Daytona Times - July 4, 2013

Page 1

HAPPY FOURTH OF JULY!

Local doctor to serve on Residency Review Committee for Family Medicine

E

Daytona

U.S. POSTAGE PAID Permit #189 Daytona Beach, FL

E FR

LEE A. DANIELS: Supreme Court Justices show PRESORTED STANDARD true colors during recent decisions See page 4

See page 3

East Central Florida’s Black Voice www.daytonatimes.com www.daytonatimes.com

JULY 4 - JULY 10, 2013

YEAR 38 NO. 27

Sale of lots catches residents by surprise

PEOPLE SPEAK

Public will learn this summer when they can bid on Midtown land BY JAMES HARPER DAYTONA TIMES harperjames59@yahoo.com

Since the Daytona Times reported last month that the city of Daytona Beach plans to sell 53 parcels of land in the predominantly Black Midtown, many residents were upset that they were not notified that such a major sale was taking place before commissioners voted to sell the properties.

Dr. Evelyn Bethune told the Daytona Times had she not read about the sale of the properties in the newspaper she and others in the Black community may not have had an opportunity to bid on the parcels of land. Daytona Beach Redevelopment Director Reed A. Berger recently told the Times, “When the RFP (request for proposal) is released all that information will be available to the public at the same time through public notice, including who and where.”

Public notice coming Reed also said he would look into publishing a public notice

advertisement in the Times. “Now that we have approval to dispose of property, we are in process of preparing a request for proposal for the buildable properties that will be published later this summer. People can bid on the parcels when the public notice is published,” he said. Many of the properties on the list did not have an address. Berger said locations of properties are by parcel number provided by county appraiser’s records. Both the city and county have interactive maps that can show these property locations when the parcel number is entered.

Some not buildable Daytona Beach Mayor Derrick Henry he supported selling the properties back to the public because it could at least mean that the new property owner will build something – a business or a home – on the property. Berger said in a memo to City Manager Jim Chisholm they wanted the city officials to approve a resolution that “allows the CRA and city to consider sale for far less than the fair market value.” Only two properties on the list are from the Main Street area and one from downtown, which means most on the list of properties proposed to be declared sur-

plus are from Midtown. Eight lots up for sale, according to Berger’s memo to Chisholm, are “not buildable (and) should be offered to the adjacent property owners for purchase.” Thirty-eight of the lots are residential and suitable to be redeveloped in accordance with the respective Community Redevelopment Area master plans. The memo also said four lots are not buildable but can be combined together and sold as buildable lots. Three lots are commercial to Midtown and suitable to be redeveloped in accordance to the Midtown Redevelopment Plan.

Local NAACP, state branches addressing Court decision on Voting Rights Act

Daytona International Speedway

BY JAMES HARPER DAYTONA TIMES harperjames59@yahoo.com

JOE BURBANK/ORLANDO SENTINEL/MCT

Week for fireworks, races Fans clamor to photograph driver Jeff Gordon before the start of NASCAR’s Sprint Cup series Coke Zero 400 at Daytona International Speedway on July 7, 2012. This year’s race takes place Saturday. See story about the grand marshals on page 8.

New law could make ‘annoying’ cop a felony BY CYRIL JOSH BARKER NNPA NEWS SERVICE

If you’re thinking about teasing a police officer in the state of New York, think again. A new law passed by the state Senate could land you in prison for up to four years if you are found “aggravating” a cop. The law, originally proposed by upstate Republican Sen. Joseph Griffo, passed in the Senate last month. The purpose of the law is “to establish the crime of aggravated harassment of a police officer or peace officer and make such crime a class E felony.” “Police officers all across this state put their lives on the line every day to protect

the people of New York. New York state must establish laws and toughen existing laws that protect the police from becoming victims of criminals,” Griffo outlines in the bill. “Far too many law enforcement officers are being harassed, injured, even killed while honoring their commitment to protect and serve this state.”

No harassing The bill is set go to the Assembly, and if passed, it would take effect in November. In further detail, aggravating a police officer includes harassing, annoying, threatening or alarming. It also includes striking, kicking, shoving or other physical contact. “Professionally, I am grateful to see this bill pass through the Senate. Our police officers have a very dangerous job and need the support of our government leaders to help make them safe,” said Utica Police Department Chief Mark Williams. “All too often, persons are physically challenging police officers in the line of duty. Currently, in those instances where an officer is physically attacked [short of

sustaining a physical injury], the lawful charge is only a violation.”

Turbulent time Critics of the law say that it opens the floodgates for the officers, especially the NYPD, to come down on citizens. The law comes up during a turbulent time in the city, as the Community Safety Act proposed by the City Council could bring changes to the NYPD. “As far as I can tell, injuring and killing police officers in unjustified situations is already illegal. Thus, the point of this law cannot possibly be to prevent that from happening, as there are already laws in place for that purpose,” said legal expert Georgia Sand from the University of California, Los Angeles. “This would the same as saying that a law against annoying/pestering/harassing women should be passed because too many women are being raped and killed. The former simply has nothing to do with the latter.”

This story is special to the NNPA from the New York Amsterdam News.

Daytona Beach NAACP President Cynthia Slater participated in a media teleconference last week called by the Florida State Conference of the NAACP to discuss the impact U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to invalidate Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act. “While the Supreme Court decision has sidelined the Voting Rights Act, the fight is not over and the game is still on,” stated NAACP Florida State Conference Presi- Cynthia dent Adora Obi Nweze. Slater “Florida units are mobilized to encourage our local, state, and national elected leaders to put politics aside and develop a new formula, as suggested by the Supreme Court Ruling, that protects the vote for all citizens.” She added, “The Su- Adora preme Court of the Unit- Obi Nweze ed States, as Justice Ruth Ginsburg stated, ‘erred egregiously.’ ’’

Five counties affected Slater said the Supreme Court’s decision is a heart-piercing decision that will have negative ramifications on voters. “As you may know, Florida is certainly affected because five counties are subjected to section 5 of the Voting Rights Act,” Slater explained. Under the provision that the court struck down, nine states and the city councils and local governments within them were required to obtain advance approval from Washington before changing their rules on voting and elections, a process known as “pre-clearance.” In Florida, affected counties were Hillsborough, Monroe, Collier, Hardee and Hendry. “Voters in this state will be adversely affected by this ruling,’’ Slater added.

Plan for branches She noted that branches have been charged to do a number of things that include: • Appeal to Florida’s congressional representatives to restore the statute in the event it is reviewed; • Be proactive with the Florida LegisPlease see NAACP, Page 2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.