETEJER,AL ETEJER,AL KIRIKLI TE

D24 YEMEK BARI 103 38,6m2 AHŞAP / SERAMİK

+2.95B21

PROJE ADI

+2.95

+2.95

12

+2.95

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 A12 A13 A14 A15

F3

F3

ESENTEPE

50.1

temizlik

kale seramik 17,5x60 cm

B28

79

6

160

6

160

6

79

REVİZYON-1

12

C

12

C

54.7

12

Tavan alçıpan ile kapatı

A4

REVİZYON-2

ahşap parke

Konstrüksiyon aralıkları

F2-F2 kesiti B

F1-F1 kesiti

B

702.2 43.4

5.8

83.2

98 222

5.8

330.1

P11a

P11

5.8

82.7

5.4

83 138

5.8

K26

330 138

98.7

83 138

35.5

P11b

D18 4

su yalıtımı, TPO membran (0,25 cm) ısı yalıtımı, mukavemetli taş yünü (4+4 cm) poliüretan buhar kesici (0,1 mm) trapez sac levha (5 cm) eğim profili (%1) çelik kutu profil kiriş 2UNP140 alçıpan asma tavan

eğim profili

4

D25

F2

PAFTA KAPSAMI

F1

+2.95

222

masif parke (14 mm) yapıştırıcı (6 mm) şap (11 cm) asmolen döşeme (32 cm) sıva (2 cm)

264.5

masif parke (14 mm) yapıştırıcı (6 mm) şap (11 cm) asmolen döşeme (32 cm) sıva (2 cm)

1/20 PLAN 2UNP 140 profil

60x60x5 mm çelik kutu profil

4

2UNP 140 profil

su yalıtımı, TPO membran (0,25 cm) ısı yalıtımı, mukavemetli taş yünü (4+4 cm) poliüretan buhar kesici (0,1 mm) trapez sac levha (5 cm) eğim profili (%1) çelik kutu profil kiriş 2UNP140 alçıpan asma tavan

+2.95 1

F3-F3 kesiti F2

4

F4-F4 kesiti

Drawings : Ceren Okumuş DESCRIPTION DIMENSIONS MM Programs used: AutoCAD

F1 mutfak konstrüksiyonu arka kolonlar kaldırıldı mı? son karara göre kapama genişliği belirlenecek.

POS Q

sebil borusunun yeri tekrar konuşulacak.

01-YEMEKHANE

A11: Verilen ölçüden daha kısa yapılacak.

A6: Kapaklı yapılacak.

D

70.9

2.5 17

12

D

buzdolabı

A13

A14

95

A7 A8

A6

388.4

A2

A1

A3

1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2

BULAŞIK SIYIRMA TEZGAHI

ÖNÜ AÇIK ALT DOLAP-800MM SETÜSTÜ ARA TEZGAH,ÖNÜ KAPALI-400MM ELEKTRİKLİ 2-PLEYTLİ OCAK-400MM COMBİ OVEN 4 600X400 ELECTRIC - LEFT OPENING DUVAR RAFI 1 EVYELİ ÇALIŞMA TEZGAHI ÇÖP ÜNİTESİ DUVAR RAFI SOĞUK TEZGAH 6X21 ÇEKMECE, SIRTLI-CONCEPT SOĞUK TEZGAH,410LT,3 KAPI,SIRTLI-STD

148.8

F4

60 LS/S ÇÖP ARABASI-KAPAKLI 1 EVYELİ ÇALIŞMA TEZGAHI ÖN YIKAMA DUŞU, TEZGAH TİPİ, SPREY ÜNİTELİ T.ALTI BULAŞIK M.540T/S,2 PRG.PD.DP.1PH DUVAR RAFI ETEJER,AL.AYAK,4.P.ETİLEN RAF-475X1304MM ETEJER,AL.AYAK,4 P.ETİLEN RAF-475X1394MM KIRIKLI TEPSİ TOPLAMA ARABASI

484.6

231.1

B28

B20 B21 B22 B23 B24 B25 B26 B27 B28

ANKASTRE KURU TİP BENMARİ, ÜST RAFLI-3GN ANKASTRE TABAK DİSPENSERİ,ÇAP:310MM EKMEKLİK & KUVER UNİTESİ DUVAR DAVLUMBAZI,304-2000X1100MM,EXPORT

