ELECTION 2013 October 24 2013
Two
the cheshire herald, october 24, 2013
ELECTION 2013 Candidates For All Offices Offer Their Reasons For Running Town Council Candidates
David Schrumm, Republican First District Candidate I thoroughly enjoy public service
and wrestling with the increasingly difficult issues confronting Cheshire. Given the egregious fiscal mismanagement at the state and Federal level, it is essential that we stay focused on the town’s long term financial stability as revenue from Hartford and Washington is reduced. If we maintain our excellent financial position, we can afford the basic community services required of every town but also the amenities that make Cheshire such an attractive town. I have been deeply involved with town budgets for many years and can offer a unique perspective on taxes, borrowing and community services. I have a clear record of fiscal conservatism and am pleased to have been able to work with other members of the Council and town staff to keep Cheshire livable and affordable. I am often asked how I can stand the pressures, the petty political nonsense and the time commitment. The answer is simple: we are put on this earth to serve, not to be served. If elected, I will do what I have always done: Do what is best in the long term for the majority of Cheshire residents.
Kristen Selleck, Democrat First District Candidate I’m running for the 1st district Town Council seat because I can serve this district effectively and efficiently. I want to ensure that as a town we are financially responsible and progressing on important issues, such as public safety, educating our children and caring for our seniors. We can be responsible and successful; we just need leaders who are willing to listen. Our Town Council cannot ignore pressing issues or obstruct progress and wait for someone else to do it. We need our representatives to be open-minded, independent and respectful. I believe that my experience and my willingness to work for this community make me the right choice for the 1st district. I believe in public service. As a social worker, I’ve spent my career working to help others in various ways. I’ve always been involved in my community from being President of the Board of Directors at the condo association of my first home, to helping my neighbors, to working with communities to improve safety for children. I will bring this energy to Town Council. Finally, I am running because we deserve better and I want to work with the 1st district residents to move our community forward.
Candidates for all offices were asked to briefly explain why they want to be elected to certain seats within Cheshire government. Here is what those who responded had to say. On a regular basis, I make every effort to inform the public about my voting record, meeting schedules, agenda items and upcoming events through a growing e-mail distribution. The on-going feedback has been invaluable, and I plan on continuing the efforts to hear from you. A good representative wants to hear from his constituents, and I am committed to acting as your voice in government. Advancing fiscal restraint, dedication to constituent service and keeping the public informed are at the core of my service to the district. In the next term I will remain devoted to good government and reliable representation. After all, this is your government and you deserve nothing less.
Matt Bowman, Democrat Second District Candidate Did not provide a response
Joseph Falvey, Republican Third District Candidate I am seeking office because as a nearly lifelong resident of this community I want to give back. I played youth sports in this town, I attended school in this town, I did my college internship in this town, and now I feel it is my, as well as my generations turn to “return the favor” to the community. We can no longer wait for others to provide services for us. As a young resident of Cheshire, and a recent college graduate, I want to make sure this community is a place where I as well as others can plant their roots and raise their families
Liz Linehan, Democrat Third District Candidate My husband and I could not have picked a better community in which to raise our children. I was raised here, and always knew that I’d raise my children here as well. We love Cheshire and the quality of life that comes with a town like ours. But it will only last if each of us does our part to preserve Cheshire’s character, keep our residents safe, and put our town on a fiscally sustainable path forward while investing in our future. That means eliminating government waste, investing in education and core community services, and taking the time to adequately research projects we wish to fund so we don’t overspend, or have to spend more on fixes and band-aids. I want to be the voice for our residents and make sure that Cheshire can continue to be such a wonderful town for many years to come.
Thomas Ruocco, Republican Second District Candidate
Mike O’Donnell, Republican Fourth District Candidate
I supported budgets with the lowest mill rate increases in recent history; while maintaining vital town services. I have advocated for reductions in overtime and, as a result, we are conducting an overtime study to control costs. In addition to controlling costs, Second District residents can rely on me to respond to your special requests. These may include suggestions for improvements or repairs to parks and roads, questions about issues that will affect your neighborhood and learning more about policies that support your interests. I will remain dedicated to constituent service.
I am running for Town Council to give back to a community that has given so much to me and my family. I was born in Cheshire, went through the school system, and now own and operate a local business. My children attend public school in Cheshire. I am active in local government as a member of the Park and Recreation Commission and the Town Beautification Committee. Through my interactions with residents of Cheshire, many residents have expressed that they feel that the Town Council is not responsive to their concerns. As an involved citizen of Cheshire, I
I was born in town and attended Cheshire schools. I also chose to raise a family here so I certainly have a vested interest in this community. I have always been involved in public service and have enjoyed my past two years on the Council. I have worked with many residents of the 4th district to solve their problems and get them answers. There’s more work to do and I want to be a part of moving Cheshire forward over the next two years.
ture. Last year the voters approved the largest project ever to update our town’s sewage treatment plant. There are two other major projects that are just getting started 1) the Linear Trail extension, a combined project with the state and Cheshire that will result in a completed trail from Southington to New Haven, 2) A specialized Performance Contract, (this is a contract that will enable Cheshire to complete approximately $9 million of building and energy updates with no additional debt to the Town). These projects will enhance our Town parks, update our neighborhood schools, and protect our environment with minimal impact on our tax rate. I am committed to keeping Cheshire a great place to raise our families, educate our kids and remain a welcoming community to all ages. I pledge to continue working hard on these projects and I will put in the extra effort needed to keep Cheshire a great place to live.
Tim Slocum, Republican At-Large Candidate
Patti Flynn-Harris, Democrat At-Large Candidate
People often ask me, “How can you do that job or Why do you bother?” The reward for me is having the opportunity to play a big part in the fiscal and operations management of our town working closely with the public, council colleagues and the town manager. It’s a volunteer job I take seriously and it’s a job I love. The position is not without its challenges. I don’t support every budget increase nor do I find merit in everything that comes before us whether it’s something in a Town employee union contract or an emergent special interest in the community. Along the way some of my cheer leaders may have become critics but leaders must find the balance between what must be funded and the taxpayer’s ability to pay for it. Finally, I enjoy my role as council chairman and serving as the town’s honorary mayor. It’s not all about running a good meeting either. I put great effort into setting an agenda that makes sense for the Cheshire taxpayers. I am honored when I have the opportunity to represent the town in my capacity as the mayor. I love our town and see no reason why Money Magazine couldn’t name us higher than the 39th best small town in America.
I believe in the democratic process and believe that everyone, if able, should participate in some way. From my years as a member, as well as serving on the board of the League of Women Voters, I’ve learned how important it is to work across party lines. I also believe in government being open and transparent, with civility to all people. I tried to bring those traits the the Planning & Zoning Commission, where I served for 11 years, as well as the Town Council. My parents had two major rules: learn something new every day, and give back to others. Although it may sound idealistic, serving on both the Planning and Zoning Commission and now the Town Council have been my way of attempting to give back to the town. I hope the voters of Cheshire will allow me to continue serving the town as a member of the Town Council.
feel that I can be a voice for the residents of Cheshire. I feel that I can assist the Town Council to become more responsive to the citizens of Cheshire. It is my sincere opinion that dialogue among politicians and citizens will lead to growth for the Town of Cheshire.
