Adopted CIP FY2014 18 by City of Greenville, South Carolina

This page is intentionally blank.

City of Greenville, South Carolina Adopted Capital Improvement Program FY 2014-2018

Knox H. White Mayor Amy Ryberg Doyle Council Member (District 1) Lillian Brock Flemming Council Member (District 2) Jil M. Littlejohn Council Member (District 3) J. David Sudduth Council Member (District 4) Susan Reynolds Council Member (At Large) Gaye G. Sprague Council Member (At Large) John F. Castile City Manager

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Table of Contents

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 2014-2018 Adopted Capital Improvement Program Table of Contents Transmittal ...................................................................................................................... A-1 Transmittal Letter .............................................................................................................. A-3 Summary Schedules ........................................................................................................... B-1 Schedule I – Total CIP Revenue and Expenditure Summary .............................................................. B-3 Schedule II – Project Summaries with Applicable Funding Sources ..................................................... B-4 Schedule III – Project Summaries by Funding Source .....................................................................B-11 Schedule IV – Unfunded Projects ............................................................................................ B-16 Project Descriptions Roads and Bridges ............................................................................................................... C-1 New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program (NSTEP) ................................................................. C-3 Street Resurfacing ......................................................................................................... C-4 Fairforest Way Rehabilitation ............................................................................................ C-5 Salters Road Improvements............................................................................................... C-6 Main Street Resurfacing ................................................................................................... C-7 Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection .......................................................................... C-8 Haywood Road Sidewalks ................................................................................................. C-9 Woodruff Road Sidewalks ............................................................................................... C-10 Streetscapes ..................................................................................................................... D-1 Pete Hollis Corridor Improvements ...................................................................................... D-3 East McBee Avenue Improvements ...................................................................................... D-4 Rhett/Camperdown Street Improvements ............................................................................. D-5 Cultural Corridor ........................................................................................................... D-6 Village of West Greenville Improvements .............................................................................. D-7 Augusta Street Improvements ............................................................................................ D-8 North Main Street Improvements ........................................................................................ D-9 Washington Street Improvements ..................................................................................... D-10 Augusta Street Streetscaping (Baseball Stadium) ................................................................... D-11 Broad Street Pedestrian Lighting ...................................................................................... D-12 Downtown Streetscapes ................................................................................................. D-13 North Main Street – Landmark Building ............................................................................... D-14 Spring/Falls Streetscape ................................................................................................ D-15 Viola Streetscaping ...................................................................................................... D-16 West Camperdown Way ................................................................................................. D-17 Augusta Street at Faris Road Streetscape ............................................................................ D-18 Wastewater ................................................................................................................. E-1 Haynie-Sirrine Wastewater System Rehabilitation .................................................................... E-3 Verdae Sewer Expansion .................................................................................................. E-4 Wastewater System Rehabilitation ...................................................................................... E-5 Wastewater System Survey and Model .................................................................................. E-6 Basin 7 Sewer Rehabilitation ............................................................................................. E-7 Basin 15 Sewer Rehabilitation............................................................................................ E-8 Basin 16 Sewer Rehabilitation............................................................................................ E-9 Basin 25 Sewer Rehabilitation........................................................................................... E-10 Stormwater ...................................................................................................................... F-1 Henderson Basin ............................................................................................................ F-3 Pinehurst Culvert Crossing Improvement ............................................................................... F-4 Westview/Windsor Crossings ............................................................................................. F-5 Table of Contents

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

Pettigru Street Improvements ........................................................................................... F-6 Fairforest Way Basin ....................................................................................................... F-7 White Oak Basin Phase II .................................................................................................. F-8 Gower Estates Stormwater Rehabilitation ............................................................................. F-9 Swanson Court ............................................................................................................. F-10 Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan ............................................................................ F-11 Public Works Complex Water Quality Improvements ................................................................ F-12 North Hills Area Stormwater Improvements .......................................................................... F-13 Aldridge/Lacey Drainage Improvements .............................................................................. F-14 Hilly Street Drainage Improvements ................................................................................... F-15 Parks and Recreation ........................................................................................................... G-1 Community Center Building Improvements ............................................................................ G-3 Main Street Tree Rehabilitation ......................................................................................... G-4 Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access .................................................................... G-5 Reedy River Trail Expansion .............................................................................................. G-6 Park Restrooms ............................................................................................................. G-7 River Street Underpass .................................................................................................... G-8 Heritage Green Master Plan .............................................................................................. G-9 Cleveland Park Bank Stabilization ..................................................................................... G-10 McPherson Park Bridge Rehabilitation ................................................................................ G-11 Cancer Survivors Park ................................................................................................... G-12 NEXT Trail Connector .................................................................................................... G-13 Falls Park Improvements ................................................................................................ G-14 Haywood at I-385 Interchange Landscaping ......................................................................... G-15 Cleveland Park Horse Stables .......................................................................................... G-16 Greenville Dog Parks..................................................................................................... G-17 Greenville Tech Trailhead .............................................................................................. G-18 Hudson Street Trailhead ................................................................................................ G-19 Swamp Rabbit Trail Rubber Surface Replacement .................................................................. G-20 Viola Center and Park Improvements ................................................................................. G-21 Economic Development ........................................................................................................ H-1 Piazza Bergamo ............................................................................................................. H-3 TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit ................................................................................ H-4 Commercial Corridors ..................................................................................................... H-5 West End Property Acquisition ........................................................................................... H-6 Peace Center ............................................................................................................... H-7 Hyatt Public Improvements ............................................................................................... H-8 Markley at Rhett Improvements ......................................................................................... H-9 TD Convention Center Chiller Plant ................................................................................... H-10 TD Convention Center Conference Center ........................................................................... H-11 TD Convention Center Parking Lots ................................................................................... H-12 Neighborhood Revitalization ................................................................................................... I-1 Haynie-Sirrine................................................................................................................ I-3 Mt. Eustis Street Improvements .......................................................................................... I-4 Public Safety ..................................................................................................................... J-1 East Area Fire Station ..................................................................................................... J-3 Fire Facilities Assessment................................................................................................. J-4 Public Safety Cameras ..................................................................................................... J-5 Station Alerting System ................................................................................................... J-6 Parking ........................................................................................................................... K-1 Richardson Street Garage ................................................................................................. K-3 Poinsett Garage ............................................................................................................ K-4

Table of Contents

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

General Government ........................................................................................................... L-1 Phone System Replacement .............................................................................................. L-3 Public Works Operations Center ......................................................................................... L-4 Public Works Radio System ............................................................................................... L-5 Central Microsoft SQL Platform .......................................................................................... L-6 Roof Replacements ........................................................................................................ L-7 Appendix .........................................................................................................................M-1 Projection of Legal Debt Margin ......................................................................................... M-3

Table of Contents

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Table of Contents

City of Greenville, South Carolina

TRANSMITTAL

Capital investment continues to renew and improve the City of Greenville. The FY 20142018 Capital Improvement Program continues the commitment to a healthy and vibrant City by investing in infrastructure, development opportunities, and community facilities.

Transmittal

A-1

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Transmittal

City of Greenville, South Carolina

A-2

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

July 1, 2013 The Honorable Knox H. White, Mayor Members of City Council Dear Mayor White and City Council Members: I am pleased to present the adopted FY 2014-2018 CIP which totals $30,700,000 across all funds over the fiveyear planning horizon, and includes a $7,384,000 capital budget in FY 2013-14. The CIP is a five-year financial planning instrument used to identify capital construction projects (generally over $100,000) and sources of funding for those projects. The first year makes up the capital budget and the remaining four years are planning years subject to future appropriation. We rely upon the financial forecast presented to City Council in its retreat to guide decisions on the availability of funds. We have relied on the input from City Council in prior worksessions and the retreat, and the rankings provided by staff in determining the priority in which to fund projects. In all budget discussions, there is a need to balance competing demands with scarce resources. Departments submitted $33,319,186 in requests in FY 2013-14. While we have worked to fund as many projects as possible, however, limited funds and the limitations on their use invariably result in unfunded projects. General Fund The General Fund is the most challenging fund to plan CIP projects for and the one with the most demands. Many of the priorities you have communicated to me – roads, commercial corridors, facilities – generally can only be funded from the General Fund. In addition, the General Fund is the most constrained of the City’s options to fund projects in terms of its fiscal capacity. In looking at the FY 2013-14 General Fund operating budget, we project that, pending audit adjustments, the City shall finish FY 2012-13 with a small surplus. We anticipate making a few philosophical changes which will provide us with greater flexibility in the General Fund in future years. In order to improve the City’s long-term financial position, we are proposing to not issue debt on the fire pumper, bucket truck, and tractor trailer truck proposed to be purchased in the FY 2012-13 operating budget and use cash proceeds instead. This will avoid adding to the City’s long-term debt burden and provide budgetary flexibility in future years. Additionally, issuing debt for capital items that are essentially recurring in nature is not sustainable on a longterm basis. The FY 2013-14 budget was built on spending a part of our fund balance including $831,032 to “catch-up” on our equipment backlog and $1,026,000 for one-time capital projects. This leaves approximately $2,000,000 in fund balance above the 20% target set by City Council. These funds are available for projects or can be left in reserve, though I recommend leaving some level above the 20% reserve as a contingency. All told, the funds made available from the General Fund were focused on the very highest priorities with an emphasis on renewing existing infrastructure and facilities, and priorities articulated by City Council. Projects funded in FY 2013-14 include: •

Transmittal

$250,000 each for Street Resurfacing and NSTEP. This maintains the total allocation to both programs originally budgeted in FY 2012-13. The future years of the CIP work to increase funding for both projects to $500,000 each. A-3

FY 2014-2018 CIP • • •

•

City of Greenville, South Carolina

$300,000 is made available for the Commercial Corridors project, consistent with priorities stated by City Council. $150,000 for the last year of the City’s commitment to the reconstruction of Salters Road. Renewed commitment to reinvesting in the City’s infrastructure and facilities including $245,000 for the City’s SQL platform, $180,000 for a Station Alerting System at the City’s fire stations, and $76,000 to replace roofs at the Nicholtown Community Center and the Public Works Center (an additional $105,000 is included in the Downtown Infrastructure Fund to replace the roof at Municipal Court). $75,000 is included to fund a dog park at the Greenville Humane Society or at an alternate site to be determined. The current site has proven to be too small and incompatible.

In future years, we will work to increase current revenue funding of General Fund projects by approximately $250,000 per year, with a goal of approaching $1,500,000 annually in FY 2017-18. However, due to the constraints in the General Fund, several highly rated projects were not funded such as the Market Point Drive Connector, additional sidewalk projects, and park renewal projects. Funding for Bicycle Lanes has not been included in the CIP (as it is below the $100,000 threshold) and is incorporated into the Operating Budget at $25,000. One debt-backed project which will impact the General Fund in future years is the Phone System Replacement. It has been expanded by $220,000 for a total budget of $695,000 to reflect current pricing estimates. Parking Fund As noted in the forecast discussion during the retreat, the Parking Fund’s position has improved significantly over the past two years and is projected to improve further in FY 2013-14 with the opening of Project ONE. The only project funded in the Parking Fund is $632,000 to rehabilitate the Poinsett garage. Maintaining financial flexibility in the Parking Fund is a high priority due to the potential for public/private partnerships. Stormwater Fund As noted in the forecast discussion during the retreat, the Stormwater Fund’s position remains strong, therefore allowing the City to fund several projects to reduce flooding and improve water quality in FY 2013-14 including: • • • • •

$1,000,000 for additional culverts associated with the White Oak Basin Phase II project in order to reduce flooding in the neighborhoods adjoining Bob Jones University. $435,000 for the Pinehurst Culvert Crossing which is the last major culvert upgrade to be made on Richland Creek. $300,000 to continue the Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan to identify and install water quality retrofits along Richland Creek now that major flooding improvements are being completed. $100,000 to design the North Hills Area Stormwater Improvements project which will work to improve drainage near Bennett and Garraux Streets. $30,000 to demolish the Cleveland Park Horse Stables.

In addition, a reduction of $1,398,000 in the Henderson Basin project budget is included as the infrastructure is complete and flood plain remapping is underway. These funds are being redirected to other projects in the FY 2013-14 capital budget. Wastewater Fund Although the Wastewater Fund’s capital plan has been adjusted to reflect current financial constraints and has been modified from the FY 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program, progress should be maintained in resolving the inflow and infiltration (I&I) issues present in our wastewater system. In FY 2013-14, the CIP includes: •

Transmittal

$1,900,000 for rehabilitation in Basin 7, of which $1,555,000 will be funded through increasing the sanitary sewer revenue bond issuance planned for the Wastewater Rehabilitation and HaynieSirrine projects adopted in last year’s CIP. An additional $345,000 will be funded through cash.

A-4

FY 2014-2018 CIP •

City of Greenville, South Carolina

$400,000 in pay-as-you-go funding for the Basin 15 project. Presently, investigation is underway within the Wastewater Rehabilitation project and a separate Basin 15 project. If funding in the Wastewater Rehabilitation project and the total $650,000 appropriated in the Basin 15 project is sufficient to remedy the I&I problem, then no additional debt issuance will be required. However, should the investigation reveal a more substantial problem than is presently anticipated, a debt issuance and adjustment to future capital plans may be necessary.

The CIP anticipates making improvements to Basins 16 and 25 in FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16. At present, forecast models indicate that the debt associated with those projects may negatively impact our debt service coverage levels relative to the debt and financial metrics established by the rating agencies. We are projecting debt service coverage in FY 2016-17 of 120% of net operating revenues to debt service. Our bond covenants require 115%; the rating agencies have noted a preference for the ratio to be closer to 140%. Therefore, it may be necessary to have conversations in future years about additional rate increases or refinements to the capital plan. Hospitality Tax Fund As noted in the forecast discussion during the retreat, the Hospitality Tax Fund’s position remains strong and allows the City to fund several tourism-related projects, while still leaving capacity for possible economic development projects, tourism-related parks, or additional marketing. Projects in FY 2013-14 include: • •

•

Funding for the development of the Cancer Survivors Park at $630,000. Funding for several projects to improve access to the Swamp Rabbit Trail including the NEXT Trail Connector ($606,000), the Hudson Street Trailhead ($225,000), and the Greenville Tech Trailhead ($125,000). Please note the Greenville Tech Trailhead is a placeholder until negotiations and discussions are complete. In addition, funding of $145,000 is included for the Swamp Rabbit Trail Rubber Surface project to remove the rubber surface on the Hincapie section of the Trail and replace with asphalt. An additional $350,000 is also provided for the River Street Underpass to improve safety. Funding to begin a program to replace the Police Department’s Public Safety Camera System, utilized in areas of high tourism concentration. FY 2013-14 funding is $500,000.

Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund Funding of $40,000 is included to design streetscape improvements on Augusta Street in the general vicinity of Fluor Field. Future year funding is planned to construct the improvements in conjunction with the Admissions Tax Fund. Local Accommodations Tax Fund Funding of $300,000 is included to rebuild the chillers at the TD Convention Center and $100,000 to design deferred maintenance improvements to the conference center at the TD Convention Center. In future years, a funding placeholder is included to renovate the conference center and rehabilitate the parking lots at the TD Convention Center (pending the results of the architectural/engineering analysis). Actual budgets will be refined in future years. Downtown Infrastructure Fund As noted in the forecast discussion during the retreat, the Downtown Infrastructure Fund’s position remains strong and has the capacity to fund several redevelopment projects, while leaving capacity for possible economic development projects. Projects in FY 2013-14 include: • • • • •

Transmittal

$165,000 for a Downtown Streetscapes project that will make spot improvements on Coffee Street, Washington Street, and Japanese Dogwood Lane. $150,000 to continue the Main Street Tree Rehabilitation project. $134,000 to make landscape and street improvements on North Main Street between College Street and Elford Street near the Landmark Building. $128,000 for the Broad Street Pedestrian Light project to install decorative lighting between Church Street and Main Street. $120,000 to rehabilitate the pedestrian bridges in McPherson Park.

A-5

FY 2014-2018 CIP â&#x20AC;˘ â&#x20AC;˘

City of Greenville, South Carolina

$105,000 for the Roof Replacement project to replace the roof at Municipal Court. $25,000 to design streetscape improvements along Spring and Falls Streets.

In the future planning years, a placeholder of $3,000,000 has been put in for the Cultural Corridor project. This amount and the total budget will be refined as the scope and scale of the project are defined in the design phase that is underway. West End Tax Increment Fund The CIP redirects funding from the West End Property Acquisition project to fund the first phase of the Rhett/Camperdown Improvements project with cash, rather than a debt issuance. This will allow the City to retain its remaining West End TIF bond capacity for other potential economic development projects in the West End. The project budget for Rhett/Camperdown Improvements is increased by $150,000 to fund a mast arm at the intersection of Camperdown and River. The remaining phase of the project (River to Markley) is planned for FY 2014-15. Should the need arise to have funding available for property acquisition during the course of the fiscal year, the funding strategy and/or timeline for the Rhett/Camperdown Improvements project will need to be changed. In addition, $250,000 is allocated for pedestrian improvements on West Camperdown Way between Academy and River Streets. Viola Street Tax Increment Fund In FY 2013-14, the Viola Street Tax Increment Fund will provide $146,000 for improvements to the Viola Center and adjoining park properties, and $280,000 for streetscape improvements in the Viola neighborhood and surrounding thoroughfares. Conclusion In summary, the FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program provides the City with reinvestments in its existing infrastructure, targets investments for the future growth of the City, and maintains flexibility for future opportunities. Sincerely,

John F. Castile City Manager

Transmittal

A-6

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Transmittal

City of Greenville, South Carolina

A-7

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Transmittal

City of Greenville, South Carolina

A-8

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Transmittal

City of Greenville, South Carolina

A-9

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Transmittal

City of Greenville, South Carolina

A-10

SUMMARY SCHEDULES

The FY 2014-2018 CIP continues investments made on the Reedy River that enhance and protect it for public use.