120 115 35.5 120 200 80 40 40 86 155 155 60 172 172.1 172.1

70 65 35.5 45 110 55 73 73 88.2 40 70 70 40 70 70

156.5 70.7 69 50 50 60 25 25 70.9 3 100 90 3 95 95

120 45 140 30 60 90 130.4 130.4 65.7

70 45 70 20 61 40 47.5 47.5 48.7

85 64 100 115 82 3 170 170 159

02-BULAŞIKHANE

663.3

B22 B20

ANKASTRE SOĞUK HAVUZ AÇIK TİP TEŞHİR-3GN

A9

A5

30*30

B23

F4

A12

574.7

12

1.2

SERAMİK

elektrik şaftı

A11

54.7

BULAŞIKHANE

343.9

104 6,8m2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1

90

90

9

B27

12

75.7

47.8

B26

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 A12 A13 A14 A15

PAFTA NO

YEMEK BARI 103 38,6m2 AHŞAP / SERAMİK

PROJE ADI

SK06

B21 12

PAFTA ADI

F3

F3

temizlik

79

6

160

6

160

6

79

B

B

83.2

5.8

330.1

5.8

82.7 83 138

5.8

330 138

43.4

83 138

K26

5.8

TARİH

ÖLÇEK

1/20

ÇİZEN

CEREN OKUMUŞ YAĞMUR YENİCE

KONTROL EDEN

702.2 98.7

Tavan alçıpan ile kapatıldı.

Modelling: Ceren Okumuş REVİZYON-2 Programs used:Konstrüksiyon SketchUp aralıkları düzenlendi.

A4

ahşap parke

35.5

REVİZYON-2

REVİZYON-1

12

C

12

kale seramik 17,5x60 cm

B28

54.7

12

MUTFAK SİSTEM KESİDİ

model and section drawing of the kitchen 27.05.16

50.1

C

ESENTEPE

5.4

ASLI ŞENER

office spaces The building has two same office floors which includes two meeting rooms. Empty space inside wooden seperators were used for placing air distributers that serve to the floor. The same design language were also used on wood cabinet doors and were created extra space for coats, water dispenser.

Drawings : Ceren Okumuş, Yağmur Yenice Programs used: AutoCAD

plan

elevations

sections

KTARI 1 ADET

logo & businesscard for the restaurant

custom made furniture designs

ground floor welcome desk

meeting room shelf

Design : Ceren Okumuş Programs used: Adobe Illustrator

door graphics

meeting room cupboard

AHLAT YOUTH CAMP ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN COMPETITION anonim.istanbul architecture July 2017 Location: Ahlat, Bitlis, Turkey Design Team: Ersin Temürcan, Sait Ali Köknar, Burcu Serdar Köknar, Aslı Şener, Hande Kalender Advisor: Kubilay Savaşeri Assistant: Ceren Okumuş, Cem Çakaloğlu, Fazıl Efe İlgen, Burak Can, Artun Agbulut, Zafer Nuriyev Ahlat Youth Camp Architectural Design Competition is a project which I took part when I was working in anonim.istanbul design office.

Project aims to emphasize the view of Nemrut and Süphan Mountains, which located northeastern side of Lake Van. Besides, with accomodation solutions which has common spaces highlights guests interaction. As an assistant, I prepared and coloured the sections, elevations, floor plans, landscape plan and round-shaped diagrams of the project.

HALİÇ (GOLDEN HORN) SHIPYARD SCIENCE CENTER LANDSCAPE PROJECT anonim.istanbul February 2017- May 2018 Location: İstanbul, Haliç (Golden Horn) Team: Burcu Serdar Köknar, Aslı Şener, Ceren Okumuş, Başak Bilge Akçağoğlu, Dilek Yürük This project started with historical research on the Haliç (Golden Horn) Shipyard and its surroundings. The fact that the area is a very important point for Istanbul, increased the importance of historical research. After the research, due to the coastline of the area and the importance of the shipyard in the history of Istanbul, the design approach was to preserve the public space and the elements that would keep the memory of the shipyard alive in situ. In the project to be realized in 3 phases, it was decided that the 1st and 2nd phases would include a controlled public space project, while the 3rd phase would include the preservation of the shipyard, which was operating with low density at the time of the project, and making it suitable for visits.