Peter Talbot, Democrat Fourth District Candidate
Mike Ecke, Democrat At-Large Candidate I am running for Town Council because I am most passionate about doing what is right for Cheshire. I am independent minded person who is honored to serve. I feel that it is my duty to do what is in the best interest of everyone in the community, young and old. Over the last few years I have seen a lack of civility creep into the council dialogue. I have heard people called names, people cut off from expressing their opinion, elected officials yelling and calling each other names and an unwillingness to entertain open communication. My goal for the next term is to work with all members of the council, in a civil way, to create an environment where good government can return.
James Sima, Republican At-Large Candidate We have been through five tough years, struggling with a prolonged recession, reduced State Aid and aging infrastruc-
Sylvia Nichols, Republican At-Large Candidate For three years, I have been part of a team which, through proper planning and reasoned deliberation, has carefully maintained or significantly improved town services and infrastructure by developing reasonable budgets. Pursuing State and Federal funding for challenging weather related incidents, for the waste water project, the linear trail expansion, negotiating insurance proceeds for the collapsed pool cover, the institution of energy saving plans at our town and school buildings have all contributed to our ability to minimize tax increases. Though I completely support the concept of term limits, I feel that my experience will be valuable for one more term. I look forward to the completion of the linear trail expansion, the waste water treatment plant and a positive result of the pool referendum. We have done a good job but there is more to do.
Paul Bellagamba, Democrat At-Large Candidate The time is now for new voices on the Town Council. To achieve that end, I have decided to seek election to the Council as an At-Large candidate. As a long time Cheshire resident (since 1989) I have proudly raised my family here. We have enjoyed all the amenities and services our town has to offer. Now it is time for me to give back to
our community. I will be an independent voice on the Council working to maintain the quality of life our citizens know and deserve, while keeping taxes in check. I also pledge to maintain an open and bi-partisan town government. The time for a change is now and I will work hard to give the residents of Cheshire their voice back in local government. Bringing a new perspective to our town government, I will strive to: 1. Maintain taxes at their current levels without unduly impacting the services provided to our residents. 2. Increase development of the Town’s commercial and retail properties, particularly in the north end which, I believe, is essential to the Town’s growth and future tax base. 3. Earmark a portion of our education funds for building and infrastructure upgrades. Our students need comfortable and well maintained facilities in order to excel and be prepared for college and the business world.
Rob Oris, Republican At-Large Candidate My reasons for running as a candidate for Town Council are very simple and straight-forward. As a father and local small-business owner, I want to do everything I can to ensure that Cheshire stays vibrant and fiscally strong long into the future. That is my vision, and I am prepared to support my vision with energy, ideas and hard work. If elected, my efforts as Town Councilor at Large will be grounded in the needs of the community, and driven by a desire to achieve real, meaningful progress that benefits all.
Dan Nowak, Democrat At-Large Candidate As an independent thinker, I bring a new voice and new energy to the Cheshire Town Council with innovative ideas and an impeccable background in communication. My goal is to lay the foundation for a bright future for my children and every Cheshire citizen. I want to serve our citizens through an engaged council that listens; jump start development by tapping into Cheshire’s valuable resource – its people; ensure high ethical standards, openness and transparency in town operations; and maintain the excellent quality of our education system through fiscally responsible means. I believe it is imperative to get closure on town athletic facilities (pool, high school lockerrooms) and will use my strong background in sports to one way or another facilitate that closure. I want to restore economic opportunity, ease the tax burden and improve local government civility. I want to introduce and research initiatives that are cost-free to the town that can help ease the tax burden and also help retain current businesses and lure new businesses.
Board Of Ed. Candidates Tony Perugini, Republican I believe that now, more than ever, our school system is faced with very big challenges be it common core standards implementation, increasing unfunded mandates, political infighting to declining revenue that will impact the quality and integrity of children’s education. We are at a crossroads. It’s imperative
continued to page 3
the cheshire herald, october 24, 2013
Three
ELECTION 2013 Candidates For All Offices Offer Their Reasons For Running
continued from page 2
that we elect BOE members that can cut through the drama, noise and misinformation and represent all stakeholders on these matters by providing what the community needs to hear, the facts, so that we can make correctly informed decisions. As a parent and tax payer I demand no less in a BOE member. As a BOE member and finance chairman, I’ve worked diligently to be a voice of reason in clarifying difficult issues as well as demystifying our education budget. Using your input, I helped streamline our budget workshops to be highly informative and interactive. I’ve demonstrated that being fiscally responsible and making sound education investments are not mutually exclusive. I helped negotiate very favorable contracts with our collective bargaining groups but more importantly helped build positive relationships as well. If you want a BOE member that’s approachable, responsible and listens - with a proven record - then I humbly request your support. Vote Perugini.
Mark Ecke, Democrat I have served the Town of Cheshire
Candidates for all offices were asked to briefly explain why they want to be elected to certain seats within Cheshire government. Here is what those who responded had to say. for my entire adult life. I am seeking a position on the Board of Education because I believe the combination of my experience working in the schools and my experience in law enforcement will make me a vital asset to the town. I have worked with teachers, administrators, and parents at all grade levels and understand the strengths of our schools. I have also seen areas of our schools that could be improved.
Sandra Pavano, Republican Did not provide a response.
Kathryn Fabiani, Democrat I have lived in Cheshire for over 15 years and my husband and I have four children who have attended Cheshire public schools. I am running for the Board of Education because I am passionate about providing a high quality education for every child. We must ensure that our children are prepared
to achieve academic and career success, and to become productive members of our society. Many issues face us – school safety, teacher and principal evaluations, full-day kindergarten, implementing the newly adopted education standards, and repairing and maintaining our school facilities. Our top priority must be to acquire accurate information about what is working and what isn’t so that we spend taxpayer dollars wisely and effectively. As an experienced attorney, I bring the ability to think analytically and independently on the big issues without losing sight of the important details. As a former small business owner and manager, I know the importance of spending money wisely to create results and I will bring that same mentality to the Board of Education. If elected, I will work hard with our teachers, administrators and parents to make sure our schools continue to be among the best in the state.
Adam Grippo, Republican As a resident of over 35 years and a
graduate of the Cheshire public school system, structural changes have come to light that greatly concern me. Most notably is the implementation of the Common Core Curriculum. There is a vast amount of detailed standards and requirements contained in the Common Core that will be imposed on our children. Yet Cheshire’s 37-page implementation plan barely scratches the surface of these complexities. It is unclear and unproven as to how any of these new methods and requirements will actually improve our education system. It is the administration’s swift endorsement of the Common Core that compelled me to stand up and take notice. I pledge to you that I will be the watchdog that you demand during this time of transition. The content taught to our children will maintain the high standards that we as Cheshire parents expect. I also pledge to preserve the individual voices of Cheshire’s students and their concerned parents. The legacy of excellence that is the Cheshire Public School system has been hard fought and I intend to preserve it to the best of my ability.
PZC Candidates Lelah Campo, Republican
Cheshire is a great community that provides many opportunities to my family. I feel it’s my duty to give back by using my time and skills to help keep Cheshire on the right track.
