A R
U N D R OC K A V
VD BL
MAYS ST S
LL BE S
1
HO
NET
A
W
DE SS AU
T ES
ITE BLV D
RL ES ON
D
IL LI AM
CA
NN
NIC S CE
E
O
LT ON
-BL
UF
F S PR
ING S
81 2
RD
RD
MC A
F M 1 62 6 R D W
F
W FM1 626
RD
SA S
E
MC SM AN R
K E N ZIE
LA A N M
D OR D SR SO N PA R
D
RD
F A GE
RQ
UI S T R D
97 3
HA
RT
HW Y
LA W S RD VE
SO
N
RD
M
81 2
RD
A - Good Drainage
D
A
LO O
P
UI NT US
RD
BE
RD
CK
NS
PE TE R
Q
O
N
RD
ER
RD
R
N
SO N
RD
183 £ ¤
RO
W IL LI AM
Hydrologic Group
RD OO P MA H
P
DO YL E
CK
R IH35 S
A MP
F
HO KA
SC H
RI BE R
RD
LO
G
M F
I3
5R
O
RD
RD
O LD
EL M
DACY LA
35 § ¦ ¨
LO
EV EL YN
RD
F M 2001 RD
RD
RD
AL
FM
WY
VO
LA W S
EF
WILLIAMSON RD
D
RD
NE RS VIL LE R
RE
LA
RD RL
MA
D
COUNTY ROAD 133 HC
TH
M AH
GR A
MA IN
ST N
TURNERSVILLE RD S
LOOP 4 N
SATTERW H ITE
AR
T RD
CA
TU R
KH
WRIGH
D
4N LOOP
LO C
D
HA
F M 1626 RD W
TURNERSVILLE RD N
OL D
PAL ME RR
B
A
UE ZR
US HWY 183 S
R
MO O
D 16 25 R
RD
IG
DS
HA W
RD
RD
RO DR
FM
CO UL VE R
7 96
COUNTY ROAD 10 5 HC
F M 967 RD
2
RD
YR
RD
RD
M
F M 1327 RD
¸
US
D
TH A
F
F M 967 RD
77 0
NG
EL RO
S
D
RD 626 M1
RD
RD
FM
WO LF LA
K NUC
CO
FM
ND
D TR
OSSIN G RD LS CR
XT ON
O AW
O
TH PA
97 3
A ALUM ROCK DR
RD 26
LA
SS
RL
71 ¬ «
RO
TE
CE
1E
S
H
PE AR
L OO P
RD
D
AU G
FM
RL A TA YL O
N RD
E
97 3
NR
SL
N
D OV ER GR ST N
ER L
DE CK S
R
E
O DR
W
SLAUGHTER LA W
9 69
RD
N
RO
¬ «1
LEXING TON
R IS RD
ED
FM
LA
M
97 3
RI VE RS ID
973
TE R
AC
AR
W
CH
GH
TR
1 inch = 5000 feet
F
E
MA N
SL AU
EN G E R
D
FU C MO N
EB
AT
G
LA OD IE BR
E
TO PO LIS D
DR
R
AN
S EA
TE
RIV ER SID E
LV
FS
PL
OL TO R
FM
TW
1S TS TS
D
S
EX PY C -P A
MO 18
M
F
SH 45
B TY NUT
18
RR
E
97 3
ST
FM
7T H
AVE ZS TE
WY 7 STATE H
BRA
FM
D
S
FS
BU
LA
ER
AL ER
CH
TV
OR
BEN WH
W H T E R LA
AK
Y HW
AUG
ER L
OP
290 £ ¤
SL
E
E
ST AS SN EY LA ST AS SN EY
969
DE CK
GD
CES AR
N W H ITE BL VD W
W
RD
D
E
FM
D
R ST
YS
US
DR
969
DR
BA
HW
ON
FM
KW OO
RD
AS
CA NN
O Y NN
JO H
E
EY
X TE
IA M
LO C
LO YO LA LA
ESTE IN
BLVD KING THER U L TIN
AL L
F
LT
DR
RD
SP RIN
1S TS TS CON G RE SS A VS
O
O
E
LITT IG
M
BLVD
IV
RD
S
L
LA
B LV M AR
DS
SI D
S ST E
ST S T
ED BL U
ER
MAR
ON
D
RD OR MA N
R MANO
ST
CE
RI VE R
W
RD 26
W 90
NR YAG
R O ME R
E
R
LAV ACA
51
ST 12TH
5TH ST W 6TH AR ST BA CH W RT 6TH AV ON ST E EZ SP ST W RIN GS RD
PA R S
CA
D AIRPO R T
ST E
T R IN IT Y S RE T D
ST
VD
6TH ST W
RD
E
EN I G LA
B LV
T
PE S
LU
DA GU A
BL
S
N SP
D
BL VD N
LA M
MO-PAC EXPY N
AR
DR
ES
N
CO B LV D NB EX PO SIT IO
N
CA
VE
GIL ES LA
HW TE XA S OF PIT AL CA
2
M
I ST
E
15TH ST W
OLD HWY 20
0E US HWY 29
ST E
ST
D
R NO
26 TH
LA E
OS ER
MA
AU
RD
26TH ST W RD 24 TH ST W
LA
GO
290 £ ¤
EAK
KE LA
SO R
N
US ON
BL UE
EL A
BL
W IN D
E
M
E
45T H 38 TH
KL IN
CA
RD
ST W
E
RD
OR
38T H
ST W
ST W
M
AN
ST W
KO
51S T
GG
LA
E-M
D
EN FIE LD
GG
AK BL
U
TR L
GR E
Y
W
LA
W
LA
LA
FE RG
DE RS ON
BO YC
E
PK
NIG
BE RG
LA W
AN
KO E
ND
RD
W
R
DE RS ON
MI DT
D
RO
BURN
AN
GR E
ER LA E
H NC
TH
TA PI CA
I LL
LA
ER LA E
ET RD
FM6 20
G
LA W
YN
DE RS ON
AK
E
DB
B
S
H W ST PKW Y E
W
GG
BRA
35
BE
Y2 HW
GR E
RI S
4 RD
E
UT
IN
H AR
AL
45 TH
RE
O
ER LA E
SPRINGDALE RD
1W
LL
SC H
R
RD
LA
LA
OR
S
Y7
LS RD
AN
G N
W
F
OH
D
LA
RI
H
B
TH
DS
TE
SE
OR
OO
ER G
NL
W
EW
ALLANDALE RD
0R
ST A
24
TR
MA N
GS
IC
W E ST L A K E DR
S
ER LA W
BR
DB
HA
R
KI
YA G
RU N
D
E
I 35 RAMP
ER LA W
AN
D
ER VIL LE EA S
JE S
SP
RD
PF LU G
D
D R
22 22
NS TE
HS
OW
T
PE CA
ME RO
IC
RD
CE LE R
130
RD
R
V BL
ME T
LL
R
EA
NS TW
LA
¬ «
DE SS AU
D
O
20 M6
L H I LS T R L
PE CA
ER
E
LL VI
KH
RD
AK
25 R D W
RD
L
Y
VA L
18
DE SS AU
R D
¬ «1
AW
PF LU G
LA
Y N C H PKW
YA G
M
KE LL YL A
OP
WE ISS
18 25 R
BR A
RU
62
LO
CA
W
L
DU
R
P
FM
LE
G ST E
ME RL
JO
LL IC
0 RD N
IL
FM
LA
W ELL S
BUR
PA R
VD
E
F