Summary Schedules

B-1

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Schedules

B-2

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FY 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE I

Projects Funded

Total CIP Revenue and Expenditure Summary

$12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $0

911233

$10,060,000 $7,384,000

541205 $2,360,000 500000

$2,165,000

$8,731,000

2520000

FY 13/14

FY 14/15 FY 13/14 CAPITAL BUDGET

FY 15/16

200000 FY 17/18 0

FY 16/17

**********Planning Years Only********** FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

TOTAL FY 17/18 FY 2014-2018

REVENUES Admissions Tax Fund

Downtown Infrastructure Fund General Fund Transfer Hospitality Tax Bonds Hospitality Tax Fund

250,000

827,000

251,000

3,150,000

150,000

4,378,000

1,526,000

700,000

995,000

1,250,000

1,375,000

5,846,000

2,000,000

2,000,000 3,581,000

2,581,000

250,000

Installment Lease Purchase Agreement

220,000

Local Accommodations Tax Fund

400,000

135,000

475,000

450,000

670,000

2,130,000

Parking Fund

632,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bonds Stormwater Fund Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund Viola Street Tax Increment Fund Wastewater Fund West End Tax Increment Bonds West End Tax Increment Fund TOTAL REVENUES

1,555,000

4,000,000

5,555,000

467,000

1,850,000

1,125,000

3,442,000

40,000

95,000

135,000

426,000

810,000

565,000

65,000

1,570,000

(1,989,000)

-1,989,000

(111,000)

2,635,000

2,524,000

8,731,000

10,060,000

2,165,000

2,360,000

30,700,000

7,384,000

PROJECTS Roads and Bridges

650,000

600,000

895,000

1,000,000

4,145,000

Streetscapes

1,172,000

3,081,000

3,000,000

150,000

7,403,000

Wastewater

2,365,000

565,000

4,065,000

65,000

7,125,000

Stormwater Parks and Recreation Economic Development Neighborhood Revitalization

437,000

1,850,000

1,125,000

3,412,000

2,602,000

2,150,000

150,000

5,052,000

(1,800,000)

235,000

575,000

550,000

770,000

275,000

330,000

Public Safety

680,000

250,000

1,680,000

Parking

632,000

General Government

646,000

7,384,000

8,731,000

10,060,000

2,165,000

2,360,000

30,700,000

TOTAL PROJECTS

Summary Sheets

B-3

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FY 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE II Project Summaries with Applicable Funding Sources FY 13/14 Project/Funding Source

COMMITTED

CAPITAL

FUNDING

BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only**********

TOTAL PROJECT

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

COST

ROADS AND BRIDGES NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) State "C" Funds

525,000

48,671

4,700,000

250,000

300,000

500,000

6,550,000

General Obligation Bond - 2001

500,000

Stormwater Fund

177,350

General Obligation Bond - 2006

350,000

6,301,021

250,000

300,000

500,000

8,151,021

Greenville County General Fund Transfer

Totals

525,000

Street Resurfacing 354,000

354,000

General Fund Transfer

Capital Projects Fund

2,655,000

250,000

300,000

500,000

4,505,000

Totals

3,009,000

250,000

300,000

500,000

4,859,000

5,600,000

Fairforest Way Rehabilitation Federal Appropriation - SAFETEA-LU

5,600,000

49,275

Greenville Water System

500,000

General Obligation Bond - 2006

706,000

Property Sales

116,338

6,971,613

State Revenue

Totals Salters Road Improvements

61,875

General Fund Transfer

Property Sales

210,000

150,000

360,000

Totals

271,875

150,000

421,875

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

370,000

Totals

370,000

Hospitality Tax Fund

194,000

Totals

194,000

General Fund Transfer

115,000

Totals

115,000

General Fund Transfer

180,000

Totals

180,000

Main Street Resurfacing

Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection

Haywood Road Sidewalks

Woodruff Road Sidewalks

TOTAL ROADS AND BRIDGES

17,117,509

650,000

600,000

895,000

1,000,000

21,262,509

STREETSCAPES Pete Hollis Corridor Impovements Viola Street Tax Increment Fund

150,000

Totals

150,000

East McBee Avenue Improvements 14,704

14,704

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

Property Sales

746,667

Totals

761,371

Summary Sheets

761,371

B-4

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 13/14

Project/Funding Source

COMMITTED

CAPITAL

FUNDING

BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only**********

TOTAL PROJECT

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

COST

Rhett/Camperdown Improvements West End Tax Increment Fund

1,264,396

2,139,000

West End TIF Bond - Series 2013

1,989,000

(1,989,000)

Property Sales

2,635,000

6,038,396 0

30,004

3,283,400

150,000

2,635,000

6,068,400

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

200,000

3,000,000

3,200,000

Totals

200,000

3,000,000

3,200,000

Hospitality Tax Fund

100,000

Totals

100,000

Capital Projects Fund

175,000

Totals

175,000

Viola Street Tax Increment Fund

228,000

Totals

228,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

500,000

Totals

500,000

Totals Cultural Corridor Urban Trail

Village of West Greenville Improvements

Augusta Street Improvements

North Main Street Improvements

Washington Street Improvements

Augusta Street Streetscaping (Baseball Stadium) Admissions Tax Fund

250,000

Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund

40,000

95,000

135,000

Totals

40,000

345,000

385,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

128,000

Totals

128,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

165,000

Totals

165,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

134,000

Totals

134,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

25,000

101,000

126,000

Totals

25,000

101,000

126,000

Viola Street Tax Increment Fund

280,000

Totals

280,000

West End Tax Increment Fund

250,000

Totals

250,000

General Fund Transfer

150,000

Totals

150,000

Broad Street Pedestrian Lighting

Downtown Streetscapes

North Main Street - Landmark Building

Spring/Falls Streetscape

Viola Streetscaping

West Camperdown Way

Augusta at Faris Streetscape

TOTAL STREETSCAPES

5,397,771

1,172,000

3,081,000

3,000,000

150,000 12,800,771

WASTEWATER Haynie-Sirrine Wastewater System Rehabilitation 409,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002

Wastewater Fund

96,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013

1,695,000

State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund

2,005,000

Totals

4,205,000

Summary Sheets

409,000

B-5

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 13/14

Project/Funding Source

COMMITTED

CAPITAL

FUNDING

BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only**********

TOTAL PROJECT

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

COST

Verdae Sewer Expansion Donations

100,000

Greenville Local Development Corporation

200,000

Greenville Water System

500,000

General Fund

366,000

1,166,000

Totals Wastewater System Rehabilitation

300,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013

Wastewater Fund

1,000,000

Totals

1,300,000

Wastewater Fund

200,000

65,000

525,000

Totals

200,000

65,000

525,000

Wastewater System Survey and Model

Basin 7 Sewer Rehabilitation Wastewater Fund

250,000

345,000

595,000

1,555,000

250,000

1,900,000

2,150,000

Wastewater Fund

250,000

400,000

650,000

Totals

250,000

400,000

650,000

Wastewater Fund

250,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016

2,000,000

Totals

250,000

2,000,000

2,250,000

Wastewater Fund

250,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016

2,000,000

Totals

250,000

2,000,000

2,250,000

565,000

4,065,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 Totals Basin 15 Sewer Rehabilitation

Basin 16 Sewer Rehabilitation

Basin 25 Sewer Rehabilitation

TOTAL WASTEWATER

7,371,000

2,365,000

65,000

14,496,000

STORMWATER Henderson Basin Stormwater Fund Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 Totals

3,468,497 61,000 3,529,497

(1,398,000) 0 (1,398,000)

2,070,497 61,000

2,131,497

Pinehurst Culvert Crossing Improvement Stormwater Fund

435,000

Totals

435,000

740,680

3,145

743,825

Stormwater Fund

395,963

Totals

395,963

Stormwater Fund

200,000

Totals

200,000

Stormwater Fund

1,195,000

1,000,000

2,195,000

Totals

1,195,000

1,000,000

2,195,000

Westview/Windsor Culverts Stormwater Fund Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 Totals Pettigru Street Improvements

Fairforest Way Basin

White Oak Basin Phase II

Gower Estates Stormwater Improvements Wastewater Fund

231,000

Stormwater Fund

1,659,000

Totals

1,890,000

Summary Sheets

B-6

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 13/14

Project/Funding Source

COMMITTED

CAPITAL

FUNDING

BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only**********

TOTAL PROJECT

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

COST

Swanson Court Stormwater Fund

263,000

Wastewater Fund

21,000

284,000

Stormwater Fund

150,000

300,000

850,000

1,300,000

Totals

150,000

300,000

850,000

1,300,000

Stormwater Fund

116,000

Totals

116,000

Stormwater Fund

100,000

1,000,000

1,100,000

Totals

100,000

1,000,000

1,100,000

Stormwater Fund

425,000

Totals

425,000

Stormwater Fund

700,000

Totals

700,000

Totals

263,000

Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan

Public Works Complex Water Quality Improvements

North Hills Area Stormwater Improvements

Aldridge/Lacey Drainage Improvements

Hilly Street Drainage Improvements

TOTAL STORMWATER

8,504,285

437,000

1,850,000

1,125,000

11,916,285

PARKS AND RECREATION Community Center Building Improvements Property Sales

467,500

Capital Projects Fund

100,000

General Fund Transfer

750,000

72,500

1,390,000

11,870

General Obligation Bond - 2003 Totals Main Street Tree Rehabilitation CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2002

11,870

CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2003

14,313

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

911,985

150,000

1,511,985

Totals

938,168

150,000

1,538,168

Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access 655,766

655,766

State Grants

Hospitality Tax Fund

65,464

Property Sales

10,396

Capital Projects Fund

119,192

Totals

850,818

Reedy River Trail Expansion Hospitality Tax Fund

325,000

Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2011

675,000

State Grants

240,000

Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2014

2,375,000

2,000,000

4,375,000

Totals

3,615,000

2,000,000

5,615,000

Park Restrooms Capital Projects Fund

180,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

153,479

Hospitality Tax Fund

218,000

Totals

551,479

River Street Underpass 0

350,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

265,000

Totals

265,000

350,000

615,000

Hospitality Tax Fund

Summary Sheets

B-7

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 13/14

Project/Funding Source

COMMITTED

CAPITAL

FUNDING

BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only**********

TOTAL PROJECT

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

COST

Heritage Green Master Plan Greenville County

1,508,000

Totals

1,508,000

Stormwater Fund

650,000

Totals

650,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

15,000

120,000

135,000

Totals

15,000

120,000

135,000

Hospitality Tax Fund

94,000

630,000

724,000

Totals

94,000

630,000

724,000

Hospitality Tax Fund

75,000

606,000

681,000

Totals

75,000

606,000

681,000

Cleveland Park Bank Stabilization

McPherson Park Bridges Rehabilitation

Cancer Survivors Park

NEXT Trail Connector

Falls Park Improvements State Grants

100,000

Hospitality Tax Fund

608,000

Totals

708,000

265,856

66,464

332,320

Stormwater Fund

30,000

Totals

30,000

General Fund Transfer

75,000

Totals

75,000

Hospitality Tax Fund

125,000

Totals

125,000

Hospitality Tax Fund

225,000

Totals

225,000

Hospitality Tax Fund

145,000

Totals

145,000

Viola Street Tax Increment Fund

146,000

Totals

146,000

Haywood at I-385 Interchange Landscaping State Grants Capital Projects Fund Totals Cleveland Park Horse Stables

Greenville Dog Parks

Greenville Tech Trailhead

Hudson Street Trailhead

Swamp Rabbit Trail Rubber Surface

Viola Center and Park Improvements

TOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION

10,992,785

2,602,000

2,150,000

150,000

16,044,785

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Piazza Bergamo Downtown Infrastructure Fund Greenville Water System Piedmont Natural Gas Grant Property Sales Totals

Summary Sheets

5,310,000

228,650

30,000

342,000

5,910,650

B-8

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 13/14

Project/Funding Source

COMMITTED

CAPITAL

FUNDING

BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only**********

TOTAL PROJECT

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

COST

TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2011

115,000

Hospitality Tax Fund

110,000

Totals

225,000

453,556

16,960

300,000

100,000

700,000

Greenville County

34,357

Property Sales

70,000

574,873

300,000

100,000

1,274,873

Commercial Corridors Capital Projects Fund State Revenue General Fund Transfer

Totals West End Property Acquisition West End Tax Increment Fund

2,500,000

(2,500,000)

Totals

2,500,000

(2,500,000)

Peace Center Downtown Infrastructure Fund

2,582,000

Totals

2,582,000

Property Sales

896,847

Totals

896,847

Stormwater Fund

37,000

Utility Undergrounding Fund

49,000

West End Tax Increment Fund

175,000

Totals

261,000

Local Accommodations Tax Fund

300,000

Totals

300,000

Local Accommodations Tax Fund

100,000

135,000

475,000

450,000

170,000

1,330,000

Totals

100,000

135,000

475,000

450,000

170,000

1,330,000

Local Accommodations Tax Fund

500,000

Totals

500,000

Hyatt Public Improvements

Markley at Rhett Improvements

TD Convention Center Chiller Plant

TD Convention Center Conference Center

TD Convention Center Parking Lots

TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

12,950,370

(1,800,000)

235,000

575,000

550,000

770,000

13,280,370

NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION Haynie-Sirrine Property Sales

125,545

3,273

Miscellaneous Grants Fund

78,750

Revolving House Fund

75,000

Stormwater Fund

44,560

Capital Projects Fund

437,180

Totals

764,308

General Obligation Bond - 2003

125,545

Mt. Eustis Street Improvements Capital Projects Fund

401,000

General Fund Transfer

226,372

275,000

501,372

General Obligation Bond - 2006

85,000

Wastewater Fund

56,000

Stormwater Fund

63,000

Totals

831,372

275,000

1,106,372

275,000

1,870,680

TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION

Summary Sheets

1,595,680

B-9

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 13/14

Project/Funding Source

COMMITTED

CAPITAL

FUNDING

BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only**********

TOTAL PROJECT

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

COST

PUBLIC SAFETY East Area Fire Station 75,000

75,000

General Obligation Bond - 2013

Property Sales

3,881,000

Totals

3,956,000

Fire Facilities Assessment Capital Projects Fund

70,000

Totals

70,000

Public Safety Cameras Hospitality Tax Fund

500,000

250,000

1,500,000

Totals

500,000

250,000

1,500,000

Station Alerting System General Fund Transfer

180,000

Totals

180,000

680,000

250,000

5,706,000

TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY

4,026,000

PARKING Richardson Street Garage Downtown Infrastructure Fund

655,000

Totals

655,000

Poinsett Garage Rehabilitation Parking Enterprise Fund

632,000

Totals

632,000

655,000

632,000

Installment Lease Purchase - 2013

475,000

220,000

695,000

Totals

475,000

220,000

695,000

TOTAL PARKING

1,287,000

GENERAL GOVERNMENT Phone System Replacement

Public Works Operations Center Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2012

3,100,000

Totals

3,100,000

Capital Projects Fund

119,000

Solid Waste Enterprise Fund

106,000

Stormwater Fund

39,000

Wastewater Fund

57,000

321,000

Public Works Radio System

Totals Central Microsoft SQL Platform General Fund Transfer

245,000

Totals

245,000

Roof Replacements General Fund Transfer

76,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

105,000

181,000

646,000

Totals TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL, ALL PROJECTS

Summary Sheets

0 3,896,000 72,506,400

7,384,000

8,731,000

10,060,000

2,165,000

2,360,000

181,000 4,542,000 103,206,400

B-10

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FY 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE III Project Summaries by Funding Source FY 13/14 Funding Source/Project

COMMITTED FUNDING

**********Planning Years Only**********

CAPITAL BUDGET

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

TOTAL FUNDING

Admissions Tax Fund Augusta Street Streetscaping (Baseball Stadium) Subtotal, Admissions Tax Fund

0 0

250,000 250,000

0 0

250,000 250,000

Capital Projects Fund Haynie-Sirrine Mt. Eustis Street Improvements Commercial Corridors Street Resurfacing Park Restrooms Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access Community Center Building Improvements Haywood at I-385 Interchange Landscaping Augusta Street Improvements Fire Facilities Assessment Public Works Radio System Subtotal, Capital Projects Fund

437,180 401,000 453,556 354,000 180,000 119,192 100,000 66,464 175,000 70,000 119,000 2,475,392

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

437,180 401,000 453,556 354,000 180,000 119,192 100,000 66,464 175,000 70,000 119,000 2,475,392

CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2002 Main Street Tree Rehabilitation Subtotal, CDB Tax Increment Bond - 2002

11,870 11,870

0 0

11,870 11,870

CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2003 Main Street Tree Rehabilitation Subtotal, CDB Tax Increment Bond - 2003

14,313 14,313

0 0

14,313 14,313

100,000 100,000

0 0

100,000 100,000

911,985 746,667 153,479 370,000 265,000 2,582,000 5,310,000 15,000 200,000 500,000 655,000 0 0 0 0 0 11,709,131

150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 0 0 0 128,000 165,000 134,000 25,000 105,000 827,000

150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101,000 0 251,000

150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,150,000

150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150,000

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1,511,985 746,667 153,479 370,000 265,000 2,582,000 5,310,000 135,000 3,200,000 500,000 655,000 128,000 165,000 134,000 126,000 105,000 16,087,131

5,600,000 5,600,000

0 0

5,600,000 5,600,000

Donations Verdae Sewer Expansion Subtotal, Donations Downtown Infrastructure Fund Main Street Tree Rehabilitation East McBee Avenue Improvements Park Restrooms Main Street Resurfacing River Street Underpass Peace Center Piazza Bergamo McPherson Park Bridges Cultural Corridor Urban Trail Washington Street Improvements Richardson Street Garage Broad Street Pedestrian Lights Downtown Streetscapes North Main Street - Landmark Building Spring/Falls Streetscape Roof Replacement Subtotal, Downtown Infrastructure Fund Federal Appropriation - SAFETEA-LU Fairforest Way Rehabilitation Subtotal, Fed. Appropriation - SAFETEA-LU

Summary Sheets

B-11

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 13/14

Funding Source/Project

COMMITTED FUNDING

CAPITAL BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only********** FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

TOTAL FUNDING

General Fund Transfer NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) Street Resurfacing Community Center Building Improvements Salters Road Improvements Verdae Sewer Expansion Mt. Eustis Street Improvements Haywood Road Sidewalks Woodruff Road Sidewalks Augusta at Faris Streetscape Greenville Dog Parks Commercial Corridors Station Alerting System Central SQL Platform Roof Replacement Subtotal, General Fund Transfer

4,700,000 2,655,000 750,000 210,000 366,000 226,372 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,907,372

250,000 250,000 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 300,000 180,000 245,000 76,000 1,526,000

300,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 700,000

300,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 115,000 180,000 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 995,000

500,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 100,000 0 0 0 1,250,000

500,000 500,000 0 0 0 275,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 1,375,000

6,550,000 4,505,000 750,000 360,000 366,000 501,372 115,000 180,000 150,000 75,000 700,000 180,000 245,000 76,000 14,753,372

General Obligation Bond - 2001 NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) Subtotal, General Obligation Bond - 2001

500,000 500,000

0 0

500,000 500,000

72,500 3,273 75,773

0 0 0

72,500 3,273 75,773

General Obligation Bond - 2006 NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) Mt. Eustis Street Improvements Fairforest Way Rehabilitation Subtotal, General Obligation Bond - 2006

350,000 85,000 706,000 1,141,000

0 0 0 0

350,000 85,000 706,000 1,141,000

General Obligation Bond - 2013 East Area Fire Station Subtotal, General Obligation Bond - 2013

3,881,000 3,881,000

0 0

3,881,000 3,881,000

Greenville County NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) Commercial Corridors Heritage Green Master Plan Subtotal, Greenville County

48,671 34,357 1,508,000 1,591,028

0 0 0 0

48,671 34,357 1,508,000 1,591,028

200,000 200,000

0 0

200,000 200,000

500,000 500,000 228,650 1,228,650

0 0 0 0

500,000 500,000 228,650 1,228,650

Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2011 Reedy River Trail Expansion TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit Subtotal, Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2011

675,000 115,000 790,000

0 0 0

675,000 115,000 790,000

Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2014 Reedy River Trail Expansion Subtotal, Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2014

2,375,000 2,375,000

0 0

2,000,000 2,000,000

0 0

4,375,000 4,375,000

General Obligation Bond - 2003 Community Center Building Improvements Haynie-Sirrine Subtotal, General Obligation Bond - 2003

Greenville Local Development Corporation Verdae Sewer Expansion Subtotal, Greenville Local Development Corporation Greenville Water System Fairforest Way Rehabilitation Verdae Sewer Expansion Piazza Bergamo Subtotal, Greenville Water System

Summary Sheets

B-12

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 13/14

Funding Source/Project Hospitality Tax Fund Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access Reedy River Trail Expansion TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection Park Restrooms Cancer Survivors Park NEXT Trail Connector Falls Park Improvements Village of West Greenville Improvements Greenville Tech Trailhead Hudson Street Trailhead River Street Underpass Swamp Rabbit Trail Rubber Surface Public Safety Cameras Subtotal, Hospitality Tax Fund