Diane Visconti, Democrat I believe in public service and am interested in doing what I can to help keep Cheshire a lovely place to live. The best towns are those that retain a “sense of place”.
Edward Gaudio, Republican Did not provide a response.
Vincent Lentini, Democrat I am a lifelong resident of Cheshire who enjoys volunteering and serving my community. I want to continue to help make Cheshire the outstanding community that it is.
Candidates Running For Cheshire Town Council Candidiates For Cheshire Town Council were asked to respond to the following three questions: 1.) What do you believe is the most pressing issue facing Cheshire in the short term and how would you help address it? 2.) Voters will decide whether to approve more than $3 million in spending for a tension membrane structure to cover the Community Pool. If that referendum fails, what would you support doing with the Community Pool? 3.) How would you look to grow the town’s commercial tax base and do you believe the proposed shopping center in the north end of Cheshire could help the community?
First District David Schrumm, Republican Age — 64 Occupation — Manager, Mergers and Acquisitions – F&M, Inc. Family — Wife – Sally – Children: Rebecca, Jeffrey and Katey Relevant Experience — Town Council—total of 18 years; Zoning Board; Economic Development Commission; Charter Revision Commission. 1.) A tradition of sound long-range
planning has prevented issues from becoming “pressing.” We have kept up with infrastructure repairs (roads, sidewalks, bridges), poured millions of dollars into school maintenance, totally revamped town and school technology, have a viable pool solution before the voters, added 110 acres to our open space and have broken ground on a sewer treatment plant that will serve us for decades. We have an energy initiative under way that will save the taxpayers $9 million while cutting costs in our schools and other public buildings. Finally, funds are now in place for the Linear Park extension, the boys’ locker
room at the high school and the concession stand and rest rooms at the CHS athletic complex. All this construction will begin next spring. The most pressing problem? How to maintain this progress while keeping tax increases to a minimum, like we have the last four years. 2.) The Council set up the pool study group last spring to come up with a solution that would be viable and affordable. I believe the solution that is on the ballot in November is both. It will solve a long-standing problem and provide the town with a great recreation resource for all ages. However, if the
referendum fails, the Council would have no authority to do anything other than make it a summer only facility in the near term since there would be no money to do anything else. I hope the Council is not forced to make that decision. 3.) Only 11 percent of Cheshire is zoned either commercial or industrial; the rest is residential. We need to insure that what is built on that land is of the highest quality to generate the greatest tax receipts. We should not allow the expansion of residential in the limited commercial/industrial areas. This is antithetical to the idea that a commercial/
industrial tax base helps relieve the burden on existing homeowners. I do not support large retail development in the north end for reasons too numerous to list here. The long-term downsides are greater than any benefit from additional taxes. I would much rather have our development efforts be focused on certain areas of the town center; that they be developed in such a way that local businesses can thrive in a pedestrian-friendly, attractive environment. People tell me that they are looking for the “New England village” atmosphere for Cheshire, not Queen Street.
First District Kristen Selleck, Democrat Age — 33 Occupation — National Training Director Family — Single Relevant Experience — I have years of experience advocating for individuals and families needs. I’m a trained social worker and know how to listen to and aid in addressing needs of others. I’ve been on the Board of Directors, including as President, of a condo association and have overseen budgets and tasks to improve my community in the past. 1.) As a resident, I understand that we want to live in a great town with many things to offer and at the same time we want to ensure that our taxes are lessened when they can be. I think the northend project is a good example of a way to increase revenue without
asking residents to pay more. In addition to finding other revenue, if elected, I would look at our current spending and ensure that, if there are unnecessary expenditures, we stop them immediately. We need to find ways to be more responsible financially and ensure that all of us as residents are able to live well on multiple levels. 2.) I believe the pool referendum is incredibly important because the decision should be made by the residents of this town. If this particular referendum does not pass, the Town Council needs to respect that decision and work with the Pool Committee to develop a new proposal that will address residents’ concerns about balancing cost and ensuring we have a solution. 3.) Growing our commerical tax base is imperative for maintaining lower tax rates for residents and current businesses. I believe the northend shopping center proposal is an important step financially for the town and can
bring us continued revenue. In addition, I sincerely believe that the proposed shopping center can bring needed ac-
tivities and opportunities for residents of Cheshire to enjoy. That said, we want to ensure that we are responsible
in our growth. We can find ways to keep our beautiful town progressing without growing beyond what we want or need.
Second District Tom Ruocco, Republican Age — 53 Occupation — Health Insurance - Proposal Family — Married, two children Relevant experience — Second District Councilor since 2005; Personnel Committee, 2005 –present and current Chairman; Budget Committee, 2007-present; Solid Waste Committee 2005-09, 2011-present
1.) Short-term thinking is not the best way to address the town’s issues. Our issues are challenging and short term thinking is not going to help. In general, I think our most pressing issue is that the economy is not growing, but the budget is. There is an expectation that government spending can increase each year. We need to live within our means and find ways to reduce the cost of government. I believe the taxpayer is tapped out and not much more tolerant of rising taxes. In the long run or, for that matter, the short run, we can’t
continue down the current path of rising budgets each year. 2.) It would seem to me that the best solution would be to make the pool a seasonal facility. But that does not rule out other options such as trying to partner with a private entity to manage the pool. The voters will decide if the referendum is suitable for the future of the pool, and I encourage voters to obtain as much information as possible before voting. 3.) Growing the tax base means en-
continued to page 4
the cheshire herald, october 24, 2013
Four Two
ELECTION 2013 Third District Liz Linehan, Democrat Age — 39 Occupation — Marketing Consultant and Justice of the Peace Family — Married with
three children Relevant experience — Running a small business, raising three children, and understanding the challenges facing Cheshire families. 1.) The most pressing issue in my
opinion is public safety and the constant tabling of votes on safety issues. For instance, our aerial apparatus fire truck is over 40 years old and in disrepair, but for many years the Council majority has been putting off sending it to referendum for Cheshire residents to approve the expenditure. Being fiscally conservative is of great importance, but not at the expense of the lives of our residents. As Councilman Talbot said, this is not an issue nine people on the Council should decide. When it comes to the safety of our citizens, our residents should have a
say. If I am fortunate enough to be elected, I would push to get the fire truck expenditure to referendum and let the people decide. 2.) I’m very pleased this went to referendum and the voters will have a chance to weigh in on Nov. 5. The Pool Commission did a great job of researching the options, but the challenges surrounding the pool are indicative of a bigger issue: our local government needs to make more careful decisions the first time around so that we aren’t spending millions on band-aids and temporary fixes. Should this referen-
dum fail, we must carefully choose an option which is fiscally responsible and does not place us in this situation again years down the road. 3.) We need to compete by keeping property taxes down and offering incentives so that businesses can take advantage of Cheshire’s otherwise great business climate. We’ve lost a few highprofile businesses in past years, and we need to put systems in place which will prevent that from happening further, as well as make coming to Cheshire desirable. Retention and growth are of equal importance. Of course, keeping
Cheshire’s small-town feel is important, too, and we must be cognizant of the need for balance between industry and residency. They can co-exist, but it requires a continuing dialogue between the two. I am very optimistic that the retail development in Cheshire’s north end will be a success. Cheshire will receive $1M in the permitting alone, with an expected annual tax revenue of $2M, which means less of a burden on our property taxes. I also believe the North End development will bring a new customer base to our existing businesses.