LA
A
HO WA RD
IH-35 N
D
FM
D
F M 1325
R
RD
DR
S
A
BL
BU
FM
62
F M 620 F
WI LK E
W
CH
BR
F
RV
EIL
N 83
RE SE AR
DN
GE
RD
Y1 HW
AN GU
L
N
LU
US
IL NE
MC
0R M 62
E R LA
HO DD
PF
When data from the Digital General Soil Map of U.S. are overlayed with other data layers, such as land use data, caution must be used in generating statistics on the co-occurence of the land use data with the soil data. The composition of the soil map unit can be characterized independently for the land use and for the soil component, but there are no data on their joint occurrence at a more detailed level. Analysis FM 2 76 9 R D of the overlayed data should be on a map polygon basis.
RD
T
SC H
F
N
RD
N
M
20 M6
5 RD 32
HE N
F
RE E K RD
IS LOU
M
VD A BL
S
EC
PRIEM LA
EI
LI M
GATTIS SCHOOL RD
KIM BR
RO
EL A
D
A MV
RE
RED BUD LA
BR
R EEK H US Y C R
L PA
D EY LL
A
D
D
RD
9 WY 7
685
B
AN WM BO
SUNRISE RD
M
N ST YS MA
SA
D BL V
US H
RD
OL D SETTL E R'S
31 M 14
D BLV
KIPHEN RD
WC COUNTY ROAD 122
RD
SS
DR
NE STO ITE H W
S
S
N LVD
A GD
F
BA
B LL BE
BA
The Digital General Soil Map of U.S. was designed primarily for regional, multicounty, river basin, State, and multistate resource planning, management, and monitoring. Data are not detailed enough to make interpretations at a county level. This soil survey product is not designed for use as a primary regulatory tool in permitting or citing decisions, but may be used as a reference source. The use of these data is not restricted and may be interpreted by organizations, agencies, units of government, or others; however, they are responsible for its appropriate application. Federal, State, or local regulatory bodies are not to reassign to the Natural Resources D Conservation Service any authority for the14decisions that they make. 31 R FM The Natural Resources Conservation Service will not perform any evaluations of these maps for purposes related solely to state or local regulatory programs.
F
RD 431 M1
RD
35 § ¦ ¨
1 143
FM
SA M
1 143 FM
D
FM
431 R FM1
183 £ ¤
A
A RO
TY
A
D
UL TZ L
S 83
UN CO
CH
WC 78 D1
R LER ND
FM1 460
F
RD
Y1 HW
The following are excerpts from the USDA, the originators of this D information: This data set consists of general soil association units. It was develped by the National Cooperative Soil Survey and supersedes the State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) data set published in 1994. It consists of a broad based inventory of soils and nonsoil areas that occur in a repeatable pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at the scale mapped. The data set was created by generalizing more detailed soil survey maps. Where more detailed soil survey maps were not available, data on geology, topography, vegetation, and climate were assembled, together with Land Remote Sensing Satellite (LANDSAT) images. Soils of like areas were studied, and the probable classification and extent of the soils were determined.
243 M2
3 224 US
ME LE SS R
FM
MC N
NA
CK BO
RD
F
M
81 2
B - Fair R
D
C - Poor D - Worst No Info City Limits ETJ County Line
F M 150 RD
Soils by Hydrolic Group (Soil Drainage) CITY OF AUSTIN EXTRA-TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AREA
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DEPARTMENT
November, 2010 Major Impact Facilities.mxd
This map has been produced by the City of Austin Planning & Development Review Department for the sole purpose of facilitating neighborhood planning. It should not be referred to as an official source of land use or zoning and is not warranted for any other use. No warranty is made regarding its accuracy or completeness.