COMMITTED FUNDING

CAPITAL BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only********** FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

TOTAL FUNDING

655,766 325,000 110,000 194,000 218,000 94,000 75,000 608,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,379,766

0 0 0 0 0 630,000 606,000 0 0 125,000 225,000 350,000 145,000 500,000 2,581,000

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 250,000

655,766 325,000 110,000 194,000 218,000 724,000 681,000 608,000 100,000 125,000 225,000 350,000 145,000 1,500,000 5,960,766

475,000 475,000

220,000 220,000

0 0

695,000 695,000

0 0 0 0

300,000 100,000 0 400,000

0 135,000 0 135,000

0 475,000 0 475,000

0 450,000 0 450,000

0 170,000 500,000 670,000

300,000 1,330,000 500,000 2,130,000

78,750 78,750

0 0

78,750 78,750

0 0

632,000 632,000

0 0

632,000 632,000

30,000 30,000

0 0

30,000 30,000

467,500 342,000 30,004 125,545 75,000 10,396 14,704 61,875 70,000 896,847 116,338 2,210,209

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

467,500 342,000 30,004 125,545 75,000 10,396 14,704 61,875 70,000 896,847 116,338 2,210,209

Revolving Housing Fund Haynie-Sirrine Subtotal, Revolving Housing Fund

75,000 75,000

0 0

75,000 75,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002 Haynie-Sirrine Basin Rehabilitation Subtotal, Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002

96,000 96,000

0 0

96,000 96,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 Haynie-Sirrine Basin Rehabilitation Wastewater Rehabilitation Basin 7 Rehabilitation Subtotal, Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013

1,695,000 1,000,000 0 2,695,000

0 0 1,555,000 1,555,000

0 0 0 0

1,695,000 1,000,000 1,555,000 4,250,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016 Basin 16 Rehabilitation Basin 25 Rehabilitation Subtotal, Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016

0 0 0

2,000,000 2,000,000 4,000,000

0 0 0

2,000,000 2,000,000 4,000,000

Installment Lease Purchase Agreement - 2013 Phone System Replacement Subtotal, Installment Lease Purchase Agree. - 2013 Local Accomodations Tax Fund TD Convention Center Chiller Plant TD Convention Center Conference Center Upgrades TD Convention Center Parking Lots Subtotal, Local Accommodations Tax Fund Miscellaneous Grants Fund Haynie-Sirrine Subtotal, Miscellaneous Grants Fund Parking Enterprise Fund Poinsett Garage Rehabilitation Subtotal, Parking Fund Piedmont Natural Gas Grant Piazza Bergamo Subtotal, Piedmont Natural Gas Grant Property Sales Community Center Building Improvements Piazza Bergamo Rhett/Camperdown Street Improvements Haynie-Sirrine East Area Fire Station Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access East McBee Avenue Improvements Salters Road Improvements Commercial Corridors Hyatt Public Improvements Fairforest Way Rehabilitation Subtotal, Property Sales

Summary Sheets

B-13

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 13/14

Funding Source/Project

COMMITTED FUNDING

CAPITAL BUDGET

**********Planning Years Only********** FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

TOTAL FUNDING

Solid Waste Enterprise Fund Public Works Radio System Replacement Subtotal, Solid Waste Enterprise Fund

106,000 106,000

0 0

106,000 106,000

State "C" Funds NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) Subtotal, State "C" Funds

525,000 525,000

0 0

525,000 525,000

State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund Haynie-Sirrine Basin Rehabilitation Subtotal, State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund

2,005,000 2,005,000

0 0

2,005,000 2,005,000

65,464 265,856 100,000 240,000 671,320

0 0 0 0 0

65,464 265,856 100,000 240,000 671,320

49,275 16,960 66,235

0 0 0

49,275 16,960 66,235

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 850,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 1,850,000

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425,000 700,000 0 1,125,000

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

44,560 395,963 2,070,497 435,000 200,000 2,195,000 740,680 1,659,000 263,000 1,300,000 177,350 116,000 63,000 39,000 650,000 37,000 1,100,000 425,000 700,000 30,000 12,641,050

State Grants Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access Haywood at I-385 Interchange Landscaping Falls Park Improvements Reedy River Trail Expansion Subtotal, State Grants State Revenue Fairforest Way Rehabilitation Commercial Corridors Subtotal, State Revenue Stormwater Fund Haynie-Sirrine Pettigru Street Improvements Henderson Basin Pinehurst Culvert Crossing Fairforest Way Basin White Oak Basin Phase II Westview/Windsor Culverts Gower Estates Stormwater Rehabilitation Swanson Court Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) Public Works Complex Water Quality Improvements Mt. Eustis Street Improvements Public Works Radio System Cleveland Park Bank Stabilization Markley at Rhett Improvements North Hills Area Stormwater Aldridge/Lacey Drainage Improvements Hilly Street Drainage Improvements Cleveland Park Horse Stables Subtotal, Stormwater Fund

44,560 395,963 3,468,497 0 200,000 1,195,000 740,680 1,659,000 263,000 150,000 177,350 116,000 63,000 39,000 650,000 37,000 0 0 0 0 9,199,050

0 0 (1,398,000) 435,000 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 30,000 467,000

Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 Henderson Basin Westview/Windsor Culverts Subtotal, Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001

61,000 3,145 64,145

0 0 0

61,000 3,145 64,145

Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2012 Public Works Operations Center Subtotal, Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2012

3,100,000 3,100,000

0 0

3,100,000 3,100,000

0 0

40,000 40,000

95,000 95,000

0 0

135,000 135,000

49,000 49,000

0 0

49,000 49,000

150,000 228,000 0 0 378,000

0 0 146,000 280,000 426,000

0 0 0 0 0

150,000 228,000 146,000 280,000 804,000

Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund Augusta Street Streetscape (Baseball Stadium) Subtotal, Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund Utility Undergrounding Fund Markley at Rhett Improvements Subtotal, Utility Undergrounding Fund Viola Street Tax Increment Fund Pete Hollis Corridor Improvements North Main Street Improvements Viola Center and Park Improvements Viola Streetscaping Subtotal, Viola Street Tax Increment Fund

Summary Sheets

B-14

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 13/14

**********Planning Years Only**********

COMMITTED FUNDING

CAPITAL BUDGET

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

Wastewater Fund Haynie-Sirrine Basin Rehabilitation Mt. Eustis Street Improvements Wastewater Rehabilitation Wastewater Survey and Model Basin 7 Rehabilitation Basin 15 Rehabilitation Basin 16 Rehabilitation Basin 25 Rehabilitation Gower Estates Stormwater Rehabilitation Swanson Court Public Works Radio System Subtotal, Wastewater Fund

409,000 56,000 300,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 0 0 231,000 21,000 57,000 1,774,000

0 0 0 65,000 345,000 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 810,000

0 0 0 65,000 0 0 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 565,000

0 0 0 65,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65,000

409,000 56,000 300,000 525,000 595,000 650,000 250,000 250,000 231,000 21,000 57,000 3,344,000

West End Tax Increment Fund West End Property Acquisition Markley at Rhett Improvements West Camperdown Way Rhett/Camperdown Improvements Subtotal, West End Tax Increment Fund

2,500,000 175,000 0 1,264,396 3,939,396

(2,500,000) 0 250,000 2,139,000 (111,000)

0 0 0 2,635,000 2,635,000

0 0 0 0 0

0 175,000 250,000 6,038,396 6,463,396

West End TIF Bond - 2013 Rhett/Camperdown Improvements Subtotal, West End TIF Bond - 2013

1,989,000 1,989,000

(1,989,000) (1,989,000)

0 0

72,506,400

7,384,000

8,731,000

10,060,000

2,165,000

2,360,000

103,206,400

Funding Source/Project

TOTAL, ALL FUNDING SOURCES

Summary Sheets

TOTAL FUNDING

B-15

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FY 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE IV Unfunded Projects

**********Planning Years Only********** FY 13/14

PROJECT

REQUEST

TOTAL FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

REQUEST

PROJECT DOES NOT APPEAR IN CIP - NO FUNDING (REQUESTED AMOUNT SHOWN) ADA Curb Ramp Compliance Auditorium Site Calhoun Street Connection Camperdown/Falls Park Chick Springs Greenway Church Street Streetscape

City Hall Energy Upgrades

50,000 1,200,000 244,450 150,000 35,000 759,796

228,625 0 0 0 285,750 0

240,056 0 0 0 0 0

252,059 0 0 0 0 0

264,662 0 0 0 0 0

1,035,402 1,200,000 244,450 150,000 320,750 759,796

625,000

250,000

Cleveland Street Extension Curves

567,000

Cleveland Street Sidewalk

246,000

Juanita Butler Administration Building

243,000

Landmark Streetscape

200,000

1,900,000

McBee Avenue - Keys

200,000

McBee Avenue Plaza

500,000

98,000

54,000

71,000

54,000

60,000

337,000

105,000

Park Parking Lots

90,000

75,000

80,000

75,000

320,000

Park Playgrounds

142,500

61,000

82,000

18,000

303,500

Reedy River Park

500,000

Ridge Road Soccer Fields

798,200

Sidewalk Gap

358,000

360,850

363,843

366,985

1,449,678

Cleveland Park Sewer Line Concealment

Market Point Drive Connector

Neighborhood Park Improvements Outdoor Fitness Center

Wenwood Fire Station West Greenville Community Center Improvements

4,540,495

615,000

**********Planning Years Only********** FY 13/14

PROJECT

REQUEST

TOTAL FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

REQUEST

262,843 200,000 1,512,500 0 0 0 0 0 0

65,985 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

69,284 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

966,462 650,000 1,812,500 155,200 66,000 100,000 1,600,000 485,000 141,000

2,812,242

832,029

393,946

23,386,433

PROJECT IN CIP - NOT FULLY FUNDED BASED ON REQUEST (UNFUNDED PORTION SHOWN) NSTEP Street Resurfacing Cultural Corridor Urban Trail Downtown Streetscapes North Main Street - Landmark Building Basin 7 Sewer Rehabilitation Basin 15 Sewer Rehabilitation Cleveland Park Horse Stables Greenville Dog Parks TOTAL UNFUNDED PROJECTS

Summary Sheets

308,500 250,000 0 155,200 66,000 100,000 1,600,000 485,000 141,000 $

17,273,141

259,850 200,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,075,075

B-16

ROADS AND BRIDGES

East Faris Road at the intersection of Cleveland Street recently was upgraded with sidewalks through the NSTEP program. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program enhances streets throughout the City to accommodate motorists and non-motorists alike.

Roads & Bridges

C-1

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Roads & Bridges

City of Greenville, South Carolina

C-2

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

NSTEP (NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALK TARGETED EXPANSION PROGRAM) Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODS CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

1999

ON-GOING

2025+

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: The NSTEP Program (Neighborhood Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program), was developed in response to concerns expressed by City residents. It is an on-going project designed to construct sidewalk on at least one side of every street within the City of Greenville. As part of the NSTEP program, not only is sidewalk with a curb lawn constructed, but as part of the improvements, curb, gutter and storm drainage improvements are made to the street as well.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): In the late 1990's, it was determined that development of a new sidewalk program would benefit the City and its residents in a variety of ways. These include safety to pedestrians by providing a designated area to travel and traffic calming from the addition of curb and gutter, accessibility standards and requirements (ADA), landscaping and vegetation, and interest and pleasantness provided by the improvements. The NSTEP criteria to determine the priority for constructing sidewalk was revisted at City Council's request and revised in January 2011. Method for Estimating Cost: Based on a per linear foot cost developed from NSTEP Rounds 1 through 7.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): NSTEP Round 7C (McDaniel Avenue from Broad Street to Ridgeland Drive construction) nearing completion.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $6,301,021 $0 $0 $6,301,021

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) State "C" Funds Greenville County General Fund General Obligation Bond - 2001 Stormwater Fund General Obligation Bond - 2006 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $525,000 $48,671 $4,700,000 $500,000 $177,350 $350,000 $6,301,021

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Roads & Bridges

$0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000

$0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000

$0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $8,151,021 $0 $0 $8,151,021 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $525,000 $48,671 $6,550,000 $500,000 $177,350 $350,000 $8,151,021

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $250,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

C-3

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

STREET RESURFACING Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

MOBILE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2006

ON-GOING

2025+

Project Description: The cost to rehabilitate one lane mile of City street is in the range of $60,000. The City of Greenville has approximately 600 lane miles of street that require regular maintenance. Consequently the number of lane miles that can be rehabilitated depends upon the funding that is appropriated for this program. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): All City streets have been rated via a Pavement Quality Index (PQI) and the PQI were updated and field verified by a third party pavement management consulting firm in 2009. Rehabilitating streets is based on a priority of "worst to first". For the most recent projects, approximately 25% of the existing pavement structural sections on the streets that were resurfaced had to be removed and replaced prior to the new asphalt concrete surface course being placed. This indicates that the City of Greenville is in a "catch-up" mode. After the PQI ratings were field verified in 2009 the average PQI rating (scale 2 to 10) for our streets was 6.6. As of October 2012 the average PQI rating has slipped to 5.9. To maximize the expenditure of the maintenance dollar, it is imperative that all streets receive maintenance on a regular basis. Method for Estimating Cost: The cost estimate is prepared based on current pricing for full depth patching, milling, and asphalt concrete in-place after the streets selected for rehabilitation are prioritized. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): An additional $500,000 was recently appropriated to support the Greenville County Delegation Transportation Committee's (GLDTC) 2013 Municipal Match Resurfacing Program. This is in addition to the previously committed $150,000.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $3,009,000 $0 $0 $3,009,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Capital Projects Fund General Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $354,000 $2,655,000 $3,009,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Roads & Bridges

$0 $250,000 $250,000

$0 $300,000 $300,000

$0 $500,000 $500,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $4,859,000 $0 $0 $4,859,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $354,000 $4,505,000 $4,859,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $250,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

C-4

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FAIRFOREST WAY REHABILITATION Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

APR

MOBILE CITY ENCOURAGE A WIDE VARIETY OF TRANSPORTATION MODES

2007

DEC

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project includes a total rehabilitation of roadway infrastructure along a 2.1 mile section of Fairforest Way. The new road will be a four lane divided arterial street with curb & gutter, sidewalks with curb lawns, landscape plantings, raised planted median islands, and the curb lanes will have shared bicycle lanes in each direction. Additionally, a new signal is planned for the Mauldin Road intersection and at the Wenwood Drive intersection. A signal upgrade is planned for the existing span wire signal at Ridge Road. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Fairforest Way provides an alternate transportation link to I-85 from Mauldin Road to Woodruff Road via Millennium Boulevard and Carolina Point Parkway. However, the existing pavement along Fairforest Way has deteriorated to a very substandard condition. Increased development in the area along with new residential housing also warrant the need for full pedestrian and bicycle accommodation. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineer's estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Phase 1 - Mauldin Road to Ridge Road is substantially complete. Phase 2 - Ridge Road to Laurens Road is funded by SAFETEA-LU Earmark. Design and right-of-way plans are complete. The next step is acquiring the right of way. There is no stimulus funding associated with this second phase. A 20% local match is also required for Phase 2 per our participation agreement with the SCDOT.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $310,000 $0 $6,621,613 $0 $40,000 $6,971,613

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Federal Grant - SAFETEA-LU State Revenue Greenville Water System General Obligation Bond - 2006 Property Sales TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $5,600,000 $49,275 $500,000 $706,000 $116,338 $6,971,613

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Roads & Bridges

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $310,000 $0 $6,621,613 $0 $40,000 $6,971,613 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $5,600,000 $49,275 $500,000 $706,000 $116,338 $6,971,613

$68,763 $68,763 0.00 0.00

$70,826 $139,589 0.00 0.00

$72,950 $212,539 0.00 0.00

$75,139 $287,678 0.00 0.00

$77,394 $365,072 0.00 0.00

$365,072 $365,072 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

C-5

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

SALTERS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

OCT

MOBILE CITY PROVIDE LINKAGES BETWEEN ALL TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS

2009

JUN

2015

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Reconstructing Salters Road will provide an alternate transportation link to Woodruff Road by providing access to surrounding largescale developments. The project will occur in two sections: Section 1 is from Verdae to Old Sulphur Springs Road (just west of I-85 Bridge), and Section 2 from Old Sulphur Springs Road to Millennium/Carolina Point Parkway (includes bridge over I-85). Both sections are currently on the Greenville-Pickens Area Transportation Improvement Program. The City, County, and SCDOT have a design and financial participation agreement. Section one requires a 20% local match (split between City and County) since this is a City road. Section 2 is a State road and no local match is required. The proposed cross-section for improvements is four travel lanes, bike lanes, and planted medians. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The Woodruff Road Corridor Study - Final Report recognized that secondary access to many of the developments on the eastside are essential in order to provide safe and efficient access to large scale development sites including ICAR, Millennium Campus, Verdae Development, and the TD Bank Campus. This will provide an alternate access to Woodruff Road and to these developments.