Third District Age — 22 Occupation — Mason/ L a n d s c a p e r, Countryside Property Services. Family — Father—Andrew Falvey; Mother—Patricia Falvey; Sisters—Erin and Katie Falvey.
Joseph Falvey, Republican
Relevant experience — Formerly employed by Cheshire Parks and Recreation; intern at Cheshire Police Department
1.) The most pressing issue facing Cheshire is our budget and rising taxes. For the first time in town history the annual operating budget is over $100 million. The Town is spending over $2 million a week. Using proper finan-
cial planning, fiscal responsibility, and eliminating frivolous spending, as well as expanding the commercial tax base, we can take the burden off the shoulders of home owners for the good of the community. 2.) Should the referendum about our town pool fail, the Town Council needs to look at the long-term viability of a seasonal facility. The Council will need to look at what is in the best interest
of the pool patrons and the town as a whole. Before any binding decision is made obligating the Town to make payments on bond issues, we need to better understand what the general population of the town wants to see happen with this facility. 3.) I would look to grow the Town of Cheshire’s commercial tax base by encouraging the development of commercial use of the north end. This area has
been zoned for commercial use for decades and by building new businesses there, it would be a large addition to the town’s tax base. This would be a welcomed addition to the town and would greatly ease the tax burden of our home owners. Land use is an issue under the jurisdiction of the Planning and Zoning Board and not under the purview of the Town Council, which is the office I seek.
Fourth District Peter Talbot, Democrat Age — 57 Occupation — Government Affairs Manager, Cox Communications (27 years) Family — Wi f e : — C a r o l
(married 22 years); Daughters—Lauren and Lindsay; Dog—Chloe Relevant experience — Cheshire Town Council, 4th District 2011-Present; Cheshire Board of Education, 2010–2011; Cheshire Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission, 2010 1.) Outside of the potential issue of
what to do with the Community Pool, the next major issue Cheshire will face is full-day kindergarten. If the Board of Education budget presented early next year contains funding for full-day kindergarten, the new Council will have to make a decision on whether to support it. I would be in favor of implementing
full-day kindergarten in Cheshire. 2.) If the Community Pool referendum fails on Nov. 5, the Town Council will have to make a major decision for the town. I would favor reconvening the Evaluation Committee to sit with them and examine all the options. 3.) Cheshire’s Economic Development Commission does a nice job re-
cruiting new businesses to Cheshire. There are incentives that the Council has passed to make our town more attractive to prospective companies. The north end development will bring a revenue boost initially through permit fees and long term through growth to the grand list. This will be a benefit to the town.
Fourth District Mike O’Donnell, Republican Age — 47 Occupation — Owner, Cheshire Cremation Containers Family — Wi f e — K a t e ; Sons—Joey
and Patrick Relevant experience — Park and Recreation Commission; Town Beautification Committee
1.) To me, the most pressing issue facing Cheshire in the short term is the economic troubles of the State of Connecticut. As a town, Cheshire receives over 10 percent of its budget from the State of Connecticut with the PILOT programs and the Education Cost Sharing grant. With the Connecticut economy still struggling to recover from the economic downturn of 2008, I fear Hartford will continue to reduce aid to the towns and cities. We need
to find new ways to reduce our expenses while maintaining the services that keep Cheshire a town that people want to live and can afford to stay in. One area that I believe we can reduce expenses is to increase our capital nonrecurring fund and start to pay cash for more projects and equipment and bond less. This would help reduce the town’s annual debt service payment and, over time, this will free up more money for the town. Spending an extra $1 million in cash over the next 10 years will help
reduce our current debt service $10 million, plus the interest on the bonds. 2.) If the voters of Cheshire decide not to approve the tension membrane structure for the pool I would support keeping the pool open as a summeronly pool for the upcoming season and continue look for a permanent structure. Some possibilities could be investigated to help offset the cost of the pool, such as state or federal grants, communitybased fund raising or private sponsorship. Perhaps some additional funding
outside of the town budget would allow a pool referendum to pass. 3.) Business development in the north end will benefit Cheshire. The area has easy access to I-691 and is separated from most residential neighborhoods. New businesses would bring jobs and an increased tax base. Adding more businesses to the town would lower the tax burden on homeowners. I believe the town is doing a good job attracting new businesses and helping existing ones stay and even expand.
At-Large
Age — 51 Occupation — Controller, Suzio York Hill Companies Relevant experience — Cheshire Town Council (2001-2013); Cheshire Housing Authority (1999-2001); Cheshire Youth Football and Baseball 1.) I believe that the most pressing issue facing Cheshire is the increasing cost of government. At a time when our citizens can least afford tax increases we are not only facing increasing cost, but a reduction in state aid. I will con-
Michael Ecke, Democrat
tinue to work hard to keep spending increases low and ensure that each dollar spent is done so wisely. Only through diligence and resourcefulness can we ensure that spending increases are held in check and our mill rate low. 2.) The Pool Evaluation Committee has done a great job reviewing the needs of the pool. It is from this group that the recommendation for the tension membrane structure came. I would ask this group to reconvene to consider other options. At that point we would have to have a difficult discussion about the future of the pool. 3.) The Town of Cheshire already has a fairly generous tax abatement program that is designed to attract new businesses. I would continue to sup-
port this program and I would consider expanding it. I think we have to look for smart growth that will enhance the community, rather than growth for growth sake. The proposed new center
in the north end, I believe, will enhance the community and will give our residents new options for shopping and entertainment closer to home. It will also bring in over $1 million a year in prop-
erty taxes and one time fees of over $1 million. I am sure that our Planning and Zoning Commission will continue to do their job in studying any new projects that are proposed.
Ruocco Responses Continued...
continued from page 3
couraging development that does not outstrip the revenue. We need development that results in a net fiscal gain for the town. The north end development has some advantages, but keep in mind that subsequent services may need to be expanded. After all, it’s not just a shopping center; it also includes
a plan for 140 residential units. Will we need a north end fire station, more fire apparatus, additional police and fire support? If you support the shopping center and residential units, then you’ll have to support the expanded services needed to keep it going. That may mean dedicating all the tax revenue from the facility, and potentially more, to sup-
port it. In effect, that leaves no possibility to offset local taxes. I’ve seen this kind of development in other towns, but I do not see an improving tax position for the residents.
the cheshire herald, october 24, 2013
Five
ELECTION 2013 At-Large Tim Slocum, Republican Age — 58 Occupation — Owner, HFM Interiors, LLC. Home Fabrics Family — Wife—Kristen Slocum; four children, two grandchildren Relevant experience — Cheshire Planning & Zoning Commission: 2003 – 2007; Town Council: 2007 - 2009; Chairman 2009 - 2013. 1.) Making decisions today on their short term impact is foolhardy. Funding anything new has a very long-term impact. This Council has effectively dealt with the town’s long-term liabilities, including pension obligations, so future taxpayer obligations won’t go haywire.