TERSANE-İ ÂMİRE OLARAK DA BİLİNEN İSTANBUL TERSANESİ İSTANBUL’UN FETHİNDEN HEMEN SONRA FATİH SULTAN MEHMET TARAFINDAN 1455 YILINDA HALİÇ KIYILARINDA KURULUR. BAŞLANGIÇTA BİRKAÇ GÖZ OLAN TERSANE ZAMAN İÇİNDE BÜYÜR VE ÖNEMLİ BİR GEMİ ÜRETİM MERKEZİ HALİNİ ALIR. (KÖKSAL, 1996) GÜNÜMÜZDE HALİÇ TERSANESİ TERSANE-İ ÂMİRE’NİN BİR PARÇASI OLARAK KASIMPAŞA’DA BULUNMAKTADIR.

BUGÜN TERSANE-İ AMİRE

TAŞKIZAK TERSANESİ

CAMİALTI TERSANESİ

HALİÇ TERSANESİ

Green circle shows the location of the project area

PROJECT HTBMPROJESİ // PEYZAJ PROJES HTBM // LANDSCAPE PEYZAJ PROGRAM CHANGES IN THE COASTLINE PROPOSAL THROUGH HISTORY KIYI ÇİZGİSİNİN TARİHSEL SÜREÇTEKİ DEĞİŞİMİ

1922

ŞEHİR HARİTASI

1966

HAVA FOTOĞRAFI

1982

HAVA FOTOĞRAFI

2015

HAVA FOTOĞRAFI

GÜNCEL KIYI ÇİZGİSİ

KAYNAK: ISTANBULURBANDATABASE.COM

PROJECT HTBMPROJESİ // PEYZAJ PROJES HTBM // LANDSCAPE PEYZAJ

HISTORICAL LAYERING

PROGRAM PROPOSAL TARİHSEL KATMANLAŞMA

3 NO’LU HAVUZ ÇEŞME

1800

3 NO’LU HAVUZUN GENİŞLETİLMESİ MAKİNE ATÖLYESİ 2 NO’LU HAVUZ VE DUVARI MAKİNE- KAZAN DAİRESİ AZAPKAPI

1870

AHŞABİYE ATÖLYESİ MAKİNE-KAZAN DAİRESİ GENİŞLETİLMESİ 1 NO’LU HAVUZ VE DUVARI

1900

AHŞABİYE ATÖLYESİ EK YAPILARI TESVİYE ATÖLYESİ ESKİ MALZEME DEPOSU İNŞAAT ATÖLYESİ KIZAKLAR

1970

TARİHİ BİLİNMİYOR ESKİ AZAPKAPI KIYI ÇİZGİSİ

KAYNAK: -ISTANBULURBANDATABASE.COM -GÜL KOKSAL,1994 -BİMTAŞ RÖLÖVE RAPORLARI

PROJECT HTBM // LANDSCAPE PEYZAJ HTBMPROJESİ // PEYZAJ PROJES

PROGRAM PROPOSAL

PROGRAM ÖNERİSİ MÜZE GİRİŞİ MUSEUM ENTRANCE GÜV ENL

İK

EXHIBITION SERGİ

KAMUSAL ALAN PUBLIC SPACE

ENTRANCE GİRİŞ

KONTROLLÜ KAMUSAL ALAN CONTROLLED PUBLIC SPACE KAMUSAL-KONTROLLÜ KAMUSAL ARASI GÜN İÇİNDE AYRILMIŞ // KONTROL NOKTALARI CONTROL POINTS

RESTAURANT RESTORAN

TESFİYE ATÖLYESİ WORKSHOP SÜRELİ SERGİ TEMPORARY EXH.