Method for Estimating Cost: Estimate provided by the SCDOT. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): The design consultant has finished the environmental study and is 60% complete with design. Right-of-way acquisition will begin in 2013 with construction starting in late 2014.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $61,875 $10,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $271,875

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Property Sales General Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $61,875 $210,000 $271,875

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Roads & Bridges

$0 $150,000 $150,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $61,875 $10,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $421,875 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $61,875 $360,000 $421,875

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$16,732 $16,732 0.00 0.00

$17,569 $34,301 0.00 0.00

$18,447 $52,748 0.00 0.00

$19,369 $72,117 0.00 0.00

$72,117 $72,117 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

C-6

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

MAIN STREET RESURFACING Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

MOBILE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

DEC

Comp. Plan Principle:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREAS

2012

NOV

2013

Project Description: Main Street between Elford Street to West Camperdown Way currently exhibits random cracking. To improve the appearance of the street, the existing surface needs to be milled and resurfaced with asphalt concrete. Additionally, sections of the existing curb and gutter need to be removed and replaced. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Main Street is a focal point for the City of Greenville and it is imperative that the aesthetics of the City's infrastructure be maintained. Milling and resurfacing Main Street will improve its appearance, provide a better riding surface for motorists, and at the crosswalks will provide a safer walking surface for pedestrians. Method for Estimating Cost: Current construction costs for milling, placing asphalt concrete, and restriping. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Construction of this project will be scheduled after Project ONE and the Piazza Bergamo Project are completed.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $360,000 $0 $10,000 $370,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $370,000 $370,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Roads & Bridges

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $360,000 $0 $10,000 $370,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $370,000 $370,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

C-7

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HAYWOOD ROAD/WOODS CROSSING INTERSECTION Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY ENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2012

JULY

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: The Haywood Road Master Plan was adopted by City Council in December 2009. A key recommendation in the plan is to redevelop the intersection located at Haywood and Woods Crossing Roads as a model that will serve as a catalyst for private investment and as an example of the design vision for the future of the corridor. Phase 1 of this project includes the installation of mast arm traffic signals and some landscaping at the four corners of the intersection. Phase 2 would include a new asphalt treatment, crosswalks, and other aesthetic improvements as recommended in the Master Plan and will be submitted in a future budget request.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Although the Haywood Road corridor has historically been a significant source of revenue for the City, the corridor is experiencing the early stages of decline due to a number of business closings and relocations to the Woodruff Road area. The completion of the Haywood Road Area Master Plan was the first step to counteract this declining trend to preserve existing businesses in the corridor and help position the corridor for the future. The creation of the model intersection recommended in the Master Plan will help to revitalize the corridor which is consistent with the City's Strategic Goal of creating a prosperous city and the goal of the Comprehensive Plan to encourage revitalization of commercial corridors. Method for Estimating Cost: Detailed construction cost estimate provided by the Engineering Division based on unit costs for traffic signal upgrades and some landscaping.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Project is nearing completion.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $189,000 $0 $5,000 $194,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $194,000 $194,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Roads & Bridges

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $189,000 $0 $5,000 $194,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $194,000 $194,000

$1,538 $1,538 0.00 0.00

$1,615 $3,153 0.00 0.00

$1,695 $4,848 0.00 0.00

$1,780 $6,628 0.00 0.00

$1,868 $8,496 0.00 0.00

$8,496 $8,496 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

C-8

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HAYWOOD ROAD SIDEWALKS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JAN

MOBILE CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2016

JUN

2016

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: The scope of this project includes the construction of approximately 1,800 linear feet of sidewalk on Haywood Road from south of the I385 bridge (entrance to the Copper River Grill) to Woods Lake Road and on Woods Lake Road from Haywood Road northwest to the entrance to the Extended Stay Motel and on Woods Lake Road from Haywood Road to the entrance to Haywood Mall. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This sidewalk will provide connectivity between the existing sidewalk just south of the I-385 bridge to Woods Lake Road and on Woods Lake Road from the entrance to the Extended Stay Motel to the entrance to Haywood Mall. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate based on current linear foot cost for the construction of sidewalk using a 5% annual inflation factor. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project. Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): This project has been submitted for Enhancement Funds through GPATS in the amount of $245,000. This amount is part of the $845,000 five year period allocation for the years 2012 to 2017. This project is subject to approval by the GPATS Committee.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) General Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Roads & Bridges

$0 $0

$115,000 $115,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $0 $115,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $115,000 $115,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $0 $115,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

C-9

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

WOODRUFF ROAD SIDEWALKS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JAN

MOBILE CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2016

JUN

2016

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: The scope of this project includes constructing approximately 4,500 linear feet of sidewalk along Woodruff Road from the Shops at Green Ridge to Costco. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This sidewalk along Woodruff Road will provide pedestrian connectivity along Woodruff Road from the Shops at Green Ridge, Carolina Point Parkway, Market Point Drive, Magnolia Park, and Costco. This sidewalk will link several hotels with restaurants, retail shops, and entertainment venues. This sidewalk will provide a safe pedestrian route along Woodruff Road. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate based on current linear foot cost for the construction of sidewalk using a 5% inflation factor. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This project has not started. Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): This project has been submitted for Enhancement Funds through GPATS in the amount of $200,000.00. This amount is part of the $845,000 five year period allocation for the years 2012 to 2017. This project is subject to approval by the GPATS Committee.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) General Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Roads & Bridges

$0 $0

$180,000 $180,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $180,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $180,000 $180,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $180,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

C-10

STREETSCAPES

The downtown area is constantly undergoing streetscape improvements to foster a vibrant City. The streetscape improvements proposed in the FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program continue investments throughout the City.

Streetscapes

D-1

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Streetscapes

City of Greenville, South Carolina

D-2

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PETE HOLLIS CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODS ENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2007

JUN

Comp. Plan Principle:

2014

Project Description: The purpose of this project is to design and construct streetscape improvements in the Pete Hollis Boulevard/Buncombe Street area. The improvements will be made in support of private development. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The Pete Hollis Gateway Plan was adopted by City Council in 2006. Staff is continuing to work with several developers who have acquired property in anticipation of beginning development projects. Method for Estimating Cost: Informal estimates. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Improvements are being planned in support of the Quick Trip.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Viola Street Tax Increment Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $150,000 $150,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $150,000 $150,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

D-3

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

EAST MCBEE AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

OCT

PROSPEROUS CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2008

JULY

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project includes streetscape improvements for a better pedestrian link between Main Street and the McBee Station project in conjunction with future plans for the Peacock site. Streetscaping will include, but is not limited to, street furniture, pedestrian lighting, new sidewalks, and new curb and gutter. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project ties in with the Downtown Master Plan by improving a major side street and helping to expand downtown economic development opportunities beyond Main Street. Method for Estimating Cost: Development agreements. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Construction is underway on the Peacock and American Roadside Burgers sites.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $75,000 $0 $686,371 $0 $0 $761,371

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Property Sales Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $14,704 $746,667 $761,371

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $75,000 $0 $686,371 $0 $0 $761,371 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $14,704 $746,667 $761,371

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$15,000 $15,000 0.00 0.00

$15,750 $30,750 0.00 0.00

$16,500 $47,250 0.00 0.00

$47,250 $47,250 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

D-4

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

RHETT/CAMPERDOWN STREET IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

FEB

PROSPEROUS CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2009

JUN

2016

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project involves streetscape improvements of approximately 1,350 feet of Camperdown Way from Main Street to River Street and approximately 2,100 feet of Rhett Street from Camperdown Way to Markley Street. Streetscaping is to include new sidewalks, curb and gutter, asphalt, landscaping, lighting, and street furniture. Improvements to the stormwater and sanitary sewer systems will also take place as part of this project. The project will be implemented in four phases. Phase 1 is Camperdown Way from Main Street to River Street. Phase 2 is Rhett Street from Camperdown Way to River Street. Phase 3 is Rhett Street from Wardlaw Street to Markley Street. Phase 4 is Rhett Street from River Street to Wardlaw Street. Depending on development projects, streetscaping may extend down a portion of O'Neal, Wardlaw or Markley in order to provide a uniform look and feel. Phase 1 is to begin after the completion of the power line undergrounding project on Camperdown Way.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): As part of the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan, the purpose of this project is to implement the principle of expanding downtown beyond Main Street. Several projects are planned or have already begun along Camperdown Way and Rhett Street creating the need for safe, walkable, and accessible streets. The streetscape of Camperdown Way will complement the undergrounding of power lines on Camperdown Way. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineer's estimate for Phases 1 and 2. Phases 3 and 4 are based on plans previously prepared by an outside consultant. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Phase 1 is under design. Phases 2, 3 and 4 have schematic plans that were prepared by an outside consultant.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $133,400 $6,463 $3,031,601 $18,654 $93,282 $3,283,400

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) West End Tax Increment Fund West End TIF Bond - 2013 Property Sales TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $1,264,396 $1,989,000 $30,004 $3,283,400

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$2,139,000 -$1,989,000 $0 $150,000

$2,635,000 $0 $0 $2,635,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $143,400 $23,963 $5,633,101 $44,654 $223,282 $6,068,400 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $6,038,396 $0 $30,004 $6,068,400

$31,000 $31,000 0.00 0.00

$48,050 $79,050 0.00 0.00

$65,953 $145,003 0.00 0.00

$69,250 $214,253 0.00 0.00

$72,713 $286,965 0.00 0.00

$286,965 $286,965 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

FY 14/15 COST $10,000 $17,500 $2,451,500 $26,000 $130,000 $2,635,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

D-5

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

CULTURAL CORRIDOR URBAN TRAIL Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP D

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2012

JULY

2017

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: The Cultural Corridor is a pedestrian oriented urban trail project between the Heritage Green campus and the Bi-Lo Center along the Beattie Street/College Street corridor. The street will be “road-dieted” from five lanes to four and three lanes and include a multi-purpose urban trail on the north side of the street. There are four phases of the project. Phase 1 will provide design and engineering between Heritage Green and North Main Street. Phase 2 will consist of the project construction from Main Street to Atwood Drive at Heritage Green. Phase 3 will provide design and engineering between the Bi-Lo Center and North Main Street. Phase 4 will consist of the project construction from the Bi-Lo Center to North Main Street. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The Cultural Corridor project has the potential to transform the north end of Main Street similar to the improvements seen in the West End that are a result of various public/private investments such as Falls Park, RiverPlace, West End Streetscape, and Fluor Field. Not only does this project apply several City Council "Strategic Goals", but it also addresses many of the Comprehensive Plan's Principles of walkability, mobility options, encouraging redevelopment, and emphasizing unique cultural characteristics of Greenville. Greenville County and the Heritage Green institutions were thoroughly involved in the planning process. Additionally, there is the potential to leverage County Hospitality Tax funding that Heritage Green is currently working to spend on campus improvements that would support improved connections between the Heritage Green campus and downtown. Method for Estimating Cost: The cost estimates provided for this project are based on the 30% schematic design plans and the cost estimates developed by the Downtown Streetscapes Master Plan consultant. Once the construction documents are completed during the design phase of the project, additional cost estimates will be developed that represent the costs of specific project features. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Phase 1 design and engineering underway. Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): Funding has been included as a placeholder in FY 2015-16 until project plans are complete.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $200,000 $200,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$0 $0

$3,000,000 $3,000,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $200,000 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,200,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,200,000 $3,200,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$25,159 $25,159 0.00 0.00

$25,955 $51,114 0.00 0.00

$26,769 $77,883 0.00 0.00

$77,883 $77,883 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

D-6

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

VILLAGE OF WEST GREENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2012

JUN

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will provide a ready source of funding for streetscape improvement projects associated with private development opportunities for the Art's District. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): An available source of funding for streetscape and faรงade improvements is needed in order to facilitate and promote private development in the Arts District's Corridor. The redevelopment and sustainability of the Village of West Greenville Arts District is in agreement with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Village has seen the private sector take initiative to improve buildings and landscaping, and to form a business association.

Method for Estimating Cost: Estimates based on analysis by City Staff that include Public Works, Engineering, Traffic Engineering, and Parks and Grounds. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Project is on-hold.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $100,000 $100,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $100,000 $100,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

D-7

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

AUGUSTA STREET IMPROVEMENTS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2012

JULY

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will provide streetscape improvements on Augusta Street, from Lupo Street to Capers Street (approximately 1,200 linear feet). These improvements will be completed following the planned relocation of overhead utility lines and removal of utility poles along this section of the corridor. The project will include the replacement and/or installation of curb and gutter, sidewalks, landscaping, decorative streetlights, furnishings, and amenities. These improvements will result in a safer environment for pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Planned coordination of the utility relocation and streetscape improvements will result in less disturbance to the businesses and residents in the area. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project supports the Council's commitment to the revitalization of the commercial corridors as well as meets the Strategic Goal of creating a prosperous city. In addition, this project meets the Comprehensive Plan Principles to create safe, walkable spaces and accessible destinations, and encourages redevelopment and infill for commercial corridors. Method for Estimating Cost: Preliminary estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Design work in progress.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $175,000 $0 $0 $175,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Capital Projects Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $175,000 $175,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $175,000 $0 $0 $175,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $175,000 $175,000

$1,500 $1,500 0.00 0.00

$1,545 $3,045 0.00 0.00

$1,591 $4,636 0.00 0.00

$1,639 $6,275 0.00 0.00

$1,688 $7,964 0.00 0.00

$7,964 $7,964 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

D-8

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

NORTH MAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2012

JAN

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will improve North Main Street from Academy Street to Stone Avenue. This project would fund the engineering design and construction of the new curbing, landscaping, and lighting to complete the design recommendations of the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan and Stone Avenue Master Plan. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) resurfaced this segment of North Main Street in 2011. The City has successfully requested from SCDOT that the restriping of North Main follow the recommendations of these two master plans, which includes a new center left turn lane, bike lanes, on-street parking, and areas for landscaping. Streetscaping will improve the connectivity between downtown Greenville, Stone Avenue, Earle Street, and the North Main neighborhood. It also has the potential to initiate private redevelopment along North Main, especially the block between Park Avenue to Stone Avenue. Method for Estimating Cost: The cost estimates provided for this project are based on the 30% schematic design plans and a modified cost estimate developed by the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan consultant. At this time, staff recommends that the City only implement parts of the recommendations from the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan such as landscape islands, furniture, lighting, and specific areas of decorative pavers. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Project is under construction.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $25,000 $0 $203,000 $0 $0 $228,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Viola Street Tax Increment Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $228,000 $228,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $25,000 $0 $203,000 $0 $0 $228,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $228,000 $228,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$26,000 $26,000 0.00 0.00

$26,780 $52,780 0.00 0.00

$27,583 $80,363 0.00 0.00

$28,411 $108,774 0.00 0.00

$108,774 $108,774 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

D-9

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

WASHINGTON STREET IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2012

UNDETERMINED

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Washington Street was identified for improvements in the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan. Out of the projects studied within the plan, Washington Street was ranked as a top priority project due to its relationship to Main Street, potential redevelopment opportunities, proximity to the multi-modal Greenlink Transit Center, and connectivity to several historic downtown neighborhoods. This capital project would expand the streetscaping associated with Project ONE to the other side of Washington to align with Laurens Street and the Greenlink Transfer Center. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Washington Street serves as an important gateway to downtown and is geographically centered along Main Street between Beattie Place and Augusta Street. A recommendation of the 2007 Downtown Master Plan, as well as the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan, was to move beyond Main Street. The Washington Street Improvements project would support the goal of encouraging redevelopment beyond Main Street by creating safe, walkable spaces, and accessible destinations. Method for Estimating Cost: Public Works estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Project is on hold pending completion of Project ONE.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $500,000 $500,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $500,000 $500,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$25,000 $25,000 0.00 0.00

$25,750 $50,750 0.00 0.00

$26,523 $77,273 0.00 0.00

$27,000 $104,273 0.00 0.00

$104,273 $104,273 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

D-10

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

AUGUSTA STREET STREETSCAPING (BASEBALL STADIUM) Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2013

JULY

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Following the recent adoption of the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan, this project would extend streetscaping along both sides of Augusta Street between South Main Street and Dunbar Street. The project would require the shifting of the existing vehicular travel lanes along Augusta Street to accommodate new streetscaping. Improvements would include new sidewalks, lighting, landscaping, and other pedestrian features. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Augusta Street is an important gateway into downtown and implementing the Augusta Street Streetscape project would encourage redevelopment and infill for this important corridor. Method for Estimating Cost: Modified version from the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan (DSMP). The DSMP included all new infrastructure on both sides of Augusta Street, whereas this proposed streetscape project maintains most of the existing sidewalks and curb/gutter. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Admissions Tax Fund Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$0 $40,000 $40,000

$250,000 $95,000 $345,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $40,000 $0 $345,000 $0 $0 $385,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $250,000 $135,000 $385,000

$8,240 $8,240 0.00 0.00

$8,487 $16,727 0.00 0.00

$8,740 $25,467 0.00 0.00

$9,005 $34,472 0.00 0.00

$9,275 $43,747 0.00 0.00

$43,747 $43,747 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $345,000 $0 $0 $345,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

D-11

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

BROAD STREET PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

SAFE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT

2013

DEC

2013

Project Description: This project will install 20 decorative deluxe acorn pedestrian lights along East Broad Street between South Main Street and the Church Street overpass. Proposed light locations fit within existing landscape and sidewalk right-of-way. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Pedestrian lighting improves visibility, encourages pedestrian activity, and thereby creates a safe environment Method for Estimating Cost: In-house estimate based on light quantity and existing unit price per Duke light. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$128,000 $128,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $128,000 $0 $0 $128,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $128,000 $128,000

$5,000 $5,000 0.00 0.00

$5,250 $10,250 0.00 0.00

$5,513 $15,763 0.00 0.00

$5,788 $21,551 0.00 0.00

$6,078 $27,628 0.00 0.00

$27,628 $27,628 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $128,000 $0 $0 $128,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

D-12

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPES Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2013

JULY

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Funding allows for streetscape and pedestrian improvements on: Coffee St. and E. North St. where the Federal Courthouse Building will be constructed, on E. Washington St., and the Falls Park/Bowater pedestrian way between Japanese Dogwood Lane and the Liberty Bridge. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Allows for the completion of streetscape and pedestrian improvements in the downtown area. Method for Estimating Cost: Modified consultant estimate for Downtown Streetscape Master Plan. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$165,000 $165,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $165,000 $0 $0 $165,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $165,000 $165,000

$8,440 $8,440 0.00 0.00

$8,740 $17,180 0.00 0.00

$9,051 $26,231 0.00 0.00

$9,372 $35,602 0.00 0.00

$9,704 $45,306 0.00 0.00

$45,306 $45,306 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $165,000 $0 $0 $165,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

D-13

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

NORTH MAIN STREET - LANDMARK BUILDING Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2013

JUN

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Funding allows for streetscape improvement on N. Main St. between Beattie/College St. and Elford St. consistent with the streetscape between Elford St. and Academy St. on N. Main St.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Funding this project completes Main St. streetscape improvements between Academy St. and College St.

Method for Estimating Cost: Modified consultant estimate from the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$134,000 $134,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $15,000 $0 $119,000 $0 $0 $134,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $134,000 $134,000

$2,380 $2,380 0.00 0.00

$2,455 $4,835 0.00 0.00

$2,530 $7,365 0.00 0.00

$2,610 $9,975 0.00 0.00

$2,690 $12,665 0.00 0.00

$12,665 $12,665 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $15,000 $0 $119,000 $0 $0 $134,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

D-14

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

SPRING/FALLS STREETSCAPE Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2013

JULY

2015

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project would provide funds for design, engineering, construction documentation, and bid documents for streetscape improvements on North Spring Street and Falls Street between East North Street and East Camperdown Way, to improve the appearance, functionality, and sustainability of this corridor. Examples include tree and shrub plantings, stormwater planters, crosswalks, signage, and minor sidewalk construction. This project is part of the recently adopted Downtown Streetscape Master Plan.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): A large majority of participants in the Comprehensive Plan supported more trees along our roadway corridors and requested the creation of "safe and walkable spaces and accessible destinationsâ&#x20AC;?. Less than half of surveyed respondents felt they could comfortably walk from their home to important destinations. Improved pedestrian infrastructure and landscaping along roadways calms traffic and encourages walking as transportation and recreation. The recently completed Downtown Streetscapes Master Plan identified several streets and intersections that would benefit from simple pedestrian oriented improvements. Method for Estimating Cost: Downtown Streetscape Master Plan cost estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$25,000 $25,000

$101,000 $101,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $25,000 $0 $101,000 $0 $0 $126,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $126,000 $126,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$5,435 $5,435 0.00 0.00

$5,715 $11,150 0.00 0.00

$6,045 $17,195 0.00 0.00

$6,382 $23,577 0.00 0.00

$23,577 $23,577 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $101,000 $0 $0 $101,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

D-15

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

VIOLA STREETSCAPING Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2013

JUN

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Funds will be used make improvements at the Viola Neighborhood entrances including replacing landscape materials at Neal and Wilton Streets and Stone and Ivy Streets. Funding is also requested to replace deteriorated decorative light fixtures in the Viola Neighborhood. Funding will also be used to improve safety at key intersections including installing mast arms at Rutherford Street and W. Stone Avenue and W. Stone Avenue and Townes Street. Funding will also be used to complete streetscape improvements at scattered sites along the Pete Hollis and Buncombe Street Corridors. The scattered sites include Walker Street (off of Rutherford), the right of way in front of the former Hair Spa building and Lloyd Street at Pete Hollis Boulevard. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Funding for streetscape and other improvements is being requested to support private investment being made along these corridors and in the Viola neighborhood. Method for Estimating Cost: Cost estimates based on public body estimates provided by Traffic Engineering, Parks and Recreation and Community Development staff. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Cost estimates have been prepared to allow bidding once funding is approved.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Viola Street Tax Increment Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$280,000 $280,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $55,000 $225,000 $0 $280,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $280,000 $280,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $55,000 $225,000 $0 $280,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

D-16

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

WEST CAMPERDOWN WAY Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2013

JULY

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Funding allows for streetscape improvements on West Camperdown St. between River St. and Academy St., including improved lighting.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Allows for the completion of streetscape improvements between Academy St. and S. Main St. along W. Camperdown St. Method for Estimating Cost: Modified consultant estimate for Downtown Streetscape Master Plan. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) West End Tax Increment Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$250,000 $250,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $24,000 $0 $226,000 $0 $0 $250,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $250,000 $250,000

$6,380 $6,380 0.00 0.00

$6,694 $13,074 0.00 0.00

$7,023 $20,097 0.00 0.00

$7,368 $27,466 0.00 0.00

$7,730 $35,196 0.00 0.00

$35,196 $35,196 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $24,000 $0 $226,000 $0 $0 $250,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

D-17

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

AUGUSTA STREET AT FARIS ROAD STREETSCAPE Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2016

JULY

2017

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project supports public streetscape improvements associated with a commercial development at Augusta Street and West Faris Road. Improvements include, but are not limited to, landscaping and street trees, decorative sidewalks and hardscape, decorative street lighting, site furnishings, and irrigation. These improvements will also complement the proposed relocation of overhead utility lines and poles at this location. Per the development agreement, the City is responsible for reimbursing the developer an amount not to exceed $150,000 for costs associated with the design and construction of the public streetscape improvements, which will be completed in conjunction with the private redevelopment of the site. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project supports the Council's commitment to the revitalization of the commercial corridors, and it meets the Strategic Goal of creating a prosperous city and the Comprehensive Plan principle to encourage redevelopment and infill for commercial corridors. The planned redevelopment of this site provides an opportunity to leverage funds to improve the public right-of-way adjacent to the site. Coordination is critical to ensuring the streetscape improvements are compatible with the new building placement and site configuration. Method for Estimating Cost: Development agreement. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) General Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Streetscapes

$0 $0

$150,000 $150,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $150,000 $150,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$12,155 $12,155 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

D-18

WASTEWATER

The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program increases the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s rehabilitation of its wastewater system with projects throughout the City.