Benefits have become a curse to both the private and public sector. This accounts increasingly for the largest bargaining chips in labor contracts. We have increased employee contributions in all of the union contracts. All new hires are on 401K-style plans instead of the old style defined benefit pension plan that are more costly to taxpayers. Mismanagement at the state and federal level is virtually institutionalized. Cheshire remains a well managed and financially secure community, but we are surrounded by communities beset with over taxation, underemployment and a host of other socioeconomic issues that drag down those communities. The challenge for Cheshire is to oppose all efforts to regionalize. The state has already cut its share of spending here, further shifting the burden to our
local taxpayers. This will continue, I am sure, and it will probably rear its head in next year’s budget cycle. 2.) I hope the referendum passes. The study committee has come up with the right solution. The town is 10 years in with 10 years to go paying for a pool structure that has arguably been a public relations and structural nightmare. After two collapses in two extraordinary winter storms, we have the opportunity to fix a problem. Make it right, problem solved. The pool is a town asset that has a diverse user base from students to seniors. Unlike any other town entity it has a P&L statement. It loses money and we know how much. Somehow we accept the fact that every other town asset we support in Cheshire simply costs money. Should the referendum fail, the next
Council will be further tested as costs for the pool don’t go away. The paying Y membership would likely have little use for the pool and while resident revenue producing summer use would continue, pool subsidies would not be reduced. Our swim teams would be permanently orphaned. Another bubble will never go back up on my watch, either. To make the “indoor pool” we have summer-only, we have to winterize it with costly changes to the plumbing and filtration systems. That’s not the best we can do so I would support putting it out to referendum again. 3.) About the only way the Town Council can work to grow the commercial tax base is to manage the town finances effectively. Higher taxes mean higher operating cost for the town’s local retailers, manufactures, warehouse and distribution companies. In a very
competitive world all cost increases can mean job losses. We know all too well how many companies in our state have left for the more moderately priced states outside of the northeast. Factories are doing quite well in the Sunbelt. Our knuckleheaded state leadership has done nothing to attract business, so we must do the best we can. Aside from tax policy and continuing support of our current tax incentive program for new or expanding local businesses, the Council can’t do much unless a text change in our local zoning law require a rare approval of the Council, which happened when the lifestyle center was first proposed over six years ago. I would not support a change in any designation that would shift our commercial and industrial land to residential. We must support our local businesses to the extent possible.
At-Large Patti Flynn-Harris, Democrat Age — 62 Occupation — Field Services Mgr, NEC Corporation of America Family — Husband—John Harris; Stepson—Zack Harris and his family Relevant experience — Served 11 years on the Planning & Zoning Commision; Past President of Cheshire
League of Women Voters; Past President of Cheshire Interfaith Housing. 1.) The aging infrastructure of the town is the most pressing issue facing Cheshire. We have allocated and spent money for major repairs for many buildings the past few years, and although we are investing in a project that could have a major impact on our energy usage in order to help us control costs, we need to have a full review of the structures
and usage and demands on them going forward to make sure we are not reaching the break-even point of our investments. Our buildings are getting old. We need to be proactive and be willing to tackle the hard decisions on spending our tax dollars on them. 2.) Although I have stated before that I believe the pool can and should be an asset to the town, I also have said that it is up to the voters to decide. I believe the special pool committee did an ex-
cellent job vetting all options for the pool, and I will wait for the results of the referendum. 3.) I very much believe that the north end project will benefit the community. Town staff reviewed the proposed tax benefits offered by the developer and both the fees from permits, and ongoing property taxes will be benefit the town. The developers’ proposal includes work on the section of the Farmington Canal Linear Trail that goes through the
property and will help connect it to the section in Southington. The Town Council can help grow the commercial tax base by being supportive of all the work our Economic Coordinator and the Economic Development Commission do to promote the town and its assets. We have successfully attracted businesses once they are made aware Cheshire’s excellent geographic location, with the quality of its schools and strong housing stock.
At-Large James Sima, Republican Age — 52 Occupation — Sima Drilling Co. Family — Wife—Jackie (29 years); D a u g h t e r s — Jamie, Jean, Jessica, Judy and Julie Relevant experience — Cheshire Town Council 2007-2013; Cheshire Board of Education 1999-2007; Cheshire Housing Authority 1997-
1999. 1.) The most pressing issue will be the reduction of state aid for education and property tax relief. Cheshire at the same time will face more unfunded mandates on education, buildings and town services. The easy way to remedy the serious pressing issues would be short sighted spending of the Town’s reserves leaving huge tax increases for future years. I believe a steady
approach of using small amounts of reserves and fiscal restraint will help mitigate the imposition of state woes on the Cheshire taxpayer. 2.) The pool has been a troublesome building since the first shovel hit the dirt. The initial building had many corners cut in order to achieve the “magical” $2.9 million price tag which convinced voters to buy in. Its 15 years since and once again we are asking voters to accept a subpar energy hog enclosure because it reaches
the $3 million “magical” number. The yearly cost will be $290,000. We should spend more than a couple months with a consultant that had only one outcome in mind the day he was hired. Let’s step back and review all options available. Maybe we have a private company come in, create and run a complex with a gym, indoor tennis and swimming. Adding $290,000 to our Town’s yearly budget means we may not be able to fund five teachers or maybe we won’t be
able to fix your street, or do we go five more years with no bulky waste? 3.) It is my opinion the retail strip mall and apartments that are soon to be built will have a negative impact on the life we enjoy. There will be more kids crowding our classrooms, more cars grid-locking our roads and increased demand on our police and fire departments. Rezoning the north end is one of the most short- sighted decisions I have seen in Cheshire.
At-Large Age — 58 Occupation — Sportswriter. Family — Wife—Vanessa Nowak (21 years); Children—Joey Nowak (age 18), daughters Amanda (16) and Samantha (11) Relevant experience — 29 years as a sportswriter at New Haven Register; Volunteer as youth baseball coach and administrator; Volunteer Connecticut Special Olympics. 1.) As a journalist with three children, education hits home hard and to me all-day kindergarten is one of several important short-term issues that needs to be addressed. All-day kindergarten will have a long-term
Dan Nowak, Democrat
impact on all children in town. From my experience with my children, half-day kindergarten at Darcey did not fully prepare my kids for their transition to Doolittle. We need to give our children the best possible resource to make an easy transition to first grade and be competitive with the outside world. The best way is for all-day kindergarten. However, there are added costs involved. We need to do research and exhaust every effort to find ways to be fiscally responsible and determine how to lower the costs in making the switch to all-day kindergarten. 2.) Because of the investment taxpayers have already made into the pool, it’s essential to move forward and find a way to make it work for the community. If the $3 million referendum fails, I would look for better
ways to fund that project. One idea would be to find a title sponsor for the venue to help or totally fund the project. This would be a local, regional or national business that attaches its name to the venue by paying the town a sponsorship fee and maybe then it would be called the Bozzuto Community Pool or ESPN Community Pool or Mohegan Sun Community Pool. I think voting “yes” on the referendum makes sense because with the right business/marketing plan a yearround pool can be self sufficient and even be a revenue producer. 3.) To grow the town’s commercial base, the first order of business is retention and keeping our current businesses. There is no growth if a current business moves or goes out of business and then add a new business.