ETAP 1

PHASE 1

TAM KAPALI TERSANE BÖLGESİ

MACHINERY MAKİNE ATÖLYESİ WORKSHOP

LIVED SHIPYARD YAŞAYAN TERSANE SERGİSİ EXHIBITION

SHIPYARD AREA

ETAP 2

PHASE 2

ETAP 3

PHASE 3

SHIPYARD TERSANE

PUBLIC PARK TAM KAMUSAL

ALANA UĞRAYAN SEA TRANSPORTATION DENİZ ULAŞIMI POINT

KONTROLLÜ ZİYARET ROTASI CONTROLLED VISITING ROUTE

PROJECT HTBM // LANDSCAPE PEYZAJ HTBMPROJESİ // PEYZAJ PROJES

PHASE 1 // DESIGN PROPOSAL

PROGRAM ÖNERİSİ

değişken bahçeler

PROJECT HTBM // LANDSCAPE PEYZAJ HTBM //PROJES PEYZAJ PROJES

PHASE 1 // SITE PLAN

PROGRAM ÖNERİSİ

CANOPIES

In the project where the preservation of publicity and the character of the shipyard are the main ideas, the layering of the shipyard is used as a design approach. The public platforms that will unite the large exhibition structures belonging to the shipyard and planned to be preserved are reinforced with different public proposals that emphasize the shipyard’s constant mobility. These proposals include the unifying platforms, dry pool, moving gardens, playground, open exhibition area, and public spaces shaded by canopies and trees. All these proposals aim to ensure the public use of the area.

MOVING GARDEN DRY POOL

BLOCK I MACHINERY WORKSHOP

I took part in concept design, construction design & drawing parts.

Project didn’t realized.

GRID WOODED AREA

CARPARK AREA

MOVING GARDEN

BLOCK A ENTRANCE BUILDING

BLOCK H MANAGEMENT OPEN EXHIBITION SPACE UNIFYING PLATFORMS

BLOCK B EXHIBITION SPACE

BLOCK F RESTAURANT BLOCK G EXHIBITION HALL PLAYGROUND

BLOCK D INNOVATION CENTER

CAR ENTRANCE-EXIT

HTBM // PEYZAJ PROJESİ

A scene from the design area

HTBM // PEYZAJ PROJESİ

Grid Wooded Area

HTBM // PEYZAJ PROJESİ

Block A // Entrance Building // Moving Gardens // Unifying Platforms

HTBM // PEYZAJ PROJESİ

Unifying Platforms

HTBM // PEYZAJ PROJESİ

Design suggestion // canopies

PROJECT HTBM // LANDSCAPE PEYZAJ HTBMPROJESİ // PEYZAJ PROJES

PHASE 1 // SHIPYARD INVENTORIES

PROGRAM ÖNERİSİ HALİÇ TERSANESİ HTBM // PEYZAJ PROJESİ

TERSANE KİMLİĞİNİN KORUNMASINA YÖNELİK ENVANTER ÇALIŞMASI Inventories from the shipyard were photographed and listed for use in the design project.

TERSANE KİMLİĞİNİN KORUNMASINA YÖNELİK ENVANTER ÇALIŞMASI

TERSANE KİMLİĞİNİN KORUNMASINA YÖNELİK ENVANTER ÇALIŞMASI TERSANE KİMLİĞİNİN KORUNMASINA YÖNELİK ENVANTER ÇALIŞMASI

VISUALISATION // PORTFOLIO DESIGN in DGA Architecture March-April 2015

During the time that I worked in Dila Gökalp Architecture, I produced works in various fields of architecture.

These are revisualization of the projects, preparing an office portfolio, Gaziemir Masterplan competition idea and visualization, Industrial Heritage research project coordination, research and visualization.

pictograms for portfolio MOBİLİKE L E V E N T O F İ S İ

project re-visualisation MİLANO MODERN SANAT MÜZESİ

1

ana müze strüktürü

2

müze ek işlevleri toplar

3

müze ek işlevleri dönüştürür

4

meydan fonksiyonel farklılık ile biçimlenir performans alanı ve açık kütüphane

müze

industrial heritage mapping // logo design

MADEN İŞLEME GIDA DERİ ENERJİ KİMYEVİ MADDE

5

geçirgen yüzeyler ile hacimler arasında iç-dış ilişkisi kurulur

yeme içme alanı idari birim ve cafe

scene from a project / modelling:rhino render:vray

HOUSING IN CITY ECOSYSTEM //KAĞITHANE BACHELOR GRADUATION PROJECT

While the number of inhabitants in metropolis Istanbul are growing rapidly and uncontrollably, the city is opening up new settlement areas which can be described as slots. Kağıthane is a place in the center of transportation nodes of İstanbul, is one of that slots of the city. Attempts to clean Cendere River, increasing student population along with new university campuses, urban transformation plans and the extra population of Levent office area affects the change of empty industrial spaces in Kağıthane and turn them into offices and dwellings. Regarding as a recreational area beginning from it’s past, new scenarios for Kağıthane as same as new generation settlement areas: settlement for the high-income population. However, of course there can be other scenarios as well. In this project, Kağıthane considered with it’s own city potentials and several question asked to improve the city’s own ecosystem.

at​İstanbul​Technical​University February​ 1 ​-​June​ 1

research for an alternative dwelling: the situaitions which faced in housing production in the city

?

public space usage

research for an alternative dwelling: the situaitions which faced in housing production in the city additions on existing situations

belgrad

haliç

housing project

occupied public space

recreational area for housing

kalan son last green alanları spaces of the city

potential of being an ekolojik ecological koridor corridor olma

how can micro values of the are be used?