Wastewater

E-1

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Wastewater

City of Greenville, South Carolina

E-2

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HAYNIE-SIRRINE WASTEWATER SYSTEM REHABILITATION Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTURE

2006

SEP

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will support wastewater system rehabilitation in the Haynie-Sirrine neighborhood to address inadequate capacity and inflow and infiltration issues. This includes flow monitoring, CCTV inspection, surveying, hydraulic modeling, system evaluation, cast in place pipe slip lining, pipe bursting, and open trench line replacement. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This improvement will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this wastewater basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principles of coordinating housing development with infrastructure. Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant estimate based on the completed sanitary sewer evaluation showing the pipes needing to be repaired and historic unit prices. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Phase 1A construction is underway.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $450,000 $75,000 $3,680,000 $0 $0 $4,205,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Wastewater Fund Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002 Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $409,000 $96,000 $1,695,000 $2,005,000 $4,205,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Wastewater

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $450,000 $75,000 $3,680,000 $0 $0 $4,205,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $409,000 $96,000 $1,695,000 $2,005,000 $4,205,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

E-3

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

VERDAE SEWER EXPANSION Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

OCT

SUSTAINABLE CITY COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTURE

2012

JULY

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will increase wastewater capacity in the vicinity of Verdae and Woodruff Road, and includes construction of 2,864 linear feet of 24” sewer, 288 linear feet of 8” sewer and 16 manholes. This will provide adequate capacity for future growth in the surrounding areas. The increased capacity totaled 2,900,000 gallons per day. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Inadequate wastewater capacity is affecting the ability for development to occur in this area. This provides infrastructure to encourage residential development in the Verdae and Woodruff Road areas. Method for Estimating Cost: Construction contract plus contingency. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Construction is underway.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $64,830 $0 $1,101,170 $0 $0 $1,166,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Donations Greenville Local Development Corporation Greenville Water System General Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $100,000 $200,000 $500,000 $366,000 $1,166,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Wastewater

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $64,830 $0 $1,101,170 $0 $0 $1,166,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $100,000 $200,000 $500,000 $366,000 $1,166,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

E-4

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

WASTEWATER SYSTEM REHABILITATION Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2012

JULY

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project provides for the rehabilitation of the wastewater system in areas identified as having limited capacity and excessive wet weather flows due to excessive inflow and infiltration as identified by ReWa and City flow monitoring. Several basins have been identified as requiring extensive rehabilitation including the Central Business District, Basin 9, and Basin 15. The methods include rehabilitation of approximately 650 manholes, 2,000 linear feet of pipe bursting, and 10,000 linear feet of pipe lining. This project also includes right-of-way clearing for future rehabilitation and maintenance. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basins and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principle of encouraging water conservation and water quality. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate based on unit pricing of rehabilitation methods. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Engineering is working with legal for contracts with manhole rehabilitation and pipe bursting.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $1,300,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Wastewater Fund Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $300,000 $1,000,000 $1,300,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Wastewater

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $1,300,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $300,000 $1,000,000 $1,300,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

E-5

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

WASTEWATER SYSTEM SURVEY AND MODEL Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTURE

2012

JULY

2017

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will obtain a survey of the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s entire wastewater system over a period of five years. The survey will first be obtained for basins 7, 9 and 15, and those areas experiencing significant growth, such as the central business district. This information would be put into a sewer modeling software that will allow staff to accurately know present capacity limitations within the City and quickly determine what upgrades may be required, if any, when new projects are constructed.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The City has an extensive wastewater system with many areas at capacity based purely on wastewater flows. Currently it takes City staff months to analyze the system for new development as there is no detailed survey data of the sewer system and all the calculations are prepared by hand as the City does not own any modeling software. This program would allow staff to analyze the current condition of the system, assign flows by parcel, and identify current capacity limitations. Also, as new development enters the City in areas that have been surveyed and modeled, City staff could provide accurate flow availability for each parcel in just a few days. In addition to the above, having survey data will reduce the time in which sewer system rehabilitations are completed.

Method for Estimating Cost: Estimate provided by consultant based on total number of manholes in the wastewater system and actual cost of modeling software.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Modeling software has been purchased, running test modeling on existing GIS data for verify correct survey is obtained.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $176,880 $0 $0 $16,120 $7,000 $200,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Wastewater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $200,000 $200,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Wastewater

$65,000 $65,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $501,880 $0 $0 $16,120 $7,000 $525,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $525,000 $525,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000

FY 14/15 COST $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000

FY 15/16 COST $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000

FY 16/17 COST $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000

FY 17/18 COST $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

E-6

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

BASIN 7 SEWER REHABILITATION Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2012

JULY

2015

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project provides for the rehabilitation of Basin 7 to reduce inflow and infiltration, thus increasing available capacity. Based on flow monitoring the majority of this basin has been identified as having excessive inflow and infiltration. The project would include surveying of the wastewater system and modeling the wastewater flows to ensure that capacity is available for future growth. The flow isolation method would be utilized to identify significant sources of inflow and infiltration. The method includes cataloging flow through all of the manholes during dry weather conditions and again during wet weather conditions to pinpoint the sources of increased flow. Once those sources have been identified, the pipe segments will be videoed to determine the ideal method (pipe bursting, pipe lining, or open cut replacements) for rehabilitation. Once the pipe is rehabilitated, the system would be reanalyzed during wet weather events. Once the major sources of inflow and infiltration have been removed the system will be flow monitored to determine the dry and wet weather peaking factor and come into compliance with the 15-year work plan. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principle of encouraging water conservation and water quality.

Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Contractor selection for CCTV work and smoke testing of the basin.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Wastewater Fund Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Wastewater

FUNDING TODATE $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 FUNDING TODATE $250,000 $0 $250,000

$345,000 $1,555,000 $1,900,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 $0 $1,900,000 $0 $0 $2,150,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $595,000 $1,555,000 $2,150,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $1,900,000 $0 $0 $1,900,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

E-7

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

BASIN 15 SEWER REHABILITATION Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2012

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

2015

Project Description: This supports the rehabilitation of Basin 15 to reduce inflow and infiltration thus increasing available capacity. Based on flow monitoring the majority of this basin has been identified as having excessive inflow and infiltration. The project would include surveying of the wastewater system and modeling the wastewater flows to ensure that capacity is available for future growth. The flow isolation method would be utilized to identify significant sources of inflow and infiltration. The method includes cataloging flow through all of the manholes during dry weather conditions and again during wet weather conditions to pinpoint the sources of increased flow. Once those sources have been identified, the pipe segments will be videoed to determine the ideal method (pipe bursting, pipe lining, or open cut replacements) for rehabilitation. Once the pipe is rehabilitated, the system would be re-analyzed during wet weather events. Once the major sources of inflow and infiltration have been removed the system will be flow monitored to determine the dry and wet weather peaking factor and come into compliance with the 15-year work plan. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principles of encouraging water conservation and water quality. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Preparing RFP for CCTV and smoke testing throughout the basin.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Wastewater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $250,000 $250,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Wastewater

$400,000 $400,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $650,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $650,000 $650,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $400,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

E-8

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

BASIN 16 SEWER REHABILITATION Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP D

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2014

JULY

2017

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This supports the rehabilitation of Basin 16 to reduce inflow and infiltration thus increasing available capacity. Based on flow monitoring the majority of this basin has been identified as having excessive inflow and infiltration. The project would include surveying of the wastewater system and modeling the wastewater flows to ensure that capacity is available for future growth. The flow isolation method would be utilized to identify significant sources of inflow and infiltration. The method includes cataloging flow through all of the manholes during dry weather conditions and again during wet weather conditions to pinpoint the sources of increased flow. Once those sources have been identified, the pipe segments will be videoed to determine the ideal method (pipe bursting, pipe lining, or open cut replacements) for rehabilitation. Once the pipe is rehabilitated, the system would be re-analyzed during wet weather events. Once the major sources of inflow and infiltration have been removed the system will be flow monitored to determine the dry and wet weather peaking factor and come into compliance with the 15-year work plan. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principles of encouraging water conservation and water quality. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Wastewater Fund Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Wastewater

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0

$250,000 $0 $250,000

$0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,250,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $250,000 $2,000,000 $2,250,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

E-9

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

BASIN 25 SEWER REHABILITATION Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2014

JULY

2017

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This supports the rehabilitation of Basin 25 to reduce inflow and infiltration thus increasing available capacity. Based on flow monitoring the majority of this basin has been identified as having excessive inflow and infiltration. The project would include surveying of the wastewater system and modeling the wastewater flows to ensure that capacity is available for future growth. The flow isolation method would be utilized to identify significant sources of inflow and infiltration. The method includes cataloging flow through all of the manholes during dry weather conditions and again during wet weather conditions to pinpoint the sources of increased flow. Once those sources have been, identified the pipe segments will be videoed to determine the ideal method (pipe bursting, pipe lining, or open cut replacements) for rehabilitation. Once the pipe is rehabilitated, the system would be re-analyzed during wet weather events. Once the major sources of inflow and infiltration have been removed the system will be flow monitored to determine the dry and wet weather peaking factor and come into compliance with the 15-year work plan. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principles of encouraging water conservation and water quality. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Wastewater Fund Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Wastewater

$0 $0 $0

$250,000 $0 $250,000

$0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,250,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $250,000 $2,000,000 $2,250,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

E-10

STORMWATER

The Water Quality Monitoring Station provides data that allows for better detection and decision-making regarding necessary stormwater infrastructure investments. As a result, the FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program funds a number of projects that seek to reduce flood losses or improve water quality.

Stormwater

F-1

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Stormwater

City of Greenville, South Carolina

F-2

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HENDERSON BASIN Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JUN

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2007

SEP

2013

Project Description: This project replaced inadequate culvert crossings at Halidon Road, Parkins Mill Road, Cleveland Street Extension, Wembley Road and two crossings at Henderson Road. Construction was completed in July 2012. The timeline has been adjusted to allow preparation and review time for the FEMA Letter of Map Revision now that construction is complete. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Prior to construct completion, Gower Creek overtopped numerous roadways within Henderson Basin including Cleveland Street Extension, Wembley Road, and two locations on Henderson Road. There are also multiple residential structures that flood along the creek resulting is repetitive flood insurance claims through the National Flood Insurance Program. With this project, all but one roadway crossing has been designed to not overtop during the 100-year storm event. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas. Method for Estimating Cost: Actual design and construction costs with allowing for additional funding as necessary for responding to FEMA comments. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): All six culverts have been constructed. The Letter of Map Revision has been prepared and will be submitted to FEMA once a public meeting is held.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FY 13/14 FUNDING TOCOST DATE $170,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,359,497 ($1,398,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,529,497 ($1,398,000)

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FY 13/14 FUNDING TOEST. FUNDS DATE $3,468,497 ($1,398,000) $61,000 $0 $3,529,497 ($1,398,000)

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $170,000 $0 $1,961,497 $0 $0 $2,131,497 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $2,070,497 $61,000 $2,131,497

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

F-3

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PINEHURST CULVERT CROSSING IMPROVEMENT Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2013

JULY

2014

Project Description: This project will replace an undersized culvert crossing at Pinehurst Drive. Due to upstream development, the existing culvert size became insufficient to handle the increasing stormwater flow. To mitigate this, the project will install a new arch 10' x 5.5' x 80' culvert at Pinehurst Drive. The Windsor Drive culvert improvement was removed from this scope of work and added to Westview Avenue due to coordination issues.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project will reduce flooding in the area, prevent road overtopping, and improve the bank's stability. The Richland Creek tributary, which crosses under Pinehurst Drive, carries flow from approximately 350 acres. The existing culvert has minimal capacity to carry heavy storm flows in the creek and is prone to blockage. The proposed upgrades will significantly improve the hydraulic capacity at the crossing, reduce regular maintenance, and would benefit private property owners directly upstream from significant reductions in the backwater flood profile. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goals of a sustainable city and a mobile city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate based on projects of similar size and scope. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Awaiting funding for project commencement.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$435,000 $435,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $35,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $435,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $435,000 $435,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $35,000 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $435,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

F-4

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

WESTVIEW/WINDSOR CROSSINGS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2002

AUG

2013

Project Description: This project will replace undersized culvert crossings at Westview Avenue and Windsor Drive. Due to upstream development, the existing culvert size became insufficient to handle the increasing stormwater flow. To mitigate this, the project will install new arched culverts at each of the crossings. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project will reduce flooding in the area, prevent road overtopping, and improve the bank's stability. The Richland Creek tributary, which crosses under Westview Avenue and Windsor Drive, carries flow from approximately 350 acres. The existing culverts have minimal capacity to carry heavy storm flows in the creek and are prone to blockage. The proposed upgrades will significantly improve the hydraulic capacity at the crossing, reduce regular maintenance, and will benefit private property owners directly upstream from significant reductions in the backwater flood profile. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goals of a sustainable city and a mobile city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas. Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant estimate adjusted for inflation. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Construction of the Westview Avenue Culvert is complete and the Windsor Drive culvert construction will commence this month.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $3,200 $0 $711,071 $0 $29,554 $743,825

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $740,680 $3,145 $743,825

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,200 $0 $711,071 $0 $29,554 $743,825 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $740,680 $3,145 $743,825

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

F-5

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PETTIGRU STREET IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2011

SEP

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project upgrades stormwater infrastructure in Pettigru Street at the intersection of Whitsett Street. The project includes the rerouting of existing stormwater pipe and the installation of a stable drainage channel through the adjacent City park. Also included in the project is the repair and/or replacement of sanitary sewer line in the project area and erosion repair within the park due to insufficient stormwater capacity. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project is located in a historic district that abuts Cleveland Park and Richland Creek. The Pettigru District has been developed into a light business district, and associated business parking has caused a concentration of stormwater runoff that channels through the project area. The additional stormwater flow from this area into Cleveland Park and Richland Creek has caused significant erosion problems. In order to affect a permanent solution to the above issues, the existing infrastructure needs to be upgraded to efficiently manage the runoff. Additionally, the exfiltration of sanitary sewer from the existing pipe system has the high potential to migrate down gradient into the freshwater creek creating a water quality issue that should be addressed as part of this initiative. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to encourage water conservation and water quality. Method for Estimating Cost: Informal engineering estimate adjusted for inflation in future years. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Project in design.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $16,713 $0 $379,250 $0 $0 $395,963

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $395,963 $395,963

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $16,713 $0 $379,250 $0 $0 $395,963 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $395,963 $395,963

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

F-6

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FAIRFOREST WAY BASIN Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JAN

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2011

AUG

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project involves performing a detailed watershed analysis and floodplain mapping for the Fairforest Way Basin. This involves, but is not limited to, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, regional detention, and erosion problem areas. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): As a regulated stormwater system and as stipulated in the City's Stormwater Management Plan, the City is required to perform a detailed watershed analysis and floodplain mapping for all of the stormwater basins within the City. The Stormwater Management Plan is a requirement of the City's NPDES General Permit through SCDHEC. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to encourage water conservation and water quality.

Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate based on similar projects. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): The hydraulic and hydrologic analyses were sent to FEMA for incorporation into their Map Modernization process. The City is awaiting comments from FEMA. The consultant is in the process of preparing the watershed study for the City's records.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $200,000 $200,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $200,000 $200,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

F-7

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

WHITE OAK BASIN PHASE II Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JAN

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2011

JAN

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project involves performing a detailed watershed analysis and floodplain mapping for the White Oak Basin. This includes but is not limited to, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, and identifying erosion problem areas. Regional detention and storm piping will be utilized to decrease flooding on Campbell Street, Karen Drive, and the surrounding areas. As a result of neighborhood meetings, additional flooding has been identified that creates the need for culvert upgrades on Corrine Drive and Twinbrook Drive. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): As a regulated stormwater system and as stipulated in the City's Stormwater Management Plan, the City is required to perform a detailed watershed analysis and floodplain mapping for all of the stormwater basins within the City. There were three culvert crossings replaced in White Oak Basin within the last few years which reduced a significant amount of area flooding. This project paved the way for moving upstream and fixing the flooding that is occurring at Twinbrook Drive, Campbell Street, Corrine Drive, and Karen Drive. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to encourage water conservation and water quality. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate based on similar projects. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): The watershed study is complete and was submitted to FEMA for incorporation into their Map Modernization process. The consultant for the design of the improvements will have been selected with anticipated construction second quarter of 2013.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $125,000 $450,000 $620,000 $0 $0 $1,195,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $1,195,000 $1,195,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$1,000,000 $1,000,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $125,000 $450,000 $1,620,000 $0 $0 $2,195,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $2,195,000 $2,195,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,000,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

F-8

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

GOWER ESTATES STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2011

DEC

2014

Project Description: Installation of storm drainage system, curb and gutter along Shelburne, Carolina Avenue, Don Drive and Charlbury Street. The roadways will be resurfaced and the sewer pipes rehabilitated as well with this project. This project was identified based on numerous citizen complaints. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The residents along Shelburne, Carolina Avenue, Don Drive, and Charlbury Street experience localized flooding during storm events. The current roads do not have curb and gutter or a sufficient storm drainage system. The majority of the stormwater runoff travels down the properties causing erosion and flooding. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate based on road linear footage and sanitary sewer linear footage. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Shelburne Road is under construction and the three remaining roadways are in design.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $45,000 $0 $1,845,000 $0 $0 $1,890,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund Wastewater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $1,659,000 $231,000 $1,890,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $45,000 $0 $1,845,000 $0 $0 $1,890,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,659,000 $231,000 $1,890,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

F-9

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

SWANSON COURT Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2012

DEC

2013

Project Description: Installation of storm drainage system, curb, and gutter along Swanson Court. The roadway will be resurfaced and sewer rehabilitated as well with this project. The plans were prepared in 2007, and will need to be reviewed and possibly modified to ensure that they match current site conditions. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The residents along Swanson Court experience localized flooding during storm events. The current road does not have curb and gutter and has an undersized storm drainage system. The majority of the stormwater runoff does not enter the existing undersized storm drainage due to no curb and travels down the properties causing erosion and flooding. This project was originally part of the East Monte Claire rehabilitation that was performed internally but was not completed due to lack of funding. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas. Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant estimate adjusted for inflation. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Project in design.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $10,000 $0 $274,000 $0 $0 $284,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund Wastewater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $263,000 $21,000 $284,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $10,000 $0 $274,000 $0 $0 $284,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $263,000 $21,000 $284,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

F-10

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

RICHLAND CREEK WATER QUALITY MASTER PLAN Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2013

DEC

2015

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Identify areas along Richland Creek that could be used to provide regional water quality. Design and construction of the regional water quality retrofits such as turning traditional detention basins into bioretention, providing rain barrels/cisterns to key neighborhoods, adding vegetative filter strips or like to existing parking lots, and adding storage between discharge points and the creek.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project will increase the quality of the water in Richland Creek and the Reedy River. Richland Creek is fully urbanized and based on the current stormwater ordinance most redeveloped sites are not required to provide water quality or quantity improvements. The goal will be to reduce fecal coliform, phosphorus, and nitrogen. This project is in line with the goal of reducing nutrients to try and meet the total maximum daily loads that are stipulated by SCDHEC for various nutrients. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to encourage water conservation and water quality. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Request for Proposal being written for design.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $150,000 $150,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$300,000 $300,000

$850,000 $850,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $150,000 $300,000 $850,000 $0 $0 $1,300,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,300,000 $1,300,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $850,000 $0 $0 $850,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

F-11

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PUBLIC WORKS COMPLEX WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2012

SEP

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will include the design, purchase, and installation of a water quality unit at Public Works for the primary outfalls in order to ensure environmental permitting compliance by preventing sediment, oil, and debris from entering the Reedy River. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): At present, the Fleet Services facility at the Public Works Complex (PWC) is under a federal spill mitigation/prevention permit and a state industrial stormwater discharge permit. The water quality requirements of these mandates require a high degree of effort to ensure pollutants like vehicle and equipment fluids, as well as debris from City operations does not enter the Reedy River. The water quality unit will ensure environmental compliance preventing sediment, oil, and debris from entering the river. With the Reedy River serving the City's tourism and quality of life initiatives immediately downstream, it is incumbent on the City to immediately initiate this water quality preservation effort.

Method for Estimating Cost: Detailed preliminary engineering estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2012): This is a new project. Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): It should also be noted that given the upstream watershed characteristics, the water quality unit will not only serve the PWC but a large offsite portion of the City, further extending its benefit to the City as a whole. Moreover, the final selection of the specific type water quality unit will be selected by considering functionality, product cost, ease of installation and maintenance, and potential for removal and reuse at the future PWC if so desired. Several commercially available water quality units have the potential to be relocated if it is determined prudent to do so.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $8,000 $0 $86,000 $15,000 $7,000 $116,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $116,000 $116,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $8,000 $0 $86,000 $15,000 $7,000 $116,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $116,000 $116,000

$2,700 $2,700 0.00 0.00

$3,075 $5,775 0.00 0.00

$3,152 $8,927 0.00 0.00

$3,231 $12,158 0.00 0.00

$3,311 $15,469 0.00 0.00

$15,469 $15,469 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

F-12

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

NORTH HILLS AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2013

JULY

2015

Project Description: This project will identify storm drainage improvements in the North Hills area, roughly bound by Russell Avenue to the west, Richland Creek to the north, Bennett Street the east, and Garraux Street to the south. The scope of work relative to construction is anticipated to include a culvert replacement on Bennett Street due to the age of the existing culvert and connectivity to upstream storm drainage, and curb, gutter, and storm drainage along Bennett Street, Russell Avenue, McDonald Street, and Garraux Street. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project was identified based on numerous citizen complaints and regular maintenance required by operations. The existing stormwater system is substandard and causes road and property flooding. The upgrades will reduce flooding, reduce maintenance, and would benefit those property owners adjacent to the improvements. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goals of a sustainable city and a mobile city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate based on known scope of work to date. Additional funding may be requested next fiscal year once the design is complete. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$100,000 $100,000

$1,000,000 $1,000,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,100,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,100,000 $1,100,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,000,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

F-13

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

ALDRIDGE/LACEY DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODS

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2015

JUN

2016

Project Description: This project provides for the installation of a storm drainage system, curb, and gutter along Aldridge Drive and Lacey Avenue. Both Streets are located within Gower Estates. The roadways will be resurfaced and the sewer pipes will be rehabilitated as well with this project. This project was identified based on numerous citizen complaints. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The residents along Aldridge Drive and Lacey Avenue have experience localized flooding during storm events. Currently only a short section of Aldridge Drive has curb and gutter. The remainder of the current streets do not have curb and gutter, or a sufficient storm drainage system. The majority of the stormwater runoff travels down the properties causing erosion and flooding. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate based on a combination of road linear footage, GIS data, and recent projects were used to develop a preliminary cost estimate to construct the project. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Collection of survey data will begin so design of these streets can start soon after the survey data is received.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0

$425,000 $425,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $15,500 $0 $374,500 $0 $35,000 $425,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $425,000 $425,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $15,500 $0 $374,500 $0 $35,000 $425,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

F-14

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HILLY STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2014

JULY

2016

Project Description: This project will replace an inadequate culvert crossing on Hilly Street at Richland Creek and purchase up to two adjacent properties.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Presently, Richland Creek overtops Hilly Street and water backs up at this location causing regular structure flooding and causing the road to become impassable. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate based on Greenville County Tax Assessment and previous culvert projects. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Stormwater

$0 $0

$700,000 $700,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $50,000 $250,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $700,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $700,000 $700,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $50,000 $250,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $700,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

F-15

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Stormwater

City of Greenville, South Carolina

F-16

PARKS & RECREATION

The City recently rebuilt numerous park restrooms to improve the quality of them to that of the rest of the park facilities. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program continues to fund improvements of other park restrooms.

Parks & Recreation

G-1

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Parks & Recreation

City of Greenville, South Carolina

G-2

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

COMMUNITY CENTER BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODS CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

2006

SEP

Comp. Plan Principle:

2013

Project Description: Funding provides for improvements to the David Hellams Community Center. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The David Hellams Community Center is 30+ years old and in need of mechanical, electrical, ADA and internal and external improvements that have been deferred for several years. Method for Estimating Cost: Design and estimate work completed by consulting architects. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Construction documents being developed.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $1,390,000 $0 $0 $1,390,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Property Sales Capital Projects Fund General Fund General Obligation Bond - 2003 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $467,500 $100,000 $750,000 $72,500 $1,390,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $1,390,000 $0 $0 $1,390,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $467,500 $100,000 $750,000 $72,500 $1,390,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-3

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

MAIN STREET TREE REHABILITATION Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

DEC

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENCOURAGE SUSTAINABLE GROWTH

2006

MAR

2017

Project Description: This project will rehabilitate the 30-year-old tree plantings along Main Street to extend their life and improve sidewalk conditions. It is necessary for the department to expand the scope of the project to include South Main Street to the intersection of Pendleton Street. The decision to include South Main Street was based on site meetings with the City's contracted arborist. Annual project decisions are based on the formal graded condition of the trees and are done in coordination with other City construction projects. This project is entering the fifth year of a ten-year program to replace the declining maples and provide additional root zone space to the oaks. Sidewalks are also replaced where tree roots have caused heaving in the pavement. Replacement of some oaks will also be planned over the next five years. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The Main Street trees are a character-defining feature of Greenville. This project also supports a positive business environment for downtown Greenville. Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant's estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Phase I, II, III, IV, V and VI have been completed. Phase VII will begin in January 2013.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $938,168 $0 $0 $938,168

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2002 CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2003 Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $11,870 $14,313 $911,985 $938,168

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0 $150,000 $150,000

$0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $1,538,168 $0 $0 $1,538,168 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $11,870 $14,313 $1,511,985 $1,538,168

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-4

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

CLEVELAND PARK REPAIRS AND NEIGHBORHOOD ACCESS Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

2007

DEC

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: The project will improve pedestrian access to and from Cleveland Park with surrounding neighborhoods and will make numerous improvements throughout the park. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Improvements at Cleveland Park were the top priority from the 2006-2011 Parks Master Plan. Method for Estimating Cost: In-house estimate based on previous contracted work. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Improvements to the Cleveland Park Center are pending.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $850,818 $0 $0 $850,818

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund State Grants Property Sales Capital Projects Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $655,766 $65,464 $10,396 $119,192 $850,818

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $850,818 $0 $0 $850,818 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $655,766 $65,464 $10,396 $119,192 $850,818

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-5

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

REEDY RIVER TRAIL EXPANSION Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

2013

JUN

2015

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will build an extension of the Swamp Rabbit Trail from the intersection of South Pleasantburg Drive and Cleveland Street to Mauldin Road where it will connect with the GCRD/Lake Conestee section of the trail completing the Swamp Rabbit Trail between Lake Conestee and Travelers Rest. Funding will also be used to make improvements to land adjacent to the trail to satisfy property owners granting easements to the City. The exact route is to be determined through a public design process funded in the current CIP budget.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project is part of the Trails & Greenways Master Plan adopted by City Council in January 2008, and is the next expansion segment of the Swamp Rabbit Trail to the south and is critical to the overall regional trails plan. The Greenville County Recreation District and the Conestee Foundation are currently working to construct the trail north from the lake to Mauldin Road. The City completed construction of the trail south, along Cleveland Street to South Pleasantburg Road in 2012. Additionally, this project will significantly increase the number of residential units within a quarter mile of a trail or greenway. The trail also promotes the protection of air quality, advances public health and provides for a well maintained infrastructure.

Method for Estimating Cost: Contractor estimates. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Staff has worked with consultants and the South Trail Committee to determine the best route option and has been meeting with staff from the Greenville Country Club to determine their support for the trail passing through and along the edge of the golf course.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $225,000 $75,000 $3,315,000 $0 $0 $3,615,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund Hospitality Tax Bond - 2011 State Grants Hospitality Tax Bond - 2014 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $325,000 $675,000 $240,000 $2,375,000 $3,615,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $225,000 $75,000 $5,315,000 $0 $0 $5,615,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $325,000 $675,000 $240,000 $4,375,000 $5,615,000

$169,683 $169,683 0.00 0.00

$79,190 $248,873 0.00 0.00

$83,149 $332,022 0.00 0.00

$87,307 $419,328 0.00 0.00

$91,672 $511,000 0.00 0.00

$511,000 $511,000 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-6

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PARK RESTROOMS Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

2010

JUN

2016

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: The project will improve the restroom facilities at the following parks: Cleveland, Holmes, and McPherson. The restrooms will be rebuilt to meet ADA standards, become environmentally friendly, and to look architecturally appealing. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The current restroom facilities in the City's parks are in desperate need of upgrades. While the City's parks are well above national standards, the restroom facilities are not. By rebuilding the restrooms and upgrading the facilities, the City can provide quality restroom facilities to its citizens. Upgrading the existing facilities will allow the City to conserve water and electricity and meet ADA standards; while also offering an attractive architectural look. The Five Year Parks and Facilities Master Plan FY 2006-2011 recommends that the City upgrade architectural design of park structures (4.10.1). Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant's estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Holmes and McPherson Parks are complete and Cleveland Park restroom is scheduled for construction FY 2012-13. Gower design is complete.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $15,000 $0 $536,479 $0 $0 $551,479

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Capital Projects Fund Downtown Infrastructure Fund Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $180,000 $153,479 $218,000 $551,479

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $15,000 $0 $536,479 $0 $0 $551,479 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $180,000 $153,479 $218,000 $551,479

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-7

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

RIVER STREET UNDERPASS Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2010

DEC

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Part 1 of this project will implement a Falls Park Bypass Bike Route to divert bicyclists around RiverPlace and Falls Park. From Reedy View Drive, the Falls Park Bypass Bike Route will direct bicyclists north on River Street, east on Broad Street, south on Falls Street, east on Camperdown Way, south on Cleveland Street, east on Ridgeland Way, and then reconnecting with the Swamp Rabbit Trail at the Major Rudolf Anderson, Jr. Memorial. Part 2 of this project will build an underpass trail along Linky Stone Park and beneath the River Street bridge to provide safe pedestrian access between RiverPlace and the CSX section of the Swamp Rabbit Trail. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Frequent trail counts indicate thousands of daily trail users along this section of the Swamp Rabbit Trail. Not only does staff receive frequent complaints from the public regarding the safety and difficulty crossing River Street at this location, but several documented accidents have occurred in recent years. The Falls Park Bypass Bike Route project will solve user conflicts between bicyclists and park users. The interactive fountain at RiverPlace successfully attracts families and children, but the design of the space in not suitable for the various user groups, especially bicyclists. Method for Estimating Cost: 90% Construction Documents from design consultants. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): 100% construction documents have been completed.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $15,000 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $265,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $265,000 $265,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$350,000 $0 $350,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $15,000 $0 $600,000 $0 $0 $615,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $350,000 $265,000 $615,000

$3,000 $3,000 0.00 0.00

$3,150 $6,150 0.00 0.00

$3,308 $9,458 0.00 0.00

$3,473 $12,930 0.00 0.00

$3,647 $16,577 0.00 0.00

$16,577 $16,577 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $350,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-8

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HERITAGE GREEN MASTER PLAN Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION

Start/Finish Dates:

MAR

Comp. Plan Principle:

EMPHASIZE UNIQUE COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS

2001

NOV

2013

Project Description: Greenville County has provided $1,508,000 to develop a unified campus plan for Heritage Green and to construct recommended improvements. The City is serving as the project manager, working with the institutions and consultant to complete plan development.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The Heritage Green Master Plan project meets many of the Comprehensive Plan's Principles including: walkability, mobility options, encouraging redevelopment, and emphasizing unique cultural characteristics of Greenville. Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant estimates. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Phase 1 construction documents being developed.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $300,000 $0 $1,208,000 $0 $0 $1,508,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Greenville County TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $1,508,000 $1,508,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $300,000 $0 $1,208,000 $0 $0 $1,508,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,508,000 $1,508,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-9

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

CLEVELAND PARK BANK STABILIZATION Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2011

JULY

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will stabilize the banks of the Reedy River and unnamed tributaries to the Reedy River within Cleveland Park. The improvements are near Woodland Way, Cleveland Park Drive, Lakehurst Street, Richland Way, and Ridgeland Drive. This project is similar to the Reedy River Bank Stabilization in Cleveland Park near McDaniel Avenue. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): There has been a significant amount of erosion to the banks of the Reedy River due to flooding. The areas that have been eroded need to be stabilized to prevent further erosion. The sediment that enters the water during the erosion process reduces the quality of the City's waterways adding undesirable nutrients to the water and increasing the level of turbidity. Beyond that, it presents a safety issue due to the proximity of the trails to the banks of the Reedy River. Method for Estimating Cost: Engineering estimate based on the linear footage of improvements and cost of similar projects. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Phase III is in design.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $200,000 $0 $450,000 $0 $0 $650,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $650,000 $650,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $200,000 $0 $450,000 $0 $0 $650,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $650,000 $650,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-10

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

MCPHERSON PARK BRIDGE REHABILITATION Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

2012

JUN

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: There are five pedestrian bridges in McPherson Park that are beginning to deteriorate. A plan for rehabilitation will be developed to include: a structural inspection, design for repair, design for restoring architectural features, and improving safety. Once the plan is complete it will be implemented to restore the bridges. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The restoration of the bridges is critical to the use of the trail in McPherson Park. Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant's estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Bridge assessment is complete.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $15,000 $15,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$120,000 $120,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $15,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0 $135,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $135,000 $135,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $0 $120,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-11

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

CANCER SURVIVORS PARK Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

MOBILE CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2011

JUN

Comp. Plan Principle:

2014

Project Description: This project provides for the establishment of a trail head on Cleveland Street adjacent to the Chamber of Commerce building and the replacement of the narrow, metal grate bridge that is between Falls Park and Cleveland Park (between Church Street and Cleveland Street). This bridge is currently less than 6 feet wide, making it a bottleneck on the trail system. The bridge is also slippery and unsafe. Both project elements will be coordinated with private fund raising efforts and construction of the new Cancer Survivors Park.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project is on the Swamp Rabbit Trail, the spine of the City and County greenway trail network. Currently, the Swamp Rabbit Trail has an average of 1,200 users a day in the county or over 400,000 users a year. That number will likely double within in the City as the trail expand. This project will help improve the safety and access for trail users. Method for Estimating Cost: Estimates provided by the City's consulting engineers. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Design being coordinated with the Cancer Survivor Park project. Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): City funds will be a small percentage of funds used to design and build the Cancer Survivors Garden between Church Street and Cleveland Street on the Swamp Rabbit Trail.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $94,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $94,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $94,000 $94,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$630,000 $630,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $94,000 $0 $630,000 $0 $0 $724,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $724,000 $724,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$63,000 $63,000 2.00 2.00

$66,150 $129,150 0.00 2.00

$69,458 $198,608 0.00 2.00

$72,930 $271,538 0.00 2.00

$271,538 $271,538 2.00 2.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $630,000 $0 $0 $630,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-12

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

NEXT TRAIL CONNECTOR Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION PROVIDE LINKAGES BETWEEN ALL TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS

2012

JUN

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project would construct a trail from Church Street to the Swamp Rabbit Trail, adjacent to the NEXT Innovation Center. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): With the Church Street rehabilitation nearing completion, there is an opportunity to connect the trail to the NEXT building, the adjacent neighborhood, Church Street, and higher density projects like the Brio. This project will support the goals and objectives of the HaynieSirrine Master Plan to provide better bike and pedestrian access for the area. The Swamp Rabbit Trail is one of the most popular recreational attractions in Greenville and this link will provide access to additional users. This section of the trail will also complement the future Cancer Survivors Park. Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant's estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This project is in the design phase.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $75,000 $75,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$606,000 $606,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $75,000 $0 $606,000 $0 $0 $681,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $681,000 $681,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $606,000 $0 $0 $606,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-13

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FALLS PARK IMPROVEMENTS Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

2012

JAN

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will fund improvements in the ravine and Furman Drive areas of Falls Park Located between the Carolina First Stage, the Furman Drive Bridge, the park entrance near University Drive Governor's School, and the City owned parking lot behind the West End Market. Improvements have been designed by a Falls Park Committee established to recommend improvements in the described area of the park. Funding of the design has been provided by private sources through the Community Foundation of Greenville. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Improvements to the south portion of Falls Park will complete improvements to Falls Park and meet the Comprehensive Plan Strategy to Improve the Quality of Life for Greenville residents through the creation of safe, walkable and accessible destinations and creating healthy environments for all Greenville residents. The project also provides a unique opportunity to partner with non-profit organizations and private residents to complete a meaningful project. Method for Estimating Cost: Consultant estimates. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Construction documents being developed.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $48,900 $0 $659,100 $0 $0 $708,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) State Grants Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $100,000 $608,000 $708,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $48,900 $0 $659,100 $0 $0 $708,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $100,000 $608,000 $708,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-14

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HAYWOOD AT I-385 INTERCHANGE LANDSCAPING Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JAN

PROSPEROUS CITY ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2013

DEC

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will landscape the interchange on I-385 at Haywood Road. This will provide for a more formal entry into the Haywood Road corridor and supports revitalization in that area.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project supports the Haywood Road Master Plan and several comprehensive plan principals to revitalize existing commercial corridors. Method for Estimating Cost: Grant agreement values. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Project nearing completion.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $332,320 $0 $0 $332,320

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) State Grants Capital Projects Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $265,856 $66,464 $332,320

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $332,320 $0 $0 $332,320 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $265,856 $66,464 $332,320

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-15

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

CLEVELAND PARK HORSE STABLES Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JUN

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

2013

JULY

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Funding will to begin redeveloping the Cleveland Park horse stable property that was donated to the City in 2012. Project includes demolition of existing structure. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The Parks and Recreation Open Space Plan recommends the expansion of Cleveland Park in the horse stable area when possible. The unexpected donation of this property allows for the expansion of Cleveland Park.