The link “Nowak, Friend To Cheshire Business” on my campaign website at www.Elect-Dan-Nowak.com explains my plan in detail to grow the business climate in town. One idea is to tap into Cheshire’ best resource – it’s people. Cheshire is blessed with professional business talent. I want to tap into that resource and form a volunteer committee
of business professionals in town. I would use that committee to assess the strengths and weaknesses of Cheshire’s business climate and address ways to retain businesses, lure new businesses and fill empty retail space. The proposed shopping center in the northend of Cheshire is a huge win-win situation for the town.
the cheshire herald, october 24, 2013
Six
ELECTION 2013 At-Large Sylvia Nichols, Republican Age — 70 Occupation — Retail Florist Family — Husband— Bruce Klein; Four children, seven grandchildren Relevant experience — Cheshire Town Council 2010 – current; Cheshire Panning and Zoning; Cheshire Human Services Committee. 1.) If I were to determine the most pressing issue by the input I receive from interested or concerned voters there are three major topics which continue to surface – the pool solution, bulky waste pick up, and FDK. The bulky waste pick up is not a dead
issue. The Town Council refused to accept the single $450,000 bid, with the intent of seeking a more cost effective bid to provide the best service for the townspeople at an affordable price. I fully expect that the BOE will present an operating budget request that will include funding for FDK. The Town Council’s role will be to develop an operating budget for the entire town and will carefully consider the requests of each dapartment to maximize services and minimize tax impact. The Town Council has presented a proposed solution for the pool. The full details are available for all residents to review at www.CheshireCT.org. It will be entirely up to the voters to decide if the facts warrant acceptance. 2.) There is no other sensible, cost effective solution should the pool referendum fail. We will continue to be obligated to our debt service for the old fa-
cility, and will have eliminated sources of revenue for repayment of the bonded debt. There will be major costs associated with closing the pool and razing the facility or winterizing the drains to maintain a summer-only pool. Therefore, the only source of funds for repayment of the existing debt and associated costs of closing or reducing the pool hours will need to come from property taxes. Replacing the cover with a new bubble will cost more than the insurance proceeds we have received and will likely result in significantly higher insurance premium costs and continued higher risk of failure. As an active member of the Pool Study Committee, I fully support what I feel is the best solution: to continue to provide year-round aquatic activity in a first class facility that will be reliable,, cost effective and very user-friendly. The pool serves a wide spectrum of res-
idents in many capacities and should be a permanent asset to the town. For once, let reason be our guide. Let’s stop the blame game, not dwell on past mistakes but embrace a well thought out, permanent solution. The TC has presented a solution, but ultimately the decision rests with you – the voters. 3.) Growing the town’s commercial tax base is the ongoing job of our Economic Development Department and based on our plan of development. It will be important to maintain proper zoning regulations in that context. Unfortunately, the environmernt in the state to encourage business development is not favorable so it will be imperative to urge our state legislators to do all they can to make changes that will create a more favorable climate. Cheshire has grown since I first moved here in 1964. We have deliberately controlled development, acquired
and maintained significant open space and are lucky to have many farm properties. It’s time to accept the reality of today’s lifestyle and residents’ expectations. To allow carefully planned projects such as the north end project will add to the balance of services, add employment opportunity, help to maintain property values and will keep Cheshire a viable community, and a sought after place to raise a family. The project will have little or no impact on existing housing development and is not in close proximity to any schools. It will not jeopardize the small-town feel of projects such as the West Main Street development or The Watch Factory Shoppes. With proper zoning regulation and enforcement the impact on the town should be minimal. If we don’t recognize the changing needs of our residents, our town will become just another monument to the past.
At-Large
Age — 56 Occupation — Civil Engineer with the City of Waterbury Bureau of Engineering; Family — Wife—Laurie (married 28 years); two sons Corey (18) and Stephen (16) Relevant experience — Past chair of Cheshire United Methodist Church administrative council; Past president of Cheshire United Methodist Church Board of Trustees.
Paul Bellagamba, Democrat
1.) Implementing a needs Assessment program for the Town’s public facilities, particularly the school buildings, to establish how to efficiently manage and upgrade our properties. Our town properties are quite aged and they need to be assessed economically, structurally and for livability to determine how to keep them viable for our future needs. We then need to follow through by acting on the program results. We are currently introducing new technologies into our schools and town buildings and we need to upgrade the infrastructure to support and maintain these new technologies. We have an excellent educational system in Cheshire
– we need to provide up-to-date, current facilities to allow our students to continue to excel. 2.) Although the pool program and construction have been mismanaged in the past, I think the Town is taking appropriate steps to remedy this situation. For all its troubles, the pool is an asset to the town and we need to maintain it to provide the best value for our hardearned tax dollars. To stop now would be a huge disservice to the monies expended and to the future benefits the pool provides to our citizens. If the referendum does not pass it shows that our citizens are really concerned about the potential tax impli-
cations that bonding the proposed pool cover would raise. The Town Council would need to take a hard look at the other options presented by the Public Building Committee and determine if any would be a viable alternative. The pool is well used by school teams, swim clubs and other outside groups, and to make it a summer-only facility would do a disservice to our town. 3.) I believe more development of commercial and retail properties, particularly in the north end, is essential to the town’s growth and future tax base. We have a well-developed roadway and infrastructure system in the north end of town which could easily accommodate
more commercial and light industrial development without unduly impacting services or traffic in the center areas of Cheshire. We need to support the Town’s Economic Development group and the Chamber of Commerce in promoting Cheshire throughout the northeast region. In addition, there are many vacant and underutilized properties in town that can be re-purposed for new businesses, whether retail or commercial. The WS development currently in the planning stages will be a wonderful asset and revenue generator for Cheshire and will help generate business for retailers throughout town.
At-Large Rob Oris, Republican Age — 48 Occupation — Commercial Real Estate Finance/Investment Family — Wife and three children ages,
16, 13 and 11 Relevant experience — Past member Cheshire Public Building Commission & Cheshire H.S. Turf Committee; Past President Cheshire Junior Football and Cheer. 1.) I believe that partisan politics, the lack of civility and cooperation among elected officials, and a lost connection with the community threatens the long-term prosperity of Cheshire. The fact is elected officials serve at the will of the people, and they must never forget who they represent and what they are charged to do while holding public office. With this tenet at the core of my campaign, I will do everything I can to improve our current political environment. I will bring new energy and ideas to the Town Council, and be a strong, effective voice for the people of Cheshire. I will work hard to create an atmosphere of cooperation amongst our elected officials, regardless of party affiliation. I believe wholeheartedly that we must collaborate to get things done, and we must communicate openly with the community regarding all of our efforts. 2.) In the short run, I would utilize
the insurance proceeds received from the bubble collapse to install another bubble for the pool which can be raised and lowered as needed due to inclement weather and still allow for all-season usage. This will give us time to come up with an alternate permanent solution that may be more cost-effective and acceptable to the community. I do not support abandonment or summer-only usage for the following reasons: If we abandon the pool, we will incur a one-time cost of approximately $1.25 million dollars to demolish and remove the facility, and we will continue to pay debt service on approximately $1.5 million dollars of debt. In addition, there will be added expense to the BOE for busing of swimmers and pool rentals totaling approximately $45,000 per year If we convert to summer-only use, we will incur about $130,000 in costs to winterize the pool, as well as an additional $60,000 for the purchase of a pool cover, and $20 to $30,000 annually to open and close the pool. This does not take into account significant lost revenue due to summer-only use and added costs for busing and pool rental as detailed above. Other communities (Canton and Brookfield YMCA) that have summer-only facilities are seeking a year-round option as their experience shows it is not financially prudent to have a pool open for such a short time. 3.) I am supportive of targeted and well-vetted economic development within Cheshire, including the proposed north end project by W/S Development. This type of development pres-
ents an opportunity to grow our grand list, and reduce the overall tax burden on the residential sector. The north end is a great place to consider development given its inventory of undeveloped land and proximity to Interstate 691.