DIVERSITY OF THE USER

potansiyeli

?

convenient for public transportation

among the riverside

gecekondu ve toplu konut alanları

boyunca 8 KM BICYCLE ROAD YOLU

shanty town and housing area

RIVER TRANSPORTATION

NEW OFFICES AND HOUSINGS NEW METRO LINE

empty factory buildings

CITY BAZAAR WHICH WILL BE MOVED TO AN UNCERTAIN PLACE

gecekondu ve toplu konut alanları

bugün

bugün

today

today

today

decrasing public space

tı kıyı hat

tı kıyı hat

tı kıyı hat

sadabad parkrecreation area

bugün

how can the entegration be possible?

shanty town and housing area

tı

kağıthane riverside recreation

?

NEW UNIVERSITY BUILDINGS

tı kıyı hat

kağıthane kıyı düzenlemesi

20 yy

river for all city

URBAN TRANSFORMATION

atıl kalmış fabrika alanları

18.yy

how can the existing city potential be used?

cendere cendere river which deresi connects haliç and belgrad forest

DIFFERENT TYPE OF TRANSPORTATION

2

sadabad parkı

? haliç ile belgrad’ı

kıyı hat

1

?

how can publicly used housing be produced?

The project consist of three main units, these are city units, circulation and housing units.

While circulation and city units are totally open to public usage, the housing units designed as private areas considering of the user privacy.

Public spaces under the housing units work with the city units and create meeting points of the project. City hubs allows public meetings in front of them and consist spaces such as library, openair cinema and city bazaar.

*

city units circulation housing units

housing buildings There are five housing buildings in the area which has three types. Circulation of the every housing block is attached to the main circulation in the 4.00 m level.

city units Using both the potentials of the city and the micro values of the area, this project aims to create a housing area that can be used as a public space. It can be seen as an alternative acoomodation design to gated communities which are highly popular in İstanbul.

housing units circulation kindergarden city unit

library city units

city unit

circulation

housing units Regarding the user numbers and changing needs of the users, the housing blocks consist of different housing units which has three sizes and seven types of plans. Plans are combined in a way that every unit has a patio and minimum connection with the main circulation.

open-air cinema, bazaar

a

city unit+ ferry dock

1

housing units

2

site plan

3

b

c

blok A1 plans

STREET.DWELLING BACHELOR 7TH SEMESTER DESIGN STUDIO at​İstanbul​Technical​University September​ 13​-​January​ 1 coordinator​Deniz​Aslan

Are dwellings totally private? If dwelling units shared, what can change in daily life? Is a dwelling can be open to the city, to the street? The questions that I asked at the beginning of the project help me to question the structure of the modern dwelling and the way of using a dwelling in a daily life. Because of the fast-living way of life, dwelling became a place where most people spend limited time in it. This caused a limited personal production as well. Besides, because of the fast-living, encounters in the public spaces decreased, too. As a result of the lack of encounters, idea flow is decreasing which allows production and creativity. The main idea which shapes the project is creating shared spaces as an alternative to the privatized spaces. StreetDwelling,

which works as an opposite to the gated communities, is trying to create spaces where the street and dwelling being meshed. This meshing allows in-between spaces where can give opportunities to several encounters. The users of the area can share their private dwellings both with the other inhabitants of the project and passer-by users of the public spaces to turn their dwellings into creative spaces.

shaping the area area 12 locates between the area 11 and 13 creates a transition space.

considering the longitudinal location of the area, broken lines, which also kept the relationship between area 11 and 13, appear.

level differentiations and broken lines are specialized to make a distinction between users from the area and visitors, in-between spaces which are commonly used occurs.

upper level of the area works with the area 13. dwelling units rise, however they do not cut their connection with the ground. circulation’s location allows the visitors to reach upper levels of the dwelling.

general view of the area

dwelling units Dwellings, which located in two dwelling blocks inside the area, are used as shared spaces. Visitors who came for the public areas can also reach and participate the events in the shared event spaces inside dwellings with the circulation directly connects dwellings and public spaces.