Method for Estimating Cost: Estimate based on cost of comparable projects. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$30,000 $30,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $30,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $30,000 $30,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $30,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-16

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

GREENVILLE DOG PARKS Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

EMPHASIZE UNIQUE COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS

2013

JUN

2014

Project Description: Funding will be used as a placeholder to find a new site for a dog park in the City limits. This includes possibly assisting the Humane Society with the construction of a dog park at their facility at 305 Airport Road near the downtown Greenville airport or an alternate site.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The City’s only dog park is located on a small ½ acre parcel in Cleveland Park. The dog park patrons routinely exceed capacity of the facility. The location of the dog park is not popular with adjacent residents and we receive complaints routinely due to excessive noise and illegal parking. Method for Estimating Cost: In-house estimate and preliminary planning. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) General Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$75,000 $75,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $75,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $75,000 $75,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $75,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-17

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

GREENVILLE TECH TRAILHEAD Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2013

MAR

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project provides placeholder funding for the development of a trailhead on the Greenville Tech Campus off of Cleveland Street where the City recently completed the expansion of the Swamp Rabbit Trail. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Project provides much needed trail head locations along the popular Swamp Rabbit Trail in a partnership with Greenville Tech and eliminates the need for the City to acquire additional land to support trail head construction. Method for Estimating Cost: Estimates from Greenville Tech. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$125,000 $125,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $125,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $125,000 $125,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $125,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-18

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HUDSON STREET TRAILHEAD Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2013

DEC

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project is for a 55-car parking lot and trailhead facility at the City-owned property at 320 South Hudson Street. In 2012, the Parks and Recreation Department oversaw the demolition of the existing Brooks Building at this property. The existing informal trailhead across Reedy View Drive from Linky Stone Children's Garden is scheduled to be closed in FY 2012-13 and this proposed trailhead on Hudson Street will support the thousands of daily trail users that frequent the Swamp Rabbit Trail. In addition to the proposed trailhead parking vehicles, it will also support Low Impact Development best practices to protect water quality as well as fully comply with the City's Landscape Ordinance requirements. The trailhead will feature pervious paving materials, decorative lighting, trail kiosk, signage, benches, bike racks, bike work stand, and new sidewalks along Hudson Street. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The addition of a formally designated trailhead for the Swamp Rabbit Trail will continue to encourage the use of the trail for both recreation as well as transportation and thereby create safe, walkable spaces, and accessible destinations. Method for Estimating Cost: 100% Engineering design by consultant. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$225,000 $225,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $225,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $225,000 $225,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$13,300 $13,300 0.00 0.00

$13,787 $27,087 0.00 0.00

$14,293 $41,380 0.00 0.00

$14,819 $56,199 0.00 0.00

$56,199 $56,199 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $225,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-19

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

SWAMP RABBIT TRAIL RUBBER SURFACE REPLACEMENT Department:

PARKS AND RECREATION

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

2013

JUN

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Funding allows for the replacement of the rubber surfacing with asphalt paving along the Hincapie Path section of the Swamp Rabbit Trail, between Woodland Way and Faris Road. The rubber surface needs to be replaced since it has lifted away from the adjacent asphalt surface due to flooding from the Reedy River. The lifting of the rubber surface has created areas that are unsafe and have been closed.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The Swamp Rabbit Trail is a heavily used recreation and transportation network within the City and must be improved to meet the expectations of users and the City. Method for Estimating Cost: Contractor estimates. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$145,000 $145,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $145,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $145,000 $145,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $145,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-20

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

VIOLA CENTER AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2013

JUN

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Funds will be used make improvements to the Viola Center including roof replacement, restroom and kitchen renovations, front porch replacement and parking pad extension. The landscpaing around the center will also be updated and sidewalks will be installed infront of center. Funding will also be used to improve the Thompson Gardner Park and Playground including clearing and creating a terraced landscape in the wooded area of the park and replacing playground equipment, ground covering and signage. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The Viola Neighborhood Revitalization was a 15-year endeavor that included the acquisition and renovation of a former duplex residential unit to provide a center for community meetings and gatherings. The renovation was completed in 1999. Although initial renovations were well-done, ongoing use of the facility requires that improvements be completed. The Thompson Gardner park and playground was completed in 2002. More families with young children have purchased homes in the Viola Neighborhood and the playground equipment has seen an increase in use. The replacement of the playground equipment will ensure that families continue to utilize the area for picnics, family outings, and recreation space for children and young people. Method for Estimating Cost: Cost estimates based on estimates provided by Parks and Recreation and Community Development staff. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Work write-ups and cost estimates have been prepared to allow us to bid project once funding is approved.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Viola Street Tax Increment Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parks & Recreation

$146,000 $146,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $120,050 $25,950 $0 $146,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $146,000 $146,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $120,050 $25,950 $0 $146,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

G-21

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Parks & Recreation

City of Greenville, South Carolina

G-22

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Continued investments in economic development broaden the tax base and make the City appealing for new businesses. The Peace Centerâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s recent renovation has led to a significant increase in the number of ticket sales and therefore visitors to the community. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program supports economic development efforts in both downtown and the commercial corridors.

Economic Development

H-1

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Economic Development

City of Greenville, South Carolina

H-2

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PIAZZA BERGAMO Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

PROSPEROUS CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

SEP

Comp. Plan Principle:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREAS

2011

DEC

2013

Project Description: This project revitalizes the Piazza Bergamo area which will facilitate the plaza's use by the general public and tenants of abutting buildings, customers, and clients. The project will be an important enhancement to North Main Street and will reposition this area in conjunction with new development. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The improvements are intended to ensure that Piazza Bergamo reaches its full potential for public use through good urban design. A new plan will help the space to flow more effectively for visitors and patrons to area businesses. It has been many years since it was constructed and is functionally obsolete in its current state. Improvements will make the space more comfortable with amenities such as shade trees and new seating options. It will become a new destination for downtown and will function better for events as well.

Method for Estimating Cost: Cost based on contract values. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Construction on Project ONE is underway with the Piazza's reconstruction to follow shortly thereafter. Project is under construction with elevator and wastewater line improvements underway.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $5,910,650 $0 $0 $5,910,650

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund Greenville Water System Piedmont Natural Gas Grant Property Sales TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $5,310,000 $228,650 $30,000 $342,000 $5,910,650

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $5,910,650 $0 $0 $5,910,650 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $5,310,000 $228,650 $30,000 $342,000 $5,910,650

$50,000 $50,000 0.00 0.00

$51,500 $101,500 0.00 0.00

$53,045 $154,545 0.00 0.00

$54,636 $209,181 0.00 0.00

$55,729 $264,910 0.00 0.00

$264,910 $264,910 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

H-3

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

TD CONVENTION CENTER KITCHEN RETROFIT Department:

MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

PROSPEROUS CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREAS

2012

JULY

2013

Project Description: The food and beverage operation remains the primary revenue generator for the TD Convention Center. Most major equipment dates to the opening of the conference center in 1993. Some equipment replacement has been achieved through annual operting budgets, but there has been no major infusion of capital dollars into the kitchen since the City took ownership over ten years ago. The proposal submitted for consideration would replace and expand deteriorating cold storage areas, replace existing flooring, and replace aged cooking equipment. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The project would provide needed infrastructure support to a prime revenue source.

Method for Estimating Cost: Current vendor pricing. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Work is nearly complete.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $30,000 $195,000 $0 $225,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Bond - 2011 Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $115,000 $110,000 $225,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $30,000 $195,000 $0 $225,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $115,000 $110,000 $225,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

H-4

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2009

JULY

2015

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will provide a ready source of funding for streetscape improvement projects associated with private development opportunities along the commercial corridors (i.e. Augusta Road, Haywood Road, Laurens Road, Pleasantburg Drive, and Wade Hampton Boulevard). Improvements may include, but are not limited to: installation of new landscaping, sidewalks, curbs and gutters; removal and replacement of existing deteriorated sidewalks, curbs and gutters; and the purchase and installation of street furniture, signage, decorative lighting, and pedestrian signals. Expenditures will be evaluated and approved on the basis of need and anticipated return on investment.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): An available source of funding for streetscape improvements is needed in order to faciliate and promote private development along the commercial corridors. This project supports the Council's commitment to the revitalization of the commercial corridors while meeting the Strategic Goal of creating a prosperous city and the Comprehensive Plan Principle to encourage redevelopment and infill for commercial corridors. Method for Estimating Cost: Informal estimate based on future development plans and opportunities, as well as funding needs from previous years. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Projects funded to date: Wade Hampton Boulevard Streetscape Plan; decorative streetlights, tree plantings and landscaped medians along Wade Hampton Boulevard; Augusta Road Fire Station streetscape improvements; Augusta and McDaniel mast arm traffic signal; Augusta Road Master Plan (Blythe to I-85); abandoned driveway closures on Augusta; pedestrian plaza at Augusta and Blythe; Lois Street bridge/trellis painting; Haywood Road at I-385 interchange improvements; design work for various streetscape projects; and the Facade Improvement Program.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $574,873 $0 $0 $574,873

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Capital Projects Fund State Revenue General Fund Greenville County Property Sales TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $453,556 $16,960 $0 $34,357 $70,000 $574,873

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000

$0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $1,274,873 $0 $0 $1,274,873 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $453,556 $16,960 $700,000 $34,357 $70,000 $1,274,873

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

H-5

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

WEST END PROPERTY ACQUISITION Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

PENDING CLOSE-OUT

Strategic Goal:

PROSPEROUS CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENCOURAGE SUSTAINABLE GROWTH

2010

JULY

2013

Project Description: This project was set up to support the purchase of three parcels in the West End for the purpose of stimulating private development. The project will now be closed and the project balances will be directed to other projects in the West End. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Project is being closed.

Method for Estimating Cost: Estimate of fair market value of the property. A property appraiser would be retained for a more accurate cost. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): On hold.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) West End Tax Increment Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $2,500,000 $2,500,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

($2,500,000) ($2,500,000)

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 ($2,500,000) $0 $0 $0 ($2,500,000)

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

H-6

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PEACE CENTER Department:

PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EVENTS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

EMPHASIZE UNIQUE COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS

2010

JULY

2013

Project Description: The Peace Center has requested the City's assistance for additional public improvements at the facility. The improvements will improve accessibility to the performing arts center from Main Street and the Reedy River. The City's commitment is contingent upon the Peace Center raising $7,500,000 in private assistance to match the City's contribution. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The project was endorsed by City Council via resolution during its January 25, 2010 meeting. The resolution stated the Council's intent to appropriate $1,250,000 in FY 2010-11 and $1,250,000 in FY 2011-12. The project will support the ongoing redevelopment of the Reedy River corridor and will promote improved cultural opportunities for the community. Method for Estimating Cost: Development agreement. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Final streetscape work is outstanding.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $2,582,000 $0 $0 $2,582,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $2,582,000 $2,582,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $2,582,000 $0 $0 $2,582,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $2,582,000 $2,582,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

H-7

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HYATT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

PENDING CLOSE-OUT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JAN

PROSPEROUS CITY CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

2011

JULY

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will provide enhanced streetscape and public spaces surrounding the Hyatt Hotel at Main Street and Beattie Place. This area was one of the first to be redeveloped in downtown and needs refreshing, including new landscaping, hardscape, and enhanced pedestrian access. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project supports one of the first redevelopment efforts in downtown. The private sector has projected spending $10 million in improvements to the Hyatt lobby, office, and exterior faรงade. These public improvements will enhance the public-side experience of the building's various users. Method for Estimating Cost: Development agreement. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Final payment is pending.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $896,847 $0 $0 $896,847

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Property Sales TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $896,847 $896,847

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $896,847 $0 $0 $896,847 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $896,847 $896,847

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$15,000 $15,000 0.00 0.00

$15,750 $30,750 0.00 0.00

$16,500 $47,250 0.00 0.00

$17,250 $64,500 0.00 0.00

$64,500 $64,500 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

H-8

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

MARKLEY AT RHETT IMPROVEMENTS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JAN

PROSPEROUS CITY COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTURE

2013

JUN

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will provide infrastructure improvements at Markley and Rhett to support an apartment building presently under construction. This includes utility relocation, stormwater upgrades, and streetscape. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project will further the redevelopment of the West End and will support the City Council's objectives to increase the amount of residential property in the City. Method for Estimating Cost: Development agreement. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Private development under construction.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $261,000 $0 $0 $261,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Fund Utility Undergrounding Fund West End Tax Increment Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $37,000 $49,000 $175,000 $261,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $261,000 $0 $0 $261,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $37,000 $49,000 $175,000 $261,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

H-9

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

TD CONVENTION CENTER CHILLER PLANT Department:

MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

OCT

PROSPEROUS CITY ENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2013

JUN

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Five chiller units provide cooling capabilities for the TD Convention Center. Three units serving the exhibit halls were installed in 1987. Two units supporting the Conference Center were new in 1993. One of the three exhibit hall chillers failed during the summer of 2011. Minimal repairs provided an immediate, but short-term remedy. Funds are being requested to rebuild each of the five units over a twoyear period. Each base rebuild is estimated to cost between $40,000 and $50,000. In addition, three of the units will need to have control panels replaced. Rebuilding is significantly less costly than replacement and will extend the useful life expectancy of each unit by approximately 10 years. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): In the event of a chiller failure, the facility would not be able to air condition its main exhibit halls and essentially render a significant portion of the facility unusable. Method for Estimating Cost: Vendor quote. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Local Accommodations Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$300,000 $300,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $300,000 $300,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

H-10

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

TD CONVENTION CENTER CONFERENCE CENTER Department:

MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Ranking:

GROUP C

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY ENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2013

JUN

2018

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will address multiple aesthetic upgrades to make the facility more marketable to potential users. Some of the individual projects, such as caulking, divider wall repairs, and floor resurfacing, are driven by identified deterioration. Other elements are intended to create a more attractive, contemporary appearance in order to maximize the facility's potential for new and retained business. Other requests are addressing normal end of life wear issues. The year one request includes funds for retaining design assistance that will include both the integration of new features, and also address modest strategic modifications such as the possible reconfiguration of space to add new meeting rooms. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The TD Convention Center is an anchor to the Pleasantburg Drive corridor, serving as host for major civic events, tradeshows, and conventions which help support our hospitality industry. The Woodside Conference Center will be recognizing its 20th anniversary in 2013. During those 20 years, there has been little replacement of carpeting, etc. This will remedy an on-going issue that, short of falling into disrepair, will eventually require action. Method for Estimating Cost: Cost estimates generally have been provided by potential contractors. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Local Accommodations Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$100,000 $100,000

$135,000 $135,000

$475,000 $475,000

$450,000 $450,000

$170,000 $170,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 $0 $1,230,000 $0 $0 $1,330,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,330,000 $1,330,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $135,000 $0 $0 $135,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $475,000 $0 $0 $475,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $450,000 $0 $0 $450,000

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $170,000 $0 $0 $170,000

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

H-11

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

TD CONVENTION CENTER PARKING LOTS Department:

MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Ranking:

GROUP D

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

APR

PROSPEROUS CITY ENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

2018

JUN

2018

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project will resurface and restripe parking lots adjoining the TD Convention Center. Limited landscaping upgrades also are included in the plan. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Due to limitations in the TDCC's annual operating budget, money has been unavailable to resurface lots, which have deteriorated over time. The proposed improvements will enhance the attractiveness of the facility while improving patron safety. Method for Estimating Cost: City of Greenville Department of Public Works estimate. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Local Accommodations Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Economic Development

$0 $0

$500,000 $500,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $500,000 $500,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

H-12

NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION

The City has had significant success in revitalizing many of its special emphasis neighborhoods including the recently completed work in Kingsview Pointe. The FY 20142018 Capital Improvement Program continues revitalization projects in the Green Avenue and Greenline-Spartanburg neighborhoods.

Neighborhood Revitalization

I-1

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Neighborhood Revitalization

City of Greenville, South Carolina

I-2

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

HAYNIE-SIRRINE Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

MAY

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODS COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTURE

2007

AUG

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project involves infrastructure improvements associated with the redevelopment of the Haynie-Sirrine neighborhood as identified in the community. Improvements include: basic street upgrades and repairs, circulation connections, streetscaping, sidewalks, sewer, stormwater, and green space. The existing budget is being used to support infrastructure improvements for the Homes of Hope and Tower Development currently underway. As part of that development, the Ellie Mae Logan Park will be restored. In addition, funds are also used for project management related to the reconstruction of Church Street.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Much of the existing infrastructure within the Haynie-Sirrine neighborhood is substandard including deteriorated roads; broken curbs and sidewalks; and outdated and undersized stormwater and wastewater systems. Public infrastructure developments are necessary not only to keep these systems up to current standards, but also to leverage private investment. Calculations of build-out value indicate a potential investment of $50 to $90 million. Method for Estimating Cost: Development agreement and contracted costs. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Project is nearly complete and awaiting final reconstruction of Church Street.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $280,000 $0 $484,308 $0 $0 $764,308

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Property Sales General Obligation Bond - 2003 Miscellaneous Grants Fund Revolving Housing Fund Capital Projects Fund Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $125,545 $3,273 $78,750 $75,000 $437,180 $44,560 $764,308

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Neighborhood Revitalization

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $280,000 $0 $484,308 $0 $0 $764,308 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $125,545 $3,273 $78,750 $75,000 $437,180 $44,560 $764,308

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

I-3

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

MT. EUSTIS STREET IMPROVEMENTS Department:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

MAY

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODS COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTURE

2007

JUN

2018

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Funding is requested to complete improvements to Phase III of the Mt. Eustis Corners Development in the Greenline-Spartanburg meighborhood. Phase III is the final phase in the development and includes replacing sanitary sewer along the portion of Mt. Zion Street that lies between the horseshoe of Mt. Eustis Street. Genesis Homes, the City's development partner, is developing 20 affordable and workforce for sale and rental units. Eight units have been completed and are leased. The Greenline-Spartanburg neighborhood has reviewed and approved the redevelopment plan. This request supports the completion of Phase III and all infrastructure needed for this development. The City's investment will be leveraged by Genesis Homes through the development of workforce and affordable residential units. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The proposed development supports affordable workforce residential units in the Greenline-Spartanburg Special Emphasis Neighborhood. These plans are consistent with the Greenline-Spartanburg neighborhood master plan and align with several of City Council's strategic goals including City of Neighborhoods, Inclusive City, Safe City and Prosperous City. The request also contributes to the Comprehensive Plan by coordinating housing development with infrastructure, maintaining quality of redeveloped areas, creating a safe environment, and creating a mixture of housing types and designs. Method for Estimating Cost: Estimates by an engineering firm. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Phase I is complete and Phase II design is complete.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $100,000 $0 $704,372 $0 $27,000 $831,372

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Capital Projects Fund General Fund General Obligation Bond - 2006 Wastewater Fund Stormwater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $401,000 $226,372 $85,000 $56,000 $63,000 $831,372

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Neighborhood Revitalization

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$0 $275,000 $0 $0 $0 $275,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 $0 $954,372 $0 $52,000 $1,106,372 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $401,000 $501,372 $85,000 $56,000 $63,000 $1,106,372

$1,000 $1,000 0.00 0.00

$1,050 $2,050 0.00 0.00

$1,103 $3,153 0.00 0.00

$1,158 $4,310 0.00 0.00

$1,216 $5,526 0.00 0.00

$5,526 $5,526 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $25,000 $275,000

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

I-4

PUBLIC SAFETY

The City recently completed renovations to the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s law enforcement training facility. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program includes funding to replace the public safety camera system and to improve the station alerting system in the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s fire stations.