Cheshire is centrally located within the state and has easy access to interstates 84, 91 and 95. We are half way between NYC and Boston. We can and should capitalize on these geographic benefits. As we consider economic development,
we must be consistent with our overall plan, and pay particular attention to expert site planning, architectural appeal, and environmental sensitivity. Our decisions today will effect generations to come. Let’s get it right!!
Candidates Running For BOE Candidiates for the Board of Education were asked to respond to the following three questions: 1.) Do you believe that Cheshire spends an adequate amount of money on education? 2.) Do you support full-day kindergarten? 3.) What would be the first thing for which you would push during your upcoming term in office?
Board of Education Tony Perugini, Republican Age — 43 Occupation — IT Professional and Professional Chef Family — Wi f e — K a t h leen; Daughters—Nicole,
11, and Victoria, 9. Relevant experience — BOE Member 2009 – Present; Finance Committee Chairman; 17 years of business experience. 1.) While some believe that we should have an unlimited budget,
spending the most doesn’t always result in the highest quality of education. Cheshire ranks in the bottom 15 percent of per student spending but ranks in the top 15 percent of student achievement. This is no small feat. Operating Budget requests over the last four years have been fiscally responsible but they’ve not been fully funded while Hartford continues to under-fund special education and push unfunded mandates. This has caused us to dip into other parts of the budget to make up for these shortfalls. No, in this regard, we’re not spending the necessary amount of money to adequately operate our school district. Our Capital Budget requests are
partially funded, causing code compliance issues to remain unresolved and preventing strategic technology investments from being completed. Our longterm, cost-effective and responsible requests are often funded for the shortterm in a penny-wise and pound-foolish manner. 2.) Yes I do support full-day kindergarten. It presents a long-term, strategic investment in our children’s’ learning that will greatly benefit them as they progress through higher grade levels with ever-demanding curriculum requirements. It more than doubles the amount
continued to page 7
the cheshire herald, october 24, 2013
Seven
ELECTION 2013 Board of Education Mark Ecke, Democrat
Age — 48 Occupation — Police Sergeant Family — Wife—Kathy; Sons—Tucker and Travis Relevant experience — Four years as an interscholastic sports coach at Cheshire High School; 22.5 years as a police officer
in Cheshire; nine years as the DARE Officer/School Resource Officer in the Cheshire Public Schools 1.) I believe that the town spends adequate money on the schools. I do believe that how that money is distributed needs to be evaluated. We need to be sure that we remember the children should be our priority. The teachers in the classroom need to have all the tools they need to make our children’s educa-
tional experience the best it can be. The board does have the responsibility to remember that there needs to be a balance between what we feel the schools need with what the town can afford. 2.) I support a full day for our kindergarten students. I come to this conclusion because of the many benefits presented by the feasibility task force that our children will receive from the experience. The long term education benefits, higher test scores and the abil-
ity for teachers to spend more time with individual students are a few of the advantages of having our young learners for a full day. I understand there are increased costs involved in the transition, but I feel the benefit to our children is worth the expense. It is not only a good move for our young learners, but the prudent decision for the school system as a whole. 3.) I have serious concerns with the current age of our school buildings. I
have personally seen multiple examples of the continuing results of a band-aid approach to maintenance. While the school system does the best with what it has, all but one of our schools is more than 50 years old. I also believe that, while the schools take security seriously, more can be done to improve our children’s safety. I welcome the opportunity to take these challenges on as a member of the Cheshire Board of Education.
Board of Education Adam Grippo, Republican
Age — 39 Occupation — Fiscal Administrative Officer for the State of Connecticut Family — Married with a
young son Relevant experience — A concerned parent.
1.) There always needs to be a balance between the needs of our education system and the ability to fund it. Cheshire has done an excellent job in achieving this balance throughout the years. As contentious as the process can be, the excellence we expect as parents has been maintained. 2.) Every parent wants to provide the best for their children. For at least 50 years, half-day kindergarten has been the transitional period between pre-
school and first grade. This is a time when play transitions to structured learning. More recently, working parents have chosen to send their children to all-day programs for reasons ranging from high quality daycare to giving their kids “a leg up” in first grade. Then there are those parents that have chosen to stay home with their children. These people have been their children’s sole educator and they count on a half-day program to ease them into school.
Beginning in 2014-15 these choices would no longer be available. Full-day kindergarten would be required at the expense of the Cheshire taxpayer. The reason given for a mandatory full-day program is a fear that children attending a half-day program would be ill equipped to be successful in the new first grade of Common Core. I could not in good conscience support a mandatory program which denies a parent the option to gradually transition their
child into a full day environment. 3.) The Common Core Curriculum is new to everyone and it claims that it will make higher achieving and well rounded students. Yet the Common Core seems to have little emphasis on the arts. As an alumnus of the Cheshire High School Marching Ram band, music and the arts played a large role in my education. I want to make sure that these types of programs continue to be robust, accessible and affordable.
Board of Education
Kathryn Fabiani, Democrat Age — 59 Occupation — Attorney Family — Husband—Dan Hallen; Children—Carolyn Fabiani, Nicholas Fabiani, Kimberly Hallen and Lindsey Hallen Relevant experience — Attorney with over 25 years of business and corporate law experience; Volunteer member of the Program Committee of Read to Grow, a non-profit organization working to improve early childhood education and literacy; General Manager of R.J. Julia Booksellers, an independent bookstore located in Mad-
ison, CT (Oct. 2003 to Jan. 2013) 1.) No – obviously not. We shouldn’t limit our children’s education merely to adequacy. There will always be additional investments we can make in our kids’ future. However, since we don’t live in a world with unlimited resources, the question can’t just be whether we’re spending enough, but whether we’re spending the money we have in the most effective ways. That means we need to rely on real results and data to get the best bang for our buck. Our children’s education is the most important commitment we can make as a community, but we have to recognize that taxpayer money is a precious and limited resource. When making spend-
ing decisions, we can’t make it a guessing game – a commitment to using real metrics while putting an emphasis on working with teachers, administrators and parents to get their input will allow us to get the most effective results for our money. 2.) Absolutely. Significant research shows the importance of a strong learning continuum from pre-kindergarten through third grade for a child’s cognitive and social development. We cannot and should not ignore the importance of full-day kindergarten as the bridge to future academic success. The Children’s Defense Fund has argued that children in full-day kindergarten have better educational outcomes than children in half-day kindergarten. Research
indicates that full-day kindergarteners make a better transition into first grade, show significant gains in school socialization and are equipped with stronger learning skills that will result in higher academic achievement in later grades. Further, the new educational standards that students are expected to meet by the end of kindergarten are rigorous. We cannot allow our children to fall behind at the very beginning of their education and a full-day program will help ensure that our kids achieve academic success through high school and beyond. 3.) There are several important issues confronting our community and educational system. We need to make sure that our schools are safe places for
our children to learn and that our teachers and students have the resources they need to meet the demanding educational standards recently adopted by the State of Connecticut. Since we do not have unlimited resources, the first thing that I will push for is an education budget that properly prioritizes all necessary and proposed expenditures with input from teachers, administrators and parents. I believe we can work with these critical stakeholders, along with the Town Council, to create fiscally responsible long-term solutions that will ensure that our schools have the resources they need to address their biggest challenges in a timely and effective manner. In the end, we need to focus on what is best for our children.