Event spaces are dwellings which are opened to the public by the owners, indeed. These dwellings turn into event/ shared spaces at certain times of the day.

The owner of the large dwelling that has a library, cinema room, meeting room, dance area etc. can open these spaces to the public. Besides, kitchens and living rooms can also be shared.

OPEN

dwelling unit belongs to the ground floor single dwelling unit

folding door

The area which is opened to the outside time to time, has specialized functions differs from dwelling to dwelling. It is used as an area for dancing, reading, studying, etc.

C

B A

plan for a dwelling type

CLOSED

URBAN FIRST AID KIT Çuhadaroğlu​Aluminium​Company Student​Design​Competition May​ 1 with​Umut​Atlı,​Ozan​Özvatan

FIRST AID KIT TAKSİM

Multi-functional urban kit in Taksim Square. Inspired by the daily movements of the passangers. The design aims to create intersectional surfaces which turn into public toilet, wi-fi point, bicycle parking area, sitting spaces. Besides, piezoelectrical steps that activates with passangers’ steps aims to produce electricity for the first aid kit.

“LIVING CARTOGRAPHY” DESIGN & DRAWING in Section in Co-action Device: A study Artist:​İnci​Eviner​I​13th​İstanbul​Biennial August 2013 - December 2013 ith​Hilal​Menlioğlu,​Eser​Ep zdemir,​ Ömercan​Çakır,​Seda​Tavukçu, Emin​Erenoğlu​

Co-Action Device: A Study is a collective study in which the roles of participants and artists are constantly changing. While students from different disciplines are on stage as part of this device, they have the opportunity to experience many concepts in a creative researchproduction relationship. Based on performative research, this formation can be viewed from the balconies that see the exhibition space throughout the biennial.

Living Carthography is located on the white wall inside the device. As the first idea, the map only covering the Galata Greek School and the device, however during the performative research it adds inside it’s layers to the participants’ personal histories of the time, the common experiences of Gezi Park and the Galata Greek School, the process of reading and examining and it turns into a semiabstract Taksim map telling the movement of a flaneur’s without being obstructed by the solid blocks of the city.

Auguste Perret’s distorted Paris theater with the inspiration of Device, collage Ceren Okumuş

abstract maps of Taksim and Gezi Parkı as a first study, Ceren Okumuş, Hilal Menlioğlu

Seçil, a woman has flying legs drawing, Ceren Okumuş

“SELECTIVE PERMEABLE” HOW TO SEE NEW INTERNAL ORGANS?

“THE BODY OF THE STUDIO” EXPERIMENTS OF THE BODY PIECES

Haliç University Architecture Faculty Interior Architecture Department

Haliç University Architecture Faculty Interior Architecture Department

Basic Design Studio I / 2021-2022 Fall Workshop Design

Basic Design Studio II/ 2021-2022 Spring Workshop Design with MK Yurttaş, Selin Erdemirci, Burçe Karadağ

Today, the changing city and changing technology bring about various changes in the body. If these changes produced a new internal organ in the body, what kind of internal organ would it be? How did this organ relate to other organs, and what kind of layering would mediate the visualization of this internal organ?

Inspired by Nat Chard’s “Body Project”, in this workshop, first of all, a new internal organ that emerges due to the changes produced by the city in the body will be designed, and methods will be researched to display this internal organ in the body. While researches on X-ray imaging methods, shadow theaters and selectively permeable materials will mediate the imaging of the new internal organ, the relationship between different materials and light will be experienced.

Basic Design I Studio Workshop, first year student Burcu Yıldız project. An additional lung for air pollution.

Make a mold of the part of your body that most relates to the studio. Reproduce this pattern with different trials! Fill in the gaps with plaster. Reconstruct body parts by bringing them together with other body parts and space.

Efe Soytok, supportive piece

Selay Kılıç, second hand

Exhibition

COLLAGES FOR THE TOWN FOR THE THINGS MAKING NOISE IN THE WIND Istabul Technical University Architectural Design Master Program Architectural Narrattives Instructor: Associate Prof. Funda Uz