Public Safety

J-1

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Public Safety

City of Greenville, South Carolina

J-2

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

EAST AREA FIRE STATION Department:

FIRE

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

SAFE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT

2007

JUN

2015

Project Description: This new fire station, constructed on approximately two acres, will serve the furthermost eastern parts of the City including the ICAR, Verdae, and Woodruff Road areas. One engine company based at this fire station will provide 24/7 initial emergency response within the primary response area. Twelve firefighters will be assigned to provide fire suppression, medical first responder, operations-level hazardous materials, and operations-level technical rescue services. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This supports both the City Council's 2011 objectives and the Fire Department's Strategic Plan. The ICAR, Verdae, and Woodruff Road corridors have emergency response times that are well outside of the national standard of 4:00 minutes or less 90% of the time. Response times to these areas currently average 6:13 minutes with only 21% being 4:00 minutes or less. Excluding the station that responds to these corridors, the average response time Citywide is currently 2:50 minutes with 90.6% of responses in 4:00 minutes or less. This new station is expected to improve response times in the target area by 35% to 50%.

Method for Estimating Cost: Estimates provided by consultants based on most recent projects. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): No funds have been expended and the City is currently attempting to acquire land for construction. Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): The fire station will be designed and built to accommodate future needs for additional personnel and the necessary equipment to adequately serve commercial and residential development in the target area.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $171,500 $799,920 $2,796,860 $187,720 $0 $3,956,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Property Sales General Obligation Bond - 2013 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $75,000 $3,881,000 $3,956,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Public Safety

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $171,500 $799,920 $2,796,860 $187,720 $0 $3,956,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $75,000 $3,881,000 $3,956,000

$510,000 $510,000 0.00 0.00

$561,447 $1,071,447 12.00 12.00

$1,063,984 $2,135,431 0.00 12.00

$1,095,903 $3,231,334 0.00 12.00

$1,119,779 $4,351,113 0.00 12.00

$4,351,113 $4,351,113 12.00 12.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

J-3

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FIRE FACILITIES ASSESSMENT Department:

FIRE

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

SAFE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JAN

Comp. Plan Principle:

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT

2012

UNDETERMINED

Project Description: This project will evaluate four fire stations and provide a needs assessment regarding the condition and operation of the facilities in the long term. The stations involved will be Station 2 (West End), Station 3 (Augusta Street), Station 4 (Stone Avenue), and Station 5 (Pleasantburg). Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project achieves the Fire Department's Strategic Plan goal to upgrade antiquated and non-NFPA compliant fire stations. Two stations were built in the early-1950's and two were built in the late-1960's. These facilities have been staffed 24 hours a day since their opening dates and their condition has deteriorated greatly over time. The City's Building Maintenance and Engineering Divisions have investigated the needs of these facilities and recommended this evaluation by an outside entity to determine the best and most costeffective course of action. This needs assessment will assist the Fire Department and Building Maintenance in defining a strategic vision for these facilities and propose facility improvements to help extend their useable life.

Method for Estimating Cost: Estimates provided by consultants. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Architectural services being procured. Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.): It is anticipated that this project will provide recommendations for future capital projects, but future cost impact is undetermined. Future growth and needs of the Fire Department will also be considered while planning renovation and/or replacement of these facilities.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Capital Projects Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $70,000 $70,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Public Safety

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $70,000 $70,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

J-4

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERAS Department:

POLICE

Ranking:

GROUP B

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

SAFE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT

2013

JUN

2018

Project Description: The first year of this project will add six cameras to the central business district, providing needed coverage for new areas of development, while also replacing 23 cameras in both the central business district and Haywood Mall. In subsequent years, approximately 100 cameras would be replaced in parking facilities and downtown. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): In 2003, the camera system was implemented in the central business district. Following this implementation, the same was done at Haywood Mall. Since 2003, the central business district has experienced extensive growth with both business and residential development. With that, the present camera system lacks the coverage needed to maintain a certain level of public safety. Six additional cameras would enhance the departmentâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s ability to render a safe environment in the central business district. In addition, the 17 street cameras in the central business district, along with the 6 cameras at Haywood Mall, have from a technological aspect, become obsolete. For many of these cameras, parts are no longer manufactured when repair needs arise, rendering them useless. These cameras are an integral part of maintaining a safe environment in the both the central business district and Haywood Mall from three points: 1) Cameras serve as a deterrent 2) Cameras provide crucial investigative evidence 3) Cameras serve as an aid in call response; primarily from an officer safety perspective Method for Estimating Cost: Initial estimate by vendor and staff. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Hospitality Tax Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Public Safety

$500,000 $500,000

$250,000 $250,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,500,000 $1,500,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $250,000

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $250,000

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $250,000

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $250,000

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

J-5

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

STATION ALERTING SYSTEM Department:

FIRE

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

SAFE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

AUG

Comp. Plan Principle:

ENCOURAGE SUSTAINABLE GROWTH

2013

NOV

2013

Project Description: This project would upgrade station alerting/communication system to modern day standards. This component of the fire department communication system alerts the firefighters in the appropriate station/vehicle that a request for service has been initiated. These components also control the lights in each fire station (currently the firefighters must navigate in the dark to find the light switch) and open the garage doors. This also allows mutual aid fire departments to gain access to a station when personnel are not on site. The unit also shuts off cooking devices in the station when a request for service has been initiated, reducing the probability of a cooking fire.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): Current station alerting and communication system is obsolete and is extremely inaudible often creating confusion. It does not provide for real time monitoring by station personnel, provides limited alerting redundancy and requires the maintenance of two separate radio systems in all facilities. The proposed system will address these shortcomings and decrease dispatcher call processing time by approximately 50%; in turn decreasing overall fire department response times. Method for Estimating Cost: Estimates from two vendors. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) General Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Public Safety

$180,000 $180,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $0 $180,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $180,000 $180,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $0 $180,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

J-6

PARKING

The City operates a parking system of approximately 6,000 spaces throughout downtown Greenville. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program provides funding to renovate the Poinsett Garage in FY 2013-14.

Parking

K-1

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Parking

City of Greenville, South Carolina

K-2

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

RICHARDSON STREET GARAGE Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

MOBILE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREAS

2012

DEC

2013

Project Description: The Richardson Street Garage has not had any substantial repairs or upgrades since it was built approximately 16 years ago. This project will seal and waterproof the top level of the garage to prevent water infiltration into the garage. There is at least one expansion joint that will require replacement in conjunction with the waterproofing. This project will also address lighting levels and aesthetic appearances within the garage by painting the ceilings and stairwells within the garage. The current gate equipment is over 16 years old and requires replacement. This should improve the overall customer experience in the garage.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This will repair water control issues within the garage, thereby extending the life expectancy of the garage. The painting and equipment replacement is crucial with the continued growth of business activity within the immediate area of the garage. Method for Estimating Cost: Estimates obtained from other facilities, as well as estimates from various vendors. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Construction underway.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $15,000 $0 $510,000 $130,000 $0 $655,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $655,000 $655,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parking

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $15,000 $0 $510,000 $130,000 $0 $655,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $655,000 $655,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

K-3

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

POINSETT GARAGE Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

PROSPEROUS CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

AUG

Comp. Plan Principle:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREAS

2013

DEC

2013

Project Description: By use of a consulting engineer, the City has identified several water impingement areas within the garage. The City has also determined through previous capital improvement projects that painting the ceilings within the parking garages improves both the overall appearance and illumination factors in the garages, as well as improves the overall customers' perception of safety. Therefore, the project will entail sealing cracks on the upper levels of the garage, as well as replacing caulking throughout various levels to prevent continued large scale water infiltration into the lower levels. In conjunction with the waterproofing, the City has identified several area within the garage where drains were placed at higher elevations thereby causing water ponding in the facility. This project will address those areas to facilitate necessary drainage. This will assist in prolonging the life expectancy of the facility. The project also includes painting the stairwells and elevator landings, and cleaning or painting the exterior of the garage to improve the overall appearance. Striping and surface markings within the garage will also be done by the selected contractor. The project also includes replacement of the existing gate control equipment since the existing equipment has exceeded the manufacture's recommended life expectancy by several years, and parts replacement is difficult. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): This project will enhance the overall life expectancy of the facility and improve the appearance of the facility for the customers that utilize this facility including businesses, visitors to Greenville, and employees who work in the downtown area. Replacement of the gate control equipment enhances the parking experience and reduces any frustration that may occur due to prolonged periods of downtime that would likely occur, while parts are located for the older equipment. Method for Estimating Cost: Our structural engineer has reviewed the facility and obtained preliminary estimates on what the necessary waterproofing and painting would cost. Quotes were obtained from various suppliers. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Parking Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

Parking

$632,000 $632,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $40,000 $0 $345,000 $247,000 $0 $632,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $632,000 $632,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $40,000 $0 $345,000 $247,000 $0 $632,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

K-4

GENERAL GOVERNMENT

The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program provides for improvements to the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s information technology infrastructure.

General Government

L-1

FY 2014-2018 CIP

General Government

City of Greenville, South Carolina

L-2

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PHONE SYSTEM REPLACEMENT Department:

MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

REVISION

Strategic Goal:

SAFE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT

2012

DEC

2013

Project Description: The City's current phone system is antiquated and dates back to the 1970s. The core infrastructure located in the basement of City Hall has met its maximum capacity and scalability. The City currently has little to no support on this equipment. Given the age of the equipment, a failure of the phone switch would cripple the City's ability to communicate with employees and the public.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The current phone situation will eventually fail, leaving the City without a viable way to communicate or conduct business. The City has no way to manage core hardware or handsets. The City is possibly paying more for the current system (centrex lines, lack of support, etc.) than they would be by replacing the system with a voice over internet protocal (VoIP) infrastructure. A VoIP phone system would allow much easier support and maintenance, would use existing data infrastructure, and potentially save the City money in the future.

Method for Estimating Cost: Costs are estimated via industry experience, the size of the organization, and comparison to other municipalities. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Scoping and estimating determined additional funds are needed.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $475,000 $0 $475,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Installment Lease Purchase - 2013 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $475,000 $475,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

General Government

$220,000 $220,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $695,000 $0 $695,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $695,000 $695,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$50,000 $50,000 0.00 0.00

$50,000 $100,000 0.00 0.00

$50,000 $150,000 0.00 0.00

$50,000 $200,000 0.00 0.00

$200,000 $200,000 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $220,000 $0 $220,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

L-3

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS CENTER Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

2012

ON-GOING

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: This project provides for the eventual relocation of Public Works away from its present site on Hudson Street and Mayberry Street to a new location elsewhere in the City. This current request provides funding to identify a new site, provide for its acquisition, and begin site preparation. Once a site is acquired and prepared, future improvements will be proposed in later budgets to fund the construction of a new facility. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The relocation of Public Works advances several long-standing goals of moving a critical facility out of the flood plain to better respond to natural disasters and to protect the City's assets from future losses. It is also the first step in advancing the Comprehensive Plan's goal of establishing a park along the Reedy River at the present location of Public Works. Method for Estimating Cost: Costs are based on current land acquisition prices. A 33-acre tract located on Fariforest Way was purchased in 2012. City Council has set up a study committee to evaluate and recommend next steps. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): City has acquired 33-acre tract of land located on Fairforest Way. Preliminary design and feasibility study are currently underway.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $1,900,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $3,100,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2012 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $3,100,000 $3,100,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

General Government

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $1,900,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $3,100,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,100,000 $3,100,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

L-4

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

PUBLIC WORKS RADIO SYSTEM Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

N/A

Project Status:

CONTINUATION

Strategic Goal:

SAFE CITY

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

Comp. Plan Principle:

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT

2012

JULY

2013

Project Description: This project replaces the existing Public Works radio system with a system that is in compliance with the Federal Communications Commission's requirement of narrowbanding certain radio frequencies. This project will include replacing all mobile, portable, fixed-base radios, and support equipment to include relicensing the system to an 800Mhz digital frequency that takes advantage of current technology. These technologies include GPS tracking of vehicles such as snow plows and sand spreaders in emergency operations. The 800Mhz digital system would also provide some interoperability with public safety radio systems in the event of a widespread emergency. This project also includes radios for Parks and Grounds and Special Events staff. The project also looks at reducing redundancy in radio and other communications equipment with the expectation of reducing total number of units. As the City grows, this proposed system would provide a greater area of radio coverage than the current conventional system.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): On January 1, 2013, all industrial land mobile radio systems must cease operating on 25Khz bandwidth and must begin operating on 12.5Khz bandwidth. Many radios in the Public Works radio system are over 10 years old and most cannot be modified or reprogrammed to the new 12.5Khz bandwith requirement and must be replaced. This includes the system infrastructure. Failure to comply with these requirements will result in operating an illegal radio system and result in significant fines and/or loss of radio license.

Method for Estimating Cost: State contract price. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): Resolving final installation issues.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $321,000 $0 $321,000

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Capital Projects Fund Solid Waste Enterprise Fund Stormwater Fund Wastewater Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $119,000 $106,000 $39,000 $57,000 $321,000

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

General Government

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $321,000 $0 $321,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $119,000 $106,000 $39,000 $57,000 $321,000

$27,696 $27,696 0.00 0.00

$27,696 $55,392 0.00 0.00

$27,696 $83,088 0.00 0.00

$27,696 $110,784 0.00 0.00

$27,696 $138,480 0.00 0.00

$138,480 $138,480 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

L-5

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

CENTRAL MICROSOFT SQL PLATFORM Department:

MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

PROSPEROUS CITY CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

2013

OCT

2013

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Microsoft products are used throughout Greenville to fulfill many functions. Most applications tie back to a server platform called Structured Query Language (SQL). This is the central warehouse where data is stored (database severs). Despite being unseen, the impact of SQL reaches every department. Funding is being requested to replace the SQL server environment with current hardware, software, and licensing that brings the city into legal compliance with Microsoft. Given that all departments and divisions are impacted by our SQL environment, this project is necessary to sustain and provide the scalability to grow the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s application base from its current position. SQL is the foundation for many applications. Firehouse, Cityworks, Transit, all websites, all the GIS data, Pro Law, PERTS, and HROAS are on a partial list of applications requiring a solid, up-to-date SQL foundation. The current SQL environment runs on hardware that is up to ten years old, does not contain a mechanism for redundancy in the event of a hardware failure, and both hardware and software are no longer supported. By funding this project, the City will be able supply the redundancy needed to keep critical applications and websites online. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): By funding this project, the City will be able to bring all MS SQL installs into compliance with Microsoft and allow expandability in the infrastructure for future and current demands. The are two driving factors driving this request: 1. The city is out of compliance with Microsoft on existing use of Microsoft SQL 2. The City cannot presently expand the current SQL platform for current or future requirements. Method for Estimating Cost: Hardware and software quotations from the suppliers. Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) General Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

General Government

$245,000 $245,000

$0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $204,167 $40,833 $245,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $245,000 $245,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

$32,995 $32,995 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $0 $204,167 $40,833 $245,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

L-6

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

ROOF REPLACEMENTS Department:

PUBLIC WORKS

Ranking:

GROUP A

Project Status:

NEW PROJECT

Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates:

JULY

SUSTAINABLE CITY CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

2013

JULY

2014

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description: Replacement of approximately 30,000 square feet of roofing at Municipal Court, Nicholtown Community Center, and Public Works Office Building. Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.): The roofing on the Court building and Nicholtown Center have been leaking for years due to deterioration of original materials, and several attempts to repair them have been unsuccessful. The shingles on the Public Works building have lasted beyond their life expectancy and are also falling off due to deterioration. Method for Estimating Cost: All 3 facilities have been inspected by qualified roofing companies who have submitted proposals to restore the roofs to new condition.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013): This is a new project.

PROJECT ITEMS Planning/Design Site Acquisition Costs Improvements Equipment Management TOTAL PROJECT COST

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) Downtown Infrastructure Fund General Fund TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING

FUNDING TODATE $0 $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTS Operating Impact Cumulative Operating Impact FTEs Added Cumulative FTEs Added

General Government

$105,000 $76,000 $181,000

$0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $181,000 $0 $0 $181,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $105,000 $76,000 $181,000

$0 $0 0.00 0.00

FY 13/14 COST $0 $0 $181,000 $0 $0 $181,000

FY 14/15 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 15/16 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 16/17 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 17/18 COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FY 13/14

FY 14/15

FY 15/16

FY 16/17

FY 17/18

EST. FUNDS

L-7

FY 2014-2018 CIP

General Government

City of Greenville, South Carolina

L-8

APPENDIX

The CIP continues to invest in projects in the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s award-winning downtown and promotes a vibrant core to the community.

Appendix

M-1

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Appendix

City of Greenville, South Carolina

M-2

FY 2014-2018 CIP

City of Greenville, South Carolina

FY 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Projection of Legal Debt Margin 6/30/2012 Actual

6/30/2013 Estimate

6/30/2014 Estimate

6/30/2015 Estimate

6/30/2016 Estimate

6/30/2017 Estimate

6/30/2018 Estimate

Assessed value Merchants' inventory for debt purposes Total assessed value

356,932,928 9,169,930 366,102,858

363,442,750 9,169,930 372,612,680

375,946,094 9,169,930 385,116,024

383,465,016 9,169,930 392,634,946

391,134,316 9,169,930 400,304,246

398,957,003 9,169,930 408,126,933

406,936,143 9,169,930 416,106,073

Statutory debt limit based on 8%

29,288,229

29,809,014

30,809,282

31,410,796

32,024,340

32,650,155

33,288,486

0 1,938,000 5,815,000 2,455,000 10,208,000

9,915,000 0 0 0 9,915,000

9,095,000 0 0 0 9,095,000

8,250,000 0 0 0 8,250,000

7,375,000 0 0 0 7,375,000

6,455,000 0 0 0 6,455,000

5,500,000 0 0 0 5,500,000

Legal debt margin, current

19,080,229

19,894,014

21,714,282

23,160,796

24,649,340

26,195,155

27,788,486

Less new issues in CIP: G.O. Series 2013

0 0

3,881,000 3,881,000

3,686,000 3,686,000

3,491,000 3,491,000

3,296,000 3,296,000

3,101,000 3,101,000

19,080,229

19,894,014

17,833,282

19,474,796

21,158,340

22,899,155

24,687,486

Less current debt G.O. Series 2012 G.O. Series 2011 G.O. Series 2006 G.O. Series 2003

Legal debt margin, revised

Appendix

M-3

FY 2014-2018 CIP

Appendix

City of Greenville, South Carolina

M-4