Board of Education Sandra Pavano, Republican Age — 63 Occupation — Realtor with Berkshire Hathaway Home Services Family — One daughter
– Kimberly Relevant experience — Board of Education last four years; Member of the Cheshire Chamber of Commerce. 1.) Cheshire ranks 137 out of 165 towns in dollars for pupil spending. As a realtor, the quality of education in the number one factor for families choosing Cheshire to live in. It is important to invest in the education of our children. Unfortunately, our budgets often face the struggle to comply with state mandates (without proper funding from the state), thus requiring us to use recources from text books, technology, instructional supplies, etc, to comply. Our aging infrastructure is another serious issue that will affect future budgets.
We must have a long-term plan to invest in our buildings. We are struggling and barely keeping up with our 750,000-square-feet of aging space. 2.) Only 14 percent of school districts in Connecticut do not have full-day kindergarten. We will do our youngest students a diservice and Cheshire will fall behind the many communities that have already ad-
opted full-day kindergarten. This will also be reflected in the number of families who choose not to live in Cheshire, thus affecting town revenues. The benefits provided by collected data shows that children in a full-day environment show greater reading and math achievements then those in a half-day class. Full-day learning offers social and emotional
Perugini Responses Continued...
continued from page 6
of time spent in a kindergarten classroom today, providing for more time to learn social skills, reading/writing, math, science, social studies and builds a strong, solid foundation upon which to learn at this early and critical age. The costs to implement and operate FDK are reasonable and helps Cheshire save approximately $125,000 per year in transportation costs. It’s a long-term investment in our students. 3.) I would push for obtaining an adequate Capital Budget to finally resolve the outstanding code compliance issues
found at CHS in 2009. This represents huge legal and educational funding risks for Cheshire and this “can” cannot be kicked down the road any longer. A responsible, cost-effective and longterm strategic resolution to these issues must be budgeted for and completed in a timely and responsible manner. Additionally, I will push for more open communications between the Town Council and BOE. I believe that the relationship between these groups is broken which is affecting the towns’ ability to make sound long-term, costeffective solutions when it comes to our
benefits, allowing an easier transition. I do not want our children to fall behind. 3.) It is a huge mistake to further delay the adoption of the Student Guardian initiative. Student Guardian will install, at no cost to the town, equipment (cameras) on six buses. They will also provide administrative services to the Cheshire Police
Department to issue tickets of $450 to motorists who break the school bus law. This will provide revenue to the Town of approximately $51,000 per year. I urge the Council to take another look and approve this before there is a fatality that could have been prevented because cameras where installed.
school system. As a town, we are faced with challenges in our school system that can only be resolved if the Town Council
and BOE works together. I will do my best to foster a productive relationship with the Town Council for the betterment of Cheshire.
the cheshire herald, october 24, 2013
eight two
ELECTION 2013 Candidates Running For Planning And Zoning Candidiates for the Planning and Zoning Commission were asked to respond to the following three questions: 1.) How do/would you effective balance the need for commercial and industrial growth with the local desire to keep a “small town” feel in Cheshire? 2.) Can the PZC and/or the Town of Cheshire do anything to aleviate the continuing problem of traffic congestion in the area and how much will such concerns influence your future decisions? 3.) Are there any changes you would like to see made to Cheshire’s zoning regulations?
Leah Campo, Republican Age — 40 Occupation — President of associated builders and contractors of CT, Inc. Family — Married with three children
Relevant experience — served on P&Z for over two years, served on Economic Development for four years, member of the Republican Town Committee for 10 years. 1.) This question really summarizes the challenge Cheshire faces. For the past two years on P&Z I believe
the Commission has done well with this issue as we always keep it at the forefront of our decision making. We need commercial business and industry to provide jobs and offset our residential taxes, but not at the detriment of our community. 2.) Yes, P&Z has significant input on this challenge. Route 10 in par-
ticular experiences heavy traffic volume. P&Z ensures that any new business on a high traffic route would not burden the roads further. We do this by requiring traffic studies done by specialized engineering firms and rejecting uses that would exacerbate congestion.
3.) As needs and technology change, P&Z does change zoning regulations from time to time. When new zoning regulations comes before us, I rely on asking a lot of questions, using common sense and keeping the Cheshire community as a whole as priority one.
Diane Visconti (Alternate), Democrat Age — 59 Occupation — Parent Educator for all Ponte Care Family — husband— John; two children—Peter
(25) and Liz (23). Relevant experience — served on the Town Council from 2001 until 2007. Was liaison to Beautification Committee. Championed Historic District creation. 1.) The PZC took a major step in that direction by banning “big box”
stores (except in the interchange zone). i support continued use of the special design district regulation for the town center to create mixed-use pedestrianfriendly development. The PZC should use its discretion to ensure that any new developments are consistent in style with our New England town feeling. 2.) No one likes to sit in traffic so certainly any project that would increase traffic needs to be examined carefully. Some have suggested a service road from Academy Road to Chipman Drive and I support more study of that as well as a bus or trolley running from one end to the other of Rt. 10 (although the PZC doesn’t run a transportation company). 3.) I admit a novice understanding
of zoning regulations but i have heard a suggestion of an extension of the Spe-
cial Design District concept to the West Main street area to support the renewal
efforts that are underway. That sounds like a good idea.
Vincent Lentini, Democrat age — 59 Occupation — Semi-Retired Businessman, Realtor/Pharmtech Family — Fiance—Margarita; two children, three grandchildren Relevant experience — currently 12-year elected commissioner of Zoning board of appeals (served four years
as Chairman) 1.) I would continue doing it the way its always been done here in Cheshire. i would encourage industrial growth in the north end of town and have limited growth in the rest of town, 2.) After over 40 years of trying,
nothing has been done and i haven’t seen any new ideas talked about. We all know the traffic is there and have to live with it. On my daily commute, I avoid Route 10 by driving an alternate route. 3.) I think the zoning regulations, as they stand, are good and effective.
****Editor’s note: Second District Town Council Democratic candidate Matt Bowman and Planning and Zoning Commission Republican candidate Edward Gaudio did not respond to questions provided.
This ad approved and paid for by Friends of the Cheshire Pool William Wynne, Treasurer.