PHY331 Magnetism Lecture 3
Last week… • Derived magnetic dipole moment of a circulating electron. • Discussed motion of a magnetic dipole in a constant magnetic field. • Showed that it precesses with a frequency called the Larmor precessional frequency
This week… • Discuss Langevin’s theory of diamagnetism. • Use angular momentum of precessing electron in magnetic field to derive the magnetization of a sample and thus diamagnetic susceptibility. • Will set the scene for the calculation of paramagnetic susceptibility.
Langevin’s theory of diamagnetism • We want to calculate the sample magnetisation M and the diamagnetic susceptibility χ (recall M = χH) • Every circulating electron on every atom has a magnetic dipole moment • The sum of the magnetic dipole moments on any atom is zero (equal numbers circulating clockwise and anticlockwise ?) • The magnetisation M arises from the reaction to the torque Γ due to the applied magnetic field B which creates the Lamor precessional motion at frequency ωL.
• i) the angular momentum L of the circulating electron is, 2
L =
mvr =
mω r
• The angular momentum Lp of the precessional motion is, L p = mω L r 2
€
where ωL is the Larmor frequency and <r2> is the mean square distance from an axis through the nucleus which is parallel to B
€
• ii) We showed last week that the magnetic moment mp per electron associated with Lp is
e mp = − Lp 2m • so the total magnetisation M of the sample must be, € M = Natoms × Zelectrons/atom × mp M = N × Z × mp
So substitute for each quantity, in turn,
e M =− NZ Lp 2m
€
e M =− NZ mω L r 2 2m ⎛ eB ⎞ 2 e M =−NZ m ⎜ ⎟ r 2m ⎝ 2m ⎠
€
so that,
χ =
€ €
M H
2
e = − µ0N Z r2 4m
Now express <r2> in terms of the mean square radius of the orbit <ρ2> , where
r
2
2 2 = ρ 3
will give
2
e χ = − µ0N Z ρ2 € 6m € €
€ The result we wanted!!
2
2
ρ =x +y +z x 2 = y 2 = z 2 = ρ 2 /3 2
2
2
2
r =x +y
2
What does this mean??? • The atom as a whole does not possess a permanent magnetic dipole moment. • The magnetisation is produced by the influence of the external magnetic field on the electron orbits and particularly by the precessional motion. • The diamagnetic susceptibility χ is small and negative, because <ρ2> is small. • Negative susceptability means that diamagnetism opposes applied magnetic field. (prefix: dia - in opposite or different directions) • Note that measurements of χ were once used to get estimates of atomic size through the values of <ρ2>.
Remember - all materials are diamagnetic – but this small effect is swamped if also paramagnetic of ferromagnetic.
Paramagnetism • Paramagnets have a small positive magnetisation M (directed parallel the applied field B). • Each atom has a permanent magnetic dipole moment. • Langevin (classical) theory • The paramagnet consists of an array of permanent magnetic dipoles m • In a uniform field B they have Potential Energy = - m .B
A dipole parallel to the field has the lowest energy • BUT, the B field causes precession of m about B. • However it can’t alter the angle between m and B (as the Lz component is constant in the precession equations). • For the dipole to lower its energy (and become parallel to the field) we need a second mechanism. This is provided by the thermal vibrations • The magnetic field “would like” the dipoles aligned to lower their energy • The thermal vibrations “would like” to randomise and disorder the magnetic dipoles
• We can therefore expect a statistical theory, based on a “competition” between these two mechanisms,
k BT ≈ −m.B to calculate the magnetisation M of a paramagnet
€
Calculate the magnetisation M of a paramagnet • M must be the vector sum of all the magnetic dipole moments
M =∑
[1] Resolved component of a dipole in field direction
X
[2] Number of dipoles with this orientation
To do this, use Boltzmann statistics to obtain the number dn of dipoles with energy between E and E + dE
dn = c exp (−E kT ) dE
where k = Boltzmann’s constant, c = is a constant of the system and T = T measured in Kelvin
€
How to find c? Integrate over all the energies, which must give N the total number of dipoles ∞
N=
∫ c exp (−E
kT ) dE
0 Next week we will do this to calculate the susceptibility of a paramagnet. The important result we will get will be That susceptibility is temperature dependent with
€
χ = C/T
This is Curie’s law.
Summary • Calculated the susceptibility for a diamagnet e2 2 χ = − µ0N Z ρ
6m
• Argued that all materials have a small diamagnetic susceptibility resulting from the precession of electrons in a magnetic field. € precession results in a magnetic moment, and • This thus a susceptibility. • Then discussed paramagnetism, resulting from atoms having a permanent magnetic moment. • Sketched out how we will calculate paramagnetic susceptibility.